election automation law

Upload: jun-romero

Post on 08-Aug-2018

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/21/2019 Election Automation Law

    1/53

    SEMINAR ON ELECTION

    LAW FOR RTC JUDGES

  • 8/21/2019 Election Automation Law

    2/53

    Seminar objectives

    Familiarize the judges with the Election Automation Law;

    Have a working knowledge of the processes involved in thePrecinct Count Optical Scan (PCOS) Automated ElectionSystem (AES);

    Understand the possible changes in the dynamics of electiondispute resolution under the PCOS AES;

    Differentiate between acceptable and unacceptable pleadings

    in election cases;

  • 8/21/2019 Election Automation Law

    3/53

    Session 1THE ELECTION

    AUTOMATION LAW

    Seminar on Election Law

    for RTC Judges

  • 8/21/2019 Election Automation Law

    4/53

    At the end of the session, the participants

    are expected to:

    Be familiar with the Legal Framework ofPhilippine Elections;

    Be familiar with the Legal Framework ofElection Automation (Rep. Act 9369, Rep. Act8436; BP 881; Rep. Act 8046

    Understand the rationale behind theautomation of the May 2010 elections;

  • 8/21/2019 Election Automation Law

    5/53

    Identify the key features of Rep. Act No.

    9369 or the Election Automation Law; and

    Identify the possible sources of disputes in

    the implementation of the Election

    Automation Law.

  • 8/21/2019 Election Automation Law

    6/53

    Election includes

    Registration of Voters

    Candidates and Political Parties

    Campaigns

    Campaign Finance

    Voting Counting

    Canvassing

    Certification or Proclamation of Winners

    Election Dispute Resolution Prosecution of Violations of Election Laws

    Election Management System

  • 8/21/2019 Election Automation Law

    7/53

    What is new in this Election?

    Counting of Votes by Optical Scanning Machines

    Electronic Transmission of Results

    From Precinct to MBOC/CBOC

    From MBOC/CBOC to PBOC

    From PBOC to Comelec and Congress

    Electronic Consolidation of Results

    Digitized Results of Elections as basis for proclaiming

    winners

    All other aspects of election, SAME AS BEFORE

  • 8/21/2019 Election Automation Law

    8/53

    LEGAL FRAMEWORK OF

    PHILIPPINE ELECTIONS

  • 8/21/2019 Election Automation Law

    9/53

    The Constitution

    Article II [sovereignty resides in the

    people]

    Article V [Suffrage]

    Article VI [Legislative]

    Article VII [Executive]

    Article IX-C [Comelec] Article X [Local Government]

  • 8/21/2019 Election Automation Law

    10/53

    International Agreements

    UN Declaration on Human Rights Article 21. (1) Everyone has the right to take part in the

    government of his country directly through freely chosenrepresentatives .(3) The will of the people shall be thebasis of the authority of government; this will shall be by

    universal and equal suffrage and shall be held by secretvote or by equivalent free voting procedures

    UN International Covenant on Civil andPolitical Rights

    Article 25 Every citizen shall have the right. 2. To voteand to be elected at genuine periodic elections which shallbe by universal suffrage and shall be held by secret ballot,guaranteeing the free expression of the will of the electors.

  • 8/21/2019 Election Automation Law

    11/53

    Major Election Statutes

    BP Blg. 881 [1985]The Omnibus Election Code

    RA 6646Electoral Reforms Law of 1987

    RA 6735Initiative and Referendum Law

    RA 7160Local Government Code

    RA 7166Synchronized Election Law

    RA 7941Party List Election Law

  • 8/21/2019 Election Automation Law

    12/53

    Major Election Statutes

    RA 80461995 Law on Computerized Elections and

    Pilot Test in ARMM

    RA 8189Voter Registration Act of 1995

    RA 84361997 Automated Election Law RA 9006Fair Election Act

    RA 9189The Overseas Absentee Voting Act of 2003

    RA 9369The Automated Election Law of 2007

    Other Laws on Election RAs 6679, 7647, 7887, 7890, 7904, 8045, 8173, 8295, 8746,

    9164, 9340, etc.

