preadhesion laser surface treatment of carbon fiber reinforced peek composite
TRANSCRIPT
J. Adhesion, 1995, Vol. 55, pp. 77-97 Reprints available directly from the publisher Photocopying permitted by license only
© 1995 OPA (Overseas Publishers Association) Amsterdam B.V. Published in The Netherlands
under license by Gordon and Breach Science Publishers SA
Printed in Malaysia
Preadhesion Laser Surface Treatment of Carbon Fiber Reinforced PEEK Connposite*
M. ROTEL and J. ZAHAVI
Israel Institute of Metals, Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 32000, Israel
A. BUCHMAN and H. DODIUK**
Materials and Processes Department, RAFAEL, P.O. Box 2250, Haifa 31021, Israel
(Received July 28.1994: in final form March 14.1995)
An excimer UV laser (193 nm) was used for preadhesion surface treatment of PEEK (polyetheretherketone) composite. This method presented an allemative to other l imited and pollut ing conventional surface treatment methods. Experimental results indicated that laser preadhesion treatment significantly improved the shear and tensile adhesion strength of structural epoxy F M 300 2K bonded PEEK composite adherends compared with untreated and SiC blasted substrates. Best results were obtained with laser energies of 0.18 or IJ/Pcm.^ Shear strength of laser-treated joints was improved by 450% compared wi th that of untreated PEEK composite and by 200% compared wi th SiC-blasled pretreatment at ambient and at extreme temperatures. An order of magnitude of improvement was found in the tensile strength-of laser-treated PEEK composite in a sandwich structure compared wi th non-treated or abraded sandwich joints. The mode of failure changed froni adhesive to cohesive as the number of pulses or laser energy increased during treatment. The latter phenomenon was correlated wi th surface cleaning as revealed by XPS, wi th morphology changes as revealed by scanning electron microscopy, and by chemical modification as indicated by FTIR and XPS. The bulk of the PEEK composite adherend was not damaged by the laser irradiat ion during treatment as indicated by the identical flexural strength before and after laser treatment. I t can be concluded that the excimer laser has a potential as a precise, clean and simple preadhesion surface treatment for PEEK composite.
K E Y WORDS Excimer laser, PEEK composite; surface treatment; FTIR; XPS; adhesion
INTRODUCTION
Fiber-reinforced thermoplast ic composi te mater ials are increasingly being considered
for a wide var iety o f appl icat ions. Adhesives are often requi red for j o i n i n g these
mater ia ls for s t ruc tu ra l and other purposes. I n order to achieve a s t rong and durable
adhesive bond there is a need to establish an effective surface p rebond ing t reatment and
to develop a scientific understanding o f the mechanism o f surface mod i f i ca t ion and its
effect on adhesion.
Thermoplast ic composi te mater ials such as ca rbon reinforced polyetheretherketone
( P E E K ) are used for engineering appl icat ions where toughness, fatigue, impact and
* One ofa Collection of papers honoring James P. Wightman, who received the 13th Adhesive and Sealant Council Award at the ASC's 1993 Fall Convention in St. Louis, Missouri, USA, in October 1993.
** Corresponding author
77
78 M . ROTEL et al.
abrasion resistance and therma l stabi l i ty^ are needed. I n aerospace manufacture,
especially for w i n g and ta i l components, i n electrical and electronic au tomot i ve ,
bearing, medical,^ nuclear, and chemical industr ies this composi te is found . I n a l l o f
these appl icat ions adhesive bond ing is the preferred me thod of j o i n i n g .
Surface energies of thermoplast ic a romat ic composites tend to be low, causing
di f f icu l ty i n we t t ing o f the surface by an adhesive. Conven t iona l surface t reatments such
as sand blast ing, mechanical abrasion, chemical etching or swel l ing, as wel l as fusion o r
we ld ing j o i n i n g methods,^ may cause de lamina t ion defects and damage the fibers and
the bu l k composite. These methods also present occupat iona l heal th and safety and
env i ronmenta l r isks.
C o r o n a and plasma surface t reatment do not damage the po lymer bu t require
special env i ronments for the act ion. Thus, as each o f these treatments have l im i ta t i ons ,
an al ternat ive t reatment should be prov ided.
U V lasers may offer an add i t i ona l surface t reatment for po lymer composi te
adherends.** Lasers have been used for cleaning po lymer surfaces, for m ic ro fabr i ca t ing
o f polymers by ablat ion,^ precise cu t t i ng , etc. M o s t organic mater ials adsorb U V
rad ia t i on , creat ing photochemica l reactions such as scissioning, b ranch ing and cross-
l i n k i n g o n the surface of the po lymer on l y several molecular layers deep (300-500 A),
w i t h o u t damag ing the b u l k polymer. The effect of laser i r r a d i a t i o n on P E E K is
especially interest ing since P E E K is a model po lymer w i t h o u t any a l iphat ic groups.
