appendix 1: interview survey list of interviewees no. name … · 2009. 9. 17. · 31 cletus...

39

AAPPPPEENNDDIIXX 11:: IINNTTEERRVVIIEEWW SSUURRVVEEYY List of Interviewees

No. Name Location / Camp District Position

1 Dr. Zyambo Livestock Services

Cooperative Society

Lusaka Former Director,

DVLD

2 Dr. D. Minyoi Lusaka Lusaka President,

Veterinary

Association of

Zambia

3 Dr. D. Mimba Smallholder Livestock

Investment Project

(SLIP – IFAD)

Lusaka SLIP Coordinator

and past VAZ

President

4 Mr. P. G. Phiri Livestock Services

Cooperative Society

Lusaka Retired Chief

Technician School

of Veterinary

Medicine

5 Dr. L. Munsimbwe Choma Choma Provincial Vet

Officer

6 Dr. Jackson Soko Choma Choma District Vet Officer

7 Dr. P. Nyimba Monze Monze District Vet Officer

8 Dr. W. Tembo Kalomo Kalomo District Vet Officer

9 Dr. S. J. Phiri Livingstone Kazungula District Vet Officer

10 Dr. E. Ndalama Sinazongwe Sinazongwe District Vet Officer

11 Peter Nkausu Kasiya Livingstone Farmer

12 Sinzala Kasiya Livingstone Farmer

13 Mrs. Judith Mataka Mambova Kazungula Farmer

14 Fredrick Sikasola Kazuni Kazungula Farmer

15 Simon Silwiindi Kalibonene/Siakasenke Monze Farmer

16 Billy Mweetwa Sipatunyana Kalomo VA

17 Ackim Malupande No. 3 Kalomo VA

18 Godwin Nawa Mukwera Kalomo VA

19 Clepperton Mweemba Zimba Kalomo VA

20 Anne Maliti Kalomo Kalomo Lab. Technician

21 Maybin Chikampa Central Kalomo VA

22 Collins Nchema Mkamdazovu Kalomo VA

23 George Mulonga Zimba Kalomo VA

24 Miss. Musa Muyapekwa Dimbwe Kalomo VA

25 Tapera Muchaneta Kabanga Kalomo VA

71

40

No. Name Location / Camp District Position

26 Able Phiri Macha Choma VA

27 Paul Chikasha Simaubi Choma VA

28 Bestwell Munema Gamera Choma VA

29 Muyangali N’gandu Namoonza Choma VA

30 Teddy Mwenya Mapanza Choma VA

31 Cletus Luapula Muntanga Choma VA

32 F. C. Ndlovu Ceptra Choma VA

33 Wilfred Sibooli Siamalosi Choma VA

34 Martin Mapala Nbabala Choma VA

35 Keston Mezeki Pemba Choma VA

36 Ackson Mwasenga Kasiya Choma VA

37 S. Mwalweni Choma Choma VA

38 R. Mulima Mangúnza Choma VA

39 R. Nkole Choma Choma VA

40 P. H. Chisompa Monze Monze VA

41 I.K. Moonde Njola Monze VA

42 J. Mwambazi Monze Monze VA

43 M. L. Matongo Siakasenke Monze VA

44 N. Mbomena Bbombo Monze VA

45 M. Moonga Monze Monze VA

46 V. Mtonga Monze Monze VA

47 B. Moonde Livingstone Kazungula Livestock Officer

48 L. Songiso Livingstone Livingstone VA

49 A. H. Hamankolo Kazungula Kazungula VA

50 Macarthy Mudenda Sesheke Sesheke Tsetse Control

Biologist

51 Mudenda Morris Central Sesheke VA

52 Prosper Bwalya Sesheke Sesheke Livestock Officer

53 Chuma Nguramene Sesheke Sesheke VA

54 Maxon Hamulinda Masese Sesheke VA

55 Davy Siamfumba Mwandi Sesheke VA

56 Mulako Munalula Mwandi Sesheke Livestock Officer

57 Chipango Maamba Sinazongwe VA

58 Simpito B/Malima Sinazongwe VA

59 Michelo Central Sinazongwe VA

72

41

AAPPPPEENNDDIIXX 22:: SSUUMMMMAARRYY QQUUEESSTTIIOONNNNAAIIRREE AANNDD LLEEVVEELLSS OOFF IINNTTEERRVVIIEEWWSS

The evaluation was carried out at four levels, which include the following:-

National Level A comprehensive literature review was conducted of the background information leading to the conception of

AHPDE, mode/nature of joint implementation between DVLD and SVM-UNZA, project monitoring reports,

farmer evaluation reports, minutes of the Joint Coordinating Committee and Steering Committee meetings.

With the help of questionnaires and a check list, personal interviews targeting key informants of project staff at

JICA offices in Lusaka, SVM-UNZA and DVLD was carried out. Emphasis was placed on the five criteria of

evaluation which include relevance, effectiveness, efficiency, impact and sustainability of the Project. The

evaluation also sought to asses the sustainability of the project by assessing the Zambian Government’s

commitment to ensure continued exchange of technical information between all stakeholders and reduction in the

high turnover of staff including relocating trained government officers outside the Project area.

Provincial and district levels At provincial and district levels focussed group discussions and personal interviews with Project personnel were

conducted with the following aspects in mind:-

Number of reports/samples arriving at the district/provincial laboratories

Percentage of samples submitted to laboratories in scientifically acceptable forms or examinable

states

Availability of diagnostic equipment as well as state of the equipment

Promptness at which samples or disease reports are attended to

Percentage of manned districts and camps trained by the Japan-Zambia Cooperation

Feed back mechanism to camp officers

Means of communication between district and camps, i.e. mobile phones, vehicles, motorbikes,

radio and state of the road network

Value chain analysis in the whole data collection and information dissemination model

Record keeping, storage, retrieval and usability

73

42

Camp level A great deal of time was spent at this level to assess Project’s relevance, effectiveness, efficiency, and impact.

Focussed group discussions were preferred to encourage collective perceptions. The following areas were

assessed:-

Level of competence of staff and technical know-how of data collection for various disease

threats

Level of preparedness for primary disease control implementation

Response time between farmer reporting and camp officer attending to the farmer

Time lag between farmer reporting to camp officer and onward transmission to district office

Feed back mechanism from district, camp officer and finally to farmers/beneficially

Ability to transform data into usable information to the farmer

Means of communication between camp and district, i.e. mobile phones, vehicles, motorbikes,

radio and state of the road network

Camp catchment area in terms of square kilometres and livestock population

Mode of transport at camp officer’s disposal

Record keeping and storage

Beneficiary level Apart from group focussed interviews with direct beneficiaries, focus was also directed to key informant personal

interviews with community opinion leaders. The following aspects were explored:-

Frequency of routine visits of veterinary service providers to farmers

Feed back evaluation:

Frequency of feedback

Methods used in feedback

Relevance of feedback to the farmers

Accessibility of camp officer to the farmer

Farmer appreciation and satisfaction of quality of veterinary services and production techniques

delivered

Farmers’ expectation of kind of veterinary services required

74

43

Qualitative and quantitative data was collected through the use of appropriate questionnaires at each of the above

stated levels. In-situ observations during field visits were employed. Capacity building and level of dependence on

the Project for activities was assessed to determine sustainability post project period.

Qualitative and quantitative data was collected through the use of appropriate questionnaires at each of the above

stated levels. In-situ observations during field visits were employed. Capacity building and level of dependence on

the Project for activities was assessed to determine sustainability post project period.

