pakistan malaria programme review (mpr)

219
1 PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

Upload: nguyenbao

Post on 13-Feb-2017

252 views

Category:

Documents


24 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

1

PAKISTAN MALARIA

PROGRAMME REVIEW

(MPR)

Page 2: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

2

Contents

Executive summary ......................................................................................................................... 4

1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 17

1.1 Background ...................................................................................................................... 17

1.2 Objectives of the MPR ........................................................................................................ 17

1.3 Methodology of the MPR ................................................................................................... 18

1.4 Outline of the document...................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.

2. Context of malaria control ........................................................................................................ 20

2.1 Historical milestones in malaria control .............................. Error! Bookmark not defined.

2.2 Malaria control within the national development agenda .... Error! Bookmark not defined.

2.3 National health policy .......................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.

2.4 National health sector strategic plan .................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.

2.5National development plan ................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.

2.6 Organizational structure for malaria control ....................................................................... 25

2.7 Key strategies for malaria control ....................................................................................... 26

2.8 Key players in malaria control ............................................................................................ 27

2.9 Linkages and coordination .................................................................................................. 28

2.10 Conclusions and Recommendations ................................................................................. 28

3. Epidemiology of malaria ........................................................................................................... 28

3.1 Geographical distribution of malaria ................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.

3.2 Population at risk ................................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined.

3.3 Stratification and risk map ................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.

3.4 Malaria parasites .................................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined.

3.5 Malaria vectors..................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.

3.6 Disease trends ...................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.

3.7 Conclusions and recommendations. .................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.

4. Programme performance by thematic areas ............................... Error! Bookmark not defined.

4.1 Programme management ..................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.

4.2 Procurement and supply chain management ....................................................................... 91

4.3 Malaria vector control .......................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.

4.4 Malaria diagnosis and case management .......................................................................... 213

Page 3: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

3

4. 5 Advocacy, BCC, IEC and social mobilization.................... Error! Bookmark not defined.

Error! Bookmark not defined.

4.7 Surveillance, Monitoring and Evaluation ......................................................................... 168

Conclusions .................................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.

Key recommendations ................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.

Annexes.......................................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.

Annex 1: Agenda for all the phases of the MPR ....................... Error! Bookmark not defined.

Annex 2: People involved in MPR ............................................ Error! Bookmark not defined.

References ...................................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.

Page 4: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

4

Executive summary

The specific objectives of the MPR were:

• To review the epidemiological outlook of malaria disease in each province of Pakistan with particular

reference to disease trends, Slide positivity rate, Species wise distribution, Blood exam rate BER,

Severe Malaria and Outcome of the managed cases at health facility with particular reference on

disease specific mortality.

• To review the Malaria program structure, capacity and management in each province and at national

level (DOMC), in view of its new roles after devolution and identify issues and challenges arising

post devolution.

• To assess the current programme performance by intervention thematic areas and review progress,

challenges and towards achievement of targets in each province and progress towards achieving

national and regional goals.

• To identify way forward, priority needs and gaps for improving programme performance and

coordination at provincial and federal level.

• To define steps to improve programme performance and redefine the strategic direction and focus,

including revision of policies and strategic plans at provincial levels which can help tapping the

available funds from various sources including the public sector and donors e.g. Global Fund from

R10 malaria grant phase II and from the new funding model.

• To assess the effectiveness of Global Fund grants supported projects in highly endemic regions of the

country and to suggest ways and means for quality assured interventions following the principals of

transparency, accountability and value for money.

• To develop the post MDG strategic plan at provincial and national level for Pakistan for 2015-2020,

based on the results of PRM, which will help mobilize resources based on new funding model.

Key Findings

Pakistan was one of the high endemic countries who launched Malaria eradication program in the 1960’s,

with the support of WHO, UNICEF and USAID. As a result of this campaign there was marked reduction

in malaria cases from a reported 7 million cases in 1961 to 9,500 cases in 1967 with associated slide

positivity rate reduction from 15% to less than 0.01%. However there was a major resurgence and

epidemics in early 1970s even in urban areas such as Karachi with reported malaria cases rising to 10

million in 1974. Some of the reasons for the resurgence were the onset of vector resistance to

Organochlorines (DDT & Dieldrin/BHC), under estimation of A. stephensi in maintenance of urban

malaria, inadequate planning for malaria control within irrigation and water development projects

together with financial and administrative constraints, inadequate administration of programs, inadequate

research, training, and supplies of chemicals and drugs, inadequate health services infrastructure with

premature withdrawal of donor support. The Malaria Program switched from Eradication to Control

Program during 1975-1985 and implementation handed over to provincial government and district health

offices and malaria control program was integrated with general health services in 1985.

In 2003 as part of the global Roll Back Malaria Movement, Pakistan launched its Roll Back Malaria

program with support of government planning commission Roll Back Malaria plan 2008/2009-2012/2013

with support of GF Round 7 and Round 10 malaria grant. This started accelerated malaria control

activities in 38 priority high malaria transmission districts out of the 136 districts in the country.

Page 5: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

5

Today Pakistan has an estimated population of 173.5 million people, out of which, according to the 2012

national malaria disease surveillance annual report, 9% are living in high transmission districts (34) with

an annual parasitic index (API) ranging from 5 to 28, 20% are living in moderately endemic districts (41

districts) with API ranging from 1 to 5, and 71% living in low endemic districts with an API below

1/1000 population. The national API for the entire country is averaging 1.69, which classifies Pakistan as

a moderate malaria endemic country. Malaria mappings show clearly that the highly endemic districts are

located mainly in the provinces of Baluchistan, FATA, Sindh, and KPK. The lowest malaria incidence

was reported in two provinces – Punjab and AJK with combined population of more than 56% of total

population of the country.

The primary malaria vectors are A.culicifacies and A.stephensi. A number of secondary vectors have

been reported and their contribution to malaria transmission is being investigated. The last nationwide

vector surveillance was in 2009 and a new one has been completed in 2013 and data is being analysed and

report under preparation

The primary malaria parasite is P. Vivax with P. falciparum being the secondary parasite. In 2012,

Annual Blood Examination Rate (ABER) varied between 1.78% in Punjab to 7.09% in Baluchistan. Out

of the 289,759 malaria cases confirmed positive in 2012, 249,504 were identified by microscopy (86.1

%), while 40,255(13.89%) by rapid diagnostic test. Majority of cases were considered as P.vivax (74.39

%) and 23.95 % as P.falciparum and 1.65 % as mixed infections. Highest P.falciparum malaria

proportion is reported in Baluchistan (44%) followed by Sindh (27%).

Malaria indicator survey of 2009 showed malaria prevalence rates in Baluchistan 6.2% (Pf 2.4% Pv 3.8%

), FATA 13.9% (Pf 0.6%:Pv13.3%),Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 3.8% (Pf0.9%:Pv2.9%) and Sind 0.7% (Pf

0.7%: Pv0.4%).

The provincial prevalence is consistent with the reported incidence from the malaria surveillance system.

The 2013 prevalence survey is being analysed and report should be available in early 2014.

The historical malaria trends in Pakistan from the malaria surveillance system between 1973 and 2012

shows clearly: 1)That the Annual parasitic index dropped drastically from 1973 ( API 13.18) to below

1/1000 in 1977 ( API 0.93) with a sharp decline in the slide positivity rate from 14% to 0.62% with

malaria eradication campaigns in less than 5 years; 2)A tremendous increase of positive cases was

observed between the years 2005-2009 with around 130.000 cases /year (malaria strategic plan) to almost

300.000 positive cases in 2012 ( National malaria disease surveillance report 2012)., The annual parasitic

incidence went up from 0.74 in 2009 to 1.46 in 2010 and 1.88 in 2011. Similar trends were observed in

low transmission areas of Punjab province which also suffered from the floods, the malaria cases went up

from 3,432 cases in 2009 to around 30,000 cases in 2010; 3) It is important to note during this long period

,that the blood examination rate ( indicator for malaria surveillance ) dropped from 9.36 in 1973 to 5.46 in

1980 and remains quasi stable around 2-3 / 1000 inhabitants between 1983 and 2013 , indicating a poor

case detection during almost 30 years.;4)Given the variety of ecotypes in the country (valleys with rivers

at various altitudes, agriculture-related malaria, peri-urban type, migrant malaria,…) the epidemiology of

malaria varies considerably between provinces / districts and union councils. More detailed spatial

analysis with micro-stratification by districts is critical for malaria control/elimination monitoring.

Transmission of malaria in most parts of the country is highly seasonal and unstable with peaks of

transmission in the summer (June-Sept) for P.vivax and late-summer and winter months (August-

November) for falciparum malaria. Because P.vivax relapses, there is a peak of relapse episodes seen in

the early summer (April-June) resulting from transmission in the previous year.

Page 6: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

6

Malaria epidemics frequently occur in Pakistan which has a history of unstable transmission. Between

2010 and 2013, Disease Early Warning System (DEWS) reported maximum number of malaria alerts and

outbreaks from Baluchistan followed by Sindh, These alerts and outbreaks peaked in 2011 and 2012

which might be explained by the fact that during those years, both provinces had major emergency due to

floods and secondly during the same period almost every district had a DEWS surveillance officer in the

provinces thus detecting alerts and outbreaks was quite efficient. Predictably, 7 out of 15 districts

reporting the highest number of alerts and outbreaks during 2010-13 belonged to Baluchistan province

with highest numbers reported from Jaffarabad with 44 alerts and 32 outbreaks.

The new malaria information system launched in 2009 in 19 priority districts managed by the DOMC

shows an increase of API from 7.13 in 2009 to 10.13 in 2012 associated with increased malaria risk with

major flood emergency and increased access to RDT and Microscopy, followed by a decrease to 7.82 in

2012 following the control measures especially with increased access to Primaquine and ACT. It is noted

that in 2010, out of 122,350 positive slides, 20,051 were taken in IDP camps. Age distribution of cases

indicates the confinement of malaria to the age group above 15 years with only 17.82% of confirmed

cases among children below 5 years.

The District Health Information System (DHIS) data from primary/clinic-health centre health care

facilities suggests that proportion of suspected/clinical malaria cases presenting to OPD is highest in

Baluchistan with 8.9% and 8.6% of total OPD consultations followed by Sindh with 8.50% and 7.36%,

KPK with 3.7% and 2.3% and Punjab with 1.5% and 1.5% for 2011 and 2012 respectively.

Similar proportions can also observed in DHIS secondary/ hospital health care facilities data with 2.6%

and 5.54% malaria OPD consultations for Baluchistan followed by Sindh with 7.8 % and 5%, KPK with

3.1 % and 2.3% and Punjab 0.6% and 0.6% respectively in 2011 and 2012.

Punjab tested the highest proportion of suspected Malaria cases with 83% and 86% of total suspected malaria

cases followed by low testing rates In KPK with 28.4% and 36.3%, and Baluchistan with 19% and 23% and very

low testing rate in Sind with 18% and 18% respectively in 2011 and 2012.

In 2011 and 2012, Baluchistan had the highest proportion of malaria cases admitted in the primary health

care facilities where as in the secondary health care facilities, Sindh province had the highest proportion

of malaria admission during the same time period. Taking admissions as proxy indicator for severe

malaria, proportion of inpatient admissions in secondary hospitals was highest in Sind with 6% and 8%

followed by Baluchistan with 1.8 and 2.7%, KPK 2% and 2.2 % and Punjab with 0.2 and 0.3%

respectively in 2011 and 2012. The hospital fatality rate among the severe malaria cases was highest in

Punjab 2% with 67 deaths in 2011 and in 2012 Sindh had a case fatality rate of 1.73% with 155 deaths.

However inpatient admission from primary health care facilities was highest in Baluchistan with 52% in

2011 and 43% in 2012.indicating the continued challenges of PF transmission and different level of

access to primary and secondary facilities in Baluchistan and Sind.

The nationwide epidemiological data shows clearly that Pakistan is a low to moderate endemic country

with an important diversity within and between the provinces and districts. The mapping of Malaria

situation (2012 data) shows clearly that the highly endemic districts are located gradually in Baluchistan

(API 7.68), FATA (6.83), Sindh (2.92), and KPK (2.76), Punjab (0.19) and AJK (0.10).

The MPR showed the existence of a fragmented malaria and health information system, with very limited

capacities of analysis. The geographical information system necessary for the strategic orientation of

malaria control interventions is absent at all levels. There is a need to understand much better the

epidemiology of malaria in all provinces.

Page 7: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

7

Key best practices, success stories and facilitating factors

Access and coverage to malaria control interventions

Malaria control program and all malaria partners supporting delivery of malaria control services have not

adequately focused on the needs and demands of the malaria risk populations and have not tracked trends

in universal access and coverage to malaria control services.

An estimated 20 % of the population have access to public health facilities, from which the number of

reported cases by per year is approximately 300,000 resulting in the total number of malaria cases to be

an estimated 1.5 million per year.

The demographic health survey conducted in 2012-13, with a representative sample of 12,943

households, recorded 38% of children under age 5 had fever symptoms in the 2 weeks preceding the

survey. Children under 5 who sought treatment from health facilities/providers was estimated to be 58.2%

in Sindh, 50.1 % in Punjab and 39.1% in Baluchistan. A higher percentage of children under the age of

fiver were detected with fever (38%) than diagnosed as confirmed malaria (20%) highlighting the need

for further investigation on the origin of fever cases and more efforts needed to confirm all suspected/

clinical malaria cases in Pakistan.

Similarly data collected from DEWS on suspected malaria indicates many fever cases of fever are

diagnosed as malaria cases, for example in Jamal Kot ( Okara district, Punjab) BHU and rural

dispensary,717 suspected malaria cases were reported in 2013 ( up to October 2013), 99 slides taken and

0 malaria cases confirmed. Lack of diagnostic facilities in BHUs and non-availability of trained staff

weakens the coverage and access to malaria control activities.

To date, the programme has distributed 2.4 million LLINs since 2009, initially targeting pregnant women

and children under the age of five in high risk areas. The current National Malaria Strategy targets 85%

(6.9 million) of the 8 million populations living in high risk areas with Long Lasting Insecticidal Nets

(LLINs) and the remaining 15% (1.2 million) of the population living in epidemic prone areas are

targeted with Indoor Residual Spraying (IRS). The overall LLIN operational coverage in targeted districts

(38) is 41%, ranging from 25% to 65% at district level. The overall IRS operational coverage at union

council level in the 38 districts targeted by Global Fund is 99%, ranging from 25% to over 100% in

targeted union councils. The programme has based their estimations for IRS on the census data taken

from 2010 which consequently has resulted in districts over achieving their original targets. Furthermore,

given that only targeted union councils are subjected to both interventions undermines the whole concept

of “universal coverage” as denoted by WHO guidelines, especially in the case of IRS where the total

population at risk, the distribution of malaria cases in all union councils and geographical reconnaissance

have been overlooked.

There are 24 reported anopheline species in Pakistan. The predominant vectors vary according to

ecological niches in the Country: An. culcifacies (sibling species A and B), An.stephensi (urban and

mysorensis). Insecticide resistance has been reported in Pakistan since 1980s to organochlorine and

organophosphate used in past Indoor Residual Spraying (IRS) campaigns. To date, the programme has

distributed 2.4 million LLINs since 2009, initially targeting pregnant women and children under the age

of five in high risk areas. The current National Malaria Strategy targets 85% (6.9 million) of the 8 million

populations living in high risk areas with Long Lasting Insecticidal Nets (LLINs) and the remaining 15%

Page 8: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

8

(1.2 million) of the population living in epidemic prone areas are targeted with Indoor Residual Spraying

(IRS). The National LLIN operational coverage is approximately 39% and for IRS it is 15%.

There is a LLIN distribution strategy with an accountable voucher system (among Global Fund (GF)

supported districts), which utilizes a continuous distribution channel i.e. routine immunization campaigns

for registration and collection from Basic Health Units. A basic monitoring system exists for IRS and

larviciding in selective provinces

Disease early warning system (DEWS) supported by WHO includes malaria outbreak detection and alert

and rapid response.

Coverage of health facilities with microscopy and RDTs, particularly in 38 target districts supported by

GFATM, has expanded. Malaria diagnostic centers are available in district hospitals, Rural Health

Centers (RHC) and District Health Offices (DHO). Diagnostic support is provided by CDC labs in DHOs

to all Basic Health Units (BHUs), though there is a significant delay in providing feedback to health

facilities in the periphery. Malaria treatment in the public sector is being provided free of charge. A

registration system for medicines exist, procurement of anti-malarial drugs (with unknown quality) from

local market is common at the district level. Monitoring of drug efficacy of first line drugs is conducted

regularly and so far is efficacious.

Key malaria indicators mostly available at central, provincial and district levels are the API, SPR, BER

and Parasites species proportion. Multiple malaria information systems are in place such as the old

malaria surveillance system, new malaria information system (MIS), DHIS and DEWS generating

different malaria indicators. New malaria information system (MIS) s being rolled out to cover 38 targets

districts and plans in place to roll out in non GF supported districts. Malaria indicator surveys conducted

in 2009 and in 2013. The results of MIS 2013 are being analysed and report under preparation. Excellent

federal annual malaria surveillance reports and malaria reports prepared as part of Ministry of Health year

book. In some provinces such as Punjab active case detection and case investigation surveys are

conducted by CDC officers. M&E capacity is being developed with M&E officers in districts and

provinces.

Malaria provincial and federal financing was started under Roll Back Malaria initiative though the

provincial and federal planning system till 2012/2013 and new cycles are being initiated as integrated

vector disease control management. Plans are underway to increase health and malaria financing in 2013

in all provinces. The Federal Malaria strategic framework 2011-2015 has been developed to support the

transition of provincial and federal PC1 2013-2018 plans. Malaria control activities are being successfully

piloted in some union councils with, supply of commodities, capacity building and M&E in 38 high

malaria burden districts supported by Global Fund and contracting malaria partners.

There is a PSM plan to support the procurement in Global Fund supported 38 districts. There are

estimates prepared for malaria commodities as part of the PC-I by the FMCP and PMCP. WHO

specifications are being used for procurement of LLIN, IRS insecticides, RDT and ACT. There is a

standardized procedure for procurement -Public Procurement Regulatory Authority-PEPRA. There is a

good malaria storage system in provinces with partners such as Merlin and SCF. ACT and RDT stock

control and reporting system is part of new MIS. There are drug quality control laboratories at federal

and provincial level with drug regulatory officers at district level. There are insecticide quality control

centers in Kharachi and Faisalabad

Main problems and challenges

Page 9: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

9

Advocacy for prioritizing malaria control with high level policy makers and political leaders needs to be

strengthened to ensure adequate funding for BCC activities. A Malaria BCC strategy has been developed

at the Federal level but needs to be approved and made available to the provinces and districts. There is

limited capacity and insufficient staff in advocacy, information, education, communication at the

provincial level. Complex socio-cultural settings exist in different provinces and districts, further

highlighted by the low literacy rate in provinces such as Baluchistan and FATA and limited access to

households, specifically women and children has resulted in the lack of broad based community

involvement. Hence the need to develop community based malaria control, design context specific IEC

messages and ensure the judicious use of communication channels (mass media, interpersonal and

printed materials). The capacity of lady health workers has been overlooked as a potential for expanding

and strengthening community based malaria control interventions.

No systematic approach towards LLIN replacement has been initiated. Universal coverage for IRS and

LLINs is not being met in all the targeted districts and union councils and universal equity for LLINs is

not being met within all targeted households. There has been observed instances of “wear and tear” of

recently distributed LLINs. The timing of IRS campaigns does not always coincide prior to the rainy

season and peak transmission period (on religious grounds) in all the targeted union councils/localities.

Some provincial programmes conduct larviciding which is not done consistently throughout the

transmission season and dosages and quantities may not be applied appropriately according to the type of

breeding sites.

There is a functioning vector control program in some provinces and districts with few trained and

experienced staff; this includes an entomologist and insect collector. Vector control strategies (malaria,

dengue, LLIN distribution), guidelines (IRS, community mobilisation for LLINs, Crimean Congo

Haemorrhagic Fever) , training manuals (IRS, LLINs) have been developed by the federal programme but

with restricted circulation to the provincial programmes, while vector control guidelines (2007) are

utilised in some provincial programmes but this needs updating. Furthermore, IRS guidelines are not

widely available at provincial and district level nor in local languages making it difficult for field use. The

Federal programme has established a basic IRS and LLIN database yet lacks tracking of operational

coverage of interventions by province and district. Evidence-based need assessment and M&E tools

developed at the federal level have yet to be disseminated to provincial programmes.

At the provincial level, there is a lack of adequate equipment, supplies, inappropriate use, maintenance

and storage of available ones. The provincial programmes are at times incapacitated by poor logistical

support which impacts on the quality of service delivery.

Despite Pakistan’s long history of malaria operational research, which documents the change in vector

composition in different ecological surroundings, vector sampling surveys, entomology and susceptibility

surveys. There are no updated vector maps with information on vector species, distribution, breeding

sites, resting and biting habits and insecticide susceptibility. This is partly attributed to a lack of adequate

resources (entomology lab and insectaries) and skills (by newly recruited and existing staff) to conduct

routine monitoring on key entomological indicators at established sentinel sites. The programme has yet

to develop an integrated vector management strategy, which addresses the increasing demands of dengue

and irrational use of public health pesticides. There is no collaboration with provincial universities for

vector surveillance and research.

Malaria transmission is unstable with high risk of epidemics but there are no maps of districts with high

epidemic potential and those with reported malaria outbreaks over the last 5 or more years. Malaria

emergency risk is high due to political and security challenges in some districts and provinces and past

Page 10: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

10

risk of floods and earthquakes. There are no malaria epidemic-emergency focal points in the federal and

provincial malaria programs supported by a technical working group. Malaria epidemic threshold for

detection of malaria outbreaks being used by the DEWS system but no thresholds are in use in by the

malaria information (MIS) system and the DHIS system.

There is a lack of trained malaria program teams on malaria epidemic-emergency preparedness and

response at all level. There are numerous partners such as WHO- provincial sub-offices and emergency

programs such as OCHA, UNHCR, UNICEF working in health emergency but inadequate partnership by

malaria program to address universal access and coverage of malaria control interventions in emergency

affected districts and provinces.

Parasitologicaly confirmed cases count for around 20% of all reported cases over the last few years. A

systematic approach for quality control/assurance for lab services is missing. There are no reference labs

at the provincial and federal levels. There is limited number of trained and qualified microscopists and on

average one third of their positions remain vacant. Shortage of trained staff, supplies, refresher training

and poor practice is more evident in districts outside GFATM support. The treatment chart based on

national treatment guideline is present in some of the health facilities, yet the adherence to guidelines is

poor. The guideline was not distributed widely and the health staffs are in need of refresher trainings on

malaria case management. Second line ACT, and in some health facilities SP, is used for the treatment of

PV and suspected cases. The radical treatment by Primaquine for P. vivax is still not available in all health

facilities. There is no designated focal person for case management in provincial and federal levels.

Regular supportive supervision for case management activities and standard supervisory checklist are

lacking. Treatment of malaria during pregnancy is part of national treatment guidelines, though adherence

to it is poor. The reporting of inpatient and severe malaria cases and deaths from health facilities appears

incomplete and not accessed consistently by the malaria program. There is inadequate focus on severe

malaria case management in the program and in general are not managed in secondary district hospitals

but referred for ICU care at tertiary hospitals. Measures to control and assure the quality of anti-malaria

drugs needs to be further strengthened. The supply management system is weak, improper estimation and

distribution of anti-malarial drugs leading to stock outs in health facilities. The estimated utilization of

public health facilities remains low (20 - 30% in different districts), private sector plays a key role in

malaria case management. However, a systematic approach for involving private sector in malaria case

management is missing.

Different malaria case definitions used by DEWES and DHIS, new and old malaria surveillance and

information systems. Lack off comprehensive compilation of access and outcome-coverage Indicators of

the program complied by, district, province and federal levels. Impact indicators such as % of malaria

admissions and deaths among hospital admissions and % of severe malaria cases are poorly collected,

with few exceptions. There is no comprehensive ONE malaria data base at district, provincial and federal

level to bring together malaria information from different sources and systems. Questions are being raised

regards the accuracy and completeness of the malaria information from public sector and it is also

estimated that 70% of malaria cases are seen in the private sector.

There is not enough mapping of malaria data due to limited malaria program GIS capacity but excellent

mapping capacity in other program such as EPI, Polio, DEWS and WHO malaria atlas that could be used.

Malaria Epidemiological orientation capacity is inadequate at all levels with many vacant provincial posts

of malaria epidemiologists.

Page 11: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

11

There are serious delays and gaps between funds allocated, released and actual expenditure. International

financing is mainly though Global Fund and the contracted local malaria partners. Despite this, malaria

control is not seen as a priority by policy makers and politicians at the district, provincial and federal

levels with more implementation efforts being placed on the millennium development goals 4 and 5 as

well as many other competing health priorities such as dengue, expanded programme for immunization,

polio, hepatitis, emergencies and health reform.

There is inadequate sharing of information and coordination and alignment between the district,

provincial and federal malaria control programs with lack of clarity with regards to their roles and

responsibilities. Inadequate partnership exists at all levels (Federal, provincial and district) of the Malaria

Control Programme as well as with other programs such as, Primary Health Care and Lady Health

worker program, District Health Information system, DEWES, etc. There is inadequate coordination and

alignment between the malaria program at federal and provincial levels and the various malaria control

partners.

Different components of malaria control policies have been integrated with the strategic and PC -1 plans

and federal guidelines although they are generally in line with WHO recommended policies. The annual

malaria operational plans are only being used in Global Fund supported districts and partially in others

and not holistically within the overall district and provincial malaria programs. Federal malaria control

guidelines and wall charts are available in certain Global Fund supported districts but appear to be

complex to use and not widely available in all provinces and district, especially in local languages.

There is inadequate partnership between malaria program with provincial and federal universities and

health institutes to support operational research and training malaria control and elimination. Malaria

control program is oriented towards neither supply based on output and neither on need nor demand based

on access, equity and coverage towards rapidly achieving and sustaining universal access and coverage.

There is a fragmented district, provincial and federal public health system which is unable to provide

adequate support to the devolution transition, emergency, health reform and is overshadowed by a

dominant private sector. The formal and informal private sector provides a large part of the fever/malaria

control services especially in urban areas and in some rural areas. Federal cross- border meetings

(Pakistan-Iran- Afghanistan) have been held with inadequate practical follow up in border districts and

provinces.

The unstable political and security situation in some districts and provinces has created challenges for

access and M&E of the malaria program but also presents opportunity for developing a malaria

emergency support. There are multiple malaria control activities being implemented at all levels of the

health system, resulting in a desynchronized malaria control program at the district, provincial and federal

level that fails to achieve systematic coverage and impact that can be sustained. Provincial malaria

managers/ coordinators are at times not senior to support district health coordinators such as EDOS/DHO.

There is a lack of functioning district malaria focal points/coordinators to be able to comprehensively

follow up implementation in all malaria thematic areas. There are lack of malaria epidemiologists,

entomologists, case management coordinators at federal and provincial levels of the program and malaria

supervisors/technicians and malaria microscopists at district and BHU levels.

Malaria PSM is a push system based on supply and not a pull system based on need and demand. There

are multiple malaria procurement and supply systems within the DOMC, PMCP, district health offices

and hospitals and the various implementing malaria partners. There is no quality assurance system in

place for RDT

Page 12: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

12

Key action points

Advocacy, Information Education Communication/ Behavior Change and Social and Community

mobilization

1. To develop a strategy for increasing malaria advocacy and prioritization for community, district,

provincial and federal government action.

2. To build partnership with LHW program and PPHI for social mobilization and community based

malaria control program delivery.

3. Update malaria messages to target the local situation and adopt a local strategy which identifies

appropriate inter-personal channels for reaching the local communities and families

4. Harness the capacity of lady health workers for improving community BCC and scaling up

malaria control activities;

5. Prioritize the use and develop tools for inter-personal malaria communication for BCC using

schools, madrasas, local traditional and political leaders.

6. Introduce qualitative monitoring tools, which assess how well the elements of the COMBI

strategy are being carried out.

Malaria Prevention: Entomology and Vector control

1. LLIN gap analysis towards accelerated coverage of 80% in target high transmission districts

through mass campaigns supported by routine continuous distribution mechanisms (outreach,

routine, schools, community, commercial sector, social marketing) for hard to reach areas and

three yearly replacement.

2. Revise the LLIN distribution strategy to ensure there is universal equity at the household level.

3. Develop a simple stratification and mapping method using reported incidence, topography and

local experts’ opinion to focus evidence based vector control on high transmission districts and

union councils.

Page 13: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

13

4. Reserve IRS (80%) to target high PF transmission districts to control and eliminate PF as well as

to prevent epidemics and eliminate malaria foci in pre-elimination phase and prevent re-

introduction

5. LSM to be targeted to support urban malaria control & elimination and can be used in general

nuisance mosquito control. LSM to be targeted to eliminate malaria foci in districts for pre-

elimination and elimination of PF and PV

6. Establish vector sentinel surveillance sites in different eco-epidemiological settings with standard

guidelines by PMCP in collaboration with HSA and provincial universities and research institutes

7. Update vector distribution maps stratified at district level which reflects the seasonal distribution

(vivax and falciparum) as well as vector binomics and susceptibility status of the predominant

malaria vectors.

8. Establish an integrated vector borne disease control program (Malaria, Dengue, Leishmania) with

adequate focus on each disease control and elimination as appropriate.

9. Develop a integrated vector management strategy, which addresses insecticide resistance

management and identifies innovative approaches for inter-sectoral collaboration

10. Entomological spot surveillance to be conducted by insect collectors and malaria supervisors

supported by districts and provincial entomologists with provincial entomological reference

laboratories.

11. Conduct LLIN hole index proportion study

12. Revive the vector control technical committee with updated TOR

13. Update and simplify the national vector control guidelines and supporting training materials

Malaria Prevention: Epidemic-Emergency Preparedness and Response

1. Update risk maps and tables on malaria epidemics and emergencies

2. Provincial quarterly malaria emergency update on needs and gaps in emergency affected

populations and districts for follow up with provincial health emergency cluster

3. Malaria program and DEWS, DHIS to jointly review and update malaria case definitions and

malaria outbreak and emergency thresholds and guidance for malaria outbreak control

4. To develop specific malaria emergency strategies such as simple community based malaria

control to access and deliver malaria control to emergency affected areas.

5. To build malaria partnership with other organizations such as OCHA, WHO, UNICEF, UNIHCR,

IOM, JICA, etc to move to universal coverage with malaria interventions by MDG 2015 in

emergency affected districts

Page 14: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

14

Parasite Control: Malaria diagnosis and treatment

1. Strengthening lab capacity: all suspected/clinical malaria cases should be tested with RDT or

microscopy before anti-malaria treatment is administered. RDT to be rapidly scaled up to all

BHUs in partnership with PPHI, IMNCI and PPNCP programs in malaria high risk districts.

2. Introduction of a systematic quality assurance system: strengthen quality control by establishing

provincial and district reference labs with adequate infrastructure, competent lab technicians with

support for annual cascade training and supervision, and continuous availability of consumables.

3. Training and development: after thorough need assessment at the central, provincial and district

levels, a comprehensive training plan (refresher, pre-service and in-service training) for

strengthening diagnostic capacity should be developed.

4. Recruitment of new staff: deployment of lab technicians in all relevant vacant positions,

particularly in malaria high risk districts is needed.

5. Competent officers should be assigned as focal points for malaria case management at federal and

provincial levels.

6. Update the federal and provincial essential drug list for health facilities and follow up the de-

regulation and ban on all malaria mono-therapy in public and private sector

7 Radical treatment for PV with Primaquine with DOTS for 15 days to reduce relapse and

transmission, supported by regular supply of Primaquine to all health facilities in malaria high

risk districts.

8 Provision of new malaria treatment policy, guidelines and wall charts to all public and private

health facilities by April 2014 supported by a ban on mono-therapy and standardized training for

all clinical staff

9 Establish community based malaria control with RDT and ACT with LHS-LHW and community

based organizations.

10 Case based reporting system be established for severe malaria cases followed by supportive

clinical investigation and audit.

11 Engagement and scale up public- private partnership in malaria control through professional

association and sharing guidelines and wall charts and orientation sessions

12 Supervision by PPHI and DHO supported medical officer for implementation of high standard of

malaria case management.

Page 15: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

15

13 DoMC and PRs should ensure efficient drug supply management system with monthly stock

situation update especially for RDTs and ACTs.

Surveillance, Monitoring and Evaluation

1. Production of monthly, quarterly and annual district, provincial and federal malaria program

reports based on strategic information at district and provincial level such as outcome/impact and

mortality data

2. Update information on needs and gaps on RDT, ACT, Primaquine, LLINs and IRS to achieve

universal coverage.

3. Establish one standard malaria case definition for diagnosis and treatment and , MIS, DHIS,

DWES .

4. Review and update the old malaria surveillance system in place in districts targeting elimination

of Malaria

5. Move to one malaria information system with data collection tool for an integrated malaria M&E

system in all malaria risk districts by first quarter 2014.(Harmonize the M&E system among the

PRs and SRs)

6. Malaria program to collect data on malaria inpatients and mortality from secondary and tertiary

hospital DHIS reporting.

7. To establish GIS and malaria mapping capacity within the provincial and federal malaria program

using WHO country office EPI and malaria atlas programs to guide malaria epidemiological

analysis and target interventions at districts level.

8. DEWS to be sustained and transferred to the DHIS provincial and district departments to support

malaria epidemics detection and response and in the future district malaria elimination.

9. MDC/PMRC/WHO/MEDVC HSA to propose an agenda for operational research to support

malaria control efforts

10. Use the available GF funds to extend the M/E system to all district under malaria control strategy

and adjust the M&E system for the districts targeted for elimination

Program Leadership and Management

1. Development of a new joint provincial and federal vision for malaria control and elimination in

Pakistan supported by one simple and comprehensive malaria and Integrated Vector Borne Disease

(IVBD)policy document.

2. Need to accelerate and intensify towards greater than 80% universal coverage by 2015 in Global

Fund supported districts (38) and rapidly introduce the new malaria policies and interventions in the

remaining 15 high transmission districts.

3. Establish functioning malaria and integrated Vector Borne Disease partnership mechanism between

the District Malaria Control Programme (DMCP), Provincial Malaria Control Programme (PMCP)

and Federal Malaria Control Programme (FMCP) and other programs such as, Primary HealthCare

and Lady Health worker program, District Health Information system, DEWES, MNCH etc

Page 16: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

16

4. To develop a special community based malaria and integrated Vector Borne Disease control

strategy for accessing hard to reach populations (Remote areas, emergency situations, IDPS, Nomads

) in selected districts and provinces.

5. To develop a special strategy for public-private partnership for malaria and integrated Vector

Borne Disease control with private medical care provider and also private retailers and producers of

combination drugs, Rapid Diagnostic Tests (RDT), Long lasting Insecticidal Nets (LLIN) , Indoor

Residual Spraying (IRS) and Larval Source Management (LSM) chemicals and hand compression

pumps to ensure standards of quality and local production at affordable costs in provinces which

involves a combination of information sharing ,training of health worker and information to public,

legislation, regulation and enforcement.

6. The malaria federal Inter-provincial coordinating committee (IPCC) and Technical Advisory

Committee on malaria (TACOM) and the technical various working groups be revived with updated

TOR on malaria and IVBD and be supported by provincial coordinating committees.

7. Joint annual operational /implementation malaria and IVBD planning started from 2014 at district,

provincial and federal with the active involvement and contribution of all malaria partners and

stakeholders

8. Joint monthly, quarterly and annual malaria and IVBD program performance reporting at district,

provincial and federal level based on a uniform performance framework of input, outputs, outcome

and impact towards sustained universal access and coverage.

9. Updating of provincial and federal malaria and IVBD strategic plans by end of April 2015 aligned

to health strategic plans and PHC and MHSP based on need and demand for acceleration and

intensification towards universal malaria intervention coverage by 2015 and post MDG

Procurement and supply system

1. PMCP. DMCP need to ensure the PPRA, PPHI, LHI and all malaria partners procure all malaria

commodities (ant malarial, insecticides and vector control equipment for IRS) according to the

WHO/WHOPES specifications.

2. Urgently align DRAP registration for malaria combination therapy with national malaria treatment

policy and to support production/import of Primaquine and de-registration and ban on use of mono-

therapeutic formulation for all malaria treatment.

3. To prepare quarterly updates on malaria commodities used and in stock and forecast urgent need

4. Establish a system for RDT quality assurance (QA) using WHO accredited international laboratory

and quality control using a national malaria microscopy laboratory.

5. Annual updating of the malaria commodities specification list based on WHO recommendations

6. Annual updating of estimates of malaria commodities based on need and demand to achieve and

sustain universal access and coverage

Page 17: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

17

7. Conduct a review of the current stores and potential need for malaria combination drugs, RDT,

LLIN, IRS and LSM chemicals in district and provinces

1. Introduction

1.1 Background

Given the concerns for malaria burden and implementation of the new arrangements for the programme,

malaria control and elimination unit, in coordination with Directorate of Malaria Control, WHO country

office and GFTAM, requested for a rapid assessment of the current situation of malaria control

programme in Pakistan. The findings of rapid assessment strongly suggested and recommended an in

depth program review to identify gaps and issues with programs especially in wake of devolution and a

national and provincial strategic document can be made as a way forward and mobilize resources on new

funding model

1.2 Objectives of the MPR

1. To review the epidemiological outlook of malaria disease in each province of Pakistan with

particular reference to disease trends, Slide positivity rate, Species wise distribution, Blood Exam

Rate (BER), Severe Malaria and Outcome of the managed cases at health facility with particular

reference on disease specific mortality.

2. To review the Malaria program structure, capacity and management in each province and at national

level (DOMC), in view of its new roles after devolution and identify issues and challenges arising

post devolution.

3. To assess the current programme performance by intervention thematic areas and review progress,

challenges and towards achievement of targets in each province and progress towards achieving

national and regional goals.

4. To identify way forward, priority needs and gaps for improving programme performance and

coordination at provincial and federal level.

5. Define steps to improve programme performance and redefine the strategic direction and focus,

including revision of policies and strategic plans at provincial levels which can help tapping the

available funds from various sources including the public sector and donors e.g. Global Fund from

R10 malaria grant phase II and from the new funding model.

6. To assess the effectiveness of Global Fund grants supported projects in highly endemic regions of

the country and to suggest ways and means for quality assured interventions following the

principals of transparency, accountability and value for money.

Page 18: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

18

7. To develop the post MDG strategic plan at provincial and national level for Pakistan for 2015-2020,

based on the results of PRM, which will help mobilize resources based on new funding model.

1.2 Methodology of the MPR

Malaria programme review will involve a mixture of methods, including desk reviews of technical

thematic areas based on programme data, reports, documents and published literature; updating

country databases and country profiles; mapping of populations at risk; estimating burden and making

projections; policy and management analyses; special studies; and group work, individual

consultations and provincial and district field visits with interviews and observations.

The programmatic review will be conducted in four phases which will include

Phase I:

Planning Phase- It will involve:

1. Needs assessment for a programme review

2. Building consensus to conduct a review

3. Appointment of a review coordinator and establish an internal review secretariat and steering

Committee

4. Constitution of Provincial Teams

5. Identify and agree on the terms of references of the internal and external review teams

6. Send an official request to WHO for technical support

7. Select and prepare central, provincial and district sites for field visits

8. Define the objectives and outputs of the review

9. Plan administration and logistics

10. Develop a review proposal, with a budget, and identify funding sources

11. Design a checklist for tracking activities

12. Collecting and summarizing all the available data including technical reports and PC1s

13. Review of available data and preparation of thematic area overviews;

Phase II:

Thematic desk review- This will involve:

1. Assembling information from reports and documents,

Page 19: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

19

2. Conducting a technical thematic desk review,

3. Compiling a thematic desk review and

4. Score achievement by thematic areas

5. Selecting and adapting data collection methods for the field review.

Phase-III:

Field review- This will involve

1. Briefing and team-building between internal and external review teams

2. Building consensus on the findings of the internal thematic desk reviews

3. Becoming familiar with the data collection methods for field visits

4. Briefing and forming the teams for field visits

5. Visiting national institutions and organizations (Central level)

6. Making district, provincial, state and regional field visits

7. Sharing reports and presentations from field visits

8. Preparing a draft review report

9. Preparing the executive summary, aide-memoire and slide presentation

10. Presenting the review findings and recommendations

11. Meeting with senior management of the ministry of health,

12. High-level meeting and signing of aide-memoire and stakeholder workshop

13. Media events (press release and press conference) and

14. Completing the final draft of the review report

Page 20: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

20

Phase-IV:

Final report and follow-up on recommendations. This phase will include:

1. Finalize and publish the report.

2. Disseminate the report.

3. Implement the recommendations.

4. Monitor implementation of the recommendations.

5. Update policies and plans and redesign the programme, if necessary.

1.4 Outline of the document

This report is structured to cover all the thematic areas mentioned below. The following thematic

areas are discussed along with its SWOT analysis followed by recommendations.

• Program Management

• Malaria Diagnosis and Case Management

• Malaria Vector Control

• Malaria Commodities, Procurement and Supply Chain management

• Advocacy, Information, Education, Communication and Community Mobilization

• Epidemiology, Surveillance, Monitoring, Evaluation and Operational Research

• Epidemic and Emergency Preparedness and Response

2. Context of malaria control

2.1 Historical milestones in malaria control

Year Activities

1952-56 A five year plan to extend the malaria control activities to other

areas aside from selected areas since 1950.

The main strategy was vector control using blanket spraying of DDT.

The results were encouraging and marked decrease in the spleen rate was

observed in children below 10 years.

1960 In 1960s, a pre-eradication malaria survey was completed.

Results indicated highest malaria prevalence in Punjab, due to the network of

irrigation canals and the extension of flooded areas.

1961-69 A nation-wide malaria eradication program was launched under the auspices

of WHO and with the help of USAID and UNICEF.

Page 21: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

21

Strategy

The main strategy was vector control using blanket spraying of DDT, with a

transient temporary relief during late 60s & early 70s

Results

As a result of this campaign the malaria was nearly eradicated from the

country and a marked reduction in malaria cases was observed from an

estimated 7 million cases in 1961 to 9,500 cases in 1967. An overall

reduction from 15% to less than 0.01% was observed in the slide positivity

rate.

1969-74 The malarial infection began resurgence in 1969 & 1970s and included the

increase of malaria in urban areas (a quarter of million cases were reported

from Karachi alone). All this resulted in the program collapse, subsequently

followed by explosive resurgence of malaria assuming epidemic proportion

in 1972-73.

