the use of mobile technology as a service enabler in the banking sector
TRANSCRIPT
FACULTY OF ENGINEERING, BUILT ENVIRONMENT AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
FAKULTEIT INGENIEURSWESE, BOU-OMGEWING EN INLIGTINGTEGNOLOGIE
INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT / INDIVIDUELE WERKSOPDRAG
Surname / Van Tonga
Initials / Voorletters T.P.B.
Student Number /Studentenommer
1 0 4 8 7 2 8 1
Module Code / Modulekode
INF : 7 8 0
Assignment number / Opdragnommer
Final Paper (Exam)
Name of Lecturer / Naam van Dosent
Prof A. Van Der Merwe (Supervisor)
Prof C. de Villiers
Date of Submission / Datum ingehandig
01/11/2013
Declaration / Verklaring: I declare that this assignment, submitted by me, is my own work and that I have referenced all the sources that I have used. / Ekverklaardathierdieopdragwatdeur my ingehandig word, my eiewerk is en datekna al die bronnewatekgebruik het, verwys het.
Signature of Student
MARK / PUNT
The use of mobile technology as a service enabler in the banking sector
by
Thomas Tonga
(10487281)
Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree
Bcom (Hons) Informatics
in the
DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATICS
of the
FACULTY OF ECONOMIC MANAGEMENT SCIENCES
UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA
Supervisor: Prof Alta van der Merwe
01 November 2013
Abstract
This paper explores how organisations, especially those in the banking industry, can
use mobile financial services to better offer services to their consumers.
Furthermore, it explores whether these organisations can gain competitive
advantage using the mobile channel. Initially, a problem statement is discussed to
explore the gaps that currently exist with regards to this study. Then a literature
review regarding these gaps is discussed.
This research is based on an interprevitism paradigm approach. Qualitative and
quantitative data collection techniques were used in this study, this techniques
included; semi-structured interviews, and pre and post-test questionnaires. The
research strategy and methodology are discussed within. An analysis of the data and
findings of the data collected is discussed. A brief summary and conclusion
answering the main question is included at the end of the research paper.
Keywords
Mobile Banking, Mobile Financial Services, Mobile Commerce, Competitive
Advantage
Acknowledgements
Firstly, I would like to give thanks to God almighty for showering me with blessings
that I myself cannot contain, for walking with me throughout the days of my life and
mostly through my studies.
Secondly, I would like to extend my depth of gratitude to my supervisor, Prof Alta
van der Merwe for the support and consultation she provided. She has truly been an
inspiration, providing much appreciated insight and acumen from the initial draft to
the final paper.
I would like to give thanks to my family and friends for their patience, support, and
motivation throughout the research and completion of this paper. And lastly, to
everyone who took part in the development and writing of this paper, including all the
respondents that took time to complete the questionnaires and interview questions,
Table of contents
Chapter 1: Introduction ............................................................................................... 1
1.1. Introduction ...................................................................................................... 1
1.2. Background Information ................................................................................... 1
1.3. Problem Statement .......................................................................................... 2
1.4. Research Objectives and Research Questions ................................................ 3
1.5. Research Scope .............................................................................................. 4
1.6. Chapter Overview ............................................................................................ 4
Chapter 2: Literature Review ...................................................................................... 6
2.1. Introduction ...................................................................................................... 6
2.2. Information Technology in Banking Industry .................................................... 6
2.2.1. Information Technology Adoption .............................................................. 7
2.2.2. Emergence of Mobile Technology ............................................................. 8
2.3. Difference between Mobile Commerce and Mobile Banking ............................ 9
2.4. Mobile Commerce Services ........................................................................... 10
2.4.1. The Use of Mobile Services by Banks ..................................................... 11
2.4.2. Advantages of Adopting Mobile Services ................................................ 12
2.5. Why are people reluctant to using Mobile Banking? ...................................... 15
2.5.1. Security .................................................................................................... 17
2.6. The Future of Mobile Banking ........................................................................ 18
Chapter 3: Research Methodology ........................................................................... 20
3.1. Research Design & Strategy .......................................................................... 20
3.1.1. Introduction .............................................................................................. 20
3.1.2. Research Paradigm ................................................................................. 20
3.1.3. Population and Sampling ......................................................................... 21
3.1.4. Unit of Study ............................................................................................ 22
3.1.5. Sample Size of Participants ..................................................................... 22
3.2. Research Strategy and Data Collection Methods .......................................... 23
3.3. Expected Results ........................................................................................... 24
3.4. Limitation ........................................................................................................ 24
3.5. Ethics ............................................................................................................. 24
3.6. Conclusion ..................................................................................................... 25
Chapter 4: Research Findings .................................................................................. 26
4.1. Introduction .................................................................................................... 26
4.2. Mobile User Statistics..................................................................................... 28
4.2.1. Mobile User Demographics ......................................................................... 28
4.2.2. Type of M-banking Transactions ................................................................. 30
4.2.3. Customer Evaluation of Service Factors ..................................................... 31
4.2.4. Customer Evaluation of Delivery Channel ................................................... 32
4.3. Organisations Statistics .................................................................................. 33
4.3.1. Organisation Demographics ........................................................................ 33
4.3.2. Purpose behind the Introduction of Mobile Banking .................................... 34
4.3.3. Benefits of Mobile Financial Services.......................................................... 35
4.3.4. Competitive Advantage Findings ................................................................ 37
4.3.5. Mobile Trends Findings ............................................................................... 38
4.3.6. Security Findings ........................................................................................ 39
4.4. Conclusions and Recommendations .............................................................. 39
Chapter 5: Conclusion .............................................................................................. 41
5.1. Summary of findings ...................................................................................... 41
5.2. Conclusion ..................................................................................................... 42
5.3. Future research .............................................................................................. 43
Bibliography ............................................................................................................. 44
Appendix A: Sample Questionnaire ......................................................................... 48
Appendix B: Sample Interview Questions ................................................................ 55
Appendix C: Ethics and Integrity .............................................................................. 59
Appendix D: Researcher Declaration ....................................................................... 61
List of Figures
Figure 1: Chapter Overview Model ............................................................................. 5
Figure 2: Number of Mobile Subscribers .................................................................... 9
Figure 3: Mobile User Gender .................................................................................. 29
Figure 4: Mobile Device Usage ................................................................................ 29
Figure 5: Financial Service Delivery Platform ........................................................... 33
Figure 6: Advantages of MFS ................................................................................... 36
Figure 7: Competitive Advantage ............................................................................. 37
List of Tables
Table 1: Mobile Banking Transactions ..................................................................... 31
Page 1 of 68
Chapter 1: Introduction
1.1. Introduction
This paper explores how banks can effectively use mobile financial services (MFS) in
order to offer better services to its consumers and possibly attract potential
customers. The variables explored are uses of MFS, benefits of adoption for banks,
competitive advantage, and consumer preference. The paper defines mobile
commercial services, looks at information technology in the banking sector and
explores why consumers are reluctant to adopt MFS. The paper then looks at how
banks can use MFS to gain competitive advantage.
1.2. Background Information
Mobile devices today allow access to any web page compared to earlier mobile
devices that supported specially formatted web pages. These mobile web browsers
allow users to look up information, communicate with friends, and read news articles
from anywhere and at any time (Kane, et al, 2009). In South Africa, mobile devices
have enjoyed spectacular growth over the past decade. More than 60% of South
Africans, especially students, use mobile phones to access mobile internet
applications (Kreutzer, 2009). This level of usage has proven to be far greater than
the use of computer-based internet. A study conducted by Accenture (2012) shows
that South Africa was ranked as the highest in terms of the most internet usage
through mobile devices compared to other countries, such as France, Germany and
Finland. As the mobile market continues to skyrocket, the use of mobile devices to
access the internet is said to overtake the use of Personal Computers, which causes
a huge opportunity for mobile services.
According to Ondiege (2010), 60% of Africa’s population have no access to banking
services. Nevertheless, because 50% of the adult population have access to mobile
devices, organisations in the financial sector, specifically banks have recognised the
potential of reaching millions of prospective customers by offering access to financial
services through these devices. As banks embark on these opportunities they need
Page 2 of 68
to understand the factors influencing the adoption of these mobile services by users,
and how they can improve these factors in order to meet their business objectives.
By using mobile devices as a mode to conduct business, banks can provide instant
tailor made products and services to their customers based on the customer’s
financial history and buying patterns (Riivari, 2005).
Mobile technology or mobile banking (m-banking) has the potential to change the life
of consumers. It has the power to eliminate the need to physically visit a branch. In
other words, it enables the customer to have access to their financial information
anywhere and anytime and also have access to anytime applications that match their
lifestyles. The study in this paper investigates the various mobile technology trends,
which can be utilised by financial sector organisations in order to make service
delivery to their client feasible. Furthermore, the study will focus on the benefits
associated with the use of mobile technology as a service delivery platform, and how
financial organisations can use m-banking to build competitive advantage.
1.3. Problem Statement
M-banking is a powerful tool that has numerous advantages over traditional banking
solutions, such as, reducing geographical constraints and offering immediacy,
security and efficiency (Ondienge, 2010). The former advantage is the main
advantage for banks and the latter caters for the customers. In order for banks to
fully reap these benefits and to effectively provide m-banking services that
customers seek, they need to understand the entire perspective of m-banking, i.e.
they need to have a conceptual view of mobile technology. Furthermore, they need
to understand how they can use mobile technology to help them offer better service
delivery.
Many studies have been conducted with regards to use of m-banking services, for
example, in their paper Durkin and Howcroft (2003) studied the perception of senior
bankers regarding the use of the internet as a relationship marketing tool. Durkin and
Howcroft’s (2003) study, which was mainly focused on bankers in UK, Sweden and
USA, found that in order for banks to reinforce the bank customer relationship they
Page 3 of 68
need to collect efficient information about customer behaviour patterns. The study in
this paper will focus on bankers in South Africa and will exploit whether the adoption
of mobile technology can help South African banks to effectively use the marketing
tools that these channel provides.
