siew moon chow's portfolio
DESCRIPTION
selection of work from 2009 to 2012TRANSCRIPT
Siew Moon Chow, M.Archportfolio architecture + design l selected works 2009-2012
Phone: +61438238813 (Australia)Email: [email protected] : 815/585 La Trobe Street Melbourne 3000 VIC AUSNationality: MalaysianWebsite: http://be.net/smchow Availability: April 2013 onwards
2011 -2012 MASTEr of ArChITECTUrE | avg. distinction University of Melbourne
2008-2010 bAChELor of ENVIroNMENTS (ArChITECTUrE) | avg. distinction University of Melbourne
NoVEMbEr 2012 grAdEx 2012 | Thesis 'deconstructing the wall' NoVEMbEr 2011 EyES exhibition semester 2 2011 | Master design studio work 'The Platform' JULy 2011 EyES exhibition | Master design studio work 'St Kilda hotel' JULy 2009 EyES exhibition | Undergraduate design studio 'The Water house'
exhibition/ acknowledgement
JAS ArChITECTS PTy LTd, MALAySIA | INTErN Participated in early design stage of Sabah Library tender & design documentation of a private residence in Kota Kinabalu
work experience
AUToCAd | SKETChUPT Pro | VrAy | rhINoCEroS | grASShoPPEr | fIrST rATEAdobE SUITES ( PhoToShoP, ILLUSTrATor, INdESIgN) | MICroSofT offICE | ModEL MAKINg | LASEr CUTTINg
skills
fluent in ENgLISh (IELTS band 8), Chinese Mandarin and Chinese Cantonesemoderately fluent in MALAy, INdoNESIAN and JAPANESE
language
art+design | architecture, amateur photography, graphic design, fashion and textile others | badminton, swimming and travelling
other
STEVE hATzELLIS | guest tutor at University of Melbourne, director of hATz Architectureemail: [email protected] | contact number available on request JErEMy WoLVErIdgE | guest tutor at University of Melbourne, director of Wolveridge Architects email: [email protected] | contact number available on request
reference
involvement
education
siew moon chow
AUgUST 2012 SoNA SUPEr STUdIo 2012 | participant SoNA Super Studio is a 24 hours student design competition across the country. Students are to form team of three to deliver a 3 minutes presentation at the end of the session.
JULy 2011 MELboUrNE oPEN hoUSE 2011 | volunteer Tasks including guiding and informing visitors alongside other volunteers
ANd LECTUrE SErIES 2010 | organising committee ANd is a student run lecture series held weekly at the faculty of Architecture, building and Planning in University of Melbourne. The lecture series invites speakers from the profes- sion to speak about their work. Tasks including communicating with speakers, scheduling and designing weekly publicity poster.
MELboUrNE UNIVErSITy ChINESE ThEATrE groUP | publicity crew Melbourne University Chinese Theatre group is a student run theatre group, producing two chinese speaking shows a year. A publicity crews’ tasks including speaking to the public and students in order to promote the show, selling tickets and organising show venue alongside other crews.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MArCh-NoVEMbEr 2010
MArCh-NoVEMbEr 2009
JANUAry 2011 - fEbrUAry 2011
deconstructing the wall 1ThESIS 2012
the aquaponic platform 13MASTEr dESIgN STUdIo 2012
the platform 25MASTEr dESIgN STUdIo 2011
alternative experience 39SoNA SUPEr STUdIo 2012
the weather gallery 51 UNdErgrAdUATE dESIgN STUdIo 2010
water house 59UNdErgrAdUATE dESIgN STUdIo 2009
architectural documentation 69APPLIEd CoNSTrUCTIoN 2011
content
1 2
deconstructing the wall a multicultural castle
TErM: MASTEr ThESIS STUdIo, 2012STUdIo LEAdEr: WArWICK MIhALy-------------------------------------------------------
Studio Synopsis:the studio asks students for a translation of castle in modern days Aus-tralia. The castle is a fortified structure dating back to Middle Ages, serv-ing primary purpose including protection, prison, barrack, market place and residence. Nowadays however, we do not have feudal system, nor catapults, nor the need of lookout. What and how would these traditional castle be translated in modern Australian context. The studio asks students to consider two key things:1- What, in contemporary Australian culture, is worth protecting?2- And from what threats is it being protected?-------------------------------------------------------------Melbourne is a multicultural city. Early research of the studio through online survey however shows that this diversity is not truly embraced. Cultural groups remain isolated of each other due to lack of shared interest and activities being discovered. having the aim to protect cultural inclusiveness from isolation, a multipurpose building located at the Peel Street and frank-lin Street is introduced as a modern translation of medieval enclosure and concentric castles.The project's immediate response to this issue is a castle that explores the common denominator of all cultural groups' food, aiming to encourage inter-actions between them. A series of programs that ranges in privacy: culinary school, community kitchen, hydroponic garden, dormitory and night market are inserted within and in between unique layers of walls that regulates and connects, surrounding a central courtyard.
