national science foundation & directorate for mathematical and physical sciences celeste m....
TRANSCRIPT
National Science Foundation &
Directorate for Mathematical and Physical Sciences
Celeste M. RohlfingHead, Office of Multidisciplinary Activities
www.nsf.gov
NSF Vision
To enable America’s future through discovery, learning and innovation
NSF Mission
• Promote the progress of science;
• Advance the national health, prosperity, and welfare;
• Secure the national defense.
• Independent agency
• Supports basic research and education
• Uses grant mechanism in two forms
•Unsolicited: curiosity-driven
•Solicited: more focused
• Review criteria: intellectual merit & broader impact
• No intramural laboratories
• Supports large facilities
• Discipline-based structure
• Supports all fields of science & engineering
• Cross-disciplinary mechanisms (e.g., nanotechnology, cyber-enabled discovery & innovation, climate)
NSF in a Nutshell
Source: AAAS analyses of R&D in AAAS Reports I-XXXI. FY 2007 figures are President’s request. Basic research only. March ’06 © 2006 AAAS.
Billion
s o
f con
sta
nt
FY
2006
dollars
Trends in Basic Researchby Agency: FY 1975-2007
FY 2010 NSF Budget Request
FY 2010 Request
Change over FY 2009
Research & Related Activities $5,733.24 $550.14 10.6%
Education & Human Resources 857.76 12.50 1.5%
MREFC 117.29 -34.72 -22.8%
Agency Operations & Award Management 318.37 24.37 8.3%
National Science Board 4.34 0.31 7.7%
Office of Inspector General 14.00 2.00 16.7%
Total, National Science Foundation $7,045.00 554.60 8.5%
Directorate forMathematical and Physical Sciences
Assistant Director
Division ofChemistry
Division ofChemistry
Division ofMaterialsResearch
Division ofMaterialsResearch
Division ofMathematical
Sciences
Division ofMathematical
Sciences
Division ofPhysics
Division ofPhysics
Division ofAstronomical
Sciences
Office of Multidisciplinary ActivitiesOffice of Multidisciplinary Activities
In FY2008, MPS provided 44% of federal funding for basic researchat academic institutions in the mathematical & physical sciences, ranging
from 34% for physics to 60% for mathematical sciences
5 Main Features of MPS
• Largest directorate
• Supports over 8,000 university-based PIs, 2,200 post-docs, and nearly 14,000 students
• Broad portfolio from individual PI grants, to centers/institutes, to over a dozen major facilities
• Spectrum of research from fundamental discoveries to marketable technologies
• Strong international ties throughout programs
MPS Funding Modality in FY 2009
Centers and Institutes
11%Facilities
19%
Individual and Group
Investigators70%
Number of People Involved in MPS Activities
FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009Estimate
Senior Researchers 8,212 8,325 9,900 Other Professionals 2,000 2,025 2,400Post-Doctorates 2,171 2,200 2,600Graduate Students 7,720 7,800 9,300Undergraduate Students 6,091 6,150 7,300K - 12 Students 615 625 750K - 12 Teachers 478 485 550
Total Number of People 27,287 27,610 32,800
MPS spends at least $300 million annually on Graduate and Postdoctoral training!
Future MPS FacilitiesFacilities under Construction:
ALMA: Atacama Large Millimeter Array, site construction
IceCube: neutrino telescope, operations initiated Advanced LIGO: construction began FY 2008 LHC: Large Hadron Collider, operations initiated
Design and Development: • DUSEL: R&D• GSMT: R&D• LSST: R&D• ATST: in “readiness” stage• 4th Generation Coherent Light Source
Astronomical Sciences• Astronomy and Astrophysics Grants
– Extragalactic Astronomy and Cosmology– Galactic Astronomy– Planetary Astronomy– Stellar Astronomy and Astrophysics
• Electromagnetic Spectrum Management• Advanced Technologies and Instrumentation• University Radio Observatories• Program for Research and Education with Small Telescopes• Astronomy and Astrophysics Postdoctoral Fellowships• Education and Special Programs
Division of Chemistry
• Mission
To support innovative research in chemical sciences, integrated with education, through strategic investment in a globally engaged workforce reflecting the diversity of America
• Topic areas
– Chemical Synthesis
– Chemical Structure, Dynamics and Mechanisms
– Chemical Measurement and Imaging
– Theory, Models and Computational Methods
– Environmental Chemical Sciences
– Chemistry of Life Processes
– Chemical Catalysis
– Macromolecular/Supramolecular/Nanochemistry
• Other
Instrumentation, centers, REU, ACC Fellows
Creating molecules and instruments that are transforming the 21st century
Solid-State & Materials Chemistry
Condensed Matter Physics
Polymers
Metallic Materials and Nanostructures
Ceramics
Electronic and
Photonic Materials
National Facilities and Instrumentation
Materials Research Science and Engineering
Centers
Condensed Matter & Materials Theory
