street art & graffiti in belgrade: ecological potentials?
TRANSCRIPT
71
Emergence of StudiesSAUC - Journal V6 - N2
1. Introduction: Environmental art
Art has always been connected to the natural world - with its
origins using natural materials and representing the living
world. But somewhere in the 1960s in the USA and the UK,
a new set of practices emerged, redefining environmental
art, and moving away from traditional art history and
representation. Land or Earth Art took artists and art lovers
to nature itself, bringing it in its crude form into gallery
spaces, collaborating with nature and challenging the very
nature of an artwork. This happened in conjunction with
post-WWII avantgarde and conceptual practices. Unlike
environmental art, a more recent trend called ecological
art, or eco art, is less concerned about aesthetics and the
use of natural materials, but rather mixing art, science and
technology, proposing activism and practical bio-social
solutions for our environment. Artist researcher mirko
nikolić1, in his PhD about ecological aesthetics, sees this
art approach as going beyond human selfishness, towards
posthumanism, and incorporating matters such as climate
and social justice (see: nikolić, 2016).
1 - Original capitalization.
Of course, sometimes clear distinctions are hard to make,
but for the sake of explaining the basic principles, a good
example between the terms and practices could be seen
in the two illustrations below. The first one, The crack of
something (Figure 2), uses natural material - wood - which
is processed and presented as a temporary installation,
as part of an art residency program Ars Kozara set in the
National park on Kozara mountain. Its physical longevity
depends on the natural and human factors, under constant
state of decay, and its reading lies in poetic reference
to cracks in the source material. In a critique of all the
artworks produced during the residency, Stojsavljević and
Anćufejev state that the artists are passivizing the role of
nature, by using it just as a raw material and creating a new,
artistic nature, where “the artwork is more the expression
of the artist” than nature itself (Stojsavljević and Anćufejev,
2013).
Street Art & Graffiti in Belgrade:
Ecological Potentials?
Srđan TunićSTAW BLGRD - Street Art Walks Belgrade, Serbia
[email protected], srdjantunic.wordpress.com
Abstract
Since the emergence of the global contemporary graffiti and street art, urban spaces have become filled with a variety
of techniques and art pieces, whether as a beautification method, commemorative and community art, or even activism.
Ecology has also been a small part of this, with growing concern over our environment’s health (as well as our own),
disappearing living species and habitats, and trying to imagine a better, less destructive humankind (see: Arrieta, 2014).
But, how can this art - based mostly on aerosol spray cans and thus not very eco-friendly - in urban spaces contribute to
ecological awareness? Do nature, animal and plant motifs pave a way towards understanding the environment, or simply
serve as aesthetic statements? This paper will examine these questions with the example of Belgrade, Serbia, and several
local (but also global) practices. This text is based on ongoing research as part of Street Art Walks Belgrade project (STAW
BLGRD) and interviews with a group of artists.
Keywords: street art, graffiti, ecology, environmental art, belgrade
72
Emergence of StudiesSAUC - Journal V6 - N2
This one belongs more in the environmental art category,
while a still of the video from we - copper & copper - us:
mineralizacija project offers a more complex involvement
(Figure 3). There, the source material goes between actual
human involvement with nature - extraction of copper by
the metal industry in Bor, the scientific and other processes
that accompany it, presented as multimedia, still with an
artistic or poetic reading behind it. As an example of eco art,
it tackles many ongoing theoretical discussions, such as the
notion of anti-extractivism (nikolić, 2016: 241). Although
the two terms are sometimes used interchangeably, I will
use environmental art (Martinique, 2016; Tunnacliffe,
2016: 17) because it covers a wide range of practices and is
more applicable to the subject in question.
Figure 1. Plant a tree – Send a message. Artez. Belgrade, Serbia, 2019. Photograph ©LSD Magazine.
73
Emergence of StudiesSAUC - Journal V6 - N2
Figure 2. Pucanje nečega (The crack of something). Ars Kozara: art in nature laboratory #7, 2014. Goran Čupić. Mountain Kozara, Prijedor, Bosnia and Herzegovina. Photograph ©Ars Kozara.
Figure 3. Blue stone synthesis experiment with Dr. Aleksandra Mitovski. Performance
documentation, we - copper & copper - us: mineralizacija. mirko nikolić. Bor, Serbia, 2016. Photograph ©Duško Jelen.
74
Trying to pin down strict definitions of both graffiti and
street art might turn out to be too complex, having in mind
numerous and fluctuating readings. Relying on the research
by Ljiljana Radošević, who has been following street art and
graffiti in Belgrade and Serbia in the last 20 years, both
street art and graffiti belong to public art (or art in public
space, urban art), fluctuating between a subculture and fine
art movement, lifestyle and art practices (Radošević, 2012).
However, there are many similarities between them - in her
research which tackles terminological issues she states: “It
goes without saying that graffiti and street art are closely
connected and intertwined: sometimes they share the
same walls, the same artists and the same techniques, but
most of the time they produce a different visual material”
(Radošević, 2012). While the graffiti movement has roots
in 1970s US subculture, street art emerged later, mixing
the graffiti heritage with visual arts (also see: Norvaišaitė,
2014: 9-11). For this paper, I will focus on artworks made
on walls - murals, made by artists predominantly working in
the field of graffiti and street art in Serbia.
In both street art and graffiti (SAG), there is a plethora of
nature and animal motifs, while a breakthrough in more
ecologically aware techniques appeared in the mid 2000s.
A set of practices labelled as reverse graffiti offered the
technique of removing layers of dirt to create messages and
images. It is also known as clean tagging, dust tagging, grime
writing, clean graffiti, green graffiti or clean advertising.
Because of this, it has been accepted in green marketing
(Figure 4). Another technique, moss graffiti combines
stencils and moss paste to leave less invasive marks in
public areas. Some other artists started using discarded
materials in the form of recycled art, such as Bordalo II
(Figure 5). These techniques remain rare in the graffiti and
street art world, and are predominantly tied to themes
such as urban pollution, exploring biodegradable materials,
and making the urban environment more green (Bambić,
2014b; Norvaišaitė, 2016).
This trend does pose a few questions and challenges for
more traditional styles, techniques and forms. On the one
hand, graffiti and most street art is based on aerosol paint
Emergence of StudiesSAUC - Journal V6 - N2
Figure 4. Green works. Paul Curtis, a.k.a. Moose. San Francisco, 2009. Photograph ©Wide Walls, 2014.
