mechanical & electrical inspection reports

122
New Hampshire Department of Transportation Mechanical & Electrical lnspection Report Portsmouth Memorial Bridge ln-depth lnspection and Condition Report

Upload: hoangtuyen

Post on 04-Feb-2017

296 views

Category:

Documents


11 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

New Hampshire Department of Transportation

Mechanical & Electrical lnspection Report

Portsmouth Memorial Bridge

ln-depth lnspection and Condition Report

Page 2: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports
Page 3: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

New Hampshire Department of Transportation

t2

3

4

TABLE OF CONTENTSMECHANICAL STUDY PAGE

EXECUTTVE SUMMARY. ................M-1

DESCRTPTTON OF SYSTEMS ...........M-1

INSPECTION APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY ..................M-2

INSPECTION FINDINGS... ..............M-2

4.1,1 Motors, Brakes, and Mounting: ..............,. .........,...... M-2

4.L.2 Reducers and Back-up Motor:.....,... ...... M-4

4.1.3 Shafts and Couplings: ........ M-4

4.1.4 Bearings:..... ... M-5

4.L.5 Rack and Pinion: ................ M-5

4.1,.6 Operating Drums: .............. M-5

4.1,.7 lnstrument Drives:.....,,,. .... M-5

OPERATING ROPES: .... M-6

4.2.1 Operating Ropes:......... ...... M-6

4.2.2 Operating Ropes Take-ups: .,,....,...., ...... M-7

4.2.3 Guide Rollers and Deflector Sheaves: ... M-7

COUNTERWEIGHT ASSEMBLIES:........... .......,....., M-7

4.3.1, Counterweight Sheaves and Bearings:................... ... M-8

4.3.2 Counterweight Ropes and Connections:............ ....... M-9

4.3.3 Countenrueight Guides:.... .......,............ M-10

LIVE LOAD BEARINGS AND SPAN GUIDES ........ M-10

4.4.1, Live Load Bearings: .......... M-10

4.4.2 Span Guides:,......,.....,,.,.. , M-10

SPAN BALANCE:.............. ....,,........ M-10

RECOMMENDATTONS ................ M-11

MINIMUM REHABILITATION: ..,......... ............... M-11

MODERATE REHABILITATION:............. ............. M-11-

MAJOR REHABILITATION:............ .M-I2APPENDIX A: MACHINERY DIAGRAM ........... MA-lAPPENDIX B: PHOTOS. ...............M8-1

APPENDIX C: FIELD MEASUREMENTS........... .MC-l

APPENDIX D: FIELD INSPECTION SHEETS ...... MD-l

4.2

4.3

4.4

4.5

5

5.1

5.2

5.3

Page 4: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports
Page 5: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

New Hampshire Department of Transportation

TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)ELECTRICAL STUDY PAGE

Page 6: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports
Page 7: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

New Hampshire Department of Transportation

MECHANICAL STUDY

1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

A mechanical inspection of the Memorial Bridge was performed on May 27th,z9th, fune 4th,

and October 15tt' of 2009. A visual inspection of all main span mechanical systems wasperformed including all operating machinery, operating ropes, counterweight ropes,liveload bearings and span guides. Measurements were taken on the gearing deflector andcounterweight sheaves, operating drums, operating ropes, and counterweight ropes as wellas select counterweight rope tension measurements to assess the condition of themechanical systems. The design alternatives presented attempt to improve the design ofthe bridge machinery and provide an expected useful operating life of 25 years. Threelevels of rehabilitation scope were considered, described as follows: (1) MinimumRehabilitation which address safety and reliability issues, and should be resolved in a timelymanner, [2) Moderate Rehabilitation which will further increase the life and reliability ofthe mechanical systems. (3) Major Rehabilitation which provide the maximum level ofreliability and safety as per modern design standards. Recommendations for each level ofrehabilitation are presented in Section 5.

2 DESCRIPTION OF SYSTEMS

The Memorial Bridge is a span driven vertical lift span with single level deck. The bridgecarries US Route 1 between the towns of Portsmouth, NH and Kittery, ME,

The operating machinery on the span consists of two main motors driving a central parallelshaft reducer, The parallel shaft gear box has two outputs which drive two sets of operatingrope drums, The reducer is connected to each drum assembly via floating shafts. Thrustertype motor brakes are mounted on each of the two input shafts of the reducer. Additionalelectro-magnetic disc brakes are mounted on shaft back stops opposite of the electric motorinput shafts. A Liquid Propane Gas [LPG) backup motor is also mounted off of one of theelectro-magnetic disc brake back stop shafts. The LPG motor is connected to the shaft via aclutch coupling and right angle gear reducer. The LPG motor is intended for emergency usewhen the electric motors are not available.

The operating rope drum assemblies consist of two operating drums driven by a pinion gearengaging a rack gear on each drum. The operating rope drums are wrapped with the up-haul and down-haul operating ropes. The operating rope drums rotate and play out or reelin the operating ropes during operation of the movable span. The opposite ends of theoperating ropes are connected to fix points on the approach spans via ropes take-ups atroadway level and at the top of the towers.

The counterweight system for the movable span consists of two counterweights, one in eachtower connected to the span via a series ofcounterweight ropes supported over sheavesmounted in the approach span towers, There are four counterweight rope sheaves, one ineach corner of the movable span. The counterweight sheaves are supported on trunnionshafts by plain bearings. The counterweight rope connections at the counterweight have nomeans of adjusting the rope tensions and they are connected to the counterweight via alarge equalizing device. The counterweight ropes are connected to the span via take-upswhich allow adjustment of the rope tensions. Each counterweight has guides which engagerails along the length of the tower to ensure the position of the counterweight during travel.

Scoping Study for the US 1 Over the Piscataqua River,

Memorial Bridge ReportPage M-1

Page 8: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

New Hampshire Department of Transportation

The movable span has features in the form ofspan guides, and centering devices located oneither end of the span to ensure proper position of the span while both moving and seated.The main movable span also has live load shoes in each corner to transfer the live load onthe movable span to the rest piers.

3 INSPECTION APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY

A visual inspection of all main span mechanical systems was performed. This includedoperating machinery operating rope system, counterweight rope system, live load bearings,and span guides. Various other measurements were taken to help assess the condition ofthe mechanical systems. Gear tooth thickness was measured using a gear tooth caliper andbacklash was measured using feeler gages on all open gearing. Physical dimensions such as

the rope diameter and lay length were measured using calipers on both the operating ropesand the counterweight ropes. Machinery bearing clearances and counterweight ropeequalizer pin clearance were measured using feeler gages. Lastly, the rope tension in arandom selection of counterweight ropes in each corner of the movable span was testedusing the American Bridge method. The check of the counterweight rope tensions helped toassess the functionality of the counterweight rope equalizer.

INSPECTION FINDINGS

4.1 Operating Machinery:

In general the operating machinery is in good condition despite the age of the some of thecomponents. With the exception of the operating drum racks and pinions, the machinery isin need of only minor to moderate attention. Despite these conditions it should still benoted that the age of the machinery makes it more susceptible to failure as well as reducesthe likelihood of available replacement parts. The condition of other components of themovable span, such the condition of the movable span and the operating ropes also has agreat effect on the course of action directed for the operating machinery.

4,L.L Motors, Brakes, and Mounting:

The movable span is driven by two electric motors and braking is performed by a pair ofthruster brakes and a pair of electro-magnetic disc brakes. AII of these devices are in goodcondition. No mechanical rehabilitation work is suggested for the span drive motors. Themotors shall be replaced in the moderate and major rehabilitation alternatives; furtherdiscussion is presented in Section 4.4 of Electrical Study. There would be some minormechanical work related to the mounting and alignment of the motors in both the moderateand major alternatives. The following is the name plate information from the motors andbrakes:

Westinghouse Motor

S\rle: 7 6F 525 B 5 (North Motor), 7 6F 52558 6 [S outh M otor)Serial#: 1S-775BI-Z Frame460 Volts, L63 Amps, 3Phase 60 Cycle354 Rotor Volts, 141 Rotor AmpsRated 100% load for 1. hour, B0'C riseMax Values; 100 HP, 585 RPM, 27 60 Ft.lb

Thruster Brake

Scoping Study for the US 1 Over the Piscataqua River,

Memorial Bridge ReportPage M-2

Page 9: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

New Hampshire Department of Transportation

General Electric BrakeModel: lC95L6-4667Catalog: 01LEBL43Max Torque: 1600 ft.lbMin Torque: 60 ft,lbSpring Length for 1600 ft.ìb: 6 13 /t6"230/460 Volts,3 Phase 60 CyclesI 7 /8" Stroke

Electro-magnetic Disc Brakes

No Manufacturer's Nameplate InformationDesign Torque Rating Each: 700 ft.lb

Despite the good condition ofthe thruster brakes, it should be considered thatthe brakesare obsolete GE brakes and are no longer commercially available products (See photo M-1).Acquisition of spare or replacement parts may not be readily available in the event that anyof the brake components fail. Minor work on the thruster brakes would consist of leavingthe thruster brakes as is, considering their acceptable condition. The moderate and majorwork on the thruster brakes would be a complete replacement of the entire thruster brakewith a new thruster brake of the same capacity,

The electro-magnetic disc brakes are in similar condition and situation as the thrusterbrakes (See photo M-2). The electro-magnetic disc brakes function properly but are of anoutdated model and may suffer from a lack of availability of replacement parts, Anotherissue presented by the electro-magnetic disc brakes is that they are of a lesser capacity thanthe thruster brakes and bridge staffhave indicated that they have had issues in the pastrelated to the use of the electro-magnetic brakes in stopping the movable span.

The current brake arrangement also does not meet the requirements of the AASHTOmovable bridge design code (2008 ed. 5.6.1J which states that mechanically operatedbridges shall utilize two sets of brakes. One se! the motor brakes, shall be located on themotor input shaft, The other set of machinery brakes, shall be located as close to theoperating ropes as possible. Idealìy, one of the existing sets of brakes should be movedcloser to the operating rope drums to be compliant with the recommendation of theAASHTO movable bridge design code. Practically, this course of action is not feasible giventhen existing machinery layout. A brake moved closer to the driving pinion would be ofsignificantly greater capacity and cost. The availabìe space in the machinery room alsoprohibits the placement of a significantly larger brake.

A similar course of action as the thruster brake is recommended for the electro-magneticdisc brakes. The minor and moderate rehabilitation alternatives assume no correctiveaction for the mechanical work on the electro-magnetic disc brakes. The majorrehabilitation work assumes a complete replacement of the electro-magnetic disc brakes aspart of the total replacement of the movable span.

All of the rehabilitation work on the motors and brakes need to be coordinated with theelectrical rehabilitation work in Section 4, of Electrical Study.

Scoping Study for the US 1 Over the Piscataqua River,

Memorial Bridge ReportPage M-3

Page 10: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

New Hampshire Department of Transportation

4,L,2 Reducers and Back-up Motor:

There are two reducers in the operating machinery. The primary reducer is a quadrupleinput double output parallel shaft reducer with the following name plate information:

Ratio: 31.4:1235 HP @ 5BO RPM

The primary reducer drives the operating rope drum and is driven by the electric motorsand the LPG backup engine, The auxiliary reducer is a right angle, single input, singleoutput reducer with the following nameplate information:

Ratio 11.4:l-

101 HP @ 1600 RPM

The overall condition of both of these reducers is good and there are only a few minormaintenance issues which need to be addressed. Both reducers suffer from moistureintrusion into the interior of the housing (See photo M-3) and would benefit from theinstallation of a desiccant style breather. AII rehabilitation alternatives with the exceptionof the major work alternative should include maintenance level work for the reducer. Themajor work alternative would include complete replacement of the reducers as part of thereplacement of the entire movable span.

It should also be noted that during operation ofthe span, the backlash between the gearteeth would allow the gears inside the primary reducer to hammer against each other at anabrupt stop of the span. Although this is not a deficiency of the reducer, it is a deficiency ofthe operating machinery system and should be corrected to provide less abrupt stop ofthespan from the braking system, This corrective action would be considered incidental to thebrake rehabilitation work, regardless of the alternative.

