leadership kel.6 akk
DESCRIPTION
LEADERSHIPTRANSCRIPT
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Definition of Leadership
Leadership is a process whereby an individual influences a group of
individuals to achieve a common goal. Defining leadership as a process means
that it is not a trait or characteristic that resides in the leader but rather a
transactional even that occurs between the leaders and the followers. Process
implies that a leader affects and is affected by followers. It emphasizes that
leadership is not linear, one-way event, but rather an interactive event. When
leadership is defined in this manners it becomes available to every one. It is not
restricted to the formally designated leader in a group
An activity or set of activities, observable to others that occurs in a group,
organization or institution involving a leader and followers who willingly
subscribe to common purpose and work together to achieve them. ( Professor
Kenneth Clark). Leadership is the ability to get men to do what they don’t like to
do and like it. (Harry S. Truman. Page 5)
Glossary for Management Papers (2004) describes leader and leadership
as follows: Leader n. guide, conductor, pilot, director, pioneer, and shepherd.
Person who influences and guides the direction action, opinions and attitudes of
people. Leader are concerned with doing right the right thing.
1
1.2. Leadership According to Scientific Management and Social
Scientific management pioneered by scientist Frederick W. Taylor in the
early 20th century and developed into as ciene of leadership.
Understanding leadership according to some figures:
1. " Activities affecting the people to work together to achieve a
goal that you want" (Ordway Tead, 1935).
2. " The process of directing and task relationships activities
affecting the members of the group" (Stoner,1982).
3. " Leadership is the ability to influence, motivate, and direct
others in order to attain desired objectives" (Don and
John, 1992).
4. " Leadership is the ability to influence people to willingly
follow one's guidance or adhere to one's decisions"
(Leslie and Lloyd, 1995).
5. “ The effort using a style affects and not forced to motivate
the individual in achieving goals" (Gibson et al., 1997).
6. "Leadership is the moral and intellectual Ability tovisualize
and work for what is best for the company and its employees"
(Mullins, 2001).
While the understanding of leadership according to social sciences according
to some figures:
1. Leadership is the influential increment over and above
mechanical compliance with the routine directives of the
organization. (Katz & Kahn, 1978: 528)
2. Leadership may be considered as the process (act) of influencing
the activities of an organized group in its efforts toward goal
setting and goal achievement. (Stogdill, 1950:3)
From a variety of the above definition, it can be concluded that leadership
is an ability to influence, directing, and motivating of others in order to achieve
2
the objectives of the organization or group. In leadership, the necessary attitude of
authority, be sensitive to taste, led, and intellectual. While the leader is someone
who has special skills, with or without official recognition can affect his group, to
conduct a joint effort leads to the achievement of specific goals.
1.3 Distinguishing between Leader and Leadership
a. Leader
A leader has to implement a personal agenda, and the organizational
agenda. The personal agenda consists of the goal close to the leader’s heart. The
organizational agenda establishes the framework within which all work is done.
Employees must know what is to be done, when it is to be done, and their part in
making it happen. The good leader must be able to state the agenda in a few
sentences that everyone can grasp. Moreover, a leader needs to have a pragmatic
and understandable operating philosophy. The framework of an operating
philosophy is created from learning, innovating, and deciding.
“A leader may not recognize the personal characteristics that cause people to follow him or her, but the followers respond to those characteristics” (Crosby, 1997).
Since the process of leadership cannot be separated from the person as
leader, the following traits and talents are required for an individual who will
adequately fulfill the role of leader: character, charisma, switching mindsets, and
know-how.
1. Character: Sheehy (1990) argued that character is the most crucial and
most illusive element of leadership. As applied to human beings, it refers
to the enduring marks in our personality which includeour inborn talents
3
as well as the learned and acquired traits imposed upon us by life and
experience.
2. Charisma: The function of a charismatic leader is the vital part of
leadership. Charismatic leaders are able to express themselves fully. They
also know who they are, what their advantages and disadvantages are, and
how to completely use their advantages and compensate for their
disadvantages. Moreover, they know what they want, why they want it,
and how to communicate what they want in order to gain cooperation and
support from others (Bennis, 1989).
3. Switching mindsets: The leaders‟ success in confronting challenges rests
entirely on the leader’s ability to change mindsets, create new realities and
thereby see new alternatives and possibilities. A mindset is a consistent but
unexamined framework of assumptions and viewpoints about the nature of
reality as it pertains to business. It is a lens or a filter that controls your
mind, your thoughts, your perceptions and your actions. Through
switching leaders' mindsets, leaders could alter the entire range of business
actions and solutions available to achieve new success in leadership.
4. Know-how: Leadership in different areas requires different technical
expertise. Bennis (1989) stated that leaders must possess "business
literacy" (p.89). That is, leaders must have knowledge of and be experts at
what they are doing. Leaders must have horizontal and vertical knowledge
of how the business works and a full understanding of what is required to
do the task well.
4
b. Leadership
As an adjective, Leadership is deliberately causing people-driven action in
a planned fashion for the purpose of accomplishing the leader‟s agenda (Crosby,
1997). Leadership means that a leader is selecting people carefully and steering
them in his direction. Leadership is a clear agenda, a personal philosophy,
enduring relationships, and worldliness. However, leadership must be done by a
leader.
“Leadership is the accomplishment of a goal through the direction of human assistants. The man who successfully marshals his human collaborators to achieve particular ends is a leader” (Prentice, 2005, p.151).
Rost (1993) defined Leadership as "a power and value laden relationship between leaders and followers who intend real changes that reflect their mutual purposes and goals" (p. 102).
All forms of leadership must use power. However, power needs not be
coercive, dictatorial or punitive to be affective. Instead, power can also be used in
a non-coercive manner to orchestrate, mobilize, direct and guide members of an
institution or organization in the pursuit of a goal or series of objectives (Thomas,
2011).
Peters and Waterman (1982) stated that "The real role of
leadership is to manage the values of an organization" (p.
255).
All leadership is value laden. Also, all leadership, whether good or bad, is
moral leadership. Leadership is a process of influence which involves an ongoing
transaction between a leader and followers (Hollander, 1978). Leadership,
however, does not exclusively reside in the leader. Rather it is a dynamic
relationship between leaders and followers alike. Leadership is always plural; it
5
always occurs within the context of others.Leaders and followers intend real
changes. All forms of leadership are essentially about transformation (Rost,
1993).
Transformation is about leaders and followers intending to pursue real
changes actively. Leadership is not about maintaining the status quo; it is about
initiating change in an organization instead. The process of leadership always
involves a certain number of transactional changes.
