cd44 regulates tight-junction assembly and barrier function

12
CD44 Regulates Tight-Junction Assembly and Barrier Function Nina Kirschner 1 , Marek Haftek 2 , Carien M. Niessen 3 , Martin J. Behne 1 , Mikio Furuse 4 , Ingrid Moll 1 and Johanna M. Brandner 1 Upon barrier disturbance, adult CD44 knockout (KO) mice show delayed recovery of epidermal barrier function. This correlates with the loss of apical polarization of lamellar body (LB) secretion. As tight junctions (TJs) are crucial for barrier function and regulate polarized targeting of vesicles, we hypothesized that CD44 regulates TJs and associated cell polarity complexes, which in turn contributes to altered skin barrier function in CD44 KO mice. We show a delay in embryonic barrier formation associated with a loss of apical LB localization in CD44 KO mice, which correlates with alterations in TJ proteins and Par3. Simultaneously, the activity of Rac1, a major regulator of TJ barrier function, was reduced. Importantly, normalization of barrier function at E18.5 coincided with the recovery of these proteins. Tape-stripping experiments revealed that the loss of CD44 also affected TJ proteins upon induced disturbance of the barrier in adult mice. In CD44 KO keratinocytes, cell polarization and TJ barrier function were impaired. An alteration of differentiation markers was also observed, but was less pronounced than alterations of TJ proteins. Taken together, the results reveal an important function for CD44 in the assembly and function of TJs, suggesting their involvement in the skin barrier phenotype of CD44 KO mice. Journal of Investigative Dermatology (2011) 131, 932–943; doi:10.1038/jid.2010.390; published online 30 December 2010 INTRODUCTION CD44 is a cell-surface receptor (Underhill, 1992) for hyaluronic acid (HA) and other glycosaminoglycans, as well as further ligands (Ponta et al., 2003) that was first described in lymphocytes with functions in cell adhesion and cell homing. Since then, CD44 was identified in numerous cells and tissues and is known to be involved in many cellular processes, such as regulation of growth, survival, differentia- tion, and motility, including the activation of cell–cell and cell–extracellular matrix interactions (Turley et al., 2002; Ponta et al., 2003). To elucidate the biological role of CD44, Protin et al. (1999) generated mice in which CD44 was inactivated in all tissues. These mice are viable and fertile and show no obvious physical or behavioral abnormalities, even though leukocyte homing is impaired. Further analysis of adult CD44 knockout (KO) mice revealed a delayed barrier recovery after acute stratum corneum perturbation, which correlated with a loss of polarized ‘‘apical’’ secretion of lamellar bodies (LBs) toward the stratum corneum. In addition, adult CD44 KO mice show an impaired expression of differentiation markers, namely involucrin, filaggrin, and cytokeratin (CK)10 (Bour- guignon et al., 2006). These authors also demonstrated an influence of CD44 activation by HA on the expression of differentiation markers in cultured human keratinocytes. Tight junctions (TJs) are intercellular junctions that form a size- and ion-selective paracellular barrier. They consist of the transmembrane proteins occludin, claudins (Cldns), and junctional adhesion molecules, which can connect to the actin cytoskeleton through the so-called TJ plaque proteins, e.g., zonula occludens (ZO)-1-3, MUPP-1, and cingulin. Cldns and the TJ plaque proteins ZO-1 and ZO-2 were shown to be crucial for TJ strand formation and paracellular barrier function (Furuse et al., 2001; Umeda et al., 2006). In cooperation with associated cell polarity complexes, TJs contribute to cell polarity by maintaining the separation between the apical and basolateral membrane domains (Aijaz et al., 2006; Shin et al., 2006). In addition, TJ proteins are involved in cell differentiation and proliferation, and in cell signaling and vesicle transport (Schneeberger and Lynch, 2004; Matter et al., 2005). ORIGINAL ARTICLE 932 Journal of Investigative Dermatology (2011), Volume 131 & 2011 The Society for Investigative Dermatology Received 23 September 2009; revised 2 November 2010; accepted 8 November 2010; published online 30 December 2010 1 Department of Dermatology and Venerology, University Hospital Hamburg- Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; 2 EA4169 Laboratory for Dermatological Research, E. Herriot Hospital, Universite ´ de Lyon, Lyon, France; 3 Department of Dermatology, Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, University of Cologne, Germany and 4 Division of Cell Biology, Department of Physiology and Cell Biology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan Correspondence: Johanna M. Brandner, Department of Dermatology and Venerology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, Hamburg 20246, Germany. E-mail: [email protected] Abbreviations: AJ, adherens junction; aPKC, atypical protein kinase C; CK, cytokeratin; Cldn, claudin; DAPI, 4 0 ,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole; GEF, guanine nucleotide exchange factor; HA, hyaluronic acid; HA-L, large-size hyaluronic acid; KO, knockout; LB, lamellar body; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; PTF, paracellular tracer flux; RT, room temperature; rtPCR, real-time PCR; SG, stratum granulosum; TER, transepithelial resistance; TEWL, transepidermal water loss; TJ, tight junction; WT, wild type; ZO, zonula occludens

Upload: independent

Post on 18-Nov-2023

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

CD44 Regulates Tight-Junction Assembly and BarrierFunctionNina Kirschner1, Marek Haftek2, Carien M. Niessen3, Martin J. Behne1, Mikio Furuse4, Ingrid Moll1

and Johanna M. Brandner1

Upon barrier disturbance, adult CD44 knockout (KO) mice show delayed recovery of epidermal barrierfunction. This correlates with the loss of apical polarization of lamellar body (LB) secretion. As tight junctions(TJs) are crucial for barrier function and regulate polarized targeting of vesicles, we hypothesized that CD44regulates TJs and associated cell polarity complexes, which in turn contributes to altered skin barrier function inCD44 KO mice. We show a delay in embryonic barrier formation associated with a loss of apical LB localizationin CD44 KOmice, which correlates with alterations in TJ proteins and Par3. Simultaneously, the activity of Rac1, amajor regulator of TJ barrier function, was reduced. Importantly, normalization of barrier function at E18.5coincided with the recovery of these proteins. Tape-stripping experiments revealed that the loss of CD44 alsoaffected TJ proteins upon induced disturbance of the barrier in adult mice. In CD44 KO keratinocytes, cellpolarization and TJ barrier function were impaired. An alteration of differentiation markers was also observed,but was less pronounced than alterations of TJ proteins. Taken together, the results reveal an important functionfor CD44 in the assembly and function of TJs, suggesting their involvement in the skin barrier phenotype ofCD44 KO mice.