Results

USAID reports in Pakistan, there were 9,500 cases in 1968. In 1971 there

108,000 cases which rose to 10 million in 1974.

The reasons of resurgence were : the onset of vector resistance to

Organochlorines (DDT & Dieldrin/BHC), under estimation of A. stephensi in

maintenance of urban malaria together with financial and administrative

constraints, inadequate administration of programs, inadequate research,

training, and supplies of chemicals and drugs, inadequate health services

infrastructure, the lack of malaria control components in hydraulic

development projects, and underdeveloped socioeconomic conditions

generally. Premature withdrawal of donor support was also an important

factor.

1975-85 The Malaria Program switched from Eradication to Control Program.

Initiation of Five years National Malaria Control Program with support of

WHO and USAID. Implementation handed over to provincial government

and malaria control program was integrated with general health services.

The main objective of the MCP was to reduce the disease incidence to less

than 500 cases per million population.

Strategy Vector control by indoor residual spraying was the main strategy.

In 1976 DDT (Organochlorines) was replace with Malathion

(Organophosphate) insecticide with two rounds of spraying in most areas.

Results

Page 22: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

22

Malaria decreased significantly in 1977-78. There has been a sharp decline in

the slide positivity rate from 14% to 0.62% and API from 13 per 1000

population to 0.3 per 1000 population in 1978. Malaria Control programme

continued till 1985.

1985-2002 In 1985, Malaria Control program was merged with Health Department.

In 2000-20012, Devolution of health and other services

The execution and implementation of the Program went directly under the

control of Executive District Officers (H).

Under devolution the malaria staff were declared dying cadre and the MCP

directorate was abolished, which further deteriorated the malaria situation in

province.

Same Malaria Control Policies and strategies continued.

2003 RBM Strategy adopted in Pakistan as a signatory with Global partners

The key objective was to reduce the disease burden by 50% by 2010.

2004 GF and strategic plans and rounds

2007-13 PC-1 of 329.954 million rupees.

Main strategies:

Early Diagnosis and Rapid treatment, Multiple Prevention, Epidemic

Preparedness, Monitoring, Evaluation and Surveillance, BCC, Operational

research besides staff component.

Results

Fail to achieve the targets because of lack of financial and

administrative constraints

2013-15 • A total of 90.0 million were calculated as KP share of National RBM

Program fund. (PSDP GRANT NO; 23 (2012-13)

• Rs.8.025 million was utilized in FY 2011-12 on purchase of goods. The

remaining Rs.81.975 million are available as capital cost for this PC-I.

• The Project Cost Estimates have been prepared in January, 2013 and will

continue till 2015.

Strategies

The main components include Early Diagnosis and Rapid treatment, Multiple

Prevention, Institutionalization and Monitoring, Evaluation and Surveillance.

2.2 Malaria control within the national development agenda/national health policy

Page 23: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

23

In the national policy (2009) of Pakistan , The burden of diseases (BoD) is heavily dominated by

communicable diseases,reproductive health and malnutrition issues accounting for 50% of the total

burden of diseases. This is further complicated by burden due to non-communicable disease group

dominated by cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, injuries and neuro-psychological diseases.

This double burden of disease is a major challenge in the health sector of Pakistan

Among the BoD, Pakistan is considered as a malaria endemic country with little

change in the status over past five years. Punjab, NWFP and Sindh have low endemicity of

malaria but Balochistan and FATA are high endemic areas

The overall goal of the 2009 policy is to improve health status of the people of

Pakistan.The National Health policy aims to improve health status of people of Pakistan by achieving the

policy objectives mentioned below and it is envisaged that it will also help Pakistan to make

progress towards health related MDGs.

i. Enhancing coverage and access of essential health services especially for the poor;

ii. Measurable reduction in the burden of diseases especially among vulnerable segments

of population;

iii. Protecting to the poor and under privileged population subgroups against catastrophic

health expenditures and risk factors;

iv. Strengthening health system with focus on resources;

v. Strengthening stewardship functions in the sector to ensure service provision,

equitable financing and promoting accountability;

vi. Improving evidence based policy making and strategic planning in the health sector.

The specific Objective 2 of the policy aims to achieve : Measurable reduction in the burden of diseases

especially among vulnerable segments of population. In response to the endemic Malaria burden in

Pakistan, the programme will continueto implement the Roll Back strategy with effective implementation

in high risk districts, using rapid diagnostic kits, expanding the use of impregnated treated nets

(ITNs) and using updated treatment protocols. In addition, a comprehensive strategy

will to be developed to respond to other vector borne diseases especially dengue

fever.

In reviewing the Human and Social Capital Development , working group report for Vision 2025 ( first

draft, December 2013) , Malaria control program is not mentioned as such. However , it is mentioned that

:”Strengthening of primary care with necessary back up support in rural areas where all health outlets

will function as focal point for control of Communicable diseases, family planning services and

improvement of surveillance and the diseases early warning system will be addressed through the

different national health programs”. DOMC should take the opportunity of the recent MPR to advocate

for inclusion of malaria control / elimination among the strategic priorities of the Vision 2025.

2-3 Malaria control in National health strategic plans

In pursuance to 18th Amendment of the Constitution, health & population sectors have been devolved to

the provinces with all administrative and financial autonomy. Most of the province are finalizing their

health sector strategies.

Page 24: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

24

Sindh for example consider as a key issue the rise of Malaria incidence witch has coincided with

outbreaks of dengue fever needing a proper vector control. The special area of focus in Sindh will be to

Establish links for integrated control at community based, MSDP and ESDP levels, and evidence based

intervention enhancements (Strategy 3.6: Establishing links between TB, Malaria and Hepatitis for

integrated control at community based, MSDP and ESDP levels, and evidence based intervention

enhancements.)

In Pundjab, The key emphasis of the Strategy is on integrating health services supported by a strong

monitoring and evaluation system. The health sector Strategy has been devised with a vision to enhance

health status and productive lives of the people of Punjab by improving maternal and child health,

nutrition, control of communicable and

non-communicable diseases .

2-4 Health services organization and management

The health delivery system in Pakistan is a mix of public and private sector services. There is

considerable inequity in access to services between rural and urban areas. One estimate indicates that

more than two thirds of the population consult private sector health providers as compared to only a third

of the population utilizing public sector health facilities1.

Thus the government is the main provider of rural health services and also the only substantial provider of

preventive care throughout the country. Little information is available about the semi-regulated private

sector.

The public health services are provided through the health care delivery systems and public health

intervention. The health system has a well defined pyramidal structure, with Basic Health Units (BHUs)

at the base (approximate catchment areas of 15-20,000 people), Rural health centres (RHCs) forming the

core of primary health care with a catchment population of approximately 80-100,000 people. Tehsil

Headquarters (THQ) hospitals provide in-patients services as the secondary level of the health system

followed by District HQ providing an upper secondary level of hospital services. There are also major

teaching hospitals and specialist centres, provided by a mixture of public and private sectors, The system

is supported by Government financing and through the support or Civil Society Organisations with a

range of donors, including the Government (using a sub-contracting mechanism) and international

bilateral donors such as USAID, DFID and many others including World Bank and Asian Development

Bank, Islamic Development Bank and numerous others.

Vertical Public health interventions include a number of public health programs which are federally led

with provincial implementation and institutional mechanisms. The list of the main vertical public health

programs is as follows;

Expanded Program on Immunization (EPI)

National Program for Family Planning and Primary Health Care (NP for FP&PHC)

National Maternal, Newborn and Child Health Program (MNCHP)

National AIDS Control Program (NACP)

National Program for Malaria Control (MCP)

National T.B. Control Programme (NTCP)

Prime Minister Program for Prevention and Control of Hepatitis in Pakistan

Cancer Treatment Programme

1 Pakistan Social and Living Standards Measurement Survey (Provincial-District) 2004-05

Page 25: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

25

National Blindness Control Programme

There are 948 hospitals in 2008 with over 133,956 registered physicians and over 65,387 registered

Nurses, 9,012 Dentists and approximately 100,000 Lady Health Workers. The population to facilities

ratio in respect of a doctor is 1 per 1,212 persons; a dentist 1 per 18,010 persons and availability of one

hospital bed for 1,575 persons2.

2.5 Organizational structure for malaria control

The programme is implemented countrywide with an established organisational set-up at federal,

provincial and district level. At the federal level there is a Directorate of Malaria Control, which is an

attached Department of the Ministry of Health. The Director Malaria Control is assisted by a team of

professionals (i.e. Epidemiologist, Entomologist, and Health Education Officer) and support staff. The

Directorate is responsible for overall leadership role including strategic direction & policy design (detail

described in Annex II). The Directorate of Malaria Control has a separate budget for development and

non-development activities, which falls under the Federal Ministry of Health.

At the Provincial level there is a complete administrative set-up for malaria control Programme, although

the structure may differ by province for example; In Punjab the Director (CDC) is the overall in-charge

with Additional Director of Malaria being directly responsible for malaria control activities. These

officers assist the Director General Health Services. There are separate Directorates of Malaria Control in

the Provinces of Sindh & Balochistan working under the provincial Health Departments. In KPK

(formerly NWFP) the Malaria Control Programme is under the Deputy Director Public Health, with an

Assistant Director (PH) being the focal person for malaria control activities.

The Provincial Malaria Control Programmes are primarily responsible for co-ordinating and facilitating

malaria planning and implementation activities in their respective districts. Each province earmark

separate budgets to co-ordinate/facilitate malaria control interventions

The Executive District Officer Health (EDO) has overall responsibility for malaria control activities at the

district level. The DOH/DDOH (preventive) is the focal person for malaria control activities in the

district. The delivery and management of malaria care has been integrated with district healthcare services

so that continuing care can be provided close to the patient’s home. The DOH also has two malaria

officers i.e. a Communicable Disease Control Officer and an Assistant Entomologist, who assist him in

looking after the malaria control activities in the district.

At Tehsil level the Deputy or Assistant DOH would be designated as sub-district/tehsil focal person for

malaria control activities in the tehsil. They would be responsible for operations of malaria control

activities in their respective tehsils. DDOH also has one CDC Inspector (CDCI) to assist in malaria

control work in the tehsil.

The district and sub-district hospitals and rural health centres (and few selected basic health units) work

as microscopy centres. A microscopy centre has a laboratory with laboratory staff and a doctor who is

trained to diagnose and treat malaria. The primary health care facilities such as basic health units and

dispensaries, where laboratory is not available, work as treatment centres. The district headquarters

hospitals also provide specialist care to complicated/severe malaria cases. The CDC Supervisors at the

union council level, associated with primary health care facility, carries out community-based activities

for the control of malaria.

2 Economic Survey of Pakistan-Health & Nutrition, 2008-09

Page 26: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

26

2.6 Key strategies for malaria control

Goal: In line with MDG 6, the strategy aims to reduce the burden of malaria by 75% percent (from 2000

levels) by 2015.

Objectives: This proposed 5-year strategy aims to provide the basis for achieving universal coverage of

malaria control interventions to the most at-risk populations in highly endemic districts by 2015. The

objectives of the strategy are:

1. To enhance access by the population at risk to quality assured early diagnosis and prompt,

effective treatment services.

2. To scale-up coverage of multiple prevention interventions (especially LLINS & Indoor Residual

Spraying [IRS]) to the level of universal coverage in the target population in high-risk districts.

3. To strengthen existing Malaria Control Programme management capacity to coordinate, plan,

implement and monitor effective curative and preventive interventions nationwide.

4. To strengthen programme capacity in enhanced epidemiological surveillance for timely detection

and curtailment of malaria outbreaks.

5. To improve public sector health facility utilization for early diagnosis, effective treatment and

preventive measures through enhanced community awareness and participation.

Targets: These targets cover the 38 highly endemic:

• The proportion of malaria cases diagnosed and provided correct treatment within 24 hours of the

onset of symptoms (at facility or community) will be 80% (baseline NA).

• The proportion of cases diagnosed as P. falciparum malaria in public sector health facilities being

treated with ACTs will be 100% (baseline 8.2%)3.

• The proportion of private sector health care providers providing malaria case management according

to the national treatment guidelines will be raised to 50% (baseline 34%)3.

• Universal coverage of freely distributed LLINs in highly endemic districts in the country.

• The proportion of women and children having access and availability of community & facility based

malaria control services will be raised to 80% (baseline TBE).

• All MCPs at federal and provincial level are capable of planning, implementing and monitoring

malaria control interventions through long and short term technical assistance.

• All provinces (05), regions (03) and districts will have quality assurance mechanisms in place.

• All endemic districts will have the capacity to detect, report and respond appropriately to malaria

epidemics.

• All endemic districts will have provision of malaria control services for population of humanitarian

concern (IDPs, refugees, nomads etc).

• 100% target population in highly endemic districts reached through behavior change communication

interventions. (baseline 0%)

3 Malariometric Survey 2009

Page 27: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

27

Strategic Elements of Malaria Control Programme:

The National Strategic Plan for Malaria Control 2011-15 is based on the following key elements:

• Case management: Early diagnosis, rapid and appropriate treatment.

• Prevention through multiple strategies

• Epidemic preparedness

• Building capacity at national and sub-national levels.

• Advocacy, communication and social mobilization.

• Partnerships with private and informal sector

• Focused operational research.

Additional elements include a focus on geographical areas of importance (such as those with manmade or

natural disasters) and on populations of humanitarian importance, such as IDPs and refugees, as well as

those with restricted access to health services. Gender issues will be addressed through combining efforts

with relevant stakeholders in mother and child health initiatives, including antenatal care and community

health workers.

This strategy will provide the basis and guidance for malaria control from 2010-2015 in Pakistan.

Crucially, elements of this plan will be used to support applications for donor funding to support the

already substantial Government contributions.

2.7 Key players in malaria control Save the Children and Department of Malaria Control (DOMC-Islamabad) are Principal Recipients

while Merlin and ACD are sub recipients. Since inception, the World Health Organization is

providing technical assistance and has recently provided National Professional Officers stationed at

MCP in Balochistan, Sindh, FATA, Punjab and KPK.

The Principal Recipients and Sub Recipient working with IVM in FATA:

Districts Sub Recipient Principal Recipient

FR Peshawar, Kohat, Bannu, DI Khan,

Lakki, Tank, North Waziristan

Merlin Save the Children

Khyber Merlin DOMC

South Waziristan, Orakzai, Mohmand ACD Save the Children

Bajaur, Kurram ACD DOMC

Page 28: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

28

The Principal Recipients and Sub Recipient working with MCP in KP:

Districts Sub Recipient Principal Recipient

Bannu, Lakki Marwat Merlin Save the Children

DI Khan, Tank Merlin DOMC

Mardan, ACD Save the Children

Charsadda, Nowshera ACD DOMC

The partners of Malaria Control Program Sindh include WHO, GFATM and NGOs implementing

activities in six selected districts of Sindh as Sub Recipient (SR) and Principal Recipients (PR) under

GFATM grant. During floods and heavy rains in Sindh in 2010 and 2011 additional partners such as

MERLIN and Islamic Relief also supported Malaria Control Program Sindh.

2.8 Resource Mobilization

2.9 Linkages and coordination

The MCP does not collaborate with other DOH departments including MNCH Program and NP for

FP&PHC and AIDS Control Program. The MNCH Program implements the Integrated

Management of Childhood Illness (IMNCI) strategy and PCPNC as part of the focused antenatal

care package. There are no joint plans with several line ministries that include Agriculture,

Tourism, Environment, Education, Public Works, Housing, Fisheries, etc. These sectors have

access to populations that are affected by malaria but are usually not targeted by interventions

delivered through the health sector.

2.10 Conclusions and Recommendations

The program should devise mechanisms for malaria control issues to be discussed on a regular basis

at the Federal, Provincial and District level using already planned and instituted partnership

coordination mechanisms.

Recommendations:

• There is coordination between partners and MCP, but not the Program Managers therefore

coordination among stakeholders need to formalized and improved.

• Unavailability of guidelines and manuals reflects weak coordination between Province and Federal

Directorate of Malaria.

• PCPNC guidelines need to be updated.

3. Epidemiology of malaria

Today Pakistan has an estimated population of 173.5 million people, out of which, according to the 2012

national malaria disease surveillance annual report, 9% are living in high transmission districts (34) with

an annual parasitic index (API) ranging from 5 to 28, 20% are living in moderately endemic districts (41

districts) with API ranging from 1 to 5, and 71% living in low endemic districts with an API below

1/1000 population. The national API for the entire country is averaging 1.69, which classifies Pakistan as

a moderate malaria endemic country. Malaria mappings demonstrate clearly the highly endemic districts

Page 29: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

29

are located mainly in the provinces of Baluchistan, FATA, Sindh, and KPK. The lowest malaria incidence

was reported in two provinces – Punjab and AJK with combined population of more than 56% of total

population of the country.

Figure 1: Proportion of PV to Pf (2008-2012)

The primary malaria vectors are A.culicifacies and A.stephensi. A number of secondary vectors have

been reported and their contribution to malaria transmission is being investigated. The last nationwide

vector surveillance was in 2009 and a recent survey has been conducted in 2013 and data is being

analysed and the report under preparation.

The predominant malaria parasite is P. Vivax with P. falciparum being the secondary parasite. In 2012,

Annual Blood Examination Rate (ABER) varied between 1.78% in Punjab to 7.09% in Baluchistan. Out

of the 289,759 malaria cases confirmed positive in 2012, 249,504 were identified by microscopy (86.1

%), while 40,255(13.89%) by rapid diagnostic test. Majority of cases were considered as P.vivax (74.39

%) and 23.95 % as P.falciparum and 1.65 % as mixed infections.

Proportion of P falciparum varies widely with a range of 2.4% - 44% respectively. Maximum proportion

of falciparum cases (i.e. 44%) has been reported from Baluchistan province followed by 27% in Sindh,

11% in FATA, 9% in KPK and 6% in Punjab province. Proportion of PV to Pf over last five years (2008-

2012) is shown in Figure-1. Certain areas of Sindh and Baluchistan have year round transmission with

falciparum predominance.

Table 1: Malaria Data – Pakistan 2012

Province Population TOTAL Indicators

Page 30: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

30

Slides/RDT Positive P.V PF Mix

SPR API BER %

P.F Examined

Punjab

91,943,208 1636079 17522 16426 1008 88

1.07 0.19 - 5.75

Sindh

39,231,406 1785499 114651 79511 31083 4057 5.56 2.9 - 27.1

KPK

22,985,802 534516 63494 57402 5804 288 12.4 2.76 - 9.14

FATA

4,382,727 197571 29926 26432 3232 262 16.2 6.82 - 10.79

Baluchistan

8,295,628 588558 63733 35372 28248 113 12.85 7.68 - 44.32

AJK

4,160,025 146744 433 421 11 1 0.29 0.10 - 2.54

TOTAL 170,998,796 4888967 289759 215564 69386 4809

(1.6) 5.57 1.69 - 23.9

Malaria indicator survey of 2009 showed malaria prevalence rates in Baluchistan 6.2% (Pf 2.4% Pv 3.8%

), FATA 13.9% (Pf 0.6%:Pv13.3%),Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 3.8% (Pf0.9%:Pv2.9%) and Sind 0.7% (Pf

0.7%: Pv0.4%).

The provincial prevalence is consistent with the reported incidence from the malaria surveillance system.

The 2013 prevalence survey is being analyzed and report will be available in early 2014.

Age- and sex-wise distribution of cases indicates malaria is confined to the age group above 15 years. In

the 19 priority districts the % of confirmed malaria cases among children below 5 years was 17.82 % of

confirmed cases

Page 31: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

31

Transmission Patterns

P. Vivax P.Falciparum

• Seasonal Transmission May – October

• Usually two peaks of vivax malaria each year – First Peak (Spring) resulting from delayed attacks or relapses

second peak after monsoon. (Rowland 1997 a)

– PF shows a single peak after summer because of summer case to case incubation interval of PF (Bouma 1996a)

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

1 3 5 7 9

11

13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51

YEARLY WEEK NUMBER

# C

ASE

S

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

1 3 5 7 9

11 13 15 17 19

21

23

25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45

47

49

51

YEARLY WEEK NUMBER

# C

ASE

S

Figure 2: Typical seasonal transmission patterns of P vivax and P falciparum seen in most of malaria endemic

Pakistan.

Transmission of malaria in most parts of the country is highly seasonal and unstable with peaks of

transmission in the summer (June-Sept) for P.vivax and relapse episodes are observed in the early summer

(April-June) resulting from transmission in the previous year. Falciparum malaria occurs in the late-

summer and winter months (August-November).

The historical malaria trends in Pakistan from the malaria surveillance system between 1973 and 2012

shows clearly the following:

1) The Annual Parasitic Index (API) decreased rapidly from 1973 (API 13.18) to below 1/1000 in 1977 (

API 0.93) with a sharp decline in the slide positivity rate from 14% to 0.62% with malaria eradication

campaigns in less than 5 years;

2) An upsurge of positive cases was observed from approximately 130.000 cases /year (malaria strategic

plan) between the years 2005 and 2009 to almost 300,000 positive cases in 2012 ( National malaria

disease surveillance report 2012)., The annual parasitic incidence increased from 0.74 in 2009 to 1.46 in

2010 and 1.88 in 2011. Similar trends were observed in low transmission areas of Punjab province which

experienced floods, malaria cases escalated from 3,432 cases in 2009 to approximately 30,000 cases in

2010 (table 1);

3) The blood examination rate ( indicator for malaria surveillance ) decreased from 9.36 in 1973 to 5.46

in 1980 and remained quasi stable approximately 2-3 / 1000 inhabitants between 1983 and 2013 ,

reflecting a poor case detection the past 30 years.;

4) Given the variety of ecotypes in the country (valleys with rivers at various altitudes, agriculture-related

malaria, peri-urban type, migrant malaria) the epidemiology of malaria varies considerably between

provinces / districts and union councils. More detailed spatial analysis with micro-stratification by

districts is critical for malaria control/elimination monitoring

Page 32: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

32

Figure 3: Malaria trend 1973-2012

Malaria epidemics are a common occurrence in Pakistan which has a history of unstable transmission.

Between 2010 and 2013, Disease Early Warning System (DEWS) reported majority of malaria alerts and

outbreaks from Baluchistan followed by Sindh, The alerts and outbreaks in both provinces peaked in

2011 and 2012 which was partially attributed to floods and the assignment of DEWS surveillance

officers, thereby making the alerts and outbreaks detection system more efficient. Incidentally,

Baluchistan province comprised of the majority of alerts and outbreaks during 2010-13 (7 out of the 15

districts) with the highest numbers reported from Jaffarabad (44 alerts and 32 outbreaks).

The new malaria information system launched in 2009 in 19 priority districts and managed by the DOMC

observed an increase of API from 7.13 in 2009 to 10.13 in 2012 mainly due to the increased malaria risk

associated with major flood emergency and increased access to RDT and Microscopy. Control measures

which emphasised increased access to primaquine and ACT propelled API to 7.82 in 2012. . In 2010, out

of 122,350 positive slides, 20,051 were taken from IDP camps

The District Health Information System (DHIS) data from primary/clinic-health centre health care

facilities suggests the proportion of suspected/clinical malaria cases presented to OPDs was highest in

Baluchistan with 8.9% and 8.6% of total OPD consultations followed by Sindh with 8.50% and 7.36%,

KPK with 3.7% and 2.3% and Punjab with 1.5% and 1.5% in 2011 and 2012 respectively.

Similar trends were observed in DHIS secondary/ hospital health care facilities data with 2.6% and 5.54%

malaria OPD consultations for Baluchistan followed by Sindh with 7.8 % and 5%, KPK with 3.1 % and

2.3% and Punjab 0.6% and 0.6% respectively in 2011 and 2012.

Punjab tested the highest proportion of suspected malaria cases with 83% and 86% of total suspected malaria

cases followed by low testing rates in KPK with 28.4% and 36.3%, and Baluchistan with 19% and 23% and very

low testing rate in Sindh with 18% and 18% respectively in 2011 and 2012.

Page 33: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

33

Between 2011 and 2012, Baluchistan had the highest proportion of malaria cases admitted to the primary

health care facilities where as in the secondary health care facilities, Sindh province had the highest

proportion of malaria admission during the same period. Taking admissions as proxy indicator for severe

malaria, proportion of inpatient admissions in secondary hospitals was highest in Sind with 6% and 8%

followed by Baluchistan with 1.8 and 2.7%, KPK 2% and 2.2 % and Punjab with 0.2 and 0.3%

respectively in 2011 and 2012. The hospital fatality rate among the severe malaria cases was highest in

Punjab at 2% with 67 deaths in 2011 and in 2012 Sindh had a case fatality rate of 1.73% with 155 deaths.

Although inpatient admission from primary health care facilities was highest in Baluchistan with 52% in

2011 and 43% in 2012 highlighting the continued challenges of PF transmission and different level of

access to primary and secondary facilities in Baluchistan and Sind.

The nationwide epidemiological data shows clearly that Pakistan is a low to moderate endemic country

with an important diversity within and between the provinces and districts.

The MPR revealed the existence of a fragmented malaria and health information system, with very

limited capacities of analysis. The geographical information system necessary for the strategic orientation

of malaria control interventions is absent at all levels, which has further compounded understanding of

malaria epidemiology in all provinces.

Specific issues on Malaria epidemiology in the provinces:

Some additional epidemiological data are included in section 4.6 ( Surveillance, Monitoring and

evaluation)

Baluchistan:

• Malaria transmission season in the province is July to November. However, along the coastal

areas and western international bordering areas of province the disease prevails throughout the

year. In some areas there are two peak transmission, the first start March and April to June and

the second peak in September to November (post monsoon).

• The extreme climate events in recent past included earthquakes and floods, these have provided

favourable breeding conditions for mosquitos with a raised epidemic threat.

• In Balochistan malaria ranks the 2nd

top priority disease after ARI (Acute Respiratory infection)

and accounts for 33% disease burden of the province.

• Table-2 shows the data on malaria diagnostic microscopy from 2007 to 2012, collected by the

data management cell of MCP. This data includes the data from the PR sources, which sharing by

the PRs has now started recently. The increase in the indicators is possibly due to the

improvement of the diagnostic skills, reporting and other resources for microscopy. However, the

increase in falciparum is a matter which needs attention.

Table 2: Baluchistan Malaria Microscopy Data 2007-2012

Population

Total

Slides

Total

Positive P.vivax P.falciparum API F.R SPR

2007 7,844,715 388,115 46,805 28,051 18,754 5.97 40.07 12.06

2008 8,159,523 371,606 43,848 30,020 13,828 5.37 31.54 11.80

2009 8,355,352 395,263 49,778 33,994 15,784 5.96 31.71 12.59

2010 8,555,880 414,707 63,625 36,480 27,145 7.44 42.66 15.34

Page 34: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

34

2011 8,761,221 420,252 57,980 36,146 21,834 6.62 37.66 13.80

2012 8,971,490 421,943 57,111 37,901 19,210 6.37 33.64 13.54

• Specific studies to ascertain exact population at risk are not available, however, given the

information for the ongoing stratification (below) it is safe to assume that excluding the low-risk

(malaria free) districts of Kalat and Ziarat, almost the entire population of the province is at risk

of contracting malaria.

Risk mapping and stratification:

• Administratively the province is organized into 6 administrative divisions, 30 districts, which are

further organized in 79 Tehsils, and 567 Union Councils. The healthcare facilities are set-up

along these administrative units and the catchment area for each facility is according to the level

of the facility, with the highest level of healthcare facilities in the districts, being the Divisional

HQ Hospital located at the divisional headquarters, and at the community level it is usually a

Basic Health Unit (BHU) or a Civil Dispensary (all Civil Dispensaries are planned to be for

upgraded to BHUs). The Lady Health Worker’s Health House is located within the houses of the

LHWs in the communities / hamlets. Therefore, there are no particular boundaries separately for

the healthcare services these follow the limitations of the administrative unit within which these

exist.

• Malaria Mapping is underway, however, this is an overlooked area requiring guidance and

assistance to complete and maintain this activity.

• As a first step - a stratification exercise has been completed utilizing multiple indices in addition

to the API. The resulting stratification model is given below.

• A very good resource has been the Malaria Atlas Project where based on data of 2010 malaria

mapping has been done and is freely available at <http://www.map.ox.ac.uk/>.

Page 35: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

35

Table 3: Malaria Stratification in Balochistan – Parameters Used.

Variables Stratum-I Stratum-II Stratum-III

Endemicity High transmission. Moderate / Seasonal transmission Low transmission

API >5 1 - 5 <1

Pop:

movement

High (Nomadic population) Moderate Moderate

Geography • Semi-urban & rural areas

• Rice & cotton fields in

Naseerabad Division

• People residing beside rivers

• Coal mines in Sibi,

Hernai&Dukki.

• Inadequate health facilities in

Chaghi&Sibi Divisions

• Dominant vector species:

stephensi

• High PF rate

• High temperature

• Poor road network

• Semi-urban & rural areas

• Moderate life style

• Plains and Hilly areas

• Orchards

• Farmers

• Mountainous High

lands

• Poor life style

• Farmers

• Low temp

Population 5,093,115 3,043,480 322,928

Accessibility In Chaghi, Dera-Bugti, and

Kohlu few health facilities

In Far-flung areas the accessibility

is a big issue.

In Far-flung areas

accessibility is less

Stability Stable Unstable Unstable

Surface water Slow Rivers, Dams & Canals

with breeding sites

Valleys & Tube wells with low

breeding sites

Springs & Tube wells

with low breeding sites

Species P.V &P.f P.V &P.f P V

Stratum-I Districts: High Risk of Malaria: 1. Sherani2. Zhob3. Musakheil4. Dukki tehsil of Ziarat

District (Not District) 5. Barkhan6. Harnai7. Sibi8. Kohlu9. DeraBugti10. Naseerabad11. Jaffarabad12.

Noshki13. Chagai14. Kharan15. Washuk16. Punjgur17. Kech18. Gawadar19. Awaran

Stratum-II Districts: Low Risk of Malaria: 1. Lasbella2. Khuzdar3. JhalMagsi4. Bolan5. Mastung6.

Quetta7. Killa Abdullah8. Pishin9. KillaSaifullah10. Lorali

Stratum-III Districts: Very Low Risk or Malaria Free Districts: 1. Kalat2. Ziarat

Page 36: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

36

The above stratification has revealed the entire province with the exception of two districts (out of 30) is

under a serious threat of Malaria, with Malaria being endemic in high or low grades in almost the entire

province of Balochistan

Epidemiology of Malaria in Sindh

Actual prevalence and incidence of Malaria in Sindh is not known, and available data regarding burden of

Malaria in the province is based on surveillance data of Sindh Malaria Control Program, which covers

public sector facilities only, with coverage of less than 100%, similarly burden of Malaria at national level

is also not known. A national Malaria prevalence study was conducted in 2011 by Aamer A Khathak

which revealed highest prevalence of Malaria in the country was in Baluchistan followed by Sindh. Sindh

contributed 30% of total reported cases of Malaria in Pakistan which has 25% national population.

Below the graph shows the annual parasite incidence has increased continueusly from 2008 to 2012 in

Sindh.

Figure 4: API (2008-2012)

Below graph shows marked reduction in prevalence of Falciparum cases.

Page 37: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

37

Figure 5: Falciparum ratio (2008-2012)

Table 4: Sindh data 2001-2012.

Year No Of

Slides

P. Vivax P.

Falciparum

Mix Total SPR FR%

2001 705126 11988 12532 18 24502 3.47 51%

2002 731038 12938 10282 05 23215 4.17 44%

2003 902021 20445 17795 09 38231 4.23 47%

2004 1521648 27326 13371 0 40697 2.67 33%

2005 1313818 17490 10359 04 27845 2.12 37%

2006 1376923 19051 15558 0 34609 2.51 45%

2007 1021822 16534 8726 0 25260 2.47 34%

2008 954028 17682 8415 04 26093 2.73 32%

2009 1113765 19112 8364 0 27476 2.46 30%

2010 1275732 34304 22289 482 57075 4.50 39%

2011 1290835 48119 34499 4989 87607 6.7 39%

2012 1785499 79511 31083 4057 114651 6.4 27%

Epidemiology of Malaria in KPK

Page 38: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

38

Table 5: Categorization of districts based on reported malaria incidence, 2007-2012 (average for six years) in

KP (source: provincial MPR report).

S.No API index Status Districts

1 Average five year API > 5 Highly

Endemic

Bannu, Buner, Lakki Marwat,

Hangu

2 Average five year > 1API < 5 Moderately

Endemic

Charsadda, DI Khan, Kohat,

Karak, Tank, , Mardan, Malakand

3 Average five year API < 1 Low Endemic Swat, Battagram, Kohat, Dir

Lower, Dir Upper, Chitral, Swabi,

Haripur, Mansehra, Abbottabad,

Peshawar, Kohistan, Shangla,

Nowshera Hangu, Malakand

Epidemiology of Malaria in FATA

Table 6: Categorization of Tribal Areas based on reported malaria incidence, 2007-2012 (average for six

years) (source: Provincial MPR report).

S.No API index Status Districts

1 Average five year API > 5 Highly Endemic Khyber, North Waziristan, Kurram, FR

DIKhan/Tank, FR Bannu/Lakki

Marwat

2 Average five year > 1API < 5 Moderately

Endemic

Mohmand, Bajaur, Orakzai, South

Waziristan, FR Peshawar/ Kohat

3 Average five year API < 1 Low Endemic NIL

Epidemiology of Malaria in Punjab

Malaria is considered to be a low endemic disease in Punjab but still has a high burden as compared to

other diseases. The District Health Information System data reports that 831117 cases of clinical malaria

were diagnosed in 2012 in primary and secondary health facilities outpatient department. A total of 10972

cases were admitted in secondary health facilities and 84 deaths were attributed to malaria. The malaria

burden is expected to be fivefold more than the reported because DHIS data is not covering all the public

health care facilities of the province and also because 70-80% of the patients utilize private health

services. The MIS data shows that there were 17,522 microscopy confirmed cases in 2012 while DHIS

reports 23389 microscopy confirmed cases. The API based on six years average (2007-12) is 0.19 which

is considered as low endemic. The endemicity of the districts based on six years API data is follows.

Page 39: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

39

Table 7: Categorization of districts based on reported malaria incidence, 2007-2012 (average for six years).

S.No API index Status Districts

1 Average five year API > 5 Highly

Endemic NIL

2 Average five year > 1API < 5 Moderately

Endemic

Layyah, Muzaffargrah and

Rajanpur

3 Average five year API < 1 Low Endemic Rest of the districts

4. Programme performance by thematic areas

4.1 Programme management

4.1.1 Policy

Federal: Government of Pakistan is committed to combating malaria and to achieving its national

targets, which are in line with the Global Roll Back Malaria (RBM) initiative, MDGs and

“Vision 2030”. In 1999 Pakistan became signatory to RBM initiative, consequently malaria control was

integrated with the National Health Policy (2001). Supporting documents such as the national malaria

strategic plans and the Malaria Control Programme PC-Is have been developed. Malaria has been included

in the national health sector and the national development plan.

The primary RBM strategy objectives include:

• To enhance access of population at risk to quality assured early diagnosis and prompt treatment

services.

• To scale-up multiple prevention interventions especially LLINs and IRS to the level of universal

coverage in target population.

• To enhance technical and management capacity of malaria control program for improved

planning, management and monitoring of malaria control interventions.

• To improve health seeking behaviors and practices of target communities in highly malaria

endemic districts through enhanced community awareness and participation.

• Improved detection and response to epidemics and malaria emergency situations.

• Developing viable public and private partnerships in the country to combat malaria.

Page 40: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

40

Baluchistan: Malaria currently ranks as the second priority disease in the province after Acute

Respiratory Infections (ARIs) with an estimated disease burden of 33% in Balochistan. There is no

provincial Health Policy or Health Sector Strategy, instead national policies and guidelines are followed.

Malaria Control activities are implemented in accordance to the strategy developed by the federal RBM

programme (under the guidance of the MDG indicators, the Global fund strategic guidelines) and has

been reflected in the federal PC-1 and the provincial PC-1. The draft Provincial Development Strategy

2013-20 has highlighted the need to strengthen Malaria Control Program towards elimination.

The overall objectives highlighted in the provincial PC-1 are:

• To co-ordinate province-wide efforts for implementation of RBM initiative for 50%

reduction in the malaria burden in Balochistan by the year 2012.

• By the year 2015 >70% of the high risk population of the province have access and use

effective malaria prevention and treatment.

The national malaria strategic objectives adopted by the provincial PC-1 (end June 2013) are as follows:

• To strengthen early diagnosis and prompt treatment.

• To expand & strengthen malaria microscopy at RHCs and BHU level.

• To strengthen multiple prevention action e.g. use of Long Lasting Insecticidal Treated

Nets (LLINs) etc.

• Use of insecticide residual spray.

• Use of alternative methods of malaria control such as environmental and biological

Control.

• BCC and Health Education regarding malaria prevention, control treatment, and self-

protection at grass root level.

• Strengthen surveillance and epidemic preparedness.

• Strengthen operational research.

• Conduct entomological survey for vector control.

• Capacity building of health care provider at district and provincial level.

• To monitor the implementation of the RBM strategies in the province.

• To strengthen the provincial program capacities for monitoring and evaluation and

implementation of malaria and dengue control strategies.

• To monitor the progress and technically assist the districts to solve problems

encountered in implementation of RBM initiative.

• To strengthen the provincial reference laboratory set-up for capacity building for case

management and vector control interventions.

Page 41: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

41

• To adopt national policy and operational guidelines for control of malaria and dengue

in Balochistan.

• To develop provincial strategic plan in consultation with federal.

• To develop category specific training packages for health care providers, managers

and entomologists.

• To produce team of Trainers (TOT’s) at district levels.

• To facilitate the operational research by provincial Program on priority issues

• Partnership building with all stakeholders.

FATA: The current PC-1 of IVM has the following goals, objectives and strategies

Goals and objectives

• To reduce malaria specific morbidity and mortality by 60% by the year 2015 and to control

growing incidence of falciparum malaria.

• To support agencies and FRs in malaria control activities.

• To strengthen the capacity of health staff in diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of Malaria.

Strategies

• Early diagnosis and prompt treatment

• Plan selective preventive measures

• Detect early , contain or prevent epidemics

• Strengthening local capacities and capabilities.

• Community participation

• Inter sectoral collaboration involving partners.

KPK: The initial National Health Policy of Pakistan (1991) focused on strengthening malaria microscopy

through upgraded basic health facilities and early diagnosis with prompt treatment. The target was to

reduce malaria cases by 50% by 2010, while Plasmodium falciparum cases would remain less than

40% of all malaria infections. Selective spraying replaced mass spraying. The policy was in the process

of being revised in 2009, when decision makers delegated more autonomy to the provinces. The 18th

Amendment resulted in transformation of the Ministry of Health to National Health Services,

Regulation and Coordination (NHS) whose main role is now a regulatory and coordinating body.

Currently, no Provincial Health Policy exists. Following devolution, the Malaria Control Program

is responsible for implementing malaria control activities in the province to achieve the MDG

targets. The Health Department aims to provide an essential basic health care package including

Page 42: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

42

promotive, preventive, curative and rehabilitative health services to the community. The KP priorities in

health are designed to achieve the MDG targets and to:

• Improve Governance and Strengthen Management

• Initiate the Culture of Informed Decision Making

• Improve Regulation and Quality Assurance

• Human Resources Development:

• Preventive Services including control of malaria

• Disaster Risk Reduction and Management:

• Improve Accessibility to Health Care

Punjab: The MCP follows the National Strategy for Rolling Back Malaria (RBM).

Sindh: Sindh does not have a Health policy and Malaria policy. In 2005 a Health policy was developed

and approved by the concerned authorities but no implementation followed. Sindh has developed a health

sector strategy in 2012 on the basis of situation analysis done in 2011. Malaria strategic plan for Sindh

has not been developed. The recently developed Sindh Health Sector Strategy 2012-2019 includes

Malaria as important communicable disease

4.1.2 Organization

There is an established set-up of Malaria Control Programme at the federal, provincial and

district level including Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA) and Azad Jammu &

Kashmir (AJK).

Federal level: There is a full-fledged Directorate of Malaria Control (DOMC), which is an addendum to

the Department of the Ministry of National Health Service, Regulation and Coordination (NHSRC) since

13th May 2013. The Directorate is headed by the Director Malaria Control, who reports to the Director

General Health Ministry of NHSRC and is supported by a team of technical staff, which includes 1

Senior Scientific Officer (Entomology), 1 Epidemiologist, 1 Health Education Officer, 1 Accounts,

Officer, 1 Statistical Officer as well as support staff. Recently the DoMC has established a Programme

Management Unit (PMU) with the support from Global Fund SSF Round-10, which provides additional

technical support to the programme. The federal level organogram highlights inadequate technical

human resource requiring an additional 5 technical staff at the central level in the capacity of a data

manager, a M & E Officer, a logistics and supply management officer, a laboratory technologist

/Parasitiologist and a operational research expert along with supportive staff. The overall mandate of

DoMC is the policy formulation, coordination with international donors and provinces, monitoring and

evaluation, technical assistance, operational research, institutional strengthening, capacity building, health

education and advocacy. The federal Directorate of Malaria Control also assists provinces in supporting

the services gaps during epidemics /outbreaks and natural disasters such as floods.

Balochistan: In 1977 Malaria control activities were integrated with the Communicable Disease Control

program in the General Health Services resulting in a change in name from ‘Malaria Eradication

Program’ to ‘Malaria Control Program’ (MCP). In continuation of the eradication era, the programme

continued to develop programme policies, plans, management and oversee donor funding vertically from

the Federal Directorate of Malaria Control, while the provincial programme enforced its role as the

facilitator and coordinator in the implementation of the National planning strategies. In 1998, Roll Back

Malaria (RBM) was introduced by WHO, UNICEF, UNDP and the World Bank in a phased approach

between 2001-2002, supplemented by the provincial PC-1s and extended to the period 2007-2012 with

Page 43: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

43

further financial support from the provincial and federal PC-1s. Between 1999-2008 the health

departments of the District Governments, as the third tier of Government in the country, presided over the

respective staff, materials and budgetary grants for malaria control including donor field coordination

which may have contributed to the lack of coordination with the provincial headquarters. The District

Government system was repealed in Balochistan in 2008 with the change of the Local Government Act

by the Provincial Assembly. In 2003 the Global Fund Against Tuberculosis, Aids and Malaria formed a

Country Coordination Mechanism for Pakistan, which encouraged donors to work through this

mechanism.