The Liquid Propane Gas (LPG) back-up motor and clutch was also visually inspected andobserved during testing of the emergency drive. A clutch connects the LPG back-up motorto the auxiliary right angle reducer. Based on observation ofthe clutch and conversationwith the bridge staff it was determined that the transmission leaks oil (See photo M-4). Itwas also noted that the clutch emitted a loud screeching noise during testing of the LPG

back-up motor. Given the age of the LPG motor it is recommended that in the minor andmoderate alternatives, the motor should be rebuilt. As part of the minor and moderatealternatives it is also suggested that the LPG back-up motor transmission and clutch bereplaced. In the major alternative the LPG back-up motor and transmission will be replacedby other means of emergency operation power. Further discussion on the replacement ofthe LPG back-up motor is presented in Section 4 of Electrical Study,

4.L.3 Shafts and Couplings:

The shafting and couplings between the drive motors, gear reducers, and pinions are ofvarious sizes and types. Overall all shafts and couplings are in good condition. Most shaftsand couplings only have paint related deficiencies [See photo M-5). It should be noted thatthe motor couplings CL and C2 are gear type couplings (See photo M-6) and do not meet therecommendation of the AASHTO movable bridge design code [2008 ed.6.7.9.3). Accordingto the code motor coupling are to be grid style coupling for the connection of motors toother machinery. Several additional instrument drive couplings were identified in theinspection which was not mentioned in previous documents, see appendix A for a

Scoping Study for the US 1 Over the Piscataqua River,

Memorial Bridge ReportPage M-4

Page 11: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

New Hampshire Department of Transportation

machinery diagram showing the location and designation of these additional couplings, Itwas noted during inspection that the instrument drive coupling off the northwest operatingdrum, identified as coupling C-1-L for the purpose of this report, may have a loose hub whichdoes not fully engage the center spider of the coupling (See photo M-7).

Minor maintenance and painting are recommended for the minor rehabilitation alternative.It is recommended that the motor couplings be replaced with the appropriate grid stylecouplings in addition to the maintenance work for the moderate rehabilitation alternative.Finally, all couplings and shafts are to be replaced as part of the major work alternative.

4.1.4 Bearings:

The operating machinery bearings consist of a several sets of bearings in the operatingdrum frames that support the pinion shafts and operating drum shafts. These bearings areplain type bearing with split bushings and housings. In general the bearings have onlyminor maintenance related deficiencies; however several have wear beyond the standardsfor clearance (See photo M-B), A table of bearing clearance field measurements can befound in appendix C. It is important to maintain proper bearing clearances such thatcouplings and gear sets are not damaged by excessive shaft movement and vibration underload.

The minor and moderate rehabilitation alternatives for the bearings will require minorwork to ensure the expected design life. The major rehabilitation alternative will includethe complete replacement of the bearings.

4.1.5 Rack and Pinion:

The rack and pinions are used to drive the main movable span via the operating ropedrums. Each pinion shaft drives two operating drums where each drum has its own rackgear mounted on the drum, The rack and pinions are the original installation on this bridge.The gear teeth show significant wear in all the open gear sets of the movable span [Seephoto M-9 &10). This poor condition of the gear teeth indicated that all of the rack andpinions are nearingthe end oftheir service life and should be replaced. Atable ofgeartooth measurements can be found in appendix C. In all rehabilitation alternatives the rackand pinion gears should be replaced.

4,L.6 Operating Drums:

A single operating rope drum assembly consists of ¡wo operating drums wrapped with theup-haul and down-haul operating ropes. The operating drums were visually inspected andmeasurements of the rope grooves were performed to quantifir the wear of the ropegrooves. All exposed operating rope grooves were measured and found to have noappreciable wear. According to the plans the operating rope drums have a pitch diameter of3 6 inches for a I" diameter operating rope. This ratio of sheave pitch diameter to ropediameter is unacceptable according to the AASHTO movable bridge design code [2008 ed.6.8.3.1.3). Further discussion on the impacts of the diameter ratio and its affects on theoperating rope life will be discussed in section 4.2.3. Maintenance cleaning and painting arerecommended for the minor and moderate rehabilitation alternatives. The operating ropedrums will be replaced in the major rehabilitation alternative.

4.t.7 InstrumentDrives:

The only externally mounted instrument drive is a chain and sprocket arrangementmounted off of the northwest operating drum shaft. The sprocket drive is in goodcondition and does not require any rehabilitation work, No rehabilitation work shall be

Scoping Study for the US 1 Over the Piscataqua River,Memorial Bridge Report

Page M-5

Page 12: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

New Hampshire Department of Transportation

performed on the instrument drives as part of the minor rehabilitation option. Theinstrument drive will be replaced in both the moderate and major rehabilitationalternatives.

Field limit switches are also located exterior to the operator house and operatingmachinery. Over travel and fully open limited switches are located in the towers and spanseated limit switches are located on the rest piers. All of these switches are driven by therehabilitation alternatives presented Section 4.8, of Electrical Study. No work shall beperformed in association with the span seated limit switches. The over travel and fullyopen limit switches shall be replaced in all rehabilitation alternatives. The mechanical workto mount the new switches shall be included in all rehabilitation alternatives.

4.2 Oneratins Rones:

The operating ropes are divided into two types of ropes, and are of the same construction.Uphaul ropes wind around the operating drums and are strung along the span supported bythe operating ropes guides. The uphaul ropes bend around the deflector sheave and run upto the top of the tower spans where they are connected to the tower span by the operatingrope take-ups. The downhaul ropes follow the same path as the uphaul ropes except thatthen bend around the deflector sheaves and run down to the roadway deck level and areconnected to the tower span by operating rope take-ups, The operating rope system as a

whole suffers from a variety of minor deficiencies throughout the system, but performs as

intended. One of the major issues with the system is an outdated design which does notconform to current standards regarding rope and drum/sheave geometry.

4.2.L Operating Ropes:

The operating ropes are L" diameter Improved Plow Steel flPS) 6x25 filler wireconstructionwith a fiber core. Each rope has an open spelter socketatthe end connected tothe operating rope take-ups. The ropes were found to be in good condition with a fewminor deficiencies related to corrosion and light wear identified during the inspection.According to past reports, some of the ropes are relatively new, having been replaced in200L. ftwas noted that during operation of the span that the operating ropes rubbedagainst each other and even transposed position when the span was stopped and theoperating ropes went slack. This condition shows that there is excessive slack in the wireropes caused by the stretching ofthe operating ropes. The cause ofthe rope stretch shall bediscussed further in section 4.2.3 in relation to the rope guides and sheaves. It was alsonoted that there was a kink in the East northeast uphaul rope just before the double rollerswhen the span was approximately I/3 open position. The kink in the rope was visible whenthe load on the rope was relieved and the rope went slack (See photo M-11J, Such adeficiency is grounds for replacement of the rope and the defect should be monitored whilethe wire rope is still in service.

In the minor rehabilitation work the operating ropes should have their tension checked andadjusted at the take-ups as needed. The moderate rehabilitation work includes thereplacement of the kinked northeast uphaul rope in addition to the tensioning of theoperating ropes. Major rehabilitation of the operating ropes would be completereplacement of the operating ropes as a result of the replacement of the entire movablespan. This major rehabilitation would include bringing the operating rope system up tocurrent standards.

Scoping Study for the US 1 Over the Piscataqua River,

Memorial Bridge ReportPage M-6

Page 13: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

New Hampshire Department of Transpoftation

4.2.2 Operating Ropes Take-ups:

The operating rope take-ups consist of a threaded rod with an eye on one end that is pinnedto the open socket end of the operating rope. The threaded rod runs through a structuralsupport on the tower and double nuts are used to adjust the tension on the rod. Generallythe take-ups are exposed to elements and have varying levels of corrosion on their outersurface. No significant wear was noted on any of the take-ups. It is recommended that thetake-ups be cleaned and painted in the minor work alternative. All other alternatives willhave the take-ups replaced same-in-kind.

4.2.3 Guide Rollers and Deflector Sheaves:

Various size guide rollers and sheaves are used to support and guide the operating ropesalong the truss ofthe movable span. In general these rollers and sheaves show signs ofmeasurable wear and corrosion. In some cases, some of the rollers did not turn during theoperation of the movables span and allowed the operating ropes to slide over them. Most ofthe intermediate deflector sheaves showed sign of wear in the rope grooves, These rollersshowed further evidence ofthe poor operation in the form of groves and scoring over theouter diameter of the rollers caused by contact with the operating ropes (See photo M-1,2).

In addition to the known deficiencies with the rollers and sheaves there is an inherentdesign feature of these devices which does not meet the AASHTO movable bridge designcode [2008 ed. 6.8.3.1.3J, Similar to the design of the operating rope drums, the guiderollers and deflector sheaves have an unacceptable pitch diameter to rope diameter ratio.Guidelines for the diameter ratio are presented to reduce known stress and wear due tobending the wire ropes over the sheave and to increase the serviceable life of the rope. Theoriginal design ofthe drums, sheaves, and rollers has subjected the operating ropes tohigher than recommended stress which has resulted in the premature elongation of theoperating ropes. The elongation of the operating ropes is the cause of the excessive slack ofthe ropes witnessed in the operation of the movable span. The additional stress will alsoreduce the service life ofthe operating ropes.

As part of the minor rehabilitation of the guide rollers and deflector sheaves, all rollersshould be replaced and all sheaves should be cleaned and painted. The moderaterehabilitation includes the replacement of aÌl rollers and sheaves. The major rehabilitationincludes the replacement of all operating drums, sheaves and rollers with improved pitchdiameter equivalents. It is recommended that the pitch diameter of these components beincreased to at least 45"for a 1" diameter operating rope. If the arc of contact between adeflector sheave and the rope is less than 45 degrees a pitch diameter of 26" for a L"diameter operating rope is acceptable.

4.3 CounterweightAssemblies:

The counterweight assemblies on the main movable span do not shown significantdeterioration of condition from the previous report. The counterweight assemblycomponents are a mix of the original installation and new components installed throughvarious rehabilitation contracts over the years. As noted in previous inspections thecounterweight equalizing assemblies creak during the operation of the movable span. Thenoise was most notable on the south counterweight equalizing assemblies, but themaintenance staff noted that this side was due for lubrication which had not beenperformed yet.

A limited investigation of the rope tensions was performed at return site visit in October.The American Bridge method of checking rope tensions was used on a random selection of

Scoping Study for the US 1 Over the Piscataqua River,Memorial Bridge Report

Page M-7

Page 14: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

New Hampshire Department of Transportation

ropes in all four corners of the movable span. Six ropes were randomly selected in eachcorner of the movable span. The resulting calculated rope tensions show that the ropetensions do vary significantly for the ropes selected. The worst case variation occurred inthe northwest corner of the bridge where the highest varying rope was L3.29o/o above themean tension and the lowestvarying rope was L7.Lío/o below the mean tension, TheSouthwest corner exhibited the least amount of variation where the highest varying ropewas 9.360/o above the mean tension and the lowest varying rope was 6.260/o below the meantensions. The variation ofthe rope tensions does not meet the industry acceptance criteriaof 2 Vz 0/o variation between individual ropes, as interpreted from AASHTO (1988 ed. 4.7.6).The summarized rope tensions for each corner can be found in appendix C.

4.3.1 Counterweight Sheaves and Bearings:

There are 4 sets of counterweight sheaves and bearings for the main movable span, one ineach corner of the span. The counterweight sheaves and bearings carry the entire weight ofthe movable span, counterweight and counterweight ropes. The counterweight sheaves aresteel castings with machined rope grooves. The counterweight sheaves are supported byplain style trunnion bearings with bronze bushings.

During operation of the movable span it was noted that there was an intermittent bangingnoise coming from the Northwest counterweight sheave. Such noise is usually associatedwith a difference in the tension of the counterweight ropes in that corner of the span.Further discussion on the tension of the counterweight ropes will be presented later insection 4.3.2. The counterweight sheave rope grooves were checked for wear with theappropriate sized gauge, and no significant wear was found. The report of significant wearin the first groove the southwest sheave could not be confirmed. The crack in the outboardweb of the NE sheave was confirmed and showed no additional growth since the previousinspection [See photo M-13). The condition of the trunnion shaft journal and transitionradius could not be assessed at the time of the scoping inspection. The trunnion bearingswere not disassembled. The trunnion bearings were visually inspected and clearancemeasurements were taken. A table of bearing clearance field measurements can be found inappendix C. Previous inspections noted scoring and wear of the trunnion shaft journalswhen the trunnion bearings were disassembled. It is assumed that these conditions havenot significantìy changed since the last inspection. The only other deficiencies thecounterweight sheaves, bearings, and trunnion shafts are minor maintenance deficienciesrelated to paint failure and surface corrosion.

