dissertation draft

188
1 Dissertation Draft # II Lubee Birru October, 15, 2008 Oromoo Gadaa System. An Unacknowledged Indigenous African Democracy. Abstract: This dissertation examines very little known Oromoo nation and their indigenous democracy contributed to the African civilization. Until recently the Oromoo knowledge has been studded by handful non- Oromoo scholars under many difficulties, such as lack of access to the Oromoo people, lack of firsthand information, and lack of indigenous translators etc. Very small numbers of Western Anthropologists together with the only African, Dr Asmirom Lagasse from Eritrea were among pioneer researches begun in the 1960 th . These pioneers were (Baxter 1954 -1996; Haberland 1963; Asmirom, 1973-2005; Knutson 1975; Hinnant 1977; Alessandro 1982; Bartels, & Bassi 1996. Many of them worked in local districts of Western Oromiya, regions, while the rest have concentrated in Boorana Oromoo region; ignores the largest parts of Oromiya. Through their scientific research work they find out the Oromoo people as a single largest nation in the Horn of Africa, and speaks Afaan Oromoo [Oromoo language] the second widely spoken African indigenous language. The second, main objective of this dissertation is to focuses on unaddressed or misaddressed Oromoo indigenous Gadaa democracy that encompasses five

Upload: independent

Post on 26-Feb-2023

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

1

Dissertation Draft # II Lubee Birru October, 15, 2008

Oromoo Gadaa System. An Unacknowledged Indigenous African Democracy.

Abstract: This dissertation examines very little knownOromoo nation and their indigenous democracycontributed to the African civilization. Until recentlythe Oromoo knowledge has been studded by handful non-Oromoo scholars under many difficulties, such as lackof access to the Oromoo people, lack of firsthandinformation, and lack of indigenous translators etc.Very small numbers of Western Anthropologists togetherwith the only African, Dr Asmirom Lagasse from Eritreawere among pioneer researches begun in the 1960th. Thesepioneers were (Baxter 1954 -1996; Haberland 1963;Asmirom, 1973-2005; Knutson 1975; Hinnant 1977;Alessandro 1982; Bartels, & Bassi 1996. Many of themworked in local districts of Western Oromiya, regions,while the rest have concentrated in Boorana Oromooregion; ignores the largest parts of Oromiya. Throughtheir scientific research work they find out the Oromoopeople as a single largest nation in the Horn ofAfrica, and speaks Afaan Oromoo [Oromoo language] thesecond widely spoken African indigenous language.

The second, main objective of this dissertation is tofocuses on unaddressed or misaddressed Oromooindigenous Gadaa democracy that encompasses five

2

political party systems, five classes of learners, fiveclasses of educators and five institutions. The systemhas continuing existing through organized socio-political system, elected national leaders from Lubaaclass for fixed eight years and transferee to the nextparty on line.

Anti-slavery military offensive force that havedefeated enslavers from 1522-1830 misinformed ordistorted as aimless sudden waves of immigrants,invaders, or expansionists by Judo-Christians and Arabsin general and by Abyssinians in particular. Even alienAnthropologist and historian in the Horn of Africa havefailed to mention that Gadaa organized antislaverymilitary force to defend the people of the Horn ofAfrica as early as 1522 AD. Thus this dissertationfocuses more on missed or undermined Oromoocontribution by previous scholars.

Important Key Terms: The following terms repeatedlymentioned on this dissertation and each of it hasspecial service in the Gadaa activities. 1…Abyssinians: are descendants of Semitic speaking Arabimmigrants who crossed the Red Sea during the firstmillennium B.C., settled in the Horn of Africa,colonized Agawu kingdom from their settlement Axum.Gradually with European assistant the Abyssiniankingdom expanded slave raiding zone and finallycolonized the peoples to their south including theOromoo and created the present day Ethiopian colonial

3

empire (Kumsa, Kuwee 1990 p.145; Holcomb and Ibssa1990). The different between Abyssinian and Ethiopia,explained by Buckingham and Hunting ford (1954) in thefollowing, “We have found it convenient in distinguish betweenAbyssinia and Ethiopia, using the former name to denote the Historickingdom of the plateau, and the latter, which is the official name of theempire, for the much larger area incorporated in it after the conquests ofManlike II” (p.vi).

Abba Bokkuu: Leader of the nation with his Lubaa class,Oromoo Gadaa leader called Abba Baku or Abba Gadaa,elected new leader every eight years. It is equivalentto the modern president.

Abba Muudaa: A spiritual leader of the Oromoo nationwith his Qaallu consulters; and equivalent to pope orhead of the Muslim religion.

Bookkuu is a straight and smooth stuff, cut from OliveTree and at the end of the rod is slightly larger thanthe rest parts. It is about thirty six inches long, byan inch and half tick in one end of the staff and twoinches and quarter on the other end. Baku alwayscarried as a symbol by elected leaders known Abba Baku,(The owner of Baku,) a certification symbol for hispassion for eight years, always carried with him/her.Abba Baku four in number run the Government with fivehigh officials from current Lubaa class, and formedSaglii or nine cabinets for eight years.

4

Booranticha: (Holy Spirit Dowell’s among the peopleas guardian to protect them from bad evils.

Chaffee is the name given to green lush large meadowlies on the bank of the lake or river, and it isconsidered as a Holy place. Oromoo loves and respectChaffee Baldho; it covers large areas of both banks ofHawaas River. Nine months green grasses and threemonths covered by over flow of Hawaas River andgradually the water return to its normal limit. Noone use Chaffee for farm usually reserved for the Gadaameeting place. Grasses can be grazed by neighboringcattle only under the Abba Chaffee or representative ofAbba Chaffee supervision.

Irreecha: Annual National thanks given in months ofSeptember and October every year. It is part of theGadaa system and functions accordingly.

Lubaa: Educationally, a highest learning class in Gadaasystem, politically a highest party class thatresponsible to lead social, political, cultural,economic religious system for eight years. Abbaa Bakuhead of the Gadaa Republic, nine cabinets, includinghead of the military forces and many other componentsare elected to their proper position from Lubaa classonly for eight years, and transfer to party or class online immediately after eight years concluded.It is a symbol for Oromoo Gadaa system and each Odaabranch represent each Oromoo clan and each clan equally

5

claims part of the Odaa trees. For these and many otherreasons

Odaa: Odaa or Sycamore tree among respected tree by theOromoo people, and many times it grows near river or onthe top of some mountains. Every Eight years Gadaaadministration report their work under the Odaa tree,Travelers rest under it when tired; local communitiesfor any types of social and political activities heldtheir meeting under it. It creates natural umbrellatypes shadow by its branches, on which many livestock’srest under it to cool from burning sun; or to protectfrom rain. It is a symbol for Oromoo Gadaa system andeach Odaa branch represents each Oromoo clan and eachclan equally claimed all.

No one farm under it, and cut its branches; people donot put any trashes under or around Odaa tree. Localpeople make coffee under it for special occasions; suchas when a new child was born, or adopted to a family,when bachelors married, when promoted from one Gadaalearner class to the next Gadaa learner class.Children encouraged to play around it, but restrictedfrom cutting any of its branches, or leaves and wereinstructed to respect the tree. Children told notquarrel under Odaa tree, and told to avoid dirty wordsor disrespect one another.

6

===========================================================

Chapter One: A

I: Introduction: Statement of Problem, & Originof Oromoo Nation.

The Oromoo people are indigenous African nation livedin their original home known the Horn of Africa. Oromoooral tradition said that “Eega uumen Walaabuu baate wanniakkanaa hin ture” (Since the creation started from Walaabusuch things never happened). Walaabu is not far fromHadar the place Lucy found at Hawaas River. BBCreported that Archeologist Johnson, and his team, in(1974 have discovered 3.9 and 2.9 million years speciesas stated below.

The Best known species… which lived between 3.9 and 2.9 million years ago, was discovered in 1974, at Hadar in the Awash valley in Ethiopia by Tom Gray and Donald Johnson. A female, the remains… Lucy has a valgus knee, which indicates that she walked upright, a public arch similar to modern human females…”

With such promising evidence has attracted morearcheologists for farther research along Hawaas River.A group of French Archeologists also discovered, pillsof “prehistoric” remains; such as human settlement;

7

animal and human bones; evidence of animaldomestications and service tools by group; artifactlike clay, curved black stone for knife and for farm,as weapon to protect from wild best, benches made fromsoft stone, hiding caves to protect from dangerousanimals and form heavy rain; and marked circulars onthe ground resembles African circle houses etc. SuchArcheological remains at Malkaa Qunture proved thatcivilized human being have been settled there fir 1.8million years. Now scientists have concluded MalkaaQunture as origin of human civilization.

In addition scholars like Bates (1979) asserted thatthe Oromoo as one of the indigenous African nation inthe Horn of Africa and East Africa in the followingterms. “The Oromoo are a very ancient race, the indigenous stock,possible, on which most other peoples in this part of Eastern Africahave been graphite” (p.7). Prouty, at, al (1981), hasreported the Oromoo nation has been in East Africa formany thousand years. No more better historical,archeological, and anthropological facts discoveredbetter since now.

Oromoo elders in the area tell the story that theirancient ancestors settled in around Hawaas River sinceuumen Walaabu Baate. They tell without doubt that theirancestors were there from the beginning history ofUumen or creation made by God. The story was inheritedfrom generation to generation to present time without

8

much change. People in the area believed that the onlyson for his mother picked from village to Hawaas BiifaaCataract less than a mile East of Malkaa Qunturre town.They stand facing to the sun rise at the age of riverclose to cataract, cried to God to accept offer theonly son for his mother to be sacrificed to reconcilewith Him, expecting rain.

However when his father and others ready to slaughterhim wind, tornedo like land shaking weather, darkensthe day. A Sheep under Abbaa Oditu foot, WhenConfused father catch a sheep assuming his son andslaughtered, the wind and darkness disappred, theireyes opened they sow Kaldhachaa in the hands, andCaaccuu (Chachuu) on the shoulder of Mallimaa, droppedfrom the sky as a sign for reconciliation with hispeople. Since then Mallimaa and his offspring’srespected as Ayyaantu. Even at present time individualor group called Maliima clan to pray for them when theyface famine dissector or any bad lack. Majority people who settled there claimed Mallimaa aholy man or Ayyantuu as the origin of their clan. Thusthis is the place where anthropologists have attractedsearching for further evidences. Legend Story of Adamand Eve, corrupted family story of Noah, thedevelopment of master and slave, have been less thaneight thousand years. Furthermore, new legend theory ofblackened Kush, slavery based on Black color inventedmyth by recent conservative Hebrew priests. Their Holy

9

books Torah, Bible and Quran does not said that Kushwas a cursed person and their second myth has developedless than two thousand years.

A: Introduction: Historical Development ofSlave and Master,

Created by Noah as Geneses ofProblem

This writer goes back to sources of religiousmyths and legendary story of Noah, slavery,racism, and exploitation, as written in Geneseschapter nine and ten. Legendary story tells theworld about disasters rain that flooded the “world”;destroyed everything on earth except Noah, his familyand lackey animals and birds (Genesis Chapter, 6&7).For whatever the legend says, the evident does notexist, and was not supported even by circumstances.For example, Neighboring countries like Egypt, kingdomsof Nile valley civilizations, their Pyramids,buildings, and their agriculture were not destroyed byflood and people who lived there have been safe.

Gustave Done (2006) argue against Noah flood disasterin the following ways,

The Great Pyramid of Cheops was built about 2589-2566BC, about 230 years before the flood, yet it has nowater marks on it.  The Djoser Step Pyramid atSaqqara, Egypt, built about 2630 BC doesn't show any

10

signs of having been under water…, the Egyptians havecontinuous historical records for hundreds of yearsbefore and after the time of the flood that make nomention of a great flood; This shows that they werenot only not aware of a global flood, they certainlywere not greatly affected by one. Outside of theBible, there is no historical or physical evidencethat would place a worldwide flood during the timeperiod specified by the Bible for the great flood,(p.7).

Indeed, story of Noah and his family regardingdisaster story of flood in world scale has no anyscientific evidences, it may be isolated local disasteror just heavy rain that Middle Eastern countries havenot experienced before.

Slavery after the so called flood disaster firstinstitutionalized within small family of Noah in theMiddle East. According to Genesis, chapter 9&10cultures of lie, and curse, system of Slave and Master,based on races declared by Noah. His myth expandedinto three great Middle Eastern religions, and leadersof each religion were agree on the institution ofmaster and slave, as it has been connected to Noahcourse of Canaan. The systems of slavery and racismhave been survived for many centuries through directcollaboration of the ruling class of kingdoms, religionleaders and the slave traders. Religion leaderspreached a person named Noah chosen by God as Holy

11

person, ordered to save only his family and lackeysamples from all living things in the world.Accordingly Good has destroyed every living thingoutside the Ship by rain and flood from the face of theworld.

Forty days later Noah and his family began brand newlife, probably became settled farmers. Noah as head ofonly human family on new earth has developedinstitution of Slave and master, colonizers andcolonized, exploiter exploited and racism. The mythhas been carried on by leaders of Hebrew Judaism,Christian and Islam religion leaders added someingredients of theirs and spread it into the rest ofthe world. The system has been suffered billions inthe past, and the same system indifferent formscontinue indirect slavery, colonialism, exploitationand racism; and it cannot be the case that Oromoonational who are still experiencing the sufferingsimposed on them, by Abyssinian colonizers.

A: 1… According to Geneses, God found Noah, as themost obedient person on earth and “He (God) blessed Noahand his sons, and said unto them. Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenishthe earth”, (Genesis, 9:1-4). Noah children had their ownwives, and Ham has four children and named them,Canaan, Kush, Mizeraim and Phut (Genesis, 10:6).Genesis, (9&10) describes that Noah went out of hisholy way, and became drunk to the extent that he cannot

12

coverup his body, but later “Noah awake from his wine, andknew what his younger son (Ham) done unto him” (Genesis, 9: 24).Noah accused innocent Canaan to be slaves to theoffspring’s of Shem and Japheth. He blessed Shem,Japheth and their offspring’s, to enslave Canaan(Genesis 9: 24-26), and divided the same family intocursed and blessed. In addition Noah lied to God byaccusing innocent Canaan. Furthermore, Noah resumedsystem of slave and master; based on race, a system ofsocial and economic inequalities; a system ofdiscriminations; and he was the first person who wasviolated the law of God after flood; and alsoresponsible for the foundation of slavery,colonization, economic exploitation and socialoppression that caused majority of people to suffer,(Geneses, 9, 25).

His life style as head of the family raised questionsif he was really qualified a holy man or evil person? Aquestion many religion and moral teachers may not liketo ask or answer. Noah never regrets for the crime hedid to his family and the world, and died withoutconfess. Among Jesus’ disciples Judah admit and askedGod for forgiveness; New Testament (St Mathew 27:3-5);But Noah curse satisfied moral boost, economic benefit,social privileges, in one side of the Noah family; andhate, poverty, curse, exile, and slavery in anotherside of the same family.

13

His new arrangement has created enmity within hisfamily, one exploiter, the other exploited, one cursedand the other blessed; one punished to be slave and theother rewarded to be master to his brothers. If Holyperson, means the true relationship with God in all hisactivities, throughout his/ her life, Noah have beenmistakenly called holy person. Noah was aresponsible individual for the development ofantisocial system and the founder of all evils.

A: 2…Kush: Corrupted Name used for Racism and Slavery,whereas Noah never cursed him. He gets his name fromhis family at a time when discrimination and racismdoes not exist. For example, a new born black skinsometimes named Mr. White or Ms. White, or Mr. Green;while some White named Mr., Black or Ms. Black; andsuch custom existed among every society since ancienttime. Kush as a name given to the grandson of Noah, whowas white like his grandfather Noah, was not cursed.Geneses (9&10), said that “Noah awake, from his wine, and hesaid Cursed be Cannon; a servant of servants shall be unto his brethren,(verse 24-26, p.15). Bible described here that the childrenof Ham, Kush, Mizraim, and Phut were not cursed expecttheir brother Canaan for the crime he never committed,(Genesis 10 verse 6).

Slave owners in the Middle East have problem withoffspring’s of Canaan slaves to keep them from run awaybecause everyone in the Middle East look like the same,speaks the same language, practiced similar culture,

14

shares the same color of their skin and such advantageshas served enslaved Canaan’s to disappear and mixedwith free people and impossible to identify them.

Rabbis have noticed the problem and in order for theinstitution of slavery to exist they ignored Noah curseof Canaan and have developed a theory that justifiesblack Africa as substitution to help the continuity ofslave and master relation, and later defined Kush meansblack Africa. Rabbis blindly defined the word Kushmeans black that best choice to substitute Canaan. Newinterpretation has paved the way to capture blackAfricans to be sold to white masters new theory hassatisfied slave traders, black slave owners andkingdoms that based their economy on the slave trades.

Hebrew Rabbis and Christian priests divided the worldbetween slave and master, black as inferior race andwhite as superior race, encourages their kings toenslave million Africans out of their continent. Thenew interpretation by the religious leaders gave moraland psychological freedom to European and MiddleEastern slave traders that encouraged slave traders tocapture more Africans male and female and sell them toenslavers.

In addition Judo-Europeans and Arabs defined black asevil, Satan, cursed race, fit only for slavery. Forexample, Hebrew, redefined Kush as cursed race, Greekcalled Ethiopia which it means cursed slave with burnedface, and Arabs called African people Nub or Sudan;means black and cursed slave. All agree that African

15

people as cursed race and fit to be slave to whitemasters. Those who immerged after Torah and the Biblealready written came with another mythical theory ofcurse, slavery, racism, against Canaan; reinterpretedto find possible reason to substitute by African blackcolor. Black Africans nick named Kush by Rabbits andaffirmed to be sold and bought. Thus, slavery andracism started by Noah has been expanded by HebrewRabbets, Arabs, Turk, Portugal and Abyssinian slavetraders, in Sub- Saharan, Red Sea, and Indian Oceanslave trade, as well as transatlantic slave trade.

Kush in the Middle East: Bible tells that Kush nevermigrated to Africa, not even to Egypt, but Bible saidKush became mighty hunters in present Israel,Palestine, and the rest Arab countries. (Genesis 10: 6-14). They were settled, and formed their own kingdoms,villages and communities, and such places were thekingdom of Babel, Eric, Accad, Calmer, Shinar, Assure,Nineveh(Genesis 10:6-14). These towns and villages arestill the home of Canaan and Kush. None of Kush clansor none of the place or towns called in the above namesfound in Africa, (Genesis 10, 6; 11-12).

Europeans and Arabs introduced Africa as the land ofbackward, pagan, infidel, heathens and savage; deservesslavery to serve the offspring’s of Shem and Japheth’s(Genesis9:27; Isenberg & Krapf, 1968, p.31). Suchtheory more propagated by Europeans who want slavesfrom Africa to New World, and supported by EuropeanEmperors for their economic benefit, approved by

16

religion leaders who were interested to preach pagansto “believe in one God, and civilize them”.

Actually Africa became the land of slavery, where itspeople forced out of their continent and taken toanother world for free and hard labors. It have been aterrible system of dehumanization, tortures of mindand body for life that still the Black people inheritedas chronic diseases that affected psychological andspiritual pain. Nevertheless, being black does nothurt anyone, and can be tolerated, but when myths orfairy tells attached to black Africans, as a symbol forSatan, evil or slavery, and when evils interpreted asthe work of black, and when kings and religiousleaders of the white world collaborated it tellsclearly and absolutely racism. In short, God did notinstruct any one to discriminate other human beings, toenslave or to colonize people. However enslavers,colonialists, racism, still existing because it hasbeen accepted by leaders of Judaism, Christian andMuslim religion followers.

A: 3…Imposing Hebrew Name Kush on the BlackAfrican People.

A:3…Introduction: If the system of slavery andcolonialism does not supported by the Judaism,Christian, and Muslim religion leaders in the past;African people may not enslaved, colonized, and Oromoo

17

people may not remain a Colony of Abyssinia,particularly in twenty first century. Followers of theJudaism, Christian, and Islam have common agreement todivert curse of Canaan to Kush, and Kush reinterpretedas the father of black Africans, by ignoring Africanfathers have been existed millions years before Kushthe son of Noah, (Holy Bible, Genesis 10:6; Isenberg&Kraft, 1968: 310). Among Ham children Kush was targetedas the starting point Europeans and Arabs Slave traderswere encouraged by falls teachings of the three greatreligions in general and followers of Torah and Biblein particular. Christian of many sects for yearspreached, writes, and paints in black color, torepresent Evil, Satan, Devil, or Hell; and black peopleparticularly described as offspring’s of “cursed” Kush,the son of Ham.

Despite stranger’s prejudicial names, Africans havetheir own different names, each community has ethnicnames, or group of ethnics identify themselves by theirethnic, or kingdoms or states they lived. African hasbeen highly civilized nation during Pharaohs of Egyptand the Nile civilization many thousand years beforeMiddle Eastern and Western countries civilization.History confirmed that highly civilized indigenousAfricans living on both side of Nile valley beyondEgypt up to Tanzania, including the Horn of Africa andpart of East Africa. These parts of the world renamedKush, in Hebrew, Ethiopia in Greek and Sudan or Nub inArab, strange name to Africans. Contempt of black

18

African first developed by Middle Eastern religionleaders, to advance their common economic interest,selectively enslave African people, based on fallstheory invented not by Noah, but by Hebrew Rabbis.

Conservative European kingdoms like Belgium, Britain,Dutch, France, Germany, Portugal, Spain, Turks, etc.were blessed by their church leaders when they lefttheir country to Africa to capture or kill defend lessBlack African people. Church leaders, European kings,Arabs Sultanates and some selfish African clan leadershave collaborated with Transatlantic Ocean and TransIndian Ocean slave trade. Of course slavery derivedmillion Africans out of the continent into unknowncontinents and Islands. Such system of slavery led byEuropeans and Arabs has been damaged the life of manymillion Africans from main continent to the diasporaAfricans. Thus, identifying black Africans with theterm Kush is absolutely racism, invented by racistHebrew persists, followed by Arab enslavers, andexpanded by Judo Christian, westerners.

A:4… Status and Paints: Tools for AdvancingRacism and Slavery.

Statues made of expensive stones of high value erectedin the compounds and inside of many churches; imaginarydrawings or paints in the interior of many churchwalls, windows and ceiling’s. They are, symbolizesracist imaginary holy men, angles, including Christ,his mother, and his disciples, and painted in selected

19

multi-colors which innocent religious common peoplewarship. In the contrary painters exclusively selectedblack and red color to identify devil as black with redeyes surrounded by cursed angles, slaves, and so calledoffspring’s of cursed race. Drawings and Statusexpanded by the ancient white racist individuals andrecognized by the church leaders, and its members.Paints and curved status in the exterior and interiorof the worship place speared voice less resistmessages through selected colors so that people easilycan understand unspoken symbols served as best brainwashing tools of racism to put in the children mind.