3 4
Two survey investigating interaction and under-standing across cultural groups in Melbourne and founding shows that there is an apparent lack
The project proposes a multiuses building that aims to tear the wall hin-dering true understand-ing between cultural groups
Site selection based on criterions: accessibility and frequency of visiting by all culture groups
Site response, as an extension to Victoria Market and Flagstaff garden
5 6
section
concept diagram perspective l day timesection
7 8
N
9 10
sectional detail
perspective l social aggregator
11 12
perspective l aerial view perspective l night market
13 14
The Aquaponic Platform is a critique of Melbourne's intense in-crease in populations, to be doubled at 2050 in one of the Australia Bureau of Statistics projection. There is a possibility that this rate will surpass the rate of food production and Melbournians would suffer from hunger. Besides, with this sudden increase in density, social interaction has evolved into its most complex and intense ever. Public spaces where the relationship of the community is knit-ted will have to be revolutionized into space that maximizes quality as well as quantitative factor. Traditional top down approach in designing public spaces such as parks and squares, its reductive-ness and monofunctionality is no longer adequate to accommodate Melbournians need.The Aquaponic Platform aims to utilize this interstitial space as an opportunity to reassess the relationship between programs of dif-ferent genres following this intense increase in density and popu-lation in the city. The project combines aquaponics farm allotments and recreational spaces that seem incompatible conventionally, in the same space. The aquaponics allotments will be owned or rented by city dwellers, whereas the recreational space will be set its purpose as a result of bottom up self organization amongst the occupants of the allotments as a community. Emergent, where the behavior of the whole is much more complex than the behavior of its parts, an effect of multiplication instead of addition is anticipated. With this new kind of typology, it might generate excitement and anticipation like never before.
the aquaponic platform farming and social hybrid
Term: Master Design Studio, 2012Team Credit: Siew Moon Chow, Haw Ping YapStudio leader: Justyna Karakiewicz & Steve Hatzellis---------------------------------------------------------
15 16
vertical urban farming vertical farming to increase food production following increasing population and density
complex adaptive nature of human interactionpublic space needed to be designed based on ‘event’,
temporal and adaptive to cater for emerging need
the aquaponic platformhybrid of urban farming and public social space
PROGRAM AND DISTANCE ANAYLYSIS
26Delaunay tri-angulation was used as the ba-sis of digital tes-sellation for ev-ery points stay conected with each other and it avoids skinny triangles.
concept
Analysis of func-tions of building in the city
People in pub-lic social space self organises in a way similair to mold organis-ing itself around food source
17 18
1. Pedestrians moving with random vector 2. The existence of attractor agent starting to stimulate swarm behaviour of the subjects
3. Subjects start to flock, in general towards the direction of the attractor.
LEGEND
Attractor - Street performer Unexited subject - Pedestrians moving randomly ( no swarm behaviour) Excited subject - Pedestrians showing swarm behavior
Street performance at southbank promenade in a weekend afternoon
Analysis of the swarm behavior of the crowd through stret performers as an attractor agent
CREATIVE RESEARCH: THROUGH OBSERVATION: SWARM BEHAVIOUR WITHIN CROWD DURING STREET PERFORMANCE
4. Subjects performs swarm behavior , which is governed by 3 basic rules :(1)Cohesion-Fly toward the centroid of the local subject; (2)Seperation: Keep a certain distance away from local subject; (3) Alignment: Align velocity vector with subject of immediate surroudings
5. Subjects moving at random vectors after the performance ended.
study on human self organisation behav-iour
19 20The aquaponics system
SECTION
GROUND FLOOR COMMERCIAL SPACE
UPPER FLOORS AGRICULTURE SPACE
NODES COtMMUNAL SPACE
the aquaponic system
section
21 22
GROUND FLOOR SUNLIGHT ANALYSIS
TYPICAL FLOOR SUNLIGHT ANALYSIS
TYPICAL FLOOR SUNLIGHT ANALYSIS
AGRICULTURE ALLOTMENT
CIRCULATION/ GATHERING SPACE
VERTICAL CIRCULATION/ RAMP
TYPICAL FLOOR PLAN
solar analysis
typical floor plan
23 24
GROWTH PARAMETERS
SUNLIGHT TRANSPORTATION DENSITY PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC DEMAND/ POPULATION GROWTH THROUGH TIME
2012 2015 2020
TIME
Growth parameters
INTERNAL PERSPECTIVE
growth in time and parameter
perspective l gathering node and aquaponic farm
25 26
the platform temporality and permanency in apartments
TErM: Master design studio, 2011STUdIo LEAdEr: Marjan Cehovin-------------------------------------------
This project is fundamentally a critique to current practices of resi-dential planning. Inflexibility and banality in housing design, short sightedness in town development that build only to cater instant need has causes issues including blind densification in Melbourne Cbd and housing glut in the growing fringe suburbs. furthermore, the fix-ated house planning has forces us to live nomadically, as one faces growth or inevitable changes in life such as marriage, having children and aging.
Questions such as "Could there be an alternative to this residential planning myopia?" "how can an apartment be a permanent home?" were asked.
