seoul natseoul nat l’l universityocw.snu.ac.kr/sites/default/files/note/1306.pdf ·...
TRANSCRIPT
Seoul Nat’l UniversitySeoul Nat l University
Concrete in Plasticity
Sung-Gul HongSung Gul HongSNU
March 2, 2006
From analysis to Design and SynthesisFrom analysis to Design and Synthesis
1900 ElasticityPlasticity
Analysis
1970
PlasticityMoment distribution
MatrixFEM
Design
1970
1980 Strength DesignLimit Designg
Synthesis of Designd A l i
1990
2000
Limit Design
Performance-basedITand Analysis Social Response
History of Theory of PlasticityHistory of Theory of Plasticity
• Gvosdev• Drucker and Prager• W.F Chen• Johansen: Yield Line Theory• Hillerborg: Strip Method• The Technical University of Denmark:
Ni l d B• Nielsen and Braestrup• Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich:
M eller and Marti• Mueller and Marti• Vecchio and Collinse in Canada• T T C Hsu in U S A• T.T.C.Hsu in U.S.A
Limit Theory for Design of Reinforced Concrete
• Lower Bound- EquilibriumEquilibrium- Yield Condition
Forces Displacement
• Upper Bound- Geometry
Forces
- Geometry- Work equation
Normality Rules
ContentsContents
h f l i i• Theory of Plasticity• Yield Conditions• Theory of Plain Concrete• Disks• Disks• Beams• Slabs• Punching ShearPunching Shear• Bond Strength
Theory of PlasticityTheory of Plasticity
• 1.1 Constitutive EquationsVon Mises’s Flow Rule
Q q ifqQ
λ ∂=
∂2Q 2qiQ∂
Q1Q 1q
Extreme Principles for Rigid-Plastic Materialsε
σσ
-Lower Bound Theorem-Upper Bound Theorem-Uniqueness Theorem
Yield ConditionsYield Conditions
• Concrete- Frictional hypothesisFrictional hypothesis
• Reinforcing bar• Disks• Disks• Slabs
Mohr Coulomb Material σ ε
τ
2 2σ ,ε
τ1 1σ ,ε
Sliding Failure
σφ Separation failure
2 2σ ,εσ
1 1σ ,ε
Determination of Parameters for More-Coulomb material
σ σ
P T i
ττPure Compression Pure Tension
1 3 ck fσ σ− =σ
Pure Shearτ
Failure Modes in Pure ShearFailure Modes in Pure Shear
σSliding failure
σ
τ
σSeparation failure
τ
Failure Modes in Pure TensionFailure Modes in Pure Tension
σSeparation failure
σ
τ
σσ
Sliding failureτ
g
Yield Condition in Plane StressYield Condition in Plane Stress
IσIIσIIIσ IσIIσIIIσ
IIIσ IIσIσ
Yield condition for DiskYield condition for Disk
2 2σ ,εf
1 1σ ,εc-f
c-f
1 1σ , εyfy-f
Disks in Plane StressesDisks in Plane Stressesyσ
τ
σ
xyτ
= +xσxσ
xyτ
σ εyσ 2 2σ ,ε
c-f1 1σ , ε
yfy-f
1 1σ ,ε
-f
1 1σ , ε
cf
Yield Condition for DiskYield Condition for Diskxy
fτ
cf
σ
s YA ft
Φ =
y
cfσ
1Φ +
x
cfσ
x
cfσ
Free Body Diagram for Yield ConditionCondition yσ
xyτ
τ xσxyτxyτ
xσ
xyτ xyyσ
cσsy YA f
cσ
θ sx YA f xσθxyτ
