how technology choices effect profitable business in ... … · manpower on demand, remote...

24
How technology choices effect profitable business in merchant shipping? Teus van Beek, General Manager Market Innovation 19 October 2015 1 © Wärtsilä

Upload: others

Post on 28-Jan-2021

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • How technology choices effect profitable business in merchant shipping?

    Teus van Beek, General Manager Market Innovation

    19 October 2015 1 © Wärtsilä

  • Why should Financiers be involved in equipment selection?

    19 October 2015 2 © Wärtsilä

    Business Solution

    Service

    Technical Solution

    Product

    - ECAs through global manufacturing footprint - Optimized finance structures

    To Reduce Financing Costs

    - Through Performance / Uptime guarantees - Limiting Financial exposure due to failures

    To Guarantee Revenue / Availability

    - EPC package reduces Integration Risk - Avoid construction delays

    To Reduced Construction Risk

    - OEM Operation and maintenance of the equipment - Ensure asset liquitidy

    To Maintain Asset Value

  • Agenda

    How to meet legislation

    How can a New Ship Concept be more profitable : concept study

    Business environment for merchant shipping

    Conclusion

    19 October 2015 3 © Wärtsilä

  • Challenges

    • Earnings low

    • Overcapacity

    • Unbalance between supply & demand

    • Older ships need to be

    upgraded - driven by legislation

    • New ship based on Eco

    concepts

    19 October 2015 4 © Wärtsilä

    How to improve your business in harsh market conditions?

  • Environmental challenges for operators!

    November 7th, 2013 5

    Acid rains Tier II (2011) Tier III (2016) NOx

    Greenhouse effect EEDI adopted by IMO

    CO2

    Acid rains Sulphur content regulated SOx

    Direct impact on humans Regionally regulated

    Particulate matter

  • Operating in Emission Control Areas

    ECAs areas copied from LR 2030 perspective

    19 October 2015 6 © Wärtsilä

  • Best option to reduce emissions?

    HFO

    Scrubber

    MDO DF-LNG

    SCR SCR

  • After treatment(SCR) to reduce NOx

    November 7th, 2013 8

  • Scrubbers to reduce SOx

    November 7th, 2013 RETROFIT & GRIP Midterm Conference 9

  • Integration in to the ship

    10

    Turn-key delivery to include: • Equipment • Installation, piping, cabling • Interfaces to existing systems • Commissioning • Performance guarantee • Class approval • Certification • Documentation • Customer training

  • LNGPac

    11 © Wärtsilä

    The LNG fuel supply system

  • CO2

    NOx

    SOx

    Particulates

    Dual-Fuel engine in gas mode

    Diesel engine

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    100

    Emission values [%]

    12 © Wärtsilä

    -85%

    -100%

    -100%

    • 25% lower CO2 Thanks to low carbon to hydrogen ratio of fuel • 85% lower NOX Lean burn concept (high air-fuel ratio) • No SOX emissions Sulphur is removed from fuel when liquefied

    • Very low particulate emissions

    • No visible smoke

    • No sludge deposits

    Natural Gas As Marine Fuel

  • Dual-Fuel advantages

    Main advantages of the Dual-Fuel 4-stroke engine:

    • Redundancy, backup without interruptions in power or speed.

    • Able to operate on liquid fuel outside ECA-area (incl HFO) • Simple system, no PTI/”take me home” or double gas

    system needed. • Vessel re-routing possible, gas supply not a limitation

    We see growth in Gas fuelled vessel on shorter routes

    13 © Wärtsilä

  • CHANGE TO MGO Run full time on Marine Gas

    Oil (MGO).

    Convenient No change over

    High oper. cost

    CONVERT TO LNG Convert engines to run on

    gas (LNG).

    Also reduces NOx and particulates Investment cost LNG availability

    USE SCRUBBERS Install an exhaust gas

    cleaning system (scrubber).

    Works with high sulphur HFO Use everywhere Easy operation ROI depends on fuel oil price difference between low sulphur fuel oil and high sulphur HFO

    14

    FUEL SWITCH Switch to low sulphur fuel in

    SECA

    Flexible Small investment

    High oper. cost Fuel change over Fuel availability

    What is the best option to fulfil the limitation?