PROJECT TO IMPROVE ANIMAL HEALTH AND PRODUCTION

THROUGH EXTENSION SERVICES (AHPDE) MACO/SVM-UNZA/JICA Joint Cooperation

Background

In January 2006, the Department of Veterinary and Livestock Development (DVLD) in the Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives (MACO) and the School of Veterinary Medicine at the University of Zambia (SVM-UNZA) jointly commenced the implementation of the Project for Improvement of Animal Health and Production Delivery through Extension Services (AHPDE) over a three year period. The AHPDE is a technical cooperation project which is supported by the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) as a component of the Japan – Zambia Technical Cooperation, which has been in existence over the past 25 years. The Project to Improve Animal Health and Production Delivery through Extension Services has been in operation in seven (7) districts of Southern Province and one (1) district of Western Province. These districts include Monze, Sinazongwe, Choma, Namwala, Itezhi-Tezhi, Kalomo, Kazungula and Sesheke. The Project has targeted providers of veterinary services, who include veterinarians, veterinary assistants, livestock and laboratory technicians at district and camp levels. These veterinary providers have been receiving training in various aspects of animal health and production in order to strengthen their delivery capacities. In addition, the veterinary providers have been equipped with appropriate tools in order to improve both the effectiveness and efficiency of the animal health and production delivery system in their areas of operation. Project Objective The objective of the Project is to strengthen the support system in the delivery of animal health and production extension services by training veterinary service providers as well as provision of appropriate equipment to enhance effectiveness and efficiency of the delivery system.

75

44

Project Expected Outputs The expected outputs included the following:

Increased knowledge and improvement of animal health and production techniques by veterinary service providers; and

Establishment of a model of technical information exchange among stakeholders. Name farmer/Official ………………………………………………………………………………………….…. Town/Camp/Village ……………………………………………………………………………………………..

Relevance: usefulness of AHPDE to the beneficiaries in this case the government, the participating farmers and the staff that have been trained

Have you undergone training by the Project? ………………………………………

Which module have you been trained in? …………………………………………..

Did the Project introduce new techniques/skills or just refreshed what you already knew?

What do you appreciate about what you were taught? ……………………………………

What difference has the training made to you/your work? ………………………………..

Is the collaboration between UNZA and MACO answering any policy objectives of DVLD?

…………………………………………………………………….

What health attributes has the collaboration between institutions brought?

Has the exchange of information between the two institutions had a bearing on DVLD policy?

How does the Project’s purpose & overall objective fit in with JICA’s policy frame work?

76

45

Effectiveness: the extent to which the desired outputs have been achieved

In order to ensure knowledge assimilation, what methods were used?

What animal production techniques have been introduced / enhanced by the project?

What number of reports/samples arrive at the district/provincial laboratories compared to before project scenario

Percentage of samples submitted to laboratories in scientifically acceptable forms or examinable states

Availability of diagnostic equipment as well as state of the equipment

Feed back mechanism to camp officers

Percentage of manned districts and camps trained by the Japan-Zambia Cooperation

Value chain analysis in the whole data collection and information dissemination model

What system is used to enhance record keeping, storage, retrieval and usability?

Level of preparedness for primary disease control implementation. What tools are available to the veterinary service provider to counter primary disease threats?

What type/kind of training was provided by the service provider to the farmer?

77

46

Efficiency: how well, and at what cost have the associated outputs and outcomes been achieved

What has been the cost of input delivery versus output?

Can AHPDE be compared to any JICA project with similar efficiency levels?

Promptness at which samples or disease reports are attended to

Level of competence of staff and technical know-how of data collection for various disease threats

What is the response time between farmer reporting and camp officer attending to the farmer?

Time lag between farmer reporting to camp officer and onward transmission to district office

Feed back mechanism from district, camp officer and finally to farmers/beneficially

Ability to transform data into usable information to the farmer

Camp catchment area in terms of square kilometres and livestock population

Mode of transport at camp officer’s disposal

Record keeping and storage

Frequency of routine visits of veterinary service providers to farmers

Feed back evaluation:

Frequency of feedback

Methods used in feedback

Relevance of feedback to the farmers

Accessibility of camp officer to the farmer

Has processing of lab samples been made easier by the availability of microscopes and centrifuges?

Has there been enhanced communication as a result of installation of radios?

78

47

Impact: the extent to which the outcomes have been achieved, the extent to which peoples lives have been changed as result of the project

Farmer appreciation and satisfaction of quality of veterinary services and production techniques delivered

Have linkages been established between UNZA and MACO field staff?

Farmers’ expectation of kind of veterinary services required

Has the Project addressed any environmental concerns?

Is there appreciation by Government officials of the production technologies and training provided by the Project?

Sustainability: what happens when the project comes to end, will there be a continuation of the activities of the project?

What has been put in place to ensure continued collaboration between MACO and SVM-UNZA?

Can the project activities be easily assimilated into the ordinary MACO activities?

79

48

AAPPPPEENNDDIIXX 33:: CCHHEECCKKLLIISSTT FINAL EVALUATION FOR IMPROVEMENT OF ANIMAL HEALTH AND PRODUCTION DELIVERY THROUGH

EXTENSION SERVICES (AHPDE)

Consultant’s Guide

Overall Goal and Programme Design

1. AHPDEs main goal: Is it related to JICA/MACO’s Vision & Mission?

2. Methods used to design the program: (Participatory, Consultative, Expert driven?)

Objectives

1. Are strategic/purpose objectives clearly stated?

2. What problems/ constraints were they intended to address/ resolve?

3. Are they consistent with, and supportive of MACO’s vision, mission and strategies, and the priorities of

the livestock sector?

4. Do they address the real problems of the target groups/beneficiaries? [Use information obtained

through interactions with farmers]

5. Are objectives: Specific; Measurable; Achievable; Relevant; and Time bound?

Objectively Verifiable Indicators

1. Are all indicators related to the objectives?

1. What are they?

2. Are indicators: Quantifiable; Quality related; Time bound?

Strategies and Activity Plans

1. Are their clear strategies to achieve the strategic/purpose objectives?

2. What activities have been undertaken? Are they related to the objectives?

Implementation (District, Camp & farm)

1. What project communication equipment is on the ground?

2. What project laboratory equipment is on the ground?

3. Is equipment in good working order?

80

49

4. What are the daily, weekly volumes of samples the labs are handling?

5. How is the farmer camp officer interaction (Frequency)?

6. Presence of improved farm structures?

7. Any livestock production techniques practiced at farm level?

8. How many farmers have adopted improved production technologies?

9. Fodder harvesting, weaning age, calf mortality rates, milk production, general body condition?

Assumptions

Were assumptions were made about factors outside the control of the project but which would have an impact

on the project? Anything on

- Government policy

- Weather

- Legal/regulatory

- Macro economic factors

- International trends

- Other

Are they regularly monitored?

Monitoring and Evaluation

Is there a system of capturing and recording data on:‐

Performance and other indicators?

Finance and material input?

Activities and outputs?

Are there regular reports?

Was information storage and data retrieval system put into place?

How is it working?

81

50

AAPP PP

EENN

DDII XX

44:: EE

VVAA

LLUU

AATT

II OONN

GGRR

II DD

Cri

teri

a In

dica

tors

So

urce

of

Info

rmat

ion

Met

hod

Eva

luat

ion

Bef

ore

Proj

ect S

tatu

s

Rel

evan

ce

1.

Rel

evan

ce

with

bene

ficia

ries'

nee

ds.

Loca

l

cons

ulta

nt's

repo

rt,

opin

ions

of

Expe

rts

and

C/P

To

conf

irm

as

to

whe

ther

th

e re

sult

of

the

proj

ect

incr

ease

th

e

know

ledg

e an

d

skill

s of

M

AC

O

offic

ials

th

roug

h

inte

rvie

ws.

- T

rain

ing

need

s as

sess

men

t

led

to

deve

lopm

ent

of

appr

opria

te m

odul

es

- Mod

ules

wer

e ea

sily

ada

pted

to fi

eld

situ

atio

ns b

y VA

s

Bef

ore

Proj

ect,

in-s

ervi

ce

train

ing

prog

ram

mes

for

fie

ld V

et a

nd V

A in

MA

CO

wer

e al

mos

t no

n-ex

iste

nt.