Statement that linked Kush cursed to be black andslave, does not exist in Bible but interpreted by JudoChristians who picked dark color, as symbol for eviland represent “Kush” who was “cursed’ to serve hiswhite brothers. If the story is true then better toadmit Noah and his family were black. Thus unless Noahand his family black Kush cannot be black, otherwiseracist must admit that Africans have no any ethnicrelation with Biblical Kush, but the so-calledprogressive religious group are keeping silent probablythey were comfortable with Myths.

Christian kids began studying the Bible and have achance to observe different paints on the wall. Blackpainted imaginary symbols indicate Devil, evil sprites,etc.; while paints in different attractive colorsdescribe white, holy person, angles, Christ, Mary, etc.

20

These were intentionally designed to plant racism andhates into the minds of children without preaching inwords. Kid’s joked to one another and jocks endedblack kids in the category of inferior and white kidsin the category of superior.

Even if not preached in public, racism invented byancient conservatives Hebrew Rabbits still exist inmany ways in many churches through technique of non-vocal expression to keep the continuation of thefourteen and fifteen century old racist view througharts, status and paints. Thus these voiceless stonecurves and paints on the church wall speaks better thanvocal speech to described white as superior and blackraces as inferior, and it keeps the wound un-hilled aslong as racist paints and status kept in the worshipplace.

B…Significance of the Study: Kush or Black asGenesis of Slavery.

B: 1...Abyssinian Migration From Yemen to theHorn of Africa

To ExpandSlave Trade

Africans have developed the Nile Valley Civilizationmany thousand years ago that have attracted traders,

21

religion leaders and adventurers from Europe, MiddleEastern countries and from Fareast. The Nile Valleycovers Sudan, Horn of Africa, part of Kenya, part ofUganda up to Tanzania (Youssef ben-Johanna, 1986 p.1).The Oromoo nation closely shares geography, black skinscolor, language backgrounds, culture, architect, arts,iron smelting, agriculture, animal Husbandry,commerce, and traditional African religion with thepeople of Nile valley, (Bulatovich, 2000:51); (Bender &Hinnant Ed el, 1976:67); Hunting ford, 1955:19).

Many people from Greek, Hebrew, and Arab Yemenisincluding the Habash from Northern Yemen, frequentlyvisited this part of Africa to exchange commercial,religion and culture with Africans. Habash were amongthe first immigrant to share prospers African wealth,in the continent where the indigenous African welcomedand accommodate them. The Habash found it convenientplace to make business with the indigenous people inthe Horn of Africa, and formed their own communitiesaround the Coast, and positively interacted with localpeople. Once the Habash pioneers get foot hold aroundRed Sea Coast their kith and kin followed by massmigration from Yemen to the Horn of Africa and settledfurther in the interior of Northern Horn of Africa.Lytton (1966) described that Habashat ethnic fromYemen have migrated to Africa started 970 BC, andsettled on the coast of Red Sea on African side in thefollowing statement, “Habashat; did most probably invade theregion of Tigre (Northern Abyssinia) during the first thousand years

22

B.C.”(p.22). Settlers intermarried with the localcommunity to secure their settlement in African land. They brought system of slavery, unknown to the Horn of

Africa before their arrival. With forced African labor

they have built Axum town, a center for their

political, religious and economy, and also center for

slave market captured from indigenous Africans,

(Perham, and 1969. pp.10-30. They begin their story

from Axum, connected it to Queen Sheba of Yemeni, but

unfortunately history denied their legend that Queen

Sheba have visited King Solomon started her journey

from Axum to Jerusalem. However, readers must be

careful that Axum was not founded before first century

AD”(p.22), and King Solomon died one thousand years

before Axum was built. Thus the Abyssinian claimed

their Queen Sheba have visited King Solomon, and had

illegitimate son from him who has inherited his father

“throne” have completely amalgamated fiction, legend

and myths.

Their real history blended with myths and legend as

Harris,(1844) stated that, Menelik I an illegitimate

23

son of king Solomon from Queen Sheba, went to his

father Temple, and “the gates of the temple of Jerusalem were left

unguarded, and the doors miraculously opened in order that the holy ark

of Zion, and the tables of the law, might without difficulty stolen and

carried away”, (p.233). This legend adopted by Abyssinian

kings for generations to legitimize right to the

throne. For example, Emperor Haile Selassie

legitimized his claim into reformed constitution of

the Ethiopian Empire proclaimed in 1955 sighted by

Perham,(1969) “Conquering Lion of the Tribe of Judah Haile Selassie I

Elected of God, Emperor of Ethiopia” (p.434); (Harris, 1844

p.233).

Dispite legends and historical misrepresentation there

are facts that indicate they have many similarities

with the people of Yemen Arabs. They speak an old

Arabic dialect; their feature closed to light brownish

Yemeni Arabs; their strait noses, tin lips, also

resemble their Arab cousins. They used Sabian scripts

for writing; practice Arabic style Monarchial culture;

adopted Judaism, Christianity, Muslim religions that

resembles Arabs and Hebrew based culture and religion,

(Lytton,1966:p.23). They believed that they are

24

descendants of Shem the son of Noah the so called a

“blessed” person who was declared system of slavery and

licensed his children to enslave his grandson Canaan

and his offspring’s.

No wonder Abyssinians still claimed Yemen as their

original home, and their claim evidently confirmed by

scholars that she shares more in common with the Arabs

and Jews than with indigenous people of Africa. One can

see Abyssinia today composed of multi-color, such as,

black, light brown and dark brown, in their skins,

because of intermarriage with their former slaves or

forced intercourse with helpless domestic female

slaves, sometimes called concubines.

Abyssinian Legendre’s claimed that their system of

government and Crown, originally belonged to King

Solomon of Israel; and passed to his illegitimate son

King Menelik I the son of queen Sheba of Abyssinia.

Abyssinia also believed as offspring of Shem the son

of Noah, inherited monarchial system from Arabs;

inherited the crown and throne from King Solomon of

Israel; adopted Judaism religion; stolen Moses Ark of

Covenant and carried to Abyssinia, (Harris, 1844,

25

(p.233). Abyssinia known as followers of Christian

religion, but in reality she practiced Judaism as

well as Christianity a unique type of Judo-Christian

faith.

B: 2…Abyssinia and Arabs as Cousins and Partner

as Slave Traders.

Historically Arabs and Abyssinians were known slave

traders between Africa and across Red Sea. Abyssinia

introduced to the Horn of Africa, since they migrated

to the Red Sea Coast on African side. Parham (1969)

described that European support justifies Abyssinian

claim to enslave other African as following.

“Slavery has been an institution in Ethiopia from the earliest daysof which

we Have record. It was an important feature of the social andeconomic

Organization of the country. Ethiopian Christianity was deeply imbuedwith

Hebraic laws which allowed certain forms of slavery, (p.217).

Slave traders justified system of slavery as special

gift God gave to offspring’s of Shem to enslave

offspring of Ham. They sighted story of Noah in

26

relation to masters and slaves, and believed as normal

excuse to enslave black non-Christian or non-Muslim

decedent of so called Kush, (Genesis 9&10). Parham

(1969) described Abyssinians views in the following

words,

From the earliest time the Ethiopians have considered it their right to enslave

other races, on the ground, that, according to Mosaic low. They were entitled

to reduce to bondage the Negro and Hamitic tribes which were said to be?

descended from Ham, upon whom Noah bestowed a curse, (p.217).

Their legendary theory and myths encouraged by

classical Christian Europeans theory of slavery and its

development. Thus, Abyssinia regards her neighbors,

such as the Oromoo, Agawu, Hadiyya, Afaar etc. as

decedents of “Kush”, to be raided, bought and sold or

killed.

From 1350-1522. Demands for African mass slavesincluding items such as, gold, silver, agriculturalproduction, and ivory were highly picked up. from 1450-1522, Abyssinia and Afaar collaborated with Arabs,Egyptians, Portuguese, and Ottoman Turks, and expandedslave trade in the Horn of Africa, they were very busy

27

to meet the Euro-Arabian demand for slaves and otheritems. As demand picked up the price for young Oromoogirls for concubines, and young boys for body gourdalso picked up. They advertise the Oromoo in thefollowing manner,

The skin is not black, but metallic bronze…They fetch a greatprice, and are much prized by the Arabs, who superstitiously believe that an Oromoo woman can re-animate and renew the blood of an old man;and as the Arab only lives for his wife, and would ruin himself to have one, they always find purchasers at a high price (p.148).

Such Euro- Arabian advisement motivated Abyssinianslave raiders, and Arabs traders encouraged by highprice raised their raiding activities to capture moreOromoo young boys and girls from less protected Oromoovillages.

Oromoo Reaction Against Slavery: From 1400-1522,

demands for more African slaves including items such

as, gold, silver, agricultural production, and ivory

were picked up. During these period especially in the

mid fourteen hundred and fifteen twenty two the

Abyssinia and Afaar collaborated with Arabs, Egyptians,

Portuguese, and Ottoman Turks, and expanded slave trade

28

in the Horn of Africa. During this period Abyssinia

and Afaar were very busy to meet Euro-Arabian demand

for slaves and other items. As demand picked up the

price for domestic young Oromoo and Gurage girls for

concubines and young boys for body gourds also picked

up in Europe and Arab countries. Abyssinian encouraged

by high price for more Oromoo young boys and girls and

therefore had intensified raids in Oromoo villages, to

capture more Oromoo slaves to meet the demand. The rush

for Slave raids and slave trade only began declining by

the emergence of antislavery or Duula Guutu national

wars that crashed the forces of both Afaar and

Abyssinia in 1522. Many captured prisoners of wars

have been liberated by Duula Guutu antislavery

military activities for more than four hundred years

(1522-1840).

B: 3…Abyssinia and Anti-Slavery or Abolitionist

Movement.

British government with the collaboration of her

churches has changed previous view on slave trade and

for the first time in early 1807, abolished the slave

trade in her sphere of influence. Such radical changes

29

have supported by European Christian churches and

organized anti-slavery group, especially from among

European Christian volunteers. Churches affiliated

devoted members of Abolitionist group, sponsored by

British government, have organized anti-slavery patrols

to intercept any ship or cargo suspected as slave

transporter.

Such radical changes have organized anti-slavery

group, especially from among devoted European

volunteers. European Protestant and Catholic have

organized anti-slavery patrols to intercept any ship or

cargo suspected slave transporter.

Abolitionist group support by their government, have

convinced many kingdoms and states to discontinue slave

trade and also abolish system of slavery in their

empire. America outlawed slavery in 1880, but Africans

in North, East, and central including Abyssinia ignored

abolition and continued slave raids and trades

activities as usual. William Hardy, (2014) stated that

“slave trade continued in North Africa, the Middle East, and the Indian

Ocean up to the 1900s , and persisted in sub-Saharan Africa during the

early twentieth century”

30

Demand for Oromoo slaves again picked up in 1840th as a

result of certain Oromoo Abbaa Duula or commander of

antislavery forces defected to Abyssinia. Betrayals

soon armed by Abyssinian kings with Guns, to the level

that they became the best slave suppliers to Abyssinia

in exchange of more guns. Thus, Abyssinians were busy

with massive slave trade passing through their capital

city to pay 10% taxes in human being. Accordingly, the

slave business have been continued in full scale,

because Abyssinian king Menelik II have permission to

use French controlled ports located at Red Sea Coast to

sell human beings even after anti-slavery task forces

were organized in world scale. In addition, French

lend its flags to Abyssinian to fly on top of slave

carrier cargos, to camouflage antislavery troops.

For example, in late eighteen hundred Abyssinia have

enjoyed slave business with Arabs and remnants of

Europeans. French, Turks and Russia indirectly support

the continuation of slave trade, because they sale

their ammunition if African continue fighting one

another, and produces illegal slave raids and trades.

Wylde (1901) have stated his eyewitness as following,

31

Oromoo slaves in large numbers are still to be perched in theYemen and

the Hedjaz and the French do not bother themselves to put down thetrade,

which passes through their dominions, although they well know whothe slave

dealers are and that they carry the slaves across the Red Sea in boatsflying

the French flag, (59).

It shows that anti-slavery group have no power to

enforce the rule over the big colonial powers that any

cargo fly’s French flag with slave inside were free

from inspection. In addition, Traffics of many cargos

from the Horn of Africa to Yemen Saudi Arabia, Egypt,

Turks and Pakistan usually seen but the controllers let

them pass without inspection, because, these Cargos

flies French and Turks flags as camouflage to deliver

African slaves to countries in demand for Oromoo

nationals.

Thus in late eighteen hundred and early nineteen

hundred Abyssinian enslavers were very active specially

when assisted by modern fire arms, and when no

competent slave suppliers in the interior of the Horn

32

of Africa and when flays French flag on the top of its

slave cargos. Thus, Abyssinian slave traders without

support of French, Russia, Italian and Ottoman Turks

may not export millions of Oromoo fighters and

teenagers out of their continent.

================================================

========

C... Introduction to the Oromoo Historical

Background

C: 1…Brief Overview of Oromoo People and Oromiya.

Introduction: The Oromoo people are the ancient society

who lived mainly in the Horn of Africa since their

existence. From their main location some branches, have

migrated to Northern Kenya, and Eastern Uganda as far

as Lack Nayasa (Victory). Scholars like (Bates, 1979),

and (Prouty, at, al, 1981) have affirmed that that

Oromoo nation have been indigenous African nation in

East Africa for many thousand years.

33

(a)…Socially: The Oromoo nation lived in peace with

others as good neighbors in the North-East Africa, with

whom they share part of African common heritages,

ethnic ties, language, culture, physical appearance,

and historical experience. Some of these ethnics are,

Afaar, Agawu, Bejja, Daraasa, Gedeo, Gimira, Gambella,

Kambaata, Konso, Kafa, Saho, Sidaama, Somali,

Walayitta, etc.

(b)…Politically: Oromoo have invented Gadaa democratic

system for all Oromoo nationals, probably before Greek

has developed town democracy for rich people. Gadaa

system has many branch institutions, such as political,

social, military, culture, economic, and religious

etc., and each institution practiced their own

institution according to the Gadaa education system.

The system was and still is a unique democratic

organization arranged five class of constant rotation

on which each party required to spend eight years in

each class, and conclude the class after forty eight

years in learning program.

©…Chaffee General Assembly: Every eight years the

ruling party or Lubaa class with the consultation of

34

educator Yubaa classes organizes general assembly for

all Oromoo nationals. All five parties within the

Gadaa system have their eight years report and their

plan for the next eight years. The reports include

eight years positive and negative activities; internal

and external obstacles; natural or man-made disasters,

which probably hindered some of their duties, not

finish on time, and this takes them three to four

weeks. Lubaa officials held their position waited for

the new election result and once the new leaders of the

Gadaa system declared immediately transfers the Lubaa

position to the elected party. The new party of

Qondaala class promoted to Lubaa class the last class

of education in the Gadaa system. The new ruling party

also elects four Abbaa Bokkuus and other consolers from

the party of fresh Lubaa class. Many western scholars

missed or ignored other male Abbaa Bokkuus elected to

run the nation according to their previous contribution

for their nation. In addition, Female position within

the Gadaa system wrongly interpreted and undermined by

Western or Euro-Oromian scholars.

35

Fortunately, this researcher has fully participated, in

three Chaffee Assembly and observed as Ittimako, in

1955, as Dabbaalle class in 1963, and as Foolle class

in 1971. Using this opportunity this researcher

summarizes first hand important information he has

collected particularly in 1971, from interview of Gadaa

experts, from memory of his observation, at Chaffee

Baldho and from his uninterrupted life time

participation. The law of the Gadaa system required

elected leaders announced to the public, according to

their ranks. Elected Abbaa Bokkuus ranked first,

second, third, and fourth, and sit on four stools

prepared for them. The first Abbaa Baku take the center

sit; the second Abba Baku sit on the right side of him,

the third Abbaa Baku sit on left side of the first

Abbaa Baku. The fourth person in rank elected as

reserved Abbaa Baku, sit next to third Abbaa Baku,

They were elected to lead the nation for eight years

according to the rule and regulation within the office

of Abbaa Bokkuus. In this case if any elected Abbaa

Bokkuu died in office or an able to perform his duty

for health reason, Hadha Bokkuu or the wife of desisted

36

or sick Abbaa Baku replaced her husband to finish the

remaining term. In case one of the three active Abbaa

Bokkuu unable to attend the meeting, or less effective

to perform his job for no good reason; number four

Abbaa Baku take the third place, and the third Abbaa

Bokkuu stepped to second and the second Abba Book

recognized as the first Abbaa Baku. New election held

within the ruling class to fill the fourth stool. This

information has collected from the memory of this

researcher has attended and participated in Gadaa

national assembly held in 1971.

(d)…Politically Gadaa built on five Party

systems; where each Oromoo arranged in line to one oftheir proper parity. It starts from lower class and

move forward to the next class every eight years along

their party line. After forty years in the system the

party of Qondaala class promoted to Lubaa class, the

highest political class in the Gadaa educational

system, and national leaders elected only from this

class. Party of Lubaa class are responsible to lead

Oromoo nation to proper administration system, build

strong political, economic, and military organization,

37

that satisfies wellbeing of the Oromoo nation for fixed

eight years.

When eight years expired current Lubaa class including

elected leaders transfers their position to the party

of the new Lubaa class. As soon the new Lubaa

inaugurated, the old Lubaa promoted to educator class

called Yubaa. Yubaa educators has their own five

classes’ arranged to educate learner classes according

to their ages and parties, called Yubaa I, II, III, IV,

V. The first Yubaa considered as Jenner educators and

the fifth Yubaa known as senior educators. Each Yubaa

class elects their own leaders that direct them to

teach learners in proper program.

(e)…Education: Education is one of the most parts of

the Gadaa system, on which all walking Oromoo national

obliged to participate from Zero (0) class to Lubaa

class. Gadaa system arranged this class as following;

(0)Daimman: Kindling Gorton or preparatory class,

arranged from new born babies, toddlers: and

children up to eight years completion. Zero class

38

recognized as preparatory class for eight years

before entering Gadaa official learner class.

Ittimako: class for under age children from eight

to sixteen, and proper education offered according

to their level.

Dabballe mostly those between age sixteen to twenty

four, they were at very active ages and their

education military trading, as well self-reliance.

Fool lee: class arranged for the national defense

force age twenty four to thirty two. Yuba III class

is responsible to instruct Fool lee or military

class.

Qondaala: class age thirty two to forty. They

spend their eight years learning Gadaa law

administration national economy, national military

etc.

Finally, the fifth party called Lubaa. After

serving in the class of Qondaala the party promoted

to Lubaa class. Lubaa class is recognized as the

highest stage of learning system, matures learners

with whom the nation depend on their leadership for

the next eight years.

39

Each class mentioned represents only their own party,

such as (1) Robalee, (II) Birmaji, (III) Horata, (IV)

Bichiille and (V) Duulo. All parties get on line for

generational (infinite) rotation, makes one step

forward every eight years, and learners concluded all

class including the highest Lubaa learner class in

forty-eight years. In the absence of written records

without the Gadaa unique ways of oral education, the

system of Gadaa democracy may not survive.

After completion of being forty eight years learning

classes promoted to Yubaa class or Educators category.

System of rotation gives a chance to each party to

reach the top class called Lubaa. It takes forty years

education without interception; to reach the top

learning class in the curriculum of the Gadaa

Education. Rotation system serves all parties equal and

each party has a chance to take part in each class and

learn knowledge prepared for each particular class. The

Oromoo life in politics, social, military, culture,

economic, religion, and language, always learned and

practiced according to the Gadaa democratic education

system. Elected national leaders administer the people

40

in accordance to the power they received from Oromoo

nation. Bad leaders immediately replaced by special

general meeting at Chaffee assembly.

All members of the entire Lubaas of old party promoted

from learner category to educators category, called

Yubaa I. Promotion continue every eight years from

Yubaa I to the next Yubaa II, III, IV, V. Yubaa

educators assist the new party as close consultant, in

general, and Yubaa first and Yubaa second in particular

considered as relatively having near fresh experiences

as learners and as administrators of the state. Yubaa

third, fourth and fifth also assist the party on power

when party need their experience on special cases.

Gadaa on power will never pass national decision,

without the consult of Yubaas or the educator class.

Individual entered the Gadaa class in proper age

complete the cycle at age 88, and became Jaarsaa/

Jaartii Raaga, Raagdu a holy elders over 88 years

and respected as lackey individuals blessed by God,

retired from Gadaa activities.

In the United States multi-party system democracies of

two parties’ dominate other smaller parties, a system

41

that allows rich individual to spend million dollars

for position. In the contrary, the Oromoo Gadaa system

has fixed five parties, and these parties rotates every

eight years to give equal chance to each party, to

lead the country when completed forty years

education and promoted to Lubaa class, and

surprisingly no one spend a penny for the position. The

system serve all parties equal and each party has a

chance to take part in each class and learn knowledge

prepared for each particular class, and lead the

country in accordance to party on line.

(f)…The Oromoo Language. The Oromoo speaks one of the

North Eastern African indigenous languages called Afaan

Oromoo or Oromic. According to Gragg (1982)”both in terms

of number of speakers and geographic extent, the Oromoo are certainly

one of the fives important languages in Africa” (.p.5). Furthermore, if

one considers Arabic and Swahili as non-indigenous

African languages, Afaan Oromoo (Oromic) is the second

most widely spoken language in Africa after Hausa.

(Melba, 1991; Assam & Megerssa, 1994; Holcomb, B.K. &

Ibssa. Sisai 1990:1-2; Jalata, 1998.p 82). When

compared to the population of the Ethiopian empire

42

(Holcomb, B.K. & Ibssa. Sisai 1990:1-2), Oromic is the

mother tongs for sixty present of the total population

of the Ethiopian empire; (Jalata, 1998.p).

======================================================

D: Chapter One: Oromiya Natural Geographic.D; 1 …The Land: Oromiya: called Biyya Oromoo, (Oromoo

country). Krapf, 1860 called it Ormania (p.72) which he

derived it from the Oromo or (Orma) people; he has

worked as a missionary for many years. Hundred fifteen

years later in 1976 Ormania amended to Oromiya in the

political program of the Oromoo Liberation Front (OLF),

of (1976) reads “Objectives, aimed to establish

People’s Democratic Republic of Oromiya” (p.16). Here

after this writer used both Oromiya and Oromoo country

as it fit to the statement.

Oromiya is located in the Horn of Africa and covers an

area approximately 400,000 square miles, which is more

43

than half of the landmass of the Ethiopian Empire

(Holcomb & Ibssa 1990, pp. 2-3). It is almost about the

size of Spain, Sweden, and Belgium put together. It is

bordering with Abyssinia in the North (Amhara and

Tigre), Afaar in the East, Somalia in the South-East,

and South, Kenya in the South, Sudan and number of

African ethnic and former kingdoms and communities in

the South West and West of Oromiya.

