notes - springer978-0-230-33924-8/1.pdf · notes preface 1. andrew taylor, “playing on the...
TRANSCRIPT
NOTES
Preface
1. Andrew Taylor, “Playing on the Margins: Bakhtin and the Smithfield
Decretals,” in Bakhtin and Medieval voices, edited by Thomas J. Farrell, 35.
Tampa: University Press of Florida, 1995.
2. Arlyn Diamond, “Introduction” to “Colloquium: The Afterlife of
Origins,” in Studies in the Age of Chaucer, edited by Frank Grady, The
New Chaucer Society, Washington University: University of Notre Dame
Press, Vol. 28, 2006, 219
3. Nick Halpern, The Everyday and the Prophetic. Madison: The University of
Wisconsin Press, 2003.
4. John Burrow, Gestures and Looks in Medieval Narrative. Cambridge Studies
in Medieval Literature. Cambridge: University of Cambridge, 2002.
5. James Simpson, Sciences and the Self in Medieval Poetry: Alan of Lille’s
Anticlaudianus and John Gower’s Confessio amantis. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, 1995.
6. Michel Foucault, The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences,
trans. of Les Mots et les choses. New York: Vintage, 1966,71
7. Karl M. Morrison, “I am You”: The Hermeneutics of Empathy in Western
Literature, Theology, and Art. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1988.
8. Thomas Nagel, The View from Nowhere. Oxford: Oxford University Press,
1986.
9. Gaston Bachelard. The Poetics of Space. Trans. Etienne Gilson. Boston:
Beacon Press, 1964. p. xxxv.
Introduction
1. Alexander Murray, Reason and Society in the Middle Ages. Oxford: Clarendon
Press, 1991, 206; Alfred W. Crosby, The Measure of Reality: Quantification
and Western Society, 1250- 1600. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
1999, Chapter 5, “Space,” esp. p. 100.
2. David C. Lindberg, “Science and the Early Church,” in God and Nature:
Historical Essays on the Encounter between Christianity and Science, edited
by David C. Lindberg and Ronald L. Numbers, eds., 19–48. Berkeley:
University of California Press, 1986.
N O T E S156
3. Steven Marrone, The Light of Thy Countenance: Science and Knowledge of
God in the Thirteenth Century (Vols. I and II). Leiden: Brill, 2001.
4. Marrone, “Henry of Ghent and Duns Scotus on the Knowledge of
Being,” Speculum, vol. 63, No. 1 ( Jan., 1988), 22 and 50–52: “In fact
it would seem that neither thinker was much interested in specifying
exactly what the intelligible light might be. Both [Robert Grosseteste
and William of Auvergne 1210–45] employed the image of illumination
not to lay out the precise epistemic or noetic conditions under which
knowledge of propositional truth could be attained but instead to exhibit
the intensities of cognitive certitude and show how they were ordered.
Under these constraints the image of light worked as shorthand for a
universal carrier of intelligibility, regardless of whether one took it to be
divine light, mind or simply truth itself. It was thus the image’s practical
function in a particular type of explanation rather than its metaphysical
or noetic import that was crucial, for it succeeded in making particularly
clear a view of the levels of certitude dependent, ironically, on Aristotle’s
schema for the sciences.”
5. It is useful to note Marrone’s distinctions between Pierre Duhem’s assess-
ment of the inf luence of medieval science on seventeenth- century science
and Alexandre Koyré’s view: Duhem argued that “medieval thinking
played an instrumental role, laying the foundations for most of the signif-
icant achievements of the seventeenth century,” but “Koyré believed the
opposite,” that “the essential attributes of modern science, on the level of
theory, praxis and results, were concocted from scratch in the seventeenth
century” (9).
6. Marrone, Light, 515. See note 7 for reference to Duns Scotus’s text.
7. Charles Norris Cochrane, Christianity and Classical Culture: A Study of
Thought and Action from Augustus to Augustine. Oxford: Clarendon Press,
1944: reprinted by Liberty Fund, Inc., from the 1944 edition (revised and
corrected from the original 1940 Clarendon Press edition), Indianapolis,
Indiana, 2003, 425.
8. A.H. Armstrong and R.A. Markus, Christian Faith and Greek Philosophy.
New York: Sheed and Ward, 1960, 39–41.
9. Katherine H. Tachau, Vision and Certitude in the Age of Ockham: Optics,
Epistemology and the Foundations of Semantics: 1250- 1345. New York: E.J.
Brill, 1988. 3, n. 2.
10. Mary Carruthers, The Craft of Thought: Meditation, Rhetoric, and the Making
of Images: 400- 1200. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
11. Carruthers cites Peter of Celle citing Augustine as his source, who “wrote
that in contrast to the direct vision of God there (ibi), here “spiritual seeing
is constructed by means of our recollection of images of corporeal things”
(73 and see note 49).
12. See Carruthers’s note on J.- P. Antoine’s essay about picture- space:
“Mémoire, Lieux, et Invention Spatiale” and his idea about “temporal
progression” (251, n. 77).
N O T E S 157
13. Andrzej Piotrowski, “Architecture and the Iconic Controversy,” in
Medieval Practices of Space, edited by Barbara A. Hanawalt and Michal
Kobialka, Medieval Cultures, Vol. 23, 101–127. Minneapolis: University
of Minnesota Press, 2000.
14. Marrone, 340, 523.
15. Light, 337. See also note 7: “Essentially this understanding of the
Augustinian position led Allan Wolter to remark that ‘the medieval the-
ory of analogy’ was rooted in Augustinian illumination.” (Wolter, The
Transcendentals and Their Function, pp. 32 and 40–43). See also Marrone,
“Henry of Ghent and Duns Scotus,” Speculum, 63, No. 1, Jan., 1988, 22
and 50–52.
16. Duns had “attacked Henry’s position on the analogical nature of mind’s
primitive notion of being by insisting that God was never known in a
common concept analogically signifying divinity and creatures but only in
one that was univocal to the two” (523).
17. Thomas Nagel, The View from Nowhere. Oxford: Oxford University Press,
1986, 163.
18. David C. Lindberg and Ronald L. Numbers (eds), God & Nature: Historical
Essays on the Encounter between Christianity and Science. Berkeley: University
of California Press, 1986.
19. Edward Grant, “Science and Theology in the Middle Ages,” in God and
Nature: Historical Essays on the Encounter between Christianity and Science,
edited by David C. Lindberg and Ronald L. Numbers, 49–75. Berkeley:
University of California Press, 1986.
20. “It was as if he brought to completion the efforts of Henry of Ghent and
Matthew of Aquasparta to set mind and its activity entirely in the world
while not forgetting its natural orientation towards God. Here was an
Aristotelianizing noetics and epistemology effectively harnessed to the
aspirations of an Augustinian cast of mind.” (531)
21. Suzanne Akbari, Seeing through the Veil: Optical Theory and Medieval
Allegory. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2004.
22. John of Salisbury, The Metalogicon of John of Salisbury: A Twelfth- Century
Defense of the Verbal and Logical Arts of the Trivium, trans. Daniel D.
McGarry, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1962.
23. See McGarry’s note, p. 5, n. 21: Metalogicon, probably from μeτά λογικών:
“about” or “on behalf of logic” or “logical studies” (the Trivium).
24. OED: Wyclif ’s use of the word “prudence” suggests the potential of the
word for considering practical as well as spiritual matters: OED, “Wyclif
Eph.iii 4 ‘As эe redinge mown vnderstonde my prudence in the mysteries
of Crist.” He is citing Ephesians 3:4: “As you reading, may understand my
knowledge in the mystery of Christ,” p. 2343.
25. Karl F. Morrison, “I Am You”: The Hermeneutics of Empathy in Western
Literature, Theology, and Art. Princeton, 1988, 182–83.
26. St. Augustine, The Trinity, Chapter XII, “On the Catechising of the
Uninstructed.”
N O T E S158
27. Gaston Bachelard, The Poetics of Space. Boston: Beacon Press, 1964,
xxxv.
28. Bruno Latour, “Visualization and Cognition: Thinking with Eyes and
Hands,” in Knowledge and Society: Studies in the Sociology of Culture Past
and Present: A Research Annual,edited by Henrika Kuklick and Elizabeth
Long, Vol. 6, 1–41, Greenwich: JAI Press Inc., 1986.
29. Nagel too has made use of James’s “art of fiction” by citing, in an essay
on “Concealment and Exposure” (1998), a passage from The Golden Bowl,
where Maggie knows of her husband’s deception, and her husband sees
that she knows. Nagel uses this Jamesian stand- off to demonstrate the
view that takes in the subjective and the objective at once: “What we can
tolerate having out in the open between us depends on what we think
we can handle jointly without crippling our relations for other purposes”
(15). “Concealment and Exposure” in Philosophy and Public Affairs, Vol.
27, no. 1 (Winter), 1998, 3–30.
30. Bruno Latour, “Visualization and Cognition: Thinking with Eyes and
Hands,” in Knowledge and Society: Studies in the Sociology of Culture Past
and Present: A Research Annual, edited by Henrika Kuklick and Elizabeth
Long, Vol. 6, Greenwich: JAI Press Inc., 1986, 1–41.
31. William Ivins, Jr., On the Rationalization of Sight with an Examination of
Three Renaissance Texts on Perspective. New York: Da Capo Press, repr.,
1975; Samuel Y. Edgerton, The Renaissance Discovery of Linear Perspective,
New York: Basic Books, 1975. See also Linda Tarte Holley, Chaucer’s
Measuring Eye, Houston: Rice University Press, 1990, 6–7.
