bixby road industrial - canal winchester

Prepared for:

BIXBY ROAD

INDUSTRIAL

Traffic Impact Study

February 2022

Stotan Industrial

Canal Winchester, Ohio

Bixby Road Industrial Traffic Impact Study (TIS)February 2022

PREPARED FOR: Jim McGill Stotan Industrial 6250 North River Road, Suite 11-100, Rosemont, IL 60018 Mobile: 847.894.6882, [email protected]

PREPARED BY: Perry Morgan, P.E. Kimley-Horn 7965 N. High Street, Suite 200, Columbus, OH 43235 Direct: 614.472.8551 | Mobile: 614.582.7838 [email protected]

Registered Engineer No. E-59569, Ohio

Date

February 8, 2022

2 Bixby Road Industrial Traffic Impact Study │ Canal Winchester, Ohio February 2022 │ Traffic Study

Contents

INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 4

NO BUILD CONDITIONS ............................................................................................................. 6

Area Land Uses and Existing Roadway Characteristics .................................................................. 6

Traffic Count Data Collection ........................................................................................................... 6

Traffic Volume Adjustment ............................................................................................................... 7

Expected Growth Traffic Assignment ............................................................................................... 7

BUILD CONDITIONS .................................................................................................................. 14

Development Characteristics ......................................................................................................... 14

Trip Generation .............................................................................................................................. 14

Directional Distribution ................................................................................................................... 15

Build Traffic Assignment ................................................................................................................ 16

ANALYSIS .................................................................................................................................. 26

Capacity Analysis ........................................................................................................................... 26

No-Build Condition Capacity Analysis ............................................................................................ 28

Build Condition Capacity Analysis ................................................................................................. 28

No-Build Mitigated Condition Capacity Analysis ............................................................................ 31

Build Mitigated Condition Capacity Analysis .................................................................................. 31

Additional Mitigated Condition Capacity Analysis .......................................................................... 32

Site Contribution to Mitigated Conditions ....................................................................................... 32

Turn-Lane Warrant Analysis .......................................................................................................... 33

CONCLUSIONS .......................................................................................................................... 34


Tables

Table 1: MORPC Growth Rates and Projection Factors .......................................................... 7

Table 2: ITE Trip Generation Data – Warehousing ................................................................ 14

Table 3: Site Generated Traffic Projections ........................................................................... 15

Table 4: Estimated Trip Distribution ....................................................................................... 15

Table 5: Level of Service Grading Descriptions .................................................................... 27

Table 6: Level of Service Grading Criteria .............................................................................. 27

Table 7: Operational Goals of Intersections ........................................................................... 28

Table 8: Weekday AM Peak Hour - Study Intersections Capacity Analysis ........................ 29

Table 9: Weekday PM Peak Hour - Study Intersections Capacity Analysis ........................ 30

Table 10: Weekday Peak Hour Mitigated Conditions- Study Intersections Capacity

Analysis ..................................................................................................................................... 32

Table 11: Additional Peak Hour Mitigated Conditions- Study Intersections Capacity

Analysis ..................................................................................................................................... 32

Table 12: Site Contribution to Peak Hour Mitigated Conditions ........................................... 33

Table 13: Turn Lane Warrant Analysis and Length Summary .............................................. 33


INTRODUCTION

Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. (Kimley-Horn) was retained by Stotan Industrial to perform a traffic

impact study for a proposed industrial development located south of Winchester Pike and north of Bixby

Road in Canal Winchester, Ohio. The proposed development would replace agriculture land. The

proposed development would include four new access intersections with the existing adjacent streets.

This would include two new intersections with Bixby Road and two new intersections with Winchester

Pike. An aerial view of the study location and the surrounding roadway network is presented in Exhibit 1.

The conceptual site plan is provided in the Appendix.

As part of this study, the existing network was analyzed to determine the current and projected future

traffic operations at the study intersections. Trip generation characteristics for the proposed industrial site

were established for the new development and added to background traffic volumes to assess the site’s

impact on the area roadway network. This report presents and documents Kimley-Horn’s data collection,

summarizes the evaluation of existing and projected future traffic conditions on the surrounding

roadways, and identifies recommendations to address the potential of site-generated traffic on the

adjacent roadway network.

Exhibit 1: Site Location Map

Bixby Industrial

N

36 4

2

1

7

LEGENDSite Location

Intersection ID#

Access Drive AAccess Drive B

Access Drive C

Access Drive D

5


NO BUILD CONDITIONS

Kimley-Horn conducted a field visit to collect relevant information pertaining to existing land uses in the

surrounding area, the adjacent street system, current traffic volumes and operating conditions, lane

configurations and traffic controls at nearby intersections, and other key roadway characteristics. This

section of the report details information on these existing conditions.

Area Land Uses and Existing Roadway Characteristics

The subject site is located south of Winchester Pike just north of Bixby Road in Canal Winchester, Ohio.

The project would replace agricultural land. The immediate site vicinity generally consists of high density

residential and industrial uses. The study area for this analysis includes the following intersections:

• Winchester Pike and Site Access A

• Winchester Pike and Site Access B

• Winchester Pike and Bixby Road/Brice Road

• Bixby Road and Site Access C

• Bixby Road and Rager Road

• Bixby Road and Site Access D

• US-33 and Bixby Road

Winchester Pike is a two-lane urban minor arterial in the site vicinity and provides one travel lane in each

direction. Regionally, Winchester Pike connects to US-33. At the signalized intersection with Bixby

Road/Brice Road, Winchester Pike includes turn lanes on both approaches. This roadway has a posted

speed limit of 55 miles per hour. Designated sidewalks are present on one side of Winchester Pike.

Bixby Road is a two-lane urban major collector in the site vicinity and provides one travel lane in each

direction. Regionally, Bixby Road connects to US-33. At the signalized intersection with Winchester Pike,

Bixby Road includes a left-turn lane. This roadway has a posted speed limit of 50 miles per hour. No

designated sidewalks are present on either side of Bixby Road.

Brice Road is a two-lane urban minor arterial in the site vicinity and provides one travel lane in each

direction. This roadway has a posted speed limit of 50 miles per hour. Designated sidewalks are present

at the signalized intersection with Winchester Pike.

Brice Road is a two-lane urban local road in the site vicinity and provides one travel lane in each

direction. This roadway has an unposted speed limit of 50 miles per hour. Designated sidewalks are

present on the east of Rager Road at the stop-controlled intersection with Bixby Road.

US-33 is a four-lane divided urban freeway in the site vicinity and provides two travel lane in each

direction. At the unsignalized intersection with Bixby Road, US-33 includes turn lanes on both

approaches. This roadway has a posted speed limit of 60 miles per hour. No designated sidewalks are

present on either side of US-33.

Traffic Count Data Collection

Base Traffic volumes and turning movement counts for the study intersections were obtained from recent

traffic studies performed in the site vicinity. Traffic volumes at the US-33 and Bixby Road intersection

were obtained via Canal Crossing Phase 2 Traffic Impact Study (August 31, 2021). Turning movement


counts at the Winchester Pike and Bixby Road/Brice Road intersection were obtained from The Franklin County Engineer’s Office (June 18, 2019). Referenced traffic volumes and turning movement counts can be found in the Appendix and are illustrated in Exhibit 2.

Traffic Volume Adjustment Due to circumstances associated with the COVID-19 public health crisis, traffic volumes have been atypically low since mid-March 2020 and slowly increasing toward normal volumes over the past several months. COVID-19 adjustment factors were not obtained for this study since traffic data was collected prior to the COVID-19 health crisis in the United States. The 2022 and 2032 Background vehicular volumes for the study intersection are illustrated in Exhibits 3-4.

Expected Growth Traffic Assignment As development of the Central-Ohio region increases, the expected vehicular volumes are anticipated to increase as well. Linear growth rates were obtained via the Canal Crossing Phase 2 Traffic Impact Study

(December 21, 2021) and were derived based on planning level analysis by using the Mid-Ohio Regional Planning Commission’s (MORPC) regional travel demand model. An excerpt from the Canal Crossing

Phase 2 Traffic Impact Study (December 21, 2021), containing the assumed linear growth rates is provided in the Appendix. The assumed linear growth rates and corresponding factors for the study area are provided Table 1:

Table 1: MORPC Growth Rates and Projection Factors

Segment Linear Annual Growth

Rate 2017 to 2022 2017 to 2032

Winchester Pike East of Bixby Road 1.20% 1.06 1.18

Brice Road North of Winchester Pike 2.40% 1.12 1.36

Winchester Pike West of Bixby Road 1.10% 1.055 1.165

Bixby Road South of Winchester Pike 0.90% 1.045 1.135

These growth rates were based on 2019 counts via the Canal Crossing Phase 2 Traffic Impact Study.

The estimated trip distribution for the anticipated offsite developments were referenced via the Canal

Crossing Phase 2 Traffic Impact Study, Winchester Pike Site Traffic Access Study, Lamp South Traffic Impact Study, and the 5100 Ebright Road Traffic Impact Study. Estimated Trips Distributions for the anticipated offsite developments can be found in the Appendix. The total anticipated offsite trips can be found in Exhibit 5. The 2022 and 2032 background volumes (Exhibits 3-4) were added to the total offsite trips (Exhibit 5) to determine the 2022 and 2032 no-build volumes. The no-build volumes can be found in Exhibits 6-7.

