election automation law
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/21/2019 Election Automation Law
1/53
SEMINAR ON ELECTION
LAW FOR RTC JUDGES
-
8/21/2019 Election Automation Law
2/53
Seminar objectives
Familiarize the judges with the Election Automation Law;
Have a working knowledge of the processes involved in thePrecinct Count Optical Scan (PCOS) Automated ElectionSystem (AES);
Understand the possible changes in the dynamics of electiondispute resolution under the PCOS AES;
Differentiate between acceptable and unacceptable pleadings
in election cases;
-
8/21/2019 Election Automation Law
3/53
Session 1THE ELECTION
AUTOMATION LAW
Seminar on Election Law
for RTC Judges
-
8/21/2019 Election Automation Law
4/53
At the end of the session, the participants
are expected to:
Be familiar with the Legal Framework ofPhilippine Elections;
Be familiar with the Legal Framework ofElection Automation (Rep. Act 9369, Rep. Act8436; BP 881; Rep. Act 8046
Understand the rationale behind theautomation of the May 2010 elections;
-
8/21/2019 Election Automation Law
5/53
Identify the key features of Rep. Act No.
9369 or the Election Automation Law; and
Identify the possible sources of disputes in
the implementation of the Election
Automation Law.
-
8/21/2019 Election Automation Law
6/53
Election includes
Registration of Voters
Candidates and Political Parties
Campaigns
Campaign Finance
Voting Counting
Canvassing
Certification or Proclamation of Winners
Election Dispute Resolution Prosecution of Violations of Election Laws
Election Management System
-
8/21/2019 Election Automation Law
7/53
What is new in this Election?
Counting of Votes by Optical Scanning Machines
Electronic Transmission of Results
From Precinct to MBOC/CBOC
From MBOC/CBOC to PBOC
From PBOC to Comelec and Congress
Electronic Consolidation of Results
Digitized Results of Elections as basis for proclaiming
winners
All other aspects of election, SAME AS BEFORE
-
8/21/2019 Election Automation Law
8/53
LEGAL FRAMEWORK OF
PHILIPPINE ELECTIONS
-
8/21/2019 Election Automation Law
9/53
The Constitution
Article II [sovereignty resides in the
people]
Article V [Suffrage]
Article VI [Legislative]
Article VII [Executive]
Article IX-C [Comelec] Article X [Local Government]
-
8/21/2019 Election Automation Law
10/53
International Agreements
UN Declaration on Human Rights Article 21. (1) Everyone has the right to take part in the
government of his country directly through freely chosenrepresentatives .(3) The will of the people shall be thebasis of the authority of government; this will shall be by
universal and equal suffrage and shall be held by secretvote or by equivalent free voting procedures
UN International Covenant on Civil andPolitical Rights
Article 25 Every citizen shall have the right. 2. To voteand to be elected at genuine periodic elections which shallbe by universal suffrage and shall be held by secret ballot,guaranteeing the free expression of the will of the electors.
-
8/21/2019 Election Automation Law
11/53
Major Election Statutes
BP Blg. 881 [1985]The Omnibus Election Code
RA 6646Electoral Reforms Law of 1987
RA 6735Initiative and Referendum Law
RA 7160Local Government Code
RA 7166Synchronized Election Law
RA 7941Party List Election Law
-
8/21/2019 Election Automation Law
12/53
Major Election Statutes
RA 80461995 Law on Computerized Elections and
Pilot Test in ARMM
RA 8189Voter Registration Act of 1995
RA 84361997 Automated Election Law RA 9006Fair Election Act
RA 9189The Overseas Absentee Voting Act of 2003
RA 9369The Automated Election Law of 2007
Other Laws on Election RAs 6679, 7647, 7887, 7890, 7904, 8045, 8173, 8295, 8746,
9164, 9340, etc.
Charter of LGUs
-
8/21/2019 Election Automation Law
13/53
Jurisprudence
Court Decisions on Elections as well as the Decision of
the various electoral tribunals
-
8/21/2019 Election Automation Law
14/53
COMELEC Issuances
General Instructions (GI)
To the Board of Election Inspectors (BEI)
To the Board of Canvassers (BOC)
Other Instructions Other Implementing Rules (On campaigning, campaign
finance, clustering of precincts, registration of voters,
etc.)