The important requirement of the leadership process is for leaders to
remember the followers to pursuit their mutual purposes and goals. Through
education and training, leaders must serve as effective teachers or mentors to
make their followers co-responsible in the pursuit of their mutual purposes and
goals (Nanus, 1989). Leadership is an extension of the leader‟s beliefs. A highly
personal core competence is only from within the leader. In leadership and the
customer revolution, Rick Tate (2003) said “Leadership touches the heart and
soul.”
1.4. Principles of leadership
Characteristics of a leader based on the principles of (Stephen r. Coney) as
follows:
1. Lifelong learning
Not only through formal education, but also out side the school. For example,
learn through reading, writing, listening, and observing. Had a good
experience or a bad as a learning resource.
6
2. Service – Oriented
A leader is not served but to serve, and serve with the leader principle based
on a career as a primary goal. In giving service, leaders should have been
more principled on good service.
3. Bring a positive energy
Everyone has energy and passion. Use the positive energy that is based on
sincerity and desire support the success of others. For that it takes positive
energy to building rapport. A leader must be able and willing to work for long
periods of time and the conditions are not specified. Therefore, a leader of the
haras can show a positive energy, such as;
a. Believe in others
A leader of the trust of others including his staff, so that they have the
motivation and keep up the good work. Therefore, the trust must be
followed with concern.
b. Balance in life
A leader must be able to balance its work. Oriented to the principles
of humanity and balance them selves between work and sports, rest and
recreation. Balance also means balanced between the life of the world and the
hereafter.
c. Look at life as a challenge
The word ' challenge ' is often interpreted negatively. In this case the
challenge means the ability to enjoy life and all its consequences. Because life
is a challenge that is needed, to have a sense of security that comes from
7
within yourself. Sense of security depends on the initiative,
skills, creativity, willpower, courage, dynamics and freedom
d. Synergies
Principled people who always lived in synergy and catalyst of change, they've
always overcome the disadvantage for yourself and others. Synergy is a group
work and benefit both sides. According to The New Webster's International
Dictionary Brolier, Synergy is a group work, which give the results more
effective than working individually. A leader must be able to
synergist with everyone, staff, boss, colleague.
e. Exercises develop yourself
A leader must be able to renew themselves in order to achieve high
success. So he is not only oriented process. The process in developing
the self is composed of several components that relate to:
1) Understanding of the material;
2) Expand the material through study and experience;
3) Teaching materials to others;
4) Apply the principles;
5) Monitor the results;
6) Reflect the results;
7) Adding new knowledge necessary material;
8) New understanding; and
9) Back to being themselves again.
8
SUMMARY
While the terms "leadership" and "leader" are different, the definition of
leadership cannot be separated from the person of leader and the task of
leadership. Leadership is the interaction between the leader’s characteristics and
the situation. A successful leader always has the special traits and talents to
adequately fulfill the role of leader. A person in the formal role of a leader may
not possess leadership skills nor be capable of leading. A good deal of leadership
can come from people who are not formal leaders.
9
CHAPTER 2
THEORY OF LEADERSHIP
2.1 Great Man Theory
The Great Man Theory was a popular 19th century idea according to which
history can be largely explained by the impact of "great men", or heroes: highly
influential individuals who, due to either their personal charisma, intelligence,
wisdom, or Machiavellianism utilized their power in a way that had a decisive
historical impact. (Stephen P. Robbins, 2008).
The Great Man Theory hypothesizes that true leaders are born not made.
Leaders have an inherent capacity to rise to the occasion when needed either
through charisma, intelligence, wisdom or some other parameter. The theory was
given prominence by a Scottish writer named Thomas Carlyle in the 1840’s. He
felt that heroes used their personal attributes or divine intervention to shape
history. His most famous quote “The history of the world is but the biography of
great men”, reflected his belief concerning leaders being born not made (Carlyle,
1888).
2.2 Trait Theory
Trait theories can be described as a branch of the Great Man Theory. These
theories hypothesize that the specific traits of an individual give them better
propensity to be a leader. These personality traits or behavioral characteristics are
inherent in the family and passed on genetically. This theory emphasizes that
leaders share many common traits and characteristics that make them successful.
10
The theory was popularized in the 1937 by Gordon Alport and Hans
Eysenck (1947). Trait theories of leadership differentiated leaders from
nonleaders by focusing on personal qualities and characteristics. (Stephen P.
Robbins, 2008).
According to Eysenck (1947) this theory based primarily on physiology and
genetics—interested in temperament (the aspect of personality that exists from
birth). Divided personality into two biologically-based categories of temperament:
Extraversion/Introversion
a. Extraversion characterized by being outgoing, talkative, and in need
of external stimulation
b. Eysenck's arousal theory of extraversion—everybody has certain
optimal level of arousal at which he/she performs best
1. extraverts chronically under-aroused and need external
stimulation to bring them up to an optimal level of
performance
2. introverts chronically over-aroused and need peace and quiet to
bring them to an optimal level of performance
Neuroticism/Stability
a. Neuroticism or emotionality characterized by high levels of negative
affect such as depression and anxiety.
b. Neuroticism based on activation thresholds in the part of the brain
responsible for the fight-or-flight response.
1. Activation can be measured by heart rate, blood pressure, cold
hands, sweating, and muscular tension.
11
2. Neurotic people, who have low activation thresholds and are
unable to control their emotional reactions, experience negative
affect in the face of minor stressors.
3. Emotionally stable people, who have high activation thresholds
and good emotional.
The two dimensions (axes), extraversion-introversion and
emotional stability instability, define four quadrants:
a. Stable extraverts (sanguine qualities such as outgoing, talkative,
responsive, easygoing, lively, carefree, good leaders)
b. Unstable extraverts (choleric qualities such as touchy, restless,
excitable, changeable, impulsive, irresponsible)
c. Stable introverts (phlegmatic qualities such as calm, even-tempered,
reliable, controlled, peaceful, thoughtful, careful, passive)
d. Unstable introverts (melancholic qualities such as quiet, reserved,
pessimistic, sober, rigid, anxious, moody)
Psychoticism
Further research demonstrated the need for a third category of temperament
is Psychoticism/Socialization. These are people with tendencies to psychosis,
meaning that they are more likely to have problems dealing with reality.
Psychotic people sometimes have hallucinations and often have delusions such as
odd beliefs about being watched. (Hans and Sybil Eysenck, 1947).