Exhibit 2: 2019 Counts

Bixby Industrial

N

35 4

2

1

67

LEGENDSite Location

Intersection ID#

XX (XX) AM (PM) Peak HourVehicle Volumes

Exhibit 3: 2022 Background Volumes

Bixby Industrial

NWinchester Pk &

Bixby Rd/Brice Rd

RTL

Q S K

k s qltr

722 (1364)Overall:

10 (68)

9 (58)

Bixby Rd

Win

ches

ter

Pk

2 (2)

Win

ches

ter

Pk

Brice Rd

20 (

12)

279

(207

)

41 (

146)

80 (44)

77 (41)

110 (161)0 (0

)

77 (

530)

17 (

95)

13

Rager Rd &

Bixby Rd

TL

k qtr

118 (193)

94 (50)

3 (3)

Bixby Rd

2 (

8)

0 (0)

Overall:

Ra

ger

Rd

19 (130)

0 (

2)

Bixby Rd

15

3

5 4

2

1

6

US-33 &

Bixby Rd

RQ S K

k s qr31 (57)

60

(2

9)

36

80

(1

88

1)

1 (

13

)

14

(2

9)

15

88

(4

01

8)

18

(1

19

) US

-33

92 (47)

Bixby Rd

Overall: 5484 (6193)

Bixby Rd

US

-33

17

7

LEGEND

Site Location

Intersection ID#

XX (XX) AM (PM) Peak Hour Vehicle Volumes

Exhibit 4: 2032 Background Volumes

Bixby Industrial

NWinchester Pk &

Bixby Rd/Brice Rd

RTL

Q S K

k s qltr

833 (1539)Overall:

11 (74)

10 (63)

Bixby Rd

Win

ches

ter

Pk

2 (2)

Win

ches

ter

Pk

Brice Rd

22 (

14)

311

(231

)

46 (

163)

98 (54)

94 (50)

135 (197)0 (0

)

86 (

586)

18 (

105)

13

Rager Rd &

Bixby Rd

TL

k qtr

126 (207)

99 (49)

3 (3)

Bixby Rd

2 (

10

)

2 (0)

Overall:

Ra

ger

Rd

20 (142)

0 (

3)

Bixby Rd

15

3

5 4

2

1

6

US-33 &

Bixby Rd

RQ S K

k s qr34 (62)

68

(3

3)

42

09

(2

15

1)

1 (

14

)

16

(3

3)

18

16

(4

59

5)

20

(1

36

) US

-33

101 (52)

Bixby Rd

Overall: 6265 (7076)

Bixby Rd

US

-33

17

7

LEGEND

Site Location

Intersection ID#


Exhibit 5: Total Offsite Trips

Bixby Industrial

NWinchester Pk &

Bixby Rd/Brice Rd

RTL

Q S K

k s qltr

516 (606)Overall:

34 (105)

29 (89)

Bixby Rd

Win

ches

ter

Pk

13 (40)

Win

ches

ter

Pk

Brice Rd

92 (

43)

92 (

117)

19 (

49)

0 (0)

104 (53)

42 (26)23 (

10)

68 (

74)

0 (0

)

13

Rager Rd &

Bixby Rd

TL

k qtr

204 (230)

146 (65)

0 (0)

Bixby Rd

0 (

0)

2 (5)

Overall:

Ra

ger

Rd

50 (158)

6 (

2)

Bixby Rd

15

3

5 4

2

1

6

US-33 &

Bixby Rd

RQ S K

k s qr0 (0)

0 (

0)

0 (

0)

0 (

0)

0 (

0)

0 (

0)

31

(4

7) U

S-3

3

43 (28)

Bixby Rd

Overall: 74 (75)

Bixby Rd

US

-33

17

7

LEGEND

Site Location

Intersection ID#


Exhibit 6: 2022 No-Build

Bixby Industrial

NWinchester Pk &

Bixby Rd/Brice Rd

RTL

Q S K

k s qltr

1238 (1970)Overall:

44 (173)

38 (147)

Bixby Rd

Win

ches

ter

Pk

15 (42)

Win

ches

ter

Pk

Brice Rd

112

(55)

371

(324

)

60 (

195)

80 (44)

181 (94)

152 (187)23 (

10)

145

(604

)

17 (

95)

13

Rager Rd &

Bixby Rd

TL

k qtr

322 (423)

240 (115)

3 (3)

Bixby Rd

2 (

8)

2 (5)

Overall:

Ra

ge

r R

d

69 (288)

6 (

4)

Bixby Rd

15

3

5 4

2

1

6

US-33 &

Bixby Rd

RQ S K

k s qr31 (57)

60

(2

9)

36

80

(1

88

1)

1 (

13

)

14

(2

9)

15

88

(4

01

8)

49

(1

66

) US

-33

135 (75)

Bixby Rd

Overall: 5558 (6268)

Bixby Rd

US

-33

17

7

LEGEND

Site Location

Intersection ID#


Exhibit 7: 2032 No-Build

Bixby Industrial

NWinchester Pk &

Bixby Rd/Brice Rd

RTL

Q S K

k s qltr

23 (

10)

154

(660

)

18 (

105)

114

(57)

403

(348

)

65 (

212)

98 (54)

198 (103)

177 (223)

1349 (2145)Overall:

45 (179)

39 (152)

Bixby Rd

Win

ches

ter

Pk

15 (42)

Win

ches

ter

Pk

Brice Rd

13

Rager Rd &

Bixby Rd

TL

k qtr

Bixby Rd

2 (

10

)

4 (5)

Overall:

Ra

ger

Rd

70 (300)

6 (

5)

245 (114)

3 (3)

Bixby Rd

330 (437)

15

3

5 4

2

1

6

US-33 &

Bixby Rd

RQ S K

k s qr

Overall: 6339 (7151)

Bixby Rd

US

-33

34 (62)

68

(3

3)

42

09

(2

15

1)

1 (

14

)

16

(3

3)

18

16

(4

59

5)

51

(1

83

) US

-33

144 (80)

Bixby Rd

17

7

LEGEND

Site Location

Intersection ID#



BUILD CONDITIONS

This section of the report outlines the proposed site plan and summarizes site-specific traffic characteristics.

Development Characteristics The 80.6-Acre proposed development would include:

Building A: 49.8-Acre industrial warehouse totaling 627,200 Square Feet

Building B: 30.8-Acre industrial warehouse totaling 312,000 Square Feet

Access to the site includes four site access intersections along Winchester Pike and Bixby Road: Access A and Access B north of the Winchester Pike & Bixby Road/Brice Road intersection, and Access C and Access D west of the Winchester Pike & Bixby Road/Brice Road intersection. As shown on the conceptual site plan, the spacing of the Access A drive along Winchester Pike will be approximately 1,550 feet north of Access B, and Access B will be approximately 1,200 feet north of the Winchester Pike and Bixby Road/Brice Road intersection. Along Bixby Road, Access C and Access D will be separated by approximately 1,100 feet. Access A is to be a right-in/right-out drive. The access configuration is illustrated on the conceptual site plan included in the Appendix.

Trip Generation To calculate trips generated by the proposed industrial development, data was referenced from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) manual titled Trip Generation, Tenth Edition. Trip generation rates for the ITE Land Use Code (LUC) corresponding to the proposed use are shown in Table 2. Copies of the ITE data are provided in the Appendix.

Table 2: ITE Trip Generation Data – Warehousing

ITE Land Use

Building Unit Vehicle Type Weekday

AM Peak Hour Pm Peak Hour

Warehousing (150)

Building A 627,200 SF

Total 𝑇 = 0.12(𝑋) + 25.32

77% in/23% out

𝑇 = 0.12(𝑋) + 27.82

27% in/73% out

Trucks 𝐴𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝑅𝑎𝑡𝑒: 0.03

52% in/48% out

𝐴𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝑅𝑎𝑡𝑒: 0.03

52% in/48% out

Building B 312,000 SF

Total 𝑇 = 0.12(𝑋) + 25.32

77% in/23% out

𝑇 = 0.12(𝑋) + 27.82

27% in/73% out

Trucks 𝐴𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝑅𝑎𝑡𝑒: 0.03

52% in/48% out

𝐴𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝑅𝑎𝑡𝑒: 0.03

52% in/48% out T – Site-generated trips X – KSF of Building

For the purpose of this study, all site generated trips are expected to be “Primary Trips” when traveling to and from the subject site. Primary trips are trips to the proposed industrial site would not normally travel on the study roadways and are considered new trips within the study area. Per these assumptions, site-generated traffic projections are presented in Table 3 and Exhibits 12-18.


Table 3: Site Generated Traffic Projections

ITE Land Use

Building Unit Vehicle Type

AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour

In Out Total In Out Total

Warehousing (150)

Building A 627,200

SF

Cars 71 17 88 18 66 84

Trucks 7 6 13 10 9 19

Total 78 23 101 28 75 103

Building B 312,000

SF

Cars 46 11 57 13 43 56

Trucks 3 3 6 5 4 9

Total 49 14 63 18 47 65

Directional Distribution The estimated distribution of site-generated traffic on the surrounding roadway network as it approaches

and departs the site is a function of several variables, such as the nature of surrounding land uses,

prevailing traffic volumes/patterns, characteristics of the street system, and the ease with which motorists

can travel over various sections of that system. To determine the percentage of traffic traveling to/from

neighboring towns/cities, a function of total population and distance from site was calculated. The

distribution of trips entering/exiting the proposed site was determined based on internal roadway

geometry, location of access driveways, and Google Maps “fastest route” determinations. Trucks and cars

from Building A and Building B resulted in various estimated trip distributions for the proposed site. The

anticipated directional distributions estimated for the site related trips are outlined in Table 4 and can be

seen in Exhibit 8-11.