Several options are possible for the rehabilitation of the counterweight sheave deficiencies.The least costly approach would be to perform no action on the counterweight rope groovesand allow the grooves to wear further. This approach will most likely not affect the servicelife of the sheave itsell but will create accelerated wear on the counterweight ropes. Thiswear on the counterweight ropes would be regardless of whether the existing ropes or newropes are installed. The moderate rehabilitation alternative would address any of thedeficiencies previously noted with trunnion shaft journal. The alternative would skim cutthe counterweight trunnion shafts to as slightly smaller diameter, The machining wouldremove potential surface deficiencies and reduce the acceleration of the wear between thetrunnion shaft and the trunnion bushings. This option is only available if an analysis of thetrunnion shaft, bearings and sheave show that the reduced shaft section can accommodatethe current stresses and still meet the requirement of current movable bridge code. Thisanalysis is outside of the scope of this report and should be performed prior toconsideration of the moderate rehabilitation alternative. Finally, the major rehabilitationalternative would be a complete replacement of the counterweight sheave. The major

Scoping Study for the US 1 Over the Piscataqua River,

Memorial Bridge ReportPage M-8

Page 15: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

New Hampshire Department of Transportation

rehabilitation alternative is the most costly option, but it also guarantees the desired designìife for the counterweight sheave.

Regardless of the work performed on the counterweight sheave in the first two options, thetrunnion bearings should be cleaned and painted with an inspection of the trunnion shaftjournal. If the counterweight sheave is to be replaced, then the bushings in the trunnionbearings should also be replaced.

4.3.2 Counterweight Ropes and Connections:

The counterweight ropes are L 5/8" diameter Improved Plow Steel (lPS) 6x25 filler wireconstruction with a fiber core. Each rope has an open spelter socket at both ends to connectto the counterweight and the movable span, The counterweight ropes are connected at themovable span via threaded bar rope take-up mounted in steel structural supports. Thecounterweight ropes are connected to the counterweight via an equalizing device consistingof a collection of bars and pins that bring the connection of the counterweight ropes downto a single pin connection at the counterweight. During inspection of the counterweightropes it was noted that there were new ropes installed in both the northwest and southwestcorners of the movable span. It was later confirmed that the ropes were replaced as part ofa rehabilitation contract in May of 2008.

During a previous inspection it was noted that several broken wires were found at thetangent point of the counterweight ropes on the span side of the counterweight sheaves inthe northwest corner. The current inspection did not operate the movable span to confirmthis condition and could not verifli the condition of the broken wires. Lay length and ropediameter measurements were taken from on top of the movable span truss at the spanconnection of the counterweight ropes, a table of values can be found in appendix C. Ingeneral the rope lay length and diameter measurements were found to be acceptable. Thewire ropes were found to be in good condition other than the broken wires noted in theprevious report.

The counterweight rope connection at the movable span was visually inspected and onlyminor deficiencies related to paint and surface corrosion were noted.

The counterweight connection at the counterweight and the equalizing device was visuallyinspected. Where possible, the clearance at the equalizing device pins was measured and atable of measurements is presented in appendix C. The worn clearances between the pinsand bars of the counterweight equalizing device have not increased since the previousinspection (See photo M-14),

As noted previously, the counterweight rope unequal tensions are the most serious problemwith the counterweight ropes and will affect the remaining effective service life of thecounterweight ropes. The unequal rope tensions also suggest along with the creaking noiseemitted from the equalizing device on the counterweight, that the equalizing device is notworking properly and that some of the plate and pin connections may be seized.

The visual inspection ofthe ropes did not identiff any serious surface or constructiondeficiencies with the counterweight ropes. Maintenance and lubrication of thecounterweight ropes appeared to be adequate.

Three different levels of rehabilitation work are possible for the counterweight ropes andconnections, Minor rehabilitation should consist of cleaning and painting all counterweightrope connection and adjusting the tension of counterweight ropes. The moderaterehabilitation includes the replacement of all remaining counterweight ropes along with thecleaning and painting of the counterweight rope connections. Major rehabilitation of the

Scoping Study for the US 1 Over the Piscataqua River,Memorial Bridge Report

Page M-9

Page 16: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

New Hampshire Department of Transportation

counterweight ropes includes the replacement of all counterweight ropes and connectionsto the movable span and counterweight. The equalizing device on used as thecounterweight connection would be replaced with a fixed type connection for eachcounterweight rope.

4.3.3 CounterweightGuides:

The counterweight guides are located laterally on either side of the counterweight and

engage rails along the inside of the tower legs. The guides were not accessible to be closelyinspected. Given the condition of the guide rail and the fact that the guides did not seem tobe riding unevenly, the counterweight guides appear to be in good condition. Lubrication ofthe counterweight guides and rails was found to be acceptable, It is recommended that thecounterweight guides be cleaned and painted in all rehabilitation alternatives.

4.4 Live Load Bearinss And Span Guides

4.4.L Live Load Bearings:

There are two live load bearings located at the corners ofthe span, on either end ofthespan, at the rest pier. They consist of an upper bearing half on the movable span and alower bearing half mounted on the rest pier. The North live load bearings are expansionbearing and the South live load bearings are fixed bearings. All of the live load bearingswere found to have only minor deficiencies, with no visible, significant wear (See photo M-15). Regardless of the rehabilitation alternative, it is suggested that all of the live loadbearings be cleaned, painted and the lower half of the live load bearings be reset on the pierwith new anchor bolts.

4.4.2 Span Guides:

There are two sets of span guides located on either end of the span, The lower set is locatedat the bottom chord of the truss while the upper set is located at the top chord of the truss.All span guides engage a rail that runs along the inside of the tower leg. All of the spanguides were found to have only minor deficiencies [See photo M-16). During inspection itwas noted that the bolts for the wear plate on the Northwest lower span guide were looseand should be tightened to prevent the wear pad from falling off (See photo M-17).Regardless ofthe rehabilitation alternative, it is suggested that the span guides be cleaned,painted, and the wearing plates be replaced same-in-kind.

4.5 Snan Balance:

The span balance of the main movable span was not directly measured during the operationof the span. Given information from the wear on the rack and pinion teeth, and amperagereadings recorded during operating it is assumed that the main movable span is span heavythrough the first half of the lift. After the first half of the lift, enough of the counterweightropes have shifted over to the counterweight side to create a counterweight heavycondition. The Memorial Bridge does not have any provisions to offset the weight of thecounterweight ropes as the span travels from fully open to fully closed, No specific work isrecommended for the span balance. Span balance adjustment may be necessary if there issignificant structural work on the movable span that may change the overall weight of themovable span.

Scoping Study for the US 1 Over the Piscataqua River,

Memorial Bridge ReportPage M-10

Page 17: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

New Hampshire Department of Transportation

5.1

RECOMMENDATIONS

Minimum Rehabilitation:

0perating Machinery

a. Rehabilitate Primary and Auxiliary Reducers: new shaft seals, breather and,paint housing.

b. Replace the LPG back-up engine transmission and clutch.c. Clean and paint bearings, shafts, and couplings,d. Adjust bearing liners for proper bearing clearance.e. Replace drum gears andpinion shafts.

f. Clean operating drum rope grooves.

g. Mounting of full open and over-travel limit switches.

Operating Ropes

a. Tension operating ropes.

b, Clean and lubricate operating ropes.

c, Monitor condition of Northeast uphaul rope.

d. Replace operating rope rollers.e. Clean and paint operating rope deflector and intermediate sheaves.

Counterwei ght Assemblies

a. Clean, paint and lubricate counterweight rope equalizer.b, Check and adjust counterweight rope tensions by working to free the

equalizing device.

c. Clean and paint counterweight guides.

d. Clean and paint counterweight sheave trunnion shaft bearings.e. Clean counterweight sheave rope grooves.

Live load bearings and Span Guides

a. Clean, paint and replace anchor bolts for live load bearings.b. Clean, paint and replace wear plates on span guides.

Span Balance

a. No expected span balance work.

Moderate Rehabilitation:

Operating Machinery

a. Mount and align new motors with new grid type motor couplings.b. Mount and align new thruster brakes.

c. Rehabilitate Primary and Auxiliary Reducers: new shaft seals, breather and,

paint housing.

L.

2.

3.

5.2

4.

5.

1..

Scoping Study for the US 1 Over the Piscataqua River,Memorial Bridge Report

Page M-11

Page 18: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

New Hampshire Department of Transportation

d. Replace the LPG back-up engine transmission and clutch,

e. Clean and paint bearings, shafts, and couplings.

f. Adjust bearing liners for proper bearing clearance.

g. Replace drum gears and pinion shafts.

h. Clean operating drum rope grooves.

0perating Ropes

a. Replace damaged Northeastuphaul rope

b. Tension operating ropes.

c. Clean and lubricate operating ropes.

d. Replace operating rope rollers, deflector sheaves, and intermediate sheaves.

Counterwei ght Assemblies

a. Clean, paint and lubricate counterweight rope equalizer.

b. Replace all remaining counterweight ropes.

c. Clean and paint counterweight guides.

d. Machine counterweighttrunnion shaft journals and replace trunnionbearing bushings.

e. Clean counterweight sheave rope grooves.

Live load bearings and Span Guides

a. Replace anchor bolts for live load bearings,

b. Replace wear plates on span guides.

Span Balance

a. No expected span balance work.

Major Rehabilitation:

Operating Machinery

a. Mount and align new motors with new grid type motor couplings.

b, Mount and align new thruster brakes.

c. Mount and align new primary reducer.

d. Install new bearings, shafts and couplings.

e. Install new operating rope drums with new pitch diameter, including rack

and pinion gears.

2. Operating Ropes

a. Install new operating ropes.

b. Replace operating rope rollers, deflector sheaves, and intermediate sheaves.

New rollers and sheaves to have new pitch diameter.

Scoping Study for the US 1 Over the Piscataqua River,

Memorial Bridge Report

5.3

2.

3.

4.

5.

L.

Page M-12

Page 19: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

New Hampshire Department of Transportation

3. Counterweight Assemblies

a. Replace all counterweight ropes.

b. Replace counterweight rope connections, including replacement of theequalizing devices with a fixed connection for each counterweight rope.

c, Clean and paint counterweight guides.

d. Replace counterweight sheaves, trunnion shafts, and trunnion shaftbearings.

Live load bearings and Span Guides

a. Replace live load bearings.

b. Replace span guides.

Span Balance

a. Adjust span balance of counterweight with respect to new span.

4.

5,

Scoping Study for the US 1 Over the Piscataqua River,

Memorial Bridge ReportPage M-13

Page 20: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

New Hampshire Depaftment of Transportation

Appendix AMachinery Diagram

Scoping Study for the US L Over the Piscataqua River

Memorial Bridge ReportPage MA-L

Page 21: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

New Hampshire Department of Transportation

( ltEcl{AtitIcAL LAYoUI t

I-EAST P¡N¡oN

NE ORUï OEAR

r,¡E t/B (85'

NE ORUH

ORUT BEAFINO

NORIH MOÍON

ORUH

ORt¡iI OEAR

*. 1/A rBTlORIJ}I EEARINO

sÍ t/B rBgtORU}I BEARIITIT

ORUH OEAR

OTIUH

SOUÎH HOIOR

THRUSIOB BRâKE

N REOUCER

MANUAL CUT.OUT

C(IJPLTNO rC8'

. ( TÌ?.ct

.. (1YP.

G5

FLOAÎ fNG

STAFf ITYP. I BACK',P RIOHT

ANOLE REDUCER

NY I/BDRUI.I

NII DRUM GEAR

N¡I ORUI.,

, FULL FLEX GEÁR COUPI-¡NG

" SEIII.RlGIO FLEX OEAR COUPL'NG... 0Rl0 couPLil{t

Scoping Study for the US 1 Over the Piscataqua RiverMemorial Bridge Report

| ,r.r ,,r'*-

LPO BACI(UP

H0T0R

Page MA-2

Page 22: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

New Hampshire Department of Transportation

Appendix B

Photos

Scoping Study for the US 1 Over the Piscataqua River

Memorial Bridge ReportPage MB-1

Page 23: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

New Hampshire Department of Transportation

Photo M-1: The thruster brakes are old style GE brakes and are no longer commerciallyavailable products.

Scoping Study for the US 1 Over the Piscataqua RiverMemorial Bridge Report

Page MB-2

Page 24: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

New Hampshire Department of Transportation

Photo M-2: The electro-magnetic disc brakes are old and are no longer commerciallyavailable products.

Scoping Study for the US 1 Over the Piscataqua RiverMemorial Bridge Report

Page MB-3

Page 25: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

New Hampshire Department of Transportation

Photo M-3: Both reducers suffer from moisture intrusion into the interior of the housing.

Scoping Study for the US 1 Over the Piscataqua River

Memorial Bridge ReportPage MB-4

Page 26: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

New Hampshire Department of Transportation

Photo M-4: The LPG back-up motor transmission leaks oil.