θ sx Yf
yσ
Shear strengthShear strengthσ A f
xytτA f
cσsy YA f
ytσ
( )( ) 2 0c x c y xyf fσ σ τ− Φ − Φ − + =xy
sinctσ θ
sy YA ftθ θ
( )( )c x c y xyf f
yσ2sinsy Y
y c
A ft tσ σ θ= −
cσ
A f σθxyτ
θcosctσ θ
y ct
i θ θsx YA f xσθ θ
sx YA ft
sin cosxy ct tτ σ θ θ=
t2cossx Y
x cA ft t
tσ σ θ= −
Shear Strength of DiskShear Strength of Disk
Relationship between Shear Strength and Reinforcement Ratio in Disk
Reinforcement in Disk based on Plasticity Solution
sx Yx xy
A ft
σ τ= +
sy Yy xy
tA f
tσ τ= +
x yσ σ≤
x xyσ τ≥ −
2x y xyσ σ τ≤y y
Failure Mechanisms in DisksFailure Mechanisms in Disks
Yield conditions for SlabsYield conditions for Slabs• Pure bending -> yield line theory• Pure bending -> yield line theory
and strip methodP t i > S d i h d l• Pure torsion -> Sandwich model
n
ptxx
pt t
Torsion in slabsTorsion in slabs
Top panelp p
( )1 2p o s Yt A f h= − Φp
bottom panelbottom panel
The Theory of Plain ConcreteThe Theory of Plain Concrete
• Constitutive Equations• Dissipation WorksDissipation Works• Lines of Discontinuity• Stress Fields• Strain Fields• Strain Fields• Applications• Concentrated Loadings
Constitutive EquationsConstitutive Equations • Coulomb Material• Yield Condition• Strain Vectors
6 Surfaces• Strain Vectors
1 3 1 2 3,ck fσ σ σ σ σ− = ≥ ≥
3 1 3 2 1,ck fσ σ σ σ σ− = ≥ ≥k fσ σ σ σ σ≥ ≥ f∂
1 2 1 3 2,ck fσ σ σ σ σ− = ≥ ≥
2 1 2 3 1,ck fσ σ σ σ σ− = ≥ ≥ ii
fqQ
λ ∂=
∂2 3 2 1 3,ck fσ σ σ σ σ− = ≥ ≥
k fσ σ σ σ σ= ≥ ≥
iQ∂
3 2 3 1 2,ck fσ σ σ σ σ− = ≥ ≥
Yield Surface in 3 DYield Surface in 3-D3σ
(2)1σ
2σ(2)(6)
(4)
(1) (5)
(3) (4)
2σ(1) (5)
1σ3σ
Plastic Strain VectorPlastic Strain Vector
• Along planes
1
2ε1ε 3εkλ 0 λ−
k f ≥ ≥2
3 λkλ
kλ0
0
λ−1 3 1 2 3,ck fσ σ σ σ σ− = ≥ ≥
f∂ 3
4
λ−kλkλ
00λ
λ−ifqQ
λ ∂=
∂ 5
6
kλkλ0
0 λ−
λ−iQ∂
1
2ε1ε 3εkλ 0 λ−1
2
3
kλ
λkλ
kλ00
0
λ−λ
3
4
λ−kλkλ
00λ− • Along edges
2ε1ε 3ε5
6
kλkλ0
0 λ−
λ−
g g
1/52ε1ε 3ε
1kλ 2kλ
( )
6 0 λ
λλ( )1 2λ λ− +
4/54/2
( )1 2 kλ λ+ 2λ−
( )1 2λ λ− +1λ−
2kλ1kλk
ε +
−=∑
∑ 2/63/6
1λ− 2λ− ( )1 2 kλ λ+
kλ ( )λ λ− + kλ
ε −∑3/61/3
1kλ ( )1 2λ λ+ 2kλ
( )1 2 kλ λ+ 2λ− 1λ−
Plastic Strain Vector at ApexPlastic Strain Vector at Apex1 2 3 cot
1cf c
kσ σ σ ϕ= = = = 3σ
1 2 3 1kϕ
−
(2)( ) ( )kλ λ λ λ (2)(6)(4)
( ) ( )1 1 3 2 4kε λ λ λ λ= + − +
( ) ( )
(1) (5)
(3) (4)
2σ( ) ( )2 4 5 3 6kε λ λ λ λ= + − +
( ) ( ) (1) (5)( ) ( )3 2 6 1 5kε λ λ λ λ= + − +
1σ
Dissipation WorkDissipation WorkAlong plane 1Along plane 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 cW k fσ ε σ ε σ ε σ λ σ λ λ= + + = − =
Along the edge 1/5
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 cf