Journal of Investigative Dermatology (2011) 131, 932–943; doi:10.1038/jid.2010.390; published online 30 December 2010

INTRODUCTIONCD44 is a cell-surface receptor (Underhill, 1992) forhyaluronic acid (HA) and other glycosaminoglycans, as wellas further ligands (Ponta et al., 2003) that was first describedin lymphocytes with functions in cell adhesion and cellhoming. Since then, CD44 was identified in numerous cellsand tissues and is known to be involved in many cellularprocesses, such as regulation of growth, survival, differentia-tion, and motility, including the activation of cell–celland cell–extracellular matrix interactions (Turley et al.,2002; Ponta et al., 2003).

To elucidate the biological role of CD44, Protin et al.(1999) generated mice in which CD44 was inactivated in alltissues. These mice are viable and fertile and show noobvious physical or behavioral abnormalities, even thoughleukocyte homing is impaired. Further analysis of adult CD44knockout (KO) mice revealed a delayed barrier recovery afteracute stratum corneum perturbation, which correlated with aloss of polarized ‘‘apical’’ secretion of lamellar bodies (LBs)toward the stratum corneum. In addition, adult CD44 KOmice show an impaired expression of differentiation markers,namely involucrin, filaggrin, and cytokeratin (CK)10 (Bour-guignon et al., 2006). These authors also demonstrated aninfluence of CD44 activation by HA on the expression ofdifferentiation markers in cultured human keratinocytes.

Tight junctions (TJs) are intercellular junctions that form asize- and ion-selective paracellular barrier. They consist ofthe transmembrane proteins occludin, claudins (Cldns), andjunctional adhesion molecules, which can connect to theactin cytoskeleton through the so-called TJ plaque proteins,e.g., zonula occludens (ZO)-1-3, MUPP-1, and cingulin.Cldns and the TJ plaque proteins ZO-1 and ZO-2 were shownto be crucial for TJ strand formation and paracellular barrierfunction (Furuse et al., 2001; Umeda et al., 2006). Incooperation with associated cell polarity complexes, TJscontribute to cell polarity by maintaining the separationbetween the apical and basolateral membrane domains(Aijaz et al., 2006; Shin et al., 2006). In addition, TJ proteinsare involved in cell differentiation and proliferation, and incell signaling and vesicle transport (Schneeberger and Lynch,2004; Matter et al., 2005).

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

932 Journal of Investigative Dermatology (2011), Volume 131 & 2011 The Society for Investigative Dermatology

Received 23 September 2009; revised 2 November 2010; accepted 8November 2010; published online 30 December 2010

1Department of Dermatology and Venerology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; 2EA4169 Laboratory for DermatologicalResearch, E. Herriot Hospital, Universite de Lyon, Lyon, France; 3Departmentof Dermatology, Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, University ofCologne, Germany and 4Division of Cell Biology, Department of Physiologyand Cell Biology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan

Correspondence: Johanna M. Brandner, Department of Dermatology andVenerology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52,Hamburg 20246, Germany. E-mail: [email protected]

Abbreviations: AJ, adherens junction; aPKC, atypical protein kinase C;CK, cytokeratin; Cldn, claudin; DAPI, 40,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole;GEF, guanine nucleotide exchange factor; HA, hyaluronic acid; HA-L,large-size hyaluronic acid; KO, knockout; LB, lamellar body;PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; PTF, paracellular tracer flux; RT, roomtemperature; rtPCR, real-time PCR; SG, stratum granulosum;TER, transepithelial resistance; TEWL, transepidermal water loss;TJ, tight junction; WT, wild type; ZO, zonula occludens

Various TJ proteins were identified in the mammalianepidermis in different localization patterns (Brandner, 2009).TJ structures are localized in the stratum granulosum (SG)of the mammalian skin (Pummi et al., 2001; Brandneret al., 2002; Furuse et al., 2002). Their relevance in regulatingmurine skin barrier function was shown by Cldn1-deficientand epidermal-specific E-cadherin-deficient mouse models.These mice have impaired functional TJs in the skin and diedperinatally because of extensive water loss (Furuse et al.,2002; Tunggal et al., 2005).

In addition, the cell polarity complex Par3–Par6–atypicalprotein kinase C (aPKC) was detected at the TJs of keratino-cytes. It was shown to be regulated by Tiam1 and Rac1activity and to be important for TJ assembly and function(Mertens et al., 2005; Helfrich et al., 2006).

For the establishment of a functional skin barrier, theformation of the stratum corneum is crucial (Madison, 2003;Feingold, 2007). This process depends, among others, on thefusion of the LB with the extracellular membrane at thetransition of the SG to the stratum corneum (Menon et al.,1992) and therefore needs a directed (polarized) transport.Given that in simple epithelial cells, TJs separate the apicalfrom the basolateral membrane domain which allowsspecific targeting of vesicles to either the apical or thebasolateral membrane domain, and that cell polarity proteinsare present at TJs in keratinocytes, it is tempting to speculatethat TJs are involved in the regulation of the polarity of LBsecretion, but this has to date not been shown.

As CD44-deficient mice showed impaired targeting of the LBtoward the stratum corneum and delayed recovery after barrierdisruption, we hypothesized that if TJs are important for thepolarity of LB secretion and epidermal barrier formation, theyshould be altered in these mice. We examined TJ compositionand function, as well as differentiation markers to excludea simple differentiation-dependent effect, in three models ofactive barrier formation: in the epidermis during epidermaldevelopment, in the adult epidermis during barrier recoveryafter tape stripping, and in keratinocytes after Ca2þ switch. Thecutaneous permeability barrier in mice is formed at theembryonic stage E16.5–E17.5. A functional barrier forms atE16.5 on the dorsal side and moves ventrally to becomecompletely impermeable at E17.5 (Hardman et al., 1998). In theadult epidermis, skin barrier function can be disrupted byconsecutive tape stripping and barrier recovery can besubsequently observed over time (Yang et al., 1995). In culturedkeratinocytes, a switch to high extracellular calcium induces theformation of cell–cell contacts and differentiation (Hennings andHolbrook, 1983) concomitant with the formation of a functionalTJ barrier (Helfrich et al., 2006; Yuki et al., 2007; Yamamotoet al., 2008).

