international decision making in the age of genocide ......8 united nations general assembly, “the...

64
1-1 International Decision Making in the Age of Genocide: Srebrenica 1993-1995 June 28 – July 1, 2015 The Hague Edited Transcript Session 1: Creating the “Safe Areas” Meeting room in The Hague TOM BLANTON: Good morning. Thank you very much for coming to the table. A reminder about our methodology: everything said at this table is on background for now but we are recording the session and will produce a transcript. 1 You will have the opportunity to correct your remarks before we release the transcript. One of our goals is to expand the historical record on Srebrenica. If you turn to your briefing books, you will find a summary of key points that we plan to address in each of the four sessions. 2 This morning we want to start with the eyewitnesses on the ground in the spring of 1993. We know this is an arbitrary date. There is an argument to be made that the sins that led to Srebrenica go back to 1 This transcript was annotated and edited for clarity by conference staff and participants in accordance with conference ground rules. 2 USHMM, “Conference Agenda,” June 28, 2015.

Upload: others

Post on 18-Jan-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: International Decision Making in the Age of Genocide ......8 United Nations General Assembly, “The fall of Srebrenica,” A/54/549, November 15, 1999, henceforth “1999 UN Srebrenica

1-1

InternationalDecisionMakingintheAgeofGenocide:Srebrenica1993-1995June28–July1,2015

TheHagueEditedTranscript

Session1:Creatingthe“SafeAreas”

MeetingroominTheHague

TOMBLANTON:Goodmorning.Thankyouverymuchforcomingtothetable.A

reminderaboutourmethodology:everythingsaidatthistableisonbackgroundfor

nowbutwearerecordingthesessionandwillproduceatranscript.1Youwillhave

theopportunitytocorrectyourremarksbeforewereleasethetranscript.Oneofour

goalsistoexpandthehistoricalrecordonSrebrenica.

Ifyouturntoyourbriefingbooks,youwillfindasummaryofkeypointsthat

weplantoaddressineachofthefoursessions.2Thismorningwewanttostartwith

theeyewitnessesonthegroundinthespringof1993.Weknowthisisanarbitrary

date.ThereisanargumenttobemadethatthesinsthatledtoSrebrenicagobackto

1Thistranscriptwasannotatedandeditedforclaritybyconferencestaffandparticipantsinaccordancewithconferencegroundrules.2USHMM,“ConferenceAgenda,”June28,2015.

Page 2: International Decision Making in the Age of Genocide ......8 United Nations General Assembly, “The fall of Srebrenica,” A/54/549, November 15, 1999, henceforth “1999 UN Srebrenica

1-2

thediplomaticrecognitionprocess[in1990-1992],thelackofprotectionforethnic

minoritiesduringthatearlyperiod,thearmsembargo,orthefamousJimBaker

comment,"Wedon'thaveadoginthatfight"whentheAmericanswentmissing.3

ButforthepurposesofthisconferenceandourfocusonSrebrenica,wewant

tobeginwithGeneralMorillon'svisittoSrebrenicainMarch1993.4MichaelDobbs,

willyouleadusoffwithafewawkwardquestions?

MICHAELDOBBS:Thankyou,Tom.Thisisthesecondinaseriesofconferencesthat

weareorganizingunderthetitle"InternationalDecisionMakingintheAgeof

Genocide,"lookingatthebigcrisesofthepost-ColdWarperiod.5Lastyear,wehada

conferenceonRwandawithasimilarsetuparoundthetable.Wehadmembersof

theUNSecurityCouncilontheleft,GeneralDallaireandtheotherUNpeacekeepers

inthemiddle,andthepeoplewhonegotiatedtheArushaAccordsontheright.I

thinkthat[formerUKrepresentativeontheUNSecurityCouncil]DavidHannayis

sittinginexactlythesamechairthatyouoccupiedforourRwandaconference.You

provideathreadofcontinuitybetweenthetwoconferences,asdoes[formerUS

AssistantSecretaryofStateforHumanRights]JohnShattuck.

ManyoftheofficialswhowereinvolvedinRwandadecision-makingwere

alsoinvolvedinBosnia.Therearesimilaritiesanddifferencesbetweenthosetwo

events.Oneofthesimilaritiesisthegapinperceptionsbetweenthepeopleonthe

groundandthepeopleinNewYorkandthenationalcapitals.InthecaseofRwanda,

itwasasifthedebatesweretakingplaceonthreedifferentplanets.Therewerethe

peoplewhonegotiatedtheArushaAgreements,thepeacekeeperswhoimplemented

theagreements,andtheUNofficialsinNewYorkwhosupervisedtheentireprocess.

Therewasimperfectcommunicationbetweenthesethreegroupsofactors.We

discoveredthattherewasimperfectcommunicationwithinthesameinstitution:at

3SecretaryofStateJamesA.BakervisitedBelgradeonJune21,1991,meetingwithawiderangeofYugoslavleaders,fivedaysbeforetheoutbreakofwarbetweenSerbiaandSlovenia.Hiscomment“wedon’thaveadoginthatfight”wasreportedlaterbyNationalSecurityAdvisorBrentScowcroft.4GeneralPhilippeMorillonvisitedSrebrenicafromMarch10to13,1993,attheheadofaUNhumanitarianaidconvoywhilethetownwasundersiegebyBosnianSerbforces.5MoreinformationontheInternationalDecisionMakingprojectcanbefoundontheUSHolocaustMemorialMuseumwebsite.

Page 3: International Decision Making in the Age of Genocide ......8 United Nations General Assembly, “The fall of Srebrenica,” A/54/549, November 15, 1999, henceforth “1999 UN Srebrenica

1-3

theUnitedNations,forexample,betweentheSecretariatandtheSecretary-General,

orbetweentheSecretariatandtheSecurityCouncil.Isuspectthatwewillfind

similardisconnectsinthecaseofBosnia.

Tosetthestageforourdiscussiontoday,IreadRupertSmith'sexcellent

chapteronBosniainTheUtilityofForceinwhichhewritesthattheseedsforthe

Srebrenicadisasterwere“sownwiththedecisionsmadeinthespringof1993:

decisionstothreatenwithnointentiontoact,todeployforceswithnointentionto

employtheirforce,decisionsmadeinnopoliticalcontextexceptfearofthe

consequencesofactiontotheforce.”6Healsocommentsonthelackofany

overarchingstrategy.Hesaystherewasnostrategicdirection,noachievable

militarygoals,nomilitarycampaign,notheaterlevelmilitaryobjectives,only

incoherence.Hetalksabout“theimperativetodosomethingandthescrambleto

createapolicy.”WemaynotagreewithGeneralSmith’sassessment,butwewill

certainlyhavetograpplewithhiscritiqueoverthenextcoupleofdays.

Thismorning,wewilllookattheperiodfromMarch1993,whenGeneral

MorillonarrivesinSrebrenicatoaccompanyahumanitarianconvoy,throughthe

threeUNSecurityCouncilresolutionsthatestablishedtheSafeAreasandsetthe

parametersfortheirprotection.7TheeventsofJuly1995areshapedbythe

decisionstakenin1993.

Afewquestionsforustoconsider:whatwasthenatureofthecommitments

containedinthesethreeUNresolutions?Didthepeoplearoundthistable—UN

ambassadors,membersoftheUNSecretariat,thepeacekeepers—haveaclearidea

ofthepolicythatyouformulatedbackin1993?Howweretheresolutionsmeantto

beimplemented?WhatwastheproperroleofUNPROFOR?Wasitaclassic

peacekeepingmissionorwasitapeaceenforcementmission?DuringourRwanda

conference,therewasalotofdiscussionabouttherulesofengagement,authorized

underChapterVIoftheUNCharter.IntheBosnia“SafeArea”resolutions,youwill

6RupertSmith,TheUtilityofForce:TheArtofWarintheModernWorld,150.7TheUNSecurityCounciladoptedResolution819onApril16,1993,callingonthewarringpartiestotreatSrebrenicaas“asafearea”.UNSCResolution824ofMay4addedfivemore“safeareas”:Sarajevo,Tuzla,Žepa,Goražde,andBihać.OnJune4,UNSCResolution836extendedUNPROFOR’smandate“todeterattacksagainstthesafeareas.”

Page 4: International Decision Making in the Age of Genocide ......8 United Nations General Assembly, “The fall of Srebrenica,” A/54/549, November 15, 1999, henceforth “1999 UN Srebrenica

1-4

findreferencestoChapterVII[e.g.in819and836]oftheUNCharter,butitis

unclearwhetherthiswasmeanttobeaChapterVIImissionoraChapterVImission.

Whatwastheproperroleofpeacekeepers?Shouldtheybestrictlyneutral,or

shouldtheytakesidesintheconflict?[TurnstoDavidHarland,authorofthe1999

UNreportonSrebrenica].InyourreportonSrebrenica,youconcludeattheendthat

peacekeeperscannotbeimpartialwhenconfrontedwith"attemptedgenocide."8We

shouldtalkaboutthat.Underwhatcircumstanceswasairpowermeanttobeused

todefendtheenclaves?Weretherealternativestotheestablishmentof“Safe

Areas”?WastheVance-Owenpeaceplanapossiblealternative?Wastherea

strategyforendingthewarinBosnia,manystrategies,ornostrategyatall?Weare

alsointerestedintherelationshipbetweenthehumanitariangoalsofUNPROFOR

andthestrategicgoals.Istherealinkbetweenthetwo?Shouldoneservetheother,

oraretheyentirelyseparate?

SHASHITHAROOR:BeforewestartatMarch1993,surelywehavetounderstand

whatUNPROFORwasdoingthereinthefirstplace:whyitwasdeployed,whatthe

logicofitwas,whyitevenhadthenameitdidandeverythingelse.Morillon'svisit

didnothappeninavacuum.TherewasayearandahalfofUNPROFORbeforethat.

EverythingRupertSmithsaysinthatextractyoureadisabsolutelyaccurate,but

thatispreciselybecauseofthewayinwhichthisoperationhadevolveduptothat

point.

DAVIDHANNAY:Ithinkitisworthspendinghalfanhourorsoonthecontext.The

documents[inthebriefingbook]arefascinating,theyrecallmuchtome,butthey

aretotallycontext-less.Youwouldnotknowfromthesepapers,forexample,that

theSecurityCouncilandmemberstatesweregrapplingwiththebiggestsplitin

NATOinlivingmemoryover“liftandstrike.”9YouwouldnotknowthattheSecurity

8UnitedNationsGeneralAssembly,“ThefallofSrebrenica,”A/54/549,November15,1999,henceforth“1999UNSrebrenicareport.”9“LiftandStrike”referredtoaU.S.proposaltoliftthearmsembargoimposedontheBosniangovernment(andotherYugoslavrepublics)inSeptember1991anduseairstrikestoforcetheBosnianSerbstothenegotiatingtable.ThestrategywasadoptedbyBillClintonduringthe1992presidential

Page 5: International Decision Making in the Age of Genocide ......8 United Nations General Assembly, “The fall of Srebrenica,” A/54/549, November 15, 1999, henceforth “1999 UN Srebrenica

1-5

Councilwassettingupitsfirstwarcrimestribunal.10Youwouldnotknowthatthe

SecurityCouncilwasimposingonSerbiathebiggestpackageofeconomicsanctions

thathadeverbeenimposed.11So,thereisalotmissingfromthecontext,whichdoes

notchangetheviewthatRuperthasrightlyexpressed,thattheSrebrenicadecision

andtheSafeAreasdecisionweretakenwithoutproperconsiderationoftheir

possibleconsequences,butrelatetothequestionofwhethertherewasastrategy.

Therewasastrategy.Itwasabadstrategy,butitwasastrategy.Thestrategywas

nottodoliftandstrike,nottodotheVance-Owenpeaceprocess,tosetupacriminal

tribunal,toimposesanctionsonSerbia,andhopeforthebest.

SHASHITHAROOR:Weneedtotalkaboutthebackground.WhydidMorillongoto

Srebrenica?Whatsortofmissionwashedeployedon?Youcannotstartoffwiththe

missionwithoutunderstandingwhathewasdoingthere.IwillbeasbriefasIcan,

butunfortunatelyIamthepersonherewiththelongestUNinvolvementinthis

issue.IwentoutontheveryfirstmissioninOctober1991that[UNUnder-

Secretary-General]MarrackGouldingundertookwhentheEuropeanCommunity

wasanxioustohandthisparticularhotpotatototheUN.Youmayrememberthe

Europeanpeacemonitorsbeingcalled"icecreamsalesmen"afewmonthsbefore

that.12TherewereEuropeanCommunitymonitorsinCroatiaandBosnia.Ourgoal

wastoseewhetherapeacekeepingoperationwasviableforCroatia.Therewas

enormouspoliticalpressureonusfromEuropetotakethison.Gouldingwas

relativelynewtopeacekeeping,buthadbeenverythoroughlyschooledintheDag

Hammarskjöldcatechismofpeacekeeping:thedoctrineofcompleteneutrality,not

takingsidesintheconflict,deployinginhighlyvisibleconfigurations,vehicles

campaign,andadoptedasofficialU.S.policyinMay1993,butabandonedbecauseofoppositionfromU.S.allies.See“DecisionsofPrincipalsCommitteeMeetingonBosnia,"May17,1993.10TheInternationalCriminalTribunalfortheformerYugoslaviawasestablishedunderUNSecurityCouncilresolution827ofMay25,1993.11TheUNSecurityCouncilpassedResolution820onApril17,1993,restrictingimportsandexportsfromSerbiaandMontenegro.Previousresolutionsincluded713(1991),724(1991),757(1992)and787(1992).12SeveralhundredEuropeanobserversweredeployedtoCroatiaaspartoftheEuropeanCommunityMonitoringMissioninJuly1991.Croatsdubbedthem“icecreamsalesmen”becauseoftheiruniformofwhitesuitsandwhiteshoes,whichweredesignedtogivethemprotection.See,forexample,RayMoseley,“EuropeanPeaceTalksOfferLittleHopeofYugoslavSettlement,”ChicagoTribune,September25,1991.

Page 6: International Decision Making in the Age of Genocide ......8 United Nations General Assembly, “The fall of Srebrenica,” A/54/549, November 15, 1999, henceforth “1999 UN Srebrenica

1-6

paintedwhiteandallthatstuff.Thiswasthelogicwithwhichweapproachedthe

entireconcept.

UNPROFORwassetup[underUNSecurityCouncilResolution743of

February21,1992]forpoliticalreasonseventhoughwementionedinourinitial

reporttotheSecurityCouncilthattherewasnoreallyviableconceptof

peacekeepingthatallsidesagreedupon.13Wecalledthepeacekeepingforce

UNPROFOR,meaningUnitedNationsProtectionForce,whichreflectedGoulding's

optimism.Wewerereallynotinthebusinessofprotectinganybodysignificantly.

Wehadobserverstobeginwithandlateravery,verysmallmilitarydeployment.

WhenthetroublesbeganinBosnia,intheearlyspringof1992,Europeanmembers

oftheSecurityCouncilasked[UNSecretary-GeneralBoutros]Boutros-Ghalito

extendUNPROFORtoBosnia.Itisoftenoverlookedthatthe[April24,1992]report

submittedbytheSecretary-Generalexplicitlysaid,"…inthelightofallthefactors

bearingonthecurrentsituationinBosnia-Herzegovina,thedeploymentofapeace-

keepingforcetherewasnotfeasible."14Itisthereinblackandwhite,apublic

document.

Manyofyouarenottooyoungtorememberthewonderfuloldsong,"Ifyou

can'tbewiththeoneyoulove,lovetheoneyou'rewith."Sincetheycouldnotfind

anyotherresponsetothiscrisisintheSecurityCouncil,theytooktheoneavailable

mechanism,namelyUNpeacekeeping,andappliedittoasituationforwhichitwas

manifestlynotsuited,astheSecretary-Generalhimselfsaidinblackandwhite.That

ishowUNPROFORbackedintopeacekeepinginBosnia.

Thecabletrafficthroughout1992fromthefield,uptotheMorillonvisitto

SrebrenicainMarch1993,showsthemountingcontradictionsinsuchamandate.

Youhaveapeacekeepingoperationwherethereisnopeacetokeep,withamandate

designedtoprotectSerbianciviliansinCroatia,andCroatiancivilianscaughtupin

thewar.ThatwastheoriginalmandateofUNPROFOR.ItwasinBosniaessentiallyto

beablereportbacktotheCouncilthatitwasdoingsomething.WhenSarajevo 13Boutros-Ghali,“ReportoftheSecretary-GeneralPursuanttoSecurityCouncilResolution721(1991),”S/23280,December11,1991.14Boutros-Ghali,“ReportoftheSecretary-GeneralPursuanttoSecurityCouncilResolution749(1992),”S/23836,April24,1992.

Page 7: International Decision Making in the Age of Genocide ......8 United Nations General Assembly, “The fall of Srebrenica,” A/54/549, November 15, 1999, henceforth “1999 UN Srebrenica

1-7

airportfelltotheSerbs,UNPROFORbecamethemechanismtoprizetheairport

awayfromthem[inJune1992]andhanditovertointernationalsupervision.15In

theabsenceofacoherentvision,UNPROFORwasexpectedtotakeallthison.Itis

againstthisbackground,withoutanyverycoherentoragreedconceptorplanof

operationsthatMorillongoestoSrebrenicainMarch1993.Thatisaveryshort

summaryofsomethingfarmorecomplicatedandmessy,butprovidesthe

DepartmentofPeacekeepingOperationsperspectiveatthetimethisSrebrenica

adventurebegins.

DAVIDHARLAND:Iagreewiththepointthatyoucannotunderstandthefallofthe

SafeAreasuntilyouunderstandhowUNPROFORgotintoBosniainthefirstplace.

WeshouldalsorememberthattheideaofSafeAreaswasextensivelydiscussedin

1992longbefore“Srebrenica.”ItwasraisedbyAustriaandHungaryinparticular.

Thereisaveryinteresting,andIthinkprofound,correspondencerelatingtothe

establishmentofSafeAreas.16Theideaactuallycomesupinamessagefrom

[AustrianforeignministerAlois]Mockto[InternationalCommitteeoftheRedCross

PresidentCornelio]Sommarugaaskingabout“safetyzones”astheyarereferredto

intheGenevaConventions.17Sommarugathenrepliessayingthattheyhavecertain

characteristics:theyareabsolutelyunarmed,theyarefortheprotectionofhospitals

andsoon.HeaskswhetherornottheUNSecretariathasbeenconsulted.Thenthere

isanotherletterto[UnitedNationsHighCommissionerforRefugeesSadako]Ogata.

Ogatarepliesfirmlyontherecordthatthisisanabsolutelyterribleideawhich,if

everused,shouldbelimitedtosimplyprotectinghospitalsbyagreement.The

reasonIraisethisisbecauseitshowshowinternationaldecisionsaresometimes

made.Anideaentersintoplayandisshapedandchanged.Thefactthatitentered

intoplayasanideatobediscountedissomethingthatsometimesgetsforgottenas

timegoesby.

15UNSC,“Resolution758(1992),”June8,1992.16ForbackgroundondiscussionofUNSafeAreas,seeparagraphs45-51,of1999UNreportonSrebrenica,A/54/549.17AnnantoStoltenberg,“Safeareas,”UNDPKO,MSC-870,May28,1993.

Page 8: International Decision Making in the Age of Genocide ......8 United Nations General Assembly, “The fall of Srebrenica,” A/54/549, November 15, 1999, henceforth “1999 UN Srebrenica

1-8

MICHAELDOBBS:WewillcertainlylookattheoriginsoftheSafeAreasconcept,and

thedifferencesbetweenthewayinwhichitwasappliedinplaceslikeKurdistanand

Bosnia,butletusgotoLarryHollingworthnow.Larry,youaccompaniedGeneral

MorillontoSrebrenicainMarch1993.Canyoudescribethecircumstancesofthis

visitandwhatyourememberfromthevisit?

LARRYHOLLINGWORTH:IwasinBosnia[withtheUnitedNationsHigh

CommissionforRefugees]primarilytodeliverhumanitarianaid.Iworkedprimarily

inSarajevo,butwewerealwaysremindedthattherewerethese[Muslim-inhabited]

enclaves[inSerbian-controlledterritory],andthatweshoulddosomethingabout

theseenclaves.18IhadmanagedtogetintoGoraždeandŽepa.Wetriedtogetinto

Cerska,butwerekeptout.Wehadthreehumanitarianreliefconvoysdottedaround

Bosnia.Wecouldnotmoveanyofthem.WespentthreedaysoutsideZvornik.

