modern design trend of metal aircraft fuselage structure

10
MODERN DESIGN TREND OF METAL AIRCRAFT FUSELAGE STRUCTURE International Science Postgraduate Conference 2012 (ISPC 2012) © Universiti Teknologi Malaysia MODERN DESIGN TREND OF METAL AIRCRAFT FUSELAGE STRUCTURE MOHAMED P.HASSAN 1* , MOHD RAFIE A. S. 2 AND FAIRUZ L. ROMLI 3 Abstract. Throughout the years, development of aircraft design has already accomplished several major milestones. However, as can be observed from existing aircraft models, the fuselage structure remains still, mostly like it was in 1930s. In this paper, the trend of fuselage designs introduced within last few decades is studied through patents and published researches, particularly with regards to the development in metal fuselage structure. All in all, it can be concluded that there seems to be a big push towards more integral structures where the structural requirements are satisfied through pre-manufactured panels. Based on these findings, several potentials and opportunities for improvement are identified and discussed. It is believed implementing new and better fuselage designs can have a significant effect on aircraft industry. Thus, making air transportation more accessible to most people, by reducing the production time and cost. Keywords Fuselage design, very light jet, design trend, aircraft industry Abstrak. Sepanjang tahun, pembangunan reka bentuk pesawat telah mencapai beberapa kejayaan besar. Walau bagaimanapun, seperti yang dapat diperhatikan daripada model pesawat yang telah sedia , struktur fiuslaj masih kekal, kebanyakannya seperti adalah pada tahun 1930-an. Dalam kertas ini, trend reka bentuk fiuslaj yang diperkenalkan dalam tempoh beberapa dekad yang lalu dikaji melalui paten dan kajian yang diterbitkan, khususnya dari segi pembangunan dalam struktur fiuslaj logam.Dalam semua, ia boleh membuat kesimpulan bahawa terdapat seolah-olah menjadi dorongan besar ke arah struktur yang lebih penting yang mana keperluan struktur berpuas hati melalui panel pra-pembuatan. Berdasarkan penemuan ini, potensi dan beberapa peluang untuk penambah baikan dikenal pasti dan dibincangkan. Adalah dipercayai melaksanakan reka bentuk fiuslaj yang baru dan lebih baik boleh mempunyai kesan yang besar ke atas industri pesawat. Terutamanya, menjadikan pengangkutan udara lebih mudah bagi kebanyakan orang, dengan mengurangkan masa dan kos pengeluaran. Kata kunci Reka bentuk fiuslaj, jet sangat ringan, trend reka bentuk, industri pesawat 1,2,3 Aerospace Department, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400, UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia * Corresponding author: [email protected] 808

Upload: independent

Post on 09-Jan-2023

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

MODERN DESIGN TREND OF METAL AIRCRAFT FUSELAGE STRUCTURE

International Science Postgraduate Conference 2012 (ISPC 2012)

© Universiti Teknologi Malaysia

MODERN DESIGN TREND OF METAL AIRCRAFT FUSELAGE

STRUCTURE

MOHAMED P.HASSAN 1*

, MOHD RAFIE A. S.2 AND FAIRUZ L. ROMLI

3

Abstract. Throughout the years, development of aircraft design has already accomplished

several major milestones. However, as can be observed from existing aircraft models, the

fuselage structure remains still, mostly like it was in 1930s. In this paper, the trend of fuselage

designs introduced within last few decades is studied through patents and published researches,

particularly with regards to the development in metal fuselage structure. All in all, it can be

concluded that there seems to be a big push towards more integral structures where the structural

requirements are satisfied through pre-manufactured panels. Based on these findings, several

potentials and opportunities for improvement are identified and discussed. It is believed

implementing new and better fuselage designs can have a significant effect on aircraft industry.

Thus, making air transportation more accessible to most people, by reducing the production time

and cost.

Keywords Fuselage design, very light jet, design trend, aircraft industry

Abstrak. Sepanjang tahun, pembangunan reka bentuk pesawat telah mencapai beberapa

kejayaan besar. Walau bagaimanapun, seperti yang dapat diperhatikan daripada model pesawat

yang telah sedia , struktur fiuslaj masih kekal, kebanyakannya seperti adalah pada tahun 1930-an.