It has considered by most European travelers to be the

breadbasket of the Horn of Africa. Accordingly to them

Oromiya is a land that is rich in agricultural

resource, and also rich in minerals, including natural

gas. It has hundreds of lakes, and rivers, which

produce hydroelectric power. Oromiya is also known for

its livestock, which places her first in all Africa.

Landor (1907), a European traveler at the beginning of

the twentieth century, described wealthy Oromiya in the

following terms

There are few regions in Africa, which are richer than the Westernand South Western portion of Abyssinian. This region is generally known as theGalla

44

[Oromoo] country. Its picturesque mountain masses are well woodedand Valleys are regular gardens. The climate is ideal, water for irrigationplentiful, and Valleys are regular gardens. The climate is ideal, water forirrigation plentiful, and the soil so fertile that it will produce anything with theminimum labor. Two crops a year can be grown without cultivation, (Pp.120-122)

Indeed, in terms of its fertility, natural wealth, andexcellent climate Oromiya was beautiful garden gift ofGod. In spite of all of its potential wealth and acentury of colonization by Abyssinian (NorthernChristian Amharic and Tegray) the Oromoo nation hasendured colonialist plunder of prosperity, exploitationof its wealth, and non-stopping deforestation program,which affect environment. Historically three/ forth ofOromiya land had been covered by forest, but due tocolonial negligence present Oromiya remained onlywith one/fourth of its forest land.

D: 2 …Climate: Oromiya has highland, semi-highland, andlow land, and these differences offered Oromiya cold,mild and hot climate. Each types of climate suiteverity of needs for the Oromoo nation. The highlandtemperature is cooler from, 55-70, F; it is goodclimate for breeding horses, sheep and also growsspecial highland crops for consumptions.

45

Semi-highland has the best climate, vary from 70-85 F,degree, and more than 70% of Oromoo populations areliving in this area. It is the area where farmers growall types of grain. Small mountains and hills spottedhere and there in the semi-low lands of the country andgives special decoration. Flat agricultural andpastoral law land south of central Oromiya, extendedfurther to Kenyan border. Most parts of the lowland arerelatively hot from 85, to 90, F, degree year round.People in lowland grows different types ofvegetables, roots all kinds of fruits, and coffee, andlowland is famous for breading best types of livestock.

People fill happy to live in the lowland area, becauselow humidity kept them comfortable. ” Salviac (1901)lived in different Oromiya climates for many years asCatholic missionary, witnessed his experience “Healthfulclimate, uniform and temperate, fertility of the soil, beauty of theinhabitants, the security in which their houses seem to be situatedmakes one dream of remaining in such a beautiful country”,(p,21).

46

D: 3…Economy: Many scholars wrote Oromiya to be the

breadbasket of the Horn of Africa. For example, a

British colonial governor in Northern Kenya, Lytton

(1966) Salviac (1901) Landor (1907), have been visited

Oromiya, and wrote, “There are self-contained agricultural

locations with lush pastures holding a superior grade of African cattle

and fertile tillage land yielding two or three crops a year, (p.27).

Thus, Salviac (1901) Landor (1907, Lytton), (1966),

have almost the same report, regarding the Oromoo

nation and the fertile /land of Oromiya. Oromiya is

still the best fertile country in the Horn of Africa,

but due to over a century colonial policy of Abyssinia,

the Oromoo people denied accuses to use of Promina’s

47

wealth to make their life better, instead they are

still remain in all types of colonial subjugation and

economic exploitation.

D: 4… Conclusion: Some scholars, travelers,missionaries and European colonial governors haveconfirmed the Oromoo people as ancient nation lived inthe Horn of Africa before many ethnics moved to thearea. Some of them have lived in Oromiya for years;others travelers observed the people and their land.They have witnessed that the Oromoo as peaceful nationwho has good relations with their neighbors, sharesAfrican culture social interaction, and languagebackground. The Oromoo assisted its neighbor’s whenneeded like help one another for common problem; andshared man made or natural disaster. Europeans haveobservers that Oromiya proved the land that a farmercan harvest crops two times a year, if not intervenedby external colonial forces from Europe and Abyssinia.Its forests, ferial mountains, rivers, lacks,agricultural and pastoral land made the life easy forthe Oromoo nation before colonization.

Oromiya the land under colony is still wealthy whenrelated to other regions of the Ethiopian empire. Butdue to over a century colonial policy of Abyssinia, theOromoo nation denied the use of their natural wealth,education, even to speak their own language in public

48

gatherings. Colonial culture, language and religionimposed on them and in many cases they were unable toexercise their heritage, and indigenous religion, andthey are suffering in all types of colonial subjugationand policies

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

E:Independent Oromoo Nation and their Life underthe Gadaa System.

E: Introduction: The Oromoo nation used to have adefined territory; speak the same language, practicethe same culture and religion Red, five fixed Gadaademocratic party system, horizontally designed Red,White and Red plague symbol represents representOromiya independent state, before completelypartitioned among Abyssinia, Britain, and Italy in1900. In this section the researcher briefs Local,Regional and National Chaffee procedures from localarea to the national election to run the government ofOromiya.

E:1:a.. Chaffee: A Special wide grassy meadow,reserved for the Gadaa Parliament assembly where eightyears Gadaa activities reported, and where existingGadaa law ratified or amended, add new law ifnecessary, and discard outdated laws. It is equivalent

49

to a place where western parliament held their assemblyIt is also a place where people elect New AbbaaBokkuus from new Lubaa class for the next eight years,and finally transferee power to the front line party.

Chaffee Hora Walaabu was the ancient national resident

of Abbaa Bokkuu, as well as a place where election of

party leadership take place every eight years. It has

been said that in sixteenth hundred the center for

Gadaa parliament moved from Hora Walaabu to present

Chaffee Baldho in Central Oromiya at the bank of Hawaas

River South West of Shaggar on Jimmaa Road. It is

still functioning sometimes act as regional Chaffee,

and another times as national Chaffee; depending on the

colonial government mood.

There are three major Chaffees existed in the

Democratic Republic of Oromiya, called only one

National Chaffee, located at Chaffee Malkaa Baldho,

Regional and local Chafees in many Oromiya regions.

The Gadaa system allows any Oromoo national regardless

of her/his gender, age, and party affiliation he/she

can attend Chaffee assembly and has a chance to

complain, criticize, ask questions, and propose

50

solution. As a result every eight years members of

learners and educators classes travels to Chaffee

Baldho from all over Oromoo land to attend the

assembly, participate on discussion, and observe

election and transfers of power from old Lubaa class to

new Lubaa class

1:b…Odaa: Odaa or Sycamore trees are among respectedtrees by the Oromoo people, and many times it growsnear rivers, closed to Chaffee or on the top of somemountains. Its main stem naturally splinted in to twoequal stem when it grew about five feet above theground; and each stem grows its own many branches withmillions of flat ever green leafs, forming widebranches that can shade many hundred people under it.

Every Eight years Gadaa administrations report theirwork under special Odaa tree. In addition Odaa treegives serves for, local community social and politicalactivities held under it; and tired travelers restunder its shade. It creates natural umbrella types ofshading by its tick branches, and millions leaves onwhich. Local courts and local Gadaa assembly held underit. Many livestock’s sheltered under Odaa tree torelive from burning sun; or to protect from rain.Legend story describes Odaa Tree as the most respected

51

plant always guarded by holy angle called Boorantichaand Booranti (Oromoo Holy Angles). Local people makecoffee under it for special occasions; such as, when anew child was born, or adopted to a family, whenbachelors married, when promoted from one Gadaa learnerclass to the next Gadaa learner class.

Children encouraged to play around it, but restrictedfrom cutting any of its branches, instructed notquarrel under it, avoid dirty words or disrespect oneanother. No one farm under it, or cut its branchesbecause of love and respect they have for it. They donot put any trashes under or around Odaa tree; animaldirt’s immediately removed by children. If Odaa falldown because of old age or bad weather no one use itfor fire wood or for another purpose. It is remainthere until rotten and turned to dust by itself. Likeholy cross for Christian, Odaa also holy tree forOromoo nation. No one allowed hanging bee hives on anyof its branches, and it is a gift from God to use forcommon purpose.

1:c…Democratic Election: Democracy never been new to

the Oromoo people, and the Oromoo nation practiced

Gadaa democracy when the world has been practiced

monarchial political system. Oromoo nation choose their

leaders for limited fixed eight years and practiced it

52

for many centuries when European worship their life

time kings and queens and believed that the royal

families as special types of human beings elected by

God.

Gadaa permit only five rotating parties for the Oromoo

nation, on which member of parties have obliged to

learn social, economic, history, culture, religion,

military, law and administration. Individual must take

step by step from class to another class every eight

years and complete five classes in forty eight learning

years, regardless of biological ages. All members of

learner’s class take one step up every eight years,

towards the top ruling class called Lubaa. At the end

of eight years a party on fifth class or on power

transfers the ruling power to the party candidate Lubaa

on front line. Immediately when fresh Lubaa class

inaugurated the old Lubaa promoted to Educator class

called Yubaa I for the next eight years, and eight

years yeas later promoted Yubaa II, and then step by

step to Yubaa III, IV, & V every eight years as

educator.

53

1:d…Parties on Line: It is national obligation that

every walking Oromoo individual must pass through five

learning program and five educators program. Gadaa

learners program Dammam or children less than eight

years similar to kindergarten take cared by elders of

both genders Yubaa educator’s mostly eighty and over

ages. Gadaa learners begin from Ittimako, Dabballe,

Foolle, Qondaala Lubaa and they are instructed by local

Yubaa educator’s classes. Each class or party organize

their own working program similar to the procedure of

Lubaa class or party on power.

Non-Lubaa parties on line discuss their party

problems, amend their internal, discard unwanted laws,

and make certain laws if necessary. Promotion of non-

Lubaa learners from one class to the next classes

requires formal ceremony in accordance to each

learner’s particular rules, regulations, and

recommendations.

Interested Oromoo national’s members of any five party

travels long distance to attend a great Chaffee

assembly mostly for the following reasons.

(a), listen to success and fallers of the outgoing

Lubaa class, and participate in

54

national discussion.

(b), listen to failed activities reported by outgoing

Lubaa class

(c), participate as eyewitness when amendment made and

learn new knowledge

and compare with their local practice.

(d), observe the process of democratic election,

appreciate or criticize if any.

(e), collect information, as eye witness informant

when returned to their villages.

E:2…Local Chaffee Election: Local Chaffee assemblyheld in all its function areas in Oromiya, to elect

their local leaders for the next eight years and to

send delegate and candidates to compute for national

election. Local Chaffee started approximately, two

months before regional or National Chaffee assembly

begin. Members of local Lubaa discuss and debate on

issues their parties encountered and unresolved

problems in the last eight year. They ratify previous

local laws; amending some internal laws; and make

their local Gadaa system in updated position with

55

regional Gadaa administration. Resident of each local

Chaffee, elected four best qualified individual as

local Abbaa Bokkuus, and send them as candidate for

national Abbaa Bokkuu. Political, social and

administration power transferred to the next party on

line in local level and they elect four local Abbaa

Bokkuus (Hayyuus) and other top leaders from local

Lubaa class to replace outgaining Lubaa. All other

learners of each class stay on educational program in

their party lines and succeed each other every eight

years.

The clan and local Chaffee trust their officials, and

have confident their interest best represented in local

and national level. Changes in some low of the Gadaa

system, amendment reported to national general assembly

for approval. General assembly has the right to reject,

amend or approved, it depend on the local candidate to

defend their position. General assembly held at Chaffee

Balldho delivers final approval by majority vote from

Lubaa class on power.

56

Political, social and administration power transferred

to the next party on line and they elect four local

Abbaa Bokkuus (Hayyuus) and other top leaders from

local Lubaa class to replace outgaining Lubaa. All

other learners of each class stay on educational

program in their party lines and succeed each other

every eight years. A single party stays in learning

program for forty years and another eight years in

Lubaa top learners class as senior learner and

representative of local leading party. The rest local

parties are Ittimako, Dabbale, Foolle, and Qondaala

classes also elect their local officers. Many local

people travel to local, regional or national Chaffee

assembly, to observe how Lubaa class conducted their

business; such as the process of reporting, discussing,

debating, and law making, amending, and transferring

political and social power to the party on line.

E:3… National Chaffee Assembly;

Gadaa knowledge is an accumulation of forty years in

Gadaa learning system and final eight years as Lubaa

learner in one hand and as leader of the party in

another hand, before promoted to Yubaa Educator Class.

57

At regional or National Chaffee Assembly the ruling

party held two weeks Moonless nights and one week day

light meeting to discuss the conclusions of eight years

performance by outgoing party. Members of assembly are

discussing their successful work as positive direction

for those who are ready to take their place. Any

problem remains unresolved announced to the general

assembly by outgoing Lubaa and transfers to incoming

Lubaa to find better solution. Thus the outgoing party

transfers not only the ruling position, but also

problems they were encountered for the last eight years

Interested Qondaala members attend General Chaffee

assembly and participate in regular and national Lubaa

class meeting, to learn advanced law, and

administration, from experienced Yubaa I and Lubaa

class. Lubaa assembly is a school where Qndaala class

encouraged to learn listing, observing, participating,

debating, and proposing opinions. In addition, members

of Yubaa II and Yubaa III, Yubaa IV and Yubaa V, assist

Lubaa class with their experience when requested from

the office of Lubaa ruling party.

58

E: 4…Election Procedures: The new Lubaa class elects

three active Abbaa Bokkuus, and one reserve Abbaa

Bokkuu or Hayyuu, for next eight years at Chaffee

assembly or parliament. Abbaa Bokkuu means simply

carrier of stick called Bokkuu symbol the elected

national leader of the Gadaa system. Candidate

individual must be from Oromoo national, from local

Lubaa class, born in Gadaa culture, and lived among

them, married and have healthy children, has father and

mother alive ; perfect physically fattiness, good body

structure, have reputation for his generous, excellent

horses person, recognized national hero, ability to

defend the Gadaa law, ability to suggest amend,

excellent public speaker, execute Gadaa laws, talented

person to represent local and national interest, and a

person who believes and loves only one God. In addition

Abbaa Bokkuu must not stingy, who is not selfish, not

coward

The first Abbaa Bokkuu is the head of National Gadaa

government sometimes called Hayyuu, and Boorana and

Gujii Oromoo called Abbaa Gadaa. The second and the

third Abbaa Bokkuus are immediate assistance body to

59

the first Abbaa Bokkuu, supervises the work of all

elected officials, for the institutions they were

elected. Full officers including three elected active

Abbaa Bokkuu, called the first Abbaa Bokkuu, the second

Abbaa Bokkuu Alangee Mirgaa, and the third Abba Bokkuu

Alangee Bitaa, and one reserved Abbaa Bokkuu named

Hayyuu

All Abbaa Bokkuus carry Bokkuu stick in their left

hand as the symbol for their position, and weep in

their right hand executers or protectors of the Gadaa

law. They also elect, Abbaa Duula, equivalent to

Minister of Defense, Abbaa Seera, equivalent to

Minister of Law and Order,) Abbaa Sa’aa, equivalent to

Minister of Economic and Agriculture), Abbaa Chaffee,

equal to Minister of the Parliament, Abbaa Dubbii

(equivalent to minister of information and Attorney

general are close similar to the modern cabinets of the

Western democratic Government.

The new Lubaa, Qondaala and Yubaa discuss laws to be

added, to be discarded; lay down their working program

for the next eight years; and do their best to remove

60

most obstacles that they inherited from the former

ruling party. In early nineteen hundred Asmee observed

over hundred thousand attendance present at Chaffee

Baldho, when new Lubaa declares new laws, amended

some laws, added new legislatives, discarded outdated

laws, and listened to certain reforms demanded by non

Lubaa Chaffee attendants. Final voted as amended only

by ruling party. Thus Lubaa from learners category as

ruling party, Yubaa I, from educators category, and

Qondaala class as learners or party candidate, are

working closely as one body on the common three

branches of Government, (legislation, Judiciary and

executive.

E.5 …Office of Judiciary: Nine Judges or Abbaa Seeras,

(fathers of law) from Lubaa class or ruling party,

elected by members of their class at national Chaffee

assembly every eight years. Elected Abbaa Seera, with

the assistant of Qondaala and Yubaa I interpret laws,

made by Chaffee assembly. After serious discussion the

final decision made only by nine Abbaa Seeras, or

Judges of the Lubaa ruling party members. In case

61

Judiciaries unable to solve they send back the issue to

elected representative of the ruling party, with

suggestion to consult with former Yubaas, for further

discussion or more clarification. For such case special

session requires that includes sometimes Yubaa the I

&II, sometimes includes all five Yubaas to assist Lubaa

class with the contravention problems. Final decision

made only by Lubaa class and re-sends the issue to

Judiciary office to finalize the decision made by

saglii or executive office of nine cabinets of the

party on power. Contravention issues discussed seriously, debated by

all participant to reach common understanding. Members

of Lubaa ruling party listens to educator’s opinion,

advice and suggestion, to solve the problem together.

Such discussion paves the way for the ruling party to

reverse their previous decision if the issue proved

unpopular by debaters.

E: 6…Office of Executive: Gadaa Chaffee assembly held

every eight years in regional level encompassing

several clans. In case of national or regional

62

assembly, the Lubaa class elects responsible

individuals from their party that include three Abbaa

Bokkuus (Hayyuus) and one reserve Abbaa Baku. Abbaa

seera, (Father of Law) Abbaa Duula (Defense Minister)

Abba Sa’aa (Ministry of Agriculture and Pastoral),

Abbaa Chaffee,( Minister of parliament) and Abbaa Seera

(Minister of law to execute any laws and rules declared

at Chaffee assembly, indorsed by the office of

Judiciary.

In case Abba Bokkuu behaves un-ethical, undermines the

committee he work with, behave like dictator, abuse his

power will be impeached before finishing his eight

years term. If Abbaa Bokkuu died, the Gadaa law allowed

his wife to continue as Hadha Bokkuu the rest term.

However in case Abbaa Bokkuu unable to govern for

health reason, or family problem he may be relieved

with honor; and the second Hayyuu automatically step up

to the first, the third Abbaa Bokku became the second

Abbaa Bokku, and the forth reserved Hayyuu became the

third Abbaa Bokkuu, and another forth person elected as

reserved Abbaa Bokku or Hayyuu in special election.

63

Thus death of individual leaders does not interrupt the

Gadaa from functioning smoothly

Chapter I.

F:The Decline of the Gadaa System and the

Emergence of Duula

Guutu as Organized anti-Slavery

offensive Movement.

F:1…Introduction: This section describes how the

ancient Oromoo listened to one another to identified

internal and external common problem for solution. The

Oromoo nation lived side by side with other neighbors,

shares part of African common heritages, ethnic ties,

language, culture, physical appearance, and historical

experience. Some of these ethnics were, Afaar, Agawu,

Bejja, Daraasa, Gedeo, Hadiyya, Kambaata, Konso, Kafa,

Saho, Sidaama, Somali, Walayitta, etc. Many kingdoms

mentioned here have adopted system of slavery from

64

Abyssinia and Arab merchants; opposite the Gadaa

system. Oromoo Nation encircled by numbers of these

big and small kingdoms all engaged on business of slave

raiders and traders, (Cornwallis Harris 1844 p).

It was during Gadaa military less active to defend the

isolated Oromoo clans Abyssinian kings and Afaar

Sultanate became strong slave raiders and traders in

the Horn of Africa. Oromoo resistance captured in war

transported to Arabia, Europe, and Pakistan, as slaves,

concubines, and body guards. (Harris p.29); Krapf

(1842), have collected information about known slave

raider; such as Zara Yaiqob, 1434-1468, and Baeda

Mariam 1468-1478, (pp.218-220). Abir (1992) reported

the number of people captured by Abyssinian raiders,

and sold to slave traders increased from time to time

as the demand for Oromoo boys and girls increased in

Europe and Middle East ,( p.411)

F:2…The weakens and strength of the Gadaa

administration seriously discussed in 1482 Chaffee

Assembly held at Hora Walaabu, after delegates from

North, West, East and Central Oromoo land voiced

terrible situation by serious expansion of slave

65

raiders and raiders from Abyssinia and Afaar. The

assembly took the agenda as part of internal Foolle or

Gadaa regular defenses force weakness since 1430th

including failed current Gadaa administration

encouraged enslavers, to suffer the Oromoo and other

people in the Horn of Africa.

Speakers from the audience criticized central

administration, for failed eternal communication that

has created gapes between the scattered Oromoo

communities, the rise of illegal clannish Abbaa Bokkuus

and Abbaa Duulas. Furthermore; the decline of Oromoo

national participation in general Chaffee assembly, and

the declining of regular visitation of Abbaa Bokkuu

office to exchange ideas, has contributed to the

expansion of slave raids and trades presented as part

of the problem to be discussed.

The assembly have decided that solving internal problem

will pave the way to solve external problems, and

therefore in Oromoo saying “Namnii mana tokko Ijaaru

dhakaa wal hinsaamu, means people who want build common

house must not still stone from one another” so to win

66

the enemy the Oromoo stick to the agenda of common

problem and support decision made by the Assembly.

Once agreed slavery as major source of all problems

in the Horn of Africa, their discussion dominated how

to remove evil business conducted by well-known

Abyssinia and Afaar. Historical Chaffee Assembly of

1482 took the matter seriously and out of many

proposals the Assembly agreed to build anti-slavery

special military force they called Duula Guutu that

organize and train all able boded in each village to

make ready for offensive war. The training includes

men, females, elders, children, and handicaps, and it

takes forty years training, planning tactics and

strategies. Division of labors, from each according to

their ability; and determination for non-stopping

military exercise for the Duula Guutu, were assigned to

each village. These have been accepted temporarily by

all five parties which were decided by Melba party of

Lubaa class of 1482.

Decision made by assembly and led by a single party

on power, and other four parties in line abide to

resolutions made, with understanding that new party on

67

line elected every eight years, also lead anti-slavery

program. That every eight year the assembly must

discussed on the progress of training and preparation.

In addition, the assembly resolved that the rest

four party rights respected, rejection or amendment to

the decision made in 1482 possible. In five assembly

or in forty years dozens of amendments made by other

parties. In mean time the Follee national military

wing “devastated Batera Amora” in 1505, a big disaster

to Libne Dingil’s army, (Bahrey, 1593,p.113).