Finally,MadameOgatasaid“enoughisenough”andpulledusallback.Thiswasthe

veryfirsttimethatIfeltthatGeneralMorillonwasinterestedintheconvoys.Hegot

agooddebrieffrommeandsaid,"Okay,weshoulddefinitelytrytogetbackinto

Cerska."WhileIwaswaitinginthefirstconvoy[outsideZvornik]forthreedays,

Kamenicafell.Morillonrangmeupandsaid,“Look,weshoulddefinitelytrytoget

intoCerskaagainbutweshouldfirstofalldoanassessment.”Hesaid,“I'dlikeyou

tocomewithme,bringa[WorldHealthOrganization]doctorwithyou.Ihave

approvalandwewillgetintoCerska.WefirstofallflewtoZvornik.InZvornikwe

pickedupanarmoredcarfromtheBritish.WetriedtogetthenintoCerskabutwe

wereregularlystoppedintheforest.Idon'tknowwhetheritwastheBosnianside

ortheSerbside,buttheycutdownlotsoftreesanditwasverydifficulttomove.

WhenwegottotheoutskirtsofCerska,weweremetbythesoldiersofNaser

Orić[commanderoftheArmyofRepublicofBosniaandHerzegovina28thDivision],

whosaid,“You'retoolate,Cerskahasfallen.”Thiswasagreatblowforus.General

Morillon,whowaswithus,said,“Okaylet'smoveonnow.WewillgotoKonjević

Polje.”WhenwegotintoKonjevićPolje,theGeneraldecidedthathewouldgoback

toZvornikandmeetupwithGeneralMladićandseeifwecouldmakefurther 18“Bosnia:AreasofControl,”September1994.

Page 9: International Decision Making in the Age of Genocide ......8 United Nations General Assembly, “The fall of Srebrenica,” A/54/549, November 15, 1999, henceforth “1999 UN Srebrenica

1-9

progresstotryandgetintoSrebrenica….Tocutalongstoryshort,thedoctor,Simon

Mardel,walkedtoSrebrenica,theGeneralwenttoZvornik,andIreturnedto

Sarajevo.ThegeneralthendecidedthatwehadtotakeaconvoyintoSrebrenica.He

gotapproval[fromUNPROFORcommander]GeneralWahlgrenandfromKaradzić

andMladić.

Sooffwewent,withaverysmallconvoy.TherewasanUNMilitaryObserver

vehicle,therewasaCanadianarmoredpersonnelcarrier,therewasasmallvehicle

withMèdecinsSansFrontiéresinit,andtherewasmyself,withtwovehicles.That

wasit.WeweregoingtoenteroverthebridgeatBratunac,buttheSerbstoldusthe

bridgewasdownandwehadtogoonasideroad,whichhadnotbeenusedfora

longtime.Weweretoldveryclearlythatitwasminedandwasunderameterof

snow.SowemovedoffwiththeGeneral,whowasintheAPC.Weweregoingtoo

slowlysohezoomedaheadofustogetintoSrebrenica.Iwasthenrunningthe

convoy.Thefirstofourtruckshitamineandwasblownup.Unfortunatelythat

meantthatthevehiclebehinditcouldnotmoveeithersincetheroadwasonlywide

enoughforonevehicle.Alittlebitfurther,welosttheMSFvehicle,whichgotstuck

inthesnow.EventuallywelimpedintoSrebrenica,lateatnight[March11,1993].

GeneralMorillonwaswaitingattheoutercheckpointofSrebrenica.Weallwent

togetherintoSrebrenicalateatnight.Wewenttothereceptioncommittee,Ithink

Muhamed[Duraković]wasthere,intheroomatthetime.Wehadasmallbriefing

andthenIspentabouttwohoursoutonthestreetswanderingaround.Itwasminus

threedegreesatthetime,andthousandsofpeoplewereoutonthestreets.

Thefollowingday[March12,1993]wemetwiththemayorandwithOrić.All

seemedtobegoingwell.WehadtwoAmericanswithuswhoweredoing

communicationsforus.Afterdoingtherecces,theGeneraldecidedwewouldgo

backhome.Weallgotinourvehiclestosetoffandthoughtitwasrathernicethat

theentiretowncameoutforus.Wethoughttheywerewavingusoff,buttheywere

notwavingusoffatall.Theywerestoppingusfromleaving.Thegeneralsaid“Okay

that'sit,wecan'tmove.”Wehadpeoplesaying,“Ifwecan'tgetout,youcan'tget

out.”Thatwasthemessagethatwasgiventous.IthinkInowknowthebackground

toit.WewenttothePTTbuilding.Thegeneralwasobviouslyworried.Hisgreatest

Page 10: International Decision Making in the Age of Genocide ......8 United Nations General Assembly, “The fall of Srebrenica,” A/54/549, November 15, 1999, henceforth “1999 UN Srebrenica

1-10

fearwasthathewouldbetakenhostageandherehewas,atleast"detained,"in

Srebrenica.

Weonlyhadonevehiclewithcommunications.CommunicationsintheAPC

didnotworksomylittlevehiclebecameakindofheadquarters.Irememberthe

general’schiefofstaff,PiersTucker,explainingwhathadhappenedtoBosnia-

HerzegovinaCommand.Thevoiceontheotherendsaid,"So,youareprisoners?

You'vebeentakenhostage."PiersTuckersaid,"No,no,no,we'vejustbeendetained,

we'rejustnotallowedtoleave.”Ithoughtitwasalittlesubtlewayofputtingit.

Thenextday,GeneralMorillonkepttohimself.Hecameupwithaplantoget

upat2:00inthemorningandwalkawayfromthebuilding.PiersTuckerandhis

bodyguardwouldpickhimupintheAPC,usingtheexcusethatwehadtomovethe

vehiclebecausewecouldnotgetgoodradioreception.Theplanfellapartbecause

peoplestoppedthemfrommovingthevehicle.Thegeneralhadtosneakbackinto

thePTTbuilding.Hehidintheroom,whichgavetheimpressionthatperhapshe

hadleft.Iwouldliketoaskyou[directsquestiontoMuhamedDuraković]whether

youthoughthehadleft,orwhetheryoudidnotknowwhetherhehadleft.Inany

case,fortwenty-fourhours,nobodycouldseehim.

Hefinallycameoutandsaid,“Lar-ry…[ImitatesFrenchaccent,withrolling

Rs]Ihaveaplan."HewassmokingDavidoffcigars[makesinhalingsound].

“Lar-ry,you‘avaflag?"Isaid,"Yes,General."Hesaid,"AUNflag?"[Makes

inhalingnoise]"Yes,General."Thenhesaid,"Lar-ry,you‘avatannoy?"Isaid,"I

thinksoGeneral,yesIthinkso."Andhesaid,"Good."Hesaid,"Getmethemayor."

SowegotthemayorandhetoldthemayorthathewantedeverybodyinSrebrenica

tobeoutsidethebuilding.Sosureenough,anenormouscrowdofpeopleappeared.

Hethensaidtome,"Lar-ry,whenInodmyhead,youputtheflagoutthewindow."I

said,"Okay."

Sowestoodonthisbalcony.Ihadnoideawhathewasgoingtosay,noidea

atall.Hestoodupandhesaidtothepeople,"Icame‘ere[inhales]voluntarily,"he

Page 11: International Decision Making in the Age of Genocide ......8 United Nations General Assembly, “The fall of Srebrenica,” A/54/549, November 15, 1999, henceforth “1999 UN Srebrenica

1-11

said,"Icame‘ereto‘elpyou."Hesaid,"Iamnowputtingyouundertheprotectionof

theUnitedNations."Henoddedhishead.Flagout.19[Laughter]

Therewasthisenormouscheerfrombelow.Peoplewereclappingand

cheeringandshoutingandIthoughttomyself,“There’sonlyeightofushere.”I

rememberaCanadiansoldiersaidtome,"Doesthatmean,sirthatwecangoout

andwalkaroundthetown?"Isaidtohim,"Noitmeanswecangetoutofhereand

protectthetown."

ThenextincidentwasthatwehadtoinformBHCommand,whichwasfun.I

wentdownwiththeGeneralandwesatinthevehicle.Heexplainedwhatwas

happeningtoBrigadierRoddyCordy-Simpson,andexplainedthathehadput

SrebrenicaundertheprotectionoftheUnitedNations.IcouldhearBrigadierCordy-

Simpsonsuckinginhisbreath.Theydecidedtotalkagainfourhourslater.The

generalsaidtoCordy-Simpson,"Roddy,I‘aveaplan,Iwantthehelicopters‘erefor

theevacuationtomorrow."AndCordy-Simpsonsaidtohim,"Umthatisnot

consideredtobeagoodidea,sir."Morillonsaid,"Bywhom?"Cordy-Simpsonsaid,

"ByBHCommand,sir.""Roddy,”theGeneralsaid,"IamBHCommand."

Thefollowingdaytherewerenohelicopters.Wespentaboutthreedays

tryingtobringaconvoyin.Mytaskwastofindoutwheretoputthefood.Wehad

200tonsoffoodcominginandapopulationofmaybe30,000veryhungrypeople.

Whereareyougoingtoputthiswarehouse?Howareyougoingtoprotectit?How

areyougoingtohandoutthefood?Wealsohadthetaskoftryingtoevacuatethe

peopleinthehospitalwhichwastheworstthatanybodyhadeverseen.

TheGeneralmanagedtogetapprovalforhimselftogooutandorganize

anotherconvoytocomein.Whentheconvoyarrived,theyunloadedtheaidbutit

wasalsoagreedthattheywouldtakeoutwomenandchildrenandmalesover60.

MICHAELDOBBS:Letusreturntotheevacuationquestion,andwhetherthepeople

wouldbeevacuatedorprotectedinplace,alittlelater.Ialsowanttoaskyouabout

themediacoveragewhichwasveryimportant.Beforewedothat,wewouldliketo

19FootageavailableinclipofBBCDocumentary,TheDeathofYugoslavia,Part5(YouTube).

Page 12: International Decision Making in the Age of Genocide ......8 United Nations General Assembly, “The fall of Srebrenica,” A/54/549, November 15, 1999, henceforth “1999 UN Srebrenica

1-12

hearfromMuhamed[Duraković],whowasinsidethetown.Couldyoudescribethe

situationinsideSrebrenicaatthistimeandtheimpactoftheMorillonvisitandthose

wordsofMorillon?Howdidyouinterpretthem?

MuhamedDurakovic,R,withLarryHollingworth

MUHAMEDDURAKOVIĆ:Thankyouverymuch.Itisanhonorandaprivilegetosee

facesthatIhavenotseenfortwentyplusyears.WehavetoputGeneralMorillon’s

visitinthecontextofhowthepopulationinSrebrenicawassurvivingatthattime.

Thewinterof1992to1993wasthemostdifficultone.Manypeoplenotnativeto

Srebrenica,whomanagedtosurvivetheonslaughtandethniccleansingintheDrina

Valley,hadmovedintotheenclave.20Themostdifficultthingforuswasbeing

unabletocommunicateoursituationtothoseoutsideSrebrenica.Peoplelivingin

SarajevoortheBihaćpocket,andotherplacesaroundBosnia-Herzegovina,were

alsoinaverydifficultsituation,butwefeltlikewewereinhabitingthislonelyisland

inthemiddleofmurkywaters.Wehadverylittletohopefor.Thefirstsignthat

someonewasthinkingaboutthepopulationofSrebrenicaandtryingtoassistus 20AccordingtoaJanuary1994surveyconductedbytheSrebrenicamunicipality,morethan16,000peoplefromothermunicipalitieshadfledtoSrebrenica,bringingthetotalpopulationto37,000.Seealso“ReportoftheSecurityCouncilMissionEstablishedPursuanttoResolution819(1993),”S/25700,April30,1993.

Page 13: International Decision Making in the Age of Genocide ......8 United Nations General Assembly, “The fall of Srebrenica,” A/54/549, November 15, 1999, henceforth “1999 UN Srebrenica

1-13

camewiththeairdropsinFebruary1993.21IalwaysmentionLarryinmy

presentationsonSrebrenica.

Iwasseventeenyearsoldandinhighschoolwhenthewarstartedin1992.I

wouldwalkawayfromSrebrenicaupintothemountains,hopingthatIwouldbethe

luckyonetoseetheseairdrops.Thestrategywastodispersethefoodinmany

differentlocationssothatitwouldnotendupontheblackmarket,sothatmany

peoplewouldgetaccesstoit.Forthesafetyoftheaircraftandthepilots,thefood

wasusuallydroppedfromveryhighaltitudes.Wewouldlookupintotheskyand

heartheplanes,butnotbeabletoseethem.Wewouldstandinthemiddleofthe

forestincompletedarknessat2:00inthemorning.Thenwewouldsuddenlyhear

the"poof,poof,poof,"[makessuccessionofpoppingnoises]ofparachutesopening.

Theskywouldlightupwithbrightcolors,yellowishandgreenish.Theseweresmall

flareshangingonthecornersoftheseparachutes.ItwasasifChristmashad

returnedtoSrebrenica.ActuallyitlookedlikealargeChristmastreefallingfromthe

sky.MyimpressionwasconfirmedwhenImetMr.SantaClaushere[referringto

LarryHollingworth,photoabove]whenhecametoSrebrenica.

ThiswasthefirsttimeinmylifethatIhadmetforeigners.Iwasyoung,I

livedinaverysmall,isolatedcommunity,andIwasnotverywelltraveled.Itwasan

extraordinaryexperience.Herewerepeoplewillingtorisktheirlivestotravelto

Srebrenicaunderverydifficultcircumstances.Youmayhavegottheimpressionthat

youwerebeingdetained,butIthinkthelocalpopulationneverfeltlikeyouwere

beingdetained.YouwerealwaysverywelcometocometoSrebrenica.Toexplain

ourperspective,however,welearnedthroughthegrapevinethattheinternationals

hadmovedtoCerska,andCerskafalls.ThentheyareinKonjevićPoljeandKonjević

Poljeisquicklyrunover.WhentheyfinallycametoSrebrenica,thisseemedlikea

verybadpattern.Thelessonwetookfromthiswas:iftheygo,wewillalldie.There

weresomeattempts,asyoumentioned,topreventtheUNfromleaving,butitwas

notreallyorganized.Itwaspurelyaccidental.

21LaketoClinton,“PresidentialDecisionforHumanitarianAirDropsforBosnia,”TheWhiteHouse,February19,1993.

Page 14: International Decision Making in the Age of Genocide ......8 United Nations General Assembly, “The fall of Srebrenica,” A/54/549, November 15, 1999, henceforth “1999 UN Srebrenica

1-14

BythetimeyouarrivedfromKonjevićPolje[addressesHollingworth],

peoplewhosurvivedtheCerskaandtheKonjevićPoljeonslaughtswerearrivingon

footfromKonjevićPolje.IttakesatleastoneortwodaystowalkfromKonjević

PoljetoSrebrenica.Bythetimeyouweregettingreadytoleave,thesepeoplewere

comingintothetown.Theyhadnoplacetostay,sotheysatdownonthestreetsof

Srebrenica.Itwasverycold,itwassnowing.Therewerewomenandchildren

makingfiresinthemiddleoftheroad.Itmayhaveappearedtoyouthatsomeone

wastryingtoblockyou,butinreality,thesepeoplehadnoplacetogo,theydidnot

knowanyoneinSrebrenica.

Ofcourse,whenfinallyGeneralMorillonmadethatfamousstatementfrom

thePTTbuilding,wecitizensofSrebrenicafeltthatwehadsurvived.Wereally

thoughtthiswastheendofoursuffering,wehaveagainbecomepartofthecivilized

world,andwewillsurvivetheatrocitiestowhichwehavebeenexposedduringthe

previousyear.

MICHAELDOBBS:BeforeweaskhowthisinformationwasreceivedattheUN,could

Larrytellushowthenewsgotout.IfMorillonhadmadethatdeclarationwith

nobodytohearitexceptforthepeopleofSrebrenica,thatwouldhavehadacertain

impact.Buttherewerejournalistspresent.Thatchangedthenatureoftheevent,

right?

LARRYHOLLINGWORTH:ThereweretwojournalistsinsideSrebrenica,whohad

madetheirownwayin.OnewasaGermanphotographer,Phillippvon

Recklinghausen,andtheotherwasacameramancalledTonyBirtley,whowas

freelancingforABC.22Bothofthemweretherebeforewegotin.Theyhadtaken

someverygoodfilm,buthadneverbeenabletogetitout.Theyfilmedtheepisode

oftheflagcomingoutofthewindowandwhateverelse.Iwasleavingwiththe

convoy,becausemyfinaltaskwastogetpeopleontheconvoywhichwasan

absolutenightmarebecausethousandsofpeoplewentonthetrucks.AsIwasgoing 22VonRecklinghausenarrivedinSrebrenicaonFebruary8-9,1993,andwaswoundedinthearm,whenhesteppedonamine.Birtleyarrivedaroundthesametime.BothjournalistswereevacuatedfromSrebrenicabyhelicopter.

Page 15: International Decision Making in the Age of Genocide ......8 United Nations General Assembly, “The fall of Srebrenica,” A/54/549, November 15, 1999, henceforth “1999 UN Srebrenica

1-15

out,TonyBirtleysaidtome,“Willyoutakeoutallofmyfilm?”Itwasagamble

becauseIcouldhavebeensearchedandIcouldhavelostthem.ItoldhimthatI

wouldtakethemoutifhewaspreparedtotaketherisk.Itookthemandgavethem

toABC.Theywerearoundtheworldandineverynewspaperwithinhoursof

usgettingout.

MICHAELDOBBS:HowlongbetweentheMorillonspeech[declaringSrebrenicato

beundertheprotectionoftheUN]andthefilmappearingonthenews?

LARRYHOLLINGWORTH:Ithinkaboutfourdays.23

MICHAELDOBBS:Itwouldbealmostinstantaneoustoday.Inthiscase,ittookfour

daysandthefilmhadtobesmuggledout.

LARRYHOLLINGWORTH:ItwasasadstoryforVonRecklinghausen.Hegavehis

filmstosomebodywholostthem.Heshotabouttwelveweeks’worthoffilmwith

littletoshowforit.

VEREHAYES:Iwasat[UNPROFORBHCommand]atKiseljakonareccetotakeover

fromCordy-Simpsonwhenallofthiswasgoingon.Hewasextremelyconcernedby

whatwashappening.NotonlydidhehavetogetintouchwithNewYorkandthe

UN,butinthenextdoorofficeFrenchSpecialForceswereplanninganindependent

nationalcovertoperationtogoinandgetGeneralMorillonout.Idon'tknowhow

widelyknownthatis,butitwascertainlytakenprettyseriouslyatthetime.

TOMBLANTON:Ithinkatonepointyoudescribethesmokeofcigarettesleaking

underthedooroftheofficetheywereusing.

VEREHAYES:Yes,thedoorwaslocked.TherewerealotofGauloisesbeingsmoked,

alotofcoffeegoingin.Itcertainlyfilteredaroundtheheadquarters.

TOMBLANTON:MinisterMuratović.

23ThefootageairedonABC’sWorldNewsTonightwithPeterJenningsonMarch16,1993.

Page 16: International Decision Making in the Age of Genocide ......8 United Nations General Assembly, “The fall of Srebrenica,” A/54/549, November 15, 1999, henceforth “1999 UN Srebrenica

1-16

HASANMURATOVIĆ:WeheardthatthearrivalofMorillonchangedthingsin

SrebrenicabutIwouldliketoexplainwhyMorillonwenttoSrebrenica.Hewas

responsiblefortheSarajevosector.HewenttotheTuzlasectorbyhisowndecision,

withoutaskinganybody’sapprovalorevenopinion.Ourdeputyprimeminister,

HakijaTurajlić,hadbeenkilledonJanuary8inaFrenchAPC.TheAPCstoppedata

checkpointneartheairport,whereallnegotiationstookplaceandstayedtherefor

twohourswiththeSerbs.The[Frenchpeacekeepers]didnotaskforanysupportin

accordancewiththerules.Aftertwohourstheyopenedthedoorandthedeputy

primeministerwaskilled[bytheSerbs].

Laterintheevening,around1a.m.,wehadagovernmentmeetingto

organizetheburialanddiscussthewholematter.GeneralMorillonappearedatthis

meeting,eventhoughhehadnotbeeninvited.Hecameandsatontheside.Heasked

ifhecouldcontributesomethingtotheburialorarrangeformoresecurityforthe

burial.RusmirMahmutćehajić,theministerwhochairedthemeeting,accused

Morillonofresponsibilityforthedeathofourdeputyprimeminister.Hesaid,"We

suspectyouofhavingapartinit."Initially,Morillondidnotreact,butlatersaidit

wasuntrue,andtriedtoproveitwasuntrue.Mahmutćehajićthenaskedhimto

leavethemeetingandsaidthatwedidnotwanttodobusinesswithhimanymore.

