teorija osećajnog vezivanja - pregled istraživanja

7/30/2019 Teorija oseajnog vezivanja - pregled istraivanja

1/27

159.922.016 XXXVII 2 2005 ISSN 0579-6431 57-81

:

,

. . , (-, , , ), (, --, ). -, - . , : -, , - , . , .: , , , -,, .

:

, , - (John Bowlby, 1978). --, - -, -

E-mail: [email protected]


2/27

58

. - (, - ) .

attachment, . , .1

/, : (attachment), (attachment as behavioral system),- (attachment working model) - (pattern of attachment).

, , , : , . ( ), . , , ,

e (Ainsworth, 1969; Bowlby, 1978).

-. --, -. (-) -

1- (2005, . 1).


3/27

: 59

. - . :

( , ), . , ( ) . , , , ,. ,

/. (Bowlby, 1978).

-, . - . () - (Bowlby, 1978: 110).

- . ,-. -- . , (Ainsworth, 1969; Bowlby,1978), (Main, 2000; West & Sheldon-Keller,1994). , . .


4/27

60

, / . , ,

, (Cowan,Cohn & Pearson, 1996). , , . - , . , . -. (Cowan, Cohn & Pearson,1996). --

- . -, -. --. - (Cowan, Cohn & Pearson, 1996). - .

, , . , (West et al.,2000).

- (Bowlby, 1978; Ainsworth,1983). . , . , , .


5/27

: 61

, . ,

. 1995. 2005. , . 1995. 2001. (Social Science Citation Index), 20022005.

, --: () - (), () -

, () , () () , . , () ()

() --.

, -, , --. , - (, , , ), 2- - (, , ). -

2.


6/27

62

--, --

. , -. -.

--

. - (Ainsworth, 1983) -, ,. , . --- -. -- / ,

, . (the strange situation) .3

: (, ); --

3-

- . . ,

() , (Main, 1999).


7/27

: 63

(- , );

- ( , ). (Mary Main, Donna Weston) e , / , (Main,1999: 723). ae

(Vanijzendorn et al., 1999) ( 6.000 ) 15% , , ,, ,.

-, 1963. , - 26 -, - 66% (), - 20% (), - 12% () (Main, 1999). ,

, - 1988. (: Byng-Hall, 1995: 5): 57%73%, - 20%, -- 4%22%. , - (Moss & Laurent, 2004) 150 . (Preschoolttachment Classification System)4 : 69% (), 10%

4 Preschool Attachment Classification System (PASC) -, -

. (). PASC Cassidy & Marvin withMacArthur working group on attachment, 1992 (Moss & Laurent, 2004: 323).


8/27

64

- (), 10% - (), 10% (). .

(Zuch, 2000), 16 (- -) : 38% (),- 25% () - 38% (). (Story Completion Task).5---, 100% , .

- (2004), 42, .: 25% (), -- 38% (), - 38% (). , 90 23 , . - (2000) Q6 ( ). : 47%

, 10% . , .

. , , . , -

5

. , , . , /. Openhaim (1997), (Zuch, 2000).

6, -

Q-sort . - Q-sort Everet Voters (Everett Waters, 1997).


9/27

: 65

. - . , -

. , (, 23, 56 ) - , --. ( -). (),

-.

- , . --, -, -, --. .

-. -/, - (Adult Attachment Interview).7 ,. , ,

7AAI, - George, Kaplan i Main, 1985. (: Crowell & Treboux,1995).


10/27

66

. .

,8 9 Q-sort.10 , , . , , , -, -. . ,

. -- (unsecure dissmising) - , . -, , - (), - .

, (AAI) -

. - , . - (Vanijzendorn & Bakerman-skranenburg, 1996). 33 , - 2000 AAI , -

8 1991. (At-

tachment Interview, : Crowell & Treboux, 1995). -.

9 1987. (Adult Attachment Styles and Adaptation, : Crowell & Treboux, 1995) - 1992. -

(Reciprocal Attachment Questioner, West & Sheldon-Keller, 1992.)10 Q-sort 1989. (Marital Q-sort, : Crowell & Treboux, 1995).


11/27

: 67

, (),. , -- AAI : 58%

/ , 24% () , 18% -, 19% ( ). . , . AAI,

, .