32. Latour, 8, reviewing Edgerton’s point from “The Renaissance Artist as
a Quantifier,” in M.A. Hagen, ed., The Perception of Pictures, Vol. I, New
York: Academic Press, 1980, 189.
33. Latour, 9, citing Svetlana Alpers, The Art of Describing: Dutch Art in the 17th
Century. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1983, 51.
34. Latour, 10.
35. Latour, 7, citing Ivins, 1973, 9. See Holley, 5.
36. See Bachelard’s chapter 7, 148–2, esp. p. 159: “I haven’t the advantage
of actually seeing the works of the miniaturist of the Middle Ages,
which was the great age of solitary patience. But I can well imagine
this patience, which brings peace to one’s f ingers . . . Also one must love
space to describe it as minutely as though there were world molecules,
to enclose an entire spectacle in a molecule of drawing.” The remark-
able point, he says, is that “images cannot be measured. And even when
they speak of space, they change in size. The slightest value extends,
heightens, or multiplies them. Either the dreamer becomes the being of
his image, absorbing all its space or he confines himself in a miniature
version of his images” (173).
37. Bachelard makes a similar assertion in his introduction: “Space that has
been seized upon by the imagination cannot remain indifferent space
subject to the measures and estimates of the surveyor” (xxxii).
N O T E S 159
38. Bachelard goes on to recall “a great novelist”—Henri Bosco and his
Monsieur Carre- Benoit à campagne: “The only piece of furniture among all
that he possessed, for which Carre- Benoit felt real affection was his solid
oak filing cabinet, which he contemplated with satisfaction whenever
he passed in front of it. Here, at least, was something that was reliable,
that could be counted on. You saw what you were looking at and you
touched what you were touching. Its proportions were what they should
be, everything about it had been designed and calculated by a meticu-
lous mind for purposes of utility. And what a marvelous tool! It replaced
everything, memory as well as intelligence. In this well- fitted cube there
was not an iota of haziness or shiftiness. Once you had put something in
it, even if you put it a hundred or ten thousand more times, you could
find it again in the twinkling of an eye, as it were. Forty- eight drawers!
Enough to hold an entire well- classif ied world of positive knowledge. M.
Carre- Benoit attributed a sort of magic power to these drawers concern-
ing which he said that they were “the foundations of the human mind”
(77). Bachelard reminds his reader that “this is said by a very common-
place man . . . For with this filing cabinet [Carre- Benoit] has succeeded in
embodying the dull administrative spirit.”
39. Stephen G. Nichols, “The New Medievalism: Tradition and Discontinuity
in Medieval Culture,” in The New Medievalism, edited by Marina S.
Brownlee, Kevin Brownlee, and Stephen G. Nichols, 4. Baltimore: The
Johns Hopkins University Press, 1991.
40. Foucault, Michel. The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences,
trans. of Les Mots et les choses, New York: Vintage, 1966, esp. 50–60.
41. Tachau makes interesting use of this same passage from Chaucer to dem-
onstrate how—after the 1340s and the Parisian ferment—“we merely
reach an important watershed in the creation of the rich noetic legacy
that medieval scholastics bequeathed to subsequent generations of intel-
lectuals and to culture more generally” (vii).
42. Marjorie Hope Nicholson, The Breaking of the Circle: Studies in the Effect
of the “New Science” on Seventeenth- Century Poetry. New York: Columbia
University Press, 1960.
43. Nicholas Howe, “The Landscape of Anglo- Saxon England: Inherited,
Invented, Imagined,” in Inventing Medieval Landscape, edited by John
Howe and Michael Wolfe, 92–112. Tampa: University Press of Florida,
2002.
44. Michel de Certeau, The Practice of Everyday Life, trans. Steven Rendall,
Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988.
45. Dorothy Hartley, Lost Country Life. New York: Pantheon Books, 1979,
57. Isak Dinesen’s telling of the legend of Sorrow- Acre directs us to the
confrontation of love and justice measured out by a mother’s brave work
to cut a hayfield in a day’s time in order to save her son’s life.
46. J. A. Raftis, A Small Town in Late Medieval England: Godmanchester, 1278-
1400. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies, 1982, 95.
N O T E S160
47. M.- D. Chenu, Nature, Man and Society in the Twelfth Century: Essays on New
Theological Perspectives in the Latin West, sel., ed., and trans. by Jerome Taylor
and Lester K. Little, 111. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1997.
48. Edith Wilks Dolnikowski, Thomas Bradwardine: A View of Time and a
Vision of Eternity in Fourteenth- Century Thought. New York: E.J. Brill,
1995. Dolnikowski’s work clarifies much of the language, principles,
and arguments of this “substantial reevaluation of all ancient authori-
ties.” Especially suggestive for me is her explanation of Aristotle’s distinc-
tion between “successive” and “continuous beings,” borrowing, she says,
“from the language of geometry” (106). The uncanny effect is an assured
articulation of Foucault’s questions about “the order of things.”
49. Alexandre Koyré, “Le vide et l’espace infini au XIV siècle,” 17, in
Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du moyen âge,1949, 45–91, and in
Metaphysics and Measurement, Cambridge: Harvard University Press,
1968, esp. 1–15.
50. Koyré, Metaphysics and Measurement, 4.
51. It is rather natural to think here of Chaucer’s f light to the House of
Fame—the subject of my chapter 2—where Geffrey’s f light grants an
impressive, even poignant, opportunity for considering one’s place in the
order of things.
52. Koyré, “Le vide et l’espace infini au XIV siècle,” 17, 1949, 90–91.
53. Here Koyré is citing Bradwardine: De Causa Dei in Thomae Bradwardini
Archiespiscopi Olim Cantuarensis, De Causa Dei contra Pelagium et de Virtule
causarum ad suos Martonenses Libri tres. Londini, MDCXVIII. Koyré
explains (n. 3, p. 80) that De Causa Dei is made up of three books: The
first is consecrated to God; the second, to man; the third, au problème de la
concordance de la liberté humaine avec la toute- puissance de Dieu(81).
54. Frank Kermode, The Sense of an Ending. New York: Oxford University
Press, 2000.
55. Marrone, The Light of Thy Countenance, 249.
56. Koyré, 87.
57. Marrone, “Henry of Ghent and Duns Scotus,” 53.
58. De Certeau, 169, citing Borges quoted by Gérard Genette, Figures, Paris:
Seuil, 1966, 123.
59. Walter Benjamin, “The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical
Reproduction,” in The Critical Tradition, edited by David H. Richter, esp.
sections I and V, 1109–1110. Boston: Bedford Books, 1998.
60. Geoffrey Chaucer, Troilus and Criseyde, The Riverside Chaucer, edited by
Larry D. Benson, third edition. Boston: Houghton Miff lin Company,
1987. References to Chaucer’s text will be from this edition unless other-
wise noted.
61. Albert of Saxony, Edward Grant, Planets, Stars, and Orbs: The Medieval
Cosmos, 1200- 1687. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994, 171,
n. 8, and cited with pointed usefulness by Donnalee Dox, “Theatrical
Space, Mutable Space, and the Space of Imagination: Three Readings of
N O T E S 161
the Croxton Play of the Sacrament,” in Medieval Practices of Space, edited by
Barbara A. Hanawalt and Michal Kobialka, Medieval Cultures, Volume
23, 178, n. 24. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2000.
62. Peter Brown, “The Containment of Symkyn: The Function of Space in
the Reeve’s Tale,” The Chaucer Review, 14, 3, 225–36. Brown shows “pre-
cisely how Chaucer systematically seeks to make organic space a part of
his material realism” (226).
63. Dox, 183.
64. Guillaume de Deguileville, The Pilgrimage of Human Life (Le Pèlerinage de
la vie humaine), trans. Eugene Clasby, vol. 76, Series B, Garland Library of
Medieval Literature. New York: Garland Publishing, Inc., 1992, 40–44.
65. Terry Eagleton, The Ideology of the Aesthetic. Oxford: Basil Blackwell,
1991, 339.
1 The Nun’s Priest’s Tale: Bookspace as Public Plaza
1. Gaston Bachelard, Poetics of Space. Boston: Beacon Press, 1969.
2. Michel Lefebvre, Rhythmanalysis: Space, Time and Everyday Life, trans.
Stuart Elden and Gerald Moore. London: Continuum Press, 2004 and
Critique of Everyday Life: Volume One, trans. John Moore. London: New
Left Books, 1991.
3. Medieval Practices of Space, edited by Barbara A. Hanawalt and Michal
Kobialka, ix. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2000.
4. David Herman, Unpublished manuscript. See Story Logic: Problems and
Possibilities of Narrative. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2002.
And see also Narratologies: New Perspectives on Narrative Analysis, edited by
David Herman. Columbus: The Ohio State University Press, 1999.
5. Dick Harrison, Medieval Space: The Extent of Microspatial Knowledge in Western
Europe during the Middle Ages. Lund: Lund University Press, 1996, 17.
6. Michel de Certeau, The Practice of Everyday Life, trans. Steven Rendall.
Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984. See also Michal Kobialka,
“Staging Place/Space in the Eleventh- Century Monastic Practices” in
Medieval Practices of Space, 1–36.
7. Kathleen Biddick, “Ethnography and City Views,” in Medieval Practices
of Space, eds. Barbara A. Hanawalt and Michael Kobialka, Minneapolis:
University of Minnesota Press, 2000, 234–36.
8. Steven Justice, Rebellion and Writing in England in 1381. Berkeley:
University of California Press, 1994, 258.
9. G.R. Owst, Literature and Pulpit in Medieval England, Second edition.
Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1961.