Weneverpublicizedoursuspicions,anddidnothaveanyevidenceabout

Morillon’sinvolvement.24Butheprobablywantedtodosomethinggoodandprove

thathewasnotinanywayinvolvedinthecase.HewenttoSrebrenicaallofa

sudden,andthenwenttoBelgradeforseveraldaystonegotiatewithMilošević.This

wasoutsidehisareaofresponsibilityattheUN.Hesucceededinnegotiationswith

theSerbsandgothumanitarianconvoysintoSrebrenica,whichhadnotbeen

allowedtopassforseveralmonths.Inouropinion,thiswasarewardbytheSerbs

forhispartintheexecutionofHakijaTurajlić.

24SeeJohnBurns,“BosnianMuslimsCriticizeU.N.OverOfficial’sKilling,”NewYorkTimes,January10,1993.ABosniangovernmentstatementissuedonJanuary9,1993,accusedMorillonoffailingtoprotectTurajlićandcoveringupeventsthatledtothekilling.Morilloncalledtheincident“atragedyoferrors”andthe“theworstblowofmycareer.”MuratovićsaidthattheBosniangovernmentsuspectedthatMorillonwasinvolvedintheTurajlićexecutionandwenttoSrebrenicatogetawayfromSarajevo.

Page 17: International Decision Making in the Age of Genocide ......8 United Nations General Assembly, “The fall of Srebrenica,” A/54/549, November 15, 1999, henceforth “1999 UN Srebrenica

1-17

TOMBLANTON:Thankyouverymuch.LetmeaskShashitodescribethereactionin

DPKOtotheMorillon"declaration”placingthepeopleofSrebrenica“underUN

protection.”

SHASHITHAROOR:AsIsaid,wehadanunclearmandate.The“protection”partof

UNPROFOR,asfarasBosniawasconcerned,essentiallymeantprotectionof

humanitarianconvoys.Fromourpointofview,thehumanitarianmissionwas

obviouslyextremelyimportant.Atthesametime,andthiswasverymuchGeneral

Wahlgren’sviewasthecommanderontheground,wewereanxiousnottobe

drawnintotheconflict.Wewerethereasapeacekeepingforce.Ourapproachwas

basedonacomplicatedsetofpremises.Weneededtoprotecthumanitarianaid

deliveriestoallsides.WeneededtoprotecttheUNpersonneldispersingthataid.

Wealsoneededtoensurethataiddeliverieswerenotusedbyonesideinthe

conflicttomakeusapartytotheconflict.

NoneofushadaproblemwiththeideaoftheUNsteppingasideandallowing

Westerngovernments,iftheywanted,totakesidesandendthewar,buttherewas

absolutelynoindicationofthenecessarypoliticalwillintheWesttodothat.

ThebandaidapproachthattheSecurityCouncilwaspushingwasinfacta

reflectionoftheabsenceofpoliticalwillforadefinitiveconclusionoftheconflict.

Wethereforefoundourselvesmanagingapeacekeepingoperationundertherules

ofpeacekeepingwithalltheusualconfigurationpatterns,includingwhitevehicles,

liaisonwithallpartiesandsoon.ThiswasatatimewhentheSerbswerereluctant

tolethumanitarianaidthroughbecausetheythoughtitbolsteredthemilitary

strengthoftheiropponents.TheBosnianshopedthatattacksonhumanitarian

convoyswouldirresistiblydragtheUNintotheconflictontheirside.Wewere

caughtinthemiddle.

ObviouslywehadnoproblemwiththeUNgoingtoSrebrenicaanddelivering

aid.ThatiswhattheUNwassupposedtobedoing.However,weweresomewhat

takenabackbythedramaticdeclarationbyMorillon.Wedidnotdisavowhimatany

pointbecausewealsorecognizedthatsignificantvoicesontheSecurityCouncil

welcomedhisstatement.Wewantedtoseehowwecouldinterpretthatinaway

Page 18: International Decision Making in the Age of Genocide ......8 United Nations General Assembly, “The fall of Srebrenica,” A/54/549, November 15, 1999, henceforth “1999 UN Srebrenica

1-18

thatwouldkeepusviableasapeacekeepingforcewhichiswhattheCouncilwanted

ustoremain.Iamsorrythatisnotaverycoherentreplybutnothingaboutthis

affairwascoherentatthetime.Thiswasthesetofballswithwhichwewere

jugglingaswetriedtodealwiththesituation.

TotakeupDavidHarland'spointabouttheearlierdiscussionsonSafeAreas:

thesediscussionswererelatedtoveryspecificideasofsafehavenswhichrequireda

numberofelementstobeviableininternationallaw.TheICRCconceptwasbased

ondemilitarization.Wewerehappytodothis,buthowdoyoudemilitarize

SrebrenicawhentheBosnianarmysaysitisdefendingitsownpeoplethere?You

don'tdemilitarize.Whentheyfireoutfromthisareaandarefiredbackupon,what

istheroleoftheUN?ArewejoiningtheBosnianArmy?Theseweresomeofthe

fundamentaldilemmasthatwefacedbecauseofthepeacekeepingnatureofour

mandate.

TOMBLANTON:AmbassadorWalker.

JENONNEWALKER:Ithinkseveralthemesareemerginghere.Thefirst,obviously,is

thefollyofcallingsomethinga“protectionforce,”orevena“peacekeepingforce,”

whenhasnointentionofprotectinganyone.Itisa“violationobservingforce”rather

thanapeacekeepingforce.Thenotionofbeingneutralbetweentheattackerandthe

victimoftheattackerputstheUNandparticipatingcountriesinanimpossible

position.Iamalsostruckbythenumberofthingsthatweredonetolookasifwe

weredoingsomethingwhen,infact,wewerenotwillingtodoanythingserious.

ThisverymuchincludesthegovernmentforwhichIworked.IwasintheClinton

administrationthefirstnineteenmonthsorso[from1993tomid-1994].We

believedverymuch—notthroughoutthegovernment,butatleastintheWhite

House—thattheWestoughttodothekindofthingsRupertSmithtalksaboutinThe

UtilityofForce,butwewerenotwillingtoparticipateinsuchaneffortourselves.

WethoughtourEuropeanalliesoughttobetakingalotmoreriskthanwe

werepreparedtoassumeourselves.Wethereforedidvariousperipheralthingsto

makeusfeelthatwewereorasifweweredoingsomethingandmakeitappearto

Page 19: International Decision Making in the Age of Genocide ......8 United Nations General Assembly, “The fall of Srebrenica,” A/54/549, November 15, 1999, henceforth “1999 UN Srebrenica

1-19

theoutsideworldthatweweredoingsomething.Iamgratifiedtohearthatyou

thoughtthefooddropswereuseful.Itoothinktheywereuseful.Itwasthefirst

initiativewetookbutitwasperipheraltothebasicproblem.Itwasameliatory

ratherthantryingtosolvetheproblem.OurattitudetowardthecreationoftheSafe

Areaswasexactlythesame.WethoughtitwasfollytocallsomethingaSafeArea

thatwehadnomeansorintentofkeepingsafe.Butwehadzeropoliticalormoral

credibilitybecausewewerenotwillingtoparticipateourselves.Afteryearsof

blatheringinNATOaboutsharingrisksandresponsibilities,wewerenotwillingto

participate.

MICHAELDOBBS:Tofollowuponthat.PresidentClintontookofficeinJanuary

1993aftercriticizingthepreviousBushadministrationforditheringonBosnia.He

promisedamoreenergeticapproach.Soyoucomeintoofficeandthe“tarbaby,”as

SenatorMcCaincalledit,ishandedtoyou.25Whydidyounottakeamoreenergetic

approach,aswasadvocatedduringthecampaign?

JENONNEWALKER:Avarietyofunsatisfactoryreasons.PresidentClinton's

majoradvisersweredeeplydivided.[ChairmanoftheJointChiefsofStaff]

ColinPowell,whospokewithgreatauthority,didnotwantusengagedatall.None

ofusfullyappreciatedtheimportanceofPresidentClinton'sdraftevasion.Colin

wouldhavetoldsomefavoritereporterthatthisdraft-dodgingPresidentwasrashly

riskingAmericanlives.Almostalltheprincipalschangedtheirminds,noonemore

oftenthan[SecretaryofState]WarrenChristopher.[NationalSecurityAdvisor]

TonyLakeconsistentlywantedamorerobustAmericanengagement.Buthedidnot

wanttoputthepresidentinthepositionofchoosingbetweenhisadvisers.Clinton

wasevenmoreneuroticthanmostpoliticiansaboutwantingtobelovedby

everybody.Sowedrifted.

Wedidsomeusefulperipheralthings.WedeliveredBosnianagreement

toVance-Owen,whichtheworldforgets.Wedidsobygettingridofaprovisionthat

25SeeMichaelWines,“ConflictintheBalkans;SenatorWhoSawWarUpCloseDoesn’tWanttoSeeAnother,”NewYorkTimes,May5,1993.

Page 20: International Decision Making in the Age of Genocide ......8 United Nations General Assembly, “The fall of Srebrenica,” A/54/549, November 15, 1999, henceforth “1999 UN Srebrenica

1-20

wouldhavemeantthedissolutionofBosniaunlesstheSerbsagreedotherwise.26

Butallofthesethingswereperipheraltothebasicproblem.“Liftandstrike”was

ourfirstseriousproposal.ThedebateinWashingtonduringthoseearlymonthswas

betweenanairstrikecommitmentonlyandairstrikeslinkedtoliftingthearms

embargo.27

Thereason“liftandstrike”waschosenwasbecausewebelieveditwould

giveusanendpointofthestrikecommitment.Wewouldhaveacertainnumberof

monthsduringwhichwewouldhelparmandtraintheBosnians.Theywouldthen

beontheirown.Ofcourse,thiswasnonsense:oncewehadgonethatfarin

supportingtheBosnians,wewouldhavebeencommittedtotheirdefenseifthey

continuedtobeattacked.Thiswasacarryoverfromthe“Vietnamsyndrome”:there

hadtobeanexitpoint.

WedidnotgetreallyseriousuntilAugust1993,whenweproposedtoNATO

aseriousairstrikethreatwithseriousintenttocarryitout.28Wegotboggeddown

inthe“dualkey”issue,whichwasanothermess.Weslowlygotmoreseriousastime

wenton,butalotofpeoplediedwhileweweredelaying.Thatisnotasatisfactory

answerbutit'sthebestonewehave.

SHASHITHAROOR:AmbassadorWalkermentionedtheVance-Owenplan.29Ithink

itisimportanttounderstandthatthiswasthelinchpinoftheinternational

community'sstrategyatthetime.Weshouldhavementionedthisearlier.TheUN

26TheVance-OwenPeacePlan[VOPP)dividedBosniainto10cantons,orsemi-autonomousregions,eachdominatedbyaseparateethnicgroup.TheplancalledforSarajevotobeadministeredjointly,underinternationalauthority.BosnianPresidentIzetbegovićagreedtothepeaceplaninaceremonyintheUNbuildinginNewYorkonMarch25,1993,onconditionthattheSerbsalsosign.BosnianSerbleaderRadovanKaradzićoriginallyagreedtotheplanonApril30,butitwasrejectedbytheRepublikaSrpskanationalassemblyonMay6.Inhisbook,BalkanOdyssey,OwenacknowledgesthatUSenvoyReginaldBartholomewwas“helpfulinnursingtheBosnia-Herzegovinagovernmentoverthefinalhurdle.”TheBosniangovernmentobjectedtotheplanonthegroundsthatthecentralgovernmentwouldlikelyhavebeentooweaktoruleovertheethnicallydividedcountry.27The“liftandstrike”policyenvisagedliftingthearmsembargoagainstBosnianMuslimsandCroatsaccompaniedbythethreatofairstrikesagainstBosnianSerbforcesiftheycontinuedshellingcivilians.28RogerGeorge&GeorgeKolttoDirectorofCentralIntelligence,“LikelyAlliedReactionstoUnilateralUSActionsinBosnia,”NIC1046/93,August5,1993.29SeeBoutros-Ghali,“ReportoftheSecretary-GeneralontheActivitiesoftheICFY:PeaceTalksonBosniaandHerzegovina,”S/25479,March26,1993,foradetaileddescriptionofVance-Owenandthepositionsofthewarringparties.

Page 21: International Decision Making in the Age of Genocide ......8 United Nations General Assembly, “The fall of Srebrenica,” A/54/549, November 15, 1999, henceforth “1999 UN Srebrenica

1-21

wastryingtopush--andtheUSwasonboardatthetime--apeacesettlementthat

wouldhavebeendestroyedhadwebeenobligedtotakesideswithoneofthethree

parties.ThechancesofVance-Owenhappeningwouldhavebeenunderminedifwe

hadfoundourselvestakingthesideoftheBosnianarmy.WhiletheUSmayhave

beencaughtupinitsowninternaldeliberations,theUSbackedVance-Owenand

broughttheBosniangovernmentonboard,asAmbassadorWalkerhasmentioned.

JENONNEWALKER:Ourofficialpositionwasthatwewouldnotendorseanything

thatallthepartieshadnotacceptedbutquietlyRegBartholomew[Clinton’sspecial

envoyonBosnia]gottheBosnianagreement.I'mnotgoingtopretendthatthere

wasanythingcoherentaboutourpolicy.

DIEGOARRIA:TheSecurityCouncil’sconcernaboutthesituationinSrebrenicawas

promptedbythevideosHollingworthhastalkedaboutthatwereshownonTV[on

March16,1993].TherewasaTVscreenoutsidetheroomwhereinformalsessions

oftheSecurityCouncilwereheld.WesawvideoofeventsinSrebrenicathathadnot

beenbroughttoourattentionbytheUNSecretariatorbytheUNPROFORmedia

personnel,andevenlessbytheUKandFrancewhobothhadasignificantmilitary

presenceinBosnia.Thispromptedmetoconveneanurgentmeetingofthenon-

alignedmembersoftheUNSC:Pakistan,Morocco,CapeVerdeandVenezuela.We

tookadvantageofthefactthatthePakistanrepresentative,JamsheedMarker,was

presidingovertheCouncilatthistime.Acouncilmeetingwasheldthateveningat

ourrequest.ThatwashowSrebrenicaenteredtheagendaoftheSecurityCouncil:

viaajournalist’svideo,andnotbytheUNSecretary-Generalasshouldhavebeenthe

case.

IneverbelongedtoalesswellinformedgroupthantheUNSecurityCouncil.I

saythisnotasajoke.Itisatruefact,anditwasdonenotbyignorancebutbydesign.

Onlythepermanentmembersarefullyinformedaboutwhatishappeningonthe

ground.TheUNSecretariataccommodatesthesepowersbyhidinginformation,or

aswesawlater,evenbyhelpingtocoverupoperations,aswiththecaseofthe“slow

motiongenocide”thatoccurredbeforetheireyesinSrebrenica.Sucharealityhelps

Page 22: International Decision Making in the Age of Genocide ......8 United Nations General Assembly, “The fall of Srebrenica,” A/54/549, November 15, 1999, henceforth “1999 UN Srebrenica

1-22

toexplainsomeofthepositionsoftheCouncilnotonlyinBosniabutlaterin

Rwanda.ThesamebehaviorappliestotheP5membersoftheCouncilwhichdonot

shareenoughinformationtotheothernon-permanentmembers.Theyputaside

theirobligationundertheChartertopreservepeaceandsecuritytoaccommodate

theirnationalinterest.

Acaseinpoint:thekillingofHakijaTurajlićinJanuary1993whileenrouteto

SarajevoairportinanUNPROFORAPC.Ipersonallytooktheinitiativetoinvestigate

hismurder.TheSerbsshothimafteraFrenchcolonel[PatriceSartre]openedthe

door.TheFrenchtroopsneitherreturnedfire,norcalledforreinforcements.

UNPROFOR,aswellastheUNSecretariat,carriedonaverymediocreevaluationof

thecase.Atthetime,Ievenrequestedtheadviceofaformerattorneygeneralin

CanadaaswellasanAmericanprosecutor.Theybothdeclaredthatjusticehadnot

beenservedinthecase.IfheSerbscouldmurdertheDeputyPrimeMinisterof

BosniawhileunderUNprotection,thatshowedtheycouldliterallygetawaywith

murder.

ColonelSartrewaslaterpromotedanddecoratedinFranceforhis“bravery.”

FormonthsIkeptaskingforareviewofthecase,butthisneverhappened.Itwasa

monumentalcrimethatwasshamefullycoveredupbyallparties.

DAVIDHANNAY:AlittlefromtheBritishpointofviewaboutthebackgroundtoall

this.BritishinvolvementinBosniawastransformedbackinAugust1992asaresult

oftheLondonConference.30Havinghadpracticallynomilitaryontheground,we

actuallysentasubstantialnumberforahumanitarianprotectionoperationthrough

theterriblewinterof1992-1993.31Intheautumnof1992,CyVancehadwarned

thattherecouldbemillionsofpeopledeadinBosniathatwinterunlesssomething

wasdone.32TheBritishgovernmentwasthereforeinthisuptoitsneck.

30TheUnitedNationsandtheEuropeanCommunityconvenedameetinginLondononAugust26-27,1992,thatchargedtheInternationalConferenceontheFormerYugoslavia[ICFY]withnegotiatingapeacesettlement.31AccordingtodatacollectedbytheUnitedNationsPeacekeepingwebsite,therewere2,874UKtroopsinUNPROFORasofDecember31,1992.32See,forexample,“VancetoUN:TroopsareneededinBosnia,”ChicagoTribune,October15,1992.

Page 23: International Decision Making in the Age of Genocide ......8 United Nations General Assembly, “The fall of Srebrenica,” A/54/549, November 15, 1999, henceforth “1999 UN Srebrenica

1-23

WehadalotoftroopsdeployedbyMarch1993,buttheywereneither

deployednorequippedtofightawar.ShortlybeforeClintontookoffice[onJanuary

20,1993],JohnMajor,whowasthenprimeminister,goteverybodytogetherin

DowningStreet,includingalotofministers,military,andmyselfbackfromNew

York.Heasked,"Whatarewegoingtodo?"Theviewofthatgatheringwaswemust

telltheAmericansthatwemustdowhateverwedotogetherbecauseotherwiseit

wasnotgoingtowork.Thatmessagemayhavebeenpassed,butitcertainlydidnot

resonate.

MICHAELDOBBS:Whatdatewasthat?

DAVIDHANNAY:ItwouldhavebeenthefirstweekofJanuary1993,beforethe

presidenttookover.AfterthetransferofpowerintheUS,thefirstthingthat

emergedoutofwhatseemedtousfairlyconfuseddiscussionswas"LiftandStrike."

LiftandStrikewasanightmareforanyonewhohadtroopsonthegroundinBosnia.

Hadthatpolicybeenaccepted,thefirstthingyouwouldhavehadtodowasto

extractyourtroops.NoneoftheEuropeanswantedtodothatbuttheyalsodidnot

wanttobeputintoapositionwheretheSerbswouldconsidertheirtroopsthe

enemy.Thisiswhatpreoccupiedeveryoneduringthosethreeorfourmonthsatthe

beginningof1993.ItwastearingNATOapartuntiltheUnitedStatesdroppedthe

policywhichcausedacertainloweringoftension.

AtthesametimetherewasnorealalternativepolicytotheVance-Owen

peaceprocess.IagreeverymuchwithwhatJenonnesaid.TheUnitedStatesdid,

betweenclenchedteeth,givesomesupporttoitintheearlyweeks.Reg

BartholomewcertainlygottheBosniangovernmenttoagreetoit.33Butwhenwe

weredraftingoneoftheseresolutions[UNSC820]inApril,wetriedtogetthe

SecurityCounciltotelltheBosnianSerbsthattheinternationalcommunitywould

sticktotheVance-Owenplanuntilhellfrozeoverandtheyhadbetterrealizethat.

Thatwastherightdiplomaticmovetomake.AfteragreatdealofdebateinNew

Yorkwhich,alas,allcameoutinthepublicdomain,theUnitedStatesrefusedtoput

33SeeMarkTran,“IzetbegovicagreestodivideBosnia,”TheGuardian,March26,1993.