In te rac t ion of a laser beam w i t h mat ter gives rise to m u l t i p h o t o n exc i ta t ion o f the
po lymer ic bonds, wh i ch is then fo l lowed by therma l decompos i t ion resul t ing in
ab la t ion . F o r ab la t ion to take place there exists a threshold laser energy density beyond
wh i ch irreversible damage of the sample surface occurs.* I n the case of P E E K
composi te, no signif icant p r o d u c t i o n o f gaseous species occurs below 0.1J/P. A t higher
fluences, aboveO.2 J/P, f ragmentat ion and volat i le species were detected. Above 0.4 J/P,
a complete convers ion of the oxygen i n the P E E K po lymer to C O occurred, o r i g i na t i ng
f rom the ca rbony l and the ether l inkages.
F r o m va r ia t i on of etch rate w i t h fluence an effective threshold for the composi te
P E E K was determined wh i ch is 0.42 J /Pcm^ . Below this value removal of the ma t r i x i n
the surface region occurs and over l ong exposure weak etching o f fibers takes place.
Once the ma t r i x is removed, the bare fibers are immune to etching at l ow fluences. Near
the threshold for ab la t ion , cone-l ike structures appear. These structures p robab ly
result f r om the semicrystal l ine character of the po lymer , since the crystal l ines have
different U V absorpt ions and etch more s lowly than the amorphous s u r r o u n d i n g
mater ia l .
Above the ab la t ion threshold the composi te fibers are observed to etch smooth ly ,
and the crystal l i tes also ablate w i t h the bu l k mater ia l and the etched region becomes
smooth . Mic ropar t i c les and debris redeposit on to the surface leaving a dust -hke
texture. W h e n the ab la t ion threshold was great ly exceeded, fibers were th inned and
buckled.
The ma in effects caused by the laser i r r ad ia t i on , such as surface chemical modi f ica
t i o n (oxygen deplet ion), morpho log ica l a l te ra t ion and f o rma t i on of cone-l ike struc
tures,''^ ^ were s imi la r to those found in previous invest igat ions on polyether imide,
polycarbonate,^- a l u m i n i u m a l l o y a n d a l u m i n i u m oxide. '^ The U V laser etch ing
was, thus, used as a preadhesion surface t reatment w i t h the advantages of chemical
PREADHESION LASER SURFACE T R E A T M E N T 79
and morpho log i ca l mod i f i ca t ion and cleaning o f the po lymer surface w i t h m i n i m a l
fiber damage.
I n the present invest igat ion, the app l i ca t ion of an excimer U V laser for preadhesion
surface t reatment of P E E K composi te adherend has been studied. The objective o f the
research was to establish the effect of the excimer laser on the surface st ructure o f the
composi te and to correlate the mic ros t ruc tu re w i t h the macrobehavior , as reflected i n
shear and tensile load ing and fai lure loca t ion o f bonded j o i n t s and sandwich structures
bonded w i t h a s t ruc tu ra l epoxy adhesive.
EXPERIMENTAL
Adherends and Adhesives
Compos i te plates 100 x 100 x 1.6 m m were prepared f r o m commerc ia l P E E K re in
forced w i t h un id i rec t iona l carbon fibers (APC-2/AS-4), a prepreg p roduc t of I C I L t d . ,
USA. The plates were produced f rom 14 prepreg layers i n a un id i rec t iona l sequence
(0/0)^ la id u p and consol idated under pressure o f 110 Psi (0.76 M P a ) at 385°C. Var ious
degrees o f crystaf l izat ion were achieved by coohng the p roduc t at different rates (1,7
and 33°C/min).
B o n d i n g of treated and nont reated P E E K composi te adherends was carr ied ou t w i t h
a s t ruc tu ra l epoxy adhesive F M 300 2 K, a p roduc t o f Amer ican Cyanamid , USA. The
adhesive was po lymer ized at 120°C under a pressure o f 35 Psi (0.24 M P a ) for 1.5 hrs. N o
pr imer was used.
Surface Treatment
A l l samples were w iped clean w i t h acetone before t reatment. T w o references were used:
a non-t reated adherend and a SiC (36 mesh) abraded adherend for a l l the experiments
conducted and described. Laser t reatment was appl ied using a U V A r F (193 nm)
excimer laser model 201 M S C , a p roduc t of L a m b d a Physik, Germany, w i t h the
fo l l ow ing parameters: repet i t ion rate of 5 Hz , in tens i ty o f 0.18-6.0 J /Pcm^ , number
o f pulses rang ing between 1 to 500 P, and a beam area between 2 x 0.5 cm^ and
0.3 X 0.1 cm^ accord ing to the fluence needed. The area o f the beam was changed using
a focusing lens. A l l experiments were conducted at ambient temperature and i n a i r
env i ronment . The parameters tested are summar ized i n Table I . The specimens were
moved under the beam by means o f a con t ro l led X - Y table.