Such

tra

inin

g

prog

ram

me

fram

ewor

ks w

ere

prov

ided

and

know

ledg

e of

Ve

t an

d VA

w

ere

stre

ngth

ened

/refr

eshe

d in

the

Pro

ject

are

a. I

n

addi

tion

the

train

ing

man

uals

are

bei

ng u

sed

as

field

re

fere

nce

mat

eria

ls

by

vete

rinar

y

serv

ice

prov

ider

s

2.

Rel

evan

ce w

ith o

vera

ll

polic

y.

The

late

st

deve

lopm

ent

stra

tegy

of

Zam

bia

To

chec

k as

to

whe

ther

th

e

know

ledg

e sh

arin

g

of

tech

nolo

gy

is

impo

rtant

in

th

e

deve

lopm

ent

polic

y

or st

rate

gy

Acc

ordi

ng

to

the

5ND

P

in-s

ervi

ce t

rain

ing

as w

ell

as

impr

oved

fa

rm

tech

nolo

gies

are

set a

s prio

ritie

s

The

lives

tock

sub

-sec

tor

is o

ne o

f im

porta

nt

pilla

rs o

f de

velo

pmen

t in

FN

DP.

Liv

esto

ck

sub-

sect

or's

anim

al

heal

th,

lives

tock

prod

uctio

n an

d ex

tens

ion

and

lives

tock

rese

arch

are

men

tione

d as

im

porta

nt f

ield

s in

the

Nat

iona

l A

gric

ultu

re P

olic

y (N

AP)

. T

he

Proj

ect's

pur

pose

to s

treng

then

sup

port

syst

em

of a

nim

al h

ealth

and

pro

duct

ion

tech

niqu

es in

the

targ

et

area

ar

e re

gard

ed

as

of

high

econ

omic

impo

rtanc

e in

Zam

bia's

agr

icul

tura

l

polic

y.

Exte

nsio

n se

rvic

e to

fa

rmer

s an

d

train

ing

to th

e fie

ld s

taff

in t

he a

nim

al h

ealth

and

lives

tock

pr

oduc

tion

are

equa

lly

prio

ritiz

ed in

NA

P. L

inki

ng a

nd e

nhan

cing

the

82

51

Cri

teri

a In

dica

tors

So

urce

of

Info

rmat

ion

Met

hod

Eva

luat

ion

Bef

ore

Proj

ect S

tatu

s

colla

bora

tion

betw

een

rese

arch

an

d fie

ld

wor

ks a

re a

lso

high

light

ed in

NA

P. T

here

fore

,

the

obje

ctiv

es a

nd a

ctiv

ities

of

the

Proj

ect

answ

er

to

the

need

s of

Za

mbi

a in

th

e

agric

ultu

re se

ctor

3.

Rel

evan

ce w

ith J

ICA

's

polic

y fo

r in

tern

atio

nal

coop

erat

ion

JIC

A O

ffice

r

To

conf

irm

as

to

whe

ther

the

pro

ject

purp

ose

and

over

all

goal

ar

e re

leva

nt

with

JIC

A's

polic

y.

The

over

all g

oal o

f the

Pro

ject

falls

w

ithin

JI

CA

's

deve

lopm

ent

assi

stan

ce p

olic

y

fram

ewor

k

Emer

gent

an

d sm

all

scal

e fa

rmer

s ar

e

supp

osed

to b

e th

e fin

al ta

rget

of

the

proj

ect.

The

proj

ect

purp

ose

is

to

stre

ngth

en

the

anim

al

heal

th

and

lives

tock

pr

oduc

tion

tech

niqu

es. H

ence

, the

pro

ject

was

in

tand

em

with

JI

CA

's po

licy

tow

ard

agric

ultu

re

deve

lopm

ent a

ssis

tanc

e

83

52

Cri

teri

a In

dica

tors

So

urce

of

Info

rmat

ion

Met

hod

Eva

luat

ion

Bef

ore

Proj

ect S

tatu

s

Eff

ectiv

enes

s

1.

Ach

ieve

men

t of

th

e

proj

ect p

urpo

se

Ach

ieve

men

t

Grid

To c

oncl

ude

as t

o

whe

ther

th

e

expe

cted

pr

ojec

t

purp

ose

is

achi

eved

.

Proj

ect

has

led

to:-

-

bette

r co

mm

unic

atio

n

betw

een

field

offi

ces

- tre

men

dous

ly

incr

ease

d

conf

iden

ce l

evel

s of

the

fie

ld

oper

ativ

es w

hen

deal

ing

with

both

he

alth

an

d pr

oduc

tion

mat

ters

-

im

prov

ed

sam

plin

g

tech

niqu

es

lead

ing

to

bette

r

diag

nosi

s

- im

prov

ed

surv

eilla

nce

at

dist

rict l

evel

- bet

ter

and

mod

ern

diag

nosti

c

equi

pmen

t ha

s be

en

mad

e

avai

labl

e cl

ose

to th

e fie

ld

Fram

ewor

k of

col

labo

ratio

n be

twee

n U

NZA

and

MA

CO

m

ade

the

supp

ort

to

dise

ase

cont

rol a

nd p

rodu

ctio

n te

chni

que

in th

e ta

rget

area

eas

ier.

Tra

inin

g pr

ogra

mm

e an

d fie

ld

man

uals

pre

pare

d in

the

proj

ect i

mpr

oved

the

know

ledg

e an

d te

chni

ques

of

Vet

and

VA.

Add

ition

al te

chni

ques

taug

ht to

the

labo

rato

ry

tech

nici

an

in

the

dist

ricts

ar

e ut

ilize

d as

pref

erre

d di

agno

stic

met

hods

.

84

53

Cri

teri

a In

dica

tors

So

urce

of

Info

rmat

ion

Met

hod

Eva

luat

ion

Bef

ore

Proj

ect S

tatu

s

2.

Cau

ses

of

the

impr

ovem

ent

of

know

ledg

e on

an

imal

heal

th

and

prod

uctio

n

tech

niqu

es.

Opi

nion

s of

MA

CO

offi

cial

s

In

orde

r to

dist

ingu

ish

the

effe

ct o

f thi

s pro

ject

from

the

effe

ct o

f

exis

ting

MA

CO

tech

nica

l

info

rmat

ion

flow,

ask

offic

ials

w

hat

caus

es

the

impr

ovem

ent

of

know

ledg

e an

d

skill

s.

A

ppre

ciat

ion

for

need

of

sam

plin

g by

VA

s re

sulti

ng i

n

impr

oved

surv

eilla

nce

- C

ompl

imen

tary

re

sour

ces

from

oth

er p

roje

cts (

ASP

, WV

I

and

EU ,

FAO

) has

acc

eler

ated

know

ledg

e tra

nsfe

r to

th

e

farm

ers

from

ve

terin

ary

serv

ice

prov

ider

s

- im

prov

ed

colla

bora

tion

betw

een

MA

CO

and

UN

ZA a

t

field

leve

l

- O

wne

rshi

p:

staf

fing

leve

ls

impr

oved

af

ter

proj

ect

was

intro

duce

d an

in

dica

tion

of

owne

rshi

p

Vet

and

VA i

n di

stric

t of

fice

in M

AC

O h

ave

seld

om o

ppor

tuni

ties

to r

efre

sh a

nd u

pgra

de

thei

r kn

owle

dge

and

tech

niqu

es

in

anim

al

heal

th

and

prod

uctio

n te

chni

ques

. Th

e

info

rmat

ion

of n

ew d

iagn

ostic

met

hods

and

prod

uctio

n te

chni

ques

acq

uire

d in

the

pro

ject

are

reco

gniz

ed a

s ne

cess

ary

info

rmat

ion

and

utili

zed

as fi

eld

man

uals

in e

duca

ting

farm

ers.

