students attending the emh&pa program
TRANSCRIPT
European MSc in Health and Physical Activity Laurea Magistrale Internazionale in Attività Fisica e Salute – LM67INT
Main figures and quality assurance indicators
9
4
14
24 2222
19 2024
8
14
11
1713
9
9
1614
23
16
68 6
9
4 5
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Students attending the EMH&PA program
ENROLLED ITALIANS ENROLLED NON ITALIANS ERASMUS
47
8,5
14,4
8,3
13,3
8,5
Contribution (% total ECTS) of European partner universities to
the 1st year teaching activities in Rome
Foro Italico Rome NSSS Oslo Vienna University GSU Cologne SDU Odense OTHERS
91,47
62,51
85,57
63,6
93,5
69,5
EMH&PA ITALY EMH&PA ITALY EMH&PA ITALY
2014/2015 2015/2016 2016/2017
% ECTS acquired at the end of the 1st year / 60 total ECTS
REGULARITY OF STUDENT CAREERS(Indicators from MIUR-SMA annual monitoring – update June 2018)
* EMH&PA vs National average for 2 level programs of the same LM67 class
*
89,5
82,8
93,8
80,2
93,5
82,5
EMH&PA ITALY EMH&PA ITALY EMH&PA ITALY
2014/2015 2015/2016 2016/2017
% Regular graduates within the 2-year program duration
* EMH&PA vs National average for 2 level programs of the same LM67 class
*
REGULARITY OF STUDENT CAREERS(Indicators from MIUR-SMA annual monitoring – update June 2018)
70,6
24,9
64,5
25,7
67,9
21,4
EMH&PA ITALY EMH&PA ITALY EMH&PA ITALY
2014/2015 2015/2016 2016/2017
% enrolled students from universities other than Foro Italico
ATTRACTIVENESS AND INTERNATIONALIZATION OF THE STUDY PROGRAM (Indicators from MIUR-SMA annual monitoring – update June 2018)
* EMH&PA vs National average for 2 level programs of the same LM67 class
*
41,1
0,5
29,0
0,5
32,0
0,5
EMH&PA ITALY EMH&PA ITALY EMH&PA ITALY
2014/2015 2015/2016 2016/2017
% enrolled students that acquired the bachelor degree abroad
* EMH&PA vs National average for 2 level programs of the same LM67 class
*
ATTRACTIVENESS AND INTERNATIONALIZATION OF THE STUDY PROGRAM (Indicators from MIUR-SMA annual monitoring – update June 2018)
158,6
10,9
152,7
7,8
199,1
9,9
EMH&PA ITALY EMH&PA ITALY EMH&PA ITALY
2014/2015 2015/2016 2016/2017
ECTS acquired abroad/total (comparative index)
* EMH&PA vs National average for 2 level programs of the same LM67 class
*
ATTRACTIVENESS AND INTERNATIONALIZATION OF THE STUDY PROGRAM (Indicators from MIUR-SMA annual monitoring – update June 2018)
88,9
78,776,5
82,785
79,577,8
60,958,8
73,270 68,7
EMH&PA ITALY EMH&PA ITALY EMH&PA ITALY
2015 2016 2017
% Graduates overall satisfied by the program
% Graduates that will enroll in the same program again
* EMH&PA vs National average for 2 level programs of the same LM67 class
PROGRAM SATISFACTION BY GRADUATES (Indicators from MIUR-SMA annual monitoring based on Alma Laurea survey – update June 2018)
*
PROGRAM SATISFACTION BY GRADUATES – 3-year trend (Data from Alma Laurea database – update September 2018)
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Library
ICT facilities
Individual study facilities
Complementary teaching facilities
Teaching facilities
Intention to proceed with PhD
Study workload
Relationship with other students
Relationship with academic staff
General satisfaction
% positive evaluation
2015 2016 2017
90,0
74,570,6 72,7
62,5
76,980,0
100,0
57,1
100,0
EMH&PA ITALY EMH&PA ITALY EMH&PA ITALY
SURVEY 2015 SURVEY 2016 SURVEY 2017
Employed at 1 year after graduation (%) Employed at 3 years after graduation (%)
Employed at 5 years after graduation (%)
EMPLOYABILITY OF GRADUATES (From Alma Laurea National database – September 2018 update)
* National average for 2 level programs of the same LM67 class at 1 year after graduation
*
EMPLOYABILITY OF GRADUATES (Survey on graduates 2014 - 2016 performed by EMH&PA Quality Group)
50
30
15
< 1 month 1 - 6 months
6 - 12 months > 12 months
How long did it take for you to find a job/ PhD/others after graduation?