Page 24: International Decision Making in the Age of Genocide ......8 United Nations General Assembly, “The fall of Srebrenica,” A/54/549, November 15, 1999, henceforth “1999 UN Srebrenica

1-24

theword"endorse"intoaresolution.Afteralotoftoingandfroingwith

Washington,weweretoldthatthefurthestSecretaryofStateWarrenChristopher

wouldgowastoputtheword"commend"in.34ThatwastheendofVance-Owen.

Thepeaceplanwasdead.AsShashisaid,thiswasthebiggamethateveryonewas

playing.TheVance-Owenpeaceplanwasthestrategy,butitwaskilledinthemiddle

oftheaction.Srebrenica,ofcourse,wasgoingonallthistime.

JORISVOORHOEVE:Irememberthattheliftandstrikepolicy,evenwhenitwasn't

supportedanymorebytheUSadministration,lingeredoninCongressuntilthe

springof1995.IhadquiteanargumentatthetimewithSenatorMcCainwho

advocatedliftandstrike.ItwasalsostrikingattheMunichconference,inFebruary

1995thattheentireAmericandelegationwasstilltalkingaboutliftandstrike,

whichweinEuropethoughtwasthewrongpolicy.

MICHAELDOBBS:WeshouldexaminesomeofthesespecificUNResolutions.Let’s

beginwiththefirstone,UNSC819,adoptedonApril16,1993.35Itwasfollowedby

theSecurityCouncilvisittoSrebrenica,ledbyDiegoArria,onApril25.Howwasthis

resolutionpassed?Whatdiditactuallysay?Howwasitmeanttobeimplemented?

WehaveaninterestingdynamicaroundthetablebetweentheSecurityCouncil

memberswhopassedtheresolutionandthepeacekeepersonthegroundwhotried

toimplementtheresolutionasbestastheycould.PerhapsDiegoArriacouldtellus

whattheresolutionwasmeanttoachieve.ThenwewillaskGeneralHayesto

describehowUNPROFORattemptedtoimplementtheresolution.

34UNSC,“Resolution820(1993),”S/RES/820,April17,1993.U.S.policy-makersopposedtheVance-Owenpeaceplanonbothmoralandpragmaticgrounds.DuringaFebruary24,1993pressconference,AlbrightstatedthatVance-Owenplanamountedto“rewardingaggressionandpunishingthevictims.”Christopherearlierpubliclyexpresseddoubtsaboutthe“feasibility”and“practicality”oftheVance-Owenformula,tellingtheSenateForeignRelationsCommitteethattheUSshould“investigateotheroptions.”(SeeJohnGoshkoandJuliaPreston,“U.S.officialsresistpressuretoendorseBosniaPeacePlan,”WashingtonPost,February4,1993.)35UNSC,“Resolution819(1993),”S/RES/819,April16,1993.

Page 25: International Decision Making in the Age of Genocide ......8 United Nations General Assembly, “The fall of Srebrenica,” A/54/549, November 15, 1999, henceforth “1999 UN Srebrenica

1-25

DIEGOARRIA:TheSecurityCouncilapprovedamissiontoBosniaandSrebrenica,

[April23-26,1993],thatIhadtheprivilegetolead.36Tomysurprise,itwasthefirst

missioneversentbytheUnitedNationsSecurityCounciltothetheaterofconflict.

AssoonaswelandedinSarajevoIfoundoutwhythiswasthecase.Therewasa

policyofkeepingnon-PermanentmembersoftheSecurityCounciluninformed.We

landedinSarajevothinkingweweregoingtonegotiatesomething,butitwas

alreadyfinished.Ademilitarizationagreementhadalreadybeensignedbythe

partiesonApril18,withtheassistanceofGeneralHayes.37

Wethoughtitwasveryimportant,andevenBoutros-Ghaliagreed,thatwe

shouldtakeacontingentofinternationaljournaliststoSrebrenicatoreinforcethe

resolution.ThejournalistswhotraveledwithusfromNewYorkwereprevented,by

UNPROFOR,fromtravelingwithustoSrebrenica.Eventhedelegationmembers

werealmostpreventedfromenteringSrebrenica.GeneralHayeswillrememberthat

therewerediscussionsthatmorninginZvornik,andthattheyalmostdidnotallow

theSecurityCouncilmemberstotraveltoSrebrenica.AndréErdöswasalsothere.

Youcanimagineourreactiontothesituation.

Intheend,weforcedourwaythrough.IwentwithGeneralHayesinoneof

thehelicopters.MycolleagueshadtowaitinZvornikwithaSerbcoloneluntilwe

gottotheotherside.UNPROFORevencooperatedindisarmingthemembersofthe

delegationofourcamerasduringthevisit.Irefusedtogiveupmycameraandtook

theonlyphotoswhichwerelaterusedbyReuters.UNPROFORhadaladyfilmingthe

wholethingbutIhaveneverbeenabletoseethatvideo.

MICHAELDOBBS:LetusrecallthelanguageofUNSC819,whichsays,"...acting

underChapterVIIoftheCharteroftheUnitedNations,"i.e.thepeaceenforcement

provision,theSecurityCouncil"demandsthatallpartiesandothersconcernedtreat

SrebrenicaanditssurroundingsasaSafeAreawhichshouldbefreefromanyarmed

attackoranyotherhostileact."Howdidyouthinkthatresolutionwouldbe

enforced? 36UNSC,“ReportoftheSecurityCouncilMissionEstablishedPursuanttoResolution819(1993),”S/25700,April30,1993.37SefirHalilović&RatkoMladić,“AgreementfortheDemilitarizationofSrebrenica,”April18,1993.

Page 26: International Decision Making in the Age of Genocide ......8 United Nations General Assembly, “The fall of Srebrenica,” A/54/549, November 15, 1999, henceforth “1999 UN Srebrenica

1-26

DIEGOARRIA:Wedidnothaveanyhopeofthathappening.Wewereaddressing

internationalpublicopinionratherthantheCouncilitself,describingthe

devastationofthepeopleofSrebrenica.ItwasnotdifficultfortheCounciltoagree

ontheresolution,becausetherewerenocommitmentsonthepartofanybody.It

waspourlagalerie[“forthepublicgallery”],astheFrenchwouldsay.Itwasa

resolutionwithoutanycostorconsequencesexcepttoaccommodatetheSerbs.

MICHAELDOBBS:Whenyoupassedthatresolution,didyouthinkthatUNPROFOR

hadthedutytoenforceitbyitself,orthatitshouldreachagreementwiththeparties

onhowtoenforceit?Howwastheresolutionmeanttobeenforced,inyourview?

DIEGOARRIA:WewerenotverywellinformedabouttherealitiesofUNPROFOR,

whichbythewayisamisnomer.Withsuchagrandiosename,UnitedNations

“ProtectionForce,”wethoughtsomethingwouldbedone.Afewdayslater,of

course,wediscoveredthatthiswasnotthecase.

Inproposingthetextoftheresolution,IhadwritteninSpanish,“Areas

Protegidas,”or“ProtectedAreas.”TheUSandUKtranslatedthisas“SafeAreas”and

theFrenchas“ZonesdeSecurité.”Thiswasmorethanjustsemantics.“Protected”

wouldhavemeantreallyenforcingtheresolution.“Safe”meantnothing,asweall

foundoutveryquickly.Therewerenoobligationsunderthe“SafeArea”concept.

SHASHITHAROOR:IfyoureadUNSC819carefully,youwillseethatitcallsonthe

partiestotreatSrebrenicaassafe.Itenjoinsnonewresponsibilitiesonthe

internationalcommunity,ifthepartiesfailtotreatSrebrenicaassafe,UNPROFOR

hastheresponsibilitytoactinself-defense.Oneofthefundamentalproblemswe

hadthroughoutthisoperationisthatdiplomaticdraftingconductedwith

greatfinesseandaplombbyveryskilleddiplomatsservedasanendinitself.Itwas

notlinkedtooperationalrealitiesontheground.

WhileweweretalkingintheSecurityCouncilaboutUNSC819,ontheground

unknowntous,GeneralWahlgren,GeneralHalilović(theBosniancommander),and

GeneralMladićhadnegotiatedandsignedademilitarizationagreementthatwasnot

Page 27: International Decision Making in the Age of Genocide ......8 United Nations General Assembly, “The fall of Srebrenica,” A/54/549, November 15, 1999, henceforth “1999 UN Srebrenica

1-27

explicitlycalledforin819.38Wehadnotaskedforitbecauseitwouldlookasifwe

weretakingsidesagainsttheBosnians.Wehadnotaskedforitbecausewedidn't

thinkforGod'ssakethatitcouldbeviablyimplementedbyus.

IwanttodrawyourattentiontotheAnnancableofApril23,1993whichI

confessIwrote.39TheseareourinstructionstoWahlgrenfollowingaphonecallI

hadwithhimearlier.Withoneortwoexceptions,mostofthecablessignedbyKofi

Annanweredraftedbyme.InthiscablewetellWahlgrenthat"...the

demilitarizationofSrebrenicawasastepagreedbytheparties,notoneproposedby

theUnitedNations."WetellWahlgrenthatUNPROFORismerely"lendingitsgood

officestohelpbothpartiesfulfillthecommitmentstheyhavemadetoeachother."

Wewereextremelyconsciousthroughoutofthesevereoperationallimitations.

Ialsohaveasentenceheresaying,"...however,UNPROFORtakesonamoral

responsibilityforthesafetyofthedisarmedthatitclearlydoesnothavethemilitary

resourcestohonourbeyondapoint."Iwrotethesewordsinsomedistressbecause

thiswasnotanactionweinheadquartershadauthorizedorrecommended.

UNPROFORhadtakeniton.Ofcourse,theSerbsweregoingtousethisasawayto

disarmtheirrivals.40But,equallynow,itgotembeddedintotheconcept.Ifthe

BosnianMuslims,ortheBosnianArmyofficially,hadnotbeendisarmed,and

thereforecouldcontinuetofightoutofthepocket,didthepocketsuddenlystop

beingaSafeAreaintermsofwhattheCouncilintendedin819?

Ikeepharpingbacktothecentraldilemma:whatwasourrole?Thebestthing

wouldhavebeeniftheUShadmadeuptheirmindsearlyenough,talkedtotheBrits

andtheFrenchandsaid,“PulltheUNoutandlet'sgotowar.”Thatwouldhavebeen

thesimplest,clearestthing,buttheywerenotdoingthat.TheyhadtheUNdeployed

there,makingpeaceasanoperation,tryingtobeneutralamongtheparties,trying

toensurethattheUNpresencedidnotbecomeamilitaryadvantagetoanyoneof

theparties,whileatthesametimeallthiswasgoingoninthecapitals,withoutany

coherentconclusions.IwouldcommendthiscablenotbecauseIwroteitbut 38“AgreementfortheDemilitarizationofSrebrenica,”April18,1993.39AnnantoWahlgren,“Srebrenica,”UNDPKO,MSC676,April23,1993.40ThecableaddedthatDPKOsaw“noneedforUNPROFORtoparticipateinhouse-to-searchesforweapons”givenWahlgren’spublicstatementsthatSrebrenicawas“fullydemilitarized.”

Page 28: International Decision Making in the Age of Genocide ......8 United Nations General Assembly, “The fall of Srebrenica,” A/54/549, November 15, 1999, henceforth “1999 UN Srebrenica

1-28

becauseitencapsulatessomeoftheoperationaldilemmasthat819gaveusandthat

franklyweforesaw.David[Hannay]willprobablyrememberthatwehadalittle

meetingintheofficeofthePresidentoftheSecurityCouncilwhereIreadout

Wahlgren'scableadvisingagainsttheadoptionofsucharesolution.TheEuropeans

wereveryclearinanycasethattheyweregoingtogoaheadwiththis,andwedidgo

aheadwithit.Thiscablesummarizestheoperationalconsequencesthatwewere

tryingtoclarifytoUNPROFORwhichmeanwhilehadtakenonestepbeyondwhat

eithertheCouncilorweinDPKOhadanticipatedinactuallysigninga

demilitarizationagreement.

MICHAELDOBBS:LetusgotoGeneralHayes.YoureceivedUNSC819andhadthe

taskofimplementingit,togetherwithGeneralWahlgren.Canyoudescribehowyou

wentabouttryingtoputfleshontotheresolutionandapplyittowhatwasactually

happeningonthegroundinBosnia.

VEREHAYES:Yes,certainly.BeforeIdo,canIjustcomebacktosomethingthat

AmbassadorArriasaidaboutUNPROFORpreventinghimfromgettinginto

Srebrenica.Thatisactuallytotallyincorrectfrommypointofview.Wedid

everythingwecouldtogetyouin.Theproblemwasthatwecouldnotgetthe

journalistsin.SinceIknewthatwasgoingtohappen,Ihadtodecidewhetherwe

tookyouandothermembersofthedelegationinsothatyoucouldseetheplaceor

nobodywouldgetinatall.IalsofinditslightlystrangethatmembersoftheSecurity

CouncilthoughtthatwewereoperatingunderaChapterVII,asopposedtoa

ChapterVI,mandate.Iwouldhavethoughtthatwouldhavebeenobvious.

MICHAELDOBBS:Soyourunderstandingwasthatyouwereoperatingunder

ChapterVIoftheUNCharter,andthiswasnotaChapterVIIoperationatall?

VEREHAYES:WewereoperatingunderChapterVI.Forus,ChapterVIwasa“cook

andlook”operation,aswerathercheekilydescribedit.That'sallyoucoulddo,

“cookandlook.”ThewayChapterVIIwentwasthattheUNissuedthewarrantsand

theUnitedStatesmadethearrests.

Page 29: International Decision Making in the Age of Genocide ......8 United Nations General Assembly, “The fall of Srebrenica,” A/54/549, November 15, 1999, henceforth “1999 UN Srebrenica

1-29

Tocomebacktowhatwashappening.TherewasameetingatSarajevoairport

onApril17-18,1993.AnagreementwassignedbetweenMladićandHalilović.41The

negotiationstartedatnoononSaturday,April17,andlasteduntil2a.m.onSunday,

April18.Thequestionarose,whowasgoingtoberesponsibleforthedetails?I

lookeddownthetableatGeneralsWahlgrenandMorillon,wholookedbackdown

thetableatme,andItookiton.Weneededtogetsomeclarificationonthephrase,

"allparties…treatSrebrenicaanditssurroundingsasaSafeArea."42Obviously,that

phrasemeantdifferentthingstodifferentparties.

Tocutalongstoryshort,wenegotiatedalldaySundayandalldayMonday.

Wehadseventy-twohoursinwhichtogettheagreementimplemented.43Otherwise

itwouldhavefallenapart.WealsohadtogetorderstotheCanadians,whohad

movedintoSrebrenica,onwhattheyweremeanttodo.Asacommanderonthe

ground,youlooktoyourhigherheadquarterstotellyouwhattodo.Youdonottry

tomakeitupasyougoalong.Wehadtogivethe145-manCanadiancontingentled

byLt.ColTomGeburtsomeorders,sohecouldactuallydosomething.44Ieventually

decidedonmyowninitiativethattheSrebrenica"SafeArea"hadtobeextendedout

fromthetownitself.Welookedatthemapsanddidaquicksurveyofthehigh

pointsaroundthetown.Thereisamaphere.45WewentanddrewtheSafeAreaon

themap,extendingouttothepointsfromwhichyouhadadirectlineofsight,with

theabilityfordirectfireintothetownitself.Thatwaswherewedrewtheareatobe

definedasaSafeArea.Itwasverysmall,about4.5kilometersbyabout1.5

kilometers.Tome,itwasthekernelofanutwhichwouldbeextended.

WedidnotdisarmtheBosniansinthepocket.Weaskedthemeithertoleave

theareawehaddesignatedtobedemilitarizedastheSafeAreaor,iftheywere 41SefirHalilović&RatkoMladić,“AgreementfortheDemilitarizationofSrebrenica,”April18,1993.42UNSC,“Resolution819(1993),”S/RES/819,April16,1993.43TheagreementsignedatSarajevoairportbetweenMladićandHalilović(Point4)specifiedthat“thedemilitarizationofSrebrenicawillbecompletewithin72hoursofthearrivaloftheUNPROFORCompanyinSrebrenica.”Theagreementalsoprovidedfortheevacuationof500seriouslywoundedandsickcivilians.44AnApril22,1993NYTarticlebyJohnBurnsreportedthatUNPROFORhad“nocontingencyplans”intheeventofaSerbattackonSrebrenica.ColonelTomGeburt,oftheRoyalCanadianRegiment,wasreportedtobe“tearingouthishair”attheprospectofhavingtodefendthecity,orevenhisownmen.Therulesofengagementwereunclear.45HayestoUNPF-HQ,“ReportontheDemilitarizationofSrebrenica,”HQBHCommand,April21,1993.

Page 30: International Decision Making in the Age of Genocide ......8 United Nations General Assembly, “The fall of Srebrenica,” A/54/549, November 15, 1999, henceforth “1999 UN Srebrenica

1-30

goingtostay,handtheirweaponsin.ThisbecameadebatewiththeSerbswhen

theywerecominginwithadelegationtosigntheagreementandhadtoleavetheir

weaponsbehind.ItalsobecameadebatewithNaserOrić,whowasintheareawith

hisbodyguardscarryinghisweapons.WhenIgotinthere[onApril21,1993]with

theBosniangovernmentandBosnianSerbdelegations,wegotoutatthecompound

wheretheweaponshadbeengathered.NaserOrićwasstandingthere.Ihadtosay

tohim,"You'rearmedinthisarea.It'snotintheagreement."Hesaidthatnobody

hadtoldhimverymuchabouttheagreement,andhedidnotknowwhatwasgoing

on.Isaid,"You'renotmeanttobeinthisareawithaweapon.I'mgoingtogetthe

delegationsoutofthevehicle.WhenIturnaround,ifyou'restillherearmedinthe

area,Iwillhavetoarrestyou."I'mnotsurewewouldhavehadmuchsuccess

arrestingNaserOrićbutwhenweturnedaroundhehadgone.

Wethenputthetwopartiestogetherinvehiclesanddrovearoundthearea.

Wehadagreedthattheareahadtobemarkedonthemapwhichthenhadtobe

confirmedandmarkedontheground.Soyouactuallyhadmapandground

markingssoyouknewwheretheareawas.Wewentaroundthatarea,cameback

andsignedanagreement.Neithersidewasparticularlyhappywithit.Ourintention

wasthattherewouldbeabufferzone,controlledbytheBosnians,extendingout

fromtheareadecreedtobesafetothefrontlines,whichwerealotfurtheroutat

thattime.Wewentbackseveraltimestotryandextendtheareabutwerenever

abletodoso.Neithersidewaspreparedtomakeanyconcessions.Thatishowit

endedup,asjustthatverysmallareaaroundthetownitself.

WhenAmbassadorArriacamewithhisdelegation,Imadeanerrorwitha

journalistforwhichIapologize.IhadheardtheAmbassadortalkingonBBCRadio4

abouttheUNdisarmingBosnians[inSrebrenica].Inowthinkhewasunawarewhat

washappeningontheground.ImadethemistakeofsayingthatIwasn'tquitesure

thattheAmbassadorknewwhathewastalkingaboutwhichcauseda

furorunderstandablywiththeAmbassador.Thatcoloredour

subsequentdiscussions.[Laughter]

IfwehadnotleftthejournalistsbehindinZvornik,you,Ambassador,would

nothavebeenabletogetintoSrebrenicaandseeit,eveninthelimitedwaythatyou

Page 31: International Decision Making in the Age of Genocide ......8 United Nations General Assembly, “The fall of Srebrenica,” A/54/549, November 15, 1999, henceforth “1999 UN Srebrenica

1-31

didseeit.Atthetime,asfarastheSerbsonthegroundwereconcerned,theUNand

yourdelegationactuallyhadnoauthoritytogoinwithouttheirpermission.There

wasnothingwecoulddoaboutit.

DIEGOARRIA:ThesmallercountriesintheSecurityCouncildonothavearmies.My

friendDavid[Hannay]onceremarkedthattheAmbassadorfromVenezuelawasnot

goingtomarchintoSrebrenicawithVenezuelansoldiers.Isaid“Heisright,butwe

donothavetheprivilegeofsittingpermanentlyintheSecurityCouncil,either.”

