fe-i 7_tir basics+appl
DESCRIPTION
Thermal Infrared Basics and ApplicationTRANSCRIPT
Remote Sensing Section
Remote Sensing - I
- Thermal Infrared -Basics and Application
Remote Sensing Section
Blackbody Radiation, Atmospheric Transmission and Regions of Operation for Remote Sensors
UV
Blu
eG
reen
Red
IR
Sun’s radiant energyat 5800 K
Earth’s radiant energy at 288 K
K b
and
X b
and
C b
and
P b
and
Radar Instruments
Passive microwave
Human eyePhotography Thermal scanners
Ener
gy
Optical scanners - ms/xs
Tran
smis
sion
%
100
adapted from Lillesand & Kiefer (1994)
Wavelength in Microns
0.2 0.3 0.6 1.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 10 20 40 60 100 200 0.5 mm 1 cm 1 m 10 m 100 m
0.2 0.3 0.6 1.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 10 20 40 60 100 200 0.5 mm 1 cm 1 m 10 m 100 m
0 VIS NIR SWIR MIR TIR
Remote Sensing Section
Fundamentals (Reststrahlen) of TIR (Silica)
a)
c)
b)a cb
a) 8 – 10 µm: asymmetricSi – O – Si stretching vibrations
b) 12 – 14 µm: symmetric Si – O – Si stretching vibrations
c) 17 – 25 µm: O – Si – O bending vibrations
Remote Sensing Section
Spectral Features in the TIR Range
1 Forsterite Nesosilicate (Insel)2 Olivine #3 Pyroxene Inosilicate (Ketten)4 Hornblende #5 Labradorite Tectosilicate (Gerüst) 6 Oligoklase #7 Albite #8 Orthoklase #9 Quartz #9
8
7
65
4
3
2
1
Remote Sensing Section
Feldspars and Carbonates
VNIR/SWIR Reflectance
TIR EmittanceOrthoclase
Albite
Calcite
SWIR
Albite
Orthoclase
TIR
Calcite
Remote Sensing Section
TIR – Laboratory Measurements at Thin Sections
Remote Sensing Section
EO-Sensors providing Thermal Data
TIMS (airborne) ASTER Landsat (E)TM/OLI NOAA AVHRR
4.0 m x 4.0 m GSD 90 m x 90 m GSD 120 m x 120 m GSD 1.1 km x 1.1 km GSDat 1.5 km flight alt. TM 1-6
60 m x 60 m GSD ETM 7 100 m x 100 m GSD
Spectral Bands (in microns)
# 1: 8.2 - 8.6 # 10: 8.125 - 8.475 # 6: 10.4 -12.5 # 3: 3.55 - 3.93# 2: 8.6 - 9.0 # 11: 8.475 - 8.825 # 10: 10.3 -11.3 # 4: 10.5 - 11.5# 3: 9.0 - 9.4 # 12: 8.925 - 9.275 # 11: 11.5 -12.5 # 5: 11.5 - 12.5# 4: 9.4 - 10.2 # 13: 10.25 - 10.95# 5: 10.2 - 11.2 # 14: 10.95 - 11.65# 6: 11.2 - 12.2
TIMS served as simulator for the space-borne ASTER-System (Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer)
Remote Sensing Section
Emissivity 'ɛ' and Temperature
Variations of 'ɛ' can be used to identify surface materials 'ɛ' and temperature are superimposed in thermal data sets
and thus are not directly deducible Methods for separation have to be applied Surface temperatures of homogenous objects like
waterbodies are relatively easily deducible as 'ɛ' is known and constant
At land surfaces, where 'ɛ' varies on small scale with changing geochemistry of materials (e.g. minerals or pigments), 'ɛ' is dominated and masked by temperature effects
Remote Sensing Section
Emissivity of Materials measured in the 8-12µm Region
Source: from Buettner, K.J.K., and C.D. Kern, Journal of Geophysical Research,v. 70, p. 1333, 1965, copyrighted by American Geophysical Union
Remote Sensing Section
System Correction of Data in the TIR-Range - I
Lsensor (λ) = Lscatter (λ) + τ (λ) ε (λ) Lbb (λ,T)+ τ (λ)(1- ε (λ))F(λ)
Lsensor = Total radiance at sensor (mW/m2sr µm) Lscatter = Scattered light (atmospheric emission and scattering (mW/m2sr µm)) τ = atmospheric transmission (ground surface - sensor) ε = Ground surface emissivity Lbb = emitted radiance of a blackbody (mW/m2sr µm) at a temperature T (K) F = thermal heat flow from atmosphere to the ground surface (mW/m2sr µm)
Recorded radiance is determined by the emitted blackbody radiation Lbb, the stray light Lscatter, the emissivity of the ground ε, the transmission τ and the downwelling heat flow F.