14,2
47,7
33,4
4,7
None Full time Part time Freelance Professional
Occupation
*
* Based on the course evaluation made by all EMH&PA plus local students (38) attending the course
Students' evaluation of the Teaching Activities expressed as % of Positive Evaluation Index (IVP)
77
91
82
95
89
89
69
83
72
81
97
94
90
74
88
94
54
75
78
85
60
94
69
100
89
95
77
85
77
83
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Internship Cologne
Internship Odense Children
Internship Odense Elderly
Internship Oslo*
Internship Rome
Internship Vienna
Mod. 4: Research methodology
Mod. 3: Movement therapy and physical activity forelderlyand special population
Mod. 2: Changing behaviour towards a lifelong healthylifestyle: from childhood to adulthood
Mod. 1: Biomediacal issues in health and exercise
Comparison of Total IVP values in the 3-year period
2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
7772
8073 76
100
67
9587 8586
7280
72 7267
10094
90 91
82
72
83
6977
91
82
9589 89
Po
sit
ive E
valu
ati
on
In
dex (
IVP, %
)(% of responders on total attending the course are shown in branchet)
IVP Course IVP Teaching IVP Total
EMH&PA – 2017 – 2018 students' evaluation of the Teaching Activities expressed as % of Positive Evaluation Index (IVP)
IVP Total includes question 1 on previous knowledge critical threshold
EVALUATION MA 401 10 CREDITS
MODULE 2017
Internship
Norwegian School of Sport Sciences
Yngvar Ommundsen
March 2018
Total number of course registered students = 38
Coaching & Psychology: 14
Physical activity & Health (SIM): 17
European Master EMHPA): 7
Response rate = 33(87%)
EVALUATION FORM – MA 401 & MAS 449
10 CREDITS MODULE 2017
Please evaluate each of the aspects below by assigning a number between
1 and 5 to each aspect
1= very poor; 2= poor; 3= acceptable; 4= good; 5= very good
1. Module organization
Information Usability of CANVAS system
Daily & weekly schedule of lectures
2. Module topics
3. Content of lectures
4. Module lecturers
5. Module reading material
6. Module working load
7. Module student involvement & group work
8. Module group assignment
9. Module time format (intensive module)
10. Module exam format (one week home exam)
Are you: (tick in one box with an X
EMHPA student
Physical Activity & Health (SIM) student
Coaching and Psychology (SCP) student
Any short comment?:........................................................................................
.......................................................................................................
Do not put your name on the evaluation form!
Thank you for your cooperation and good luck with your exam paper!
xx
x
Frequencies and percentages – all variables: Total sample (N= 33)
INFO_QUALITY
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid ACCEPTABLE 8 24,2 24,2 24,2
GOOD 8 24,2 24,2 48,5
VERY GOOD 17 51,5 51,5 100,0
Total 33 100,0 100,0
WEB_USAB_ACSESS
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid POOR 1 3,0 3,0 3,0
ACCEPTABLE 1 3,0 3,0 6,1
GOOD 11 33,3 33,3 39,4
VERY GOOD 20 60,6 60,6 100,0
Total 33 100,0 100,0
LECTURE_SCHEDULING
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid ACCEPTABLE 2 6,1 6,1 6,1
GOOD 10 30,3 30,3 36,4
VERY GOOD 21 63,6 63,6 100,0
Total 33 100,0 100,0
MODULE_TOPICS
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid POOR 1 3,0 3,0 3,0
ACCEPTABLE 8 24,2 24,2 27,3
GOOD 15 45,5 45,5 72,7
VERY GOOD 9 27,3 27,3 100,0
Total 33 100,0 100,0
CONTENT_OF_LECTURES
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid POOR 2 6,1 6,3 6,3
ACCEPTABLE 8 24,2 25,0 31,3
GOOD 16 48,5 50,0 81,3
VERY GOOD 6 18,2 18,8 100,0
Total 32 97,0 100,0
Missing System 1 3,0
Total 33 100,0
MODULE_LECTURERS
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid POOR 2 6,1 6,1 6,1
ACCEPTABLE 6 18,2 18,2 24,2
GOOD 17 51,5 51,5 75,8
VERY GOOD 8 24,2 24,2 100,0
Total 33 100,0 100,0
MODULE_READING MATERIAL
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid VERY POOR 1 3,0 3,1 3,1
ACCEPTABLE 8 24,2 25,0 28,1
GOOD 18 54,5 56,3 84,4
VERY GOOD 5 15,2 15,6 100,0
Total 32 97,0 100,0