Joseph and Stone (2003) studied the impact of technology on banking sector
service. They looked at the evolution of technology and the customer’s perception on
the impact of this evolution on service delivery. Patricio, Fisk and Cunha (2003)
studied the use of internet banking integrated in a multi-channel offering and found
that customer satisfaction, in a multi-channel context, is dependent not only on the
performance of isolated channels but they tend to use these channels in a
complementary way. The focus of these studies was mainly on the use of self-
service system, which included ATMs, internet banking and telephone banking. The
latter study measured the contribution of each service delivery channel, but focused
on internet as a channel in general. This paper focuses on the evolution of mobile
technology, specifically m-banking and analyse the impact of this evolution on the
banking sector.
1.4. Research Objectives and Research Questions
The core objective of this paper is to investigate how financial institutions can use
mobile services or mobile technology in order to enhance service delivery, i.e. the
paper aims to discover the feasibility of the use of m-banking by banks in order to
offer better service to its clients. In this paper, the opportunities that exist with
regards to use of mobile services are investigated and how these can help the
financial sector to meet their customers forever changing needs. As mobile devices
become omnipresent and many organisations take advantage of these innovations,
a lot of financial institutions are yet to exploit these advantages in order to gain
competitive advantage.
Further, this paper reflects whether consumers prefer mobile technology over the
other available platforms, such as branch, ATM, telephone and internet, and why
financial institutions should adjust to these changes. The various opportunities
Page 4 of 68
available to the banking sector with regards to mobile services will also be
investigated. The following questions are used as guidelines in order to attain the
paper’s objective:
Question 1: How can banks use mobile technology to better enable service
delivery?
Question 2: What are some of the benefits associated with the use of mobile
channel to offer services?
Question 3: Can mobile technology help organisations gain competitive
advantage over its competitors?
Question 4: Do customers prefer mobile services over the other available
platforms?
1.5. Research Scope
This research is conducted in Pretoria, South Africa. The research method, refer to
Chapter 3, is conducted on bank account holders who have a mobile device and on
four of the South African banks, which are based in the surroundings of Pretoria. The
research focuses on the following core constructs:
The benefits associated with the adoption of mobile services
The opportunities for m-banking
Consumer’s trust and perceived risk.
1.6. Chapter Overview
Figure 1 shows the chapter overview of this paper, each chapter entails the
following: Chapter 1 – Introduction, this section gives a brief background of the
problem statement, research objective and research scope. This section is then
followed by Chapter 2 – Literature Review. In this section, I will look at the available
literature regarding the use of MFS in the financial sector and the variables
mentioned above.
Chapter 3 – Research Methodology, discusses the research design and strategy to
be followed. It further discusses paradigm used, the population and sampling
Page 5 of 68
methods used to acquire the data, how the data is analysed and what the
expectations of the results are.
The fourth section, Chapter 4 – Data Analysis and Findings, focuses on the analysis
of the collected data and discusses the findings and results of the research. Finally,
Chapter 5 – Conclusion, I will summarise and conclude the findings of this paper.
The research findings will be discussed and synthesis with the literature.
Chapter 2Literature Review
Chapter 3Research
Methodology
Chapter 4 Research Findings
Chapter 5 Conclusion
Chapter 1Introduction
Interested in research method?
No Yes
Figure 1: Chapter Overview Model
Page 6 of 68
Chapter 2: Literature Review
2.1. Introduction
In this chapter, the existing literature regarding the use of m-banking or mobile
technology in the financial sector is reviewed. The focus of the literature review is
based on how financial institutions, specifically banks can better offer mobile
services through the use of m-banking. The evolution of mobile technology is
reviewed. The literature review then explores mobile commerce, m-banking and the
various mobile services that exist. It further reviews the benefits associated with the
adoption of mobile technology by banks, risks associated with the use of mobile
services and competitive advantage.
2.2. Information Technology in Banking Industry
Information technology (IT) plays an important role across many industries.
According to Padmanabhan (2012) the financial industry, particularly banking
industry, was one of the first to adopt the use of IT in the 1960s in order to influence
economic development across many nations. Banks use technology to take care of
their internal requirements with regards to book keeping and transaction processing.
This enables banks to offer products or services of quality at the utmost speed. The
introduction of m -banking has help banks eliminate the need for customer to set foot
in a bank, i.e. the time and distance barriers associated with accessing banking
services have been alleviated (Padmanabhan, 2012). Firms have adopted IT to
breed changes in managing customer relationships and opens doors to innovation,
which involves adding new services that customers need, expanding existing ones
and improving the service delivery process (Chen & Tsou).
However, technology comes with disadvantages, according to Joseph, Sekhon,
Stone, and Tinson (2005) qouting Durkin and Bennet (1999), states that the
introduction of service delivery technology will change the basic cost dimensions of
business. New technologies will initiate new opportunistic competition which the
Page 7 of 68
current players have never faced before. In order to adjust to this competition and to
be effectively competitive, the entire organisation culture will need to change. This
may force an organisation to follow a direction which contradicts the main business’
strategy, leading to business faillure. Furthermore, Joseph, Sekhon, Stone, and
Tinson (2005) state that when customer decide on what constitutes as good service
quality, they evaluate each aspect of service which is important to them. If an
organisation doesn’t satify their needs and forever changing needs, they simply seek
an organisation which provides these needs. In order for organisation to be effective
when choosing the technology adoption route, they need to keep certain technology
adoption elements in mind.
2.2.1. Information Technology Adoption
Chen and Tsou (2007) suggests the use of Scott Morton's (1995) MIT90 model,
when organisations want to adopt IT. This model consists of four elements:
Information technology infrastructure:
o The IT infrastructure includes the networks that enable an organisation to
effectively share information across departments in an ad hoc fashion.
Effective management of this are a foundation to IT adoption
Strategic alignment:
o The IT and organisation strategies need to be aligned in order to obtain
effective organisation performance
Organizational structure:
o The organisation structure includes the formal lines of communication and
the management hierarchy in an organisation, organisation structure
needs to be re-engineered to improve performance
Individual learning:
o In order for an organisation to gain effective benefits of IT, end-users and
IT personnel in the organisation must acquire new IT related skills and
knowledge.
Chen and Tsou (2007) research illustrates that by adopting these mechanisms
financial firms can sustain and enhance service innovation practices, which leads to
significant effects on competitive advantage and satisfied customers.
Page 8 of 68
2.2.2. Emergence of Mobile Technology
With the emergence of smart phones, technology now offers a multifunctional
wireless infrastructure that is accessible to customers 24/7. Mobile phones, referring
to those that are typically mobile, this includes notebooks and sub notebooks, are
becoming part of our everyday lives. Studies show that they have the potential to
become low-cost delivery channels for financial information, services and
transactions (Duncombe & Boateng, 2009). With nearly 885.99 million mobile
subscribers (Figure 1), the mobile service platform provides an opportunity for banks
to offer banking products and services (KPMG India, 2011). Accenture (2012) in the
their study on the mobile internet, found that South Africa, Brazil and Russia showed
the highest adoption of mobile technology, this is due to the developments in other
emerging markets. Many consumers use mobile devices to access internet
application, this level of usage is far greater than the use of computer-based internet
(Kreutzer, 2009). In his paper, Masinge (2010) quoted ITU (2009) saying that 90% of
South Africans own a mobile device and according to Ondinge (2010) there was a
substantial increase in South Africa’s mobile telephone subscription, from 16860
subscriptions in 2003 to 46436 subscriptions in 2009 with a 18.39% annual growth
rate. According to Deloitte’s (2010) research, about 10% of mobile users conducted
m-banking on their devices. In return, banks have made large investments in m-
banking capabilities. According to KPMG India (2011) the new channel can be built
at low cost, by incorporating internet platforms to mobile devices. For communication
this mobile devices use GSM/GPRS and 3G technologies as typical connections
standards.
In his research Masinge (2010) discovered three technology solutions which m-
banking can be implemented through, which will be discussed below:
Browser-based application:
o This solution is based on micro-websites following the Wireless Application
protocol (WAP). The functions of this solution are similar to those of
electronic banking which uses http (Pousttchi & Schurig, 2007)
Messaging-based application:
Page 9 of 68
o This is the communication between the bank and client via text messages.
Short Message Service is a GSM service used to exchange text
messages. The short message service centre (SMSC) receives this text
messages and transmit it to the destination device (Pousttchi & Schurig,
2007).
Client-based application:
o Software is installed in the mobile phone (Masinge, 2010). An example is
SIM Application Toolkit (SIM-Toolkit, SAT), the software or mobile baking
application is stored on the SIM card of the user or on the device, and with
the use of GSM standards the communication between the card and
mobile device is extended (Pousttchi & Schurig, 2007).
Figure 2: Number of Mobile Subscribers
2.3. Difference between Mobile Commerce and Mobile Banking
The terms electronic commerce (e-commerce) and mobile commerce (m-commerce)
are used interchangeably by many people. However, according to Tiwari and Buse
(2006) in order to understand the terms e-commerce and m-commerce one needs to
initially understand the similarities and differences between these terms. M-
commerce is similar to e-commerce in a sense that services offered by both of these
Page 10 of 68
terms are done electronically over computer-mediated networks. The difference is
that the communication networks used by m-commerce are accessed through
mobile devices and e-commerce is accessed through personal computers, laptops,
etc (Tiwari & Buse, 2006).
M-banking at the other hand refers to the use of mobile telecommunication devices
through which bankers do their bank related transactions (Pikkarainen, Karjaluoto &
Pahnila, 2004). M-banking is also defined as an application of m-commerce which
allows bank clients to access their financial account information or perform bank
related transactions such as balance enquires, money transfer, and purchasing
prepaid airtime from anywhere and at any time (Masinge, 2010). M-banking enables
customer to gain access to information relating to their accounts via the devices
themselves or enables them to transact online (Njenga, 2009). Besides the success
of the applications to get convenience at customer’s fingertips, m-banking also helps
rural household in that they no longer need to travel to post offices or banks to
conduct transactions (KPMG India, 2011).
2.4. Mobile Commerce Services
The market for mobile commerce services also known as mobile financial services
(MFC) is huge and is expanding, the use of mobile devices by users are three times
more than that of Personal Computers (Riivari, 2005). According to Marsh and
McLennan Companies (2012) 20 million users across Europe use their handheld
devices to access their bank account. Out of that 20 million, 3 million users in UK
use their mobile device to manage their money. The research also found that
compared to online banking users, who access their account six times a month, On
average, m-banking user’s accounts are active 16-18 times a month. Many mobile
users are now using their mobile devices to access online services. As the number
of financial transactions carried out through the use of mobile service increase
enormously, we can expect banks to start considering closing this gap (Tiwari, Buse,
& Herstatt, 2006).