Dalam kertas ini, trend reka bentuk fiuslaj yang diperkenalkan dalam tempoh beberapa dekad

yang lalu dikaji melalui paten dan kajian yang diterbitkan, khususnya dari segi pembangunan

dalam struktur fiuslaj logam.Dalam semua, ia boleh membuat kesimpulan bahawa terdapat

seolah-olah menjadi dorongan besar ke arah struktur yang lebih penting yang mana keperluan

struktur berpuas hati melalui panel pra-pembuatan. Berdasarkan penemuan ini, potensi dan

beberapa peluang untuk penambah baikan dikenal pasti dan dibincangkan. Adalah dipercayai

melaksanakan reka bentuk fiuslaj yang baru dan lebih baik boleh mempunyai kesan yang besar

ke atas industri pesawat. Terutamanya, menjadikan pengangkutan udara lebih mudah bagi

kebanyakan orang, dengan mengurangkan masa dan kos pengeluaran.

Kata kunci Reka bentuk fiuslaj, jet sangat ringan, trend reka bentuk, industri pesawat

1,2,3

Aerospace Department, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400, UPM

Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

808

MODERN DESIGN TREND OF METAL AIRCRAFT FUSELAGE STRUCTURE

1.0 INTRODUCTION

From dawn of Aircraft design up

till now, major milestones have been

accomplished. Yet it’s of most

importance to realize, we are still at

dawn of real industry evolution.

Currently not each person can have

an airplane; however same person

could easily get a car.

Using relevant articles and patents,

we first started with new VLJ aircraft

considering it being a similar

example to the traditional private car.

We then investigated proposed

designs of metal fuselage structure, in

general, looking for defined

milestones; to be used in predicting

the design trend. Relevant history and

Airframe structure books have been

reviewed as well.

1.1 History

Metal aircraft fuselage structure main design concept hasn’t changed since

1930s. One might argue modern aircrafts include latest gadgets and use more

sophisticated materials for their structure. However, we shouldn’t get past fact we

are using same metal semi-monocoque structures (comprising: skin panels, frame

members and stringers, attached together by fasteners) up till now, in both civil

and military aircrafts, as shown in Figure 1.

John Cutler criticized a similar issue in his book ‘Understanding Aircraft

Structures’: “A glance at these post-1955 designs shows very clearly that the

structures of big aircraft are not just little aircraft structures scaled up (or the

opposite way around). In fact, whatever the size of the aircraft, the fuselage

frames are always. about 500mm (20in.) apart and have between 75mm (3in.) and

150mm (6in.) deep cross-sections”. Cutler pointed-out in same book, modern

development has considered only minor optimizations i.e. reducing rivets number

and effects of structural damage [1].

Figure 1 Fuselage structure inside a turboprop

military transport aircraft (top) and an engine

enclosure of a jet fighter; comprising portion

of its fuselage (bottom), both having semi-

monocoque structure

809

MODERN DESIGN TREND OF METAL AIRCRAFT FUSELAGE STRUCTURE

A recent study concluded; aircraft industry compared with automobile’s, is

lagging 4 phases from a total of 8 phases automobile industry had already

fulfilled to reach today’s mature level.

2.0 VERY LIGHT JET

Very Light Jet or simply VLJ is a class of three to eight passenger turbofan-

powered aircraft that entered service in 2006. The price of models introduced in

2006 broke previous minimum price tag which was around 4 million American

dollars and were sold for about 1 million dollar. Current VLJ aircrafts need just

less than 700m to takeoff [3].

Searching for “very light jet” we obtained about 500 article and patent, where

27 had VLJ as their main topic.14 of these were concerned with future traffic

models after introducing the new breed (VLJs), 2 with environment expected

changes, 2 with marketing VLJs and 1 with engine configuration. While only 8

were found to be concerned with design.

The 8 researches had: 1 discussing general theories for development of VLJs,

1 defining and giving an approach aimed at change of external design

configuration in order to achieve a cheaper VLJ, 1 optimizing external design for

better performance, 1 about audio system, 1 developing model for engineering

students, 1 study concerned with interior passenger continence facilities and 2

specifying general guide model for VLJ specs and design.