Table 4: Estimated Trip Distribution

Traveling To/From:

Estimated Trip Distribution

Building A Building B

Cars Trucks Cars Trucks

West on Winchester Pike 20% 15% 10% 15%

East on Winchester Pike 40% 85% 40% 85%

North on Brice Road 35% - 35% -

South on Bixby Road 5% - 15% -


Build Traffic Assignment

The build traffic assignment represents traffic volumes at the study intersections upon construction of the

proposed development. The 2022 Build traffic assignment consists of the 2022 No-Build trips plus the

total anticipated site generated trips. The 2032 Build traffic assignment consists of the 2032 No-Build trips

plus the total anticipated site generated trips. The 2022 and 2032 Build traffic volumes for the study area

are illustrated in Exhibits 19-20.

Exhibit 8: Site Trips (Building A - Cars)

Bixby Industrial

NWinchester Pk &

Access Drive A

Q S

k slr

Access Drive A

Win

ches

ter

Pk

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0

)

7 (2

)

Win

ches

ter

Pk

0 (0

)

2 (7

)

Overall: 9 (9)

11

Winchester Pk &

Access Drive B

Q S

k slr

Win

ches

ter

Pk

20 (

6)

0 (0

)

6 (19)

Overall:

7 (2

)

0 (0

)

Win

ches

ter

Pk

Access Drive B

2 (7)

35 (34)

12

Winchester Pk &

Bixby Rd/Brice Rd

RTL

Q S K

k s qltr

0 (0

)

4 (1

3)

2 (6

)

14 (

3)

14 (

4)

0 (0

)

6 (2)

19 (4)

0 (0)

68 (62)Overall:

6 (17)

3 (13)

Bixby Rd

Win

ches

ter

Pk

0 (0)

Win

ches

ter

Pk

Brice Rd

13

Access Drive C &

Bixby Rd

RT

Q K

lt

0 (0

)

Bixby Rd

5 (1

9)

Acc

ess

Dri

ve C

2 (11)

Overall:

0 (0)

20 (5)

13 (2)

Bixby Rd

40 (37)

14Rager Rd &

Bixby Rd

TL

k qtr

Bixby Rd

0 (0

)

0 (0)

Overall:

Rag

er R

d

2 (11)

0 (0

)

13 (2)

0 (0)

Bixby Rd

15 (13)

15

35 4

2

1

6

LEGEND

Site Location

Intersection ID#

Bixby Rd

RT

Q S K

lt

Access Drive D &

3 (1

0)

0 (0

)

Bixby Rd

2 (1

1)

Acc

ess

Dri

ve D

0 (0)

Overall:

11 (3)

29 (26)

13 (2)

0 (0)

Bixby Rd

16

7

US-33 &

Bixby Rd

RQ S K

k s qr

Overall: 14 (13)

Bixby Rd

US-

33

0 (0)

0 (0

)

0 (0

)

0 (0

)

0 (0

)

0 (0

)

11 (3

)

US-

33

3 (10)

Bixby Rd

17

Exhibit 9: Site Trips (Building A - Trucks)

Bixby Industrial

NWinchester Pk &

Access Drive A

Q S

k slr

Access Drive A

Win

ches

ter

Pk

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0

)

1 (2

)

Win

ches

ter

Pk

0 (0

)

1 (1

)

Overall: 2 (3)

11

Winchester Pk &

Access Drive B

Q S

k slr

Win

ches

ter

Pk

6 (9

)

0 (0

)

5 (8)

Overall:

1 (2

)

0 (0

)

Win

ches

ter

Pk

Access Drive B

1 (1)

13 (20)

12

Winchester Pk &

Bixby Rd/Brice Rd

RTL

Q S K

k s qltr

0 (0

)

5 (8

)

0 (0

)

0 (0

)

6 (9

)

0 (0

)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

11 (17)Overall:

0 (0)

0 (0)

Bixby Rd

Win

ches

ter

Pk

0 (0)

Win

ches

ter

Pk

Brice Rd

13

Access Drive C &

Bixby Rd

RT

Q K

lt

0 (0

)

Bixby Rd

0 (0

)

Acc

ess

Dri

ve C

0 (0)

Overall:

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

Bixby Rd

0 (0)

14Rager Rd &

Bixby Rd

TL

k qtr

Bixby Rd

0 (0

)

0 (0)

Overall:

Rag

er R

d

0 (0)

0 (0

)

0 (0)

0 (0)

Bixby Rd

0 (0)

15

35 4

2

1

6

LEGEND

Site Location

Intersection ID#

Bixby Rd

RT

Q S K

lt

Access Drive D &

0 (0

)

0 (0

)

Bixby Rd

0 (0

)

Acc

ess

Dri

ve D

0 (0)

Overall:

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

Bixby Rd

16

7

US-33 &

Bixby Rd

RQ S K

k s qr

Overall: 0 (0)

Bixby Rd

US-

33

0 (0)

0 (0

)

0 (0

)

0 (0

)

0 (0

)

0 (0

)

0 (0

)

US-

33

0 (0)

Bixby Rd

17

Exhibit 10: Site Trips (Building B - Cars)

Bixby Industrial

NWinchester Pk &

Access Drive A

Q S

k slr

Access Drive A

Win

ches

ter

Pk

0 (0)

2 (8)

7 (2

)

2 (1

)

Win

ches

ter

Pk

0 (0

)

2 (9

)

Overall: 13 (20)

11

Winchester Pk &

Access Drive B

Q S

k slr

Win

ches

ter

Pk

34 (

9)

0 (0

)

6 (23)

Overall:

2 (1

)

2 (8

)

Win

ches

ter

Pk

Access Drive B

2 (9)

46 (50)

12

Winchester Pk &

Bixby Rd/Brice Rd

RTL

Q S K

k s qltr

0 (0

)

4 (1

6)

4 (1

5)

0 (1

)

18 (

4)

0 (0

)

16 (5)

0 (0)

0 (0)

42 (42)Overall:

0 (0)

0 (1)

Bixby Rd

Win

ches

ter

Pk

0 (0)

Win

ches

ter

Pk

Brice Rd

13

Access Drive C &

Bixby Rd

RT

Q K

lt

0 (0

)

Bixby Rd

0 (0

)

Acc

ess

Dri

ve C

0 (1)

Overall:

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (1)

Bixby Rd

0 (2)

14Rager Rd &

Bixby Rd

TL

k qtr

Bixby Rd

0 (0

)

0 (0)

Overall:

Rag

er R

d

0 (1)

0 (0

)

0 (1)

0 (0)

Bixby Rd

0 (2)

15

35 4

2

1

6

LEGEND

Site Location

Intersection ID#

Bixby Rd

RT

Q S K

lt

Access Drive D &

1 (2

)

0 (0

)

Bixby Rd

0 (1

)

Acc

ess

Dri

ve D

0 (0)

Overall:

2 (1)

3 (5)

0 (1)

0 (0)

Bixby Rd

16

7

US-33 &

Bixby Rd

RQ S K

k s qr

Overall: 3 (3)

Bixby Rd

US-

33

0 (0)

0 (0

)

0 (0

)

0 (0

)

0 (0

)

0 (0

)

2 (1

)

US-

33

1 (2)

Bixby Rd

17

Exhibit 11: Site Trips (Building B - Trucks)

Bixby Industrial

NWinchester Pk &

Access Drive A

Q S

k slr

Access Drive A

Win

ches

ter

Pk

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (1

)

0 (0

)

Win

ches

ter

Pk

0 (0

)

0 (1

)

Overall: 0 (2)

11

Winchester Pk &

Access Drive B

Q S

k slr

Win

ches

ter

Pk

3 (4

)

0 (0

)

3 (3)

Overall:

0 (0

)

0 (0

)

Win

ches

ter

Pk

Access Drive B

0 (1)

6 (8)

12

Winchester Pk &

Bixby Rd/Brice Rd

RTL

Q S K

k s qltr

0 (0

)

3 (3

)

0 (0

)

0 (0

)

3 (4

)

0 (0

)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

6 (7)Overall:

0 (0)

0 (0)

Bixby Rd

Win

ches

ter

Pk

0 (0)

Win

ches

ter

Pk

Brice Rd

13

Access Drive C &

Bixby Rd

RT

Q K

lt

0 (0

)

Bixby Rd

0 (0

)

Acc

ess

Dri

ve C

0 (0)

Overall:

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

Bixby Rd

0 (0)

14Rager Rd &

Bixby Rd

TL

k qtr

Bixby Rd

0 (0

)

0 (0)

Overall:

Rag

er R

d

0 (0)

0 (0

)

0 (0)

0 (0)

Bixby Rd

0 (0)

15

35 4

2

1

6

LEGEND

Site Location

Intersection ID#

Bixby Rd

RT

Q S K

lt

Access Drive D &

0 (0

)

0 (0

)

Bixby Rd

0 (0

)

Acc

ess

Dri

ve D

0 (0)

Overall:

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

Bixby Rd

16

7

US-33 &

Bixby Rd

RQ S K

k s qr

Overall: 0 (0)

Bixby Rd

US-

33

0 (0)

0 (0

)

0 (0

)

0 (0

)

0 (0

)

0 (0

)

0 (0

)

US-

33

0 (0)

Bixby Rd

17

Exhibit 12: Site Trips (Building A)

Bixby Industrial

NWinchester Pk &

Access Drive A

Q S

k slr

Overall: 11 (12)

0 (0

)

3 (8

)

0 (0

)

8 (4

)

Win

ches

ter

Pk

Access Drive A

Win

ches

ter

Pk

0 (0)

0 (0)

11

Winchester Pk &

Access Drive B

Q S

k slr

48 (54)

8 (4

)

0 (0

)

Win

ches

ter

Pk

Access Drive B

3 (8)

Win

ches

ter

Pk

26 (

15)

0 (0

)

11 (27)

Overall:

12

Winchester Pk &

Bixby Rd/Brice Rd

RTL

Q S K

k s qltr

79 (79)Overall:

6 (17)

3 (13)

Bixby Rd

Win

ches

ter

Pk

0 (0)

Win

ches

ter

Pk

Brice Rd

14 (

3)

20 (

13)

0 (0

)

6 (2)

19 (4)

0 (0)0 (0

)

9 (2

1)

2 (6

)

13

Access Drive C &

Bixby Rd

RT

Q K

lt

40 (37)

20 (5)

13 (2)

Bixby Rd

2 (11)

Overall:

0 (0)

0 (0

)

Bixby Rd

5 (1

9)

Acc

ess

Dri

ve C

14Rager Rd &

Bixby Rd

TL

k qtr

15 (13)

13 (2)

0 (0)

Bixby Rd

0 (0

)

0 (0)

Overall:

Rag

er R

d

2 (11)

0 (0

)

Bixby Rd

15

35 4

2

1

6

LEGEND

Site Location

Intersection ID#

Bixby Rd

RT

Q S K

lt

29 (26)

13 (2)

0 (0)

Bixby Rd

0 (0)

Overall:

11 (3)

3 (1

0)

0 (0

)

Bixby Rd

2 (1

1)

Acc

ess

Dri

ve D

Access Drive D &16

7

US-33 &

Bixby Rd

RQ S K

k s qr0 (0)

0 (0

)

0 (0

)

0 (0

)

0 (0

)

0 (0

)

11 (3

)

US-

33

3 (10)

Bixby Rd

Overall: 14 (13)

Bixby Rd

US-

33

17

Exhibit 13: Site Trips (Building B)

Bixby Industrial

NWinchester Pk &

Access Drive A

Q S

k slr

Overall: 13 (22)

0 (0

)

2 (1

0)

7 (3

)

2 (1

)

Win

ches

ter

Pk

Access Drive A

Win

ches

ter

Pk

0 (0)

2 (8)

11

Winchester Pk &

Access Drive B

Q S

k slr

52 (58)

2 (1

)

2 (8

)

Win

ches

ter

Pk

Access Drive B

2 (10)

Win

ches

ter

Pk

37 (

13)

0 (0

)

9 (26)

Overall:

12

Winchester Pk &

Bixby Rd/Brice Rd

RTL

Q S K

k s qltr

48 (49)Overall:

0 (0)

0 (1)

Bixby Rd

Win

ches

ter

Pk

0 (0)

Win

ches

ter

Pk

Brice Rd

0 (1

)

21 (

8)

0 (0

)

16 (5)

0 (0)

0 (0)0 (0

)

7 (1

9)

4 (1

5)

13

Access Drive C &

Bixby Rd

RT

Q K

lt

0 (2)

0 (0)

0 (1)

Bixby Rd

0 (1)

Overall:

0 (0)

0 (0

)

Bixby Rd

0 (0

)

Acc

ess

Dri

ve C

14Rager Rd &

Bixby Rd

TL

k qtr

0 (2)

0 (1)

0 (0)

Bixby Rd

0 (0

)

0 (0)

Overall:

Rag

er R

d

0 (1)

0 (0

)

Bixby Rd

15

35 4

2

1

6

LEGEND

Site Location

Intersection ID#

Bixby Rd

RT

Q S K

lt

3 (5)

0 (1)

0 (0)

Bixby Rd

0 (0)

Overall:

2 (1)

1 (2

)

0 (0

)

Bixby Rd

0 (1

)

Acc

ess

Dri

ve D

Access Drive D &16

7

US-33 &

Bixby Rd

RQ S K

k s qr0 (0)

0 (0

)

0 (0

)

0 (0

)

0 (0

)

0 (0

)

2 (1

)

US-

33

1 (2)

Bixby Rd

Overall: 3 (3)

Bixby Rd

US-

33

17

Exhibit 14: Site Trips (Total)

Bixby Industrial

NWinchester Pk &

Access Drive A

Q S

k slr

Access Drive A

Win

ches

ter

Pk

0 (0)

2 (8)

7 (3

)

10 (

5)

Win

ches

ter

Pk

0 (0

)

5 (1

8)

Overall: 24 (34)

11

Winchester Pk &

Access Drive B

Q S

k slr

Win

ches

ter

Pk

63 (

28)

0 (0

)

20 (53)

Overall:

10 (

5)

2 (8

)

Win

ches

ter

Pk

Access Drive B

5 (18)

100 (112)

12

Winchester Pk &

Bixby Rd/Brice Rd

RTL

Q S K

k s qltr

0 (0

)

16 (

40)

6 (2

1)

14 (

4)

41 (

21)

0 (0

)

22 (7)

19 (4)

0 (0)

125 (128)Overall:

4 (17)

3 (14)

Bixby Rd

Win

ches

ter

Pk

0 (0)

Win

ches

ter

Pk

Brice Rd

13

Access Drive C &

Bixby Rd

RT

Q K

lt

0 (0

)

Bixby Rd

5 (1

9)

Acc

ess

Dri

ve C

2 (12)

Overall:

0 (0)

20 (5)

13 (3)

Bixby Rd

40 (39)

14Rager Rd &

Bixby Rd

TL

k qtr

Bixby Rd

0 (0

)

0 (0)

Overall:

Rag

er R

d

2 (12)

0 (0

)

13 (3)

0 (0)

Bixby Rd

15 (15)

15

35 4

2

1

6

LEGEND

Site Location

Intersection ID#

Bixby Rd

RT

Q S K

lt

Access Drive D &

4 (1

2)

0 (0

)

Bixby Rd

2 (1

2)

Acc

ess

Dri

ve D

0 (0)

Overall:

13 (4)

32 (31)

13 (3)

0 (0)

Bixby Rd

16

7

US-33 &

Bixby Rd

RQ S K

k s qr

Overall: 17 (16)

Bixby Rd

US-

33

0 (0)

0 (0

)

0 (0

)

0 (0

)

0 (0

)

0 (0

)

13 (4

)

US-

33

4 (12)

Bixby Rd

17

Exhibit 15: 2022 Build

Bixby Industrial

NWinchester Pk &

Access Drive A

Q S

k slr

Access Drive A

Win

ches

ter

Pk

0 (0)

2 (8)

7 (3

)

195

(714

)

Win

ches

ter

Pk

0 (0

)

471

(428

)

Overall: 675 (1153)

11

Winchester Pk &

Access Drive B

Q S

k slr

Win

ches

ter

Pk

63 (

28)

466

(410

)

20 (53)

Overall:

10 (

5)

187

(717

)

Win

ches

ter

Pk

Access Drive B

5 (18)

751 (1231)

12

Winchester Pk &

Bixby Rd/Brice Rd

RTL

Q S K

k s qltr

23 (

10)

161

(644

)

23 (

116)

126

(59)

412

(345

)

60 (

195)

102 (51)

200 (98)

152 (187)

1363 (2098)Overall:

48 (190)

41 (161)

Bixby Rd

Win

ches

ter

Pk

15 (42)

Win

ches

ter

Pk

Brice Rd

13

Access Drive C &

Bixby Rd

RT

Q K

lt

0 (0

)

Bixby Rd

5 (1

9)

Acc

ess

Dri

ve C

73 (308)

Overall:

0 (0)

20 (5)

256 (121)

Bixby Rd

354 (453)

14Rager Rd &

Bixby Rd

TL

k qtr

Bixby Rd

2 (8

)

2 (5)

Overall:

Rag

er R

d

66 (275)

6 (4

)

220 (100)

3 (3)

Bixby Rd

305 (395)

15

35 4

2

1

6

LEGEND

Site Location

Intersection ID#

Bixby Rd

RT

Q S K

lt

Access Drive D &

4 (1

2)

0 (0

)

Bixby Rd

2 (1

2)

Acc

ess

Dri

ve D

58 (253)

Overall:

13 (4)

294 (388)

13 (3)

204 (104)

Bixby Rd

16

7

US-33 &

Bixby Rd

RQ S K

k s qr

Overall: 5575 (6284)

Bixby Rd

US-

33

31 (57)

60 (2

9)

3680

(18

81)

1 (1

3)

14 (2

9)

1588

(40

18)

62 (1

70) U

S-33

139 (87)

Bixby Rd

17

Exhibit 16: 2032 Build

Bixby Industrial

NWinchester Pk &

Access Drive A

Q S

k slr

Access Drive A

Win

ches

ter

Pk

0 (0)

2 (8)

7 (3

)

205

(780

)

Win

ches

ter

Pk

0 (0

)

521

(462

)

Overall: 735 (1253)

11

Winchester Pk &

Access Drive B

Q S

k slr

Win

ches

ter

Pk

63 (

28)

516

(444

)

20 (53)

Overall:

10 (

5)

197

(783

)

Win

ches

ter

Pk

Access Drive B

5 (18)

811 (1331)

12

Winchester Pk &

Bixby Rd/Brice Rd

RTL

Q S K

k s qltr

23 (

10)

170

(700

)

24 (

126)

128

(61)

444

(369

)

65 (

212)

120 (61)

217 (107)

177 (223)

1474 (2273)Overall:

49 (196)

42 (166)

Bixby Rd

Win

ches

ter

Pk

15 (42)

Win

ches

ter

Pk

Brice Rd

13

Access Drive C &

Bixby Rd

RT

Q K

lt

0 (0

)

Bixby Rd

5 (1

9)

Acc

ess

Dri

ve C

74 (322)

Overall:

0 (0)

20 (5)

261 (120)

Bixby Rd

360 (466)

14Rager Rd &

Bixby Rd

TL

k qtr

Bixby Rd

2 (1

0)

4 (5)

Overall:

Rag

er R

d

72 (312)

6 (5

)

258 (117)

3 (3)

Bixby Rd

302 (414)

15

35 4

2

1

6

LEGEND

Site Location

Intersection ID#

Bixby Rd

RT

Q S K

lt

Access Drive D &

4 (1

2)

0 (0

)

Bixby Rd

2 (1

2)

Acc

ess

Dri

ve D

61 (265)

Overall:

13 (4)

302 (400)

13 (3)

209 (104)

Bixby Rd

16

7

US-33 &

Bixby Rd

RQ S K

k s qr

Overall: 6356 (7167)

Bixby Rd

US-

33

34 (62)

68 (3

3)

4209

(21

51)

1 (1

4)

16 (3

3)

1816

(45

95)

64 (1

87) U

S-33

148 (92)

Bixby Rd

17


ANALYSIS

This section of the report provides an overview of capacity analysis for the traffic volumes and turn-lane

analysis for the study intersections and identifies recommended transportation improvements to

accommodate the proposed development.