    Charter of LGUs

  • 8/21/2019 Election Automation Law

    13/53

    Jurisprudence

    Court Decisions on Elections as well as the Decision of

    the various electoral tribunals

  • 8/21/2019 Election Automation Law

    14/53

    COMELEC Issuances

    General Instructions (GI)

    To the Board of Election Inspectors (BEI)

    To the Board of Canvassers (BOC)

    Other Instructions Other Implementing Rules (On campaigning, campaign

    finance, clustering of precincts, registration of voters,

    etc.)

    COMELEC Rules of Procedure

  • 8/21/2019 Election Automation Law

    15/53

    Rules of Procedures

    of Electoral Tribunals

    PET, SET, HRET Rules of Procedures

    SC Administrative Matter No. 07-04-15 (Rules of

    Procedure in Election Contests before the Courts

    involving Elective Municipal and Barangay Officials)

  • 8/21/2019 Election Automation Law

    16/53

    LAWS ON AUTOMATED

    ELECTIONS

  • 8/21/2019 Election Automation Law

    17/53

    Past Laws on Automated

    Elections PD 12961978 Election Code [Section 185 (j)] Prescribe the use or adoption of the latest technological and

    electronic devices, taking into account the situation prevailing in

    the area and the funds available for the purpose.

    BP 881The Omnibus Election Code [Section 52(j)]

    Prescribe the use or adoption of the latest technological and

    electronic devices, taking into account the situation prevailing in

    the area and the funds available for the purpose: Provided, That

    the Commission shall notify the authorized representatives ofaccredited political parties and candidates in areas affected by

    the use or adoption of technological and electronic devices not

    less than thirty days prior to the effectivity of the use of such

    devices.

  • 8/21/2019 Election Automation Law

    18/53

    Past Election Laws .

    RA 8046Nationwide Demonstration and Pilot Test of a

    Computerized Election System in the March 1996 ARMM

    Elections

    Use of Paper Ballot Optical Scanning/Mark Reader System

    Stand Alone Machine

    Audit Trail

    Centralized Count

    Implemented in the 1996 Regional Election in the ARMM

  • 8/21/2019 Election Automation Law

    19/53

    Past Election Laws

    RA 8436 (before amendment by RA 9369)

    Appropriate Technology for Voting

    Electronic Device for Canvass

    Use of appropriate ballots Stand alone machine which can count votes

    Envisions Central Count

    Audit Trail

    For 1998, the system was intended to applyNationwide but only for National Offices. In

    subsequent elections, COMELEC can implement

    automated election on a nationwide basis/

  • 8/21/2019 Election Automation Law

    20/53

    Past Election Laws.

    RA 8436 cont.

    Actually implemented only in the ARMM

    Loong vs. COMELEC, et. al, G.R. No. 133676, April 14, 1999

    ITFP, et. al. vs. COMELEC, et. al. G.R. No. 159139. January 13,

    2004 [Mega Pacific Case] Brillantes vs.COMELEC, G.R. 163193, June 14, 2004

  • 8/21/2019 Election Automation Law

    21/53

    Current Automated Election

    Laws RA 8189Voter Registration Act of 1995, which

    provides a Computerized Voters List

    RA 9369

    New Automated Election Law passed in January

    2007

    Basically amended the entirety of RA 8436

    Implemented in the August 11, 2008 ARMMElections, using two systems, OMR and DRE

  • 8/21/2019 Election Automation Law

    22/53

    REP. ACT NO. 9369

  • 8/21/2019 Election Automation Law

    23/53

    Rep. Act No. 9369

    Passed in January 2007 (5 months before the 2007Elections)

    Amended RA 8436 [Sec. 1-30]

    Amended BP 881, RA 6646, RA 7166 [Secs. 31- 40]

    Primary Mandate is to authorize COMELEC to useautomated election system, whether paper-based [OMR]or direct recording electronic system [DRE]

    Use of appropriate technology for voting, counting,consolidating, canvassing, and transmission of election

    result [Sec. 2] Covers voting up to transmission and consolidation ofresults

  • 8/21/2019 Election Automation Law

    24/53

    Principal Objectives of RA 9369

    Ensure secrecy and sanctityof the ballot [Sec. 1]

    Ensure transparent and credible process [Sec. 1]

    Ensure fast and accurate results [Sec. 1]

    Ensure that results are reflective of the peoples will[Sec.1]