Photo M-5: Most shafts and couplings have paint related deficiencies.

Scoping Study for the US 1 Over the Piscataqua RiverMemorial Bridge Report

Page MB-5

Page 27: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

New Hampshire Department of Transportation

Photo M-6: It should be noted that the motor couplings C1 and C2 are gear type couplings.

Photo M-7: Coupling C-11 may have a loose hub which does not fully engage the centerspider ofthe coupling,

Scoping Study for the US 1 Over the Piscataqua River

Memorial Bridge ReportPage M8-6

Page 28: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

New Hampshire Department of Transportation

Photo M-B: The machinery bearings have minor maintenance related deficiencies and inmost cases have wear beyond the standards for clearance.

Photo M-9: The gear teeth show significant wear in all the open gear sets of the movablespan, Southeast drum gear raise face shown.

Scoping Study for the US 1 Over the Piscataqua RiverMemorial Bridge Report

Page MB-7

Page 29: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

New Hampshire Department of Transportation

Photo M-10: The gear teeth show significant wear in all the open gear sets of the movablespan, West pinion gear raise face shown.

Photo M-11: There is a kink in the East, northeast uphaul rope at about the just before thedouble rollers when the span was approximatelry 1/3 open position. The kink in the rope

was visible when the load on the rope was relieved and the rope went slack,

Scoping Study for the US 1 Over the Piscataqua River

Memorial Bridge ReportPage MB-8

Page 30: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

New Hampshire Department of Transportation

Photo M-12: These rollels show evidence of groves and scoring over the outer diameter ofthe rollers caused by contact with the operating ropes.

Photo M-l-3: The crack in the outboard web of the NE sheave was confirmed and showed noadditional growth since the previous inspection.

Scoping Study for the US 1 Over the Piscataqua River

Memorial Bridge ReportPage MB-9

Page 31: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

New Hampshire Department of Transportation

Photo M-14: The worn clearance between the pins and bars of the counterweight equalizingdevice have not increased since the previous inspection.

Photo M-15: All of the live load bearings were found to have only minor deficiencies, withno visible, significant wear.

Scoping Study for the US 1 Over the Piscataqua River

Memorial Bridge ReportPage MB-10

Page 32: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

New Hampshire Department of Transportation

Photo M-16: All of the span guides were found to have only minor deficiencies such as paintfailure and corrosion.

Photo M-L7: During inspection it was noted that the bolts for the wear plate on theNorthwest lower span guide were loose.

Scoping Study for the US 1 Over the Piscataqua RiverMemorial Bridge Report

Page MB-11

Page 33: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

New Hampshire Department of Transportation

Appendix C

Field Measurements

Scoping Study for the US 1 Over the Piscataqua River

Memorial Bridge ReportPage MC-1

Page 34: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

New Hampshire Department of Transportation

Bearins Clearances:

Bearing Marh Location

DescriptionPrevious

Clearance

Measured

Clearance

Original FitClearance

{ortheast East

lrunnion BearingN/A 0.035". 0.015"

{ortheast Westlrunnion Bearing

N/A 0.055" t 0.015"

tlorthwest East

frunnion BearingN/A 0.048" t 0.015"

t{orthwest Westfrunnion Bearing

N/A 0.035" * 0.015"

ioutheast East

frunnion BearingN/A 0.023"' 0.015"

ioutheast Westfrunnion Bearing

N/A 0.007" * 0.015"

ìouthwest East

frunnion BearingN/A 0.035" 0.015"

ìouthwest Westlrunnion Bearing

N/A 0.037" r 0.015"

Searing 81, East

nboard Pinion0.022" No Measure 0.010"

Searing B2, East

¡utboard pinionN/A 0.008" 0.010"

Bearing B3, Westinboard pinion

N/A 0.025" * 0.010"

3earing 84 Westrutboard pinion

N/A 0.006" 0.010"

'Bearing clearance noted is between the trunnion journal and cap, not a running fit.*Requires immediate attention.

Scoping Study for the US L Over the Piscataqua RiverMemorial Bridge Report

Page MC-2

Page 35: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

New Hampshire Department of Transportation

Bearins Clearances fCont.ì:

Bearing Marþ LocationDescription

Previous

Clearance

Measured

Clearance

Original FitClearance

3earing 85, NE inboardlrum

0.0L7' 0.020" 0.01,0"

Searing 86, NE

lutboard drumN/A No Measure 0.010"

3earing 87, SE Inboardlrum

0.016" 0.077" 0.010"

3earing BB, SE outboardlrum

N/A No Measure 0.010"

learing 89, SW inboardlrum

0.022" 0.024" * 0.010"

3earing 810, SW

rutboard drumN/A No Measure 0.010"

3earing Bl-1, NW

nboard drumN/A 0.025" * 0.010"

Searing BL2, NW

rutboard drumN/A No Measure 0.010"

'Bearing clearance noted is between the trunnion journal and cap, not a running fit.* Requires immediate attention.

Scoping Study for the US 1 Over the Piscataqua River

Memorial Bridge ReportPage MC-3

Page 36: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

New Hampshire Department of Transportation

Gear Tooth Measurements:

Tooth Thickness

Pinion Gears measured at addendum = 0.662"

Drum Gears measured at addendum = 0.645"

Chordal Backlash

Gear Mark Previous Measured Previous Measured

Drum Gear

Northeast

't.205" T- 1.L98"

M- 1.205"

H- 1.205"

0.110" 0.1L37"

East Pinion 'J,.205" T- 1.093"

M-7.092"

H-1.095"

0.047' 0.LLA"

Drum Gear

Southeast

L.205" T- 1.200"

M- r.204"

H-l.203"

Drum Gear

Northwest

'1.205" T- 1.120"

M-7.120"

H- 1.190"

0.069" 0.065"

West Pinion 1.205" T- 1.220"

M- 1.L90"

H-1.200"

0.047' 0.098"

Drum Gear

Southwest

'1.205" T-'J..L84"

M- 1.180"

H-L.'184"

Scoping Study for the US L Over the Piscataqua RiverMemorial Bridge Report

Page MC-4

Page 37: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

New Hampshire Department of Transportation

Counterweight Rooe Measurements :

Rope Layout at Lifting Girder:

-+?46810oooooooooo13579

L? 14 t6oooooo11 13 15

Scoping Study for the US 1 Over the Piscataqua River

Memorial Bridge Report

Southwest Corner

Rope NumberAverage Period

lsecondsl Tension llbl Deviation Lav LensthRope

Diameter7 B.1B 37157.4r 8.7 60/o No Measure No Measure

2 No Measure No Measure No Measure l-0.800" r.635" /t.638"3 No Measure No Measure No Measure L0.569" 1.628" /L.639"4 8.70 32869.96 -3.14o/o No Measure No Measure

5 8.30 36064.25 6.000/o No Measure No Measure

6 No Measure No Measure No Measure 11.250" L.632" /L.635"7 No Measure No Measure No Measure I0.700" L.635" /L.630"B No Measure No Measure No Measure No Measure No Measure

9 No Measure No Measure No Measure No Measure No Measure

10 No Measure No Measure No Measure I0.644" 7.631" /7.644"IL B.3B 354L7.87 4.28o/o r0.700" 1.632" /L.634"L2 8.57 33818.51 -0.240/o No Measure No Measure

13 No Measure No Measure No Measure No Measure No Measure

L4 No Measure No Measure No Measure L0.495" 1.649" /t.647"15 No Measure No Measure No Measure 10.850" L.63L" /L.634',

76 9.41 28075.44 -20.750/o No Measure No Measure

Average Tension (lb 33900.56

Page MC-5

Page 38: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

New Hampshire Department of Transportation

Northwest Corner

Rope NumberAverage Period

[secondsl Tension ûbl Deviation Lav LensthRope

DiameterL 8.42 34896.38 6.07o/o 10.237" t.649" /'J..649"2 No Measure No Measure No Measure No Measure

3 No Measure No Measure No Measure 10.744" 1,.657',/t.651"

4 9.40 27979.56 -t7.750/o 1.0.770" 1..627" /7.635"5 No Measure No Measure No Measure No Measure No Measure

6 No Measure No Measure No Measure No Measure No Measure

7 No Measure No Measure No Measure No Measure No Measure

B No Measure No Measure No Measure 10.762" 7.638" /L.645',9 8.53 340L5.74 3.640/o L0.824" 1..666" /7.758"10 8.56 33877.70 3.070/o No Measure No Measure

17 No Measure No Measure No Measure No Measure No Measure

L2 No Measure No Measure No Measure 10.683" L.634" /r.632"t3 No Measure No Measure No Measure 10.385" 1.65\" /L.664"L4 No Measure No Measure No Measure No Measure No Measure

15 8.1L 37801.88 L3.290/o No Measure No Measure

76 9.37 281,62.34 -76.39o/o r0.700" L.624" f '1,.629"

Average Tension (lbJ 32778.93

Rope Layout at Lifting Girder:

Scoping Study for the US 1 Over the Piscataqua River

Memorial Bridge Report

?46410121416

*l ooooooccloooooooo

I 3 5 7 9 11 t3t5

Page MC-5

Page 39: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

New Hampshire Department of Transportation

Southeast Corner

Rone NumberAverage Period

fseconds) Tension llbl Deviation Lav LenethRope

DiameterL 8,09 3797L.25 9.360/o No Measure No Measure

2 No Measure No Measure No Measure No Measure No Measure

3 8.77 32389.42 -6.26% No Measure No Measure

4 No Measure No Measure No Measure No Measure No Measure

5 No Measure No Measure No Measure No Measure No Measure

6 8.59 33892.58 -1.550/o No Measure No Measure

7 No Measure No Measure No Measure No Measure No Measure

I No Measure No Measure No Measure No Measure No Measure

9 No Measure No Measure No Measure No Measure No Measure

10 8.46 34655.74 0.690/o No Measure No Measure

Í 8.51 34354.10 -0.LBo/o No Measure No Measure

t2 No Measure No Measure No Measure No Measure No Measure

13 No Measure No Measure No Measure 10.800" t.630" /t.63L"T4 No Measure No Measure No Measure Ll.LL3" L.636" /1.640"15 No Measure No Measure No Measure 10.985" L.628',t.642',

L6 8.64 33236.05 -3.55% L0.770" L.635" /L.632"Average Tension (lb) 344t6.52

Rope Layout at Lifting Girder:

rlV

? 4 6 I 10t21416oooooooooooooooo1 3 5 7 9 11 1315

Scoping Study for the US L Over the Piscataqua River

Memorial Bridge ReportPage MC-7

Page 40: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

r'u',.,^, / t. i trt ryu-,t :, t

,New Hampshire Department of Transportation

Northeast Corner

Rope NumberAverage Period

[secondsJ Tension llbl Deviation Lav LenethRope

Diameter

I No Measure No Measure No Measure 1,0.7 60" 1..626" /L.634"2 9.18 29478.99 -I1,.710/o 'J.0.670" 1'630', /'J..640"

J 8.59 33627.89 2.600/o L0.g',J.\" \.634" /1..640"

4 9.16 29664.36 -1,0.42% L0.687" r.630" /L.651"5 No Measure No Measure No Measure No Measure No Measure

6 No Measure No Measure No Measure No Measure No Measure

7 No Measure No Measure No Measure No Measure No Measure

B 8.67 33.35.57 0.85% No Measure No Measure

9 8.31 35935.L7 8.85% No Measure No Measure

10 No Measure No Measure No Measure No Measure No Measure

77 No Measure No Measure No Measure No Measure No Measure

L2 No Measure No Measure No Measure No Measure No Measure

L3 No Measure No Measure No Measure No Measure No Measure

74 No Measure No Measure No Measure No Measure No Measure

15 8.46 34786.97 5.84o/o No Measure No Measure

16 No Measure No Measure No Measure No Measure No Measure

Average Tension (lb 32754.82

Rope Layout at Lifting Girder:

't?46810141416ocoooooooocooocor 3 5 7 9 li 1315

Scoping Study for the US 1 Over the Piscataqua RiverMemorial Bridge Report

Page MC-8

Page 41: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

New Hampshire Department of Transportation

Operating Rope Measurements:

Counterweieht Rone Sheave Groove Measurements:

Scoping Study for the US 1 Over the Piscataqua River

Memorial Bridge Report

Rope Location Lav LenethRope

Diameter

Northwest No Measure No Measure

Southwest

Raise East L2.830" 1.01B"

Raise West t2.660', r.025"

Lower East L3.097" L.072"

Lower West 13.085" 1_.025"

Northeast No Measure No Measure

Southeast

Raise East 12.780" 1.031"

Raise West r2.700" L.074"