TABLE I Laser parameters for APC2/AS4 reinforced PEEK composite samples
Laser energy J/P-cm^ Repetition rate Hz Pulse No. Beam area cm^
ao9 a i 8
5 5
10,52,100 1,5,10
53,106.502 1.10,102 1,10,101
2 x 0 . 5 2 x 0 . 5
LOO 6.00
5 5
0.8 X 0.25 0.3 X 0.1
80 M . ROTEL et al.
Testing
O p t i m a l laser parameters were chosen using several techniques by wh ich t reated and
untreated samples were compared:
a. The morpho logy o f the surface after laser t reatment was observed using a
Scanning E lec t ron Microscope (SEM) model JSM-840, Jeol, Japan.
b. The chemical changes i n the surface were studied i n an external specular reflec
t i o n mode using a Four ie r T rans fo rm In f ra Red ( F T I R ) Nico le t 5 D X spec
t ropho tomete r equipped w i t h a hor i zon ta l stage in a near - to -normal incidence
and a gold-coated m i r r o r as a reference.
c. Chemica l depth prof i le and surface compos i t i on were analysed using X-Ray
Photoe lect ron Spectroscopy (XPS), w i t h a model PH I555 spectrometer w i t h an
A l Koc X- ray source at 10 K V , 40 m A and 3 x 1 0 " ^ to r r .
d. Adhesive j o i n t propert ies were determined using single lap shear j o i n t s (SLS)
accord ing to A S T M D-1002-72. The SLS specimens were tested i n an I n s t r o n
machine, model 1185, at a rate of 2mm/min at - 30°C, R T and 120°C to fai lure.
The mode o f fai lure was determined visual ly to be either adhesive ( in lerfacial ,
100% coverage of the adherends) or cohesive ( 2 0 0 % coverage o f the adherends,
b o t h adherends covered), or mixed.
The effect o f laser t reatment on the po lymer ma t r i x is most ly ablat ive pho todecom-
pos i t ion .^ ' As most organic mater ials exh ib i t very h igh absorp t i on i n the U V range,
most of the energy is absorbed in a t h i n surface layer (0.1 — 0.5 \x) wh ich is the on l y par t
o f the mater ia l that is affected o r changed.^** I n order to prove this assumpt ion and t o
measure the effect o f laser i r r a d i a t i o n on the b u l k propert ies o f the laminate, flexural
tests were conducted on treated and untreated samples.
I n a flexural test, tension occurs on one side and compression o n the other side o f the
sample. The tensional side is very sensitive to changes on the surface. A simple beam
2.2 X 21.7 X 100 m m (span 50 m m ) was tested accord ing to A S T M D-790 (3-po in t
flexural test). The beam was loaded at a rate of 2 mm/m in u n t i l fai lure. The side loaded
by tension was laser treated at var ious cond i t ions and compared w i t h non-t reated o r
SiC-abrasion-treated specimens. Stress, s t ra in and flexural modu lus were calculated
and the mode of fai lure was determined visual ly.
P E E K is a par t ly -crysta l l ine mater ia l w i t h an e q u i h b r i u m concent ra t ion o f 4 8 %
crystal l ine phase. The rma l h is tory of the P E E K processing affects its degree o f
c rys ta l l in i ty as wel l as its mechanical and morpho log i ca l propert ies. The efficiency o f
laser t reatment may also be affected by this factor. I n order to determine the o p t i m a l
c rys ta l l in i ty for achieving the best effect of laser t reatment , several P E E K composites
w i t h different crystal l ine concentrat ions were laser treated, bonded and tested.
Var ious crystal l ine concentrat ions were achieved by app ly ing different coo l ing rates
d u r i n g laminate processing (1 , 7 and 33°C/min). The var ious laminates were bonded
(SLS jo in ts ) w i t h F M 300 2 K after laser or abrasion t reatment and compared w i t h
non-treated ones. The level of c rys ta l l in i ty was determined by Phi l ips M o d e l PN-2000
X- ray apparatus equipped w i t h a C u l a m p at the range of 15-35 degrees.
After o p t i m a l laser and crystalhne cond i t ions were determined and no damage was
revealed to the composi te adherends, a sandwich s t ructure typ ica l for aerospace
PREADHESION LASER SURFACE T R E A T M E N T 81
appl icat ions was prepared. The st ructure conta ined t w o P E E K composi te skins
37 X 37 X 2 m m and a Nomex^ honeycomb. The skins were treated w i t h the o p t i m a l
laser cond i t ions (compared w i t h abraded and non-t reated ones) and bonded to the
honeycomb w i t h F M 300 2K .
The whole st ructure was tensile loaded to fai lure in an I ns t ron machine at a rate o f 2
mm/min . The tensile strength was calculated and the mode o f fai lure was visual ly
assessed.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Surface Morphology
S E M micrographs of the nontreated and SiC-abraded P E E K composi te adherend are
shown i n F igure l a and b. The surface of the abraded adherend is marked ly damaged,
cracked and the exposed fibers are b roken .
S E M micrographs of the P E E K composi te adherend after U V laser t reatment at
different cond i t ions are presented in Figures I c - f A t lower energies (less than the
ab la t ion t h r e s h o l d * - 4 2 0 m J / P c m ^ ) and at a low number of pulses, etching o f the
surface is observed w i t h shal low cracks. A t a higher number o f pulses, rounded granules
are formed on the surface ^ 2\i i n diameter. These granules g row in size (2 -6 |a) as the
number o f pulses increases. The fibers close to the surface are being exposed bu t seem
undamaged.
