the chernobyl disaster and ethics west virginia university ee 481 group #10 spring 2014 floyd baker...
TRANSCRIPT
THE CHERNOBYL DISASTERAND ETHICS
West Virginia University
EE 481 Group #10
Spring 2014
Floyd Baker - Matt Logue - Stuart Christie
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Saturday, 26 April 1986 Reactor #4 of Chernobyl Plant Near the city of Pripyat, Ukraine Close Proximity to Belarus and the Dnieper River
Actual modern location is in the Ukraine Widely considered to be worst Nuclear Power Plant accident in history
The only other comparable event is the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Disaster
THE DISASTER
Began as a systems testUnexpected power surgeEmergency shutdown was attemptedLarger power spike occursReactor rupture and steam explosionsGraphite explosionNuclear falloutEffects continue today
EFFECTS OF THE ACCIDENT
31 deaths attributed to directly to accident 64 confirmed deaths from radiation as of 2008 Many more could die from effects of radiation 400 times more radioactive material than Hiroshima
Immediate and long lasting effects of flora and fauna
Thyroid cancer is a major issue in the affected areas
Massive economic effects
ETHICAL VIOLATIONS OF CHERNOBYL
The staff and engineers violated the following NSPE code of ethics:
“Engineers shall hold paramount the safety, health, and welfare of the public”
ETHICAL VIOLATION PREVENTION IN CHERNOBYL
The nuclear engineers should have contained the reactor area properly in case of the explosion.
This would contained the radiation and kept it from spreading to such a large area
ACCIDENT PREVENTION OF CHERNOBYL
The Engineers at Chernobyl could have designed the RBMK reactor very differently:
Avoid positive temperature coefficient of reactivity
Not putting moderator on the tips of control rods
Use a SCRAM system that responds in seconds instead of minutes
Add automatic lockouts to prevent operators from performing actions known to create unstable operating conditions
Provide a containment building
POTENTIAL ETHICAL ISSUES IN OUR PROJECT
Tracking food expiration dates
Users who have food allergies
Users on diet plans
Users on a budget
User data privacy
PREVENTION OF ETHICAL VIOLATIONS
Provide early warning to users that foods they have are going to expire soon
Warn users if a food they are buying contains an ingredient they are allergic to
Warn users if they are buying foods that are outside of their diet plan restrictions
Warn users if they are spending more than the budget they set for themselves
Implement database security