In this study, we demonstrate that CD44 deficiency isindeed accompanied by alterations of TJ protein expressionand localization in all models used. We show altered cellpolarity and impaired TJ barrier function for ions, but not forlarger molecules in CD44 KO keratinocytes. Our data furthersuggest that Rac1 activity and Par3 protein levels are likely tobe involved in these processes, whereas alterations of celldifferentiation might only have a minor role.

RESULTSCD44 KO delays outside-in barrier formation and affects LBcellular localization in the embryonic epidermisReformation after barrier disruption is delayed in adult CD44 KOmice (Bourguignon et al., 2006). To ask whether skin barrierformation is also delayed during epidermal development, weperformed toluidine blue permeability assays (Hardman et al.,1998) in E17.5 and E18.5, as well as in newborn wild-type (WT)and CD44 KO mice. As described previously, WT mice acquireda functional outside-in barrier at embryonic day 17.5 (Kuramotoet al., 2002; Sevilla et al., 2007). In contrast, CD44 KO miceshowed penetration of the dye at E17.5 but not at E18.5, indi-cating that the loss of CD44 delayed barrier formation (Figure 1a).

To investigate LB localization in epidermal development ofCD44 KO mice, transmission electron microscopy was used.We observed retention of LBs in granular cells bordering to thehorny layer indicative of reduced LB extrusion. In addition, wefound a loss of restriction of LB localization to the apical partof cells in the SG (Figure 1b) and in cells at the interface of theSG and stratum spinosum (data not shown) in the CD44 KOepidermis at day E17.5. Numerous LBs were present in theapical and in the basal compartments of the cells. In contrast,LBs were only present in the apical part of cells of the WTepidermis (Figure 1b).

Loss of CD44 results in temporary alterations of expression andlocalization of TJ proteins and Par3 in the skin of embryonicmice

In the simple epithelia, TJs separate the apical membranedomain from the basolateral membrane and thereby controltargeting of vesicles to apical or basolateral membranes. Asthe polarized localization of LBs in CD44 KO mice is absentat E17.5, a similar role might be envisioned for TJs in thestratifying epithelia. In addition, TJs are known to be involvedin barrier function of newborn murine skin. As barrierformation in embryonic CD44 KO mice is delayed, again arole for TJs could be postulated.

Therefore, we investigated TJ and cell polarity proteinlocalization and expression in embryonic CD44 KO mice. Inthe epidermis of CD44 KO embryos, reduced staining wasobserved for both, Cldn1, normally found in the embryonicepidermis at sites of cell–cell contact in suprabasal cell layers(Troy et al., 2007) and Cldn4, which is found in the upperepidermal layers of newborn mice (Furuse et al., 2002)(Figure 2a). Although the staining intensity for ZO-1 was notobviously reduced, its localization was altered upon the lossof CD44: whereas in the WT epidermis, ZO-1 was found atthe entire membrane, its localization was more restricted tothe lateral sites of the upper epidermal layers in the CD44KO epidermis. In addition, distribution of the cell polarityprotein Par3, investigated using an antibody that recognizesall three major splice variants, was altered in the E17.5 CD44KO epidermis (Figure 2a). In contrast, there was no changefor aPKC (data not shown). Alterations of TJs and cellpolarity proteins were confirmed by western blot analysis.The protein levels of the TJ proteins Cldn1, Cldn4, and ZO-1were downregulated in skin lysates of E17.5 CD44 KO mice.It is noteworthy that at day E18.5, the protein levels of these

www.jidonline.org 933

N Kirschner et al.CD44 Regulates TJ

proteins were comparable with the WT skin, except for ZO-1which was upregulated (Figure 2b and c). In addition, thethree isoforms of the cell polarity protein Par3 showedreduced protein levels at day E17.5, but increased levels forthe 180-kDa isoform were found at day E18.5 in CD44 KOmice (Figure 2b and c). There were no alterations for aPKC(data not shown).

Loss of CD44 results in temporary alterations of expression andlocalization of differentiation markersAs an alteration of differentiation was observed in adultCD44-deficient mice (Bourguignon et al., 2006), we also

investigated the expression and localization of CK14, CK10,involucrin, loricrin, and filaggrin during the embryonaldevelopment of CD44-deficient mice. Localization andstaining intensity of involucrin and filaggrin exhibited nodifferences in the epidermis between E17.5 CD44 KO andWT mice, whereas loricrin staining was slightly decreased inthe lower layers of the CD44 KO epidermis (SupplementaryFigure S1a online). Moreover, for CKs, we found only minorchanges: CK14 staining intensity was slightly reduced butthere was no alteration in localization, and CK10 wasnormally expressed (data not shown). Western blot analysisrevealed no significant differences in the protein amounts of

WT CD44 KO

E18.5

E17.5

WT CD44 KO

SC

D D

D

DD D

D

D

D D

***

*

*

*

D

D

SG1

SG1

SC

SG1

SG2

SG2

500 nm

500 n

m

SG1

Figure 1. Defective epidermal outside-in permeability barrier and altered LB

localization in embryonic CD44 KO mice. (a) Epidermal permeability barrier

assay using toluidine blue staining on E17.5 and E18.5 WT and CD44 KO

mouse embryos. (b) Ultrastructural images of the upper epidermal layers in

E17.5 WT (A, C) and CD44 KO (B, D) embryos. LB extrusion into the interface

between granular and horny layers is impaired in CD44 KO mice (B), as

documented by retention of these vesicles within the cytoplasm (arrows)

and by the small volume of intercellular spaces at this anatomical level

compared with the WT skin (A). In the granular layer, LBs (arrows) are

concentrated in the apical part of WT keratinocytes, (C) whereas polarization

is lost in CD44 KO keratinocytes. The vesicles are found in the basal and the

apical parts of SG cells (D; arrows). Dotted lines highlight cell borders

between the layers; asterisks indicate keratohyalin granules. D, desmosome;

KO, knockout; LB, lamellar body; SC, stratum corneum; SG, stratum

granulosum (cells numbered from the top); WT, wild type. Bar¼ 500nm.