  • 8/21/2019 Election Automation Law

    25/53

    Types of Automated Election

    System

    Paper-Based Election System [Sec. 2]

    a type of automated election system that usespaper

    bal lots, records and counts votes, tabulates,

    consolidates/canvasses and transmits electronically

    the results of the vote count

  • 8/21/2019 Election Automation Law

    26/53

    Direct Recording Electronic System [Sec. 2]

    a type of automated election system that uses

    electro nic bal lots, records votes by means of a

    ballot display provided with a mechanical or electro-

    optical component that can be activated by the voter,

    processes data by means of computer programs,

    records voting data and ballot images, and transmits

    voting results electronically

  • 8/21/2019 Election Automation Law

    27/53

    Choosing the AES

    Factors to consider in choosing a system

    Most suitable or appropriate technology [Sec. 1 and 5]

    Demonstrated capability [Secs. 1 and 10]

    Situation in the area [Sec. 1] Funding Availability [Sec. 1]

  • 8/21/2019 Election Automation Law

    28/53

    Minimum requirement under the AES

    Security against unauthorized access

    Accuracy in recording, reading, transmission and

    tabulation of votes Error recovery

    System integrity

    Voter Verified Paper Audit Trail

    Auditability An election management system

    Accessibility to illiterates and disabled voters

  • 8/21/2019 Election Automation Law

    29/53

    Minimum requirement under the AES (Section

    7)

    Vote tabulating program for election, referendum orplebiscite;

    Accurate ballot counters

    Data retention provision

    Provide for the safekeeping, storing and archiving ofphysical or paper resources used in the election process

    Utilize or generate official ballots as defined in the law

    Provide the voter a system of verification to find outwhether or not the machine has registered their

    choice; and Configured access control for sensitive system data andfunctions.

  • 8/21/2019 Election Automation Law

    30/53

    Other Requirements under the AES

    Secure transmission lines [Sec. 8]

    Continuity Plan or Back Up Plans [Sec. 11]

    Random Manual Audit [Sec. 24]

    Education of Stakeholders [Sec 27]

    Field Testing and Mock Elections [Sec. 9 and 12]

    Source Code Review [Sec. 12]

  • 8/21/2019 Election Automation Law

    31/53

    Basic Features of the AES

    Ballots may be paper ballots or electronic ballots [Sec.

    2]

    Official Ballots refer to paper ballots, whether printed or

    generated by machines [Sec. 2]

    Surnames of Candidates arranged alphabetically

    [Sec. 13]

    Fixed space on the ballot for signing

    and/authentication by the BEI Chair [Sec. 13]

    Printed either by the NPO or the BSP [Sec. 13]

    Must contain bar codes, holograms, etc as safe

    guards [Sec. 13]

  • 8/21/2019 Election Automation Law

    32/53

    Basic Features of the AES

    Election Returns (ER) consist of printed and electroniccopies [Sec. 2]

    30 printed copies of ERs allocated to designated

    recipients, and an additional 30 copies can be requested

    [Sec. 19] Each copy to be signed and thumb marked by BEI

    members and watchers [Sec. 19]

    One copy to be posted near the polling place for 48

    hours [Sec. 19] Electronic copy of ER must be digitally signed by the

    BEI and is the official source of election results being the

    one to be used for canvass and for proclamation of

    winners [Sec. 19]

  • 8/21/2019 Election Automation Law

    33/53

    Basic Features of the AES

    Electronic transmission of results [Sec. 19]

    To the Board of Canvassers

    To the Dominant Majority and Minority Parties

    To the accredited Citizens Arm To the Kapisanan ng mga Broadkaster sa Pilipinas

    At least one member of the Board of Election

    Inspectors [BEI] must be Information Technology

    (IT) capable, as certified by the DOST [Sec. 3]

  • 8/21/2019 Election Automation Law

    34/53

    Basic Features of the AES

    Canvassing at the Municipal, City, Provincial

    Level and at the Comelec to be done by

    consolidating electronically transmitted ERs

    and/or COCs [Sec. 20] Board of Canvassers to be supported by IT

    capable Personnel [Sec. 5]

    Winning local candidates are to be proclaimed

    using electronically transmitted ERs [Sec. 20]

  • 8/21/2019 Election Automation Law

    35/53

    Basic Features of the AES

    Certificate of Canvass (COC) [Sec. 20] Printed and Electronic Form

    30 copies of COC prepared by Municipal and City BOCs are to beprinted [Sec. 21]