F: 3…Declaration of Duula Guutu 1522-1840: Anti-

slavery national offensive war led by Lubaa class of

Melba party has been declared in 1522 and continue

every eight years to eliminate slave raids and trades

from the Horn of Africa. Abyssinia and Afaar sometimes

separately and sometimes jointly fights the Oromoo

military forces, and since 1540th they were assisted by

European Military troops and modern firearms, mainly

from Portugal and Ottoman Turks. However, the

combinations of Christians (Abyssinian and Portugal)

Muslims (Afaars, Ottoman Turks, and Arabs) were unable

68

to defeat the Oromoo women and men armed only with

spears, shields and their supper cavalries. As a result

the enemy lost slave raiding zones, such as Dawaro,

Fatagar, Ifaat, and Hasalo. Very few liberal European

scholars have mentioned this war, in limited

statements, and the rest information kept alive orally

passed one generation to next generation.

Bahrey has reported that the Oromoo antislavery forces

attacked the Abyssinian troops at battle of Dago, where

Prince Hamalmal was killed and King Galwdewos run away

from his base Dago. Sultan Nur of Afaar lost the war to

Masle at battle of Hasalo and Bahrey said, “Since the

Oromoo first invaded “our” country there had been no such slaughter,

(p.117).

Of all wars the Oromoo engaged against enslavers, the

offensive wars led by Lubaa of Melba party, 1522-

1530; Lubaa of Muudaa from 1530-1538; Lubaa of

Kilolee 1538-1546, Lubaa of Befolle 1546-1554, Lubaa

Mesle 1554-1562, remembered by Oromoo generations after

another generation, (Bahrey 1593, pp.115-121);( Abir

1992:414).

69

Portugal Jesuit Lobo in (1624) stated the following

angry remarks, “These Galles (Oromoo) lay everything, where they

come, in ruin, putting all to the sward without distinction of age or sex,

which barbarities, though their number are not great, have spread the

terror of them over all the country”, (p.14). Jesuit Lobo blamed

antislavery resistance forces, as if they have no

good reason to defend themselves and their properties

from slave raiders and traders. Infect there were no

worst human terror than system of slavery spearheaded

by the Christian Portuguese and Muslim Ottoman Turks,

in which their terror still remembered by Diaspora

Africans whose ancestors were victims of slavery. For

the Oromoo nation the defeat of slave raiders and

traders have been the happiest moment. Enslavers have

no more collect millions of hard working Oromoo

families to foreign land across Red Sea ports and sell

them to slavery.

=======================================================

=

Chapter IV

70

A: 1…The Partition of Oromiya and the Oromoo

Nations

Introduction: A:1…Abyssinia was known ancient

independent Christian State ever before Europe. She has

religious and political ties with many European

Christian States in general particularly with Portugal

since early fifteen hundred. Following the scramble

for African in 1884-1885, the colonial powers have

decided to colonize all non-Christian independent

states in Africa, with expectation Abyssinian as the

only Christian state below Sahara. As ancient Christian

kingdom Abyssinia has claimed her right to be a member

to the scramble for Africa in equal base with European

colonizers. Having fully aware that Abyssinia still

practices slavery, but no member of the scramble

complained; it seems that they think none of their

business if black sale another black. Abyssinia the

only black Emperor joined European white colonizers to

divide the continent among them.

Propaganda campaign among Italian, Russia, French and

Britain circulated that they were concerned for the

71

security of Abyssinia than the continuation of slave

raids and trades by her Emperor. They believed if left

alone without Christian help, her Kingdom may not

survive, from non-Christian Oromoo antislavery

offensive forces. From such point of concern, European

powers have admitted Abyssinia in the scramble for

Africa by ignoring slave trade in the Horn of Africa

Each the above states have requested Abyssinia

voluntarily give up independent status and substitute

by protectorate statues under one European colonial

power she wished. Meanwhile, Russia, French and Italian

were busy, arming, and training, Abyssinian troops in

European fashions, and even western troops have

personally participated in Abyssinian war of

colonization of Oromiya Russia French and Italian armed

Abyssinian troops.

European journalists and Christian missionary Mr.,

John Mayer (1886 have reported the following shocking

news to antislavery humanitarian organization and to

members of the scramble for Africa,“ I am very sorry… the king

Menelik again allows the traders to carry on …business of the slave trader.

This said news was confirmed… slave dealers brought six hundred young

72

“Galla” Girls, with many boys, joined our caravan towards Tanjurrah

(p.472). Mr, Mayer described further that the Oromo under colonial empire of Abyssinia were

not safe in their birth place to make their living as

the second citizen. Sometimes they were raided by the

government sponsored slave raiders, sometimes picked

for forced labor to work on the land belonged to the

colonial government for no pay. Colonized farmers not

sure if they harvest, travelers were not sure if they

return home safe, even at their home they were not

safe. To be a colony of Abyssinia is equally a terror

for life to already defeated nation.

However, many Europeans like French never been serious

to enforce Abyssinia to abandon slave trade, instead

as Wylde (1901) eye witnessed that French allow Abyssinia to use her Red Sea ports for export slaves

and import ammunition, also permit to fly French flag

on the top of slave carrier Cargos from Red Sea ports

to Aden, Egypt, Turkey and to countries across Indian

Ocean, (p.59), Wylde (1901)further described in his

73

own words, that “This trade has been going on for a long time and

it connote be put a stop to, as neither Turkey, Italy, or England have the

right of search under the French flag. (Wylde.1901: 66).

Despite such evidences Abyssinia was accepted as full

member of the scramble for Africa, without question

from members of the scramble, because in all her dirty

business Russia and French were indirectly behind

Abyssinia slave trade and no country interested to

intervene in the business of French and Russia,

relation with Abyssinia.

Italian proposed the statue of protectorate under

Italian colonial state, a choose given to Abyssinia

better than complete colony. Proposal failed because

Emperor Menelik refused, with confidence European

weapon he accumulated, millions of Abyssinian he can

march against any European colonial power, with Russia

and French directly behind Abyssinia and British

indirectly support Abyssinia. European hidden interest

turned around for the Menelik II, advantage for he

employed individual from Russia, and French to train

his solders assist him to consolidate his position. As

74

long as French, Italian, Russia and British in

competition among themselves and jealous to one

another, Menelik fear no one of them.

In 1896 five days war between Abyssinia and Italian

left thousands of soldiers in both side with victory on

Abyssinia side. Victory over Italian army encouraged

Abyssinian to march return armies to South, East, and

West of Oromiya to bring unconquered Oromiya State

under control. These conquest has resulted of tenths of

thousands conquered people Oromoo prisoners of wars,

derived into enslavers. In exchange of French

assistance with free port to export slaves and to

import Guns and military expert from Europe, Emperor

Menelik gave full right to exploit row material, using

cheap labor from the conquest territories

Wylde, (1901), described relation between Russia and

King Menelik as following, “The Russians …are trying to get a

foothold in Africa by an alliance with Menelik, and they also tried

to get a seaport or coaling station from him”(p.50). However,

he has no port to give them but willing to host

75

any Europeans as long as they supplies arms,allows him to use their ports to export slaves, to

import ammunitions, and willing to train his soldiers

in modern fashion, (Lytton. 1966, p.38).

Nevertheless by 1900 the Horn of Africa including

Oromiya partitioned among Abyssinia, Britain, Italy,

and French, as the only possible way assured the

security of lonely Christian Abyssinia. Garden Water

field (1957) reported at the meeting of Royal African

society when asked his view of Abyssinia participation

on the scramble for Africa. “They (Abyssinia), like the other

European nations, joined the grab for Africa at the end of the nineteenth

century. Menelik II, then the ruler of Ethiopia, was very much an empire

builder” (p.11). Prouty, ET, al., (1981), Adam, 2009:50)

Prouty 1981 conformed that Oromoo nation never

conquered by Abyssinia alone and without western

support in general and without French and Russia the

empire will never exist. Lytton, 1973 asserted this

view in following words. “The Oromoo were thus conquered by the

Habash for the first time in recorded history during the last thirteen years

of the nineteenth century. Without massive European help the Oromoo

76

would not have been conquered at all” (p.160), Perham, (p.294).

Thus, for the first time in history, the Gadaa system

of indigenous African democracy replaced by alien

monarchial feudal system. Furthermore, without

admitting Emperor Menelik II as colonial partner,

without supply of firearms, and without European

colonial advisors, and without being member of the

partition for Africa, the colonization of Oromiya by

Abyssinia was impossible.

Menelik cases have been a unique, for the

following points.

First Menelik was among the top slave trader,

but he was admitted as a partner in the scramble

without any condition to stop slave trade in his

empire, (Lytton.1966.pp.221-222).

Second, when all members of scramble for Africa

were Europeans, Menelik II was the only black

African Emperor who joined them to colonize

independent countries beyond his territory.

77

Finally Menelik case was unique that historians,

politicians and humanitarian organizations have

been silent for years instead of exposing such

notorious African individual, who sold more than

four million Africans to the world. Austen

(1992) reported that, “The total of just over 4 million

slaves exported across the Red Sea during the Islamic era is only

a larger figures in itself but also represents a major percentage of

the global slave trade (p.464). In addition, more than

this number was killed in the Afaar desert on

their way to Red Sea port for sale.

Europeans including the French have abolished slave

trades, and freed domestic and agricultural slaves from

their colonies, but beside all knowledge they have

about Abyssinia French permitted Emperor Menelik to use

her ports in Read Sea, for import ammunition and

manufactured goods and slaves, from conquered land

south of Abyssinia. Cargos flay French flags were busy

carrying number of slaves across Red Sea to Yemen

(Mayer 1886).

78

Second. Abyssinian accepted to League of Nation in 1924

without abolishing domestic and commercial slave trade

in the empire, and still used French accommodate for

import and export including exporting slaves. Despite

of Italian many years ambition to expand her colonial

territory as civilizing mission, she send a message for

the justification a mission aimed to abolish slavery

from the Ethiopian Empire. Slavery was one of a good

case Italy used slavery for good case and her

justification for war against Abyssinia silenced

members of the League of the Nations.

Abyssinia for the first time lost one supporter from

members of League of Nations, and Italy in 1935 annexed

Abyssinia to Eritrea (another Italian colony northeast

of Abyssinia). Immediately in 1936, Italian” proclaimed the

liberation of all slaves… that they had freed 400,000 slaves in the Galla-

Sidama area alone liberated “(Derrick, 1975, p.153). Actually

the number estimated not included slaves in all the

empire, and after five years in Abyssinia she already

more than two million slaves were liberated.

79

Surprisingly, after Emperor Haile had returned from

exile slave raiders and traders immediately resumed and

the emperor did not take any action against it; and no

one opposed to Abyssinia to stop resumed slave trade,

instead allowed her as one of the founder of the United

Nation in 1946. United Nation is an Organization that

replaced League of Nations After the end of Second,

World War.

This researcher witnesses in the 1960th Colonized young

individuals were picked from their home, from towns,

from farm fields and from market places and forced them

to Satit Humara at the border of Sudan; and to Adoola

remote area in the South of the empire. The Oromoo

nation still suffering from Abyssinian colony because

in the past she was assisted by European colonial

powers, and uninterrupted support continued from

western countries at present.

====================================================

Chapter 4 General Introduction to AbyssinianColonial Policy.

80

B: Writers before 1974 borrowed prejudicial term

“Galla” from Abyssinian Monk who wrote “History of

Oromoo people titled “History of the Galla” from 1522-

1593. Since then, non Oromoo writers used such

derogatory term when addressing the Oromoo case.

Oromoo grandparents lost millions of their brave women,

men and children resisting slavery, Colonialism, and a

very derogatory term “Galla”.

Under Abyssinian colonial policy Oromoo lost their

ancestral land, and made serfs for the settlers who

were settled on Oromoo land. Serfs were restricted from

traveling without the permission from their settlers

land lords. Their Gadaa system was suppressed, and the

power of Abba Bokkuu reduced to clan level and many

Chaffee assembly forced to be closed, their military

wing known Foolle, and Abba Duula or Minister of

defense were eliminated. Oromoo religion suppressed,

and head of all spiritual leaders known Qaallu also

killed by hanging, because he refused to submit.

IV: Abyssinia Colonial Policy during Emperor

Menelik (1884-1913).

81

B:1…Emperor Menelik declared number of policies to rule

over the people he colonized by European assistances.

His solders burn Oromoo villages, crops in the field,

kill or capture those who refused to submit. Oromoo

people and Oromiya land, rivers, lakes, mountains

animals, birds and forests declared the property of

Emperor Menelik. A Russian political advisor and

commander of Menelik’s army captain Bulatovich (1897 -

1900 AD) witness his observation in the following

manner. “Oromoo land is considered together with their population

belong to the emperor by the right of conquest. All Oromoo are considered

obliged to pay rent, the process of turning people into serf” (p.84).

Those who were captured including non-combatant

families turned to slavery and delivered them to Arab

traders through Zailaa, Barbara and many other ports at

Red Sea ports

Defeated Oromoo remained in their land were

distributed to Abyssinia soldiers, Coptic Church, and

ordinary Abyssinia as serfs. Local collaborators

offered pieces of land, and village ranks, in return to

serve the colonial authority, such as to collect taxes,

build churches, offer free labor for the settlers,

82

capture or kill local rebels, and spay on their own

people. According to Bulatovich {2000} eyewitness,

“Their peaceful way of life is broken, freedom is lost; and the independent,

freedom-loving Oromoo find themselves under the severe authority of the

Abyssinia conquerors” (p.68).Thus, Organized Oromoo

complains about heavy taxes, and bad treatment

immediately removed from the area and sale them to Arab

slave traders (Bulatovich, 1900 .p.4). Others who were

resisted less for fear of driven to unknown countries

made field and domestic slaves for many Abyssinians.

Members of European antislavery organization

intentionally ignored when Menelik II sales the

conquered prisoners of wars to Arabs, using French, and

Turkey, ports located on African side of the Red Sea

Coasts. French even rent its flags’ to slave carrier’s

fleet ships, and boats to camouflage slave traders.

Historian (Wylde, 1901:59) explained this in detail.

In addition, domestic Oromoo female slaves assigned to

unlimited hour’s heavy work every day for their

masters, during their limited break hours they were

also serve their masters as un-volunteered concubines.

83

B:2... Social Policy During Emperor Haile

Selassie I: The colonial regime has many methods tominimize non Abyssinian history, political science,

culture, language, religion etc. Abyssinians

discourages non Amhara ethnics from speaking in their

mother tongues, in urban public meetings and in schools

compound, at court and in hospital etc. Church leaders,

ordinary priests, and school teachers all from

Abyssinia, instructed to discourage non Amharic

language; restrict student from speaking to one another

in their mother tongues, in the school compound, and in

sport fields. Fortunate Oromoo who joined government

fill lonely fearing dirty jokes against individual if

not physical, but psychological and moral torture. It

were daily practice against Oromoo nationals by their

classmates, school teachers, co-workers, in the form of

jock in daily bases. As a result some Oromoo parents

disinterested sending their children to urban schools.

It was hidden colonial policy designed to minimize the

number of educated Oromoo national in the Ethiopian

empire. Many frustrated left schools by not overcoming

84

Abyssinian so called jokes, in reality it was equal to

physical joke.

Existing literatures at schools have been in ancient

Geese and modern Amharic language. Only non-social

science literatures written in European language

permitted to be served in the private libraries located

in major towns of the empire. Book stores import

literatures and text written aboard only after it has

assured by the government body of censured committee.

Some Text books for the elementary schools described

that the Oromoo have learned their language from

“Devil” at Hora Walaabu. (Atsmee. 1907. Part I, p. 3,

Gebere Selassie, 1959. (p.29), until late 1960th these

books used in many elementary school as text. As a

result many Oromoo speakers discouraged and left the

school. Abyssinian teachers have worked very hard to

Amaharanize non Amhara. Ordinary teachers by their

right have changed the name of non-Abasha students to

Amharic in the schools, at churches, or neighborhoods.

85

After all these effort the Abyssinians failed to

eliminate Oromoo language, because the Oromoo language

have strong social, historical , ritual and political

attachment, to one another, and losing one affect all

others. Especially Oromoo people in the rural area

never abandon their language, Pollock (1996),

humanitarian actives have travelled in most parts of

Oromiya and have observed the government impose Amharic

language, as recent as 1996, as following“ the Oromo’s are

the largest ethnic group yet Amharic, a minority Abyssinian language,

is the national language” (p5). Oromoo considers their

language as identifier who they are, and that makes

them different from ethnics in the Horn of Africa.

Oromoo believes that loosing Afaan Oromoo (Oromoo

language) gradually leads to loosing the Gadaa system.

B:3...The Term Galla as Intentional Colonial

Policy: The Ethiopian colonial authority has specialpolicy for western social scientists and missionaries

while working particularly in Oromiya. Among policies

before 1974, the Ethiopian government instructed

missionaries and academic researchers to use the term

86

“Galla”, orally or in written form when addressing the

Oromoo national. The Oromoo were not aware foreigners

have unofficial special instruction from hosting

government.

European Anthropologists in accepted by local people

provide them accommodation, and arranged elders for

interviews, to make them comfortable in their research

work. Missionaries also welcomed to their local areas,

and the local people helped them to build their

churches, schools and clinic; attend churches, and

secured them from some fanatic individuals etc.

However, foreign missionaries, western Anthropologists

and others follow the colonial government instruction

and the term” Galla “imposed on the Oromoo people as

obligation to work in the Oromoo speaking region.

Gradually the word Oromoo have been almost faded from

western literatures, and replaced by the term Galla.

Christian and Muslim religious followers directly

interpreted the word Galla as pagan, infidel, Kafire,

heathen, unbeliever. Socially it means foolish,

uncivilized, In Politico-military sense, described as

87

brutal, distracter, barbarians and terrorist etc. In

1974 as a result of revolution in the Ethiopian empire

the new ruling class responds to over four hundred

years struggle (1522-1974) and dropped old policy and

replaced by Oromoo as demanded.

B: 4…Educational and Language Policies: Education is not only a matter of reading and writing,

but also a means to social, civic, economic and

cultural development. In the contrary, Colonial

Abyssinia believes, any education that contributed to

the knowledge of modern activities regarded as a

dangerous explosive, to the existence of the Ethiopian

colonial empire. Like any colonial language the

minority Amharic language, their culture, history, and

religion imposed on Oromoo nation through (memorandum

of 1944 p.253), and officially became part of the

constitution declared in 1955 article 125 (Perham.

1969, p.461). Article 25 demands, Oromoo nationals who

work for the colonial government must conduct their

duty only in Amharic language, regardless of the

audiences. The law requires every public speeches must

88

be translated to Amharic language even if no one speak

or understand Amharic. Government official

administration, local priests and teachers were told to

encourage others to drop their mother language,

culture, history, religion; even many were forced to

change their indigenous names to Amharic, or to

Biblical names

It was the policy of the Empire not to include history,

social and political and economic contribution of

Oromoo nation and other colonized people in school

curriculum. All text books written by educated

Abyssinians glorifies history of the colonizers, their

patriotisms during the process of colonization. Oromoo

national attending schools that teaches Abyssinian

myths, legends, falls history, culture, and religion

for many years. Beside that schools in the colonized

territories have been limited to provincial capitals,

where military garrisons, Orthodox churches and

government administration concentrated.

The colonial administration used education as

instrument to silent local chiefs from rebelling and

89

Emperor Haile Selassie has offered some collaborators

to send one or two of their male children to Shaggar

(Addis Ababa) to attend modern education for four

reasons. First: was to hold these children as hostage

in the name of schooling them, in case the

collaborators rebelled. Second, to keep collaborators

close to administration by offering minor position,

such as collecting taxes, report political movements.

Third: to keep eyes on individuals from organizing

resistance forces against Abyssinian colonization.

Forth: an attempt to acculturate these children into

Abyssinian culture, religion, language, and customs, to

use them as future tokens for the Oromoo nation.

(Perham, 1969, (p, 251; p.253; p.255).

Until 1974 revolution rural Oromoo where denied schools

in their districts, a hidden policy to make hard for

99% Oromoo children access to modern Education. Even

if someone have relative in town, and planned to send

his child requires Abyssinian land lord permission.

Ordinary Abyssinia settlers have unlimited power on the

life of Oromoo peasant families

90

B:5…Amharic Language: Like any colonial policy the

minority Amharic language, culture, history, and

religion imposed on Oromoo nation through (memorandum

of 1944 p.253), and Government constitution declared

Amharic as official language of the empire in 1955

article 125 (Perham. 1969. P: 461). The law demands,

any non Amhara government official who work in the

empire, must conduct his/her duty only in Amharic

language, regardless of the audiences they work with.

The law requires translator who speaks both languages

into Amharic where no one understand the Amharic

language. Government official administration, local

priests and teachers ordered to encourage others to

drop any claims of their language, culture, history,

religion; even some forced to change their birth

traditional names to Amharic, or to Biblical names.

Oromoo nation have resisted against colonial policies

despite the Abyssinia education system, discourages the

conquered people culture, language, religion social

organization

The government uses the law they made without the

Oromoo national participation, enforces education to be

91

thought only in Amharic language. Article five explain

clearly Amharic, as the only compulsory language all

students must be instructed. “, (Perham, 1969, p: 253).

However Amharic language was not limited to schools

curriculum it enforces non-Amharic language speakers

to use it in public gatherings such as civilian

government, religious, social, political, education,

health, agricultural and civic organizations etc. For

example, Anthropologist Dr, Baxter (1978) who worked

for many years among the Oromoo nation has observed the

following facts.

Oromoo was denied any official status and it was not

permissible to publish,

preach teach or broadcast in any Oromoo dialect. In court or

before an official

and Oromoo had to speak Amharinya or use an interpreter, Even case

between two Oromoo before an Oromoo speaking magistrate had to

be heard

in Amharinya,I sat through a mission church service at which the

preacher

and all the congregation were Oromoo but at which the sermon, as

well as the

service, was given first in Amharinya which few of the congregation

92

understood at all, and then translated to Oromoo, ( p.288).

Using a policy like this the colonial government left

the Oromoo nation illiterate, kept them away from

opportunities of equal treatment, access to education,

to health, and other social services. Oromoo national

who resides in urban area, speaks Amharic language as a

second or third language considered as Amhara national

and added to the percentage of censuses made, to

increase the number of Amhara high.

Linguistic scholars in the Horn of Africa also have contributed to

the Abyssinia colonial policy by neglecting or ignoring the importance

of Oromoo language. Their silent or negligence has contributed to the

Abyssinian over a century efforts to undermine or dwarf the Oromoo

language. Nevertheless, the Oromoo people remain majority in the

empire, and their Afaan Oromoo also the majority language in the Horn

of Africa. In the contrary, Abyssinia is still imposing Amharic the

language of Abyssinian minority as national language similar to the

former European colonialists in Africa.