The phenomenon of the granules formed on the surface as a result of laser t reatment
is typ ica l to var ious other materials. ' ' '^- A t higher laser energies (above threshold)
the phenomena at the surface are to ta l l y different. A t a low number of pulses the etching
of the surface is homogeneous w i t h o u t granules. A t a higher number o f pulses the fibers
are exposed and fine powder collects on the surface, p robab ly due to condensat ion of
ablated m a t e r i a l . ' *
A t very h igh energy (6J/Pcm^), deformed fibers are exposed and the ma t r i x between
them is ablated (Fig. 10- I t can also be seen that below threshold the effect o f h igh energy
w i t h a low number o f pulses is equivalent to low energy w i t h a h igh number of pulses.
The f o rma t i on of granules extending f rom the treated surface due to laser t reatment
s igni f icant ly enlarges the surface area and cont r ibutes to better mechanical in te r lock
ing of the adhesive to the adherend.
FTIR
Signif icant chemical changes i n the P E E K composi te surface were detected by
F T I R after laser t reatment. Typ ica l F T I R spectra o f the surface of laser-treated samples
at the same energy (0.18 J/P cm^) but at different number o f pulses are presented i n
Figure 2.
The chemical mechanism at low laser energies is different f rom that at h igh energies.
A t l ow energies, C = 0 groups are formed (1653 and 1161 c m " ' ) , ma in cha in bonds
( C — O — C ) break ( 1 2 5 0 c m " ' ) , C H end groups are formed (685 c m " ') and new
crossl inkings ( 0 - 0 ) appear at 951 and 1111 cm " ' . A t higher energies, the chemical
82 M . ROTEL et al.
changes are less p ronounced. N o C = 0 groups are formed, on ly new </> - H groups and
</) — 0 cross l ink ing can be observed.
A t 6 J / P c m ^ a vast ab la t ion , ca rbon iza t ion o f the surface and a to ta l decrease i n a l l
the absorpt ions o f the organic groups occurs.
F IGURE 1 SEM micrographs of PEEK composite surface after treatment at various parameters, (a) non-treated, (b) SiC-abraded. (c) laser-treated: 0.I8J/P cm^ SOP, (d) 0.18J/P c m ^ lOOP, (e) l J / P c m \0 6J/P c m ^ 10 P
PREADHESION LASER SURFACE T R E A T M E N T 83
c
F IGURE 1 iContinueiH
XPS
XPS surface spectra and surface a tomic concent ra t ion of laser-treated and untreated
composi te P E E K specimens completed the i n fo rma t i on gained f rom S E M and F T I R
results. The or ig ina l C j^ spectrum o f P E E K ' ^ is composed of a m a i n peak o f ary l ic C at
84 M . ROTEL et al.
e
F I G U R E I (Continued)
285.0 ev (C - H , C - C), and smaller C peaks at 286.5 ev ( C - O , etheric), 287.6ev (C = O,
carbony l ) and 291.6ev ( C = C, phenyl). The O s p e c t r u m o f P E E K is composed of 2
peaks at 533.6ev (C - O) and 532.2ev (C = O) and 532.7 (O - C = O)'** appeared after
extended ox ida t ion .
PREADHESION LASER SURFACE T R E A T M E N T 85
/ REFERENCE , 8 0 m J / P c m 2 / 5 PULSES /
W A V E N U M B E R { C M " ' )
F I G U R E 2 FTIR spectra of PEEK composite surface laser treated at 0.18 J/P at various no. of pulses.
The results of the laser-treated samples compared w i t h the o r ig ina l P E E K spectrum
are shown i n Figures 3a and b and i n Table I I .
After laser t reatment w i t h low energy (0.18 J/100 P) the C^^ spectrum shows that the
etheric peak (286.4 ev) decreased, the ketonic peak increased and new groups appeared
(O - C - C - CH3, 285.8 ev and O - C - O, 290.0 ev).'^ A t higher energy on ly m i n o r
O O
chemical changes were indicated (Fig. 3a).
The oxygen peaks after laser t reatment show increase of the etheric peak and
decrease of the ca rbony l peak. The to ta l intensi ty o f the oxygen peaks was reduced by
ha l f (Fig. 3b).
The to ta l ra t io o f O/C decreases, p robab ly due to new crossUnking bonds {(p — <p) as
ind icated by F T I R . The same phenomenon (increase of C/O rat io) was also observed i n
References 7 and 8 due to bond break ing and evo lu t ion o f C O derivatives. A s imi la r
mechanism o f c ross l ink ing was also observed as a result of P E E K bombardmen t w i t h
an electron beam.^*' Table I I summarizes the XPS results.
The surface XPS spectra (Fig. 4) clearly show a cleaning process imposed by the laser
i r r ad i a t i on . Var ious contaminants such as M g and Si wh i ch were present at the
non-t reated APC-2/AS-4 surface are absent after t reatment at 0.18 J/100 P. Th is
phenomenon is typ ica l o f the laser t reatments o f a l l the mater ials tested.^ " ' ^
86 M. ROTEL et al.
^' 4000. c
" ;oon.