Page 11 of 68
Because the focus of this paper is on m-banking, I will not look into the other service
delivery platforms used by banks, such as ATMs, branch, telephone banking and
internet banking. According to Riivari (2005), not only do banks use m-commerce
services channels to render convenient services to customers but they use these
channels to attract new customers and to help them build good brand image. M-
banking also helps to sustain current customers, i.e. it allows banks to build a close
relationship with its clients and also to reduce marketing and fixed or variable costs
(refer to “2.4.2 Advantages of adopting mobile services”). The services offered by m-
banking providers may include transfers between accounts as well as between
peers, view and manage accounts, and receive alerts regarding account activity,
balances and other issues.
2.4.1. The Use of Mobile Services by Banks
The financial sector core business consists of the handling of money but banks have
now taken on a speculative forte (Ricard, Prefontaine, & Sioufi, 2001). In order for a
firm to reap profits, managers in various industries have realised the importance of
providing quality customer service. This strategy is key to improving customer
satisfaction and wining a bigger share of the market. Because of the high increase in
satisfactory service delivery expectations of customers, banks have been forced to
respond with a set of deeper and broader services than they use to in the past
(Joseph, Sekhon, Stone, & Tinson, 2005). As with other industries, banks have also
invested in technology in order to entice new customers, meet the forever changing
needs of their existing customers, to offer better services and to meet the technical
innovation expectations of customers (Stone & Joseph, 2003).
According to a study conducted by Deloitte (2010), banks can realise operational
efficiencies by adopting an integrated channel strategy that includes the various
service delivery channels and m-banking. The cost of a transaction processed via a
mobile phone is ten times lower than transactions processes via an ATM and more
than fifty times lower than via a branch (Deloitte, 2010). Thus banks need to drive
more transactions to mobile phones in order to increase operating efficiencies.
Mobile application can help banks generate high revenues as well. In order to reach
Page 12 of 68
this objective, they need to offer value added and highly innovative MFC while
retaining their technological literate customers (Tiwari, Buse, & Herstatt, 2006).
According to Deliotte (2010), an increase in revenue can be realised by:
Expanding distribution
o M-banking allows banks to expand beyond their current geographic
segment, thus catering to a large pool of consumers.
“Monetizing the value of customer analytics”
o Because m-banking allows banks to have a broader view of their
customers spending patterns. Banks are put in a position whereby they
can develop a new line of business specifically catering for their
consumers’ needs
Real-time access to products and services
o Banks can pin-point a customer’s physical location in order to make
relevant offers to the customer. For example, when a consumer enters a
shopping centre, the banks can be notified and can offer the customer
products or services without them actually acquiring the service.
A research conducted by Future Foundation (2011) found that users of m-banking
are in a very frequent contact with their bank. The study found that this interaction is
far greater than that from any other channel, which creates new opportunities for
banks to build a relationship with customers (Future Foundation, 2011). On the
whole, the mobile channel has proven to be the most effective and efficient way
through which banks can use to communicate with consumers. The study further
found that a third of customers are willing to be contacted by the banks through their
mobile devices if it improves the service they receive.
2.4.2. Advantages of Adopting Mobile Services
Mobile services have a positive impact on customers because they allow customers
to access information and services from anywhere and at any time (Bhatti, 2007).
Customer want to be in control of their account and want ad hoc information, mobile
services thus increase customer satisfaction. According to Future Foundation (2011)
the appeal of m-banking is not one-dimentional, rather consumers benefit from a
Page 13 of 68
number of advantages. Consumers that value their time and ability to regularly
monitor their finances to avoid bank charges, convenience, speed and control are
some of the key factors. “When it comes to service, sometimes it’s what you don’t
get that is most important” (Future Foundation, 2011). Consumers that ulitises m-
banking appreciate not having to go to a branch and the benefit of not having to use
a call centre, some love the idea of checking if they have sufficient funds in their
accounts before purchasing something. Apart from the consumers benefits
discussed above banks can also reap a few benefits as well.
A research conducted by Marsh and McLennan Companies (2012) determined the
following benefits to banks if they embrace m-banking:
Reduced cash handling costs
Large pool of customer, i.e. global reach
Alleviate the need for branches, this helps reduce location costs and cost
associated to employees.
A study also done by Marsh and McLennan Companies (2012) on a medium-sized
Spanish bank that implemented m-banking services showed that the use of m-
banking resulted in a 6% decrease in fraud. A bank can through the use of mobile
technology, inform customers and ask for their confirmation when a transaction is
performed. By combining information services and marketing, banks can improve
customer service by using mobile applications that offer tailor made products based
on the consumer’s financial history, interests and spending patterns (Riivari, 2005).
M-banking assist banks to get to know their clients, banks are therefore able to
provide accessible service (convenience) which attract customer, thus fostering a
long term personalised relationships (Ricard, Prefontaine, & Sioufi, 2001).
2.4.2.1. Competitive Advantage
With the emergence of mobile technology, banks now operate in a highly competitive
market. According to Clemons (1986) referencing Michael Porter states that there
are three generic competitive strategies which form the basis of a business’s
Page 14 of 68
strategy and these generic competitive strategies help to define competitive
advantage:
Differentiation
o Organisations should provide superior value products or services which
are difficult to imitate, difficult to substitute and dominate on premium
prices
Cost leader
o Organisation should provide reasonable value or quality products or
services at low prices
Focus
o Organisations need to study and understand their target market, thus
enabling them to provide better products and services than their
competitors.
Banks that possesses differentiation, cost leadership and focus will be able to
provide services that are unique, faster, and the advantage of charging premium
prices. According to Clemons (1989) this is achieved through differentiation with
innovation, quality or customer service. Furthermore, competitive advantage is
achieved by following a focus strategy. This enables an organisation to target a
specific market, for example, banks target local or high net worth customers. These
customers therefore enjoy the personal touch that big organisations may not be able
to provide. In support of this theory, in their research Stone and Joseph (2003),
found that banks that offer both branch and technology based services are more
competitive than their competitors as consumers prefer to conduct at least a portion
of their bank services via technology-based services.
According to Pearlson and Saunders (2012), Information resources can be used to
influence competitive forces. There are five major competitive forces which can be
used to shape the environment in which a firm operates. These forces include
potential threat of new entrant, bargaining power of suppliers, bargaining power of
buyers, industry competitors and threat of substitute product. For the purpose of this
paper only barging power of buyers and threat of substitute products will be explored
in detail from a banks perspective.
Page 15 of 68
Bargaining power of buyer
Consumers have power to influence the competitive environment in which banks
operate. This power can take the form of easy access to banks or ATMs in order to
purchase the same products and services or the opportunity to get access to
products and services from anywhere and at any time. Banks can use information
resources to build switching costs that make it less desirable for consumers to
purchase from competitors. For example, Apples iTunes software makes it difficult
for customer to use other formats and technologies other than the iPod, this reduces
the power of consumers.
Threat of substitute products
A substitute product is a product from another industry or firm that provides the same
benefits to the buyers as products provided by firms in the same industry (Pearlson
& Saunders, 2012). A product on the marketplace is substitutable depending on the
buyer’s willingness to substitute. Information resources can be used to reduce the
threat of substitution. Thus in order for competitors to be successful, they need to
offer better services to their customers and not just substitute products.
According to Pearlson and Saunders (2012), a resource is only viable when it
enables a bank to become more efficient and effective. It is considered rare when
competitors do not posses it. For example, many banks use ATMs in order to
conduct their operations and customers expect these ATMs in many convenient
locations. However, because these ATMs are offered by most banks, they are no
longer rare and they no longer offer strategic advantage. The aim of this paper is to
explore whether m-banking can be used to offer rare services, reduce threat of
substitute products and reduce power of consumers, thus creating competitive
advantage.
2.5. Why are people reluctant to using Mobile Banking?
Regardless of the time, cost-saving and freedom of location which are benefits of
using online banking, banks still face problems with consumers being reluctant to
use online banking (Pikkarainen, Karjaluoto & Pahnila, 2004). Research conducted
Page 16 of 68
by White and Nteli (2004) shows that there has only been a 6 per cent increase for
the use of the World Wide Web (www) for banking purposes in the UK. Consumers
are sceptic about using online services or online banking because they are uncertain
as to what are best practices with regards to the use of the internet (Durkin &
Howcroft, 2003). In their paper, White and Nteli (2004) says that the level of increase
of the use of internet for banking purposes has stayed stationery while there has
been an increase in the number of internet users. One of many reasons for this is
fear about security.
Despite the reassurance given by banks, customers still have negative perceptions
about using these services. There are various factors which influence the adoption of
mobile services in South Africa. Financial institutions need to understand these
factors in order to increase the rate of adoption (Brown, Zaheeda, Davies & Stroebel,
2003). In their paper, Pikkarainen, Pikkarainen, Karjaluoto and Pahnila (2004)
discovered various reasons why bankers do not use online banking channels. Firstly,
because customers need to have access to the internet in order to use this service,
they face cost challenges. These costs include traditional bank charges, mobile
network charges and mobile device costs. On top of that novice users still need to
learn how to use these services, some people go to say that they have no interest
because a phone is to call and text. Secondly, people also complain about the lack
of social dimension when using online banking. Thirdly, trust has been recognised as
one of the critical factors with influences the success of m-banking. This trust is
categorised into two aspects:
Trust in mobile network providers
Trusting banks.
Masinge (2010) states that consumers have a psychological expectation towards
banks, they expect banks not to act as opportunists when providing their services.
Finally, Pikkarainen, Pikkarainen, Karjaluoto and Pahnila (2004) concurs with White
and Nteli (2004), they say that customers have been afraid of security issues, i.e.
customers are reluctant to adopt MFS because of the security risk associated with
such platforms.
