ch-motivation & motivational theories

Upload: nrngshsh

Post on 03-Jun-2018

230 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/12/2019 CH-Motivation & Motivational Theories

    1/36

    2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

    Motivation

    Concepts

    ChapterSIX

  • 8/12/2019 CH-Motivation & Motivational Theories

    2/36

    2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

    What Is Motivation?

    Direction

    PersistenceIntensity

  • 8/12/2019 CH-Motivation & Motivational Theories

    3/36

    2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

    Key Elements

    1. Intensity: How hard a person tries

    2. Direction: Toward beneficial goal

    3. Persistence: How long a person tries

    MotivationThe processes that account for an individuals intensity,

    direction, and persistence of effort toward attaining a

    goal

    What Is Motivation?

  • 8/12/2019 CH-Motivation & Motivational Theories

    4/36

    2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

    Hierarchy of Needs Theory (Maslow)

    Hierarchy of Needs Theory

    There is a hierarchy of five needs:

    physiological, safety, social, esteem,

    and self-actualization; as each need

    is substantially satisfied, the nextneed becomes dominant.

    Self-Actualization

    The drive to become what one is capable of

    becoming

  • 8/12/2019 CH-Motivation & Motivational Theories

    5/36

    2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

    Maslows Hierarchy of Needs

    E X H I B I T 61

    Lower-Order NeedsNeeds that are satisfied

    externally; physiological

    and safety needs

    Higher-Order NeedsNeeds that are satisfied

    internally; social, esteem,

    and self-actualization

    needs

    Self

    Esteem

    Social

    Safety

    Physiological

  • 8/12/2019 CH-Motivation & Motivational Theories

    6/36

  • 8/12/2019 CH-Motivation & Motivational Theories

    7/36

    2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

    Assumptions of Maslows Hierarchy

    Movement Up the PyramidIndividuals cannot move to the next higher level until all

    needs at the current (lower) level are satisfied.

    Maslow Application

    A homeless person

    will not be motivated tomeditate!

    Individuals therefore

    must move up the

    hierarchy in order.

  • 8/12/2019 CH-Motivation & Motivational Theories

    8/36

    ERG Theory

    EExistence (equivalent to physiological & safetyneeds of Maslows theory)

    RRelatedness (equivalent to social and esteem

    needs of Maslows theory)

    GGrowth (equivalent to self-actualizaton needs of

    Maslows theory)

    2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

  • 8/12/2019 CH-Motivation & Motivational Theories

    9/36

    2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

    Theory XManagers See Workers as

    Disliking Work

    Avoiding Responsibility

    Having Little Ambition

    Theory Y

    Managers See Workers asEnjoying Work

    Accepting Responsibility

    Self-Directed

    Lazy & must be coerced to perform

  • 8/12/2019 CH-Motivation & Motivational Theories

    10/36

    2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

    Herzbergs Two-Factor Theory

    Bottom Line: Satisfaction and dissatisfaction are

    not opposites of the same thing!

    Separate Constructs Hygiene Factors

    Extrinsic and Related toDissatisfaction

    Motivation FactorsIntrinsic and Related to

    Satisfaction

    Hygiene

    Factors

    Salary

    WorkConditions

    Company

    Policies

    Security,

    status,

    relationshi

    p, personal

    life

    Motivators

    Achievement

    Responsibility

    Growth,

    advancement,

    recognition,work itself

  • 8/12/2019 CH-Motivation & Motivational Theories

    11/36

    2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

    Comparison of Satisfiers

    and Dissatisfiers

    Factors characterizing eventson the job that led to extreme

    job dissatisfactionFactors characterizing

    events on the job that

    led to extreme job

    satisfaction

    E X H I B I T 62Source: Reprinted by permission of Harvard Business Review. An exhibit from One More Time:How Do You Motivate Employees? by Frederick Herzberg, SeptemberOctober 1987. Copyright

    1987 by the President and Fellows of Harvard College: All rights reserved.

  • 8/12/2019 CH-Motivation & Motivational Theories

    12/36

    2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

    Contrasting Views of Satisfaction and

    Dissatisfaction

    E X H I B I T 63

  • 8/12/2019 CH-Motivation & Motivational Theories

    13/36

    2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

    David McClellands Theory of Needs

    Need for Achievement

    The drive to excel, to

    achieve in relation to a set

    of standards, to strive to

    succeed

    Need for Affiliation

    The desire for friendly

    and close personal

    relationships

    Need for Power

    The need to make others

    behave in a way that theywould not have behaved

    otherwise

    Bottom Line

    Individuals have

    different levels of needsin each of these areas,

    and those levels will

    drive their behavior.

  • 8/12/2019 CH-Motivation & Motivational Theories

    14/36

    2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

    Matching High Achievers and Jobs

    E X H I B I T 64

  • 8/12/2019 CH-Motivation & Motivational Theories

    15/36

    Contemporary Theories of Motivation

    Cognitive Evaluation Theory

    Goal-Setting Theory

    Self-Efficacy Theory

    Reinforcement Theory

    Equity Theory

    Expectancy Theory

    2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

  • 8/12/2019 CH-Motivation & Motivational Theories

    16/36

  • 8/12/2019 CH-Motivation & Motivational Theories

    17/36

    2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

    E X H I B I T 65

    What Would Herzberg Say? What Would

    Maslow Say?