, (Crowell & Treboux, 1995), -, - , --. (2004) . 209 , ,

/. -, -. -, -. , 180 , , AAI , (-, 2002). 52.8% , -


12/27

68

26% , - 17.2% 3.9% . , 53.3%, - 24.4%, -

18.3%, 5% . .

- (2003) , 280 ,, -, - : ( ) , () -/ .

.-, . , -. - ( ), , ,

, .

--. -. -

, .


13/27

: 69

- () (I).

(Waters et al., 2000)

(Weinfield et al., 2000), . , ( ). (72% /), (36% ).

(,, , , ) . (66% ). 22% () . .

, --.-. () , , , , , .

, -


14/27

70

-, . , -

, , -. .

- (Zimmermann et al., 2000). (-, , ), . () ,

16 . , . . .

, -

, , --. -, - , , . , ( ) , .


15/27

: 71

--

. - . (AAI), .

(Gomille &Glogrtippelt, 1999; Glogertippelt, 1999) 28 -, -, - (, -) (

, -). -,-. , : , --,.

(Steele et al., 1996) , 90 ,

, (AAI), (). : -- , . , , - , , - .

- .


16/27

72

- .

(Sagi et al., 1997) --

. -. - 45 -. , (24 ), -. (AAI),. - 76% , 40% . -

. (), . .

(Kazui et al., 2000) , 50 , -

(AAI) - (Q-sort ). Q-

-sort (), - . Q-sort , -. -.

- (Siddiqui et al., 2000)


17/27

: 73

. -. -, . -

: . -. .

- . , , -

-. -, () , .

- (, , ). , , ----. -.

. - , , .

(Laible & Thompson, 2000)

-


18/27

74

() -. -. , Q-sort , -,

. - 45- : , . , , . , .

(Steele t al., 1999) , . , , . , (AAI), (AAI) 18 . , . ( ,

, ) , .

e (Demulderet al., 2000) , . 94 . , Q-.


19/27

: 75

. . -

. -/-.

, , . . -

-. (Salzman, 1996), -

1821 , (I). . , 80% . ,

. , .

(Okoon, 1997) 167 - ( 1618 ) , -. - (), -. , , -.


20/27

76

, ,

. ----.

(Zimmermann et al., 1996), - -,11

. , .

(Allen & Hauser, 1996), -, -, --. 73 -:

, , -. , 14 , - , . 25 , . . 11. 25. . 25.

11-e (ego-resilience), -

. -.


21/27

: 77

11 . , -, ,

. , .

(Allen et al.,1998) , -. 131 --. I, - , .

( ), 12

(), ( ). . .

(Fischer & Good, 1998) 195 .

, . , , ,.

(Haigleret al., 1995) , . , 218 -

12 , -, .


22/27

78

, -. -

. . . -.

- (Wensauer& Grossmann, 1998) - ( AAI) -

(). - 48 69 . - , . , , . . , ,

- .

/

-. , - -, . -,, .

/, -


23/27

: 79

, , -. , -, -

.-.

-, , -. , .

(insworth, 1988) , - , -, -. , - , , . ,

. -, . , -. - -- - .


24/27

80

. 1429 - (20022005).

Ainsworth, M. (1988): On security. Stony Brook attachment discussions.Ainsworth, M. (1983): ary D. Salter Ainsworth; in A. N. O. Connell & N.F. Russo (eds.):

Models of achievement: reflections of eminent women in psychology (200219). NewYork: Columbia University Press.

Allen, P. & T. Hauser (1996): Autonomy and relatedness in adolescent-family interactions aspredictors of young-adults states of mind regarding attachment, Developement andPsychopatology, Vol. 8, No. 4, 793809.

Allen, P., C. Moore, G. Kuperman & K. Bell (1998): Attachment and adolescent psychosocialfunctioning, Child Development, Vol. 69, No. 5, 14061419.

Bowlby, J. (1978):Attachment and loss, Vol. 1. Penguin books.Byng-Hall, J. (1995): Creating a secure family base: some implications of attachment theory

for family therapy,Family Process, 114.Cowan, P., D. Cohn & J. Pearson (1996): Parents attachment histories and childrens externa-

lizing and internalizing behaviour: exploring family systems models of linkage, Journalof Counceling and Clinical Psychology, Vol. 64, No. 1, 5363.

