slides on composites
TRANSCRIPT
1
MSE 280: Introduction to Engineering Materials
I ddReading: Callister Ch. 15
CompositesIssues to address… • What are composites?• Classification of composites.• Why composites?
MSE280© 2007, 2008 Moonsub Shim1
• Mechanical properties of composites.• Applications.
Composites: definition & examples- Multiphase materials with chemically different phases and distinct interfaces.
- Properties of the resultant combination of materials are- Properties of the resultant combination of materials are superior to the properties of the individual components.
- Advantages: High-strength/light-weight, low cost, environmentally resistant…
- Natural composites:-Wood: strong & flexible cellulose fibers in stiffer lignin (surrounds the fibers).B t b t ft ll ( t i ) ithi h d b t b ittl tit
MSE280© 2007, 2008 Moonsub Shim2
-Bone: strong but soft collagen (protein) within hard but brittle apatite (mineral).-Certain types of rocks can also be considered as composites.
-Synthetic composites: fiberglass, concrete, carbon-carbon composites….
2
Bicycle forksBraided and
High Strength
unidirectional S-2 Glass and carbon fibers are used to produce forks with different stiffness
MSE280© 2007, 2008 Moonsub Shim3
High StrengthWeight ReductionDesign FlexibilityCost Performance
From http://matse101.mse.uiuc.edu/
Lightweight - low density
Pole-vaultingg t e g t o de s ty
Buckling resistance - stiffness Strong - yield strength Minimal twisting Cost
MSE280© 2007, 2008 Moonsub Shim4
Glass fiber web/epoxy Glass fiber ringsLongitudinal carbon fibers/epoxy
From http://matse101.mse.uiuc.edu/
3
Boeing 757-200Rudder (graphite) Fixed trailing edge
panels graphiteFlap support fairings Fwd segment (graphite/Kevlar
Aft flaps Outboard (graphite) Inboard (graphite/fiberglass)
Fixed trailing edge panels Graphite/Kevlar + non-woven
Fixed trailing edge panels upper (graphite /fiberglass), lower (graphite /Kevlar + non-woven Kevlar mat)
Elevators (graphite)
Auxiliary power inlet
graphiteEnvironmental control system ducts (Kevlar)
Engine strut fairings (Kevlar/fiberglass)
Ailerons (graphite)
Tip fairings (fiberglass)
panels graphite /Kevlar + non-woven Kevlar mat)
Fwd segment (graphite/Kevlar + non-woven Kevlar mat Aft segment (graphite/fiberglass)
MSE280© 2007, 2008 Moonsub Shim5
Wing leading edge lower panel Kevlar/fiberglass
Kevlar matSpoilers (graphite)
Cowl components (graphite)
Body main landing gear doors (graphite) Trunnion fairings and wing landing gear doors (graphite/Kevlar) Brakes( structural carbon)
Wing to body fairings (graphite/Kevlar/Fiberglass and Graphite/Kevlar + non-woven Kevlar mat
Nose landing gear doors (graphite)
From http://matse101.mse.uiuc.edu/
Terminology• Matrix:
– softer, more flexible and continuous part that surrounds the other phase.– transfer stress to other phases– protect phases from environment
• Reinforcement (dispersed phase):– stiffer, high strength part (particles or fibers are the most common).– enhances matrix properties
C fibers: very stiff very strongC matrix:
MSE280© 2007, 2008 Moonsub Shim6
fibers lie in plane
view onto plane
C matrix: less stiff less strong
4
Composite characteristicsDepends on:
- properties of the matrixconcentration size shapeproperties of the matrix
material.
- properties of reinforcement material.
- ratio of matrix to reinforcement. distribution
orientation
MSE280© 2007, 2008 Moonsub Shim7
- matrix-reinforcement bonding/adhesion.
- mode of fabrication.