3

Com

paris

on

with

offic

ials

ou

tsid

e of

proj

ect a

rea.

Doc

umen

ts,

opin

ions

of

rele

vant

To

find

som

e

exam

ples

of

vete

rinar

ian

in

outs

ide

of

targ

et

area

and

int

ervi

ew

them

.

Atti

tude

of V

et a

nd V

A to

war

ds w

ork

in ta

rget

area

has

pos

itive

ly c

hang

ed a

nd t

here

is

a

grow

ing

desi

re t

o ac

quire

mor

e kn

owle

dge

and

skill

in

lives

tock

inf

ectio

us d

isea

se a

nd

impr

ovem

ent

of p

rodu

ctio

n te

chni

ques

. Th

ey

are

cons

iste

ntly

re

ques

ting

for

mor

e fie

ld

train

ings

and

lat

est

info

rmat

ion

on d

iagn

ostic

tech

niqu

es.

85

54

Cri

teri

a In

dica

tors

So

urce

of

Info

rmat

ion

Met

hod

Eva

luat

ion

Bef

ore

Proj

ect S

tatu

s

4

Impo

rtant

as

sum

ptio

ns

and

othe

r ex

tern

al

fact

ors

whi

ch a

ffect

the

achi

evem

ent

of p

roje

ct

purp

ose.

Rep

orts

,

Obs

erva

tion

To

chec

k th

e

impo

rtant

assu

mpt

ions

an

d

anal

yze

the

influ

ence

to

th

e

proj

ect.

VAs

is s

omet

imes

con

stra

ined

by

logi

stic

al

fact

or

s e.

g.

trans

port,

no

fu

el

whe

re

trans

ports

ex

ists

. A

dequ

ate

budg

et

shou

ld

be

mad

e;

prio

rity

shou

ld

be

give

n to

dist

ricts

w

ith

few

com

plem

enta

ry p

artn

ers

-

Col

labo

ratio

n be

twee

n JI

CA

an

d U

NZA

Scho

ol o

f ve

t ove

r 20

yea

rs m

ade

it ea

sier

to

mob

ilize

res

ourc

es a

nd q

uick

ly a

nsw

er t

o th

e

need

s of M

AC

O fi

eld

staf

f.

Trai

ners

un

ders

tand

th

e im

porta

nce

to

cont

inue

the

stru

ctur

e of

tech

nica

l sup

port.

Trai

ners

are

abl

e to

mak

e ap

prop

riate

pla

ns

cons

ider

ing

the

tech

nica

l and

kno

wle

dge

leve

l

in th

e fie

ld.

Targ

et

area

s ar

e tra

ditio

nally

lives

tock

-dep

ende

nt a

reas

and

far

mer

s in

the

area

und

erst

and

the

valu

e of

live

stoc

k an

d th

e

tech

niqu

es t

o in

crea

se l

ives

tock

pro

duct

ion.

Vet

and

VA a

re o

blig

ed t

o be

kee

n to

kno

w

impr

oved

te

chni

ques

w

hen

they

gi

ve

inst

ruct

ions

to su

ch fa

rmer

s.

MA

CO

st

aff

have

hi

gh

owne

rshi

p of

th

e

Proj

ect a

ctiv

ities

.

86

55

Cri

teri

a In

dica

tors

So

urce

of

Info

rmat

ion

Met

hod

Eva

luat

ion

Bef

ore

Proj

ect S

tatu

s

Eff

icie

ncy

1. In

put A

ccom

plis

hmen

t A

ccom

plis

hmen

t

Grid

To c

onfir

m w

ith th

e

Acc

ompl

ishm

ent

Grid

-imm

edia

te

feed

ba

ck

on

sam

ple

resu

lts

has

been

witn

esse

d-ra

dios

le

ss

cost

ly

to c

omm

unic

ate

Equi

pmen

t and

man

ual i

nduc

ed in

the

proj

ect

are

effic

ient

ly

used

. Pa

rticu

larly

, tra

inin

g

man

ual,

mic

rosc

ope

and

refr

iger

ator

s ar

e

high

ly

used

. R

egar

ding

hu

man

re

sour

ces,

activ

ities

of

coun

ter-p

art

is e

xcel

lent

. H

uman

reso

urce

s. R

adio

s in

trodu

ced

for

info

rmat

ion

colle

ctio

n ha

ve n

ot b

een

able

to

use

due

to

freq

uenc

y, b

ut a

ppro

pria

te f

requ

ency

im

prov

e

the

com

mun

icat

ion

amon

g ca

mps

and

dis

trict

offic

es.

2.

O

utpu

t Acc

ompl

ishm

ent

Acc

ompl

ishm

ent

Grid

To c

onfir

m w

ith th

e

Acc

ompl

ishm

ent

Grid

Bod

y of

kno

wle

dge

has

been

built

in

te

rms

of

hum

an

capa

city

- re

fere

nce

mat

eria

ls m

ade

avai

labl

e at

fiel

d le

vel

- so

me

VAs

are

near

ing

retir

emen

t an

d ha

d ne

ver

atte

nded

any

refr

eshe

r cou

rse

Gen

eral

ly th

e ou

tput

s wer

e ac

hiev

ed.

This

pro

ject

was

abl

e to

util

ize

the

outc

ome

of

20 y

ears

of

coop

erat

ion

of J

ICA

and

UN

ZA

such

as

hu

man

re

latio

n an

d ac

adem

ic

reso

urce

s.

3-

1.

Com

paris

on o

utpu

t with

inpu

t

Com

paris

on

of

inpu

t w

ith

outp

ut

To

conf

irm

as

to

whe

ther

th

e

acco

mpl

ishe

d le

vel

of

outp

ut

can

just

ify

enou

gh

of

the

inpu

t. To

The

outp

ut

on

im

prov

ed

know

ledg

e an

d ho

w q

uick

the

info

rmat

ion

is u

tiliz

ed b

y en

d

user

is

im

mea

sura

ble

com

pare

d to

impa

ct

Focu

sed

targ

et a

nd n

eces

sary

inp

ut m

ade

the

adeq

uate

out

put f

or th

e in

put.

87

56

Cri

teri

a In

dica

tors

So

urce

of

Info

rmat

ion

Met

hod

Eva

luat

ion

Bef

ore

Proj

ect S

tatu

s

mea

sure

as

to h

ow

effic

ient

th

e in

put

turn

ed

into

th

e

outp

ut.

3-

2.

Com

paris

on w

ith o

ther

proj

ects

JI

CA

staf

f

To

conf

irm

as

to

whe

ther

th

e

quan

tity

of

inpu

t

can

be j

ustif

ied

by

com

paris

on

with

othe

r si

mila

r

proj

ects

.

Com

pare

d to

ot

her

proj

ects

, th

e ow

ners

hip

of

Zam

bian

co

unte

r pa

rts

is

very

hi

gh

espe

cial

ly

UN

ZA S

choo

l of V

eter

inar

y m

edic

ine.

Thi

s is

as

a

resu

lt of

the

long

tech

nica

l coo

pera

tion

rela

tions

hip

betw

een

JIC

A an

d U

NZA

. Th

e Za

mbi

an c

ount

er

parts

in

the

PIU

wer

e ve

ry e

nthu

sias

tic a

nd a

ctiv

e

thro

ugho

ut th

e Pr

ojec

t im

plem

enta

tion

perio

d.

3-

3.

Com

bina

tion

with

inpu

t Ex

perts

, C/P

To

inte

rvie

w

the

opin

ion

whe

ther

the

inpu

ts a

re to

o m

uch

or

too

little

an

d

wha

t inp

ut.