Capacity Analysis A capacity analysis was performed to quantify the delay and level of service at the study intersections

during the weekday AM and PM peak hours. Synchro software was utilized to evaluate capacity of the

proposed study intersections (reported overall and by approach) for the peak hour of site generated

traffic.

The capacity of an intersection quantifies its ability to accommodate traffic volumes and is measured in

average delay per vehicle. It is expressed in terms of level of service (LOS) which ranges from A to F,

with LOS A as the highest (best traffic flow and least delay), LOS E as saturated or at-capacity conditions,

and LOS F as the lowest (oversaturated conditions). The LOS grades shown below, which are provided in

the Transportation Research Board’s Highway Capacity Manual, quantify and categorize the driver’s

discomfort, frustration, fuel consumption, and travel times experienced as a result of intersection control

and the resulting traffic queuing. A detailed description of each LOS rating can be found in Table 5. The

range of control delay for each rating (as detailed in the HCM) is shown in Table 6. Because signalized

intersections are expected to carry a larger volume of vehicles and stopping is required during red

signals, higher delays are tolerated for the corresponding LOS ratings. For unsignalized stop

intersections, the intersection LOS is reported as the worst side street movement.

Traffic models for the following scenarios were developed using Synchro/SimTraffic, and the capacity

analysis (delay and LOS) was evaluated for each scenario. The scenarios that were analyzed are as

follows:

• 2022 (Opening Year) No-Build

• 2032 (Horizon Year) No-Build

• 2022 (Opening Year) Build

• 2032 (Horizon Year) Build

• 2022 (Opening Year) Mitigated No-Build

• 2032 (Horizon Year) Mitigated No-Build

• 2022 (Opening Year) Mitigated Build

• 2032 (Horizon Year) Mitigated Build


Table 5: Level of Service Grading Descriptions

Level of Service Description

A Minimal control delay; traffic operates at primarily free-flow conditions; unimpeded movement within

traffic stream.

B Minor control delay at signalized intersections; traffic operates at a fairly unimpeded level with slightly

restricted movement within traffic stream.

C Moderate control delay; movement within traffic stream more restricted than at LOS B; formation of

queues contributes to lower average travel speeds.

D Considerable control delay that may be substantially increased by small increases in flow; average

travel speeds continue to decrease.

E High control delay; average travel speed no more than 33 percent of free flow speed.

F Extremely high control delay; extensive queuing and high volumes create exceedingly restricted traffic

flow. 1Highway Capacity Manual 2010

Table 6: Level of Service Grading Criteria

Level of Service Average Control Delay (s/veh) at:

Unsignalized Intersections Signalized Intersections

A 0 – 10 0 – 10

B > 10 – 15 > 10 – 20

C > 15 – 25 > 20 – 35

D > 25 – 35 > 35 – 55

E > 35 – 50 > 55 – 80

F2 > 50 > 80 1Highway Capacity Manual 2010 2All movements with a Volume to Capacity (v/C) ratio greater than 1 receive a rating of LOS F.

The ODOT OATS Manual defines operational goals for intersection inside and outside of an MPO.

Additionally, the Franklin County Engineer’s Office designates supplemental operational goals for study

intersections. The study area is inside of Franklin County; therefore, a combination of Franklin County

and ODOT operational Goals were assumed. Table 7 outlines the LOS criteria for intersections which

were assumed in this study.


Table 7: Operational Goals of Intersections

Result Inside an MPO Outside of an MPO

Intersection LOS C or better 1 C of better

Approach LOS D or better2

Movement LOS D or better3

v/c All movements < 1.0 with < 0.93 preferred.

QSR All movements < 1.0 from HCS analysis, otherwise TransModeler may be needed to determine if queuing impacts upstream intersections.

v/c = Volume-To-Capacity Ratio, QSR = Queue-Storage Ratio 1Intersection LOS goal is LOS C or better as defined by the Franklin County Engineers Office. 2Approach LOS goal is LOS D or better as defined by the Franklin County Engineers Office. 3Movement LOS goal is LOS D or better as defined by the Franklin County Engineers Office.

No-Build Condition Capacity Analysis The capacity analysis for the study intersections were completed for the 2022 and 2032 No-Build

conditions and the results are summarized in Tables 8-9. The No-Build capacity analysis assumed the

existing geometry at all study intersections. With the following exceptions, all approaches and

intersections operated at an acceptable LOS, during No Build (2022 and 2032) peak hour conditions. The

Synchro capacity analysis reports are included in the Appendix.


o Eastbound approach during the 2022 (PM) and 2032 (PM)

o Westbound approach during the 2022 (AM and PM) and 2032 (AM and PM)

o Southbound approach during the 2022 (AM and PM) and 2032 (AM and PM)

o Northbound approach during the 2022 (PM) and 2032 (PM)


o Southbound approach during the 2032 (PM)

Mitigation measures including a minimum of modified signal timings, and an eastbound right turn lane on

Bixby Road at the Winchester Pike and Bixby Road/Brice Road intersection should be considered to

mitigate the operational impact of the 2022 and 2032 background traffic growth, within the study limits.

Build Condition Capacity Analysis The capacity analysis for the study intersections were completed for the 2022 Build (Opening Year) and

2032 Build (Design Year) are summarized in Tables 8-9. These scenarios assumed no additional

geometric changes to the roadway network, except for the addition of four entrances to the proposed site.

With the following exceptions, all approaches and intersections operated at an acceptable LOS, during

Build (2022 and 2032) peak hour conditions. The Synchro capacity analysis reports are included in the

Appendix.


o Eastbound approach during the 2022 (PM) and 2032 (PM)

o Westbound approach during the 2022 (AM and PM) and 2032 (AM and PM)

o Southbound approach during the 2022 (AM and PM) and 2032 (AM and PM)

o Northbound approach during the 2022 (PM) and 2032 (PM)


o Southbound approach during the 2022 (PM) and 2032 (PM)


Mitigation measures including a minimum of modified signal timings, and eastbound right turn lane on

Bixby Road at the Winchester Pike and Bixby Road/Brice Road intersection should be considered to

mitigate the operational impact of the 2022 and 2032 background traffic growth, within the study limits.

Table 8: Weekday AM Peak Hour - Study Intersections Capacity Analysis


Table 9: Weekday PM Peak Hour - Study Intersections Capacity Analysis


No-Build Mitigated Condition Capacity Analysis No Build Mitigated analysis were used to determine the operational benefits of potential mitigation

measures to offset the background traffic growth.

The No Build Mitigated conditions included the following roadway improvements:

2022 No-Build:

• Modified traffic signal timing at the Winchester Pike and Bixby Road/Brice Road intersection

2032 No-Build:


• Eastbound right turn lane on Bixby Road at the Winchester Pike and Bixby Road/Brice Road

intersection

Analysis consisted of testing additional turn lanes on multiple approaches to add capacity and optimizing

the signal timing cycle length and splits. For the Winchester Pike and Bixby Road/Brice Road intersection

to operate with an acceptable level of service during the 2032 No Build Mitigated condition, an eastbound

right-turn lane on Bixby Road is warranted. Table 10 summarizes the operational results of the No Build

Mitigated conditions. All approaches and intersection operated at an acceptable LOS.

Build Mitigated Condition Capacity Analysis No Build Mitigated analysis were used to determine the operational benefits of potential mitigation

measures to offset the impact of the increased traffic attributed to the proposed development, background

traffic growth, and off-site development.

The mitigated conditions included the following roadway improvements:

2022 Build:



intersection

• Northbound left turn lane on Winchester Pike at the Winchester Pike and Access B intersection

2032 Build:



intersection

• Northbound left turn lane on Winchester Pike at the Winchester Pike and Access B intersection

Analysis consisted of testing additional turn lanes on multiple approaches to add capacity and optimizing

the signal timing cycle length and splits. For the Winchester Pike and Bixby Road/Brice Road intersection

to operate with an acceptable level of service during the 2022 and 2032 Build Mitigated condition, an

eastbound right-turn lane on Bixby Road is warranted. Table 10 summarizes the operational results of the

No Build Mitigated conditions. All approaches and intersection operated at an acceptable LOS.

Synchro 11 was used to analyze an additional southbound thru lane on Winchester Pike at the

Winchester Pike and Bixby/Brice Road intersection as a mitigation measure. The intersection and all


approaches operated at an acceptable LOS during the 2022 and 2032 Build peak hour conditions. The

Synchro 11 reports are included in the Appendix.

Table 10: Weekday Peak Hour Mitigated Conditions- Study Intersections Capacity Analysis

Additional Mitigated Condition Capacity Analysis The Franklin County Engineer’s Office requested an evaluation of the addition of a second southbound

through lane on Winchester Pike at the Winchester Pike and Bixby Road/Brice Road intersection.