Is
NO TREATMENT
iPi sp t is
B i n d i n g E n i r y i . ! ,' f',•
•tooo.
::ooo_
0.18 J/P-cm' loop
6000_( m 5p f i s
IJ/P-cm^ lOP
e i n J - r t i E n e r q . , ,/
^ sec .
•-• 7 CO.
j - I f a i-iii 0 l i
!
J
// A .
\
•\
0.18 J/P-cm' lOOP
1
—
:.' e
? 1 • : • r 5 i l s i : 2 T = i . ^ . w
•_ : :•
- :. IJ/P-cm'
L , k : . 1 / lOP
y — --^ -
5 3 8 SSr ? 1 ' I ' l ' r o I * r I ' :
5 ^ 5 1 s i : 5;- c ^ < : . - _ < • 5 ^
F IGURE 3 Comparison of XPS spectra of C „ (a) and 0 „ (b) of PEEK composite non-treated and laser-treated.
PREADHESION LASER SURFACE T R E A T M E N T 87
TABLE I I XPS results for laser treated and non-treated APC-2/AS-4 reinforced PEEK composite
Treatment None 0.18J/100P IJ/lOP
Peaks C i ,
c — o — c c = o C = C(<I>) o - c o - c
+ +(284.7 ev) + {286.4 ev) + (289. lev) + (291.3ev)
+ +(284.5 ev) -(287.4ev) + (290.0ev) + (291.4ev) + (285.8 ev)
+ +(284.6 ev) + (286. lev) + (287.8 ev) + (291.0ev)
Peaks O i , C — o — C c = o o — c = o
+ +(535.3 ev)
" ++ (531 .7 ev)
+ (533.3ev) + +(532.0ev)
+ +(533.3 ev)
+ (531.7ev)
Ratio O/C 0.197 0.05 0.091
+ + Strong peak + Weak peak — Poor peak
Shear Strength and Failure Mode
Based on the S E M , F T I R and XPS results, laser parameters were chosen for t rea t ing
the P E E K composi te samples. A wide range o f cond i t ions was tested at R T and the
o p t i m a l ones were tested at extreme temperatures. The results of SLS strength of
APC-2/AS-4 j o i n t s bonded w i t h F M 3 0 0 2 K at var ious laser parameters and tested at
different temperatures are summar ized i n Table I I I , compared w i t h those for untreated
and abraded adherends.
I t is evident that U V laser i r r ad ia t i on is effective as a preadhesion t reatment on the
APC-2/AS-4 reinforced P E E K adherends at al l the chosen cond i t ions tested. There are
two o p t i m a l laser cond i t ions for pretreatment (0.18J/100P and IJ / lOP) . A t higher
energies and greater number o f pulses the effectiveness of the t reatment is reduced,
p robab ly due to ab la t ion and carbon iza t ion of the surface.
A t the o p t i m a l laser t reatment condi t ions, the single lap shear strength is increased
by 2 5 0 % compared w i t h SiC abrasion t reatment and by 4 5 0 % compared w i t h
non-treated adherend.
Fu r the rmore , SLS strengths o f laser-treated adherends d i d not s igni f icant ly deter io
rate at lower test temperatures whi le a signif icant decrease was observed for n o n -
treated ( - 3 7 % ) and abraded ( - 2 3 % ) j o i n t s at the same test ing temperatures. A t
higher temperatures, this effect is less pronounced due to the therma l propert ies of the
adhesive.
V isua l inspections of the fai lure surfaces shows clearly tha t laser t reatment caused a
d is t inc t improvement o f fai lure mode f r o m adhesive (interfacial) i n non-laser treated
adherend to most ly cohesive (mixed) fo l l ow ing laser t reatment at al l temperatures
tested. Th is indicates tha t the interfacial adhesion was signi f icant ly improved .
S E M micrographs of the f ractured adhesive surfaces exh ib i t a smooth adhesive
fai lure i n the non-t reated adherend (Fig. 5a) and a mixed fai lure i n the SiC-abraded and
88 M . ROTEL et al.
LU
UNTREATED
Mg
J i .
180 m J / P , l O O P
0
ATOMIC CONC %
C 661 0 2 8 9 Mg 2 8 SI 2 2
ATOMIC CONC %
C 92 7
0 7 3
J L
I J / P lOP
J I I I L
ATOMIC CONC %
C 7 4 6 0 21.5 SI 3 9
S. Si
5 4 0 4 2 0 3 0 0 180 6 0
B I N D I N G E N E R G Y , ( e V )
F I G U R E 4 XPS spectra of surface atomic concentration of PEEK composite nontreated and laser-treated.
laser-treated adherends (Fig. 5b, c). A t higher energy, the fai lure is most ly cohesive
(Fig. 5d). F igure 5e and f reveal the effectiveness o f the fine mo rpho logy formed on
the adherend due to laser t reatment wh i ch causes in te r l ock ing o f the adhesive on the
granules formed on the adherend. These granules are t o r n ou t d u r i n g fai lure and are
visible on b o t h sides of the failed surfaces. They are not visible at higher laser energies.