10. Jill Mann, Ysengrimus: Text with Translation, Commentary and
Introduction. New York: Brill, 1987.
11. Kenneth Varty, Reynard, Renart, Reinaert and Other Foxes in Medieval
England: The Iconographic Evidence. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University
Press, 1999.
N O T E S162
12. Lilian Randall. Images in the Margins of Illuminated Manuscripts. Berkeley:
University of California Press, 1966.
13. Johan Huizinga, Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play- Element in Culture.
Boston: Beacon Press, 1955, 25.
14. E.W. Holloway, Reynard the Fox, a poem in twelve cantos, translated from the
German by E. W. Holloway, with thirty- seven engravings on steel, after designs by H.
Leutemann. Dresden: Publications for the Proprietors of A. H. Payne, 1852.
15. Harry J. Owens, The Scandalous Adventures of Reynard the Fox, a Modern
American Version by Harry J. Owens. New York: A.A. Knopf, 1945.
16. Stephen Justice, Rebellion and Writing in England in 1381. Berkeley:
University of California Press. 1994, 224.
17. Walter Benjamin, “The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction”
in The Critical Tradition: Classic Texts and Contemporary Trends, edited by.David
H. Richter, 1106–22.Boston: Bedford Books, 1998.
18. Justice, 188.
19. Michael Riffaterre, “The Mind’s Eye: Memory and Textuality,” The New
Medievalism, edited by Marina S. Brownlee, Kevin Brownlee, and Stephen
G. Nichols, 33. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1991.
20. Sherri Olson, A Chronicle of All That Happens: Voices from the Village Court
in Medieval England. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies,
1996.
21. J.A. Raftis, A Small Town in Late Medieval England: Godmanchester, 1278-
1400. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1982, 95.
22. Daniel Lord Small, “The Linguistic Cartography of Property and Power
in Late Medieval Marseille,” in Medieval Practices of Space ,eds. Barbara A.
Hanawalt and Michal Kobialka, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota
Press, 2000, 47.
23. Small cites Derek Keene’s “The Property Market in English Towns A. D.
1100- 1600,” in D’une ville a l’autre, eds. Giulio Bollati and Paolo Fossati,
where Keene makes the point that “cartographic conversations were not
particular to Marseille” but were taking place throughout Europe, espe-
cially after shifts in properties as a result of the Black Death.
24. Charles Burroughs, “Spaces of Arbitration and the Organization of Space
in Late Medieval Italian Cities,” in Medieval Practices of Space, eds. Barbara
A. Hanawalt and Michal Kobialka, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota
Press, 2000, 70.
25. Michael Camille, “Signs of the City: Place, Power, and Public Fantasy
in Medieval Paris,” in Medieval Practices of Space, edited by Barbara A.
Hanawalt and Michal Kobialka, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota
Press, 2000, 1–36.
26. De Certeau, 123.
27. Harrison, Medieval Space, 13–14.
28. Austin Lane Poole, From Domesday Book to Magna Carta: 1087- 1216,
Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1951, 53: “It was seemingly only in the last
resort that sheep were sent to the butcher.”
29. Justice, 5.
N O T E S 163
30. Justice, 37.
31. Justice, 66.
32. James Simpson, 274.
33. De Certeau, 123.
34. Andrew Taylor, “Playing on the Margins: Bakhtin and the Smithfield
Decretals,” Bakhtin and Medieval Voices, edited by Thomas J. Farrell, 31.
Tampa: University Press of Florida, 1995.
35. Henri Lefebvre, Rhythmanalysis Space, Time and Everyday Life, trans. Stuart
Elden and Gerald Moore. London: Continuum, 2004, 82.
36. Information for this item appears at http://wwwlib.umi.com/eebo/
image/31557.
37. De Certeau, 165–76.
38. Austin Lane Poole, From Domesday Book to Magna Carta: 1087- 1216.
Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1951.
39. Werner Rösener, Peasants in the Middle Ages, trans. Alexander Stützer.
Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1992, 150–55.
40. Riffaterre, in The New Medievalism, 36–37.
41. Nancy Mason Bradbury, “Popular- Festive Forms and Beliefs in Robert
Mannyng’s Handlyng Synne” in Bakhtin and Medieval Voices, 179..
42. Andrew Taylor, “Playing on the Margins: Bakhtin and the Smithfield
Decretals,” 17–37, in Bakhtin and Medieval Voices, ed.Thomas Farrell, 36.
Tampa: University Press of Florida, 1995.
43. Gary Saul Morson, “Essential Narrative: Tempics and the Return of
Process,” in Narratologies: New Perspectives on Narrative Analysis, edited by
David Herman, 277–314. Columbus: Ohio State University, 2000.
44. St. Augustine’s Confessions with an English translation by William Watts,
1631, in two volumes, London: Heinemann, 1912. Further references to
St. Augustine’s Confessions will be to this translation.
45. De Certeau, 127, “Es war einmal ein Lattenzaun/mit Zwischenraum,
hindurchzu- /schaun.”
2 The House of Fame: “I wot myself best how y stonde.”
1. Wolfgang Clemen, Chaucer’s Early Poetry, tr. C.A. M. Sym, 1963, 98. See
note to l. 712 in The Riverside Chaucer, p. 983.
2. De Certeau, 127.
3. Paul Zumthor, La mesure du monde: représentation de l’espace au Moyen Age,
Paris, Éditions du Seuil, 1993, 390.
4. Stephen Nichols, “The New Medievalism: Tradition and Discontinuity
in Medieval Culture,” in The New Medievalism, edited by Marina S.
Brownlee, Kevin Brownlee, and Stephen G. Nichols, Baltimore: The
Johns Hopkins Press, 1991, 15. Nichols cites Hans Blumberg, The
Genesis of the Copernican World, Cambridge: MIT Press, 1987, 138, where
Blumberg points out the “diminished efficacy of [the material world]
that is far removed from the purity and regularity of what it comes from,
being, as it were, multiply refracted [my emphasis].”
N O T E S164
5. See Benjamin Koonce’s Chaucer and the Tradition of Fame: Symbolism in The
House of Fame, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1966, 151, where
he shows us the Ovidian image of Fame’s house and its central position in
the cosmos: Ryght even in myddes of the weye/Betwixen hevene, erthe, and see
(714–15). Professor Koonce’s point is that Chaucer is perfectly satisfied to
use the centrality of Fame’s house as a “pagan inversion of the Scriptural
house of God, the divine center of man’s spiritual life”—suggesting a
“mid- point” (151–44).
6. John of Salisbury, The Metalogicon of John of Salisbury: A Twelfth- Century
Defense of the Verbal and Logical Arts of the Trivium, trans., Daniel D.
McGarry, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1962, IV. 17, 229.
Citations will be from this text throughout unless otherwise noted.
7. Michel Lefebvre, Critique of Everyday Life: Volume One, trans. John
Moore, London: New Left Books, 1991, and Rhythmanalysis: Space,
Time and Eveyrday Life, trans. Stuart Elden and Gerald Moore, London:
Continuum Press, 2004; Michel de Certeau, The Practice of Everyday
Life, trans. Steven Rendall. Berkeley: University of California Press,
1988.
8. Sheila Delaney makes the point that fantomes, I, 493, may refer to literary
illusions as well as false dreams. See the note on l. 493, Riverside Chaucer,
Explanatory Notes, 981.
9. See Holley, p. 111.
10. Robert D. Richardson, William James: In the Maelstrom of American
Modernism, New York: Houghton Miff lin, 2006, 501.
11. See Nichols, n. 3, 23.
12. James Simpson, Sciences and the Self in Medieval Poetry: Alan of Lille’s
Anticlaudianus and John Gower’s Confessio amantis, Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press, 1995.
13. Howard Bloch, “The Medieval Text—“Guigemar”—As a Provocation to
the Discipline of Medieval Studies” in The New Medievalism, 99–112.
14. Isabel Colgate, The Shooting Party. New York: Viking Press, 1982.
3 The Book of the Duchess: The Space of Self
1. C.S. Lewis, The Allegory of Love: A Study in Medieval Tradition. New York:
Oxford University Press, 1958.
2. Georg Lukács, “The Ideology of Modernism,” in The Critical Tradition:
Classic Texts and Contemporary Trends, edited by David H. Richter,
1126–41. Boston: Bedford Books, 1998.
3. Michel de Certeau, The Practice of Everyday, trans. Steven Rendall, 86.
Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988.
4. Paul Ricouer, The Rule of Metaphor: Multi- disciplinary Studies of the Creation
of Meaning in Language, trans. Robert Czerny with Kathleen McLaughlin
and John Costello, SJ. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1977, 137ff.
5. Gaston Bachelard, 9.
N O T E S 165
6. Stephen Kruger, Dreaming in the Middle Ages. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, 1996, 130.
7. Karl F. Morrison, “I Am You: The Hermeneutics of Empathy in Western
Literature, Theology, and Art. Princeton: Princeton University Press,
1988.
8. Thomas Pynchon, The Crying of Lot 49. Philadelphia: N.B. Lippincott,
1966, 13.
9. De Certeau, Chapter IX, “Spatial Stories,” 117–30.
10. De Certeau, 89.
11. Karl F. Morrison, “I Am You”: The Hermeneutics of Empathy in Western
Literature, Theology, and Art. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1988,
passim, esp. XIX–XXVI of his introduction.
