how technology choices effect profitable business in ... … · manpower on demand, remote...
TRANSCRIPT
-
How technology choices effect profitable business in merchant shipping?
Teus van Beek, General Manager Market Innovation
19 October 2015 1 © Wärtsilä
-
Why should Financiers be involved in equipment selection?
19 October 2015 2 © Wärtsilä
Business Solution
Service
Technical Solution
Product
- ECAs through global manufacturing footprint - Optimized finance structures
To Reduce Financing Costs
- Through Performance / Uptime guarantees - Limiting Financial exposure due to failures
To Guarantee Revenue / Availability
- EPC package reduces Integration Risk - Avoid construction delays
To Reduced Construction Risk
- OEM Operation and maintenance of the equipment - Ensure asset liquitidy
To Maintain Asset Value
-
Agenda
How to meet legislation
How can a New Ship Concept be more profitable : concept study
Business environment for merchant shipping
Conclusion
19 October 2015 3 © Wärtsilä
-
Challenges
• Earnings low
• Overcapacity
• Unbalance between supply & demand
• Older ships need to be
upgraded - driven by legislation
• New ship based on Eco
concepts
19 October 2015 4 © Wärtsilä
How to improve your business in harsh market conditions?
-
Environmental challenges for operators!
November 7th, 2013 5
Acid rains Tier II (2011) Tier III (2016) NOx
Greenhouse effect EEDI adopted by IMO
CO2
Acid rains Sulphur content regulated SOx
Direct impact on humans Regionally regulated
Particulate matter
-
Operating in Emission Control Areas
ECAs areas copied from LR 2030 perspective
19 October 2015 6 © Wärtsilä
-
Best option to reduce emissions?
HFO
Scrubber
MDO DF-LNG
SCR SCR
-
After treatment(SCR) to reduce NOx
November 7th, 2013 8
-
Scrubbers to reduce SOx
November 7th, 2013 RETROFIT & GRIP Midterm Conference 9
-
Integration in to the ship
10
Turn-key delivery to include: • Equipment • Installation, piping, cabling • Interfaces to existing systems • Commissioning • Performance guarantee • Class approval • Certification • Documentation • Customer training
-
LNGPac
11 © Wärtsilä
The LNG fuel supply system
-
CO2
NOx
SOx
Particulates
Dual-Fuel engine in gas mode
Diesel engine
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Emission values [%]
12 © Wärtsilä
-85%
-100%
-100%
• 25% lower CO2 Thanks to low carbon to hydrogen ratio of fuel • 85% lower NOX Lean burn concept (high air-fuel ratio) • No SOX emissions Sulphur is removed from fuel when liquefied
• Very low particulate emissions
• No visible smoke
• No sludge deposits
Natural Gas As Marine Fuel
-
Dual-Fuel advantages
Main advantages of the Dual-Fuel 4-stroke engine:
• Redundancy, backup without interruptions in power or speed.
• Able to operate on liquid fuel outside ECA-area (incl HFO) • Simple system, no PTI/”take me home” or double gas
system needed. • Vessel re-routing possible, gas supply not a limitation
We see growth in Gas fuelled vessel on shorter routes
13 © Wärtsilä
-
CHANGE TO MGO Run full time on Marine Gas
Oil (MGO).
Convenient No change over
High oper. cost
CONVERT TO LNG Convert engines to run on
gas (LNG).
Also reduces NOx and particulates Investment cost LNG availability
USE SCRUBBERS Install an exhaust gas
cleaning system (scrubber).
Works with high sulphur HFO Use everywhere Easy operation ROI depends on fuel oil price difference between low sulphur fuel oil and high sulphur HFO
14
FUEL SWITCH Switch to low sulphur fuel in
SECA
Flexible Small investment
High oper. cost Fuel change over Fuel availability
What is the best option to fulfil the limitation?