2.3 Behavioral Theory
Douglas McGregor (1906 - 1964) is one of the forefathers of management
theory. McGregor developed a philosophical view of humankind with his Theory
12
X and Theory Y in 1960. His work is based upon Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs,
in that he grouped the hierarchy into lower-order needs (Theory X) and higher-
order needs (Theory Y). He suggested that management could use either set of
needs to motivate employees, but better results would be gained by the use of
Theory Y, rather than Theory X. (McGregor, 1960).
These two opposing perceptions theorized how people view human behavior
at work and organizational life :
a. Theory X
This is the authoritative and traditional style of management. Theory
X managers assume that people are lazy, don't want to work and it is the job
of the manager to force or coerce them to work. People are viewed as a
"cost" that must be monitored and controlled. It is based on three basic
assumptions:
1. The average person inherently dislikes work and will avoid it if at
all possible.
2. Most people have to be coerced, controlled, directed and threatened
to get them to work towards organizational goals.
3. The average person prefers to be directed, avoids responsibility,
isn't ambitious and simply seeks security.
In practice Theory X managers tend to be autocratic and controlling,
and feel it is up to them to ride people and make them do their work. These
managers tend to micro-manage, be extremely task oriented and not put
much emphasis on building positive relationships. Little emphasis is shown
towards developing a positive work environment, and recognition and
13
appreciation would be rare. People working for these managers tend to be
motivated by fear and feel unappreciated.
b. Theory Y
This is a more dignified and enlightened management style. Theory Y
managers assume people will perform well if treated positively, and that
higher order needs dominate most individuals. People are viewed as "assets"
that should be valued and developed. It is based on six basic assumptions:
1. The physical and mental effort of work is as natural as play, so the
average person does not inherently dislike work.
2. People will exercise self-direction and self-control in order to
achieve objectives.
3. Rewards of satisfaction and self-actualization come from the effort
to achieve objectives.
4. The average person learns not only to accept but to seek
responsibility.
5. Most people have a capacity for imagination, ingenuity and
creativity.
6. The intellectual potential of most people is only partially realized.
In practice Theory Y managers tend to be participative when making
decisions, and value both results and relationships. These managers tend to
delegate and empower their people because they trust them and feel they
will do good work (i.e., managers are "coaches"). Priorities will be given to
developing positive work environments, and expressing regular recognition
and appreciation. These managers will also feel that people are important
14
and worth developing. People working for these managers tend to feel
appreciated and dignified, and will generally have good morale and feel
motivated.
2.4 Situational Theory
Paul Hersey and Ken Blanchard developed situational leadership theory.
The theory was first introduced as “Life Cycle Theory of Leadership” and was
renamed to situational leadership in the 1970s (1969). The basis for this
theory/style is that there is no one best leadership style. The style employed is
driven by the immediate task and the maturity of the group to which they are
leading.
15
Hersey and Blanchard characterized leadership style in terms of the amount of
Task Behavior and Relationship Behavior that the leader provides to their
followers. They categorized all leadership styles into four behavior types,
which they named S1 to S4:
a. S1: Telling – is characterized by one-way communication in which the
leader defines the roles of the individual or group and provides the
what, how, why,when, and where to do the task.
b. S2: Selling – while the leader is still providing the direction, he is now
using two-way communication and providing the socioemotional
support that will allow the individual or group being influenced to buy
into the process.
c. S3: Participating – this is now shared decision making about aspects of
how the task is accomplished and the leader is providing less task
behaviors while maintaining high relationship behavior.
d. S4: Delegating – the leader is still involved in decisions; however, the
process and responsibility has been passed to the individual or group.
The leader stays involved to monitor progress.
Of these, no one style is considered optimal for all leaders to use all
the time. Effective leaders need to be flexible, and must adapt themselves
according to the situation.
Readiness
According to Hersey and Blanchard, knowing when to use each style
is largely dependent on the readiness of the person or group one is leading.
The four different readiness levels are:
16
a. R1 – People at this level of readiness lack the knowledge, skills, or
confidence to work on their own, and they often need to be pushed to
take the task on. They are unable and unwilling.
b. R2 – at this level, people might be willing to work on the task, but they
still don’t have the skills to complete it successfully. The person is,
therefore, unable but willing or motivated.
c. R3 – Here, people are ready to perform the task. They will be called able
but unwilling or insecure.
d. R4 – These people are able to work on their own. They have high
confidence and strong skills, and they’re committed to the task. They
are, therefore, able and willing or motivated.
2.5 Contingency theory
Because of the perceived failure by researchers to obtain consistent results
from either the behavioural or trait theories, researchers began to focus on
situational influences. The goal was to match leadership style with work
conditions in order to achieve leadership effectiveness. Isolating the situational
conditions proved to be somewhat difficult. Three of the most successful
contingency theories are presented here.
1) The Fiedler Contingency Model.
One of the first models of this type was developed by Fred Fiedler. It
proposes that effective group performance depends on the proper match
between the leader’s style and the degree to which the situation gives control
to the leader.
17
a) Identifying Leadership Style. Fiedler created the Least Preferred Coworker
(LPC) questionnaire, which purports to measure whether a person is task-
or relationship-oriented. High LPC scores indicate a relationship-oriented
leader; low LPC scores indicate a task-oriented leader. Fiedler assumed
that an individual’s leadership style is fixed. If the situation and style are
not optimal, then the situation needs to be modified or the leader needs to
be replaced.
b) Defining the Situation. Fiedler identified three contingency dimensions
that defined the key situational factors that will determine the appropriate
leadership style.
1) Leader-member relations: the degree of confidence, trust, and
respect members have in their leader. Measured as good or poor.
2) Task structure: the degree to which the job assignments are
structured or unstructured. Measured as high or low.
3) Position power: the degree of influence a leader has over hiring,
firing, discipline, promotions, and salary increases. Measured as
strong or weak.
c) Eight Potential Situations. The combination of the measurements of these
three dimensions creates eight potential situations (“octets”) that a leader
might face.
d) Matching Leaders and Situations.
1) Task-oriented leaders tend to perform better in situations that
are either very favorable to them or which are very unfavorable
(category I, II, III, VII, or VIII).
18
2) Relationship-oriented leaders perform better in moderately
favorable situations (categories IV through VI).
3) Recently Fiedler has condensed these eight situations down to
three based on the degree of control: task-oriented leaders
perform best in situations of high and low control while
relationship-oriented leaders perform best in moderate control
situations.
e) Using the Model to Improve Leadership Effectiveness. Because Fiedler
believes an individual’s leadership style is fixed, there are really only two
ways to improve leader effectiveness:
1) Change the leader to fit the situation.