Publicopinionwasfundamentalinthisissue.Weknewtheimportanceofbringing

thejournalists.General[Hayes],yousaidsomethingatthetimeaboutUnited

NationsSecurityCouncilResolutionsbeing“woolly-headed.”46Thiswasthefirst

timeIheardthatexpression.Isaid,“Howcanageneralwhoisnottheforce

commanderaddresstheSecurityCouncilinthatway?”Thesearepoliticalmatters.I

thoughtthatyouweregettinginvolvedinpoliticalnegotiations.Youtalkedjustnow

aboutwantingtoarresttheBosniancommanderinSrebrenica[NaserOrić].Ithink

thatwouldhavebeenanabuseofpowerwhichwouldhavehadconsequences.

VEREHAYES:Idonotthinkitwouldhavebeenanabuseofpowerbecausethe

agreementbetweenthetwopartiessaidthattherewouldbenoarmedpeoplein

thatarea.Itwouldsimplyhavebeenimplementinganagreementthathadbeen

madebetweentheparties.

ANDRÉERDÖS:InHungary,wewerelookingtotheUnitedStatestoplayan

importantrole.InJanuary1993,wereceivedinformationfromUSsources,whichis

notincludedinthisbooklet.USofficialsmetwithnon-permanentmembersofthe

SecurityCouncil,andsaidthattheUSwasreadyformoreradicalsteps,includinga

moreactivemilitaryrole.Itseemstheywereunabletotakethesestepsbecauseof

oppositionfromtheUnitedKingdom,FranceandRussia.Theyaddedthattheyalso

hadtotakeintoconsiderationYeltsin’sinternalpoliticalproblems.InMay1993,we

46SeeJohnPomfret,“UNdelegationvisitsshell-scarredBosnianEnclave,”WashingtonPost,April26,1993quotedanonymousUNpeacekeeperscallingrecentSecurityCouncilresolutionsonBosniaas“woolly-headed”and“sovaguetheywerealmostimpossibletoenforce.”

Page 32: International Decision Making in the Age of Genocide ......8 United Nations General Assembly, “The fall of Srebrenica,” A/54/549, November 15, 1999, henceforth “1999 UN Srebrenica

1-32

heardthesamething.USdelegationsourcessaidthattheUnitedStateswasreadyto

conductairstrikesaslongastheywerenotopposedbythemajoralliesandthe

SecurityCouncil.Thisshowsthat,quiteapartfromalltheinternalYugoslav

problems,suchasnationalismandsoon,amajorprobleminvolvedrelations

betweenwesterncountries.Thiswasoneofthereasonswhythewardraggedon

until1995.

OBRADKESIC:TheGenevaConventionsdiscusstheprotectionofciviliansandthe

organizationofsafeareas.47AsfarasSafeAreasareconcerned,therearetwo

elementsthatareequallyimportant.Thefirstisthattheydependonthewillofthe

belligerents.Combatantforcesmusthavethewilltoconcludeanagreementand

defineaSafeArea.Thesecondpartisdemilitarization.Wasthiswhatwasinthe

mindofthepeopledraftingtheUNSecurityCouncilResolutionorwasitmorea

case,asAmbassadorWalkersuggested,creatingtheperceptionof“doing

something”withoutactuallyunderstandingwhatyouweredoing?

MICHAELDOBBS:Justtoaddtothat,therewasnomentionof“demilitarization”in

theUNSecurityCouncilResolution.Itwassomethingthatwasaddedbythepeople

ontheground.ShashimentionedhisApril23cablewhichstatesexplicitlythat“we

seenoneedforUNPROFORtoparticipateinhouse-to-housesearchesforweapons.”

Inotherwords,DPKOwasbackingoffsomeofthecommitmentsthathadbeen

madeontheground.

SHASHITHAROOR:Yes,wewerecaughtinacleftstick.Wehadnotproposedthis

thingtobeginwith.Wedidnotthinkwehadthecapacitytoenforceitand

implementit.Atthesametimewewereunderthetremendousmoralpressurein

theSecurityCouncilandinthemediathatweweregivingaidandcomforttoethnic

47“Safetyzones”werecreatedundertheGenevaConventionsinMadridin1936duringtheSpanishCivilWarandinShanghaiin1937duringtheJapanesebombardment.Article15oftheFourthGenevaConvention(1949)on“TheProtectionofCivilianPersonsinTimeofWar”providesfor“neutralizedzones”intendedtoshelter“woundedandsickcombatantsornon-combatants”and“civilianpersonswhotakenopartinhostilities.”Protocol1Article60on“Demilitarizedzones”prohibitswarringpartiesfromextendingmilitaryoperationstodemilitarizedzones.

Page 33: International Decision Making in the Age of Genocide ......8 United Nations General Assembly, “The fall of Srebrenica,” A/54/549, November 15, 1999, henceforth “1999 UN Srebrenica

1-33

cleansersandkillersandsoon.Thelastthingwewantedwastobeseenasaiding

andabettingtheSerbs.WecouldnotaffordtotaketheBosnianside"militarily,"but

wecouldmorally.WedidhaveaproblemtakingtheSerbsidesincetheywere

besiegingatownwithcivilians.Itwascomplicatedbythefactthatthisagreement

hadalreadybeensignedbyallpartiesincludingtheBosnianArmy.Sowesaid,“Let

thepartiesfulfilltheirobligationstoeachotherbutdon'tgoaroundbeingthe

enforcersofthisagreement.”Thatwasourguidance.

TOMBLANTON:YouhaveasentenceinyourApril23cable,mentioningthe

"...strongfeelingamongstseveralMemberStatesthatUNPROFORshouldnot

participatetooactivelyin'disarmingthevictims.'"48

SHASHITHAROOR:Thatisright.IknewthatpeoplelikeDiegoArriaandAndré

ErdöswerecertainlysayingthatsortofthingintheCouncil,aswerethePakistanis

andothers.Therewerealotofverystrongvoicesonthissubject.Iwouldsaythe

principalauthorsofUNSC819weretheBrits.DavidHannaycanspeaktothe

thinkingbehindit.Atthetime,Davidassuredusthatthepartieswerebeing

enjoinedtotreattheSafeAreaassafeandtherewerenonewobligationsfor

UNPROFOR.Thedemilitarizationagreementlookedverymuchlikeanewobligation

whichiswhywe[inDPKO]triedtopushitbackandsay,“Don'tdomorethanyou

absolutelyhaveto.”Letthemkeeptheirwordtoeachother.

VEREHAYES:Tobeclearonthedemilitarization,whatweweresayingwas,“you

eitherhandinyourweaponsandstayintheareaoryouleavethearea.“Those

peoplewhowantedtostayintheareaweredisarmedbyvoluntarilyhandingin

theirweapons.Iftheydidnotwanttohandintheirweapons,theyhadtomoveout

oftheSafeArea.We,theUN,didnotactuallydisarmanybody.

SHASHITHAROOR:Thatisright.Ourguidancefittedinverymuchwiththewayyou

sawit.IhaveasentencetheretellingGeneralWahlgren,"...givenyourownpublic

statementsthatSrebrenicaisfullydemilitarized..."Frankly,wetookthiswith 48AnnantoWahlgren,“Srebrenica,”UNDPKO,MSC676,April23,1993.

Page 34: International Decision Making in the Age of Genocide ......8 United Nations General Assembly, “The fall of Srebrenica,” A/54/549, November 15, 1999, henceforth “1999 UN Srebrenica

1-34

severalpinchesofsalt,butthatiswhatWahlgrenwassayingofficially,inpublic.

Thatwasanotherreasonwhyweshouldnotgoarounddoinghousetohouse

searches.Iseefromaseparatedocumentthat[onApril8]30,000roundsof

ammunitionwerefoundinSrebrenicasoitwasnotinfactdemilitarized.49

VEREHAYES:ThatammunitionwasfoundinaUNHCRconvoygoingtoSarajevo

acrosstheairport.IthadnothingtodowithSrebrenica.Thatwasbeforeanything

happenedwiththeSrebrenicaagreementandwasoneofthereasonswhytheSerbs

becamesoinsistentonsearchingUNHCRconvoys.50

ZLATKOLAGUMDŽIJA:Ifeellikeaguineapigwhosurvivedanexperiment.Iam

honoredtobeherewiththescientistswho,let'ssay,“helpedussurvive.”Ithinkthat

HasanMuratovićmadeanimportantpoint.ThekillingofDeputyPrimeMinister

HakijaTurajlićwasaclearsignalthatyoucandoanythingyouwantandnotbe

49WahlgrentoAnnan,“High-LevelMilitaryMeetinginBelgradeof9April1993,”UNPF-HQ,Z-495,April11,1993.ThedocumentsupportsHayes’memorythattheammunitionwasdiscoveredinaUNHCRconvoyinSarajevo.50ForMladic’saccountofhistalkswithWahlgrenandMorilloninBelgrade,seehisdiaryentry,“MeetingwithGeneralsWalgren(sic)andMorillon,”April9,1993.

ZlatkoLagumdžija,left,withHasanMuratović

Page 35: International Decision Making in the Age of Genocide ......8 United Nations General Assembly, “The fall of Srebrenica,” A/54/549, November 15, 1999, henceforth “1999 UN Srebrenica

1-35

punished.Afewweeksafterhismurder,Iwasresponsibleforthenegotiationswith

MorillonandSadakoOgataonhumanitarianactivitiesasactingprimeminister.We

triedforweekstoevacuatewoundedkidsfromSarajevoontheemptyplanesthat

weredeliveringthefood.Itprovedimpossible.Theytoldusthatthepeoplewho

killedTurajlićwouldnotallowit.

Atonepointthingsgotsodesperatethatwerefusedtoacceptfoodin

Sarajevountilfoodwasdeliveredtotheenclaves,firstwithparachutes(those

“Christmastrees”)andthenwithconvoys.WegreetedUNSCResolution819with

enthusiasm,notbecauseoftheresolutionbutbecauseofthementionofChapterVII

oftheUNCharter.51

Weheardmanytimes,andagaintoday,thatUNPROFORdidnotwanttobe

draggedintotheconflict.IdebatedthisquestionmanytimeswithLarry

Hollingworth,bothbeforeandafterIwasseriouslywoundedonMay22,1993.What

does“beingneutral”mean?Doesitmeanoccupyingthemiddlegroundbetweentwo

warringsides?Isitgeometric?Oristheresomeotherlogictoit?Ifyoudemonstrate

neutralitybytakingthemiddlegroundbetweenakillerandhisvictim,thenyou

betrayyourownvalues,inwhichcaseweshouldrethinkeverythingwearedoing.

DAVIDHANNAY:ItisperfectlyclearfromwhatLarryHollingworthsaidthat

MorillonactedonhisownwhenhemadehisspeechfromthebalconyofthePTT

buildinginSrebrenicawiththeflag.Oncethatbecamepublic,thechoice[wefacedin

theSecurityCouncil]waswhethertodisownhimortosupporthim.Itwasassimple

asthat.YouaskedhowUNSC819cametobewritten.Themainpeoplebehindthe

resolutionweretheEuropeans,whowerenotpreparedtodropMorillondespitethe

factthathehadactedwithoutanyauthoritywhatsoever.Therewasabsolutelyzero

enthusiasmfortheSafeArea,asdescribedinUNSC819,certainlyinmygovernment.

OurviewwasmuchclosertotheviewsofMrs.OgataandtheICRCaboutSafeAreas

thanitwastothosewhowantedamilitarizedSafeArea.IneversawfromLondon

anycriticismoftheSafeAreaagreement,asitwasnegotiatedbyUNPROFOR

betweentheBosniansandtheBosnianSerbs.Ithinktherewasafeelingthatitwas 51UNSC,“Resolution819(1993),”S/RES/819,April16,1993.

Page 36: International Decision Making in the Age of Genocide ......8 United Nations General Assembly, “The fall of Srebrenica,” A/54/549, November 15, 1999, henceforth “1999 UN Srebrenica

1-36

notideal,toputitmildly,buttheagreementmadeitslightlymoresustainable.The

stormofprotestthateruptedovertheagreementmeantthatitwasneverrepeated

inanyoftheotherSafeAreas.

[BREAK]

TOMBLANTON:Oneofthepolicyquestionsthatwehavenotyetdiscussedisthe

dilemmaoverwhethertoprotectrefugeesinplace,intheSrebrenicaSafeArea,or

evacuatethem.Ifyouorganizedevacuations,youcouldbeaccusedofsanctioning

ethniccleansing.Butwealsoknowthattheword“protection”inthetitleof

UNPROFORwasanaspiration,notareality.Larry,canyouaddressthechallenge

youfaced?

LARRYHOLLINGWORTH:Thefirstpointistoask,whatdothelocalpeoplewant?

Whataretheirwishes?Iftheywanttoleave,areyouimprisoningthembykeeping

themin?Itisagreatdilemma.Wedidnotwanttoaidethniccleansing,butwealso

didnotwanttokeepthemasprisoners.Myopinionalwaysis,whatistheviewof

thepeoplethemselves?Ifpeoplegenuinelywanttoleave,weshouldletthemgo.

MICHAELDOBBS:Thefirstevacuationswerelimitedtothesickandtheveryelderly.

AnumberofevacuationconvoyswereorganizedbutatacertainpointtheBosnian

governmentcalledahalt.Whatwasyourperceptionofwhatthelocalpopulationin

Srebrenicawantedtodo?

LARRYHOLLINGWORTH:Thepeoplewereinthemostdirestraitsyoucanimagine.

Therewasnowayintheworldthatwewereabletosustainthemtoanythinglikea

minimumstandard.Iamnotsurprisedthattheywantedtogo.Theyknewfullwell

thatwiththeconditionsthatwereimposedonus,theywerenevergoingtobe

sustained.Iamnotsurprisedthateverysinglepersonwantedtogo.

Theywereallfrightenedthattheirfamilieswouldbeseparated.Thewomen

andchildrenthoughtthat,iftheygotout,theSerbswouldshellthecitywithallthe

meninsideit.

Page 37: International Decision Making in the Age of Genocide ......8 United Nations General Assembly, “The fall of Srebrenica,” A/54/549, November 15, 1999, henceforth “1999 UN Srebrenica

1-37

MICHAELDOBBS:Whatdidyourfriendswanttodo,Muhamed?

MUHAMEDDURAKOVIĆ:InSrebrenicain1993,itwasobviousthatstayinginareas

thatweremeanttobeethnicallycleansedmeantcertaindeath.Everyonewastrying

tosustainlifeasmuchaspossible.Themenwantedtoatleastgettheirwivesand

childrenoutassoonaspossibletogivethemachanceofsurvival.Mostciviliansin

Srebrenicawantedtogetoutassoonaspossible.I'mtalkingfrommyownpersonal,

privateexperience.Yourmainobjective—today,too,incertainpartsoftheworld—

isthepreservationoflife.Youhavetosavethosewhoarecaughtinthemiddle

betweentwowarringpartiesandaredirectvictimsoftheatrocities.Thatdidnot

reflecttheview,perhaps,ofthepoliticalstructureofSrebrenica.Theyfeltthat

ifthewomenandchildrenleftSrebrenica,itwouldbecomeamucheasierterritory

tooccupy.

Ifyouhaveonlyonebulletinyourgun,andyouknowthatyourwifeandkids

areamileawaybehindyoufacingcertaindeath,youwillstandyourgroundno

matterwhat.Youwillfighttothelastdropofyourblood.Butifyourwifeandkids

arenolongerinSrebrenica,thenyouwilldowhateveryoucantojointhem,evenif

thatmeansthatfightingyourwayoutthroughalmostonehundredmilesofNo

Man’sLand.FromthepointofviewoftheBosnianmilitaryleadership,evacuating

civiliansfromSrebrenicameantweakeningthemoraleofthefightingforcein

Srebrenica.Theydidnotrepresentthefeelingofthemajorityofthepeoplewhoonly

wantedtosurvive,tolivesomewhereelseifSrebrenicawasnolongeraviable

option.

AsfarasthedemilitarizationofSrebrenicaisconcerned,mypersonalview

andtheviewoftheBosnianauthoritiesatthatparticulartimewasthattheCanadian

troopswerehighlyprofessional.Theycameinanderectedcheckpoints.One

ofthecheckpoints,onthesouthsideofthetown,wasonehundredmetersaway

frommyhouse.Iwasabletoaidthesecheckpointsasamemberofthelocalpolice.

Wewouldsearchanyoneenteringorleavingtheenclave.Thiswasajointeffortby

UNPROFORandthelocalpolicewhoweretheretoensurethattheagreementwas

followed.

Page 38: International Decision Making in the Age of Genocide ......8 United Nations General Assembly, “The fall of Srebrenica,” A/54/549, November 15, 1999, henceforth “1999 UN Srebrenica

1-38

IfthelocalpoliceorUNPROFORfoundanyonewithweaponsatthese

checkpoints,theweaponswereseizedanddestroyedonthespot.Ifsomeonewas

foundcarryingaconcealedhandgun,thepeacekeeperwouldtakethemagazineout

ofthepistolanddestroythepistolbythrowingitunderanAPC.Thiswasatthe

beginningwhenthedemilitarizedzonewasconfinedtoSrebrenicaanditssuburbs.

LateronthiswasextendedsouthwardstoOP[ObservationPost]Echo,OPFoxtrot

andtheotherobservationpoints.

LARRYHOLLINGWORTH:Wemustrememberthatatleast50percent,ifnotmore,

ofthepopulationofSrebrenicawerefromoutsideSrebrenica.Theyhadfledtheir

ownvillagesforwhattheythoughtwasabetterplace.Whentheyfoundthatitwas

actuallytheworstplaceonGod'searth,it'snotsurprisingthattheywantedtoleave.

MUHAMEDDURAKOVIĆ:Iagree.

HASANMURATOVIĆ:Whethertoleaveorbeprotectedinsideasafezoneisan

immoraldilemma.Whenthe[Srebrenica]safezonewascreated,therewasno

clearlydefinedfinalgoal.Whatwasthefinalintentionwiththissafezone?Howlong

wasitmeanttostayinplace?Whathadtobedonetoenablepeopletoleavethe

areaortodefendthemselves?Wasthereanyothersolution?Wesawwhatthe

bettersolutionwas,bothinBosniaandlaterinKosovo:equipanarmytoprotectthe

place,withtheassistanceofairstrikes.Letthearmyfight,andgivesupportfromthe

air.Orevenreprimandseriously.WhentheSerbswereorderedtosurrender

weaponsinSarajevo,theysurrenderedtheirweaponsbecauseitwasanultimatum.

ButtheywerenotreprimandedseriouslyinSrebrenica.Instead,therewere

negotiationswiththem.

EverypeacekeepingforceinBosniaandevery[foreign]civilianorganization

wassupposedtofollowtheoveralllineoftheUN,buttheyalsoworkedandfollowed

thelineoftheirowngovernments.DeploymentsofUNpeacekeepersreflected

politicalinterestsofdifferentcountriesfromwhichtheycome:TurksandEgyptians

inSarajevo,FrenchbetweenPaleandSarajevo,andbetweenBanjaLukaandBihać,

theSpanishinMostar.

Page 39: International Decision Making in the Age of Genocide ......8 United Nations General Assembly, “The fall of Srebrenica,” A/54/549, November 15, 1999, henceforth “1999 UN Srebrenica

1-39

Wemustbearinmindthesedualroleswhenexaminethedecisionsthatwere

taken.TherewasnoconsensusbetweenEuropeancountriesonwhattodo.There

weredifferentpoliciesanddifferentviews.ThecreationoftheSafeArea,asMadam

Ogatasaid,wasdubiousfromallpointsofview.52Youcanprotectahospital,youcan

protectthepopulation,onlyifyouhelpthemtodefendthemselvesandhavean

overallgoalinmind.TheUNmissionneverhadclearlydefinedgoalsinBosnia.They

livedfromtodaytotomorrow,attemptingtosolveday-to-dayproblems.

CARLBILDT:IwasnotaroundatthetimebutIwasinvolvedinasimilarsituationin

Žepain1995.Thequestionis:ifyouassistinbringingpeopleoutofadifficult

situation,areyouanaccompliceinethniccleansingorgenocide,ornot?Thisisboth

amoralandpoliticaldilemmaforinternationalorganizations,whenfacedwith

situationslikethis.Thewarcrimestribunal,ICTY,dealtwiththisintheZdravko

Tolimircasebutwasunabletomakeupitsmind.Firstthetribunalsaid:yes,youare

anaccompliceinacrime.Thentheychangedtheirpositionandsaid:no,youcannot

reallysaythat.53Thefactthattheygobackandforthonthisissueillustrateshow

difficultthisis.Ofcourse,ithasvastimplicationsforotheroperationsaroundthe

world.

MICHAELDOBBS:Whatisyourpersonalview?