COMELEC Rules of Procedure
-
8/21/2019 Election Automation Law
15/53
Rules of Procedures
of Electoral Tribunals
PET, SET, HRET Rules of Procedures
SC Administrative Matter No. 07-04-15 (Rules of
Procedure in Election Contests before the Courts
involving Elective Municipal and Barangay Officials)
-
8/21/2019 Election Automation Law
16/53
LAWS ON AUTOMATED
ELECTIONS
-
8/21/2019 Election Automation Law
17/53
Past Laws on Automated
Elections PD 12961978 Election Code [Section 185 (j)] Prescribe the use or adoption of the latest technological and
electronic devices, taking into account the situation prevailing in
the area and the funds available for the purpose.
BP 881The Omnibus Election Code [Section 52(j)]
Prescribe the use or adoption of the latest technological and
electronic devices, taking into account the situation prevailing in
the area and the funds available for the purpose: Provided, That
the Commission shall notify the authorized representatives ofaccredited political parties and candidates in areas affected by
the use or adoption of technological and electronic devices not
less than thirty days prior to the effectivity of the use of such
devices.
-
8/21/2019 Election Automation Law
18/53
Past Election Laws .
RA 8046Nationwide Demonstration and Pilot Test of a
Computerized Election System in the March 1996 ARMM
Elections
Use of Paper Ballot Optical Scanning/Mark Reader System
Stand Alone Machine
Audit Trail
Centralized Count
Implemented in the 1996 Regional Election in the ARMM
-
8/21/2019 Election Automation Law
19/53
Past Election Laws
RA 8436 (before amendment by RA 9369)
Appropriate Technology for Voting
Electronic Device for Canvass
Use of appropriate ballots Stand alone machine which can count votes
Envisions Central Count
Audit Trail
For 1998, the system was intended to applyNationwide but only for National Offices. In
subsequent elections, COMELEC can implement
automated election on a nationwide basis/
-
8/21/2019 Election Automation Law
20/53
Past Election Laws.
RA 8436 cont.
Actually implemented only in the ARMM
Loong vs. COMELEC, et. al, G.R. No. 133676, April 14, 1999
ITFP, et. al. vs. COMELEC, et. al. G.R. No. 159139. January 13,
2004 [Mega Pacific Case] Brillantes vs.COMELEC, G.R. 163193, June 14, 2004
-
8/21/2019 Election Automation Law
21/53
Current Automated Election
Laws RA 8189Voter Registration Act of 1995, which
provides a Computerized Voters List
RA 9369
New Automated Election Law passed in January
2007
Basically amended the entirety of RA 8436
Implemented in the August 11, 2008 ARMMElections, using two systems, OMR and DRE
-
8/21/2019 Election Automation Law
22/53
REP. ACT NO. 9369
-
8/21/2019 Election Automation Law
23/53
Rep. Act No. 9369
Passed in January 2007 (5 months before the 2007Elections)
Amended RA 8436 [Sec. 1-30]
Amended BP 881, RA 6646, RA 7166 [Secs. 31- 40]
Primary Mandate is to authorize COMELEC to useautomated election system, whether paper-based [OMR]or direct recording electronic system [DRE]
Use of appropriate technology for voting, counting,consolidating, canvassing, and transmission of election
result [Sec. 2] Covers voting up to transmission and consolidation ofresults
-
8/21/2019 Election Automation Law
24/53
Principal Objectives of RA 9369
Ensure secrecy and sanctityof the ballot [Sec. 1]
Ensure transparent and credible process [Sec. 1]
Ensure fast and accurate results [Sec. 1]
Ensure that results are reflective of the peoples will[Sec.1]
-
8/21/2019 Election Automation Law
25/53
Types of Automated Election
System
Paper-Based Election System [Sec. 2]
a type of automated election system that usespaper
bal lots, records and counts votes, tabulates,
consolidates/canvasses and transmits electronically
the results of the vote count
-
8/21/2019 Election Automation Law
26/53
Direct Recording Electronic System [Sec. 2]
a type of automated election system that uses
electro nic bal lots, records votes by means of a
ballot display provided with a mechanical or electro-
optical component that can be activated by the voter,
processes data by means of computer programs,
records voting data and ballot images, and transmits
voting results electronically
-
8/21/2019 Election Automation Law
27/53
Choosing the AES
Factors to consider in choosing a system
Most suitable or appropriate technology [Sec. 1 and 5]