Page 17 of 68
2.5.1. Security
Pikkarainen, Pikkarainen, Karjaluoto, and Pahnila (2004) found that many studies
have already realised the importance of security when it comes to customer
accepting to use online services. Security was found to be the main obstacle to the
adoption of online services in Australia, although people are aware of the risks they
had little understanding of online banking security risks.
KPMG India (2011) found that m-banking services use basic SMS/USSD based data
transfer technologies, which makes it less secure than internet banking. Though the
services offered by banks over the mobile platform are for information dissemination
and small value transactions, Padmanabhan (2012) advises banks to ensure that
they have the best controls and measures in place, i.e. banks need to protect assets
and highly sensitive data they hold about customers from cyber-crimes and
unauthorised access. Features like authentication using OTP and alerts need to be
implemented in order to enhance security (KPMG India, 2011). In their paper,
Pousttchi and Schurig (2007) suggested two security requirements that need to be
considered by banks when introducing m-banking services. Firstly, because m-
banking transmits sensitive data, the data transmission process needs to be
encrypted. Secondly, users need to authorise every transaction or access to the
data, i.e. users need to prove that they are the rightful holder of the account before
any transaction can take place.
In order for customers to trust banks, banks need to educate customers about the
risk of online banking (Padmanabhan, 2012). Literature emphasise that people want
to work or share information with people they trust thus the creation of a strong
relationship between banks and their customers is essential (Brown, Zaheeda,
Davies & Stroebel, 2003). Since traditionally, building trust occurs mostly through
face-to-face contact, the implications of introducing e-banking remain uncertain
whether building long-term relationships will still be possible (Joseph, Sekhon,
Stone, & Tinson, 2005).
Page 18 of 68
2.6. The Future of Mobile Banking
M-banking is being used more and more by banking customers. The banking trend is
increasing simultaneously with the increase in the adoption of smart phones and
tablets, especially amongst the y-generation. A study conducted by the Federal
Reserve (2012) found that nearly 21 percent of mobile device users have used m-
banking in the past 12 months. Eleven percentage non-users reported that they will
use m-banking in the future. In terms of functions performed over m-banking, the
study further found that 90 percent of mobile users use m-banking to check financial
account balances or transaction inquiry. According to the Pew Research Center
(2012) there has been a drastic increase in the number of users that use their mobile
devices to query account balance information, an increase from 18 percent to 29
percent between the years 2011 and 2012. M-banking is seen an additional
customer expectation that compliments other banking channels rather than a service
delivery channel replacement (Federal Reserve, 2012). Banks therefor need to
invest in their channel network in order to make these channels more customer-
centric and user-friendly. By doing so the channel will be more efficient which in turn
contributes to better returns on investment and increased profitability.
Because of the emergence of new mobile technologies, the banking sector is
becoming highly competitive with the traditional channels no longer offering
competitive edge. According to Capgemini (2012), the changes in mobile
technologies have led to the emergence of four technology trends in the retail
banking channels. The trends will be discussed in detail below.
Increased spending on mobility to enhance consumer experience:
o As customers are shifting from PCs to mobile devices, the mobile channel
is now becoming part of the banking channel blend. Banks are said to
spend more than 30 percent on mobile channels in order to improve
customer experience. A focus by banks on mobile innovation will help
them improve customer experience and differentiate them in the highly
competitive environment in which they operate. Banks need to invest more
in digital channels and implement the best solutions which are available on
the market.
Page 19 of 68
Concentration on mobile remote deposit capture (RDC) and mobile marketing to
gain competitive advantage:
o RDC is a technology that allows bankers to remotely scan cheques and
send that image to the bank for deposit, via an encrypted internet
connection (Deloitte, 2010). Banks can use RDC to strengthen the bank-
customer relationship by offering the customers value-added services.
According to Capgemini (2012) the driver for this trend is the rapid
consumer preferences and lifestyle which forces banks to develop ways to
allow customers to transact anytime and anywhere.
o In order to leverage business growth and efficient customer service, they
need to integrate mobile marketing and social media.
Increase on social media and social analytical tools to help make strategic
decisions:
o With an increase in the use of social platforms, customers expect banks to
commune through these platforms as well. They expect customer service
and financial advice through these platforms. Banks need to consider
social media as part of their multi-channel strategy.
o A combination of customer intelligence and social analytics can help banks
gain an insight into customer behaviour and needs.
Focus on multi-channel integration in order to better offer services:
o According to Gartner Inc (2012) one of the problems faced by banks is the
challenge of delivering a seamless experience to customers. Another
challenge is the integration of “backend systems” with “multi-channel front-
end”. In the upcoming years, banks that offer seamless customer
experience for better service delivery through the use of multi-channel will
gain a competitive edge over its competitors.
Page 20 of 68
Chapter 3: Research Methodology
3.1. Research Design & Strategy
3.1.1. Introduction
In order attain the objectives of this study, which is how banks can reap the benefits
associated with the use of MFS to offer better services. The opportunities provided
by m-banking and the risks and challenges faced by banks without and those without
such are studied. In support of this objective, a second objective is studied which aim
to encourage the adoption of MFS as an effective service delivery platform. The
second objective of this paper is to investigate whether customers prefer MFS over
the other available banking service platforms, such as, ATMs, internet banking, and
branch banking. In this chapter, we will look at the research paradigm, the various
research instruments that will be used to conduct the research, the population,
sampling and size of sample and the unit of study. Furthermore, the data collection
techniques are discussed including the challenges and limitations of this paper.
3.1.2. Research Paradigm Researchers have different thinking styles, beliefs and views of their environment,
thus the way they conduct their research studies tend to differ. According to Oates
(2006), a paradigm is a specific way of thinking about problems and practices that
regulate inquiry within a discipline. Therefore, to clarify the researcher’s thinking
style, an exploration of the paradigm chosen for this study will be discussed.
This study makes use of a two methods to explore and advice on how banks can
reap the benefits associated with the use of MFS to offer better services.
Quantitative method is used to provide a representative sample from the population,
so that the results of the sample studied can be generalised back to the population
(Oates, 2006). Because the population of this study is unknown, this method is used
to provide numeric measurements and analysis of the adoption dynamic of mobile
services between banks and customers, thus the study is not generalised back to the
population. Qualitative on the other hand is used, according to Marshall (1996), to
Page 21 of 68
help provide understanding of complex psychological issues. Thus this method will
be used to help understand the issues and benefits relating to the use of m-banking
or MFS by banks.
According to Oates (2006), the philosophical paradigms most mainly used in
Information System research are positivism, interpretivism, and critical research. The
qualitative method is in the same philosophical foundation as the interpretive
paradigm, which is concerned with understanding the social context of Information
Systems (Oates, 2006). The interpretivism paradigm is used in this paper because it
supports the view that there are many truths and multiple subjective realities. This
type of paradigm helps to understand complex ideas and concepts of people in their
natural social settings which is more the focus of this study. Furthermore, the
interpretive paradigm provides an opportunity for the research’s participants to voice
their concerns and practices.
The quantitative method on the other hand is in the same philosophical foundation
as the positivist paradigm. This paradigm forms the foundation of what is called “the
scientific method”, it argues that there is one version of truth or objective reality
(Oates, 2006). But because only the measurement method (quantitative) is adopted
from this paradigm, the paper doesn’t make use of universal laws, mathematical
models and is not based on the empirical testing of hypothesis. Thus the use of
quantitative method in this study is to understand people in their world and to
recognise that multiple interpretations exist.
Qualitative and quantitative data collection techniques were used in this descriptive
study, this techniques included; semi-structured interviews, and pre and post-test
questionnaires. In order to attain different perspectives and to draw attention to the
adoption of MFS by financial institutions, descriptive research methods were used in
this study.
3.1.3. Population and Sampling The population in this study is divided into two parts. Firstly, the population for this
study is consumers with a mobile device and a bank account with any of the four
Page 22 of 68
banks in South Africa. Secondly, according to Marshall (1996) the nature of the
population is defined in such a way that all the members have an equal chance of
selection. Thus the second part of the population follows random sampling, thus the
sample includes the four major banks in South Africa, FNB, Standard Bank, ABSA
and Capitec Bank.
3.1.4. Unit of Study
For the purpose of this study, the unit of analysis is 25 consumers with bank
accounts in South Africa. These consumers also need to own a mobile device. To
better understand the adoption issues of the consumers, the research is not limited
to consumers with a mobile device and a bank account or those with a banks
account but no mobile device. It also includes consumers with bank account and
mobile device or bank account and no mobile device, regardless of their status and
age group. The study however does not include consumers who do not have a bank
account.
The study also focuses on the banks that actually provide these services; the banks
include the four major banks in South Africa, ABSA, FNB, Standard Bank and
Capitec Bank. These banks are limited to only those that are in the Pretoria
surroundings, only each of the main banks will be included in the study.
3.1.5. Sample Size of Participants
According to Marshall (1996), a probability technique is use when an author beliefs
that the sample of respondents chosen are representatives of the overall population.
Because the first part of the study, refer to “3.1.3 Population”, focuses on consumers
with or without mobile device but those consumers with bank accounts with FNB,
Standard Bank, ABSA or Capitec Bank, the sampling method followed in this study is
non-probability. The sampling method is also chosen because the researcher does
not know enough about the population to thoroughly conduct a probability sample.
The second part of this study, refer to “3.1.3 Population”, will use a probability
Page 23 of 68
technique, because the results of the sample study can be generalised back to the
population.
According to Marshall (1996), in order to determine how close one is to the true
population, the margin of error and confidence interval are used. For the purpose of
this study, twenty-six questionnaires were created in order to attain a sample size of
twenty, which is necessary to ensure ninety-five percent level of confidence with a
+/- three percent accuracy range. Interviews will also be conducted with the each of
the four banks in S.A.
3.2. Research Strategy and Data Collection Methods
In this study, a survey interview was used to collect all the data necessary to answer
the main research question. Furthermore, a survey questionnaire was used to
support findings of the main question (refer to instruments in Appendix A and
Appendix B).
The survey interview (Appendix B) was directed at the major bank’s IT managers or
representatives, who have knowledge and insight about the implementation of m-
banking as a service delivery channel in their respective organisations and how
these channels affect or benefit the organisation. The interview seeks to establish
the benefits associated with the use of mobile technology by banks, determine
whether mobile technology can be used to offer better services to consumers and
how banks can effectively use these services to make service delivery more efficient.