  • 8/12/2019 CH-Motivation & Motivational Theories

    18/36

    2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

    Goal-Setting Theory (Edwin Locke)

    Basic Premise:That specificand difficult goals, withself-generated feedback, lead to higher performance.

    But, the relationship between goals and performance will

    depend on:

    Goal commitment

    I want to do it & I can do it

    Task characteristics (simple, well-learned, independent)

    National culture

  • 8/12/2019 CH-Motivation & Motivational Theories

    19/36

    2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

    Goal Setting in Action: MBO Programs

    Management By Objectives Programs

    A program that encompasses specific goals,

    participatively set, for an explicit time period, with

    feedback on goal progress

    Company wide goals and objectives

    Goals aligned at all levels Based on Goal Setting Theory

  • 8/12/2019 CH-Motivation & Motivational Theories

    20/36

    2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

    What Is MBO?

    Key Elements

    1. Goal specificity (clearly defined goals)

    2. Participative decision making3. An explicit time period

    4. Performance feedback

    Management by Objectives (MBO)

    A program that encompasses specific goals,

    participatively set, for an explicit time period, with

    feedback on goal progress

  • 8/12/2019 CH-Motivation & Motivational Theories

    21/36

    2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

    Cascading of Objectives

    E X H I B I T 61

  • 8/12/2019 CH-Motivation & Motivational Theories

    22/36

    2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

    Linking MBO and Goal-Setting Theory

    MBO Goal-Setting Theory

    Goal Specificity Yes Yes

    Goal Difficulty Yes Yes

    Feedback Yes Yes

    Participation Yes No

    (qualified)

  • 8/12/2019 CH-Motivation & Motivational Theories

    23/36

    2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

    Why MBOs Fail

    Unrealistic expectations about MBO results

    Lack of commitment by top management

    Failure to allocate reward properly

    Cultural incompatibilities

  • 8/12/2019 CH-Motivation & Motivational Theories

    24/36

    2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

    Self-Efficacyan individuals belief that

    he/she is capable of performing a task

    An individuals feeling that s/he can complete a

    task (e.g. I know I can!)

    Enhances probability that goals will be

    achieved

  • 8/12/2019 CH-Motivation & Motivational Theories

    25/36

  • 8/12/2019 CH-Motivation & Motivational Theories

    26/36

  • 8/12/2019 CH-Motivation & Motivational Theories

    27/36

    2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

    Reinforcement Theory

    Assumptions: Behavior is environmentally caused.

    Behavior can be modified (reinforced) by providing(controlling) consequences.

    Reinforced behavior tends to be repeated.

    Argues that behavior is a function of itsconsequences

  • 8/12/2019 CH-Motivation & Motivational Theories

    28/36

  • 8/12/2019 CH-Motivation & Motivational Theories

    29/36

    2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

    Equity Theory (contd)

    E X H I B I T 68

  • 8/12/2019 CH-Motivation & Motivational Theories

    30/36

    2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

    Equity Theory (contd)

    Choices for dealing with inequity:

    1. Change inputs (slack off)

    2. Change outcomes (increase output)3. Distort/change perceptions of self

    4. Distort/change perceptions of others

    5. Choose a different referent person

    6. Leave the field (quit the job)

  • 8/12/2019 CH-Motivation & Motivational Theories

    31/36

    2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

    Equity Theory (contd)

    Propositions relating to inequitable pay:

    1. Overrewarded hourly employees produce more thanequitably rewarded employees.

    2. Overrewarded piece-work employees produce less,but do higher quality piece work.

    3. Underrewarded hourly employees produce lowerquality work.

    4. Underrewarded employees produce larger quantitiesof lower-quality piece work than equitably rewardedemployees.

  • 8/12/2019 CH-Motivation & Motivational Theories

    32/36

    2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

    Justice and Equity Theory

  • 8/12/2019 CH-Motivation & Motivational Theories

    33/36

    2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

    Distributive Justice

    Perceived fairness of the

    outcome (the final distribution)

    Who got what?

    Procedural Justice

    Perceived fairness of the

    processused to determine

    the outcome (the final

    distribution)

    How was who gets what

    decided?

    Interactional Justice

    The degree to which one istreated with dignity and

    respect.

    Was I treated well?

    Three Types of Justice

  • 8/12/2019 CH-Motivation & Motivational Theories

    34/36

    Expectancy Theory

    2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

    The strength of a tendency to act in a certain way

    depends on the strength of an expectation that the act

    will be followed by a given outcome and on the

    attractiveness of that outcome to the individual

  • 8/12/2019 CH-Motivation & Motivational Theories

    35/36

  • 8/12/2019 CH-Motivation & Motivational Theories

    36/36

    2007 P ti H ll I All i ht d

    Putting It All Together