Conclusion: The Oromoo language for the last one hundred twenty years

is among the most suppressed language in the world. The Christian

Coptic church shares the power with the colonial government in

administrative branches; they were major curriculum developers for the

entire education program in the empire. Both the Government and the

church worked hard for the last century to replace the Oromoo

93

languages in the empire by Amharic languages, gradually aimed to

eliminate them, (Perham, 1969, p.253). Thus, access to education,

health, and other social services systematically distanced the Oromoo

nation from equal treatment.

B.6…Policy against Equal Employment and Opportunity.Discrimination against grown number of urban Oromoonationals deep rooted in all government offices. Theywere denied access to civil service they qualified for,because of their broken Amharic language, or because oftheir colonial background or for their Oromoo name theyrefused to change. Oromoo national who finished highschool or above, identified by his/her Oromoo name,with little accent when speaks Amharic languages, whichwill be disqualified from opportunity of employmentin his/her field. Those who have education below ninthgrade or have no education encouraged to join theimperial army and sent to war front. In the words ofBaxter, 1978, “The Amharic language, is a symbol of nationalidentity as well as the language of political power. Fluent Amharinyaand an Amharic way of life were almost prerequisites for entry togovernment employment…” (p.288). The Abyssinia colonialcruelty was a comparable to much former colonial systemin Africa. In some cases it was the worst type ofcolony that world refused to understand, because theynever heard Africa colonize Africa, and the colony theyknow was only when white colonize black. Employment forurban Oromoo female has been even the worst, expect fordemotic laborer for upper and middle class Abyssinian

94

families with a salary of Ethiopian $30 a month and aminimum 16 hr.; a day work before 1974 revolution.

B.7…Colonial Policy against Social Integration:

Documents disclosed in Amharic language in early 1967th

sold in public by Abyssinian Orthodox church forbid anyAbyssinia Christian individual to have social contact,such as sexual relation, either through marriages, asconcubines, or by forces with Oromoo individuals. Thechurch forbids it and officially preached it up toearly 1970th sponsored by Orthodox Coptic Christianchurch. For many innocent illiterate OrthodoxChristians it was heard to override restrictions rulespreached by “holy priests”. But majority ofAbyssinians ignored these types of teaching byconservative preachers, (See Taimmira Miriam, 1967).

Despite Coptic Abyssinia Church opposition tointegration of any types with Oromoo, an Abyssiniaindividual marries only when Oromoo person born fromOrthodox Coptic Christian family, adopted Abyssinianculture, speaks fluent Amharic language, own land incase of peasant, and have education or business incase of urban dwellers. These types of marriage existfrom top royal families to ordinary individuals.Generally, intermarriage between children of colonizersand colonized are very low, and not encouraged by both

95

side. Daily social activities also very limited betweenAbyssinians and colonized people, cultural, religion,social, and language tolerance does not encourageduntil 1991, the former colonial authority overthrown byanother Abyssinian northern Tigrigna forces.

B: 8…Colonial Policy against Oromoo Religion

Emperor Johannes, King Takle Hayimaanot and KingMenelik in 1878, held religion conference inconquered Wallo Oromoo region at a place called Boru-Medaa. The Abyssinia conference demands all Oromoounder their control must renounce their traditionalreligion Waaqeffanna and Islam. Wallo leaders wereforced to renounce Islam faith and ordered to acceptCoptic Christian religion. They bowed to new rule tosave their traditional position they have over theirclans. The conference declared that any individual orgroup refused must leave their ancestors land and gosomewhere. Many Islam and traditional religionfollowers left their ancestors land and exiled to Haar,Jimmaa, and Matamaa. Thus religious tolerance violatedby the colonial government or by individual Christian.

B.9…Colonial Policy Against Traditional Oromoo HolyPlaces:

96

Waaqeffanna traditional religion has number of holyplaces, and holy symbols inherited from theirancestors. Emperor ordered Abyssinian priests tobaptize every traditional Holy days, and builtAbyssinian church in each Oromoo holy places; such as,Glama Qullubbi in Barantu region, replaced by St,Gabriel church; Galma Garaa Cuuqaala in Tuulama regionreplaced by St Abbo; Araddaa Leeqaa Dabballee inTuulamaa region replaced by St Yohaanis church; andEjarssa Lafoo in Shaggar, turned to St George church,etc.

People travel to Boorana region as pilgrimage to AbbaaMuudaa residence, to receive blessing from the holy menand women. When Oromiya colonized, Emperor Menelikfirst targeted these holy men and women, and executedmany of them, because people listen to them. Bulatvish(1897) have stated his observation in the followingways, “When the country was subjugated, the first thing theAbyssinians did was to capture and execute the Qaallu. A Qaallu whoadvices well and speaks the truth is very respected by the people”,(Bulatvich 2000, p.64). Furthermore, Oromoo nationalresides in Oromiya, required to build church in theirarea, maintain them, and pay annual taxes from theiragricultural products to the local church and colonialState. According to some scholar statics there arestill 20% strictly followers of indigenous Oromooreligion called Waqeffanna, and they remain unconverted

97

to any alien religion; and in twenty first centurytheir number is increasing specially among the youngOromoo nationalists and they are parts of theresistance forces.

Part IV, Oromoo Resistance against Colonial

Policy: The Emerging

of Urban Oromoo Political

Nationalism:

C 2...The Birth of Organized Resistance forces: In theearly 1960th resistance against colonial policy

gradually increased in many parts of Oromoo regions.

For example modern armed struggle (1963-1970), in

Balee region, pan-Oromoo Macchaa, Tuulama socio-

political organization in (1964-1969), was some

examples. In early 1960th few conscious urban Oromoo

Nationals, like Mr. Haile Mariam Gammada, Dajjazmach

Kabbada Buzunash, Kolonel Alamuu Qixxeessa Qnyazemch

Makonen Wasanuu, Mr., Gabra Sillassie Waldaa, Mr,

Ilaala Ibssa, Basazenew, Qadiida Gurmeecha, Qadiida

Gonfaa, Bojiyaa family, and many others began

discussing their concern of the Oromoo people. In 1964

98

they have agreed on five major points to Organize

Macchaa Tuulama pan Oromoo socio-political association.

Many of them were, land owing classes, others were high

ranking military officers, and still others in high

position within the civilian administration.

These urbanized Oromoo nationalist, had an access to

observe economic, social, cultural, political,

employment, inequality in the empire. Despite, some of

these people were wealthy individuals, lived better

than ordinary Abyssinians, they were nationalist

determined to sacrifice their life. They can’t separate

themselves from poor Oromoo nationals who were striped

their own farm lands. Economic achievements and social

integration with Abyssinia never protect them from

psychological torture, by the action of the government

activities against the Oromoo nationals. Their economic

privileges never gave them complete pleasure in their

life.

They recall their memories that as young Oromoo when

they moved to urban area, they were told Oromoo people

as socially politically and economically inferior race;

uncivilized, pagan, slaves. They were called “Galla” a

99

derogatory term that the Abyssinians like to call

Oromoo nationals. To make it more agley Abyssinians

intentionally attached endless never breaking

stereotypes that system of unwelcomes to urban area,

Lytton: 1966. (p.35). Oromoo national who moved to

urban area for school, employment, and those who were

born in town, remembers endless stereotypes Abyssinian

have invented and used against individuals.

Founding members of Macchaa Tuulama discussed

experience they passed through as starting causes of

their own example. Being in urban area opens more

access to observe the Oromoo individual, group or

nation treated as second class citizen; at work places,

in the school, in the sports fields, at public

gathering, at churches and in the streets.

1… tired hearing every day, stereotypes colonialist

used against Oromoo nationals

2… worried about the deteriorated living condition of

Oromoo farmers, whose

land confiscated and distributed to Abyssinian

absentee land lords, and

100

Oromoo made to farm their own land for the new

Abyssinian settlers as serfs.

3… observed Oromo landless peasants payee heavy taxes,

and yet have no

services; such as, clinics or hospitals, paved

streets and bridges, schools,

except in major towns for Abyssinian settlers.

4… worried about unknown future of Oromoo children if

condition continues

without challenge.

5… observed national army and police, paid the worst

salary which 80% of soldiers were from Oromoo

nationals. With small salaries they cannot able to send

their children to school, pay rent, food, and take care

their families. So many questions rose, and discussed

to find right answer. Finally they have agreed to

organize Machaa Tuulama Socio-political Association and

expanded it into Oromoo rural areas.

They analyzed cases they knew well, like some Oromoo

self-denial individuals, who were born in urban area,

without accent when speaks Amharic, have Abyssinian

names. Behaves in Abyssinian social style; married

101

Abyssinian, gave their children Abyssinian names, avoid

teaching their children Oromoo language, avoid rural

relative visitors, speaks Amharic at work, and at

school; but still suffers from being social

discrimination, racial degradation by Abyssinians,

because many of them carried their indigenous last

names.

For the colonized people it requires organization, with

guts, and determination to counter colonial policy.

Many small self-help local organizations merged and

formed one strong and big organization, known Macchaa

Tuulama Association in 1964. Branches of this

Organization have expanded in all Oromiya with over

five million members in few years. Members of

organization encouraged to explain their experience of

discrimination against the Oromoo national at work

place, in occasional gatherings, in employment, in

education, and in land distribution etc. Fearing the

Macchaa Tuulama fast expansion in Oromiya the colonial

authority have arrested and jailed several leaders and

individual activists

102

Chapter 4:

C.3...Resistance against Cultural Policy: Once the Baale Peasant uprising fired organized

resistance force, every Oromoo in the region physically

joined the forces to fight against the new land

distribution policy. The news of uprising not by

government but by word of mouth spread to every corner

of Oromiya and people waiting for brave group to follow

Baale uprising example many of them dreams future

Oromoo independent state and governed according Gadaa

democracy. They knew that institutions, such as

language, social organization, religion, culture can be

freely functions only under indigenous Gadaa

administration. Etc. Gadaa survived under heavy

pleasure Oromoo national have resisted alien

interventions. People preferred Gadaa based

traditional culture to resolve conflicts between them

or between Oromoo and others, (Bahrey. 1593, p111).

Hunting ford, 1955, p.21

103

Despite the Oromoo under colony people prefers the

Gadaa system to solve conflicts within their society

rather than spend their money and time in corrupted

colonial systems court. Abyssinian court system

representatives including Judges Attorney general and

ordinary Clarks are strangers, appointed by colonial

regime to execute the colonial policy. Since appointed

and employed were from Abyssinia, language of

communication was major problem for the local people to

explain their case to the people alien to the Oromoo

language. Practically they have no confident on alien

judges whom they do not know, but appointed by the

colonial authority to judge them. The fact that all

people within the circle of court office, such as

judges, lawyers, attorneys, police and reporters are

expecting bribes, from accuser and accused individuals

it has financial burden on them. Oromoo culturally do

not know how to bribe government officials.

At provincial or regional level the language of courts

are in Amharic, the Oromoo speakers must have good

translator. The amount of bribe at regional level is

higher than district courts which the Oromoo peasant

104

cannot afford, and also risk losing their case by

having regular translator’s means by not bribing

translators known by the judges. To avoid all these

constrains the Oromoo prefers Gadaa based conflict

resolution even for homicide cases.

Conflict resolution was and still is part of the Gadaa

system which was easily understood by Oromoo national,

and exercised by village elders free of charge.

Ignoring colonialist policy of conflict resolution

means peaceful way of resistance against alien imposed

conflict resolution. It is a democratic method; part of

the Gadaa system to resolves their problem very

quickly, before an individual conflict develops to clan

or ethnic conflicts.

Nine, seven or five neutral elders selected by the

ethnic or clans from both sides, (Lewis, 1994, pp: 56-

57). No matter how serious was the conflict, people in

both sides have confident on the elder’s wisdom and

experience to resolve without offending any side, fair

judgment and fair punishment delivered. Resolving their

problem by local elder was a system of indirect

resistance against colonial policies imposed on them

105

against their will. Restrictions from exercising their

tradition have existed since colonization. But the

government found it difficult to execute in every

sector of Oromoo society, they rather serious to

suppress organized rebellious in the area.

===================================================

Chapter 4 D…IV....The Survival of the Gadaa System under

Colonial PolicyThis paper will discuss the survival of an indigenous

African democracy known as the Oromoo Gadaa system

(Lagesa 2000: xi). The system is one of the surviving

African indigenous democratic systems for several

thousand years. It has many institutions functioning

encompass history, politics, culture, social,

education; and religion institutions practiced

according to the Gadaa system. The Oromoo nation

practiced democracy based on popular election every

eight years; while Abyssinia practiced Monarchial and

Feudal institutions, a system that recognize one

person for life by virtue of inherited King or

emperor (Pp.11-12).

106

This chapter discusses present Gadaa activities, its

institution, internal changes due to colonial policies.

Colonial force, their feudal system, contradicts the

democratic system of the Gadaa system. Democratic Gadaa

system once functions in national level has been

reduced to regional and local branches by colonizers

systematic plan to minimize its importance. For

example the Oromoo nation at Chaffee assembly still

exercises parts of the Gadaa activities in local or

regional level, but right after colonization completed

in 1900, the colonial administration has restricted

certain major democratic rights on national level. The

author of this essay is an insider who has spent all

his life studying the Gadaa system by reading,

interviewing, observing, participating, and teaching as

it works in the Gadaa system.

The Oromoo lost their independent only after

Abyssinia, French, and Russia Italian, and British

formed collision to divide the Horn of Africa among

them. This has been reported partly by Capitan

Harrington an English diplomatic Mission in 1897 “the

107

French and Russians had the whole time to make all their plan for

helping Menelik in his annexations towards the Nile valley and the

Equatorial provinces, (pp.61;64). By the end of 1900

Oromiya completely partitioned among Abyssinia, British

and Italian. Colonial demarcation immediately signed

with British and Italian colonial government to

complete partition, and arranged colonial

administration policies for Menelik similar to European

colonial policy in the Horn of Africa.

Menelik’s policy to eliminate the Gadaa system

backfired from his own Oromoo betrayers or Oromoo

collaborators with colonizers and raised big question,

this coupled with serious oppositions from Oromoo

nationals when tried to implement.

The Emperor has no choice but compromised only to

reduce certain top position in the Gadaa system to

regional level. For example, the power of National

Abbaa Bokkuu and other national representatives have

reduced to regional, local and clan levels. In such

plan there can be many Abbaa Bokkuus, functions

separate from one another. Emperor took uncompromised

position, on the Oromoo religion, he even hanged the

108

Oromoo spiritual leader Abba Muudaa, because he refused

to give up his traditional religion and opposed to

Menelik policy over the Abbaa Muudaa and the Gadaa

system.

Abyssinian royal chronologist Atsme Giorgis, in (1900)

witnessed that over one hundred thousand Oromoo people

held their national Chaffee assembly at Hawaas Malta

Baldho, (The History of the Oromoo Vol. I, and (p.24).

For example,

(Atsme, (1900) witnessed that national Chaffee

Baldho reduced by Menelik to regional Chaffee

Tuulama, (p11).

The power of four elected national Abbaa Bokkuus

at national Chaffee,

reduced to regional level.

Foolle the Oromoo national army reduced to local

or clan police.

the position of Abbaa Duula head of Oromoo

national army equivalent to

Ministry of defense force replaced by

appointed Abyssinian officials.

109

traveling for Pilgrimages to offer traditional

spiritual homage to national

Spiritual Qaallu, known as Abbaa Muudaa banned;

Oromoo national Gadaa flag Red, White and Red

discarded, and remained in the archives of local

and national Qaallu offices, (pp.11-12).

The following Chaffee continues functioning as local,

regional, and as national activities. Tuulama Chaffee

Malka Baldho functions as national Chaffee during

Emperor Iyyaasu Mohammed Alii Liban. Alien religion in

general and Coptic Orthodox in particular expanded in

Oromiya by force to replace indigenous religion. Local

people were ordered to build church in each conquered

village and assist Abyssinian priests and deacons in

all types of help they want; in addition to ten

present tax for the church from their agricultural

annual income. Priests expect addition pay for their

“spiritual” service, they were called the ears of

colonial government, because they were secret agents

who report every political and social movement in the

conquered area.

110

Local Priests and colonial representatives in the area

call the local people to the nearest churches and at

the gun point have changed their tradition name and

baptized them in the name of the local church.

Baptisms take place at market place, at funeral

sermonizes, at traditional holy place, forced then to

renounce their traditional religion and order to drop

traditional Oromoo names and carried baptism name. In

addition the colonial government discredits the

indigenous Waaqeffanna faith, as “uncivilized, backward

pagan practices”, etc.

Oromoo nation under colonial government assisted by

Local Coptic Orthodox priests, Catholic priests, and

Protestant Pastors, conducted force conversation from

tradition faith to Christian. In protest to force

Christianization many Oromoo national, led by local

Shakes voluntarily converted to Islam in millions, and

still millions of Oromoo nationals opposed to both

religion remain with their indigenous traditional

Faith. Despite all these difficulties, the Oromoo

tradition, Gadaa activities, and traditional religion

are still surviving mostly in area dominated by Tuulama

111

and Eastern Maccha or Liiban, Boorana, Gujii, Karrayyu

and Gabara regions.

Chaffee: One of surviving national center called

Chaffee Baldho in Tuulama, about 35 miles West of

Shaggar at Hawaas River on Jimmaa road. There are also

two more regional Chaffees called Chaffee Galaan for

Galaan and Chaffee Tuutaa for Jillee clan; and all are

still functioning. Boorana Gumii Gayyoo as regional

Chaffee for the Boorana Oromoo, Chaffee Baku Xulee

functions by Liiban of Eastern Macca region, Eastern

Oromiya, represented by Karrayyu Chaffee, Southern

Oromiya Gujii Caffees, and Gabara Chaffees are still

functioning, Mohammed Hassan, 1990,( p.42). Thus the

Oromoo resistance against colonial policy of Menelik at

least saved some Chaffees until this time. Even though

Gadaa kept apart to regional and local level, by Euro-

Abyssinian colonial authorities; the system remains

with minor differences due to over time development of

certain word. Many of these Chaffees are busy every

eight years as regional centers for Oromoo Gadaa system

in Oromiya.

112

Unfortunately the following Chaffee’s were banned or

ceased its functions. Boorana-Gujii Caffees, at Hora

Walaabu the cradle home of the Gadaa System; Ituu of

Barentuu Chaffee at Mormon and Karaa Qurqura, Chaffee

Bulullu, for Afran Qallo, Chaffees Makoodi for Wallo,

and number of Chaffees in all over Oromiya banned by

Menelik between 1900-1913. Menelik natural death in

1913 hampered the process of complete elimination of

the Gadaa system. In addition some Chaffees ceased its

existent due to the negative teachings of alien

religions; such as Islam, Protestant, and Catholic,

mostly appeared since 1830th.

Iyaasu, Oromoo in his paternal side, has inherited his

maternal grandfather’s Menelik II crown. Emperor

Iyaasu, in his three years short rule has positive

attitude towards the conquered people; spend more time

with colonized nations; married several Oromoo wives to

from fraternal relationship; redistributed the land

taken from Oromoo peasants by emperor Menelik;

sympathized with the Gadaa system; spent his time with

elected Gadaa officials. His style of ruling completely

113

opposite to the feudalist colonial rule of his

Abyssinia maternal grandfather.

Loyalist Abyssinian of his grandfather, Abyssinian

officials, and few Oromoo collaborators and fanatics

Orthodox religion leaders deposed him. He was

Christian, but accused of being born from Muslim Oromoo

father, who was accepted Christian and baptized by

force. Emperor Iyaasu was put in prison for twenty

years and was killed by the order of Emperor Haile

Selassie in 1935.

Empress Zewuditu: Gadaa was on the process of reviving

when Empress Zewuditu replaced Emperor Iyaasu, and she

was very busy with palace internal power struggle; as a

result she has no time to move against Gadaa system and

Chaffee Baldho again began functioning as National

Chaffee, during her reign and she died in 1924. Emperor

Haile Sillassie was not aggressive opponent towards the

Gadaa system, but he ordered district administrators to

control Gadaa activities not function beyond regional

level. Nevertheless his prime priority was to

eliminate some crown claimers within the palace. He

114

gave priority to expand Amharic language in conquered

areas, settle Abyssinian peasants in Oromiya,

baptizing non converted population to Orthodox faith by

force to complete the process of imperial building.

===========================================

==

Chapter 4.

E... Colonized Oromoo Struggle for Independence:In the previous chapters this researcher has discussed

the struggle of the Oromoo nation against slavery, and

the resistance of the Oromoo nation against the

Abyssinia, Portugal, Afaars, Ottoman Turks, and Arab

enslavers. The emergence of Mootii system (Monarchial

) formed by group of Abba Duulaas in the western parts

of Oromiya, interested to join slave trade with

Abyssinia and Arabs also discussed. Oromoo resistance

against advancing colonizer led by Abyssinian, Britain

and Italian colonization’s since 1870th and finally lost

115

their independence to Euro-Abyssinian colonization by

1900.

This chapter briefly discusses on the struggle of

Oromoo nation for independence with special

concentration on the emergence of Baale, Afran Qallo,

Machaa Tuulama, and Tokkumma Oromoo Students movement.

In addition, Members of Oromoo in exile and clandestine

former Macchaa Tuulama members in the empire with

southern nations and nationalities have organized the

Ethiopian nationalities’ Liberation Front (ENLF). ENLF

organized colonized people intellectuals, traders

peasants to say no to the empires policies of land

allocation, policy of language, restriction of

movement, restriction from equal employments for equal

qualification, and equal schooling policies in the

empire.

ENLF, and Union of Oromoo Student Movement, in the

empire, (UOSM), agreed to form Oromoo Liberation

Front (OLF) with objective to liberate Oromiya from a

century old Abyssinian colonization, and to establish

Independent Republic of Oromiya.

116

Organized military struggle in 1963 has been started by

General Waaqo Guutu against colonial land grabs from

Oromoo farmers and distribute to Abyssinian settlers.

Maccha Tuulama Oromoo self-help organization declared

in 1964, to build schools, clinics and roads in Oromoo

geographical area. Two years later question of

political democracy raised by members of Maccaa

Tuulama, and their struggle not any more limited to

build roads, clinics and schools, but also struggle

towards political and economic change of the empire.

Secret agenda for the total independent of Oromoo

country unofficially circulated within some members of

Machaa Tuulama that reduced popularity from self-help

civic movement, to plan for total independence of

Oromoo people and their land. Selected individuals

were picked to contact armed struggle leaders in Baale

region to coordinate both organizations. They agreed

to liberate the Oromoo people and their country from a

century old Abyssinian colony. Colonial government

quickly and aggressively responded by arresting and

jailing and killing suspected members of Machaa Tuulama

to eliminate the movement. Even, non-evolved

117

individual Oromoo attacked at schools, at work places,

in the military camp, and police station etc.