Capacity analysis of such an improvement was completed and are provided in Table 11. To achieve

utilization of the second through lane requires that the lane extends approximately 600 feet south of the

intersection before merging into the other southbound lane.

Table 11: Additional Peak Hour Mitigated Conditions- Study Intersections Capacity Analysis

Site Contribution to Mitigated Conditions As part of their review, Franklin County Engineer’s Office requested the percentage of the site traffic

compared to the total traffic be provided for the intersections of Winchester Pike and Bixby Road/Brice

Road and the Winchester Pike and Gender Road intersections. The site and total entering volumes at the

intersections for the 2032 Build condition are shown in Table 12.


Table 12: Site Contribution to Peak Hour Mitigated Conditions

Winchester Pike and Gender Road Intersection Totals taken from Canal Crossing Phase 2 Traffic Impact Study (December 21, 2021)

Turn-Lane Warrant Analysis The ODOT Location and Design Manual was used to determine if turn-lanes were warranted at the study intersections. A turn-lane analysis was performed at Winchester Pike and Bixby Road/Brice Road, Winchester Pike and Access A, Winchester Pike and Access B, Bixby Road and Access C and the Bixby Road and Access D intersections. Table 11 provides a summary of the turn-lane warrant analysis and calculated storage length per ODOT location and Design Manual Standards. A copy of the turn-lane analysis and turn-lane length calculations are provided in the Appendix.

Table 13: Turn Lane Warrant Analysis and Length Summary

Intersection Movement EX. Length (ft) Warranted Turn Lane Length (ft)

2032 No-Build 2032 Build

Winchester Pike and Bixby Road/Brice Road

NBRT 100 490/550 490/575

NBLT 500 340/550 365/575

SBRT 195 285/800 285/850

SBLT 310 340/800 365/850

EBRT - 3202 3252

EBLT 300 3003 3003

WBRT - - -

WBLT 375 3504 3754

Winchester Pike and Access A SBRT - - -

NBLT - - -

Winchester Pike and Access B SBRT - - -

NBLT - - 2852

Bixby Road and Access C WBRT - - -

EBLT - - -

Bixby Road and Access D WBRT - - -

EBLT - - -

2 See Mitigated Condition Calculated Turn Lane Length / Thru Movement Backup Length

3 Length is limited by the adjacent left turn lane to Olde Bixby Road 4 Length is limited by the location of Sandflow Road

128 2273 5.6

1.1

2032 PM Build

Total Site Trips Total Intersection Volume

Winchester Pike and

Gender Road

Total

Contribution (%)

Winchester Pike and

Bixby/Brice Road

49 4439

Intersection


CONCLUSIONS

Based on an evaluation of traffic conditions at the study intersections, the addition of site generated traffic from the development anticipated to be complete by the year 2022 is not expected to significantly impact traffic operations compared to the No-Build condition.

The analysis of study intersections with the addition of site generated traffic and anticipated off-site traffic expected to be completed by 2032 is expected to moderately impact traffic operation compared to the 2032 No Build condition.

The following improvements are recommended based on the analysis of this study. Improvements recommended during “No Build conditions” represent improvements which are warranted based on background traffic growth. Improvements recommended during “2022 Build conditions” represent items which were warranted based on the addition of site-generated trips. Improvements recommended during “2032 Build conditions” represent items which were warranted based on the addition of site-generated trips.

2022 No-Build:

• Traffic signal timing at the Winchester Pike and Bixby Road/Brice Road intersection should be modified

2022 Build: • Traffic signal timing at the Winchester Pike and Bixby Road/Brice Road intersection should be

modified • Add an eastbound right turn lane on Bixby Road at the Winchester Pike and Bixby Road/Brice

Road intersection. Trips from the proposed site represent less than 9 percent of this this right turn volume (14 of 161) and less than 6 percent of the overall volume at this intersection.

• Construct a 285-foot northbound left turn lane on Winchester Pike at the Winchester Pike and Access B intersection

2032 No-Build: • Traffic signal timing at the Winchester Pike and Bixby Road/Brice Road intersection should be

modified • Construct a 320-foot eastbound right turn lane on Bixby Road at the Winchester Pike and Bixby

Road/Brice Road intersection • Construct a 285-foot northbound left turn lane on Winchester Pike at the Winchester Pike and

Access B intersection

2032 Build: • Traffic signal timing at the Winchester Pike and Bixby Road/Brice Road intersection should be

modified

627,

200

Acces

s A

Acces

s B

Access C

Access D

BU

ILD

ING

A

BU

ILD

ING

B

File

Nam

e: w

inch

este

r_pi

ke_&

_bix

by_r

d_br

ice_

rd_6

7012

3_06

-18-

2019

Site

Cod

e:

Star

t Dat

e: 6

/18/

2019

Page

No

: 1

Gro

ups

Prin

ted-

Car

s - T

ruck

s - P

edes

tria

nsB

rice

Rd

Sout

hbou

ndW

inch

este

r Pik

eW

estb

ound

Bix

by R

dN

orth

boun

dW

inch

este

r Pik

eEa

stbo

und

Star

t Tim

eLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Nor

th

Cro

ssw

alk

App.

Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

East

Cro

ssw

alk

App.

Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Sout

h

Cro

ssw

alk

App.

Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Wes

t

Cro

ssw

alk

App.

Tot

alIn

t. To

tal

07:0

0 AM

2112

170

5010

7312

095

10

30

43

120

015

164

07:1

5 AM

2121

240

665

714

080

02

20

45

210

026

176

07:3

0 AM

3216

210

691

617

069

05

30

84

210

025

171

07:4

5 AM

2923

130

653

6417

084

13

10

54

210

025

179

Tota

l10

372

750

250

1926

940

032

82

109

021

1675

00

9169

0

08:0

0 AM

1716

100

439

5015

074

03

00

32

230

025

145

08:1

5 AM

1213

170

428

5217

077

03

00

32

230

025

147

08:3

0 AM

1822

130

534

2511

040

11

00

22

330

035

130

08:4

5 AM

217

50

332

2911

042

04

10

54

322

038

118

Tota

l68

5845

017

123

156

540

233

111

10

1310

111

20

123

540

04:0

0 PM

345

40

433

4826

077

017

140

318

118

10

127

278

04:1

5 PM

2611

80

454

4740

091

18

170

2611

121

00

132

294

04:3

0 PM

338

90

500

3125

056

19

70

1724

117

00

141

264

04:4

5 PM

396

70

522

5132

085

013

100

2318

114

00

132

292

Tota

l13

230

280

190

917

712

30

309

247

480

9761

470

10

532

1128

05:0

0 PM

418

160

655

4647

098

020

170

3716

134

00

150

350

05:1

5 PM

3213

110

563

5639

098

116

170

3430

143

00

173

361

05:3

0 PM

3811

70

562

4723

072

117

120

3028

122

00

150

308

05:4

5 PM

326

90

470

4340

083

217

150

3413

961

011

027

4To

tal

143

3843

022

410

192

149

035

14

7061

013

587

495

10

583

1293

Gra

nd T

otal

446

198

191

083

561

794

366

012

219

138

119

026

617

411

514

013

2936

51Ap

prch

%53

.423

.722

.90

5

6530

0

3.4

51.9

44.7

0

13.1

86.6

0.3

0

Tota

l %12

.25.

45.

20

22.9

1.7

21.7

100

33.4

0.2

3.8

3.3

07.

34.

831

.50.

10

36.4

Car

s44

119

619

00

827

6178

436

50

1210

913

711

90

265

172

1138

40

1314

3616

% C

ars

98.9

9999

.50

9910

098

.799

.70

99.1

100

99.3

100

099

.698

.998

.910

00

98.9

99Tr

ucks

52

10

80

101

011

01

00

12

130

015

35%

Tru

cks

1.1

10.

50

10

1.3

0.3

00.

90

0.7

00

0.4

1.1

1.1

00

1.1

1Pe

dest

rians

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0%

Ped

estri

ans

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0

Smar

t Ser

vice

s, In

c.88

Wes

t Chu

rch

Stre

etN

ewar

k, O

H 4

3055

(740

) 345

-470

0

File

Nam

e: w

inch

este

r_pi

ke_&

_bix

by_r

d_br

ice_

rd_6

7012

3_06

-18-

2019

Site

Cod

e:

Star

t Dat

e: 6

/18/

2019

Page

No

: 2

Bric

e R

dSo

uthb

ound

Win

ches

ter P

ike

Wes

tbou

ndB

ixby

Rd

Nor

thbo

und

Win

ches

ter P

ike

East

boun

dSt

art T

ime

Left

Thru

Rig

htN

orth

Cro

ssw

alk

App.

Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

East

Cro

ssw

alk

App.

Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Sout

h

Cro

ssw

alk

App.

Tot

alLe

ftTh

ruR

ight

Wes

t

Cro

ssw

alk

App.