75
Emergence of StudiesSAUC - Journal V6 - N2
Figure 5. The Swift/Apus Apus. Bordallo II. Lodz, 2015.
Photograph ©I Support Street Art, 2015.
and the use of industrial spray cans. New eco practices are
far removed from this approach, distancing themselves
from the non-eco-friendly aspects of spray cans, such
as waste, presence of heavy metals, and poisonous
chemicals. However, both share great visibility in public
space, potent direct communication, and are ephemeral
at the core.
2. Case Study: Belgrade
If not originally rooted in these new environmental
practices, is it still possible to have graffiti and street
art that raises awareness of ecology? I would argue that
it is possible, if we see graffiti and street art as part of
the urban ecosystem. Metaphorically, this often non-
permitted artform grows like purslane from cracks in
concrete, on walls and other surfaces, covering spaces
from small corners to whole facades. It both pollutes
the visual field like weeds and serves as a beautification
method. It can serve a similar need like growing a plant
or keeping a pet, where we nurture a connection with
nature around or far removed from us.
Belgrade is the birthplace of graffiti and street art in
Serbia, with roots in the mid 1980s, expanding only in mid
1990s during the student protests against the Milošević
regime. From the original letters of graffiti subculture,
characters of street art, and traditional mural painting,
this city also offers environmental motifs taken from
flora and fauna. It goes without saying that just by simply
depicting a natural motif, a work does not automatically
have ecological messages. However, by diving deeper into
the artists’ oeuvre, one can note ecological potentials,
apart from manifest eco murals, which I aim to support.
In several examples, I would also pay attention to how
artist intention relates to interpretation of the work, and
what could be done to make this eco reading potentially
more clear.
For the purpose of this text, several active street artists
were contacted based on the presence of natural motifs
in their work and nine out of twenty responded to a
survey via Instagram between autumn 2019 and spring
2020. All are actively producing SAG, whether coming
from (visual) arts, the very subculture of graffiti or other
backgrounds: Jana, wrnkl, Lunar, Piros, Junk, ZEZ lunatic,
Artez, Quam and Brva. Most have been active for the last
76
decade, or longer, and all but one operate from Belgrade.
This does not at all cover all the street art and graffiti artists
operating in Belgrade, or Serbia, with a potential ecological
reading.
The survey was designed to discover more about the
reasons and meanings behind the animal and plant motifs
present in their works, as well as messages artists wanted
to communicate in the streets. The focus on motivation,
motifs and messages, as well ecological potentials, is
echoing Veronika Norvaišaitė’s approach in her study
Environmental Communication in Street Art: Motivations
& Messages of Reverse Graffiti Creators, where she
interviewed artists and green companies utilizing reversed
graffiti around the world. In grounding a certain ecological
practice, it is necessary to understand the messages
communicated behind certain motifs (Norvaišaitė, 2016:
62). Motifs are also important because, according to
nikolić, environmental art imports nature into culture,
e.g. by depicting nature and/or using it as raw material
(nikolić, 2016: 46-52).2 In this process, nature is considered
as something taken from the outside, while more radical
eco-orientated art sees nature as part of a “cohabitation
of agencies, human and other-than-human” (nikolić, 2016:
51). Following their leads, chapters The Elm-Chanted
Forest and Urban Jungle will mostly tackle the use of
nature’s symbology, as subject-matter, through a variety of
animal and plant motifs, while Plant a tree, send a message:
Ecology, responsibility and activism will pay more attention
to critical practices with certain ecological techniques as
well.
Additionally, when asked about ecological readings
of their work, most of the artists dismissed the label,
stating that they are more interested in urban than
natural surroundings, social relations, and an individual’s
place in society. Apart from using animals as alter egos,
metaphorical motifs and formal inspiration, several of
them acknowledged the communication potential of SAG
and noted several artworks that have ecological messages.
Regarding motivation, reasons for including natural
motifs differ among: inspiration for formal and symbolic
explorations (symbols widely popular and understandable),
love towards the natural world, animals as transmitters of
2 - In the street art and graffiti world, using natural materials is still rare and an emerging practice, that’s why this article focuses mostly on depicted motifs.
emotions and messages, metaphorical greening, search for
spirituality, and alter egos.
3. The Elm-Chanted Forest: Nature as alter ego
Creating and invoking a connection between urban and
natural spaces, at least through images, artists are visually
challenging the often gray and brown city, dilapidated
and discarded areas. Among the most popular motifs
are animals which are culturally infused with symbolism,
according to Claude Levi Strauss, because they are “good
to think with.” On the streets of Belgrade in the past years,
most species in SAG are local animals (domesticated and
wild), with a few examples of exotic and pop culture ones.
There is also a great number of hybrid beings, standing
somewhere between monsters and fantasy creatures.
Artists such as Lunar and Brva emphasize that animals can
transmit emotions and universal values with more sincerity
than humans (or human motifs). According to Lunar, who
is based in Zagreb and has been making art since the late
1980s: “Evolutionally, they were there before humans and
aren’t capable of causing such damage (to the environment)
as humans have, they simply exist” (Interview with Lunar,
2019). ZEZ lunatic said that “nature is an inevitable motif,
after all, we’re all nature” (Interview with ZEZ lunatic,
2019). By relying on commonplace and personal symbolic
readings, the artist gives animals meanings of happiness and
tenderness (rabbit), wisdom (owl), and strength (bull).3 This
reading is quite personal and often relying on commonplace
assumptions and present cultural symbols.
Several artists create distinct characters that can be
interpreted as alter egos. They stand as signs, visual
signatures, that we can recognize in addition to their overall
style. Given the often anonymity of the creators, these
animals the authors identify with could be seen as their
stand-ins in public space, fulfilling the function of a tag. Rage
(also known as Resto) uses a characteristic animal alter ego
that looks like a fox, as well as a dog called Jackie (Džeki / Џеки.; Figure 8); Lunar is recognizable by his often positive,
good-hearted cats (or tomcat, Catso; Figure 6), wrnkl with
his pug stencils (Figures 18 and 26), and Brva with French
bulldogs (Figure 7).
3 - Other artists depict a variety of animals, both local and global, such as Junk, Weedzor, Lemon One, Oniro (IT), and Ami imaginaire (FR), the latter two leaving a few pieces behind upon visiting Serbia.