2.1 VLJ Development

Since VLJ is “recent", it was to use all advancement developed, to produce this

new segment of industry. However, need to mass produce the vehicle, was faced

by manufacturing techniques limitations. We can easily recall Citation Mustang

VLJ, “world's first fully certified entry-level business jet” which required Cessna

Aircraft Company almost 5 years to roll out 400 of [4].

It was hence suggested in 2008, these vehicles to be produced out of

composite materials and to contain as little as 200 structural parts. Moreover

along “reduced number of parts” goal, a highly automated process is to be used

for manufacturing and assembly [5]. Another research in 2010, considered

revising arrangement of members within semi-monocoque structure where it was

to choose between different concepts [6]. These later concepts dealing mainly

with number of frame members related to that of stringers, where these

arrangements (concepts) were tested in order to choose best combination.

810

MODERN DESIGN TREND OF METAL AIRCRAFT FUSELAGE STRUCTURE

However more researches in 2009 and 2010, still considered it was essential to

improve aircraft’s aerodynamic profile and performance [7], [8], [9].

2.2 Innovation importance

Since big aircrafts’ manufacturers might not benefit as much of such

development. It was of great importance to start off with this particular new

category of small aircrafts. Hence help visualize significant effect, a cheaper and

faster to manufacture developed design of current structure, might have on

facilitating a possible mass production of these small aircrafts.

3.0 NEW IDEAS INTRODUCED

Revolutionary designs were looked past, while minor ones got implemented

Searching for “airframe structure” and “fuselage structure”; about 4500 results

were obtained. Through first 250 results that appeared and after filtration by title

50% of articles and patents were relevant to research topic. Through second 250

results only 12% relevance within same category was obtained. Through rest of

first 1000 reachable results within Google scholar search (within next 500

results), only 2.6% was found to be relevant. On other hand, searching for

“integral airframe structure” only returned 1% relevance.

Researches in 2001 and 2004, related to fuselage development, were more

concerned with replacing traditional metal structures with carbon fiber [10], [11].

However in 2006, one research under same topic was investigating as titled:

“challenges of the metallic fuselage” [12].

3.1 Patents timeline

As early as 1948, Richard H. Prewitt, filed for a patent titled “Method and

apparatus for fabricating Airframes”. In which he explained a revolutionary

design stating that: “The entire unit may be adhesively assembled in one curing

operation”. Prewitt wasn’t granted the patent until 11th

of September 1956. The

invention comprised a structure made out of spiral member, running along length

of fuselage, which was to be assembled on a mandrel with respective spiral

recesses [13].

The spiral member to have a C-channel cross section, with leaps projected

outwards at each edge. These leaps were to be adjacent to each other, with almost

811

MODERN DESIGN TREND OF METAL AIRCRAFT FUSELAGE STRUCTURE

no space in between. Thus comprising a closed structure even before skin was

applied. The section to be opened towards outer skin, which is later, bonded to the

spiral structure. The patent was very detailed that it introduced solution to a

possible undesired deformation of outer skin while force is being applied during

bonding.

Ten years later, in year 1965, an inventor, at state of Ohio in United States,

proposed another innovative design for fuselage that would only require a spiral

coil acting as “frames” along length of fuselage. The coil to be welded to

members extended along length of fuselage and angularly spaced apart

(longerons), thus comprising main structure which would later be fitted with

stressed outer skin [14].

Although later design looked logically acceptable and provided a relatively

crash resistant fuselage (due to spiral coil ability to absorb shocks, even patent

was entitled “Aircraft Safety Body”). The design wasn’t structurally sound i.e. it

didn’t comprise enough strength against torsional stresses (one of main functions

of traditional fuselage peripheral frames). Unfortunately it didn’t change way

planes are designed or manufactured, at least not yet.