Flexural Test
The f lexural fracture st rength (a,,), f racture s t ra in (e ,), and modu lus (E) data determined
for P E E K composi te samples subjected to different surface treatments are presented i n
Tab le IV .
N o change i n the mechanical propert ies of the adherend due to surface t reatment is
observed; the values are a l l w i t h i n the tolerance of the reference (untreated) results.
PREADHESION LASER SURFACE T R E A T M E N T 89
T A B L E I I I The effect of laser pretreatment of APC-2/AS-4 reinforced PEEK composite adherends on SLS strength at
various temperatures
Sample Laser Treatment Lap Shear Strength (MPa)
-WC RT + 120°C
Untreated _ 3.8+0.3 (a)* 6.0 ± 0.6 (a) 3.8 + 0.4 (a) SiC Abraded - 11.3±0.S(a) 14.7 ±1.3 (m) 12.3+0.6 (a) Laser treated 0.1J/P•cm^ 50P - 26.6 + 0.7 (m) -O. lJ /Pcm^ lOOp - 27.0 ± 0.6 (m) -0.18J/Pcm\P - 24.S + 3.6 (m) -0.t8J/P•cm^ lOOP 23.2 ± 1.1 (m) 27.2 ± 0.3 (m) 21.4 ± Km)
1J/P•cm^ 10 P 2S.4±0.S(m) 27.8 + 0.6{m) 21.2± 1.8(m) 1J/P•cm^ SOP - 22.4 +4.3 (cc) -
•a-adhesive failure m-mixed failure (adhesive/cohesive in adhesive) c-cohesive failure (in adhesive) cc-cohesive failure (in adherend)
These results prove that m ic ros t ruc tu ra l changes resul t ing f rom laser t reatment occur
on ly i n the t h i n outer layers (few molecular layers o f the specimen)^ ^ and do not affect
the ent ire b u l k of the adherend. S E M micrographs of the fracture showed dis t inct
s t ruc tu ra l differences between the tensile and the compression loaded sides of the
specimen and the fracture was s imi lar for treated and untreated specimens.
Effect of Crystallinity
The X-ray spectrum of P E E K composi te is composed o f three con t r i bu t i ons : amor
phous phase, Q , crystal l ine phase, Q , and carbon fibers, Q^.
The crystal l ine phase has 4 m a i n peaks at 26 = 18.9°, 20.9°, 23", 29^ The amorphous
phase has a b road peak at 26 = 19-20° and the carbon fibers have a peak at 26 = 25"}^
C o m p a r i n g the X- ray spectra o f the P E E K composi te consol idated at var ious coo l ing
rates (Fig. 6a) shows that at slower rates (1 °C/min) the area o f the crystal l ine peaks was
the largest when compared w i t h the amorphous peak, meaning tha t the degree o f
crys ta l l in i ty increases w i t h reducing coo l ing rate. The degree of c rys ta l l in i ty was
calculated and is presented i n Table V.
Laser t reatment causes shi f t ing o f the crystal l ine peaks to lower 26, p robab ly due to a
change i n the crystal l ine st ructure caused by the laser i r r a d i a t i o n (Fig. 6b). C o m p a r i n g
the lower energy laser t reatment (0.I8J/100P) w i t h the higher energy laser t reatment
( l J /10P)on the X- ray spectra indicates tha t at higher energies the crystal l ine peaks are
sharper and larger than the carbon fiber peaks (a l though more fibers were exposed at
this energy). Increasing laser energy causes crysta l l iza t ion at higher temperatures
leading to more perfect crystals. '^ Th is is another p roo f tha t at h igh energies the laser
effect is most ly the rma l .
90 M . ROTEL et al.
The effect o f degree of crystalHzat ion of the adherend on the effectiveness o f the laser
t reatment was tested mechanical ly by SLS j o i n t s w i t h F M 300 2 K s t ruc tu ra l adhesive
(Table V).
The results show tha t for a l l the degrees of c rys ta l l in i ty laser t reatment marked ly
improves the lapshear strength compared w i t h untreated or abrasion-t reated
PREADHESION LASER SURFACE T R E A T M E N T 91
c
d
F I G U R E 5 (Continued)
adherends. The degree of crystalHzat ion has no effect on the SiC-abraded adherend as
the adhesion mechanism for this t reatment consists of mechanical i n te r lock ing , wh i ch
is no t affected by crysta l l izat ion.
The lower-energy laser t reatment imposes a photochemica l mechanism wh i ch
chemical ly modif ies the adherend's surface and is, thus, affected by the degree o f
crystaUini ty. The lowest coo l ing rate shows the highest lap shear slrength.^^ The
high-energy laser t reatment, the effect of wh ich is most ly therma l , vast ly affects the