CD

44

KO

CD

44

KO

WT

WT

E17.5 E18.5WT

180 kDa

Cldn1

Cldn4

ZO-1

Par3

Tubulin

WTE17.5

200

150

100

50

0

Cldn1

Cldn4

ZO-1

Par3

180

kDa

Par3

150

kDa

Par3

100

kDa

Cldn1

Cldn4

ZO-1

Par3

180

kDa

Par3

150

kDa

Par3

100

kDa

Rela

tive p

rote

in level (%

)

Rela

tive p

rote

in level (%

)

250

*

* *

* **

*

E18.5CD44 KO 200

150

100

50

0

WT

CD44 KO

150 kDa

100 kDa

180 kDa150 kDa

100 kDa

CD44 KO WT CD44 KO

CD

44

KO

CD

44

KO

WT

WT

Cldn1

Cldn4

ZO-1

Par3

Figure 2. Localization and protein amounts of TJ proteins and Par3 in the

murine embryonic epidermis. (a) Immunolocalization of Cldn1, Cldn4, ZO-1,

and Par3 in the E17.5 epidermis of WT and CD44 KO mice. Overlay of red

epifluorescence and phase-contrast pictures. (b) Western blot analysis of total

skin lysates from E17.5 and E18.5 WT and CD44 KO embryos. Three

independent WT and CD44 KO mouse lines are shown for each time point.

The molecular masses of Par3 isoforms are indicated at the sides. Equal

amounts of proteins were separated, and tubulin was used as the gel loading

control. (c) Semi-quantitative western blot analysis of TJs and cell polarity

proteins in the E17.5 (left) and E18.5 (right) WT and CD44 KO skin. The

western blot band intensities were measured using ImageJ software.

TJs and cell polarity protein levels were normalized to tubulin levels. Results

are expressed as mean±SEM, *Po0.05 (n¼ 3). Cldn, claudin; KO, knockout;

TJ, tight junction; WT, wild type; ZO, zonula occludens. Bar¼50 mm.

934 Journal of Investigative Dermatology (2011), Volume 131

N Kirschner et al.CD44 Regulates TJ

loricrin, involucrin, and filaggrin in skin lysates of E17.5 andE18.5 CD44 KO mice compared with WT mice (Supplemen-tary Figure S1b and c online). The quantification of proteinamounts for TJ proteins (Figure 2c) and differentiation-associated proteins (Supplementary Figure S1c online) clearlyshows that protein levels of TJ proteins are more pronounc-edly reduced than levels of differentiation-associated proteinsin E17.5 CD44 KO mice.

In adult CD44 KO mice, delayed barrier formation isaccompanied by an altered expression of TJ proteinsTo verify our results in adult mice also, we performed tape-stripping experiments to impair epidermal barrier functionand pursued barrier recovery at 1 and 3 hours. We observed adelay in barrier recovery in CD44 KO mice comparedwith WT mice (data not shown; also see Bourguignon et al.(2006)). In WT mice, barrier recovery went along with asignificant increase in Cldn4 mRNA, which was absent inCD44-deficient mice (Figure 3a).

Western blot analysis also showed a slight increase in theprotein level of Cldn4 in WT mice during barrier recovery,

whereas in CD44 KO mice, no upregulation was found(Figure 3b and c). There were no differences between proteinlevels of Cldn1, Cldn4, and occludin in the non-tape-strippedadult WT and CD44 KO mouse skin (Figure 3b).

Loss of CD44 results in alterations of expression andlocalization of TJ proteins in cultured keratinocytes andinfluences cell polarity and TJ barrier functionTo analyze TJ protein (sub)cellular localization in moredetail, as well as TJ functionality, we isolated and culturedkeratinocytes from WT and CD44 KO mice and switched thecells from a low-calcium (50 mM) to a high-calcium (1.8mM)medium. Immunostaining for the transmembrane proteinsCldn1, Cldn4, and occludin at different time points revealedthat the overall outlines of the cell junctions were distorted inCD44 KO cells. The staining appeared diffuse and curvedcompared with straight lines in WT cells, especially at earlytime points (1 and 3 days) (Figure 4a). Three and six days afterCa2þ switch, the staining intensity of Cldn1 and Cldn4 wasslightly decreased at the cell–cell contacts of CD44 KO cells.

Western blot analysis of calcium-treated cells revealed astrong reduction in Cldn1 protein levels in CD44 KOkeratinocytes at all time points (0–10 days), whereas Cldn4levels were slightly decreased from day 3 onward. Interest-ingly, occludin protein levels were increased in CD44 KOcells at all time points after Ca2þ switch (Figure 4b).

Confocal microscopy of double immunolocalization ofoccludin and E-cadherin (Figure 4c), as well as of Cldn4 andE-cadherin (data not shown) revealed that in WT cells,occludin and Cldn4 were clearly separated from E-cadherinalong the z axis, whereas in CD44 KO cells, the proteinswere found in the same plane at the lateral sites of the plasmamembrane, demonstrating an incomplete separation of TJ andadherens junction (AJ) proteins and therefore incompletepolarization of the cells.

The staining for Cldns and occludin suggested that theseproteins were still recruited to sites of cell–cell contact butthese contacts showed an altered, less mature appearanceespecially at early time points. Therefore, we analyzed the TJplaque proteins ZO-1 and ZO-2, which are crucial for Cldnclustering and paracellular barrier function (Umeda et al.,2006). ZO-1 and ZO-2 staining also revealed distortedoutlines in CD44 KO keratinocytes, which were very similarto those of occludin and Cldn1 (Supplementary Figure S2aonline). Western blot analysis did not show obviousdifferences for ZO-2 protein levels at early time points (0–5days) except for 0 day, whereas a slight downregulation forZO-1 was observed. At later time points (6–10 days), ZO-1protein levels showed no obvious differences but ZO-2protein levels were slightly downregulated (SupplementaryFigure S2b online).

The downregulation and mislocalization of TJ proteins wasearlier shown to influence TJ barrier function in keratinocytes(Yuki et al., 2007; Yamamoto et al., 2008). Therefore, weinvestigated TJ barrier function in CD44 KO cells. Wemeasured transepithelial resistance (TER) to assess the ionicTJ barrier formation, and FITC-dextran paracellular tracerflux (PTF) to assess the barrier function for larger molecules.