Lower East 12.800' L.O2B'

Lower West 13,085" I.024"

All Grooves Measured with 1 5 /8" + 3 / 64' Guase

Groove Number Northeast Northwest Southeast Southwest

1 Worn Worn Worn Worn2 Worn Worn Worn Worn.l Worn Worn Worn Worn4 Worn Worn Worn Worn5 Worn Worn Worn Worn6 Worn Worn Worn Worn7 Worn Worn Worn Worn8 Worn Worn Worn WornI Worn Worn Worn Worn

10 Worn Worn Worn WornL1 Worn Worn Worn WornL2 Worn Worn Worn Worn13 Worn Worn Worn Wornl4 Worn Worn Worn Worn15 Worn Worn Worn WornI6 Worn Worn Worn Worn

Page MC-9

Page 42: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

New Hampshire Department of Transportation

xMeasurements of pin clearance were only possible at the tertiary level pins

Groove Number Northeast Northwest Southeast Southwest

D 3/4" 3 /1.6 " 3/8" 3/8',

E 0.069" No Measure No Measure No Measure

F No Measure 0.085" 0" 0"

G 9fL6" 1/2" 0.135" 0"*

Counterweight Rope Equalizer Pin Clearance Measurements:

Pin Naming Convention:

,lgll

ÉI 'årt

î.XnPbs ;

Ir

I

VIeTT Þ F EOUALTZÃfi

Scoping Study for the US L Over the Piscataqua River

Memorial Bridge ReportPage MC-L0

Page 43: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

New Hampshire Department of Transportation

Appendix DField lnspection Sheets

Scoping Study for the US 1 Over the Piscataqua River

Memorial Bridge ReportPage MD-1

Page 44: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

Memorial Bridge Span Features

Span GurUes

Span G""les1

Page 45: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

Memor¡al Bridge Span Features

Performed by:

Date:

Span Gurdes

Span Guides2i

,'', .: t:. t.,*l

Page 46: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

Memorial Bridge SPan Features

performed by: l4p þll

Date: Y/W

j1:

Live Load Bearings

/øl/l -l fqtlur

fo ¿,e. l- at fo I l,),1,1

Prinl ¡ì,,,,, i/ /í'Q ,f pd (o l,rrt f i <t .it

',Q Loa JnoI sø/q/

ntt¿iir

Live Load Bearings

Page 47: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

%p*.&

lMr!

It,r 7o

¡a,VvfH

(o,762

[0,8"1{

I 0,Ê 8?

1P ,î 8F

l; c s'Q

f'$çq

1,6>?[ú1i

¿,aaili , ,,

. :] :

¡;67f{ g,,r}fI ;6ß'6

t i7F{

lliiitr:r¿iii¿rComputed:

l"l'l I I I I i I i ¡ r,rrrr rr¡i,iùl I l,ll i lll I

Project

¡l r! 16

Dae

IiR [;X,i#*Job ú No:

l.l"ef, tJel&

{{û L4 göo.öoø ô OO?^5sr

ifu ç*+ebàot6'$%

rß goOÓc>OIr ,9l

Ð)"

n¿¡r¡ F>.u. Lut u

4T

TD

[]

ló ¡itù,

l'; û1'4

'[-,6]1L, :ì.

ii;'; y!{,'6'64

tl| ,t.d\ lrij:.t'î+ ¡

.f,6?c4

lLt

Page 48: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

1""'1 i'r o iil I I I l,ll | | 'll I lil ! ¡o;'ia¡:icr r¡r

ProjecÈ

FtRI;::,",:X,X

¡ül:r(r i¿l,rür r¡or'

Computed: Daær

Job * No:

lv','!çt

J'o'g ¡/

Io ,68?

п/r:.(,'1o

I ',É ùlù

'1,626

l, ri¿l

{.9 rnd

r, û'ì0

¡ ,6]&ì .u;þ',i

t\t

Page 49: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

l""l I I I I I I I I I I lii I i'i;: r,¡rji¿¡r'r r'lti i i*i'ltl ¡ i¿l i l,i,l I i,r,ì;r*,Project Computed: Dare:

IiRllx,î:*#Job *

{o4 2ÞÐü0aô57 I

it

tÅì

I ì,!ífl

,f:{

J.ll¡atq.

a

(l

t!

t,

ira'*j0, ffO

.,qt'i"¿

lø,üa$ i,,.{41f i' "+

ôonair'f ,'cl q

I ol',iJ1

Ie

.fr,Q.us,4 "F€

Ïã,7

t'3

tf{þ

tl,7rc

lc,ç64,

t1:.

tI

¡

.tÌt.1

È.

¡v,Ç¿t4

Page 50: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

f il I I tl I I I I Ir¡t t{l l¡l i,ri' iit I t,ll i lll I lJl ¡ ill !

froiú f,4 arl¡,t¡g¡'.af ffifi,

IìRl;X",:r,,* suqeæ Ç F Co¿,

l',1,r,!:i*r t¿l'ì,!r i¿i

Computed: Date:

Job f

@T7anl,'f,'o4þsr {,r4e

d

{1,¿¡l i, $1n,6

i,øof7

I

t,#='ç$$ #åH"a"yço,t" ,üEt¡ ¡tr:r"-{ 7 I / I

Page 51: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

Counte zight Sysfem

Performed by: f1,C

Date: sla+ k5"¿ rJ'r\'#..,*[ P'€'a'E ç¡ e*'t'u'#¡'

/¡*[%l:uP laçÇw¡&a

¡/a arLc-áeCounterweighf Ropes

2 \spa-l a/fvar ia be,

url\e +t" -eaç,rl' fto¡o p fö

';i::#',)!", ri,ot {v6

/,,én¿o-t* N.

Gountenreþht Ropes 2

Page 52: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

l",,llrllii,,, ,,¡r tli I I'il i lll I ioi-,*,Projecu

róiii¿irl¿lii' r¿llCompued: Date:

FilR l;:"i",:r:*No:

Page 53: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

Memo,.l Bridge Span Features

Performed by: Á(Á

Date: ^ L

6[A(

Bumper Blocks

AX, þt*pi€ÉÇf'lÅnyþ {'^**& l'ç'{'l -}a N"*t

cf*<-k*, ol ",Hu,

fitr^e È+{Þ-,Á -

Bumper Blocks1

Page 54: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

1

Counte¡weight Sysfem

5e¿, ^-oLL4'*/ t ''&"4¿¿t"{&

Counterweight Ropes

Countemeight R. t 1

Page 55: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

Memorlal Brldge Span Drlve

Performed by:

Dale:

ì4M6lr"[ú

DriwOoenGearc

GearNortheast'.. i

rjr-ì: -l

o.645Odginal

1-215Prev.1.205

1 t#truff /,fla{rl) /,Aof "

0.110

Õ. l4?"

0.662

Original1.215Prev.1.205

o.M7

Ò, /lr{ o

0.et5.î

Original1.215Prev.1.205

Op€n Gâss -T€€lh I';$ài-r. :. ..: I.l- : ..'.". ''

d âI¡i;+t'i :1. I 'j x

Page 56: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

---rjii' i

Operating Ropes

.t'.'t::.r. i

.i.:i

'ffi*, !..':li

:\

'.:::.

tz

Page 57: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

Operating Ropes

n"..

i

Oeprating Ropes I't:

:'S+,;

. 'i:Fi

_.ì r.._..:j

¡.f 'r;:tzj::¡

. ti:

¡ ip:

Page 58: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

Performed by: VfhlDate: íþzla'l

Operating Drums

Northeast

:S\\:*\

ÐoulneaÞI i,.,/

lr

I

Oeprating Dr ,1

Page 59: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

Operating Drums

Oepraling Drums 2

Page 60: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

æ,Þ.r

Memorial Bridge Span Drlve

performed by: }l{ n¿

Date: sla+lú

Drive Machinery

NOIIN |V|OIOT

/-ltto4 Íæ.45 ,u6r4 *^

NOnnThrusterBrake

-{f// Ò4 a-c^< 4r ¡>4 áa þ

öoun'ThrusterBrake

Drive Mach' t 1

Page 61: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

DiscBrake Kb,%atu

berL W U".-

'4J;^ "*beo

Disc .,r

Brake

Reducer

'12t, b¿t ^4; ,"r*.///o(gr/Ê'o<, )ø4 \

- t@3. -/rre, .ozl do<< 4r¿.4¿¿t

rí..êgK upReducer .árn¡ 2,-¿( Lue.

Drive Machinery 2

Page 62: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

.a.--"'-:l-,

Memorlal Erldge Span Drlve

Perrormedbs f"lpr/,Date:

6la-+lol

- Op.o Gese -Teelh 2

Page 63: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

-E îr-.il¡,Qr

;Þf

Memorial Bridge Span Drive

Performed by: l<(JDate: {zl/oa

Leaf Bearings

i:

Er-1

East inboardpinion

ong0.010prev.

o.022

ItA Gva,j fl o0c/l

I

ni¡nr 1 rr("¿ ¡ t' cafr øíù4

fai yt ¡ ftì (rre6-¿East outbrdpinion

N/Aô,Òo{

rsov/ (ãr't 9to

B-öWest lnboardpinion

orig0.010

prev.

N/A

,oD'73õ 004 çoo+Á

;:i:: i I I,

Page 64: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

Memorial Bridge Span Drive

Performed by:

Date:

Leaf Bearings

/)

B-4West Outbrdpinion

N/Aa.oö4

B-5NE lnbrddrum

orig0.010

prev.

0.017

,07Ò Bno( Taau/ tr to/ fqùrre *qn/ q/ø2ho

E-þNE outbrddrum

N/A

'(h/rrn / olrnr'',4 (annc4

inçf'uf

B-tSE lnbrddrum

orig0.010prev.

.0.016

,o 17 w r*J îo' tønu þo in lñ,í|re,o4-t vtfqoe ry/-y, ,rïnAy^y. Lq,k, i t ,r--, qa'¡vl c L

E-õSE outbrddrum

N/A

þrA; ø drvn ça 4 ntl i"9Vø6f

Bea

Page 65: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

Leaf Bearings

H-9SW lnbrddrum

orig0.010

prev.

0.o22

,ta4to

o¿\ ,f4öú

E'.-IUSW Outbrddrum

N/A

Beh;nJ ølf,rr¡ ønn,¡ irtyce.f

u'l1NW lnbrddrum

orig0.010

prev.

N/A

to\Ç 14Ty fqÎ +T Nl"r" o,44¿

T,ffir';;ffi:ta4ó-12NW Outbrddrum

N/A

fuh rry/drv tunntf l^çre,*

.

Page 66: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

Memorial Bridge Span Drive

Performed by: úPÁ

k/"6r. "/,&'*-./n/tæ o* ,tt /brro*(4,;Rope Sheayes

r\otInweslDeflector

NOnnwestDouble rolfers t, ¡z/hn, 6{,t r} s

ìatÆ c*,vhÁ.- -[

{- e.àrû-ï f" /æ dkNOnnwesllntermediateSheave

.r,* .ll ,y ro a Ç * a\ ftlovg4 f ree l¡¡ai,tf (onitnn hqfou1l fheqvt

f faauz ç ltqru-þecot'1q

cz(e eFPf

r\ol.mwestLowerOuter Roller !#fu MNOnnwes[Lowerlnner Roller

, ,ryí

:' Drive Mach ¡ 1

Page 67: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

Memorio, tsridge Span Drive

Rope Sheaves

*Wa#Iüt*ù

?f.fqÉn**,*pna,tes,d CafY' æw ffQê.,,/e. ¡s,m/*./os uk, ffr-srií^

fu;fit;nf {^l[arç tvbø ¿K

/ty,:Ê P*l-É,/-gþhrci7,ú cor/Qc^e-? ¿,?e

Drive lvlachinery 2

Page 68: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

Memorial Brìdge Span Drive

_l

1nPry

"ana¿i â""^,/

rcratíng Rope Sñeayes

NOnneastDeflector /tr"*t ul y'r.,\-í f* /*,.o t- ea,,ry ø,^ ¡/t-.\s

f1q**a+r--U f,.rða41 ê",,h okn

NOnneaslDouble rollers ,rWfulW{þ*-i*" Mt\onneasllntermediateSheave

l";n¡ {aìlur1, I u te o ft, øfoîle 2 ,/ k(/,

NOnneastLowerOuter Roller ?¿L(*Lro cvrQ<*&4

I "'&t ;CoxN9ftneastLowerlnner Roller

J rtÁ

Ddve Macl l3

Page 69: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

Sheaves

l'0umeastDeflector ár!:: a{ c¿¿t 6'a 5;!r4',-ftpnt;#

$rm"e' /'J-e úK, f#);s ø'K

ùoutneaslDouble rollers

N/frùC,utfleasIlntermediateSheave

ç¡,be oK, P*ìp/ e,'þfe o yy'er2 p totzs çltav¿ ¿-afn ,n7n-

ùQUm9aSILowerOuter Roller l\çoon ,1 ?-{ 4,*kø

¡

l^betok ¡ 5,5[+ ,oirQ*64ætt*

ryA

uoulneaslLowerInner Roller

V¿

Ddve Machinery 4

Page 70: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

I

t

t

l

i

i

IJ

I

I

I

I

I

Iíneohanlcal l.EloctrlcÍl tnslectlon Rêpoft.fcil lh6 Ponsnouth ltlêmorlal BrldgcN ow H a;mpsh/iè Deparlment ol Trcnspoñallo nEHF-X.T-Ií 01 P7 5) P4leat N+ t 3678

iuqqjeNrcal-lâr$ln

Pæe 12of 79'

[-r*t rtnï

NE O8W.

