ncrp presentation

26
RESIDENTIAL LOCATION OF MILLENNIALS A Calgary Case Study Trina Burgess University of Lethbridge Master’s Student 1

Upload: trina-burgess

Post on 16-Apr-2017

20 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: NCRP presentation

1

RESIDENTIAL LOCATION OF MILLENNIALS

A Calgary Case Study

Trina BurgessUniversity of Lethbridge Master’s Student

Page 2: NCRP presentation

2

Who are the Millennials?

■Born between 1980 and 2000■Aged 15 to 35 years old in 2015■27 % of the Canadian population

(Statistics Canada, 2011 Census)

Page 3: NCRP presentation

3

Millennials are different than previous generations■Getting married later■Having children later or not at all■Smaller household sizes■Fewer drive cars■Higher concentrations in downtowns and high-

density housing

Page 4: NCRP presentation

4

Millennial Housing Demand■Changing residential ecology of cities■Increase in segregation based on age

– “Youthification” of certain cities and certain areas of the city (polycentrism)

■Development of amenities in downtown cores– Lead to increase in high-density residential

suites■Not all young adults live downtown

– Many dispersed throughout the city or concentrated in the suburbs

Page 5: NCRP presentation

5

Location Quotients for 25-29 year olds in Calgary census tracts in 2011. Statistics Canada Census, 2011

25-29 year olds in 2011(# of Census Tracts in Range)

>=2.00 (7)1.50 to 1.99 (19)1.00 to 1.49 (67)0.50 to 0.99 (123)0.00 to 0.49 (32)

Page 6: NCRP presentation

6

LQ for 25-29 year olds

1981

25-29 year olds in 2011(# of Census Tracts in Range)

>=2.00 (7)1.50 to 1.99 (19)1.00 to 1.49 (67)0.50 to 0.99 (123)0.00 to 0.49 (32)

25-29 year olds(# of Census Tracts in Range)

1.5 to 2 (10)1 to 1.5 (43)0.5 to 1 (50)0 to 0.5 (12)

2011

Page 7: NCRP presentation

7

Research Question

■Why are Millennials deciding to live downtown, or close to it as opposed to in the suburbs?– What factors do Millennials aged 25-35

state as being important in deciding where to live?

■What are the future residential intentions of this group of young adults?

Page 8: NCRP presentation

8

Domains of Influence on Millennial Residential Location

Millennial Residential Location

Other

Neighborhood attributes

Social Network

Family-based considerations

Personal Security

MobilityLifestyle

Employment-related considerations

Page 9: NCRP presentation

9

Research Method■Qualitative interviews

– Open-ended questions– Semi-structured interview– Inductive, exploratory

■To determine important attributes and reasons– Why young adults choose to live where

they live– Housing attributes, neighborhood

attributes

Page 10: NCRP presentation

10

■Explanatory understanding of housing choices and locational preferences of Millennials in Calgary

■Inform ongoing development and planning objectives

Page 11: NCRP presentation

11

Millennial Residential Location

Housing Attributes

Neighborhood attributes

Social Atrributes

Family-based considerations

Psychological benefits

Transportation attributes

Lifestyle

Employment-based considerations

Themes emerging from qualitative analysis

Page 12: NCRP presentation

12

Neighbourhood attributes

■Amenities– Green space– Shopping

■Location■Trees■Nightlife

■Quiet■Safety■Community

maintenance■Housing stock –

aesthetics and appearance

Page 13: NCRP presentation

13

Housing attributes

■Apartment and condo living■Interior housing attributes■External housing attributes

Page 14: NCRP presentation

14

Transportation attributes

■Active transportation■Public transportation■Car sharing

Page 15: NCRP presentation

15

Social attributes of the neighbourhood■ Families and Children■ Proximity to family and friends■ Places to meet people and meet up with people■ Friendly neighbours■ Community engagement■ High density living■ Social diversity

Page 16: NCRP presentation

16

Psychological benefits

■Happiness■Pride of ownership■Neighbourhood reputation

Page 17: NCRP presentation

17

Differences between areas

■ Core– Condo living– Car sharing– Sport and concert

facilities– Cycle tracks– Limited space– Lots of people– Homeless people– History– No car

■ Area surrounding the core– Quiet

■ Suburbs– More families and

children– Lakes

Page 18: NCRP presentation

18

#1Location

#2Walkabili

ty

#3Quiet

Less time commuting = more time for other things

Sleep

Feel Healthier

Wendy, young professional, lives in city core

Page 19: NCRP presentation

19

#1Location

#2Vibrant

Community

#3Amenitie

s

Ease of access to things

Less time to get things, also variety in choicesHappier

peopleBeth, university student, lives in city core, doesn’t have driver’s license

Page 20: NCRP presentation

20

#1Proximity to

grocery stores, etc.

#2Proximity to transportati

on

#3Communit

y feel

General well being

Belonging, connectedness

Less time travelling Steve, married with 1 child, lives

in city core.

Page 21: NCRP presentation

21

#1Proximity to

amenities and work

#2Wide

variety of activities

#3Modern

look

Frees up time for enjoyable things

Vanity

If there is more to do we will do more

Shawn, young professional, lives in area surrounding city core.

Page 22: NCRP presentation

22

#1Good School

System

#2Lots of

recreation space

#3Price

Good education for kids

Want to do other things

Active family

Jessica, stay at home mom, suburbs

Page 23: NCRP presentation

23

Unique Community

Backyard Affordable

Pleasing Aesthetics

Single budgetDo

g

Joanne, single young professional with a dog, lives in suburbs

Page 24: NCRP presentation

24

Observations

■Location is important to most people– People have different standards for

why location is important to them– Downtowners want walkability/bike-

ability– Suburbanites are willing to drive

■Diversity in top priorities

Page 25: NCRP presentation

25

Observations

■Most people want to stay close to where they currently live– Downtowners want to stay central– Suburbanites want to stay in suburbs

■Change in family status would change housing choice more than neighborhood choice– People might need bigger homes in same/

similar area