Classification of Composites• Matrix-based:
– Metal Matrix Composites (MMC)Metal Matrix Composites (MMC) – Ceramic Matrix Composites (CMC)– Polymer Matrix Composites (PMC)
MSE280© 2007, 2008 Moonsub Shim8
5
• CMCs: Increased toughness • PMCs: Increased E/ρ
E(GPa)10 210 3
PMCs
ceramicsparticle-reinf
Force
COMPOSITE BENEFITS
10-46061 Al1
G=3E/8K=E
Density, ρ [Mg/m 3].1 .3 1 3 10 30
.01.1
110
10metal/ metal alloys
polymers
fiber -reinf
un-reinf
Bend d isplacement
MSE280© 2007, 2008 Moonsub Shim9
• MMCs:Increasedcreepresistance
20 30 50 10 0 20010-10
10-8
10-66061 Al
6061 Al w/SiC whiskers σ(MPa)
εss (s -1 )Adapted from T.G. Nieh, "Creep rupture of a silicon-carbide reinforced aluminum composite", Metall. Trans. A Vol. 15(1), pp. 139-146, 1984. Used with permission.
From Callister resources CD
Reinforcement-based
dparticle>100nm
dparticle< 100nm
MSE280© 2007, 2008 Moonsub Shim10
6
Particle-reinforced Fiber -reinforced Structural• Examples:
-Spheroidite matrix: particles: Adapted from Fig.
COMPOSITE SURVEY: Particle-I
p steel ferrite ( α)
(ductile)cementite(Fe 3C) (brittle)
-WC/Co cemented carbide
matrix: cobalt (ductile)
particles: WC (brittle, hard)
60 μm
Vm:
10.10, Callister 6e. (Fig. 10.10 is copyright United States Steel Corporation, 1971.)
Adapted from Fig. 16.4, Callister 6e. (Fig. 16.4 is courtesy Carboloy Systems, Department, General Electric Company )
MSE280© 2007, 2008 Moonsub Shim11
hard)
-Automobile tires
matrix: rubber (compliant)
particles: C (stiffer)
Vm: 10-15vol%! 600 μm
0.75 μm
Electric Company.)
Adapted from Fig. 16.5, Callister 6e. (Fig. 16.5 is courtesy Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company.)
From Callister resources CD
• Elastic modulus, Ec, of composites:two approaches
Fiber -reinforced StructuralParticle-reinforced
COMPOSITE SURVEY: Particle-II
-- two approaches.
Data: Cu matrix w/tungsten particles
15020 025030 0350
E(GPa)
lower limit:1
Ec= Vm
Em+
VpEp
c m m
upper limit:E = V E + VpEp
“rule of mixtures”
Adapted from Fig. 16.3, Callister 6e. (Fig. 16.3 is from R.H. Krock, ASTM Proc, Vol. 63, 1963.)
MSE280© 2007, 2008 Moonsub Shim12
• Application to other properties:-- Electrical conductivity, σe: Replace E by σe.-- Thermal conductivity, k: Replace E by k.
0 20 40 60 80 10 0 vol% tungsten(Cu) (W)
From Callister resources CD
Analogy to resistors in series vs. parallel…
7
Fiber-reinforced composites
MSE280© 2007, 2008 Moonsub Shim13
Continuous & aligned
Discontinuous & aligned
Discontinuous & random
Fiber-reinforced compositesThe Fiber Phase
Smaller diameter fiber is stronger than bulk in most materials ( i ll b i l ) Wh ?(especially brittle ones). Why? Flaws!
Whiskers:• very thin single crystals that have extremely large aspect ratios.• high degree of crystallinity and virtually flaw free – exceptionally high strength.• usually extremely expensive.• some whisker materials: graphite, SiC, silicon nitride, aluminum oxide.Fibers:
MSE280© 2007, 2008 Moonsub Shim14
Fibers:• polycrystalline or amorphous.• typically: polymers or ceramics (polymer aramids, glass, carbon, boron, SiC…Fine Wires:• relatively large diameter, often metal wires.• e.g. steel, molybdenum, tungsten…
8
Fiber-reinforced compositesThe Matrix Phase• can be metal polymers or ceramics• can be metal, polymers, or ceramics.
• typically metals and polymer because some ductility is often desired.
• main functions of the matrix:
-Hold fibers together.
-Transmit and distribute external stress to the fibers.
MSE280© 2007, 2008 Moonsub Shim15
-Protect fibers from surface damage: abrasions, chemical reactions…
• in CMCs, reinforcements are usually added to improve fracture toughness .
