professor_mark_blyth__lisbon_december_2013_final (1).pdf
TRANSCRIPT
Austerity: The
History of a
Dangerous Idea
“Does Austerity Kill? Does Austerity Cure?”
IDEFF - Law School of Lisbon University
November 29th 2013
Mark Blyth, Brown University and the Watson Institute for International Studies, USA
So What is Austerity Anyway?
• Austerity is not cutting when you grow. Cutting when you grow is commonly known as ‘sensible economic policy.’
“The Boom, not the slump, is the time for Austerity”
J.M. Keynes, 1933
• Austerity is cutting in a slump, which is turbocharged when everyone does it at the same time and they are all each others trading partners
• ”It is an undisputable fact that excessive state spending has led to unsustainable levels of debt and deficits that now threaten our economic welfare. Piling on more debt now will stunt rather than stimulate growth in the long run. Governments in and beyond the Eurozone need not just to commit to fiscal consolidation and improved competitiveness – they need to start delivering on these now.”
• W. Schauble, 2010
•
But why then have the countries that have cut spending the most increased their debts the most?
• Greek Debt to GDP • Greek Public Spending
The same is true whether big or small
• Spain’s debt goes down then up • While Spain’s spending goes up then down
Even the “Poster Child” quadrupled their debt as they cut
• Latvia’s Debt to GDP • And what paid for it
Assets held by banks in Germany, France, and the UK are about double the annual GDP of the entire EU
0
5000000
10000000
15000000
20000000
25000000
30000000
35000000
40000000
45000000
50000000
GDP Bank Assets
Other
UK
Germany
France
• Gross contribution to GDP and Bank Assets in the EU (millions of EUR)
For Comparison – The “too Big to Fail” USA
Bank Assets (millions of USD) Bank Assets (% of GDP)
0
2.000.000
4.000.000
6.000.000
8.000.000
10.000.000
12.000.000
14.000.000
16.000.000
18.000.000
20.000.000
Bank Assets GDP
GDP
Other
Wells Fargo
Citigroup
Bank of America
Morgan Stanley
JP Morgan
Goldman
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
GDP Top 6 Bank Assets Total Bank Assets
France is the exemplar of the ‘too Big to BAIL’ problem
Bank Assets (millions of EUR) Bank Assets (% of GDP)
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
GDP Top 3 Bank Assets Total Bank Assets
0,00
1.000.000,00
2.000.000,00
3.000.000,00
4.000.000,00
5.000.000,00
6.000.000,00
7.000.000,00
8.000.000,00
9.000.000,00
10.000.000,00
Bank Assets GDP
GDP
Other
Societe Generale
Credit Agricole
BNP Paribas
…but it is why we have Austerity policies…
Keeping the periphery in at all costs
• Its all about stopping the Bank run round the bond market…
But…
You Can’t Solve a Banking
Problem with Budget Cuts
You Can’t run a Gold Standard in a Democracy (in Theory…)
You can’t all cut at once and expect to grow without increasing your debt
Because you can ‘kick the can down the road’ with unlimited liquidity to keep the banks afloat
• Thanks Mr. Draghi!
• December 2011: Long Term Refinancing Operation (LTRO) (1 trillion Euro)
• March 2012: LTRO 2 (0.529 T Euro)
• June 2012: Emergency Liquidity Assistance (0.4 Euro)
• July 26th 2012: Draghi says he will do “whatever it takes…”
• Italian Ten Year Bond Yields June 2011 – May 2013
So government debts were going down going into the crisis – they went up (massively) during the crisis despite austerity -
and yet yields went down…despite the debt going up!
• And all at a sadly predictable cost…
Liberalism’s Reluctant Embrace of the State
• John Locke’s fifth chapter
• Markets as inequality generators
• States as Policemen
• Don’t trust the state since it will rob you blind
• But you need it to create the markets you want
The Fear of Debt: “Public Credit will Destroy the Nation”
• David Hume
• Money and Merchants
• The Ease of Debt Issuance
• Crowding Out and Easy Money
• Adam Smith
• Parsimony, Inequality and the Necessity of the State
• Taxation?
• Debt perverts parsimony
The Result: The “can’t live with/without it and don’t want to pay for it” problem
Liberalism’s Neuralgia with Debt and the Aspirin of Austerity
This creates two Liberal Stories through 19th Century Economics
• Story One: Can’t live with it and don’t want to pay for it
• Story Two: Accepting the need for it and to pay for it
Austerity American Style: Liquidationism
• Modern Business Cycle Theory
• Long Run Capital Structure (too much and wrong type)
• Misallocation of capital
• Austerity via Binge and Purge
British Austerity: The Treasury View
• Laissez Faire and crowding out
• Public Spending, Investment, and Taxes
• Lack of Suitable Public Works
Individually rational actions can be collectively disastrous
• The Critical Cases of the 1930s
• Simultaneous contractions (just like today) in USA, UK, Germany, France and Japan
• Austerity is the response
• Extremism and collapse is the result
An ‘Ordoliberal’ Home for Austerity
• Late Development and Export Led Growth
• Freiburg and the State
• The economic constitution
• Competition not consumption
• Sound Money and CBI
• Result: Exports Yes, Keynes No.
Generalizing Ordoliberalism
• The Euro as Generalized Ordoliberalism
• Commission > Parliament
• Sound Money > Output considerations
• Rules > Discretion
• Competitiveness > Consumption
• Result: Let’s all be more Competitive
And then came the current crisis, which was not (only) made in America
• Thanks Mr. Trichet!
• “... the idea is to revive the market [for covered bonds], which has been very heavily affected, and all that goes with this revival, including the spreads, the depth and the liquidity of the market. We are not at all embarking on quantitative easing." [italics added] (ECB: May 7th 2009)
The New Bad Old Idea: The Expansionary Austerity Hypothesis
• Credibility and cutting the state
• Spending and future taxes
• The New Cases: Ireland, Sweden, Canada, Denmark, Australia
Is written right into the ECB’s Crisis Response
• Alesina’s Ecofin Brief
• ECB June 2010 Report
• Troika conditionality
• Structure of periphery bailouts (cuts not taxes)
• Result: The Greatest Bait and Switch in Human History
But Reality Bites?
• IMF challenges to EFA hypothesis
• October 2012 IMF WEO and 1.5-1.7 negative multipliers
• 0.3 percent growth Q3 2013 based on NOT doing austerity
• More debt not less
• Emigration of future tax bases
• 12-25-50 percent unemployment in Europe
• 0.1 percent Growth last quarter…
Where does this all end?
• More of the Same? Problem of different preferences and ideas (Merkel, ECB, EC, IMF)
• Turning Japanese? Perma-Austerity and Perma-low growth?
• Or Worse? If the North runs a Perma-surplus and no corresponding deficit is allowed, the result must be unemployment and bankruptcy
• Gray Swans? Political Unrest? Interest rate spike from global recovery?
• Black Swans? Italy leaves?