12. Morrison, 196.
13. See OED under nought, 7c: “Arith. a cipher. Noughts and crosses. See Ought
sb.3. vulgar corruption nought in sense “cipher.” “Probably originating
in an erroneous division of ‘a nought’ as ‘an ought’; but by many associ-
ated with the figure ‘O’ of the cipher, which they take as the initial O
of ought. Oughtes and crosses.” In any case, the knight is as “still” as
nothing, as zero, a mere cipher now. See Paul Acker, “The Emergence of
an Arithmetical Mentality in Middle English Literature” in The Chaucer
Review, Vol. 28, No. 3, 1994, 293–302, esp. n. 50.
14. Morrison, 174, 178, 180.
15. Rose Zimbardo, “The Book of the Duchess and the Dream of Folly,” The
Chaucer Review, 18, 1984, 329- 46.
16. Robert Jordan, “Heteroglossia and Chaucer’s Man of Law’s Tale,”
in Bakhtin and Medieval Voices, edited by Thomas Farrell, 90. Tampa:
University Press of Florida, 1995.
17. Albert Cook, Temporalizing Space: The Triumphant Strategies of Piero della
Francesca. New York: Peter Lang, 1992, 21.
18. Samuel Y. Edgerton, Jr., The Heritage of Giotto’s Geometry: Art and Science
on the Eve of the Scientific Revolution. Ithaca: Cornell University Press,
1991, p. 79 and n. 44.
19. Simpson, 244.
20. Patrick J. Gallacher, The Structural Uses of the Theme of Speech in John
Gower’s Confessio Amantis, Doctoral Dissertation, University of Illinois,
1966.
21. Richard Eales, Chess: The History of a Game. New York: Facts on File
Publications, 1985. See especially chapter two, “The Symbolic Game
of the Middle Ages,” 39–70. As a matter of fact, Eales uses The Book of
the Duchess to demonstrate the allegorical uses of the chess game, in this
case, “making the whole game depend on the loss of his queen” (62).
It is the case that after 1475 the queen gains more force in the game
(71–77).
22. In this instance, de Certeau is citing the historian and anthropologist,
Marcel Détienne, in the course of discussing storytelling. He writes, “In
this space of textual practices, as in a chessgame in which the pieces, rules
N O T E S166
and players have been multiplied out to the scale of a whole literature,
Déteinne has an artist’s sense for the innumerable moves that have already
been executed” (80).
23. See a helpful opposing view where number and allegory work in The
Book of the Duchess: Russell A. Peck, “Theme and Number in Chaucer’s
Book of the Duchess,” in Silent Poetry, edited by Alastair Fowler. London:
Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1970.
24. See Morrison’s note on Baldus de Ubaldis, a medieval lawyer who argues
that since “[f ]iction imitates nature,” then “fiction has a place only where
truth can have a place,” xxiii and notes 10 and 12.
25. Morrison, 174, n. 11.
26. John Keats, “To George and Georgiana Keats,” March 17 [1819] in English
Romantic Poetry and Prose, edited by Russell Noyes, 1224–26. New York:
Oxford University Press, 1956.
4 Perle: The Pedagogy of Soul and Self
1. The Poems of the Pearl Manuscript: Pearl, Cleanness, Patience, Sir Gawain
and the Green Knight, edited by Malcolm Andrew and Ronald Waldron.
Berkeley: University of California Press, 1982. References to Perle will
come from this edition unless otherwise indicated.
2. A.C. Spearing, “Poetic Identity,” in The Companion to the Gawain- Poet,
35–51. Cambridge: D.S. Brewer, 1997.
3. Bachelard, 212: Bachelard is citing Jean Hippolite: La Psychanalyse, No.,
1, 1956, 35.
4. See Andrew and Waldron’s note to ll. 425–32, 74, on the uses of this
image of the Phoenix to describe either Christ or Mary.
5. See Gordon’s note to the Perle- poet’s use of зe, Appendixes, pp. 105–106:
One aspect of French linguistic inf luence on Pearl is the use of зe pl. as
the polite form of the singular “you,” and an understanding of this usage
is of importance for a full appreciation of the poem.
Зe (and yow, your) are used, in addressing one person, only to impart a
tone of formality or humility. (The workmen were being insolent in using
þou to the lord, 556). Thus the Pearl in her first greeting uses зe, 257–58,
after which she uses þou, &c., throughout. The Dreamer uses þou through-
out (and thus shows plainly that he is addressing no stranger . . . The Pearl
often uses зe with a general reference: “all you people in the world.” So
858. This probably explains зe in 698, and similarly your 497, yor, 761, yow
951. Also possibly зe 307, 308, your 305, 306 . . . Though the distinction
between þou, зe (between equals) was beginning to be blurred, it cannot
be neglected in the fourteenth century, especially any work containing
dialogue. Þou was still in full colloquial use, and the substitution of зe was
seldom without at least a change of tone; and the failure to use зe could in
certain circumstances be either insolent or forward.
6. Spearing, Companion, 41.
N O T E S 167
7. Spearing cites K. Brownlee, Poetic Identity in Guillaume de Machaut,
Madison, 1984.
8. John of Salisbury is citing Hugh of St. Victor, Summ. Sent., I, I: De
Sacram., Leg. Nat. et Script.; and De Sacramentis, I, 10, c. I (n Migne, P. L.,
CLXXVI, 43, 35, and 330), 223
9. Spearing continues this point as he closes his essay “Poetic Identity”:
The protagonist understands he has moved from suffering to awe.
Spearing cites W.A. Davenport, The Art of the Gawain- Poet, London,
Athlone Press, 1978: “Any inclination to judge is forestalled because he
judges himself ” (50). ( See Elizabeth Salter, “Medieval Poetry and the
Figural View of Reality,” in Proceedings of the British Academy, 54, 1968,
73–92.)
10. See Gordon’s note on l. 107, p. 51.
11. Ruth Harvey, The Inward Wits: Psychological Theory in the Middle Ages and
the Renaissance. London: The Warburg Institute: University of London,
1975, 28 and n. 76.
12. F. Edward Cranz, “The Reorientation of Western Thought circa 1100
A.D.,” Four unpublished lectures. Department of History, Connecticut
College, New London, 1984.
13. Samuel Y. Edgerton, Jr., The Heritage of Giotto’s Geometry: Art and Science on
the Eve of the Scientific Revolution. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1991.
14. Elizabeth Salter, “Medieval Poetry and the Figural View of Reality,” in
Proceedings of the British Academy, 54, 1968, 73–92.
15. Salter, p. 77, citing Erich Auerbach from Mimesis, trans. W. R. Trask ,
New York, 1957, and from his lecture “Figura.”
16. A.J. Minnis and A.B. Scott, eds., Medieval Literary Theory and Criticism—
c.1100- c.1375, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991, 239, citing Thomas
Aquinas, Summa theologiae, i (Ia I), edited by T. Gilby (London and New
York, 1964, 32–40, with the permission of Eyre and Spottiswoode,
London.
17. Minnis and Scott, 200.
18. Minnis and Scott, 196.
19. Minnis and Scott, 236, 6. Bonaventure: “On the Mode of Expounding
Holy Scripture.”
20. Minnis and Scott, 239.
21. Gordon reads myry as “fair” for l. 781, certainly a reasonable linguistic
choice for myry. But the opportunity is too charming, given what we
know of this curmudgeonly dreamer and the thoroughly easy spirit of the
lady, not to read “merry” here.
22. Perle, note to l. 492, p. 63. See also The Poems of the Pearl Manuscript,
edited by Malcolm Andrew and Ronald Waldron. Berkeley: University
of California Press, 1982, 312. Andrew and Waldron argue for reading
date at l. 492 as rank: “to dere a date: ‘too exalted a rank,’ ” (p. 77).
23. One line seems to have been lost at 472. See Gordon, 17, and note to l.
472
N O T E S168
24. Robert M. Jordan, The Shape of Creation: The Aesthetic Possibilities of
Inorganic Structure. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1967.
5 Patience: The Space of Play
1. St. Augustine, Confessions, with an English translation by William Watts,
Vol. 2, 1631, London: Heinemann, 1912.
2. In fact, if we subtract the two lines containing the image itself, we are
within one line of the numerical center.
3. “Le vide et l’espace infini au XIV siecle,” Archives d’historie doctrinale et
littérâire du moyen age, 17, 1949, 45–91:
4. Koyré, “Le vide,” 79.
5. The Holy Bible, Jonas, IV, 9. Translated from the Latin Vulgate and
Diligently compared with Other Editions in Divers Languages, Douai,
A.YD. 1609; Rheims, A.D. 1582. Published as revised and annotated
by authority with a preface by the Cardinal Archbishop of Westminster,
London: Burns and Oates, 1914; Belgium, 1964.
6. Patience in A Book of Middle English, 2nd edition, edited by J.A. Burrow
and Thorlac Turville- Petre. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1996, l. 425.
References to Patience—text, notes, and glosses—will be to this edition
unless otherwise noted.
7. Morrison, see chapter 4, “Malevolent Sympathy,” and especially p. 78.
8. Max Jammer, Concepts of Space: The History of Theories of Space in Physics.
New York: Dover Publications, 1993, 31–32.
9. Invaluable information for the introductory remarks to this chapter come
from Max Jammer; Edward Grant. Much Ado about Nothing. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press, 1981; Grant, Planets, Stars, and Orbs: The
Medieval Cosmo, 1200- 1687. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
1994; Edith Wilks Dolnikowski, Thomas Bradwardine: A View of Time
and a Vision of Eternity in Fourteenth- Century Thought. New York: Brill,
1995; God and Nature: Historical Essays on the Encounter between Christianity
and Science, edited by David C. Lindberg and Ronald L. Numbers,
Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986; H. Lamar Crosby, Jr.,
Thomas of Bradwardine: His Tractatus de Proportionibus: Its Significance for
the Development of Mathematical Physics, Madison: The University of
Wisconsin Press, 1961.