The District Health Management Team (DHMT) (present in majority of the districts) comprises of the

DHO, the Deputy DHO, Medical Superintendent-DHQ hospital, District Coordinator National Program

for FP/PHC and the District Officer of Population Welfare department. The DHMT is the monitoring and

supervisory system for the activities of Malaria Control in the districts; it conducts visits to the public

sector health facilities in the district and approves malaria control interventions. The human and other

resources of the MCP come under two separate command structures: the PC-MCP and DHO (figure 6),

both of which report to the Director General Health Services Balochistan and have limited involvement

with malaria activities. The Malaria staff in the districts receive their payroll from the district health

offices and do not coordinate with the PC-MCP, constraining performance based monitoring. Majority of

staff are retained at the provincial headquarters with only District Malaria Superintendent assigned to 7

districts and 1 to the MCP headquarters, consequently 22 out of the 30 sanctioned posts are vacant. The

Assistant Malaria Superintendent, initially recommended for Tehsil levels, is presently located at the

District Health Offices and assists the Malaria Superintendent, in the absence of a supervisor he acts as

the Malaria Superintendent. If more than one Assistant Malaria Superintendent is present then the

workload is shared. Presently there are only 15 posts of Assistant Malaria Superintendents but given the

number of Tehsils, there should be at least 85 posts. The position of Malaria Supervisor was initially

assigned at Union Councils, but due to deficiency of sanctioned posts, the Malaria Supervisors have been

assigned to District HQ Hospitals and where there are ample workforce to the RHCs and BHUs.

Responsibilities of this position include spraying, larviciding campaigns, collection of blood samples of

suspected cases for confirmation and cross checking at the Provincial Reference Laboratory for quality

control. Due to shortage of microscopists, a Malaria Supervisor may be trained to perform microscopy

and provide treatment according to guidelines, conduct awareness sessions, assist in monitoring and

supervision of malaria activities in his assigned area. The Malaria Supervisor is the basic staff member of

MCP located at the Union Council level, who is required to perform as the Community – Program

outreach and link delivering services, there are 567 Union Councils in the province, while the authorized

posts of Malaria Supervisors are only 203. Technical staff are lacking in the areas of data analysis and

data management, IT, microscopists, equipment repair, M&E, training coordination, financial

management and IRS maintenance. Currently there are only 2 entomology technicians and 9 insect

collectors in the province. Access to healthcare facilities is limited to only 30% - 40% of the total

population. The LHWs perform malaria activities under their respective program duties. The PRs have

collaborated with CBOs and local NGOs in their respective districts. The Data Management Cells at the

district level for Malaria Control are functioning in several districts and remains to be introduced to other

districts by the MCP-HQ with the induction of the central Data Management Cell.

Figure 6: Organizational Structure of Balochistan MCP

Page 44: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

44

FATA: Integrated Vector Management formerly called Malaria Control Program is working in all the

tribal agencies and frontier regions funded by the Global Fund. The departmental staff under the Program

Manager is limited with no technical persons including case management, vector control, surveillance,

M& E, logistic and finance. The Global Fund has recruited a malaria supervisor who works as a data

manager. In each tribal agency, Malaria Supervisors work at BHU’s (Union Council level) and

microscopists work at RHC level Laboratories. Presently RHC function as Diagnostic centers while

BHU’s (FLCF) as Treatment Centers. At agency (district) level, there is a shortage of staff, which has

compounded malaria control activities.

Figure 7 : Secretariat/Directorate Level Organogram of Integrated Vector Management

Secretary Social Sector

Director

FATA Health Directorate

Program Manager

Integrated vector Management

Page 45: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

45

Figure 8: Agency/District Level Organogram

Computer Operator Class IV

Driver

Naib Qasid

Agency Surgeon

Malaria Inspector

Microscopist

Malaria Supervisor

Clerk , Porter , Driver

Page 46: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

46

KPK: The Health Secretariat oversees and provides policy guidelines and directions to autonomous

institutions of the health department which include teaching/tertiary hospitals, health foundation, Khyber

Medical University, Health Regulatory Authority. There are two Health departments i.e. Director General

Health Services and Provincial Health Services Academy. Director General Health Services (DGHS) is the

implementing arm of the health department. DGHS office is responsible for ensuring policies, vision and

mission of health department are achieved. DGHS office manages 25 districts of the province, overseeing all

projects , programs and ensures that services are provided to the population.

Figure 9: Organogram of Health Directorate

Page 47: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

47

District Health Officer heads the district health system which is responsible for providing health services in

accordance to departments guidelines and direction. As a member of Health Management Cadre, s/he

manages primary and secondary health care facilities, all preventive programs at primary level and is assisted

by Coordinator EPI, Coordinator LHW, Coordinator Public Health and Coordinator HMIS. District Health

Page 48: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

48

Officers are also responsible for implementing Drug Act 1976 and Food Act and are assisted by Drug

inspector and Food and Sanitary Inspector for this responsibility.

Malaria Control Program is fully functional in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Province through its established

organizational setup at Provincial, District, Tehsil and Union Council level. There is complete

administrative setup of Malaria Control in Districts under jurisdiction of DHO’s. The organogram of

Assistant Malaria Superintendent: (AMS), Malaria Supervisors and microscopists is similar to FATA.

The RHC and BHU function similar to FATA. Currently the Malaria control program comes under the

Director General Health Services, KP. At the Provincial level, a medical doctor has been appointed

supported by limited staff, which in turn restricts programme implementation. A new organogram

has been proposed to recruit more staff at the provincial and district level so as to ensure effective

delivery of control interventions.

Figure 10: Provincial Organogram of Malaria Control Program, KP

Figure 11: Organogram at District level

Support Staff

• Junior Clerk/ Store Keeper 1

• Drivers 2

• Naib Qasid 2

• Malaria

Superintendent

• Senior Microscopist

Epidemiologist Statistical

Assistant

Computer

Operator

Deputy Program Manager

Program Manager

MCP, KP District Health Officer

Stationed at DHO

Office

Stationed at Union

Council /Facility based

• Malaria Supervisor

• Junior Microscopist

Director General Health

Secretary Health

Page 49: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

49

Punjab: In 2009, The Ministry of Health was abolished and converted to National Health

Services, Regulation and Coordination (NHS) whose main role is now a regulatory and

coordinating body. At present the Provincial Government is responsible for implementing the

malaria control activities in the province and to achieve the MDG targets.

Malaria Control Program is fully functional in Punjab Province through its established organizational

setup at Provincial, District, Tehsil and Union Council level. There is complete administrative setup of

Malaria Control in Districts under control of EDO (H). Each District has Assistant Malaria

Superintendent: (AMS) while Malaria Supervisors are working at BHU’s (Union Council level).

Similarly Microscopists are working at RHC level Laboratories. Presently RHC acts as a Diagnostic

centers while BHU’s (FLCF), as Treatment Centers. The confirmed malaria cases among the fever cases

are detected through passive case detection (PCD) and treated.

Malaria Control Program is headed by Director General Health Services and is assisted by Director Health

Services CDC Punjab who oversees all the communicable diseases including malaria. At the Provincial

level, a medical doctor is appointed who presides over two entomologists, 4 Communicable

Disease Control Officers (CDCO), 3 Communicable Disease Control Inspectors (CDCI) and 1

parasitologist.

Figure 12: Organogram of Malaria Control Programme Punjab

Page 50: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

50

.

EDO (H) s heads the district health system and is responsible for providing health services to the district in

accordance with health department guidelines and direction. As a member of Health Management Cadre, s/he

manages primary and secondary health care facilities including all preventive programs at primary level.

Over the past several years all the activities of malaria control program have come to a halt, as the

malaria staff are given duties of dengue control and Polio eradication.

Secretory

Health

DGHS

Punjab

Principles of teaching

hospitals

DHS CDC

Punjab

MS

EDO Health ADHS Malaria Pathologist

MS DHQ District Officer Health Ento=2,CDCO=4,CDCI

=3,Parasitologist=1

Lab Assistant/Tech

MS THQs DDOH CDCO AE Provincial Reference

Lab, Senior Microscp

Pathologist SMO ICs

(RHC

Level)

MO ICs

BHUs

CDC Insps

(tehsil

level)

Dist CDC Lab (Sr Micro,

Micro Lab Attendants) & ICs

Diagnostic Centre

Lab Assistant/Technicians

CDC Supervisors (UC

level)

Page 51: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

51

Sindh: Provincial Malaria Control Program in Sindh is headed by the Director Malaria Control Program,

who reports to the Director General Health Services Sindh and secretary health, Government of Sindh.

The additional Director Malaria Control Program assists Director Malaria Control Program in all

administrative and field activities, and co-ordinates with District Health Officers (DHOs). There are three

components of Malaria Control Program including administrative, evaluation and health education. The

evaluation department is headed by the epidemiologist who works as focal point for vector control,

surveillance and epidemic control. The epidemiologist is supported by the senior evaluator, entomologist,

senior microscopist, microscopist, entomology technician, and insect collector. Senior education officer in

coordination with provincial health education cell and district health education officer works as focal

point for education, communication, advocacy and community mobilization. Senior microscopist works

as focal point for malaria diagnosis. There is no focal point at provincial level for malaria treatment. At

district level there are two components of Malaria Control Program Administrative and Evaluation,

coordinated by District Malaria focal person nominated by DHO. Administrative component includes

Malaria superintendents, Assist Malaria superintendants.

Figure 13: Programme organogram

Page 52: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

52

Organizational Structure

(Provincial Level)

Page 53: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

53

4.1.3 Guidance

The programme has developed following guidelines and training materials on key interventions:

1) Case Management Guidelines (uncomplicated and complicated malaria): There are four

versions of case management guidelines. The first guideline (a desk guide) was developed

during the first phase of RBM implementation in Pakistan and updated in 2005. Following

changes in malaria treatment strategy in Pakistan as well as the inclusion of issues not

highlighted in the previous version, these guidelines were updated again in 2007 and finally in

2013. The latest guidelines are in the form of Job Aids (charts) and have been introduced to

38 districts supported by TGF SSF Round-10 districts.

2) Desk Guide on Complicated Malaria: The Programme has recently updated the case guidelines

for the management of severe malaria aligned with the WHO recommendations.

3) Guidelines on Malaria Microscopy: There are malaria microscopy guidelines (updated in

2007) and quality assurance of malaria microscopy (updated in 2008).

4) Guidelines on Rapid Diagnostic Tests: These guidelines (Job Aids) have been developed with

support from TGF-10 and are comprehensive in terms of knowledge on RDTs and conducting

the rapid tests as well as interpretation.

5) The LLIN distribution strategy was developed to provide a comprehensive strategic direction

and operational mechanism to ensure equitable distribution of LLINs to achieve the target of

universal coverage.

6) Emergency Vector Control

7) IRS Training guide and manual

8) IRS strategy (TGF SSF-10)

9) Guidelines for interventions in complex emergencies

10) BCC strategy (TGF SSF-10)

11) M&E Guidelines (developed by TGF-7)

12) Malaria Information System (MIS) guidelines (TGF-7)

13) Surveillance guidelines (TGF SS-10)

The Global Fund through Save the Children has/ in the process of preparing the following documents:

1) LLIN distribution strategy

2) Malaria BCC strategy

3) Malaria Information System (MIS)

4) Counselling cards for LHWs

Page 54: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

54

5) Malaria Case Management

6) Complicated Case management of Malaria

7) Malaria Treatment Flow Charts

8) Malaria Microscopy Desk Guide

9) Malaria Microscopy Training manual

10) How to use a Rapid Diagnostic Test (RDT)

11) National Summary Treatment Protocol for Case management of Malaria

12) Training manual for early detection of malaria outbreaks, malaria surveillance, M&E statistics

and Data management

13) Supervision and external quality assurance of Malaria Laboratory Services

14) Operational guidelines for DLS

Balochistan: The National Guidelines prepared by the DoMC and Partners adopted and in practice by the

Balochistan MCP are:

14) Case Management

15) Complicated Malaria Case Management

16) Use of LLINs at community level

17) Guidelines for anti-vector interventions in emergencies

18) Emergency guidelines for vector control

19) Guidelines for anti-vector interventions in monsoon

20) Dengue Vector Control

21) Integrated Vector Management

22) BCC and Advocacy

23) MIS

24) Microscopy and Quality Assurance in Microscopy

25) RDT

26) Distribution Strategy for LLINs 2012

FATA, KPK: The federal guidelines as described for Balochistan are followed.

Sindh: The following federal guidelines are followed:

• Guidelines For Malaria Information System (MIS)

• Complicated (severe) Malaria Case management

Page 55: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

55

• Uncomplicated (severe) Malaria Case management

• Manual for rapid diagnostic test (RDT)

• Manual for microscopy

• LLIN manual

• Indoor residual spray (IRS manual)

• Training manual for early detection of malaria outbreaks, Malaria surveillance , M & E

statistics and data management

• Guidelines for Planning and implementation of malaria vector control at district level

4.1.4 Human resources, training and capacity development

Directorate of Malaria Control (Public Sector PR): The DOMC (Public Sector PR) has established a

Programme Management Unit (PMU) with support from TGF Round-7 Grant. The organizational

structure of PR Office is given in figure-15 below. The Unit is headed by the Director Senior Project

Officer, who reports to the Director, Directorate of Malaria Control. There are well established units for

finance, PSM, M&E, PIU and HR Management each headed by a Manager. These units have contributed

considerably to enhancing the malaria control programme capacity in case management, surveillance,

financial management, and monitoring and evaluation. The PMU has been instrumental in closely

working with the malaria control programme and providing technical support. This Unit has a technical

unit equipped with technical staff including an epidemiologist, entomologist and a programme Officer.

Some of the key achievements of the PMU are:

1) The M&E Unit of PMU has been instrumental in developing a robust information system to meet the

requirements of the GFATM as well as providing support to the DOMC in gathering malaria morbidity

data on a monthly basis, development of a structured M&E system and M&E Plan;

2) The Procurement and supply management unit has been involved in the maintenance of the supply

chain to avoid stock outs which have not been reported during the grant period. The Unit has developed a

comprehensive PSM plan and SOPs for storage and quality assurance of commodities;

3) The Finance Unit has been responsible for management of finances and has been instrumental in

developing the system of financial management.

Page 56: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

56

Fig-14: Organogram of the Directorate of Malaria Control Ministry of National Health Services, Regulations & Coordination,

Islamabad

Director (BPS-19)

Senior Scientific Officer Health Education Officer Epidemiologist Superintendent Assistant Account Officer Stenographer (BPS-18) (BPS-18) (BPS-18) (BPS-16) (BPS-16) (BPS-16)

Stenotypist Assistant Scientific officer U.D.C cum Cashier Naib Qasid (BPS-14) (BPS-14) (BPS-17) (BPS-09) (BPS-02)

Assistant Stenotypist & Assistant Naib Qasid (BPS-14) (BPS-14) (BPS-02)

Naib Qasid Naib Qasid (BPS-02) (BPS-02)

Stenotypist Assistant Incharge Assistant U.D.C D.M.O Driver (BPS-14) (BPS-15) (BPS-14, 04 Posts) (BPS-09) (BPS-05) (BPS-05)

L.D.C Daftry (BPS-09) (BPS-03)

HR Management

Project Officer

Manager HR (SPO)

Assistant Project Officer HR Officer

Admin Assistant

Driver (1,2,3)

Janitor

Office Boy

(1,.2)

Page 57: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

57

HR Management

Project Officer

Manager HR (SPO)

Assistant Project Officer HR Officer

Admin Assistant

Driver (1,2,3)

Janitor

Office Boy

(1,.2)

Page 58: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

58

Figure-15: PR Office GFATM Round 10, Directorate of Malaria Control

Director Directorate of Malaria Control (DOMC)

Audit Unit

Senior Project Officer

Internal Audit

PSM Unit Finance Unit M & E Unit PIU

Manager PSM

Manager Finance

Manager M & E Technical Unit

Logistic Officer

Assistant Finance Manager

M&E Office (KPK, FATA)

Epidemiologist

Finance Officer

M & E Officer (Sindh)

Epidemiologist

M & E Officer

(Balochistan

Program Officer

Page 59: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

59

HR Management

Project Officer

Manager HR (SPO)

Assistant Project Officer HR Officer

Admin Assistant

Driver (1,2,3)

Janitor

Office Boy

(1,.2)

Page 60: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

60

Figure-16: Directorate of Malaria Control Ministry of National Health Services, Regulations & Coordination

Islamabad

Country Director

Deputy Country Director Manager Internal Audit Deputy Country Director Deputy Country Director Deputy Country Director Director Director Director

Finance & Support Services Program Implementation Program Development & Quality Emergencies Human Resource & OD Security Member Services

Director Controller Finance Director Deputy Director Senior Manager Grants and Compliance Logistics GFATM - Round 10 MEAL

Page 61: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

61

Manager Operation/Logistics

Manager Finance & Grants Malaria Program Specialist

GFATM GFATM

Grants Coordinator Logistic / Inventory Officer

GFATM

Epidemiologist

Finance Coordinator Procurement Officer

GFATM Admin Assistant Manager

Training / Communication

Malaria Program Officer

x 2

Provincial Coordinator

x 3

Admin / Finance Assistant

x 3

Drivers

x 3

Page 62: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

62

Save the Children (Private Sector PR): The PR Office is headed by the project Director who is

supported by the managers to the Finance and Grants, Logistics and Operations, trainings and

communication and M&E (figure 14). Save the Children, as private sector PR of the Global Fund Round-

10 grant has contributed substantially to improving the Malaria Program’s capacity in Monitoring,

Evaluation, Accountability and Learning (MEAL) component. In addition to strengthening the existing

routine malaria Program’s M&E system at district, provincial and federal levels, SCI has developed an

online Integrated Management Information System (MIS) that allows the real time field based data entry,

analysis and report generation at each management level for evidence informed decision making. The

system also includes a complete training database for all the trainings that have been conducted under the

program and has the capacity to generate indicator wise and theme wise reports at various levels to better

understand the program’s performance and make timely decisions. In addition, SCI has also developed an

interactive grant performance dashboard that is being used as a management tool to achieve the program

objectives. SCI has also conducted a number of trainings at provincial and district levels to operationalize

the system and is in process of expanding its utilization to DoMC’s districts as well. Other important

activities include development of BCC strategy, BCC material and IRS Guidelines.

Balochistan: In the past the National Malaria Program, DoMC, provided support in training of health

care staff in capacity building which included local, national and international trainings. A new

partnership of the MCP has been formally developed with the Institute of Public Health, Quetta, and

(IPHQ). The institute provides support by technical assistance, trainings, and plans are underway for

health education and operational research including more emphasis on entomology and epidemiology.

The IPHQ is now the training center for the technical Malaria staff including District level Master

Trainers. Presently the Provincial MCP regularly organizes trainings for Malaria staff and other health

staff also, with the assistance of the partners in the following areas:

• Malaria Case Management

• Complicated Malaria Case Management

• Microscopy

• Quality Assurance in Malaria Microscopy

• RDT

• LLINs distribution

• Strategy for LLINs distribution

• MIS Tools

• Malaria Surveillance & Outbreaks

• BCC

To date there are 180 Microscopy centers and 351 RDT centers functioning in the province. The

Laboratory Staff in the District HQ Hospitals, Tehsil HQ hospital and RHC levels have been trained on

Malaria Microscopy. Majority of the District HQ Hospitals and the RHCs have Malaria Microscopy

Centres, while there are ongoing construction of centres in districts without. Other ancillary support staff

are also in some districts.

Page 63: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

63

FATA: The Integrated Vector Management (IVM) programme has 51 microscopists and 144 malaria

supervisors. Regular trainings are conducted on case management, MIS, basic and refresher

microscopy, RDT and LLIN distribution strategy. The IVM department has no funds in the present

PC-1 for training. There is a need to assess the training needs of IVM on managerial and technical

issues at directorate and agency levels so that they acquire the sufficient capacity to respond to the

changing malaria and partnership landscape.

Table 8: List of Human Resources for IVM in FATA

Agency /FR

Microscopists

RDT Person

Malaria Supervisor

Malaria Inspector

Lab Attendent

Porter Clerk Driver

Khyber

19

05 50

01 01

Bajaur

11 01 01

Kurram

02

15

Mohmand

01

09

North Waziristan

07 14 20

South Waziristan

02

26 01 03 01

Orakzai

02

13

FR Peshawar

03 07

FR Kohat

03 09

FR DI Khan

03 06

FR Bannu

03 14

FR Tank

03 08

FR Lakki

03 07

FATA Total

51 79 144 01 01 03 02 02

Page 64: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

64

Table 9: List of FATA human resource trained in various areas.

Agency/FR

Basic Microscopy

Refresher Microscopy

MIS RDT Case Mgt LLIN Distribution Strategy

Khyber

32 07 28 08

Bajaur

00 17 34 14 33 20

Kurram

00 07 11 10 12 12

Mohmand

04 04 35 20 31 0

North Waziristan

03 08 19 14 19 05

South Waziristan

04 05 20 11 18 17

Orakzai

08 05 26 12 21 25

FR Peshawar

03 06 09 07 10 11

FR Kohat

02 06 08 09 07 10

FR DI Khan

02 05 08 05 09 10

FR Bannu

02 06 17 13 16 11

FR Tank

02 05 11 07 12 09

FR Lakki

02 02 08 08 10 09

FATA Total

32 52 193 113 181 107

KPK: The PC-1 2002-2006 documents a total of 925 medical officers were trained on case

management and national treatment guidelines. Within the same period a total of 67 microscopists

were trained on microscopy in NIMRT Lahore. Limited trainings were also conducted on new

malaria tools (FM1 and FM2 etc). The districts funded by GF underwent regular trainings on case

management, MIS, basic and refresher microscopy, RDT and LLIN distribution strategy.

Punjab Currently there are 43 assistant entomologists, 22 CDC Officers and 161 microscopists in

Punjab. A large numbers of posts have been vacant.

Page 65: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

65

Table 10: Category wise vacancy position of CDC staff in Punjab

S.No Name of Post Sanctioned posts Filled Vacant

1 Assistant Entomologist 44 43 01

2 CDC Officer 50 22 28

3 CDC Inspector 114 60 54

4 Senior Microscopists 36 20 16

5 Microscopists 253 141 112

6 Microscope repair technician 01 0 01

7 CDC Supervisor 2230 1661 569

8 Insect Collector 72 60 12

9 Lab Technician 68 57 11

TOTAL 2868 2064 804

There are 385 microscopy centers, 2650 RDT centers. There is a Provincial Reference Laboratory

located at Director General Office with only six microscopists out of which four are currently

working. The total sanctioned posts are 13. All MCP staff have been trained in their respective

fields:

• Microscopy Training: All staff trained at NIMRCT

• Case Management, vector control, Surveillance, MIS Tools: The master trainers were trained by the

Health Directorate while remaining were trained by the DHDC.

• Entomology studies including safe use of pesticides, vector control measures: The CDC Officer and

entomologists were trained in Health service Academy.

Staff have yet to receive orientation on the updated guidelines and training manuals developed at the

Federal level.

Sindh: Due to the non release of budget (2012-13) there have been no recent trainings conducted. The

trainings which have been conducted in the past include:

Page 66: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

66

• 6 week comprehensive training of Microscopists at National Malaria Research Training Institute

(NMIRT) Lahore,

• 2 days case management training at Malaria Directorate,

• 6 weeks Sr. Microscopist Master Trainings in Malaria Superintendent at NMIRT Lahore,

• 6 weeks training of Malaria Supervisors as Microscopists at NMIRT Lahore,

• 6 days refresher course in Malaria microscopy of Mal: Supervisors / Microsopists at provincial

laboratory,

• 1 day Training for master trainers in vector Control.

4.1.5 Strategic and annual planning Goal: To reduce malaria burden by 60% in 38 highly endemic districts.

Target Group/Beneficiaries: The target groups are the populations living in 38 high risk districts

attending the health care facilities.

Strategies and objectives: To reduce burden of malaria by 60% in 38 highly endemic districts of Pakistan,

this includes 19 districts of the Global Fund Round 7. The target population in these 38 high risk districts

is estimated to be 24.84 million.

The objectives are as follows:

Objective 1: To enhance access of population at risk to quality assured early diagnosis and prompt

treatment services;

Objective 2: To scale-up multiple prevention interventions especially LLINs and IRS so as to achieve

universal coverage in target population;

Objective 3: To enhance technical and management capacity of malaria control program

for improved planning, management and monitoring of malaria control interventions;

Objective 4: To improve health seeking behaviours and practices of target communities in

malaria endemic districts through enhanced community awareness and participation.

Planned Activities

• Strengthen existing diagnostic services in 19 districts,

• Establish RDT Centres at first level care facilities,

• Train laboratory supervisors on quality assurance in malaria diagnosis,

• Enhance the capacity of healthcare providers in proper malaria case management,

• Involve the private sector in the provision of diagnostic and curative services

according to national guidelines,

• Provision of mobile outreach malaria diagnostic and treatment services to severely

flood affected population in 5 districts,

• Prevention through universal coverage of LLINs in target districts,

• Selective IRS in epidemic prone areas,

Page 67: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

67

• Strengthen epidemiological surveillance,

• Conduct anti-malaria drug efficacy monitoring surveys at existing sentinel sites,

• Strengthen program management capacity (Supportive Environment),

• Conduct operations research studies for evidence based programming,

• Program monitoring and supervision,

• Review and finalization of national malaria BCC strategy,

• Develop and disseminate print and electronic media materials and messages,

• Advocacy and mobilization activities, and strengthen community based systems for malaria

behavior change communication.

4.1.6 Financing At the federal level there is a Directorate of malaria control under the administrative control of Ministry

of national Health Services, Regulation and coordination since 2013. The Programme has two types of

budget i.e. non-development budget that is for salaries of regular staff, maintenance etc and the

development budget for the developmental activities of the programme through PSDP. The source of

development budget is Planning Commission-1 (PC-I).

Table 11: Approved Development Budget of the Directorate of malaria control from 2008

to 2013

S.#

Service Delivery Area

2008-

2009-10

2010-

2011-12

2012-

Total

09

11

13

1. Early diagnosis and

30.81

18.22

16.40

14.76

13.38

93.575

prompt treatment

2. Multiple prevention 109.29 52.79 13.03 13.06 10.78 198.95

3. Malarial Epidemic

18.89

1.93

2.34

1.00

0.20

24.352

Preparedness

4. Institutional

40.99

36.84

38.23

35.78

38.24

190.079

Strengthening

5. Behavioral Changes

18.73

18.80

17.20

16.30

16.70

87.73

Communications (BCC)

6. Strengthening of NIMRT 14.98 11.98 12.27 11.92 12.79 63.94

Total 233.69 140.57 99.46 92.82 92.08 658.625

Table 12: DoMC Development budget from 2001-2013

Year

Phasing

PSDP allocation

Releases

Expenditure

as per PC-1

2001-02 146.665 146.00 146.00 97.514

2002-03 30.820 31.000 31.000 25.972

Page 68: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

68

2003-04 33.182 29.000 29.000 27.336

2004-05 29.509 34.000 34.000 27.199

2005-06 32.861 33.000 33.000 33.000

Total 273.037 273 273 211.021

2006-07 -

60.000

60.000

48.850

-

2007-08 -

100.00

5.00

4.7

-

Total 160.00 65 53.55

2008-09 233.69 100.00 30.0 14.966

2009-10 140.57 100.00 71.7 70.7

2010-11 99.46 100.00 31.5 30.5

2011-12 92.82 Nil Nil Nil

2012-13 92.08 Nil Nil

Total 658.62 300 133.2 116.166

There has been an exponential increase from 273 million Rupees in 2001-05 to 658 million Rupees in the

period in the overall development budget through public sector support. However in last 5 years the

allocations remain low and the releases were delayed. In addition to the public sector commitment the

programme has been successful in securing the donor commitment through increased funding to address

the gaps. The main source of funding is the Global Fund and to some extent WHO. To date the

programme has been successful in securing four TGF grants in R2, 3, 7, 10. The tables below shows the

resources and expenditures from Global Fund TGF 7 & SSF Round-10 Grants over last few years. The

expenditure is 96%. Expenditures have been limited due to late grant start. However, all these savings are

being disbursed in the following 9 months as a no-cost extension that GF has already agreed to. Figures

17 and 18 below show the trend of disbursements and expenditure for TGF Grant (2008-2011& 2011-

2013) over the years.

Directorate of Malaria Control

Table 13: Detail of year wise budget, expenses and disbursed by The Global Funds

Year

Amount in US $

Budget

Disbursement by TGF

Expenses

2008-09 6,799,913 6,444,371 5,276,547

Page 69: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

69

2009-10 6,086,769 3,926,190 4,557,906

2010-11 4,531,362 2,780,112 3,030,316

2011-12 10,895,424 12,216,049 8,595,845

2012-13 10,858,068 4,971,805 7,717,999

Total 39,171,536 30,338,527 29,178,613

Table 14: Entity wise Breakup of budget for Private Sector PR (Save the Children)

(September 2011-September 2013)

S.#

Entity name

Type

Budget

Expenditure

Amount in US$

1. Save the Children

PR 3,109,050

1,654,119

Federation Inc

2. ACD SR 920,736 564,821

3. ASD SR 350,598 153,959

4. MERLIN SR 1,178,693 711,290

5. NRSP SR 660,859 376,471

6. PLYC SR 247417 115,884

Total 6,467,353 3,576,544

Figures 17 and 18: TGF Grant (2008-2011& 2011-2013)

Page 70: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

70

Pakistan has two active Global Fund grants:

Grant numbers: PKS-M-DOMC; PKS-M-SC.

Duration: 01 September 2011 to 30 June 2014

LFA presence in the country: UNOPS is the LFA for Pakistan since 2009. It has a full-time team of

finance, procurement, public health and M&E specialists. Progress reports are verified on a semiannual

basis. There are two PRs in Pakistan: the Directorate of Malaria Control (Ministry of Health Services

Regulation and Coordination) and ‘Save the Children (INGO).

Balochistan: The SRs are the ‘National Rural Support Program’ (NGO) and ‘Merlin’ (INGO). The

Balochistan Rural Support Program is a SSR of the NRSP and responsible for the 17 high-risk districts in

Balochistan. The heads under each budget (non-development budget and development budget) are

designated by the Finance Department and re-appropriation between budget heads cannot be made

without permission of the Finance Department.

Table 15: Global Fund-PR/SR/SSR and their Districts in Balochistan.

PR SR SSR Sr.# Districts

SAVE

MERLIN - 1 Musakheil

2 Pishin

NRSP

- 1 Panjgoor

BRSP

1 Chaghi

2 Kharan

3 Washuk

DoMC MERLIN -

1 Zhob

2 Sherani

3 K.Saifulla

4 Loralai

5 Hernai

6 Sibi

7 Naseerabad

Page 71: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

71

8 Mastung

9 Noshki

NRSP - 1 Kech

2 Gawadar

FY Employee Related Expenditure Operating Expenditure

2011-12 Rs. 28,899,000 Rs.1,117,000

2012-13 Rs. 32,981,000 Rs. 1,271,700

2013-14 Rs.32,557,400 Rs. 1,585,200

Table 16: Non-Development Budget

Figure 19: Comparison of Non-development Budget Grant for MCP Balochistan.

Page 72: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

72

Table 17: Development Budget under the PC-1 for 2008-13.

Financial

Year

Net

Allocation

(PKR in

million)

Total

Released

during the FY

(PKR in

million)

Balance Not

Released

(PKR in

million)

Expenditure

out of

Release’

(PKR in

million)

Surrendered

un-utilized

(PKR in

million)

2008-2009 34.612 11.270 23.342 9.696 1.574

2009-2010 25.692 11.270 14.422 11.029 0.241

2010-2011 24.092 11.430 12.662 10.433 1.387

2011-2012 28.560 13.000 15.560 12.995 0.040

2012-2013 29.143 5.000 24.143 5.000 0

Grand Total 142.099 51.97

[37%]

90.129

[63%]

44.153

[95%]

3.242

[5%]

Page 73: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

73

Figure 20:Comparison Graph of Released/No-released Development Budget (PC-1) 2008-13.

FATA: The main sources of funding for malaria control activities are the IVM Budget and

GFATM. The IVM also acquires funding by applying to PC-1. The MCP drafts its annual plan and

budget PC-1 (based on the available resources with the government), before forwarding it to

Planning Section in Health Secretariat. The Additional Chief Secretary has the authority to approve

the budget up to Rs 200 million, Presidential approval is needed beyond this ceiling cost. The PC-

1of 2012 to 2015 documents Rs 152.452 being allocated to the integrated management program. A total

of Rs 16.207 has been reserved for expenses at Directorate Level while the remaining amount is

distributed among the tribal agencies. The reduced budget has undermined all efforts made in the past. In

the current budget no financial investment has been made in capacity building and the government does

not intend to conduct training till 2015.

KPK: Similar to FATA, the main sources of funding for malaria control activities are the

Provincial Budget and GFATM. The MCP seeks funding by following the ad-hoc criteria of

Planning Commission Document, PC-1 following the same protocol as for FATA, except after

approval by the Planning and Development Working Party; the PC-1 is submitted to the Finance

Ministry.

The PC-1of 2007-13 documents Rs 105.50 million was allocated for insecticide spraying, Rs 120.00

million for larviciding, Rs 5.25 million for fog Spraying and 19.50 million for ITN’s. Although the total

MCP

PC-1

Health Directorate

Planning Cell

Health Secretariat

Planning and Development

Department

PDWP Meeting

Additional Chief Secretary Health Secretariat/ Directorate

Administrative

Approval

MCP

PC-1

Health Secretariat

Planning Cell

Health Secretariat

Economist

Ministry of Planning and

Development

PDWP Meeting

Finance Department Health Secretariat/ Directorate

Administrative

Approval

Page 74: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

74

amount initially forecasted is different from the actual amount released and utilized as indicated in the

table below:

Table 17: List of Budget Allocation/Releases/Utilization of RBM PC-I (2007-12) & One Extension year

Year 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12

2012-13

Extension

year

Total

Allocations 90.222 64.873 63.611 55.991 55.256 55.256

Total

Releases 35.788 19.601 20.000 16.756 15.888 19.448

Total

Utilization 35.788 19.601 20.000 16.756 15.888 To be utilized

PSDP PC-1 (Budget 2012-2015): From the total of 90.000 million , Rs.8.025 million was utilized in the

financial year 2011-12 on purchase of goods, while the remaining Rs.81.975 million was allocated as

capital cost for this PC-I. The government informed the MCP to prepare the budget within the PSDP

share, although the present budget is not sufficient for malaria control activities. There is no money for

capacity building and government will not be conducting any training till 2015.

Table 18: Component Wise Budget Details of PSDP Rs. In Million

S.No

Main

Components

of Project

Total

Cost 2012-13 2013-14 2014- 15

1.

Early

Diagnosis and

Prompt

treatment

18.743 5.444 7.440 5.859

2. Multiple

Prevention 48.849 10.791 20.369 17.689

3. Institutionalization 10.508 Nil* 5.201 5.307

4. Monitoring, Evaluation

& Surveillance 3.875 0.275 1.800 1.800

Total 81.975 16.510 34.810 30.655

Punjab: Mechanism of MCP Funds Mobilization is through PC-1. Government Budget Allocation for

MCP covers the staff salaries. The Punjab government receives Rs 86 million each year as federal share

to be utilized for malaria control interventions. There is a special development assistance fund from the

health department: Rs 500 million each year out of which approximately 10% is reserved for malaria

control activities. The Program purchases drug and other consumables from this fund. The staff of

Page 75: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

75

malaria program has their salary component from a permanent source i.e. current budget and not

through adhoc PC-1’s. Previous Roll Back Malaria Control Program Punjab PC-1 for the year

2003-4 to 2006-7 was Rs 93.275 million and is summarised below:

Table 19: Component wise budget of Previous PC-1 RBM 2006-7

S. No Description Rs (in million)

1 Case Detection, Diagnosis and Treatment 33.270

2 Strengthening the trained facilities at Provincial HQ 0.740

3 Vector Control Measures 31.195

4 Monitoring, Supervision and Printing Materials 20.840

5 Contingencies 6.480

6 Research Activities 0.750

Total 93.275

The MCP has submitted another PC-1 amounting Rs 999.199 for the year 2011-12 to 2015-16. The

proposed PC-1 is awaiting approval.

Table 20: Component Wise Budget Details of Proposed PC-1 2011-16 Rs. In Million

Strategy Project Phasing Total

2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16

Early Diagnosis and

Prompt Treatment

97.019 97.323 88.629 89.330 90.156 462.456

Prevention &

Control

19.885 20.246 15.796 14.046 14.046 84.018

Health Education &

Communication

14.700 14.700 14.700 14.700 14.700 73.500

Surveillance &

Monitoring

131.574 46.524 46.524 46.524 46.524 317.672

Program

Management Unit

13.850 10.200 2.800 2.800 2.800 32.450

Page 76: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

76

Total 277.029 188.993 168.449 167.400 168.226 32.672

Price Contingencies 8.311 5.670 5.053 5.022 5.047 29.103

Grand Total 285.340 194.663 173.503 172.422 173.272 999.199

Sindh: Malaria Directorate received continuous funding from the Government of Sindh and Ministry of

Health Federal Government of Pakistan. From 2002 onwards Government of Sindh implemented RBM

activities through development budget and PC-1s were prepared and approved by the relevant authorities.

The allocated sum from the development budget is utilized by the public health sector but the private

health sector is overlooked despite providing care to 70% of the population except for the six districts

which receive GFATM assistance.

Public Sector Budget includes the current budget (non-development) and development budget.

a. Current Budget: The current budget mainly comprises of salary component (98%) and the

remainder is allocated for utilities and services. Till early 90s the operational cost of the program was

provided by donor agencies (USAID).

b. Development Budget: After discontinuation of foreign assistance in early 90s, the program was

supported federally but was inadequate to meet the requirements. The financing of operational cost of

the Malaria Control Program was initially from the provincial development budget in late 90s. It

included budget for purchases of Anti Malaria Drugs insecticides, bed net, equipment, training,

surveillance, social mobilization, health care research, monitoring and evaluation.

The development and non-development budget of past years is illustrated in the following tables with

their graphs.

Page 77: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

77

Table 21. Malaria Control Program Sindh - Current & Development Budget for 4 Years (Rs. In Millions)

S.No. Financial

Year

Budget Allocation Releases Expenditure

%

Utilization

Current Dev. Total Current Dev. Total Current Dev. Total

1 2009-10 30.7 93.7 124.4 26.6 70.2 96.8 24.4 69.9 94.2 97.4

2 2010-11 24.3 109.4 133.7 34.3 80.0 114.3 32.3 80.0 112.3 98.2

3 2011-12 31.2 130.0 161.2 22.1 130.0 152.1 20.7 128.7 149.3 98.2

4 2012-13 35.8 105.0 140.8 26.1 105.0 131.1 22.6 104.8 127.4 97.1

Page 78: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

78

Table 22. Malaria Control Program Sindh - Current Budget (Rs. In Millions)

Sr.No. Financial

Year Allocation Releases Expenditure

%

utilization

on BE

%

utilization

on RE

1 2009-10 30.747 26.574 24.393 79.33 91.79

2 2010-11 34.262 34.262 32.297 94.26 94.26

3 2011-12 31.191 22.079 20.650 66.20 93.53

4 2012-13 35.822 26.146 22.573 63.01 86.33

Table 23. Malaria Control Program Sindh - Development Budget (Rs. In Millions)

Sr.No. Financial

Year Allocation Releases Expenditure

%

utilization

on

Allocation

% utilization

on Releases

1 2007-08 52.512 49.092 48.766 92.87 99.34

2 2008-09 54.092 48.900 48.800 90.22 99.80

3 2009-10 93.686 70.200 69.856 74.56 99.51

4 2010-11 109.360 80.000 79.957 73.11 99.95

5 2011-12 130.000 130.000 128.650 98.96 98.96

6 2012-13 105.000 105.000 104.834 99.84 99.84

Page 79: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

79

Page 80: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

80

Table 24. Malaria Control Program Sindh Intervention/Component wise Allocations in PC-I

(2009-2012)

Rs. In millions

Sr.# Intervention Allocation

A Early Diagnosis & Rapid Treatment (ED&RT)

I Lab. Equipment & consumables 24.896

ii Anti-Malaria Drugs 53.540

Sub-Total 78.436

B Multiple Prevention

I Spraying 93.950

ii Fumigation 20.010

iii Larviciding 83.668

Sub-Total 197.628

C Surveillance & Monitoring 8.115

D Capacity Building-Training 8.901

E Transport & office Equipment 6.660

F Advocacy & Social mobilization 29.160

G Research 6.310

H Gen. Misc. 2.100

I Third party Monitoring 3.000

J Operational support 2.307

G.Total 342.617

A Early Diagnosis & Rapid Treatment (ED&RT) 78.436

B Multiple Prevention 197.628

C Surveillance & Monitoring 8.115

D Capacity Building-Training 8.901

E Transport & office Equipment 6.660

F Advocacy & Social mobilization 29.160

G Research 6.310

H Gen. Misc. 2.100

I Third party Monitoring 3.000

J Operational support 2.307

G.Total 342.617

Page 81: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

81

Figure 21: PC-1 2009-2012

Page 82: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

82

Table 25. Malaria Control Program Sindh Intervention/Component wise Allocations in PC-I (2012-2015)

Rs. In millions

Sr.# Intervention Allocation

A Early Diagnosis & Rapid Treatment (ED&RT)

I Lab. Equipment & consumables 35.528

ii Anti-Malaria Drugs 80.772

Sub-Total 116.300

B Multiple Prevention

I Spraying 111.500

ii Fumigation 24.050

iii Larviciding 179.560

Sub-Total 315.110

C Surveillance & Monitoring 7.852

D Capacity Building-Training 9.100

E Transport & office Equipment 5.920

F Advocacy & Social mobilization 26.000

G Research 2.080

H Gen. Misc. 2.950

I Third party Monitoring 3.903

J Operational support 1.190

G.Total 490.405

A Early Diagnosis & Rapid Treatment (ED&RT) 116.300

B Multiple Prevention 315.110

C Surveillance & Monitoring 7.852

D Capacity Building-Training 9.100

E Transport & office Equipment 5.920

F Advocacy & Social mobilization 26.000

G Research 2.080

H Gen. Misc. 2.950

I Third party Monitoring 3.903

J Operational support 1.190

Page 83: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

83

Figure 22: PC-1 2012-2015 G.Total 490.405

Page 84: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

84

4.1.7 Strengths and Weaknesses /federal

Policy & Guidance

Strengths Weakness

• Focus on Integrated vector control-Malaria –

Dengue-Leishmania

• Devolution of health from federal to

provinces

• Province demanding to take leadership role

in post-devolved scenario in health

• Health is more of priority with increasing

health funding in 2013

• Provincial funding PC1-2013-2015

• Potential district funding from district local

government

• Malaria included in Health policy of 2001

• Most malaria policies in malaria strategic

plan 2011-2015 and in malaria guidelines

• Different malaria guidelines in place

• Case management; Vector control (Malaria,

Dengue, General vectors);BBC training

manual; QA guidelines for malaria

microscopy ; IRS: District level decision

making; QA protocols and tools for

IRS/insecticides management; LLINs

distribution strategy in place

• Wall charts on Diagnosis and treatment and

microscopy

• Malaria strategic objectives; Early Diagnosis

& Prompt Treatment; Multiple Prevention

(IRS, LLINs,;Epidemic Preparedness; Health

Promotion campaign ;Partnership Building;

• Malaria is low priority with MDG 6

• Roll Back Malaria now IVM with Dengue

and Leishmania with increased work load

using the same staff and funding

resources

• Lack of clarity of roles and

responsibilities of different levels of the

health system

• Malaria not included in draft health policy

of 2009 and in Vision2025

• Lack of simple and comprehensive

federal malaria policy document

• Lack of federal malaria manual for

malaria control/elimination Inadequate

security for service delivery, supervision

and M&E

Page 85: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

85

Operational Research

Planning and Reporting

Strengths Weakness

• Malaria five year strategic plan-PC1

2008/2009 to 2012/2013

• Federal and provincial malaria strategic plan

2005-2010

• Malaria strategic framework 2011-2015 in

place to support GF

• Annual malaria operational plan (July/June)

• Malaria domestic financing under

development fund and non-development

funding

• Malaria international financing with

GF.Rd.10 support for 19+19 high

transmission districts.