NE ORIÃI SEâR

rE- ¡/€ tBs' .

Brx'r BEARIN6

dRUB gEhñ

SÊ UÊ' IB?':OBW BEAÊIilG

I

I

I

j,l

I

ilfrrÈ !¡broR so.urH t{0f08'Í}IRUSIOR BFÌÁI(EltfUSroB AnnXE

ÂEoucEa

I'{âNUAL CUTTOUT

iouPLr¡ril .(cB,

'. flYn.€5

EËOAfTÀü

S-HAFT .fTTþ. '

rBACK'P

4¡re!E 4EglasB'

NH I/B (ETI-):

ORW

; FUL! FLEx'6EFR.couPr-.1!.t6... sËv,.t :R¡c¡0, FLsx qgÁ8 cotFLINo

'.. Gnlo CoUPLING

EL€CTRIC.BFAIGS

Page 71: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

i?I

I

I

I

I

]

I

I

Mechantfơt lglectdctl tnspacllon Rcpora.lor lho Ponsmouth Mamorltit Btldgo '

Nøw Httn¡st lie DèFarlmènt of TttnsparleüonBH F*f41 0'l (01 5) tueJaat Na I 3lI I

P€ge 12 of 7P'

[_*t "tn') 7-,<Ð=LlJ

--¿

I

l

I

T

I

I

I

jl

I

ì.

i¡g oRull'

NE Oñ*I OSAR

Nçr t/q t9õ) ,

Dfl& EEinlNG

ERUE gEâ8

siÉ llg .g7r:08t¡l BEâ8IN6

Sy t./F,. (89.tO8UH BEâB¡NO

ohuM gÊAß

06u¡

solrfH ì,t0T0RTtrf,rjsfo ulAKE

,IN REI¡UC€R

P,âùluâL qUfrOUT

CouPLi¡.¡6 {cB)

IFRTH

(

II

tII

¡-. r TtP.:û5

FUoAf ¡rsèé :rtvÞ., BACI(I.P RIOHT

6¡q!e siEqrc€B' uu eecxupr{¡f0R

NC ORUN GSAS

¡ FUI.L FJLEX.C€¡R.9O['PL¡N6s.Eltl rRIGlD. F,L€X qSl{8 CQJPL Il0

'., GÊ:0 cbuPtfN6

l-ror 'n,i

Page 72: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

.-""-.T.f-+_+i--:.-'-------]:]Ìliîji::li:]E':-ãr::.î.-.j"_^---

Memorial Bridge Counterwg. íght Sysúem

''1¡r;' : i :

---T . : -.

Sheaves

NOnneast ,{ W&.,,t*'*¿Æ¡- @^.1. t"ln ft*, rxrkn o- *-

G P,J¿,,K

t j+e

Iöouneast

- cá-þ ' ,À.j

Cþc'l\¿1 +

Counterweight She. ,1

Page 73: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

Countv-.rcightSñeaves k( 6W

Northwest

uoumwest -/ru nh,-/{tu J¿o,f/ eL 5/re.-A

Notes:

Countenrveight Sheaves 2

Page 74: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

Date:'- f/r-7/O 7,th r

'2 f)it a ,z

'O, lld|

.{ -'r---+

l-runnion Bearings

Trunnion Bear 1

Page 75: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

Memo, -.1 Bridge Counte¡welght system

Performed by: ß (

Date: E/zVoq

runnrcn

N/APvl, ü f^7

G ooo{ favl/ fri/ure d¿ælf 'rÊ* re )u**

NOnneastEast Bearing

lN/A

çt7,)y éo*/ +'(( tt

N/A

t

o 6T Ço øof Pq/'/11 ñ./( oa d Fa/#,uffz+ e,e wrfa'¡ ,/0r,

ìtoutneaslEast Bearing

N/Ao'LT

I lr t(

ùoutneastWest Bearing

\:

7 '1t.. Ir\

Trunnion Bearings 2

Page 76: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

ol#lnLearopenGearc YIW 5,

GearSoutheast OA

Vttd,

^^

GearNorthwest

N/A X x 4Pinion West

\r / ,:i-.t¡l

.' X

^

4

Open Gears General 2

Page 77: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

g lejeuoc sjEeg uedo

ar:

ÞeMqlnosJeoÐ

ffils ?)'hmt

Page 78: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

Memorial Bridge Span Drive

Performedby: ¡/MlK(Date:

5þ+

{^

Northeast

''lr4IV

Open Gears Genoral I

Page 79: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

Memo¡,al Bridge Span Drive

Performed by: l{*Dare:

QA+

1.695 MdTA

East Float ¡aiaùr f"rnf Fq,lrk

West Float rùr, /*l,tf {qit ûe- tzlte¡¿ /%f"'r*,14

'..i,: ,

{o¡ffitn @f fnqern#lenôgrWra- vtartãtt

{nfut't Je

t"t¡d,+,f åurí

q+{^r

f4-

O=fi üvur ;r,otÇVfrü l/qre

$hafts 1

Page 80: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

'+

Drive

u-'lNorth Motor

Vcl r,+fl¿ pa.itf Ohl rPtaV Í,

W +tol fu[Åou fr fuhtt: ,

IJ

Iv-zSouth Motor

,hÌ,, o r P6t^l C|;pn¡ nl ,:,Do,+,+ ltcr ( r(I'Wft;q¡o

,,ì,u,i;_r, ,.

,

Ld4nof ,e<'!(altf qr'Ìr? y' /b"4¿

u-óEast outbrdFloat

anool Øry,lìl l¿ n(i^, n 1 (o,il u rg tn itto F Ç urfo c-a-

(of rotio n o nltla ¿u-z+East inbrdFloat

'' 'l¿i':j

{::î r,!r,tï:'o/!,nr r*; turl Le oÅ F** æ¡du4 ol

5' I

Notes:

Gou¡ ;1'..] i,.,., ,

Page 81: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

Memo'.-,1 Bridge Span Drive

Performed by: WDate: gl8+

Drive Couplings

gn fÙlifrf fr'4

?iKrøl\t fr - Ìnt¡ecf lLqf" wtqc) 9eal5 ltc¡¡,av2 tLo( înqtrwartf llflq r h-(,ql !(.d6ç a [,'fi ¿tut,vt ;ç

,ooe/l

[-*F.g lr*q. ont o ctawol

u"öClutch Cplg nof ru[( VIW P,tLt'Í"tl úc/'lh, fl*-u,

lzf ø(ûenr1 ,rabt wYr*¡nprwr# qfrr,/íV

.lr

Couplings 2

Page 82: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

ei

lllcahanlcst I Eteôttaai lnspeÚlon Reqort fot tha Poftsmoulh Mefiorìal BtìdgeNpv Haøßç,hlrø Deparlment of ÍanspqûatlonB H Fx:Vü o 1 (ol8) P tojëct N o: ß 67 I

tI

, -:j

"i:::l, ' 'l

I

I

I

'. .,{

, :r1l''l

,lE"

Irt

ì.i

tI

)

$

It.,!.r

!.,j

I

ì,', !'

!

vtEtt, F-F EOUaLTZ-E.;R

tlt'! --'----i,.'',

Page 83: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

M em o t . -l B ri dg e C o u nterwei g ht Sysfem

Corner: , ø

Counterweight Plns I

Counterweight Rope Equalízer Pins

ytrs+{

Page 84: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

Mlemorial Bridge Counterwe t :;f"^Perrormed ? (n /'

Date : Ò o(

Corner: ,FEqualizer Pins

Countenaleight ,2

Page 85: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

Memori al Bridge Co u nterweight System

Performed by: KC/ øfnDate: ê/tf,/OZCorner: ç t

Equalizer Pins

Countenreight Plns 3

Page 86: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

Memori al Bri dg e Co u nterwei g ht Sysfem

Performed by: KC / ?h P ltt :r

Dare: þ/flù' t.,ri

CÒrner: ç UCounterweight Rope Equalizer Pins

ti1

l:: :l::

lI,.t

APrimary fÊ (¿rîficn

fr"ff ,\ct'V ¿Ø/17,'à þ

4

ttSecondary

USecondary

UTertiary 7/g7

trTertiary

\

Countenreight

Page 87: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

.llll em,o' ..tl B ri dge C o u nterwei g ht Sysfem

Performed by: l<(/nftADate: 6/4/uqCorner: S lr/

Rope Egualizer Pins

lb otara4q

obur*lkfF 4.u rf-s l' o n

Frn/t,'V C" .njy n

:'r

Countennreight Pins 2

Page 88: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

lïem,ori al Bri dge Cou nterweighf Sysúem

Performed by: ñ e-/ ft /fUDare: 6/ q/08corner: I U

Countenreight ,3

Page 89: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

Mema¡ nl pri dge Cou nterweÍghú Sysfem

Performed by: U,

Date: ç lþ/oVcorner: N ECounterweight Rope

f/4/;ntr lornçjoo

/-

I)a>l ,ro)-,ôI+,0

Countenreight Pins 1

Page 90: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

M em o ri a I,B ri d g e Co u nte rwei g htSysfem

Performed by: 'K C /-nffuû/,1 /ÒlMI

F ó¿f¿ro S îa rS

Fr.:ffraV Ø/fþ, ia ot

Counterueight ,2

Page 91: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

M em o n al .B ri dg e Co u nterwei g hf Sysúem

Perrormed by: F< C/n/" fhDare: ø/q PqGorner:

IV ECounterweight Equalizer Pins

Countenreight Pins 3

Page 92: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

Memori al B ridge Cou nterwei ghf Sysfem

Performed by:

Dare: 6 /a/O'(Corner: N UCounterweight Rope Equalizer Pins

É\Primqry

HSecondary

USecondary

L)

Tertiary %6t

ts

Tertiaryl#l

v

Counterueight P''s 1

Page 93: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

Corner: M l/

Counterweight Equalizer Pins

lF bû! ¡ itvtfrdl,'aV carfr5)cr.

,u ll>'Atl

Counterweight Plns 2

Page 94: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

M e m o ri al B ri dg e Co u nterwei g ht Sysúem

Perrormed by: K C/fu fl'Yla4

Date : 6/4 7oc4corner: ;,hlv

-/f orro r,'î I

Counterweight 3

Page 95: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

a/9/\ttlet18/lt/lott5

,z1-9,çç

rt

Y?fS'_ trú2 Vf J

ffiEäffi4t,Å'fì

,.4¿oQ'ol

lqq

Page 96: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

-l

' Portsftóuth, NH4'

1,0 / t4: Bam' 3f ä"s.t

tO/15 8am 28 deg.

J!-

: ,J.

,' t.t..- n:'.',F, 3pin 59 d"g. {

F, .1pm 42 deg. F

l' t'

Naf{,,,¡ø1.Lo fnet^

, RoP( 4¡

.3

.ft

4/¿ qú 7,/{7-17 f "

Page 97: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

/rr2 /, /¿,1'A I t

i{2 Titó'ó al7/'a/ (,

qç'a/ &

t'',¿ Ìe6'.8 2

?e'-g :te'Å h

ßT'L ç

tt'g -.'{"

hlr,ó I

ag'g ¿tX

V* Gç'Q/ ló ó+T Lçz *tLx /a 6 vr'Å

óQ'3 pß

g'Ø_g"tt

,-g'a/

ó)'/

)t;/ffi

>ynÐ b,-% f.N X

t.

Page 98: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

\-"7

*

*

*..