    14 copies of COC prepared for BOCs in Cities with two or more

    Districts and in Provinces are to be printed [Sec. 21] COC to be electronically transmitted to higher canvassing bodies

    Must be accompanied by Statement of Votes to be generated by theconsolidating machines [Section 20]

    The Electronic Copy is the source of official electionresults, in the sense that it is the one that will becanvassed at the higher canvassing bodies

  • 8/21/2019 Election Automation Law

    36/53

    Basic Features of the AES

    Provincial Board of Canvassers, the City Board ofCanvassers, (with constituent districts), and theCOMELEC, will canvass results by consolidatingelectronically transmitted COCs from lower

    canvassing bodies, and proclaim the winners at thatlevel [Sec. 20, 22]

    Congress, will open COCs and determine theirauthenticity and due execution [Sec. 23] pursuant

    to RA 7166 as supplemented and modified by RA8792 [E-Commerce Act] for canvass of Presidentand Vice President [Sec. 25]

  • 8/21/2019 Election Automation Law

    37/53

    Implementing the AES

    Responsible Agencies/Committees COMELEC

    Principal Implementor of the Law

    Mandated to come up with Implementing Rules and

    Procedures (GIs) on Voting[Sec. 15], Closing of Polls [Sec.16], Counting of Votes[Sec. 18], Canvassing andConsolidation of Election Results [Sec. 30]

    Advisory Councilrecommend and assist COMELEC[Sec. 9]

    Technical Evaluation Committeecertifies to thereadiness of the System and its compliance with theminimum requirements of the law [Sec. 9]

    Steering Committeemanager of the System

  • 8/21/2019 Election Automation Law

    38/53

    Steps in the Implementation of AES

    Recommendation of the Advisory Council and Adoption

    of the System by the Comelec

    Preparation of the Specifications

    Bidding Awarding

    Roque, et al vs. COMELEC et. al., G.R. 188456,

    September 10, 2009

    Manufacturing

    Source Code Review

  • 8/21/2019 Election Automation Law

    39/53

    Steps in the Implementation of AES

    Stakeholders Education and Training to be held not later

    than six (6) months before election

    Testing and Mock Elections

    Certification by the Technical Evaluation Committee

    Release of Continuity Plan to be published and made

    available to parties not later than 15 days before elections

    Election day testing

    Actual Use in the Election

    Random Manual Audit

    Evaluation and Assessment

  • 8/21/2019 Election Automation Law

    40/53

    Source Code.

    Human Readable Instructions on what the machines will do Sec 12 - Once an AES technology is selected for

    implementation, the Commission shall promptly make thesource code of that technology available and open to anyinterested political party or groups which may conduct their

    own review thereof Technical Evaluation Committee Certification as to the successful completion of a source code review

    that the source code is kept in escrow with the Bangko Sentral ngPilipinas;

    that the source code reviewed is one and the same as that used

    by the equipment

  • 8/21/2019 Election Automation Law

    41/53

    Continuity Plan

    Section 11- Continuity plan in case of a systemsbreakdown

    Activation in the presence of representatives ofpolitical parties and citizens arm of the

    CommissionAll political parties and party-list groups shall be

    furnished copies of said continuity plan

    Publication in at least two newspapers of nationalcirculation

    Posting at the COMELEC website at least fifteen(15) days prior to the electoral activity concerned.

  • 8/21/2019 Election Automation Law

    42/53

    Random Manual Audit

    Where the AES is used, there shall be a random manual

    audit in one precinct per congressional district randomly

    chosen by the Commission in each province and city.

    Any difference between the automated and manual

    count will result in the determination of root cause and

    initiate a manual count for those precincts affected by

    the computer or procedural error.

    Purpose is to validate machine count by a

    manual count

  • 8/21/2019 Election Automation Law

    43/53

    First Penal Provisions (Sec. 28)

    Utilizing without authorization, tampering with, damaging,destroying or stealing:

    Official ballots, election returns, and certificates of canvass ofvotes used in the system; and

    Electronic devices or their components, peripherals or supplies

    used in the AES such as counting machines, memorypacks/diskettes, memory pack receivers and computer sets;

    Interfering with, impeding, absconding for purpose of gain,preventing the installation or use of computer counting devicesand the processing, storage, generation and transmission ofelection results, data or information;

    Gaining or causing access to using, altering, destroying ordisclosing any computer data, program, system software,network, or any computer-related devices, facilities, hardware orequipment, whether classified or declassified;

  • 8/21/2019 Election Automation Law

    44/53

    First Penal Provisions (Sec. 28)

    Refusal of the citizens' arm to present for perusal its copy ofelection returns to the board of canvassers;

    Presentation by the citizens' arm of tampered or spuriouselection returns;

    Refusal or failure to provide the dominant majority and

    dominant minority parties or the citizens' arm their copy ofelection returns; and

    The failure to post the voters' list within the specified time,duration and in the designated location shall constitute anelection offense on the part the election officer concerned.