Special Programs
Division of Materials Research
Biomaterials
Experimental, may include Theory
Experimental and/or Theory
>90% Theory
Division of Mathematical Sciences
“Core business”: single investigator & group proposals through targeted solicitations - Covers the entire mathematical spectrum
Institutes:- Visitors to long-term programs,
workshops
Workforce:- Training grants- Postdoctoral fellowships- Research for undergraduates
Advancing the Frontier 74%
Workforce 16%
Institutes/Centers 10%
Division of Physics
Facilities: LHC, LIGO, IceCube, NSCL
Programs:Atomic, Molecular, Optical, and Plasma
PhysicsBiological PhysicsElementary Particle PhysicsGravitational PhysicsNuclear PhysicsParticle and Nuclear AstrophysicsPhysics at the Information FrontierPhysics Frontiers CentersTheoretical PhysicsEducation and Interdisciplinary
Programs
Facilities/Instrumentation
35%
Advancing the Frontier58%
Centers/Institutes
4%
Education/Workforce
3%
Writing Competitive Proposals
• Sign up for NSF email newsletters
• Contact the program officer(s) to discuss your project, and learn of relevant, current opportunities
• Be familiar with projects that have succeeded – search award abstracts at http://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch
• Know and follow the current Grant Proposal Guide (GPG) - it changes at least annually
• Know the audience for your proposal’s review - it is a competition
Writing Competitive Proposals
• Explicitly address Intellectual Merit and Broader Impact in both the Project Summary and Project Description
• Match and justify the budget to the scope of the proposed work – ask for what you need!
• Special programs/consideration exist for Primarily Undergraduate Institutions (PUIs), e.g., RUI and ROA
Reasons For FundingA Competitive Proposal
• Special Programmatic Considerations (CAREER/RUI/EPSCoR)
• Broadening Participation
• Educational Impact
• Impact on Institution/State
• Likely High Impact
• PI Career Point(“established” or “young”)
• “Launching” versus“Maintaining” Areas
• Place in Program Portfolio
• Other Support for PI
Merit Review Criteria
Intellectual Merit
• How important is the proposed activity to advancing knowledge and understanding within its own field or across different fields?
• How well qualified is the proposer (individual or team) to conduct the project?
• To what extent does the proposed activity suggest and explore creative, original, or potentially transformative concepts?
• How well conceived and organized is the proposed activity?
• Is there sufficient access to resources?
Merit Review CriteriaBroader Impact
• How well does the activity advance discovery and understanding while promoting teaching, training, and learning?
• How well does the proposed activity broaden the participation of underrepresented groups?
• To what extent will it enhance the infrastructure for research and education, such as facilities, instrumentation, networks, and partnerships?
• Will the results be disseminated broadly to enhance scientific and technological understanding?
• What may be the benefits of the proposed activity to society?
Supporting Multidisciplinary Research: Solicitation Mechanism
• NSF– STC (not targeted)– CDI– Climate (*expected FY10)
• MPS (targeted topics)– SOLAR (CHE, DMR, DMS)– Complexity (DMS, ENG)– Cultural Heritage (CHE, DMR) (*expected FY10)
Supporting Multidisciplinary Research: MPS Divisional
Mechanisms
• Institutes & Centers (solicited)– DMS, CHE, DMR, PHY
• Focused Research Groups (unsolicited)– DMS, DMR, CHE
• Cross Review– Joint panels, joint program officers
International Research Experiences for Students (IRES)
East Asia Pacific Summer Institutes (EAPSI)
Doctoral Dissertation Enhancement Projects (DDEP)
International Research Fellowship Program (IRFP)
Pan American Advanced Studies Institutes (PASI)
OISE Programs
National Science FoundationOffice of International Science and Engineering
National Science FoundationOffice of International Science and Engineering
Partnerships for International Research & Education (PIRE)
Research excellence through international collaboration
Development of a diverse, globally engaged US science and engineering workforce
Strengthened international engagement by U.S. institutions
Five year awards, no budget ceiling PIRE budget FY10-14: $40,000,000
Planning Visits: Supports travel by small teams of U.S. researchers to plan a new collaboration, up to $20,000
Planning Workshops: Co-organized by U.S and foreign investigator to identify areas of joint research interest and to develop new collaborations, up to $60,000
Intended Outcomes: Proposals to NSF Research Directorate with strong international collaboration
National Science FoundationOffice of International Science and Engineering
Thank Thank You!You!