Emergence of StudiesSAUC - Journal V6 - N2
77
Emergence of StudiesSAUC - Journal V6 - N2
Figure 6. United Colors of Belgrade, Festival Rekonstrukcija 2018. Lunar & Flying Förtress. Belgrade, Serbia, 2018. Photograph
©Street Art Walks Belgrade / STAW BLGRD.
78
Piros has a distinct invented animal, which is a hybrid with
a rooster’s head and wasp’s body, called Džamutka (Figure
9). He emphasizes that painting Džamutka is an “expression
of my own freedom statement. She has a noble mission, to
inspire and motivate on her path!” (Interview with Piros,
2019). According to Radošević:
...for its author it represents all the best in this
world – extreme dedication and ability to fly.
And if pushed to the limits it can sting. The name
was derived from the Roma dialect in which
it has a meaning of curse word but it can also
mean something frightful and unseen. Therefore
Džamutka can be everything and nothing and
exactly this contradiction can infuse all sorts of
traits in her” (Radošević, 2020).
Piros’ hybrid is an invented character with great personal
symbolism, and it is rather common to see imaginary
creatures and hybrids.4 As in the case of Džamutka,
cultural background and local history often influences the
4 - Another Belgrade-based artist, Velvet, has a mermaid/octopus character, referencing Ursula from The Little Mermaid, which could stand as her alter ego or at least trademark. Weedzor usually depicts colorful animal faces, while for Runaway Festival 2019 the artist made a unicorn in a project sponsored by Sprite. Artists such as Snout, Endo, and Alek Leaf also often use monster-like or hybrid characters.
artwork, as could be seen with few artists from abroad who
made their mark with a fusion of certain “tribal” elements,
referencing native imagery from Latin America, such as
Farid Rueda (MX, in Belgrade) and Jumu (PE, in Čačak).
Rueda in his two murals so far made as part of the Runaway
Festival painted a deer (Figure 10) and an eagle (the latter
in collaboration with TKV), common forest animals in
Serbia, incorporating them in his complex and rich in color
style blending Mexican popular culture and evoking pre-
Conquest Mexican societies.
Birds are a common motif - Brva made one of his early
murals of an owl, while TKV and Jana often depict swallows
(Figure 11). Jana analyses the bird motif as representing a
personal and social need to (not)belong to a group identity:
Birds were a handy metaphor - if you pull
out a bird (from the swarm) she’s a freedom
symbol, and when you push her in the swarm
she becomes part of a multitude of sameness,
something that doesn’t have an identity (of its
own) (Kalaba, 2019).
As we can see in this example, the reading fluctuates
depending on the context. Similar is with another example.
Rats are expected companions during the night when most
SAG artists do their magic, and are often referenced on the
walls of Belgrade. An undisclosed artist known simply as
Emergence of StudiesSAUC - Journal V6 - N2
Figure 7. Festival Rekonstrukcija 2019. Brva, Belgrade, Serbia, 2019. Photograph ©Festival Rekonstrukcija.
79
Emergence of StudiesSAUC - Journal V6 - N2
Figure 8. Џеки. Rage. Belgrade,
Serbia, 201?. Photograph ©Street
Art Walks Belgrade / STAW
BLGRD.
Figure 9. Džamutka. Piros. Belgrade, Serbia, 2018. Photograph ©Piros.
80
Emergence of StudiesSAUC - Journal V6 - N2
Figure 10. Runaway Festival & Donji Dorćol. Farid Rueda. Belgrade, Serbia, 2019. Photograph ©Street Art Walks Belgrade /
STAW BLGRD.
Ratz (or Rats) made a series of human-sized rat characters
engaging in everyday activities and street scenes in 2013,
reimagining the city dwellers as living in a hood (Figure
12). TKV - Kraljica Vila (The Fairy Queen) - also made a
rat series between 2018 and 2019 (Figure 13), where she
accepts them as one of street art & graffiti symbols. And this
should be no surprise given the popular imagery of artists
such as Banksy (UK) and before him Blek le rat (FR), the
latter leaving his traces in the yard of the Cultural Center
Magacin (Belgrade) in 2009. Blek le rat famously said that
the rat is “the only free animal in the city” and their image
reminds city people of often invisible and suppressed urban
elements (I Support Street Art, 2017).
Insects are also a notable theme. Quam dedicated most of
his recent art to natural motifs, using them to explore formal
qualities. Murals of monarch butterfly’s hatching (made for
DUK Festival 2019; Figure 34), scarab and longhorn beetle
(Figure 14), or drawings of crickets, cicadas, moths and the
rest stand as poetic interpretations of the natural world,
often with a symbolism of rebirth and transformation
(series Metamorphosis), if not just fascination. However,
Quam prefers when the message is subtle and not imposing:
“I like the form of living creatures, they are rewarding to
draw because they have a lot of information and could be
used in a variety of contexts” (Interview with Quam, 2020).
Relying on the fantastic and metaphorical, several artists
have been depicting human-plant hybrids. Artez has a
series of humans who in place of heads and torsos have
plants, or humans with bird houses as heads, inviting the
birds in (Figure 15). This could be read as an attempt to
acknowledge the (need for) nature inside of us (Interview
with Artez, 2020). In a wider field of urban art, plants are
also used as an ally, often tackling issues such as activism,
community and urban regeneration (see: Pedersen, 2018).
81
Emergence of StudiesSAUC - Journal V6 - N2
Figure 11. Jana. Belgrade, Serbia, 2017. Photograph ©Jana Danilović.
82
Many artists stated that by depicting natural motifs they
are symbolically and visually participating in a project of
making Belgrade greener. Junk, as well as Piros and Artez,
emphasizes that his murals contribute to the effect of
greenification of the city. In his words:
There is not a specific message, more an effect,
it’s interesting for me to take natural elements
and invented characters and put them in an
urban space and to have that colorfulness -
which I often employ in my work - popping out
from the concrete grayness (Interview with
Junk, 2019).
Spring Vibes (Figure 16) and Mother Nature murals, as well
as his contribution to the Rekonstrukcija Festival 2018 bear
witness to this statement. Another artist, Marko Ćulum,
following this thread, states that creating a mural is just
a part of activities one could do to make the environment
look better, and that he as an artist can provide “a game for
the eye, an impulse” to make one’s day better in the city’s
concrete grayness (Banić, 2020).