Tot

alIn

t. To

tal

Peak

Hou

r Ana

lysi

s Fr

om 0

7:00

AM

to 1

1:45

AM

- Pe

ak 1

of 1

Peak

Hou

r for

Ent

ire In

ters

ectio

n Be

gins

at 0

7:00

AM

07:0

0 AM

2112

170

5010

7312

095

10

30

43

120

015

164

07:1

5 AM

2121

240

665

714

080

02

20

45

210

026

176

07:3

0 AM

3216

210

691

617

069

05

30

84

210

025

171

07:4

5 AM

2923

130

653

6417

084

13

10

54

210

025

179

Tota

l Vol

ume

103

7275

025

019

269

400

328

210

90

2116

750

091

690

% A

pp. T

otal

41.2

28.8

300

5.8

8212

.20

9.5

47.6

42.9

017

.682

.40

0PH

F.8

05.7

83.7

81.0

00.9

06.4

75.9

21.5

88.0

00.8

63.5

00.5

00.7

50.0

00.6

56.8

00.8

93.0

00.0

00.8

75.9

64C

ars

102

7275

024

919

266

400

325

210

90

2116

740

090

685

% C

ars

99.0

100

100

099

.610

098

.910

00

99.1

100

100

100

010

010

098

.70

098

.999

.3Tr

ucks

10

00

10

30

03

00

00

00

10

01

5%

Tru

cks

1.0

00

00.

40

1.1

00

0.9

00

00

00

1.3

00

1.1

0.7

Pede

stria

ns0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

% P

edes

trian

s0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

Peak

Hou

r Ana

lysi

s Fr

om 1

2:00

PM

to 0

5:45

PM

- Pe

ak 1

of 1

Peak

Hou

r for

Ent

ire In

ters

ectio

n Be

gins

at 0

4:45

PM

04:4

5 PM

396

70

522

5132

085

013

100

2318

114

00

132

292

05:0

0 PM

418

160

655

4647

098

020

170

3716

134

00

150

350

05:1

5 PM

3213

110

563

5639

098

116

170

3430

143

00

173

361

05:3

0 PM

3811

70

562

4723

072

117

120

3028

122

00

150

308

Tota

l Vol

ume

150

3841

022

912

200

141

035

32

6656

012

492

513

00

605

1311

% A

pp. T

otal

65.5

16.6

17.9

03.

456

.739

.90

1.6

53.2

45.2

015

.284

.80

0PH

F.9

15.7

31.6

41.0

00.8

81.6

00.8

93.7

50.0

00.9

01.5

00.8

25.8

24.0

00.8

38.7

67.8

97.0

00.0

00.8

74.9

08C

ars

149

3741

022

712

198

141

035

12

6656

012

492

510

00

602

1304

% C

ars

99.3

97.4

100

099

.110

099

.010

00

99.4

100

100

100

010

010

099

.40

099

.599

.5Tr

ucks

11

00

20

20

02

00

00

00

30

03

7%

Tru

cks

0.7

2.6

00

0.9

01.

00

00.

60

00

00

00.

60

00.

50.

5Pe

dest

rians

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0%

Ped

estri

ans

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0

Smar

t Ser

vice

s, In

c.88

Wes

t Chu

rch

Stre

etN

ewar

k, O

H 4

3055

(740

) 345

-470

0

File

Nam

e: B

ixby

_Rd_

&_R

ager

_Rd_

6701

33_0

6-18

-201

9Si

te C

ode

: St

art D

ate

: 6/1

8/20

19Pa

ge N

o: 1

Gro

ups

Prin

ted-

Car

s - T

ruck

sB

ixby

Rd

Wes

tbou

ndR

ager

Rd

Nor

thbo

und

Bix

by R

dEa

stbo

und

Star

t Tim

eLe

ftTh

ruAp

p. T

otal

Left

Rig

htAp

p. T

otal

Thru

Rig

htAp

p. T

otal

Int.

Tota

l07

:00

AM2

2123

00

03

03

2607

:15

AM1

2526

00

04

04

3007

:30

AM1

1617

00

08

08

2507

:45

AM0

2222

01

13

03

26To

tal

484

880

11

180

1810

7

08:0

0 AM

126

270

11

30

331

08:1

5 AM

120

210

00

30

324

08:3

0 AM

026

260

00

20

228

08:4

5 AM

010

100

11

40

415

Tota

l2

8284

02

212

012

98

04:0

0 PM

010

100

00

300

3040

04:1

5 PM

015

150

22

230

2340

04:3

0 PM

07

70

33

140

1424

04:4

5 PM

26

80

11

220

2231

Tota

l2

3840

06

689

089

135

05:0

0 PM

013

130

33

320

3248

05:1

5 PM

314

170

11

340

3452

05:3

0 PM

013

131

34

270

2744

05:4

5 PM

04

41

01

330

3338

Tota

l3

4447

27

912

60

126

182

Gra

nd T

otal

1124

825

92

1618

245

024

552

2Ap

prch

%4.

295

.811

.188

.910

00

Tota

l %2.

147

.549

.60.

43.

13.

446

.90

46.9

Car

s11

246

257

215

1724

40

244

518

% C

ars

100

99.2

99.2

100

93.8

94.4

99.6

099

.699

.2Tr

ucks

02

20

11

10

14

% T

ruck

s0

0.8

0.8

06.

25.

60.

40

0.4

0.8

Smar

t Ser

vice

s, In

c.88

W. C

hurc

h St

reet

New

ark,

OH

430

55(7

40) 3

45-4

700

File

Nam

e: B

ixby

_Rd_

&_R

ager

_Rd_

6701

33_0

6-18

-201

9Si

te C

ode

: St

art D

ate

: 6/1

8/20

19Pa

ge N

o: 2

Bix

by R

dW

estb

ound

Rag

er R

dN

orth

boun

dB

ixby

Rd

East

boun

dSt

art T

ime

Left

Thru

App.

Tot

alLe

ftR

ight

App.

Tot

alTh

ruR

ight

App.

Tot

alIn

t. To

tal

Peak

Hou

r Ana

lysi

s Fr

om 0

7:00

AM

to 1

1:45

AM

- Pe

ak 1

of 1

Peak

Hou

r for

Ent

ire In

ters

ectio

n Be

gins

at 0

7:15

AM

07:1

5 AM

125

260

00

40

430

07:3

0 AM

116

170

00

80

825

07:4

5 AM

022

220

11

30

326

08:0

0 AM

126

270

11

30

331

Tota

l Vol

ume

389

920

22

180

1811

2%

App

. Tot

al3.

396

.70

100

100

0PH

F.7

50.8

56.8

52.0

00.5

00.5

00.5

63.0

00.5

63.9

03C

ars

389

920

22

180

1811

2%

Car

s10

010

010

00

100

100

100

010

010

0Tr

ucks

00

00

00

00

00

% T

ruck

s0

00

00

00

00

0

Peak

Hou

r Ana

lysi

s Fr

om 1

2:00

PM

to 0

5:45

PM

- Pe

ak 1

of 1

Peak

Hou

r for

Ent

ire In

ters

ectio

n Be

gins

at 0

5:00

PM

05:0

0 PM

013

130

33

320

3248

05:1

5 PM

314

170

11

340

3452

05:3

0 PM

013

131

34

270

2744

05:4

5 PM

04

41

01

330

3338

Tota

l Vol

ume

344

472

79

126

012

618

2%

App

. Tot

al6.

493

.622

.277

.810

00

PHF

.250

.786

.691

.500

.583

.563

.926

.000

.926

.875

Car

s3

4346

27

912

50

125

180

% C

ars

100

97.7

97.9

100

100

100

99.2

099

.298

.9Tr

ucks

01

10

00

10

12

% T

ruck

s0

2.3

2.1

00

00.

80

0.8

1.1

Smar

t Ser

vice

s, In

c.88

W. C

hurc

h St

reet

New

ark,

OH

430

55(7

40) 3

45-4

700

CANAL CROSSING PHASE 2 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY

DECEMBER 21, 2021

2022 Background Traffic Volumes

4.0 TRAFFIC VOLUME PROJECTIONS

FIGURE 4A


DECEMBER 21, 2021

2032 Background Traffic Volumes


FIGURE 4B


DECEMBER 21, 2021

2022 No-Build Traffic Volumes


FIGURE 4D


DECEMBER 21, 2021

2032 No-Build Traffic Volumes


FIGURE 4E


DECEMBER 21, 2021

2022 Build Traffic Volumes


FIGURE 4K


DECEMBER 21, 2021

2032 Build Traffic Volumes


FIGURE 4L

LOCATION: Winchester Pike & Bixby-Brice

DATE: 11-19-20 LOCATION: sig#4940 (2019-21)

TYPE OF CONTROLLER: RECORDED BY: WJB

***Winchester Pike is designated as the N-S direction***

Phase: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NOTES MOVEMENT: NB LT SB EB LT WB SB LT NB WB LT EB

MIN GREEN 5 15 5 8 5 15 5 8

VEH EXT (Initial Gap) 3.0 8.0 3.0 6.0 3.0 8.0 3.0 6.0

MAX 1 (Free-Op) 20 40 20 40 20 40 25 50

VEH CLEAR 3.0 5.1 3.0 4.7 3.0 5.1 3.0 4.7 RED CLEAR 0.5 1.0 0.5 1.0 0.5 1.0 0.5 1.0

Time Before Reduction 5 10 5 6 5 10 5 6

Time to Reduce 10 15 10 8 10 15 10 8 Min Gap 1.0 3.0 1.0 3.0 1.0 3.0 1.0 3.0

WALK - 7 - 7 - 7 - 7 FDW - 20 - 23 - 20 - 23

RECALL - Min - - - Min - -

MEMORY NL NL NL NL NL NL NL NL DETECTORS

All Detectors in Presence Mode Set Detector Delay & Extension times on controller Y+AR interval begins at the end of the FDW Simultaneous Gap: Off

Det #

Loop # Ph Lane Dist. from

S.B. / Size AMP x CH

Mode / Delay Ext.

Det #

Loop # Ph Lane Dist. from

S.B. / Size AMP x CH

Mode / Delay Ext.