• USAID support under flood emergency 2011

Annual malaria disease surveillance reports and

annual malaria report as part of MOH year book

• Inadequate alignment between goals,

objectives and strategies in MOH five

year plan and Malaria strategic

framework (2011-2015)

• Lack of comprehensive (evidence-

informed) strategic planning based on full

need and demand

• Domestic funding-PC1 serious gap

between approved and releases and

expenditure

• No joint strategic and annual planning

with provinces and districts and malaria

partners

• Multiple parallel systems for malaria

service delivery

• GF only sole international funder with the

PRS and SRS main partners

• No partnership mapping and partnership

meetings.

Governance & Partnership

Strengths Weakness

Page 86: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

86

• Malaria Inter-provincial coordinating

committee (IPCC)

• Technical Advisory Committee on malaria

(TACOM)

• Vector control working group

• Partnership with GF, SCF, Merlin, ACD,

ASD and this energy to the DOMC, province

and DHO

• Partnership with Pakistan Medical Research

Council

• Partnership with Health service academy

• Annual malaria report a section of the MOH

Year book

• Oversight and coordinating committees

have not been meeting since 2008

• Link between DOMC and national health

institute is not clear

• Duplicating roles and responsibilities of

implementing partners

• No table of partners and roles and

responsibilities

• No quarterly meeting with partners

• Last quarterly inter-provincial

coordinating meetings – last was in 2008

• Last meeting of the TACOM was in

• Lack of thematic area working groups

under TACOM

• Lack of a feedback system with

accountability through simple reporting

Organizational Structure & Stewardship

Strengths Weakness

• DOMC and PMCP structure

• GF-DOMC-PMU structure

• Strong SCF-Malaria structure

• Strong ACD-Malaria structure

• Strong Merlin-Malaria structure

• Provincial malaria structure (PMCP) but

different levels and capacity

• Monthly district meetings of SRS and DHO

• Quarterly provincial meetings of PHO-PRS

and SRS

• Cross- border is seen as important but last

meetings held in 2009

• Data base on training with SCF

• Weak health system and general staff

working time limited and low motivation

• Insecurity and instability affecting

acceleration and intensification activities

• Many posts vacant and Issue of many

staff reaching retirement.

• Private sector provides health services to

70% of the public

• No uniform minimum malaria structure at

provincial level

• Fragmented and duplicating malaria

structures and lack of coordination

between DOMC-PMCP and malaria

partners

Page 87: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

87

• Infrastructure and logistics

• Strong PPHI structure for BHU-PHC

delivery

• District malaria service delivery structure

• New malaria staff development within -

multi-purpose technicians

• SR-Supervision check list, PPHI check list

• Training in vector control, case management,

microscopist and MIS- Data base for training

• Structures in place but not fully functional

• DOMC no case management diagnosis

cell

• DOMC no Epidemic-Emergency cell

• Inadequate provincial and district

epidemiologist, entomologist and case

management coordinators.

• Lack of a district malaria coordinator in

all districts to lead and manage all

thematic areas.

• Majority of approved malaria posts vacant

and not filled or will be abolished

following retirement of existing staff

• No follow up of cross- border malaria

control at provincial and district level

• No national malaria master training center

• No annual cascade of malaria training

before the annual malaria season

• No human resource and development plan

and comprehensive malaria training

course

• No border meetings , sharing of

information and joint operations and at

district and provincial level Pak-

Afghanistan & Pak- Iran

4.1.8 Successes, best practices and facilitating factors

Malaria provincial and federal financing was initiated under Roll Back Malaria initiative though

the provincial and federal planning system till 2012/2013 and new cycles are being initiated as part

of the integrated vector disease control management. Plans are underway to increase health and

malaria financing in 2013 in all provinces. The Federal Malaria strategic framework 2011-2015

has been developed to support the transition of provincial and federal PC1 2013-2018 plans.

Different components of malaria control policies have been integrated with the strategic and PC -1

Page 88: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

88

plans and federal guidelines although they are generally in line with WHO recommended policies.

Malaria control activities are being successfully piloted in some union councils with, supply of

commodities, capacity building and M&E in 38 high malaria burden districts supported by Global

Fund and contracting malaria partners.

4.1.9 Problems and challenges

• However there are serious delays and gaps between funds allocated, released and actual

expenditure.

• International financing is mainly though Global Fund and the contracted local malaria

partners.

• Malaria control is not seen as a priority by policy makers and politicians at the district,

provincial and federal levels with more implementation efforts being placed on the

millennium development goals 4 and 5 as well as many other competing health priorities

such as dengue, expanded programme for immunization, polio, hepatitis, emergencies

and health reform.

• There is inadequate sharing of information and coordination and alignment between the

district, provincial and federal malaria control programs with overall lack of clarity with

regards to their roles and responsibilities.

• The annual malaria operational plans are only used in Global Fund supported districts and

partially in others and not holistically within the overall district and provincial malaria

programs.

• Malaria control program is not oriented towards supply based on output including need

and demand based on access, equity and coverage towards rapidly achieving and

sustaining universal access and coverage.

• There is a fragmented district, provincial and federal public health system which is unable

to provide adequate support to the devolution transition, emergency, health reform and is

overshadowed by a dominant private sector.

• The formal and informal private sector (approximately 70%) provides a large part of the

fever/malaria control services especially in urban areas and in some rural areas.

• Federal cross- border meetings (Pakistan-Iran- Afghanistan) have been held with

inadequate practical follow up in border districts and provinces.

• There is poor partnership between malaria program with provincial and federal

universities and health institutes to support operational research and training on malaria

control and elimination.

• The unstable political and security situation in some districts and provinces has created

challenges for access and M&E of the malaria program but also presents opportunity for

developing a malaria emergency support.

• Some provincial malaria managers/ coordinators do not have sufficient experience making

it difficult to support district health coordinators such as EDOS/DHO.

Page 89: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

89

• There is a lack of functioning district malaria focal points/coordinators to comprehensively

follow up implementation in all malaria thematic areas.

• There are lack of malaria epidemiologists, entomologists, case management coordinators

at federal and provincial levels of the program and malaria supervisors/technicians and

malaria microscopists at district and BHU levels.

• There are multiple malaria control activities being implemented at all levels of the health

system, resulting in a desynchronized malaria control program at the district, provincial

and federal level that fails to achieve systematic coverage and impact that can be

sustained.

• District malaria focal points/coordinators have not been assigned to follow up

implementation in all malaria thematic areas.

• There is a functional MCP with staff and equipment at the provincial and district

levels in Balochistan. However, the province lacks a comprehensive malaria policy

and guidelines (some need updating).

• The National Policy, guidelines and training manuals are rigorously followed in

Balochistan districts funded by GF but not in non GF districts due to limited funding

(PC-1) and insufficient human resources.

• There is need to reinforce the capacities at provincial and district levels in

Balochistan if the program is to cope with the prevalent partnership environment.

• The quality control and impact of malaria control activities across Balochistan must be

maintained through resource mobilization, training, supervision and monitoring as

well as periodic reviews and evaluations.

• Delay in release of budget at provincial level for Balochistan.

• The basic structure particularly the field deployment of malaria staff has been more

or less same since 1960s eradication era - Balochistan.

• The malaria control staff work under control of DHOs and have no coordination with

the Provincial Program - Balochistan.

• Despite the Program in FATA changing its role to integrated vector management - its

organizational structure is not aligned with its present role.

• The frequent changeover of the management is a concern (FATA).

• Security situation and difficult terrain makes implementation very difficult (FATA).

• All the tribal agencies and Frontier Regions are supported by the Global Fund

(FATA).

• The coordination between implementing partners and IVM needs to be strengthened

(FATA).

Page 90: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

90

• The PC-1 of IVM does not address all issues and needs to be revised (FATA).

• There are no guidelines or training manuals available at the provincial level.

(Punjab).

• All staff are busy controlling the dengue epidemic and polio eradication (Punjab).

• There is no budget for control activities (Punjab).

• The service structure for malaria is not well defined (Punjab).

• There is no logistical support for supervision and there is an overall lack of political

commitment (Punjab).

• Malaria Control policy and strategic plan for Sindh is not available.

• There is no Malaria Control Program structure available, at divisional level (Sindh).

• Trained epidemiologist is not posted at Provincial Malaria Directorate (the post is

occupied by senior medical officer) (Sindh).

• Malaria diagnostic and treatment facilities are not available at all public sector health

facilities and private sector is not covered (Sindh).

• There is political commitment at the provincial level for Malaria Control (needs to be

improved at the community level), but allocation of resources is not adequate (Sindh).

• Steering and technical committees meetings are not held regularly (Sindh).

• There is no regular training program for capacity development of staff at provincial and

district level (Sindh).

• There is inadequate office space, equipment and vehicles (Sindh).

4.1.10 Conclusions and recommendations

1. Development of a new joint provincial and federal vision for malaria control and

elimination in Pakistan supported by one simple and comprehensive malaria and

Integrated Vector Borne Disease (IVBD) policy document.

2. Need to accelerate and intensify towards greater than 80% universal coverage by 2015

in Global Fund supported districts (38) and rapidly introduce the new malaria policies

and interventions in the remaining 15 high transmission districts.

3. Establish functioning malaria and integrated Vector Borne Disease partnership

mechanism between the District Malaria Control Programme (DMCP), Provincial

Malaria Control Programme (PMCP) and Federal Malaria Control Programme

(FMCP) and other programs such as, Primary HealthCare and Lady Health worker

program, District Health Information system, DEWES, MNCH etc

4. To develop a special community based malaria and integrated Vector Borne Disease

control strategy for accessing hard to reach populations (Remote areas, emergency

situations, IDPS, Nomads) in selected districts and provinces.

5. To develop a special strategy for public-private partnership for malaria and integrated

Vector Borne Disease control with private medical care provider and also private

retailers and producers of combination drugs, Rapid Diagnostic Tests (RDT), Long

lasting Insecticidal Nets (LLIN) , Indoor Residual Spraying (IRS) and Larval Source

Management (LSM) chemicals and hand compression pumps to ensure standards of

quality and local production at affordable costs in provinces which involves a

Page 91: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

91

combination of information sharing ,training of health worker and information to

public, legislation, regulation and enforcement.

6. The malaria federal Inter-provincial coordinating committee (IPCC) and Technical

Advisory Committee on malaria (TACOM) and the technical various working groups

be revived with updated TOR on malaria and IVBD and be supported by provincial

coordinating committees.

7. Joint annual operational /implementation malaria and IVBD planning started from

2014 at district, provincial and federal with the active involvement and contribution of

all malaria partners and stakeholders

8. Joint monthly, quarterly and annual malaria and IVBD program performance reporting

at district, provincial and federal level based on a uniform performance framework of

input, outputs, outcome and impact towards sustained universal access and coverage.

9. Updating of provincial and federal malaria and IVBD strategic plans by end of April

2015 aligned to health strategic plans and PHC and MHSP based on need and demand

for acceleration and intensification towards universal malaria intervention coverage by

2015 and post MDG

10. Update the current status of approved and vacant malaria human resources at all levels

based on set minimum standards followed by a malaria human resource development

plan

11. Development of a comprehensive malaria manual supported by simple wall charts in

local provincial languages

12. To establish systematic cross-border collaboration between Pakistan-Iran in

Baluchistan provinces and Pakistan- Afghanistan in KPK province

13. To develop a special strategy for malaria control in emergency districts and provinces

14. To develop a strategy which builds a partnership between the malaria programme

and private medical care provider including private retailers and producers of

combination drugs, RDT, LLIN , IRS &LSM chemical and hand compression pumps

to ensure standards of quality and local production at affordable costs

15. MCP to adopt an operational research agenda in collaboration with PMRC and

MEDVC/HSA

16. MCP to work closely with VBD in order to develop a comprehensive model of

collaboration

17. WHO/NPOs to be posted in provincial MCP and trained in GIS and malaria

control/elimination

4.2 Procurement and supply chain management

4.2.1 Policy

The Procurement and supply management section of the Programme Management Unit of the

Directorate of Malaria Control has recently developed a detailed PSM Plan and SOPs for the

period 2011-14, Quality Assurance and Quality Control Plan as well as SOPs on good storage

practices, The guidelines are comprehensive and address areas of quantification, procurement,

distribution, storage and quality assurance. The Directorate of Malaria Control has not

procured major commodities since devolution in 2011. The procurements carried out at the

Page 92: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

92

federal level have been done by the Principal Recipient (DOMC) through TGF support. The

specifications and quantities of these products are finalized by the PR and intimated to the VPP

according to the planned timelines. The specifications of antimalaria drugs including ACTs,

LLINs, equipment and supplies generally follow the WHO specifications. Once the specifications

are developed these are shared with the Technical Working Group of the DoMC and all partners for

advice and endorsement.

4.2.2 Guidelines

Balochistan: National malaria commodities management guidelines are under process for

finalisation.

FATA and Punjab: There are no training modules for management of medicines and other

health products.

KPK: There is no plan or strategy guideline to guide the program on emergency supply in

case of stock outs. The program is dependant on partners in cases of emergencies. There are

no training modules for management of medicines and other health products.

Sindh: Government of Sindh has established a Sindh Public Procurement Regulatory Authority

(SPPRA) and adopted the procurement rules of National Public Procurement Regulatory Authority

(NPPRA) of Federal Government of Pakistan. The SPPRA public procurement guidelines outline

the procurement of different services, goods and consultancies. All public sector procurement is

made according to SPPRA rules and guidelines. All procurement of Malaria Control Program

including drugs, equipment, vehicles, insecticides, bed nets and services of seasonal labour is done

in accordance with SPPRA rules. All procurement tenders of Malaria Control Program are

advertised through national news papers and placed on SPPRA website. SPPRA monitors all steps

of procurement process and retains copies of important procurement documents.

4.2.3 Registration of products

4.2.4 Specifications

Antimalarials

As per revised case management protocol of the Directorate of Malaria Control Pakistan the

current treatment policy Artesunate + Sulphadoxine-Pyrimethamine is the 1st line treatment for

uncomplicated falciparum malaria and Artemether + Lumifantrine (ALU) is the second line drug

and for the treatment of mixed infections. For the treatment of severe malaria the first line

treatment is Inj. Artesunate 60 mg.IV/IM.

Table 26: Features Specifications of Artesunate plus Sulfadoxine-Pyrimethamine combination in co-

blister pack:

Page 93: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

93

Active ingredients Artesunate 100 and 50 mgs per tablet (for adult and children use

respectively) 6 tablets in blister

Sulfadoxine/Pyrimethamine 500mg/25mg white tablets packed in

plastic blister packs, in pack 3 and 2 Sulfadoxine/ Pyrimethamine

tablets. Blister pack should be marked with different colors based

on their dosage schedule. Manufacturing source: WHO prequalified

GMP certified manufacturers

Shelf life Two years.

Labeling and packaging The contents of prepackaged courses of treatment must include in accordance with GMP

specs Labeling of primary pack (blister pack)

• Minimum requirements for labeling of the primary pack

(regulatory):

• Name of the product; - international nonproprietary name

(INN) and the strength of the active ingredient;

• Dose instructions;

• Batch number and expiry date; the expiry date of the

combination pack should be defined as the earliest expiry date of any of the active components in the product.

• The manufacturer’s identification.

Package insert (regulatory) • The present regulatory minimum specification requires that

there should be a package insert for prescribers.

• The minimum requirements for regulatory approval of the

package insert are:

o The INN of each active ingredient;

o indications of the product;

o the name and address of the manufacturer (9).

o Information, education and communication materials for prepackaged anti-malarial medicines

General considerations: Information (what end-users should • Malaria is a curable disease.

know when taking anti- • The earlier you treat it with the right medicine the better. -

malarial medicines) Completing the whole course of treatment is important. - If you do not complete the treatment, the malaria is not cured. -

People need to use the right dosage for their age and weight.

• If you become sicker during or after completion of the treatment, see a trained health worker.

• If the child vomits, give the unit dose to replace the one which is lost.

Concepts • Malaria is caused by a parasite

Page 94: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

94

• The longer the parasite is in the body, the more chance there is that it can kill.

• The full treatment is needed to kill all the parasites; if the

treatment is not completed, malaria will come back.

• Bigger and older children require higher dosage levels.

• Other diseases may coexist with malaria, or the parasite may be

resistant to the medicine.

Instructions:

• All the instructions on Primary and Secondary pack should be in Urdu.

• The language in Primary Insert will be English

Page 95: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

95

Table 27 Rapid Diagnostic Tests (RDTs): Technical Specification Of Malaria Multispecies

Rapid Diagnostic Tests (RDTs)

1. Description A Rapid Diagnostic Test (RDT) Device utilizing whole blood for the detection of malarial species in whole blood samples.

2. Technical Sample type: whole blood

Specification Shelf life: 24 months or more from date of manufacture. Guaranteed

minimum remaining shelf life at time of delivery is 80%

Temperature requirement for storage: + 4 0 to + 30 0 C or higher

(storage at higher temperature will be preference)

Parasites: the test must identify at least P.falciparum and PAN

High sensitivity and specificity (panel detection rate) (see the

table1below)

Results being ready within 20 minutes or less

3. Kit components and Each test pack should include the following elements for testing: packaging: 1. A laminated foil pouch that contains;

• Test device that contains a cassette

• Desiccant

2. An accessory pack that contains;

• An alcohol swab

• A lancet

• A metered pipette (marked at 5μl)

• A developer solution vial

• An instruction for use.

• All of these components should be individually packed. 3. All the above individual pack should be in a kit box of 25 or above.

4. Instruction for use: Instructions for use are included with the test kit. The test procedure should be simple to use and easy to read the results. Test procedure consist ;: 1 Collection of whole blood 2 Addition of the collected blood into test device 3 Addition of clearing solution into test device 4 Interpretation of test results

5 Performance proof: 1 Certificate of Good Manufacturing Practice (ISO 13485:2003 or equivalent)

2 Fulfill the following WHOFIND Malaria Rapid Diagnostic Test

Page 96: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

96

Performance Round 3 Reports as in the following Table:

Performance requirement: should be 80% or higher for Sensitivity( panel detection rate ) both for panels P.falciparum, cultured

200 parasites /μl

2000parasites/μl

Sensitivity ( panel detection rate should be 80% or higher for ) for P.falciparum, wild types both 200 parasites /μl panels 2000parasites/μl

Sensitivity ( panel detection rate Should ) for PAN infection be 75% or higher for both 200 parasites /μl panels 2000parasites/μl

Overall false positives Should be 5% or less in all

criteria

Heat Stability Testing Should demonstrate 2 month stability in all criteria LONG LASTING INSECTICIDE IMPREGNATED NETS (LLINs)

The preference has been for LLINS approved by WHOPES with dernier fiber above The LLINs specifications are as given below:

Table 28: Specifications for LLINs

Odor Odorless

Colour Green

Shape Rectangular

Size Double size with 160 cm width, 150 cm

height and 180 cm length

Active Ingredient Permethrin

Impregnation Technology Treated with Permethrin, incorporated

into the polyethylene fibers during the

manufacturing process

Standard: “WHO/WHOPES full recommendation

Duration of Insecticide

Efficacy from first use 5 Years (minimum)

Yarn 100-150 Denier

Mesh Size(holes/sq inch) 56 (minimum)

Packing 100/bale, packed in polythene bags,

having all the markings and instructions

for use bearing the tag of “Free

Page 97: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

97

distribution by Directorate of Malaria

Control Ministry of Inter Provincial

Coordination in collaboration with Provincial Malaria

Control Programs” Not For sale” Sample bag is attached IRS Insecticides and Pumps The selection criteria for insecticides include baseline entomologic and vector

susceptibility to insecticide studies as well as WHO standards. The main groups of

insecticides used are: pyrethroids. The DOMC recommend Hudson X-Pert pumps for IRS.

The Hudson based pumps have been procured only through SSF round-10 for 38 districts.

However, the pumps purchased from PSDP allocation are locally manufactured but of

good quality.

Table 29: Specifications for Insecticide Spraying Pumps Max filing Capacity 10 L. Light weight: >2 kg (net). High Chemical Resistant polypropylene tank with contents indicator.

Translucent tank offer visible indication of filling level Pressure regulator set at 1.5 bar- 21 psi - to achieve the larger than 200 microns median

droplet size required for residual spraying of surfaces and treating other areas with

larvicidal according to the W.H.O. Specification Guidelines Set of nozzles included with the equipment:

• 2 x Even Fan nozzle (FE 80/0.8/3) – assembled on elbow + one extra included for I.R.S.

• 1 x Even Fan nozzle (FE 80/1.2/3) – included for I.R.S.

• 1 x Hollow cone nozzle (HC 80/0.2/3) – included for larviciding.

Directional lance with 50 cm. tube. Dual filters located at the nozzle and handle (to minimize blockage).

Safety Valve with green & red color indicator (red: max pressure) High Chemical resistant hose (1.55 m) with modular screw-on nuts system (clampless) to ensure safety and durability. . Fitted with high chemical resistant “viton” seals & washers.

Lance fastener – for easy handling. Hose winder – to minimize entanglement Adjustable straps with shoulder pads, with option to adjust to double-strap system for carrying as back-pack for better comfort.

Page 98: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

98

TECHNICAL IK-12-VC

SPECIFICATION Components

Net Weight 1.6 kg

Tank Heavy Duty Polypropylene,100% Leak Proof (3 year warranty on

tank)

Lance Fiber Glass (Light weight and more durable)

Nozzles Polyacetal Highly resistant to chemical wear and tear

Pressure Control offering

Regulator 3 possible positions:

1.5-Bar/ 3-Bar / free Flow

Hose Bi-component Hose with internal protection - Totally Chemical

Resistant

Pressure Chamber Polypropylene Chamber

Insecticides For Indoor residual spraying DOMC recommend synthetic pyrethroids.

Currently Deltamethrin WP is in use. Only WHOPES approved insecticides to be

used. The specifications are as follows:

Table 30: Specifications for Deltamethrin Wettable Powder

1 Description The material shall consist of a homogeneous mixture of technical

deltamethrin, complying with the requirements of WHO

specification 333/TC (April 2005), together with filler(s) and any

other necessary formulants. It shall be in the form of a fine powder

free from visible extraneous matter and hard lumps.

2 Active 2.1 Identity tests (333/WP/M/2, CIPAC Handbook L, p.45, 2006)

ingredient The active ingredient shall comply with an identity test and, where

the identity remains in doubt, shall comply with at least one

additional test.

Deltamethrin content (333/WP/M/3, CIPAC Handbook L, p.45,

2006)

The deltamethrin content shall be declared (g/kg) and, when

determined, the average measured content shall not differ from

that declared by more than the following tolerances: Declared

content, g/kg

Tolerance

Page 99: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

99

up to 25 ± 25% of the declared content

above 25 up to 100 ± 10% of the declared content

Specifications for Microscopes

Binocular Microscope Universal Infinity System

Optical System

Illumination system Built-in transmitted illumination system. 6V20W (Helogen bulb).

240 V 60Hz universal voltage.

Focusing Stage height movement , fine focus graduation : 2.5 um

Eyepiece: Field Number (F.N): 18 (antifungal)

Objective: Plan Achromatic Objectives (anti fungus). 4X, 10X, 40X and 100X

oil

Mechanical stage: Wire movement mechanical fixed stage 120 X 153 mm ,

traveling range : 80x 30 mm

Movement range: 80mm x 50mm

Observation Tube 30 inclined binocular tube interpupillary distance adjustment

range 45-80 mm

Measuring unit Compatible with microscope

Condenser ABBE Type with aperture iris diaphragm N. A. 1.25

4.2.5 Quantifications

A quantification exercise for antimalarials, RDTS, LLINs, IRS, health equipment (microscopes and

spray pumps) was carried out in 2010 as part of the Procurement and Supply Management Plan for the

SSF-10 grant. The DOMC forecast the requirements of antimalarial drugs, RDTs and

Microscopes/reagents at the time of developing PC-I. A five year forecasting is generally done and

quantification is based on the previous year API .The commodities are procured through PSDP

allocation.

Quantification of Animalarial Drugs : The quantification of anti-malarial Drugs (AMD) including

ACTs was calculated for target population of 300,000. The basis of this forecast was the 2009

surveillance data on malaria cases in the target 38 districts. Total number of reported malaria cases was

approximatley120,000. The data was not representative of vivax cases because R-7 interventions were

mainly falciparum specific. Considering the high endemicity of the 38 target districts, the relative

proportion of falciparum and vivax malaria cases was taken as 40% and 60% respectively

(Malariometric Survey in Target Districts-SoSec 2009). Based on this assumption the estimated total

number of malaria cases (both vivax Falciparum) in target 38 districts was taken as 300,000 per year

and the antimalarial drugs were forecasted, accordingly.

Quantification for LLINs: The forecast for LLINs and IRS was calculated for target population of

50% of 65% total rural population (i.e. 16.146 Million). The population to be covered under LLINs

is forecasted to be 855 and IRS 15% was also taken into account.

Page 100: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

100

Balochistan: There are two separate methods utilized, while for emergencies the estimates are made

differently. These methods are:

o For the procurements made using the regular Non-Development Budget, the

estimates are directly related to the amount of money available, against which the

demands and assessed needs for the districts are weighted and the size of the

procurement is decided.

o For the procurements made using the Development Budget, the quantities to be

procured for each period, which usually is one financial year, are already decided in

the respective PC-1. The actual quantities to be procured are made according to the

size of the grant specified for the respective procurement that is released.

For emergency situations, the size of procurement is directly dependent upon the size of population

and area where services are to be provided.

• The quantification estimates for item wise procurement during the PC-1 period ending in

June 2013 were:

o Formula to quantify Insecticides adopted for the Provincial PC-1

Total Union Councils 492

Total Houses in each UC 2000

30% (n=150) UCs in high risk districts which fall beyond 2 Standard

Deviations of the Mean of the Annual Parasites Incidence (API) and Annual

Falciparum Incidence (AFI).

According to National Vector Control Guidelines (on WHO criteria) such

UCs will be covered (80% of the households) with IRS.

On the basis of 1998 census there are 3 rooms per household and size of

each room is 40 sqm. Assuming there are 2000 household (6000 rooms) in

each union council and 1600 household (80%) in one UC will be sprayed.

The area to be sprayed will be 120 sqm areas per HH, using 0.025 g of 5%

strength insecticide per sqm i.e. 0.5gms of 100% strength per sq meter and

60 gms per house hold. Using these assumptions the annual consumption of

insecticide for 1600 households per union council = 96 Kg.

o Spray Pumps

• Normally, 4 pumps per union council will be needed for the application of

insecticides.

o Protective Clothing for Spray men

• The quantification for protective cloths includes:

Page 101: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

101

• Helmet

• Goggles

• Mask

• Uniform

• Long shoes

• Gloves (for spray men and mixer)

• Four sets of spraying cloths will be provided to 300 UCs.

o Larviciding

• Granules Fenthion 2G for use in urban areas where mostly water is

organically and chemically polluted.

- 7.5 kg of larvicide of strength 2% is required for 10,000 sqm.

- It is estimated the total area of a UC where water treatment with

larvicide will be needed on an average is 40,000 sqm.

- 30 Kg of fenthion is required for each cycle.

- For proper larval control there will be 4 cycles each year.

- Therefore total larvicides required are 120 Kg / UC.

• Liquid Temephos (500E) for use in rural areas.

• 1.5 litres of Temephos with the strength of 500E is enough for 1

UC for each cycle and there will be 4 cycles (6 litres) in each year.

• Fogging Machines for Space Spraying

- Fog machines - 6 vehicle mounted fog machines and 20 hand

carrying fog machines can effectively cover the epidemic prone

districts.

• Spray men

- A total of 150 Spray men for provincial headquarters and high-risk

districts under the MCP (other than GF supported districts).

- Hired on daily wage / contingent basis, working @ 25 days/month

for 3 months.

• Long Lasting Insecticide Treated Nets (LLINs)

Page 102: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

102

- The principal beneficiaries of LLINs will be pregnant women and

children < 5 years age of the population of high risk districts of the

province which is 3.52 million.

- 1 net is recommended for 3-4 persons (mother along with 2

children <5 years age).

KPK: For routine LLIN distribution through the ANC care visit, 5% of the population was

estimated to be pregnant yearly and one LLIN would be distributed to each pregnant woman

at the time of their first ANC visit. Over 84% of pregnant women access the health care system

during their pregnancy. The GF while planning quantities for insecticides takes into account

the following variables: type of insecticides to be used, weight per sachet, total area in square

meters (m²) to be sprayed and existing stock at provincial level.

Punjab: The Program has limited funds for LLINs and has no policy to distribute LLINs. The

MCP purchases insecticides based on availability of funds and the case load.

4.2.6 Procurement, storage and distribution

National procurement is done on a annual basis. The procurement follows PPRA rules 2004. The

procurement of amounts exceeding Rs 100,000 tender need to be uploaded on a PPRA website, while

procurements above 2 million are uploaded and an advertisement is also needed to be given in the

three national newspapers (both English and Urdu). Once the tenders are received these are

scrutinized and the comparative statement is prepared. There is a purchase committee that opens the

tender and finalizes the procurement. An evaluation committee does the technical evaluation.

Once the evaluation is completed, the bidding parties are invited and the financial statements are

opened in front of all bidders. A comparative statement is prepared and the lowest bidder offering is

selected. The commodities purchased are sent to the provinces hiring private transport. Directorate of

Malaria Control Programme procures the items following the government procurement

rules S.R.O. 432(I)/2004, section 26 of the Public Procurement Regulatory Authority Ordinance,

2002 (XXII of 2002).

Procurements over one hundred thousand rupees and up to the limit of two million rupees are

advertised on the Authority’s website in the manner and format specified by regulation by the

Authority. These procurement opportunities may also be advertised in print media, if deemed

necessary. All procurement opportunities over two million rupees are advertised on the

Authority’s website as well as in other print media or newspapers having wide circulation.

The advertisement in the newspapers should principally appear in at least two national dailies, one

in English and the other in Urdu. For procurements less than one hundred thousand rupees quotations

may be called. At least 3 quotations are required. Procurements less than twenty five thousand

rupees are exempted from the requirements of bidding or quotation of prices.

The response time should be less then fifteen days for national competitive bidding and thirty

days for international competitive bidding from the date of publication of advertisement or

notice. Open competitive bidding is done by the DOMC for the procurement of goods and

services. The DOMC has formulated a comprehensive bidding document that is made

available to the bidders immediately after the publication of the invitation to bid.

The bid comprises of a single package containing two separate envelopes. Each envelope shall

contain separately the financial proposal and the technical proposal; the envelope shall be

Page 103: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

103

marked as “FINANCIAL PROPOSAL” and “TECHNICAL PROPOSAL” in bold and legible

letters to avoid confusion; initially, only the envelope marked “TECHNICAL PROPOSAL” shall be

opened; the envelope marked as “FINANCIAL PROPOSAL” will be retained in the custody of

the procuring agency without being opened. After the evaluation and approval of the technical

proposal the procuring agency, shall at a time within the bid validity period, publicly open

the financial proposals of the technically accepted bids only. The financial proposal of bids

found not to meet the criteria shall be returned un-opened to the respective bidders; and the bid

found to be the lowest evaluated bid shall be accepted. Emergency procurement system will address

national stock-outs. Emergency procurement system is in place (PPRA rules 2004 explicitly

explain the terms and conditions procurement)

PSM Set-up at the Public Sector PR (DOMC) Level: In June 2009, the Global Fund launched the

Voluntary Pooled Procurement (VPP) Initiative, which encouraged collective procurement of

drugs and related commodities to decrease prices, expand access to quality medicines, and

improve the reliability of drug supplies. The initiative focused on four product categories: first-line

antiretroviral treatment (ART), second-line ART, ACT drugs, and long-lasting insecticide treated

nets (LLINs). By monitoring prices, cost savings, and market shares, the Global Fund hopes to

strengthen national procurement systems and supply chain management. The procurements

included AMDs, ACTs, LLINs, RDTs and microscopes. The specifications and quantities of

these products are finalized by the PR and submitted to the VPP according to the planned

timelines. There is a full fledged unit of procurement and supply chain management (PSM)

supported by TGF SSF-10 headed by the PSM manager

PSM Set-up at the Private Sector PR (SSI): The Private sector PR follows the organizational

procurement system of Save the Children. All procurements are done through this system. There is a

Manager PSM who is responsible in following all procurement procedures and laising with the SSI

procurement unit.

Balochistan : After the 18th Constitutional Amendment malaria commodities are procured under the

provincial budget grants. Procurement is dependent on the timing of the budget release (non-

development or development), which usually occurs mid-way to the last quarter of the respective

financial year.

The provincial MCP is the procuring unit for commodities purchased from Development Budget

grants. The standards are already included in the approved PC-1 with the specifications and other

related requirements. In this case the regulatory bindings are the same as for other procurements

including donor requirements. These procurements are made under supervision of the designated

Purchase Committee for these procurements. Routine quality control measures are operative for

example inspection and testing where applicable. This system is as represented here:

Page 104: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

104

The PC-MCP prepares the lists with specifications, quantities and related

information with a draft tender document and submits the same for consideration

and approval of the authorities, through the Director General Health Services

Balochistan.

After approval from the DGHS the demand is forwarded for consideration and

approval of the Health Secretary Balochistan, who forwards it for approval of the

Planning and Development Department and Finance Department or the Project

Steering Committee as the case maybe.

If the demand is approved and budget is available, a Purchase Committee is

constituted (if not existing already). The Tender is published through the

Directorate of Public Relations, with designated date and time for tender bids, to

be submitted with Surety Bond / Deposit at Call / another agreed security

instrument.

The Purchase Committee evaluates the bids in an open bidding process, and the

accepted bidder is placed with a Supply Order, with signing of a Supply Contract

with the PC-MCP including agreed terms and conditions applicable.

The items tendered are supplied to the designated place by the supplier.

Inspection of the supplied item is made for conformation with the tender

specifications and quantities. This is done by an Inspection Committee

designated for the purpose.

Page 105: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

105

Figure 23: Procurement system

For the procurements made under the regular non-development budget the basic procedure remains

the same, with the exceptions that:

The Purchase Committee evaluates the bids in an open bidding process, and after

approval from the Health Secretary, the accepted bidder is placed with a Supply

Order, with signing of a Supply Contract including agreed term and conditions

applicable.

• Final Settlement of Supplier’s dues.

• Supply to the districts and for MCP

activities initiated.

If error is corrected the supplies are again

inspected by the Inspection Committee.

If cleared by the Inspection

Committee.

If error is corrected the

supplies are again inspected

by the Inspection

Committee.

• If error is not corrected the supplies are

rejected and penalty proceedings are

initiated against the supplier as per

contract agreement.

• Re-tendering is done if approved.

If cleared and certified by the Inspection

Committee the supplies are formally received

by the authorized stores personnel and

entered on the respective Stock Registers.

Page 106: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

106

o The procurements of anti-malaria medicines, equipment for laboratories and related

supplies are made by the Government Medical Stores Department (MSD) from the

budget placed at their disposal under the respective budget heads, these procurements

are made under their own system. These items are purchased in consultation with the

PC-MCP.

o The procedure for emergencies is also the same, with the exception that time and type of

tendering and supply may be shortened accordingly as provided under the rules.

o Same procedure is applied for the procurement of RDT and LLIN supplies, however,

the bulk of these supplies are presently provided from the donor’s side.

The procured items are stocked in the provincial MCP stores, from where they are distributed to the

districts on demand and utilized by the MCP HQ for control and intervention activities as required.

Each district has a Malaria store or if space is limited in whatever storage space is available. The

districts report stock-outs to the MCP however; districts in which GFATM Partners operate, the

bulk of these items are procured and distributed through their own network, without any

coordination with MCP. The commodities are issued under a prescribed indent procedure with a

properly maintained issue registers and other documentary records. The disbursement of medicines

is made through the regular healthcare system from the health facilities and outreach workers, as the

case may be. In all cases patient prescriptions records are required to be maintained and reported.

The MCP Balochistan has to follow two sets of regulatory procedures, the first is the regulatory

requirements applicable to government organizations like the Balochistan Purchase Manual and the

second is the WHOPES quality standards and procedures.

FATA: Procurement procedures are based on the prevailing National Procurement framework

and legislation called PEPRA Rules.

KPK: Procurement procedures are based on the existing national and Provincial procurement

framework and legislation. In Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Province, the NWFP procurement of

Goods, Works and Services rules 2003 are applicable for initiating public procurement of

pharmaceuticals insecticides, surgical and non-surgical disposables, hospital supplies and bio-

medical equipment. In Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, all procurement related polices are developed and

their administrative approval conducted by the Health Secretariat. The Secretary Health acts as an

approving body for the contract award recommendations being chairman Selection (Purchase)

Committee and as the Principal Accounting Officer. The procurements are dealt by the Director

General Health Services, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa which procures medicines through the pharma Wing

of the Govt-Medical Coordination Cell (Govt-MCC) the newly established Procurement Cell based

on the requirements received by the DG office from various Districts & Vertical Programmes. The

Procurement Cell, established after the devolution of powers to the Provincial Government in the

post-18th Amendment era, centrally procures the bio-medical equipment for all the Districts by

conducting all the Pre-Award procurement planning, designing the Standard Bidding Documents,

conducting technical and financial evaluations, awarding the contract and administering the post-

award contractual relationships with the suppliers. The Procurement Cell, DGHS is therefore

engaged in the Pre-award planning, designing the Standard Bidding Documents, bid evaluation and

subsequently awards the contract on unit rates through central contracting which remain valid till the

next financial year for the selected drugs, medical devices and surgical disposables for all the field

formations including EDOs (Health), MS DHQs, Autonomous Medical Institutions (AMIs) and

Vertical Programs etc which in turn conduct the post-award process by placing the Purchase Orders

(POs) themselves on need-basis during the whole year on a quarterly basis.

Page 107: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

107

Roll-Back Malaria (RBM) Vertical Program has initiated a specialized procurement activity such as

the procurement of anti-malaria through the Procurement Cell. The technical specifications for anti-

malarial items are in the process of preparation with the technical support of Technical Resource

Facility (TRF) Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. The Standard Bidding documents have been prepared by the

Procurement Cell on the prescribed format of FIDIC (International Federation of the Consulting

Engineers). The technical and financial evaluation criteria, previously based on price alone has been

replaced with Merit Point Evaluation Methodology having more emphasis on the quality and

therapeutic aspects of the pharmaceutical items.

Emergency procurements in the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Health Department are conducted through

local purchases by the autonomous medical institutions such as the teaching hospitals from the

market and where necessary, by the vertical programs on single source contracting with proper

justification for the same and subsequent to the approval of the Competent Authority.

The Health Department Khyber Pakhtunkhwa has been provided technical support by the TRF – a

DFID funded project in health, to develop Standard Bidding Documents (SBDs) and design the

technical and financial evaluation criteria based on merit point evaluation with product and firm

evaluations done separately. As per the evaluation criteria, the highest-ranking product will get the

contract based on National Competitive Bidding (NCB).

Punjab: The Malaria Control Program has a very exhaustive system for procurement. The approval

has to be granted by many committees like technical evaluation committee, purchase committee and

inspection committee. Procurement procedures are based on the prevailing PEPRA Rules of

Punjab. Materials are purchased on Single Source Contracting with proper justification for the same

and subsequent to the approval of the Competent Authority.

Page 108: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

108

Figure 24

INDENT

Collection of

demand from

Districts

Province

Rationalization & Justification

Advertisement through Tender Notice

WHOPES

specifications

document attached

Financial & Technical Quotations from companies

Opening of technical quotations by Technical Evaluation Committee

Meeting of Technical Evaluation Committee

Successful bidders with technical quotations provide

samples

Pre Shipment Test at

DTL

Opening of Financial Bidding

Contract Awarded

Technically & financially

sound quotations with

lowest bidding

PPRA 2006

rules

followed

Issuance of supply order

Inspection by

Page 109: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

109

Sindh: After allocation of funds in the budget, a requisition paper is prepared by Malaria

Directorate which contains specification, quantity of the required items. The approval is obtained

from Secretary Health department Government of Sindh. Procurement committee is constituted

comprising of Chair and four members. Usually two third of members are from outside of health

department, the Director General Health services chairs the committee. Tenders are floated

according to SPPRA rules, and bids are invited. Bids are opened in the presence of committee

members and the bidders. After opening of bids, offers are examined in terms of technical

requirements and the comparative costs. The contracts are awarded on competitive basis. After

specified time, the delivery of goods is received, which are examined by inspection committee

notified by secretary health. After examination of inspection committee, goods are entered in the

stock registers and payments orders are issued. There is no availability of a proper warehouse

however three rooms are available for storage purpose, two rooms are used for storage of

insecticide, LLINs, and ULV - third room is used for storage of medicines and laboratory reagents

and microscopes

Page 110: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

110

Figure 25: Procurement Process Diagrammatic

Page 111: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

111

Distribution of goods is made according to indents received from districts. Consumption Reports

Page 112: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

112

from the Malaria Districts are sent to the consumption Directorate on monthly basis.

