the role of the informational accessibility of the subject in the development of adjectival...
TRANSCRIPT
The role of the informational accessibility of the subject in the
development of adjectival complementation from Old English
to Present-day Englishto Present-day English
An Van linden &Kristin Davidse
University of Leuven
ICHL19, August 14, Nijmegen
Introduction (1)
• Topic: complex constructions with adjectivalmatrix and complement, more specifically deontic-evaluativeadjectives and mandative complements (ex-pressing desired action) (Huddleston & Pullum 2002: 996)
(1) It is essential that money is better distributed, so that it reaches the poorest people.
Introduction (2)
• Topic: complex constructions with adjectival matrix and mandative complement
(1) It is essential that money is better distributed, so that it reaches the poorest distributed, so that it reaches the poorest people.
adjective essential
Introduction (2)
• Topic: complex constructions with adjectival matrix and mandative complement
(1) It is essential that money is better distributed, so that it reaches the poorest distributed, so that it reaches the poorest people.
adjective essential
that-clause complement
(versus to-infinitive)
Introduction (2)
• Topic: complex constructions with adjectival matrix and mandative complement
(1) It is essential that money is better distributed, so that it reaches the poorest distributed, so that it reaches the poorest people.
adjective essential
that-clause complement
(versus to-infinitive)
in extraposition construction with
anticipatory it in matrix
Introduction (3)
• Diachronic shift in formal coding of the mandative complement:
predominance of that-clauses changes to one of to-clauses in Middle English
� Hypothesis: decrease of that-clauses (typically � Hypothesis: decrease of that-clauses (typically accomodating subjects with specific reference) led to increase of complements with subjects with general reference (cf. Los 2005: 292: “majority of instances [with evaluative predic-ates] have arbitrary PRO (in to-infinitives)”
Cf. role of information structure in variation between that- and to-clauses (Noël 2003)
Structure of the talk
1. Data and methods2. The rise of the to-infinitive3. Informational accessibility: two
parametersparameters4. Analysis of data5. Discussion of findings6. Conclusion
1. Data and methods (1)
• Corpus-based study of adjectives that express deontic meaning (weak and strong degree)
• Historical counterparts of PDE
weak appropriate, convenient, desirable, expedient, fit, fitting, good, important, profitable, proper, suitable
strong critical, crucial, essential, indispensable, necessary, needful, vital
1. Data and methods (2)
Sub-period
Time span
Corpus Number of tokens
OE 750–1150
York-Toronto-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Old English Prose (YCOE)
1.45 mln
ME 1150– Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Middle 1.16 ME 1150–1500
Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Middle English, Second Edition (PPCME)
1.16 mln
EModE 1500–1710
Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Early Modern English (PPCEME)
1.79 mln
LModE 1710–1920
Corpus of Late Modern English texts (Extended version) (CLMETEV)
15.01 mln
PDE 1990–1995
Collins COBUILD corpus (CB)(only British subcorpora)
42.10 mln
2. The rise of the to-infinitive (1)
• Diachronic data show a major shift in the distribution of mandative that- and to-clauses in Middle English (Van linden 2009, Forthc.):
to-infinitive starts to replace that-clause
2. The rise of the to-infinitive (2)
Examples: OE that-clause � ME to-infinitive
(2) He andwyrde; Nis na god þæt man nyme his bearna hlaf. and awurpe hundum; ‘He answered: “It is not good that one should take the bread of his children and throw it to the dogs”’ (YCOE 990–1010 ÆCHom II, 8 67.16)990–1010 ÆCHom II, 8 67.16)
(3) And Crist answeride and seyde ‘Hit is not good to take þe breed þat falluþ to children, and Ɨyuen hit to howndes to ete fro þese children.’ ‘And Christ answered and said: “It is not good to take the bread that belongs to children from these children and give it to dogs to eat.”’ (PPCME ?a1425 Wycl.Serm. (Add 40672) 401)
• The replacement of that-clauses has not run its full course: to-clause stabilizes at roughly a 3:1 ratio to that-clause in Modern English
2. The rise of the to-infinitive (3)
� did the decreased frequency of that-clauses go together with a decreased frequency of specific subjects?