An analysis of the risks and challenges of banks with and without such mobile
services will also be conducted.
The survey questionnaire (Appendix A) was mainly directed at the bank’s customers
who make use of the various service delivery platforms offered by the banks. The
respondents may include anyone who has a bank account and a mobile device. The
questionnaire aims to establish whether the respondents/customers prefer MFS over
the other available platforms offered by the banks. It further aims to identify the
issues leading to lack of mobile service adoption.
Page 24 of 68
3.3. Expected Results
Upon conclusion of this research, I expect to come to a solution for the main
research question including its sub-questions. The solution expected is aimed to
advise financial institutions, especially banks how they can better take advantage of
the benefit associated with the use of MFS as a service delivery channel. This is a
solution aimed to help banks to effectively exhaust the benefits provided by MFS, a
solution that will realise competitive advantage and provide knowledge about what
consumers prefer. In support of the main question, I also aim to discover whether
customers really do prefer MFS channel over the other available channels.
3.4. Limitation
The survey will only be conducted on the surroundings of Pretoria. A pre-requisite of
a respondent answering this survey is that one should have a bank account, with any
of the major banks in South Africa, ABSA, FNB, Capitec Bank or Standard Bank,
and/or a mobile device. The questionnaire will be English, thus misunderstanding
and misinterpretation of the questions might occur especially for non-speaking
respondents. This might negatively affect the results.
3.5. Ethics
The author shall adhere to the following general principles of ethics while conducting
the research of this paper:
The author shall obtain informed consent of the respondents before conducting
research on this paper
Respondents have the right not to participate or are not obliged to respond to the
questionnaire distributed or interview conducted by the researcher
The researcher pledges that the data collected shall be handled with out-most
confidentiality and anonymity
The research shall be conducted with close attention and promises not to provide
misinterpretation or misunderstanding of any sort
Page 25 of 68
3.6. Conclusion
Research instrument
Qualitative – interview
Quantitative – user questionnaires
Population and unit of study
consumers with a mobile device
and a bank account
four major banks in South Africa
not consumers with no mobile
device
regardless of status or age group
Pretoria surroundings only
Sample size
Non-probability – with or without cell
phone but with bank account
Probability – banks or financial
institutions
Data collection
Survey based questionnaire distributed
to consumers
Interview with banks that offer mobile
banking services
Page 26 of 68
Chapter 4: Research Findings
4.1. Introduction
In order to explore theories and concepts that are relevant to a research study,
according to Oates (2006), a researcher needs to conduct data analysis, which is the
process of analysing and arranging the collected data. In this section, the aim is to
analysis the collected data in order to answer the questions discussed in Chapter 1.
In order to answer the main question formulated in Chapter 1, “How banks can reap
the benefits associated with the use of mobile technology to offer better services?”,
and its sub-questions, an interview was conducted with the banks representatives.
The first part of the interview questions are designed in such a way as to provide
qualitative data which will be analysed through the use of thematic analysis
(Appendix B). Whilst the second part of the interview questions are constructed in
such a way as to provide quantitative data by utilising a rating for each response to a
question. The rating used had variables ranging from “strongly disagree” to “strongly
agree”. Included in between, in their respective order the other rating were;
“disagree”, “neutral”, “slightly agree”, and “agree”. The interviews with banks focus
on the bank’s perspective about customer behaviour and use of m-banking service
delivery channel. The open-ended interviews were literally transcribed and a cross-
analysis method was used in order to underline different concept and assess
relationship among these concept.
The closed questions questionnaire aims to collect data in order to support the main
questions. This questionnaire aims to find out whether consumers or bankers prefer
MFSs over the other available service delivery channels. Thus the application of
rating scores was incorporated into the design of the questionnaire, in order to obtain
quantitative data. Part of the questionnaire was a section used to collect data about
the usage of MFSs, including the attitude and perception of consumers towards the
use of such services.
Page 27 of 68
The analysis technique applied in this study is thematic analysis and association
cross analysis. This data analysis is manually conducted based on the determined
categorise. This chapter is divided into two parts; the first part, section 4.2 shows
results based on user findings, while section 4.3 will analyse the organisation
statistics gathered by the author. The results that follow in the section below are
presented through the use of tables, figures and graphs.
Page 28 of 68
4.2. Mobile User Statistics
The section below analyses mobile user statistics gathered using a survey
questionnaire, see Appendix A. A few topics regarding the findings are touch upon,
these topics include: user demographics, types of m-banking transactions, customer
evaluation of service factors, and lastly customer evaluation of delivery channel.
4.2.1. Mobile User Demographics
In this section, I focus on a few variables in order to analyse the demographics of the
mobile users evaluated. These variables include the respondent’s gender, mobile
device and bank account status, and whether they use mobile device to transact.
The reason behind the choice of these variables is to determine the gender, and to
screen out respondents that cannot participate in this study.
Twenty-six questionnaires were distributed to individuals, with all the individuals
completing all the sections of the questionnaire. Figure 3 below shows the gender
distribution of the respondents’ surveyed. According to the Figure, off the 26
respondents, 57.69% were male, while the other 42.31% were female. All the
respondents had a mobile device and owned a bank account with at least one of the
major banks in South Africa. Figure 4 below illustrates that only 80.77% of the
respondents use mobile devices to perform any form of financial transaction. The
remaining 19.23% did not use a mobile device to transact. Off the 57.69% male
respondents, 20% did not use mobile devices to transact and out of the 42.31% of
female, 18.18% did not use mobile devices to transact.
Page 30 of 68
From the user demographic analysis and figures above, it is visible that the most
individuals surveyed were males. Furthermore, it is clear that the usage of mobile
device by consumers to conduct financial transactions is higher than those that do
not use the channel. This could be caused by the increase in mobile device users.
4.2.2. Type of M-banking Transactions
Customers were asked to indicate the types of m-banking transactions that they
conduct via mobile devices and indicate how often they use these type transactions,
the analysis allowed a comparative evaluation of the transactions. The transaction
included: balance enquiry, compare state of accounts, transfer funds, pay
beneficiaries, purchase airtime, locate nearest branch, view financial indicators, and
loan calculator. As shown in Table 1, purchase of airtime is seen as the most
performed transaction, with 19.23% of customers performing such a transaction
daily. From the data analysed, what appeared to be significantly surprising is that
that out of the 19.23% customers, 100% of the people purchasing airtime daily is
female. Due to misinterpretation and misunderstanding 11.5% of respondents who
do not use their mobile device for any form of financial/banking transaction have
completed Question 5 of the “Mobile User Questionnaire”.
A significant 80.77% respondent showed no interest in the use of loan calculators
and 76.92% showed no interest in the use of GPS features to locate nearest bank
branch. This statistics could be due to a number of reasons, such as customers not
having smartphones or customers not being interested in the additional features
offered by banks through the mobile channel. Banks seem to be investing in
additional features such as calculators and so forth that consumers show no interest
in.
Page 31 of 68
Table 1: Mobile Banking Transactions
4.2.3. Customer Evaluation of Service Factors
From the customers’ perspective, when asked to rate the service factors most
important to them, the greatest customer service factor was the possibility of having
security measures in place and providing quality information. 92.31% of the
customers indicated that security is the most important service factor, with reliability
or quality of information being the second most important factor with 84.62%. The
study results concur with the literature review discussed in “2.5.1 Security”. Security
concerns were indicated as the main obstacle to the adoption of m-banking, five of
the respondents who did not use m-banking rated security as the highest concern.
However, security concerns in terms of MFS were more related to trust in the
technology of m-banking itself, and not so much on the trust in banks.
Overall, all the factors, response time; convenience of accessing the service; quality
of information; credibility; responsiveness; and security performed well. Credibility
Page 32 of 68
seems to be related to trust in the technology of m-banking. This is an important
reason for customer preference of m-banking compared with Branch or ATM. The
convenience of accessing banking services through m-banking seems to be of less
importance compared to the other five factors.
M-banking service prices do not seem to be of concern, as 34.62% respondents
rated the pricing level 2, from a scale of 1 being very cheap and 5 being very
expensive. However, the data shows that 4 of the respondents who do not use m-
banking found the service as being somewhat expensive. Three of these
respondents preferred ATMs or internet banking over m-banking. The lack of
adoption of m-banking could be influenced by how customers view the pricing of the
service. If the customers perceive the service to be expensive then they are likely not
to use that specific service.
4.2.4. Customer Evaluation of Delivery Channel
Customers were asked to evaluate the delivery channel which they prefer. Internet
Banking (IB) is seen as the most preferred service delivery channel, with a 3.85%
difference between IB and m-banking. This fact concurs with the literature reviewed
in Chapter 3, consumers have access to m-banking but prefer IB because of its
visual and printing capabilities. These capabilities allow users to have a more visible
display and also be able to print prove of their transaction if need be. Customers who
enjoy the luxury that m-banking provides, have highly rated the advantages of the
mobile service delivery channel. It makes sense for these customers to highly rate
the channel because they have first-hand experience with the channel. Furthermore,
non-users of m-banking have also highly rated the channel. As shown in Figure 5, m-
banking performed well in terms of time saving, and accessibility, with percentages
measuring above 60%.
Non-users justified their ignorance to use m-banking on the trust in the technology of
m-banking. These customers were uncomfortable with using or trusting mobile
technology, thus showing no interest or completely avoiding the technology. Security
issues seemed to be the main reason why non-users do not want to adopt m-
banking. However, the advantages of m-banking, such as time saving and
Page 33 of 68
accessibility seem to encourage current users to continue using the channel, in spite
of the security concerns and the lack of personalisation.
Figure 5: Financial Service Delivery Platform
4.3. Organisations Statistics
In this section, the results obtained from the interview questions, see Appendix B,
are analysed. The variables analysed are: organisation demographics, purpose
behind the introduction of m-banking, benefits of MFS, competitive advantage
findings, mobile trends findings and security findings.
4.3.1. Organisation Demographics
In this section, I will analyse the demographics of the organisations interviewed. The
variables analysed are organisation size and the type of organisation. The purpose
of these analysis is to determine the how big or small the organisations are, and
what type of organisation they are.