Fiber-reinforced composites
1. Molecular entanglement (interdiffusion):• Entanglement of molecules at the interface.
The Fiber-Matrix Interface
Entanglement of molecules at the interface.• Especially important in fibers that are pre-
coated with polymers.• Molecular conformation/structural and
chemical aspects.2. Electrostatic attraction
• Depends on surface charge density.• e.g. glass fibers, polymers with chargeable
groups.3. Covalent bonding
• Usually the strongest fiber matrix
+ + + + + + + - - - - - - -
- - - - - - -+
-
+
-
+
-
+
-
+
-
+
-
MSE280© 2007, 2008 Moonsub Shim16
• Usually the strongest fiber-matrix interaction.
• The most important in many composites.4. Mechanical adhesion
• Interlocking of 2 rough surfaces• e.g. thermosetting resins
AB
AB
AB
9
Fiber-reinforced compositesProperties depend on LENGTH and ORIENTATION of the fibers (as well as isolated properties of each of the components)!
*Critical fiber length
c
fc
dl
τσ2
*
==fσ Fiber tensile strength
=d Fiber diameter
=cτ Smaller of:• fiber-matrix bond strength• matrix shear yield strength.
Possible failure modes:
Continuous when fiber length >> lcDiscontinuous when fiber length < 15 lc
MSE280© 2007, 2008 Moonsub Shim17
1) fiber breaking.2) matrix breaking.3) fiber pullout (interface between fiber and matrix fails)
Fiber-reinforced composites
σ(x)σ(x)
Short fibersLong fibers
MSE280© 2007, 2008 Moonsub Shim18
Poorer fiber efficiency Better fiber efficiency
10
Aligned fibers
Elastic Modulus
Continuous when fiber length >> lcDiscontinuous when fiber length < 15 lc
Not so detrimental since:1) Not all fibers fail at the same time2) Matrix still intact
E
0o
MSE280© 2007, 2008 Moonsub Shim19
0o 90o
σ
max min
Aligned Continuous fibersFiber-reinforcedParticle-reinforced Structural
COMPOSITE SURVEY: Fiber-I
• Examples:
fracture surface
matrix: α (Mo) (ductile)
--Metal: γ'(Ni3Al)-α(Mo)by eutectic solidification.
--Glass w/SiC fibersformed by glass slurryEglass = 76GPa; ESiC = 400GPa.
(a)
MSE280© 2007, 2008 Moonsub Shim20
From W. Funk and E. Blank, “Creep deformation of Ni3Al-Mo in-situ composites", Metall. Trans. A Vol. 19(4), pp. 987-998, 1988. Used with permission.
surface
fibers: γ’ (Ni3Al) (brittle)
2μm From F.L. Matthews and R.L. Rawlings, Composite Materials; Engineering and Science, Reprint ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2000. (a) Fig. 4.22, p. 145 (photo by J. Davies); (b) Fig. 11.20, p. 349 (micrograph by H.S. Kim, P.S. Rodgers, and R.D. Rawlings). Used with permission of CRCPress, Boca Raton, FL.
(b)
From Callister resources CD
11
Continuous-aligned fibersConsider a composite with fibers having square rod geometry with stress in the longitudinal direction…
fiber
L
B
B
Matrix
b
l
σ σ
When l >> l (typically l > 15 l ) we can simplify to:
MSE280© 2007, 2008 Moonsub Shim21
b
When l >> lc (typically l > 15 lc), we can simplify to:
σ σB
l thenl
Ll
Ll
L matrixfibercomposite Δ=
Δ=
Δ
since ,lLΔ
≡ε matrixfibercomposite εεε ==
ISOSTRAIN
Continuous-aligned fibersWhat about elastic modulus? σ σ
B
l
Total force on the composite is simply the sum of
Longitudinal loading
b
fibermatrixcomposite FFF +=Total force on the composite is simply the sum of forces on matrix and fibers:
sinceAF
=σ or , we have: AF σ= ffmmcc AAA σσσ +=
Recall stress-strain relation: εσ E= Sub-in for stresses…
AEAE
MSE280© 2007, 2008 Moonsub Shim22
fffmmmccc AEAEAE εεε +=
Imposing isostrain condition ,mfc εεε ==cc
fff
cc
mmmc A
AEA
AEEεε
εε
+=rearrange
c
ff
c
mmc A
AE
AAEE +=
“Area fractions”Prefer volume fractions….