Generally assumed view:• OE: mainly that-complements; overt subjects with
- either general reference: - pronouns man, we, you- generic types, e.g. women
- or specific reference: - pronouns 1/2 and 3- full NPs, e.g. the king
3. Informational accessibility: two parameters (1)
- full NPs, e.g. the king• ModE: to-complements supersede that-complements;
inferable subjects predominantly general reference: - pron. man, one, we, etc.
(cf. Los (2005: 292): majority of instances [with evaluative adjectives] have arbitrary PRO)
- generic types� general subjects factor in rise of to-infinitive?
3. Informational accessibility: two parameters (2)
• Verification of this view through diachronic analysis:- subjects of that-complements
- subjects of to-complements which subsume 4 subtypes:(i) for + subject + to-infinitive, e.g.
It is not proper for children to answer!(ii) to-complement of complex transitive matrix, e.g.(ii) to-complement of complex transitive matrix, e.g.
I do not think proper to mix much with your other guardians
(iii) to-complement with Experiencer in matrix, e.g.“It is crucial to us to play in such an important competition,” he said.
(iv) to-complement of copular matrix, e.g.Nor is it, in my opinion, proper to offer the same reward indiscriminately to all that shall accept it
3. Informational accessibility: two parameters (3)
- Informational accessability in terms of twoparameters:
generalgeneral reference
exophoric1st/2nd person
3rd personendophoric
specific reference
referenceexophoric
• Information status of 3 types of reference (Martin 1992, Ariel 2001):
(i) general and speech participant reference:The little sins are sometimes harder to confess than the big ones--but that's why it's so important to confess them. (CLMET 3)… give me a word of explanation as to who she is, what mischief she's been up to, or what you are to do with her! If I'm to be of any further use, it would seem at least expedient to give me some hints (CLMET 3)
- typically exophoric retrieval of referents
3. Informational accessibility: two parameters (4)
- typically exophoric retrieval of referents- more accessible discourse referents
(ii)specific third person reference:Instead of the little passions which so frequently perplex a female reign, the steady administration of Zenobia was guided by the most judicious maxims of policy. If it was expedient to pardon, she could calm her resentment (CLMET 1)
- intrinsically endophoric (within the text) retrieval of referents - less accessible discourse referents
• General picture:
4. Analysis of data (1)
� OE � PDE: decrease that-clauses with general subjects (54>15.48%)� OE � PDE: increase to-clauses with general subjects (12>49.28%)� BUT: in ModE data: temporary reversal of trend: predominance of to-
clauses with specific subjects (LModE: 60.68%)
• General picture:
4. Analysis of data (1)
� OE � PDE: decrease that-clauses with general subjects (54>15.48%)� OE � PDE: increase to-clauses with general subjects (12>49.28%)� BUT: in ModE data: temporary reversal of trend: predominance of to-
clauses with specific subjects (LModE: 60.68%)
• Development within formal complement types:
4. Analysis of data (2)
� that-clauses: increase specific subjects (30.77>43.28%)� to-clauses: increase general subjects (54.55 > 68.71%)BUT: in ModE: to-clauses: temporary predominance specific subjects
• That-clauses:
4. Analysis of data (3)
�general subjects: overall decrease (but stabilizearound 50%)
�specific subjects: from equal shares of 1/2 and 3 to predominance of 3rd person (less accessible option)
4. Analysis of data (4)
• To-clauses:
� overall increase in general subjects, but in E/LModE temporary reversal: strong predominance (65/76%) of specific subjects
� within specific subjects: predominance of 1/2 over 3, but effect tapers off (in LModE even equi-probable choices)
5. Discussion of findings (1)
• overall general expectations confirmed:
(i) to-complements increasingly attract subjects with general reference (cf. Los 2005)
(ii) convergence of factors promoting rise of to-infinitivecoding mandative complements of adjectival matrices coding mandative complements of adjectival matrices (cf. Van linden forthc.)- analogy with rise of to-infinitive coding mandative complements of verbal matrices (Los 2005)- informational factor of accessible (‘exophoric’) subjects, which, however, can be argued to include both general and specific 1/2 subjects (note: specific 3rd p. subjects relatively more common in that-complements)
5. Discussion of findings (2)