In 1981 a patent was granted for a new approach in “Airframe assembly”. The

patent concluded using diffusion bonding and superplastic forming could

eventually make it feasible to produce airframe comprising i.e. fuselage and wing,

in a simultaneous operation. Where a blank or blank sheet is superplastically

formed in a mold, after/during which fusion bonding is carried out to bond the

newly formed structure to other components of same nature. Thus surpassing

need for conventional machining or welding [15].

In 1991, some inventors, working for a Japanese company in Tokyo, proposed

as they indicated “A plurality of ring-shaped members”. These were to be first

prepared, to have recesses along there peripheral. After which a counter parts to

these recesses with extended length are to be inserted so as to group these rings

together thus concluding “stringers”. The “frames” are concluded from a lip that

extrudes along peripheral of pre-prepared “rings”. Finally, the assembled

structure would be much similar to traditional semi-monocoque fuselage in terms

of structural worthiness [16].

3.2 NASA Report

In May 2000, NASA in a report performed by Boeing investigated Integral

Airframe Structures. The report title says it all: “Validated Feasibility Study of

Integrally Stiffened Metallic Fuselage Panels for Reducing Manufacturing Costs”.

It goes on adding; although integral structures are cost effective there still some

unresolved issues regarding i.e. Structure durability. The report mentions testing

812

MODERN DESIGN TREND OF METAL AIRCRAFT FUSELAGE STRUCTURE

different manufacturing concepts, some use forming and others use machining.

One significant conclusion was, although forming (i.e. by extrusion) is cheaper,

post machining required sums up total to be greater than using machining process

performed alone. The report later mentions alternative processes: “Shot peening,

roll forming, and stretch forming do not appear to be physically possible as

forming options”. Where, Shot peening is a cold working process used to produce

a compressive residual stress layer and modify mechanical properties of metals

[17]. Concepts pursued in report were experimentally tested and other tests

carried on prototypes. As a result; roll forming only, roll forming then five-axis

machine, extrusion only, extrusion then three-axis machine and casting only all

got low rating, while three-axis machine then forming got high rating; as

indicated by report. Report later suggested based on tested concepts; priority

should be to: Three-axis machine then forming and Extrusion then three-axis

machine. As for material forms to be further investigated report suggested:

Extrusions and Machined Plates. It also defined two forming methods for further

study: bump formed and Age creep forming. At one point, study estimated

moving to IAS panels would reduce parts number by 91% and cost by 58%.

Based on the concept, proposed IAS (Integral Airframe Structures) panels would

only need to have skins and frames in comparison to built-up panels which

comprise: Skins, frames, shear ties, stringer clips and stringers. The report

however clarified later concepts mentioned were just "a starting point" [18].

3.3 More integral structures

In 2007, an inventor named Cord Haack, proposed an integral structure which

comprises a frame and connection elements for connecting to skin fitted with

stringers. In addition to that, a cross beam is attached to circumferential frame,

structure to be pre-fabricated to form a single piece for each integral unit. Along

with this patent Haack filed for another patent (on same day) concerning an idea

Figure 2 Fuselage panels design development, where those to right

are expected future fewer integral skin panels comprising stiffeners

i.e. stringers (adapted from previously mentioned NASA’s report) [18]

813

MODERN DESIGN TREND OF METAL AIRCRAFT FUSELAGE STRUCTURE

to comprise fuselage of plurality of shells, the skin to be added later to integral

structure so as to form a complete integral unit, which basically then forms a

transverse portion of the fuselage [19], [20].

Another patent granted in 2007, claimed fuselage could contain pre-

manufactured integral units, where portion of main deck cross members would

merge into frame section creating a cord in its circle cross-section, as shown in

Figure 3 [21].

3.4 Latest

In 2009, some German inventors working for Airbus redesigned traditional

fuselage frame. The new frame is to accommodate windows within in an

innovative design. Traditionally windows act as stress raisers beside frames. The

new design can now be seen implemented in Airbus 380 [22].

After same idea introduced by NASA report in 2000, Sergio M. O. Tavares

among others, discussed in an article for Key Engineering Materials journal in

2011, “Impact of Integral Structures in the Design for Manufacturing and

Assembly of Airframes”. He stated: “the huge amount of fasteners used in

airframes appears to be the inverse of what the design for manufacturing should

seek”. The article then pushed towards integral joints manufactured via welding,

proposing this as a solution for “lightweight reinforced structures” [23].