Demonstrated capability [Secs. 1 and 10]
Situation in the area [Sec. 1] Funding Availability [Sec. 1]
-
8/21/2019 Election Automation Law
28/53
Minimum requirement under the AES
Security against unauthorized access
Accuracy in recording, reading, transmission and
tabulation of votes Error recovery
System integrity
Voter Verified Paper Audit Trail
Auditability An election management system
Accessibility to illiterates and disabled voters
-
8/21/2019 Election Automation Law
29/53
Minimum requirement under the AES (Section
7)
Vote tabulating program for election, referendum orplebiscite;
Accurate ballot counters
Data retention provision
Provide for the safekeeping, storing and archiving ofphysical or paper resources used in the election process
Utilize or generate official ballots as defined in the law
Provide the voter a system of verification to find outwhether or not the machine has registered their
choice; and Configured access control for sensitive system data andfunctions.
-
8/21/2019 Election Automation Law
30/53
Other Requirements under the AES
Secure transmission lines [Sec. 8]
Continuity Plan or Back Up Plans [Sec. 11]
Random Manual Audit [Sec. 24]
Education of Stakeholders [Sec 27]
Field Testing and Mock Elections [Sec. 9 and 12]
Source Code Review [Sec. 12]
-
8/21/2019 Election Automation Law
31/53
Basic Features of the AES
Ballots may be paper ballots or electronic ballots [Sec.
2]
Official Ballots refer to paper ballots, whether printed or
generated by machines [Sec. 2]
Surnames of Candidates arranged alphabetically
[Sec. 13]
Fixed space on the ballot for signing
and/authentication by the BEI Chair [Sec. 13]
Printed either by the NPO or the BSP [Sec. 13]
Must contain bar codes, holograms, etc as safe
guards [Sec. 13]
-
8/21/2019 Election Automation Law
32/53
Basic Features of the AES
Election Returns (ER) consist of printed and electroniccopies [Sec. 2]
30 printed copies of ERs allocated to designated
recipients, and an additional 30 copies can be requested
[Sec. 19] Each copy to be signed and thumb marked by BEI
members and watchers [Sec. 19]
One copy to be posted near the polling place for 48
hours [Sec. 19] Electronic copy of ER must be digitally signed by the
BEI and is the official source of election results being the
one to be used for canvass and for proclamation of
winners [Sec. 19]
-
8/21/2019 Election Automation Law
33/53
Basic Features of the AES
Electronic transmission of results [Sec. 19]
To the Board of Canvassers
To the Dominant Majority and Minority Parties
To the accredited Citizens Arm To the Kapisanan ng mga Broadkaster sa Pilipinas
At least one member of the Board of Election
Inspectors [BEI] must be Information Technology
(IT) capable, as certified by the DOST [Sec. 3]
-
8/21/2019 Election Automation Law
34/53
Basic Features of the AES
Canvassing at the Municipal, City, Provincial
Level and at the Comelec to be done by
consolidating electronically transmitted ERs
and/or COCs [Sec. 20] Board of Canvassers to be supported by IT
capable Personnel [Sec. 5]
Winning local candidates are to be proclaimed
using electronically transmitted ERs [Sec. 20]
-
8/21/2019 Election Automation Law
35/53
Basic Features of the AES
Certificate of Canvass (COC) [Sec. 20] Printed and Electronic Form
30 copies of COC prepared by Municipal and City BOCs are to beprinted [Sec. 21]
14 copies of COC prepared for BOCs in Cities with two or more
Districts and in Provinces are to be printed [Sec. 21] COC to be electronically transmitted to higher canvassing bodies
Must be accompanied by Statement of Votes to be generated by theconsolidating machines [Section 20]
The Electronic Copy is the source of official electionresults, in the sense that it is the one that will becanvassed at the higher canvassing bodies
-
8/21/2019 Election Automation Law
36/53
Basic Features of the AES
Provincial Board of Canvassers, the City Board ofCanvassers, (with constituent districts), and theCOMELEC, will canvass results by consolidatingelectronically transmitted COCs from lower
canvassing bodies, and proclaim the winners at thatlevel [Sec. 20, 22]
Congress, will open COCs and determine theirauthenticity and due execution [Sec. 23] pursuant
to RA 7166 as supplemented and modified by RA8792 [E-Commerce Act] for canvass of Presidentand Vice President [Sec. 25]
-