Missing System 1 3,0
Total 33 100,0
MODULE_WORKINGLOAD
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid POOR 2 6,1 6,1 6,1
ACCEPTABLE 6 18,2 18,2 24,2
GOOD 20 60,6 60,6 84,8
VERY GOOD 5 15,2 15,2 100,0
Total 33 100,0 100,0
MODULE_STUDENT_INVOLVEMENT_GROUPWORK
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid POOR 3 9,1 9,1 9,1
ACCEPTABLE 10 30,3 30,3 39,4
GOOD 10 30,3 30,3 69,7
VERY GOOD 10 30,3 30,3 100,0
Total 33 100,0 100,0
MODULE_STUDENT_ASSIGNMENT
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid POOR 1 3,0 3,0 3,0
ACCEPTABLE 5 15,2 15,2 18,2
GOOD 15 45,5 45,5 63,6
VERY GOOD 12 36,4 36,4 100,0
Total 33 100,0 100,0
MODULE_TIMEFORMAT
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid VERY POOR 1 3,0 3,0 3,0
POOR 1 3,0 3,0 6,1
ACCEPTABLE 6 18,2 18,2 24,2
GOOD 16 48,5 48,5 72,7
VERY GOOD 9 27,3 27,3 100,0
Total 33 100,0 100,0
MODULE_EXAMFORMAT
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid POOR 2 6,1 6,5 6,5
ACCEPTABLE 8 24,2 25,8 32,3
GOOD 9 27,3 29,0 61,3
VERY GOOD 12 36,4 38,7 100,0
Total 31 93,9 100,0
Missing System 2 6,1
Total 33 100,0
Mean and range all variables split on "Health students" (N= 24) and the Sport
Psychology & coaching students (N=9)* STUDENT GROUPS = Health students (emhpa & nsss_health_PA)
STUDENT GROUPS = Sport Psychology & coaching
EUROPEAN MASTER STUDENTS SEPARATELY (n=7; response rate = 100%)
Oslo 07-03-2018 Yngvar Ommundsen, co-ordinator MA401 & MAS 449
EVALUATION MA 401 10 CREDITS
MODULE 2016
Norwegian School of Sport Sciences
EMHPA STUDENTS: Number of registered students =9
Response rate = 8 (90%)
2016 DATA RE-RUN TO CONSIDER EMHPA STUDENTS ONLY
Oslo 26-09-2018 Yngvar Ommundsen,
co-ordinator MA401 & MAS 449
EVALUATION FORM – MA 401 & MAS 449
10 CREDITS MODULE 2016
Please evaluate each of the aspects below by assigning a number between
1 and 5 to each aspect
1= very poor; 2= poor; 3= acceptable; 4= good; 5= very good
1. Module organization
Information Usability of Fronter system
Daily & weekly schedule of lectures
2. Module topics
3. Content of lectures
4. Module lecturers
5. Module reading material
6. Module working load
7. Module student involvement & group work
8. Module group assignment
9. Module time format (intensive module)
10. Module exam format (one week home exam)
Are you: (tick in one box with an X
EMHPA student
Physical Activity & Health (SIM) student
Coaching and Psychology (SCP) student
Any short comment?:........................................................................................
.......................................................................................................
Do not put your name on the evaluation form!
Thank you for your cooperation!
xx
x
Frequencies and percentages – all variables: EMHPA STUDENTS
INFO_QUALITY
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid GOOD 4 50,0 50,0 50,0
VERY GOOD 4 50,0 50,0 100,0
Total 8 100,0 100,0
WEBSUPPORT_USABILITY
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid GOOD 6 75,0 75,0 75,0
VERY GOOD 2 25,0 25,0 100,0
Total 8 100,0 100,0
LECTURE_SCHEDULING
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid ACCEPTABLE 3 37,5 37,5 37,5
GOOD 2 25,0 25,0 62,5
VERY GOOD 3 37,5 37,5 100,0
Total 8 100,0 100,0
MODULE_TOPICS
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid POOR 2 25,0 25,0 25,0
ACCEPTABLE 1 12,5 12,5 37,5
GOOD 5 62,5 62,5 100,0
Total 8 100,0 100,0
CONTENT_OF_LECTURES
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid POOR 2 25,0 25,0 25,0
ACCEPTABLE 1 12,5 12,5 37,5
GOOD 5 62,5 62,5 100,0
Total 8 100,0 100,0
MODULE_LECTURERS
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid ACCEPTABLE 2 25,0 25,0 25,0
GOOD 5 62,5 62,5 87,5
VERY GOOD 1 12,5 12,5 100,0
Total 8 100,0 100,0
MODULE_READINGMATERIAL
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid POOR 2 25,0 25,0 25,0
ACCEPTABLE 2 25,0 25,0 50,0
GOOD 3 37,5 37,5 87,5
VERY GOOD 1 12,5 12,5 100,0
Total 8 100,0 100,0
MODULE_WORKINGLOAD
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid POOR 1 12,5 12,5 12,5
ACCEPTABLE 5 62,5 62,5 75,0