CARLBILDT:Myviewisthatyouhavetolookateachsituationasitis.Itis

difficulttohaveanoverridingprinciple.Youarenormallyinterestedinsavinglives.

Thehumanitarianimperativeisoftenwhatdrivespeopleinsituationslikethis.

52See,forexample,HannaytoFCO,“Bosnia:MrsOgata’sviewsonSafeAreas,”Telno1903,May29,1993.Ogatawarnedthatsafeareascouldturninto“largescalerefugeecamps…closedinbythesurroundingmilitaryforces.”53ThisissuerelatestoArticle42(b)oftheICTYStatute,whichgivesthetribunalauthoritytoprosecutethecrimeofgenocide,specifically“causingseriousbodilyormentalharm”with“intenttodestroy,inwholeorinpart,anational,ethnical,racial,orreligiousgroup.”TheICTYAppealsChamberruledinApril2015thattheTrialChamberhadfailedtoestablishthattheMuslimsexpelledfromŽepa(incontrasttotheMuslimsexpelledfromSrebrenica)hadsuffered“seriousmentalharm”risingtothelevelofgenocide.Seeparagraphs216-217,AppealJudgment.ThisreversedthefindingcontainedinParagraph758ofthe2012TrialChamberjudgment.

Page 40: International Decision Making in the Age of Genocide ......8 United Nations General Assembly, “The fall of Srebrenica,” A/54/549, November 15, 1999, henceforth “1999 UN Srebrenica

1-40

JORISVOORHOEVE:Ientirelyagreewiththeoverridingprincipleofsavinglives.

Thattakespriorityovernotcooperatingwithethniccleansing.

IwouldputSecurityCouncilResolution819,whichwediscussedthis

morning,inthecategoryof"fake"actions.Fakeactionscreatetheimpressionthat

somethinghasbeendecidedandisbeingdonewheninactualfactnothingwas

decidedordone.TheonlyoperationalpartoftheresolutionwasthattheSecretary-

Generalshould"increasethepresenceofUNPROFOR."54Theresolutiondoesnotsay

whatUNPROFORshoulddo.ThereismentionofChapterVII,butthatismeaningless

becauseitdoesnotsaywhatpartisunderChapterVII.MembersoftheSecurity

Councilwoulddobetternottovoteforsuchfakeresolutions.Thereareother

resolutionsthatweremuchstronger:forexample,UNSCresolution836,whichalso

invokedChapterVIIandallowedtheSecretary-Generaltouse"airpowerinand

aroundthesafeareas...tosupportUNPROFORintheperformanceofitsmandate."55

ThatwasaverysignificantresolutionthatmadeuseofChapterVII.

ThesecondpointIwanttomakeisverysimilartotheoneraisedbyMr.Bildt.

IdrawattentiontotheproposalsmadebyMrs.Ogatain1992.Shefavored

evacuationofthepopulationofSrebrenicaandnegotiationsbetweentheBosnian

governmentandtheBosnianSerbs[onalandswap].56TheBosnianswouldhave

receivedapieceoflandnearSarajevothatwouldhaveimprovedthedefensibilityof

SarajevoandmadeitpossibletorelocatethepopulationofSrebrenicapreventively.

IunderstandthedilemmafacedbytheBosniangovernment.Iknowtherewere

discussionsintheBosniangovernmentonapreventiveevacuation.Therewere

ministersinfavorofpreventiveevacuation,butintheendtheydecidedagainst.

Politicalandethicalquestionswereconfused,notonlyintheUnitedNations,but

alsoinBosnia.

TOMBLANTON:LetmeaskDavidHannaytorespond.Ithinkthatyouhaveargued

thattheso-called“fakeresolution,”819,didactuallyachievesomething,namely

54UNSC,“Resolution819(1993),”S/RES/819,April16,1993.55UNSC,“Resolution836(1993),”S/RES/836,June4,1993.56SadakoOgata,“StatementtotheInternationalMeetingonHumanitarianAidforVictimsoftheConflictintheformerYugoslavia,”July29,1992.

Page 41: International Decision Making in the Age of Genocide ......8 United Nations General Assembly, “The fall of Srebrenica,” A/54/549, November 15, 1999, henceforth “1999 UN Srebrenica

1-41

headingoffaSerbianoffensiveagainstSrebrenica.HadtheVance-Owenplan

actuallybeenadopted,wemightbelookingbackattheestablishmentoftheseSafe

Areasasatriumphforinternationaldiplomacy.Isthatanaccuratereflectionofyour

view?

DAVIDHANNAY:TheseSafeAreasresolutions—819inthecaseofSrebrenica,and

836settingouttheoverallpolicy—wereneverdesignedasanythingotherthana

shorttermexpedient.Theyhadtobefittedintoawiderpoliticalstrategywhichhad

toinvolvepeacenegotiationsandasettlement.ThedestructionofVance-Owenin

thespringof1993wasdisastrousbecauseitknockedawaythatoption.Ittookthree

yearstoreconstructthe[peacenegotiation]optionwhichcametobeknownas

Dayton.TheSafeAreasshouldneverhavebeenseenasalong-termsolutionto

anything.Theywereashort-termexpedientthatneededtobefittedintoaproper

politicalandmilitarystrategybutneverwas.

As1993and1994woreon,theexpedientbecamemoreandmore

threadbare,aswewillseewhenwetalkaboutGoraždeandBihać.Bythetimeofthe

Srebrenicamassacre,itwascompletelyworthless.Thereasonitwasworthlesswas

becausenoonedidanythingaboutthepoliticalframework.Tomymind,the

destructionofVance-Owenwasadisaster.IfyoureadtheJointActionProgram,you

canseewhatthesignatoriesthoughtaboutpreservingVance-Owen.Theymakea

vaguereferenceto“buildingontheVance-Owenprocess,”butitwasbasically

dead.57Thatwasarealdisaster.TheSafeAreaswereanexpedientthatbecamea

policy.

TOMBLANTON:Jenonne,canyouaddressthat?

JENONNEWALKER:IagreewithmostofwhatDavidhassaid.Iplaceless

importancethanhedoesonVance-Owen.Obviouslyifthereisapeaceagreement,

thereisapeaceagreement,whetherit'stheVance-Owenplanoranyother.What

waslackinginalltheUNResolutions,andcertainlyinAmericanpolicyandinthe

57PermanentRepresentativesofFrance,Spain,theRussianFederation,theUnitedKingdom,andtheUnitedStates,“Jointactionprogramme,”S/25829,May24,1993.

Page 42: International Decision Making in the Age of Genocide ......8 United Nations General Assembly, “The fall of Srebrenica,” A/54/549, November 15, 1999, henceforth “1999 UN Srebrenica

1-42

JointActionProgram,wasanywillingnesstomaketheSerbsstoptheiraggression.

ThefirstseriousthingthatwasdoneintheWestwastheNATOdecisioninAugust

1993totakeseriousmilitaryaction,airaction,againstanyonewhocontinued

shellingciviliansettlements,whichofcoursemeanttheBosnianSerbsandtheir

Serbbackers.58ItworkedinFebruary1994,thefirsttimeitwastested,whenwe

issuedanultimatumtotheSerbsaboutpullingtheirweapons20kilometersbeyond

Sarajevo.59Atthelastminute,withRussianhelp,theycompliedbecausetheyreally

believedNATOairstrikeswerecoming.Hadthatpolicybeencontinued,things

mighthavebeenbettersooner.

TheJointActionProgramtookmostofusinWashingtonbysurprise.Icannot

rememberwhytheseniorEuropeanofficialswereintown.Therehadbeensome

otherevent.Thenextday,Igotaphonecallfromsomeonequiteseniorinthe

DefenseDepartmentsaying,issomethinghappeningattheStateDepartmentthat

wearebeingcutoutof?Isaid,noofcoursenot,Iwouldknowaboutit.Allofuswere

takenbysurprisewhenWarrenChristopherandhiscolleaguescameoutwiththe

JointActionProgram,whichwasfakepolicy.Itgavenobonestoanything.Ihaveno

ideawhyChrisandhiscolleaguessigneduptothat.Mostofusthoughtitwasan

embarrassment.IaskedTonyLakeafterwardifhehadknownthiswasgoingon.He

wasevasive.ItwasmaybetheonlytimeIfailedtogetastraightanswerfromTony.I

don'tknowifhewasalsotakenbysurprise.Itwasonlythewillingnesstomove

fromneutralitytousingforcetostopaggressionthatmadeitpossibletoimplement

Vance-Owen,Dayton,oranyotherpeaceplan.

Washingtonfinallycametoawillingnesstoseriouslygetbehindapeaceplan

inthespringandearlysummerof1994.WeagreedthenwiththeWestEuropeans,

theEU,thatwewouldjointheminendorsingaplan,includingamap,iftheywould

agreethatanyonewhodidnotaccepttheplanwithinacertainperiodoftimewould

58Secretary-GeneralofNATO,“PressStatementbytheSecretary-General,”August2,1993.59“DecisionstakenattheMeetingoftheNorthAtlanticCouncilinPermanentSession,”February9,1994.“SummaryofConclusionsofPrincipalsCommitteeMeetingonBosnia,”USNationalSecurityCouncil,February18,1994.

Page 43: International Decision Making in the Age of Genocide ......8 United Nations General Assembly, “The fall of Srebrenica,” A/54/549, November 15, 1999, henceforth “1999 UN Srebrenica

1-43

faceseriousNATOairstrikes.60Afterthat,therewasaperiodofpinprickairstrikes

untilthingsfinallybecamesobadthatWashingtonsaiditwouldactaloneif

necessary.Itwastheenforcementthatmattered,nottheVance-Owenmaporthe

Daytonmaporanyothermap.

TOMBLANTON:Peter,youhadjustarrivedinCroatiainJune1993,andinheriteda

SafeAreaortwo?

PETERGALBRAITH:I'mstruckbythedisconnectbetweentheincoherentpolicyin

Washingtonandthingsactuallygoingontheground,eventhoughtheywerewell

reportedatthetime.FirstawordabouttheVance-Owenpeaceplan.Ifyoulookatit,

youwillseealotofblue.

Farfrombeingapeaceplan,thatmapacceleratedtheconflictbetween

BosniaksandBosnianCroatsastheBosnianCroatstriedtoseizetheterritory

offeredthembythemap.61Bythesummerof1993,therewaslittletheClinton

administrationcoulddotofollowthroughonthepresident’scampaignpledgesto

helptheBosniangovernment.ThiswasbecauseofthewarbetweentheMuslims

andtheCroats.Ifyoulookatthemap,youseeCroatiatothewestofBosniaand

Serbiatotheeast.TherewasnoaccesstotheBosniangovernmentareasaslongas

theMuslim-Croatwarwasgoingon.

WithoutmuchpolicyguidancefromWashington,theUSembassyinZagreb

inthesummerof1993beganpressuringtheCroatiangovernmenttoendthe

atrocitiestheBosnianCroatswerecommittinginBosnia.62ThroughForeign

MinisterMateGranicandDefenseMinisterGojkoSusak,Igotembassyofficersinto

theheliportnearMostarwherethousandsofBosnianswerebeingheldinappalling

conditions.InJuly,IhadaverycontentiousmeetingwithMateBobaninwhichI

60InJuly1994,aContactGroupmadeupoftheUnitedStates,Russia,Britain,France,andGermanyproposedamapwitha51/49percentterritorialcompromisebetweentheMuslim-CroatFederationandtheBosnianSerbs.ThebasicprinciplesoftheContactGroupproposalwereacceptedatDayton.ForU.S.strategyduringthisperiod,seeLaketoClinton,“Bosnia–NextSteps,”TheWhiteHouse,July19,1994.61FightingflaredbetweenBosnianCroatsandMuslimsaftertheCroatianDefenseCouncilgavetheBosnianarmyadeadlineofApril15,1993towithdrawfromareasdesignatedasCroat-dominatedcantonsundertheVance-OwenPeacePlan.62“DecisionsofPrincipalsCommitteeMeetingonBosnia,”May17,1993.

Page 44: International Decision Making in the Age of Genocide ......8 United Nations General Assembly, “The fall of Srebrenica,” A/54/549, November 15, 1999, henceforth “1999 UN Srebrenica

1-44

pressedhimtoreleasethedetainees.Bytheendofthesummer,wesecuredthe

releaseofabout5,000Bosniakprisoners.Wegotaccesstotheheliportinspiteof

theoppositionoftheUSambassadortoBosnia[VictorJackovich]whowasbasedin

Vienna.Butthat’sanotherstory.

ProposedVance-Owenpeaceplan,1993

TOMBLANTON:SothereweredivisionsevenwithintheStateDepartmentandeven

betweenUSambassadors?

Page 45: International Decision Making in the Age of Genocide ......8 United Nations General Assembly, “The fall of Srebrenica,” A/54/549, November 15, 1999, henceforth “1999 UN Srebrenica

1-45

PETERGALBRAITH:Evenwithinthebureaus.IusedtorefertotheEuropean

BureauunderSteveOxmanasthe“HomeAlone”Bureau.63

JENONNEWALKER:Don'tgetintoit.

PETERGALBRAITH:Whynot?It'stwenty-twoyearslater.

Anyhow,inthefallof1993webegantoputpressureonTudjman,Šušakand

Granićtochangethe[BosnianCroat]leadership.TheygotridofBosnianCroat

leaderMateBobanbytheendoftheyear.Thatsetthestageforthealliancebetween

theMuslimsandCroatsthatwasexpressedintheFederationofBosnia-Herzegovina

[establishedbytheWashingtonAgreementofMarch1994].64Thiswasadifferent

constructfromVance-Owen.ItdidnotofferallthisterritorytotheBosnianCroats

andwasasignalthattheUSstronglydiscouragedTudjmanfromdoingwhathe

wantedtodo,whichwastograbagoodpartofBosnia.Thatalliancethensetthe

stageforustotelltheCroatiansthatweweregoingtolooktheotherwayasarms

wentthroughCroatiatoBosnia.Wedidnotneedtodotheliftpart[oflifeandstrike]

becausearmsdeliveriesweretakingplace.Thischangedthemilitarybalance.

Beforehedied,IzetbegovićtoldmethatmymessagetoTudjmanthattheUSdidnot

objecttoarmstransitingCroatiaforBosniawasthesinglemostimportantthingthat

theUnitedStatesdidforBosnia.Thisisadifferentperspectiveonhowthisevolved

thantheNewYork,andperhapstheNSC,perspective.

ZLATKOLAGUMDŽIJA:SeveralspeakersmentionedtheVance-Owenplan.Justto

remindyouaboutthemeetingbetweenIzetbegovićandVicePresidentGoreon

March26,1993[thedayafterIzetbegovićsignedtheVance-Owenplan.]65US

63StephenA.OxmanwasAssistantSecretaryofStateforEuropeanandCanadianAffairsbetweenApril1993andAugust1994whenhewassucceededbyRichardHolbrooke.AWashingtonPostarticleonMay21,1996byJohnPomfretandDavidOttaway(“U.S.Envoy’sBalkanRoleCriticizedonCapitolHill”)notedfrictionbetweenGalbraithandotherUSenvoysintheregion.64TheWashingtonagreementreducedtheamountofBosnianterritorycontrolledbyBosnianCroatsfromaround20percentto10percent,moreinlinewithpre-warethnicdivisions.65FuerthtoLake,“MeetingbetweenVicePresidentGoreandPresidentAlijaIzetbegovićofBosniaandHerzegovina,”OfficeoftheVicePresident,April14,1993.GorereceivedIzetbegovićinWashingtonthedayafterIzetbegovićsignedtheVance-OwenpeaceplanattheUnitedNationsheadquartersinNewYork.

Page 46: International Decision Making in the Age of Genocide ......8 United Nations General Assembly, “The fall of Srebrenica,” A/54/549, November 15, 1999, henceforth “1999 UN Srebrenica

1-46

officialstoldIzetbegovićthattheUSwouldconsiderliftingthearmsembargoif

Serbsrefusedtosign.WeheldaparliamentsessioninthebesiegedcityofSarajevo

atwhichthemajorityadoptedtheVance-OwenplanafteritwassignedinAthens

[onMay3,1993]byIzetbegovićandKaradzić.Weacceptedthatplan.Itwasavery

toughdecision.Thiswasoneofthosedecisionswhenthepresidentisaskingyou,

whatismoreimportant,thepeopleorthecountry.

TheBosnianSerbsrejectedtheVance-OwenplanonMay6[atameetingof

theRepublikaSrpskaassemblyinPale].TheVance-Owenplanwasnotadream

scenario,butwhenyoucomparetheVance-OwenmapwiththeDaytonmap

BosniaafterDayton

Page 47: International Decision Making in the Age of Genocide ......8 United Nations General Assembly, “The fall of Srebrenica,” A/54/549, November 15, 1999, henceforth “1999 UN Srebrenica

1-47

[below],itisDisneyland.ThereisnoRepublikaSrpska,therearenoethnically

definedterritories.

IntheVance-Owenmap[seepage1-44oftranscript]thereisayellowline

representingtheDaytonpeaceagreementboundarybetweenRepublikaSrpskaand

theFederation.HadtheVance-Owenplanbeenadopted,notonlywouldthewar

havebeenstopped,butwewouldbeamorefunctioningcountrythanwearetoday.

Weacceptedtheplanbecauseweweretoldthattheinternationalcommunitywas

fullybehindit.IfKaradzićacceptedit,wewouldproceedwithpeace

implementation.IfweacceptedandtheSerbsrefused,thearmsembargowouldbe

lifted.Thatwasaclearunderstanding.Whathappenedwas:weaccepted,Karadzić

refused,andthearmsembargoremained.TheBosnianSerbswereafraidofthe

armsembargobeinglifted,buttheyknewthatthiswasafalsethreatbythe

internationalcommunity.MypointisthatwhathappenedinJuly1995wasthe

consequenceoftheinternationalcommunitynotcarryingthroughonitsthreatsand

commitments.

TOMBLANTON:CanIaskJohnShattucktospeaktoapointthatJenonnewas

makingabouttheJointActionProgramandSecretaryChristopher.Whatwas

SecretaryChristopherthinking,ifthisoccursreallyoutsideofaprocessthattheNSC

andothersknew,andmaybeLakeknew,butwhathappened?Whatwasthat

dynamiclikeinsidetheClintonadministration?

JOHNSHATTUCK:SecretaryChristopherwentonatourofEuropeancapitalsinMay

1993.66Theexpectationwasthathewouldarrivewithsomenewpoliciesandthere

wouldbeanopportunityfordiscussion.Infact,itwasasortof"listeningtour."Not

onlywastherenodialoguebuttherewasreallynotmuchspeech.Thisreflectedthe

completedisarrayinsidetheUSGovernmentwithrespecttoformulatingapolicy

implementingClinton'scampaignpromises.

Myjob[asAssistantSecretaryofStateforHumanRights]wastogather

humanrightsinformation.Wewereconstantlysidetracked.Wewouldbebroughtin

66SeeElaineSciolino,“ChristopherFailstoWinConsensus,”NewYorkTimes,May7,1993.

Page 48: International Decision Making in the Age of Genocide ......8 United Nations General Assembly, “The fall of Srebrenica,” A/54/549, November 15, 1999, henceforth “1999 UN Srebrenica

1-48

fromtimetotime,andthenpushedbackwhenitwasfeltthatwhatmybureauwas

spotlightingwasnotgoingtobehelpfultothepoliticalnegotiations.Iremember

goingwithPeterGalbraithandMadeleineAlbrighttoVukovarinJanuary1994toa

massgravesite[believedtocontainthebodiesofsome200Croatpatientswhohad

disappearedfromVukovarhospitalonNovember20,1991.]Ourvisitwasseenas

toohighprofileforWashingtonsoIwasthenbasicallyputunderwrapsandnot

allowedtotravelbacktoBosniauntilJuly1995[followingtheSrebrenicamassacre].

Igivethisasanexampleofthehighdegreeofbothconfusionandhesitancyonthe

partoftheUnitedStatestodothekindofspotlightingthatneededtobedonein

ordertochangethepolicy.