There was an estimation of four organisations to be interviewed. In total, three
organisations were interviewed. All of the organisations were large organisations,
Page 34 of 68
with more than 5001 employees. The organisation type for these organisations was
public organisations, all based in the banking/financial services industry.
4.3.2. Purpose behind the Introduction of Mobile Banking
In this section, I discuss the findings of the data analysis of the organisations
purpose behind the introduction of m-banking. Organisations were asked to
emphasise on their purpose for the introduction of m-banking. The study found some
key similarities as to why organisations use mobile channels to add value to their
organisation. What appears common throughout the organisations is that they all
introduce mobile channel to improve customer service, adapt to market demand and
also to position themselves in the forefront of innovation. This indicates that mobile
technology can in essence be used to improve customer service and to gain
competitive advantage. According to the organisations, the mobile platform should
not simply be used to provide information but to offer services which consumers
highly demand. They believe that mobile technology can extend beyond providing
access to account management features. For example, mobile technology can be
used to alert consumers when they have a low balance or insufficient funds to
purchase or pay for something.
The organisations were asked whether the introduction of mobile channel was to
compete with other organisations or not. They argued that the implementation was
not to compete but to improve service delivery. They do this by leveraging off the
latest functionality of the device itself, these functionalities provide them the
opportunity to create value to their customers. They further argue that they do not
simply use the mobile channels to catch-up with the digital age but they are tying it
into their business processes, directly unlocking core business functions and
knowledge. This makes good business sense as IT is merely an enabler of business
processes. The IT strategy thus needs to be aligned with business strategy.
Furthermore, the mobile channel, according to the study, is introduced to give
customers, especially the young, tech-savvy users the convenience of self-service.
Customers are therefore able to manage their finances effectively. According to the
Page 35 of 68
organisations, there has been a huge increase in the younger group opening bank
accounts. This group prefer the mobile channel over the traditional face-to-face,
therefore giving them direct interaction with their finances. Although the
organisations are aware of the implications of no face-to-face relationships between
them and their customers, they seem to have hope in their multi-channel integration
strategy. Consumers use the various channels depending on their individual needs.
If they feel like face-to-face interaction they tend to make use of branch channel, and
for no face-to-face interaction they make use of IB or m-banking.
When the organisations were asked which channel the customers prefer, they
concurred with the literature reviewed in this paper. Customers tend to use those
channels that perform best in satisfying their banking needs. From the organisation’s
perspective, no channel satisfies all the users’ needs, thus that is why banks offer
various banking channels. The channels are used only for the purpose they need to
serve, e.g. branch is used for absolute transactions while m-banking is used for
money transfers and purchase of airtime. From these findings, it seems that
organisations need to focus on integrated multi-channel offering strategies and
management.
4.3.3. Benefits of Mobile Financial Services
Organisations were asked to rate the advantages of MFS. What appears apparent in
Figure 6 is that most organisations benefited from a large pool of customers and
reduced costs. The large pool of consumers has been cause by an increase in the
number of mobile subscribers. With this increase, organisations now leverage the
mobile channel in order to reach out to a large pool of consumers at the lowest
possible cost.
All three organisations benefited from reduced location costs and costs associated to
employees or overhead costs. This has been a result of a decrease in the number of
employees needed to carry daily business tasks or decrease in the cost of serving
customers. Some business processes may no longer be needed due to the
introduction of mobile channel, thus eliminating costs related to these business
Page 36 of 68
processes. From the organisation’s perspective, they benefited from reduced costs
related to call centers and branch banking. Furthermore, mobile channel provided
them the upper hand of getting closer to their customers by using somewhat
analytical tools thus providing better feedback and satisfying customer needs.
Figure 6: Advantages of MFS
What appears significant is that most organisations use mobile channel to improve
customer service, which is the core of this paper. These organisations have realised
that mobile channel helps them to build customer relationship. The mobile channel is
on the rise and the ever-growing base of young people using this channel is
expecting more advanced capabilities. As a result, the tech-savvy consumers expect
high quality customer service at their fingertips. In order for organisations to live up
to this challenges, they need to understand their customers and be able to provide
quality service to this customers via mobile channel. A further significant finding is
that with an increased improvement in customer service, organisations seem to
benefits from a large pool of customers. Satisfied customers and customer who have
a great experience with an organisation are likely to spread the word to their peers,
thus increasing the pool of customers.
Page 37 of 68
4.3.4. Competitive Advantage Findings
Organisations were asked to say whether the introduction of MFS has helped them
to gain competitive advantage over their competitors. They were further required to
rate the various variables associated with competitive advantage developed in this
study. As shown in Figure 7, most organisations, about 66.67%, uses MFS to gain
competitive advantage, with only one of the organisation’s representative being
uncertain. From this result it is apparent that organisations are aware of the
competitive market in which they operate. As discussed in the literature, organisation
that possess differentiation, cost leadership and focus as generic competitive
strategies will be more advantaged than other organisations. By looking at the
results, most organisations have implemented these strategies. Some organisations
however, do not see ‘non-imitation’ as a problem, they believe that approximately
80% of the investments should be spent on infrastructure. Services or new features
offered can be imitated by other organisation once they acknowledge that their
competitor is benefitting from such innovation. However, according to the
organisations, a beneficial infrastructure is difficult to imitate.
Figure 7: Competitive Advantage
Furthermore, the results show that most organisations use MFS to enable better
service delivery. The use of MFS to enable better service delivery seems to correlate
with the use of MFS to acquire new customers, with both having an average rating of
Page 38 of 68
6.33. The organisations argue that customers select their banks based on the
service quality of the mobile channel provided by that specific bank. As discussed in
the literature organisations that possess competitive advantage are likely to attract
new consumers. What appears significant is that all the organisations had unique
MFS processes that were not easy for the competition to imitate. These unique
features were associated with increased investment in infrastructure capacity and
services and decrease time-to market. Further, a combination of service offerings in
one platform, especially m-banking proved to be competitive.
4.3.5. Mobile Trends Findings
The result of this study shows a slow increase in the number of organisations in
South Africa that are investing on mobile technology in order to enhance customer
experience. Most organisations seem to be aware of the impacts and benefits of
such an investment. However, they do not simply invest on technology that does not
support their core business strategy but focus on those technologies that will help
align the business strategy with IT strategy.
Furthermore, South African organisations do not seem to invest too much on social
media and social analytics tools, which are tools used to help organisations study
their customers behaviour and spending patterns. Thus giving them insights into
customer preferences and market trends. The lack of investment in such tools and
analytics can be due to a shortage of analytic talent. Organisations are held back
from investing in analytics because of lack of skills, training and education. Further, it
could be affected by the strategy of organisations as mentioned above. The use
social analytics may not be part of the organisations strategy.
The organisations were asked to rate their use of multichannel integration, what
seems significant is that these organisations use or are in the process of adopting
multichannel integration. According to the literature reviewed in this paper, a
multichannel integration strategy helps organisations to frequently engage with their
customers through different service delivery platforms, thus taking personal channel
preference into account. The literature further emphasises that organisations can
only benefit from multichannel integration if they have extensive use of analytics in
Page 39 of 68
place. However, according to the results of this study, as organisations have not yet
extensively adopted social analytics, they do not leverage multichannel integration.
4.3.6. Security Findings
The organisations interviewed were aware that the lack of m-banking adoption was
due to security concerns. When asked how they mitigate the issues of adoption and
how they go about assuring consumers that they are safe. They said that they use
explicit functions, such as security icons, is used to shows customers that they are
accessing or working on a secured environment. Furthermore, they have various
levels of authentication such as one-time password (OTP) built onto the mobile
platform, including real-time alerts on unusual activities. The possibility of fraud is
also reduced due to the m-banking apps platform which alerts customers via SMS
every time an activity is conducted . According to the organisation, a way to mitigate
the issue is constant communication with customers, thus creating trust amongst
them and the customer. For example, one of the organisations makes use of emails
or SMSs to notify their customers if there is a security breach. Organisations still
have a challenge in convincing non-users to start using m-banking.
4.4. Conclusions and Recommendations
Mobile Users Findings
i. More efforts are needed in order to offer services such as buying airtime
over the mobile channel to the consumer, especially women. Demand for
these services is anticipated to increase in future.
ii. A lot of unnecessary features are provided by organisation which
consumers show no interest in, such as locating nearest branch and loan
calculator. Banks should provide only those features which the consumers
see as most beneficial to them and those features that consumers will use
more often
iii. More efforts are needed to promote the safety of consumers about
services provided over the mobile channel. Organisations should invest
more resources in this.
Page 40 of 68
Organisations Findings
i. Mobile banking can be used to improve customer service and to gain
competitive advantage over your competitors. Organisations need to think
beyond just providing information and account management features in
order to fully leverage the benefits
ii. More effort is needed to leverage off the functionality of mobile device
itself in order to create quality value to the consumers
iii. Organisations should not neglect the benefits of having a multichannel
offering strategy
iv. More investment is needed in mobile banking in order to benefit from the
large pool of consumers, thus increasing revenue and reducing overhead
costs
v. Mobile channel can be used to gain the upper-hand against competitors.
Organisations need to focus more on differentiation, cost leadership and
niche focus. Furthermore, a great deal of investment needs to go to
infrastructure in order to support the technologies
vi. More focus is needed to align IT needs with organisation vision
vii. Organisations need to invest more in social analytic tools and talent. They
need to work together with universities in order to build the necessary
skills needed in the market.
Page 41 of 68
Chapter 5: Conclusion
In this chapter, I will summarise the finding of the study. The summary aims to
provide answers to the objectives formulated in the problem statement, refer Chapter
1. The summary will be based on the finding in Chapter 4. This chapter and the
overall paper are concluded with a discussion about future research, gaps and
opportunities.
5.1. Summary of findings
In this chapter, the questions formulated in Chapter 1 will be answered.
What are some of the benefits associated with the use of mobile channel to
offer services?
The literature in Chapter 2 suggest that the mobile channel is a viable tool
through which organisation can benefit from and could potentially help them meet
the objectives of the organisation. Furthermore, it is a cost effective solution to
these organisation, which helps them to understand the way their customers
make monetary transactions. Hence the organisations can improvise on making
customer service better. Organisations that make use of mobile channel are
benefiting from a large pool of customers and improved customer service.