In

as

far

as

mee

ting

the

obje

ctiv

es o

f th

e Pr

ojec

t, th

e

inpu

ts tr

ansl

ated

ver

y w

ell i

nto

outp

uts.

Com

bina

tion

was

com

pose

d pr

actic

ally

with

too

k

acco

unt

of

field

ne

eds

and

deci

ded

for

inpu

t.

How

ever

the

re i

s re

mai

ning

an

issu

e ab

out

utili

ze

the

radi

o sy

stem

that

inpu

t und

er th

is p

roje

ct.

3-

4.

Com

bina

tion

with

activ

ities

Ex

perts

, C/P

To

inte

rvie

w

the

opin

ion

whe

ther

the

activ

ities

ar

e

appr

opria

te

and

reas

onab

le.

The

activ

ities

sy

stem

atic

ally

led

to

achi

evem

ent

of

the

Proj

ect o

bjec

tives

The

layo

ut o

f th

e ac

tiviti

es w

as g

oing

on

wel

l fr

om t

he o

n st

art

such

as

from

the

need

s as

sess

men

t, pl

anni

ng

of

train

ing,

oper

atin

g of

tra

inin

g an

d m

onito

ring

the

proj

ect.

88

57

Cri

teri

a In

dica

tors

So

urce

of

Info

rmat

ion

Met

hod

Eva

luat

ion

Bef

ore

Proj

ect S

tatu

s

3-

5.

Any

link

ages

with

oth

er

type

of

co

oper

atio

n

whi

ch

prom

ote

the

effic

ienc

y.

Expe

rts

and

JIC

A st

aff,

prev

ious

docu

men

ts

To

chec

k as

to

whe

ther

an

y

coop

erat

ion

such

as

gran

t or

ot

her

proj

ects

in

Zam

bia

enha

nce

the

effic

ienc

y of

th

e

proj

ect?

Com

plem

enta

ry

deve

lopm

ent

agen

ts s

uch

as W

.V.I,

FA

O,

ASP

, an

d SA

DFS

m

ade

it

easi

er

and

poss

ible

to

ta

ke

mat

eria

ls

and

know

ledg

e to

farm

ers

Impa

ct

1.

The

chan

ges

of

envi

ronm

ent

caus

ed b

y

the

proj

ect

whi

ch

the

rele

vant

feel

/ th

ink.

Expe

rts ,

C/P

Inte

rvie

w w

ith t

he

rele

vant

stak

ehol

ders

an

d

disc

uss

freel

y as

to

wha

t an

d ho

w t

he

proj

ect

gave

an

y

influ

ence

.

Proj

ect

has

mot

ivat

ed

field

staf

f to

w

ork

for

thei

r

prof

essi

onal

sa

tisfa

ctio

n as

oppo

sed

to

fulfi

lling

an

oblig

atio

n or

rout

ine

dutie

s

The

Uni

vers

ity

of

Zam

bia

Scho

ol

of

Vete

rinar

y M

edic

ine

coul

d fo

cus o

n th

e fie

ld

of li

vest

ock

deve

lopm

ent t

hrou

gh fi

eld

staf

f

train

ing

espe

cial

ly v

eter

inar

y as

sist

ants

who

are

in t

he f

ront

lin

e at

fie

ld l

evel

. Th

e

Min

istry

of A

gric

ultu

re re

cogn

ized

the

need

for f

ield

staf

f to

unde

rgo

in-s

ervi

ce tr

aini

ng.

89

58

Cri

teri

a In

dica

tors

So

urce

of

Info

rmat

ion

Met

hod

Eva

luat

ion

Bef

ore

Proj

ect S

tatu

s

2.

The

impa

ct

of

vete

rinar

y tra

inin

g to

outs

ide

of ta

rget

are

a in

targ

et p

rovi

nces

.

Expe

rts,

C/P

,

othe

r dat

a

Inte

rvie

w w

ith t

he

rele

vant

as

to

whe

ther

the

train

ing

has

any

impa

ct t

o

outs

ide

of

targ

et

area

in

ta

rget

prov

ince

s,

espe

cial

ly

for

the

achi

evem

ent

of

over

all g

oal.

Oth

er p

roje

cts

e.g.

ASP

are

usin

g sa

me

mat

eria

ls

and

train

ed

field

st

aff

are

bein

g

invi

ted

to tr

ain

farm

ers

outs

ide

the

Proj

ect a

rea

Nee

ds l

ike

this

tra

inin

g ar

e hi

gh b

ecau

se

ther

e w

ere

seve

ral i

nqui

ries

from

targ

et a

rea

and

even

th

ose

outs

ide

of

targ

et

area

.

Vete

rinar

y se

rvic

e pr

ovid

ers

who

are

bas

ed

out o

f ta

rget

are

a al

so f

eel t

he n

eces

sity

for

in-s

ervi

ce

train

ing

to

refr

esh

thei

r

know

ledg

e an

d te

chni

ques

on

di

seas

e

cont

rol o

r liv

esto

ck d

evel

opm

ent d

ue to

the

info

rmat

ion

of th

is p

roje

ct.

3.

Poss

ibili

ty

to

acco

mpl

ish

the

Ove

rall

Goa

l of t

he P

roje

ct.

Expe

rts,

C/P

,

othe

r dat

a

Inte

rvie

w w

ith t

he

rele

vant

as

to

whe

ther

the

pro

ject

can

acco

mpl

ish

the

over

all

goal

and

, if

not,

whe

ther

th

ere

are

any

obst

acle

s

for i

t.

Des

ign

of t

he p

roje

ct a

llow

ed

com

plim

enta

rity

with

ot

her

deve

lopm

ent

agen

ts;

usin

g

exis

ting

MA

CO

VA

s

Ove

r go

al o

f th

is p

roje

ct is

Dis

ease

con

trol

and

Live

stoc

k ex

tens

ion

serv

ice

will

be

stre

ngth

ened

. T

he a

ctiv

ities

of

vete

rinar

y

serv

ice

prov

ider

s in

the

pro

ject

tar

get

area

are

impr

ovin

g.

90

59

Cri

teri

a In

dica

tors

So

urce

of

Info

rmat

ion

Met

hod

Eva

luat

ion

Bef

ore

Proj

ect S

tatu

s

4 In

stitu

tiona

l V

iew

Long

la

stin

g re

latio

nshi

p

betw

een

UN

ZA

and

MA

CO

has

been

cr

eate

d e.

g.

Dea

n

now

mem

ber

of s

ome

natio

nal

com

mitt

ees

spon

sore

d by

MA

CO

to

st

rate

gize

on

natio

nal

dise

ase

cont

rol

appr

oach

es.-

Rec

ordi

ng

form

ats

have

bee

n in

trodu

ced

e.g.

lab

reco

rds

whi

ch a

re u

ser

frie

ndly

; sc

hedu

led

times

of

radi

o co

mm

unic

atio

n ha

ve

been

in

stitu

ted

- VA

s no

w

appr

ecia

te n

eed

for

sam

plin

g

and

its a

ccur

acy

5

Fina

ncia

l V

iew

91

60

Cri

teri

a In

dica

tors

So

urce

of

Info

rmat

ion

Met

hod

Eva

luat

ion

Bef

ore

Proj

ect S

tatu

s

6 Te

chni

cal

Vie

w

In

Sina

zong

we

now

VA

s ar

e

able

to

advi

se f

arm

ers

agai

nst

selli

ng p

regn

ant

cow

s du

e to

tech

niqu

es l

earn

t. T

his

will

lead

to

incr

ease

in

lives

tock

popu

latio

n

7 C

apac

ity/

Farm

ers

have

ado

pted

bet

ter

tech

niqu

es

in

lives

tock

m

gt

prac

tices

e.g

. vi

llage

chi

cken

s

like

new

cas

tle v

acci

natio

n

- im

prov

ed h

ousi

ng s

truct

ures

for l

ives

tock

- fo

dder

sto

rage

was

obs

erve

d

in L

/sto

ne

Sust

aina

bilit

y 1.