JENONNEWALKER:Iwasonthe“liftandstrike”salestrip,duringthefirstweekof

May1993.WarrenChristopherhadsupportedthatpolicywithintheadministration

asopposedto“strikeonly.”Ithinkhereallybelievedinit.Hispresentationmight

haveconvincedajudgebuttherewasnopolitical“umph”toitatall.Incapitalafter

capital,lookingathisbriefingbookandnevermakingeyecontactwithanyone,he

wouldgothroughalltheotheroptionswehadconsideredandexplainwhywehad

rejectedthem.Finally,wheneveryonewassoundasleepordaydreaming,hewould

getto“liftandstrike”andexplainwhythatwastheleastbadoftheavailable

options.Idon'tunderstandwhetherhechangedhismind.Whenwegotoffthe

airplaneinLondon,ourfirststop,onSunday,May2,weweregreetedwithahuge

headlineintheSundayTimessaying,"BritainwillvetoUSplantoarmBosnian

Muslims,"beforetheconversationshadevenbegan.67Thatdidn'thelpthe

atmosphere.ItwasadisasterofAmericandiplomacy.Weneveractuallydropped

thepolicybutwedidn'tdoanythingtopushitafterthat.Itwaspartofourgradual,

muchtooslow,movementtobeingwillingtotakemoreseriousaction.

Wewerekeenlyawarethatourallieswereonthegroundtakingrisksthat

wewerenotsharing.IfwereallystooduptoSerbianaggression,their

peacekeepers,the"peaceobservers"or"violenceobservers,"wouldbeputin 67SeeJamesAdams&AndrewGrice,“BritainwillvetoUSplantoarmBosnianMuslims,”SundayTimes(UK),May2,1993.

Page 49: International Decision Making in the Age of Genocide ......8 United Nations General Assembly, “The fall of Srebrenica,” A/54/549, November 15, 1999, henceforth “1999 UN Srebrenica

1-49

seriousdangerthatwewerenotpreparedtoshare.Wewereverydeferentialto

theirviewsforalongtime.WethoughtinAugust1993thatwehadanagreementon

aseriousNATOairthreat.Thatfellapartwiththedualkeyarrangement.Thefirst

testwasinSarajevoafterthemarketplacebombinginFebruary1994whichshowed

thatthecrediblethreatofforcewouldmakeadifference.Bythespring,orearly

summerof1994,wewerewillingtoendorseapeaceplaninreturnforEuropeans’

commitmenttoseriousairstrikes.IrememberTonyLake’sworkinghardtogeta

consensusamongClinton'stopadvisers.Hekeptsayingtome,"Justtrustme,I'llget

usthere."Meanwhile,lotsofpeopleweredying.LakefinallygotClinton'sagreement

toaplanbeforesurfacingittoothermembersofthePrincipalsCommittee.

TOMBLANTON:Let'sgobacktoUNSCResolution836ofJune4,1993.68Joris

Voorhoeve,amongothers,compared836favorablywith819.Thedocuments,

however,recordseverecriticismfromtheSecretariatandahugegapbetweenthe

toughlanguageoftheresolutionandwhatwashappeningontheground.Thereisa

wonderfulexchangebetweentheSecretariatworkingpaperofMay28andaDavid

HannaycablebacktoLondonthefollowingdaythatillustratesthisdifferenceof

opinion.69Hannaycomplainsabout"thescandalouslyslantedSecretariatpaper”

thatwas“almostcertainlytheworkofTharoor.”David,youseemtobeconcerned

thattheworkingpaperisadvocatingaheavyoptionrequiringatleast15,000more

troopswhileyouarearguingfora"light"option.70Willyouexplainthisdebatefor

us?

68UNSC,“Resolution836(1993),”S/RES/836,June4,1993.69AnnantoStoltenberg,“Safeareas,”UNDPKO,MSC-870,May28,1993.HannytoFCO,“MyTelno1881:Bosnia:SafeAreasResolution,”UKMissiontotheUN,Telno1911,May29,1993.70TheMay28WorkingPapercoveredtheproposedsafeareasofSarajevo,Bihac,Tuzla,Goražde,Srebrenica,andŽepa.TheSecretariatinitiallybelievedthat15,000extratroopswouldbeneededtodeterpossibleaggressionagainstthesafeareas,butlaterincreaseditsestimateto“32,000additionalgroundtroops.”[SeeUNSrebrenicareport,paragraph94].AJune14reportbytheUNSecretaryGeneral[S/25939]quotedGeneralWahlgrenassayingthathewouldneed34,000additionaltroops,inadditiontothe24,000alreadyintheater,inorder“toobtaindeterrencethroughstrength.”Wahlgrenstated,however,thatitwouldbepossibleto“startimplementing”UNSCResolution836witha“lightoption”ofaround7,600moretroops,relyingprimarily“onthethreatofairaction”todeterattacksonthesafeareas.[Seealso:UNSrebrenicareport,paragraph96].The7,600extratroopswereauthorizedbyUNSC

Page 50: International Decision Making in the Age of Genocide ......8 United Nations General Assembly, “The fall of Srebrenica,” A/54/549, November 15, 1999, henceforth “1999 UN Srebrenica

1-50

DAVIDHANNAY:ByMay1993,IandothermembersoftheSecurityCouncil

(principallyFrance,theRussianFederation,Spain,theUnitedKingdomandthe

UnitedStatesofAmerica,i.e.asignificantportion),wereoperatingonthebasisof

theJointActionProgram.Personally,IthoughttheJointActionProgramwas

anappallingidea,butyouarepaidtocarryouttheinstructionsofyourgovernment.

ThegovernmentshadsigneduptotheJointActionProgram.TheJointAction

Programsaid[inParagraph4]that“wewillworktosecureearlyadoptionofthe

newUnitedNationsSecurityCouncilResolutionnowunderdiscussion.”71The

reasonwhywereactedverynegativelytotheSecretariatpaperwasbecauseitwas

quiteclearlydesignedtofrustratethat.Ithinkhistorywillbequitekindtothe

UnitedNationsSecretariatwhentheysaid,“It'snotgoingtowork.”Butthatisnot

wherewewerethen,andthatwaswhywecouldnotaccepttheworkingpaper.

Onthedifferencebetweenthelightandtheheavyoptions.Tobehonest,the

heavyoptionwasajoke.Theheavyoptionwaswhatwecallinthejargon:"Giveme

halfamillionmenandIwillmarchtoMoscow."Absolutely,halfamillionmen,

marchtoMoscow.That'sprobablynotaverygoodidea,butOK.Thelightoption

wasarealisticallyfeasibleone.72Itwasconceivablethatwecouldget7,600more

troops.ItwasconceivablethattheycouldprotecttheSafeAreasforaperiodoftime.

Thatiswhywefavoredthatoption,alongwithalltheothersignatoriesoftheJoint

ActionProgram.

TOMBLANTON:Shashi?

SHASHITHAROOR:Thisallhappenedin"ahundredhurries,"whichwasalltoo

oftenthecaseatthistime.TheSecurityCouncilaskedforapaper.IthinkDavid,in

allfairness,wasplayingaverycomplicatedgame.Ontheonehand,hehadtoward

offdemandsfromDiegoandthenon-aligned,whowerecallingformuchmore

resolution844ofJune18,1993,butittookmorethanayeartodeploythemtoBosnia.[S/1994/1389].Fewerthan3,000hadarrivedintheatrebyJanuary1994.[A/48/847].71PermanentRepresentativesofFrance,Spain,theRussianFederation,theUnitedKingdom,andtheUnitedStates,“Jointactionprogramme,”S/25829,May24,1993.72Boutros-Ghali,“ReportoftheSecretary-GeneralPursuanttoSecurityCouncilResolution836(1993),”S/25939,June14,1993.

Page 51: International Decision Making in the Age of Genocide ......8 United Nations General Assembly, “The fall of Srebrenica,” A/54/549, November 15, 1999, henceforth “1999 UN Srebrenica

1-51

explicitlypro-Bosniakaction.Ontheotherhand,therewasbackgroundpressure

fromtheAmericanstopreserveanappearanceofactionwhilemaintainingthe

viabilityofUNPROFOR.TheBritishandFrench,meanwhile,werefartoodeeply

committedonthegroundtosuddenlychangetheentirestrategyonadime.Wein

theSecretariathadtheimpossibletaskofbeingaskedtoproduceapaperatless

thantwenty-fourhours’notice.Ithinkwewentonuntil4a.m.puttingthisblessed

thingtogether.Asisprobablyapparentfromthequalityofthewriting,itwasa

productofmanyhandsandmanyheads.Icertainlybearresponsibilityforitasthe

leaderoftheteam.AsIunkindlypointedouttoDavidwhenhegotangrywithme,

themilitaryinputactuallycamefromaBritishofficer,MajorAdrianFoster,whohad

beendetailedtomefromtheBritishArmy.Thepoorfellowgotpulledout[oftheUN

Secretariat]forhiscontributiontothispaper.73

Itistruethat34,000wasanunrealisticfigure.Wehadnoexpectationofever

gettingthosenumbers.Thereasonwhywegavethosenumbers,whichcamefrom

seriousmilitaryplanners,wastolettheSecurityCouncilknowthatthiswasthe

kindofnumbertheyneededtobetalkingaboutthatiftheywantedtohaveSafe

Areasthatweredefendable.Ifnot,theyoughttoaltertheirmandateaccordingly.

Thatwasthepurposeofprovidingthemtheheavyoption.WeinDPKOcameunder

veryheavypressure,rightfromBoutros'office,toalsoprovidealightoption.We

hadnointentionofcomingupwithalightoptiononourown.Itwasdonebecauseof

politicalpressurefromkeygovernmentswholearnedearlyonthatthiswasgoingto

beaveryheavything,perhapsfromtheirownpeopleonourteam.

IhadtwopeoplewhowerefulltimeUNofficialsonmyteam.Everybodyelse

wassecondedfromgovernments:themilitarypeople,thepolice,andthewholelot.

Again,thisisnormal.IalwaysusedtojoketotheUSMissionthatIhadmorepeople

followingmyworkthanIhadtodoit.Thatwaschronicallythecase.Theycertainly

hadtheirownsourcesofinformation.Whilewewerestillputtingtogetherthis

blessedthingintwenty-fourhours,wordcamethatwehadtoproducea“light

73InanAugust15,2015emailcommunicationtotheorganizers,retiredGeneralAdrianFosterdisputedTharoor’srecollectionofevents.Hesaidhe“completed”afulltourinNewYorkanddeniedbeing“pulledout”byLondon.

Page 52: International Decision Making in the Age of Genocide ......8 United Nations General Assembly, “The fall of Srebrenica,” A/54/549, November 15, 1999, henceforth “1999 UN Srebrenica

1-52

option.”Sowecameupveryreluctantlywithalightoption.Asyoucanseefromthe

May28cable,IcouldonlysendthepapertoGeneralWahlgreninthefieldafterwe

hadsubmittedittotheCouncil.74Wehadnotime.Therewassimplynoquestionof

beingabletoconsult.Sowesentitoffandindeeditgotaveryfrostyreception.

Davidshoutedatmeafewtimes.Iflookscouldkill,Iwouldnotbeheretoday.Atthe

endofit,theCouncilwasdeterminedtogoaheadwitharesolution.

Inadditiontotheworkingpaper,wealsosentacabletoWahlgrenonJune2,

askingforhiscomments.75Atthispoint,someofthekeyquestionshavealready

comeupveryclearly.Davidtalkedaboutwhathewaspaidtodo.Weinthe

Secretariatwerepaidtoupholdourmandatesandprinciples,oneofwhichis

outlinedinparagraph3,"...aSafeAreacannotbe'safe'ifonepartywithinitremains

armedandabletoattackthoseoutsideit.Thereshouldthereforebeanobligation

fortheBHArmyalsototreattheSafeAreasassafe,thatis,todesistfromanyhostile

activitytherein,eventhoughtheCouncilresolutiondoesnotrequireittodisarmor

withdraw."76Thiswasanimpossiblecontradictiontosquaresincethenon-aligned

wantedustotakethesideoftheBosniaks.TheBritishandtheFrenchdidnot

becausetheirowntroopswereontheground.Theywantedtogivetheappearance

ofrespondingtoallthemoraloutrageontelevisionandcomingoutofWashington.

Wehadtoconcoctanoperationalmandatethatmadesenseoutofallthisand

workedontheground,whichwasimpossible.Igooninthenextparagraphtotalk

aboutthequestionofSerbcooperationwiththesearrangements.TheFrenchhad

toldus,I'mquotinghere,"...France(onbehalfofthesponsors)hasstated,in

informalconsultationsoftheSecurityCouncil,thatthedraftresolutionassumesthe

consentandco-operationofthepartiesbutthatnon-cooperationwouldinvolve

consequencesunderchapterVII."77TheassumptionhereisthattheSerbsagreeto

bebombedbyNATOiftheBosniaksshootandtheyshootback.Imean,comeon.

Obviouslythishascertainimplicationsforthemission.Iputtheonusonthe

74AnnantoStoltenberg,“Safeareas,”UNDPKO,MSC-870,May28,1993.75AnnantoStoltenberg/Wahlgren,“SecurityCouncilDeliberationson“safeareas,”MSC-896,June2,1993.76Seeparagraph3,MSC-896,op.cit.77Seeparagraph4,MSC-896,op.cit.

Page 53: International Decision Making in the Age of Genocide ......8 United Nations General Assembly, “The fall of Srebrenica,” A/54/549, November 15, 1999, henceforth “1999 UN Srebrenica

1-53

Generalsbysayingthereportcalledforinparagraphtwelve[ofUNSCresolution

836]wouldhavetocomeverylargelyfromUNPROFOR.78Wewerenotgoingtosit

anddoarepetitionoftheworkingpaperexercise,havingbeenburnedbyit.We

said,“Youchaps[UNPROFORcommanders]tellushowyouwanttooperationalize

this.”Itwasnotjustpassingthebuck,itwasbeingrealistic.Theyweretheoneswho

wouldhavetoimplementitontheground.Letthemcomeupwiththeoperational

concept.Theyweren'thappy,asyoucanseefromsubsequentcontext.Thereis

anothercableonJune3[Z-703],wherewespelloutcertainspecificchallenges.79

Thentheresolutionisadopted.Sothemandatewasbecomingmoreandmore

operationallyimpossibletodefine.

Bytheway,Jenonne,theAmericanpressureonairstrikeswasnothelpful.

ProfessorEliotCohencameupwithawonderfullineaboutairpowerbeingan

“unusuallyseductiveformofmilitarystrength”inWashington.Hewrotethatair

power,“likemoderncourtship…appearstooffergratificationwithout

commitment."80ThatispreciselywhattheAmericansseemedtobewantingtodo.

Theyweregoingtobeflyingfromagreatheight,dropbombs,andflyaway,while

therestofuswouldwakeuponthegroundthenextmorningandlivewiththe

consequences.Thiswasthefundamentaldilemmathatboththetroopcontributors

andtheSecretariatweregrapplingwith.

HASANMURATOVIĆ:Inmyview,UNSCResolution836wasagoodresolution.It

providedthegroundsforcallinginairstrikes,andforNATOtoact.Itwasuptothe

decision-makerslatertodecidewhethertheywantedtostrikeornot,toprevent

attacksanddisaster.Thereisnothingintheresolutionthatsays,“Don’tactinthis

case,orthatcase.”

MICHAELDOBBS:WedonothaveGeneralWahlgrenwithusasheisnolongeralive,

butwedohavehisJune3cablereactingtowhatwashappeninginNewYork.He 78UNSC,“Resolution836(1993),”S/RES/836,June4,1993,paragraph12.79WahlgrentoAnnan,“SecurityCouncilDeliberationson‘SafeArea’,”UNPF-HQ,Z-703,June3,1993.80SeeEliotA.Cohen,“TheMystiqueofU.S.AirPower”,ForeignPolicy,January/February1994,arguesthatUSmilitarystrategistsintheBalkansdrewthewrongconclusionsfromtheJanuary1991bombingofIraqatthestartofthePersianGulfWar.

Page 54: International Decision Making in the Age of Genocide ......8 United Nations General Assembly, “The fall of Srebrenica,” A/54/549, November 15, 1999, henceforth “1999 UN Srebrenica

1-54

statesveryclearlyhisoppositiontoairstrikes.Inparagraphfive,hestates"Wehave

indicatedinourcorrespondenceoverthemonthsthatairstrikeswouldsimply

bringUNPROFORandUNHCRoperationstoanend."Inparagrapheight,hegoeson:

"Inconclusion,IdoubtifthecurrentTroopContributingNationswouldagreeto

leavetheircontingentsinUNPROFORundertheproposedmandate.Onesimply

cannotmakepeaceandwaratthesametime."81InWahlgren’sabsence,perhaps

RupertSmithcouldgiveushistakeonWahlgren’scritiqueandtheextenttowhich

heandotherssharedit.Rupert,youwerecoordinatingUKpolicyattheMinistryof

DefenseastheAssistantChiefofDefenseOperationsatthetime?

RUPERTSMITH:IwasattheMinistryofDefense,butIhadnosenseofcoordinating

anything.Itwasaveryconfusedperiodforallthereasonsthathavebeenexplained.

Idon'trememberthisdocument.Iwouldliketomakeapointabouttheforce

numbersbeingquoted,whichgoesbacktotherelationshipbetweenmilitaryadvice

andmilitaryactionandpoliticaldirection.Irememberthosenumbersbeing

bandiedabout.MajorFosterwascertainlycommunicatingbacktoLondon,asking

questionsaboutwhatwethoughtandwhatwaspossible.Thequestionwekept

askingwas:arewetodefendthisterritoryasapieceofground?Orarewetodefeat

anddestroythoseattackingthisterritory?Itcompletelyaltersthemethodandthe

numbersinvolved.

WeeventuallyweretoldbytheothersideofWhitehall[referencetothe

ForeignOffice]:youaredefendingterritory.Themomentyousaythattheseblobs

onthemaparetobedefended,yougetthesehighnumbers.Youhavetoputmenon

theground,feedthem,andsoon.Therewasnodesiretoconsidertheideaof

destroyingordefeatingtheattacker.Youarenottobeoffensiveatall.That,Ithink,

reflectsthegeneralatmosphereoftheUNforceasawhole.Iwasnotpartofthat,but

IthinkIcouldeasilyhavewrittensomethinglikeWahlgren'smemoifIwassittingin

hischairatthattime.

TOMBLANTON:DavidHarland.

81WahlgrentoAnnan,“SecurityCouncilDeliberationson‘SafeArea’,”UNPF-HQ,Z-703,June3,1993.

Page 55: International Decision Making in the Age of Genocide ......8 United Nations General Assembly, “The fall of Srebrenica,” A/54/549, November 15, 1999, henceforth “1999 UN Srebrenica

1-55

DAVIDHARLAND:Mycommentisaveryancientonefromanhourago.On

evacuationversusethniccleansing,Ithinkthisgoestotheheartofhowthewarwas

fought.IputthisquestiontoPresidentIzetbegovićwhenIwaswritingtheUN

Srebrenicareport.IsaidthattheSerbshadaccusedhimofblockingevacuations

withUNassistancefromSrebrenicaandinSarajevoandwagingwarbyusing

civiliansasshields.Hetoldme,"Wehaveachoice,sometimes,betweenaterritory

andthepeople.Ofcourse,bothareimportant,butwewillnotallowtheBosniak

peopletobeputintoghettos."Inotherwords,thepolicywas:humanshields.The

policywastophysicallyblockpeoplefromtryingtoescapeembattledareasand

thereforemakeitharderfortheenemytoattackwithoutinflictingcivilian

casualties.

DavidHarland,center,nexttoMuhamedDurakovicandLarryHollingworth

[TurnstothedebateaboutUNSC836].Thoseofuswhowereonthe

receivingendofallthisguidance,includingtheguidancefromUNPROFOR

Headquarters,feltadeepfrustration.IwasinPaleeverydaywiththeBosnian

leadershipandwasoftenatSarajevoairportwithHasanMuratović.AsHasansays,

theSerbswerevery,veryresponsivetotheperceivedlevelofthreatcomingfrom

Page 56: International Decision Making in the Age of Genocide ......8 United Nations General Assembly, “The fall of Srebrenica,” A/54/549, November 15, 1999, henceforth “1999 UN Srebrenica

1-56

NATO,andlaterfromtheRapidReactionForce.Wheneveritseemedtothemthat

themandatewasnotclearenoughtoallowanyseriousthreattobeusedagainst

them,theywouldprobefurther.Itistruethattherewerepoliticalcompromises

involved[indraftingUNresolutions]anditwasuglyandmuddledandmorally

wrongandabsentinstrategy.Nevertheless,asHasansaid,thoseofusonthe

receivingendfelttherewasplentyoflanguage,particularlyinResolution836,that

wouldhaveallowedfortheapplicationofforce.Itwasfrustratingafterthese

debatestookplace[inNewYork]toreceiveguidancesayingyoushoulddoevenless

thantheresolutionsays.