• but remarkable reversal general trend in ModE: to-complements: specific subjects predominate (65/76%) with 1/2 vs 3 equi-probable options in LModE (38/38%)
�seems to have been promoted by 3 cxns attracting specific subjects and in LModE favouring 3rd p subjects
(i) complex transitive cxns (OE: 7.7%; ME: 0%; EModE: 46.2%; (i) complex transitive cxns (OE: 7.7%; ME: 0%; EModE: 46.2%; LModE: 38.7%; PDE: 7.6%)
� 89% spec / 61% 3rd p subj. in LModE(ii) for-NP-to-inf cxns (OE: 0%; ME: 5%; EModE: 17.1%; LModE: 10.3%; PDE: 15.1%)
� 79% spec / 45% 3rd p subjects in LModE(iii) Experiencer in matrix cxns (OE: 53.9%; ME: 23.3%; EModE: 6.0%; LModE: 0.9%; PDE: 0.6%)
� 71% spec / 43% 3rd p. subjects in LModE
5. Discussion of findings (3)
• these 3 special cxns attracted a majority of specific subjects
� influence on to-complements of ordinary copular matrices which also came to be used more with specific subjects in ModE matrices which also came to be used more with specific subjects in ModE BUT this effect is
(i) like the complextransitive cxn itself, a boom-and-bust phenomenon of ModE
(ii) probably distorted by register bias of ModE-data (mainly literary data with typical stylistic fashions)
6. Conclusion (1)
60
70
80
90
100
excl to
endoph to
exoph to
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
EOE
EOE
LOE
LOEEM
EEM
ELM
ELM
EEM
odE
EMod
ELM
odE
LMod
E
PDE
PDE
exoph to
excl that
endoph that
exoph that
to
that
6. Conclusion (2)
• diachronic data-analysis confirms initially predicted correlations:- increase in to-complements goes together with increase of informationally accessible subjects, i.e. mainly of general but also 1/2 p. subjects
� latter contributing factor to former, besides analogy with rise in verbal mandative to-complements
� extraposition construction with deontic-evaluative adjectives favoured to-complements, amongst others, because economic way of proposing desired action for general and speech participant referents
6. Conclusion (3)
• however, development OE > PDE is quantitatively not spectacular
• may be due to temporary reversal of general trends• in writing in (L)ModE: stylistic and ‘systemic’
constructional factors (paradigmatic interplay between constructional factors (paradigmatic interplay between related constructions) favoured temporary attraction of 3rd p. subjects to to-complements (clearly register and style factors involved in this development)
• after this detour, developments in PDE reconnect with the tendencies observable in OE and ME
6. Conclusion (4)
• theoretical and methodological challenges emanating from this case study:
• further study of interaction between constructional and informational factors in language change
• theory formation needed about short-lived changes• theory formation needed about short-lived changes• how to conceptualize of such temporary reversals of
trends and relate them to general trends?• more theoretical reflection needed on changes
associated with writing (role of fashionable stylistic phrasing, etc.); currently, writing as locus of change underrated and understudied
• more theoretical and practical work needed on register consistency of diachronic corpora (cf. Davies’s COHA)
References• Ariel, Mira. 2001. Accessibility theory: an overview. In Ted Sanders
et al. (eds), Text Representation: Linguistic and Psycholinguistic aspects. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
• Los, Bettelou. 2005. The rise of the to-infinitive. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey Pullum. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP.
• Martin, J. R. 1992. English Text. System and Structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
• Noël, Dirk. 2003. Is there semantics in all syntax? The case of• Noël, Dirk. 2003. Is there semantics in all syntax? The case ofaccusative and infinitive constructions vs. that-clauses. In GünterRohdenburg and Britta Mondorf (eds.), Determinants of grammaticalvariation in English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 347–377.
• Van linden, An. 2009. Dynamic, deontic and evaluative adjectivesand their clausal complement patterns: A synchronic-diachronicaccount. PhD diss., Department of Linguistics, University of Leuven.
• Van linden, An. Forthcoming. The rise of the to-infinitive: Evidencefrom adjectival complementation. English Language and Linguistics.
• Van linden, An & Kristin Davidse. 2009. The clausalcomplementation of deontic-evaluative adjectives in extrapositionconstructions: a synchronic-diachronic approach. Folia Linguistica43: 171-211.