1.7

WT

*

*

3

Cldn1

Cldn4

Occludin1.7

CD44 KO

1.5

1.3

1.1

0.9

Cldn1

Cldn4

Occludin

Time (hours)

WT

Con

trol

1 Hou

r

3 Hou

rs

Con

trol

1 Hou

r

3 Hou

rs

CD44 KO

WT CD44 KO

Cldn1

Cldn4

Occludin

Cldn1Cldn4Occludin

Cldn1Cldn4Occludin

Tubulin

150

100

501 3

Time (hours)

1 3

Time (hours)

Rela

tive p

rote

in level (%

)

150

100

50

Rela

tive p

rote

in level (%

)

Time (hours)

1 31

1.5

1.3

1.1

0.9Fold

changes in

mR

NA

levels

Fold

changes in

mR

NA

levels

Figure 3. Expression of Cldn1, Cldn4, and occludin mRNA and protein levels

in the WT and CD44 KO epidermis after tape stripping. (a) Real-time PCR

analysis of Cldn1, Cldn4, and occludin mRNA expression levels. Values are

denoted as fold changes in the WT (left) and CD44 KO (right) tape-stripped

skin compared with the non-tape-stripped (control) skin. Results are expressed

as mean±SEM, *Po0.05 (n¼ 3). (b) Western blot analysis of total skin lysates

from the WT and CD44 KO tape-stripped and non-tape-stripped (control)

skin. Equal amounts of proteins were separated and tubulin was used as the

gel loading control (n¼3). (c) Semi-quantitative western blot analysis of

Cldn1, Cldn4, and occludin expression in the WT (left) and CD44 KO (right)

tape-stripped skin compared with the non-tape-stripped (control) skin. The

western blot band intensities were measured using ImageJ software. Cldn1,

Cldn4, and occludin protein levels were normalized to tubulin levels.

Subsequently, the values at the different time points were normalized to

non-tape-stripped skin values, which were denoted as 100% (n¼3).

Cldn, claudin; KO, knockout; WT, wild type.

www.jidonline.org 935

N Kirschner et al.CD44 Regulates TJ

An increase in TER and a decrease in PTF after Ca2þ switchindicate the formation of an epithelial barrier (Yuki et al.,2007). WT keratinocytes established a TER of up to

1,400O cm2 within 4 days. In contrast, the formation ofTER in CD44 KO keratinocytes was delayed and neverreached the levels of WT keratinocytes. CD44 KO cells

1 d

WT

Cld

n1

Cld

n4

Occlu

din

CD

44 K

OW

TC

D44 K

OW

TC

D44 K

O

3 d 6 d

WT CD44 KO

WT CD44 KO

WT

xy-Section 1

2

WT

CD

44 K

O

xz-Section 1

xz-Section 2

xy-Section

xz-Section

CD44 KO

Cldn1

Cldn4

Occludin

Tubulin

Cldn1

Cldn4

Occludin

Tubulin

0 d

6 d 7 d 8 d 9 d 10 d 6 d 7 d 8 d 9 d 10 d

1 d 2 d 3 d 4 d 5 d 0 d 1 d 2 d 3 d 4 d 5 d

Figure 4. Localization and protein amounts of TJ transmembrane proteins in cultured WT and CD44 KO keratinocytes. (a) Immunofluorescence localization

of TJ transmembrane proteins in cultured WT and CD44 KO keratinocytes at the indicated time points (1 day (d), 3d, 6d) after Ca2þ switch. Bar¼20 mm.

(b) Western blot analysis of WT and CD44 KO keratinocytes at 0–10 days after Ca2þ switch. Equal amounts of proteins were separated and tubulin was used

as the gel loading control (n¼ 3). (c) Double immunolocalization of occludin and E-cadherin in cultured keratinocytes. WT and CD44 KO cells were

cultured on coverslips for 72 hours and double labeled with antibodies directed to E-cadherin (red) and occludin (green). In WT cells, the green signals for

occludin are detected above the red signals for E-cadherin along the lateral plasma membrane (z axis). In CD44 KO cells, both signals are detected in the same

plane. Eight xy-sections were recorded at 0.45-mm intervals from base to apex by confocal microscopy. Rectangles in the overview screen were magnified

and the xz-image was reconstructed at the white lines drawn in the xy-section. KO, knockout; TJ, tight junction; WT, wild type. Bar¼ 20mm.

936 Journal of Investigative Dermatology (2011), Volume 131

N Kirschner et al.CD44 Regulates TJ

established a maximum TER of 1,000O cm2 2 days later thandid WT cells. The differences between the maximum TERvalues were significant (Figure 5a). There were no signifi-cant differences in the barrier function for the PTF of largermolecules: CD44 KO and WT keratinocytes formed similarpermeability barriers for 4- and 40-kDa FITC-dextrans afterCa2þ switch (Figure 5b). Thus, the tight junctional barrierfor ions but not for larger molecules is impaired upon lossof CD44.

To examine the TJ barrier function in the epidermis, weinjected a 557-kDa tracer (biotinylation reagent; Furuse et al.(2002)) in the dermis of E17.5 mice and explored thediffusion of this molecular tracer into the epidermis. Loss ofCD44 did not clearly affect the diffusion pattern of the tracer.Both CD44 KO and WT mice showed a restricted diffusionof the tracer up till the SG, where TJ structures, markedby occludin, are localized (Figure 5c). This indicates an intactTJ barrier for larger molecules also in vivo, similar to whatwas observed in vitro.

CD44 deficiency influences Par3, Rac1, and Tiam1in cultured keratinocytesOwing to the altered localization and expression of TJproteins, as well as impaired TJ functionality, we investigatedupstream molecules known to regulate TJ formation andbarrier function in keratinocytes, i.e., the polarity complexproteins aPKC and Par3, as well as the small GTPase Rac1and the Rac1-guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF)Tiam1 (Mertens et al., 2005; Helfrich et al., 2006). Theimmunostaining for Par3 in CD44 KO cells revealed a diffuseand curved localization at sites of cell–cell contacts, similarto, e.g., occludin and Cldn1 (Figure 6a). However, surpris-ingly, CD44 KO cells showed an increased staining intensityfor Par3, suggesting that more Par3 is recruited to themembrane.

Western blot analysis clearly showed reduced levels of the150-kDa and slight changes for the 180-kDa isoform of Par3,whereas no difference was found for the 100-kDa isoform. Inaddition, no obvious differences in protein levels were foundfor either aPKCi/l or aPKCz, whereas Rac1-GEF Tiam1 andRac1 levels were slightly reduced at certain, but not all, timepoints after Ca2þ switch (Figure 6b).

Delayed barrier formation and TJ protein alterations in CD44KO mice are associated with reduced levels of active Rac1To examine whether Rac1 is also altered in vivo, weinvestigated total levels of Rac1 in CD44 KO mice comparedwith WT mice in the embryonic skin, but no obviousdifference was found (Figure 6c). However, it is known thatnot only the presence but also most importantly Rac1 activity,i.e., Rac1 which has bound guanosine triphosphate, is thekey feature for the mode of action of Rac1. Therefore, weperformed a Rac1 activity assay. Indeed, in parallel toalterations of TJ protein expression and localization, as wellas impaired skin barrier formation, a strong reduction ofactive Rac1 was observed in the skin of E17.5 CD44 KO micecompared with WT mice. In contrast, there was no differencebetween WT and CD44 KO mice in the level of active Rac1at day E18.5, when mice had established a completelyfunctional barrier and TJ protein levels were no longerreduced (Figure 6c). Quantification revealed a 70% reductionin the amount of active Rac1 in the E17.5 CD44 KO skin(Figure 6d).