8/21/2019 Election Automation Law
37/53
Implementing the AES
Responsible Agencies/Committees COMELEC
Principal Implementor of the Law
Mandated to come up with Implementing Rules and
Procedures (GIs) on Voting[Sec. 15], Closing of Polls [Sec.16], Counting of Votes[Sec. 18], Canvassing andConsolidation of Election Results [Sec. 30]
Advisory Councilrecommend and assist COMELEC[Sec. 9]
Technical Evaluation Committeecertifies to thereadiness of the System and its compliance with theminimum requirements of the law [Sec. 9]
Steering Committeemanager of the System
-
8/21/2019 Election Automation Law
38/53
Steps in the Implementation of AES
Recommendation of the Advisory Council and Adoption
of the System by the Comelec
Preparation of the Specifications
Bidding Awarding
Roque, et al vs. COMELEC et. al., G.R. 188456,
September 10, 2009
Manufacturing
Source Code Review
-
8/21/2019 Election Automation Law
39/53
Steps in the Implementation of AES
Stakeholders Education and Training to be held not later
than six (6) months before election
Testing and Mock Elections
Certification by the Technical Evaluation Committee
Release of Continuity Plan to be published and made
available to parties not later than 15 days before elections
Election day testing
Actual Use in the Election
Random Manual Audit
Evaluation and Assessment
-
8/21/2019 Election Automation Law
40/53
Source Code.
Human Readable Instructions on what the machines will do Sec 12 - Once an AES technology is selected for
implementation, the Commission shall promptly make thesource code of that technology available and open to anyinterested political party or groups which may conduct their
own review thereof Technical Evaluation Committee Certification as to the successful completion of a source code review
that the source code is kept in escrow with the Bangko Sentral ngPilipinas;
that the source code reviewed is one and the same as that used
by the equipment
-
8/21/2019 Election Automation Law
41/53
Continuity Plan
Section 11- Continuity plan in case of a systemsbreakdown
Activation in the presence of representatives ofpolitical parties and citizens arm of the
CommissionAll political parties and party-list groups shall be
furnished copies of said continuity plan
Publication in at least two newspapers of nationalcirculation
Posting at the COMELEC website at least fifteen(15) days prior to the electoral activity concerned.
-
8/21/2019 Election Automation Law
42/53
Random Manual Audit
Where the AES is used, there shall be a random manual
audit in one precinct per congressional district randomly
chosen by the Commission in each province and city.
Any difference between the automated and manual
count will result in the determination of root cause and
initiate a manual count for those precincts affected by
the computer or procedural error.
Purpose is to validate machine count by a
manual count
-
8/21/2019 Election Automation Law
43/53
First Penal Provisions (Sec. 28)
Utilizing without authorization, tampering with, damaging,destroying or stealing:
Official ballots, election returns, and certificates of canvass ofvotes used in the system; and
Electronic devices or their components, peripherals or supplies
used in the AES such as counting machines, memorypacks/diskettes, memory pack receivers and computer sets;
Interfering with, impeding, absconding for purpose of gain,preventing the installation or use of computer counting devicesand the processing, storage, generation and transmission ofelection results, data or information;
Gaining or causing access to using, altering, destroying ordisclosing any computer data, program, system software,network, or any computer-related devices, facilities, hardware orequipment, whether classified or declassified;
-
8/21/2019 Election Automation Law
44/53
First Penal Provisions (Sec. 28)
Refusal of the citizens' arm to present for perusal its copy ofelection returns to the board of canvassers;
Presentation by the citizens' arm of tampered or spuriouselection returns;
Refusal or failure to provide the dominant majority and
dominant minority parties or the citizens' arm their copy ofelection returns; and
The failure to post the voters' list within the specified time,duration and in the designated location shall constitute anelection offense on the part the election officer concerned.