2) Change the situation to fit the leader. This can be done by
restructuring tasks or increasing/decreasing the power the leader
has to control factors such as salary increases, promotions, and
disciplinary actions.
f) Fiedler Contingency Model Summary. Considerable evidence supports
substantial parts of Fiedler's model. In the more recent and simplified
version of the model, there is even stronger evidence to support its
conclusions. However, the LPC questionnaire is problematic and the
contingency variables are complex and difficult for practitioners to assess,
making this a difficult model to use on a practical basis.
2) Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) Theory.
Unlike the other leadership theories mentioned thus far, the LMX theory
does not assume that managers treat all workers the same way.
19
a) Grouping.
Because of time pressures, leaders establish a special relationship with a
small group of their followers: the in-group. These individuals receive a
disproportionate amount of the leader’s attention and are more likely to
receive special privileges. Out-group members get less of the leader’s
time, fewer of the preferred rewards and have leader-follower relations
based on formal authority interactions.
b) Group Selection.
While the selection process is unclear, leaders tend to choose in-group
members (high LMX) because they have attitude and personality
characteristics that are similar to the leader or a higher level of competence
than do the out-group members (low LMX). While the leader does the
choosing, it is the followers’ characteristics the drive the leader’s
categorizing decision. The selections appear to be relatively stable over
time.
c) Maintaining LMX.
Leaders induce LMX by rewarding those employees with whom they want
a closer linkage and punishing those with whom they do not. High LMX
employees are allowed to communicate frequently with the supervisor,
while low LMX employees are discouraged from doing so.
d) LMX Theory Summary.
Research has been generally supportive and may be tied to the concept of
the self-fulfilling prophecy: when leaders expect the best from a set of
20
employees, they tend to get it. In general, research has shown the
following:
Leaders do differentiate among followers.
The in-group and out-group disparities are not random.
In-group members will have higher performance ratings, lower turnover
intentions, greater satisfaction with their superior, and higher overall
satisfaction.
3) The Path-Goal Theory.
Developed by Robert House, this theory extracts elements from the Ohio
State leadership research as well as the expectancy theory of motivation.
a) The Leader’s Purpose. In Path-Goal theory, the leader's job is to provide
followers with information, support, or other resources necessary for them
to achieve their goals. Effective leaders clarify the path to goal
achievement and remove any roadblocks the workers encounter along the
path.
b) Leader Behaviors. Unlike Fiedler, House assumes leaders are flexible and
that the same leader can display any or all of the necessary behaviours for
effectiveness in a given situation. There are four identified leadership
behaviors in this theory:
1) Directive: these leadership behaviors include letting followers
know what is expected of them, scheduling work to be done,
and giving specific guidance as to how to accomplish tasks.
2) Supportive: these behaviors include being friendly and showing
concern for the needs of followers.
21
3) Participative: the leader consults with followers and uses their
suggestions before making a decision.
4) Achievement-Oriented: the behaviors for this type of leader
include setting challenging goals and expecting followers to
perform at their highest level.
c) Contingency Variables. This theory proposes two classes of contingency
variables that moderate leadership behavior:
1) Environmental Variables: factors that are outside the control of
the employee such as task structure, the formal authority system,
and the worker. These variables determine the type of leader
behavior required for outcomes to be maximized.
2) Employee Characteristics: variables such as locus of control,
experience, and perceived ability, which are the interpersonal
characteristics of the employee. These variables determine how
the environment and leader behavior are interpreted.
d) Path-Goal Theory Predictions. The theory proposes the leader behaviour
will be ineffective when it is redundant with the sources of environmental
structure or incongruent with employee characteristics. Specific
predictions (i.e., effective matches between leadership behaviors and
contingency variables) include:
1) Directive leadership behaviors are more appropriate when tasks
are ambiguous or stressful.
2) Supportive leadership is more effective when employees are
performing structured tasks.
22
3) Directive leadership is inappropriate when employees have high
perceived ability or considerable experience.
4) Participative leadership behaviors are more appropriate for
employees with internal locus of control.
5) Achievement-oriented behaviors are appropriate when tasks are
ambiguously structured.
e) Path-Goal Theory Summary. The theory itself, due its complexity, has
received mixed support. While this theory is attractive, it may be quite a
while before we can safely say that it has practical uses in the workplace.
2.6. Transactional theory
Transactional Leadership, also known as managerial leadership, focuses
on the role of supervision, organization, and group performance; transactional
leadership is a style of leadership in which the leader promotes compliance of his
followers through both rewards and punishments.
Within the context of Maslow's hierarchy of needs, transactional
leadership works at the basic levels of need satisfaction, where transactional
leaders focus on the lower levels of the hierarchy. Transactional leaders use an
exchange model, with rewards being given for good work or positive outcomes.
Conversely, people with this leadership style also can punish poor work or
negative outcomes, until the problem is corrected. One way that transactional
leadership focuses on lower level needs is by stressing specific task performance
(Hargis et al, 2001).
23
2.7. Transformational theory
Transformational leadership theory is all about leadership that creates
positive change in the followers whereby they take care of each other's interests
and act in the interests of the group as a whole (Warrilow, 2012). The concept of
transformational leadership was introduced by James Macgregor Burns in 1978 in
his descriptive research on political leaders, but its usage has spread into
organizational psychology and management with further modifications by B.M
Bass and J.B Avalio (Jung & Sosik, 2002). Transformational leadership enhances
the motivation, morale, and performance of followers through a variety of
mechanisms. These include connecting the follower's sense of identity and self to
the project and the collective identity of the organization; being a role model for
followers that inspires them and makes them interested; challenging followers to
take greater ownership for their work, and understanding the strengths and
weaknesses of followers, so the leader can align followers with tasks that enhance
their performance. Warrilow (2012) identified four components of
transformational leadership style:
(1) Charisma or idealised influence: the degree to which the leader
behaves in admirable ways and displays convictions and takes
stands that cause followers to identify with the leader who has a
clear set of values and acts as a role model for the followers.
(2) Inspirational motivation: the degree to which the leader articulates a
vision that is appeals to and inspires the followers with optimism
about future goals, and offers meaning for the current tasks in hand.
24
(3) Intellectual stimulation: the degree to which the leader challenges
assumptions, stimulates and encourages creativity in the followers -
by providing a framework for followers to see how they connect to
the leader, the organisation, each other, and the goal] they can
creatively overcome any obstacles in the way of the mission.
(4) Personal and individual attention: the degree to which the leader
attends to each individual follower's needs and acts as a mentor or
coach and gives respect to and appreciation of the individual's
contribution to the team. This fulfils and enhances each individual
team members' need for self-fulfilment, and self-worth - and in so
doing inspires followers to further achievement and growth.