10. Johan Huizinga, Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play Element in Culture,
Boston: The Beacon Press, 1955. See especially chapter V, “Play and
War” and chapter VI, “Playing and Knowing.”
11. Anonymous, Patience in A Book of Middle English, J.A. Burrow and Thorlac
Turville- Petre, eds., Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 2001, 161.
12. The Poems of the Pearl Manuscript, edited by Malcolm Andrew and
Ronald Waldron, York Medieval Texts (second series). Berkeley:
University of California Press, 1978. I like Andrew and Waldron’s
glosses on mere: “sea” in the present line (112) but “boundary” in l.
N O T E S 169
320. I would read “boundary” here in l. 112 so that the sense of con-
tainment works with the sea as it does with the mountain in l. 320. As
Andrew and Waldron point out, however, the poet is closely follow-
ing Jonas here. Jonas II, 7.
13. Hurrok is the word for the part of the boat between the bench where the
rower sits and the back end of the boat. O.E.D.
14. Ruchen, I would argue, is “folded,” a milliner’s term for a special kind of
fold. See O.E.D. So the sailors fold their gear according to the guiding
wind. See the glosses of Burrow and Turville- Petre, especially ll. 103–4:
“ ‘They swiftly weigh their anchors at the windlass, quickly fastened to
the bowsprit the bowline kept in reserve.’ The bawelyne is spare because it
is used only in difficult sailing conditions to hold the sail steady.” And ll.
106–8: “They set a course to port and gain the luff (turn into the wind).
The favourable wind at their back finds the belly of the sail; it turns this
fine ship swiftly from the harbour.”
15. Burrow and Turville- Petre, “Syntax,” 5.3.3, p. 41. “This kind of dative
[the pleonastic me] expresses the speaker’s interest in the fact stated.” The
use, the editors go on to say, is familiar in this poet’s work.
16. Jammer, 19. See Book 10 of Aristotle’s Physics.
17. Edward Grant. Much Ado, esp. pp. 135–44.
18. St. Augustine, Confessions, VII, v, Watts.
19. Grant, Much Ado, 140.
20. Grant, chapter 5: “The Historical Roots of the Medieval Concept of
an Infinite, Extracosmic Void Space” and Chapter 6: “Late Medieval
Conceptions of Extracosmic (“Imaginary”) Void Space,” 105–147. Grant
offers a clear and solid “conceptual history” of these questions as ground
for the f lourishing scientific community of the sixteenth and seventeenth
centuries. See especially, p. 144 with n. 127.
21. But see also p. 143 with its n. 124, where Grant argues against Koyré’s
point “that Bradwardine formulated the paradoxical conception of
imaginary space by uniting in the same mind ‘la notion théologique de
l’infinité divine avec la notion géométrique de l’infinité spatiale’ (“Le
vide et l’espace infini,” 91).
22. H. Lamar Crosby, Jr., Thomas Bradwardine: His Tractatus de Proportionibus:
Its Significance for the Development of Mathematical Physics. Madison: The
University of Wisconsin Press, 1961, 7.
23. Dolnikowski, 204, and especially chapter seven: “Time in the De Causa
Dei.”
24. Dolnikowski, p. 185 and esp. n. 56.
6 The Cloud of Unknowing: The Dimensionless Space
of the Seeking Spirit
1. The Cloud of Unknowing, edited by Patrick J. Gallacher, Medieval
Institute Publications, Kalamazoo: Western Michigan University, 1997,
N O T E S170
Introduction, 259. References in the text will be to this edition, unless
otherwise noted, and are cited by chapter and line number.
2. Edward Grant, “Science and Theology in the Middle Ages,” in God and
Nature: Historical Essays on the Encounter between Christianity and Science.
Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986, p. 62.
3. Gallacher, Introduction, citing his translation of Thomas Gallus and
apparent inf luence on the Cloud- author, p. 7.
4. Morrison, p. 40, n. 15, citing Augustine De cat. rud., 12.17, Corp. Christ.,
ser. Lat., 46, p. 141, Tr. In Ev. Johan., 21.7.8 (Corp. Christ., ser. Lat., 36,
216–17.
5. Simpson, 230.
6. Simpson, 133.
7. Simpson, 7.
8. Simpson, 2.
9. Dolnikowski, 173.
10. Hodgson, 186, n. 17/16–18, citing Du Cange, seventeenth- century glos-
sator of medieval Latin.
11. Dolnikowski, 69, n. 80.
12. Hodgson, The Book of Privy Counselling, p. 153, l. 26–27.
13. Anonymous “Mystical Prayer” in English Mystics of the Middle Ages, ed.
Barry Windeatt, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1994, 106–7.
Epilogue
1. Bachelard, Poetics of Space, p. xxxv
2. John Burrow, Essays on Medieval Literature. Oxford: Clarendon Press,
1984, 145.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Primary Texts
St. Augustine of Hippo. Confessions with an English translation by William
Watts, 1631, in two volumes. London: Heinemann, 1912.
The Holy Bible. Translated from the Latin Vulgate and Diligently compared with
Other Editions in Divers Languages, Douai, A.D. 1609; Rheims, A.D. 1582.
Published as revised and annotated with a preface by the Cardinal Archbishop
of Westminster. London: Burns and Oates, 1914; Belgium, 1964.
The Cloud of Unknowing, edited by Patrick J. Gallacher, Medieval Institute
Publications. Kalamazoo: Western Michigan University Press, 1997.
The Cloud of Unknowing and The Book of Privy Counselling, edited by Phyllis
Hodgson, Early English Text Society. London: Oxford University Press,
1958.
Chaucer, Geoffrey. The Riverside Chaucer, edited by Larry D. Benson. Boston:
Houghton Miff lin Company, 1987.
Guillaume de Deguileville. The Pilgrimage of Human Life (Le Pèlerinage de la vie
humaine) trans. Eugene Clasby, Vol. 76, Series B, Garland Library of Medieval
Literature. New York: Garland Publishing, Inc. 1992, 40–44.
John of Salisbury. The Metalogicon of John of Salisbury: A Twelfth- Century Defense of
the Verbal Arts of the Trivium, trans. Daniel D. McGarry. Berkeley: University
of California Press, 1962.
Patience, A Book of Middle English, second edition, edited by J.A. Burrow and
Thorlac Turville- Petre. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1996.
Patience, in The Poems of the Pearl Manuscript, edited by Malcolm Andrew and
Ronald Waldron. York Medieval Texts (second series). Berkeley: University
of California Press, 1978.
Pearl, in Pearl, edited by E.V. Gordon. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1953.
The Poems of the Pearl Manuscript, edited by Malcolm Andrew and Ronald
Waldron, York Medieval Texts (second series). Berkeley: University of
California Press, 1978.
Secondary Texts
Suzanne, Conklin Akbari. Seeing through the Veil: Optical Theory and Medieval
Allegory. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2004.
B I B L I O G R A P H Y172
Acker, Paul. “The Emergence of an Arithmetical Mentality in Middle English
Literature,” in The Chaucer Review, Vol. 28, No. 3, 1993, 293–302.
Armstrong, A.H., and R.A. Markus. Christian Faith and Greek Philosophy. New
York: Sheed and Ward, 1960.
Bachelard, Gaston. The Poetics of Space. Trans. Etienne Gilson. Boston: Beacon
Press, 1964.
Bakhtin, M.M. The Dialogic Imagination, trans. Caryl Emerson and Michael
Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1981.
Benjamin, Walter. “The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction,”
in The Critical Tradition: Classic Texts and Contemporary Trends, edited by David
H. Richter. Boston: Bedford Books, 1998.
Biddick, Kathleen. “Ethnography and City Views,” 221–41, in Medieval Practices
of Space, edited by Barbara A. Hanawalt and Michal Kobialka. Minneapolis:
University of Minnesota Press, 2000.
Bloch, Howard. “The Medieval Text—“Guigemar”—As a Provocation to the
Discipline of Medieval Studies” in The New Medievalism, 99–112, edited by
Marina S. Brownlee, Kevin Brownlee, and Stephen G. Nichols. Baltimore:
The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1991.
Bradbury, Nancy Mason. “Popular- Festive Forms and Beliefs in Robert
Mannyng’s Handlyng Synne,” 158–79, in Bakhtin and Medieval Voices, edited by
Thomas J. Farrell. Miami: University Press of Florida, 1996.
Brown, Peter. “The Containment of Symkyn: The Function of Space in the
Reeve’s Tale,” The Chaucer Review, 14, 3, 225–36.
———. Chaucer’s Visual World: A Study of His Poetry and the Medieval Optical
Tradition, submitted as a D. Phil. Thesis at the University of York, Centre for
Medieval Studies, 1981.
Burroughs, Charles. “Spaces of Arbitration and the Organization of Space in
Late Medieval Italian Cities,” 64–100, in Medieval Practices of Space, edited
by Barbara A. Hanawalt and Michal Kobialka. Minneapolis: University of
Minnesota Press, 2000.
Burrow, John. Essays on Medieval Literature. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984.
———. Gestures and Looks in Medieval Narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, 2002.
Carruthers, Mary. The Craft of Thought: Meditation, Rhetoric, and the Making of
Images: 400- 1200. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
Camille, Michael. “Signs of the City: Place, Power, and Public Fantasy in
MedievalParis,” 1–36, in Medieval Practices of Space, edited by Barbara A. Hanawalt
and Michal Kobialka. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2000.