Crowell, J.A. & D. Treboux (1995):A review of adult attachment measures: implications fortheory and research, Social Development, No. 4, 294327.

Demulder, K., M. Schmidt & J. Mitchell (2000): Q-sort assessment of attachment security du-ring the preschool years links from home to school, Developmental Psychology, Vol.36, No. 2, 274282.

Fischer, R. & E. Good (1998): Perceptions of parent-child relationships and masculine roleconflicts of college men,Journal of Consulting Psychology, Vol. 45, No. 3, 346352.

Frosch, A., C. Mangelsdorf & L. Mchale (2000): Marital behavior and the security of pre-schooler-parent attachment relationships,Journal of Family Psychology, Vol. 14, No.1, 144161.

Glogertippelt,G.(1999):Transmisionofattachmentinmothersand their preschool-aged child-ren, Praxis der Kinderpsychologie und Kinderpsychiatrie, Vol. 48, No. 2, 113128.

Gomille,B.&G.Glogertippelt(1999):Transgenerational transmission ofattachmentrelationsbetweenmothers mental models of attachment and their infants patterns of attachment,as well as mothers experiences and interaction behaviour during transition to parent-hood,Praxis der Kinderpsychologie und Kinderpsychiatrie, Vol. 48, No. 2, 101112.

Haigler, F., D. Day & D. Marshall (1995): Parental attachment and gender-role identity, SexRole, Vol. 33, No. 34, 203220.

Kazui, M., T. Endo, A. Tanaka, H. Sakagami & M. Suganuma (2000): Intergenerational tran-smission of attachment Japanese mother-child dyads,Japanese Journal of EducationalPsychology, Vol. 48, No. 3, 323332.

Laible, D.J. & R.A. Thompson (2000): Mother-child discourse, attachment security, sharedpositive affect and early conscience development, Child Development, Vol. 71, No. 5,14241440.

Main, M. (1999): Mary D. Salter Ainsworth: tribute and portrait,Psychoanalitic Inquiry, No.19, 682776.

Main, M.(2000): The organized categories of infant, child and adult attachment flexible vs.inflexible attention under attachment-related stress, Journal of the American Psycho-

analitic Asociation, Vol. 48, No. 4, 10551096.


25/27

: 81

Moss, E. & D. Laurent (2004): Correlates of attachment at age 3: construct validity of the pre-school attachment classification system, Developmental Psychology, Vol. 40, No. 3,323334.

Niki, G. (2003): Dva pristupa izuavanju bliskih partnerskih relacija (magistarski rad).Beograd: Filozofski fakultet.

Okoon, J. (1997): Attachment to parents and peers in late adolescence and their relationship

with self-image,Adolescence, Vol. 32, No. 126, 471482.Polovina, N. (2004): Tok razvoja orijentacije ka roditeljstvu (doktorska disertacija). Beograd:

Filozofski fakultet.Rosenstein, D. & H. Horowitz (1996): Adolescent attachment and psychopathology, Journal

of Counceling and Clinical Psychology, Vol. 66, No. 2, 244253.Sagi, A., M.H. Vanijzendoorn, M. Scharf & T. Joels (1997): Ecological constraints for inter-

generational transmission of attachment, International Journal of Behavioral Deve-lopment, Vol. 20, No. 2, 287299.

Salzman, J. (1996): Primary attachment in female adolescents: association with depression,self-esteem and marital identification,Psychiatry, Vol. 59, 2033.

Siddiqui, A., B. Hagglof & M. Eisemann (2000): Own memories of upbringing as a determi-nant of prenatal attachment in expectant women, Journal of Reproductive and InfantPsychology, Vol. 18, No. 1, 6774.

Steele, H., M. Steele & P. Fonagy (1996): Associations among attachment classifications ofmothers, fthers and their infants, Child Development, Vol. 67, No. 2, 541555.

Steele, H., M. Steele, C. Croft & P.Fonagy (1999): Infant-mother attachment at one-year pre-dicts childrens understanding of mixed emotions at 6 years, Social Development, Vol.8, No. 2, 161178.

Stefanovi-Stojanovi, T. (2000):Afektivno vezivanje transgeneracijski pristup (magistarskirad). Beograd: Filozofski fakultet.