Storage and Delivery at District and Community Level: District Health Office (DHO) does not

separate storage facilities for insecticides, LLINs and anti malarial drugs. However each DHO office

has common stores for goods, equipment and drugs. Distribution in the community is on the day to

day basis and any surplus is returned to the DHO store. Stock register is maintained at provincial

and district levels for all procured goods, anti malarial drugs and other logistics.

4.2.7 Inventory Management

Managing distribution of commodities: The PR procures the items through VPP and is responsible in

receiving items at the port of entry in the country. The stocks are shifted to the SRs regional/ district

stores by the PR and the district stocks are received and stored by the respective SRs. Thereafter

the stocks are distributed to the public sector facilities/MCH centers at THQ/RHC/BHU by the

SRs and handed over to the Public sector facility staff. At the facility level the items are stored at

the medical stores of the THQ/RHC/BHU for onward issuance to the beneficiaries. Procurement

of Pharmaceutical and health items is carried out biannually and rented transport is used for transfer

of stocks from port of entry to the SRs district stores. During Phase-1 PR s outsourced the

procurements to one of its SR an NGO and the transportation of stocks from Dockyard to district

stores of SR was outsourced. Phase-1 procurements by the Procurement Agent was a success story

as timely and economical procurement facilitated the implementation partners in achieving

the targets within stipulated time which facilitated PR in better performance grading.

However, during phase-2, procurement was conducted through VPP and in view of security risk,

inland distribution of stocks was carried out by the PR. To ensure secure transportation of

commodities, transport agency with insurance was selected and locked and sealed vehicle were

used for transportation, however, insurance of stocks was not done as it was not budgeted.

Inspection committee has been constituted by the PSM unit among the DOMC and PMU staff

members which inspects the stock at the central level and verifies that it is according to the

specifications and meets storage standards. Provincial Directorate of Malaria Control and District

Public sector along with the M&E and PSM unit of PMU is responsible for quality and quantity of the

pharmaceutical and health items.

There is a complete inventory management system in place and maintained at three levels. At

the first level, the PR maintains the inventory of all the items procured and distributed to the

SRs. At second level, the SRs maintain the inventory of items received from the PR and issued to

the facility level. The most important tier of the inventory control is the facility level where all the

stocks are issued to the beneficiaries. The data maintained on FM1 at facility level is compiled on a

monthly basis and conveyed to the district through FM2. The district authorities (EDO Office)

compiles all the data received from the facilities on FM3 and conveys it to the provincial malaria

control program which forwards the report from all districts on FM4 to the DoMC/PR. Inventory and

stock registers are available at each health facility. Reporting of stock outs is made using FM1 form.

The PSM guidelines developed by the DOMC from SSF round-10 support gives guidance on the

system of inventory.

Page 113: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

113

Balochistan: The Malaria Indicator Survey is being revived and refurbished on the new FM1 to 4

system, replacing the old G30 system. The new system includes indicators for stock control and

reporting. The stores at all levels are required to maintain a card system to monitor the medicines

and related supplies on stock.

FATA: There is no plan or strategy guideline to guide the program on emergency supply in

case of stock outs. The program depends on partners in cases of emergencies, who have

identified one focal person for malaria control intervention in each agency. The GF has a

buffer stock for malaria epidemics.

There is no system for storage and distribution of antimalarials and RDT’s. The IVM procures the

consumables and stores them in the Fata Directorate Warehouse. The agency staff of all the

tribal areas receive and transport the consumables to their respective warehouses located at

agency headquarter office. The PR receive consumables and supplies from GF in a regional

warehouse located at Islamabad, which are transported to main warehouses at Peshawar, Bannu

and Lakki Marwat. The quarterly stock is then transported to the health facilities of the

respected agencies.

FATA, KPK and Punjab: There is a system of stock control where the spray operators report

at the end of each day the amount of insecticide used and return the sachets. This system is not

followed and till date no reporting has reached the directorate. The GF districts however have

all the reports and data available on usage of IRS.

KPK and Punjab: There is no scientific system of storage and distribution of antimalarials and

RDT’s. The stock of province is kept in the provincial depot and transported to the districts.

Similarly insecticides are procured at a provincial level and transported to the district

warehouses where IRS takes place.

4.2.8 Quality Control

For quality assurance and quality control measures, the PSM section finalizes the “Quality

Policy” encompassing both the quality assurance and control aspects. For quality control

purposes, random samples are drawn from the lots of pharmaceuticals/drugs at three

levels i.e. central warehouse, regional/district warehouse and facility level. Seven samples

of each product are drawn from a consignment and sent to the WHO pre-qualified

laboratory or ISO 17025 certified laboratory for test/analysis in compliance with the TGF

quality assurance policy.

The PSM unit of the PR needs training and capacity building on the PHPM related activities

and provision in this regard has been incorporated in the R-10 budget. Regarding distribution

of these products procured from the GF grant, as earlier described, all the products are

distributed free of cost to the target population while adhering to the prescribed procedures.

Balochistan: Regular Quality Control mechanisms are followed at the time of procurement

tendering with clear indication of specifications in the tender documents and through inspection

mechanisms at time of delivery. Quality control of stored items on-stock is limited to batch and

expiry monitoring. The concept of Special Quality Control centers is not operative, with the

Page 114: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

114

exceptions that: there is a Drug Testing Laboratory at Quetta, which is however a part of Drug

Regulatory System; the Insecticides are sent to the Department of Chemistry, University of Karachi,

for quality testing. The report from this department is utilized for quality control and testing of

insecticides from time to time as may be required.

FATA, KPK and Punjab: The National Laboratory of Quality Control of Medicines

(LNCQM) was established in 1991, in Karachi. Its mandate is the quality control of medicines

to ensure adherence to established international quality standards. The products procured are

tested before release into the system. There is currently no system in place for quality control

of the insecticides.

4.2.9 SWOT analysis

Strength Weakness Opportunities Threats

Procurement policies

available

Low storage capacity at all

levels

Preparation for drafting

the proposal for GF

Inadequate funding for

malaria commodities

Procurement guidelines

and rules are available

Inadequate systems for

quantification of RDT’s

and other commodities

Weak standardization of

GF activity reported vs

treatment provided vs

disbursement causing

delays in funding

Trained man power for

store management

available

Inadequate logistics for

transportation of malaria

commodities

Long term procurement

process

System for Distribution of

stores available

SPPRA does not have

regional and district

officers

Transparency in

procurement process

Procurement process may

be delayed

Guidelines are silent on

certain issues

Funds available for

procurement

Timely targets not

achieved

Proper storage facility not

available

System available Floods heavy rains

Consumption report from

districts not received

regularly

Vehicle for transportation

of insecticide, drugs,

LLINs and other stores not

Page 115: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

115

available

4.3.0 Successes, best practices and facilitating factors

Malaria PSM is a push system based on supply and not a pull system based on need and demand.

There is a PSM plan to support the procurement in Global Fund supported 38 districts. There are

estimates prepared for malaria commodities as part of the PC-I by the FMCP and PMCP. WHO

specifications are being used for procurement of LLIN, IRS insecticides, RDT and ACT. There are

multiple malaria procurement and supply systems within the DOMC, PMCP, district health offices

and hospitals and the various implementing malaria partners.

There is a standardized procedure for procurement -Public Procurement Regulatory Authority-

PEPRA. There is a good malaria storage system in provinces with partners such as Merlin and SCF.

ACT and RDT stock control and reporting system is part of new MIS. There are drug quality

control laboratories at federal and provincial level with drug regulatory officers at district level.

There are insecticide quality control centers in Kharachi and Faisalabad.

4.3.1 Problems and challenges

• One of the main challenges has been the supply of commodities depends on availability of

funds, particularly for RDTs and LLINs, funding for procurement of these items has been

far below the requirements due to which reason the targets are often not met.

• The delayed release of funds even when allocated, are sometimes delayed up to the last

quarter, which in turn delays procurements resulting in a serious operational impediment for

MCP.

• Inadequate guidance on the quantification of the first and second line alternative anti-

malarials.

• The quality control of products of malaria is an issue that should be given more attention

and the rational use of these products.

• Lack of focal point in the team at MCP to monitor and track malaria commodities.

• Proper storage facilities for drugs, insecticide, LLINs and other stores is not available

• Vehicle for transportation for goods not available

• Weak reporting system from districts

• There is no quality assurance system in place for RDT.

Page 116: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

116

4.3.2 Conclusion and recommendations

1. PMCP. DMCP need to ensure the PPRA, PPHI and all malaria partners procure all

malaria commodities (antimalarial, insecticides and vector control equipment for IRS)

according to the WHO/WHOPES specifications.

2. Urgently align DRAP registration for malaria combination therapy with national

malaria treatment policy and to support production/import of Primaquine and de-

registration and ban on use of mono-therapeutic formulation for all malaria treatment.

3. To prepare quarterly updates on malaria commodities used and in stock and forecast

urgent need

4. Establish a system for RDT quality assurance (QA) using WHO accredited international

laboratory and quality control using a national malaria microscopy laboratory.

5. Annual updating of the malaria commodities specification list based on WHO

recommendations

6. Annual updating of estimates of malaria commodities based on need and demand to

achieve and sustain universal access and coverage

7. Conduct a review of the current stores and potential need for malaria combination

drugs, RDT, LLIN, IRS and LSM chemicals in district and provinces

4.3 VECTOR CONTROL

4.3.1 Introduction

Primary and secondary malaria vectors and bionomics

In Pakistan over 24 species and sub species of Anopheles have been recorded, out of

which only two: An culicifacies and An stephensi are considered as the primary vectors involved

in the transmission of malaria. Earlier studies considered An culicifacies as the most important

vector in rural areas13

,14

,15

,16

and An stephensi in the urban areas17

but a study conducted in Punjab in

1989 incriminated An. stephensi with malaria parasites in the rural areas of Punjab. The

vectors are prevalent across a wide range of ecological zones, and are heavily associated

with water logged areas. In addition to the above two species Anopheles pulcherrimus and

Anopheles fluviatilis are considered as the suspected malaria vectors (which need to be

confirmed) especially in the mountainous and foothill areas of KPK and Punjab18

. Anopheles

pulcherrimus has been implicated in malaria transmission in Afghanistan, in countries

bordering the Persian Gulf, and Rajhistan desert in western India. Like wise Anopheles fluviatilis is

also a known vector in Afghanistan, Iran and parts of India. Anopheles annularis has

also been identified in FATA and Baluchistan - this species is a confirmed

malaria vector in Afghanistan and Iran. The role of species complexes is poorly understood in the

country. A species complex consists of sibling species which by definition are species with

obscure morphological differences. Anopheles culicifacies has been found to represent a

complex of sibling species, provisionally named as Anopheles culicifacies species A and B19

.

Studies so far carried out have indicated the presence of Anopheles culicificies species A in

Punjab. Like wise Anopheles stephensi is not a homogeneous species and the possible existence of

two species is inferred. Both the primary vectors An. culicifacies and An. stephensi have been

considered to be essentially endophilic in their diurnal resting habits. They breed in clean water and

are chiefly zoophilic. Both species bite around mid-night till 2:30 am. As far as the seasonal

Page 117: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

117

abundance of malaria vectors is concerned, A culicifacies is found in the country through out the

year with seasonal fluctuations in the population abundance depending upon climate. In Punjab and

Sind this species exhibit a bimodal pattern with two peaks, one in April/May and other in

August/September. In cooler areas in the part of KPK, Baluchistan and Azad Jammu and Kashmir, it

exhibits a unimodal pattern, occurring between May and September with no clear peak. The density

of A. stephensi increases by the end of March, reaching a peak in April-May and thereafter falling

from September-November. In KPK, Baluchistan and AJK this species is more prominent between

July and September. No recent studies are available on sporozoite rates, Entomological

Inoculation Rates (EIR) and blood index. The species of Anopheles fluviatilis and Anopheles

annularius have been reported as confirmed malaria vectors in Balochistan (district Zhob). The role

of An. pulcherrimus, An. maculatis, An. turkhudi, An. pulcherrimus and An. superpictus for malaria

transmission needs to be investigated for effective control.

Sentinel sites for Vector bionomics

Federal: The Directorate of Malaria control has established 4 sentinel sites in the country. These

sites were established to monitor drug resistance and insecticide resistance as well as vector

surveillance. None of the sites are currently functional. The DOMC has recently developed new

vector surveillance tools which need to be field tested and implemented. Aside from

intermittent insecticide susceptibility monitoring and seasonal distribution no additional

operational research activities or entomological data collection has been conducted at federal,

district or provincial levels

Balochistan: Currently there are two sentinel sites in Zhob and Kech district headquarters, from

where regular reports including information on vector bionomics are expected. However, due to the

deficiency of properly trained entomology professionals these sites have been used for routine

malaria reporting than for collection of key entomological parameters.

KPK, Punjab: The sentinel sites for vector bionomics (breeding, biting and resting habits of

mosquito) as well as other inoculation rates, sporozoite rates and human blood index indicators

do not exist. There is no vector map in KP province. Punjab has conducted vector density studies

which are not regularly reported to the DOMC.

Sindh: Vector surveillance is conducted at district levels and vector density reports are generated.

.

Vector susceptibility to insecticides

Knowledge of vector/pest susceptibility to pesticides, changing trends of resistance and

their operational implications are basic requirements to guide pesticide use in vector-

borne disease and pest control programme. The insecticide resistance monitoring is an

integral part of the DoMC strategy for vector control. During early 1970’s resistance was detected

among An. culicifacies and An. Stephensi, to D.D.T (Organo-chlorinated hydrocarbons) in

some districts of Pakistan20

, compelling the programme to replace DDT

with BHC ( same insecticide class) in 1972. In 1979 Malathion and Sumithion

(Organophosphate) were introduced although BHC continued to be used until 1980’s to mid 1990’s.

A high frequency of malathion-resistance was reported among An.

Stephensi in some districts of Punjab, while lower frequencies were observed in the NWFP

and the Sindh province during mid 1980’s21

. During late 1980s An. culicifacies also developed

Page 118: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

118

resistance to Malathion in certain parts of Pakistan. Since 1996, deltamethrin (Synthetic Pyrethroids)

has been used for indoor residual house spraying in Pakistan. A recent survey was conducted in 4

districts of Punjab province (Layyah, Muzafargrah DG Khan and Rajanpur). The results

indicated An. stephensi and An. Culicifacies still resistant to DDT and Malathion in four districts.

Resistance is slowly developing in some districts to permethrin, lambdacyhalothrin and deltamethrin.

The results of the study provide important evidence base for strategic planning of vector control in

southern Punjab. Currently the Health Services Academy at Islamabad is conducting vector

susceptibility studies in various districts of Punjab but due to financial constraints, the MedVC

Unit of HSA is unable to expand surveys to collect data on a National level. There is no system

currently in place for routine monitoring of insecticide susceptibility/ resistance in the country.

Balochistan : An. culicifacies and An. stephensi have developed resistance to organochlorines and

the latter species has also developed resistance to organophosphate, ‘Malathion’ (not currently in

use).

FATA: No entomology reference laboratory exists

KPK, Sindh and Punjab: Does not have an insectary and entomology reference laboratory. No

insecticide susceptibility testing has taken place.

4.3.2 Policy and guidance

The key components of the vector control strategy include Indoor Residual Spray (IRS), Long

Lasting Insecticide Treated Nets (LLIN) and Larviciding. The National Malaria Control

Strategic Plan (2011 – 2015) outlines the new national LLINs distribution policy which focuses

on universal coverage for the entire population at risk of malaria in areas not covered by IRS

targeting specifically pregnant women at IMCI centres and antenatal clinics. The key

implementers are the provinces which produce annual plans and reports. World Health Organization

recommends integrated vector management (IVM) approach for the control of vector-borne

diseases including malaria. Pakistan has yet to develop IVM guidelines to guide the implementation

of vector-borne diseases control. Recently the programme has developed an IRS Manual and

training guide with support from SSF-Round-10 which includes chapters on safety and waste

management procedures. These guidelines provide good directions on standard procedures e.g.

how to plan, how to quantify insecticides, the safety procedures and waste management etc. but

does not address focal spraying to curtail epidemics and outbreaks. Two other guidelines drafted by

the DOMC include i) guidelines on anti-vector interventions for monsoon season and ii) guidelines

for control of vectors of public health importance after monsoon rains in Pakistan. A comprehensive

distribution strategy for LLINs have also been developed in 2012 which has been implemented in 38

TGF supported SSF-10 districts. LLINs guidelines for communities use is currently being finalized.

The DOMC has recently developed data collection tools for vector surveillance but these tools have

not yet been circulated.

.

Balochistan: Same protocols are followed by respective PRs in 17 GF supported districts, although

their district plans are not coordinated with the MCP. The guidelines for IRS training module are

available. No guidelines exist for safety guidelines even at national level.

FATA: The federal LLIN distribution and IRS guidelines are adhered to. The annual and strategic

vector control plans are not available.

Page 119: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

119

KPK: There are no guidelines for IRS or training manuals available at provincial level. LLIN

distribution guidelines are available and till date majority of staff of GF districts are trained, whereas

no training is conducted by the MCP. There are no vector control plans.

Punjab: The guidelines for IRS training module are available. The annual and strategic vector

control plans are not available.

Sindh: National guidelines on IVM have been developed but in Sindh province still no training has

been conducted.

4.3.3 Organizational structure

At the federal level, the Director, Directorate of Malaria Control heads the malaria control

program, supported by an entomologist. Recently an additional entomologist has been appointed in

the PMU through GF SSF-10, whose responsibility is to provide guidance to the provinces and

districts for IRS and LLINs distribution. The DOMC is not directly involved in any spraying

operations or LLIN distribution but these activities are carried out by the provinces.

Balochistan: There are 2 entomology technicians and 9 insect collectors. The vector control

activities are conducted by the respective malaria supervisor staff in the respective district health

offices, headed by the Malaria Superintendent. The PRs do not coordinate in vector control with the

MCP. The capacity of the existing entomology staff need to be harnessed by attending training

modules conducted by the Institute of Public Health Quetta.

FATA: There is no malaria vector control department.

KPK and Punjab: The MCP Manager heads the malaria control program but with no vector

control department.

Sindh: There is a trained entomologist and insect collector at provincial level and they are involved

in vector control activities at the community level.

4.3.4 Guidance

The key components of the vector control strategy include Indoor Residual Spray (IRS),

Long Lasting Insecticide Treated Nets (LLIN) and Larviciding. The National Malaria Control

Strategic Plan for 2011 to 2015 outlines the new national LLINs distribution policy which

focuses on universal coverage for the entire population at risk of malaria in areas not

covered by IRS and especially the distribution to pregnant women through IMCI centres

and Antenatal Clinics. The key implementers are the provinces and they are responsible to

produce annual plans and reports.

World Health Organization recommends integrated vector management (IVM) approach

for the control of Vector-borne diseases including malaria. Pakistan has not yet developed

IVM guidelines to guide the implementation of vector-borne diseases control. Recently the

programme has developed an IRS Manual and training guide with support from SSF-

Round-10 that also includes chapters on safety and waste management procedures. These

Page 120: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

120

guidelines basically provide good directions on standard procedures e.g. how to plan, how

to quantify insecticides, the safety procedures and waste management, do’s and don’ts

etc. but does not specifically address the MCP strategy of focal spraying to curtail the

epidemics and out breaks. Two other guidelines drafted by the DOMC include i) Guidelines

on anti-vector interventions for monsoon season and ii) guidelines for control of vectors of

public health importance after monsoon rains in Pakistan.A distribution strategy for LLINs

have also been developed in 2012 which is quite comprehensive and has been

implemented in 38 TGF supported SSF-10 districts. LLINs guidelines for communities use

have also been drafted and are being finalized.

4.3.5 Human resources, training and capacity development

The provinces are mainly responsible for training of entomologists, spray men on safety operations,

handling of spraying equipment and insecticides on annual basis. The Malaria Vector Control

Focal Point (Entomologist) at national level coordinates IRS training for Provinces if so required.

Table 31: Capacity building of health care providers on LLINs 19 districts of TGF

Round10 (Save the Children International)

Year 1

Year2

Year 1,Year 2

Activity Description

Q1,Q2,Q3,Q4 Q5,Q6,Q7,Q8 Q1,Q2,Q3,Q4,Q5,Q6,Q7,Q8

Target Progress Target Progress Target Progress

Training workshops for outlet

staff (district-level malaria

control program staff) on LLIN 364 0 206 552 570 552

distribution strategy, data

management and user guide

Training of master trainers on

LLIN distribution strategy, data 84 0 0 88 84 88

management & user guide

Total

602 39 281 781 883 820

Balochistan: Some infrastructure and human resources are present although acutely deficient in

numbers.

Sindh

Malaria Control Program at Provincial level has following positions for vector control activities

1. Senior Evaluator

2. Entomologist

3. Entomology Technician

4. Insect Collector

and at district level non medical evaluator, assistant entomologist, insect collector are required to

work in the field to determine breeding and resting habits and vector density. But due to non

availability of mobility support and guidelines the performance of the staff is poor and not properly

Page 121: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

121

documented. The only document obtained related to vector control from Malaria Directorate was

vector density report.

4.3.6 Annual planning

Targets

• 80% of the target communities sleep under LLIN in malaria transmission season;

• 20% of target localities receive 2 rounds of IRS coverage annually;

• All four provincial sentinel sites regular monitor insecticide resistance;

Indicators

• % of target population sleeping under LLIN in malaria transmission

season;

• % of households in target localities received annual IRS coverage;

• # of sentinel sites reporting on insecticide resistance;

Sindh: Integrated Vector Management (IVM) has been proposed in PC-1 of Malaria Control

Program to cover Dengue, Cutaneous Leishmaniasis and Congo Fever.

4.3.7 Service delivery outputs and outcomes

Indoor Residual Spraying

IRS is effective in rapidly controlling malaria transmission, hence in reducing the local burden of

malaria morbidity and mortality, provided that most houses and animal shelters (e.g. > 80%) in

targeted communities are treated. Indoor residual spraying has been the key vector control

intervention in Pakistan during the eradication era. The failure of eradication programme prompted

the initiation of a five year national malaria control programme plan in 1975, again using IRS as

primary method for vector control in Pakistan. At this stage the Malaria control programme

was provincialized and implementation was handed over to the provincial governments. The

DOMC assumed the responsibilities of policy, technical advice, evaluation, coordination, training,

research, procurement, supply of insecticides, larvicides and equipment to the provinces. From

early 1980’s to mid 1990’s only malathion was used for malaria vector control. In 1994,

malathion was replaced by deltamethrin (synthetic pyrethroids) and since then this insecticide is

being used for indoor residual house spraying in Pakistan.

The preliminary selection of the union councils (spraying unit) in the districts for IRS are

made by the DOMC in consultation with the provinces and partners. The selection is based

on previous year‘s reported incidence: API= 30/1000 and AFI=5/1000 populations. The

DOMC with support from the TGF SSF-10 conducts IRS in 15% of the high risk

populations of 38 high risk districts. The APIs reported from all UCs is arranged in the

Page 122: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

122

descending order and the top 15% of the population are selected as the target

population for IRS. Two cycles of spraying are conducted: pre-monsoon (April- May)

and post monsoon (August-September). The insecticide used is Deltamethrin (WP 5%) but

will vary among the provinces. A squad of 7 persons are recruited on daily wages (1

supervisor, 1 diluter and 5 spray men) to spray an average 30-40 household per person per

day.

Balochistan: The activities under vector control strategy for the GF supported districts (17) are done

by the respective PRs and by the MCP in the remaining districts in Balochistan.

Usually two IRS cycles are carried out per year using the following insecticides:.

Deltamethrin Wetable Powder (WP)5%

Deltamethrin Liquid (UL) packing 1littre/Bottle 1 .5 EC

Emergency Spraying is done according to the need. Equipment and transport maintenance facilities

are available within the program. Central and district (majority) malaria stores are functional but

need to be upgraded into proper ware houses. The planning and site selection for the IRS is done by

the district Malaria Superintendent under the respective DHO.

FATA and KPK: The FATA lVM Program uses WHOPES approved insecticides and spray

pumps. The MCP purchases alpha-cypermathrin and permethrin. IRS spray is done only once i.e in

post monsoon period when malaria transmission is at peak. The high risk union councils

(communities) are identified by the agency malaria supervisor based on case load or his experience.

A total of 15-20% areas are marked as outbreak prone areas. The spraying is done regularly by spray

men who are trained by the district malaria supervisor. There is no supervision of IRS activity

because of technical and financial constraints.

FATA: The IVM both at directorate and agency level have adequate storage capacity. There is

sufficient logistical support for IRS but availability of funds for POL is problematic. The

personal protective equipment is available and used. The GF districts have adequate storage

space however the FATA Directorate rent their warehouses.

KPK and Punjab : The MCP both at provincial and district level have inadequate storage capacity.

There is sufficient logistical support for IRS but availability of funds for POL is problematic. There

is no personal protective equipment at provincial or district level.

Annual trends in coverage with IRS: The MCP does not document the coverage of IRS spraying

campaigns. The data of IRS coverage in GF district is less than a year and has yet to achieve

substantial coverage.

Punjab: The Provincial Malaria Control Program uses WHOPES approved insecticides and

spray pumps. The MCP purchases deltamethrin (WP 5%) IRS spray is done twice i.e. pre

monsoon period and post monsoon period. The high risk union councils (communities) are

identified by district malaria supervisor based on case load i.e. confirmed vivax cases of 5 or

more/or 2 cases of confirmed falciparum or more. Geographical Reconnaisance (GR) is

conducted prior to IRS campaign. Spraying is conducted around confirmed cases by sanitary

person due to human resource shortage.

Page 123: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

123

Table 32: IRS Coverage Criteria, Punjab

S.No Population Houses Coverage

1 2000 100% houses

2 2000-3000 75 % houses

3 3000-4000 50% houses

4 4000-6000 25% houses

5 Greater than 6000 10% houses

.

Table 33: Year wise consolidated spray reports (2001-2013) Punjab

Year Name of

Insecticide

Population

covered

Number of

rooms sprayed

Consumption

of insecticide

(Kg)

2001 Deltamethrin 5%

w.p

350430 175230 5841

2002 ------------do---------

----

195297 109452 3723.5

2003 ------------do---------

----

242850 121440 4048

2004 ------------do---------

----

151850 86214 3033.5

2005 ------------do---------

----

316620 180735 6154

2006 ------------do---------

----

110571 61522 2112.5

2007 ------------do---------

----

119807 66790 2323.5

2008 ------------do---------

----

171639 91697 3240.5

Page 124: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

124

2009 ------------do---------

----

278962 177656 4050

2010 ------------do---------

----

137756 55000 1925

2011 ------------do---------

----

No spray Operation was conducted due to Dengue epidemic in

province.

2012 ------------do---------

----

295801 rooms were planned to be sprayed with 10075 Kg of

Deltamethrin but spray operation could not be conducted as per

order of Provincial DHS-CDC due to expectation of Dengue

Outbreak.

2013 ------------do---------

----

942345 376842 13188

In 2013, 13188 kg of IRS is consumed and 376842 houses are sprayed. There was no

supervision of IRS activity because of technical and financial constraints

Sindh: IRS is conducted in two transmission seasons: 1st low peak transmission season between

March and April and 2nd

high peak transmission season between August and November. The IRS

activities depended heavily on the budget. The IRS plans (number of talukas planned for IRS,

number of union councils, number of localities, number of houses, population of district, total

number of rooms planned, insecticide required) are developed at the district level and sent to the

DOMC Sindh, which finalises the plan depending on availability of the budget. The team of IRS

consists of 5 members. Four spray men and 1 person for mixing the insecticide. The team is

supervised by malaria supervisor. The five team members are hired on a temporary basis by DHO.

The compensation for five temporary members is currently 300/ day. One squad (five team

members) sprays120 rooms per day. 1 spray men sprays 8-10 pumps. 1 pump sprays 3-4 rooms.

Table 34: IRS data

Page 125: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

125

IRS Data five years

Year Rooms Sprayed Houses covered

2008-

09 799965 319986

2009-

10 909720 291410

2010-

11 2256493 708567

2011-

12 3461097 1082969

Long-lasting Insecticidal Nets : Since 2001, the NMCP has promoted the distribution of ITNs to

selected areas in the malaria at-risk region. The target population were pregnant mothers and

children under five years. The DoMC recommends the purchase of rectangular white or green

colored LLINs (PermaNet) approved by WHOPES. Since pursuing WHO recommendations for

universal coverage with LLINs, the DOMC in 2007 embarked on universal coverage. During TGF

7 a total of 1 million LLINs were received and distributed in 19 districts. Under SSF Round-10

another 2.0 Million LLINs were procured and 1.7 Million were distributed in 38 high risk

districts, Only 78,000 LLINs were procured from PSDP through PC-I (2008-12).

Storage: DOMC procures only small quantities of insecticide and does not require much

storage space. Nonetheless, a permanent store which meets storage standards and

safety procedures is essential. Currently adhoc storage arrangements are made. The

insecticides procured for 38 TGF Round-10 supported districts are delivered to the Sub

recipients who are responsible for storing them in their respective districts. An Inspection

committee has been constituted by the PSM unit among the DOMC and PMU staff members,

which inspects the stock at the central level to verify it is according to specifications and meets

storage standards. Procurement of pharmaceutical and health items is carried out biannually and

rented transport is used for transfer of stocks from port of entry to the SRs district stores.

LLINs

Distribution method: The LLINs procured for 38 TGF Round-10 supported districts are

delivered to the Sub recipients who are responsible for their storage in their respective districts.

An inspection committee has been constituted by the PSM unit among the DOMC and PMU staff

members which inspects the stock at the central level to verify it is according to specifications along

with other aspects of storage.

Balochistan: The LLINs (WHOPES) are distributed in the high-risk districts according to the

policy guidelines developed by DoMC and GF-PRs. The distribution mechanism in the GF

supported districts (17 districts) is developed and implemented by the respective PR.

Page 126: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

126

Sindh: LLINs are procured through funds provided under PC -1 according WHO specifications.

However due to inadequate funds available only one thousand LLINs are provided to each district

for distribution in the community. The population of each district varies from one to two million.

Districts develop distribution plans of LLINs according to local needs keeping in mind needs of

pregnant ladies and children in the country.

Table 35: Global Fund Supported Districts in Sindh

Details of LLINs Distribution

S.No District Total Target Achievement till

June – 13

Balance

1 Khairpur 140,182 93,554 46,628

2 Dadu 146,813 38,022 108,791

3 Tharparkar 76,649 55,971 20,678

4 Tando Allahyar 49,658 34,270 15,388

5 Mirpur Khas 76,287 40,730 35,557

Total 489,589 262,547 227,042

KPK: Since 2007 KP has targeted children less than five years old and pregnant women for LLIN

distribution. The LLINs guidelines focus on universal coverage for the entire population at risk of

malaria in areas not covered by IRS. However due to limited funding the Malaria Control Program

in unable to achieve the target. The Global Fund working in selected union councils of high endemic

districts following LLIN distribution guidelines. The MCP recommends the purchase of only LLINs

that are approved by WHOPES. The MCP does not follow the LLIN distribution strategy nor does it

have data related to LLIN coverage.

Page 127: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

127

Punjab: LLINs intervention is not a major feature in Punjab because of low endemicity. LLIN

donated by UNICEF and WHO were distributed during the flood season. The Program does

not have a policy to purchase or distribute LLINs.

Larval source management

The strategy for implementing larval control in Pakistan is as follows:

1) In areas where breeding sites are identified as relatively few, accessible and manageable, the

community based health workers (such as CDCS, LHW) will encourage volunteer participation of

the communities in source reduction.

2) The application of chemical larvicides is restricted to selected urban localities, on the basis of

MCP guidelines. However in rural communities with few breeding sites (man-made, such as those

used for burrow-pits to make mud-walls), limited chemical larviciding may be considered on the

advice of local malaria control officials where appropriate.

.

KPK: Larviciding and fog fumigation are conducted using granules but without a proper

mechanism.

Punjab: Larviciding and fog fumigation are conducted. Temephos 1% granules or temephos 50%

emulsified concentrate or fenthion 2% granules are purchased and used for larviciding. The

concentration used is 1-2 gm/meter square depending on water quantity in indoor and outdoor

settings.

Table 36: Dose of Temphos for Larviciding

S.No Indoor Quantity of Temphose

1 Less than or equals 25 Liters 2.5 mg

2 50 Liters 5 mg

3 100 Liters 10 mg

In outdoor setting, geographical reconnaissance of breeding site is done first. The distance of

breeding site is measured by foot. Twenty steps are considered as 10 meter and single step as 10/20.

If the distance is 200 steps then it is calculated as 100 meter distance. Temephos 50% EC is used for

big breeding places like hotels swimming pools etc. The granules are thrown at 1.5 meter distance

away around the circle. The dose of the larvicide depends on depth of breeding site.

Page 128: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

128

Table 37: Dosage of Larviciding for Outdoor areas.

S.No Depth of breeding Site Dosage

1 15cm (6 inch) Single dose = 0.55 gm

2 25 cm Two doses = 1.1 gm

3 Greater than 25 cm Three doses= 1.65 gm

Fogging: is conducted using 5% deltamethrin emulsion concentrate. With 10 litre of diesel, 33 ml or

66 ml of active ingredient is mixed which is enough for 1 hectare area.

Sindh: Larvicidal activities are conducted by DOMC at district level but coverage is limited.

Malaria vector control research: Research related to the coverage of LLIN distribution and IRS

operations have been carried out in the 2013 Malaria Indicator Survey in collaboration with

Pakistan Medical Research Council. The survey results are being analyzed and will be available

by January 2014. A study on insecticide susceptibility has been conducted in Punjab in 2012.

The results of the study form important evidence base for strategic planning of vector control in

southern Punjab.

4.3.8 SWOT Analysis

Strengths Weakness

• Some targeted provinces have reported high LLIN

coverage at union level (>80%)- GF

• LLIN distribution guidelines with an accountable

voucher system – GF supported

• Adopting supplementary mode of LLIN

distribution i.e. routine immunization campaigns

for registration

• High risk areas and peak transmission seasons are

covered by IRS (100%) in some union councils

• Functioning vector Control program in some

provincial and district levels

• Entomologist and Insect collector posted at some

• Lack of focus towards universal

coverage in all targeted districts with

LLIN or IRS

• Universal coverage of LLINs is not

met at the union council and

household level

• “Wear and tear” of recently

distributed LLINs

• Inadequate training of follow up

support and supervision of district

staff in IRS and LLIN in districts

outside Global Fund

• IRS and LLIN guideline not available

Page 129: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

129

provincial and district

• Recent insecticide susceptibility survey has been

conducted by HAS yet to be shared with the

programme

• Developed IRS, LLINs strategies.

• Guidelines for awareness on use of LLINs at

community level, control of vectors of public

health importance after monsoon rains and

prevention of CCHF but limited circulation

• Established basic IRS and LLIN database

• History of malaria operational research, which

documents the change in vector composition in

different ecological surroundings, entomology and

susceptibility survey (2009).

• Dengue strategy and guideline strategy has been

developed at the federal level but not circulated

• Insecticides resistance management strategy final

draft

• Evidence-based need assessment and M&E tools

developed at the federal level but not circulated to

the provinces

• Vector control working group established

(2009/10)

at provincial and district level and in

local languages and is complicated for

field use.

• entomologists not stationed in all

provinces and districts

• Lack of adequate and appropriate

equipment, supplies, inappropriate

use, maintenance and storage of

available ones.

• No updated vector maps with

information on vector type,

distribution, breeding , resting and

biting and insecticide resistance

• Lack of sufficient resources

(entomology lab and insectaries) and

skills (by newly recruited and existing

staff) to conduct routine

entomological monitoring on key

entomological indicators at

established sentinel sites

• No collaboration with provincial

universities for vector surveillance

and research

• No development and implementation

of insecticide resistance management

strategy at the provincial level

• Larviciding applications is not done

consistently throughout the

transmission season ( i.e. fenitrothion

effective for only 1-3 weeks and

reapplication is needed), dosages,

quantities may not be applied

according to breeding sites

• Entomology staff are diverted to

tackle Dengue

• Federal database needs to incorporate

the coverage of the LLINs and IRS

• No IVM strategy addressing all vector

Page 130: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

130

borne diseases in a holistic approach

• Insufficient capacity to routinely

analyse and interpret entomology

related data to give strategic direction

to the Programme (Federal and

provincial)

• Larviciding considered only option

for LSM

Opportunities Threats

• Health Service Academy are currently conducting a

comprehensive insecticide susceptibility survey

• The experienced entomology staff from the malaria

eradication era should be consulted in identifying

the way forward for malaria elimination in selected

provinces i.e. LSM

• Strengthen intersectoral collaborations through

vector control working group

• Build on existing capacities for vector control (e.g.

Dengue)

• Separate budget for vector control activities in PC

– 1

• Insecticide resistance - selection

pressure from unregulated public

health and agricultural pesticides

• Non-immune IDPs/migrant workers

• Climate change –floods

• Competing priorities between dengue

and malaria

4.3.9 Successes, best practices and facilitating factors

There is a LLIN distribution strategy with an accountable voucher system (among Global Fund (GF)

supported districts), which utilizes a continuous distribution channel i.e. routine immunization

campaigns for registration and collection from Basic Health Units. There is a functioning vector

control program in some provinces and districts with few trained and experienced staff; this includes

an entomologist and insect collector. Pakistan has a long history of malaria operational research,

which documents the change in vector composition in different ecological surroundings, vector

sampling surveys, entomology and susceptibility surveys. A recent insecticide susceptibility survey

has been conducted by Health Service Academy and data analysis is currently on-going. The

programme has established a technical vector control working group in 2009.

Page 131: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

131

4.3.10 Issues and challenges

• Insecticide resistance has been reported in Pakistan since 1980s to organochlorine and

organophosphate used in past Indoor Residual Spraying (IRS) campaigns.

• No systematic approach towards LLIN replacement has been initiated.

• Universal coverage for IRS and LLINs is not being met in all the targeted districts and union

councils and universal equity for LLINs is not being met within all targeted households.

• There has been observed instances of “wear and tear” of recently distributed LLINs.

• The timing of IRS campaigns does not always coincide prior to the rainy season and peak

transmission period (on religious grounds) in all the targeted union councils/localities.

• Some provincial programmes conduct larviciding which is not done consistently throughout the

transmission season and dosages and quantities may not be applied appropriately according to

the type of breeding sites.

• Vector control strategies (malaria, dengue, LLIN distribution), guidelines (IRS, community

mobilisation for LLINs, Crimean Congo Haemorrhagic Fever) , training manuals (IRS, LLINs)

have been developed by the federal programme but with restricted circulation to the provincial

programmes, while vector control guidelines (2007) are utilised in some provincial programmes

but this needs updating.

• Furthermore, IRS guidelines are not widely available at provincial and district level nor in local

languages making it difficult for field use.

• The Federal programme has established a basic IRS and LLIN database yet lacks tracking of

operational coverage of interventions by province and district.

• Evidence-based need assessment and M&E tools developed at the federal level have yet to be

disseminated to provincial programmes, while a basic monitoring system exists for IRS and

larviciding in selective provinces.

• At the provincial level, there is a lack of adequate equipment, supplies, inappropriate use,

maintenance and storage of available ones. The provincial programmes are at times

incapacitated by poor logistical support which impacts on the quality of service delivery.

• There are no updated vector maps with information on vector species, distribution, breeding

sites, resting and biting habits and insecticide susceptibility. This is partly attributed to a lack of

adequate resources (entomology lab and insectaries) and skills (by newly recruited and existing

staff) to conduct routine monitoring on key entomological indicators at established sentinel

sites.

• The programme has yet to develop an integrated vector management strategy, which addresses

the increasing demands of dengue and irrational use of public health pesticides.

• There is no collaboration with provincial universities for vector surveillance and research.

Page 132: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

132

• Aside from Global Fund districts, the MCP has not put in place strategies to distribute LLINs

towards universal coverage because of limited funds.

• Limited MCP contribution to IRS in districts that are supported by partner, which threatens IRS

sustainability in these districts.

• The MCP does not collect entomology indicators including insecticide resistance.

• The IRS program does not conduct geographical reconnaissance to guide planning

quantification and program performance in terms of operational coverage and proportion of

population protected.

• There is no full functional collaboration between MCP, Met Office, other relevant line

departments of the government, and institutions at the national level.

• Collaboration with IPHQ has just recently initiated which needs technical support, guidance,

strengthening and streamlining.

• The deficiency of entomology and vector control professionals is acute and is directly effecting

program performance.

• There is no proper waste disposal system for vector control interventions to safeguard the

environment.

• Larval source management measures such as larvivorus fish and larval parasites are not in

practice in Balochistan and should be introduced.

• Proper ware houses do not exist for malaria commodities at provincial or district levels, storage

spaces are made available on as hoc arrangement.

• No clear guidelines and training manuals for IRS intervention

• Lack of supervision of IRS operations compromises IRS quality.

• Limited IVM contribution to IRS in agencies that are supported by partners. This

threatens IRS sustainability in these agencies.

• The IVM program does not conduct geographical reconnaissance to guide planning

quantification and calculation of program performance in terms of operational coverage

and proportion of population protected.

• Shortage of equipment for entomology tests.

• Although integrated vector control guidelines are available but no trainings have been

conducted on guidelines in Sindh.

• Insecticide resistance research studies not conducted.

• Entomologists are not posted at all districts of province.

4.3.11 Conclusion and recommendations

• Develop a simple stratification and mapping method using reported incidence, topography

and local experts opinion to focus evidence based vector control on high transmission

districts and union councils.

Page 133: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

133

• LLIN gap analysis towards accelerated coverage of 80% in target high transmission districts

through mass campaigns supported by routine continuous distribution mechanisms (

outreach, routine, schools, community, commercial sector, social marketing) for hard to

reach areas and three yearly replacement

• Revise the LLIN distribution strategy to ensure there is universal equity at the household

level.

• Conduct LLIN hole index proportion study

• Reserve IRS (80%) to target high PF transmission districts to control and eliminate PF

• Reserve IRS to prevent epidemics and eliminate malaria foci in pre-elimination phase and

prevent re-introduction

• LSM to be targeted to support urban malaria control & elimination and can be used in

general nuisance mosquito control. LSM to be targeted to eliminate malaria foci in districts

for pre-elimination and elimination of PF and PV

• Develop an integrated vector management strategy, which addresses insecticide resistance

management and identifies innovative approaches for inter-sectorial collaboration.