In

stitu

tion

1-

1.

Col

labo

ratio

n sc

hem

e

betw

een

MA

CO

an

d

UN

ZA.

Expe

rts a

nd C

/P

To

chec

k th

e

inte

ntio

n to

cont

inue

th

e

colla

bora

tion

activ

ities

th

roug

h

inte

rvie

w

with

expe

rts, C

/P.

Lon

g la

stin

g re

latio

nshi

p

betw

een

UN

ZA

and

MA

CO

e.g.

M

AC

O

now

in

vite

s

UN

ZA t

o th

eir

polic

y m

akin

g

e.g.

now

Dea

n is

a m

embe

r of

Live

stoc

k w

orki

ng G

roup

.

- use

of e

xist

ing

stru

ctur

es le

ad

The

fram

ewor

k fo

r co

llabo

ratio

n ha

d bu

ilt

by th

is p

roje

ct, h

owev

er a

fter

this

pro

ject

it

is s

uspe

ctin

g th

at t

his

colla

bora

tion

will

be

cont

inue

d.

But

fr

om

the

resu

lt of

th

is

proj

ect,

the

nece

ssity

of

th

is

kind

of

colla

bora

tion

betw

een

MA

CO

and

UN

ZA

Scho

ol o

f Vet

. was

reco

gniz

ed.

92

61

Cri

teri

a In

dica

tors

So

urce

of

Info

rmat

ion

Met

hod

Eva

luat

ion

Bef

ore

Proj

ect S

tatu

s

to h

igh

owne

rshi

p an

d he

nce

sust

aina

bilit

y of

the

syst

em

1-

2.

MA

CO

an

d U

NZA

's

stra

tegy

to

prom

ote

the

train

ing

Expe

rts, C

/P

To

chec

k th

e

stra

tegy

or

plan

to

colla

bora

te

with

othe

r or

gani

zatio

n

thro

ugh

inte

rvie

w

with

exp

erts

, C/P

.

The

nece

ssity

of

this

kin

d of

tra

inin

g w

as

reco

gniz

ed, h

owev

er th

e st

rate

gy to

pro

mot

e

is n

ot p

lane

d ye

t.

2.

Fi

nanc

e

2-

1.

Fina

ncia

l co

nditi

on

of

UN

ZA a

nd M

AC

O

C/P

To

cons

ider

as

to

whe

ther

th

ey

can

cont

inue

th

e jo

int

train

ing

MA

CO

to b

udge

t for

UN

ZA to

train

th

eir

field

st

aff

on

pred

icta

ble

basi

s

It is

nec

essa

ry t

o pr

epar

e fo

r bu

dget

ing

on

the

side

of

MA

CO

as

a co

nstru

ctor

. It i

s no

need

to

prep

are

for

spec

ial

on t

he U

NZA

side

be

caus

e th

ey

will

be

do

ne

by

the

requ

est

from

MA

CO

, ho

wev

er i

n ca

se o

f

som

e ki

nd o

f re

quire

men

t fo

r ex

amin

atio

n

from

the

fie

ld,

UN

ZA w

ill b

e co

vere

d th

e

cost

of

them

suc

h as

rea

gent

s an

d sm

all

equi

pmen

ts fo

r exa

min

atio

n.

93

62

Cri

teri

a In

dica

tors

So

urce

of

Info

rmat

ion

Met

hod

Eva

luat

ion

Bef

ore

Proj

ect S

tatu

s

2-

2.

Fina

ncia

l so

urce

to

prom

ote

the

train

ing

C/P

To c

heck

as

to h

ow

C/P

th

ink

abou

t

finan

ce i

n or

der

to

cont

inue

th

e

train

ing

Due

to M

AC

O w

ill b

e co

ntin

uous

ly h

eld

of

this

kin

d of

pro

ject

, the

y w

ill p

rom

ote

this

proj

ect

as a

mod

el c

ase

to o

ther

don

ors

or

they

will

be

hold

by

them

selv

es r

educ

ing

the

scal

e of

the

prog

ram

me.

3.

Te

chno

logy

ada

ptab

le te

chno

logy

e.g

. use

of lo

cal m

ater

ials

for f

odde

r

-pre

serv

atio

n of

fodd

er

3-

1.

Poss

ibili

ty

to

cont

inue

the

colla

bora

tion

betw

een

two

orga

niza

tions

.

Expe

rt an

d C

/P

To

chec

k as

to

whe

ther

M

AC

O

wel

com

e th

e

know

ledg

e of

UN

ZA t

o im

prov

e

the

serv

ice

prov

idin

g,

ZIA

to a

llow

thei

r sta

ff to

lear

n

at

UN

ZA

and

cont

inuo

us

curri

culu

m d

evel

opm

ent

They

ar

e ex

pect

ed

this

co

llabo

ratio

n

cont

inuo

usly

. N

ow

they

ar

e bu

ildin

g up

som

e of

act

s on

Vet

erin

ary

and

Live

stoc

k

field

by

tied

up, a

nd t

he s

hort,

mid

dle

and

long

te

rm

plan

s fo

r di

seas

e co

ntro

l in

Zam

bia

also

be

pl

anni

ng

by

thei

r

colla

bora

tion.

O

n th

ese

situ

atio

n,

it is

poss

ible

to

hold

lik

e th

is k

ind

of t

rain

ing

unde

r the

col

labo

ratio

n be

twee

n M

AC

O a

nd

UN

ZA.

94

63

Cri

teri

a In

dica

tors

So

urce

of

Info

rmat

ion

Met

hod

Eva

luat

ion

Bef

ore

Proj

ect S

tatu

s

4.

Ris

ks

agai

nst

sust

aina

bilit

y Ex

perts

, C/P

To

inte

rvie

w

and

find

out

wha

t th

e

mos

t lik

ely

risk

to

obst

ruct

th

e

sust

aina

bilit

y of

the

proj

ect w

ould

be.

budg

et

It is

sug

gest

ed th

ere

is n

ot s

o bi

g ris

k, if

the

train

ing

prog

ram

me

is

held

un

der

the

colla

bora

tion

betw

een

MA

CO

and

UN

ZA.

How

ever

the

tra

inin

g pr

ogra

mm

e w

ill b

e

held

an

d fo

cuse

d on

m

ajor

liv

esto

ck

prod

ucin

g ar

eas,

ther

e w

ill b

e no

ben

efit

for

area

s w

ith l

ow n

umbe

rs o

f liv

esto

ck.

So

whe

n ch

oosi

ng t

he t

arge

t ar

ea, i

t ha

s to

be

one

of th

e m

ajor

live

stoc

k pr

oduc

ing

area

s.

95

64

AAPPPPEENNDDIIXX 55:: SSHHOORRTT CCOOUURRSSEE TTRRAAIINNIINNGG OOFF TTEECCHHNNIICCAALL SSTTAAFFFF

No. Name Designation Course University Duration 1 Mr. M. N. Chihana Technician I Ten months

(1992) 2 Mr. H. Sinsungwe Technician II Lab.