92 M. ROTEL ef al.
. F I G U R E S {Continued) . ,r<,
mat r i x c rys ta l l in i ty , compared w i t h the low-energy t reatment , possibly increasing the
degree of c rys ta l l in i t y due to anneal ing wh ich results in higher lapshear strength t han
for the low-energy laser t reatment. I n b o t h cases, the lowest coo l ing rate shows the
highest strength as ind icated in Table V. These results suppor t the F T I R , XPS, S E M
PREADHESION LASER SURFACE T R E A T M E N T 93
TABLE IV Effect of surface treatment on flexural properties of APC-2/AS-4 reinforced PEEK composite
Treatment fT,(MPa) E(GPa)
None 1.55 + 0.04 1.94 + 0.03 121.4 + 4.2 SiC 1.52+0.05 1.88+0.08 120.3 + 3.0 0.1J/50P 1.48 + 0.06 2.05 + 0.14 133.8+4.7 0.18 J/50 P 1.40 + 0.1 1.91+0.1 130.9+0.5 0.18J/100P 1.52 + 0.06 1.97 + 0.2 130.0 + 2.2 I.OJ/lOP 1.55+0.02 2.07 + 0.06 130.2 + 2.6 i.0J/50P 1.54 + 0.04 2.06 + 0.07 " ' ^ 130.6 + 3.9
TABLE V Single lap shear strength (MPa) of joints bonded with F M 300 2K adhesive using APC-2/AS4 reinforced
PEEK composite adherends wi th different degrees of crystallinity
Cooling rate °C/min Laser treatment SiC No treatment (Crystallinity) (%) 0.18J/P•cm^ lOOP 1J/P•cm^ 10 P
1 (32.7) 29.5+1.3 (m)* 35.5 + 0.5(m) 14.3 ± 1.2 (m) 4.6 ± 1.5(a) 7 (30.8) 27.2 +0.8 (m) 27.8+0.7 (m) 14.7 +2 .0 (m) 6.1 +0.8 (a)
33(21.2) 26.4 + 4.0 (m) 30.3+ 1.6(m) 14.8 + 0.5 (m) 5.3 + 0.1 (a)
*a-adhesive failure m-mixed failure
and mechanical behavior results, i nd ica t ing t w o different mechanisms: below the
ab la t ion c r i t i ca l po in t where the mechanism is most ly chemical ab la t ion , and above the
c r i t i ca l po in t where the mechanism is a c o m b i n a t i o n of chemical and therma l ab la t ion .
S E M fractographs (F ig. 7) of laser-treated adherends after SLS fai lure indicate tha t the
inter facia l par t of the mixed fai lure was actual ly pa r t l y cohesive i n the adherend, and
tha t the P E E K m a t r i x was t o r n ou t f rom between the ca rbon fibers, i nd i ca t i ng excellent
adherence.
SANDWICH STRUCTURE ^
The skins of the s t ructure were treated using t w o o p t i m a l laser parameters (IJ/P/lOP
and 0.18 J/IOOP) and compared w i t h non-t reated and abrasive SiC-treated skins. The
tensile results o f the skins bonded to N o m e x ^ honeycomb w i t h F M 300 2 K adhesive
are summar ized i n Tab le V L
The results show tha t laser t reatment is preferable for the composi te sandwich
structure. The tensile strength is one order of magn i tude higher for the treated
compared w i t h the non-t reated adherend. The fai lure shifts f rom adhesive i n the
non-t reated P E E K , to d iv ided adhesive for the SiC-abraded, and to cohesive i n the
honeycomb and in the adhesive in the laser-treated ones (Fig. 8).
94 100
A P C - 2 / A S - 4
R E F
I 00
0 64
0 36
0 16
0 0 4
35 0
A P C - 2 / A S - 4
NO TREATMENT^^ ^ r ^ C / m i n
_ 0 18 J/P lOOP
1 J/P lOP ^
1 1 1 I I I I I , 1 15.0 2 0 0 25 0 30 0
(b) 35.0
2 G
F IGURE 6 X-ray diffraction of PEEK composite, (a) non-treated PEEK composite at various cooling rates during consolidation; (b) the effect of laser treatment at cooling rate of T^C/min.
T A B L E V I Tensile strength of composite sandwich structure
Treatment (T,<MPa) Fracture mode
None 4.9 + 0 Adhesive from skin SiC 49.5+0.2 Adhesively divided from honeycomb and skin IJ/lOP 55.6 ±6.4 ] cohesive in adhesive and
0.18J/100P 60.7 + 5.5 J in honeycomb
PREADHESION LASER SURFACE T R E A T M E N T 95
F I G U R E 7 SEM fractograph of PEEK composite bonded wi th F M 300 2K (21.2% crystaIIinity)-cohesive failure.
F I G U R E 8 Failure mode after tensile loading of a sandwich structure for various treatments of the PEEK composite skin. See Color Plate I .
CONCLUSIONS ^
The use of an A r F excimer laser as a preadhesion surface t reatment for a composi te
thermoplast ic substrate ( P E E K ma t r i x reinforced w i t h AS-4 carbon fibers) has been
investigated. S t ruc tu ra l epoxy bonded single lap j o i n t s w i t h laser-treated adherends
96 M.KOTEL etal. i
had signi f icant ly higher lap shear st rength (450% and 250%) t h a n j o i n t s w i t h untreated
or abras ion- treated adherends (respectively).