25
C o m p a r i s o n o f T r a n s a c t i o n a l a n d T r a n s f o r m a t i o n a l L e a d e r s h i p ( H a y , 2 0 1 2 )
Transactional Leadership Transformational Leadeship
Leadership is responsive Leadership is proactive
Works within the organisational culture
Works to change the organisational culture by implementing new ideas
Employees achieve objectives through
rewards and punishments set by leader
Employees achieve objectives through higher ideals and moral values
Motivates followers by appealing to their
own self interest
Motivates followers by encouraging them to put
group interests first
Management-by-exception: maintain the
status quo; stress correct actions to improve
performance.
Individualised consideration: Each behaviour is
directed to each individual to express consideration
and support.
Intellectual stimulation: Promote creative and
innovative ideas to solve problems.
SUMMARY
The theory of leadership that most suitable to be applied in Indonesia is
situational theory which states that there is no one best style of leadership. but
leadership theory should be applied conditionally, like what is happening today,
Mr. Jokowi has been selected as Indonesia's president 2014-2019 period, because
people need a leader who is close to citizens.
26
CHAPTER 3
TYPES OF LEADERSHIP
3.1 Autocratic leadership style
A leadership style where the leader makes all decisions independently or
without consulting with others
Advantages : Good in certain circumstances, such as urgent tasks or military
actions
Disadvantages : Poor decisions, poor level of employee motivation
High degree of dependency on the leader
Can create de-motivation and alienation of staff
May be valuable in some types of business where decisions need to be
made quickly and decisively.
In the autocratic style, the leader makes decisions without consulting with
others. In Lewin’s experiments he found that caused the greatest discontent.
An autocratic style works best when:
a) There is no need for input on the decision.
b) Where the decision would not change as a result of input actions
would not be affected whether they were or were not involved in the
decision-making.
3.2 Democratic leadership style: persuasive or consultative
A leadership style where a leader encourages employee participation in
decision-making
Can be persuasive or consultative
27
Consultative : Process of consultation before decisions are taken
Persuasive : Leader takes decision and seeks to persuade others that the
decision is correct
Advantages : Better decisions, employee motivation
May help motivation and involvement
Improves the sharing of ideas and experiences within the business
Can delay decision making
Workers feel ownership of the firm and its ideas
Disadvantages : Delayed decision, long consultation
In the democratic style, the leader involves the people in decision making,
although the process for the final decision may vary from the leader having the
final say to them facilitating consensus in the group
Democratic decision making usually appreciated by the people, especially
if they have been used to autocratic decisions with which they disagreed.
Democratic style can be problematic when there are wide range of
opinions and there is no clear way of reaching an equitable final decision.
3.3 Laissez-faire leadership style
A leadership style where employees are encouraged to make their own
decisions within limits.
Advantages : More freedom for employees
Relies on good team work
Relies on good interpersonal relations
Can be very useful in businesses where creative ideas are
important
28
Can be highly motivational, as people have control over their
working life
Can make coordination and decision making
Disadvantages : Few guidelines, little incentive, poor motivation, maybe a mess
Time-consuming and lacking in overall direction
Free-reign leadership when leader believes in minimal supervision,
leaving most decisions to subordinates. Empowerment when practice in which
managers lead employees by sharing power, responsibility, and decision making
with them. ‘Let it be’ – the leadership responsibilities are shared by all
The laissez-faire style minimizes the leader’s involvement in decision
making. Laissez-faire works best when people are capable and motivated in
making their own decisions, and where there is no requirement for a central
coordination.
Autocratic
Leadership
Democratic
Leadership
Free-Reign Leadership
(Laissez-faire)
Concentration
of power
With manager Share between
manager and
employees
With employees –
minimal supervision
Decision
making
By manager By manager and
employees
By employees
Communication
flow
From top down Two way Widespread and as
needed
Limitation Employees
cannot question
It is a time
consuming
Not suitable for lesser
experienced employees
29
decisions affair
Agreement Team agreement
is not necessary
Team
Agreement is
needed
When team members
are able to analyze the
situation
3.4 Bureaucratic leadership
The bureaucratic leader believes more in very structure procedures and
tends to bend over the pre-established measures rather it was successful or not.
This type of leadership has no space to explore new ways to solve problems and is
usually slow paced to ensure adherence to the ladders stated by the company.
Leaders ensure that all the steps have been followed prior to sending it to the next
level of authority. Universities, hospitals, banks and government usually require
this type of leader in their organizations to ensure quality, increase security and
decrease corruption. Leaders who would like to speed up the process will
experience frustration and anxiety and are not welcome (Weber, 1905).
3.5 Charismatic leadership
The charismatic leader leads by infusing energy and eagerness into their
team members. A charismatic leader is someone who is often on the run. they is
not someone who feels pleased with any type of stationary situation. This type of
leader has to be committed to the organization for the long run. If the success of
the division or project is attributed to the leader and not the team, charismatic
leaders may become a risk for the company by deciding to resign for advanced
opportunities. It takes a company time and hard work to gain the employees’
30
confidence back with other type of leadership after they have committed
themselves to the magnetism of a charismatic leader (Weber, 1905)
3.6 Transactional leadership
The transactional leader is given power to perform certain tasks and
reward or punish for a team’s performance. It gives the opportunity to the
manager to lead the group and the group agrees to follow his lead to accomplish a
predetermined goal in exchange for something else. Power is given to the leader
to evaluate, correct and train subordinates when productivity is not up to the
desired level and reward effectiveness when expected outcome is reached (Burns,
1978).
3.7 Transformational leadership
The transformation leader motivates its team to be effective and efficient.
Communication is the base for goal achievement focusing the group in the final
desired outcome or goal attainment. This leader is highly visible and uses
chain of command to get the job done. Transformational leaders focus on the big
picture, needing to be surrounded by people who take care of the details. The
leader is always looking for ideas that move the organization to reach the
company’s vision (Burns, 1978)
3.8 People-oriented leadership
The people-oriented leader is the one that, in order to comply with
effectiveness and efficiency, supports, trains and develops his personnel,
increasing job satisfaction and genuine intert to do a good job (Fiedler, 1967)
31
3.9 Servant leadership
The servant leader facilitates goal accomplishment by giving it steam
members what they need in order to be productive. This leader is an instrument
employees use to reach the goal rather than a commanding voice that moves to
change. This leadership style, in a manner similar to democratic leadership, tends
to achieve the results in a slower timeframe than other styles, although
employee engagement is higher (Greenleaf, 1977).