Can mobile technology help organisations to gain competitive advantage
over its competitors?
Competitive advantage is discussed in Chapter 2. It discusses the generic
competitive strategies that organisations need to adopt in order to be in the
forefront of the market they operate in. The findings indicate that organisations
use mobile technology to gain competitive advantage. They do this by investing
more on infrastructure and multichannel integration than on differentiation, cost
leadership and focus as discussed in the literature. Furthermore, the
organisations also possessed unique MFS processes which were the result of
increased investment in infrastructure capacity and decrease time-to market.
Page 42 of 68
Do consumers prefer mobile services over the other available platforms?
The findings indicate that consumers prefer IB over the other available service
delivery channel because of its visual and printing capabilities. However, m-
banking is anticipated to over-take IB if organisation can find ways to alleviate
security fears among consumers. Consumers, especially those who do not use
m-banking, acknowledge the benefits provided by this channel but they are still
concerned about security issues related to the mobile platform itself.
5.2. Conclusion
The aim of this paper is to answer the question: How can banks use mobile
technology to better enable service delivery?
Certain trends were identified during the analysis of the findings. From these we can
clearly see the importance of having a stable infrastructure and processes in place to
be able to build an effective mobile channel based on multichannel integration and
social analytics. Organisations need to design these processes if they are to gain
competitive advantage. The mobile channel can be a powerful resource in offering
better services and building a sustainable competitive advantage.
Security and quality of information is recognised as being of key importance by
consumers. At this point in the literature, as well as the results of the current study,
there is little doubt that improving quality of information will improve the overall
satisfaction of consumers. In turn, the higher the quality score, the more the
customer pool and the more beneficial the organisation. If organisations can address
security concerns amongst users regarding the trust in the mobile channel itself then
they are deemed to benefit from an increase in m-banking usage adoption. Apart
from organisations investing in features that consumers do not necessary use, they
need to concentrate their efforts on those areas customers feel are of importance to
them, such as response time, convenience and credibility.
It was suggested in Chapter 2 that an integration of multichannel and social analytics
or analytics is essential for organisations to effectively use mobile channel to offer
Page 43 of 68
better services. Based on the findings, organisations are yet to exploit the use of
analytical tools and multichannel integration. Furthermore, the trend towards future
mobile adoption, especially amongst the tech-savvy consumers, suggests that
organisations may need to re-evaluate their target market.
5.3. Future research
In order to have more accurate findings on the use of m-banking to offer better
services, future study on this topic can be conducted on a larger scale. This paper
did not look at whether consumers choose their banks based on the bank’s mobile
channel offering, a study on this can be conducted. Furthermore, the study found
that most organisations do not use social analytics and analytics, a further research
on the reason behind this lack of adoption can be conducted.
Page 44 of 68
Bibliography
Accenture. (2012). Mobile Internet - spawning new growth opportunities in the
convergence era. Retrieved May 13, 2013, from Accenture:
http://www.accenture.com/SiteCollectionDocuments/PDF/Accenture-Mobile-Web-
Watch-Internet-Usage-Survey-2012.pdf
Begley, K. (2004). Face to face communication: Making human connections in a
technology-driven world.
Bhatti, T. (2007). Exploring factors influencing the adoption of mobile commerce.
Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce , 12 (3).
Brown, I., Zaheeda, C., Davies, D., & Stroebel, S. (2003). Call phone banking:
predictors of adoption in South Africa - an exploratory study. International Journal of
Information Management , 23, 381-394.
Capgemini . (2012). Trends in Retail Banking Channels: Meeting Changing Client
Preferences.
Chen, J., & Tsou, H. (n.d.). Information technology adoption for service innovation
practices and competitive advantage: the case of financial firms. Retrieved April 22,
2013, from Information Research: http://InformationR.net/ir/12-3/paper314.html
Chen, J., & Tsou, H. (2007). Information technology adoption for service innovation
practices and competitive advantage: the case of financial firms. Retrieved April 22,
2013, from Information Research: Available at http://InformationR.net/ir/12-
3/paper314.html
Clemons, E. (1986). Information Systems for Sustainable Competitive Advantage.
Information and Management , 131-136.
Deloitte. (2010). Mobile Banking: A catalyst for improving bank performance.
Retrieved May 19, 2013, from Deloitte: http://www.deloitte.com/assets/Dcom-
UnitedStates/Local%20Assets/Documents/us_consulting_MobileBanking_010711.pd
f
Duncombe, R., & Boateng, R. (2009). Mobile Phones and Financial Services in
Developing Countries: a review of concepts, methods, issues, evidence and future
research directions. Third World Quartely , 30 (7), 1237-1258.
Durkin, M., & Howcroft, B. (2003). Relationship marketing in the banking sector: the
impact of new technologies. Marketing Intelligence & Planning , 21 (1), 61-71.
Page 45 of 68
Federal Reserve. (2012, March). Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
Services. Retrieved September 14, 2013, from Consumers adn Mobile Banking and
Payment: www.federalreserve.gov/econresdata/mobilr-devices/2012-current-use-
moile-banking-payments.htm
Future Foundation. (2011). Emerging Trends in Mobile Banking. Monitise.
Joseph, M., Sekhon, Y., Stone, G., & Tinson, J. (2005). An exploratory study on the
use of banking technology in the UK. A ranking of importance of selected technology
on consumer perception of service delivery performance. International Journal of
Banking Marketing , 397-413.
Joseph, M., Sekhon, Y., Stone, G., & Tinson, J. (2005). An exploratory study on the
use of banking technology in the UK. A ranking of importance of selected technology
on consumer perception of service delivery performance. International Journal of
Banking Marketing , 23 (5), 397-413.
Kane, S., Karlson, A., Meyers, B., Johns, P., Jacobs, A., & Smith, A. (2009).
Exploring Cross-Device Web Use on PCs and Mobile Devices. The Information
School .
KPMG India. (2011). Technology enabled transformation in banking.
Kreutzer, T. (20009). Generation Mobile: Online and digital media usage on mobile
phones among low-income urban youth in South Africa. Centre for Film and Media
Studies .
Marsh & McLennan Companies. (2012, August). M-Commerce: an overview of
mobile banking and payment trends for Financial Intitutions. Retrieved May 04, 2013,
from MARSH: https://me.marsh.com/downloads/attachments/m-commerce_an
overview of mobile banking and payment trends for FIs-EXTERNAL.pdf
Marshall, M. (1996). Sampling for qualitative research. Oxford University Press , 13
(6).
Masinge, K. (2010). Factors influencing the adoption of mobile banking services at
the Bottom of the Pyramid in South Africa.
Mulligan, P., & Gordon, S. (2002). The impact of information technology on
consumer and supplier relationships in the financial services. International Journal of
Service Industry Management , 13 (1), 29-46.
Njenga, A. K. (2009). Mobile phone banking: Usage experiences in Kenya. Retrieved
April 21, 2013, from http://www.w3.org/2008/10/MW4D_WS/papers/njenga.pdf
Page 46 of 68
Oates, B. (2006). Researching Information Systems and Computing. London: SAGE
Publications.
Ondienge, P. (2010). Mobile Banking in Africa: Taking the Bank to the People. Africa
Economic Brief , 1 (8).
Padmanabhan, G. (2012). Technology enabled transformation in the financial.
GM/CIOs Conference of the Institute for Development & Research in Banking
Technology (IDRBT). Hyderabad,.
Patricio, L., Fisk, R., & Cunha, J. F. (2003). Improving satisfaction with bank service
offerings: measuring the contribution of each delivery channel. Managing Servie
Quality , 13 (6), 471-482.
Pearlson, K., & Saunders, C. (2012). Strategic Management of Information Systems.
Singapore: Wiley.
Pew Research Center. (2012, November 25). Pew Internet. Retrieved September
14, 2013, from Cell Phone Activities 2012: http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2012/Cell-
Activities/Main-Findings.aspx
Pikkarainen, T., Pikkarainen, K., Karjaluoto, H., & Pahnila, S. (2004). Consumer
acceptance of online banking: an extension of the technology acceptance model. 14
(3), 224-235.
Porteous, D. (2006). The enabling environment for mobile banking in africa.
Department for International Developements (DFID).
Pousttchi, K., & Schurig, M. (2007, April 25). Assessment of Today’s Mobile Banking
Applications from the View of Customer Requirements. Retrieved May 4, 2013, from
Munich Personal RePEc Archive: http://mpra.up.uni-muenchen.de/2913/
Ricard, L., Prefontaine, L., & Sioufi, M. (2001). New technologies and their impact on
French consumer behavour: an investigation in the banking sector. International
Journal of Bank Marketing , 19 (7), 299-311.
Riivari, J. (2005). Mobile banking: A powerful new marketing and CRM tool for
financial services companies all over Europe. Journal of Financial Services
Marketing , 10 (1), 11-20.
Riivari, J. (2005). Mobile banking: A powerful new marketing and CRM tool for
financial services companies all over Europe. Financial Sevices Marketing , 11-20.
Stone, G., & Joseph, M. (2003). An empirical evaluation of US bank customer
perceptions of the impact of technology on service delivery in the banking sector.
International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management , 31 (4), 190-202.
Page 47 of 68
Tiwari, R., & Buse, S. (2006). The Mobile Commerce Prospects: A Strategic Analysis
of Opportunities in the Banking Sector. Hamburg: Hamburg University Press.
Tiwari, R., Buse, S., & Herstatt, C. (2006). Customer on the move: Strategic
Implications of Mobile Banking anf Financial Enterprises. Proceeding of the 8th IEEE
International Conference on E-Commerce Technology and the 3rd IEEE
International Conference on Enterprise Computing, E-Commerce, and E-Services.
Tiwari, R., Buse, S., & Herstatt, C. (2006). Mobile banking as business strategy:
Impact of mobile technology on customer behaviour and its implications for banks.
Technology Management for the Global Future - Proceedings of PICMET '06, 4, pp.
1935-1946. Istanbul.
Tiwari, R., Buse, S., & Herstatt, C. (2007). Mobile Services in Banking Sector: The
Role of Innovative Business Solutions in Generating Competitive Advantage. in:
Proceedings of the International Research Conference on Quality (pp. 886-894).