( )1 2 cW fλ λ= +
g g
At the apex
( )1 2 3 4 5 6 cW fλ λ λ λ λ λ= + + + + +
Yield Condition and Flow Rule for Coulomb Material in Plane Stress
2 2,σ ε2 2,σ ε
( )kλ λ 2 2
( )0, ,kλ λ−
( )0kλ λ1
cfk
( )0, ,kλ λ−
( ), ,0kλ λ−
1 f
( ), ,0kλ λ−1 1,σ εk
( ), ,0kλ λ−( ),0, kλ λ− cf
1 1,σ εcfk
( )0, , kλ λ−
( ), ,0kλ λ−( ),0, kλ λ− cf
( )0 kλ λ
( )
( )0, , kλ λ−
Plane StrainPlane Strain2 2,σ ε
1 1,σ ε( ), ,0kλ λ−
1
( )
1
1 1,σ ε1
cfk
11 cfk −
cf
( ), ,0kλ λ−( )
Modified Coulomb MaterialModified Coulomb Material3σ
6
2
8
9
6
87
3
4
2σ
51
1σ
Modified Coulomb MaterialModified Coulomb Material3σ Surfaces: 7 8 9
62 Edges: 1/7, 3/7, 6/9, 2/9, 4/8, 5/8, 8/7, 7/9, 8/9
Surfaces: 7, 8, 9
897
6
34
51σ2σ
Apex: 4/5/8, 7/8/9/1, 1/3/7, 3/7/6/9, 2/6/9, 8/9/2/4, 7/8/9
51
1
+∑ kεε
+
−>∑
∑ ε∑
Dissipation WorksDissipation Worksε +∑When kεε −
=∑∑
∑∑
cW f ε −= ∑
When kε +
−>∑
∑ ε∑
( )+∑ ∑ ∑( )c tW f f kε ε ε− + −= + −∑ ∑ ∑
Planes and Lines of DiscontinuityPlanes and Lines of Discontinuity
I II
IIII II
Cracking ICrackingIIt II
δ
t
1 u
δThin layer
α ( )max1 sin 12
uε ε αδ
+= = +u
nutu
u
( )min1 sin 12
uε ε αδ
−= = −
n
( )min 2 δ
Dissipation work : Plane StrainDissipation work : Plane StrainI II
u
Along surfaces2 2,σ ε
1 1,σ ε( ), ,0kλ λ−I II
I IIϕ
( )1 1 sin2c
uW f ϕδ
= −1 1,σ ε
1cfk
11 cfk −
cf
I ϕ IIu
1 1,σ ε
( ), ,0kλ λ−( )1 1 sin
2l cW ub f ϕ= −
ϕ uAt apex ϕ α π α≤ ≤ −
I IIϕ
( ) ( ){ }1 1 sin 1 1 sintfW ub f k kα α⎡ ⎤
= − + − − + +⎢ ⎥( ) ( ){ }1 sin 1 1 sin2l c
c
W ub f k kf
α α= + + +⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦
Dissipation work : Plane StressDissipation work : Plane StressI II
uAt apex at A ϕ α π α≤ ≤
( )1 1 sincfW ub α+
I ϕ IIu
I IIϕ
At apex at A ϕ α π α≤ ≤ −2 2,σ ε
( )0, ,kλ λ−
( )0kλ λ( )1 sin2
cl
fW ubk
α= +
1 1,σ ε
1cfk
( ), ,0kλ λ−
Along other apexes and surfaces ( ), ,0kλ λ−( ),0, kλ λ− cf
d≤ ≥
I IIϕ u( )0, , kλ λ−and α ϕ α π ϕ≤ ≥ −
1 I II( )1 1 sin
2l cW f ub α= −
Coulomb Material
Stress FieldStress Field
c
σ3σ 1σmσ
ϕϕ
στ
( ),σ τc
σ
ττσ
τ
90 ϕ−
Stress on Failure sectionStress on Failure sectiontt στ
τσ
τ( )21 2 tan 2 tannt cσ ϕ σ ϕ= + −
τσ
n nϕ ϕσ
nσ σ=tant cτ τ σ ϕ= = − tannt cτ τ σ ϕ
Stresses from Failure SectionStresses from Failure Section( ) ( )cot cot 1 sin sin 2c cσ ϕ σ ϕ ϕ θ ϕ= + − − +⎡ ⎤⎣ ⎦( ) ( )( ) ( )
cot cot 1 sin sin 2
cot cot 1 sin sin 2x m
y m
c c
c c
σ ϕ σ ϕ ϕ θ ϕ
σ ϕ σ ϕ ϕ θ ϕ
= + +⎡ ⎤⎣ ⎦= + − + +⎡ ⎤⎣ ⎦
( ) ( )cot sin cos 2xy m cτ σ ϕ ϕ θ ϕ= − − +
σx
θτxσ
τσ
xyτ
y
Failure section from a given stressesgFor given and x xyσ τ
tancot
xy
x cτ
βσ ϕ
= −−
i β
Angle θ is determined.