1 1 1 NB Lt 50’/ 6x20 1 x 1 5 sec 13 13 7 WB Lt 50’/ 6x20 4 x 1 5 sec 2 2 6 NB Th Near 150’/ 6x6 1 x 2 14 14 4 WB Lt (S.B.) 0’/ 6x20 4 x 2 Call 0.1 3 3 6 NB Th Far 400’/ 6x6 1 x 3 15 16 4 WB Th Near 100’/ 6x6 4 x 3 4 4 4 WB Th (S.B.) 0’/ 6x20 1 x 4 Call 0.1 16 17 4 WB Th Far 350’/ 6x6 4 x 4 5 5 5 SB Lt 50’/ 6x20 2 x 1 5 sec 6 6 2 SB Th Near 150’/ 6x6 2 x 2 7 7 2 SB Th Far 400’/ 6x6 2 x 3 8 9 8 EB Th (S.B.) 0’/ 6x20 2 x 4 Call 0.1 9 10 3 EB Lt 50’/ 6x20 3 x 1 5 sec

10 8 8 EB Lt (S.B.) 0’/ 6x20 3 x 2 Call 0.1 11 11 8 EB Th Near 100’/ 6x6 3 x 3 12 12 8 EB Th Far 350’/ 6x6 3 x 4

REVIEW

AGENCY

# COMMENT ACTION

Canal 1 Exhibit 1: Add information to this exhibit which labels which access drive is

which, A – D, and add intersection numbers to the list of the study area

intersections on page 6.

Access Drives (A,B,C,D) are labeled on Exhibit 1.

Canal 2 Study Area: Add the intersections of Bixby Road/Rager Road, and

Winchester Pike/Gender Road to the study area for consistency with multi-

jurisdictional efforts to evaluate the impact of several proposed

development sites in this area. Reference traffic counts from the Canal

Crossing Phase 2 Traffic Impact Study, dated December 21, 2021. The

Winchester Pike/Gender Road intersection is within the City of Columbus,

and they will need included in reviews moving forward.

Volumes/analysis for the Bixby/Rager intersection have

been included as part of the study update. For the

Winchester Pike & Gender Road intersection the study

update includes a % of the Stotan site traffic at this

intersection.

Canal 3 Traffic Counts: Upon the second submittal of the Canal Crossing Phase 2,

FCEO allowed the study to use the traffic count at the intersection of

Winchester Pike/Bixby Road/Brice Road performed by Smart Services in

June 2019. Please review with FCEO but we recommend using the 2019

count instead of the 2017 count data that was previously furnished by

FCEO in order to promote consistency between these studies. Update

traffic volumes accordingly.

The study update includes a revision of the volumes at

this intersection using the June 2019 counts

Canal 4 Traffic Counts: For the intersection of Bixby Road/Rager Road, use the

count performed by Smart Services in June 2019 from the Canal Crossing

Phase 2 submittal. Update traffic volumes accordingly.

See Reponse to #2.

Canal 5 Traffic Volumes: Please add a traffic volume exhibit showing the counted

traffic volumes as collected, prior to these volumes being modified using

the growth rates.

The requested exhibit has been added the update study.

Canal 6 Traffic Volumes: Please show the build-up of traffic volumes from the

offsite trips more incrementally with more exhibits/plates for each site.

The traffic volumes for the other developments are

included in the appendix.

Canal 7 Trip Generation: On page 13, change Building 1 and Building 2 to Building

A and Building B, or vice-versa, as well as on any exhibits showing the site,

for consistency throughout the report.

The study text now references only Building A and

Building B.

Canal 8 Trip Generation: On page 13, the sizes of Building 1 and Building 2 add up

to 950,400 sq. ft., while the buildings in Table 2 total 939,200 sq. ft. Please

revise accordingly.

The study text has been updated to reflect the proper

building sizes. (627.2 KSF and 312 KSF)

Canal 9 Trip Distribution: Exhibits 7-8 indicates that Building A is accessed on the

north side of Bixby Road via intersections 4 and 5, but the site plan in

Appendix A shows Building 2 (300,000 sq. ft., while Building A in Table 2

on sheet 13 is listed at 312,000 sq. ft.) is accessed on the west side of

Winchester Pike. Update site trips accordingly.

The study has been updated to better reflect the

Building names.

Canal 10 Trip Distribution: Check Exhibits 9-10 as needed based on the above

comment.

The trip distribution exhibits have been removed from

the study. This information is included in Table 4 on

page 15.

Canal 11 General: The last paragraph under “Development Characteristics” on page

13, there is a minor error at the end of the first line that should read

“Access A and Access B…”

The text has been updated accordingly.

Canal 12 Trip Generation: On page 13, Table 2, the average rates listed for the

trucks in the PM Peak Hour shows 0.02, but per Appendix F, the average

rate is listed as 0.03. Update Table 2 and Table 3 as needed.

Table 2 and Table 3 have been updated.

REVIEW

AGENCY

# COMMENT ACTION

Canal 13 Turn Lane Warrant: Per the turn lane warrant charts in Appendix G, left

turn lanes are warranted for both Site Access A, and Site Access B. Table

11 only lists turn lane lengths at Site Access B.

The traffic volumes and analysis have been updated to

include Access A as a RIRO.

Canal 14 Turn Lane Lengths: Provide turn lane length calculations in support of the

lengths shown in Table 11, and in Appendix G.

Turn lane length calculation tables are provided in the

appendix.

Canal 15 Proposed Roadway Improvements: Please provide exhibits for any

proposed/recommended roadway improvements.

An exhibit of the proposed roadway improvements is

provided.

Canal 16 Signal Timings: Provide current signal timings for signalized intersections in

the appendices.

The current signal timings are provided in the appendix.

Canal 17 Appendix A: The provided site exhibit shows 3 proposed access points,

while the study consists of 4 access points.

The site plan in the appendix has been updated to

reflect the latest site plan.

Canal 18 General: Please provide a comment disposition to each of these

comments and any additional comments issued by other reviewing

agencies, describing the way in which they were addressed or adding any

additional important information in response to these comments.

This document is being provided as a response to

comments by Canal Winchester and Franklin County.

Canal 19 General: Note that development of this site obstructs extension of Rager

Road as provided in the Canal Winchester Thoroughfare Plan.

No Response necessary

Canal 20 Site Plan: Please coordinate access locations with the “Canal Crossing

Phase 2” site currently under study by The Kleingers Group, a portion of

which is across Bixby Road from the subject site. Ensure that access

locations proposed for both sites meet Canal Winchester Thoroughfare

Plan spacing and alignment criteria for Minor Arterials as provided in Table

9 in Section 9 of the Thoroughfare Plan.

The Access locations are shown on the improvements

exhibit.

REVIEW

AGENCY

# COMMENT ACTION

FCEO A Identify Winchester Pk is assumed (N-S or E-W) and retain that

throughout. Same with Bixby Rd and Brice Rd.

The report text is updated so that Winchester Pike is

referenced as North-South.

FCEO B Use 2019 count at Winchester Pk Bixby Brice. Volume plates will be

reviewed more closely once that change is made.

The study update includes a revision of the volumes at

this intersection using the June 2019 counts

FCEO C Double check the numbers in Table 3. Numbers don’t match what the

equations on the prior page calculate.

Tables 2 and 3 have been updated in the revised report.

FCEO D FCEO’s signal requirements for LOS are overall minimum C, and D for

individual movement.

The study has been updated to reflect this requirement.

FCEO E Check turn lane warrant labels. Appears Bixby Rd access points are labeled

as Winchester Pk

The labels on the turn lane warrants has been updated.

FCEO F Evaluate additional south bound thru (Winchester Pk) as a

countermeasure. This would appear to improve the blocking of turn lanes

more than adding length to the turn lanes as suggested. There is little

NBLT (WP) that would overlap well with a WBRT (Bixby) and it would take

time from the largest movement, SBTH (WP).

This additional analysis has been provided. The addition

of a 2nd southbound thru lane doesn't provide a better

LOS than the addition of an eastbound right turn lane on

Bixby Road. Additionally, to obtain high utilization of a

second southbound thru lane would require extending

this lane approximately 600 feet south of the

intersection before it is tapered.

FCEO G Provide % of total WP B B intersection. Off-site improvements will most

likely be a contribution towards a SBTH at this intersection.

The percent of site traffic at the Winchester Pike & Bixby

intersection is provided in the updated study.

FCEO H Provide driveway spacing details. Winchester Pk is 55 mph with requires

495’ of spacing between private driveways.

This information is provided in the report. The spacing of

the drives along WP are ~ 1,550' and 1,100'

FCEO I Provide spacing from intersection details. If the study proposes to

lengthen the SBLT length on Winchester Pk, then how does that spacing

work out with the warranted NBLT for Site Access 2?

This information is illustrated on the improvements

exhibit.

FCEO J Due to high speeds and heavy SBTH volumes on Winchester Pk, although

not warranted, FCEO may require a SBRT lane for the access points.

Discussions are ongoing.

No response necessary.

FCEO K Discussions are also ongoing regarding requiring a NBLT lane for Access 1

as well. Due to high speeds and heavy SBTH volumes, a handful of vehicles

attempting to turn left with limited gaps and no left turn lane gives FCEO

concerns.

Access A has been changed to a RIRO.

WINCHESTER PIKE

WINCHESTER PIKE

WINCHESTER PIKE

WINCHESTER PIKE

BIXB

Y RO

AD

BRIC

E RO

AD

AC

CES

S B

AC

CES

S A

ACCESS

C

ACCESS

D

PRIV

ATE D

RIVE

(BY

OTHER

S)

BUILDING B312,000 SF

BUILDING A

627,2

00 SF

BIXB

Y EX

HIB

ITNORTH

LEGEND

bixby road industrial - canal winchester

Documents