Another well present scene is forest and farm, as a personal
project or a setting for collaborations. Artists such as Junk
and Snout depict a variety of plants, animals and often
symbols grouped together. But the most striking ones
might be the large-scale graffiti jams, such as Meeting of
Styles 2010 and Runaway Festival 2018 (Figure 17). The
collaborative large-scale mural made for the latter offers
a possible interpretation of the famous Animal Farm novel
by George Orwell, where Brva contributed a pack of dogs
and sheep. Animals serve as symbols of e.g. freedom,
independence, struggle, and love, and that through street
art the artist wants to communicate those messages. Brva
claims that this aspect of his work can be seen as ecological
because “...it draws attention to specific types of animals
which require (that) attention” (Interview with Brva,
2020). While attention is good, as a prerequisite for further
ecological actions, it raises the question - what next? Fitting
well with the environmental art definition, these examples
are trying to address ecological questions from within the
art world, via aesthetics. But how to create stronger, more
purposeful messages and links with the ecosystem? This
will be further explored in the next two chapters.
Emergence of StudiesSAUC - Journal V6 - N2
Figure 12. Rats. Belgrade, Serbia, 2013. Photograph
©Street Art Walks Belgrade / STAW BLGRD.
Figure 13. TKV. Belgrade, Serbia, 2018. Photograph
©Street Art Walks Belgrade / STAW BLGRD.
83
Emergence of StudiesSAUC - Journal V6 - N2
Figure 14. Quam. Belgrade, Serbia, 2019. Photograph ©Igor Svetel / Walls of Belgrade.
84
Emergence of StudiesSAUC - Journal V6 - N2
Figure 15. Artez. Belgrade,
Serbia, 2017. Photograph
©Artez.
Figure 16. Spring vibes pt. 2.
Junk. Belgrade, Serbia, 2016.
Photograph ©Junk.
85
Emergence of StudiesSAUC - Journal V6 - N2
Figure 17. Runaway Festival 2018. Belgrade, Serbia, 2018. Photograph ©Vatovec.
86
Emergence of StudiesSAUC - Journal V6 - N2
4. Urban Jungle: Commenting on the environment
While most of the previous examples were not made
specifically to foster a direct (or sometimes conscious)
ecological message, and most artists usually avoid putting
“eco” in front of their works, nevertheless there are
murals with general ecological messages. Ecology, usually
understood as a human’s relation to the natural world, can be
understood as using natural motifs to comment on our wider
environment. In her research about how environmentally
engaged urban street art provokes interactions between
various urbanites with the environment, Claire Malaika
Tunnacliffe notes:
The environment does not stand-alone against
political, social or economic issues; our daily
reality is woven out of these entanglements.
Environmentally engaged urban street art
reflects this by critiquing everyday life through
the social interstices it creates, and revealing
new environmental understandings, raising an
awareness of surroundings (Tunnacliffe, 2016:
18).
Figure 18. wrnkl. Belgrade, Serbia, 2014. Photograph
©Inspektor Yoda Zgužvani.
Festival Rekonstrukcija in Belgrade (Figures 7 and 21)
recognized this potential for street art to address and
collaborate with the communities in and via public space,
paving the road to a more general citizen activism:
Art interventions set in the context of everyday
people’s lives, in neighborhoods, can influence a
new reading of the city (parts) in a multifaceted
way, creating new urban contexts and connecting
people. By positioning the art in public space, it
[public space, author’s note] stops being faceless
and closed for communication, rather, on the
contrary, calls for a dialogue - between the
city and individuals, between the inhabitants
themselves, but also by provoking the creation
of other artworks, which juxtaposed make new
relations (Marković, 2020: 5).
While collaboration with communities, if not the ecologists
themselves, in this sphere remains scarce, artists do see the
power in public art, which is a valuable resource for more
active community engagement. In chapter 3, I mentioned
a few uses of alter egos - some other artists use them as
commentators on society (and the urban environment),
that I like to label street philosophers. From the past
years, some of the most prominent ones on the streets of
Belgrade have been wrnkl, Vudemn (an actual philosopher)
and Orbot. wrnkl - also known as inspektor Joda zgužvani
(inspector Yoda the wrinkled) has taken an image of one
of his pugs as the literal face for his messages. Made as
stencils, with added speech balloons, the pugs comment,
often with almost untranslatable word plays, on gender
relations, subvert common sayings, and generally play with
language loaded with an activist mindset (Marčetić, 2014).
A few examples include: “Izvini, nisi moj (stereo)tip” (Sorry,
you ain’t my (stereo)type), “Duga je ulica” (The street is long/
rainbow), “Ne tuci (p)se” (Don’t beat dogs/yourself) and
“Strah rađa nasilje” (Fear gives birth to violence; Figure 18).
On a more general level, the artist sees that animals have
the spiritual potential to reconnect us to nature, reminding
us of an alienated world that has therefore become even
magical, and aims to present animals as equal to, if not
above, humans (Interview with wrnkl, 2019).
Artists such as ZEZ lunatic created a world full of
anthropomorphic beasts and animals, raging on and
from the walls, in a surreal, comic book-like setting. He
mentioned in the interview that his goal is to both express
emotions and offer a critique of contemporary society,
mainly capitalism, consumerism and materialism, such as in
the mural More food for people (Figure 19), targeting fast
87
Emergence of StudiesSAUC - Journal V6 - N2
Figure 19. More food for people. ZEZ lunatic. Belgrade, Serbia, 2018. Photograph ©ZEZ lunatic.
food chains such as KFC and McDonalds (Interview with
ZEZ lunatic, 2019). The artist finds it important to raise the
consciousness of the onlookers: “For me, it’s enough just to
create a reaction, whatever it might be. Lethargy is worse
than any bad reaction” (Milošević, 2018).
Nevercrew from Switzerland made their Imitation of life no.
9 depicting a paint machine going over an old blue (actually
sperm) whale, made for Mikser festival 2014 (Figure 20).
Often using endangered species, such as whales and polar
bears in their poetic interpretations of our environmental
challenges, Nevercrew said that: “It’s about transformation,
evolution, which are all ideas very current in this area
(Savamala)” (Bambić, 2014a). We could also assume the city
itself represented as the sea mammal, old but still standing,
putting up with another renovation by the machines, while
remaining the same at its core.