3.10 Environmental leadership
The environmental leader is the one who nurtures group or organizational
environment to affect the emotional and psychological perception of an
individual’s place in that group or organization. An understanding and application
of group psychology and dynamics is essential for this style to be effective. The
leader uses organizational culture to inspire individuals and develop leaders at all
levels. This leadership style relies on creating an education atmosphere where
groups interactively learn the fundamental psychology of group dynamics and
culture from each other. The leader uses this psychology and complementary
language, to influence direction through the members of the inspired group to do
what is required for the benefit of all (Carmazzi, 2005 )
3.11 Visionary Leadership Type
Early ideas on visionary leadership were developed via the sociologist
Max Weber’s notions of charisma and the transformational and charismatic
leadership theories of the historian James MacGregor Burns and the management
scholar Robert House. Other theorists, such as Bernard Bass, Ben Avolio, Warren
Bennis, Burt Nanus, Jay Conger, and Rabindra Kanungo also developed theories
32
with vision communication components. Visionary leadership is said to have
positive effects on follower outcomes, resulting in high trust in the leader, high
commitment to the leader, high levels of performance among followers, and high
overall organizational performance.
3.12 Transactional Leadership style
Motivate followers by appealing to their own self-interest. Motivate by the
exchange process. Example : business owners exchange status and wages for the
work effort of the employee, Focuses on the accomplishment of tasks & good
worker relationships in exchange for desirable rewards, Encourage leader to adapt
their style and behaviour to meet expectations of followers.
When this style used: Leader wants to be in control, When there are
approaching deadlines that must be met, Relationship is short term.
33
3.13 6 Types of Leadership Style by Goleman
34
Leadership Styles cont.
Directive Visionary Affiliative Participative Pacesetting Coaching
Impact on
Climate
Negative Most strongly
positive
Positive Positive Negative Positive
Comments Flexibili
ty hardest hit
People
feel
disrespected
Sense of
responsibility
evaporates
Most
effective style
Visionar
y; motivates
people by
making clear
how work fits
into larger
Builds
emotional bonds
Positively
effects
communication
Trust
increases
flexibility
Builds
trust, respect, and
commitment by
getting input and
building buy-in
By
listening leader
learns how to
Sets high
standards, looks to
do things better,
pinpoints poor
performers
Paradoxica
l, would think
above improves
Help
employees identify
their unique
strengths and
weaknesses
Establish
long-term goals
and help
35
Leaves
people
alienated
Someti
mes it will
work, e.g., a
turnaround or
hostile takeover
looming
Can
break failed
business habits
vision.
Standar
ds and rewards
clear.
Gives
people leeway
to devise means
to meet vision
Works
in most
situations
Does
not work in all
situations, e.g.,
Gives
positive feedback
Celebrates
successes
Style
generally works
well but
particularly when
want to build
team, increase
trust, etc.
May not
focus on
performance; use
build morale
Can lead to
endless meetings
Can delay
decisions and
escalate conflict
Works best
when leader is
uncertain or need
to generate ideas
and followers are
competent.
results, instead it
destroys climate
Employees
overwhelmed and
feel untrusted.
Guidelines
often not made
clear.
Commitme
nt & flexibility
decline.
Works well
when all
employees are
employees see
how to reach them
Excel at
delegating
Powerful
tool but not often
used
Employees
know what is
expected and how
it fits vision
Good when
employees want to
be coached
36
team of experts with other styles self-motivated and
competent.
Leader
must have
expertise to help
employee
SUMMARY
In the leadership style, that must be combine to make our strategy or our action can be success. Someone or leader can’t be stand
just had one style in their company field. That means if the leader just on use one style, the company can’t be survive in the future. Not
only just in leader, but in employee, organization also happen like that
37
CHAPTER 4
A WAY TO BUILD THE LEADERSHIP SOUL
Leadership is an ability to influence a person or group of people towards
to achieve their objectives, in this very dynamic world an organizations need a
capable leaders to challenging the status quo, to create visions of the future and
inspire the members of the organization to have the desire to achieve their visions
(Robbins, 2001; Appelbaum et al., 2004).
Because there are no one can deny the important of leadership to a success
of an organization. The ability of the leadership of the organization is a major
factor in building a work ethic within the organization (Bass &Avolio, 1994).
Defined by Stoner, Freeman and Gilbert (1995), Leadership is the process
of directing and influencing the members in terms of the various activities that
must be performed. The leader can be defined as someone who has the ability to
influence the behavior of others without the use of force, so they lead people to
accept him / her as someone who is worthy to lead them.
Leadership is developed, not discovered. People who are born as a true
leader will always stand out, but to remain consistent, natural leadership
characteristics must be developed. According to John Maxwell, in his book
Developing Leadership that: "An optimal leadership is a result of training /
practice, it wasn’t born just like that. So it should be seized, not given.
All people are born as a leader ,everyone can develop leadership and skills.
Everyone can benefit from using them. First, take time to honestly analyze your
self. Learn to understand yourself. It’s the first step tounder standing others.
38
Before knowing the step to be a good leader, there are several questions that must
be answered by ourselves. Consider these important questions:
1. What kind of leader am I? One who helps solve problems? A leader who
helps people get along? How do others see me as a leader?
2. What are my goals, purposes, and expectations in working with this
particular group?
Identify areas for improvement. Ask yourself these questions:
1. Do I try to be aware of how others think and feel?
2. Do I try to help others perform to the best of their abilities?
3. Am I willing to accept responsibility?
4. Am I willing to try new ideas and new ways of doing things?
5. Am I able to communicate with others effectively?
6. Am I a good problem solver?
7. Do I accept and appreciate other perspectives and opinions?
8. Am I aware of current issues and concerns on campus or in my
community?
Then after analyzing your strengths and weaknesses ,take action. Devise a
strategy for upgrading your skills. Here are a few strategies to consider:
Based on The Undefeated Mind by dr.Lickerman, he explains that there are
several requirements for someone to be a leader. Among them:
1) Be confident.
Requiring an entire post unto itself, suffice it to say for the purpose of this
post that a world of difference exists between saying, "I don't
know" nervously and uncertainly and saying "I don't know" confidently.
39
To say "I don't know" nervously and uncertainly communicates
incompetence. To say "I don't know" confidently not only communicates
competence but also that it's perfectly acceptable that you don't know the
answer to the specific question you were asked. I listen to medical students
say "I don't know" all the time. The ones who say it confidently do tend to
be more competent than those who say it nervously and uncertainly. Not
knowing something doesn't make you a bad leader. Allowing that lack of
knowledge to sap your confidence, or worse, not having confidence in the
first place, does.
2) Be kind but firm.