• Establish an integrated vector borne disease control program (Malaria, Dengue, Leishmania)

with adequate focus on each disease control and elimination as appropriate.

• Establish vector sentinel surveillance in different eco-epidemiological settings with standard

guidelines by PMCP in collaboration with HAS and provincial universities and research

institutes

• Entomological spot surveillance to be conducted by insect collectors and malaria

supervisors supported by districts and provincial entomologists with provincial

entomological reference laboratory

• Update vector distribution maps stratified at district level which reflects the seasonal

distribution (vivax and falciparum) as well as vector binomics and susceptibility status of

the predominant malaria vectors.

• Revive the vector control technical committee with updated TOR

• Update and simplify the national vector control guidelines and supporting training materials

4.4 Malaria diagnosis and case management

4.4.1 Introduction

Access to diagnostic testing and treatment should be seen not only as a component of malaria

control but as a fundamental right of all populations at risk. According to WHO, early diagnosis and

treatment of malaria reduces disease and prevents deaths. It also contributes to reducing malaria

Page 134: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

134

transmission. One of the key strategies of Malaria Control Programme Pakistan is the early

diagnosis and prompt treatment of malaria cases.

4.4.2 Policy and guidance

Malaria case management is a thematic area aimed at ensuring those infected with malaria are

correctly diagnosed and consequently managed appropriately, using standard and effective

medications. The current policy of the Directorate of Malaria Control for the management of

malaria cases is to provide parasitological confirmation of all suspected cases before the

administration of anti-malarial drugs, except in children under 5 years with suspected

uncomplicated malaria in areas where diagnostic services are not available. The programme has

developed national guidelines on case management and malaria microscopy.

There is a long history of development of national case management guidelines in Pakistan.

Prior to 2001, the majority of malaria cases were presumptively treated based on clinical symptoms

due to lack of availability of diagnostic facilities at the PHC level (though malaria microscopy was

available but at limited health facilities). The practice of clinical diagnosis of malaria patients is still

being administered across the country. In 1978 the malaria case management service delivery was

integrated with overall health care delivery system. Chloroquine and primaquine remained on the

essential drug list and all forms of CQ (tablets, syrup and injectable) had been procured and

distributed to all health facilities in the province. Until1999 MCP in the provinces and at the

national level advocated for using treatment guidelines of eradication era mainly dependent

on chloroquine and primaquine for treatment of both falciparum and vivax malaria. The main

difference in the treatment regimen between the 2 species was for falciparum confirmed cases in

addition to chloroquine, primaquine was recommended for 3 day as anti gametocidal drug whereas

in vivax confirmed cases primaquine was recommended for 5 days as a anti-relapse drug.

Presumptive therapy with single dose of chloroquine in suspected cases was also part of guideline at

all level of health facilities. Quinine in diluted form was used to treat severe and complicated

falciparum malaria cases. With the implementation of national strategic plan for Roll back malaria in

2001 and the subsequent strategic plans (2005-10, 2011-15) number of national guidelines on case

management (both uncomplicated and complicated malaria) were developed in alignment to the

WHO guidelines. In 2001 the first country level consultation was held and the “First Treatment

Protocol for malaria case management was developed “replacing the presumptive treatment

option with the full course of Chloroquine in all malaria suspects, omitting active case

detection for treatment of malaria patients in the community. In 2003 the guidelines and policy

were reviewed and changes in treatment option for confirmed falciparum and anti-relapse therapy

were introduced. Based on the falciparum resistance to CQ, Sulfadoxine-pyrimethamin was

recommended as the first line treatment for confirmed falciparum cases. The treatment duration of

primaquine as anti-relapse therapy was extended to 14 days compared to previous 5 days

treatment. In 2004, Pakistan received GF for the implementation of malaria control intervention in 33

highly endemic districts. One of the major interventions was strengthening early diagnosis and

effective treatment. Linked to this grant proposal was a planned output to review and revise the

available case management protocol and training manuals of malaria microscopy and case

management training manuals.

In 2006 confirmatory tests for suspected malaria became mandatory excluding children under 5 with

suspected uncomplicated malaria and in areas where malaria diagnostic facilities are not available.

Additionally malaria patients of any age with presentation of severe and complicated were also

exempted from confirmation on microscopy in areas where facility was not available. For the first

Page 135: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

135

time antigen detected tests based on the detection of HRP2 proteins specific for falciparum were

introduced in GF target districts. Major policy shift in treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria

as ACT (artesunate+ SP) was introduced as first line treatment. In line with the recommendation of

WHO, the ban on production and use of Artemisinin monotherapies was imposed by the MOH across

the country which can be considered as a landmark decision.

In 2008, the new treatment protocol were developed through a consultative process including

provinces and national experts but it deviated from the national case management policy. Large

number of these protocols were printed without a national consensus which resulted in some critical

mistakes being overlooked in the document. During the same period in 2008 when the GF7

project was incepted in 19 high risk districts, the case management guideline and training

manuals were updated. In the same year while ,these guidelines were finalized an addition was made

for the pre-referral cases due to severe malaria diagnosed or suspected at FLCFs, the

injectable Artemether was recommended in place of i/m Quinine injection. This change was made

to avoid the side effects of Quinine while the patients are referred to higher centres. These

guidelines were used during the training session for the healthcare providers in malaria case

management in GF districts.

In 2009, the GF Round 10 proposal was developed for single stream funding with

round 7 in 38 high risk districts of Pakistan to strengthen diagnostic and treatment services

under the approach of universal coverage. WHO recommended a major policy shift in the coverage

of case management services and in the available option of 1st, 2

nd and 3

rd line drugs and was made

part of the proposal. This resulted in a major policy shift of selecting the Aretemisinin-

Lumafantrine as second line drug for failure cases and first line drug for mixed infections.

Injection Artesunate (I/M) instead of Artemether (I/M) was recommended as pre referral

treatment in severe and complicated malaria at referral enters and Artesunate I/V as the treatment

of choice in the treatment of severe and complicated malaria except during first trimester of

pregnancy where quinine remained the drug of choice.

During the course of R-10, SCI as a Co-PR given the responsibility to review and develop all the

technical guidelines for the program including the national treatment protocol and case management

training manuals. SCI through technical support of WHO developed the algorithm of malaria

treatment at public health facilities incorporating the new policy shifts. WHO released the first

edition of training manuals which were completely adopted in country training programs

with the 1st batch of the master trainers being trained by WHO experts using these manuals. In the

current treatment guidelines it has been agreed that 1 single dose of primaquine (45 mg) will also be

given to confirmed cases due to falciparum malaria. In 2013 guidelines on case management of

complicated malaria were also developed. All guidelines developed in 2013 have been implemented

in 38 TGF supported districts only. The remaining districts in Pakistan are following the 2007

guidelines.

Approximately 70-80% cases in Pakistan are due to vivax malaria, despite this home management

of malaria is not the national policy and is not administered. IPTT during pregnancy is also not

the national policy as reliable data prevalence of malaria in pregnancy is not available. Guidelines

on Quality Assurance of malaria Microscopy was developed by the programme in 2010-11.

However, how far these guidelines have been implemented remains to be assessed.

Page 136: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

136

Table 38: Pakistan Current Treatment Guidelines

Classification of Malaria

Treatment Regimen

Uncomplicated Falciparum Malaria (first-line) Artisunate (100 (adults) or 50mg (6-14 years)

mg)+Sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (500/25

mg) for 3 days + Single dose of primaquine

(0.75 mg)/Kg body weight

Note: Dose by age is given in the guidelines

Uncomplicated falciparum Malaria (Second line) Oral artemether-Lumifantrine (ALu) for 3

days.

First dose of 20mg/Kg body weight followed

by 10 mg/Kg body weight 8 hourly (dose by

age is given in the guidelines)

Uncomplicated vivax Malaria (First line) Chloroquine (150 mg base) tablets for 3 days

+ Primaquine 15mg tablets (0.25/Kg Body

weight) for 14 days

Primaquine should not be administered to

pregnant women, children> 5 years and

known G6PD deficiency

Page 137: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

137

Uncomplicated vivax Malaria (Second line) Oral quinine 20mg/Kg Body weight.

First dose of 20mg/Kg body weight followed

by 10 mg/Kg body weight 8 hourly

Severe Malaria (children and adults) at the If signs of severe malaria are observed, give

primary care level health facilities pre-referral treatment with IV/IM or

suppository of Artisunate and refer to

secondary care hospital.

Give I/M Quinine in pregnancy

Severe Malaria (Children and adults) at Artesunate 2.4 mg/kg bw IV or IM given on

secondary and tertiary level. admission (time = 0), then at 12 h and 24 h,

then once a day is the recommended

treatment.

Artemether, or quinine, is an acceptable

alternative if parenteral artesunate is not

available:

Artemether 3.2 mg/kg bw IM given on

admission then 1.6 mg/kg bw per day;

or Quinine 20 mg salt/kg bw on admission

(IV infusion or divided IM injection), then 10

mg/kg bw every 8 hours; infusion rate should

45

Page 138: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

138

Classification of Malaria

Treatment Regimen

not exceed 5 mg salt/kg bw per h.

Parenteral antimalarials in the treatment of severe malaria should be given for a minimum of 24 hours, once started (irrespective of the patient’s ability to tolerate oral medication earlier). If the patient can swallow, thereafter, the treatment should be completed by giving a complete course of one of the following: 1. full course of the recommended first-line ACT; 2. artesunate (2 mg/kg once daily) plus either clindamycin (10 mg/kg twice a day) or doxycycline (3.5 mg/kg once a day) or

tetracycline (4 mg/kg four times daily) to

complete a 7-day course of treatment;

3. quinine (10 mg salt/kg, 8-hourly) plus

either clindamycin (10 mg/kg twice a day), or

doxycycline (3.5 mg/kg once a day) or

tetracycline (4 mg/kg four times daily) to

complete a 7-day course of treatment.

Note:

In patients requiring more than 48 hours of

quinine parenteral therapy, the

maintenance

Dose should be reduced by one-third to

one-half (i.e. 5–7 mg salt/kg bw every 8

hours).

Doxycycline and tetracycline should not be used in children under 8 years of age and

Pregnant women.

Malaria in Pregnancy (uncomplicated) Detailed national Guidelines not available

Malaria in Pregnancy (complicated) Detailed national Guidelines not available

Malaria in Children Detailed National Guidelines not available

Page 139: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

139

According to malariometeric survey conducted in19 Global fund districts during 2009, only

41.5% facilities had standardized malaria case management guidelines which were about four

out of every ten facilities. Almost the same proportion of PHC facilities had staff trained (42.1%)

in the use of these management guidelines. Facilities from FATA had no malaria case management

guidelines and only one facility had staff trained in the use of guidelines. In KPK three facilities

had both trained staff and the guidelines. A little more than half of the facilities in the province of

Sindh (55%) and Balochistan (50.6%) had malaria case management guidelines along with trained

staff. Summary information is displayed in below:

Table 39: Health facilities having Standard Malaria case Management Guidelines and Staff trained in use of Guidelines

Guidelines

Guidelines but no Total Health

Province/Region Guidelines Trained staff and trained trained staff

facilities

staff Total Health

Facilities.

% No % No % No % No

Sindh 55.0 22 57.5 23 55.0 22 42.5 17 40

Baluchistan 56.8 46 55.6 45 50.6 41 39.5 32 81

KPK 10.0 3 10.0 3 10.0 3 90.0 27 30

FATA 0.0 0 5.0 1 0.0 0 95.0 19 20

Total 41.5 71 42.1 72 38.6 66 55.6 95 171

Source: Malariometric Survey in Target Districts-2009

Until 2005 WHO Bench Aids on Malaria microscopy was used to train the malaria

microscopists and laboratory technicians. In 2007 new guidelines were developed and aligned

with the malaria microscopy guidelines of the WHO. In the same year guidelines

on external quality assurance of malaria microscopy were also developed. These

microscopy and quality assurance guidelines were again updated in 2010 with no major

difference. In 2010 the first ever guidelines on RDTs were also developed for Pakistan.

The diagnosis and treatment guidelines stipulates that all malaria cases require confirmed

diagnosis through a parasitological test (RDT or microscopy) before treatment is given and

both are provided free in the public sector. The malariometeric survey (2008) indicated 20.5% of

clinics surveyed had malaria microscopy (which varied by province) and only 8.2% had an RDT

available. Because of the lack of diagnostic services in many areas, presumptive treatment of fever

which presents with malaria like symptoms is given routinely. Strict monitoring of malaria

diagnosis and treatment practices at the PHC level by the National and Provincial Malaria Control

Programmes could lead to better understanding of malaria best possible ways of managing the

disease at health facility level. The effects of malaria in young children (<5 years of age) and in

Page 140: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

140

pregnancy are not well understood in Pakistan. There are no exclusive guidelines for the

management of malaria in pregnancy, but the protocols are described in the national case

management guidelines. There is training manual for microscopy and case management guidelines.

KPK: There are training manuals for microscopy and case management guidelines. There is a

need to update the IMNCI guidelines and also include guidelines for complicated malaria and

mixed infections in children. There are two types of guidelines available for treatment of pregnant

ladies: national guidelines for treatment of all type of malaria in pregnancies and

Malaria Treatment according to Pregnancy Childbirth Post Partum New Born Care (PCPNC)

guidelines which is based on national guidelines. Quinine is the only anti-malarial drug that is

recommended in pregnancy. WHO in collaboration with other UN Agencies (UNICEF and

UNFPA) has developed generic guidelines for Pregnancy, Child birth, Post Partum and New

born Child (PCPNC). It has been locally adopted and master trainers are prepared however

the malaria treatment portion is still yet to be developed.

FATA, KPK, Punjab: The National Summary Treatment Protocol for Case Management of

Malaria documents the clinical malaria, uncomplicated vivax malaria, uncomplicated and

complicated falciparum malaria and mixed infections.

Punjab: The IMNCI guidelines also mention the treatment of malaria on national guidelines

which need to be updated.

Sindh: Case management guidelines are available and staff have been trained according to these

guidelines. However adherence to case management guidelines is an issue particularly in private

sector (except in six GFATM supported districts).

4.4.3 Organization of case management services

The DOMC does not have full time technical staff responsible for developing/updating

guidelines on diagnosis and treatment. The development of guidelines on case

management are generally sourced out and then presented to the technical advisory

committee for review compared to the national policy and

for endorsement. Once the guidelines are endorsed provincial level trainings are

conducted, but there is no follow-up mechanism to monitor the implementation of

these guidelines at the tertiary, secondary and primary level health facilities except in 38

Global Fund supported Districts through recently developed and implemented

surveillance tools (FM1-4). These tools collect information from the BHUs,

RHCs and DHQs. Unfortunately there is no system in place for the surveillance of either

severe or complicated malaria cases or mortality due to malaria although national

guidelines on complicated malaria have recently been developed with support from

TGF-10. At present none of the tertiary and district hospital report any data to the

DoMC or the provinces, although patients with severe malaria are admitted and

managed at this level.

FATA: Physicians, Medical Officers, Technicians, Pharmacists, nurses/lady health visitors

work at different level of health care facility. At the community level, CHW known as

(Lady Health Worker) handle mainly health education but are also provided with a medicinal

kits and are responsible for the diagnosis and management of uncomplicated malaria cases in

the communities and referral of those with signs of severity. The cases of severe malaria in

Page 141: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

141

FATA cannot be treated even at DHQ level because of non functional ICU or blood

transfusion services. Usually all the severe cases are referred to the nearest district of the

settled area of Khyber Pakhthunkhwa.

Table 40: Case Management Facilities and Functions at Different Level

Health Facility

Human Resource

Lab Facilities Medicines

DHQ/THQ Specialized Physicians Medical officers Technicians Nurses etc

RDT’s, Microscopy done

Admission 24 hours a day. No functional ICU Blood transfusion services available but not a routine procedure

For Vivax Tab chloroquine (phosphate or sulfate) 150 mg For Falciparum Tablets Primaquine (diphosphate) 15 MG To be used in combination (coblister) Tab Sulfadoxine + Pyrimethamine Tab Artesunate 50 mg Management of severe malaria Artemether Ampule 80mg/ml in 1-ml Artemether + Lumefantrine Tablets 20 mg + 120 mg

RHC Medical Officer (Doctor)

RDT’s, Microscopy done

No admission No ICU or blood transfusion services available

For Vivax Tab chloroquine (phosphate or sulfate) 150 mg For Falciparum Tablets Primaquine (diphosphate) 15 MG To be used in combination (coblister) Tab Sulfadoxine + Pyrimethamine Tab Artesunate 50 mg Management of severe malaria Artemether Injection 40mg/ml

BHU Medical Officer (Doctor)

RDT’s, Microscopy done

No admission service

For Vivax Tab chloroquine (phosphate or sulfate) 150 mg For Falciparum Tablets Primaquine (diphosphate) 15 MG To be used in combination

Page 142: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

142

(coblister) Tab Sulfadoxine + Pyrimethamine Tab Artesunate 50 mg

CD Dispenser/ Technician

NO RDT and Microscopy

No admission service

Not Available

Drug Stores/ Pharmacies

Non technical persons

NO RDT and Microscopy

No admission service

All type of medicines available

Community LHW

NO RDT and Microscopy

No admission service

Tablet, 150 mg (as phosphate or sulfate) Strip/blister 100 tablets/ per LHW/per month Syrup, 50 mg/5ml (as phosphate or sulphate) 5 bottles/per LHW / per month

Clinic General Physicians

MBBS Treatment on clinical diagnosis NO RDT and Microscopy

No admission service

Not available

Clinic Specialists

Treatment on clinical diagnosis NO RDT and Microscopy

No admission service

Not available

KPK: Physicians, Medical Officers, Technicians, Pharmacists, nurses/lady health visitors

work at different level of health care facility. At the community level, CHW known as

(Lady Health Worker) handle mainly health education but are also provided with a medicinal

kits and are responsible for the diagnosis and management of uncomplicated malaria cases in

the communities and referral of those with signs of severity. The tertiary or teaching

hospitals have well equipped laboratory where complete parasitology is done. The

physicians are highly qualified. The cases of severe malaria in tertiary hospital can be

treated 24 hours a day where blood transfusion services as well as intensive care unit

available.

Page 143: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

143

Table 41: Case Management Facilities and Functions at Different Level

Health

Facility

Human

Resource

Lab Facilities Medicines

Tertiary

/Teaching

Hospitals

Specialized

Physicians

Medical

officers

Technicians

Nurses etc

Modern

well

equipped.

RDT’s,

Microsco

py done.

Admission

24 hours a

day.

Intensive

care unit

(ICU) and

blood

transfusion

services

available

All type of drugs is available.

DHQ/THQ Specialized

Physicians

Medical

officers

Technicians

Nurses etc

Well

Equipped

RDT’s,

Microsco

py done

Admission

24 hours a

day.

ICU and

Blood

transfusion

services

available

For Vivax

Tab chloroquine (phosphate

or sulfate) 150 mg

For Falciparum

Tablets Primaquine

(diphosphate) 15 MG

To be used in combination

(coblister)

Tab Sulfadoxine +

Pyrimethamine

Tab Artesunate 50 mg

Management of severe

malaria

Artemether Ampule 80mg/ml

in 1-ml

Page 144: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

144

Artemether + Lumefantrine

Tablets 20 mg + 120 mg

RHC Medical

Officer

(Doctor)

RDT’s,

Microsco

py done

Limited

admission

No ICU or

blood

transfusion

services

available

For Vivax

Tab chloroquine (phosphate

or sulfate) 150 mg

For Falciparum

Tablets Primaquine

(diphosphate) 15 MG

To be used in combination

(coblister)

Tab Sulfadoxine +

Pyrimethamine

Tab Artesunate 50 mg

Management of severe

malaria

Artemether Injection

40mg/ml

BHU Medical

Officer

(Doctor)

RDT’s,

Microsco

py done

in GF

districts

and not in

non GF

districts

No

admission

service

For Vivax

Tab chloroquine (phosphate

or sulfate) 150 mg

For Falciparum

Tablets Primaquine

(diphosphate) 15 MG

To be used in combination

(coblister)

Tab Sulfadoxine +

Pyrimethamine

Tab Artesunate 50 mg

Page 145: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

145

CD Dispenser/

Technician

NO RDT

and

Microsco

py

No

admission

service

Not Available

Drug

Stores/

Pharmacies

Non

technical

persons

NO RDT

and

Microsco

py

No

admission

service

All type of medicines

available

Community LHW

NO RDT

and

Microsco

py

No

admission

service

Tablet, 150 mg (as phosphate

or sulfate) Strip/blister

100 tablets/ per LHW/per

month

Syrup, 50 mg/5ml (as

phosphate or sulphate)

5 bottles/per LHW / per month

Clinic

General

Physicians

MBBS Treatmen

t on

clinical

diagnosis

NO RDT

and

Microsco

py

No

admission

service

Not available

Clinic

Specialists

Treatmen

t on

clinical

diagnosis

NO RDT

and

Microsco

py

No

admission

service

Not available

Page 146: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

146

Specialised

Private

Hospitals

Specialized

Physicians

Medical

officers

Technicians

Nurses etc

Modern

well

equipped.

RDT’s,

Microsco

py done.

Admission

24 hours a

day.

Intensive

care unit

(ICU) and

blood

transfusion

services

available

All type of drugs is available.

Punjab: There are 385 public microscopic centers and 2650 RDT centers. Large numbers of

posts are vacant. There is no focal person for case management at provincial or district

level. No technical committee exists which guides the program on case management.

Physicians, Medical Officers, Technicians, Pharmacists, nurses/lady health visitors work at

different level of health care facility. At the community level, CHW known as (Lady Health

Worker) handle mainly health education but are also provided with a medicinal kits and are

responsible for the diagnosis and management of uncomplicated malaria cases in the

communities and referral of those with signs of severity. The tertiary or teaching hospitals

have well equipped laboratory where complete parasitology is done. The physicians are also

highly qualified. The cases of severe malaria in tertiary hospital can be treated 24 hours a

day where blood transfusion services as well as intensive care unit is available.

Table 42 Case Management Facilities and Functions at Different Level

Health

Facility

Human

Resource

Lab Facilities Medicines

Tertiary

/Teaching

Hospitals

Specialized

Physicians

Medical

officers

Technicians

Modern

well

equipped.

RDT’s,

Microscop

y done.

Admission 24

hours a day.

Intensive care

unit (ICU)

and blood

transfusion

services

All type of drugs is available.

Page 147: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

147

Nurses etc

available

DHQ/THQ Specialized

Physicians

Medical

officers

Technicians

Nurses etc

Well

Equipped

RDT’s,

Microscop

y done

Admission 24

hours a day.

ICU and

Blood

transfusion

services

available

For Vivax

Tab chloroquine (phosphate or

sulfate) 150 mg

For Falciparum

Tablets Primaquine

(diphosphate) 15 MG

To be used in combination

(coblister)

Tab Sulfadoxine +

Pyrimethamine

Tab Artesunate 50 mg

Management of severe

malaria

Artemether Ampule 80mg/ml in

1-ml

Artemether + Lumefantrine

Tablets 20 mg + 120 mg

RHC Medical

Officer

(Doctor)

RDT’s,

Microscop

y done

Limited

admission

No ICU or

blood

transfusion

services

available

For Vivax

Tab chloroquine (phosphate or

sulfate) 150 mg

For Falciparum

Tablets Primaquine

(diphosphate) 15 MG

To be used in combination

(coblister)

Tab Sulfadoxine +

Pyrimethamine

Page 148: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

148

Tab Artesunate 50 mg

Management of severe

malaria

Artemether Injection 40mg/ml

BHU Medical

Officer

(Doctor)

RDT’s,

Microscop

y done in

GF

districts

and not in

non GF

districts

No admission

service

For Vivax

Tab chloroquine (phosphate or

sulfate) 150 mg

For Falciparum

Tablets Primaquine

(diphosphate) 15 MG

To be used in combination

(coblister)

Tab Sulfadoxine +

Pyrimethamine

Tab Artesunate 50 mg

CD Dispenser/

Technician

NO RDT

and

Microscop

y

No admission

service

Not Available

Drug Stores/

Pharmacies

Non technical

persons

NO RDT

and

Microscop

y

No admission

service

All type of medicines available

Community LHW

NO RDT

and

Microscop

y

No admission

service

Tablet, 150 mg (as phosphate

or sulfate) Strip/blister

100 tablets/ per LHW/per month

Page 149: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

149

Syrup, 50 mg/5ml (as

phosphate or sulphate)

5 bottles/per LHW / per month

Clinic

General

Physicians

MBBS Treatment

on clinical

diagnosis

NO RDT

and

Microscop

y

No admission

service

Not available

Clinic

Specialists

Treatment

on clinical

diagnosis

NO RDT

and

Microscop

y

No admission

service

Not available

SpecialisedP

rivate

Hospitals

Specialized

Physicians

Medical

officers

Technicians

Nurses etc

Modern

well

equipped.

RDT’s,

Microscop

y done.

Admission 24

hours a day.

Intensive care

unit (ICU)

and blood

transfusion

services

available

All type of drugs is available.

Sindh: There is a network of 431 microscopy centers of Malaria Control Program spread to 7

teaching hospitals, 18 DHQs, 26 in major other hospitals, 41 in THQ, and 109 in RHC and 205 in

BHUs and 27 in MCH centers.

Page 150: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

150

4.4.4 Human resources, training and capacity development

Capacity building is one of the key components of the Directorate of Malaria Control. During last

five years following trainings/workshops have been held to train human resource on case

management. Training methods include module based training with combination of knowledge

and skills. Generally training sessions use interactive approach followed by lectures and

presentation using multimedia. The targets achieved by the TGF were achieved, the following

table shows the number of trainings conducted by the DOMC in collaboration with TGF support.

Table 43: Capacity building of health care providers 19 districts of TGF Round-7 (DOMC)(Sept 2011-June 2013)

Indicators Targets Results Progress

percent

age wise

Number of health care providers trained on national Case 2550 2356 92% management guidelines in public and private sectors

Table 44: Capacity building of health care providers 19 districts of TGF Round10 (Save the Children International)

Year 1

Year2

Year 1,Year 2

Indicator

Activity Description

Q1,Q2,Q3,Q4

Q5,Q6,Q7,Q8 Q1,Q2,Q3,Q4,Q5,

Q6,Q7,Q8

Description

Target Progress Target Progress Target Progress

Tra

inin

gs

Refresher training of private sector. 79 5 41 80 120 85

Basic malaria microscopy. 65 43 30 64 95 107

Refresher training of public sector. 76 30 0 83 76 113

D

iagnosis

&M

anagementCase

Public RDTs. 198 156 182 284 380 440

Private RDTs. 79 16 41 99 120 115

QA in malaria diagnosis. 43 47

0 0

43 47

Training of private care providers on

malaria case management in 79 8 41 105 120 113

selected 6 districts

50

Page 151: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

151

Year 1

Year2

Year 1,Year 2

Indicator

Activity Description

Q1,Q2,Q3,Q4 Q5,Q6,Q7,Q8 Q1,Q2,Q3,Q4,Q5,

Q6,Q7,Q8

Description

Target Progress Target Progress Target Progress

Training of public sector health care

providers on uncomplicated malaria 627

50 0

578 627

628

case management at first level

health care facilities.

Incountry training: WHO advanced 24

23 0

0 24

23

course on Malaria Case

Management (1 week)

Training of master trainers on 38

16 0

16 38

32

malaria case management (03 days)

in 38 districts

Training of public sector health care

providers on severe and

complicated malaria case 92 0 75 125 167 125

management at secondary and

tertiary level health care facilities

Total 1400 394 410 1434 1810 1828

FATA: A total of 181 physicians were trained on case management guidelines, 84

microscopists are trained on microscopy and 113 personnels on RDT’s.

KPK: A total of ??? physicians are trained on case management guidelines, ???

microscopists are trained on microscopy and ???on RDT’s.

Punjab: All human resource are reportedly trained.

Sindh: There is no focal point or case management specialist in Malaria Directorate

Sindh to provide technical guidance to the health care providers on malaria case

management. However directorate has collaborated with Liaqat University of Health

Sciences (LUMHS) Hyderabad, where Prof Dr Salma Shaikh (Dean of Pediatric Ward) to

provide technical support and guidance in case management trainings of Malaria

treatment according to the National Guidelines.

4.4.5 Annual planning

The indicators for malaria diagnosis and treatment have been spelled out in the national

strategic framework 2011-15 which are as follows:

• % of patients with uncomplicated malaria getting correct treatment at health

facility and community levels, according to national guidelines;

Page 152: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

152

• % of patients with severe/complicated malaria correctly managed at health

facility;

• % of public health facilities with adequate antimalarial drugs and diagnostic

supplies;

• % of diagnosed P. falciparum cases treated with ACTs;

• % of private sector health care providers involved in malaria case management

according to the national treatment guidelines;

• # of sentinel sites reporting on antimalarial drug resistance.

4.4.6 Malaria Diagnosis

Malaria diagnosis in Pakistan is based on microscopy (both thick and thin smears) and

RDTs. The RDTs currently being used are for diagnosis of both falciparum and vivax

malaria. In addition large numbers of cases diagnosed clinically are reported through

DHIS.

According to the existing policy FLCFs (BHUs) have been designated as RDT centers,

while, Rural Health Centres (RHCs), Tehsil Head Quarter Hospitals (THQs), District

Head quarter Hospitals (DHQs) have been designated as the malaria microscopy centres.

The District Headquarter Hospitals and tertiary care (Teaching Hospitals) hospitals have

well equipped laboratory and advanced case management services with well- equipped

Intensive Care Units (ICUs), which act as the referral hospitals for severe cases of

malaria. Emergency care services are available 24 hours.

However the staff in tertiary care hospitals have not been trained on national guidelines

for the management of severe cases. Table 42 below shows strengthened microscopy

centers in 19 high risk districts of TGF-7. A total of 708 have been strengthened in both

public and private sector (supported mainly by Global Fund). However, strong political

commitment from the public sector is required to sustain these diagnostic centers. In

addition the public sector PR Save the Children through TGF SSF-10 support 161

microscopy centers, 378 RDT Centres have been established in Public sector health

facilities and 8 microscopy and 53 RDT centers have been established in private clinics

(Table 43).

Table 45: Detail of Microscopy Centres and RDT Centres in Highly Endemic TGG Supported Districts of Pakistan for PUDR P-7

Microscopy Private

Province

Population

RDT Centre

Total

Centre

Practitioners

KPK / FATA 5,184,596 97 126 13 236

Sindh 4,593,585 89 82 20 191

Page 153: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

153

Balochistan 2,485,243 90 168 23 281

Total 12,263,424 276 376 56 708

Table 46: Detail of Microscopy and RDT Centres in Highly Endemic TGF Supported

Districts of

Pakistan TGF – 10

Public Centre

Private Practitioners

Province

Total

Microscopy

RDT Centre Microscopy

RDT Centres

Centres

Centres

KPK / FATA 95 222 0 35 352

Sindh 22 65 2 6 95

Balochistan 44 91 6 12 153

Total 161 378 8 53 600

Page 154: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

154

Table 47: Achievement in coverage for diagnosis and treatment 19 districts of TGF

Round-7 and 19 districts of TGF-Round 10 Progress

Entities Indicators Targets Results percentage

wise

Percentage of confirmed PF cases

treated with ACT as the first line 95% 97% 102%

treatment in 19 target districts

TGF-7 Number of RDTs used at first level care

Facilities (FLCFs) in 19 R-7 target 611,970

771,952

126%

districts including private clinics in 04

pilot districts

Cases treated 80% 92% 115%

TGF-10

Number RDTs done 727380

161095

22%

Balochistan: Microscopists and staff (RDT) have undergone training, but the number of diagnostic

facilities needs to be improved and refresher training has to be extended to the private sector.

FATA: The microscopy centers are rolled out to primary health level facilities i.e. basic health

units or community health centers. There are 108 public microscopic centers and 152 RDT centers

in FATA.

KPK: Currently, The GF funded districts have introduced microscopy centers to primary health

level facilities i.e. Basic Health Units, CD’s and private centers while the diagnostic centers in non

GF districts are limited to rural health centers and the basic health units as diagnostic centers.

There are 70 public microscopic centers and 20 RDT centers. There is limited technical staff in

rural areas and serious concerns regarding the quality of laboratory. The introduction of RDT in KP

placed an additional challenge for the diagnosis of malaria as their guidelines were unclear

concerning criteria for their use along with poor quality training and lack of quality control

systems. Even with these efforts of improving diagnosis of malaria, the continued treating of fevers

as malaria can be attributed to inadequate guidance on what to do with a negative result. But even

when this is provided, the performance of these tests greatly depends on the training of the

providers and conditions in distributing and storage especially of RDTs.

4.4.7 Malaria Treatment

Balochistan : The paramedical level staff and first-level health professionals have been trained on the

national case management guidelines.

Table-45, shows the data on malaria diagnostic microscopy from 2007 to 2012, collected by the data

management cell of MCP including PR sources. The increase in the indicators is possibly due to the

improvement of the diagnostic skills, reporting and other resources for microscopy. However, the increase

in falciparum needs further investigation.

Page 155: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

155

Table 48: Balochistan Malaria Microscopy Data.

Population

Total

Slides

Total

Positive P.vivax P.falciparum API F.R SPR

2007 7,844,715 388,115 46,805 28,051 18,754 5.97 40.07 12.06

2008 8,159,523 371,606 43,848 30,020 13,828 5.37 31.54 11.80

2009 8,355,352 395,263 49,778 33,994 15,784 5.96 31.71 12.59

2010 8,555,880 414,707 63,625 36,480 27,145 7.44 42.66 15.34

2011 8,761,221 420,252 57,980 36,146 21,834 6.62 37.66 13.80

2012 8,971,490 421,943 57,111 37,901 19,210 6.37 33.64 13.54

KPK : Clinical Malaria: First line drug is chloroquine oral only without primaquine. During follow up if

the response is partial, or the symptoms reappear within 28 days (recrudescence of falciparum case with

initial response to CQ but due to resistance to CQ the symptoms reappear) instead of using Artesunate+

SP suggestion have been made for the prescriber to administer Artemether plus lumefantrine for three

days. In case of developing more severe symptoms the patient should be referred to secondary care

facility after pre-referral treatment with IV/ IM or suppository of Artesunate, Artemether IM .

Confirmed uncomplicated falciparum malaria (by RDT or microscopy): Oral Quinine for 7 days should

be prescribed to all cases, in case of failure 3 days Artemether plus lumefantrine

Confirmed vivax cases (by RDT or microscopy): Three days treatment with oral Chloroquine plus 14

days Primaquine (daily single dose) 2nd

line treatment in failure cases oral quinine for 7 days should be

prescribed to all cases

PF/PV mixed infections: Artemether plus lumefantrine for 3 days should be given with fatty diet (milk,

butter etc.) a 14 days Primaquine should also be prescribed as in vivax cases

Severe and complicated falciparum malaria: IV Artesunate where not contraindicated once daily till the

patient takes the drug orally or 7 days treatment is completed with this monothrapy. Patient is switched

over to oral ACT for 3 days (Artesunate plus SP). In areas where parenteral Artesunate is not available,

IV Quinine in diluted form should be dispensed under close

4.4.8 Performance indicators and targets

The indicators for malaria diagnosis and treatment have been spelled out in the national strategic framework 2011-15 which are as follows:

• % of patients with uncomplicated malaria getting correct treatment at health facility and community levels, according to national guidelines;

• % of patients with severe/complicated malaria correctly managed at health facility; • % of public health facilities with adequate antimalarial drugs and diagnostic supplies; • % of diagnosed P. falciparum cases treated with ACTs;

• % of private sector health care providers involved in malaria case management according to the

national treatment guidelines; • # of sentinel sites reporting on antimalarial drug resistance.

Page 156: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

156

4.4.9 Service Delivery outputs and outcomes

Currently National Malaria Control Programme receives malaria data by vertical Malaria Information

system on a monthly basis from all the districts. Two different types of reporting tools are used. The newly

developed surveillance tools by the GF (FM1-FM4) are being used for reporting from 38 Round-10

supported districts, whereas in non-Global fund supported districts data is being collected using the

older version developed during eradication era. . The new forms are more comprehensive and

capture age, sex, pregnancy status and stock out for antimalarials, LLINs, Insecticides, Lab supplies apart

from information on diagnoses, treatment (both uncomplicated and severe malaria), OPD admissions and

deaths.

Clinical diagnosis currently is reported through DHIS which does not routinely share its data with the

Programme nor is it analyzed for any planning or M& E activities. Confirmed cases are also

collected by DHIS yet figures may not be the same as those from MIS. No data on severe cases or mortality

is available from the Programme. There is no established electronic database in the programme and the

data is mainly paper based. The Directorate of Malaria Control is considering implementing the new

tools in the non-global fund supported districts also, but no clear timeline have yet been agreed on.

4.4.11 SWOT Analysis

Malaria diagnosis

Strengths Weakness

• Existing network of labs at public and private care

delivery outlets

• Provincial level and national level training

institutes, training medics and para-medics in lab

techniques

• New diagnosis policy with simple wall charts -

2010

• RDT and microscopy strengthening in BHUs in GF

supported districts

• National public health laboratory division in the

national institute of health

• Rehabilitation of diagnostic facilities in 38 target

districts (RDT and Microscopy)

• Integrated approach of malaria Diagnosis at PHC

package

• Free of cost services

• Availability of training manuals and experts

• Most cases are clinically diagnosed

• Lack of systematic quality assurance

through provincial malaria reference

laboratories

• Poorly defined case definition

(DEWS)

• Inconsistency in case definition

(DEWS vs. Program & DHIS,

MNCH)

• Lack of qualified staff

(microscopists/technicians performing

RDTs)

• Irrational use of RDTs

• Poorly defined role of LHWs in

diagnosis of malaria at community

level

• Poorly defined indicators (# of RDT

Page 157: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

157

trainers trained by WHO in Muscat

used)

• Low utilization of public health

facilities

• Inconsistency in number of slide

received, examined and reported back

to BHUs

• Delay in confirmation (at the BHU

level)

• Poor adherence to infections

preventions measures while doing

microscopy and RDTs

• Large number of vacant positions

(microscopists)

Malaria treatment

Strengths Weakness

• Availability of:

National treatment guideline

Guideline on complicated case management

Malaria case management training manual

Malaria case management guide

• Primaquine partially supplied for P. vivax

treatment

• Imposed ban on the production and use of

monotherapies by DRA

• Free of cost treatment availability at public health

facilities/hospitals

• Drug quality control system in place for drugs and

enforced with district drug inspectors

• National program procuring ACT

• No universal radical treatment for PV

• Treatment of clinical cases

• Mono-therapy for the treatment of PF

• New treatment policy not fully

approved and internalized at

provincial level

• Not enough hard copies of malaria

treatment policy

• Need for collaboration with IMNCI

and PCPNCP and LHW to update

their guidelines on malaria

• Too much focus on project not

enough on expanding access

• Poor adherence to treatment guideline

at all levels

• Low utilization of health facilities

• Fake and low quality medicines due

to lacking mechanisms for QA

Page 158: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

158

• No follow up DOTS compliance

system for 14 days P. vivax

• Self medication and mono-therapy in

private sector

• Inadequate estimation of total needs

for ACT and Primaquine

• Second line ACT for treatment of PV

and clinical malaria

• Use of SP for the treatment of clinical

cases

• Poor adherence to treatment guideline

in public and private health facilities

• Poor knowledge of malaria

4.4.12 Successes, best practices and facilitating factors

Malaria treatment in the public sector is being provided free of charge. Second line ACT, and in some

health facilities SP, is used for the treatment of PV and suspected cases. Regarding treatment, the national

case management guidelines spell out the treatment options for pregnant women both for uncomplicated

and severe malaria. These guidelines have been adapted from the updated WHO guidelines on case

management of malaria. Antimalarials that are safe in first trimester of pregnancy includes: quinine,

chloroquine, progunail and sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine. Of these quinine remains the most

effective and can be used in all trimesters of pregnancy. A registration system for medicines exist,

procurement of anti-malarial drugs (with unknown quality) from local market is common at the district

level. Monitoring of drug efficacy of first line drugs is conducted regularly and so far is efficacious.

4.4.13 Issues and challenges

Case management:

• Clinical diagnosis very common

• Delay in confirmation

• Lack of systematic quality assurance

• Poor adherence to infections preventions measures

Page 159: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

159

• Declining health system in areas where insecurity has prevailed

• War, natural disasters as earthquakes and floods resulting in IDP crises

• No refresher training over the years

• Large number of vacant position

• Lack of coordination between MCP and IMNCI strategy

Malaria treatment:

• Mono-therapy of most clinical cases

• No radical treatment for PV with Primaquine everywhere

• No follow up DOTS compliance system for 14 days P. vivax

• Self medication and mono-therapy for PF and PV in private sector

• Poor knowledge of malaria in districts where malaria is not a priority

• Shortage of supplies ( e.g. Primaquine, first line ACT)

• Mono-therapy still in use in public sector

• Irrational use of AMD

• Lack of availability of new treatment guidelines in public health facilities and DMCP and PMCP

(poor adherence to treatment guideline)

• Partnership with private sector in malaria case management still in pilot stage

• No refresher training over the years

4.4.14 Conclusion and recommendations

Case management:

1. Strengthening lab capacity: all suspected/clinical malaria cases should be tested with RDT or

microscopy before anti-malaria treatment is administered. RDT to be rapidly scaled up to all

BHUs in partnership with PPHI, IMNCI and PPNCP programs in malaria high risk districts.

2. Introduction of a systematic quality assurance system: strengthen quality control by establishing

provincial and district reference labs with adequate infrastructure, competent lab technicians with

support for annual cascade training and supervision, and continuous availability of consumables.

Page 160: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

160

3. Training and development: after thorough need assessment at the central, provincial and district

levels, a comprehensive training plan (refresher, pre-service and in-service training) for

strengthening diagnostic capacity should be developed.

4. Recruitment of new staff: deployment of lab technicians in all relevant vacant positions,

particularly in malaria high risk districts is needed.

Malaria treatment:

1 Competent officers should be assigned as focal points for malaria case management at federal and

provincial levels.

2 Update the federal and provincial essential drug list for health facilities and follow up the de-

regulation and ban on all malaria mono-therapy in public and private sector

3 Radical treatment for PV with Primaquine with DOTS for 15 days to reduce relapse and

transmission, supported by regular supply of Primaquine to all health facilities in malaria high

risk districts.

