the workplace mediator 34 section three: putting conflict …
TRANSCRIPT
THE WORKPLACE MEDIATOR’S HANDBOOK | 34
© THE TCM GROUP l WWW.THETCMGROUP.COM
SECTION THREE:
PUTTING CONFLICT INTO
CONTEXT
This section includes course notes, handouts and articles related to workplace
conflict.
THE WORKPLACE MEDIATOR’S HANDBOOK | 36
© THE TCM GROUP l WWW.THETCMGROUP.COM
What is conflict?
Conflict is a normal, natural and inevitable aspect of working life.
"Conflict occurs when an individual (or a group of individuals), believe that another individual (or a
group of individuals) is preventing them from achieving their needs or goals; preventing access to
the resources they need to achieve their needs or goals; or preventing them from expressing their
values or beliefs in a way which they consider to be reasonable. Our actions, our reactions and our
interactions determine whether the conflict becomes and remains constructive or whether it
becomes destructive… “
David Liddle, 2009
Destructive conflict is not healthy – it is avoidable, and it is escapable.
The root cause of destructive conflict is a sense of loss arising from our unmet needs (Loss of
confidence, face, esteem etc.) The loss triggers negative emotions and behaviours which can
become, hostile, divisive and eventually harmful.
THE WORKPLACE MEDIATOR’S HANDBOOK | 37
© THE TCM GROUP l WWW.THETCMGROUP.COM
How and why do conflicts escalate?
According to extensive research undertaken at the TCM Group, we have identified 5 distinct stages
to conflict:
The 5 stages of conflict
Stage 1: The pre-conflict stage
This stage relates predominantly to the underlying or root causes of conflict. For instance, change
and conflict are inextricably linked, and one often drives the other. Other factors include the role of
the leadership, functional, systemic and structural factors, cultural and political factors or factors
relating to the distribution of resources or rewards.
Stage 2: The early conflict stage
This stage develops as the parties experience the initial stages of the conflict - often referred to as
‘fight or flight’. The parties’ positions may harden, and communication becomes limited and
disrupted. Alliances and cliques begin to form, and the parties blame each other for the problem. As
parties ‘enter the conflict zone’, divergence between one or more of their needs, goals or
expectations begin to emerge. This leads to a sense of frustration and anxiety for the parties and the
early warning signs may include reduced communication, hostility, inappropriate behaviours and
attempts to isolate one another. The parties adopt a series of positions to communicate their own
points of view, which can become mutually exclusive and seemingly irreconcilable. This adds to the
frustration, anger and a sense of mistrust for all parties as their positions are not accepted or
realised. Frequently at this stage, the parties lose sight of common ground and focus on the factors
that have driven them apart.
THE WORKPLACE MEDIATOR’S HANDBOOK | 38
© THE TCM GROUP l WWW.THETCMGROUP.COM
Resolving differences at this early stage and encouraging the parties to ‘let off steam’, step back and
talk the issues through can be very valuable. By engaging the parties in a process of open and honest
dialogue, positions can be softened, behaviours changed, attitudes realigned, and dialogue
developed. However, many managers miss this vital opportunity to ‘nip the conflict in the bud’,
leaving the conflict to fester so it requires only a spark to ignite it and throw all parties into an
uncontrollable and destructive spiral of stressful and damaging conflict.
Taking a stand
The parties are immersed in ‘the conflict zone’. Though they may still be prepared to engage in
dialogue, if their efforts to seek a resolution are fruitless, they will start to doubt that a solution can
be found, and they will question the ‘reasonableness’ of the other party. As the conflict escalates
and rational communication is replaced with emotional confrontation, the parties may become more
forceful in pushing their positions. All focus is now on winning.
At this stage, the protagonists may try to forge alliances with people they believe will support and
strengthen their position. Inflexibility and stubbornness become the staple diet of the conflict and
tactics may appear confused, irrational and increasingly aggressive. These behaviours, however,
reflect the parties’ perceptions of reality - their ‘truth’. In conflict, our sense of the ‘truth’ is extremely
powerful, and any attempts to force parties to accept another ‘truth’ may be viewed with suspicion.