88
Poetic and symbolic approach is also utilized by Jana
who covered many walls with jungle-like plants and often
presents human hearts intertwined with swallows, waves,
plants, and other elements that have personal and symbolic
meanings. These are made as large-scale murals and more
intimate paste ups, where Jana literally plants a seed in
us: a heart made for Rekonstrukcija Festival 2018 has a
growing branch poking out of it (Figure 21). Another, The
Heart of the Mountain at Divčibare mountain was made
for the Mountain Music Festival in 2018,5 making a rare
intervention into the natural surrounding itself (Figure
22). By utilizing visual symbols, she constructs a metaphor
somewhere between notions of tameness/civilization/
smoothness and wildness (in a positive light), linking our
inner wilderness with the one surrounding us (Interview
5 - http://mmf.rs/2019/05/
with Jana, 2019). Here, the connection is direct, by using
widely recognized (heart, plants) symbols, and setting the
hearts in certain context (abandoned building, mountain),
the artist is able to communicate her message with less
ambiguity.
Artez usually combines plants with humans and their
intimate surroundings, offering a connection with nature,
but also ecological messages. Works such as Plant a tree,
send a message (Figure 1); Unexpected journey through the
day 3: Help her grow; Reading makes you grow (Figure 23)
and many others offer both a message of greening the city
and personal, doable engagements that everyone can do
in our daily lives. In general, when asked about ecological
aspects of his work, the artist aims to be more aware while
working, not leaving trash behind him, recycling materials
and tools, and so on. “What I like most is spending time in
Emergence of StudiesSAUC - Journal V6 - N2
Figure 20. Imitation of life no. 9. Nevercrew. Belgrade, Serbia, 2014. Photograph ©Ana Bambić Kostov / Widewalls.
89
Emergence of StudiesSAUC - Journal V6 - N2
Figure 22. Srce planine (The hearth of the mountain). Jana. Divčibare, Serbia, 2018. Photograph ©Mountain Music Fest.
Figure 21. Festival Rekonstrukcija 2018. Jana. Belgrade,
Serbia, 2018. Photograph ©Street Smart Belgrade.
90
nature, that’s why I’m trying to bring a bit of greenery to the
space I’m working in by using floral motifs” (Interview with
Artez, 2020). Junk says similarly: “My works in a way point
to the fact that we need more green areas in the city, and by
using colors and motifs from nature I’m creating an image
about how important it is for a city to have its little green
oases” (Interview with Junk, 2019).
Lunar with his cats (Catso) has an underlying belief to
promote universal messages of a good and constructive
world, as shown in his murals Daily care for nature,
Protectors (Figure 24) and Savage Love. In the survey,
Lunar noted grimly that many ecological solutions, such
as recycling, have been globally used to “smudge our
eyes” instead of contributing to real social change. He is
disappointed with human ignorance of ecology, and “...
aware of my own powerlessness, but just the same I don’t
plan only to sit down and look at the downfall that we’re
presented with by the hordes of parasites [corrupted
politicians]” (Interview with Lunar, 2019).
Duo Studio Kriška made a fictitious and allegorical
Endangered Savamala’s Ghost Panda in Belgrade (Figure
25), as part of their wider project Ghost people of Savamala,
with an interesting social twist: “...he represents all the
repressed inhabitants of Savamala, the ones without a voice,
that are not seen or are pushed aside, but are still a part of
the community” (Kriška studio, 2013; also: Start Street Art
Belgrade, 2014a). This and most of previous works rely
on symbolic and often poetic and subtle reading of our
environment, reflecting on the society and communicating a
personal need for closer links with the natural world. A way
towards activism and more bold ecological involvement
could be made by incorporating ecological findings and less
Emergence of StudiesSAUC - Journal V6 - N2
Figure 23. Reading makes you grow, Campo en Blanco project. Artez. Armstrong, Argentina, 2016. Photograph ©Firma
creative.
ambiguous messages.
5. It’s our responsibility...: Ecology and activism
In discussing various practices of reverse graffiti, Veronika
Norvaišaitė notes that art in the streets has social potentials
and in her research underlines that “...creators of reverse
graffiti are much more driven by the possibility to beautify
neglected places and improve the social atmosphere there
than by a desire to bring to attention the issue of pollution”
(78). In other words, they seem equally interested in
influencing the social and the physical environment. In the
case of Belgrade, the social aspect - beautification and pro-
ecological messages - seem to be predominant, still with a
few notable eco technical interventions lining towards eco
graffiti and eco art.
Many artists are focused on humans and their relation to
the city environment and nature. wrnkl’s philosophical
messages, as previously mentioned, target homo- and
trans- phobias, violence towards people and animals (as
in Ne tuci (p)se - Don’t beat dogs/yourself, Figure 26),
and aim to influence people’s perceptions in a playful and
activist way. Another example is a green mountain goat
pushing a domino-like structure in Piros’ mural made as
part of Be pArt Budva Festival in 2018 (Figure 27). For this
mural the artist stated in his portfolio: “The main purpose
of this project is to spread [e.g. talk about, author’s note]
the negative attitude of young people towards improper
construction, unplanned urbanism and the irresponsible
behaviour of humanity towards nature and its resources”
(Piros, 2020: 27).
In Pop Lukina street no. 6 in Belgrade, we have a mini
case study which shows two different voices in the eco
story, both which gain their strength from knowing and
incorporating the local context in the artwork itself. The
first one was made as part of Belef 09 festival, with BLU’s
piece The tree eater. BLU (IT), still keeping an anonymous
identity, creates large-scale often site-specific murals on a
global scale, infused with critical and activist commentary
of social relations, values and current politics. The Belgrade
one presents a business person with buildings instead of
teeth devouring a green tree (Figure 28). “The message is
clear - nature loses the battle with urban expansion and
enormous developmental projects which are destroying it
91
Emergence of StudiesSAUC - Journal V6 - N2
Figure 24. Protector. Lunar. Zagreb, Croatia, 2019.
Photograph ©Lunar.
Figure 25. Endangered Savamala’s Ghost Panda.
Studio Kriška. Belgrade, Serbia, 2013. Photograph
©selenborcbakan.
92
day by day” (Start Street Art Belgrade, 2014b). The mural
is more current than ever given that the city government
has initiated many reconstruction projects in the past years
that removed trees and previously green spaces by filling
them with concrete and insisting on the “concretization” of
public space (Tešić, 2019). This is all happening in a period
when there is a rising concern about the air quality, which
has dramatically worsened during the 2019/2020 winter
period.
The newer mural is Zeleni grad - nova energija (The green
city - new energy) initiated by NIS (Naftna industrija
Srbije - Oil company of Serbia), which had a petrol pump
just underneath BLU’s piece (Figure 29). Designed by Sara
Antov and Dragan Vuković, and executed by the Paint
Kartel graffiti crew, the mural imagines the interconnected
city like a leaf with its veins. It serves a marketing purpose
(Danas, 2018), signaling an ecological dedication of the
company and a vision of a green future (if already not the
present), which features more green areas followed by art.