Being a leader means having to set boundaries, but boundaries can be set
angrily and condescendingly or gently and compassionately. Do it gently
and compassionately and people will not only respect the boundaries you
set but you as well.
3) Be an expert.
However long it takes, whatever you have to do, know what you're talking
about. Don't ever try to fake content knowledge. If you don't know what
you need to know, find it out.
4) Be decisive.
A great leader listens to a diversity of opinions, asks probing questions,
debates issues, challenges positions---but when the time to discuss and
debate is over, makes a decision and moves on.
40
5) Be willing to have people disagree with you.
If you're setting appropriate boundaries and taking strong positions, some
people may not only disagree with you but actively dislike you. But that's
more about them than it is about you. Don't take it personally.
6) Know when to spend time building a consensus and when to make an
executive decision.
Sometimes everyone (or almost everyone) involved needs to agree before
progress can be made. Other times waiting for a consensus risks failure.
Learn to recognize when it's time to take over.
7) Have a vision.
A vision that excites the people who follow you, that inspires them in such
a way that they perform (or want to perform) at a level they didn't know
they could.
8) Care about the people you lead.
Genuine concern is always perceived and appreciated---and far more
motivating than any punitive measure could ever be.
9) Mentor people.
Great leaders always have people who want to learn from them. Someone
is always watching you, whether you realize it or not. If you're ever unsure
about what decision to make, think about what each of your choices will
teach the people around you. Try to pick the choice that demonstrates the
greatest virtue.
10) Fully visualize every repercussion of each of your decisions in
advance. Plans often fail because of unforeseen consequences. Follow the
41
predicted results of your decisions into every nook and cranny and take a
360 degree look around in your mind. The more concretely you can do
this, the more likely you'll be able to predict results no one else can.
Communication Skills in Leadership
Skill Category LeadershipInterpersonal Communication √Active hearing √Public Speaking √Interview √Written Communication √Computer Skills √Advocate Media √Sensitivity of Culture √Feed Back √Delegation √Framing √Dialogue √Meeting Skills √Health Communication √Social Marketing √Mentoring √Conflict Resolution √Negotiate √
Source: Rowitz, Louis(2012)
Leadership is being a good listener and talking about a situation or a
problem expands can improved our understanding about the situation. And keep
your team informed so they will understand their role in the organization and will
tend not to be confused. Generally, people would like to have too much to do than
not enough to do. They lose self-esteem if they are not kept busy, and then
productivity falls off dramatically.
SUMMARY
Everyone can be leader but not of all leaders have a leadership
characteristic. A person who have a leadership not always as a leader in their
42
group or workplace, but they influence the others, of course in the positive ways.
A leader have to develop their skills ,because a leadership is not given , but a
result of developing and practicing to be a better personal.
43
CHAPTER 5
DIFFERENCES BETWEEN MANAGER AND LEADERSHIP
The development of the transformational theories of leadership stimulated
a reconsideration of the concept of leadership and management and initiated
drawing distinctions between the two. These differences have not been entirely
clear, as there has been great confusion in terminology, and these distinctions may
be largely academic rather than practical in nature. Many authors seems to use the
words almost interchangeably at times while others are quick to illustrate the
distinctions between management and leadership as if represent a litmus test of
the truly effective executives.
Although there do seem to be a set of practical and important tasks that fall
under “management” and a set that belong under the heading of “leadership”,
some actions that have passed for leadership in health system, organization, and in
the literature really represent management skill. Before refocusing on leadership
skill, it is important to note that some management aspect of a public health
practitioner’s work can not be exchanged for leadership. There is great inherent
value to enabling people and ideas to interact to “establish strategies and make
decisions”. It is not leadership alone that makes public health systems function.
Although the distinction is primarily an academic one, the difference between
leadership and management behaviors raises many questions. The context itself
may contribute much to the evaluation and categorizing of behaviors; some fall
more cleanly into the two groups.
44
In essence, management holds a primary allegiance to the organizations
and fulfills certain roles because they are attached to the position. Managers may
set productions goals for an organization, assign workloads, and ensure that
workers have the requisite skills and materials necessary to complete their
assigned task. Leadership, on the other hand, is the way managers get things done
by inspiring the best performance and building the internal capacity of an
organization in something no tangible ways. Although a central role of
administration, leadership is merely one role of management. However, the peril
is that public health leaders will engage only in management and not in leadership
because of lack of training and experience or benefit from leadership skills, he or
she must not simultaneously relinquish his or management duties. An ability to
seamlessly execute both when necessary is a skill that is vital to successful public
health leaders.
The current academic thinking holds that while management talent is an
important component of administration, it is quite different from those of
leadership. Traditional management follows a transactional model, in which work
is exchanged for rewards. Here, the leader works to maintain the status quo and
preserve the current working criteria. Playing within the rules, maximizing
personal rewards, and providing incentives commensurate with performance are
thought to support only ordinary performance in organizations. In
transformational leadership, however, upsetting the status quo to create new rules
that optimize the system using an independent structure are purposed to create
extraordinary result
45
Kotter draws even further distinctions between management and
leadership skill. According to Kotter, management copes with complexity while
leadership copes with change. An important management skill is to plan and
budgeting, while the leadership counterpant is to set direction. Managers use
organizing and staffing to achieve the institutional plan while leaders align people
to achieve organizational objective. Controlling and problem solving skills are
employed by managers to ensure that plans are accomplished while leaders
motivate and inspire people to achieve the mutual visions.
Transactional vs Transformational Leadership:
Differences Between Manager and Leader
Transactional Leader or Manager Skills
Transformational Leader or Leader Skills
PerformanceConsidered by leadership writers to produce ordinary performance
Considered by leadership writers to produce extraordinary performance
Goal To maintain the status quo by playing within the rules
To change the status quo by changing the rules
Goal arise out of
Necessity, are reactive, and respond to ideas. They are deeply imbedded in the organization’s history and culture
Desires; they are active, shaping ideas; may be a departure from organization’s history and culture
EmphasisRationality and control, limits choices, focuses on solving problems
Innovation, creativity to develop fresh approaches to long-standing problems, and open issue to new options
Attitudes towards goal
Impersonal, if not passive attitudes Personal and active attitudes
Incentives Based on exchange of needs Based on the greater goodLocus of rewards Maximize personal benefits Optimize systemic benefit
Requires
Persistence, tough-mindedness, hark work, intelligence, analytical ability, tolerance, and good will
Genius and heroism
View work as Enabling processes, ideas, and people to establish
Creative, energizing, and emerging
46
strategies and make decisions
Tactics employed
Negotiate and bergain, use of rewards, punishment, and other forms of coercion.Strive to convert win-lose into win-win situations as part of the process of reconciling differences among people and maintaining balances of power.