Chenu, M- D., O.P. Nature, Man and Society in the Twelfth Century: Essays on New
Theological Perspectives in the Latin West, sel., ed., and trans. by Jerome Taylor
and Lester K. Little. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1997.
Clemen, Wolfgang. Chaucer’s Early Poetry, trans. C.A.M. Sym. New York: Barnes
and Noble, 1963.
Colgate, Isabel. The Shooting Party. New York: Viking Press, 1982.
Cook, Albert. Temporalizing Space: The Triumphant Strategies of Piero della Francesca.
New York: Peter Lang, 1992.
B I B L I O G R A P H Y 173
Crosby, Alfred W. The Measure of Reality: Quantification and Western Society:1250-
1600. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
Crosby, H. Lamar, Jr. Thomas Bradwardine: His Tractatus de PropProportionibus: Its
Significance for the Development of Mathematical Physics. Madison: The University
of Wisconsin Press, 1961.
Dales, Richard C. The Scientific Achievement of the Middle Ages. Philadelphia:
University of Pennsylvania Press, 1973.
De Certeau, Michel. The Practice of Everyday Life, trans. Steven Rendall. Berkeley:
University of California Press, 1988.
Diamond, Arlyn. “Introduction” to “Colloquium: The Afterlife of Origins,”
in Studies in the Age of Chaucer, edited by Frank Grady, The New Chaucer
Society, vol. 28, 2006, 219.
Dolnikowski, Edna Wilks. Thomas Bradwardine: A View of Time and a Vision of
Eternity in Fourteenth- Century Thought. New York: Brill, 1995.
Dox, Donnalee. “Theatrical Space, Mutable Space, and the Space of Imagination:
Three Readings of the Croxton play of the Sacrament,” 167–98, in Medieval
Practices of Space, edited by Barbara A. Hanawalt and Michal Kobialka.
Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2000.
Eagleton, Terry. The Ideology of the Aesthetic. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1991.
Eales, Richard. Chess: The History of a Game. New York: Facts on File
Publications,1985.
Edgerton, Samuel Y., Jr., The Heritage of Giotto’s Geometry: Art and Science on the
Eve of the Scientific Revolution. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1991.
———. The Renaissance Discovery of Linear Perspective. New York: Academic
Press, 1980.
Foucault, Michel. The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences, trans.
of Les Mots et les choses, New York: Vintage, 1966.
Gallacher, Patrick J. The Structural Uses of the Theme of Speech in John Gower’s
Confessio Amantis. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Illinois, 1966.
Grant, Edward. Planets, Stars, and Orbs: The Medieval Cosmos, 1200- 1687.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
———. “Science and Theology in the Middle Ages,” in God and Nature: Historical
Essays on the Encounter between Christianity and Science, edited by David C.
Lindberg and Ronald L. Numbers. Berkeley: University of California Press,
1986, 49–75.
———. Much Ado about Nothing. Cambridge: Cambridge University, 1981.
———. A Source Book in Medieval Science. Cambridge: Harvard University Press,
1974.
Hagen, M. A. (editor). The Perception of Pictures, Vol. 1. New York: Academic
Press, 1980, 189.
Halpern, Nick. The Everyday and Prophetic. Madison: The University of Wisconsin
Press, 2003.
Hanawalt, Barbara, and Michal Kolbialka (editors). Medieval Practices of Space.
Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2000.
Harrison, Dick. Medieval Space: The Extent of Microspatial Knowledge in Western
Europe During the Middle Ages. Lund: Lund University Press, 1996.
B I B L I O G R A P H Y174
Hartley, Dorothy. Lost Country Life. New York: Pantheon Books, 1979.
Harvey, Ruth. The Inward Wits: Psychological Theory in the Middle Ages and the
Renaissance.(Warburg Institute Surveys, vi.) London: The Warburg Institute,
University of London, 1975.. 175, 28 and n. 76.
Herman, David. Unpublished manuscript. See Story Logic: Problems and Possibilities
of Narrative. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2002.
———. Narratologies: New Perspectives on Narrative Analysis, edited by David
Herman. Columbus: The Ohio State University Press, 1999.
Hill, Ordelle G. “The Audience of Patience,” in Modern Philology, 66, No. 2 (Nov.
1968), 103–09.
Hodgson, Phyllis. The Cloud of Unknowing and The Book of Privy Counselling,
edited by P. Hodgson, The Early English Text Society, London: Oxford
University Press, 1944, rep. 1973.
Holley, Linda Tarte. Chaucer’s Measuring Eye. Houston: Rice University Press,
1990.
Holloway, E.W. Reynard the Fox, a poem in twelve cantos, translated from the
German by E. W. Holloway, with thirty- seven engravings on steel, after Designs
by H. Leutemann. Dresden: Publications for the Proprietors of A.H. Payne,
1852.
Howe, Nicholas. “The Landscape of Anglo- Saxon England: Inherited,
Invented, Imagined,” in Inventing Medieval Landscape, 92–112, edited
by John Howe and Michael Wolfe. Tampa: University Press of Florida,
2002.
Huizinga, Johan. Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play- Element in Culture. Boston:
Beacon Press, 1960.
Ivins, William, Jr. On the Rationalization of sight with an Examination of Three
Renaissance Texts on Perspective. New York: Da Capo Press, repr., 1975.
Jammer, Max. Concepts of Space: The History of Theories of Space in Physics. New
York: Dover Publications, 1993.
John of Salisbury. The Metalogican of John of Salisbury: A Twelfth- Century Defense of
the Verbal and Logical Arts of the Trivium, trans., David D. McGarry. University
of California Press, 1962.
Jordan, Robert. “Heteroglossia and Chaucer’s Man of Law’s Tale,” 81–93, in
Bakhtin and Medieval Voices, edited by Thomas Farrell. Tampa: University
Press of Florida, 1995.
———. The Shape of Creation: The Aesthetic Possibilities of Inorganic Structure.
Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1967.
Justice, Stephen. Rebellion and Writing in England in 1381. Berkeley: University of
California Press, 1994.
Keats, John. “To George and Georgiana Keats,” March 17 [1819] in English
Romantic Poetry and Prose, edited by Russell Noyes. New York: Oxford
University Press, 1956.
Kermode, Frank. The Sense of an Ending: Studies in the Theory of Fiction. New
York: Oxford University Press, 2000.
B I B L I O G R A P H Y 175
Koonce, Benjamin G. Chaucer and the Tradition of Fame: Symbolism in The House of
Fame. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1966.
Koyré, Alexandre Metaphysics and Measurement: Essays in Scientific Revolution.
Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1968.
———. “Le vide et l’espace infini au XIV siècle,” 17, Archives d’histoiredoctrinale
et litéraire du moyen âge, 1949.
Kruger, Stephen. Dreaming in the Middle Ages. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press, 1996.
Lewis, C.S. The Allegory of Love: A Study in Medieval Tradition. New York: Oxford
University Press, 1958.
Latour, Bruno. “Visualization and Cognition: Thinking with Eyes and Hands”
in Knowledge and Society: Studies in the Sociology of Culture Past and Present:
A Research Annual, edited by Henrika Kuklick and Elizabeth Long, Vol. 6,
Greenwich: JAI Press Inc., 1986, 1–41.
Lefebvre, Michel. Rhythmanalysis: Space, Time and Everyday Life, trans. Stuart
Elden and Gerald Moore. London: Continuum Press, 2004.
———. Critique of Everyday Life: Volume One, trans. John Moore. London: New
Left Books, 1991.
Lindberg, David C., and Ronald L. Numbers (editors). “Science and the
Early Church,” in God and Nature: Historical Essays on the Encounter between
Christianity and Science, 19–48. Berkeley: University of California Press,
1986.
Lukács, Georg. “The Ideology of Modernism,” 1126–1141, in The Critical
Tradition: Classic Texts and Contemporary Trends, edited by David H. Richter,
1126–41. Boston: Bedford Books, 1998.
Mann, Jill. Ysengrimus: Text with Translation, Commentary and Introduction. New
York: Brill, 1987.
Marrone, Steven. The Light of Thy Countenance: Science and Knowledge of God in the
Thirteenth Century. Leiden: Brill, 2001, Vols. I and II.
———. “Henry of Ghent and Duns Scotus on the Knowledge of Being,”
Speculum, 63, Jan. 1988, 22–57.
Minnis, A.J., and A.B. Scott (editors). With the assistance of David Wallace.
Medieval Literary Theory and Criticism c. 1100- c.1375: The Commentary Tradition,
rev. edition. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988.
Moody, Ernest A. “The Age of Analysis,” in Studies in Medieval Philosophy, Science,
and Logic: Collected Papers—1933- 1969. Berkeley: University of California
Press, 1975.
Morrison, Karl F. “I Am You”: The Hermeneutics of Empathy in Western Literature,
Theology, and Art. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 1988.
Morson, Gary Saul. “Essential Narrative: Tempics and the Return of Process,”
277–314, in Narratologies: New Perspectives on Narrative Analysis, edited by
David Herman. Columbus: Ohio State University, 2000.
Murray, Alexander. Reason and Society in the Middle Ages. Oxford: Clarendon
Press, 1991.
B I B L I O G R A P H Y176
Nagel, Thomas. The View from Nowhere. Oxford: Oxford University Press,
1986.
Nichols, Stephen G. “The New Medievalism: Tradition and Discontinuity
in Medieval Culture,” in The New Medievalism, 1–26. edited by Marina S.