ï

J"

#-3-yL(-t,-.4JF

f-v-

/Ô ",ll -/,7-l3'/// -

ll-/a-

Page 99: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

New Hampshire Department of Transportation

ELECTRICAL STUDY

1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The Memorial Bridge Movable Span Electrical facilities were inspected on May 27rn and 2Bthof 2009. The electrical inspection team examined all the accessible components of thebridge electricaì and control systems. The bridge electrical system was found to be nearingthe end of its reliable service life and many of the system components have become obsoletewith unavailable spare parts. Three levels of rehabilitation scope were considered,described as follows: (1J Minimum Rehabilitation which represents the minimum repairrecommendations required to resolve the findings that affects the bridge reliability andgeneral public and maintenance staff safety and should be resolved in a timely manner, [2)Moderate Rehabilitation which represents repair recommendations that will furtherincrease the electrical and control system reliability, [3) Major Rehabilitation whichrepresents repair recommendations that will make the bridge electrical and controlsystems very safe and reliable as per the current design standards. Recommendations foreach level ofrehabilitation are presented in Section 5,

2 DESCRIPTION OF SYSTEMS

This bridge is a span drive vertical lift bridge that carries a single roadway deck of US Route1 between the towns of Portsmouth, NH and Kittery, ME.

The bridge is manned 24/7 year round and is operated from the machinery control houselocated on the top of the movable span. A gate tender is stationed on each end of the bridgeto manually operate a pair of structural steel swing gates, In addition to the manuallyoperated gates, there are two remotely operated warning gates located at the abutments.There are curtain style barrier gates located atthe approach spans. The barrier gates areabandoned in place, The remote operated gates are controlled from the gate tenders housenear each abutment.

The utility power feeder is supplied from the south end of the bridge from Porlsmouth, NH.The power is transferred to the movable span thru vertical catenaries on the south tower.

Bridge back up power is supplied through a diesel two cylinder Onan, air cooled propanegenerator to run the hotel loads and a propane operated motor is used to lift the movablespan in case of a power failure. A pair of magnetic DC brakes powered off the propanemotor DC system is used for braking during the emergency bridge operation. There is nobackup power for the gates. The heat rejected from the engines is rejected into the controlhouse. Doors are opened on each end to allow the heated air to escape. The propane tanksare located at the roadway level in a fenced enclosure.

Two 10OHP motors with a single SCR thyristor drive are used to operate the span. Bothmotors are controlled by the same drive and they are both required to run in order to liftthe span. An over speed switch and a tachometer generator are installed on the back end ofeach motor to provide the feedback required by the drive. The tachometer is switch selectedproviding redundancy.

There are no span locks on the bridge. The operator pulls tension on the downhaul ropesand then applies the brakes to hold the span closed.

Scoping Study for the US 1 over the Piscataqua River

Memorial Bridge ReportPage E-1

Page 100: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

New Hampshire Department of Transportation

Other ancillary systems such as navigation, access and egress lighting are located at variouslocations about the bridge,

The bridge electrical and control system was found to be operational butthe reliably ofthesystem is questionable. Some of the system components have become obsolete. Finding aretrofit replacement in an emergency situation may be challenging and require an extendedperiod of operating with the backup engine. The components most susceptible to failurewith prolonged outage are the brake thrusters, thyristor drives and the rotary cam limitswitch.

3 INSPECTION APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY

A visual inspection of the bridge electrical and control systems components was conducted.All the accessible cabinets and enclosures were opened and inspected. Tests consisting ofinsulation resistance and load current measurements were also conducted. Tests wereperformed to highlight areas that could be problematic towards the continued safe andreliable operation of the bridge as well as its effectiveness in supporting both roadway andmarine traffic operations.

4 INSPECTION FINDINGS

4.1 Main Electric Service

There is one utility feeder supplying power to the bridge from Portsmouth NH at the southend ofthe bridge. The system voltage is 480/277Y three phase. A separate feed supplies theequipment at the north tower and equipment on the approach span from Kittery, Maine.The main service disconnect switch for the bridge is located on the south abutment andfeeds power to the exposed bare bronze catenaries on the face of the tower. The power isthen transferred to the movable span through spring loaded bronze rollers that are incontact with the catenaries, these rollers remain in contact with the catenaries as the spanis moving. The main disconnect switch does not have the clearance required to safely access

or operate the switch. Any rehabilitation should include the relocation of the disconnect toa new location that meets NEC code for clearances around electrical equipment.

The catenaries are problematic since they are an electrical hazard to trespassers, orauthorized persons performing maintenance or inspection on the bridge. The catenariesalso ice up in the winter. Local switching is required to provide heating power from thedeicing transformers that are installed on the tower at the south end of the bridge at the topchord of the truss to melt the ice [See photo E-1). This process must be performed in the icyenvironment that has an elevated risk of accidents for the maintenance and operation crew.As a part of a moderate or major rehab the catenary system should be replaced with a droopcable system. The droop cable system will require less maintenance, enhance the reliabilityof the electrical system and minimizethe risk of accidents.lnstalling droop cables on bothtowers would provide the means for the gates and traffic signals to be powered from theemergency generator. The droop cables shed any ice accumulation as they flex when thespan is moved.

4.2 Back un Electric Service

The back up power is provided from an air cooled 4KW two cylinder Onan propane firedengine generator set. This generator is sized to supply back up power to some of the hotel

Scoping Study for the US 1 over the Piscataqua River

Memorial Bridge ReportPage E-2

Page 101: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

New Hampshire Department of Transportation

loads in the machinery and control room that are powered normally from a branch circuit inthe I20 /208V lighting panel. The loads include the span height indicator. None of thenormal bridge control devices are powered from this engine. An Automatic Transfer Switch(ATS) is used to switch the branch circuit when the main power feed is lost or catenarydeicing is required. All the bridge hotel loads on the single branch circuit are connecteddirectly to the load side of the ATS. The ATS is an obsolete model that uses magneticallyheld contactors. During the HDR inspection, the ATS failed to switch when required. Theelectrical service contractor was called out to perform repairs. Any rehabilitation approachshould include the replacement of the existing ATS with a modern electrically switchedmechanically held transfer switch in order to increase the system reliability.

A propane powered, four cylinder, spark ignition engine is used to operate the span whenthe main power feed is lost. A gear type manual clutch is used to connect the output shaft ofthe engine reducer to the primary gearbox, Limit switches are provided to disable the maincontrol system to assure that the engine reducer is not back driven by the main spanmotors. During emergency operation the thruster brakes are hand released and the DCpowered magnetic brakes are used for braking. In case of an emergency where the DCpowered magnetic brakes fail to set; the operator will have to leave the control station tomanually set the thruster brakes. Any design rehabilitation approach should incìude theupgrade of the generator to a three phase unit with sufficient capacity to allow the thrusterbrakes to be eìectrically operated when the backup engine is being used. This upgrade willenhance the reliability ofthe electrical system and enhance the safety ofthe operators andpersonnel in case of the failure of the DC magnetic brakes. As part of a major rehabilitation,a substantially larger generator with the appropriate power system equipment should beinstalled to eliminate the propane engine and provide for normal operation of the spandrive. The generator and ATS could be located on shore ifa droop cable system is installed.There is sufficient real estate for the equipment. As part of any rehabilitation approach, theusage ofthe propane fueled engine in the operator house requires carbon monoxidedetectors to be installed to alert the operator ofany exhaust or plenum leaks (See photo E-2), A CO detector is generally required where gas fired space heaters are installed as is thecase in the Memorial Bridge controlhouse.

4.3 Motor Control Centers (MCC)

The MCC is located in machinery and control room and is fed directly from the catenarysystem located at the south tower. The MCC is 1950's design and requires personnel toopen the doors to manipulate breakers with exposed bare copper bus and other exposed,energized components. [See photo E-3J. This practice is unacceptable by today's standardssince it exposes the electrician to the arcing faults that might result during a switchingprocess. Any rehabilitation approach must include provisions to de energize the MCCwithout opening the door or replace this MCC with a modern dead front style MCC wherethe switching is performed without personnel being exposed to energized conductors.

4.4 Motors and Drives

The span is raised and lowered using two 100HP, sBsRPM, 460V,3 phase, 60 cycle, woundrotor type motors, These motors are controlled by a single Westinghouse Silicon ControlledRectifier (SCR) thyristor drive that is located in the machinery room MCC, Both motors areconnected directly to the load side ofthe drive through independent three phase breakers.Resistor grids are connected to motor secondary windings and are used to modify the speedtorque characteristics of the motors The inspection found the motors brushes to be in

Scoping Study for the US 1 over the Piscataqua River

Memorial Bridge ReportPage E-3

Page 102: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

New Hampshire Department of Transportation

serviceable condition, however the motors have excessive grease inside which should becleaned as part of regular maintenance. It was also identified that the lead wire insulationon the secondary circuit of the north motor was chaffing on the motor frame. The electricalservice contractor was requested to provide corrective action. Temporary measures weretaken to minimize the potential for the insulation on the rotor leads to chafe through andshort out as they leave the motor rotor housing by adding rubber insulation [See photo E-

4). More permanent measures should be taken.

The motor secondary resistor grids are mounted in the machinery room next to the MCC.

The secondary resistors have limited guards in place. Non grounded parts and conductorsare exposed (See photo E-5). Guard should be installed to compìetely cover the resistors.

The motor primary and secondary windings were megger tested during the inspection andthe insulation resistance values were found to be 550 Megohm for all the windings. These

values are acceptable and the motors windings appeared to be in good condition.

With the current drive configuration, one thyristor drive is used to run both motors, If thisthyristor drive fails, there will be no means to operate the bridge electrically. Circuit boardlevel parts for this drive are no longer available from the Original Equipment Manufacturer(OEMI. With the advent of modern digital motor drives, there are few technicians familiarwith this technology should repairs be required. A minimum rehabilitation scope shouldinclude the installation of a new redundantthyristor drives to enhance the reliability of thesystem. The motors should be cleaned and serviced by a qualified motor shop to replacethe secondary circuit extension leads. The motor secondary resistor grids should bereplaced with modules that have factory designed and installed guards to minimize thehazard of the exposed energized conductors. A moderate and major rehabilitation scopeshould include the replacement of the span motors and installation of modern flux vectordrives.

4.5 Brakes

The bridge braking system consists of two thruster actuated machinery brakes and twoDirect Current (DCJ electro-magnetic disc brakes. The thruster brakes are mounted on theoutput shaft of each motor and the electro-magnetic disc brakes are mounted on theopposite end ofthe input shaft to the reducer, The thruster brakes are used when the bridgeis operated using the electrical power and the DC electromagnetic brakes are used when thebridge is operated on the emergency engine.

The electromagnetic brakes are powered from the DC system of the emergency motor andthey appeared to be in a good condition. The emergency motor self charges the batterieswhen it is running.

The thrusters are 460V, 3 phase units and even though they appeared to be in a goodcondition they are an obsolete GE model. Spare parts, such as seals, are not available (See

photo E-6). Both brakes must be released, electrically or by hand to operate the span usingthe electric motors or emergency engine. A design provision is that only one thruster brakecan be hand released and still operate the electric drive. The brake thrusters were meggertested and the insulation resistance was found to be 550 Megohm or greater for each. These

values are acceptable and the brakes appeared to be in a good condition. Two lever armlimit switches are mounted on each thruster brake for brake released and brake handreleased indication. These switches appeared to be in a good condition. A moderate andmajor rehabilitation scope should include the replacement of the existing thruster brakeswith modern single piston thruster brakes and the installation of new limit switches.

Scoping Study for the US 1 over the Piscataqua River

Memorial Bridge ReportPage E-4

Page 103: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

New Hampshire Department of Transportation

4.6 Control Desk

The main control desk is located in the machinery and control house, The desk has seenseveral modifications over the years and a new console was added next to the originalcontrol desk for gates and lights. The modifìcations have made the controls separated andnot laid out in a logical order that follows the sequence of the bridge operationalprocedures. The gates and traffic lights on each abutment are actually controlled from acontrol panel that is located inside the gate attendant shacks and the original controls onthe add-on console are bypassed. Anyrehabilitation approach shall include thereplacement of the control desk with a human factors designed integrated control desk thatprovides for all bridge operating controls at the main control desk with provisions tooperate the gates from remote control stations should the need arise. An industrial qualityradio communication system with redundant links should be used to communicate withlocal gate controls. In addition, a significant amount of video equipment is clustered nearand on the control desk. This equipment should be segregated in to a separate cabinet.

4.7 Gates And Traffic Signals

The bridge has electrically operated warning gates at the abutments, and electricallyoperated curtain gates at the towers. The bridge staff indicated that the curtain gates do notwork in cold weather and have been abandoned. One gate attendant on each end of themovable span manually operates a pair of structural steeì swing gates. The gate attendantshave to be onsite for any bridge opening. The structural steel swing gates may not conformto current requirements for barrier gates and any rehabilitation approach should includethe replacement of these gates with AASHTO compliant barrier gates rated for thisapplication.