It is hard for parties to listen at this stage. They are planning their strategy, and the ability to
empathise is one factor which is seriously undermined.
Stage 3: The mid conflict stage
This stage often sees the parties engaging in coercive and destructive tactics to ‘win’ the conflict (I
win; you lose). Often this is a very challenging period for managers and HR and is typified by increased
grievances, allegations, absence and stress for all parties.
The blame game
As the conflict escalates, the parties’ tactics are aimed at gaining and maintaining the upper hand.
Both parties are convinced they are in the right and that the threat to their values, needs, goals or
expectations is real and substantial. The language of blame becomes the language of the conflict…
• “You should back down …you are wrong”
• “They always behave like this and should be punished”
• “If it wasn’t for them…”
• “You’re the manager; you do something about them…”
This language is aimed at presenting the other party as the wrongdoer and influencing decision-
makers to take their side. It can become increasingly threatening, sometimes even aggressive and
violent. The parties are being driven by their emotional responses and may experience symptoms of
stress and anxiety. They may try to project an image of righteousness and strength while absolving
themselves of responsibility for the conflict.
THE WORKPLACE MEDIATOR’S HANDBOOK | 39
© THE TCM GROUP l WWW.THETCMGROUP.COM
The blame game prevents protagonists from looking inward and maintains an unhealthy focus on
the tactics and games being played. Any reasonable attempts to engage the parties in
communication may result in bickering, arguments and hostility. It is unusual for either party in a
conflict to win the blame game….
Actions speak louder than words
Not unsurprisingly, as the conflict escalates, the communication and dialogue trail off with the
parties beginning to feel further debate is unlikely to resolve anything. The parties develop strategies
that will make the other side back down and yield to their demands – they aim to block the
opposition from attaining their needs, goals and expectations whilst enabling theirs to be met. As
the communication process fades into distant memory, it is replaced with a series of non-verbal
signals and actions. The protagonists form stereotypical views of their counterparts based on
assumptions and prejudice. Typically, these are wholly inaccurate, but they are used to rationalise
and justify their own behaviour and activities. Tactics include:
1. Provoking the other person to act in a particular way
2. Trading insults and negative comments
3. Preventing the other party from accessing information, files, records etc.
4. Issuing threats and ultimate
Attack and counter attack
These threats and ultimately become increasingly rigid and inflexible. As the conflict continues, the
parties start to view each other as almost sub-human. They react violently to one another and may
experience high levels of anxiety in each other’s presence. Given the codes and norms of the
workplace, it probably won’t be easy for them to engage in open hostility, so the attacks and counter
attacks become increasingly subversive and devious.
The parties may start to feel out of control and their alliances begin to fail as the conflict becomes
more serious and threatening. They may lose sight of their strategy and begin to demand immediate
actions from their counterparts, some of which will leave them with little room for manoeuvre. If it
hadn’t already, the conflict will now have taken over and the parties are entirely locked in. To back
down now would end in a loss of face, submission and failure.
At this stage, the parties may seek external assistance, sometimes as a tactic to strengthen their
position, sometimes as a genuine cry for help and support.
THE WORKPLACE MEDIATOR’S HANDBOOK | 40
© THE TCM GROUP l WWW.THETCMGROUP.COM
Stage 4: The late conflict stage
This stage sees the conflict erupt and become all consuming. Alternatively, the conflict slowly ‘eats
away’ to such a great extent that a previously well performing team begins to fail and implode. Either
way, the cost of the conflict can be significant, extensive and often formal procedure or court action
is the outcome. At this stage, the fight or flight response is extremely powerful, and the basis of the
parties’ activities is survival at all costs. In the workplace, the parties are at war. The smallest spark
could result in an all-out offensive and the normal rules of engagement have been tossed in the bin.