Inspire followers, create shared vision, motivate.Strive to create new situations and new directions without regard to reconciling groups or power.
SUMMARY
The leader is the one who brings change with the ideas or new inspiration
while a manager is someone who leads an organization or group according to the
rules of the existing organizations.
47
CHAPTER 6
INDICATOR OF THE LEADERSHIP EFFECTIVENESS
According to J.T. Wren (1995), there is no possible way to measure the
effectiveness of leadership for the reason that an individual's leadership style
varies from person-to-person and is determined by the methodology in which
he/she handles the situation. Leadership is often measured by an individual's
ability to motivate and influence change within an organization or community.
Consequently, leadership effectiveness is primarily predicated upon a leader's
ability to receive adequate results whether the leader is a positive influence or a
negative influence on followers.
Gary Yukl (2009) explained that the criteria of selected to evaluate
leadership effectiveness reflect a research’s explicit or implicit conception of
leadership. Most research evaluate leadership effectiveness in terms of the
consequences of influence on a single individual, a team or group, or an
organization.
The most commonly used measure of leader effectiveness is the extent to
which the performances of the team or organizational unit is enhanced and the
attainment of goals is facilitated. Examples of objective measures such as
productivity. Subjective measures of effectiveness include ratings obtained from
the leader’s superiors, peers, or subordinates.
Follower attitudes and perceptions of the leader are another common
indicator of leader effectiveness. How well does the leader satisfy their needs and
expectations? Do followers like, respect, and admire the leader? Do followers
48
trust the leader and perceive him or her to have high integrity? Are followers
strongly committed to carrying out the leader’s requests or will they resist, ignore
or subvert them? Does the leader improve the quality of work life, build the self
confidence of followers, increase their skills, and contribute to their psychological
growth and development? Follower attitudes, perceptions, and beliefs are usually
measured with questionnaires or interviews. Such aspect of follower behavior also
provide an indirect indicator of dissatisfaction and hostility toward the leader
such as absent of the employee.
Leader effectiveness is occasionally measured in terms of the leader’s
contribution to the quality of group processes, as perceived by followers or by
outside observes. Does the leader enhance group cohesiveness, member
cooperation, member commitment, and member confidence that the group can
achieve its objectives? Does the leader enhance problem solving and decision
making by the group, and help to resolve disagreements and conflicts in
constructive way? Does the leader contribute to the efficiency of role
specializations, the organization of activities, the accumulation of resources, and
the readiness of the group to deal with change and crises?
A final type of criterion for leadership effectiveness is the extent to which
a person has a successful career as a leader is the person promoted rapidly to
positions of higher authority? Does the person serve full term in a leadership
position, or is he or she removed or forced to resign? For elected positions in
organizations, is a leader who seeks re-election successful?
49
There is no simple answer to the question of how to evaluate leadership
effectiveness. The selection of appropriate criteria depends on the objectives and
values of the person making the evaluation and people have different values.
In determining a leader's effectiveness would assess whether he/she is a
transformational or transactional leader. According to Bass (1990)
transformational leaders inspire employees to exceed the expected by embracing a
vision and striving to achieve that vision. Transformational leaders demonstrate
specific behaviors and actions: attributed charisma, inspirational motivation,
intellectual stimulation, and individualized consideration. Attributed charisma
occurs when leaders demonstrate behaviors that engender respect and trust.
Leaders who display charisma demonstrate interest in the well-being of others,
stay calm in crisis situations, formulate decisions that benefit the group as a
whole, demonstrate competence, and earn followers' respect.
SUMMARY
There isn’t certain indicator to measure the effectiveness of leadership.
Leadership effectiveness observable the way of she/he influence subordinate
person in which related with performance of the team or organizational unit is
enhanced and the attainment of goals.
50
REFERENCES
Bass, B. Mm. (1996). A new paradigm of leadership: An inquiry into transformational leadership. Alexandria, VA: U. S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.
Cooper, James Fenimore., and John Nirenberg. "Leadership Effectiveness." Encyclopedia of Leadership. Ed. . Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 2004. 845-54. SAGE.http://www.sagepub.com/northouse6e/study/materials/reference/reference6.4.pdf (accessed on 26th October 2014).
Fleenor, John W. "Trait Approach to Leadership." Encyclopedia of Industrial and Organizational Psychology.2006. SAGE Publications. 16 Feb. 2011.
Fleishman, E. A., Mumford, M. D., Zaccaro, S. J, Levin, K. Y, Korotkin, A. L, & Hein,M. B. (1991). Taxonomic efforts in the description of leader behavior: A synthesis and functional interpretation. Leadership Quarlerly, 2, 245-287.
Gibson, Jame L., Jr. Donnely, H.James, John M.Ivancevich. (1998). Fundamental of Management. New York: Mc.Graw-Hill Companies.
Guthrie, V. A, & Kelly-Radford. (1998). Feedback-intensive programs. In C. D. McCauley, R S. Moxley, & E. Van Velsor (Eds.), Center for Creative LeadershIp handbook of leadership. San francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 66--105.
Hersey, P. and Blanchard, K. H. (1969). Life cycle theory of leadership. Training and Development Journal, 23 (5), 26–34.
Hersey, P. and Blanchard, K. H. (1969). Management of Organizational Behavior – Utilizing Human Resources. New Jersey/Prentice Hall.
Hersey, P. and Blanchard, K. H. (1977). Management of Organizational Behavior 3rd Edition– Utilizing Human Resources. New Jersey/Prentice Hall.
Hersey, P. (1985). The situational leader. New York, NY: Warner Books.
Kouzes, James M. (2007). The leadership Challenge 4th edition. Jossey Bass.
Piccolo, R.F, and Colquitt, J.A. (2006) .Transformational Leadership and Job Behavior: The Mediating Role of Core Job Characteristics. Academy of Management Journal. Pp 327 – 340.
Robbins, Stephen P. and David A. Decenzo. (2001). Fundamental of Management. 3rd ed. New Jersey: Uppersuddle River.
51
Rue, Leslie W. and Lloyd L. Byars. (1995). Management, Skill, and Application 11th edition. United States of America: Von Hoffman Press.
Warrilow. S. (2012). Transformational Leadership Theory - The 4 Key Components in Leading Change & Managing Change. [Retrieved 15/03/2013]. http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Stephen_Warrilow.
Wren, J.T. (1995). The Leader’s Companion.New York: The Free Press.
Yukl, Gary. (2009). Leadership in organizations. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
52