Attendant shacks are provided for the gate attendants and a traffic signals and gates controlconsole is located inside these shacks, The traffic signals and gates controls are notinterlocked with the main bridge controls. The lack of interlocks requires a high level ofvigilance on the part of the gate tenders and bridge operators, A human error might lead toincidents such as the movable span being lifted before the gates are closed and locked.Providing a data link for remote indication and control for the gates and traffic signals to thecontrol system will allow the operator to operate the bridge without relying on any otherstaff. This option will decrease the labor cost associated with the bridge operation and willenhance safety by providing built in interlocks and eliminating the presence of the gateattendant in the roadway. This recommendation should be included with any rehabilitationapproach that involves the bridge control system.

4.8 Limit Switches

Field limit switches are provided for span closed, normal open and full open. The fieldwiring for the new span seated limit switches uses THWN wire. THWN wires are notcompliant with AASHTO requirements. Over the long term the insulation wears through dueto vibration and causes short circuits. A major or moderate rehabilitation should includethe installation of RHW type wire for the limit switches wiring in conformance with thelatest guidance provided in the 2008 interim revisions to the AASHTO LRFD MovableHighway Design Specifications section "8.9 Electrical Conductors".

4.8.1 Span Seated:

The movable span is provided with one heavy duty, plunger operated,limit switch on eachend ofthe span that is tripped by a structural steel target mounted to each rest pier to

Scoping Study for the US 1 over the Piscataqua River

Memorial Bridge ReportPage E-5

Page 104: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

New Hampshire Department of Transportation

provide span seated indication (See photo E-7). The switches have been recently replacedand are in a very good condition. From field experience the plunger switches can beproblematic. If they are not adjusted properly, they may be jammed and will no longeroperate reliably. It is recommended as part of a moderate or major rehabilitation to replacethe existing plunger switches with proximity sensors. Proximity sensors are a more reliablesince they do not need to make physical contact to function.

4.8.2 Span Position:

The bridge has one multi turn, chain driven lead screw rotary cam limit switch. This switchis the main input used for the bridge control system. It is an obsolete model and will be

difficult to find repair parts or to replace the switch in case of a failure. From a functionalstand point this switch is difficult to adjust (See photo E-B). It is recommended as part of amoderate or major rehabilitation to replace the lead screw rotary cam limit switch with amodern state of the art rotary cam limit switch.

4.8.3 Full Open and Over Travel:

There are several lever arm limit switches on each corner near the top chord of the truss.One switch at each corner is used to provide the full open indication and one switch is usedfor over travel indication. The existing switches did not appear to be functional and some ofthem were missing levers [See photo E-9). Functional over travel and full open limitswitches are essential components in the bridge control system that enhance the safety andreliability of the bridge control system. The installation of new full open and over travellever arm limit switches should be included in the scope of any rehabilitation approach. Acontrol system upgrade should trigger a complete review of limit switch requirements,including limit switches for use during emergency engine operation.

4.9 Navisation Lishts

Navigation lights are installed on the piers and on the north and south face of the lowertruss over the navigation channel ofthe movable span to provide visual guidance for themarine traffic. Several junction boxes are tied to the bridge with wire and several accessdoors on the navigation lights are open due to missing or defective closing hardware (See

photo E-10). Operational and reliable navigation lights are important indications tomariners and are required to be installed and be maintained by US Coast Guardrequirements. It is recommended that as a part of any rehabilitation scope the lightingfixtures, supports and raceways be rehabilitated A major rehabilitation scope shouldinclude the installation of new navigation lighting system.

Aircraft warning beacons are installed on the top of the towers, As part of anyrehabilitation, the beacons should be relamped with energy efficient long life LED lamps. Amajor rehabilitation should trigger the replacement or the entire aircraft warning beaconwith FAA compliant units.

4.10 Miscellaneous

The 480V distribution panel board and the lighting transformer inside the machinery andcontrol room appears to be original bridge equipment, and items such as closure plates onthe face of the breaker panels are missing. The equipment appears to be beyond it normalanticipated 40year life and should be replaced to assure continued reliable service. Circuitsin the new panels should be designed to provide proper coordination, selectivity and

Scoping Study for the US 1 over the Piscataqua RiverMemorial Bridge Report

Page E-6

Page 105: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

New Hampshire Department of Transportation

segregated to assure that tripping ofbreakers for non critical loads do not interrupt criticalfunctions.

5 RECOMMENDATIONS

5.1 Minimum Rehabilitation:

L Main electric service

a. Install new main disconnect switch in an accessible location with theappropriate access and work clearances on the south pier.

2. Back up electric service

a. Replace the ATS

b, Install carbon monoxide detection system in the machinery roomc. Upgrade the generator to provide additional power required to operate the

thruster brakes when bridge is run on the emergency engine.

3. Motor control centers

a. Install a new main deadfront disconnect switch in the operators house.

4. Motors and drivesa. Replace existing motor secondary resistor grids with modules that have a

factory designed and installed guards,

b. Install a two thyristor drives for the span motors to ensure reliability.c. Replace the drive motor rotor extension leads and add bushings or other

protection where they pass through the motor frame, Replace motorbrushes and clean motor interiors.

5, Brakes

a. Provide remote control for thruster brakes next to the magnetic brakecontrols for use during operation with the emergency engine.

6. Control desk

a. Replace the control desk with a human factors designed integrated controldesþ incorporating the gate control stations

7. Traffic gates

a. Install AASHTO compÌiant barrier gates

b. Provide data link and remote communication and control modulescoordinated with the bridge control system to allow gate to be operatedfrom control house and interlocked with the control system.

B. Limit Switches

a. Replace the over travel and full open lever arm limit switches9. Navigation lights

a. Rehab or replace navigation lighting that is missing functional access doorclosure hardware or has degraded raceway system

l-0. Miscellaneous

a. Provide instrument rack and relocate alì video equipment from the controldesk

Scoping Study for the US 1 over the Piscataqua River

Memorial Bridge ReportPage E-7

Page 106: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

New Hampshire Department of Transportation

5.2 Moderate Rehabilitation:

L. Main eìectric service

a. Install new main disconnect switch in an accessible location with the

appropriate access and work clearances on the south pier.

b. Replace catenary system with a droop cable system,

2. Back up electric service

a. Replace the ATS

b. Install carbon monoxide detection system in the machinery room

c. Upgrade the generator to provide additional power required to operate the

thruster brakes when bridge is run on the emergency engine.

3. Motor control centers

a. Replace MCC with a modern dead front MCC.

4. Motors and drivesa. Replace span motors and install new flux vector drives.

5. Brakes

a. Provide remote control for thruster brakes next to the magnetic brakes

controls by the back up emergency engine

b. Replace thruster brakes with modern brakes

c. Install new brake limit switches6. Control desk

a. Replace control desk with human factors designed integrated control desk

and integrate the remote gate control stations7. Traffic gates

a. Install AASHTO compliant barrier gates

b. Provide data link and remote communication and control modules

coordinated with the bridge control system to allow gates to be operated

from the control house and interlocked with the control system

B. Limit Switches

a. Replace the over travel and full open lever arm limit switches

b. Replace existing span seated plunger switches with proximity sensors

c. Replace lead screw rotary cam limit switch with modern state of the artrotary cam ìimit switch

d, Replace the THWN wires used for devices wiring with RHW wire.9. Navigation lights

b, Rehab or replace navigation lighting that is missing functional access doorclosure hardware or has degraded raceway system

10. Miscellaneous

a. Provide instrument rack and relocate all video equipment from the controldesk

b. Replace lighting transformer and lighting panel board. Rewire operator'shouse to provide selectivity between circuits,

Scoping Study for the US 1 over the Piscataqua RiverMemorial Bridge Report

Page E-8

Page 107: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

New Hampshire Department of Transportation

5.3 Maior Rehabilitation:

Main electric service

a. Install new main electrical service with droop cable systemBack up electric service

a. Install new emergency generator and ATS capable of electrically operatingthe bridge in case of a power failure.

Motor control centers

a. Install new motor control centerMotors and drives

a. Install new flux vector drives and motorsBrakes

a. Install new thruster brakes with modern single piston thruster and newlimit switches

Control desk

b. Replace control desk with human factors designed integrated control desk.

Traffic gates

a. Install AASHTO compliant barrier gates

b. Provide data link and remote communication and control modulescoordinated with the bridge control system to allow gates to be operatedfrom the control desk in the control house or locally

Limit Switches

a. Install new limit switchesNavigation lights

a. Install new navigation lighting system

b. Replace the aircraft beacon system with FAA compliant system

7.

2.

aJ,

4.

5,

6.

7.

8.

9.

Scoping Study for the US 1 over the Piscataqua River

Memorial Bridge ReportPage E-9

Page 108: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

New Hampshire Department of Transportation

Appendix APhotos

Scoping Study for the US 1 over the Piscataqua RiverMemorial Bridge Report

Page EA-1

Page 109: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

New Hampshire Department of Transportation

Photo E-l-: Catenaries are problematic since they ice up in the winter and local switching isrequired to provide heating power from the transformers that are installed on the top of the

bridge truss level at the south end to melt the ice

Photo E-2: The use of propane fired emergency engine in the machinery and control roomrequires the installation ofcarbon monoxide detectors to alertthe operator ofanyexhaust

or plenum leaks

Scoping Study for the US 1 over the Piscataqua River

Memorial Bridge ReportPage EA-2

Page 110: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

New Hampshire Department of Transportation

Photo E-3: The MCC is of obsolete design with exposed bare copper bus which exposes theswitch person to the arcing that might occur during the switching process

Photo E-4: Temporary measures were taken to minimize the potential for the insulation onthe rotor leads to wear through and short out as they leave the motor rotor housing

Scoping Study for the US 1 over the Piscataqua River

Memorial Bridge Report

Page EA-3

Page 111: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

New Hampshire Department of Transportation

Photo E-5: The secondary resistors have exposed energized elements and conductors andthe existing guard does not fully encompass for the hazard

Photo E-6: Even though the thruster brakes appeared to be in a good condition, they are anobsolete GE model and no spare parts, such as seals, are available

Scoping Study for the US 1 over the Piscataqua RiverMemorial Bridge Report

Page EA-4

Page 112: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

New Hampshire Department of Transportation

Photo E-7: From field experience the plunger switches for the span seated indication areproblematic. If they are not adjusted properl¡ they get damaged easily.

Photo E-8: The lead screw rotary cam limit switch is an obsolete model and it is verydifficult to adjust

Scoping Study for the US 1 over the Piscataqua River

Memorial Bridge ReportPage EA-5

Page 113: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

New Hampshire Department of Transportation

Photo E-9: Many of the existing lever arms limit switches normaìly used for span full openand over travel indication switches are not functional

Photo E-10: Several access doors on the navigation lights are open due to missing ordefective closing hardware

Scoping Study for the US 1 over the Piscataqua RiverMemorial Bridge Report

Page EA-6

Page 114: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

New Hampshire Department of Transportation

Appendix B

Field lnspection Sheets

Scoping Study for the US 1 over the Piscataqua River

Memorial Bridge ReportPage EB-1

Page 115: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

-FI l r l l l l il l l l ,l I r l ,l l r ll l r ll I r l l l ! l å l r lJ t r t¿ I r l ,| | t ¿ t , t t t , tÅ I I

+":Aãe),'u+;bq /w _

g'["r,*d \+ÊTs;

'4-

Page 116: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

Fl I I I ¡ I I I ¡ I r IüI ¡ IùI r.IùI I I¿I' I*I', IåI' IåI' IiI', I¿I' I¡I' IúI' IòI'

I

\tÙ¡a U têå h,L 7:tok-."-ç uq.{"= ¿o-..sÇ.<s

i

I

I

l_

Page 117: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

ProJectè (continued)

Page 118: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

o

Page 119: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports
Page 120: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports

lrrttttfvl¿ç

/lvTt r(u)u tAç f,W

/Y174 '1tø?z/ 9- ¿tt 4l'¡fl)TXS', 4tÁt+/fh +¡V&'

)o

{/o 'sg ßr/2 ns|21

¡.4/e- à '.42<J/f .l tt- hA at$ t'?4' ttuJð

trFlÈt

d@o

&^ Í'u ç ç>v)QO|'l I

!L/Z ) t/1/tl. w) ^u -Y ,t¿-P/824t 7 try?t

,1lo .¡v

't0 'sL

@

Page 121: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports
Page 122: Mechanical & Electrical Inspection Reports