( ) sincos 2sin
βθ ϕ βϕ
+ − =
( )cotcot
1 sin sin 2x
mcc σ ϕσ ϕ
ϕ θ ϕ−
= +− +
Stress σ and τ are calculated.
( )ϕ ϕ
( ) 2cot coscσ σ ϕ ϕ= +( )cot cosm cσ σ ϕ ϕ= +
Equilibrium EquationsEquilibrium EquationsRankine Zone
( )tan0
c σ ϕσ ∂ −∂± σ σ∂ ∂( )
( ) ( )2
0
1 2 tan 2 tan tan0
x y
c c
ϕ
ϕ σ ϕ σ ϕ
± =∂ ∂
⎡ ⎤∂ + − ∂ −⎣ ⎦ ± =
0x yσ σ∂ ∂
= =∂ ∂( ) 0
y x± =
∂ ∂y
Prandtl Zoneσ∂
2 tan cotCe cθ ϕσ ϕ±= − +0
rσ∂
=∂σ∂
2 tantanr C e θ ϕθτ ϕ ±= ±
( )2 tan 0cσ σ ϕθ
∂± − =
∂
Rankine ZoneRankine Zoney
cσ σϕ
3σ c3σ1σ
σ c
σ
τ90 φ−
mσϕ
cτ
( ),σ τσ
45 / 2φ− ( )x
3σ
Strut and Rankine ZoneStrut and Rankine Zone
( )σ τσ
y
( ),σ τ3σ
y
σ σ3σ 1σ
τ45 / 2ϕ45 / 2ϕ−
x τ3σ
Prandtl ZonePrandtl Zone
σ3σ
1σ
( )σ τ3σ ( ),σ τ
3στ
3σ
3σ
Prandtle ZonePrandtle Zone( )σ τ( ),σ τ
σ3σ
1σ
τ
Strain Fields1
2ε1ε 3εkλ 0 λ Strain Fields1
2
kλkλ
00λ−
λ−
1 1⎛ ⎞
3
4
λ−kλkλ
00λ−
11 112 k
ε⎛ ⎞+⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠
4
5
6
kλkλ
0
0
0 λ−
λ
λ
ε1ε6 kλ0 λ−
ε1ε12 k
εε = −ϕ
112
γ
Homogeneous Strain FieldHomogeneous Strain Fieldn / cos tan
cos cosh u uh
hϕ γ
ϕ ϕ× = =
tanu ϕϕ
cos coshϕ ϕ
uϕ
γh
ϕ
γ90 ϕ+h
t/ cosh ϕ
tan tanu ϕε γ ϕ= =t
11 112 k
ε⎛ ⎞+⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠tann h
ε γ ϕ
uε1ε1
2 kεε = −
ϕ
0tε = ntuh
γ γ= = 12
γ
Triangular ZoneTriangular Zonen
uγ
h
γ
90 ϕ+ht
uu2u
2u
/ 2γ/ 2γ
90 ϕ+ hh
ApplicationsApplications
uu1uϕ
ββϕu
2uβ
ApplicationsApplications2u
u1u2β β ϕ
1u
2u2u 22
ApplicationsApplications
1u1u
2u2u 22
Design for concentrated loadingg gP
σ
2a
σ
b
1 1 bσ ⎛ ⎞= +⎜ ⎟h
12cf a
+⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠
fh⎛ ⎞
fb⎛ ⎞
b 2 21.0 1 , 2.482
t
c c
fhK Kf a fσ ⎛ ⎞= + − ≅⎜ ⎟
⎝ ⎠
1 11.5 1 , 3.6t
c c
fbK Kf a fσ ⎛ ⎞= + − ≅⎜ ⎟
⎝ ⎠
Semi empirical formulaSemi-empirical formula2 2A e f•2 2oA e f= •
2 2A c d= •
1 1 tfAK⎛ ⎞⎜ ⎟
2 2A c d= •
2ec 4
0
1 1 tlocal
c
fc KA f
= + −⎜ ⎟⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠
2e
2 fc
d d
01 1,2 2
a A b A= =
DisksDisks
• Constitutive Equations• Dissipation WorksDissipation Works• Yield Zones• Applications• Strength Reduction due to Initial Cracks• Strength Reduction due to Initial Cracks• Strut and Tie Models• Shear Walls
Disk ElementDisk Element2 2,σ ε2 2
1 1,σ εcfΦ
1 1,σ ε
cf
DissipationDissipationη
( ) ( )2 2
1 1 1u u u
W f ξ η ξ⎡ ⎤⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞⎢ ⎥Φ Φ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟
δuξ uη
( ) ( )1 12 cW f ξ η ξ
δ δ δ⎢ ⎥= + Φ + − − Φ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟⎢ ⎥⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠⎣ ⎦
ξξ
Known SolutionsKnown Solutionsf
pcf
0y
0h y−
fΦ
0h y
cfΦ
L
212 1p cM th fΦ
=Φ ( )
2
2
41
ch fpL
Φ=
+ Φ2 1p cf+ Φ ( )1 L+ Φ
Discontinuous Stress FieldsDiscontinuous Stress Fields
pcf
cfΦ
p
cf cfΦcf cf
Strength Reduction due to Sliding in Initial Cracks
14 1
scsf ν
= ≤
α β
2 1sin cos 0.75sino cfν γ γ γ
= ≤−
δα β
δ
Strut and Tie ModelsStrut and Tie Models
• Strut• Strut and Tie SystemsStrut and Tie Systems• Fans- Non-concentric fans- Concentric fans- Concentric fans- Fans with Bond
Single StrutSingle Strutx h y−0x 0 0
0 0
tan x h yy a x
θ = =+
f
0x
0y
20 1 1
2x a ah h h
⎡ ⎤⎛ ⎞⎢ ⎥= + −⎜ ⎟⎢ ⎥⎝ ⎠⎣ ⎦
hcf
2h h h⎢ ⎥⎝ ⎠⎣ ⎦
21 a aτ ⎡ ⎤⎛ ⎞⎢ ⎥θ 1 1
2c
a af h hτ ⎡ ⎤⎛ ⎞⎢ ⎥= + −⎜ ⎟⎢ ⎥⎝ ⎠⎣ ⎦a
20 01 4 1
2y yx a a
h h h h h
⎡ ⎤⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞⎢ ⎥= − + −⎜ ⎟⎜ ⎟⎢ ⎥⎝ ⎠⎝ ⎠2h h h h h⎜ ⎟⎜ ⎟⎢ ⎥⎝ ⎠⎝ ⎠⎣ ⎦
Single StrutSingle Strut
0s Y cA f y tf=
cf
0 12
s YA f ythf h
Φ = = ≤h
cf
2cthf h
θ0y
a0x
( )2
0 1 4 1xP a aτ ⎡ ⎤⎛ ⎞⎢ ⎥= = = Φ − Φ + −⎜ ⎟( )4 12c cf thf h h h
⎢ ⎥= = = Φ Φ + ⎜ ⎟⎢ ⎥⎝ ⎠⎣ ⎦
Fan shaped stress fieldsFan-shaped stress fields
• Non-concentric fan- Uniform Normal stress type
D
Uniform Normal stress type- Uniform Shear stress type
A
• Concentric FanB
• Concentric Fan
C
T
Boundary Stress onBoundary Stress on Non-concentric fan-shaped stress field
y Py
Sw(x)
tcσ ,top
h
x
Z(x) cσ ,botr
q
Uniform normal stress on boundary ofUniform normal stress on boundary of Non-concentric fan-shaped stress field
d =dx+(dw-dz)k+(w-z)dk
-dw
w+dw-[z+dz]
x+(w-x)k
k 1
1
z
k+dk
ddx
dx
-dz
Geometry for Infinitesimal Elements of Non-concentric Fan-shaped stress field (Uniformof Non concentric Fan shaped stress field (UniformNormal stress type)
y σconstτ =
H
P
x
LLdx-dz k+( -z)dk2
⋅
-dzk
k+dk1
1
k+dk
Uniform shear stress on boundary of Non-concentric fan-shaped stress field
yl/2 y
yσ
0
2σ =0xyτ
yσy
yxτ+y-σ t
+
x
T
1σ =0
pl 2-σ
x
+- tτ1σ =0
0
el
dx
-y-σ t
+y-σ t
+- tτtrT-q
2-σ
-- tτ
y tτ
2σ =0
1σ =0
or
xσ
y- tτtr
-pt
os
p
r
s yx- tτ1σ =0
2σ 0
T+dTx
l/2l/2
yy
ξξ
el
kk+dk
11
kdξ
θ
( ) k+dk1
-r
r
dr
Q(x,y)
b b(x ,y )
xx
-ss
-ds+y-σ t
+x
1σ =0
x
dξ
+y-σ t
+y- tτ
+y- tτ
dr
2-σ1σ 0
-qtx' 2-σw
+
dξ R
R'
θ
-ds
-ptx' 2
+-σ tR