Brownlee, Kevin Brownlee, and Stephen G. Nichols. Baltimore: The Johns
Hopkins University Press, 1991.
Nicholson, Marjorie Hope. The Breaking of the Circle: Studies in the Effect of the
“New Science” on Seventeenth- Century Poetry. New York: Columbia University,
1960.
Olson, Sherri. A Chronicle of All That Happens: Voices from the Village Court in
Medieval England. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1996.
Owens, Harry J. The Scandalous Adventures of Reynard the Fox, a Modern Version by
Harry J. Owens. New York: A.A. Knopf, 1945.
Owst, G.R. Literature and Pulpit in Medieval England, second edition. Oxford:
Oxford University Press, 1961.
Peck, Russell. “Theme and Number in Chaucer’s Book of the Duchess,” in Silent
Poetry, 73–115, edited by Alastair Fowler. London: Routledge and Kegan
Paul, 1970.
Poole, Austin Lane. From Domesday Book to Magna Carta: 1087- 1216. Oxford:
Clarendon Press, 1951.
Pynchon, Thomas. The Crying of Lot 49. Philadelphia: N.B. Lippincott, 1966.
Raftis, J.A. A Small Town in Late Medieval England: Godmanchester, 1278- 1400.
Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies, 1982.
Randall, Lilian. Images in the Margins of Illuminated Manuscripts. Berkeley:
University of California Press, 1966.
Ricouer, Paul. The Rule of Metaphor: Multi- disciplinary Studies of the Creation of
Meaning in Language, trans. Robert Czerny with Kathleen McLaughlin and
John Costello, SJ. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1977.
Richardson, Robert D. William James: In the Maelstrom of American Modernism.
New York: Houghton Miff lin, 2006, 501.
Riffaterre, Michael. “The Mind’s Eye: Memory and Textuality,” in The New
Medievalism, 29–45, edited by Marina S. Brownlee, Kevin Brownlee, and
Stephen G. Nichols. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1991.
Rösener, Werner. Peasants in the Middle Ages, trans. Alexander Stützer. Urbana:
University of Illinois Press, 1992.
Salter, Elizabeth. “Medieval Poetry and the Figural View of Reality,” Proceedings
of the British Academy, 54, 1968, 73–92.
Simpson, James. Sciences and the Self in Medieval Poetry: Alan of Lille’s Anticlaudianus
and John Gower’s Confessio amantis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
1995.
Small, Daniel Lord. “The Linguistic Cartography of Property and Power in Late
Medieval Marseille,” 37–63 in Medieval Practices of Space, edited by Barbara
A. Hanawalt and Michal Kobialka. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota
Press, 2000.
Tachau, Katherine H. Vision and Certitude in the Age of Ockham: Optics, Epistemology
and the Foundation of Semantics: 1250- 1345, New York: E.J. Brill, 1988.
B I B L I O G R A P H Y 177
Spearing, A.C. “Poetic Identity,” in The Companion to the Gawain- Poet.
Cambridge: D.S. Brewer, 1997, 35–51.
Taylor, Andrew. “Playing on the Margins: Bakhtin and the Smithfield
Decretals,”17–37, in Bakhtin and Medieval Voices, edited by Thomas Farrell.
Tampa: University Press of Florida, 1995.
Varty, Kenneth. Reynard, Renart, Reinaert and Other Foxes in Medieval England:
The Iconographic Evidence. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 1999.
Windeatt, Barry (editor). Anonymous “Mystical Prayer,” in English Mystics of the
Middle Ages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
Zimbardo, Rose. “The Book of the Duchess and the Dream of Folly,” The
ChaucerReview, 18, 1984, 329–46.
Zumthor, Paul. La mesure du monde: représentation de l’espace au Moyen Age. Paris:
Éditions du Seuil, 1993.
INDEX
“abstract particularity,” 71, 73, 82
aggregation, 6–7, 20
Akbari, Suzanne, 10
Alan of Lille, 27, 46, 68, 82–83, 137
Albert of Saxony, 12, 15, 18, 30–31,
60, 141
Andrew, Malcolm, 95–96
angelus novus, 32
Aquinas, Thomas, 103–4, 106
Aristotle
Augustine and, 2, 4, 19, 157
Book of the Duchess and, 87–88
Bradwardine and, 24
Christianity and, 27–28
Cloud of Unknowing and, 139, 142
House of Fame and, 57–58, 60, 63
intellect and, 8–9
Patience and, 118–19, 123–25, 128
Perle and, 103, 105–7, 111
science and, 2, 22, 24–25, 155, 159
Wisdom and, 12, 18, 31–32
Armstrong, A.H., 4
“art of fiction,” 157
Auerbach, Erich, 105
Augustine, Saint
Aristotle and, 2, 4, 19, 157
Book of the Duchess and, 84, 87–88
Bradwardine and, 24, 27
Cloud of Unknowing and, 136
God and, 66
Morrison and, 78, 84
Moses and, 78
narrative time and, 51–53
Patience and, 115–16, 127–28
Perle and, 104
Peter of Celle and, 156
reason and, 13, 18, 61
science and, 1–5, 7–10, 27
self and, 12, 22
teaching and, 152
Avicenna, 103
awareness, 33, 37, 41, 52, 57–59, 124
see also self-awareness
Bachelard, Gaston, 7, 12, 16–18, 29,
35, 72, 92–93, 105, 151–52, 158
Bacon, Roger, 4
Bakhtin, Mikhail, 37–38, 47, 51–52,
80, 82
Baldwin, Charles Sears, 11
Baudelaire, Charles-Pierre, 17
Benjamin, Walter, 29, 32, 42
Bergson, Henry-Louis, 16
Berlin, Isaiah, 52
Bernard of Clairvaux, 132
Biddick, Kathleen, 36
Black Knight, 74–75, 77, 79, 83,
86–89, 99–100, 105, 152
Bloch, Howard, 69
Boethius, 58–59, 61, 67
Bonaventure, 28, 32, 105–6
Book of Privy Counselling, 148
Book of the Duchess, The, 71–89
Bradbury, Nancy Mason, 50
Bradwardine, Thomas, 24–27, 57,
116, 118, 127–30, 135, 138–39
Burroughs, Charles, 44
Burrow, John, 120, 131, 151, 153
180 I N D E X
Camille, Michael, 44–45
Canterbury Tales, The (Chaucer),
19, 41
“Canon’s Yeoman’s Tale,” 58
“Knight’s Tale,” 31, 42
“Man of Law’s Tale,” 80–81
“Miller’s Tale,” 31, 42
“Nun’s Priest’s Tale,” 9, 28–29, 33,
36, 40, 42, 45–46, 49–50, 52, 69,
76, 130, 151–52
“Pardoner’s Tale,” 41
“Squire’s Tale,” 19
“Summoner’s Tale,” 30, 42, 58
Capella, Martianus, 62
Carruthers, Mary, 4–5, 10, 156
Catholicism, 1, 73, 83
Chekhov, Anton, 152
Chenu, M.-D., 23–24, 27–28
Christian Faith and Greek Philosophy
(Armstrong and Markus), 4
Chronicle of All That Happens, A
(Olson), 43
Cicero, 11, 72
Clark, Elizabeth, 4
Clemen, Wolfgang, 33, 56
Cloud of Unknowing, The, 135–49
Book of the Duchess and, 80, 88
divinity and, 9
House of Fame and, 55–56, 59, 70
instruction and, 33, 151
perception and, 1, 4
Perle and, 93
Cochrane, Charles, 3, 7–9
Colgate, Isabel, 69
Concepts of Space: the History of Theories
of Space in Physics ( Jammer), 118
“concrete typicality,” 73, 82, 86
context, 12–13, 24, 33, 50, 66, 88, 91,
100, 105, 117, 138
Contra Faustum (Augustine), 7
Cook, Albert, 81
Cornificius, 62
Cranz, Edward, 104
Crosby, H. Lamar, 23, 128
Crying of Lot 49, The (Pynchon), 73
De causa Dei contra Pelagium
(Bradwardine), 127, 129–30
de Certeau, Michel, 23, 29, 36, 38,
40, 45–47, 56, 63, 71, 73–75, 82,
84, 86, 165
De futuris contingentibus (Bradwardine),
130
de Gand, Henri, 26
de Guileville, Guillaume, 15, 18, 31
de Middleton, Richard, 26, 128
de Ripa, Jean, 128
divine illumination, 2–4, 6, 8, 22, 153
Dolnikowski, Edith Wilks, 24,
129–30, 138, 159
ductus, 5, 8
Duns Scotus, John, 2–3, 5–10, 16, 20,
29, 128, 142
Eagleton, Terry, 32
Edgerton, Samuel, 14, 18, 104
faith
Augustine and, 13, 18
Book of the Duchess and, 72, 83
Cloud of Unknowing and, 135
House of Fame and, 59, 61
observation and, 33
Patience and, 131
Perle and, 98–99
reason and, 3–4, 7, 10, 13, 59
science and, 1–3, 8, 10–11, 24–28,
135
View from Nowhere and, 51, 52, 57
Fechner, Gustav Theodor, 67–68
Fielding, Henry, 41