Scanning electron microscopy revealed morpho log ica l changes i nc l ud ing increase i n
surface roughness and pa r t i a l exposure of carbon fibers. F T I R and XPS spectroscopy
indicated chemical changes o f the surface fo l l ow ing laser t reatment , i nc lud ing increase
i n ca rbony l groups as wel l as f o r m a t i o n o f new crosshnking bonds and removal o f
con tam ina t i on (Si, M g ) f rom the surface. Us ing o p t i m a l laser t reatment parameters
resulted i n a cohesive o r mixed mode of fai lure i n ambient and extreme test tempera
tures.
S E M , F T I R and XPS analysis as wel l as a crys ta lhn i ty effect ind icated the presence o f
two different mechanisms at higher o r lower laser energy treatments. A t l o w energy
(0.18 J/P) the effect was most ly photochemica l and morpho log ica l . A t h igh energy
(1 J/P) the effect was most ly the rma l . Thus, on ly the h igh energy t reatment was affected
by the degree o f c rys ta l l in i t y o f the adherend.
The b u l k of the adherend was not damaged by the laser t reatment as indicated by the
short beam flexural test of treated compared w i t h non - or abras ion- treated specimens.
The c o m b i n a t i o n of increased surface roughness, surface cleaning and chemical
mod i f i ca t ion by the laser t reatment of P E E K composi te adherends is responsible for
the h igh strength of these jo in t s , best i l lus t ra ted in the s t ruc tu ra l sandwich j o i n t .
I t can be concluded f r o m the present s tudy tha t the A r F excimer laser is an effective,
clean and accurate me thod for surface preadhesion t reatment o f P E E K composi te
compared w i t h convent iona l abras ion methods. Th is conf i rms the po ten t ia l of using
U V lasers for preadhesion surface t reatment of many other substrates as was demon
strated i n ou r previous researchers.^" '^
D u r a b i l i t y tests are being conducted and their results w i l l be publ ished i n Par t I I of
this research.
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank Dr. Y. Gefen for supporting this research and Mr . S. Ashkenasy for his technical assistance.
References
1. RAPRA Review Reports 2 (2) 1986 {Report 16). 2. J. C. Roberts. J. A. Ecker and P. J. Biermann. NTIS Rep. No. N93-25569/3/XAD (1993). 3. D. M. Maguire,S/lMP£ J . ,25 ( l ) , 11 (1989). 4. J. R. J. Wingfield, Int. J. Adhesion and Adhesives, 13 (3), 151(1993). 5. H. M . Masuhara and H. Fukumura, Poiym. News, 17, 5 (1991). 6. P E . Dyer, S.T. Lau, G. A. Oldershaw and D. SchudeU. Mater. Res., 7 (5), 1152(1992). 7. E. Occhiello, F. Garbassi and V. Malatesta, Die Angewandte Makromolekulare Chemie, 169 (2780), 143
(1988). 8. P. E. Dyer. G. A. Oldeshaw and D. Schudel, Appl. Phys.. B51. 314 (1990). 9. E. Wiirzberg, A. Buchman, E. Zylberstein, Y. Holdengraber and H. Dodiuk. Int. J. Adhesion and
Adhesives, 10 (4), 254 (1990). 10. A. Buchman, H. Dodiuk, M. Rotel and J. Zahavi, Int. J. Adhesion and Adhesives, I I (3), 144 (1991). 11. H. Dodiuk. A. Buchman. S. Kenig, M. Rotel. J. Zahavi and T. J. Reinhart. J . Adhesion, 41,93 (1993). 12. Z. Gendler, M. Rotel. A. Buchman, A. Rosen, J. Zahavi, M . Bramberger and H. Dodiuk, J. Mater. Sci.
29,1521(1994). 13. P. Davis, C. Courty, N. Xanthopoulos and H. J. Mathieu, J. Mater. Sci. Utters, 10, 335 (1991).
PREADHESION LASER SURFACE T R E A T M E N T 97
14. Z. KoIIia and E. Hontzopulos, SPIE, 1503, 215, Excimer lasers applications I I I (1991). 15. S.J. Fang and R. Salovey, Po/>'m. Eng. and Sci, 29 1241 (1989). 16. R. Srinivasan, J. Appl. Phys., 73 (6), 2743 (1993). 17. T. Sugama, N. R. Carciello and M. Muira, Int. J. Adhesion and Adhesives, 12(1), 27 (1992). 18. D. J. Pawson, A. P. Ameen, R. D. Short, P. Denison and F. R. Jones, Surf. Interface Anal. 18, 13 (1992). 19. G. Beamson and D. Briggs. "H igh Resolution XPS of Organic Polymers," in The Scienta ESCA300
Database (John Wiley & Sons, U.K.. 1992). 20. A. B. Strong, S. R. Blad, G. R. Bryce and D. D, Olcott, SAMPE Quarterly, 22,45 (1991). 21. S. L. Kaplan, R. W. Rose, Int. J. Adhesion and Adhesives, I I (2). 109 (1991). 22. D. E. Sphar and J. M . Schultz, Polymer Composites, 11 (4), 201 (1990). 23. F. M . Sonnenschien and C. M . Ronald, Appl. Phys. Utters, 57 (5), 425 (1990).