Geometry for Infinitesimal Elements of Non-concentric Fan-shaped stress field (UniformShear stress type)
θe
p
m
q
r
Concentric Fan-shaped stress field
dx
2,bottomσσ =
dx hdK+2,
1top dK
dx
ση
=+dx hdK+
2 tσdx
2,topσ
11K K dK+
11
dx
K dK+2,bottomσ
dxStress State in Diagonal Compression Stress FieldsStress State in Diagonal Compression Stress Fields
Single Strut actiong0x
cf0y
hh
′
N
θa
0y′
0Ca
PN τN
sτ
sσ
P 0T
Strut with Diagonal Compression FieldStrut with Diagonal Compression Fieldtτ
cσcott tσ τ θ=
f
N Ncf
θcf
PP P21 1
2s ca aP thfh h
⎡ ⎤⎛ ⎞⎢ ⎥= + −⎜ ⎟⎢ ⎥⎝ ⎠2s cf h h⎜ ⎟⎢ ⎥⎝ ⎠⎣ ⎦
sP Pτ −=
( )0t t h y
τ =′−
Diagonal Compression FieldDiagonal Compression Field
cσ
cffσ =
θc cfσ =
2sin 2fτθ = tanYyrf τ θ=
cf21 1 a a aτ ⎡ ⎤⎛ ⎞⎢ ⎥= + + Φ⎜ ⎟ ( )1τ
= Φ − Φ12 y
cf h h h⎢ ⎥= + − + Φ⎜ ⎟⎢ ⎥⎝ ⎠⎣ ⎦
( )1y ycf
= Φ Φ
Maximum Shear StrengthMaximum Shear Strengthτ
cf
( )1y ycf
τ= Φ − Φ0.5
cf21 1
2 ya a a
f h h hτ ⎡ ⎤⎛ ⎞⎢ ⎥= + − + Φ⎜ ⎟⎢ ⎥⎝ ⎠⎣ ⎦
Φ0.5
2cf h h h⎢ ⎥⎝ ⎠⎣ ⎦
Strut with Fan-Shaped Stress Fieldp
Chap 5 BeamsChap. 5 Beams
• Beams in Bending• Beams in ShearBeams in Shear- Transverse reinforcement
Without transverse reinforcement- Without transverse reinforcement- Effective Concrete Compressive Strength
Arch Actions- Arch Actions- Design
- With Normal Forces
• Beams in Torsion
Beams in BendingBeams in Bendingbcf
dpM 0yh dp
sA s YA fd
A f y bf0s Y cA f y bf=
0y= Φ
2p cM bd f=
dΦ
211M bd f⎛ ⎞= Φ Φ⎜ ⎟12p cM bd f= − Φ Φ⎜ ⎟
⎝ ⎠
Failure Mechanism in BendingFailure Mechanism in Bending
0y 452ϕ
+
Beams in ShearBeams in ShearP P
P Py
CVV
MV
T xθcσ
cotV θT xθ
Lower Bound SolutionLower Bound Solutionfτ
cf( )1ψ ψτ
⎧ −⎪⎨ 1
2cf
= ⎨⎪⎩
0.5
ψ0.50.5
Shift in Tension Force in StringerShift in Tension Force in Stringer
/M h1 cot2
V θ
/M h T
Tmax max/M h T=
TT
Upper Bound SolutionUpper Bound Solution
2β θ= tan ψθ =
⎡ ⎤
2β θ= tan1
θψ
=−
21 12c
a a af h h hτ ψ
⎡ ⎤⎛ ⎞⎢ ⎥= + − +⎜ ⎟⎢ ⎥⎝ ⎠⎣ ⎦c ⎣ ⎦
Upper Bound SolutionsUpper Bound Solutionsτ
cf
0.5
( )1cf
τ ψ ψ= −21 a a aτ ⎡ ⎤⎛ ⎞⎢ ⎥
ψ
cf
0 5
1 12c
a a af h h hτ ψ⎛ ⎞⎢ ⎥= + − +⎜ ⎟⎢ ⎥⎝ ⎠⎣ ⎦ ψ
0.5
Shear Capacity without Shear Reinforcement
f 1
b
cfcf
012
y h=
hhT
aP
Influence of Longitudinal Reinforcement on Shear Capacity
sl YlA fΦ =
1 cot2Y
PaT Ph
θ= +
cbhfΦ =
2Y h
cotYwP rfbh
τ θ= =
22 a af h hτ ψ
ψ
⎡ ⎤Φ ⎛ ⎞⎢ ⎥= + −⎜ ⎟⎢ ⎥⎝ ⎠⎣ ⎦cf h hψ⎢ ⎥⎝ ⎠⎣ ⎦
Beams in TorsionBeams in Torsion