Diagnostic methods in Parasitology

Nippon Eight months (1992/93)

3 Mr. P. G. Phiri Technician I Hokkaido Nine months (1991/92)

4 Mr. J. Lungu Assistant Technician

JOVC Nine months (1991/92)

5 Mr. D. M’ule Technician II JOCV Osaka Prefecture

Five months (1992)

6 Mr. A. Chota Technician I Lab. Diagnostic methods in Parasitology

Nine months (1993/94)

7 Mr. S. Chisembe Chief Technician

Soya nutrients Azumino Agricultural School

One month (1992)

8 Mr. F. Chitondo Pharmacy Technician

Pharmacology Nine months (1993/94)

9 Mr. G. Sikazwe Technician I Vet. Physiology and Pharmacology


10 Mr. T. F. Mphande Breeding, hygiene and Management of Large Animals

Five months (1994/95)

11 Mr. C. M. Mubita Technician I Vet. Bacteriology


12 Mr. G. Kawila Assistant Registrar UNZA-Med

Vet. Pharmacology


13 Dr. L. N. Zulu Senior Vet. Virological Five months

96

65

No. Name Designation Course University Duration Technician technology (1995)

14 Mr. G. Himunzowa Chief Technician, School of Engineering

Repairing Technology of Electronic Equipment

Five months (1995)

15 Mr. G. S. Nawa Botswana Clinical Biochemistry

Seven months (1995/96)

16 Mr. B. Sakala Technician I Vet. Physiology


17 Mr. E. Mwachindalo Pharmacy Technician

Vet. Pharmacology

Four months (1995)

18 Mr. L. Ngoma Histology Seven months (1996/97)

19 Mr. S. Tingiya Vet. Clinical Technology


20 Mr. M. Nyambe Assistant Technician

Vet. Medicine Nine months (1994/95)

21 Mr. W. Benkele Acting Chief Technician

Eleven months (1988/89)

22 Mr. S. Chisembe Acting Chief Technician

Microbiological and Virological Lab. Techniques

Three months (1988)

97

66

AAPPPPEENNDDIIXX 66:: CCHHRROONNOOLLOOGGIICCAALL TTAABBLLEE OOFF TTHHEE VVEETTEERRIINNAARRYY EEDDUUCCAATTIIOONN PPRROOJJEECCTT,,

PPHHAASSEE II AANNDD IIII

Date Event July 1981 FAO advised to establish veterinary school in Southern African Region. August 1982 GRZ officially requested grant aid as well as technical cooperation to Japanese

Government for establishment of veterinary school of UNZA. August 1982 Japan dispatched project finding mission February 1983 Japan dispatched a team for Basic Design Survey for Construction Project under

Grant Aid Programme May 1983 Japan dispatched a team for Basic Design Confirmation Survey for the Grant AidAugust 1983 Japan and GRZ exchanged Notes (signed mutual agreement) of JPY2.4 million for

construction of main facility. September 1983 The first generation of prospectus veterinary students completed one year

prerequisite program and enrolled into veterinary school. The second year student took basic curriculum which is common between Department of Agriculture and Department of Natural Science.

March 1984 The facility construction began April 1984 JICA dispatched Preliminary Survey Team for a Technical Cooperation of School

of Veterinary Medicine, UNZA (UNZA Vet School) July 1984 Japan and GRZ exchanged Notes (signed mutual agreement) of JPY1, 483 million

for construction of peripheral facilities as well as procurement of their equipment.September 1984 The first generation of prospectus veterinary students entered their third year.

The students started taking basic veterinary medicine. January 1985 JICA dispatched an Implementation Survey Team, whose task is a formulation of

project coordination as well as implementation plan, signing an R/D. The Five year technical cooperation of UNZA Vet School had started.

August 1985 JICA dispatch the first expert team. They shared rooms of school of mining as well as those of school of natural science.

October 1985 Japanese experts started coaching and practicing basic veterinary clinical medicine to new fourth year students.

March 1986 The construction of school of veterinary building had completed. Hand over ceremony took place.

July 1986 JICA dispatched four JOCV to UNZA Vet School October 1986 His Excellency of President Kaunda joint official opening ceremony of UNZA Vet

School March 1983 Annex building of UNZA Vet School was constructed by the project budget. August 1988 13 of the first generation of veterinary student successfully completed the

program and graduated.

98

67

Date Event August 1989 Joint evaluation of the project was implemented. The evaluation team

recommended to continuing technical cooperation up to July 1992. (extension of current project = Phase I)

December 1990 GRZ requested the second phase of the technical cooperation. September 1991 JICA dispatched Preliminary Survey Mission for technical cooperation for second

phase. July 1992 JICA dispatched an Implementation Study Team, whose task is a formulation of

project coordination as well as implementation plan, signing an R/D and tentative implementation plan. Phase II cooperative assistance had begun.

January 1994 The veterinary school started Master’s program. The first four students enrolled. November 1994 JICA dispatched mid-term evaluation team: revised tentative implementation

plan. March 1995 JICA finished dispatch of JOCV to UNZA Vet School October 1996 Construction of infected laboratory animal study facility completed by the project

budget December 1996 Joint evaluation of the project was implemented. It confirmed the successful

achievement of the goal within the project term. April 1997 10th anniversary symposium of the UNZA Vet School was held July 1997 Technical Cooperation had completed.

99

68

AAPPPPEENNDDIIXX 77:: UUNNZZAA AACCAADDEEMMIICC SSTTAAFFFF TTRRAAIINNEEDD IINN JJAAPPAANN

No. Name University in Japan Current position 1 Dr. A. S. Mweene Hokkaido University Dean, School of Veterinary Medicine, UNZA 2 Prof. M. M.

Musonda Azabu University Vice Chancellor, Copperbelt University

3 Dr. H. Chitambo Osaka Prefecture University

Senior lecturer, School of Veterinary Medicine, UNZA

4 Dr. M. Syakalima Hokkaido University Senior lecturer, School of Veterinary Medicine, UNZA

5 Dr. B. M. Hangómbe

Osaka University Lecturer, School of Veterinary Medicine, UNZA

6 Dr. V. C. Zulu Rakuno University Senior Lecturer, School of Veterinary Medicine, UNZA

7 Dr. O. Patel Tokyo University USA 8 Dr. A. Mulenga Hokkaido University Assistant Prof. Texas A & M University, USA 9 Dr. C. Mowa Hokkaido University Assistant Prof. Appalachian State University,

USA 10 Dr. I. Bhaiyat Hokkaido University Associate Prof. St. George’s University, Bahamas11 Dr. W. Witola Hokkaido University Post Doc. University of Connecticut Health

Centre, USA 12 Dr. K. Muzandu Hokkaido University Lecturer, School of Veterinary Medicine, UNZA 13 Dr. K. Makondo Hokkaido University Canada 14 Dr. Careen

Hankanga Iwate University Lecturer, School of Veterinary Medicine, UNZA

15 Dr. M. Malamo Hokkaido University Not completed but Lecturer, School of Veterinary Medicine, UNZA

16 Dr. E. Simulundu Hokkaido University Still studying 17 Dr. T. Mwanza Hokkaido University Late 18 Dr. M. Ngoma Hokkaido University Late 19 Dr. Janet

Muleya Yamaguchi University Late

20 Dr. C. Bishonga Hokkaido University Late

100

69

AAPPPPEENNDDIIXX 88:: SSHHOORRTT CCOOUURRSSEE TTRRAAIINNIINNGG OOFF AACCAADDEEMMIICC SSTTAAFFFF

No. Name Designation Course University Duration 1 Dr. A. S. Mweene Dean Zoonosis

Control Hokkaido One month

(2006) 2 Dr. B. Hangómbe Lecturer I Zoonosis


(2006) 3 Dr. M. Syakalima Senior Lecturer Zoonosis


(2006) 4 Dr. N. Saasa Lecturer II Zoonosis


(2007) 5 Dr. Ntombi

Mudenda- Nkonde Lecturer II Zoonosis


(2007) 6 Dr. E. T. Mwase Senior Lecturer Entomology Institute of

Animal Health

Thee months (1992)

7 Dr. Janet Muleya Late lecturer Small Animal Medicine

Nine months (1992)


8 Prof. A. Nambota Professor Vet. Parasitology

Five months (1996)


9 Prof. L. M. Tuchili Professor Poultry diseases

Six months (1995)

10 Dr. L. Chiti House surgeon Small Animal Surgery and Clinical Management

Six months (1996/97)