The parties engage in often brutal and increasingly desperate attacks and seek to inflict as much
damage on the other as possible. They will seek to damage their opponent’s reputation, integrity,
power base and alliances. They may lash out blindly and may even seek to inflict damage upon other
staff, managers, representatives, mediators or negotiators.
As the conflict grows in intensity and sucks other people in, the pressure increases, and the parties
experience extreme levels of stress. Then BANG - suddenly, like a volcano, it explodes or like a
collapsing building it implodes. At this time, the conflict will be potentially highly dangerous with
very little consideration of personal needs; it is about winning at any cost. This can have a number
of outcomes, including: both parties being subjected to disciplinary action; one or both parties
pursuing grievances; one or both parties being dismissed; a criminal investigation; or litigation by the
parties or the organisation.
Stage 5: The post conflict stage
Of course, someone has to meet the needs of the customers, deliver the services, heal the patients,
drive the lorries, deliver the post etc. It is often up to HR and managers to pick up the pieces and to
retain a balance between the needs of the parties and the needs of the business. This is never an
easy task, yet it is made even harder when the parties believe that they are right and everyone else
is wrong.
What can managers and HR do?
An effective conflict management or dispute resolution strategy should take account of the 5
different stages of conflict and should enable managers and HR to recognise the nature of conflict at
each stage.
Moreover, a workplace dispute resolution strategy should provide the parties in dispute, their
managers and HR with an effective range of measures to help resolve the conflict swiftly, effectively
and, most importantly, constructively.
THE WORKPLACE MEDIATOR’S HANDBOOK | 41
© THE TCM GROUP l WWW.THETCMGROUP.COM
Constructive and destructive conflict
Based upon a model from ‘Playing with Fire’ (1992)
Nic Fine and Fiona Macbeth; LEAP Confronting Conflict/Youth Work Press
This figure represents the two extremes of conflict and what actions may be required to take a
conflict on a destructive or constructive path.
The ingredients are the people concerned, their personality, ideas, values etc. The combinations and
conditions are the factors that contribute to the conflict (people, power, politics, culture,
environment, leadership etc.) The spark is the immediate event or incident that triggers things off.
Conflict can develop in different ways from here. The left-hand column depicts potentially
destructive conflict and involves our typical image of negative conflict. The right-hand column
depicts more constructive responses which may in turn lead to improved communication,
understanding, trust, respect and tolerance.
Ingredients
Combinations and Conditions
Spark
THE WORKPLACE MEDIATOR’S HANDBOOK | 42
© THE TCM GROUP l WWW.THETCMGROUP.COM
What is your conflict management style?
From Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument also known as the TKI (Mountain View, CA: CPP, Inc., 1974–2009)
Avoiding – “The Turtle” (withdrawing)
Turtles withdraw into their shells to avoid conflict. They give up their personal goals
and relationships. They stay away from the issues over which the conflict is taking
place and the people they are in conflict with. Turtles believe it is easier to withdraw
(physically and psychologically) from a conflict rather than face it.
Competing – “The Shark” (forcing)
Sharks try to overpower opponents by forcing them to accept their solution to
the conflict. Their goals are highly important to them and their relationship is of
minor importance. Sharks seek to achieve their own goals at all costs. They are
not concerned about the needs of other people. They do not care if other people
like or accept them. Sharks assume that one person winning and the other
person losing settles conflicts. Sharks want to be the winner. Winning gives sharks a sense of pride
and achievement. Losing gives them a sense of inadequacy and failure. They try to win by
attacking, overpowering, overwhelming and intimidating others.
Accommodating – “The Teddy Bear” (smoothing)
To teddy bears the relationship is of great importance while their own goals are of
little importance. Teddy bears want to be accepted and liked by other people. They
think that conflict should be avoided in favour of harmony and believe that if the
conflict continues, someone will get hurt and that would ruin the relationship.
Teddy bears give up their goal to preserve the relationship. Teddy bears say, “I’ll give up what I
want and let you have what you want in order for you us to get along.” Teddy bears try to smooth
over the conflict and avoid causing harm.