Stefanovi-Stojanovi, T. (2002):Bliske partnerske veze u svetlu teorije afektivnog vezivanja(doktorska disertacija). Beograd: Filozofski fakultet.

Stroufe,A.,E.Carlson,K.Levy&B.Egeland(1999):Implicationof attachment theory fordevelopmental psychology,Developmentand Psychopathology, Vol. 11, No. 1, 113.

Vanijzendorn, H. & J. Bakermanskranenburg (1996): Attachment representation in mothers,fathers, adolescents and clinical groups a metaanalitic search for normative data, Jo-urnal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, Vol. 64, No. 1, 821.

Vanijzendoorn, M.H., C. Schuengel & M.J. Bakermanskranenburg (1999): Disorganised at-tachment in early-childhood: metaanalysis of precursors, concomitants and sequelae,Development and Psychopathology, Vol. 11, No. 2, 225249.

Waters, E. (1997): Attachment behavior Q-set (Version 3.0) Advisoryhttp://www.psychology.psy.sunysb.edu/ewaters/measures/aqs.htm

Waters, E., S. Merrick, D. Treboux, J. Crowell & L. Albersheim (2000): Attachment securityin infancy and early adulthood: a twenty-year longitudinal study, Child Development,Vol. 71, No. 3, 684689.

Weinfield, N.S., L.A. Sroufe & B. Egeland (2000): Attachment from infancy to early adultho-od in a high-risk sample continuity, discontinuity and their correlates, Child Deve-lopment, Vol. 71, No. 3, 695702.

Wensauer, M. & K.E. Grossmann (1998): Attachment theoretical considerations as to rese-arch on life satisfaction and individual future orientation in old-age, Zeitschrift fur Ge-rontology und Geriatrie, Vol. 31, No. 5, 362370.

West, M. & A. Sheldon-Keller (1992): The assessment of dimensions relevant to adult reci-procal attachment, Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 37, 600606.

West,M.& A.Sheldon-Keller(1994):Patternsofrelating.NewYork: The Guilford Press.West, M., S. Rose, S. Spreng & K. Adam (2000): The adolescent unresolved attachment

questionnaire: the assessment of perceptions of parental abdication of caregiving be-

havior, The Journal of Genetic Psychology, Vol. 161, No. 4, 493503.Zimmermann, P., J. Gliwitzky & F. Beckerstoll (1996): Attachment and friendship: relationsin adolescence, Psychologie in erziehung und unterricht, Vol. 43, No. 2, 141154.


26/27

82

Zimmermann,P.,F. Beckerstoll, K. Grossmann, K.E. Grossmann, H. Scheuererenglisch & U.Wartner (2000): Longitudinal attachment development from infancy through adoles-cence,Psychologie in erziehung und unterricht, Vol. 47, No. 2, 99117.

Zuch (2000): Toddlers attachment security and their conflict regulation during a storycompletion task in their preschool years,Psychologie in erziehung und unterricht, Vol.47, No. 3, 161175.

07.09.2005; 27.10.2005.

Nada PolovinaATTACHMENT THEORY: A REVIEW OF RESEARCH

Abstract

Research of attachment is numerous and versatile. They differ according to problemsaddressed, methodology applied (longitudinal studies, studies with horizontaldesigns, different instruments used, different methods of data analysis), andcharacteristics of samples involved (concerning age, socio/economic status, familyecology). The research is commonly relied on the core assumptions of the theoryitself, and the shared characteristic is orientation to explore complex phenomena ofhuman experience and functioning. From the vast variety of research only those who

most directly test the basic assumptions of the attachment theory are focused andadressed in the paper: representation of patterns of attachment in the childhood andadulthood, stability and change of attachment security from infancy to earlyadulthood, transsgenerational transmission of attachment characteristics, the placeand the role of attachment behavioral system in the personality development. Theaim of the paper is to highlight the basic research and theory issues and directions,and illustrate them with concrete research date.

Key words: attachment, research, individual differences, transsgenerational tran-smission, personality development, social functioning.

:

-. , ( ,,- ), ( , -, ). , , -, , -, -, , -. , - , : --

, -, -


27/27

: 83

, -. - , . : , , ,

.

teorija osećajnog vezivanja - pregled istraživanja

Documents