The value of this project is experimenting with modularity and kit-of- parts to provide flexibility that caters the changing need of the so-ciety and individuals. In urban scale, detachable pods can be installed and removed to render the project with adaptability to accommodate needs in facilities that comes with development of North Melbourne. on an individual scale, extension pods of 1.5m and 3m module can be attached or detached according to preference and need, to basic apartment units of 3 dwelling typologies: single floor, south facing and north facing duplex, designed based on 6.3mx 8.4m structural grid. In the light of adaptability, internal partition are segregated from its load bearing structure and services running along structural walls, to allow adaptability in space transformation and possibility of joining adjacent units.
27 28
The project is located at North Melbourne, an inner city suburb. Following the growth in population and North Melbourne Development Plan, North Mel-bourne is shifting from a industrial precinct to a medium density suburb.
5 years 10 years 20 years
10000M2
site study
conceptual diagram
29 30
typical apartment
each approximately 100m2
north facing duplex
south facing duplex
SINGLE COUPLE COUPLE WITH YOUNG CHILDREN
COUPLE WITH GROWN UP
AGED COUPLE THREE GENERATION
apartments with alteration possibil-ity to cater occu-pants’ need
Living/ dining spaceService space RoomGreen space/ terrace
31 32
physical model
kits of parts for individual apartment extension
33 34
N
1-500 ON A4
apartmentdetachablecommunity pod
commercial communal green spacemain pedestrian entrance
solar cellsroof top garden
plans
perspective l attached pod
35 36
1-200 ON A4
esd detail
section
programmatic distribution
west elevation
37 38DETAIL SECTION 1-5 ON A3
detail section
perspective l arden street
39 40
alternative experiencearchitecture beyond physicality and materiality
Term: SONA Super Studio Competition 2012Team Credit: Siew Moon Chow, Justin Tan, Yee Von Low------------------------------------------------Proposal:The project questions how we perceive architecture and our environ-ments? Questions such as 'is physical materiality the only we can per-ceive our environment?' 'is architecture limited to only built forms?'We approach the subject and the production of future achitecture as a broad and curious field that oscillates between representation and reaslisation, experience and expertise. The project proposes that architecture as an experience of multisensory and multiperspective, where physical realm is overlapped with the synthetic realm that is reconstructed based on rules and physical reality.Question:With the current stretching of architecture into new territories we can observe a concurrent and perverse retreat into architectural primitiv-ism, limiting architecture to corporeal materiality. How will architects engage with the fast future while affirming material reality? What is your radical proposition for future culture, architecture, environment, and thought? SuperStudio 2012 requires you to materialise a future for architecture while engaging with the present. Entrants are asked to eschew objec-tivity and immerse themselves in a new critical practice. SuperStudio 2012 asks you for your personal architecture.-------------------------------------------------SONA Superstudio is a 24 hour Australian and New Zealand nation-wide design competition that aims to refurbish studio culture, lay foundations for creative design solutions and assemble networks between students and the profession. Students are to work in team of three to prepare a 3 minutes presentation to deliver their idea or solution.
41 42
43 44
45 46
47 48
49 50
51 52
the weather galleryTerm: Undergraduate Design Studio 2010 Studio Leader: Catherine Duggan
-------------------------------------------
Located at the Docklands, The Weather Gallery aims to encourage weather and environmental aware-ness amongst Melbournians through its exhibits as well as its architecture. A home to various form of climate themed art work including sculpture, paint-ings and performance, the gallery is composed of two distinctive parts, the closed and detached from the climate, in contrast to the open and susceptible to weather, interchanging as one move across the gallery.
The project outcome is ultimately an explorative one, as a result of a series of experiments with media in early studio sessions, than a prescriptive one.
53 54
concept
conceptual diagram
early workshop experiments, media: modelling and photography l drawing
55 56
ground floor plan N first floor plan second floor plan third floor plan
57 58
perspective l corridor perspective l performing space perspective l gallery perspective l from site
59 60
water houseTerm: Undergraduate Design Studio 2009 Studio Leader: Jeremy Wolveridge
-------------------------------------------
The Water House was designed for Tracey Bialek, the founder and managing director of Ripple Prod-ucts. Her passion about water saving and her enthu-siasm on the environments has inspire the project to explores the pleasure of experiencing and living with nature in an inner city suburb (Fairfield). The Water House is composed of a pavilion containing a home office or study room and a main house, seper-ating from each other. A short distance of travel-ling from one to another gives Tracey and her family a dose of nature from day to day. The main house and pavilion has also double height glazing towards the east, that ensures maximum pleasure of river view and privacy.
61 62
1. The house is cut into two, a home office pavilion and the main house
2. Greenery was placed in between to allow a daily dose of nature for the family in the inner suburb
3. The pavillion and main house are shifted sidways
4. ...to allow maxi-mum view to the river
1 23 4
physical model
concept
63 64
Ground floor plan
first floor plan perspective l first floor living areaplans
65 66
in a3
section b-b
site plan
esd planning
perspective l dining
section
67 68
physical modelperspective
69 70
architectural documentationTerm: Applied Construction 2011Studio Leader: Andrew Lyons
------------------------------------------
Selection from a series of detailing drawings for University of Melbourne Architecture School as per Denton Corker Marshall's proposal, as part of university construction subject submission.
71 72
73 74
75 76