4 Provision of new malaria treatment policy, guidelines and wall charts to all public and private

health facilities by April 2014 supported by a ban on mono-therapy and standardized training for

all clinical staff

5 Establish community based malaria control with RDT and ACT with LHS-LHW and community

based organizations.

6 Case based reporting system be established for severe malaria cases followed by supportive

clinical investigation and audit.

7 Engagement and scale up public- private partnership in malaria control through professional

association and sharing guidelines and wall charts and orientation sessions

8 Supervision by PPHI and DHO supported medical officer for implementation of high standard of

malaria case management.

9 DoMC and PRs should ensure efficient drug supply management system with monthly stock

situation update especially for RDTs and ACTs.

4.5 Community mobilization

Page 161: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

161

4.5.1 Introduction

The National Malaria Control Programme recognizes that effective advocacy,

communication and social mobilization forms the foundation of any efforts to effectively

change service-providers ability, community behaviour and overall demand for effective

service utilization. Every planning document whether it is PC-I or strategic plan has

included BCC as one of the key component for disease control through behaviour

change.

4.5.2 Policy and Guidance

The key elements of the newly developed BCC strategy are as follows:

• Non-use of LLINs

• Inappropriate use

of LLINs

• Self-medication

• Irrational use of drugs

• Delayed treatment seeking

Over diagnosis and reporting

• lack of practices for preventing mosquitoes breeding

• Non compliance with prescription

• Treatment seeking from non qualified health practitioners

• Non use of IRS

Balochistan: The strategies and targets that have been adopted for MCP Balochistan are:

o Review the existing material on malaria and dengue control in Balochistan, especially on

awareness campaigns

o Develop health education messages for BCC aimed at general population through printed

material.

o Develop BCC strategy aimed at patients, their families and especially the mothers for

seeking early diagnosis and treatment within the first 24 hours of the onset of fever.

o Behavioral Change Communication strategy that will target the population at risk to

improve their treatment seeking behavior and proper use of LLINs, repellants, and

mosquito control.

FATA, KPK, and Punjab: In 2012 the BCC strategy was developed for Round 10 which has yet

to be endorsed by the Ministry of Health and so not implemented. No training guidelines exist.

Page 162: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

162

4.5.3 Organization

The Directorate of Malaria Control has a Health Education Officer who is a regular

staff of the Directorate. He is responsible to coordinate all BCC/IEC activities

related to malaria control. There is a Communication Manager recruited by Save

the Children who has been actively involved in development of BCC materials.

There is no separate IEC/BCC/Advocacy working group responsible for coordinating

activities.

4.5.4 Human resources, training and capacity development

Balochistan: The MCP has one health educator for the program. A formal health education unit is not

available. Staff, concerned with health education activities in the province are located in the Provincial

Health Directorate, under the DGHS there is a Chief Health Educator with some health educators posted

in the districts. There is a health education unit in each of the preventive programs, and there is a Health

Education department in the Institute of Public Health, Quetta.

FATA : There is no focal person for BCC activities at IVM, FATA. Presently the Program has only

a Program Manager, a data manager, computer operator and support staff. They are dependent on

the old health messages developed by DoMC and Partners. The Lady Health workers, school

teachers, religious scholar and health facility are trained on key health messages, who conduct health

awareness sessions with community members and are given incentive of Rs 50 for interacting with

each person. There are no health education sessions at health facility level.

KPK: The Health Directorate KPK has a focal point (Health Educationist) that coordinates

BCC/IEC for all diseases at the provincial level. Due to lack of resources and capacity, the role of

this single person is limited to gathering information during emergencies. There is no focal person

for BCC activities at Malaria Control Program, KP. Presently the Program has only a Program

Manager, a computer operator and support staff. They are dependent on the old health messages

developed by DoMC and Partners.

Sindh: Trained Health Education Officers are available both at province and district levels, but due to

inadequate allocation of funds and lack of mobility support there is limited implementation of health

education component.

4.5.5 Annual planning

4.5.6 Performance indicators and targets

As per strategic plan 2011-15 following are the BCC targets and indicators:

• ACSM strategy & implementation plans developed by Yr 2.

• At least one event per month per Union Council

organized during malaria transmission season;

• 80% of the LHWs involved in delivering malaria messages;

• All districts conduct mass media campaign during transmission season

Page 163: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

163

Indicators:

• # of events per month per UC conducted;

• % of LHWs involved;

• # of districts conducting mass media campaigns

4.5.7 Service Delivery outputs and outcomes

The programme has developed several materials such as: posters, charts, pamphlets, Banners, radio

television spots, dramas and jingles. The materials have basically been developed to address personal

protection measures using LLINs and early diagnosis and timely treatment. Radio, television, press,

community radio, religious leaders and health education at health facilities are the main channels used

to disseminate key messages. World Malaria Day is commemorated on 25th

April every year in

Islamabad and the Provinces. These days are used to conduct awareness creation on malaria

issues. Meetings are held with the policy makers and decision makers at the federal level and

importance of theme of the world malaria day is discussed. The World Malaria Day event is

followed by a press conference highlighting the burden of malaria and importance of its control.

The DOMC developed BCC materials as follows:

1. Printed materials

2. TV and Radio spots

The printed material includes posters, charts, pamphlets, banners and newspaper

while the media material includes “spots” on radio and television.

Messages on printed materials are as follows.

- Malaria is a life threatening disease. How malaria spreads, symptoms of

malaria, diagnosis and treatment of malaria and preventive measures.

- Insecticide Treatment Net is effective against malaria especially for children

and pregnant women.

- Prevention from Malaria fever is possible. Take preventive

measures.

- Instructions for Use of LLIN.

- Three important steps for prevention of malaria.

- Quality Malaria Diagnosis and Treatment available in all health

facilities of your area.

• Malaria is a killer. Protect your family with a treated net. Ways

from prevention of malaria

Page 164: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

164

Table 49 below shows the spots run on TV Radio and Printed in News papers.

Table 46: Media wise Statement of Expenditure (Pak Rupees) for Electronic and Print Media for the Period 2005 to

2010

Year /

2005-2006

2006-2007

2007-2008

2008-2009

2009-2010

Name of

Add Aired / Amount Add Aired / Amount Add Aired / Amount Add Aired / Amount Add Aired / Amount

Media

Published Spent Published Spent Published Spent Published Spent Published Spent

147 Spots

120 Spots 211 Spots

117 Spots (PTV, ATV,

Hum, KTN,

Nil Apna, ARY

Digital & News,

(PTV, ATV,

(PTV, ATV,Geo

Kook TV,

Televisio

n

6908568

(PTV, ATV, Geo 6752593

Nil

3494337 Khyber news,

5212663

Geo News,

News, ARY,

Business Plus,

News, ARY, ARY-

ARY, ARY-D,

(non- Express, KTN,

Waseeb, Rohi,

D, ATV, TV

ATV, TV

availabilit

y Rohi , Sindh TV

Saama, Dunia,

One, KTN, Sindh

One, Hum

of budget) Dherti, Apna,

News One,

TV, Hum TV,

TV, Business

Saama, Kook, &

Sindh TV,

Business PI,)

PIus, Indus)

Business Pius)

Mehran, Awaz,

Punjab TV, Star

Asia & CNBC)

Spots

287spots 314 Spots Nil

Spots

(PBC, FM-100,

Radio (PBC, FM- 671087 (PBC, FM-101, 1367773 Nil (non- 804086 FM-88, FM- 1785025

100, FM101,

FM-100, FM-91,

(PBC, FM-107,

104, FM-106.2,

availability

FM-104 &

FM-92 & FM- FM-91& FM-99

FM-105, FM-

of budget

FM-105)

105) 97, FM-93 FM-

91 & FM-99)

44 Adds

Nil

(Daily Jan,

Two Adds News, Nawa-e- 107 adds 44 Adds

Press 2889610 waqat, 1872104 Nil 3484136

Khabrian,

(Daily Aftab)

(non-

Published Published

Waqt, Din,

availability

Ausaf, Jinnah,

of budget

Express,

Page 165: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

165

Mashriq & Aaj )

7,579,655 9992470 7782559 6997688

Table 50: Media wise Statement of Expenditure (Pak Rupees) for Electronic and Print Media for the Period 2005 to 2010 Events conducted by Save the Children (Private Sector PR)

Advocacy events with Community awareness Community awareness

Entities community based activists session at community and sessions at community and

including lady health facility level in 38 districts facility level in 38 districts

workers by LHWs by CBOs/NGOs

PLYC 2699 32445 11854

NRSP 2212 25258 20067

ASD 2093 18106 10968

ACD 1305 29643 18900

Merlin 5151 66427 34200

Total 13460 171879 95989

Balochistan: The main bulk of BCC activities are being carried out by the PRs in the 17 high-risk

districts; according to their reports they have made progress in achieving the stated targets, but besides the

numbers of the sessions conducted there is no qualitative indicator to measure the quality of BCC

activities, but this will change after the initiation of the Partners Coordination meeting mechanism in

October 2013.

FATA: World Malaria Day is commemorated every year at the Agency Headquarter Level to create

awareness on malaria issues. The IVM in collaboration with Partners conducts a meeting at Agency

Headquarter Office to discuss the importance of world malaria day. The Agency Surgeon conducts

a press conference highlighting the malaria burden and the importance of its control.

The IVM distributes the already developed BCC materials (messages have been described earlier)

by DoMC or Partners. The developed materials are available as

1. Printed materials

2. TV and Radio spots

Page 166: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

166

Mosques and health education at community level are also the main channels used to disseminate

key messages.

KPK (same as FATA): The Lady Health workers conduct health education sessions on malaria

control at household level. At health facility level, there are no health education sessions.

Punjab: The Lady Health workers conduct health education sessions at household level while School

health and nutrition officers who are social scientists of Grade 17 conduct health education sessions

at school as well as community level.

The MCP Punjab distributes the already developed BCC materials by DoMC.

Sindh: On World Malaria Day Malaria Control Program organizes advocacy workshops and seminars for

opinion leaders, peers and community leaders which are presided by Minster or Secretary Health. Walks,

rallies and puppet shows are also organized at district level. In the PC - 1 there is provision of TV spots

and radio messages. Each message is of 30-40 seconds which are telecasted / broadcasted on TV and

Radio. For TV five messages for fifteen days per year and for Radio ten to fifteen messages per day are

broadcasted for one month per year. Messages are related to awareness of community regarding

prevention, diagnosis and treatment of Malaria.

4.5.8 SWOT Analysis

STRENGTHS WEAKNESS OPPORTUNITIES THREATS

Communication and

awareness strategy and

material available

Low involvement of other

political leaders at

provincial and district

level

Existence of many

political leaders that could

be recruited to advocate

for malaria control

Law and order situation

Commemoration of World

Malaria day including a

press conference

No focal point at MCP at

provincial or district level

NGO, donors, private

sector have shown

interest.

Lack of equipment,

transport and other means

to conduct social

mobilization

BCC strategy of GF

available

No mobility support and

inadequate financial

allocation for Advocacy,

BCC, IEC, activates at

provincial level and

district level

Availability of trained

human resources at

provincial and district

level

Existence of strong

cooperate sector in Sindh

Lack of Coordination

Page 167: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

167

province social

responsibility funding

available

Existence of two Health

Education officer at

provincial level. Separate

health education cell in the

DG office for all

preventive programs and

availability of education

officer at each district

Inadequate funds for

electronic media

Large number of NGO

function in Sindh can be

used for advocacy with

policy makers

Misconceptions among

general public due to lack

of education

Funds available for mass

media, TV, Radio in

current approved PC-1

Expansive and non

interactive

Access to the mass media

even by the rural

population

Miss interpretation of the

messages

Prolong electricity

shutdowns

Availability of many TV

channels including local

languages and increasing

radio coverage

No mobility support and

inadequate financial

allocation for Advocacy,

BCC, IEC, activates at

provincial level and

district level

Availability of trained

human resources at

provincial and district

level

Existence of strong

cooperate sector in Sindh

province social

responsibility funding

available

Lack of Coordination

4.5.9 Successes, best practices and facilitating factors

4.6.0 Issues and challenges

• Advocacy for prioritizing malaria control with high level policy makers and political leaders

needs to be strengthened to ensure adequate funding for BCC activities.

• A Malaria BCC strategy has been developed at the Federal level but needs to be approved and

made available to the provinces and districts.

• There is limited capacity and insufficient staff in advocacy, information, education,

communication at the provincial level.

Page 168: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

168

• Complex socio-cultural settings exist in different provinces and districts, further highlighted by

the low literacy rate in provinces such as Baluchistan and FATA and limited access to

households, specifically women and children has resulted in the lack of broad based community

involvement.

• Hence the need to develop community based malaria control, design context specific IEC

messages and ensure the judicious use of communication channels (mass media, interpersonal

and printed materials).

• The capacity of lady health workers has been overlooked as a potential for expanding and

strengthening community based malaria control interventions.

• Lack of funding prevent activities from being conducted

• Fine-tuning of IEC/BCC interventions is dependant on behavioral research on people’s perceptions of

malaria issues, malaria prevention and treatment. Currently, there is limited up to date research data

to inform proposed IEC/BCC activities.

• There are limited IEC/BCC materials

• Inadequate evaluation of health promotion activities for feedback

• Limited coverage

• Lack of mobility support for health education officers at provincial and district levels.

• Expensive mass media campaign (use of TV and Radio).

4.6.1 Conclusion and recommendations

1. To develop a strategy for increasing malaria advocacy and prioritization for community,

district, provincial and federal government action.

2. To build partnership with LHW program and PPHI for social mobilization and community

based malaria control program delivery.

3. Update malaria messages to target the local situation and adopt a local strategy which

identifies appropriate inter-personal channels for reaching the local communities and families

4. Harness the capacity of lady health workers for improving community BCC and scaling up

malaria control activities;

5. Prioritize the use and develop tools for inter-personal malaria communication for BCC using

schools, madrasas, local traditional and political leaders.

6. Introduce qualitative monitoring tools, which assess how well the elements of the COMBI

strategy are being carried out.

4.6 Surveillance, Monitoring and Evaluation

4.6.1 Introduction

Malaria is considered a major public health problem in Pakistan. With an estimated burden of 1.6 million

cases annually, Pakistan has been categorized by WHO in group-3 countries of the Eastern

Page 169: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

169

Mediterranean Region along with Sudan, Afghanistan and Yemen. These four countries account for

98% of the confirmed malaria cases in the region. Mass population movements within the country

and across international borders with Iran and Afghanistan, natural disasters and civil unrest,

unpredictable transmission patterns due to climatic changes, low immune status of the population, poor

socioeconomic conditions, declining health infrastructure, resource constraints, poor access to

preventive and curative services and lack of mounting drug and insecticide resistance in parasites and

vectors all contribute to this huge disease burden. It is generally believed that public sector health

facilities only reach 20% of the population therefore according to a conservative estimate total number

of malaria cases in the country could be five times higher. If this presumption is applied to the 2011 data, the

number in Pakistan is an estimated 1.5 Million cases. The Government of Pakistan is implementing

Malaria Control Program (MCP) in 72 malaria endemic districts with public sector resources and in 19

highly endemic districts with the support from the Global Fund (Round 7). Pakistan has also been

successful in receiving the Global Fund Round 10 Malaria grant targeting 38 highly endemic districts.

These 38 target districts include 19 districts of the Global Fund Round 7 and additional 19 districts from

Round 10. The total target population living in these districts is estimated at 24.84 million people. The

malaria burden in majority of the provinces is expected to be fivefold more than the reported as DHIS

data does not cover all the public health care facilities and 70-80% of the patients utilize private health

services

Balochistan: In some areas there are two peak transmissions, the first start March and April to June and

the second peak in September to November (post monsoon). In Balochistan malaria ranks the 2nd

top

priority disease after ARI (Acute Respiratory infection) and accounts for 33% disease burden of the

province. In 2012, 130 from among the malaria microscopy centers in the province, reported the numbers

of confirmed malaria cases to be 60974, this brings the API to 6.90. However the actual caseload may be

4 to 5 times higher due to the public sector diagnosis facilities covering only 20-30% of the attending

patients. Annual parasite index (API) of Balochistan is the highest compared to other Provinces in the

country.

Figure 1: Burden of Malaria in Balochistan: reported confirmed cases 2007 to 2012.

Page 170: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

170

Figure 2: Positive Slides 2012

Page 171: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

171

Figure 3: Falciparum Rate (FR) Balochistan – 2007-2012

Page 172: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

172

Figure29: Burden of API in Balochistan: 2007 to 2012.

Figure 304: Comparison of P.vivax with P.falciparum in Balochistan – 2007-2012

Table-48: shows data on malaria diagnostic microscopy from 2007 to 2012, includes the data from the PR

source. The increase in the indicators is possibly due to the improvement of the diagnostic skills,

reporting and other resources for microscopy. Although the increase in falciparum needs to be

investigated.

Page 173: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

173

FATA: Malaria is a high burden disease in FATA. The District Health Information System data reports

that 65944 cases of clinical malaria were diagnosed in 2012 in primary and secondary health facilities

outpatient department. Of these 3107 were admitted in a facility and no death was attributed to malaria.

The MIS data indicates there were 28791 microscopy confirmed cases in 2012. The API based on six

years average (2007-12) is 16.02 which is considered highest among all the provinces/states and is hyper

endemic.

KPK: Malaria is a high burden disease in KP. The District Health Information System data reports that

321046 cases of clinical malaria were diagnosed in 2012 in primary and secondary health facilities

outpatient department. Of these 5622 were admitted in a facility and 28 deaths were attributed to malaria.

The malaria burden is expected to be fivefold more than the reported because DHIS data is not covering

all the public health care facilities of the province and also because 70-80% of the patients utilize private

health services. The MIS data shows that there were 55928 microscopy confirmed cases in 2012.

Sindh: The Malaria surveillance system incorporates data from only public sector health facilities and is

fragmented. It is a passive surveillance system, where, data is collected from patients who report to health

facilities. Malaria is not a notifiable disease in Sindh and elsewhere in Pakistan, data from private sector

is not included. Public sector is covered partially; only 622 health facilities (41.54%) are covered out of

total 1497 health facilities in public sector in Sindh.

4.6.2 Policy, Guidance, Coordination

The aim of the malaria control programme is to reduce the burden of disease in these 38 high risk districts

by scaling-up appropriate intervention including strengthening case management, treating all confirmed

malaria cases as per national guidelines, and vector control through IRS and LLINs. In order to achieve

the targets the programme requires a bench mark against which progress towards scale-up can be

measured.

4.6.3 Malaria country profile, risk mapping and stratification

Both Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax are widely distributed in Pakistan. Table-52 shows

statistics for the year 201222

. The incidence annual parasite incidence vary widely between provinces

ranging from as low as 0.10 cases per 1000 population in AJK to 7.68/1000 population in Baluchistan and

6.82 cases per 1000 population in FATA. The number of confirmed malaria cases reported from all

provinces and AJK have been 289759. Proportion of P falciparum varies widely with a range of

2.4% -44% respectively. Maximum proportion of falciparum cases (i.e. 44%) has been reported from

Baluchistan province followed by 27% in Sindh, 11% in FATA, 9% in KPK and 6% in Punjab province.

Proportion of PV to Pf over last five years (2008-2012) is shown in Figure-31. Certain areas of

Sindh and Baluchistan have year round transmission with falciparum predominance.

Table 51: Malaria Data – Pakistan 2012

Page 174: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

174

TOTAL

Indicators

Province

Population

Slides/RDT

Positive

P.V

PF

Mix

SPR API BER % P.F

Examined

Punjab 91,943,208 1636079 17522 16426 1008 88 1.07 0.19 - 5.75

Sindh 39,231,406 1785499 114651 79511 31083 4057 5.56 2.9 - 27.1

KPK 22,985,802 534516 63494 57402 5804 288 12.4 2.76 - 9.14

FATA 4,382,727 197571 29926 26432 3232 262 16.2 6.82 - 10.79

Baluchistan 8,295,628 588558 63733 35372 28248 113 12.85 7.68 - 44.32

AJK 4,160,025 146744 433 421 11 1 0.29 0.10 - 2.54

TOTAL

170,998,796

4888967

289759

215564

69386

4809

5.57

1.69

-

23.9

(1.6)

Figure 31: Overall PV-PF Ration (2008-12) in Pakistan

The MIS data 2007-2012 includes all the four provinces and Regions (Punjab, Sindh, Balochistan, KP

and FATA and AJK). The data shows Plasmodium falciparum and vivax as the prevalent species in

Page 175: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

175

Pakistan and which have increased since 2007. There was a significant rise of both species in 2010 which

may have been attributed to intensive floods. There has been a steady increase in the number of

Plasmodium Vivax cases since 2010 while the number of falciparum cases has declined. Data on mixed

infection indicates a rise since 2009

Figure 32: MIS data 2007 -2012

Overall P. falciparum accounted for 23.9% of both slides and RDTs examined as mono infection and

1.6% as mixed infection mainly in association with P. vivax.

Disease trends:

Figure 33 shows API, SPR and BER trend over time. The API has shown an upward trend from 2009-

2010 with a marginal descend in the subsequent years which coincides with BER. There has been an

increase in SPR from 2009 to 2011 with a decline in 2012. Based on this information it is difficult to

attribute this to malaria preventive intervention (use of LLINs), or due to quality of services or outbreaks

occurring in several districts during the same period. Interestingly there is a weak correlation between the

SPR and API which needs to be further investigated. A more worrying observation is the BER which

remains at less 3% despite a huge investment made in trainings, equipment, supplies and effective

monitoring. Detailed data is given in Table 53 below;

Page 176: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

176

Figure-33: Trends in malaria indicators Pakistan (2007-12)

8.00

6.00

4.00 BER

SPR

2.00 API

0.00

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Page 177: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

177

Table-52 Province wise disease burden: Confirmed cases, SPR and API 2005-2012

*This includes microscopy and RDT positives

The table below shows gender and age wise distribution of PV and PF in 19 high risk districts supported

by Global Fund. The female:male is 0.8. Among pregnant women number of cases with confirmed

malaria reported was almost negligible (732 and 514 cases were recorded in 2011 and 2012

respectively). However, proportion of children less than 5 years who had confirmed malaria was

18%. Microscopy was 19% in 2011 and 17% in 2012 whereas RDT positivity was 9% in 2011 and 8% in

2012. Approximately double number of mixed infections was reported in 2012 after the introduction of

Combo RDTs. However, there have been negligible mixed infections reported by microscopy. The

higher number of mixed infections captured by RDTs need to be investigated as this has policy

implications.

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Province Positive SPR API Positive SPR API Positive SPR API * SPR API *Positi SPR API * SPR API

Positive

ve Positive

Punjab 1,903 0.10 0.02 3,721 0.21 0.04 4,695 0.6 0.05 46643 2.4 0.5 19699 1.17 0.21 17522 1.07 0.19

Sindh 29,330 2.47 0.71 26,070 2.74 0.62 32,403 6.2 0.80 10286 6.62 2.5 93306 7.76 2.38 90566 5.56 2.9

6

NWFP 17,451 2.89 0.80 15,247 3.66 0.68 25,636 14.0 1.10 56435 9.65 2.6 75384 13.44 3.28 60095 12.4 2.76

FATA 23,234 10.86 6.19 17,898 14.02 4.64 22,056 28.7 5.50 32518 20.55 7.8 46149 17.93 12.14 28904 16.2 6.82

B’tan 55,908 8.49 6.33 41,348 10.99 4.56 45,435 23.8 5.30 79918 13.55 9.0 84579 11.78 10.2 51984 12.85 7.68

AJK 744 0.27 0.21 170 0.11 0.05 264 0.30 0.06 316 0.22 0.1 475 0.31 0.12 433 0.29 0.10

TOTAL 128,570 -- -- 104,454 -- -- 130,489 -- -- 31869 6.44 1.8 31959 6.98 1.88 24950 5.57 1.69

6 2 4

Page 178: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

178

Table 53: PV and PF in 19 high risk districts s 2011

Male

Female

Microscopy Center

RD Center

S.#

DISTRICT

Population

<5

5-14

>14

<5

5-14

>14

Preg

S.Exain

PF

PV

Mix

Total

RDTs

Pos: MC

Examined

1 Tharparkar 1,224,523 821 1991 3137 810 1212 1793 8 45951 2422 6620 54 9096 17291

2

Thatta

1,405,071

328

944

1113

438

625

649

3

37710

1737

1484

37

3258

13680

3

Dadu

2,247,627

120

283

652

111

233

371

1

46281

513

1083

0

1596

8545

4 Khairpur 2,013,031 2460 5521 7837 2078 4088 5641 31 75976 6621 7720 11 14352 69719

5 Mardan 1,837,260 510 1139 3941 445 981 4294 80 68886 2393 8803 4 11200 7544

6 Bannu 806,223 1773 3573 4258 1752 3140 4287 206 52428 4917 11851 127 16895 33381

7

Lakki

657,634

467

1145

2739

408

877

1987

45

27085

1730

4980

9

6719

35706

8 Kurrum 567,614 140 619 1133 119 606 953 2 17079 752 2624 66 3442 9200

9 Bajaur 788,914 1217 1260 1242 872 981 1415 14 21617 2641 3653 102 6396 11951 10 Khyber 767,854 568 1464 1929 516 1385 1798 13 20977 2403 5148 48 7599 4349

11 Mastung 195,490 164 417 524 228 574 573 38 11099 763 1413 0 2176 4608

12 Naseerabad 314,830 546 1695 1944 626 1395 1625 15 6588 608 845 6 1459 29237

13

Noshki

158,974

119

403

594

123

328

501

2

17527

566

1247

3

1816

16162

14 Sibbi & 250,081 542 972 1480 477 969 1386 25 9883 1221 1667 3 2891 26375

S.#

DISTRICT

Population

<5

5-14

>14

<5

5-14

>14

Preg

S.Exain

PF

PV

Mix

Total

RDTs

Pos: MC Examined

Harnai

15 Gawadar 246,089 880 991 1157 711 989 1398 55 22801 3104 3032 4 6140 5125

16

Kech

461,864

817

1623

1607

614

1277

1372

16

37378

2980

1428

6

4414

45480

17 Zhob &

493,022 2515

2933 3123

1977 2268

2695 77

17405 1982

1655 500

4137 137872

Sharani

18

Killa Saifullah

233,155

393

619

975

354

464

792

55

9759

579

1724

1

2304

20929

Page 179: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

179

19 Loralai 503,743 208 612 894 159 510 693 46 6786 555 285 21 861 21555

TOTAL

1

5

,

1

7

2

,

9

9

9

1

4

5

8

8

2

8

2

0

4

4

0

2

7

9

1

2

8

1

8

2

2

9

0

2

3

4

2

2

3

7

3

2

5

5

3

2

1

6

3

8

4

8

7

6

7

2

6

2

1

0

0

2

1

0

6

7

5

1

5

1

8

7

0

9

Table 54: Data Base of Malaria Cases 2012 (GF 19 Districts)

Male

Female

Microscopy Center

RD Center

POPULATI Total RDTs

S.#

DISTRICT

<5

5-14

>14

<5

5-14

>14

Preg

S. Exain

PF

PV

Mix

Pos:

Examin

ON

MC

ed

1 Tharparkar 1,250,237 1103 3099 5145 808 1463 2500 17 55354 887 12922 73 13882 13879 253

2 Thatta 1,434,577 732 1282 1788 762 1101 1220 18 41007 2876 1884 45 4805 14819 2006

3

Dadu 2,294,826

94

321

548

111

283

379

0

48909

204

1393

3

6443

74

1600

4

Khairpur 2,055,305

2035

4040

6190

1596

2861

4516

75

69353

4363

8818

24

60664

7643

13205

5

Mardan 1,875,841

463

1023

1914

386

827

2402

43

67104

321

6501

2

4850

84

6824

6 Bannu 823,153 2039 3497 4279 1789 3183 4375 199 69996 1116 15545 70 16731 25512 1181

7

Lakki 671,444

484

1108

2357

423

777

1714

32

30054

456

5894

10

20304

372

6360

8 Kurrum 579,534 214 631 771 163 583 675 47 14023 227 2755 16 2998 4140 56

9 Bajaur 805,480 629 783 838 578 681 946 11 18294 342 3467 61 3870 10357 410

10

Khyber 783,978

637

1166

1557

628

1109

1592

8

29755

474

5844

39

4815

154

6357

11

Mastung 199,594

2

2

6

2

4

6

0

464

7

14

0

117

1

21

12 Naseerabad 321,440 322 932 1371 335 884 1349 19 5881 431 688 1 1120 28710 4066

13

Noshki 162,311

55

167

195

53

126

207

1

15728

145

549

3

697

18554

104

14 Sibbi & 255,333

404 732

1085 357

731 977 0

11961 905

1848 8

2761 22072

1520

Harnai

15 Gawadar 251,256 715 1006 1376 719 1002 1478 9 28685 2691 3606 2 6299 4719 2

16 Kech 471,562 506 828 893 434 640 728 26 29899 1517 1290 14 2821 16539 967

17 Zhob & 503,375

651 979

996 506

832 830 4

14524 826

1216 7

2049 61196

2746

Sharani

18 Killa 238,050

178 377

632 149

267 433 3

9710 128

1238 7

1373 14527

666

Saifullah

19 Loralai 514,322 152 399 592 120 291 465 2 7694 344 299 9 652 17883 1369

TOTAL

15,491,62 1141

22372

32533

9919

17645

2679

514

568395

18260

75771

394

94425

350100

23674

0 5 2

Page 180: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

180

Page 181: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

181

The figure below shows PV- Pf ratio from 2009 to 2012. The proportion of PV to PF was 36:64 in 2009

whereas in 2012 the proportion of PV to PF was 65:35.The increase in vivax cases is most likely an effect

of introduction of COMBO RDTs introduced through Global Fund in 38 districts.

Figure 34: PV- Pf ratio from 2009 to 2012

The figure below shows Annual Parasite Incidence (API) from 2009-2012 in 38 TGF high risk

districts of Pakistan. There has been an increase in API from 7.13/1000 population in 1999

to10.31/1000 in 2010 followed by a decline in 2012 (API 7.8/1000) indicative of better Programme

Performance.

Figure 35: Annual Parasite Incidence (API) from 2009-2012

Page 182: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

182

4.6.4 Human resources, training and capacity development

Balochistan: As of November 2013 two M&E Officers have been assigned to the MCP Balochistan with

offices at the MCP HQs at Quetta. However, they are responsible only for the GF-DoMC supported

districts, and do not perform M&E work for the other districts.

FATA: There is no resource person at provincial or district level nor are there any monitoring tools.

Similarly there are no surveillance officers at provincial or district level. The IVM doesn’t have the

technical and financial capacity to conduct the trainings.

KPK: The MCP doesn’t have the technical and financial capacity to conduct the trainings.

Punjab: The MCP has no monitoring and evaluation system. There are no are no surveillance officers at

provincial or district level.

Sindh: There are only 8 surveillance officers in Sindh and face logistical constraints in compiling the

data.

4.6.5 Routine Information Systems

Currently National Malaria Control Programme receives malaria data by vertical Malaria Information

system on a monthly basis from all the districts. Two different types of reporting tools are used. The

newly developed surveillance tools by the GF (FM1-FM4) are used for reporting from 38 Round-10

supported districts, whereas in non-Global fund supported districts data is being collected using

the older version developed during eradication era. The new forms are more comprehensive and capture

age, sex, pregnancy status and stock out for antimalarials, LLINs, insecticides, lab supplies including

standard information on diagnoses, treatment (both uncomplicated and severe malaria), OPD admissions

and deaths. Clinical diagnosis is currently reported through DHIS which does not routinely share its data

with the Programme nor is it analysed for any planning or M&E activities. Confirmed cases are also

collected by DHIS but figures may not be the same as those from MIS. No data on severe cases or

mortality is available from the Programme. There is no established electronic database in the programme

and the data is mainly paper based. The Directorate of Malaria Control is considering implementing the

new tools in the non-global fund supported districts also, but no clear timeline has been agreed on.

Balochistan: The following information systems are present and functional in the health department

including data on patient and Malaria Indicators. (tertiary care and the private sector facilities are not

included in any of these systems):

- District Health Information Management System which is now developing into eDHIS.

- Disease Early Warning System which includes malaria.

- Malaria Information System. (Efforts to strengthen this system are underway by the MCP along with the

Data Management Unit at the provincial headquarters and in the districts).

- DEWS, is the integrated disease surveillance system and reports weekly, monthly, as well annually,

including epidemics. ‘Report is communicated electronically.

Page 183: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

183

Figure 36 Malaria Stratification Map of Balochistan.

• Malaria is a notifiable disease.

• Reports include cases and deaths.

• The HMIS/DHIS includes data on mortality and morbidity data. The frequency or reporting is

quarterly and annually.

Page 184: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

184

• Malaria Information System is Malaria specific, the system is now being streamlined with IT

based communication.

• Provincial database on Malaria is under consideration.

• Health Information Data Base is generated by the HMIS/DHIS.

• WHO Database is freely available on the web.

• Surveillance data is reported from all levels of healthcare facilities and Sentinel sites.

FATA, KPK, Punjab:

The malaria data is received through three sources

1. Malaria Information System: Malaria confirmed through Microscopy

2. District Health Information System

3. Disease Early Warning System:

Uncomplicated malaria

Any one presenting with fever and chills,

Severe Malaria

Fever with prostration, altered consciousness, generalized seizures, difficulty in breathing, low

urinary output or dark urine, severe anaemia, abnormal bleeding, and hypoglycaemia

FATA and KPK: the MIS data is reported through newly designed FM-3 forms. The data has

discrepancies within the program and with partners. The partners report through FM (1-4) forms from

selected facilities. Unfortunately due to lack of coordination there are discrepancies in data at agency and

directorate level.

FATA: The population figures assumed by the MCP are the same throughout the years as no projections

have been done. The districts funded by the Global Fund works in selected union councils and the

population (denominator) is taken as whole district without scientific projections.

Page 185: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

185

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Vivax

Falc

Mix

Figure 37: Vivax, falciparum and mix cases 2007-2012

Data shows that the Plasmodium vivax and falciparium has increased since 2008. The SPR has

significantly increased since 2008 while there is steady increase in API.

Figure 38: BER, SPR and API 2007-2012

District Health Information System (DHIS) was established with help of JICA. There are a total of 698

health facilities reports which includes 305 BHU’s, 246 CD’s, 18 CH and 6 DHQ’s. The primary facility

report shows that 67151 patients were diagnosed as suspected malaria cases from Jan-Dec 2012. A total

of 15832 slides were examined of which 3228 were MP positive and 684 PF positive. The secondary

facility report indicates that 50112 patients were diagnosed as suspected malaria cases in OPD from Jan-

Page 186: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

186

Dec 2012. A total of 61399 slides were examined of which 13573 were MP positive and 1407 were PF

positive. There were 3017 admissions while no death was reported due to malaria.

There are limitations of DHIS as all the public health facilities are not reporting. Similarly the DHIS does

not include the private health facilities.

KPK:. The population figures assumed by the MCP are the same throughout the years as no projections

has been done.

Figure 39: Vivax and falciparum cases

Data shows that the Plasmodium vivax and falciparium is on rise since 2007. The SPR is significantly on

rise since 2007 while there is steady increase in API.

Figure 40: BER, SPR and API

District Health Information System (DHIS) was established with help of JICA and report of 2012 is the

first comprehensive report. The record is based on information of 23 districts and only Torghar district is

not included. A total of 1728 health facilities reports which includes 10 teaching hospitals, 22 DHQ’s and

760 BHU’s. The primary facility report shows 198281 patients were diagnosed as suspected malaria cases

from Jan-Dec 2012. A total of 75006 slides were examined of which 12839 were MP positive and 1622

PF positive. There were 464 admissions while no cause of death was reported. The secondary facility

report shows that 122765 patients were diagnosed as suspected malaria cases in OPD from Jan-Dec 2012.

A total of 163889 slides were examined of which 22999 were MP positive and 1453 were PF positive.

Page 187: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

187

There were 5158 admissions of which 28 deaths were attributed to malaria. There are limitations of DHIS

as all the public health facilities are not reporting. Similarly the DHIS does not include the private health

facilities.

Punjab: The MIS data is reported through G-30 forms. The data is incomplete and has discrepancies when

compared with the federal program.

Figure 41: Vivax, falciparum and mixed cases (2007-2012)

Data shows that the Plasmodium vivax and falciparium has increased since 2007. There is marked

increase in cases of malaria in 2010 due to floods.

Page 188: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

188

Figure 42: BER,SPR and API (2007-2012)

The API had increased in 2010 because of floods in Punjab.

District Health Information System (DHIS) was established with help of JICA and report of 2012 is the

first comprehensive report. The primary facility report indicates 674810 patients were diagnosed as

suspected malaria cases from Jan-Dec 2012. A total of 568153 slides were examined of which 12072

were MP positive and 1584 were PF positive. There were 464 admissions while no cause of death was

reported. The secondary facility report shows that 156307 patients were diagnosed as suspected malaria

cases in OPD from Jan-Dec 2012. A total of 413307 slides were examined of which 8722 were MP

positive and 1011were PF positive. There were 10972 admissions of which 84 deaths were attributed to

malaria. There are limitations of DHIS as all the public health facilities are not reporting. Similarly the

DHIS does not include the private health facilities.

Sindh: MIS is based on the confirmed Malaria cases and data is collected from Microscopy centers (453)

and RDT centers (169) established in public health facilities (except 20 RDT centers in Khairpur and 4 in

Tnado Allahyar in private health sector facilities). Data is collected from health facilities and documented

on (G30) Performa on daily basis. There is no strategy for validation of data, such as inter-district and

intradistrict meetings to validate surveillance data. Active surveillance to collect data from community is

not done.

District Health Information System is functioning in all districts of Sindh since January 2012 and collects

data on 49 health conditions, including Malaria. The information includes malaria suspected cases, total

slides examined, total slides positive for malaria, P. Falciparum positive, total admission for malaria and

total deaths due to malaria.

The data is collected from primary (BHUs, RHCs, MCH centers and dispensaries) and secondary health

facilities (THQs and DHQs) on a daily basis using specially developed data collection tools. Filled

Performas are signed by the in charge of health facility and sent to district coordinators of DHIS by the in

charge of health facility. The district coordinator checks these for completeness and if the data is found

lacking, the Performas are sent to the health facility for correction. All completed Performas are entered

into the data base by data entry operators after which the file is sent to the Director General Health and

Page 189: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

189

Health Sector Reforms Unit (HSRU). The quality of data is compromised because DHIS staff district

health facilities check the quality. Moreover all health facilities don’t report regularly to DHIS

coordinator.

Page 190: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

190

Table 55. District wise Suspected Malaria Cases

Districts Suspected Malaria

211-Badin 130518

212-Dadu 67869

213-Hyderabad 48101

215-Jamshoro 40666

216-Tando Allahyar 31103

217-Thatta 40130

218-Matiari 44508

219-Tando Muhammad Khan 48510

221-Karachi 5707

231-Jacobabad 32401

232-Larkana 94902

233-Shikarpur 72902

234-Kamber @ Shahdadkot 60361

235-Kashmore @ Kandhkot 32104

241-Khairpur 209520

242-Naushero Feroze 50888

243-Shaheed

Benazirabad(Nawabshah) 133920

244-Sukkur 29414

245-Ghotki @ Mirpur Mathelo 50782

251-Mirpurkhas 65940

252-Sanghar 124436

253-Tharparkar @ Mithi 44490

254-Umerkot 84137

District Total 1543309

Page 191: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

191

4.6.6 Sentinel Surveillance Systems

Balochistan: Focal points of DEWS at the district and provincial level collect data, including

malaria on a weekly basis. There is no epidemic reporting system in the Programme. Last outbreak was

reported in December 2012 (Sakka) based on rumors from the Media, the Programme investigated and

confirmed it was not malaria.

FATA: Malaria is also reported through WHO established “DEWS”. Only three agencies report on

priority diseases including suspected malaria. The report is not comprehensive and as such DEWS is not

fully functional in FATA.

KPK: The malaria is also reported through WHO established “DEWS”. A total of 21 KP districts provide

surveillance data to the DEWS from 984 health facilities which include 566 BHU’s, 208 CD’s, 67 RHC’s,

35 CH’s, 31 Tertiary hospitals, 18 MCH’s, 14 THQ’s, 12 DHQ’s, 12 SHC’s, 7 Others, 6 TBC’s and 5

LC’s.

Khyber Pakhunkhwa

Disease name # of Cases %

Acute Respiratory Infection 1,516,532 22.5

Bloody Diarrhea 43,496 0.6

Other Acute Diarrhea 587,797 9.0

Suspected Malaria 102,026 1.5

Suspected Typhoid Fever 22,737 0.3

Pyrexia Unknown Origin 353,066 5.2

Scabies 176,395 2.6

Other diseases 3,930,897 58.4

Grand Total 6,732,946 -

Table 56: 2012 DEWS

A total of 6,732,946 consultations were reported in 2012. ARI consultations were the highest reported

percentage i.e.22.5% or 1,516,532 cases of the total cases while suspected malaria ranked 4th having

102,026 cases or 1.5% of total cases.

Punjab: The Disease Early Warning and Response System (DEWS) in Punjab started as a weekly review

of health facility data and notification of epidemic prone diseases from the health facility (HF) level

during subsequent disasters culminating in the 2010 Floods. In addition to immediate reporting of

epidemic prone diseases including Malaria, aggregate numbers of consultations for major syndromes are

collected and analysed on a weekly basis. Investigation and response to alerts and outbreaks are

organized at the district level.

The devastation of the 2010 super flood disaster was still apparent throughout the first half of 2011 and

Punjab was trying to recover from its adverse effects, especially transmission of water borne and vector

borne diseases including malaria and access to safe drinking water, sanitation, proper nutrition and health

care. At the end of June 2011, political control of health care services devolved from federal to provincial

control, and the transition had only begun when, in August 2011, the country was hit by the

unprecedented monsoon rain causing floods at mass level in many districts in Sindh and Balochistan

Page 192: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

192

provinces. At the same time Punjab province experienced a huge dengue fever outbreak, especially in

Lahore city. Surveillance Officers deployed in the affected districts are supported by provincial DEWS

coordinator and data assistant; they investigate and respond to alerts and outbreaks of epidemic-prone

diseases including Malaria.