GOOD 2 25,0 25,0 100,0
Total 8 100,0 100,0
MODULE_STUDENT_INVOLVEMENT_GROUPWORK
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid ACCEPTABLE 1 12,5 12,5 12,5
GOOD 7 87,5 87,5 100,0
Total 8 100,0 100,0
MODULE_STUDENT_ASSIGNMENT
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid ACCEPTABLE 1 12,5 12,5 12,5
GOOD 5 62,5 62,5 75,0
VERY GOOD 2 25,0 25,0 100,0
Total 8 100,0 100,0
MODULE_TIMEFORMAT
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid POOR 2 25,0 25,0 25,0
ACCEPTABLE 3 37,5 37,5 62,5
GOOD 2 25,0 25,0 87,5
VERY GOOD 1 12,5 12,5 100,0
Total 8 100,0 100,0
MODULE_EXAMFORMAT
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid POOR 1 12,5 12,5 12,5
ACCEPTABLE 1 12,5 12,5 25,0
GOOD 5 62,5 62,5 87,5
VERY GOOD 1 12,5 12,5 100,0
Total 8 100,0 100,0
Bars - Percentages – all variables: EMHPA STUDENTS
Mean and range ETC all variables
EVALUATION MA 401 10 CREDITS
MODULE 2015
EMHPA STUDENTS: Number of registered students =5
Response rate = 5 (100%)
2015 DATA RE-RUN TO CONSIDER EMHPA STUDENTS ONLY
Oslo 26-09-2018 Yngvar Ommundsen,
co-ordinator MA401 & MAS 449
EVALUATION FORM - MA 401 10 CREDITS MODULE 2015
Please evaluate each of the aspects below by assigning a number between
1 and 5 to each aspect
1= very poor; 2= poor; 3= acceptable; 4= good; 5= very good
1. Module organization
Information
Daily & weekly schedule of lectures
2. Module topics
3. Content of lectures
4. Module lecturers
5. Module reading material
6. Module working load
7. Module student involvement & group work
8. Module student assignment
9. Module time format (intensive module)
10. (Module exam format)
Are you: (tick in one box)
EMHPA student
Physical Activity & Health (SIM) student
Coaching and Psychology (SCP) student
Any short
comment?:...............................................................................................................................................................................................
Do not put your name on the evaluation form! Thank you for your cooperation!
Frequencies and percentages – all variables: EMHPA sample
INFO_QUALITY
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid POOR 1 20,0 20,0 20,0
ACCEPTABLE 1 20,0 20,0 40,0
GOOD 2 40,0 40,0 80,0
VERY GOOD 1 20,0 20,0 100,0
Total 5 100,0 100,0
LECTURE_SCHEDULING
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid ACCEPTABLE 1 20,0 20,0 20,0
GOOD 2 40,0 40,0 60,0
VERY GOOD 2 40,0 40,0 100,0
Total 5 100,0 100,0
MODULE_TOPICS
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid ACCEPTABLE 1 20,0 20,0 20,0
GOOD 2 40,0 40,0 60,0
VERY GOOD 2 40,0 40,0 100,0
Total 5 100,0 100,0
CONTENT_OF_LECTURES
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid POOR 1 20,0 20,0 20,0
ACCEPTABLE 1 20,0 20,0 40,0
GOOD 2 40,0 40,0 80,0
VERY GOOD 1 20,0 20,0 100,0
Total 5 100,0 100,0
MODULE_LECTURERS
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid ACCEPTABLE 2 40,0 40,0 40,0
GOOD 3 60,0 60,0 100,0
Total 5 100,0 100,0
MODULE_READINGMATERIAL
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid ACCEPTABLE 1 20,0 20,0 20,0
GOOD 3 60,0 60,0 80,0
VERY GOOD 1 20,0 20,0 100,0
Total 5 100,0 100,0
MODULE_WORKINGLOAD
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid GOOD 4 80,0 80,0 80,0
VERY GOOD 1 20,0 20,0 100,0
Total 5 100,0 100,0
MODULE_STUDENT_INVOLVEMENT_GROUPWORK
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid ACCEPTABLE 1 20,0 20,0 20,0
GOOD 1 20,0 20,0 40,0
VERY GOOD 3 60,0 60,0 100,0
Total 5 100,0 100,0
MODULE_STUDENT_ASSIGNMENT
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid GOOD 5 100,0 100,0 100,0
MODULE_TIMEFORMAT
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid ACCEPTABLE 1 20,0 20,0 20,0
GOOD 2 40,0 40,0 60,0
VERY GOOD 2 40,0 40,0 100,0
Total 5 100,0 100,0
MODULE_EXAMFORMAT
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Valid ACCEPTABLE 1 20,0 25,0 25,0
GOOD 2 40,0 50,0 75,0
VERY GOOD 1 20,0 25,0 100,0
Total 4 80,0 100,0
Missing System 1 20,0
Total 5 100,0
Bar Chart- Percentages – all variables: EMHPA sample
Overall mean, min-max and SD across EMHPA sample