Foucault, Michel, 19–20, 28–29
Geffrey, 17, 27, 55–60, 63–70
Gerhoch of Reichersberg, 75
Gestures and Looks in Medieval Narrative
(Burrow), 151
Gilson, Etienne, 16
Gower, John, 46, 68, 82–83, 112, 137
Grant, Edward, 10, 127–29, 136, 169
Grosseteste, Robert, 105
181I N D E X
Halpern, Nick, xiii–xiv
Hamlet, 71–73, 82
Hanawalt, Barbara, 35
Harrison, Dick, 35–36, 45, 48
Harvey, Ruth, 103–4
Henry of Ghent, 2, 157
Herman, David, 35–36
Hodgson, Phyllis, 141
Holloway, E.W., 40
House of Fame, The (Chaucer), 9, 17,
27, 30, 33, 55–70
Howe, Nicholas, 22–23
Hugh of St. Victor, 61, 68, 99
Huizinga, Johan, 39, 132
I Am You: The Hermeneutics of Empathy
in Western Literature, Theology, and
Art (Morrison), 11–12, 73
Illumination, see divine illumination;
manuscript illumination
imagination
body’s space and, 77
House of Fame and, 55, 57, 61, 63
mathematics and, 1
measure and, 16
metaphor and, 14–15, 17, 25
metaphysical and, 10
Perle and, 93, 98, 104–6
reason and, 7–9, 61, 152, 154
science and, 2, 14, 63
sensation and, 10–11, 13–14
sermon texts and, 37
infinity, 17, 21, 93
inscriptions, seeing by means of,
15–16, 33, 84
instruction
Book of the Duchess and, 72, 74
Cloud of Unknowing and, 9, 135–41,
146–47, 149
exchange of information and,
14–16
House of Fame and, 55, 57–59,
61–66, 68
material space and, 5–6, 27
Patience and, 152–53
pedagogy and, 33–34, 152
Perle and, 100, 105–6
Reynard and, 40
Treatise on the Astrolabe and, 153–54
Introduction to Metaphysics (Bergson),
16
Ivins, William, 14, 16
Jack Straw Rebellion, 36–37, 47, 50
James, Henry, 13, 157
James, William, 67–68
Jammer, Max, 118, 123
John of Salisbury, 7, 10–13, 18,
23–24, 58, 61, 66, 78, 85, 91, 99
Johnson, Samuel, 13
Jordan, Robert, 80
Joseph Andrews (Fielding), 41
Joyce, James, 75
Justice, Steven, 36–37, 42, 46
Keats, John, 88–89, 94
Kermode, Frank, 28
King Lear, 79
Klee, Paul, 32
Kobialka, Michal, 35
Koyré, Alexandre, 24–27, 116, 155
Kruger, Stephen, 72–73
Lacan, Jacques, 104
Latour, Bruno, 12–16, 18, 29, 84
Lefebvre, Henri, 35, 44, 46, 63
Lewis, C.S., 15, 71, 140
Light of Thy Countenance, The
(Marrone), 2
Lindberg, David, 1, 10, 27
Lombard, Peter, 105
Loukas, Hosios, 6
Lukács, Georg, 71, 73
MacBeth, 93
Mann, Jill, 37
Mann, Thomas, 75
manuscript illumination, 39, 44, 49
Marrone, Steven, 2–4, 8–10, 20, 22,
28, 32
I N D E X182
mathematics
Book of the Duchess and, 76–77, 80,
84, 87
Cloud of Unknowing and, 33–34,
135, 138, 144, 148
measure and, 1, 24–30
motion and, 74
Patience and, 129
Perle and, 93, 111–12
spirituality and, 14
world order and, 18
Matthew of Aquasparta, 157
measurements
Book of the Duchess and, 81–82
Cloud of Unknowing and, 9, 135–36,
138–39, 141–42, 144, 148, 153
House of Fame and, 57, 66–67, 69
imagination and, 1
instruction and, 16
knowledge and, 19–20
mathematics and, 24, 27–28, 33
measured space, 43
narrative and, 28–30, 51
Nun’s Priest’s Tale and, 39, 43–45,
51
Patience and, 120, 123, 129–31
Perle and, 93, 109
reality and, 23
religion and, 24
Treatise on the Astrolabe and, 153–54
see also space
Medieval Practices of Space (Hanawalt
and Kobialka), 35
Metalogicon, The ( John of Salisbury), 7,
11, 61, 63, 66, 78
metaphor, 17–20
Minnis, A.J., 105
More, Henry, 21–22
Morrison, Karl, 11, 73, 75, 78–79, 84,
87, 100, 117, 132, 148, 152
Morson, Gary Saul, 51–52
Moses, 78, 122
Nagel, Thomas
aggregation and, 20
“art of fiction” and, 157
awareness and, 15–18, 57
Book of the Duchess and, 79
circumspection and, 12–13
divine and, 7
House of Fame and, 65–67, 69–70
Patience and, 134
reason and, 9
understanding and, 61–63, 153
“view from nowhere” and, 20, 22,
33, 51
narrative
Book of the Duchess and, 71, 73–75,
77–79, 82–87, 152
Cloud of Unknowing and, 142–43
House of Fame and, 64–65, 68
measure and, 28–31
Nun’s Priest’s Tale and, 33, 35, 38,
40–42, 47, 50–52
Patience and, 116–21, 123–26, 128,
130
Perle and, 92, 97–98, 100, 107–8,
110
New Medievalism, The (Nichols), 30
Nichols, Stephen, 18, 30, 57–58, 68
Nicholson, Marjorie, 20–22
Numbers, Ronald, 10, 27
O’Connor, Flannery, 138
Olson, Sherri, 43
ordered motion, 5
Oresme, Nichole, 128
Ovid, 72, 163
Owens, Harry, 41
Owst, G.R., 37
Parliament of Fowls, The (Chaucer), 64
Pecham, John, 4
Perle, 1, 4, 9, 27, 33, 59, 70, 91–113,
151–53
perspectivism, 4, 14, 50
Peter of Celle, 23, 156
Philosophie, 59–61
Physics (Aristotle), 142
Piers Plowman, 100, 107
I N D E X 183
Pilgrimage of Human Life, The (de
Guileville), 31
Piotrowski, Andrzej, 6
Plato, 24, 27–28, 39, 57–58, 63, 83,
118–19, 136
Pluralistic Universe, A ( James), 67
poetic identity, 98–99
Poetics of Space, The (Bachelard), 12,
16, 92
Poole, Austin Lane, 49
Pynchon, Thomas, 73–74
Raftis, J.A., 23, 44
Randall, Lilian, 39
rationality, 3, 7, 16–18, 39, 44, 63–64,
67, 72, 77–78, 84, 93, 144, 148
realism, 24, 160
related thought, 152
Richard of Middleton, 128
Richardson, Robert D., 67
Ricoeur, Paul, 71, 82
Riffaterre, Michael, 42, 50
Rösener, Werner, 49
St. Paul, 59, 65
Salter, Elizabeth, 100, 104–5, 107, 113
Scandalous Adventures of Reynard the
Fox (Owens), 41
science
Aristotle and, 22
Augustine and, 7
Bachelard and, 152
Cloud of Unknowing and, 135,
137–39, 145, 148
divine illumination and, 8
faith and, 1–3, 8, 10, 24–28
House of Fame and, 30, 33, 55,
57–59, 62–63, 67, 72–74
inscriptions and, 15
models and, 14
Patience and, 115, 118–19, 128
Perle and, 91, 99, 105–6
perspective and, 4, 14
poetry and, 20–21
self and, 46, 82
sensation and, 11
Science and the Self in Medieval Poetry
(Simpson), 46, 137
Scott, A.B., 105
self-awareness, 2, 22, 151
see also awareness
Sentences (Lombard), 105
sermons, 37, 41
Shooting Party, The (Colgate), 69
Simpson, James, 46, 68, 82–83,
137–38, 140
Sir Gawain and the Green Knight,
37–38, 82, 88, 98, 116–17
Small, Daniel Lord, 44
Small Town in Late Medieval England,
A (Raftis), 23, 44
space
architectural, 6
Book of the Duchess and, 71–74,
76–88
Cloud of Unknowing and, 135,
139–41, 144–46, 148–49
depicted space, 6
God and, 26–27
House of Fame and, 55–57, 59–62,
65–66, 68–70
imaginative, 16–17
inhabited, 17–18
material space, 5
measurement and, 9, 24–25,
28–32, 153
memory and, 32
motion and, 5, 27–28, 153
narrative and, 35–36
Nun’s Priest’s Tale and, 36–47,
52–53
Patience and, 116–20, 122–30,
134
perception and, 14–16, 22
Perle and, 92–93, 97, 99–100, 105
poetics of, 17, 151
“practice of,” 36
void space, 6
see also measurements
Spearing, A.C., 92, 98–100, 113
I N D E X184
Tachau, Katherine, 4, 19, 159
Taylor, Andrew, 46, 51
Timaeus (Plato), 27
Treatise on the Astrolabe, A (Chaucer),
18, 34, 58, 69, 153
Trinity, The (Augustine), 12
Troilus and Criseyde (Chaucer), 29–30,
47, 64–65, 111–12
truth
Book of the Duchess and, 83, 92
Cloud of Unknowing and, 139, 145,
153
divine illumination and, 6
divine truth, 3
House of Fame and, 58, 66–67
illumination and, 22
Nun’s Priest’s Tale and, 40, 46, 52
pedagogy and, 13
Perle and, 100, 111, 113
prudence and, 11
science and, 8
truth content, 4–5
Turville-Petre, Thorlac, 120, 131
univocity, 7–10, 16
Varty, Kenneth, 39
View from Nowhere, The (Nagel), 7, 20,
22, 33, 51, 57, 61, 66, 70, 153
Vision and Certitude in the Age of
Ockham (Tachau), 19
V[U]ncortayse, 98
Waldron, Ronald, 95–96
William of Auverge, 155
William of Couches, 10
Witelo, 4
Zimbardo, 79
Zumthor, Paul, 56–57