reading and math crct scores for 2010-2013 comparing riverside intermediate school, cobb county...

12
READING AND MATH CRCT SCORES FOR 2010-2013 COMPARING RIVERSIDE INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL, COBB COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, AND STATE RESULTS BY SAM COLSON

Upload: amie-ward

Post on 30-Dec-2015

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

READING AND MATH CRCT SCORES FOR 2010-2013

COMPARING RIVERSIDE INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL, COBB COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, AND STATE RESULTS

BY SAM COLSON

The data shared will help isolate the problem areas for our school in reading and math. We can assess the scores and observe where the upward and downward trends occurred. This will help us create a learning plan to assist our students in overcoming the weaknesses that are troubling them and raise their learning and test scores.

Does not meet Meets Exceeds

State 6 54 40

Cobb 10 54 37

Riverside 14 71 15

5

15

25

35

45

55

65

75

2010-2011 Reading

State Cobb Riverside

Does not meet Meets Exceeds

State 5 56 39

Cobb 4 49 47

Riverside 16 64 21

5

15

25

35

45

55

65

2011-2012 Reading

State Cobb Riverside

Does not meet Meets Exceeds

State 5 52 44

Cobb 3 44 52

Riverside 14 62 24

5

15

25

35

45

55

65

2012-2013 Reading

State Cobb Riverside

2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-20130

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

14

1614

71

6462

15

21

24

Riverside Reading CRCT Scores 2010-2013

Does Not Meet Meets Exceeds

STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES IN CRCT MATH AND READING SCORES

Strengths• Math “does not meet” scores have

decreased from 42% to 29% in 3 years.

• Math “meets” scores have increased from 44% to 48% in 3 years.

• Reading “exceeds” scores have increased from 15% to 24 % in 3 years.

• Riverside scored higher during the previous year in Reading “meets” scores than either the state or Cobb county.

Weaknesses• Math “does not meet” scores are much

higher than the state or Cobb county for the most current year.

• Math “meets” scores have basically stagnated for the last 3 years with very little change.

• Reading “meets” scores have dropped significantly over the last 3 years from 71% to 62 %.

• Reading “does not meet” scores have stagnated as well for the last 3 years.

What can we do to stop the stagnation on both reading and math scores?

How can we use this data to better equip our teachers and students to both learn

more and raise scores next year?

How can the data team utilize this data appropriately and plan a course of action

for the students and teachers?