12
Continuous-aligned fibers
σ σB
l
Total area = Bb
Af = number of fibers x area of each fiber = Nb2
Longitudinal loading
bThen we have:
BNb
AA
c
f = Also,
BNb
AA
AAor
AAA
c
f
c
m
fcm
−=−=
−=
11For volume fractions:
lNbV
BblV
f
c2=
=
MSE280© 2007, 2008 Moonsub Shim23
Then:c
f
c
ff A
AB
NbBbl
lNbVV
v ====2
same as “area fraction”
c
mm A
Av =Similarly, ffmmcl EvEvE +=Longitudinal elastic modulus(upper bound for Ec)
Continuous-aligned fibers
σ σB
l
?fFWhat about the load on the matrix and the fibers?
Longitudinal loading
b?=m
f
F AF σ=
mm
ff
mm
ff
m
f
vv
AA
FF
σσ
σσ
==
With εσ E=
MSE280© 2007, 2008 Moonsub Shim24
mmm
fff
m
f
vEvE
FF
εε
=Isostrain conditions
mm
ff
m
f
vEvE
FF
=
13
Continuous-aligned fibersσ
B
lTransverse loading
Stress, rather than strain, is the same in this case:
b
σ
B
mfc σσσ == ISOSTRESS condition
The total elongation will be the sum of elongation of the components:
mfc LLL Δ+Δ=Δ
mfcc L
LLL
LL Δ
+Δ
=Δ
=ε Where Lc = length of the composite along the direction of stress = BStrain =
MSE280© 2007, 2008 Moonsub Shim25
ccc LLL along the direction of stress B
Again, to express in terms of volume fractions:
BNb
LL
NbL
c
f
f
=
=
Same as what we derived for volume fraction
fv=Rearrange
f
fc v
LL = Similarly,
m
mc v
LL =
Continuous-aligned fibers
B
lTransverse loading
mfcc L
LLL
LL Δ
+Δ
=Δ
=ε
b
σ
B
m
mm
f
ff
mm
m
ff
f
LLv
LL
vvL
LvL
L Δ+
Δ=
Δ+
Δ=
//
ccc LLL
fε mε
ffmmc vv εεε +=Lower bound for E
MSE280© 2007, 2008 Moonsub Shim26
From stress-strain relation;Eσε =
f
ff
m
mm
c
c
Ev
Ev
Eσσσ
+=
Applying isostress condition and rearranging gives mffm
fmct EvEv
EEE
+=
Lower bound for Ec(transverse modulus)
14
Continuous-aligned fibers
B
lMany properties follow these upper and lower bound relations for continuous-aligned fiber composities.
b
BIn general:
ffmmupperccl vv χχχχ +==
MSE280© 2007, 2008 Moonsub Shim27
mffm
fmlowercct vv χχ
χχχχ
+==
Continuous-aligned fibers: example1. Calculate the longitudinal and transverse modulus and
thermal conductivity for polyester reinforced with 60% volume fraction of glass fiber (E-glass).volume fraction of glass fiber (E glass).
2. Calculate longitudinal specific stiffness.
3. Calculate the percentage of the load on the fibers for longitudinal loading.
MSE280© 2007, 2008 Moonsub Shim28
E(GPa) K(W/mK) Specific gravity
Polyester 6.3 0.17 1.46
E-glass 72.4 0.97 2.58
15
Continuous-aligned fibers: example Mixed Fibers
• A two-fiber composite (continuous aligned) i d f th f ll i tis composed of the following components.
E(GPa) Vol. fraction
Kevlar fiber 131 30%
E-glass fiber 72.5 20%
Epoxy matrix 2.41 50%
MSE280© 2007, 2008 Moonsub Shim29
• Calculate the longitudinal elastic modulus.
Continuous-aligned fibers
B
l
Tensile strengthTensile strengthLongitudinal: *'*
ffl vv σσσ +=
Similar to elastic modulus
bffmmcl vv σσσ +This is assuming that the fiber fails prior to the matrix.
='mσ Stress in the matrix at failure
=*fσ Tensile strength of the reinforcement fiber
Transverse: more complex due to many factors that affect it(e.g. matrix & fiber properties, fiber-matrix bond strength,
presence of voids etc…)
MSE280© 2007, 2008 Moonsub Shim30
In general, stronger along longitudinal direction
16
Discontinuous & aligned fibersDiscontinuous when fiber length < 15 lc
If l > lc
mmc
ffcd vl
lv '**
21 σσσ +⎟
⎠⎞
⎜⎝⎛ −= Similar to continuous case,
except for the length factor.