ZLATKOLAGUMDŽIJA:YoumentionedWahlgren’scableofJune3,1993,inwhichhe

says“Onesimplycannotmakepeaceandwaratthesametime.”82Endofcable.I

thinkthisgoestothecoreofthemisunderstanding[overthenatureof

peacekeeping].InOctober1991,PresidentIzetbegovićmadeaveryfamouspublic

statementsaying,"Sleeppeacefully,thereisnoneedtofear,becauseittakestwoto

tango."83Actually,forwar,youneedone.Whenyouhavetwo,thereisnowar.

Someonedecidestogotowarifhefeelsheisinastrongerposition.Thatiswhen

youhaveawar.Atthesametime,youcannotmakepeace,especiallyunderChapter

VIIoftheUNCharterwithoutbeingreadytogotowar.Otherwiseyouendup

sendingalotofreligiousleadersoverthere.Thisisthefundamental

misunderstandingbetweenus.

JORISVOORHOEVE:SecurityCouncilResolution836isanexampleofclarity.It's

verygood.ItsaysthatMemberStatesmaytake“allnecessarymeasures,throughthe

useofairpower”to“supportUNPROFORintheperformanceofitsmandate.”84The

problemisnotthelightorheavyoption,butthefactthatthisresolutionwasnot

used.Therewasanenormousgapbetweenthelanguageoftheresolutionandthe

actualapplicationupuntilAugust1995.AfterthefallofSrebrenica,thisresolution

82WahlgrentoAnnan,“SecurityCouncilDeliberationson‘SafeArea’,”UNPF-HQ,Z-703,June3,1993.83SeeStevenBurg&PaulShoup,EthnicConflictandInternationalIntervention:CrisisinBosnia-Herzegovina,1990-93,page78.84UNSC,“Resolution836(1993),”S/RES/836,June4,1993.

Page 57: International Decision Making in the Age of Genocide ......8 United Nations General Assembly, “The fall of Srebrenica,” A/54/549, November 15, 1999, henceforth “1999 UN Srebrenica

1-57

becamethelegalbasisfortheuseofairpoweranddeterrence.Whatisoften

forgotteninthediscussionintheUnitedNationsandthememberstates,becauseof

theconfusionwetalkedabout,isthetremendousimportanceofdeterrence.Youtell

awarringparty,"Ifyoudothis,therewillbeveryseriousconsequences.Wehave

escalationdominanceandyoucannotchallengeus."Therewasnoescalation

dominancein1993forthereasonsthatJenonneWalkerandJohnShattuck

explained.TherewasconfusioninWashingtonaboutwhattodointhisterrible

situation.

AfterthefallofSrebrenica,everythingbecameclear.Airpowerwasusedina

veryadequatefashion.Iwouldliketodrawattentiontothisbecausetheuseof

deterrencewasdiscreditedaftertheendoftheColdWar.Itwasseenassomething

relatedtonuclearweapons,butitisanageoldprincipleofusingmilitarypower.

Youshowbeforehandthatiftheoppositesidegoestoofar,therewillbeveryserious

consequences.TheSerbsunderstoodthismessage.Thiswasthemessagethatwas

deliveredattheLondonConferenceonJuly21,1995.85Iwish,ofcourse,thatthis

changeofcoursehadtakenplaceseveralweeksearlier,inwhichcaseitwouldhave

savedthelivesof8,000peopleinSrebrenica.

JOHNSHATTUCK:ApartfromtheorganizersandDavidHannay,Iamtheonly

personaroundthetablewhoattendedtheRwandaconferenceayearago.86Inboth

BosniaandRwanda,youhaveaverycomplexsetofmessages,whichessentially

serveasgreenlightstoaggressors.EventsinRwandawereshapedinpartby

decisionstakeninSomalia,asaresultoftheBlackhawkDownincident[October3-4,

1993]when18USRangerslosttheirlives.87ThedecisiontowithdrawthewholeUS

forceinSomalia[inMarch1994]served,insomerespects,asagreenlightforwhat 85SeeJohnDarnton,“AccordinLondon,”NewYorkTimes,July22,1995.TheLondonconferenceof16countriesinvolvedintheBosniawar,includingtheUnitedStates,Britain,andFrance,threatenedtheBosnianSerbswiththeuseof“substantialanddecisiveairpower”intheeventofanattackontheGoraždeandothersafeareas.NATObeganlarge-scalebombingofBosnianSerbtargetsonAugust30,twodaysaftertheshellingoftheMarkalemarketplaceinSarajevo,killing37people.86“InternationalDecision-MakingintheAgeofGenocide:Rwanda1990-1994,”Rapporteur’sReport,April6,2015.87ColinKeatingtoWellington,“SecurityCouncil:Rwanda,”NewZealandMissiontotheUN,C04408/NYK,May3,1994.

Page 58: International Decision Making in the Age of Genocide ......8 United Nations General Assembly, “The fall of Srebrenica,” A/54/549, November 15, 1999, henceforth “1999 UN Srebrenica

1-58

happenedlaterinRwanda.ThereweremanyelementstotheRwandangenocide,

butunderneathitallitwasthedangerthattheinternationalcommunitywas

essentiallysendingagreenlighttotheaggressors.Ithinkweseeasimilardynamic

inBosniawithrespecttotheseeventsin1993and1994.

Bytheway,alltheseeventsaretakingplaceinthesametimeframe.The

RwandagenocidebeganinApril1994(followingtheassassinationofRwandan

presidentJuvenalHabyarimanaonApril6).Weareinthissamepost-ColdWar

framework.Deterrenceisnolongeronthetableandnegotiationanddiscussion

appeartobethemoreappropriatetoolsfordealingwiththesecasesofsmallfire

aggressionoccurringinplaceswheretheworldisfallingapartaftertheendofthe

ColdWar.Itisnotuntillaterthatweadopttheconceptofdiplomacybackedby

force.Therecognitionthatacrediblethreatofforce,orsometimestheactualuseof

force,isnecessarytoachievediplomaticobjectivesunderpinsthewholeDayton

process.Duringthis1993-1994period,Idonotthinkthethreatofforcewas

credible.GeneralSmithhasmadethatpointveryeloquently,butIwantedtoaddthe

comparativeelement.Wearedealingwithalargergeopoliticalframework

characterizedbyfailedstates,massatrocities,andevengenocide.

Theonlywaytoengageontheseissuesistoputaspotlightonthemby

gatheringtheevidencethatisneededforpeopletounderstandwhatisgoingon.I

thoughtitwasabigmistakefortheUStosidetrackitshumanrightsreportingprior

tothehorrificeventsofJuly1995.Ourembassies,particularlytheembassyin

Croatia,certainlykeptthespotlighton[humanrightsviolations],butwithalldue

respectitwasnotsufficient.USpolicymakingwasnotunderpinnedbythedaily

reportingofwhatwasactuallyhappeningonthegroundthatwouldhavebeen

neededtomobilizepublicopinionaroundtheconceptofdiplomacybackedby

force.

DIEGOARRIA:UNSCResolution836wasoneofthemostdebated.Itwasvery

controversial.AstherepresentativeofVenezuela,Iabstainedtogetherwith

Page 59: International Decision Making in the Age of Genocide ......8 United Nations General Assembly, “The fall of Srebrenica,” A/54/549, November 15, 1999, henceforth “1999 UN Srebrenica

1-59

Pakistan.88Thenon-alignedgrouphadbeenthemoreenthusiasticsupportersofthe

SafeAreaconcept,butthisresolutiondidnotrespondatalltotheneedsofthe

situation.IbelievedthatwewouldhaveachievedmorebyarmingtheBosniansthan

byexpectingtheUnitedNationstodosomethingfortheBosnians.Ireadtoday

PresidentClinton’sconversationwithFrenchPresidentChirac[onJuly13,1995,

afterSrebrenicafell]inwhichheharshlycriticizestheBosniansforleaving

Srebrenicawithout“puttingupafight.”89Atthesametime,hesayswecannotarm

theBosnians.Thisexplainswhywewereagainsttheresolution.IrememberIhad

theBritishambassadorandtheFrenchambassadorinVenezuelapressingmy

ForeignMinistertoaskmetochangemyvote.Ididnotpickupthephone.Whenit

cametothevoteon836,Iabstained.

HadtheSecretariatWorkingpaperbeenadopted,weprobablywouldnot

havehadtheoutcomewedidinSrebrenica.90Thatpaperwasexactlywhatwe

wanted.IrememberenteringtheSecurityCouncilreadingthepaperandsaying,“My

god,finallywehavesomethingofsomesubstanceandimportance.”Then,allofa

sudden,itdisappeared.IthinkthatDavidHannayorJean-BernardMériméemust

havecalledBoutros-Ghaliandgothimtowithdrawthedocument,becauseit

suddenlyvanishedfromthetable.IhadalsopersonallywrittentoMadamOgata,

askinghertooutlinetherequirementsofarealSafeArea.Sheproducedadocument

alongthesamelinesastheSecretariat.Unfortunatelythiscourseofactionwasnot

adopted,whichiswhyweabstainedontheresolution.

ANDRÉERDÖS:WhenaCouncilresolutionispassedunderChapterVII,with

wordinglike"takeallnecessarymeasures,"thatwastheequivalentofthenuclear

option.Itgivesagreenlighttostrong,concreteenforcementmeasures.Wedonot

88UNGA,“ThefallofSrebrenica,”A/54/549,November15,1999.UNSCUNSCresolution836wasadoptedonJune4,1993,by13votestonone,withabstentionsfromPakistanandVenezuela.Arriaexplainedhisabstentionbypointingtoalackof“necessarymeansandresources”forimplementingtheresolutionandlackofclarityabouttheuseofforce.Hesaidthatuntilthesequestionsweresatisfactorilyanswered“thesafeareaswouldnotbesafeatall.”89AnthonyGardner&AlexanderVershbow,“TelconwithFrenchPresidentJacquesChirac,”TheWhiteHouse,July13,1995.90AnnantoStoltenberg,“Safeareas,”UNDPKO,MSC-870,May28,1993.

Page 60: International Decision Making in the Age of Genocide ......8 United Nations General Assembly, “The fall of Srebrenica,” A/54/549, November 15, 1999, henceforth “1999 UN Srebrenica

1-60

alwayshavethislanguageinCouncilresolutions.Thefactthatwedidnotfollowup

onthislanguageunderminedtheimageoftheUnitedNations.

Iwasrepresentinganon-permanentmembercountry.Wewerenotevena

non-alignedcountry.Wehadjustexperiencedatransitiontowardsdemocracy,and

wereknockingonthedoorsoftheEuropeanUnionandNATO.Wewerelookingat

theseguysasourfriendsandfutureallies.Wewereinaverydifficultsituation

becauseweweretheonlycountryontheCouncil[in1993]thatreallyunderstood

Yugoslavia.LookatthemapandyouwillseehowfarHungaryisfromBosnia.We

wereveryclosetotheAustrianposition,whowerealsoontheCouncilin1992,as

partofthewesterngroup.OtherCouncilmembersreferredusas“theHapsburgs.”It

wasveryfunny.WecouldhaveimaginedtheemperorFranzJosefsaying,“Mysons,

thisiswonderful,butwhydoyouneedtwoambassadors?“

IwasfrustratedbythelackofknowledgeaboutYugoslavia,notsomuchon

thepartofVenezuela,CapeVerdeorMorocco,butonthepartofthepermanent

members.Oneofthepermanentrepresentativestoldmeinaprivateconversation

thatBosniawasa“Titoistinvention.”Another,ratherdramaticexample:In2000,

Newsweekmagazinepublishedachronologyofimportant20thcenturyevents.The

entryfor1914wasasfollows:"YugoslavarchdukeFranzFerdinandassassinatedin

Sarajevo."WeweretheonlycountryontheCouncil—Isaythisinallmodesty—who

knewwhatBosniawas,geographicallyandhistorically.91

WhentheAustro-HungarianmonarchyoccupiedandlaterannexedBosnia,it

waspartofthemonarchy.TherewerethreegovernorgeneralsinBosnia,twoof

whomwereHungarians.WhenIwenttoSrebrenicainApril1993[aspartofthe

Arriadelegation],therewasanimmediatereactionfromtherefugeeswhenIsaidI

wasfromHungary.TheyknewwhatHungarywas.Forme,itwasagiftoflifethat

91BosniaandHerzegovinabecameaProtectorateofAustria-HungaryattheCongressofBerlininJuly1878followingtheRusso-Turkishwar.IthadpreviouslybeenunderOttomanruleformorethan300years,since1463,andremainedtechnicallyundertheadministrationoftheSultan.Austria-Hungaryannexedtheterritoryoutrightin1908,enragingpan-Slavicnationalists.AfterAustria-Hungary’sdefeatinWorldWarI,BosniajoinedtheSouthSlavKingdomofSerbs,Croats,andSlovenes,whichwaslaternamedYugoslavia.AfterthevictoryofMarshalTito’sCommunistPartisansinWorldWarII,BosniaandHerzegovinabecameoneofsixrepublicsofSocialistFederalRepublicofYugoslavia.

Page 61: International Decision Making in the Age of Genocide ......8 United Nations General Assembly, “The fall of Srebrenica,” A/54/549, November 15, 1999, henceforth “1999 UN Srebrenica

1-61

wehappenedtobeontheSecurityCouncilwhenwehadthisnumberoneissueof

Yugoslaviaaroundournecks.

Thewholeissueofforciblepopulationtransfers,andtheestablishmentof

ethnicallypurehomogeneouscountries,isalethaloneforcentralandEastern

Europeeventoday,despitethefactthattwodecadeshavepassedsincethese

events.ItisapoisonousPandora’sbox.Wewerefollowingwhatwashappeningand

wereafraidoftheimplications,whichwentwaybeyondtheunfortunatecountryof

BosniatotheentireareafromtheBalticstotheMediterranean.Wecommitteda

graveerrorinnottakingtheappropriatepreventivemeasures,withthenecessary

mandatesandfinancialresources.

Atthesametime,wewerenotabigplayer.Wewerenotapermanent

memberoftheSecurityCouncil,andhadnobluehelmetsontheground,unlikethe

British,theFrench,andothers.Wedidn'twanttogointoaneighboringcountry.

Thisdidnotpreventusfromexpressingourcriticismsoutloudastothe

mismanagementoftheconflict.Wewerenotalwaysprivytothebehindthedoor

consultations.

ObradKesic,right,withDavidRohde

Page 62: International Decision Making in the Age of Genocide ......8 United Nations General Assembly, “The fall of Srebrenica,” A/54/549, November 15, 1999, henceforth “1999 UN Srebrenica

1-62

OBRADKESIC:Somebodymentionedtheeffectivenessofthethreatofairstrikeson

theSerbleadershipinPale.Aswitheveryissuethatwearediscussing,thisisvery

complex.Itplayedoutindifferentwayswiththepoliticalleadershipandthe

militaryleadership.Thepoliticalleadershipwasconvincedthatthewarwouldend

throughnegotiations.Theythoughtthatany[foreign]interventionwouldupset

whattheysawasprogresstowardsasettlementtotheconflict.Asettlementof

courseinlinewithwhattheyweretryingtoachieve.

Themilitaryleadership,ontheotherhand,sawpossibleairstrikesasa

threattotheirabilitytoconductthewarsuccessfully.Theywouldtellthepolitical

leadership,“Yourindecisivenessisthreateningourtroopsandourabilitytohold

thisterritory.Weneedtotakeaction.”Thisculminateswhenthemilitary,andRatko

Mladić,askforadeclarationofwar.Theytriedtodothatseveraltimes.Thepolitical

leadershipalwaysturnedthemdown.

WespeculateabouttheBosnianarmysuccessfullylaunchingmilitary

operations[asaconsequenceofa“liftandstrike”policy],butthatisnotnecessarily

thecase.Thereisadisconnectbetweenadecisiontoarmoneofthepartiesand

theirabilitytousetheweapons.Firstofall,youwouldhaveupsethumanitarian

operations:youwouldnotbefeedingpeople.Second,theothersideisnotgoingto

passivelysitandwatchtheirenemiesbeingarmed.Suchastepwouldhaveforced

theRepublikaSrpskaleadershiptotakedecisivemilitaryaction.Itwouldhavealso

putpressureonSerbiatotakeactionaswell.“Liftandstrike”wasalittlebitofared

herring.Intheendtheonlydecisivechangetothemilitarybalanceofpowerwas

directinterventionbyNATOonthesideoftheBosnians.Nothingshortofthatwould

havechangedthemilitarybalance.Itcouldactuallyhaveledtosomethingtotally

differentthanpeoplehereareassuming.

CARLBILDT:IwasPrimeMinisterofSwedenin1993.Swedenwasnotheavily

involvedinthepoliticsofthewarinYugoslavia,butweweredeeplyaffected.We

tookroughly3,000refugeesaweekattheheightofthewar,roughlytheperiodthat

Page 63: International Decision Making in the Age of Genocide ......8 United Nations General Assembly, “The fall of Srebrenica,” A/54/549, November 15, 1999, henceforth “1999 UN Srebrenica

1-63

wearespeakingaboutatthemoment.92Wehadadeepinterestinsavingpeople

downtherebecauseweknewthatwewouldhavetohelpthemelsewhere.Itwasus

andtheAustriansandtheSwiss,andtosomeextenttheGermans,thatborethe

bruntoftherefugeeinflux.Thatwasoneofthereasonswhywedecidedtocommita

mechanizedbattalion.93

WehadatraditionofUNpeacekeeping,butwehadnotbeeninsucha

complicatedsituationsincetheCongo.Wesentinamechanizedbattaliontogether

withtheDanesandNorwegians,includingLeopardtanks,whichwasvery

controversialatthetime.WeendedupinthemiddleoftheCroat-Muslimfight[in

centralBosnia]theautumnof1993.Wewereappalledbytheabsenceofany

politicalstrategy,butwefeltahumanitarianimperativedriventoacertainextentby

pressurehometodowhateverwecouldabouttherefugeesituation.

TherehassubsequentlybeenadiscussioninSweden:didwedoanygood?I

thinkwedidanawfulamountofgoodinthesensethatwesaved"x"numberof

people.Whetherwecontributedtoapoliticalsolutionisdebatablebecausethatwas

wellaboveus.Welostlivesdownthereandsavedquitealotofpeople.Wehelpedto

stabilizeTuzlaregionforthedurationofthewar.

PETERGALBRAITH:WhatObraddescribedismoreorlessmyunderstandingof

whatactuallyhappened.Bythesummerof1995,thebalanceofpowerwasshifting.

AllowingarmstogettoBosniaviaCroatiawasabetteroptionthanhavingtheUS

unilaterallylifttheembargo.IftheUShaditselfliftedtheembargoUNPROFOR

wouldhavewithdrawn.InsteadofAmericanarms,theBosniansgotRussian

weapons,whichwereweaponstheyalreadyknewhowtouse.WhiletheRussian

governmentopposedliftingthearmsembargo,thefreemarketsystemmade

RussianweaponsreadilyavailabletoBosnians.However,BosnianSerbssawtheUS

Congressmovingtowardliftingthearmsembargo.Itwasatthatpointthatthey

decidedtheyneededcleanuptheirinternallines,eliminatetheenclaves,Srebrenica,

92See“Generosityof‘BigHearted’DanesisTestedbyInfluxofRefugees,”ChristianScienceMonitor,May18,1993.93Boutros-Ghali,“ReportoftheSecretary-GeneralPursuanttoResolution871(1993),”S/1994/300,March16,1994,page21.

Page 64: International Decision Making in the Age of Genocide ......8 United Nations General Assembly, “The fall of Srebrenica,” A/54/549, November 15, 1999, henceforth “1999 UN Srebrenica

1-64

Žepa,GoraždeandBihać.Obradisrightthatthewaywarendedwasthroughdirect

militaryintervention,butitwasinterventionbyCroatia,notbyNATO.

DAVIDHANNAY:BeforeweendthediscussionofUNSC836,Iwantedtoecho

MinisterMuratovićinsayingthatitwasverycomprehensive.Itprovidedthelegal

basisforBoutros-GhalitoaskNATOtoissueasuccessfulultimatumoverSarajevoin

February1994.ItwasalsothebasisforthemilitaryactionagainsttheBosnian

SerbsinAugustandSeptember1995afterSrebrenicafell.Therewasneveranew

mandate.Thereneverneededtobeanewmandate.The836mandatecoveredboth

thosemilitaryoptions.Therealquestionisnotwhatwaswrongwiththe836

mandatebutwhythemandatewasnotappliedmoreforcefullyandeffectively.

Therewasnothingwrongwiththemandate.

[EndofSession1]