• Space truss models• Closed thin walled sectionsClosed thin walled sections• Extended application of beam models in shear
Torsional Strength ModelTorsional Strength Model
Tq2 o
qA
=
AcpA
0 0.85 ohA A=
Cracking Torsional LimitCracking Torsional Limitτ
102
TA t
σ τ= =τ
τ
02A t ττ3 2cpA
2στ02,
4 3cp
cpcp
t A Ap
= =
1σcpTp
σ τ1σ
σ
1 2cpA
σ τ= =
2σ
Cracking TorsionCracking Torsion
113 ckfσ = 압축-인장 파괴 강도: 균열 비틀림3
1 0.7 kfσ = 휨인장 파괴 강도: 균열 휨강도 산정1 0.7 ckfσ
1 f1 6 ckfσ = 압축-인장 파괴 강도: 전단 강도산정
2⎛ ⎞216
cpcr ck
AT f
p⎛ ⎞
= ⎜ ⎟⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠6 cpp⎝ ⎠
비틀림 효과 무시비틀림 효과 무시1T T=4 crT T
2 2
1T V⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞+⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟전단 비틀림 상관 1
cr crT V+ =⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟
⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠전단-비틀림 상관
0.97 crV V= cr
2Af ⎛ ⎞
12cpck
thcp
AfT
pφ
⎛ ⎞= ⎜ ⎟⎜ ⎟
⎝ ⎠cpp⎝ ⎠
비틀림 강도비틀림 강도
Tq =2 o
qA
=
V d 1V qd=1 / sinD V θ=
1V qd=
V qd=
1 q
cott tN V θ=1V qd= t t
비틀림 강도비틀림 강도
1 2o oT V y V x= +
t yv oA f y2 cott yv of y
Vs
θ=s
2 o t yvA A fθcoto t yv
n
fT
sθ=
s
길이방향 철근길이방향 철근
( )2 cot2
no o
TN x y
Aθ= +( )
2 oA
l ylA f N=
T pcot
2n h
lo fl
T pA
A fθ=
o flf
전단-비틀림 조합전단 비틀림 조합
Direct sum
Root-square sum
압축장의 압축파괴 한계압축장의 압축파괴 한계비틀림으로 유발된 압축응력
2 hT pV
비틀림으로 유발된 압축응력
22cos sin 1.7 cos sin
u hcd
o oh
T pVf
ty Aθ θ θ θ= =
전단력으로 유발된 압축응력
cos sinu
cdV
fb d θ θ
=cos sinwb d θ θ
최소철근최소철근
12 w wt k
b s b sA A f+ = ≥2
16 3v t ckyv yv
A A ff f
+ ≥
5 yvck t ff AA A p
⎛ ⎞⎛ ⎞= ⎜ ⎟⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟,min 12l cp hyl yl
A A pf s f
= − ⎜ ⎟⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠
SlabsSlabs
• Statical Conditions• Geometrical ConditionsGeometrical Conditions• Constitutive Equations• Yield Zones• Upper Bound Solutions• Upper Bound Solutions• Lower Bound Solutions
Upper bound SolutionsUpper bound Solutions
• Assume yield lines • Work equationsWork equations• Minimize the upper bound solutions
Axes of rotationsLines of plastic hingesLines of plastic hingesFan mechanismsCorner leversC
Lower Bound SolutionsLower Bound Solutions2 22
2 22 xy yx m mm px x y y
∂ ∂∂− + = −
∂ ∂ ∂ ∂x x y y∂ ∂ ∂ ∂
2m a bx cx= + +xm a bx cx+ +
2m d ey fy= + +ym d ey fy= + +
hxym g hx my ixy= + + +
Punching ShearPunching Shear
• Upper Bound Solutions• Practical ApplicationsPractical Applications• Eccentric Loading• Effect if Counter-pressure• Edge and Corner Loads• Edge and Corner Loads