Two years afterwards, the muralization has not been
continued and the ecological potential of many public
spaces is unrealized, if not already erased with concrete.
“The big companies nowadays are, ironically, the ones to be
the loudest in carrying on campaigns for protection of the
natural environment and investing big money in recycling
which became a profitable business as well” (Start Street
Art Belgrade, 2014b). The tree eater and The green city
showcase two approaches, coming from a personal activism
and urban redevelopment. While the former became a
reality, in its 11th year of existence, the latter stands as a
fragile promise.
Looking back at motifs, while many animals seem to be
accepted as a global imagery, ready to be used anywhere,
some of them are specifically linked to local and endangered
Emergence of StudiesSAUC - Journal V6 - N2
Figure 27. Be pArt Budva festival. Budva, Montenegro, 2016.
Photograph ©Fondacija Budva.
Figure 26. Ne tuci (p)se. wrnkl. Srebrno jezero, Serbia, 2014.
Photograph ©wrnkl.
93
Emergence of StudiesSAUC - Journal V6 - N2
Figure 29. Zeleni grad - nova energija. Sara Antov and Dragan Vuković. Belgrade, Serbia, 2018. Photograph ©NIS.
Figure 28. The tree eater. BLU. Belgrade, Serbia, 2009.
Photograph ©Start Street Art Belgrade.
94
Emergence of StudiesSAUC - Journal V6 - N2
Figure 30. Odgovornost je naša za orla krstaša. Piros. Belgrade, Serbia, 2019. Photograph ©Igor Svetel / Walls of Belgrade.
species. Another “urban-ecological” artwork by Piros
represents the eastern imperial eagle (orao krstaš) that
was unveiled in the lower Dorćol area, tied to a campaign
by LAV beer and the Bird Protection and Study Society
of Serbia (BPSSS), supported by the Association of Lower
Dorćol (Figure 30). The aim of the campaign was to protect
endangered birds and their habitat and rebuild it at Fruška
Gora mountain. According to the mural initiators, at the
time (2019), although the eagle is the national symbol,
only one nesting pair was found in the country and BPSSS
worked hard to provide them all the necessary resources
to reproduce (B92, 2019; Piros, 2020: 41). In an example
from neighboring Montenegro, Mišo Joskić depicted a
deforestation scene warning the public about the habitat
loss of black woodpeckers, initiated by the Center for
Protection and Research of Birds (CZIP) (Đurović, 2018;
Figure 31). Apart from being related to larger call-for-
action projects, these works provide more context and
involvement, by bringing attention to animals which require
it, to paraphrase Brva’s words.
As far as my knowledge goes, there have not been any
continuous and actual attempts to use reverse graffiti or
similar techniques in Belgrade.6 A Youtube video shows
Moose (UK), one of the founders of reverse graffiti or clean
tagging, who worked on a hallway in Belgrade in 2011
with a few fine arts students.7 Recently, in 2019, Belgrade
artist Ivan Kocić made a mural Griffon Vulture (beloglavi
sup) using recycled materials, an extension of his Recycling
of Play assemblage project, which could be an interesting
way forward, mixing mural and installation art (Figure 32).8
Together with Piros’ eagle mural, it tackles a sensitive bird
species, which was luckily saved from near-extinction.
Additionally, it is also part of a wider environmental project,
supported by the EU, and was made in collaboration with
school kids (Evropa.rs, 2019).
Recently, in autumn 2020, a mural was made as part
of Converse City Forests project, the very first one in
6 - wrnkl mentioned an intention to do moss graffiti, but hasn’t done so yet (Interview with wrnkl, 2019). 7 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J0nHYRFm5JA 8 - https://www.instagram.com/p/BztR9yAIsxG/ A prominent international example of eco alternative street art techniques could be found in the works of Bordalo II (Figure 5).
95
Emergence of StudiesSAUC - Journal V6 - N2
Figure 31. Crna žuna ne može bez šuma. Mišo Joskić. Podgorica, Montenegro, 2018. Photograph ©Mišo Joskić.
96
Serbia which uses colors9 that actively clean the air from
pollutants (Figure 33). This technology is based on the
photocatalytic process naturally present in the Earth’s
atmosphere (Banić, 2020). Artists Artez and Wuper
created a scene called Celebrating our roots inspired by
tradition and ecology, where one of the characters depicted
has a bouquet of flowers instead of their head (Arsić, 2020).
In a podcast about ecological street art, Wuper mentioned
that the ecological colors gave “mural a good story behind
it” and how the artist hopes the technique would come to
life, especially in cities like Belgrade (Banić, 2020). In the
current absence of other practices, technically this mural
is the closest Belgrade came to eco-art in the streets, by
incorporating materials which actively contribute to the
environment’s wellbeing. Here we could have an example
of what nikolić calls “a cohabitation of agencies, human and
other-than-human” (nikolić, 2016: 51), where the active
colors and their interaction with polluted air are integral
part - conceptually and physically - of the artwork.
9 - http://www.knoxoutpaints.com/about.do?id=20800
6. Conclusions
Given the pieces present in Belgrade streets and the specific
artworks by the artists who responded to the survey, one
can see that most ecological actions come from personal,
aesthetic programs, with a few examples of direct activism.
While few would categorize their initiatives as ecological,
given the public aspect of their work and motivations to
make art, it is evident that street art and graffiti have great
potential in talking about our environment. Given the rapid
industrialization and increasing migrations to big cities
worldwide, Tunnacliffe states that street art does have
potentials to “rewrite” the urban environment:
It is important to remember that nature and
society do not exist in isolation from one
another. Everyday life in the urban setting is
made up of social and natural entanglements.
To ignore their relation to one another is to
ignore the very fabric of today’s urban society,
maintaining the invisible barriers between the
two (Tunnacliffe, 2016: 7).
Emergence of StudiesSAUC - Journal V6 - N2
Figure 32. Beloglavi sup (Griffon Vulture). Ivan Kocić. Belgrade, Serbia, 2019. Photograph ©A. Malko / Ras Srbija.
97
Emergence of StudiesSAUC - Journal V6 - N2
Figure 33. Celebrating our roots. Artez & Wuper. Belgrade, Serbia, 2020. Photograph ©Igor Svetel / Walls of Belgrade.