That said it’s of some importance to realize not only load efficiency of weld

over fasteners but also its advantageous effect on better aerodynamics. Especially

considering it was proven in 2006 that RSW is more cost effective than riveting

[24]. The whole development timeline is summarized in Figure 4.

Figure 3 Integral fuselage frame structure comprising lower portion

of frame and adjacent part of floor member (figure adapted from

patent WO 2007/141291) [21]

814

MODERN DESIGN TREND OF METAL AIRCRAFT FUSELAGE STRUCTURE

4.0 RESULTS

Surveying patents concerned with fuselage design, we found a rather shy

number of those. Moreover only one patent within little number found was

distinctively implemented, although being a minor optimization compared with

others. Notably it was as well assigned by a company (Airbus) rather than being

an individual’s initiative.

Overviewing different designs, where some were very innovative. We could

split them in two categories:

1. Type A; dealing with converting traditional structure, comprising many

assembly parts, into integral ones having fewer parts or ones with

enhanced features

2. Type B; dealing with completely new structures that should perform same

job as traditional structures, however with better features

This is within those designs concerned with metal fuselage structure; however

some other designs proposed non-metal structures i.e. carbon fiber structures.

Table 1 Time (in years) designs of type A and B were introduced

Type A 1981 1991 2000 2007 2009 2009 2010

Type B 1956 1965

Figure 4 development timeline of fuselage structure

815

MODERN DESIGN TREND OF METAL AIRCRAFT FUSELAGE STRUCTURE

From simple data presented in Table 1, we could see there have been tendency

and more concern towards improving current semi-monocoque structure (Type

A), in one way or another, rather than introducing a completely new better design

(Type B).

5.0 CONCLUSION

There is lack of interest to improve current structure or solve major issues for

good. Moreover recent patents are in fact more concerned with solving minor

issues and improving current semi-monocoque structure i.e. through integral

structures, rather than inventing a new structure altogether.

New designs or optimizations might have a real chance getting implemented

when being assigned by a company rather than being an individual initiative.

Designs introduced recently within patents along related articles and

researches concerned with metal aircraft fuselage development are pushing

forward: “Integral structures”, where fuselage would be formed out of few pre-

manufactured panels comprising all structural requirements. It is thus expected

future development would be more concerned with these new easier to assemble

integral structures, rather than sticking with fixing issues arising in old “piece by

piece” assembled structures.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We would like to thank “Universiti Putra Malaysia” for providing facilities that

helped with this paper, specially having provided both military and civil aircrafts

in full form.

REFERENCES

[1] J. Cutler and J. Liber, "History, Semi-monocoque structures," in Understanding Aircraft Structures,

4th ed., Padstow, Cornwall: Blackwell, 2005, pp. 9-14.

[2] M. P. Hassan, M. R. A. S. and F. I. Romli, "Aircraft industry current phase," Unpublished results,

2012.

[3] B. P. and H. R. J., "Investigation of the Potential Impacts of the Entry of Very Light Jets in the

National Airspace System," MIT International Center for Air Transportation (ICAT), Cambridge,

Massachusetts 02139 USA, 2006.

[4] Very-Light-Jet.com, "Cessna Citation Mustang Reaches 400 Aircraft," 27 January 2012. [Online].

Available: http://www.very-light-jet.com/vlj-manufacturer-news/cessna-citation-mustang-reaches-400-

aircraft.html.

816

MODERN DESIGN TREND OF METAL AIRCRAFT FUSELAGE STRUCTURE

[5] S. Tsach, O. Rix and R. Bublitsky, "Innovative Approach For Future Aircraft Development At IAI," in

26th Congress of International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences, Alaska, 2008.

[6] K. YUSUF, N. Y., S. Z. DAWAL, D. CHANDRA and N. SOFIA, "Conceptual Design of Fuselage

Structure of Very Light Jet Aircraft," in HEAPFL'10 Proceedings of the 2010 international conference

on theoretical and applied mechanics, and 2010 international conference on Fluid mechanics and heat

& mass transfer, Stevens Point, Wisconsin, USA, 2010.