Oromoo Students in Poly Technique Institution

Organized Union of Oromoo Students Movement in 1965 in

Bahar Daar (UOSM) for the first time in the history of

the Oromoo student’s movement. Letter of declaration of

the organization have been sent to different high

schools, university, colleges, teachers training

institution, commercial school and missionary schools

in the empire. In two months branch organizations in

many government and private schools immerged.

In addition, Tokkumma Oromoo has some knowledge About

Baale Oromoo armed struggle through one of the student

who came from Raayitu district to Bahar Daar Poly-

Technical institution in 1964.

In the month of September 1965 this researcher with

group of 15 students introduced Tokkumma Oromoo

Organization to Macchaa Tuulamaa self-help

organization. The student movement in Shaggar sharply

increased, Machaa Tuulama allowed the student movement

to use the hall every Saturday. Branch of Afran Qallo

118

also introduced to Machaa Tuulamaa through Abdul Aziz

Mohamed a member of Ethiopian parliament represented

the city of Harar and suburban districts. Afran Qallo

entertains members of Macchaa Tuulama with their modern

music from Eastern Oromoo while group of Muloo

youngsters entered the organization in traditional

dances before meeting start and after the meetings.

The Great sons and daughters of Oromiya, such as

Haile Mariam Gammada, Alamuu Qixxessa, Makonen Wasanu,

Baqalaa Nadii, Taddassa Birru General, Dawit Abdii

General, Abbaba Gammmada, Basazenew Bayiisa, Dhiinssa

Lephisa, Gabre Sellassie Waldaa, Abdul Aziz Mohammed,

Adam Saddo, Ahmed Gunaa, Angaawu Dhuguma, Hajii Galmoo,

Baqala Mokonen, Baaro Tumssa , Husen Sura, Ijjata

Fayiisa, Ilaala Ibssa, Kumssa Lata, Mammo Mazemir,

Qadiida Gonfaa, Sihina Bojuyaa, Rabiyaa Abdulqadir ,

Sahilu Birrii, and many Oromoo nationalist were

actively campaigning among the Oromoo nationals to

support Macca Tuulamaa Organization. They have played a

major role where some of them coordinated the Oromoo

national civic movement, others worked towards armed

119

struggle for the independent of Oromiya many years

before Oromoo Liberation Front formed. Macchaa Tuulamaa in 1966 reached its highest pick with

more than five million memberships in Oromiya. In 1967,

many leaders of Macchaa Tuulama, such as Maammo

Mazemir, and Haji Adam Saddo, General Taddassa Birru,

Haile Mariam Gammada, Alamu Qixeessa, Makonen Wasanu

etc. were jailed, while Ijjata Fayiisa and Husen Sura

with few Macchaa Tuulama members left the country to

organize Oromoo in Sudan and Middle Eastern countries.

The colonial authority invented falls rumors to divide

educated class from uneducated Oromoo nationals,

between Muslim and Christian, and also to divide the

unity of Oromoo nation in regional bases etc.

Those remaining including this researcher went

underground to continue the struggle for independent by

working closely with those who left the empire for the

same purpose. At a time every one feared even their own

friend, and nobody knows when to be arrested. In 1968

this researcher, Dr Tolasaa, and Mr., Baroo Tumssa get

together for a serious discussion at Reverend Gudinaa

120

Tumssa house. Baaroo said “we have worried about the

situation, but we better discuss what to do next”.

After a minute silent Baroo suggested that “obboleewwan

Koo! Ta’anii yaaddawuura manna, ka’anii ittii yaadu wayya”, Baaro

Tumssa (1968). Roughly, it means” brothers! Nothing can

be gained by sitting and worrying for the worst; but

better to get up and plan for the next”

Baaroo Tumssa was graduated from University of Shaggar,

has very important position at Ministry of Health,

popular organizer of the Oromoo youth, understand

friends and enemies of the Oromoo nation, expert in

collecting information from friends and form enemy

camps. Six feet tall person like his families, he do

not laugh, but smiles when necessary and has special

gift to convince others, and trusted person. Working

with the person of such qualities makes this researcher

very proud

Serious political conversations have exchanged by

three individuals the purpose for plan, what to plan?

And how? Through discussion exchange the idea to form

clandestine network proposed. Of course under this

121

general topic there were several subtopics’ to be

discussed. At the effort of these friends’ clandestine

organization favored by these three individuals. Later

on the number of this group grew to five, and many

similar clandestine for the same purpose began

mushrooming in university. Most of University student

Oromoo has been recruited by Baaroo Tumssa and Dr

Tolasa.

Many students in high schools were recruited by this

researcher. Industry and factory Oromoo worker

organized by Mr., Ilaala Ibssa. Baaro Tumssa was the

head of this clandestine movement coordinator. This

author shared the idea with his uncle, who was one of

the active members of Maccha Tuulama, and he was

already in similar underground organization with Baaroo

Tumssa, but he kept secret to himself. This writer

with his uncle Ilaala Ibssa, Baaroo Tumssa, Dr Tolasaa,

and others have played major role for the continuation

of the struggle against Abyssinian colony.

The clandestine group purchased carbon copy machine,

borrowed type writer, but an individual last name

122

Gammada, promised to type disappeared on the last day

probably feared to take risk. Inexperienced fresh

graduated from typing school, a sister of this writer

Mulu Birru have typed without really knowing what she

have been typing. For the first time in the history of

Oromoo straggle has organized and distributed seven

pages opposition pamphlet by clandestine group. The

distribution has continued for three days in Shaggar

University, Araada, Markaato, and Haile Sillassie

square in August 21-23. Despite different clandestine

group were not personally known each other this writer

only knows the job have been done in many parts of

Shaggar, Asalla and Shashamanne.

This author left Shaggar for Harar city the same night

to handout some pamphlets to two activist Macchaa

Tuulama Members, and a member of clandestine

organization. One was a leader of Noolee clan, Hajii

Galmoo at his home in Dirre Dhawaa, and Lieutenant

Getachew Takluu in Harar city. The opposition pamphlet

appeared and distributed a week, after the government

sentenced death to Lieutenant Maammo Mazamir and

General Taddessa Birru. The paper written in Amharic

123

language, and titled “An Organization for the

establishment of the Oromoo Liberation Front”, signed

by clandestine organization

Two month later this author kidnapped by the Abyssinia

security force and covered from head to feet with large

black cotton Grown including his eyes and taken to

Shaggar suburb. For reason unknown why he was taken to

one hour drive out of Shaggar, and why they changed

their mind and returned him back to Shaggar the same

night still unknown by this researcher. The security

took him to a secret private prison Villa prepared for

serious political suspected individuals. It was unknown

place, even if a person died during torture no one

knows who killed him/her. During these periods his

eyes and his body remain covered and his hands tied

with powerful handicaps. He does not have clue where

they kept him for almost a month.

He was interrogated in this villa three times for two

hours repeated questions by five security men, every

day; and followed by physical torturers every four

days interval for a period of twenty seven days. They

124

bit inside feet of this individual without stopping

for one or more hours forcing him to expose person or

group he worked with. But this person determined rather

dies than disclose any information he knew and his

participation. Finally after twenty seven days four

armed securities took him around three AM, to Gullallee

suburb of the capital city, and ordered to walk out of

the car. From there he walked about four miles, and

reach the main Machaa Tuulama Office and stayed the

rest night there.

Even though this researcher out of secret jail he was

not free at all. Government security force always

behind him; where ever he goes. When he was in night

law school at Shaggar University, two former kidnappers

take a class with him. After two years in such risky

situation the clandestine organization advised him to

leave the country and it was relive for his worried

families, group of his clandestine organization. Thus

in the first week of 1972 this individual arrived in

Washington DC, joined his beloved uncle late Sisai

Ibssa. A letter sent to him by clandestine organization

signed by late Magarss Barii in February 1972, assigned

125

him to work as representative of the organization in

the North America. This individual made contact with

offices of Ethiopian Nationalities’ Liberation Front

(ENLF) foreign offices, in Syria, Iraq, and Yemen.

Line of communication that connect the ENLF in Oromiya

and those foreign offices in the Middle Eastern

countries have been exposed, which caused arrest of

many suspected individuals. All foreign in the Middle

East divert their channel via Washington DC

representatives. ENLF organized general meeting in

Shaggar in late 1973 to make organizational reform

regarding the name of the front and the program of the

organization. ENLF has the only organization supported

by the majority of clandestine members and at the same

time they work day and night to convince some

individuals who oppose to the name ENLF and proposed

the Oromoo Liberation Front (OLF) and with goal to

established independent republic of Oromoo state.

ENLF organized general meeting in Shaggar, Finfinne in

late 1973 to make organizational reform regarding the

name of the front, the objective of the organization

126

and to revise the political program. Even though the

ENLF has enjoyed majority member supporters and at the

same time they work for proper name that liberates the

Oromoo nation with the goal to establish independent

Oromiya state. While leaders discussing to choose

between existing ENLF and proposed Oromoo Liberation

Front (OLF), supporters of the name change led by

Elemoo Qilxuu in late 1973 has declared OLF in Eastern

parts of Oromiya at a place called Charcar Mountain.

From the day the liberation gun fired on the Charcar

Mountain the existence of Oromoo Liberation Front was

no more secret by international media

In opposition against the declared OLF, another secret

organization formed by the minority who were from the

beginning opposes on the proposed objectives of the

Oromoo Liberation Front call for the Independent

Republic of Oromiya. After many days debate on the

subject the reformist were defeated by majority vote

and their reform proposal failed. Ethiopian National

Liberation Front officially changed to Oromoo

Liberation Front. Some OLF leaders who have on minority

side formed Oppressed Nationalities Revolutionary

127

Liberation Struggle EONRLS, or ECHAT. was organized

while still these organizers were officially leads

the Oromoo Liberation Front.

Pro-ECAT group believed that with Baaroo high position

in ECAT with his special skill to convince top Durge

members they can easily recognized as Marxists

organization, also put Baroo into their longtime

planned trap. They intrigued Baaroo Tumssa to accept

secretary position of organization for two reasons.

The intriguers believed recognition by regime

considered as first stepping stone towards the

elimination of the OLF. Nevertheless for unknown reason

Baaroo accepted to lead reformist organization without

dropping the leadership position from the OLF.

Soon ECAT was recognized as expected by the Ethiopian

Socialist military government and closely worked for

short time with the colonial regime, an secret

agenda hidden from Baaro.

Cadres of ECAT assigned to work in the name of OLF to

advance ECAT reform program by misinforming differences

between ECAT and OLF. Supporter members of

128

organization aboard including this writer were told by

members who were claimed OLF, but advocate for minor

reform of ECAT, by ignoring aim and objective of the

OLF. Such minority members within the Oromoo

Liberation Front

have created misunderstanding that coasted the life of

Baaroo Tumssa and Badhoo

Dachasa, which the intriguers attempt to eliminate the

OLF or split the front between pro-ECAT and OLF. After

Baaroo and Badho killed pro-ECAT left the country to

Djibouti, and Khartoum, to open offices in the name of

OLF. Group of ECHAT from Khartoum office opened new

office in Mogadishu in the name of OLF, and invited

the OLF leaders in Eastern Oromiya, for discussion, and

planning for further progress of OLF from Eastern

Oromiya.

The travelers were told journey from Harar Charchr to

Mogadishu, arranged for delegate safest direction which

was said facilitated by the officers of foreign

officers in Mogadishu in the name of OLF. Eleven

delegates sent from the field, followed the directions

they were told, and unfortunately all of them were

killed by ambushed armed group in Ogden desert. Since

129

then ECAT freed them to change every things that

reflected the independent of Oromiya.

In 1974 this researcher with his few friends organized

Union of Oromoo in North at the same time the

continuation of Oromoo Liberation Front armed struggle

resumed by General Taddasa Birru, Hailu Raggaasa,

Kabbada Buzunesh, Makonin Wasanu, Taklu Tasamma, and

Abbaba Haile Mariam. They began hit and run armed

struggle in the suburb of Shaggar in April 1974. From

that on the existence of Oromoo Liberation Front was no

more secret in international media.

The Liberation front in Shaggar has established

effective communication with Union of Oromoo

Organization in the United States and in Europe. In

addition the General Command of OLF told the UONA to

assist foreigner relation based in Khartoum, actual

many of them undeclared ECAT Group. Thousands of

captured Oromoo fighters by Tigray People Liberation

Front (TPLF) and by Eritrean People’s Liberation Front

(EPLF) transferred to OLF office in Khartoum. However

the OLF leaders in Khartoum sent back to their family

130

instead of joining them to the existing OLF in western

region or to organize fresh OLF if not exist.

Tigray and Eritrean People’s Liberation Fronts have

tried to improve the Oromoo armed struggle in western

Oromiya, and even they were participated with OLF army

in action more than two times. In one military mission

taken joint action by OLF and EPLF Abyssinian military

stationed at Asoosa town and many civilian unnecessary

killed. Asoosaa town was temporarily captured for three

days, and left the town as Abyssinia army approached

the town. Disappointed Eritrean commander reported

that the OLF leadership was not interested in any

military engagement, which discouraged many Oromoo

nationals interested to join them anymore. Thus the

formation and strength of OPDO was not formed only

prisoners of wars by TPLF and EPLF, but also by

discouraged Oromoo individual and group nationalists

who were disappointed by inexperienced OLF leadership,

who feared to exercise their own political objective in

practice; because of their ECAT and MESON background.

131

ECHAT failed to overthrow the OLF in Eastern Oromiya,

but claimed the formation of camouflaged OLF to advance

the objectives of ECAT or democratization of Ethiopia.

OLF objective that demand for Democratic Republic of

Oromiya changed to self-determination, Oromiya Shall be

free changed “victory to the Oromoo people” and

Abyssinian colonialism have been eliminated from their

literature. They take blind effort to convince EPRDF,

EDIHAQ, Qinjit, and Ginboot Seven, to win trust from

Abyssinian political and civic organization, which they

fall in all. Surprisingly the same group after forty

years has formed Oromoo Democratic Front, (ODF) similar

to ECAT, in Europe and America, with slit name change

aimed only to eliminate or weaken the Oromoo struggle

for independent Oromiya.

Hidden EHCAT began rising up its head from the office

of the OLF in Khartoum during the Transitional

government. OLF program discarded without discussing

with OLF in eastern Zone. Khartoum group accepted new

program for new Ethiopian Transitional Government that

means practically no need of OLF. But what the Oromoo

132

people want and what OLF leaders attempt to offer

during their short months in the transactional

government goes opposite. Members and leaders of OLF in

Eastern zone never agreed action taken by leaders of

Khartoum group. As OLF armed struggle started from

different parts of Oromiya the TPLF closed all office

in the country side, the OLF office in Shagger

maximum action they take were complain to TPLF and

EPLF.

Second Step was restrict any armed OLF from approaching

the main street only allowed to travels out of ten

kilometer in diameter from any Asphalt roads in

Oromiya. So called OLF leaders of the Transition have

accept a policy similar to Apartheid without any

complain. Oromoo nationals opposed to their leaders,

who ignored original goal and objective of OLF and

accepted unpopular Tigrian Transitional government of

Ethiopia (TGE) which the Oromoo believes TGE program as

the new system that advances new type of colonialism.

However, the demand has been handled by EHCAT group

returned from Khartoum. TPLF who knows the OLF for log

133

time did not take long to kick them out of the

transitional government.

Chapter IV:

B: 8`…Current Colonial Policy: Current Ethiopian regime has adopted some former

colonial policies and polished them to fit for the

present political and social condition without losing

colonial supremacy over the colonized people. The

regime has developed new land grubbing policy; a system

that evicts small farmers from their ancestral land.

Currently, Saudi Arabia, Djibouti, India, China, Egypt,

N Sudan, Nigeria, South Korea …etc., are among many

grabbers of huge fertile agricultural land of Oromoo

nation, and signed with the Abyssinian colonial

government for ninety nine years.

Chapter II: Abyssinia and Portugal Myths andLegend

134

as Sources of DistortedLiteratures

A: Introduction: Abyssinian Church composed of large

number of clergies, and ecclesiastical, who were

writers of tradition legendary, religion myths, and

chronology of kings. Royal clergies write only what the

king like to hear and full of exaggeration to build

their kings moral boosts with mountains of lies. In

addition, destructions made to human beings and

properties, by Abyssinia Kings and emperors during

seasonal expeditions to collect prisoners of wars,

considered as normal heroisms, and presented as

chronology of their kings. Intensification of slave

raids and traders has been by the French collaborate in

transportation of slaves from their ports across Red

Sea to Arabia. Millions of able-bodied strong Oromoo

resistance forces been genocides in the war, thousands

of captured prisoners of war and their families killed

in the Afaar desert by slave traders. This has been

affirmed by Abir (1965) as following, “Those of the enemy

“Oromoo” who were not killed in battle were enslaved, together with all

their women and children.” (p.216). Thus even escaping from

135

death in the battle, does not relived them from the sun

burn in Afaar desert and lackey individual’s reach at

slave ports on Red Sea coast.

A.1…The Problem of Documentations: Following footsteps

of the Portugal soldiers, number of Jesuits

missionaries, classical European adventurers,

geographers, and slave traders, have increased in

Abyssinia. They were sheltered in the Abyssinia

Monoesters, and hosted by Christian Coptic Orthodox,

ecclesiastic, clergies, and monks. Many Jesuits,

adventurers, surprised to Abyssinia religious leaders

who were mastered themselves as culturally story

tellers, fiction fabricators, myths makers, and dream

translators. European have collected biased information

assuming as fact and added to their fifteen and sixteen

hundred myths. Jesuits were unaware of Abyssinia

costume where even their own history covers more

fictions and legends, than closed to fact.

Abyssinia kings and Clergies have warned European

Missionaries to have avoided contact the Oromoo nation

and as a result they never attempted to spend their

time with Oromoo national to collect information.

136

Instead, they have trusted clergies, and totally

depend on distorted Abyssinian sources. They published

several distorted books, still existing in many western

university libraries, as sources of information of

ancient Abyssinia and the rest people in the Horn of

Africa. Until recently it has been used as text in many

western universities, and major sources for European

students interested on the Horn of Africa. Such

information has been disclosed before the emergence of

Maccha Tuulama, in 1964.

Question on land reform raised by Oromoo University

Students, gradually supported by University students,

workers and Southern landless peasants, and urban

civilians in the empire. Popular uprising hijacked by

organized imperial military forces in 1974, and

successfully over turned the Emperor. Few in number,

but determined Oromoo scholars 1974 take the

advantage of transitional military government, and made

an access to many biased information written by

Abyssinians, collected by European who does not know

the Oromoo nation. In some case Euro-Abyssinian

137

researcher are using the same distorted information as

their sources for Oromoo cases.

The existence of biased texts in the European classes,

or libraries are still misleading many non-Oromoo

researchers, interested to work on Oromoo case; and in

their turn unknowingly produces another biased

document. Thus, documents produced by ancient

conservatives, and modern scholars without the

participation of Oromoo national are additional major

problems, and currently Oromoo scholars and this

researcher are encountering

A: 2…Oral Tradition: Oral traditions have been

recognized as important as written information that

orally passed information from one generation to

another generation. Despite, the Oromoo nation lacks

written materials in many cases; oral tradition is an

alternative to recover lost history, culture, system of

government, religion and language of their nation. It

is part of the Gadaa system on which all Oromoo male

and female required to learn history, culture,

religion, military, law, proverb, song etc. It has been

138

conducted according to individual ages as class of

Hiriyaa, and according to their parties, as class of

Miseenssa, practiced in daily bases. Every walking

Oromoo national instructed for the first forty years of

their ages, studying Oromoo cases through Gadaa

arranged Oral education system as it has been inherited

from grand families to families and inherited by new

born person.

Children learn past history of slavery from the mouth

of their families, from Gadaa curriculum, and from

village elders. Learning orally the Oromoo history,

culture, language, political system and religion,

cannot be distorted or forgotten, because the system

allow if one missed the other feel the gap. If one

unintentionally distorted or misinformed, it will be

immediately corrected by a person who listened to the

statement. It like millions of people read one book,

and when one forget, undermined, or distorted there are

million people ready to correct it. Many Oromoo

individuals whose grandparents, and great grandparents

suffered in the past, tells their memories that they

have collected from their parents. They tell how their

139

parents property have destroyed, their normal life also

disturbed by enslavers. From time to time, unprotected

families have taken by force for sale, or killed by

each enslaver’s forces.

This researcher born and grew among the nation of oral

tradition and was fortunate to learn the story of slave

raids and trades; the Gadaa system and antislavery

movement; colonization of Oromiya from their memories’,

or that collected orally from their families, from

village elders and from local and national Chaffee

assemblies. Through Oral tradition new generation

learn past events that have affected part of their

families, where raiders captured people from their

villages, and killed those who have resisted. It also

very hard to estimate properties raiders looted or

burned, and domestic animals they have eliminated.

It is not fair to deny Bahrey’s work, and also it is

not part of the Gadaa culture to undermine facts he has

contributed. His collection was not fiction, or legend,

some misunderstanding, and some wrong interpretation

does exist because of his bandage with Coptic Orthodox

Abyssinia background. But he has recorded what he

140

heard in Abyssinian perspective and observed as the

pioneer writer about the Gadaa system as it was

practiced by Oromoo nation from 1522-to 1593, and as

Oromoo nation is exercising at present.

In Conclusion; this researcher not to make Bahrey as

perfect person in the Gadaa knowledge, but his work

needs edition by qualified indigenous Oromoo group

orally trained the Gadaa knowledge, and access to

written information to compare. Oral tradition is

still strong among the Oromoo nation as the only

alternative to correct distorted information made by

non-Oromoo interested group. When one carefully listens

oral performance by Oromoo person who cannot read and

write “illiterate”, who never heard the existence of

any written information, and compare his/her inherited

memories, eyewitness, and activities in Gadaa education

it seems replicas of 1593 information produced by

Baharey. These make Oral tradition as the only to mend

missing links among the people who lacks keeping past

record in writing.

However this researcher believes that written record

can be distorted by the enemy, can be stolen, and can

141

be misinformed by winners. In the contrary Oromoo

types of Oral tradition educational system cannot

destroyed by enslavers, colonizers, alien religion

propagators, because the knowledge is kept in the mind

of millions of Oromoo national, tells their memories

of their eyewitness, from observation, from

experiences and from inherited information from the

people existed before them.

Attention! This is Partially final

from page 1 to 10

I. Writing the Gadaa, indigenous African democracy

and its institutions in real senses is not easy for

scholars of any field without missing some major

concepts, or without misinterpreting its institutions

and indeed without distorting important parts of the

system. Enrico Cerulli, (1922) criticized European

ethnologist for distorting the Gadaa system based on

their own prejudicial problem they have for African

democracy. ”The Gadaa system is not simple, but it

142

seems to have been especially maltreated (treat badly)

by European ethnologist (p.167)”. he was among very few

European scholars who understand some ethnologist

intentionally maltreating the Oromoo Gadaa system.