Upper Bound SolutionUpper Bound Solution
u
r( )
0,
h
cP f F r r dxπ ′= ∫α
( )r r x=( )
0∫
x 1 / 2d
Shape of failure surfaceShape of failure surfacerr
( )r r x= ( )0
,h
cP f F r r dxπ ′= ∫u α1 / 2d
( )r r x ( )0c ∫
x 1
Truncated cone with half-angle α0 dTruncated cone with half angle α00tan
2dr x α= +
( )( )cos sin sind h l mh α α α+ −( )( )0 0 02
0
cos sin sin2 cosc
d h l mhP fα α α
πα
+=
Use of Euler EquationUse of Euler Equation• Minimization of functional
( ),h
cP f F r r dxπ ′= ∫0∫
h i hx xb
• Complete solution
cosh sinhx xr a bc c
= +
r d⎧r
( )r r x=ϕ
0 0
tan2d x
rx h x h
ϕ⎧ +⎪⎪= ⎨ − −⎪u α/ 2d
( )r r x= 0 0cosh sinhx h x ha bc c
⎪ +⎪⎩
x 1 / 2d
Shear in JointsShear in Joints
• Monolithic Concrete• Strength of Different Types of JointsStrength of Different Types of Joints- Crack as a Joint- Construction Joint- Butt Joints- Butt Joints- Keyed Joints
Monolithic JointMonolithic Joint P
α
u
PcosEW Pu α=
sinR s YD A f u α=1 ( )1 1 sin2c cD f u α= −
Shear CapacityShear Capacityfτ
cf
0.5 ( )1τ ψ ψ=
tanc c
cf fτ ψ ϕ= +
( )1cf
ψ ψ= −
ψc cf f
ψsin1 2t t tf f fτ ϕψ ψ
⎡ ⎤⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞= + − − +⎢ ⎥⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟
0.51 2
1 sinc c c cf f f fψ ψ
ϕ= + +⎢ ⎥⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟−⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠⎣ ⎦
Crack as a JointCrack as a Joint
uϕ
Average yield line
yield line in cement paste
Load carrying capacity by frictionLoad carrying capacity by friction( )tanp α μ+( )tan
1 tanp α μ
τμ α
+=
−pp
σσ
p p( )tan tan tanβ μ β β α+ − pβ
p( )( )tan
pβ μ β β
σβ α μ
=− −
Bond StrengthBond Strength
• Local Bond Strength• Failure Mechanisms in SectionsFailure Mechanisms in Sections• Effect of Transverse Reinforcement
Local Bond Strength ModelsLocal Bond Strength Modelsu i
1csu =cu sincu α=
cossu α=s
cu
P L S Bτ+ +
cos cos cosc c c c cf dlf dlf ndlf ndlfπ π α π α π α= = + +
Failure MechanismsFailure Mechanisms
Closing Remarks and Future TopicsClosing Remarks and Future Topics
• Compatibility based Upper bound Solutions• Ultimate Deformation Estimation Models• Application to Composite structures• How to handle Brittle Failures : Fracture mechanics• How to handle Brittle Failures : Fracture mechanics• Bond Strength applications