Punishable by 8 years and 1 day to 12 years, no parole,perpetual disqualification from holding public office, bothappointive and elective
-
8/21/2019 Election Automation Law
45/53
Manual Election
under RA 9369 Reading of votes for national candidates before going to
local candidates [Section 32]
Election Returns, 8 hand-prepared copies [Sec. 33], 30
printed copies [Sec. 32]
Posting of the 8thcopy of ER for National Candidates, 2ndcopy of the ER for Local Candidates [Sec. 33]
30 copies of ERs are to be produced by a data capturing
device and printed at the polling place [Sec. 32]
Transfer of Polling Place, when deemed necessary, must beendorsed by majority of watchers [Sec. 35]
-
8/21/2019 Election Automation Law
46/53
Manual Election
under RA 9369
During canvassing, the BOCs are required to project on a wall, theER or COC being canvassed [Sec. 39]
Pre-proclamation controversy occurs in the National Canvass inCongress for President and Vice-President in case of any
discrepancy, incompleteness, erasure or alteration in the COCsand in the supporting Statement of Votes [Sec. 37]
The Municipal City District and Provincial Board of Canvassersshould also produce 30 printed copies of the COCs and Statementof Votes aside from those prepared by hand, using a DataCapturing Device and a printer at the canvassing venue [Sec. 39]
Digital Image of the COCs and the SOVs are to be transmittedusing secured transmission with authentication features to thesecured tabulation system of Comelec . [Sec. 39]
S d P l P i i C t B th
-
8/21/2019 Election Automation Law
47/53
Second Penal Provisions Common to Both
Manual and Automated Election
Crime of Electoral Sabotage Defined [Sec. 42]
For a national position, when it is made to appear by dagdag-bawas,
or failure to credit votes, that a loser is a winner
Regardless of the position, when dagdag bawas is done in a single
document, and in transposing election results from one document tothe other, and it involves alteration of 5,000 or more votes
In any case when the alteration involves 10,000 or more votes.
Punishable by Life Imprisonment
Jurisdiction to conduct preliminary investigation and
prosecution of election offenses, concurrent to bothCOMELEC and other prosecutorial arm of government.
-
8/21/2019 Election Automation Law
48/53
Absentee Voting in the Philippines
Overseas Absentee Voting
Local Absentee Voting
-
8/21/2019 Election Automation Law
49/53
Overseas Absentee Voting
Filipino citizens who are: abroad or will be abroad on election day
At least 18 years of age on the day of the elections
Intending to vote Not otherwise disqualified by law
Overseas Absentee Voters can vote only for
National Positions (President, Vice President,
Senators and Party List)
-
8/21/2019 Election Automation Law
50/53
Local Absentee Voters
Members of the Armed Forces of the Philippines
Members of the Philippine National Police
Government Employees and Teachers who will perform
poll functions in May 10, 2010 elections
Local Absentee Voters can vote only for National
Positions (President, Vice President, Senators
and Party List)
-
8/21/2019 Election Automation Law
51/53
Detainee Voting
Comelec Resolution No. 8811
Detainee: A person who is:
- confined in jail, formally charged for any crime/s and
is awaiting trial; or- Serving a sentence of imprisonment for less than one
(1) year; or
- Whose convicting of a crime involving disloyalty to a
duly constituted government such as rebellion,sedition, violation of the firearms law or any crimes
against national security is on appeal
-
8/21/2019 Election Automation Law
52/53
May be thru special voting place inside jail
(if at least 100 registered detainee voters
May be thru escorted voting
-
8/21/2019 Election Automation Law
53/53
Thank You!!