If l < l
MSE280© 2007, 2008 Moonsub Shim31
mmfc
cd vvd
l '*' στσ +=
=cτ Smaller of:• fiber-matrix bond strength• matrix shear yield strength.
If l < lc
Discontinuous, random 2D fibers• Example: Carbon-Carbon
--process: fiber/pitch, then
C fibers: very stiff very strong
Discontinuous & random fibers
burn out at up to 2500C.--uses: disk brakes, gas
turbine exhaust flaps, nosecones. fibers lie
in plane
view onto plane
y gC matrix: less stiff less strong
(b)
(a)
Ec = EmVm + KEf Vf
MSE280© 2007, 2008 Moonsub Shim32
From Callister resources CD
efficiency factor (depends on vf and Ef/Em):--aligned 1D: K = 1 (anisotropic)--random 2D: K = 3/8 (2D isotropy)--random 3D: K = 1/5 (3D isotropy)
17
Polymer matrix composites• Glass fiber-reinforced
polymer (GFRP) it fib lcomposites: fiberglass
– Some reasons for using glass as fibers:
• Easy to draw fibers from molten state.
• Strength.• Readily available/economic.• Chemical inertness (e.g.
non-corrosive).
MSE280© 2007, 2008 Moonsub Shim33
)– Applications: automotive &
marine bodies, storage containers, industrial flooring…
Polymer matrix composites• Carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP)
composites:composites:– Some reason for using C-fibers:
• Highest specific modulus and specific strength of all reinforcing fiber materials.
• Retain high modulus and TS at elevated T (chemical oxidation may be a problem).
• At or near RT, very inert.• Can engineer specific mechanical and physical properties
MSE280© 2007, 2008 Moonsub Shim34
• Can engineer specific mechanical and physical properties.– Some applications: fishing rods, golf clubs, bicycles,
military and commercial aircraft structural components…
18
Polymer matrix composites• Aramid (e.g. Kevlar) fiber-reinforced polymer composites:
– High strength, high modulus.Much better strength to weight than metals– Much better strength-to-weight than metals.
– Stable to relatively high T (high mechanical properties maintained from ~ - 200 to 200oC).
– Relatively inert chemically (except strong acids).– Uses: bullet-proof vests, tires, ropes, missile cases, parts for automotive
brake, clutch lining and gaskets…
MSE280© 2007, 2008 Moonsub Shim35
Carbon-carbon composites• Carbon fiber reinforced carbon matrix
composites.p– High modulus & TS (retained to T > 2000oC).– Resistant to creep.– Large fracture toughness.– Small thermal expansion coefficient.– High thermal conductivity.– Uses: rocket motors, friction material for aircraft and
hi h f t bil b k t f
MSE280© 2007, 2008 Moonsub Shim36
high-performance automobile brakes, components for turbine engines…
– Very expensive mainly due to relatively complex processing.
19
Carbon nanotube composite
Carbon matrixMaterial Young’s Modulus
Aluminum 72 GPa
1μm
Aluminum alloys
72 GPa
Steel 200 GPa
Tungsten 400 GPa
Carbon Nanotube
>1000 GPa
MSE280© 2007, 2008 Moonsub Shim37
Ajayan et al.
Nanotube bundles
Processing of fiber-reinforced composites
Pultrusion
Prepreg production process
MSE280© 2007, 2008 Moonsub Shim38
20
Processing of fiber-reinforced composites
Filament winding
MSE280© 2007, 2008 Moonsub Shim39
Design exampleF
Requirements - at F = 890N, deflection < 0.33mm
- Circumferential winding with θ = 15o
A) Which fiber(s), if embedded in epoxy matrix, meet the these criteria?
B) D id th t t ff ti fib
MSE280© 2007, 2008 Moonsub Shim40
B) Decide on the most cost-effective fiber.
21
Concepts to remember…• Matrix & reinforcement.• What composite characteristics depend on.
Cl ifi ti t i b d MMC CMC PMC• Classification: matrix-based – MMC, CMC, PMC; reinforcement-based.
• Particle reinforced composites: upper and lower bound for E (rule of mixtures).
• Fiber-reinforced composites– Continuous-aligned, discontinuous-aligned &
discontinuous-random cases.C i i l l h
MSE280© 2007, 2008 Moonsub Shim41
– Critical length.– Longitudinal & transverse properties.– Isostrain & isostress cases.
• Structural composites.