Remote Sensing Section
System Correction of Data in the TIR-Range - II
The integrated, emitted blackbody radiation Lbb (ε = 1) is described by the given surface temperature T by Planck's function in relation to the wavelenght for each band
Natural surfaces do not emit radiance like an ideal blackbody
The spectral emissivity ε is defined by
εi = Li ground surface / Li bb
as ratio of the (ground) materials radiation versus the radiation of a blackbody at the same temperature
Remote Sensing Section
Thermal Characteristics of Minerals (and Water at 20oC)
source: Janza and others (1975)
Thermal conductivity(K),
cal*cm -1sec -1*°C -1
Density g*cm -3
Thermal capacity(c),
cal*g -1*°C -1
Thermal diffusity(k),
cm 2*sec -1
Thermal inertia(P),
cal*cm -2*sec -1/2*°C -
1
1 Basalt 0.0050 2.8 0.20 0.009 0.0532 Clay soil, moist 0.0030 1.7 0.35 0.005 0.0423 Dolomite 0.0120 2.6 0.18 0.026 0.0754 Gabbro 0.0060 3.0 0.17 0.012 0.0555 Granite 0.0075 2.6 0.16 0.016 0.0526 Gravel 0.0030 2.0 0.18 0.008 0.0337 Limestone 0.0048 2.5 0.17 0.011 0.0458 Marble 0.0055 2.7 0.21 0.010 0.0569 Obsidian 0.0030 2.4 0.17 0.007 0.035
10 Peridotite 0.0110 3.2 0.20 0.017 0.08411 Pumice, loose, dry 0.0006 1.0 0.16 0.004 0.00912 Quarzite 0.0120 2.7 0.17 0.026 0.07413 Rhyolite 0.0055 2.5 0.16 0.014 0.04714 Sandy gravel 0.0060 2.1 0.20 0.014 0.05015 Sandy soil 0.0014 1.8 0.24 0.003 0.02416 Sandstone, quartz 0.0120 2.5 0.19 0.013 0.05417 Serpentine 0.0023 2.4 0.23 0.013 0.06318 Shale 0.0042 2.3 0.17 0.008 0.03419 Slate 0.0050 2.8 0.17 0.011 0.04920 Syenite 0.0077 2.2 0.23 0.009 0.04721 Tuff, welded 0.0028 1.8 0.20 0.008 0.03222 Water 0.0013 1.0 1.01 0.001 0.037
Remote Sensing Section
Relationship of Thermal Inertia to Density of Rocks
Ther
mal
iner
tia ,
cal *
cm
-2 *
sec
-1/2
* °
C-1
Density, g * cm-3
.0080
.0060
.0040
.0020
1 2 3
11
22
15
216 18
9
2
1420 13
16 81
4
17
123
10
5
Numbers refer to the materials listed in the previous table
modified from: Sabins (1987)
Remote Sensing Section
Surface Temperatures of Rocks with varying Inertia and Albedo
source: Watson (1971)
Materials with different ther-mal inertias
Materials with different albedos
0
20
40
60
800.01
0.03
0.05
0.01
0.05
Sur
face
tem
pera
ture
°C
0.05
0.01
0
20
40
60
Sur
face
tem
pera
ture
°C
0.10.3
0.5
Thermal Symbol Rock Inertia Albedo
Dolomite 0.023 0.19Limestone 0.036 0.22Granite 0.058 0.15
0
20
40
Sur
face
tem
pera
ture
°C
12noon
18 0midnight
6 12noon
Limestone, Dolomite, and Granite
modified from: Sabins (1987)
Remote Sensing Section
The Effect of varying thermal Capacities of different Rock Types
Paraffin
Rhyolite0.40
Limestone0.42
Sandstone0.47
A. Spheres of rock heated to 100 °C and placedon a sheet of paraffin. The value for each rock isthe product of its thermal capacity (c) and densityin cal*cm-3*C-1.