[7] P. Kadarno, S. Z. M. Dawal, T. Y. S. T. Ya, K. Yusuf, N. Yusoff and P. Edi, "Initial Design of Very

Light Jet with Unconventional Arrangement," in HEAPFL'10 Proceedings of the 2010 international

conference on theoretical and applied mechanics, and 2010 international conference on Fluid

mechanics and heat & mass transfer, Stevens Point, Wisconsin, USA, 2010.

[8] P. EDI, K. YUSUF, A. R. A. GHANI and H. S. S. ALJIBORI, "The Design of Light Jet Aircraft,"

WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on APPLIED and THEORETICAL MECHANICS, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 85-94,

2009.

[9] E. Iuliano and D. Quagliarella, "Efficient Aerodynamic Optimization of a Very Light Jet Aircraft using

Evolutionary Algorithms and RANS flow models," in Evolutionary Computation (CEC), 2010 IEEE

Congress on, Capua, Italy, 2010.

[10] J. HINRICHSEN and C. BAUTISTA, "The Challenge of Reducing both Airframe Weight and

Manufacturing Cost," AIR & SPACE EUROPE, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 119-121, 2001.

[11] B. Kolesnikov and L. Herbeck, "Carbon Fiber Composite Airplane Fuselage: Concept and Analysis,"

SECTION II. POSSIBLE WAYS OF RUSSIA-EUROPE COOPERATION, 2004.

[12] M. Pacchione and J. Telgkamp, "CHALLENGES OF THE METALLIC FUSELAGE," in 25TH

INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF THE AERONAUTICAL SCIENCES, Hamburg, Germany, 2006.

[13] R. H. Prewitt, "METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR FABRICATING AIRFRAMES". United States

of America Patent 2,762,419, 11 September 1956.

[14] C. O. Scott, "AIRCRAFT SAFETY BODY". United States of America Patent 3,337,164, 22 August

1967.

[15] J. A. Fouse and S. W. McClaren, "AIRFRAME ASSEMBLY AND PROCESS". United States of

America Patent 4,294,419, 13 October 1981.

[16] K. Hamamoto, K. Amaoka, N. Takizawa and M. Hosoi, "AIRCRAFT FUSELAGE STRUCTURE".

Japan Patent 5,170,967, 15 December 1992.

[17] Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, "Shot peening," Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., 6 May 2012. [Online].

Available: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shot_peening. [Accessed 28 May 2012].

[18] J. Munroe, K. Wilkins and M. Gruber, "Validated Feasibility Study of Integrally Stiffened Metallic

Fuselage Panels for Reducing Manufacturing Costs," National Aeronautics and Space Administration,

Hampton, 2000.

[19] C. Haack, "AIRCRAFT FUSELAGE STRUCTURE AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING IT". United

States of America Patent US 2010/0181426 A1, 22 July 2010.

[20] C. Haack, "AIRCRAFT FUSELAGE STRUCTURE AND METHOD FOR ITS PRODUCTION".

United States of America Patent US 2009/0314891 A1, 24 December 2009.

[21] R. Thorsten and S. Thorsten, "AIRCRAFT FUSELAGE STRUCTURE AND METHOD FOR ITS

PRODUCTION". Germany Patent WO 2007/141291 A1, 13 December 2007.

[22] V. Dittmar, J. Rohde, R. Brunken and M. Lange, "FUSELAGE STRUCTURE FOR AIRCRAFT".

United States of America Patent US 2010/0320324 A1, 23 December 2010.

[23] S. M. O. Tavares and P. M. S. T. d. Castro, "Impact of Integral Structures in the Design for

Manufacturing and Assembly of Airframes," Key Engineering Materials, vol. 450, pp. 279-282, 2011.

[24] P. Briskham, N. Blundell, L. Han, R. Hewitt, K. Young and D. Boomer, "Comparison of Self-Pierce

Riveting, Resistance Spot Welding and Spot Friction Joining for Aluminium Automotive Sheet," in

SAE 2006 World Congress & Exhibition, Detroit, Michigan, 2006.

817