11 Dr. B. Namangala Senior Lecturer/Assistant Dean Post graduate studies

Post Doctorate Obihiro Two years

101

70

AAPPPPEENNDDIIXX 99:: NNUUMMBBEERRSS OOFF GGRRAADDUUAATTEESS FFRROOMM TTHHEE SSCCHHOOOOLL

Academic year Male Female Total 1987/88 11 2 13 1988/89 13 2 15 1989/90 17 0 17 1990/91 12 2 14 1991/92 15 2 17 1992/93 15 4 19 1993/94 19 3 22 1994/95 17 1 18 1995/96 8 2 10 1996/97 7 5 12 1997/98 - - - 1998/99 14 3 17 1999/00 10 2 12 2000/01 - - - 2001/02 14 2 16 2002/03 13 8 21 2003/04 N/A N/A 12 2004/05 N/A N/A 9 2005/06 N/A N/A 6 2006/07 N/A N/A 13 2007/08 15 6 21

Total 185 38 284

102

71

AAPPPPEENNDDIIXX 1100:: AACCAADDEEMMIICC SSTTAAFFFF LLEEVVEELLSS OOVVEERR TTIIMMEE

Year Zambian Expatriate Total

1988 3 30 33

1991 11 19 31

1992 14 21 35

1993 17 16 33

1996 28 9 37

1997 22 1 23

2001 35 1 36

2002 34 2 36

2003 29 2 31

2004 29 2 31

2005 28 1 29

2006 27 1 28

2007 35 1 36

2008 35 1 36

103

72

AAPP PP

EENN

DDII XX

1111 ::

NNAA

TTII OO

NNAA

LL LL

II VVEE

SS TTOO

CCKK

NNUU

MMBB

EERR

SS BB

EETT

WWEE

EENN

1199 88

22 AA

NNDD

2200 00

55

YEAR

B

ULL

S

CO

WS/

HEI

FER

S

OXE

N/S

TEER

S

CAL

VES

T

otal

Cat

tle

She

ep

Goa

ts

Pig

s

1982

56.

161

979

.040

5

37.1

59

379

.513

1.

951.

873

25

.524

31

5.91

7 14

7.09

3

1983

58.

449

1.

038.

121

5

58.6

34

393

.056

2.

048.

260

39

.264

44

0.99

8 16

8.62

4

1984

64.

712

1.

018.

898

5

58.1

45

394

.663

2.

036.

418

35

.972

36

6.97

2 16

6.47

7

1985

79.

382

1.

053.

057

5

71.8

44

371

.453

2.

075.

736

30

.468

39

3.89

6 15

6.04

1

1986

78.

163

1.

082.

663

5

37.7

63

399

.896

2.

098.

485

29

867

419.

153

178.

502

1987

56.

236

1.

091.

179

5

77.7

44

415

.942

2.

141.

101

29

.601

40

0.99

8 19

6.31

0

1988

58.

346

1.

090.

686

5

91.5

76

415

.092

2.

155.

700

31

.037

49

0.23

9 20

1.59

1

1989

61.

473

1.

105.

966

5

80.8

86

446

.862

2.

195.

187

34

.846

48

7.72

1 23

5.06

5

1990

62.

471

1.

103.

464

5

62.6

21

449

.524

2.

178.

080

36

.892

51

5.05

1 46

4.34

6

1994

81.

073

1.

294.

998

6

46.4

09

503

.487

2.

525.

967

72

.428

61

1.71

3 25

8.28

5

1995

66.

152

1.

167.

513

5

78.9

83

454

.449

2.

267.

097

63

.439

63

3.21

3 28

6.10

8

2001

78.

122

1.

129.

495

8

19.0

83

464

.290

2.

490.

990

-

-

-

2002

1

00.0

70

9

84.8

12

784

.920

6

46.7

48

2.51

6.55

0

60.9

47

856.

810

276.

791

2003

77.

401

1.

158.

653

6

62.0

36

477

.363

2.

375.

453

76

.799

96

6.26

4 26

8.59

9

2004

77.

285

1.

156.

933

6

51.0

68

456

.684

2.

341.

970

97

.605

1.

002.

376

286.

726

2005

92.

742

1.

388.

320

7

77.4

59

541

.445

2.

799.

966

11

7.93

0 1.

762.

461

398.

637

104

73

AAPPPPEENNDDIIXX 1122:: TTHHIIRRDD CCOOUUNNTTRRYY PPAARRTTIICCIIPPAANNTTSS

Course Country Tick Borne (1999)

Zoonosis (2000)

Trans Border (2001)

Poultry (2002)

Wild life Management (2003)

Angola N/A 0 2 2 3 Botswana N/A 2 1 3 1 Congo D.R. N/A 0 0 1 1 Lesotho N/A 2 2 1 1 Malawi N/A 1 1 1 0 Mauritius N/A 1 1 1 1 Mozambique N/A 1 2 1 3 Swaziland N/A 1 1 2 1 Tanzania N/A 2 1 2 1 Zambia N/A 4 4 4 4 Zimbabwe N/A 1 2 2 4 Namibia N/A 1 2 0 0 South Africa N/A 3 1 0 0 Seychelles N/A 0 0 0 0 Total 20 19 20 20 20

105

74

AAPPPPEENNDDIIXX 1133:: JJOOCCVV MMRRMMBBEERRSS WWHHOO HHAAVVEE SSEERRVVIICCEEDD AASS VVEETTEERRIINNAARRIIAANNSS IINN ZZAAMMBBIIAA

Number of JOCV members who served as Veterinarians in Zambia Period Period No.

from to

Place

Position

No.

from to

Place

Position

1 1977 1979 Namwala DVO 1 1975 1977 Mazabuka Labo.Vet

2 1978 1980 Mbabala DVO 2 1977 1979 Mazabuka Labo.Vet

3 1978 1980 Lusaka DVO 3 1984 1986 Lusaka NRDC(?)

4 1979 1981 Mongu DVO 4 1986 1988 Lusaka UNZA

5 1979 1981 Ndola DVO 5 1986 1988 Lusaka UNZA

6 1979 1981 Chipata DVO 6 1986 1988 Lusaka UNZA

7 1979 1981 Lusaka DVO 7 1986 1990 Lusaka UNZA

8 1980 1982 Mukushi DVO 8 1987 1988 Mazabuka ZIAH(?)

9 1980 1982 Lusaka DVO 9 1987 1989 Mazabuka Vet Clinic

10 1981 1983 Ndola DVO 10 1988 1991 Lusaka UNZA


12 1981 1984 Choma DVO 12 1988 1991 Lusaka UNZA


14 1982 1984 Mazabuka DVO 14 1989 1991 Mazabuka ZIAH


16 1983 1985 Choma DVO 16 1989 1991 Mazabuka Vet Clinic

17 1983 1985 Mazabuka DVO 17 1990 1991 Lusaka UNZA

18 1984 1986 Mazabuka DVO 18 1990 1992 Mazabuka ZIAH


20 1984 1985 Lusaka DVO 20 1991 1993 Mazabuka ZIAH


22 1985 1987 Mazabuka DVO 22 1992 1994 Lusaka UNZA

23 1986 1990 Choma DVO 23 1992 1994 Lusaka UNZA

24 1986 1988 Mazabuka DVO 24 1992 1994 Mazabuka ZIAH(?)



27 1989 1991 Solwezi DVO 27 1993 1995 Mazabuka ZIAH

28 1989 1992 Mazabuka DVO 28 1995 1997 Mazabuka NAIS

29 2004 2006 Mongu Vet Officer

106

APPENDIX 14

75107

100132

101133

103135

104

136

105

137

106

138

107

139

108140

109

141

110142

111

143

112

144

113

145

114146

　APPENDIX 16

115147

116148

117

149

118150

119151

appendix 1: interview survey list of interviewees no. name … · 2009. 9. 17. · 31 cletus...

Documents