-
∆ Capex increase and ∆ Opex vs. Reference
∆ To reference case (W 46F Tier II)
0255075
100125150175200225250275300325350
SCR; MGO SCR; HSFO + scrubber DF engine
Delta Capex from Tier2 (€/kW)
-5
5
15
25
35
45
55
65
75
85
SCR; MGO SCR; HSFO + scrubber DF engine
Delta Opex vs. Reference Case (€/MWh)
Delta Opex (20% ECA) Delta Opex (50% ECA)Delta Opex (80% ECA) Delta Opex (100% ECA)
-
How new ship concepts improve your business
• Which factors are effecting the day rate mostly?
• Can we instead find a ship speed which give a better day rate?
• How can we beat these factors?
• What is needed to obtain this?
19 October 2015 WÄRTSILÄ CORPORATION 16 © Wärtsilä
-
Reducing Total Shipping Cost
Slow Steaming: Wärtsilä Technologies to Reduce Cost
Propulsion Cost Renewable Energies,(Wind) to reduce Energy consumption, Ultra Large Propulsors, Hull Design
Auxiliaries Cost WHR, Operation Profile
Cost Factor Selected Technologies
Crew Cost Automation, Remote Monitoring & Control, Manpower on Demand, Remote Maintenance, Remote Expert Support
Vessel CAPEX Design to Cost, Simplification
-
Why? Main cost drivers in shipping
10/19/2015 18
TOTAL Fuel cost Vessel CAPEX Cargo CAPEX Crew cost
Ship speed
-
Is this the future?
19
Features & Concepts for maximum efficiency
Ultra large fin propulsor
Low number of crew
Light weight hull structure
Decentral power generation
Energy storage to reduce load fluctuations
Ship speed optimised for auxiliary wind energy to reduce propulsive power
Zero emission fuel
Low hull resistance
Remote operation engine room
-
Is this the future?
20
-
Capex machinery versus Opex
OPEX CAPEX mach
• Ultra large fin propulsor 18% 8% • Low hull resistance 5% 5% • Light weight hull structure 2% - • Ship speed optimised for OPEX 5% • Auxiliary wind energy to reduce propulsive power 18% 50% • Decentral power generation - • Energy storage to reduce load fluctuations 3% • Zero emission fuel - • Low number of crew on board 1% -3% • Remote operation engine room -
TOTAL REDUCTION IN ENERGY CONSUMPTION: 42%
19 October 2015 WÄRTSILÄ CORPORATION 21 © Wärtsilä
-
Financial benefit
19 October 2015 WÄRTSILÄ CORPORATION 22 © Wärtsilä
Value: 1,2 m$ lower fuel cost per year at 2,8 m$ extra investment (5,4% of the vessel) Payback in 3 years at current level of fuel price
-
What is our key message today?
• We challenge the norm! – Why? …Todays market needs a change and we constantly work on this!
• There is more to cost savings than just reducing crew! – Automated ships are not the only answer!
• The future is still uncertain! – How to make it good? We believe that together we can create it!
In Short…
Technology choices really do matter for the future of sustainable & profitable shipping.
19 October 2015 WÄRTSILÄ CORPORATION 23 © Wärtsilä
-
Thank you for your attention
Teus van Beek General Manager Market Innovations Wartsila Mobile: +31 653797704 E-mail: [email protected]
19 October 2015 WÄRTSILÄ CORPORATION 24 © Wärtsilä
Slide Number 1Why should Financiers be involved in equipment selection?AgendaChallengesEnvironmental challenges for operators!Operating in Emission Control AreasBest option to reduce emissions?After treatment(SCR) to reduce NOx Scrubbers to reduce SOxIntegration in to the shipLNGPacNatural Gas As Marine FuelDual-Fuel advantagesSlide Number 14 Capex increase and Opex vs. ReferenceHow new ship concepts improve your businessReducing Total Shipping CostWhy? Main cost drivers in shippingIs this the future? Is this the future? Capex machinery versus OpexFinancial benefit What is our key message today?Thank you for your attention