Writing the Gadaa system also problematic for urban

born Oromoo nationals or raised in areas where the

Gadaa partially replaced by semi- monarchical types of

Sultanate, or Mootii system. They depend on naked

secondary sources or adopt from religiously fanatics,

socially prejudiced, and culturally biased ancient

Arab Muslims and Judo-Christian written documents.

Such sources have misled many foreigners and Oromoo

nationalists who have keen interest to learn the Gadaa

system. This writer came across several written

documents by distinguished scholars including

definitions that does not compliment with the number of

important concepts of Gadaa indigenous African

democracy. Most pioneer writers have been religiously

extremist, and racially prejudiced; while others have

depend on secondary documents and therefore, both

have limited Gadaa knowledge; and many of them

143

never been in Oromiya countryside, to collect direct

information from indigenous Oromoo people. They lack

integration into the indigenous people to be eyewitness

informants, and participants in the activities of

concerned people they plan to write. Any document short

of this or in the absence of direct participation of

indigenous people can be sources of misleading,

assumptions, imaginations, wrong interpretation, and

distortion. Such document may not be considered as

major primary sources; but can be sighted only when

necessary.

Finally, there are very few western scholar field

researchers, spend their young ages with Oromoo

nationals, staying with them, speaks their language,

practice their culture, interview them, participate in

their social activities, and become part of the

indigenous people. Devoted individuals like these

deserve appreciation for their academic honesty and for

their contributions under much difficulty. Without

these types of evidences this author may have much

144

even more problem to convince other scholars who always

demand for sources.

Oral Tradition: Oral tradition is another major source

of information. More than ninety present past and

present exposed to Gadaa system are illiterate, but

they were all qualified in oral education and

practitioners of the system without looking to the

written sources. They transfer their knowledge to

their children and grandchildren by means of Oral

tradition. As a result of these background indigenous

Oromo’s researcher, born and raised and orally educated

according to the Gadaa system may have less problems to

collect orally based information.

Personal Experience: This researcher is lucky to be an

indigenous Oromoo, born, and raised in Gadaa culture.

His uninterrupted learning while in Oromiya from

traditional educators; personal observation,

participation, including interviewing experts in Gadaa

system, at Chaffee Baldho general assembly as

eyewitness source. In exile he interviews individuals

145

to collect information by experts from different

regions; in writings, tapes and video recording, and

practicing some of it are additional sources. In

addition his memory and lifetime experiences, as well

as his opinion, and interpretations are part of this

dissertation. Thus the author knowledge of the Gadaa

system and its institutions; definition of the system

and important key terms within the system and his

uninterrupted relation with the Gadaa system makes this

dissertation different from many writers.

Chapter I…F: Gadaa System Before Colonization Respond to SlaveRaids. Introduction: This section focuses on the Oromoo

Democratic culture of conduct internal, external,

social, political, and ritual problem, to fined common

solution. In Oromoo Gadaa System people discussed

serious problem, and decide types of action taken to

146

solve popular opinion for national respond. Any emotion

or board speeches are wisely handled by leaders of

assembly. Regardless of how the case was serious or

simple, Once the problem identified the assembly also

discussed very carefully before decisions was made on

the matter, regardless of the time it consumed.

Listening to one another about already identified

internal or external common problem required repeated

discussion, no matter how many hours or days it takes.

Such practice fully implemented during Gadaa Chaffee

Assembly every eight years if the case taken to Chaffee

meeting. For any minor problems Chaffee assembly does

not required, but it could be handled within clans, in

the villages or families level, as long as it follow

Gadaa procedure and Chaffee rules.

Slavery; System of slavery was one of the primary

problems in the Horn of Africa in general and Oromiya

in particular. It includes Political colonization, and

economic exploitations not yet properly addressed by

many scholars in the area. Slave raids and traders

pickup in 1450th and continue rising in many folds

since. In 1482, Oromoo national from North, West,

147

East, and Central Oromoo land take their common problem

to National Chaffee assembly at Hora Walaabu to find

common solution. The assembly recommended the

importance of urgent unity among Oromoo national, and

unanimously supported by Chaffee Walaabu attendants in

1482. Those who were worried the expansion of Muslim

Afaar and Christian Abyssinian enslaver’s have been

already victims of slavery, and many of them lost

members of their communities and families, to

Abyssinian and Afaar slave raiders and traders.

Communication gaps among scattered Oromoo communities,

decline of Oromoo national participation in General

Chaffee assembly and the rise of illegal clannish Abbaa

Bokkuus and Abbaa Duulaas in village have been

contributed to the problems.

Each attendant worried on the Oromoo internal problem

than external enslavers and believed that only when

internal problem identified and solved in proper way

external problem faded away by minor action against it.

Oromoo says that “Namnii mana tokko Ijaaru dhakaa wal

hinsaamu”, means people who want build common house

must not still stone from one another. Thus, the

148

Oromoo decided to stand together for common interest,

and support the decision made by the Assembly.

Chaffee assembly in 1482 demanded for unity as the best

suggestion guaranteed together build anti-slavery

military force, Organize all able boded for war in each

village; including females, elders, children, and

handicaps; train them minimum for eight years and

maximum for forty years; plan for the tactics and

strategies. Division of labors, and non-stopping

military exercise for the Duula Guutu immediately

started as was decided by assembly. These have been

accepted by all five parties led by Melba party of

Lubaa class of 1482-1490.

Decision made by assembly abided by all parties, and

with understanding that each party led discussion on

the same agenda, and their right to accept, or reject

with reasons, or amend decision made in 1482, raised

during their Chaffee assembly. In forty years decision

went on every eight years and also dozens of amendments

made in those years (1482-1522). In mean time the

Foollee national military wing has “devastated Batera

149

Amora” in 1505, a big disaster to Liban Dengil ’s

army,(Bahrey, 1593,p.113).

Oromoo Duula Guutu or anti-slavery war officially

declared by Lubaa class led by the party of Melba in

1522. Enslavers, sometimes separately and sometimes

jointly fights the Oromoo military forces, but whatever

strategies they use, they were unable to defeat the

Oromoo Duula Guutu military force. Abyssinian and

Portugal forces from the North; Afaar, Ottoman Turks,

and Arabs from the East jointly fought the Oromoo

antislavery military offensive wars. However, the

combination of Christian Abyssinian and Portugal;

Muslim Afaars, Ottoman Turks, and Arabs were unable to

stand against Oromoo men and women, armed only with

spears, shields but best in the world cavalries.

According to Bahrey observation and interview Oromoo

elders, the Oromoo antislavery forces fought the

Abyssinian troops at battle of Dago where Prince

Hamalmal was killed and King Galwdewos run away from

his base at Dago. Sultan Nur of Afaar lost the war to

Masle at battle of Hazalo and unknown numbers of people

150

were killed from both side. In Bahrey (1593) words

“Since the Oromoo first invaded “our” country there had been no such

slaughter” (p.117). Afaar and Abyssinian enslavers lost

raiding zones, such as Dawaro, Fatagar, Ifaat, and

Hazalo. Very few liberal European scholars have

mentioned in limited statements, and the rest

information kept alive by orally passed from one

generation to next generation

The Oromoo antislavery forces led by Lubaa Melba,

occasionally engaged in conformation as Bahrey have

indicate, that a case in 1522-1530 Lubaa of Melba,

1530-1538 Lubaa of Muudana, 1538-1546, Lubaa of

Kilolee; 1546-1554, Lubaa of Befolle, 1554-1562 Lubaa

Mesle, were remain remembered by Oromoo generations

after another generation, (Bahrey 1593, pp.115-125).

It has been united international enslavers such as

Abyssinia and Portugal forces from the North; Afaar,

Ottoman Turks, and Arabs from the East, jointly fought

the Oromoo antislavery military offensive wars.

However, the combination of Christian and Muslim were

unable to stand against Oromoo men and women, armed

only with spears, shields and best cavalries.

151

Enslavers lost slave raiding zones, such as Dawaro,

Fatagar, Ifaat, and Hazalo. Very few liberal European

scholars have mentioned in limited statements, and the

rest information kept alive orally passed one

generation to next generation.

Pro- Abyssinian Portugal Jesuit Lobo in (1624) made the

following angry remarks, “These Galles ( Oromoo) lay everything,

where they come, in ruin, putting all to the sward without distinction of age

or sex, which barbarities, though their number are not great, have spread

the terror of them over all the country”, (p.14). He blamed

antislavery resistance forces, as if they have no

good reason to defend themselves and their properties

from slave raiders and traders. Infect there were no

worst human terror than system of slavery spearheaded

by the Christian Portuguese and Muslim Ottoman Turks,

in which still remembered by Diaspora Africans whose

ancestors were victims of slavery.

Enslavers have no more collect millions of hard working

Oromoo families to foreign land across Red Sea ports

and sell them to slavery. Afaars, Abyssinians, and

their religious allays have written there side of story

when at a time they were the only people accompanied by

152

their own individuals who were employed and supervised

by leaders of enslavers.

Understanding Historical Problem of Literature

Review.

Introduction: This paper is an attempt to examineclassical and modern literatures written by foreigners,including Abyssinian sources. The Europeans actuallypreferred to place their first foot step in the land oflegendary Preston John which was later discovered asvery small Abyssinian Christian kingdom surrounded byOromoo and another nationalities. The kingdom waslocated in the extreme North and Northwest of presentEthiopian Empire. It was the interest of Europeans tomake mutual friends with the Christian Abyssinian inthe Red sea region to stop Turkey’s commercialdomination and Islam expansions in the region of RedSea and Arabian Gulf in African side.

Number of documents reviles that Europeans andAbyssinians support one another for the following majorreasons. Both practiced feudal and aristocratic systemin their kingdoms; they share Christian faith, theypractice system of slavery, both were colonizers of

153

African people and the continent; and both were racist.Once they colonize the continent, they also control thepeople, information, economy, and culture. Literatureproduced by Europeans covers the imperial institution,Abyssinian culture, and Coptic Christian religiondoctrines. Eshete 1981 (The Rural Scene and RuralTransformation in Ethiopian History) reveal this “themajority of published material describes the situationin the Christian highlands” (p11).

A…The Problem of Abyssinian Sources. Ancient Abyssinianwritten records have been absolutely put in the handsof Abyssinian clergies, and ecclesiastics; others likepriests and deacons can read and pray in the ancientlanguage called Gize; but they cannot understand , andcannot write expect very few individual clergies, orecclesiastics. Gradually around 1200 AD, they havedeveloped new languages for common people calledAmharic or the rulers tongue; basically derived fromancient Gize. After 1900, religions, history,chronology, social and military activities of Abyssiniahave been translated from Gize to Amharic language.They have distorted Oromoo indigenous democratic Gadaasystem, neglected or biased Oromoo history, suppressedOromoo language, ridiculed Oromoo religion, andculture, and in all of their writings they expressedprejudicially motivated literatures.

For example, Bahrey, the chronicle writer forAbyssinian kings was the front-runner in 1593 that

154

changed the word Oromoo to Galla and titled his twenty-one pages manuscript named “History of the Galla”(p.111). Portuguese missionaries, European travelers,adventurers and Arabs slave traders quickly adoptedthis derogatory word and expand in their literatures.In addition, they have fabricated endless negativedefinitions for the word “Galla” to make it devilishthat they think describes the Oromoo people better. ToAbyssinians “Galla” means, the worst savage evercreated on earth, and unwonted people to exist.Furthermore they wrote that the Oromoo as human likecreature who came out of the river like fish; peoplewho associated with Satan or evil sprite, thereforeOromoo described us, barbarians, blood trusty,brutal, zeal, foolish, coward, heathen, ignorant,pagan, uncivilized, etc.

B… The Problem of European and Arab Sources:

From 1500 onwards, number of missionaries, adventurers,and colonial spays, mercenaries, traders, geographers,and diplomats have traveled into Abyssinia. When theyfirst appeared they used written materials they foundfrom court Clarks, church clergies, and royalchronologist. They were dependent on Abyssiniansources; and added their own imaginations, assumptionsand uncontrolled interpretation.

155

Besides that, both Arabs and Europeans always havewrong view about indigenous African conurbation toAfrican continent. They do not recognize non-Muslim andnon-Christian Africans have their own culturalidentity, social activities, political organizations,legal system and religion different from people in theMiddle East or Europe. To them people of the Horn ofAfrica, including the Oromoo people depend on Islamicor christen culture. Islamic and Christian Identitymeans the way of life as Muslim or as Christianconducted their beliefs, practices and ideologies asderived from the Qur'an and Bible

For instance , many Europeans and Arabs, in the courseof their travel, in Oromiya, to Abyssinia, if they didnot see church or mosque, if they did not observe localpeople with Christian or Muslim identity in theirdresses, or if they did not find symbol thatidentifies Muslim or Christian; the indigenouspeople branded as pagans or Kefirs. If they didnot observe slave traders on their way, travelersconsider indigenous people as uncivilized, barbarians,savages or atheists. Finally social activities, such asgroup gatherings for ritual ceremonies, localgatherings to resolve local problems, politicalgatherings to defend their territory, or elect theirleaders, annual sermons to celebrate new year,interpreted as worthless pagans assembly to worshippagan god.

156

Nevertheless, in the absence knowledge of locallanguage; or qualified interpreters their nakedobservations alone mislead or distorted the fact,regarding the Oromoo social, political, religion,culture, and history. As a result, their so-calledeyewitness information about the Oromoo people havedistorted, misinterpreted, and wrongly assumed. Interms of natural wealth of Oromiya fertility of theland, agriculture, livestock’s, animals, birds, rivers,mountains, climate etc-- of course their observationmay be much important attract Europeans futurecolonization of Oromiya.

Presently, many scholars are fully depend on suchbiased, misinterpreted, and misinformed existing booksand articles written by previous European, and, Arabiantravelers, Christian and Muslim missionaries, orgeographers etc. These practices have continued for 500years without any serious opposition from the Oromooside until the emergence of Maccha Tuulama Self-helpAssociation in 1964. From experience this researchersome distorted books and articles has some factstatements between the lines where Oromoo case appears,here and there, sometimes as full sentence, anothertimes as a single sentence or phrases in differentpages. The researcher has collected them to re-examineits relevant to the African indigenous Gadaa system anduse them where it fits.

157

Political Reform and National Revival: Until 1970th dueto colonial policy the Oromoo nation denied access tomodern Education, and restricted from publishing anybook or article regarding the Abyssinian colonialpolicy. Only few scattered information or articles doesexisted produced by Oromoo intellectuals or localprotestant missionaries. As the years of 1960th hasbeen the years of liberation for colonized Africansand civil right movement for African Americans; so thatthe 1970th considered as the year of reinterpretationand reconstructing and revival of the Oromoo people’shistory, social, religion, culture politics in modernforms. Many Oromians and modern European scholarsjoined the re-writing revolution to popularize longoverdue Oromoo cases and this group are now advancingtheir serious research. Thus, the researcher put pre-1960th European and Abyssinian (Ethiopian) writtenmaterials under classical literature review; whiledocuments produced after 1960th categorized as modernliterature review. Researchers can use some specialbooks in both categories.

(1)… Classical Literature: The first ever writtendocument History of the Galla (Oromoo) appeared in 1593 by anAbyssinian monk named Abba Bahrey. This manuscriptwritten in ancient Abyssinian language known as Gize,translated into Amharic and many European languages.Bahrey has clearly stated his motive in his own words.“I have begun to write the history of the Galla(Oromoo) in order to make known the number of their

158

tribes, their readiness to kill the Christian and thebrutality of their manners” Manuel De Almeida, 1954(Some Records of Ethiopia, p.xxxvi). 1954” p, 111).Many Oromoo readers discouraged by the word “Galla”Bahrey used instead of Oromoo and the first prejudicialsentence he made to describe the manner of Oromoonation. Nevertheless, few Oromoo readers who coveredthe whole book have appreciated the writer’sinformation in one hand and criticized for hisunnecessary prejudicial words here and there scatteredin his document pages.

Bahrey was in Gamo village, in North Eastern Tuulama;during a serious war between Abyssinian slave raiders,and the Oromoo antislavery resistance. Monk Baharey maybe volunteered to serve his Abyssinian government as aninformation agent. He traveled in Oromiya based his sitin Gamo, (Waamii, 2014:126). During his stay in inOromiya he has observed and also informed aboutconstant wars between Oromoo people and ChristianAbyssinian slave raiders on which, according to hismanuscript the Oromoo were always winners. He hasadmired the Oromoo Gadaa democracy and its highlydisciplined military organization. Above all, he hatesthe Oromoo people, for the following reasons. a) Theywere not Christian, b) his Christian army wasrepeatedly defeated, c) the Oromoo militarily actionagainst Abyssinian slave raiders, and Afaar slavemerchants expanded, in the Horn of Africa.

159

Bahrey who called the Oromoo people as readiness tokill people and brutal in their manners” p, 111” waswelcomed to Oromiya and as a Christian visitor he washosted as a guest, accommodated food and shelter, andassisted by knowledgeable individual or group of OromoGadaa experts. Baharey dressed himself with usualCoptic monk uniform, freely traveled from place toplace in Oromiya to collect information from Gadaaexperts. He has observed anti-slavery activitiesconducted by Follee (Oromoo military wing) againstChristian Abyssinians slave raiders. His documentcovers Oromoo people’s social, political, ritual,cultural, and military organization of the Gadaasystem. His manuscript devoted to Abyssinian. Inaddition, the Abyssinian authority enjoyed hisexcellent spay report.

Regardless of Bahrey’s some contradictions, few majorerrors and some minor misunderstandings and this bookholds very important facts about the Gadaa system; andit is the only existing source written in the fifteenhundred. It is important as the only ancientdocument with information partly as his eye witnessand partly as secondary sources, and ready forinterested scholars to make a research, on Africanindigenous democracy and socio-political, andmilitary structure by independent Gadaa government.It is also useful for investigators to compare how

160

Gadaa govern Oromiya before colonization and how thesystem gradually changed under the colony of Abyssinianwithout losing much of its democratic practice.Nevertheless, despite Bahrey’s attempt to write anegative history of Oromoo people, he unintentionallyleft invaluable information, which mostly agrees withthe current Oromoo Gadaa system and oral tradition ofthe Oromoo nation.

Number of Western Christian Missionaries, havedocuments about the African people they work with. Inaddition to their missionary work, some of them havedeveloped personal contact with the indigenous people,learned their language, and observed the Oromoo social,religion, political life. The writer has selected thefollowing as his sources of pervious in formations.

Portuguese missionary Jeromino Lobo’s (1624-1634) hasattempted to contact slave traders when he asked Oromooto assist him in his travel from port Melinda, locatedin Jubo district of East African coast to Abyssinia viaOromiya. According to him about 2000 Oromoo cavalriesblocked his way from travelling through Oromiya. In hisliterature he accused the Oromoo for his failedjourney, and accused Oromoo military group whopatrollers the port Melinda and surrounding Jubodistrict, from slave raiders and slave traders in EastAfrican coast. He was forced return to Goa and fromtheir he accused the Oromoo in the following manner.

161

“Among this nation, the Galles (Oromoo) who first alarmed the world in1542 have remarkably distinguished themselves, by the ravage they havecommitted, and the terror they have raised in these parts of Africa (p43).In addition he has ridiculed the Oromoo culture,politics, and religion moral and social activities.“As a Catholic “missionary” he supposed to side withthe Victimized people regardless of their colour, racesor origin. Instead he has described the militaryengagement between Oromoo patrollers and slave tradersas below, “These Galla lay everything, where they come, in ruinputting all to the sword without distinction of age or sex, which barbarities,though their numbers are not great, have spread the terror of them overall the country,(p14). From his report one can understandthat this person was among those camouflaged undercovermissionaries whose mission was to facilitate necessarycondition for Portuguese, whose ambitions was tomonopolize slave trade all over the world. Lobo ascitizen of Portugal was true loyal to his earthilyemperor than heavenly God, when he blamed victimizedpeople as ravages and terrorisers; and even condemnGadaa as a system of barbarians, and indigenous Oromooreligion as heathen (13-17). Many European scholarshave accepted his book, as one of the best eyewitnessdocument and they have translated it into French in1735 into English in 1985.

Krapf: A German Protestant Krapf, (1858-1868), livedamong Oromoo people for more than ten years, learnedtheir language, culture, history and socialOrganization. His book is very important eyewitness

162

contains his participation in King Sahile Selassie’scampaign against the Tuulama Oromoo. Krapf eyewitnessed when European modern arms, used byAbyssinian, killed thousands of Tuulama Oromoo.According to him, those who remain from slaughters havecaptured and sent to different Red See port for sale.He blamed Europeans who supplied modern ammunitions toAbyssinia etc. He has collected valuable informationand printed it in his book titled Ormania and theGallas:

Salviac: The Oromo: An Ancient People, Great AfricanNation, 1880. This French Academy Prize winning bookwas translated into English in 2005. Reverend,Martial de Slavic lived many years in Oromiya asmissionary. He speaks the Oromoo language and he hascultivated many Oromoo friends from whom he collectsall necessary information. He has observed Oromoopeople, basic beliefs, prayers, religion pilgrimages,cults, and “superstitions”. Gadaa democratic structure,its legislative and judicial, its militaryorganization, its five grades and five classes, socialand cultural organization and democratic election oftheir leaders every eight years included. According tothis person such democratic activities makes the Oromoopeople a great nation in Africa. This firsthandinformation selected by this researcher as source forthe firsthand information.

163

Alexander Bulatovic: His book titled Ethiopia throughRussian Eyes 1896-1898.

A Russian colonel by rank, double agent military spayfor Abyssinian and Russia. He was with Meneliks’ armyto help the process of colonization of the Oromoopeople for Abyssinian. During his travel, he hascollected the weakest and strongest side of Oromoopeople and passed to Emperor Menilik of Abyssinia.Later on, he published his observation and eyewitnessin his book. He has admired Oromiya richness inagriculture, forest etc. He has recommended that theOromoo people and Oromiya must be colonized andencouraged Emperor Menilik to speed the colonizationprocess.

Hotten, (1868), Life in the Land of Preston John; thebook summarizes the work of several European who wroteabout their adventure, missionary obligation, militaryintervention and commercial activities in Abyssinianand the Oromoiya.