B. After the rocks and paraffin have reached thesame temperature
source: F. Sabins (1987)
Remote Sensing Section
Variations in diurnal Surface Temperature
Sur
face
tem
pera
ture
Noon Midnight Noon Midnight
Materials with lower thermal inertia;shale, cinders, high T
Materials with higher thermal inertia;sandstone, basalt, low T
T T
modified from: Sabins (1987)
Remote Sensing Section
Diagramatic diurnal Radiances of Objects
0 4 8 12 16 20 0 Hours
localdawn
Midnight Noon Midnight
Rad
iant
Tem
pera
ture
localsunset
Rock
s
(typical)
&soils
Vegetation
standing water
Damp terrain
Metallic objects
modified from: Sabins (1987)
Remote Sensing Section
Heat Loss Survey of Brookhaven Nat. Laboratories
Long Island, New York
Arial Photografh with overlay of heating lines Nighttime thermal IR image (8 to 14 µm)
modified from: Sabins (1987)
Remote Sensing Section
Stilfonteine Area, Western Transvaal, South Africa
Arial photograph
Interpretation map of thermal IR image
Mine tailings pond0 0.5 mi
0 0.5 km
Dolomite andcherty beds
Dolomite andcherty beds
Dolomite Dolomite
modified from: Sabins (1987)
Nighttime thermal image (8 to 14 µm)
Remote Sensing Section
Thermal Survey Hengill/S-Island (Thematic Mapper)
Highest temperatures are indicated by saturated red colors
Coldest temperatures are indicated by green colors to non saturated white (snow covered Hengill)
IHS-Color Compositeof Thematic Mapper DataI=band 4; HS=band 6
Remote Sensing Section
Heat Capacity Mapping Mission (NASA-78)
Day TIRNight TIR
VIS
geol.Map
600m GSD/10.5-12.5µm
Remote Sensing Section
Visible Data versus Day/Night IR
Day-IRVisible Night-IR
Remote Sensing Section
Pelleponnesus – Gulf of Nauplia
TM-bands 7,4,1 coded RGB
TM-bands 4,3,1 coded RGB
Remote Sensing Section
Lithological Units derived from Landsat TM Data
Argos
Nauplia
Tripolis
Stimtalia
Holous
sa
Alea
37°50'
37°40'
37°30'
22°30' 22°40' 22°50'
Gulf of Argos
T r i p o l i s
Argos
Nauplia
Tripolis
Hol
ouss
a
Alea
Skot
ini
Legend
young soil deposits, slope debris, fullsediments of the poljes (Quaternary
moris, conglomerates (Neogene)
limestones (Olonos-Pindos nappe)
sandstones, siltstones (Tripolis nappe)
limestones (Tripolis nappe)
metamorphic sediments (Phyllit series)
polje
settlement
N
0 5 10 15 km
Geological Sketchmap of the Central and NE-Peloponnesus
Remote Sensing Section
Thermal Data – Fresh Water Discharge
124
124
123
119
121 122
119
DN Values (not converted to absolute temperature)each step is equivalent to ~0.6 °C
Kroe
Lerna
Kiveri
Band 4(blue part)Contamination from harbor
Fresh water invisibile
Dam constructionfor freshwater catchmentat Kiveri discharge
Anavalos
Kiveri
Remote Sensing Section
Tectonic Elements derived from Landsat TM Data
37°50'
37°40'
37°30'
22°30' 22°40' 22°50'
Argos
Anavolos
Kalalar
Tripolis
Nauplia
Stimtalia
Holous
sa
Alea
Structural Interpretation of the Central and NE-Peloponnesus
0 5 10 15 km
strike-slip fault
strike-slip fault
N
E
joint
joint
joint
S
W
polje
settlement
lineament
strike-slip fault
spring
sinkhole
tracer path ways
Remote Sensing Section
Tschernobyl - Facts
• the accident happened April 26, 1986 in Block 4 of the power plant near the city Prypjat in Ukraine
• within the first ten days after the explosion several trillion Becquerel have been released
• Isotopes Caesium-137 (RHL ~30 Jahre) and Iod-131 (RHL: 8 Tage) evaporated
Remote Sensing Section
Chernobyl - Thematic Mapper before nuclear accident: April 21, 1985
RGB: bands 7, 5 and 3.water color-coded by thermal band (6)
red -> yellow -> green -> blue warm -----------------------> cold
source: Richter et al. 1986
Remote Sensing Section
Chernobyl - Thematic Mapper 3 days after the nuclear accident: April 29, 1986
source: Richter et al. 1986
RGB: bands 7, 5 and 3.water color-coded by thermal band (6)
red -> yellow -> green -> blue warm -----------------------> cold
Remote Sensing Section
Basic Laws of Radiation IIBlackbody Radiation – Wien's Displacement Law
0.2 0.5 1 2 5 10 20 50 1000.110-6
10-5
10-4
10-3
10-2
0.1
1
10
102
103
104
UV VIS NIR MIR/TIR FIRR
elat
ive
Elec
trom
agne
tic In
tens
ity
Wavelength (Microns)
sun5800 K
molten lavanuclearaccident1400 K
forest fire
hot spring360 K
ambient
arctic ice220 K
288 K
1000 K
SWIR
Wien's displacement law
T rad
Kµm2897
max
adapted from Lillesand & Kiefer, 1994
Remote Sensing Section
Calculation of Kinetic Temperature from DN Values
165
TM-5 / 1.6 µm
36
33
26
31
44
25
33
29
36
44
23
66
44
44
26
73
47
47
39
42
46
34
60
40 42 37
35
59
69
64
72
TM-7 / 2.2 µm
21
19
16
18
26
17
6
14
23
27
8
91
20
27
23
13
149
85
24
27
25
21
43
45
41
38
21
20
32
45
43
43
93
Geometric Considerations:• calculate background/target radiation for selected pixels• calculate contributing fraction of target to selected pixels• calculate atmospheric attenuations• calculate spectral radiance of sub-pixel target
L D S / Gi i i i mWcm sr m2 1 1
L T c exp c T 1i B 15
2 B , / / , K
DN => Spectral Radiance
Spectral Radiance => Brightness Temperature
Brightness Temperature => Kinetic Temperature T TB
1 / 4kin K
Target Size m 2 T band - 5 K T band -7 K
14 x1410 x10
10501300
10001250
75
Richter et al. 1986
Remote Sensing Section
Wiesn in Munich - Optical versus Thermal Data
Dais 7915 Band 74, 9µm20.09.1994, ~11.00hrs
Airplane Imagery Real Color (2009?)