Alteration of differentiation markers in cultured keratinocytesare less pronounced than changes of TJ proteins and Par3In CD44-deficient mice, we observed a decrease in thestaining intensity of loricrin as well as in the staining intensityand protein levels of TJ proteins at day E17.5. The alterationswere abrogated at day E18.5. Thus, the chronological orderof events is difficult to determine.

Therefore, to investigate the expression of differentiationmarkers compared with TJ proteins in more detail, we usedcultured keratinocytes obtained from WT and CD44 KO miceafter Ca2þ switch. We observed no clear differences forprotein levels of filaggrin monomer (Supplementary FigureS3a online for days 0–5; days 6–10: data not shown) andloricrin (data not shown) at all time points. The protein levels

1,750

1,500

1,250

1,000

750

500

250

00 2 4 6 8 10

Days

120

100

80

60

40

20

0

120

100

80

60

40

20

00 24 48 72 96 120

Time (hours)

0 24 48 72 96 120

Time (hours)

WT CD44 KO

WTCD44 KO

WTCD44 KO

Para

cellu

lar

tracer

flux

of

4 k

Da F

ITC

(%

)

Para

cellu

lar

tracer

flux

of

40 k

Da F

ITC

(%

)

*

*

*

*

*WT

CD44 KO

TE

R (

Ω c

m2)

Figure 5. Barrier function of TJs in cultured keratinocytes and the embryonic

epidermis of WT and CD44 KO mice. (a) Transepithelial resistance (TER) of

cultured WT and CD44 KO keratinocytes after Ca2þ switch was determined

at the time points indicated. Data represent mean±SEM. Black asterisk

denotes significant differences (Po0.05) between WT and CD44 KO

keratinocytes at each time point (n¼ 9). Gray asterisk denotes significant

differences between the peak values of WT (day 4) and CD44 KO (day 6)

keratinocytes. (b) Paracellular diffusion of 4- (left) and 40-kDa (right)

FITC-dextrans through keratinocyte monolayers was determined at the

indicated time points after Ca2þ switch. Data are expressed as the percentage

of the corresponding 0-hour values and represent mean±SEM (n¼ 9).

(c) Confocal images of the in vivo TJ barrier assay using a dermal injected

biotinylation reagent (557-kDa tracer; red) in E17.5 WT (left) and CD44 KO

(right) mouse embryos. Localization of TJ is marked by occludin (green,

arrows); blue: DAPI staining. DAPI, 40,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole; KO,

knockout; TJ, tight junction; WT, wild type. Bar¼ 15 mm.

www.jidonline.org 937

N Kirschner et al.CD44 Regulates TJ

of involucrin were slightly downregulated at early time points(0–5 days) (Supplementary Figure S3a online). The alterationsof differentiation markers were less pronounced than thechanges for TJ proteins (Figure 4), especially for Cldn1. Inaddition, downregulation of Cldn1 preceded the alterationsof differentiation markers.

To investigate whether downregulation of Cldn1 influ-ences the expression of differentiation markers, we investi-gated keratinocytes isolated from Cldn1-deficient mice(Furuse et al., 2002) after Ca2þ switch. As in CD44-deficientkeratinocytes, we observed a downregulation of involucrin.In addition, we observed a slight alteration for filaggrin at472 hours (Supplementary Figure S3b online). There was noalteration for the protein level of loricrin (data not shown).

Influence of high-molecular-weight HA on TJ barrier functionHyaluronic acid is an important ligand for CD44 in keratino-cytes and its large-size form (HA-L) was shown to influencedifferentiation, as well as LB formation and secretion incultured human keratinocytes (Bourguignon et al., 2006).

Therefore, we investigated whether the binding of HA-Lshows any influence on TJ barrier function. WT mouse andhuman keratinocytes were treated with 10 mgml1 HA-L(Supplementary Figure S4a online), as well as with 50 and100mgml1 (data not shown). Although we observed,comparable with the study by Bourguignon et al. (2006), aninfluence of HA-L on CK10 expression (Supplementary FigureS4b online), the TER with 10 mgml1 HA-L shows only aslight increase, which was not statistically significant.

DISCUSSIONIn this study, we demonstrate that TJ protein levels andlocalization, as well as TJ function are impaired by CD44deficiency and might therefore be involved in the alterationsof cell polarity and barrier function observed in the epidermisof CD44 KO mice.

CD44 is expressed in the epidermis in all viable layers andhas an important role in epidermal differentiation, lipidsynthesis, and skin barrier function. Bourguignon et al. (2006)described in adult CD44 KO mice, a delayed barrier recovery

24 Hours

E17.5 E18.5

Active Rac

140

120

100

80

60

40

20

0WT

*

CD44 KO

Rela

tive

Rac1 a

ctivity (

%)

Total Rac

Active

WT

WT

CD44

KO

CD44

KO

48 Hours 72 Hours WT CD44 KO

aPKCι/λ

aPKCζ

Par3

Tiam1

Rac1

Tubulin

kDa 0 d

1 d

2 d

3 d

4 d

5 d

0 d

1 d

2 d

3 d

4 d

5 d

WT

CD

44 K

O

Par3

180150

100

Figure 6. Localization of Par3 and protein levels of cell polarity complex proteins, as well as Rac1 and Tiam1 in cultured WT and CD44 KO keratinocytes

and Rac1 activity assay in the embryonic skin of WT and CD44 KO mice. (a) Immunofluorescence localization of Par3 in cultured WT and CD44 KO

keratinocytes at the indicated time points after Ca2þ switch (24, 48, 72 hours). (b) Western blot analysis of WT and CD44 KO keratinocytes at

0–5 days (d) after Ca2þ switch. Equal amounts of proteins were separated and tubulin was used as the gel loading control. The molecular masses of Par3 isoforms

are indicated at the sides (n¼ 3). (c) Pull-down Rac1 assay of total skin lysates from WT and CD44 KO embryos at days E17.5 and E18.5. One representative

experiment is shown. (d) Quantification of Rac1 activity in the E17.5 WT and CD44 KO skin. Active Rac1 was normalized to total Rac1, and WT values are

denoted as 100%. Results are expressed as mean±SEM, *Po0.05 (n¼ 3). KO, knockout; WT, wild type. Bar¼ 20mm.