98
This statement provides ground to understand one’s work
in the streets as potentially artivistic. Therefore, it is my
goal to find a way of approaching street art and graffiti with
ecological potentials. However, it would not be beneficial to
force ecological readings onto the artists’ work, as to quote
Quam, “themes of preserving the natural environment
are almost never present in my work. I think I’d change
profession if I wanted to deal with those topics. I use
elements from urban and natural surroundings in my works
to often tell a personal story or because they are interesting
as drawing templates” (Interview with Quam, 2020). On the
other hand, Brva says “the connection (between SAG and
ecology) is of course possible only if ecology is honored in
all aspects of a mural, from creation to the message itself”
(Interview with Brva, 2020). I feel that if the work itself is not
closely related to an artist’s oeuvre, it can lose much of its
creativity and power; likewise, if it’s solely a beautification
project, it has a bleak ecological potential.
Most artists agreed that a way forward towards eco art
would be to use more eco-friendly colors (as with the
newest example by Artez and Wuper), recycling (Kocić) and
a purposeful ecological activism (Piros’s eagle). Certainly, if
remaining within traditional, not biodegradable techniques
or less polluting colors (such as acrylics), SAG could still rely
on an aesthetic greenification of the gray city walls, focusing
primarily on communication of ecological messages, which
many artists see as a great potential. To achieve it, more
work is needed on researching the current ecological
challenges, local context and ways how to address the
public. Support and momentum gained from city projects
that aim to tackle ecological issues has its benefits, and
could be used creatively by the artists, however avoiding
traps of greenwashing and relying solely on projects to do
continuous eco work.
On the other side, scientists and researchers according
to Curtis, Reid, and Ballard, have mostly overlooked
the potential role of the arts in disseminating scientific
findings, although the arts have a history of social activism.
According to them:
The arts can synthesize and convey complex
scientific information, promote new ways of
looking at issues, touch people’s emotions, and
create a celebratory atmosphere, as was evident
in this case study. In like manner, the visual and
performing arts should be harnessed to help
extend the increasingly unpalatable and urgent
messages of global climate change science to
a lay audience worldwide (Curtis, Reid, and
Ballard, 2012).
Emergence of StudiesSAUC - Journal V6 - N2
Figure 34. DUK Festival 2019. Quam. Čačak, Serbia, 2019. Photograph ©DUK Festival.
While both artists and ecologists can benefit from mutual
collaboration on these issues, many raise concerns on
how these initiatives could be framed and used. In her
research about reverse graffiti, Norvaišaitė notes: “Since
eco communication has seen a growing mistrust when
coming from the government and industries (...), and
graffiti is supposedly a socio-political commentary free
of mainstream influences, street art could be a potential
channel of environmental communication” (Norvaišaitė,
2014: 3). As an independent practice, within SAG ecological
murals could tackle biodiversity and shift attitudes, where
both the artists and the viewers are directly visually
engaged in its ecological messages (Arrieta, 2014), whether
part of official projects or bottom-up initiatives.
Turning to local and endangered species, these artworks
could be more site-specific, linking history, biology and
activism in raising awareness. A very good example is
ATM (UK) who mainly depicts local species that are always
connected to the local history and environment, whether
present, endangered, or already lost. With continuous,
contextualized and well researched bird murals, his aim is to
inspire care and conservation (ATM, 2017). This approach
has potential especially when involving the community -
from scientists, artists, to regular people - as stakeholders,
such as in the example of Curlew mural done as part of
Endangered 13 conservation effort where street art raised
visibility of disappearing species in the UK (Figure 39).10
The actual example of Festival Rekonstrukcija in Belgrade
stands as a living example how an art initiative could foster
both new production, community engagement and express
10 - http://humannatureshow.com/endangered13/
99
Emergence of StudiesSAUC - Journal V6 - N2
Figure 35. Curlew. ATM. London, 2016. Photograph ©ATM.
100
solidarity (Marković, 2020).
Of course, the most obvious way requires abandoning the
traditional techniques and going towards experimentation,
turning to moss and/or reverse graffiti, if not other
art mediums. However, reverse graffiti does not equal
direct ecological messages; artists could tackle nature
and the urban surroundings in a wider way, beautifying
neglected surfaces and improving the living atmosphere
(Norvaišaitė, 2014: 57-69). At the present moment, these
experimental techniques could provide both a challenge
for implementation and ways of demonstrating originality,
given its present lack in the Belgrade.
As a conclusion, street art and graffiti are without doubt part
of the urban ecosystem, with potentials to aesthetically and
critically reflect on it. Apart from its great communication
power, by supporting deeper engagement, research and
collaboration, as well as eco techniques and even activism,
SAG in Belgrade could gain a critical edge and scientific
base (as in contemporary eco art), becoming a stronger
stakeholder in making the city really more green.
Acknowledgements
The author wishes to thank the artists, Charlotte Whelan,
Ljiljana Radošević and Pedro Soares Neves, for making this
article possible.
Sources:
Artez (2020, January 10). Online interview.
Brva (2020, February 02). Online interview.
Jana (2019, October 01). Online interview.
Junk (2019, October 18). Online interview.
Lunar (2019, October 09). Online interview.
Piros (2019, October 17). Online interview.
Quam (2020, January 21). Online interview.
wrnkl (2019, October 01). Online interview.
ZEZ lunatic (2019, October 18). Online interview.
All interview references in the text and resources in Serbian
were translated to English by the author.
References:
Arrieta, D. (2014). Street Art: A tool for increasing
biodiversity awareness. MA. The University of Edinburgh.
(Online) Accessed April 15, 2020. https://www.
researchgate.net/publication/273060022_Street_Art_A_
tool_for_increasing_biodiversity_awareness
Arsić, M. (2020). Umetnost će spasiti svet! City Magazine.
(Online) Accessed November 23, 2020. https://
citymagazine.rs/kultura/art/umetnost-ce-spasiti-svet/
ATM (2017). Street Art, Ecology and Extinction.
TEDxImperialCollege. (Online) Accessed April 15, 2020.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pKlbYS9RnmU
Emergence of StudiesSAUC - Journal V6 - N2
B92 (2019). Orao krstaš “sleteo” na Dorćol. B92 Život.
(Online) Accessed April 15, 2020. https://www.b92.
net/zivot/vesti.php?yyyy=2019&mm=11&dd=26&nav_
id=1622741
Bambić, A. (2014a). Balena con le Gambette che Vola.