  • ∆ Capex increase and ∆ Opex vs. Reference

    ∆ To reference case (W 46F Tier II)

    0255075

    100125150175200225250275300325350

    SCR; MGO SCR; HSFO + scrubber DF engine

    Delta Capex from Tier2 (€/kW)

    -5

    5

    15

    25

    35

    45

    55

    65

    75

    85

    SCR; MGO SCR; HSFO + scrubber DF engine

    Delta Opex vs. Reference Case (€/MWh)

    Delta Opex (20% ECA) Delta Opex (50% ECA)Delta Opex (80% ECA) Delta Opex (100% ECA)

  • How new ship concepts improve your business

    • Which factors are effecting the day rate mostly?

    • Can we instead find a ship speed which give a better day rate?

    • How can we beat these factors?

    • What is needed to obtain this?

    19 October 2015 WÄRTSILÄ CORPORATION 16 © Wärtsilä

  • Reducing Total Shipping Cost

    Slow Steaming: Wärtsilä Technologies to Reduce Cost

    Propulsion Cost Renewable Energies,(Wind) to reduce Energy consumption, Ultra Large Propulsors, Hull Design

    Auxiliaries Cost WHR, Operation Profile

    Cost Factor Selected Technologies

    Crew Cost Automation, Remote Monitoring & Control, Manpower on Demand, Remote Maintenance, Remote Expert Support

    Vessel CAPEX Design to Cost, Simplification

  • Why? Main cost drivers in shipping

    10/19/2015 18

    TOTAL Fuel cost Vessel CAPEX Cargo CAPEX Crew cost

    Ship speed

  • Is this the future?

    19

    Features & Concepts for maximum efficiency

    Ultra large fin propulsor

    Low number of crew

    Light weight hull structure

    Decentral power generation

    Energy storage to reduce load fluctuations

    Ship speed optimised for auxiliary wind energy to reduce propulsive power

    Zero emission fuel

    Low hull resistance

    Remote operation engine room

  • Is this the future?

    20

  • Capex machinery versus Opex

    OPEX CAPEX mach

    • Ultra large fin propulsor 18% 8% • Low hull resistance 5% 5% • Light weight hull structure 2% - • Ship speed optimised for OPEX 5% • Auxiliary wind energy to reduce propulsive power 18% 50% • Decentral power generation - • Energy storage to reduce load fluctuations 3% • Zero emission fuel - • Low number of crew on board 1% -3% • Remote operation engine room -

    TOTAL REDUCTION IN ENERGY CONSUMPTION: 42%

    19 October 2015 WÄRTSILÄ CORPORATION 21 © Wärtsilä

  • Financial benefit

    19 October 2015 WÄRTSILÄ CORPORATION 22 © Wärtsilä

    Value: 1,2 m$ lower fuel cost per year at 2,8 m$ extra investment (5,4% of the vessel) Payback in 3 years at current level of fuel price

  • What is our key message today?

    • We challenge the norm! – Why? …Todays market needs a change and we constantly work on this!

    • There is more to cost savings than just reducing crew! – Automated ships are not the only answer!

    • The future is still uncertain! – How to make it good? We believe that together we can create it!

    In Short…

    Technology choices really do matter for the future of sustainable & profitable shipping.

    19 October 2015 WÄRTSILÄ CORPORATION 23 © Wärtsilä

  • Thank you for your attention

    Teus van Beek General Manager Market Innovations Wartsila Mobile: +31 653797704 E-mail: [email protected]

    19 October 2015 WÄRTSILÄ CORPORATION 24 © Wärtsilä

    Slide Number 1Why should Financiers be involved in equipment selection?AgendaChallengesEnvironmental challenges for operators!Operating in Emission Control AreasBest option to reduce emissions?After treatment(SCR) to reduce NOx Scrubbers to reduce SOxIntegration in to the shipLNGPacNatural Gas As Marine FuelDual-Fuel advantagesSlide Number 14 Capex increase and Opex vs. ReferenceHow new ship concepts improve your businessReducing Total Shipping CostWhy? Main cost drivers in shippingIs this the future? Is this the future? Capex machinery versus OpexFinancial benefit What is our key message today?Thank you for your attention