938 Journal of Investigative Dermatology (2011), Volume 131

N Kirschner et al.CD44 Regulates TJ

after acute stratum corneum perturbation and a loss of theapical polarization of LB secretion. However, the down-stream effector molecules contributing to these alterationsremained unknown. As TJ proteins are known to be involvedin barrier function and in cell-membrane separation of theapical from the basolateral part resulting in directed targetingof vesicles and cell polarization in the simple epithelia andendothelia (Shin et al., 2006), we hypothesized that they maycontribute to skin abnormalities induced by the loss of CD44.Indeed, we show in this study that the deficiency of CD44alters TJ protein expression and/or localization during theformation of the skin barrier in the developing embryonicepidermis, in the course of barrier recovery after tapestripping and during barrier formation in cultured keratino-cytes after Ca2þ switch. These changes coincided withdelayed skin barrier formation in mouse embryos and adultmice, and impaired TJ ion barrier function and polarization incultured keratinocytes. Interestingly, the alteration of TJproteins in the epidermis of CD44 KO mice was temporary.Normal or even increased protein amounts and normalstaining patterns of TJ proteins were restored at day E18.5when a functional epidermal barrier is evident. In addition, inadult CD44 KO mice, the expression pattern of TJ proteins isnormal, again paralleled by a normal skin barrier function(Bourguignon et al., 2006). However, during barrier recovery,which is delayed in CD44 KO mice, an alteration of TJprotein expression was found. This strongly supports thenotion that alterations in TJs contribute directly to the skinbarrier phenotype observed in CD44 KO mice.

Recent studies have shown a correlation between TJmolecule expression and TJ barrier function (TER) inkeratinocytes: downregulation of Cldn1 and occludin re-sulted in mislocalization of ZO-1 and in a decrease in TER(Yamamoto et al., 2008). Furthermore, treatment of kerati-nocytes with ochratoxin A leads to reduced amounts of Cldn4and decreased barrier function (Yuki et al., 2007). Therefore,the downregulation of Cldn1, Cldn4, and ZO-1 proteinamounts in CD44 KO keratinocytes is likely to be responsiblefor the reduced extent of TER observed in our study.However, as the TER of CD44 KO cells is not reducedcompared with WT cells at later time points (46 days),whereas especially Cldn1 is still downregulated, there mayexist compensatory mechanisms which have to be elucidatedin future experiments. It must be noted that changes in Cldnlocalization at later time points might contribute to this effect.

CD44 KO keratinocytes exhibited no significant changesfor the permeability of larger molecules, i.e., 4- and 40-kDadextrans. It was shown before that the permeability ofmolecules of different sizes can be independently regulatedby TJs (Nitta et al., 2003), and it is therefore tempting tospeculate that CD44 influences only TJ permeability for ionsbut not for larger molecules. This may also be the explanationfor the finding that we did not observe increased permeabilityfor a 557-kDa tracer through TJs of the SG of CD44 KO micein vivo. Although this tracer is smaller than FITC-dextrans, itis much larger than ions. This might also contribute to theobservation that CD44 KO mice are viable and do not showmajor defects in the basal skin barrier after birth, whereas,

e.g., Cldn1- or E-cadherin-deficient mice, which show adefect of TJ barrier function for larger molecules also, exhibita much more severe phenotype, i.e., death on the first day ofbirth due to a very high transepidermal water loss (TEWL)(Furuse et al., 2002; Tunggal et al., 2005).

The observation that the alteration of epidermal barrierfunction is only temporary and the finding that in culturedkeratinocytes formation of functional TJs was delayed but notcompletely abolished, further suggests that other moleculesmust be able to replace CD44 in signaling to TJs. This rescuemight also result in the overexpression of some TJ proteinsobserved in our study at day E18.5. It is noteworthy that therescue of a skin barrier phenotype during embryogenesis wasalso observed in loricrin-deficient mice (Koch et al., 2000).

The formation of intercellular junctions is initiated by acalcium-dependent clustering of cadherins at opposing cellmembranes and a subsequent recruitment of AJ and TJproteins forming a so-called primordial junction, whichcontains components of both AJ and TJ. The components ofthis junction are localized at the basolateral side of the plasmamembrane. In the primordial junctions of keratinocytes, theassociation of the Rac1 GEF, Tiam1, with Par3 enhances theactivation of Rac1, which is necessary for the activation ofaPKC to recruit junctional adhesion molecule-A, occludin,and Cldns. Upon activation, these molecules separate from AJproteins and form TJ strands. This results in the separation ofthe plasma membrane in apical and lateral compartments andtherefore in the establishment of cell polarity (Mertens et al.,2006). We show in this study that occludin and Cldn4 arefound in CD44 KO cells in the same plane of the lateralplasma membrane as the AJ protein E-cadherin, whereas inWT cells, there is a clear separation of these proteins along thelateral plasma membrane (z axis). This reflects a disturbedseparation of TJs from AJ components in CD44 KOkeratinocytes and therefore incomplete polarization of thecells. This is likely to contribute to the perturbed cellpolarization found in the epidermis of CD44 KO micedemonstrated by the loss of apical localization of LBs.

Besides the absence of separation between TJ and AJcomponents, we observed a striking diffuse and/or curveddistribution of Cldn1, occludin, ZO-1, ZO-2, and, to someextent, of Par3 at the cell–cell contacts in CD44 KO keratinocytesespecially at earlier time points (o5 days). Interestingly, Tuba-deficient cells exhibit a similar curved distribution for ZO-1(Otani et al., 2006). Tuba is the specific GEF for Cdc42. Thissimilarity in staining patterns might hint for a role of a GEF in thealteration of TJ protein membrane organization observed inCD44 KO cells. As we found slightly reduced protein levels ofTiam1 in CD44 KO cells, this GEF might be involved in thealtered membrane organization observed in this study.