DEWS Surveillance Officers (SOs) in collaboration with the District Health Office (DHO) investigate

and respond to disease threats which are notified from the health facilities such as malaria, suspected

cholera or measles cases. They also respond to disease threats revealed in the weekly reports as crossing

standardized “alert thresholds” – for instance, a cluster of cases of confirmed disease or weekly

syndromic trend showing doubling of cases. When notified, and having prepared stockpiles of relevant

medicines and supplies in advance, the DEWS SO, with the district health team, investigates, takes

specimens for laboratory confirmation, and takes action to control the outbreaks in the early stages.

Figure 43: Week wise percentage of Malaria 2013 Punjab

This graph shows the weekly trend of suspected malaria cases from all over DEWS implemented districts

of Punjab during year 2013 till week 46. Highest percentage of suspected malaria cases (1.74%) is evident

in week 01-2013. The trend line indicates downward trend towards the end of year. In week 29 (1.4%)

and 37-2013 (1.33%) a sudden rise in suspected malaria cases was observed which can be attributed to

monsoon spell.

Page 193: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

193

Figure 44: Yearly comparison of Malaria 2011 to 2013

Figure 44 shows yearly comparison (2011-13) of suspected malaria consultations reported through

DEWS in Punjab. The trend lines of each year do not follow a specific pattern of suspected malaria

consultations. In year 2011 & 2013 an overall decrease in malaria consultations was evident while the

trend was opposite during 2012. The inconsistency in the yearly malaria trends points towards issues

related to reporting methodology of suspected malaria cases. One possible way to confirm this may be

through physical validation of the DEWS data available at district level.

Figure 45: District wise percentages of Malaria 2013

Figure 45 provides district wise break up of suspected malaria cases reported from 13 DEWS-

implemented districts in Punjab during year 2013. It can be clearly noted that Muzaffargarh district

reported the highest malaria cases (36.84%) followed by DG Khan (10.57%), Rahim Yar Khan (8.88%),

Bhakkar (8.12%) and Mianwali (7.37) as the most endemic areas in southern Punjab. District Jhelum

Page 194: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

194

seems to be the most endemic (7.27%) area in Northern Punjab. Slide positivity rate for each district,

during year 2013, can be a good indicator to scale endemicity of the area.

Figure 46: District wise percentages of malaria for 2012 and 2013

Figure 46 shows 2 year comparison of 13 dews-reporting districts regarding suspected malaria cases,

which was maintained in the respective districts between the years.

Page 195: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

195

Figure 47: District wise SPR And Falciparum rate (FR) according to eDEWS data 2013

Figure 47 shows the SPR & FR in DEWS implemented districts of Punjab in year 2013. Graph shows that

District Multan has highest (50%) FR followed by D.G Khan (36.5%), Layyah (21.4%), Muzaffargarh

(12.8%), Mianwali (12.1%). Highest FR was seen in Layyah (13), Muzaffargarh (7), Rajanpur & Bhakkar

(6).

Table 57: District wise Yearly cases of Malaria

District 2011 2012 2013

Attock 0 0 5070

Bahawalpur 18490 0 0

Bhakkar 15763 21768 11131

DG Khan 35164 14725 14488

Gujrat 0 0 1024

Jhelum 0 0 9966

Jhang 36386 0 0

Khushab 13187 0 0

Lahore 0 153 3129

Layyah 23126 20189 8878

Page 196: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

196

Mianwali 27374 21788 10105

Multan 6513 3746 1585

Muzaffargarh 73835 78466 50494

Rahim yar khan 49661 34583 12166

Rajanpur 31641 22712 7409

Sahiwal 0 0 1614

Sargodha 27028 0 0

Table 58: Malaria Alerts from 2010-2013

Since establishment of DEWS system a total of 44 alerts were picked up and responded by surveillance

officers (table 55). Maximum number of alerts were responded in year 2012 (24) followed by year 2011

(13) & 2013 (7). Maximum number of alerts were reported from District Muzaffargarh (13) followed by

Layyah (7), Mianwali (6), Rahim yar Khan (6), Bhakkar (5), D G Khan (3) while Districts Bahawalpur &

Rajanpur reported 2 alerts each.

District Total Number

of Alerts

Year

2010

Year 2011 Year 2012 Year 2013

Bahawalpur 02 0 0 0 2

Bhakkar 05 0 0 5 0

D.G Khan 03 0 0 1 2

Layyah 07 0 4 3 0

Mianwali 06 0 3 3 0

Muzaffargarh 13 0 5 8 0

Rahim Yar

Khan

06 0 0 3 3

Rajanpur 02 0 1 1 0

TOTAL 44 0 13 24 7

Page 197: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

197

Table 59: Malaria Outbreaks from 2010-2013

Table 56 indicates 3 outbreaks were reported & responded: 2 were reported from District D G Khan one (

2010 & 2011). District Muzaffargarh reported 1 outbreak in year 2010.

Sindh: Disease early warning system is functional in Sindh since 2007 and as of 2010 all districts are

reporting to DEWS. The objective of DEWS is to a decrease morbidity and mortality caused by

communicable and epidemic prone diseases, including malaria out breaks DEWS also responds to alerts

and outbreaks and conducts epidemiological surveys.

DEWS has provided weekly disease reporting formats to every health facility, in which the number of

slides taken, number of malaria positive slides and falciparum positive slides are entered to calculate SPR

and FR. Data is collected directly from health facilities. Constraints include less number of slides taken,

therefore that data is not reliable because from 30-40 slides are not reflective of the whole district.

Secondly all the districts do not send the complete malaria data. Third all suspected malaria cases are not

tested for MP. Fourth expertise and honesty of testing staff is questionable. No data is collected from the

private sector. Malaria information DEWS receives information from districts through online system on

weekly basis, the system compiles reports and disseminates to all stakeholders including Malaria Control

Program.

District Total Number

of Outbreaks

Year

2010

Year

2011

Year

2012

Year

2013

D.G Khan 02 1 1 0 0

Muzaffargarh 01 1 0 0 0

TOTAL 03 2 1 0 0

Page 198: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

198

Figure 48: District wise % of malaria cases

Figure 49: Week wise distribution of malaria cases

Page 199: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

199

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

80.0

90.0

100.0

Ba

din

Ka

rach

i

Da

du

Gh

otk

i

Hy

de

rab

ad

Jaco

ba

ba

d

Jam

sho

ro

Ka

mb

ar

Ka

shm

ore

Kh

air

pu

r

Lark

an

a

Ma

tia

ri

Mir

pu

rkh

as

N-F

ero

ze

Sa

ng

ha

r

S. B

en

azi

rab

ad

Sh

ika

rpu

r

Su

kk

ur

T. A

LLA

H Y

AR

Th

arp

ark

ar

Th

att

a

TM

Kh

an

Um

erk

ot

Slide Positivity Rate Falciparum Ratio

Figure 50: SPR and Falciparum ration

4.6.7 Monitoring and Evaluation Plan

The National Malaria Control Programme has a recently developed Malaria Monitoring and

Evaluation Plan in 2012 (M& E Plan Round 10 Malaria,2012).The plan provides the foundation for

measuring progress through the identification of goals, objectives and indicators across malaria

intervention strategies. The Malaria M&E plan also outlines the available and desired data sources, the

strategies for quality control, validation of data and identifies the role of key malaria stakeholders in

M&E. The DOMC does not have M & E officer, but the programme management unit has

established with support from TGF SSF-10 Grant provides M&E support to the Directorate. There is a

qualified M&E Manager at the federal level supported by an IT In charge/Data analyst and a data officer.

Similarly the Private sector PR -SSI also has an experienced M& E officer.

The Management Units have experience in:

- Collecting and analyzing programmatic data on a Sub-national level.

-Experience in producing regular reports on program progress and results.

-Written terms of reference with each Sub-reporting Entity establishing data reporting requirements

and deadlines.

-Mechanism/procedure in place to periodically verify training numbers reported (e.g., random review of

attendance sheets).

Page 200: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

200

-The Management Unit can demonstrate that site visits for data verification have taken place.

At the provincial levels (KPK, Sindh and Baluchistan) Provincial Management Units have been

established each having a trained M&E Officer equipped with a computer. At the district level District

Management Units have been established in each district with a M&E Officer. There are well structured

plan, guidelines and clear monitoring & evaluation indicators and well defined roles and

responsibilities. There is a M&E system in place at the provincial levels in high risk 38 districts. M&E

budget has been ear marked in the TGF Grant SSF Round 10. During Round -7 implementation there were

684 monitoring visits by the SRs, 9 visits by the Provincial Managers, 651 visits by Data management In

charges and 22 visits by M&E officer (Table). The Save the Children SSSF-Round -10 has made 1011

visits in total to monitor case management practices in public and private facilities.

Table 60: Monitoring visits in 19 districts of TGF-Round-7

Provincial- District

Budgeted

District

SRs Visits Manager

Data Management

PR-M&E Officer visit

visits

Incharger

Actual Budgeted

Actual

Actua M&E Officer Actual

Planned

Planned l

Planned Visit

visit

Planned visit

visit

visit

per month

Total 785 684 114 9

684 551 19 22

87%

8%

81%

116%

%

Table 61: Monitoring visits in 19 districts of TGF-Round-10

Year 1

Year2

Year 1,Year 2

Activity Description

Q1,Q2,Q3,Q4 Q5,Q6,Q7,Q8 Q1,Q2,Q3,Q4,Q5,Q6,Q7,Q8

Target Progress Target Progress Target Progress

Monitoring & supervisory visits

from federal & provincial level 5 5 5 10 5

to the districts

Monitoring and supervision of

case management practices in 774 162 774 972 774 972

public & private sector

DHMT 114 0 114 39 114 39

Total

893

167

893

1021

893

1011

Page 201: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

201

4.6.8 Malaria Surveys

Operations research (OR) is critical in providing scientific evidence for health and disease control

programs to improve their quality and “learning” as they scale up. RBM puts a major challenge for

broadening research base for its successful implementation in Pakistan. The PC-I has a separate

component on operational research highlighting the priority research areas. However, there is no

separate research unit within the DOMC and in most of the cases the research is out sourced or done in

collaboration with the research organizations like PMRC,HSA,AKU, INGOs. The health institutions in

the country also conducts research on diverse issues related to malaria. There are a number of research

institutions in the country both in public and private sector. The known institutions include PMRC,

HAS, NIH and AKU. PMRC and AKU have established their field research centres. In addition there

are 15 Universities those have major research programmes. Some key universities include Punjab

University, KEMU, Karachi University, Peshawar University, and AKU.

Approved PC-1 of Malaria Control Program Sindh has research as separate component, but budget

allocation is only Rs0.36 millions for three years. The staff of Malaria Control Program both at Provincial

and District levels have limited research capacity. There is no research capacity development program to

enhance the research capacity of staff. Malaria Control Program Sindh has received very limited support

from international technical agencies such as WHO, to enhance research skills of staff. During last five

years there has been no one from provincial Malaria Directorate or any district who has been trained to

improve research skills. Although PC-1 of Malaria Control Program has indicated the development of

research collaboration with Medical Universities in Sindh, but no such collaboration have been developed

and MOUs signed. However one study has been conducted by LUHMS, using data of Malaria Control

Program during last five years.

Chloroquine resistance was first reported from Pakistan in 1984 and was followed by several reports

confirming it in Punjab, Afghan refugee camps and areas borderingAfghanistan9,10

,11

.12

. Over the last decade,

resistance surveys conducted by the National Institute for Malaria Research and Training using the WHO

extended invivo test(WHO1973) have shown that chloroquine resistance is widespread in many areas of the

Punjab and North-west Frontier Province (Shah et al. 1997) WHO latest survey. Drug resistance

management is one of the key components in the federal PC-I and the national strategic plan. The

Directorate of Malaria control at the federal level established 8 sentinel sites in various provinces for

surveillance of drug resistance, but these sites are yet not functional. World Health Organization is providing

technical assistance to the programme for conducting drug efficacy and monitoring studies in various

provinces.

Balochistan: Two studies have been conducted till date one by the WHO for drug resistance monitoring

for Plasmodium falciparum in district Zhob, and in a sampled region of Balochistan by the PMRC. The

reports are still waiting to be submitted. Regular prevalence survey or operational research systems are

not in place. Two studies have been conducted till date one by the WHO for drug resistance monitoring

for Plasmodium falciparum in district Zhob, and the second in a sampled region of Balochistan by the

PMRC. A survey on Community Perceptions on Malaria (2004) has also been conducted, however, the

report is not available locally. No other regular national or provincial level studies or surveys have been

done with the exception of studies conducted by individual research students or faculty of the universities.

Despite a local Institute of Public Health at Quetta existing, there are limitations of resources and

capacity issues, which require technical guidance.

KPK: The following surveys have been conducted at national level which also highlights the

findings of KP Province. Pakistan Demographic Health Survey, Malariometric Survey, MICS and

PSLM. Findings are given in national report.

Page 202: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

202

4.6.9 Malaria Reporting

The Malaria data is collected and recorded under the following programs.

o Malaria Information System (MIS), includes the secondary data generated at the

Provincial Malaria Reference Lab, and other diagnostic centers in the province.

o Disease Early Warning System (DEWS) does not act as a information system for malaria

o Health Management Information System (HMIS), does not act as a information system

for malaria

o Information from other preventive program sources, such as National Program is also

generated, but it is not a regular resource for malaria information.

The reporting frequency is monthly, gathered by the index health facility or health professional

concerned, assimilated and refined by the Data Management Unit at the MCP headquarters at Quetta.

FATA: The malaria reporting is done as highlighted in table 62:

Malaria slides/RDT examination data in year 2012

District Slides / RDT

examined

P. Falciparum

P. Vivax

P. Mixed

Total +Ve

Slide Positivity Rate (SPR)

Falciparum Rate (FR)

Vivax Rate

Mixed

Rate

Abbottabad 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Bannu 1,993 51 402 94 547 27.4 26.5 73.5 17.2

Batagram 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Buner 4 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Charsadda 12,422 187 2,718 40 2,945 23.7 7.7 92.3 1.4

DI Khan 8,191 195 1,770 40 2,005 24.5 11.7 88.3 2.0

Dir Lower 5,871 10 815 139 964 16.4 15.5 84.5 14.4

Hangu 5,759 54 1,761 9 1,824 31.7 3.5 96.5 0.5

Haripur 237 4 17 0 21 8.9 19.0 81.0 0.0

Kohat 9,804 190 1,728 168 2,086 21.3 17.2 82.8 8.1

Kohistan 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Malakand 5,736 1 355 50 406 7.1 12.6 87.4 12.3

Mansehra 515 1 134 2 137 26.6 2.2 97.8 1.5

Mardan 19,136 71 1,979 79 2,129 11.1 7.0 93.0 3.7

Nowshera 5,993 37 1,393 16 1,446 24.1 3.7 96.3 1.1

Peshawar 240 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Shangla 1,042 0 206 3 209 20.1 1.4 98.6 1.4

Swabi 405 0 1 1 2 0.5 50.0 50.0 50.0

Swat 4,084 76 124 3 203 5.0 38.9 61.1 1.5

Tank 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Page 203: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

203

Upper Dir 46 0 2 0 2 4.3 0.0 100.0 0.0

Total 81,478 877 13,405

644 14,926

18.3 10.2 89.8 4.3

A total of 81,478 slides were tested for Malaria. Out of which 14,926 slides were positive and

accounted for SPR is 18.3% with 10% (1,521 slides) for the falciparum ratio, 90% (13,405 slides) for

Vivax ratio and 4.3% for Mixed ratio.

KPK: The malaria data is not reliable, there are flaws in data at district and provincial level. The partners

report through different format and have no coordination with MCP. There is a need to conduct a detailed

analysis and triangulation of various data sources to determine the current epidemiological situation in KP

from which decisions on scaling up malaria control interventions could be based. The MIS need to be

made reliable and efficient so that it helps in detecting any epidemiological transitions that would warrant

a change in delivery of services.

Sindh: District reports are compiled on monthly basis on developed Performa and sent to provincial

Malaria Directorate. The provincial reports are compiled on monthly basis and disseminated to stake

holders. Reporting from health facilities to District Health Officer (DHO) and from districts to provincial

Malaria Control Directorate is not regular and there are administrative and logistic issues. The GF

districts also reports on confirmed cases (microscopy as well as RDT) having a different format i.e. F1 to

F4. Unlike G-30 reporting mechanism it does include stock outs. There is no separate Monitoring and

Evaluation plan developed at provincial and district level, however Director Malaria Control Program,

Additional Director and Epidemiologist visit different health facilities and communities during IRS

activities, larvicidal activities and during out breaks. Entomologist and insect collectors visit different

sites for determining vector density.

The Surveillance Program is assessed through indicators including Annual parasite incidence (API),

Plasmodium Falciparum Ratio (PFR), Blood Examination Rate (BER), Slide Positivity Rate (SPR),

Passive Case Detection (PCD). The data of several years is available with the program in the form of

graphs and charts, but annual evaluation reports are not available to know trends and patterns of malaria

in Sindh.

4.6.10 Malaria database and informatics System

-Computers, software, e-mail and Internet network for districts and provincial

malaria focal points: (Exists)

-Country websites and process for updating (Yes)

-Web-based reporting (No)

Balochistan: MIS includes a logistics information but the system needs strengthening. The Log

Information system by the Global Fund Partners pertaining to the GF supported districts is reporting on

these items and is shared with the MCP, however, the log information from the remaining districts is

presently being revamped from G30 to FM 1 to 4, and will become operational soon. Laboratory Data on

Malaria Microscopy and RDT is regularly processed .

The WHO database and country profiles are available on the WHO site with free access. The district

malaria profiles will be developed in line with stratification process. Presently these do not exist.

Page 204: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

204

The district profiles in general however exist developed by the Planning and Development Department of

the Government of Balochistan.

The Balochistan MCP is progressing with progressive improvement of the IT systems. Till date

computers are available only in 11 districts (which are limited in connectivity and dependent on

electricity), the remaining districts do not have this facility for MCP related work; and is one of the

reasons these districts delay in submitting their reports. Web-based reporting is as yet not in practice.

KPK: The MCP (office at provincial level) has one computer but have no database. Recently they

were connected with internet facility and now partners sent the reports and other information

through internet. At district level there are no computers and net services. Reports are sent through

courier. Program is planning to establish web site which needs technical and financial support.

4.6.11 Progress towards achievement of targets

DOMC:

Performance indicators Target

(P1-P7)

Result

(P1-P7)

Percentage of

Achievement

Number & percentage of health facilities with malaria

testing capability in 19 target districts.

N: 656

D: 656

P: 100 %

N: 657

D: 656

P: 100.2 %

100%

Number of Rapid diagnostic tests done and read in 19

target districts. 611,970 757,117 120% *

Number of health care providers trained on national case

management guidelines in public and private sectors in 19

target districts.

2,826 2,441 86%

Percentage of confirmed PF cases treated with ACT as the

first line treatment in 19 target districts. 95 % 98 % 103%

Number of LLINs distributed to people in 19 target

districts. 632,000 570,102 102%

Number of households (or structures or walls) in 19 new

target districts sprayed by indoor residual spraying in the

last 12 months (MAL-P2).

215,650 100,232 46%

Number of health personnel trained on malaria data

management, M&E and early detection of malaria

175 208 119%

Page 205: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

205

outbreaks

Percentage of monitoring visits conducted vs planned in

19 target districts. 80 % 72 % 90%

Save the Children:

Performance indicators Target

(P1-P7)

Result

(P1-P7)

Percentage of

Achievement

Health facilities with microscopy and/or rapid diagnostic

testing capability (number or percentage)

N: 551

D: 551

P: 100 %

N: 535

D: 551

P: 97.1 %

97%

Number of RDTs done and read in 19 new target districts. 591,030 84,731 14%

Number of health providers trained on malaria diagnosis

(microscopy and RDT) and QA in 19 new target districts. 834 905 109%

Number of health care providers trained on national case

management guidelines, LLIN distribution, Vector Control

and Medical Entomology in 19 new target districts.0

1,689 1,561 92%

Percentage of lab/RDT confirmed P. falciparum malaria

cases correctly treated as per national guidelines in new

19 target districts.

N:

D:

P: 70 %

N: 1,922

D: 1,922

P: 100 %

120% *

Number of LLINs distributed to people in new 19 target

districts 381,667 315,528 83%

Number of LLINs distributed for women (15 to 49 years)

and children under 5 years of age in new 19 target

districts.

145,032 119,900 83%

Number of households (or structures or walls) in 19 new

target districts sprayed by indoor residual spraying in the

last 12 months (MAL-P2).

N: 65,150

D: 65,150

P: 100 %

N: 64,153

D: 65,150

P: 98.5 %

98%

Number of health personnel trained on malaria data

management, M&E and early detection of malaria

715 689 96%

Page 206: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

206

outbreaks.

Percentage of monitoring visits conducted versus planned

in 19 new target districts.

N: 625

D: 893

P: 70 %

N: 1,017

D: 1,115

P: 91.2 %

120% *

Number of people reached by behavior change

communication community outreach in 38 target districts. 362,900 227,754 63%

Balochistan: The overall targets for MCP Balochistan are the same as the national targets for control and

elimination of Malaria, these are consonant with the MDG indicator 21 and 22 which state the objective

to be:

o Reduction in morbidity and mortality associated with malaria.

o Increase proportion of population in malaria risk areas using effective malaria prevention

and treatment measures.

The targets set in 2010, however which targets have as yet not been acquired, were:

o 50% reduction in the malaria burden by the year 2010.

o By the year 2015 >70% of the high risk population of Pakistan having access and using

effective malaria prevention and treatment so that malaria is no longer a potential public

health threat.

.

Sindh: The Malaria Control Program uses following indicators to assess and to monitor the malaria

surveillance.

• Annual parasite incidence (API)

• Plasmodium Falciparum Ratio (PFR)

• Blood Examination Rate (BER)

• Slide Positivity Rate (SPR)

• Passive Case Detection (PCD)

In the graph below slide positivity rate in Sindh during last five years from 2008 to 2011 has increased

while in 2012 there was a slight decrease. There was also continuous increase in number of slides taken.

Page 207: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

207

Figure 51: SPR

Figure 52: No. of slides

Figure 53 : Annual Parasite Incidence (API)

Above graph shows the annual parasite incidence has increased continuously from 2008 to 2012.

Page 208: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

208

Figure 54: Falciparum Ratio (FR)

Above graph shows marked reduction in prevalence of Falciparum cases.

Page 209: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

209

Table 63.

Year No Of

Slides

P. Vivax P.

Falciparum

Mix Total SPR FR%

2001 705126 11988 12532 18 24502 3.47 51%

2002 731038 12938 10282 05 23215 4.17 44%

2003 902021 20445 17795 09 38231 4.23 47%

2004 1521648 27326 13371 0 40697 2.67 33%

2005 1313818 17490 10359 04 27845 2.12 37%

2006 1376923 19051 15558 0 34609 2.51 45%

2007 1021822 16534 8726 0 25260 2.47 34%

2008 954028 17682 8415 04 26093 2.73 32%

2009 1113765 19112 8364 0 27476 2.46 30%

2010 1275732 34304 22289 482 57075 4.50 39%

2011 1290835 48119 34499 4989 87607 6.7 39%

2012 1785499 79511 31083 4057 114651 6.4 27%

4.6.12 Successes, best practices and facilitating factors

Monitoring and evaluation is critical for performance assessment of malaria control activities, the keys

indicators mostly available at central, provincial and district levels are the API, SPI, BER and Parasites

species proportion. Indicators of the program are complied by, district, province and federal levels.

Multiple malaria information systems are in place such as the old malaria surveillance system, new

malaria information system (MIS), DHIS and DEWS generating different malaria indicators.

Comprehensive federal annual malaria surveillance reports and malaria reports are prepared as part of

Ministry of Health year book. In some provinces such as Punjab active case detection and case

investigation surveys are conducted by CDC officers. The information systematically collected for M/E is

based on the “Malaria information system’ in place in the 38 priority districts funded by the global fund

and managed through malaria databases.

Page 210: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

210

4.6.13 SWOT Analysis

STRENGTHS WEAKNESS OPPORTUNITIES THREATS

Existence of an

epidemiological

surveillance system that

provides monthly data on

the malaria burden

M&E plan has been

developed based on

requirements of the

GFATM and may not have

been embraced by the

MCP and partners as

M&E plan for the

strategic plan

Current political context

strongly in favour of

M&E in the public sector

Weak information culture

at all levels of the system

Weak capacity in the

malaria M&E.

Increased interest by

partners to support M&E

Current human resource

crisis in all public sector

Monitoring indicators and

documenting tools available

Lack of skills in

monitoring and evaluation

by managers in malaria

control specially in the

MCP structures

Existence of a central unit

of M&E at Federal level

Staff are not motivated

due to weak incentives

Existence of separate

research component in

approved PC-1

Limited experience of

existing staff to

implement monitoring and

evaluation activities

Multiplicity of reporting

system

Full time sectioned post of

epidemiologist in the

program

Low quality data from

routine systems.

Poor coordination

between MCP and

partners in terms of

information/data sharing

Weak capacity of MCP in

integrating data from

different sources Malaria Indicator Survey will provide more Policy implications

Lack of plan for studies of

malaria to be carried out Devolution is an opportunity for the provinces to

plan realistically

Lack of provincial capacity and resources may

effect programme performanc

Covers only Public sector

partially private sector not

Public private partnership in

six districts of Sindh

supported through GFATM

True burden of disease

difficult to calculate.

Page 211: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

211

covered

No community based

prevalence survey

conducted

projects.

Non existence of M&E plan

No system of validation of

data

M&E budget available,

Posting of National

Program Officer recently

Non availability of Mobility

support for M&E

Limited funds allocation

and limited research

capacity

Availability of funds for

research.

Lack of research capacity

No trained epidemiologist

posted

Budget allocation available Political interference in

recruitment and posting

4.6.14 Issues and challenges

• Impact indicators such as percentage of malaria admissions and deaths among hospital admissions

and percentage of severe malaria cases are poorly collected, with few exceptions.

• There is no comprehensive ONE malaria data base at district, provincial and federal level to collate

malaria information from different sources and systems. Concerns have been raised on the accuracy

and completeness of the malaria information from the public sector especially as an estimated 70%

of malaria cases are seen in the private sector.

• Different malaria case definitions used by DEWES and DHIS , new and old malaria surveillance and

information systems .Lack off comprehensive compilation of access and outcome-coverage

• Mapping of malaria data IS limited due to poor GIS capacity in the malaria programme but can be

resolved through collaborations with other programmes such as EPI, Polio, DEWS and WHO malaria

atlas who have strong GIS systems in place.

• Malaria Epidemiological orientation capacity is inadequate at all levels with many vacant provincial

posts of malaria epidemiologists although the capacity of M&E officers is being enhanced in

districts and provinces.

• The data illustrated above suggests PRs and SRs are performing quite well ( Rate A1 and A2 ),

however the question of representativity of these data (mainly process indicators)with respect to the

total population at risk, the distribution of malaria cases in all union councils and geographical

reconnaissance ( for IRS in particular) is questionable .

Page 212: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

212

• The responsibility of MCP in setting the targets must be underlined, specifically coverage of

interventions implemented. The denominator of the proposed interventions must be based on the total

population at risk, the epidemiology of the disease in the district

• Coverage of malaria diagnostic centers through the country needs to be consistently monitored.

• Majority of the Basic health units at union councils are poorly equipped and staffed. Other impact

indicators such as % of malaria admissions among hospital admissions and % of severe malaria cases

are collected intermittently.

• The outcomes and impact indicators need to be collected systematically through appropriate channels

such as DHS, MIS, and KAP surveys.

• There is limited capacity within the MCP to coordinate and implement activities of well-established

M&E unit. Currently, there is no responsible person for M & E within the MCP.

• Data collected by MCP and GF is not comparable .The data quality in terms of diagnosis and

completeness is questionable and does not allow confident analysis of the trends.

• Inadequate personnel and supplies leading to poor M&E.

• Weak use of data for decision-making.

• Inadequate training and human resource development in malaria surveillance, monitoring and

evaluation.

• There are also delays in data submission to all levels.

• Data is not readily available for the managers for their use and the quality of the data is low.

• There are weak linkages between the MCP and research institutions resulting into limited operational

research on malaria.

• The data quality in terms of diagnosis and completeness is questionable and does not allow

confident analysis of the trends.

• Weak use of data for decision making and inadequate training and human resource

development in malaria surveillance, monitoring and evaluation.

• Surveillance system covers only public sector health facilities partially. Private sector is not covered,

therefore actual burden of Malaria in the province is not known.

• No community based prevalence surveys conducted.

• Monitoring and Evaluation plan at provincial and district levels not developed.

• Limited mobility support available for monitoring and evaluation.

• Limited allocation of funds for operational research (0.36 million rupees for three years)

• Limited research capacity development of provincial and district staff.

• Although there is some collaboration between Malaria Control Program Sindh and some research

organization such as Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences, but no formal MOU have

been signed and there is no active collaboration agenda.

• Trained epidemiologist not posted as head of evaluation component of Malaria Control Program.

Page 213: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

213

4.6.15 Conclusion and recommendations for surveillance/Monitoring and evaluation

1. Production of monthly, quarterly and annual district, provincial and federal malaria program

reports based on strategic information at district and provincial level such as outcome/impact and

mortality data

2. Update information on needs and gaps on RDT, ACT, Primaquine, LLINs and IRS to achieve

universal coverage.

3. Establish one standard malaria case definition for diagnosis and treatment and , MIS, DHIS,

DWES .

4. Review and update the old malaria surveillance system in place in districts targeting elimination

of Malaria

5. Move to one malaria information system with data collection tool for an integrated malaria M&E

system in all malaria risk districts by first quarter 2014.(Harmonize the M&E system among the

PRs and SRs)

6. Malaria program to collect data on malaria inpatients and mortality from secondary and tertiary

hospital DHIS reporting.

7. To establish GIS and malaria mapping capacity within the provincial and federal malaria program

using WHO country office EPI and malaria atlas programs to guide malaria epidemiological

analysis and target interventions at districts level.

8. DEWS to be sustained and transferred to the DHIS provincial and district departments to support

malaria epidemics detection and response and in the future district malaria elimination.

9. MDC/PMRC/WHO/MEDVC HSA to propose an agenda for operational research to support

malaria control efforts

10. Use the available GF funds to extend the M/E system to all district under malaria control strategy

and adjust the M&E system for the districts targeted for elimination

4.7 Epidemics

In the past malaria epidemics have occurred in Pakistan at 6-10 years interval, with the

the most recent having occurred in 1972-73. Since then cyclical reoccurrence of these epidemics are no

more observed but small scale outbreaks have occurred. Following the floods in 2010 a resurgence in

confirmed malaria cases was noted in 2011 (50 000) compared to 16000 in 2010. A Disease Early Warning

System is in place, but malaria control programme does not get alerts through this system highlighting a

lack of coordination between the MCP and DEWS as well as limited capacity of Disease Early

Warning System and Focal Points in the districts. According to the recent assessment by WHO, the focal

points of DEWS at the district and provincial level collect data, including malaria on a weekly basis.

There is no bulletin, no newsletter or regular reporting system in the Programme. The last outbreak was

reported in December 2012 (Sakka) based on rumors from the Media, the Programme investigated and

confirmed it was not malaria. DEWS have never contacted the Programme to respond to malaria

outbreaks.

Page 214: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

214

4.7.1Determinants of malaria epidemics and emergencies and risk factors

Sindh: Past outbreaks have occurred in Sindh in 2003 at Mirpurkhas, 2006 at Tharparkar, 2010 at

Kasmore, 2011 at Tharparkar, 2013 at Tharparkar . The terrain in Tharparkar is desert and mountainous

and has ideal breeding sites for mosquito. Other risk factors include lack of awareness about malaria,

communities are remote from health facilities and the quality of care being provided to the people.

4.7.2 Forecasting malaria epidemics

Balochistan: In the absence of studies on malaria cyclical trends, forecasting is not a routine activity. Nor

does the programme have links with Met services for the purposes of Malaria Control activities and

forecasting. After the initiation of the inter-partner (GF-PRs and MCP) coordination process in October

2013, developing a system for epidemic forecasting is underway.

Sindh: There are no maps present at district or sub-district level and there is no any coordination with the

metrological department.

4.7.3 Preventing malaria epidemics

Balochistan: The MCP (and districts have been advised to do so) maintains special stores for these

emergency stocks. In case of emergencies the government also allocates special funds for emergency

procurements of commodities needed, this system needs to be streamlined with particular emphasis on

training for diagnostics, case management, personal safety, identification of cases requiring referral and

the referral system, offensive and defensive anti-vector measures, environmental management, and an

efficient surveillance system.

4.7.4 Preparedness and planning for malaria epidemics

Sindh: There is no preparedness plan present, however DOMC Sindh has a buffer stock (10%)

transported immediately upon identification of an epidemic. There is an epidemic preparedness team but

they are not trained properly and perform epidemic assessment based on the guidelines present.

4.7.5 Early warning and surveillance of malaria epidemics

Balochistan: Early detection containment and prevention of an epidemic is an important element of the

MCP strategy. Surveillance forms the basic tool to allow proper response and preventive modality,

however, this system is still fully functional. A DEWS system with weekly reporting is fully operative in

the province, and sends regular reports to the PC-MCP. Regular Malaria Indicator Surveys (MIS) with the

establishment of the Data Management Cell at the MCP will strengthen and streamline the epidemic

detection process. The epidemic threshold indicator is not routinely utilized, but is expected to be

monitored with the streamlining of the overall MIS. Insufficient resources and poor capacity compound a

strong epidemic surveillance system.

Sindh: Metrological department don’t provide any monthly or weekly warnings during peak months to

DOMC but they provide information directly to media and other departments.

Disease Early Warning System (DEWs) is operational in Sindh and all districts are reporting to DEWs

since 2010, DEWs received information from district through online system on a weekly basis and

compiles reports, circulating to stakeholders including Malaria Directorate. DEWs reports alerts,

outbreaks and conducts epidemiological surveys. There is no weekly surveillance during peak months.

Epidemic investigation is completed within two weeks of occurrence is conducted by a provincial team

comprising of an epidemiologist, senior malaria evaluator, microscopes, and one community member

along with technical support from WHO.

Page 215: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

215

4.7.6 Rapid response to malaria epidemics

Balochistan: The provincial arrangement for epidemic preparedness is under the Epidemiologist of the

MCP, who heads an epidemic response team, which oversees the epidemic containment activities

comprising of Space Spraying, emergency IRS, distribution of LLINs, diagnostic and treatment services.

The districts particularly the GF supported districts, have recently reported a designate emergency and

epidemic response team under the District Malaria Superintendent is in the process of being appointed.

However, the actual performance capacity of these teams and the respective emergency plans still needs

to be assessed. The case reporting and assessment indicators are routinely operational and monitored.

Special WHO checklists and tools that are also utilized.

FATA: At Federal level there are guidelines for malaria and dengue control in case of emergencies,

however, comprehensive updated policy and guidelines are not available. No document specifying the

roles and responsibilities during epidemics do not exist at provincial level. There are no contingency plans

including quantities buffer stock for malaria emergency preparedness and response at directorate or

agency level.

KPK: In the past, KP has experienced emergencies on a large scale such as earthquakes, floods and

conflicts emphasising the need for timely response. Poor preparedness and response was seen during

recent dengue outbreaks in three districts of KP.

Sindh: Response to epidemics are immediate with the team performing a malaria-metric survey (MMS),

collecting slides (from those with fever and people who have history of fever since last week) to check on

microscopy from where there is higher number of cases along with the peripheries and analyzing the data

before compiling a report, data of last 5 years of that district is also collected. In this survey team collects

slides. They check slides on microscopy and come up with the analysis whether this outbreak or not. All

fever cases without diagnosis receive full doses (radical) of ACT if PF is dominating in the area.

4.7.7 National control systems for malaria epidemics and emergencies

Balochistan: The DoMC is the national focal point. National Guidelines are in place and followed for

epidemics and emergencies. There is presently no Technical Working Group at the provincial level for

malaria epidemic. The provincial Health Directorate and the MCP are the focal and coordination points in

the province; a formally designated group for Malaria Control is not available. The IPCC at the national

level is functional for overall IPCC for malaria control activities in the country. Sentinel Surveillance sites

and early warning systems are functionalized to provide support and cover for epidemic control, as a part

of emergency response.

FATA: No organization or focal point exists at national, directorate or agency level to lead malaria

emergency preparedness and response. There has been no training in emergency preparedness and

response. No training manual exists. The present PC-1 does not have any funding for emergency

preparedness and response.

KPK: The PC-1 of MCP documents a malaria epidemic in KP in 1974 however the details are unknown.

There is neither documented history of Malaria Epidemics in KP nor any malaria epidemic risk mapping.

There is no contingency plan including buffer stock for malaria emergency preparedness and response at

provincial or district level. No organization or focal point exists at national, provincial or district level to

lead malaria emergency preparedness and response. There is no training in emergency preparedness and

Page 216: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

216

response yet. No training manual exists. The previous PC-1 has allocated one million Rs for establishing

early malaria warning system but this budget was not released and consequently halted implementation.

The present PC-1 does not have any funding for emergency preparedness and response.

Punjab: At Federal level there are guidelines for malaria and dengue control during emergencies,

however, comprehensive updated policy and guidelines are not available. There is no document

specifying the roles and responsibilities during epidemics. There is no contingency plan including buffer

stock for malaria emergency preparedness and response at provincial or district level. In the past oonly

20% of the buffer stock was kept aside for epidemics but in the absence of a PC-1, the stock no longer

exists. There is no focal point that exists at provincial or district level to lead malaria emergency

preparedness and response. No training in emergency preparedness and response has been conducted. No

training manual exists. The present PC-1 does not have any funding for emergency preparedness and

response.

Sindh: An EPR team is present (provincial) but there is no focal point for malaria epidemic and

emergencies. There is a district level malaria focal person. There has been no training conducted on

epidemic assessment. Sentinel surveillance, epidemic warning and early detection systems are not in

place.

4.7.8 Advocacy, information, education, communication and community involvement

Studied data to assess the KABP for Malaria epidemic as during routine times is not available. The

importance of BCC for epidemic containment is fundamental but the situation is the same as for BCC

overall, particularly to improve the treatment seeking behavior of the communities and preventive

practices. There is a need for the BCC campaigns to target the health professionals of all categories in

their response to malaria containment and control, particularly following prescribing practices under

the treatment guidelines. PRs oversee BCC campaigns (community meetings, seminars, walks) in the

GF supported districts, while MCP is constrained by a lack of funding.

Sindh: Health education officer does sessions on epidemic.

4.7.9 Summary

There is no proper surveillance system in place for epidemic forecasting and alerts for timely

response by the Programme. The programme there is no separate unit for epidemic preparedness and

response. Disease early warning system (DEWS) supported by WHO includes malaria outbreak

detection and alert and rapid response.

4.8.0 SWOT Analysis

Strengths Weakness Opportunities Threats

Malaria surveillance at

place at provincial and

district level.

Malaria surveillance

system not yet involving

use of epidemic thresholds

for early detection of

malaria epidemics.

Support from Global Fund

for implementation of

main malaria epidemic

preventive measures

Increasing development of

new urban settings in big

cities without an

infrastructure supportive

of vector control and new

large scale irrigated

Page 217: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

217

agricultural schemes

without in-built vector

control methods, like Tube

Wells, Dams, Ponds, and

in the cities the sewerage

disposal works.

Absence of an early

warning system for

prevention of malaria

epidemics.

Presence of some

international and national

NGOs experienced in

supporting efforts for

prevention and

containment of malaria

epidemics.

Delay in release of

running cost needed to

implement preventive or

containment measures at

times of malaria

emergencies.

Lack of seasonal spray

men and other workers

needed to implement

additional preventive

measures during the rainy

season or at times of

malaria epidemics, due to

low payments.

Poor documentation of

malaria epidemics

witnessed in the province

in the past period.

DEWS is functional in

Sindh and all districts

report to DEWS on

weekly basis since 2010

Coordination of DEWS

with DOMC is weak.

Limited Number of

surveillance officers

System is in place can be

improved

Lack of staff motivation

DOMC Sindh keeps 10%

buffer stock as Epidemic

stock

No – Epidemic forecasting

system no maps available

Availability of resources Community support

Epidemic response team at

DOMC investigates the

epidemic

No preparation plan

available trained

Epidemiologist not posted

Human Resources is

available

Law and order situation

4.8.1 Issues and Challenges

• Malaria transmission is unstable with high risk of epidemics but there are no maps of districts

with high epidemic potential and those with reported malaria outbreaks over the last 5 or

more years.

Page 218: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

218

• Malaria emergency risk is high due to political and security challenges in some districts and

provinces and past risk of floods and earthquakes.

• There are no malaria epidemic-emergency focal points in the federal and provincial malaria

programs supported by a technical working group.

• Malaria epidemic threshold for detection of malaria outbreaks being used by the DEWS

system but no thresholds are in use in by the malaria information (MIS) system and the DHIS

system.

• There is a lack of trained malaria program teams on malaria epidemic-emergency

preparedness and response at all level.

• There is a malaria emergency guideline to support malaria control in refugee camps and to

some extent in IPD camps but does not address people living in security affected districts.

• There are numerous partners such as WHO- provincial sub-offices and emergency programs

such as OCHA, UNHCR, UNICEF working in health emergency but inadequate partnership

by malaria program to address universal access and coverage of malaria control interventions

in emergency affected districts and provinces.

• At Federal level there are guidelines for malaria and dengue control in case of emergencies,

however, comprehensive updated policy and guidelines are not available.

• The document specifying the roles and responsibilities and other actions during epidemics do

not exist. No such guidelines exist at provincial level

4.8.2 Conclusion and recommendations

1. Update risk maps and tables on malaria epidemics and emergencies

2. Prepare the policies, guidelines and training manuals for emergency preparedness and response.

3. Provincial quarterly malaria emergency update on needs and gaps in emergency affected

populations and districts for follow up with provincial health emergency cluster

4. Malaria program and DEWS, DHIS to jointly review and update malaria case definitions and

malaria outbreak and emergency thresholds and guidance for malaria outbreak control

5. To develop specific malaria emergency strategies such as simple community based malaria

control to access and deliver malaria control to emergency affected areas.

6. To build malaria partnership with other organizations such as OCHA, WHO, UNICEF, UNIHCR,

IOM, JICA, etc. to move to universal coverage with malaria interventions by MDG 2015 in

emergency affected districts

Page 219: PAKISTAN MALARIA PROGRAMME REVIEW (MPR)

219

ANNEX 1 : Agenda of all MPR phases

ANNEX 2 List of people involved in MPR