Innovation and Knowledge Management.
White, H., & Nteli, F. (2004). Internet banking in the UK: why are there not more
customers? Journal of Financial Services Marketing , 9 (1), 49-56.
Page 48 of 68
Appendix A: Sample Questionnaire
Faculty of Engineering, Built Environment & Information Technology
Department of Informatics
The use of mobile technology as a service enabler in the financial sector
Research conducted by:
Mr. Tonga, TP (10487281)
Cell: 0739694471
Dear Respondent
You are invited to participate in an academic research study conducted by Thomas
Tonga, Bcom (Hons) student from the Department of Informatics at the University of
Pretoria.
The research study focuses on the following core constructs:
The benefits associated with the adoption of mobile financial services
The opportunities for the adoption of mobile banking
Consumer’s trust and perceived risk.
Please note the following:
This study involves filling in anonymous survey. Your name will not appear on
the questionnaire and the answers you give will be treated as strictly confidential.
You cannot be identified in person based on the answers you give.
Page 49 of 68
Your participation in this study is very important to us. You may, however, choose
not to participate and you may also stop participating at any time without any
negative consequences.
Please answer the questions asked in the questionnaire as completely and
honestly as possible. This should not take more than 10 minutes
The results of the study will be used for academic purposes only and may be
published in an academic journal. We will provide you with a summary of our
findings on request.
Should you require any clarification or further details please contact me or
alternatively contact my research supervisor Prof. Alta van der Merwe on 012 420
3798.
Please sign the form to indicate that:
You have read and understand the information provided above.
You give your consent to participate in the study on a voluntary basis.
___________________________ ____________________
Respondent’s signature Date
Page 50 of 68
Section A: Screening respondents - Users
Q1. Please indicate your age group. Circle the appropriate code.
Code Age
1 16-25
2 26-35
3 36-45
4 >46
Q2. Please indicate your gender. Circle the appropriate code.
Code Gender
1 Female
2 Male
Q3. Do you own a mobile device?
Instructions
Yes Go to Q4
No Terminate
Q4. Do you own a bank account?
Instructions
Yes Go to Q5
No Terminate
Q5. Do you use your mobile device for any financial/banking transactions?
Instructions
Yes Go to Q6
No Go to Q6
Page 51 of 68
Section B: Usage of Mobile Banking
Q6. What type of mobile banking transactions do you currently make and how often do you
make the applicable transaction/s?
(circle
option)
Type of financial transaction Frequency
(record frequency code)
1 Balance enquiry/bank statement
2 Compare state of accounts
3 Transfer funds
4 Pay beneficiaries
5 Purchase airtime
6 Locate nearest branch
7 View financial indicators
8 Loan calculator
Frequency code
Code Option
A Daily
B Weekly – once
C Weekly – several times
D Monthly – once
E Monthly – several times
F Occasionally (less than a
month)
Q7. On a scale of 1 to 5, 1 being lowest and 5 being highest, please rate the customer
service factors that are most important to you.
Rating
Very low low Average High Very High
Response time 1 2 3 4 5
Convenience of accessing the service 1 2 3 4 5
Reliability - Quality of information 1 2 3 4 5
Credibility 1 2 3 4 5
Responsiveness 1 2 3 4 5
Page 53 of 68
Section C: Attitude and Perception
Q8. On a scale of 1 to 5, 1 being very cheap and 5 being very expensive, do you find mobile
banking service to be cheap or expensive?
Cost (circle
option)
1 2 3 4 5
Q9. On a scale of 1 to 5, 1 being lowest and 5 being highest, please rate the financial
service delivery platform that you most prefer.
Rating
Very low low Average High Very High
Internet banking 1 2 3 4 5
Mobile banking 1 2 3 4 5
Branch 1 2 3 4 5
ATM 1 2 3 4 5
Q10. On a scale of 1 to 5, 1 being lowest and 5 being highest, please rate the advantages of
mobile banking delivery system.
Rating
Very low low Average High Very High
Accessibility 1 2 3 4 5
Time saving 1 2 3 4 5
Ease of use 1 2 3 4 5
Cost saving 1 2 3 4 5
Physical security 1 2 3 4 5
Other (please specify)
______________
1 2 3 4 5
Q11. On a scale of 1 to 5, 1 being lowest and 5 being highest, please rate your view on
mobile financial services.
Rating
Very low low Average High Very High
Overall trust 1 2 3 4 5
Trust in banks 1 2 3 4 5
Trust in the technology of mobile 1 2 3 4 5
Page 54 of 68
banking
Security from fraud 1 2 3 4 5
Ease of use 1 2 3 4 5
Overall trust 1 2 3 4 5
Lack of personalisation 1 2 3 4
END OF QUESTIONNAIRE
Page 55 of 68
Appendix B: Sample Interview Questions
Interview – Bank Representative
Q1. What is the organisations purpose behind the introduction of mobile banking as a
service delivery channel?
Q2. What are the benefits associated with the use of mobile banking as a service delivery
channel?
Q3. How huge is the opportunity for mobile financial services in the banking sector?
Page 56 of 68
Q4. Has the introduction of mobile financial services helped the organisation to gain
competitive advantage over its competitors? If yes, please elaborate further.
Q5. How does the organisation ensure better service quality via the use of mobile financial
service channel?
Q6. The lack of mobile services adoption is due to security concerns. How does the
organisation assure customers about security issues?
Page 57 of 68
Q7. Please indicate (by circling the appropriate rating) the extent to which you agree or
disagree with each of the following statements in each section. The rating scale is as follows:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree Slightly
Disagree
Neutral Slightly
Agree
Agree Strongly
Agree
Advantages of Mobile Financial Services (MFS)
My organisation benefits from... Rating
Reduced cost handling costs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Large pool of customers 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Reduced location costs and costs associated to employees 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Improve customer service 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Reduce fraud 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Competitive Advantage
My organisation... Rating
Uses MFS to gain competitive advantage 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Uses MFS to enable better service delivery 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Has unique MFS processes that are not easy for the competition to
imitate
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Uses MFS to increase customers 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
M-banking Trends
My organisation uses… Rating
Increased spending on mobility to enhance consumer experience
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Concentration on mobile remote deposit capture (RDC) and mobile
marketing to gain competitive advantage
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Increase on social media and social analytical tools to help make
strategic decisions
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Page 58 of 68
Focus on multi-channel integration in order to better offer services
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
END OF INTERVIEW
Page 59 of 68
Appendix C: Ethics and Integrity
UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA
FACULTY OF ENGINEERING, BUILT ENVIRONMENT
AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
FACULTY COMMITTEE FOR RESEARCH ETHICS AND INTEGRITY
APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF A RESEARCH PROJECT
This application form must be read with the Regulations for Research Ethics and Integrity and completed. Important: Each item must be completed.
Date of submission 01/11/13 1. DETAILS OF APPLICANT 1.1 Applicant's surname Tonga 1.2 Applicant's initials TP 1.3 Applicant's title (prof, dr, mr, ms, other)
Mr
1.4 Postal address (where approval is to be sent)
1328 Indian centre, lydenburg 1120
1.5 E-mail address [email protected] 1.6 Telephone 0739694471 1.7 School in Faculty (Engineering, Built Environment or Information Technology)
IT
1.8 Department Informatics 1.9 Study leader/promotor (if the applicant is a student) name, address, e-mail address
Prof. A. van der Merwe
1.10 Names, addresses, e-mail addresses and capacity of co-researchers/ students/ lecturers involved with the project
2. RESEARCH PROJECT DETAILS 2.1 Title of research project The use of mobile technology as a service enabler in
the financial sector 2.2 Furnish as brief outline the following so that the relevant ethical aspects can be identified clearly:
Statement of the problem
Statement of objectives
Experimental methods/ measuring instruments
Materials/Apparatus
Profile of research subjects/target group/animals/environmental factors The research focuses on the following core constructs:
The benefits associated with the adoption of mobile financial services
The opportunities for the adoption of mobile banking
Consumer’s trust and perceived risk. 2.3 Is a research questionnaire/ survey/interview used? (Yes or No) Yes
Page 60 of 68
2.4 If yes, have you submitted this with your application? (Yes, No or Not Applicable)
Yes
3. RESEARCH SUBJECTS If the project involves people, either individually or in groups, complete this section
3.1 Does the study involve people as informants, or does it involve people as research subjects? (Tick one)
Informants Research subjects
X
3.2 Describe possible safety and health implications that participation in project may pose
Not applicable
3.3 Expected duration of participation of subjects in the project
Not applicable
3.4 Describe the manner in which confidential information will be handled and confidentiality assured The study does not at any point elicit explicit confidential information about the respondent or the organisation. The results of the study will be used for academic purposes only.
3.5 Remuneration offered to subjects for participation
If the project involves animals, complete this section 3.6 Describe possible safety and health implications participation in the project may hold Not applicable
3.7 Expected duration of participation by animals in the project
3.8 Care/housing/feeding of the animals during the project
4. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT If the project may have a potentially detrimental environmental impact, complete the following
4.1 Potential impact on the environment
4.2 Expected duration of the impact
4.3 Locality of the project
4.4 Preventive measures
5. DISSEMINATION OF DATA Method of publishing/application of the results
6. SUBMISSION CHECKLIST 6.1 Have you submitted the Declaration by the Researcher? (See the website for this form)
6.2 Have you submitted an example of the informed consent form to be completed by each participant? (See the website for an example)
Page 61 of 68
Appendix D: Researcher Declaration
Hereby I Thomas Prince Tonga in my capacity as Bcom (Hons) student, that
1 Research subjects will be informed, information will be handled confidentially,
research subjects reserve the right to choose whether to participate and, where
applicable, written permission will be obtained for the execution of the project
(example of permission attached).
2 No conflict of interests or financial benefit, whether for the researcher, company or
organisation, that could materially affect the outcome of the investigation or
jeopardise the name of the university is foreseen.
3 Inspection of the experiments in loco may take place at any time by the committee or
its proxy.
4 The information I furnish in the application is correct to the best of my knowledge and
that I will abide by the stipulations of the committee as contained in the regulations.
5 Signed: _____________________ Date: 01/11/2013