Compromising – “The fox”
Foxes are moderately concerned with their own goals and about the relationship
with other people. Foxes seek compromise. They give up a part of their goals and
persuade the other person in conflict to give up part of his or her goals.
Foxes seek a solution to conflict where both sides gain something- the middle
ground between two positions. They are willing to sacrifice part of their goals and
relationships in order to find agreement for the common good.
THE WORKPLACE MEDIATOR’S HANDBOOK | 43
© THE TCM GROUP l WWW.THETCMGROUP.COM
Collaborating – “The owl”
Owls highly value their own goals and relationships. They view conflicts as
problems to be solved and seek a solution that achieves both their own goals
and the goals of the other person involved in the conflict. Owls see conflict as an
opportunity for improving relationships by reducing tension between two
people. They try to begin a discussion that identifies the conflict as a problem. By seeking
solutions that satisfy both themselves and the other person, owls maintain the relationship. Owls
are not satisfied until a solution is found that achieves their own goals and the other person’s
goals. Owls are not satisfied until the tensions and negative feelings have been fully resolved.
THE WORKPLACE MEDIATOR’S HANDBOOK | 44
© THE TCM GROUP l WWW.THETCMGROUP.COM
The 3 components of most conflicts
Most conflicts are basically made up of three separate components: content, interaction and
expectations.
1. Content
This describes individual’s concerns. It tells us what the conflict is about from their
perspective. Within conflict and particularly at the early stages of mediation, we are often
faced with a variety of differing accounts. This is natural and indicates that the contents are
different according to individual perspectives. Often there is limited commonality about
the content of the dispute.
2. Interaction
This describes how people behave towards one another and their feelings towards one
another. The interaction will be based upon how an individual perceives the conflict along
with their own conflict management style. Generally, interactions, prior to mediation, have
been negative and harmful.
3. Expectations
This describes individual’s expectations of how they want the situation to be handled or
resolved. The expectations may often sound like a demand and are often put forward as
non-negotiable. Often expectations are outcome-orientated and are based on a premise of
blame. Typically, expectations seek a win/lose outcome.
THE WORKPLACE MEDIATOR’S HANDBOOK | 45
© THE TCM GROUP l WWW.THETCMGROUP.COM
The role of the mediator
Content
Mediators need to be clear about the contents of a dispute. The content of the dispute can often be
seen as complex and confusing (this is why so many people chose to avoid dealing with it). As
mediators, we understand that people’s perception of the content of the conflict is affected by their
view of themselves, of the other person and the situation. Furthermore, we accept that people’s
view of the content of the conflict can be affected by their own prejudices, experiences, points of
view, beliefs, backgrounds, cultural viewpoints.
Interaction
Mediators seek to build positive, safe and constructive interactions between the parties. By
remaining un-phased, impartial and fair, you will gain the trust of all parties. As you work with all
parties, they will begin to have confidence in you and the process. By defusing anger and responding
to aggression in an assertive and non-threatening way, the parties will feel safe. This is vital for them
in order to feel that they can communicate with one another. Do not underestimate the importance
of your role and the process you are managing.
Expectations
Mediation encourages the parties to develop expectations of a process and outcome, which will
meet their underlying needs as well as the needs of other parties. These types of outcomes are
known as "win/win" outcomes and are explored in detail within the course. The mediator encourages
individuals to focus on their interests and needs rather than their rigid positions. They encourage
parties to focus on the future and learn from the past. Mediators help parties develop realistic
expectations, which meet the needs of all parties. Mediators also encourage parties to move away
from notions of blame. The use of ‘I’ statements rather than “you” statements is vital at this stage of
conflict management.
THE WORKPLACE MEDIATOR’S HANDBOOK | 46
© THE TCM GROUP l WWW.THETCMGROUP.COM
The ABC of conflict
Adapted from Working with Conflict, Skills and Strategies for Action. - S. Fisher et al- Responding to Conflict 2000
ABC can also be used to describe our own reactions to conflict:
- Affective Responses (emotional)
- Behavioural responses
- Cognitive Responses