(Cecchi 1886: 523-530,)

Cerulli, (1922); Cerulli documents different types ofhistorical songs and folk literature. The literature

164

includes the war between Oromoo people and Abyssinian,the defeat of Oromoo people, and complete colonizationof Oromiya, the declining of the Gadaa system, Inaddition, love songs, nuptial, religious songs, andcaravans songs, included, (p.14) Huntingford 1955)Haberland 1963, older sources

Budage: A History of Ethiopia: Nubia and Abyssinia:1928: Egyptologist/Hebraist Sir E.A. Wallis Budge, Hehas published his book in 1928 and 1970, partlytranslated from Abyssinian historical and legendarydocuments kept in theological archives. Abyssinianprejudicial view on other ethnic groups of the Horn ofAfrica reflects in this book. In his second Volume, heincludes Barley’s manuscript “History of the Galla1593” pp601-617. In both volumes, he has scatteredinformation regarding three hundred years war betweenOromoo and Abyssinia. The entire book is about thepeople of the Horn of Africa, different culture, modeof production, administration, political system, socialactivities, religious practices, military Organizationof each ethnic group, the problem of slavery, theOromoo antislavery movement, etc. Nevertheless, thisbook can serve as an option to some researcher wholacks access to Abyssinian archives.

165

Adriaan Hendrik& Johan Prins, 1953: East African Age-Class Systems. Galla, Kipsigis and Kikuyu. The groupis highly distinct from each other in terms of originof their ethnics, language, and culture. Thisliterature compares age, grade and class among threedifferent ethnic groups in East Africa. The studyprovides definitions of age set, age grade, and ageclass systems of each ethnic. It also discussedsimilarities and difference as it has practiced amongthese groups. The book is very important documents forone who want know social formation in East Africa. TheAbyssinian government deliberately removed the bookfrom library shelves. However, one can find in someEurope, and American Universities.

Modern Literature Review: No two

The Ethiopian education policy was designed to hinderOromoo children from modern education, and Oromooadults from all types of social development. Thispolicy was exercised for over one hundred years andwas changed only after the overthrow of AbyssinianMonarch in 1974. Before the revolution of 1974, thecolonial authority has restricted intellectuals fromwriting the history of non-Abyssinian people; such as,the Oromoo, Walayittaa or Ogadinian etc. The Europeanwriters sometimes discouraged, another time misinformedabout Oromoo history, culture or the Gadaa system.However, in late 1960th, the establishment of the Maccha

166

Tuulama Association, Balee Oromoo peasant armedstruggle and the revival of the Gadaa, a uniquedemocratic system, has attracted many modern EuropeanAnthropologist, historians and modern missionaries.This includes Knutesson, 1967, Legesse, 1973, Schlee,1998.Thus since 1970’s Oromoo scholars and ProgressiveWestern intellectuals have active in the reassessmentof Oromoo history, culture, language, politics,religion, and social values’

Asmarom Lagasse (1973), his book titled Gadaa: ThreeApproaches to the Study of African Society. The bookdescribes his anthropological work in Southern Oromiyaamong the Boorana Oromoo. Dr. Asmarom demonstrates thecomplexity of the Gadaa system, which is simultaneouslya calendar system, a division of age grades and socialresponsibilities, a means of maintaining andtransmitting oral history, and a political mechanism,which provides the basic organizational principle forOromoo culture.

Distinguished anthropologist, P.T. W. Baxter has spent

half of his life working on Gadaa system. One of his

interesting books titled “Age, Generation and Time”

(1978 focuses on the role of every individual Oromoo

guided by their Gadaa organization. His second document

titled “Ethiopia’s Unacknowledged Problem: The Oromo

167

(1978)”. Popular article, produced on the Journal of

the Royal African Society Vol, 77 July (1978) no 308.

This article has captured the attention of scholars of

the social science throughout the world. Baxter focused

on the Ethiopian Government oppressive policy, of

Oromoo language. He Eye witnessed restriction of Oromoo

at church when congregation, and preacher were Oromoo

speakers, at Government court accuser and accused,

attenders and Judge all Oromoo speakers but forced to

present their case in Amharic language or higher

translator where no one understand Amharic language.

Students and teacher ordered to communicate in Amharic

language in school compounds, and sport fields even

though they were not speak and understand well. Public

gatherings also ordered to use Amharic language in the

language no one understands expect the translator,

(p288).

Anthropologist Bonnie Holcomb and Sisai Ibssa (1990) in

their book titled the “Invention of Ethiopia” have

demonstrate that the Ethiopian empire has been invented

as an empire by the agreement made between European

168

colonial powers and the Northern Abyssinian kings.

Further Holcomb and Ibssa have argued that Gadaa system

provides some of the basic principle for the

establishment of a democratic society in an independent

Oromiya.

Mohammed Hassen (1993) has published a book titled

Oromo of Ethiopia: history 1570-1860. He described the

similarities and difference of the Qallu institution

and the Gadaa system; this includes its politico-

military structure, migration and peaceful transfer of

power every eight years.pp.7-14. In addition, the

author made an important contribution to the

reinterpretation of Ethiopian history with discussion

of the five Gibe States.

Asaffa Jalata (1993) has provided an account of class

development within the Gadaa system and this

development has created the western Oromoo Mooti system

(7). The system that discourages the Gadaa system and

paved the way to submit themselves to Abyssinia

colonizer with only minor resistance from local

169

peasants. Such development has created another

contradiction even within the Oromoo under the Gadaa

system. Focusing on the Oromoo colonization, he linked

the creation of the Ethiopian empire state itself to

the broader political, economic, European capitalism

and colonialism.

Being and Becoming Oromoo: Historical and

Anthropological Enquiries (1996) edit by P.T. W.

Baxter, Jan Hultin, and Alessandro Triulzi. The book

contains collection of 19 articles produced by social

science scholars. It outlines historical, social,

political, economic, anthropological enquiries in

addition to Oromoo people’s cultural activities and

traditional teaching methods in Oromiya. Some more

recent work such as a debate on the nature and the

political significance of the Gadaa (see Baxter 1978,

Bassi 1996, Legesse 2006), (Hinnant 1978, Schlee 1994,

Ege 1996) quite clearly mention the political character

of Gadaa, other anthropological work tended to stress

the ritual aspects of the system

In addition Gadaa indigenous African democracy has

attracted scholarly interest, individuals since 1880,

170

and many of them have left their contribution and can

be used for second and primary sources for this

dissertation. Some of these scholars are (d'Abbadie

1880: Cecchi 1886; Paulitschke 1896; de Salviac 1901;

Cenilli, 1929/33, Huntingford 1955 Haberiand 1963,

Knutsson 1967, Legesse 1973, Hinnant 1978, Schlee

1994,1998, and some more). While particularly the older

sources) and some more recent work Ege 1996) quite

clearly mention the political character of Gadaa, other

anthropological work tended to stress the ritual

aspects of the system there by opening a debate on the

nature and the political significance of Gadaa (see

Baxter 1978, Bassi 1996),

Bahrey, as pioneer writer about the Oromoo people,

which for the first time gave them strange name “Galla”

He described the so-called Galla people as wicked, who

Zeal to kill people, possessed with brutality of their

demeanor, and enemy of Christian, (Bahrey 1593 p.111).

Jeromino Lobo a Portuguese Catholic Missionary (1624-

1634) adopted the name Galla from Bahrey and stated

that “… the Galles distinguished themselves, by the

171

ravage they have committed, and the terror they have

raised in this parts of Africa (.p43.). J.L.Karf

(1839-1840) oppose to Oromo militarily intervention

against Christian and Muslim slave traders, and he

viewed their human tight effort as barbarous and

savages because the Oromoo action blocked Abyssinian

and Afaar people who were depended on slave trade for

centuries. Budge, (1885-1914), (p.2)

Even some writers compared the Oromoo features,

their hair and appearance to animal like such terrified

Budge, (1885-1914), described the Oromo’s “features are

savage looking, and when they shake their long hair which wear hanging

over their shoulders like a mane, their appearance is animal like and

terrifying”, (p.131)”.

William Cornwallis Harris, explained” the Oromoo as

barbarian, hordes who brought darkness and ignorance in their

train”pp72-73, etc. Scholar Edward Ullendorff in (1960)

wrote the Oromoo lacks significant material or

intellectual culture, (p73). Perham, (1969) described

how the t Abyssinians and their “Amhara kings would, regard

the Oromoo as heathens and enemies, fit only for massacre or

enslavement, (p.300).

172

Some older sources (Cecchi 1886: 523-530, Paulitschke

1896, de Salviac 1901, Huntingford 1955) and some more

recent work (Legesse 1973, Schlee 1994, Ege 1996) quite

clearly mention the political character of Gadaa, other

anthropological work tended to stress the ritual

aspects of the system (Hinnant 1978, van de Loo 1991),

thereby opening a debate on the nature and the

political significance of Gadaa (Baxter 1978, Bassi

1996,)

Many scholars used Abyssinian biased statement as a

source of their information to write about the Oromoo

society. More than all social science academicians,

Anthropologists have been lived among the Oromoo people

as field researchers for years, and they knew the real

name of the people they lived with to collect

information. Even, they sat with Oromoo national for

personal observation and interviews, they disregard the

word Oromoo and replace by the term Galla; or

undermined their fieldwork, and replaced it by recorded

Abyssinian biases. They avoided the term Oromoo in any

possible ways; but they hear the ward every minuets of

the day from Oromoo people and every word mentioned

173

replaced by “Galla”, by field researcher the without

the knowledge of interviewed person. The term “Galla”

was and still is prejudicial word the Abyssinian used

to address the Oromoo nation. Field researchers are

among first hand literature producers, but they refused

listing to the term Oromoo. Thus they adopted Galla as

real name of the people who called themselves Oromoo.

Many scholar in the Horn of Africa shares the term

Galla with first inventor of the term Monk Abba Bahrey

of (1522-1593). To mention some of them were, Crulli,

(1922) Huntingford G.W.B. (1954) ; Karle Eric, (1963)

(Fage,Vol 1, (1965), Lytton (1966); Lewis,(1966);

Knutsson,(1967); Baxter(1950th), and Legessa (1973. They

knew that it meant nagger, pagan, barbarian, and they

also knew that the Oromoo do not want addressed by such

name.

In addition, Christian Missionaries worked as arms of

Abyssinian colonial policy, and were used as agents of

Abyssinia government to spread colonial language,

agents of Christ to convert Oromoo nation to Christian.

They discouraged indigenous Oromoo tradition religion,

and all ritual and social activities attached to Oromoo

174

faith, interpreted as paganism. Thus, Missionaries and

Judo Christian field workers have assisted the

Abyssinians psychological war against the Oromoo

people, and have expanded the term Galla through their

literatures more than Abyssinians imagined.

New military rule have made certain reform, in early

1970, such as the prejudicial name “Galla” dropped by

the new Government, from new government files in the

country, was replaced by indigenous term Oromoo.

Anthropologists followed the declaration of military

policy and since then their pen began writing the term

Oromoo. Despite difficulties to select reasonable

sources of information this author is dealing with

these types of discouraging pills of prejudicial words,

sentences, and paragraphs, designed to misled many

independent mind researchers for many hundred years.

Until 1970s due to a hidden policy of the Ethiopian

government, the Oromoo have very little access to

modern education. As a result, their chance to write

about their people was also limited to local religious

materials. Because of these practices, the author has

carefully selected some literature to include under

175

classical and the rest under modern literature review.

Few old literatures produced by liberals can serve in

both categories

Part 1 consisted classical materials, written by

Abyssinians, Bahrey (1593) missionaries, travelers, and

Abyssinians. Their writings were partly expression of

colonialist perspectives, partly Judo-Christian

outlook; partly consist of Euro-centric adventurers’

report, and partly Abyssinian intellectual. The second

part includes books written by scholars Oromoo

intellectuals, non-Oromoo social scientists and modern

anthropologists, in which much of their work dealt with

the survival of Oromoo socio-cultural organizations.

Method: Personal Experience. This researcher is lucky

to be an indigenous Oromoo, born, and raised in Gadaa

culture. His uninterrupted learning while in Oromiya

from traditional educators; personal observation,

participation, including interviewing experts in Gadaa

system, at Chaffee Baldho general assembly as

176

eyewitness source. In exile he interviews individuals

to collect information by experts from different

regions; in writings, tapes and video recording, and

practicing some of it are additional sources. In

addition his memory and lifetime experiences, as well

as his opinion, and interpretations are part of this

dissertation. Thus the author knowledge of the Gadaa

system and its institutions; definition of the system

and important key terms within the system and his

uninterrupted relation with the Gadaa system makes this

dissertation different from many writers.

ethod.

References Bairu Tafla. 1987. Asma Giyorgis and His

Work. History of the Gāllā and the Kingdom of Šäwā,

Stuttgart.

Bassi M. 1996. I Borana : una società assembleare

dell'Etiopia. Milano.

Beckingham C.F, Huntingford G.W.B. 1954. Some records

of Ethiopia 1593-1646:

177

Being extracts from the history of High Ethiopia or

Abassia by Manoel Almeida

Including with Bahrey's History of the Galla. –

Nendeln.

Beke, Charls. T. 1848. On the Origin of the Gallas,

Report to the British Association for the Advancement

of Science, London, pp.1-7.

Caquot, A. 1957. Histoire Amharique de Grañ et des

Gallas, AE, 2, pp.123-143.

Getatchew Haile. 2002. Yeabba Bahriy Dirsetoch.

Minnesota.

Chernetsov, Sevir. 1974. The “History of the Gallas”

and death of Za-Dengel, king of Ethiopia (1603-1604).

In: Atti del IV Congresso Internazionale di Studi

Etiopici, Roma, pp. 803-808.

Guidi, Ignazio. 1907. Leggende Storiche di Abissinia,

RSO, 1, pp. 5-30.

Hultin, Jan. 1996. “Perceiving Oromo. ‘Galla’ in the

Great Narrative of Ethiopia”. In: Being and becoming

Oromo, ed. by P.T.V. Baxter,

Jan Hultin, Alessandro Triulzi, Nordiska

Afrikainstitutet, Uppsala.

178

The Oromo as recorded in Ethiopian literature

1331

Lusini, Gianfrancesco. 1994. Documents on the History

of the Oromo. In: Proceedings of the 11th International

Conference of Ethiopian Studies, I, Addis Ababa,

pp.641-647.

Mekuria, Bulcha. 1996. “The survival and reconstruction

of Oromo National Identity”.

In: Being and becoming Oromo, ed. by P.T.V. Baxter, Jan

Hultin, Alessandro

Triulzi, Nordiska Afrikainstitutet, Uppsala.

Triulzi, Alessandro. 1994. Oromo Traditions of Origin,

in Etudes Ethiopiennes, Actes de la Xe conférence

internationale des études éthiopiennes, I, pp. 593-601.

Triulzi, Alessandro, Täsämma Ta’a. 2004. Documents for

Wallaga History (1880s-1920s E.C.), I, Addis Ababa.

Attention!Partelly final from page 1 to 10

I. Writing the Gadaa, indigenous African democracy and its institutions in real senses is not easy for scholars of any field without missing some major concepts, or without misinterpreting its institutions

179

and indeed without distorting important parts of the system. Enrico Cerulli, (1922) criticized European ethnologist for distorting the Gadaa system based on their own prejudicial problem they have for African democracy. ”The Gadaa system is not simple, but it seems to have been especially maltreated (treat badly) by European ethnologist (p.167)”. he was among very fewEuropean scholars who understand some ethnologist intentionally maltreating the Oromoo Gadaa system.

Writing the Gadaa system also problematic for urban born Oromoo nationals or raised in areas where the Gadaa partially replaced by semi- monarchical types of Sultanate, or Mootii system. They depend on naked secondary sources or adopt from religiously fanatics, socially prejudiced, and culturally biased ancient Arab Muslims and Judo-Christian written documents. Such sources have misled many foreigners and Oromoo nationalists who have keen interest to learn the Gadaa system. This writer came across several written documents by distinguished scholars including definitions that does not compliment with the number ofimportant concepts of Gadaa indigenous African democracy. Most pioneer writers have been religiouslyextremist, and racially prejudiced; while others have depend on secondary documents and therefore, both have limited Gadaa knowledge; and many of them never been in Oromiya countryside, to collect direct

180

information from indigenous Oromoo people. They lack integration into the indigenous people to be eyewitnessinformants, and participants in the activities of concerned people they plan to write. Any document shortof this or in the absence of direct participation of indigenous people can be sources of misleading, assumptions, imaginations, wrong interpretation, and distortion. Such document may not be considered as major primary sources; but can be sighted only when necessary.

Finally, there are very few western scholar field researchers, spend their young ages with Oromoo nationals, staying with them, speaking their language,practicing their culture, interviewing them, participating in their social activities, and becoming part of the indigenous people. This author appreciates such scholars, for carrying their scholar responsibility, and documenting their eyewitnesses. Without these types of evidences this author may havemuch more difficulty to convince other scholars who always demand for sources.

Oral Tradition: Oral tradition is also another form of information. Indigenous Oromoos researchers who were born and raised according to the Gadaa system may have fewer problems in collecting oral information from experts. More than ninety present past and present practitioners in the Gadaa system cannot read and

181

write. They transfer their knowledge to their children and grand children by means of Oral tradition. Oromoo person born, raised observing and participating in the Gadaa system, may have less problem in writing the Gadaa system.

GADAA: Gadaa as a complex system has multi -institutions beyond its general name. It is similar to big university with many departments; or any independent state with its governing branches. Each institution in the Gadaa system requires its own definition to show particular concept where a definition of one institution cannot exactly substitutethe rest institutions. Even in the same institution individual defines in many different ways, depending onresearcher background or area of interest.

Below the author, defines the Gadaa system and its institutions in the following five slightly different ways.

Generally, Gadaa is an indigenous African democratic system encompassing several institutions; including language, education, economy, history, culture, social,sports, military, politics, law, religion, rituals, construction, etc. Nevertheless, the writer believes

182

more elaborations are needed to fill the gap missed by general definition.

(a), Gadaa is a political and social system of five fixed parties in ascending and descending categories both categories as shown below.

(1),Horata (2), Bichiille, (3) Duulo, (4) Birmajii, (5) Roobalee, in Tuulamaa and Maccaa regions. See Huntingford, 1955,( p.44), Cerulli

(b), Ascending category has five fixed learners classe, and eight years learners program for the following each class. (1), Ittimakoo, 8-16 ages;(2). According to Tuulamaa and Macchaa, (1) Ittiimakoo,,8-16 Gadaa class age; Dabballee, 16-24 ages; (3), Follee, 24-32 ages; (4) Qondaala, 32-40 ages; (5), Lubaa, 40-48 Gadaa learners class age. Other Oromoos in different regions havedifferent names for it, but functions the same.

© Educator category has five fixed educators classes and eight years program for each class. ( 1) Yubaa I, 48-54 ages (2) Yubaa II, 54-62, ages, (3) Yubaa III, 64-72 ages; (4)Yubaa IV, 72-80, ages, (5) Yubaa V. 80-88, ages, these names are also in Maccaa and Tuulamaa version.

183

(d). Members of learners category are active learners within their party; and similarly membersof educators category are active representing Yubaa educators. In each class educators teach different subjects like modern teaching and learning system. Learners are sharing the sameparty names with their fathers, which their fathers have inherited from their ancestors. Members of educator class represent the same parties they have inherited from their fathers.

(e) Daimman: First, it is given name for waiting class,prepared for the children of ascending category, born from Dabballee, Follee, and Qondaala learner’s class. It also refers to children born from members of Educators category, named II Yubaa, III Yubaa, IV Yubaa, and V. of educators. Daimman preparatory class, used their fathers party name who are in Lubaa class, even though their father and motherparty are still in last Lubaa learners program. Daimman Learners of this class are officially recognized Ittimakoo class of members of Roblee party only when Lubaa of Robalee party promoted to Robalee Educator in Yubaa class I

Special Buttaa or festival prepared to celebrate in honor of children promotion to a Gadaa learner class as Ittimakoo to fill the gap mothers and Fathers left for them and promoted to Yubaa I

184

educator class of Robaleeparty. Highly experienced elders of eighty to eighty eight knownas Yubaa V; are responsible in educating children in Daimman class age one to eight. This means, siblings of the same family in learner’s category,between one and eight ages put together in the same Daimmam calss, regardless of their different ages. Every eight years step up from Ittimako to Dabballee, Foollee, Qondaala and until they complete Lubaa class at the age of approximately forty eight biological ages or five complete Gadaaage.

(f)… Hiriyaa: Literally means children who were born inthe same month or count the same calendar of twelve months. Socially, it means friends shares in many social activities, including class mates, play mates, and people who celebrates equal birth day, etc. Politically, it is legal participation in an arrangement of five classes for learners, and five classes for educators Gadaa age or Gadaa class mates, regardless of different biological ages, Enrico Cerulli1922, (p.170).

1…Children who were born early before their fathers promoted to Lubaa, and children who were born late after their fathers have completed Yubaa I, are subordinate to any proper party fit to their ages as Hiriyaa, or class mate; and they are not members of

185

the parties they are participating as learners. For example, if a member of another party actively participates in Robalee Party, he act as member of Robalee, in reality he is not member of Robalee until officially declared and celebrate Itti-guula sermons otherwise he can continue as Hiriyaa or acting class ofRobalee.

(1) Perfect &Imperfect Ages.

(i) Perfect Ages: Children of perfect age, means

those who were born any time when their fathers

and mothers are in in ascending category of

Lubaa class. Children born from Lubaa

families recognized as candidate to their

families party right after their birth, and put

in preparatory class for maximum eight years,

and automatically become learners of Ittimakoo

class at the same time when their families

promoted to Yubaa I educator class.

186

(ii) Children born from Yubaa I, automatically

became Dabballee learners to fill the gap left

by their fathers for Yubaa I educators class.

(iii) Imperfect age: It means, Children born

before their parents entered Lubaa learners’

class, and children born from Yubaa classes.

They are not members of their fathers party

because they were born late or early and they

are subordinate to any party that fits to

their ages as Hiriyaa class mate; or learners

mate. For example, if a member of another party

actively participate in Robalee party,

regardless of individual service to Robalee

party, legally he/she is not a member of

Robalee party; but recognized as Hiriyaa or

class mate act as Robalee member. Members of

imperfect ages must pass through preparatory

187

class or Daimman class before joining

Ittimakoo, first Gadaa class as Hiriyaa or

members of Ittimakoo learners class.

(iv) Adoption: Any member of Hiriyaa has a chance to

become complete member of the party of his age,

only after promoted to Dabballee learner class.

(16-24). Individual must make official declaration

of his adoption to the party he spend over sixteen

years as Hiriyaa or class mates. Those who were

adopted became full members of a party as class

mates and as party members. In this case children

of the same father with many years age different

among them can serve in any party fit to their

age. Therefore, there are possibilities of

brothers adapt to any parties that are not their

families Party. Adoption must pass through certain

Gadaa legal procedures led by ritual experts’

188

Formal recognition of new member approved by

acclamation and followed by well come to the party

ceremonies. Any group or individual who has

adapted to a party have the right to stand for

election to the highest Lubaa class. But those who

were not interested in adoption to the party fit

to their ages has the right to reclaim their

fathers or grandfathers party