    Punishable by 8 years and 1 day to 12 years, no parole,perpetual disqualification from holding public office, bothappointive and elective

  • 8/21/2019 Election Automation Law

    45/53

    Manual Election

    under RA 9369 Reading of votes for national candidates before going to

    local candidates [Section 32]

    Election Returns, 8 hand-prepared copies [Sec. 33], 30

    printed copies [Sec. 32]

    Posting of the 8thcopy of ER for National Candidates, 2ndcopy of the ER for Local Candidates [Sec. 33]

    30 copies of ERs are to be produced by a data capturing

    device and printed at the polling place [Sec. 32]

    Transfer of Polling Place, when deemed necessary, must beendorsed by majority of watchers [Sec. 35]

  • 8/21/2019 Election Automation Law

    46/53

    Manual Election

    under RA 9369

    During canvassing, the BOCs are required to project on a wall, theER or COC being canvassed [Sec. 39]

    Pre-proclamation controversy occurs in the National Canvass inCongress for President and Vice-President in case of any

    discrepancy, incompleteness, erasure or alteration in the COCsand in the supporting Statement of Votes [Sec. 37]

    The Municipal City District and Provincial Board of Canvassersshould also produce 30 printed copies of the COCs and Statementof Votes aside from those prepared by hand, using a DataCapturing Device and a printer at the canvassing venue [Sec. 39]

    Digital Image of the COCs and the SOVs are to be transmittedusing secured transmission with authentication features to thesecured tabulation system of Comelec . [Sec. 39]

    S d P l P i i C t B th

  • 8/21/2019 Election Automation Law

    47/53

    Second Penal Provisions Common to Both

    Manual and Automated Election

    Crime of Electoral Sabotage Defined [Sec. 42]

    For a national position, when it is made to appear by dagdag-bawas,

    or failure to credit votes, that a loser is a winner

    Regardless of the position, when dagdag bawas is done in a single

    document, and in transposing election results from one document tothe other, and it involves alteration of 5,000 or more votes

    In any case when the alteration involves 10,000 or more votes.

    Punishable by Life Imprisonment

    Jurisdiction to conduct preliminary investigation and

    prosecution of election offenses, concurrent to bothCOMELEC and other prosecutorial arm of government.

  • 8/21/2019 Election Automation Law

    48/53

    Absentee Voting in the Philippines

    Overseas Absentee Voting

    Local Absentee Voting

  • 8/21/2019 Election Automation Law

    49/53

    Overseas Absentee Voting

    Filipino citizens who are: abroad or will be abroad on election day

    At least 18 years of age on the day of the elections

    Intending to vote Not otherwise disqualified by law

    Overseas Absentee Voters can vote only for

    National Positions (President, Vice President,

    Senators and Party List)

  • 8/21/2019 Election Automation Law

    50/53

    Local Absentee Voters

    Members of the Armed Forces of the Philippines

    Members of the Philippine National Police

    Government Employees and Teachers who will perform

    poll functions in May 10, 2010 elections

    Local Absentee Voters can vote only for National

    Positions (President, Vice President, Senators

    and Party List)

  • 8/21/2019 Election Automation Law

    51/53

    Detainee Voting

    Comelec Resolution No. 8811

    Detainee: A person who is:

    - confined in jail, formally charged for any crime/s and

    is awaiting trial; or- Serving a sentence of imprisonment for less than one

    (1) year; or

    - Whose convicting of a crime involving disloyalty to a

    duly constituted government such as rebellion,sedition, violation of the firearms law or any crimes

    against national security is on appeal

  • 8/21/2019 Election Automation Law

    52/53

    May be thru special voting place inside jail

    (if at least 100 registered detainee voters

    May be thru escorted voting

  • 8/21/2019 Election Automation Law

    53/53

    Thank You!!