the unification of germany transforming the balance of power
TRANSCRIPT
The Unification of Germany
Transforming the
Balance of power
Zollverein
Zollverein – tariff free zone 1818 – Prussia abolished internal tariff barriers
to allow for the freer movement of goods Lowered administrative costs of government Improved movement of goods within the state Lowered import tariffs on some foreign products
Good for farmersDid not protect manufacturers
Austria removed tariff barriers within the western half of the empire but not the whole empire
1819 – 1828 – Prussia moved to include the enclave states within the Prussian state
Prussia will not actively include Austria 1820 – South German States began to create their own customs
union Bavaria & Wurttemberg – did not involve Prussia
1831 – Prussian trade treaty with Holland to open the Lower Rhine River to Prussian trade
Hesse-Cassel joined Prussian trade union – connected east and west Prussia
1833 – Prussia joined with the Southern German Customs Union 1834 – the German Customs Union Prussian trade increased dramatically
IB Objective:
European diplomacy and the changing balance of power after 1870
What is a nation state?
Geographic boundary – territory Sense of common culture and social lifeCommon history Sense of community
Two phases of the rise of the Nation-State
National integration – expansion and admission of new territory – war, annexation, plebiscite
Institution building – creation of new govt. for new nation state
Issues prior to unification
Conservatism – desire to keep society and political power structure the same – Junkers (landed aristocracy) dominant class in Prussian society and military
Liberalism – desire to increase the political rights of the common citizen
Industrialization – German states became leading industrial power in Europe – economic ties fostered a degree of unity among the German states – rise of the middle class and industrial owners
Socialism – desire to increase the rights, power, and wealth of the working person
The German Confederation – loose union of independent German states
Nationalism – loyalty to a common nation – unification of Italy provided example
Prussia vs. Austria – who will lead the movement in Germany and become the dominant state
Key Players
William IKing of PrussiaHohenzollern family
Otto von Bismarck – “the Iron Chancellor”
Prime Minister of Prussia (1862)
Solve military budget issue
Created unified Germany based on conservatism
Followed Realpolitik
Military issue
Prussian king and conservatives wanted to increase size of military and modernize weapons
Liberals in parliament refused to support military increase and taxation increase
Solution to military budget
Bismarck ruled without Parliament’s consent for four years
Government collected taxes without Parliament’s consent – people paid anyway (duty to state)
Army reorganized, retrained and reequipped with tax money – military will play leading role in unification
Restricted freedom of press, speech on political issues, did not confirm the election of progressive mayors to Prussian cities – political war against liberalism
Prussia will grow “by Blood and Iron” and not liberalism.
Creation of Prussian Dominance
Prussia and Russia 1863 – Polish revolt against Russia Bismarck (Prussia) sided with Russia Prussia mobilized troops on Eastern
borderAustria could not side with Russia
because of larger Polish population
Prussia vs. Denmark (1864)Schleswig and Holstein – two duchies
ruled by Denmark but not official part of kingdom – large German populations
1863 – Denmark attempts to annex Schleswig
Bismarck issued ultimatum to Denmark to not annex Schleswig – Denmark rejected
Prussia and Austria declare war
Prussia and Austria defeated Denmark Treaty of Vienna (1864) – ended war
Prussia – Schleswig and port city of KielAustria – Holstein
Created tension between Austria and Prussia – Bismarck viewed war as inevitable
The Isolation of AustriaDeal with France (Napoleon III) – France
receive territory in Rhineland if neutral in Austria-Prussia war
Alliance with Italy – Italy attacks Austria in Austria-Prussia war – Italy receives Venetia
Austro-Prussian War (1866) – the Seven Weeks War
Prussia sent troops into Holstein and leaves the German Confederation
Austria and German Confederation send troops to oppose Prussia
Prussia won with assistance of Italy
Treaty of Prague (1866) – ended warGerman Confederation dissolvedPrussia annexed Schleswig and Holstein,
Hanover, Frankfurt North German Confederation created –
controlled by Prussia – Austria left outParliament – two houses – lower house elected
by universal male suffrage William I – presidentBismarck – chancellor
Economic Alliance with Southern German states (not Austria) – created free trade and extension of railroadsSouthern German states not formally organized
Southern German states militarily aligned with the North German Confederation
Prussian parliament supported Bismarck and military budgets after defeat of Austria
By passing universal male suffrage – socialists support Bismarck
Franco-Prussian War (1870-1871)
France vs. PrussiaSpain invited Hohenzollern family member
(Leopold of Hohenzollern) to rule – Prussia supported invitation
France opposed – fear of being politically surrounded – declared war on Prussia
France = no alliesPrussia defeated France
Proclamation of German Empire – “The Second Reich”Discuss structure of govt.
France – the Palace of Versailles – Hall of Mirrors
William I became Emperor William I of Germany – emperor = hereditary
German princes proclaim allegiance to William I and “give” their territory to the new German empire
Treaty of Frankfurt (1871)Germany annexed French provinces of
Alsace and Lorraine Iron Ore CoalTextile industries
France pay Prussia $5 billion francs
Germany under Bismarck
Industrial leader in manufactured goods outproducing France and England – challenged England’s role in the global economy
Leader in iron, steel and coal outputInstituted govt. insurance program for
workers – sickness, accident, incapacity in old age.
Implemented protective economic tariffs (1879)Protected agriculture (Junkers) from Russian
and US wheat imports Supported by industrialists wanting to protect
German industrial market from foreign competition
Govt increased military expenditures – helped industrialists
Question of Catholicism
Prussia and Northern German states = protestant
Southern German states = Catholic Loyalty of Catholic citizens came into
question – will they support Germany or the Catholic church
Kulturkampf “the Battle for Modern Civilization”Effort to reduce the influence of the Catholic
Church esp. in Southern GermanyLaws restricted Catholic worship and Catholic education Catholic bishops and clergy were arrested or expelled
from Germany Laws restricting Catholic publications
Catholics created the Center Party to represent Catholic political interests Developed into strong oppositional party in the Reichstag
Decided to stop Kulturkampf campaign Needed support of Centre party against
the socialist movement of the working class
German Social Democratic Party
Founded in 1875 Workers party
Represented threat to new government – demanded social change
1878-1890 - Bismarck passed anti-socialist laws – no socialist meetings or newspapers
Bismarck passed social legislation that supported the workers and the old
Effects of Unified Germany:
Germany = Great Power Politically – influence among Eur. countriesEconomically – industrial leader Militarily – used military to expand
Threat to England, France, Austria, Russia – other Great Powers
Upsets traditional balance of power Countries have to account for Germany
Close:
Provide examples of both domestic and foreign policy that reflect Bismarck’s philosophy of Realpolitik.
Be able to explain how or why the examples reflect Realpolitik.
Explain how Bismarck’s policies reflect or support the following philosophies:ConservatismLiberalismSocialism Industrialism Nationalism
Removal of Bismarck
William I died in 1888Frederick III died after three monthsWilliam II became Kaiser of Germany 1890 – Bismarck ordered to resign
because of disputes over foreign and social policy
Germany adopts a “new course” (p.598)