Widewalls. (Online) Accessed April 15, 2020. https://www.
widewalls.ch/nevercrew-mural-mikser-festival-belgrade/
Bambić, A. (2014b). Reverse Graffiti - The Art With Clear
and Temporary Message. Widewalls. (Online) Accessed
April 15, 2020. https://www.widewalls.ch/reverse-graffiti-
method/
Banić, M. (2020). Future Generations podcast, Epizoda 1
– Eco Street Art. (Online) Accessed November 23, 2020.
https://podcast.rs/epizoda-1-eco-street-art/
Curtis, D. J, Reid, N, and Ballard, G. (2012). Communicating
Ecology Through Art: What Scientists Think. Ecology and
Society 17(2), Art 3. The Resilience Alliance.
Danas (2018). NIS poklonio novi mural Beogradu. (Online)
Accessed April 15, 2020. https://www.danas.rs/beograd/
nis-poklonio-novi-mural-beogradu/
Đurović, M. (2018). Novi mural Miša Joskića u Podgorici
upozorava na ugroženost ptica. Vijesti online. (Online)
Accessed April 15, 2020. https://www.vijesti.me/vijesti/
drustvo/novi-mural-misa-joskica-u-podgorici-upozorava-
na-ugrozenost-ptica
Evropa.rs (2019). Belgrade Gets a New Mural – “Beloglavi
Sup” From Recycled Material. (Online) Accessed November
27, 2020. http://europa.rs/belgrade-gets-a-new-mural-
beloglavi-sup-from-recycled-material/?lang=en
I Support Street Art (2017). “Ratical” by Blek le Rat. (Online)
Accessed April 15, 2020. http://www.isupportstreetart.
com/festibition/ratical-blek-le-rat/
Kalaba, A. (2019). Jana Danilović nam otkriva pravila igre
među BG grafiterima i street artistima. Noizz Kultura.
(Online) Accessed April 15, 2020. https://noizz.rs/kultura/
jana-danilovic-nam-otkriva-pravila-igre-medu-bg-
grafiterima-i-street-artistima/yc68l9b
Kriška studio (2013). Endangered Savamala’s Ghost Panda.
(Online) Accessed April 15, 2020. http://krishka-studio.
blogspot.com/2013/06/endagered-savamalas-ghost-
panda.html
Marčetić, D. (2014). Inspektor Yoda zgužvani u Zagrebu:
‘Krenimo od onog što je dobro’ - Razgovor. Libela: Portal o
rodu, spolu i demokraciji. (Online) Accessed April 15, 2020.
https://www.libela.org/razgovor/5684-krenimo-od-onog-
sto-je-dobro/
Marković, T. (2020). Umetnost u javnom prostoru
kao mehanizam podsticanja zajedništva. Pregovori o
pregovorima, Broj LXIV / 2020. BOŠ - Beogradska otvorena
škola. (Online) Accessed November 27, 2020. https://
javnozagovaranje.bos.rs/vesti/154/umetnost-u-javnom-
prostoru-kao-mehanizam-podsticanja-zajednistva-.html
Martinique, E. (2016). The Era of Environmental Art.
Widewalls. (Online) Accessed April 14, 2020. https://www.
widewalls.ch/environmental-art/
Milošević, A. (2018). Igor Zlatić Zez Lunatic, arhitekta
enterijera, ulični umetnik. Zlatibor.rs. (Online) Accessed
November 27, 2020. https://www.zlatibor.rs/vest/igor-
zlatic-zez-lunatic-arhitekta-enterijera-ulicni-umetnik
nikolić, m. (2016). minoritarian ecologies: performance
before a more-than-human world. PhD. University of
Westminster, London. (Online) Accessed November 23,
2020. http://minoritarianecologi.es/
Norvaišaitė, V. (2014). Environmental Communication in
Street Art: Motivations & Messages of Reverse Graffiti
Creators. MA. Erasmus University Rotterdam. (Online)
Accessed November 23, 2020. https://thesis.eur.nl/
pub/17739
Pedersen, C. (2018). Subversive weeds: Bio-activist
strategies in urban interventions. Nuart Journal
2018, Volume 1, Number 1. (Online) Accessed April
15, 2020. https://nuartjournal.com/wp-content/
uploads/2018/09/03_Pedersen_Nuart-Journal-1-1-2018.
101
Emergence of StudiesSAUC - Journal V6 - N2
102
Piros (2020). One man and one vision (portfolio).
Radošević, Lj. (2012). Street art and the way it has
been reappropriated: Problems of terminology and
independence. Mustekala Kulttuurilehti. (Online) Accessed
April 15, 2020. http://mustekala.info/teemanumerot/
street-art-4-12/street-art-and-the-way-it-has-been-
r e a p p r o p r i a t e d - p r o b l e m s - o f - t e r m i n o l o g y - a n d -
independence/
Radošević, Lj. (2020). Džamutka. Piros: One man and one
vision (portfolio).
Ratković, V. (2018). Andrej Žikić ARTEZ: Trudim se da
za sobom ostavim radove koji će uspostaviti dijalog s
posmatračem. 42 magazin. (Online) Accessed April 15,
2020. http://42magazin.rs/andrej-zikic-artez-street-
artist-42/
Start Street Art Belgrade (2014a). Društveno odgovorni
duhovi Savamale. (Online) Accessed April 15, 2020. https://
startstreetart.wordpress.com/2014/02/26/duhovi-
savamale/
Start Street Art Belgrade (2014b). BLU u Beogradu. (Online)
Accessed April 15, 2020. https://startstreetart.wordpress.
com/2014/03/05/blu-u-beogradu/
Stojsavljević, A, and Anćufejev, V. (2013). ArsKozara -
umetničko iskušavanje ništavila. Brazdablog.
Tešić, M. (2019). Ko seče drveće po Beogradu i šta može da
se uradi protiv toga. Vice Beograd. (Online) Accessed April
15, 2020. https://www.vice.com/rs/article/gyanv4/ko-sece-
drvece-po-beogradu-i-sta-moze-da-se-uradi-protiv-toga
Tunnacliffe, C. M. (2016). The power of urban street art
in re-naturing urban imaginations and experiences. The
Bartlett - Development Planning Unit Working Paper
no. 182. London: University College London. (Online)
Accessed April 15, 2020. https://www.ucl.ac.uk/bartlett/
development/sites/bartlett/files/migrated-files/WP_182_
Claire_Malaika_T_June_0.pdf
Emergence of StudiesSAUC - Journal V6 - N2