Seeking for further possible causes explaining theperturbed localization of TJ proteins, we found a strongreduction of active Rac1 in CD44 KO mice at day E17.5. Thisfits well because Rac1 is known to have a central role in theformation of TJs. In addition, we observed a morepronounced reduction in the protein levels of the 150- and180-kDa isoforms of Par3 than for the 100-kDa isoform. Par3is subject to alternative splicing, resulting in three proteins

www.jidonline.org 939

N Kirschner et al.CD44 Regulates TJ

with different molecular masses (100, 150, and 180 kDa). Allthree isoforms possess the three PDZ domains, whereas theshortest isoform lacks the aPKC-binding site. The reducedprotein levels of the 150- and 180-kDa isoforms of Par3 in theembryonic skin of CD44 KO mice at day E17.5 and incultured CD44-deficient keratinocytes after Ca2þ switchindicates that Par3 might have an important role in theassembly and function of TJs in murine keratinocytes. It wasdemonstrated before that Par3 knockdown in Madin-Darbycanine kidney cells reduces the activation of Rac1 and that ithas a central role in the formation of TJs in these cells (Ooshioet al., 2007). In contrast to the reduced protein levels, weobserved an increased localization of Par3 at the plasmamembranes of CD44 KO-cultured cells. One might speculatethat this reflects the 100-kDa isoform, which is not altered atthe protein level in cell culture and which is unable to bindaPKC. However, this has to be clarified in future experiments,which are beyond the scope of this manuscript.

The absence of a major effect of HA-L on TJ functionalitywas surprising as Bourguignon et al. (2006) observed aneffect of HA-L on differentiation and we also observed anincrease in CK10 protein amount in HA-treated keratino-cytes. In addition, Cywes and Wessels (2001) described aninteraction of group A Streptococcus HA capsule with CD44,which results in a loss of ZO-1 from intercellular junctions.However, Kaya et al. (2006) showed that only intermediate-size HA, but not HA-L or small-size HA, influenceskeratinocyte proliferation. Therefore, we cannot exclude thatother types of HA or other concentrations might have aneffect on TJs. In addition, it is known that CD44 is also areceptor for several other molecules and can exert HA-independent influences on cell behavior (Sleeman et al.,1996; Ponta et al., 2003) and the results of the study byCywes and Wessels were obtained with squamous cellcarcinoma cells and not primary keratinocytes. The importantquestion of the appropriate ligand activating TJs in keratino-cytes will be addressed in future experiments.

As it is known that CD44 influences epidermal differentia-tion (Bourguignon et al., 2006) and that calcium also inducescell differentiation, the question arises whether the changesseen for TJ proteins might simply be mediated by altered(delayed) cell differentiation. Although we cannot completelyexclude this possibility, there are several lines of evidencethat render this hypothesis unlikely: (1) The alterations ofdifferentiation markers observed in the embryonic skin and incultured cells are less pronounced than the changes observedfor TJ proteins. (2) Changes in differentiation markers incultured keratinocytes are found at later time points than thealteration of Cldn1, a key regulator of TJ barrier function(Furuse et al., 2002). (3) Whereas the adult CD44 KO mouseskin shows decreased levels of differentiation markers(Bourguignon et al., 2006), we do not observe alterations ofTJ proteins. (4) Differences in TEWL in the adult CD44 KOmouse skin are not correlated with changed differentiationmarkers, but with alterations of TJ markers: the non-tape-stripped skin of adult CD44 KO mice exhibits—as alreadymentioned—altered differentiation-associated proteins butneither differences of TEWL nor TJ proteins. Only after

barrier disruption, when TEWL recovery is delayed in CD44KO mice, an alteration of TJ proteins was observed. (5) Wehave shown before that an alteration of TJ proteins in theepidermis occurs independent from an alteration of differ-entiation markers (Kirschner et al., 2009).

As it was demonstrated in the simple epithelia that TJproteins can actually influence proliferation and differentia-tion (Matter et al., 2005), changes of differentiation markersmight even be a consequence from and not a cause foralteration of TJ proteins. Indeed, when investigating culturedkeratinocytes derived from Cldn1 KO mice, we observed analteration of the differentiation markers, involucrin andfilaggrin. In addition, Cldn1-deficient humans, i.e., patientssuffering from the neonatal ichthyosis-sclerosing cholangitissyndrome, show alterations of skin differentiation as theydevelop an ichthyosis (Hadj-Rabia et al., 2004).

Summarizing our results, we show that CD44 is anupstream regulator of TJ formation and function in murinekeratinocytes. The loss of CD44 alters TJ protein expressionand/or localization in the embryonic epidermis, duringbarrier recovery in the adult epidermis, and in culturedkeratinocytes. Cell polarity is changed and TJ barrier functionfor ions is impaired. Par3 protein levels and Rac1 activity arelikely to be involved in TJ alterations. The temporalcorrelation between impairment of skin barrier function andalteration of TJ in CD44 KO mice strongly suggests that TJsare involved in the defective skin barrier phenotype observedin these mice.

MATERIALS AND METHODSTissues and keratinocytesCD44 (CD44tm1Hbg/J) KO and CD44 WT mice were purchased from

The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). Male and female mice

were mated and gestational days were counted from the day when

vaginal plugs were formed. On days 17.5 and 18.5, pregnant mice

were killed and the embryos obtained. In addition, skin samples

from newborn and adult mice were investigated. These animal

experiments were approved by the responsible authority (FL104-04,

Behorde fur Soziales, Familie, Gesundheit und Verbraucherschutz,

Hamburg, Germany). Cldn1 KO mice were generated as described

previously (Furuse et al., 2002).

Primary keratinocytes were isolated from newborn WT and KO

mice as described previously (Helfrich et al., 2006). In brief, the skin

was removed and trypsinized (0.1% trypsin/0.02% EDTA) overnight at

4 1C to separate the epidermis from the dermis. The epidermis was

minced, and cells were detached by shaking at room temperature (RT)

for 30minutes. Cell suspensions were seeded in dishes coated with

collagen type 1 (Becton Dickinson, Heidelberg, Germany) and cultured

in FAD (mixture of DMEM/HAMs F12) medium containing 50mM Ca2þ

in the absence or presence of mitomycin C-treated 3T3 fibroblasts as

feeders. For the Ca2þ -switch assay, keratinocytes were transferred to

the FAD medium containing 1.8mM Ca2þ and cultured for the

indicated time periods.

Antibodies, primers, and HAAntibodies specific for Cldn1 (71-7800), Cldn4 (36-4800), occludin

(33-1500), ZO-1 (33-9100), ZO-2 (38-9100), and E-cadherin

(13-1900) were purchased from Zymed Laboratories (San Francisco,

940 Journal of Investigative Dermatology (2011), Volume 131

N Kirschner et al.CD44 Regulates TJ

CA). Antibodies to Par3 (07-330) were purchased from Upstate

(Temecula, CA). For immunoblot staining, antibodies to tubulin

(CP06) and Rac1 (AB4202) obtained from Calbiochem (Darmstadt,

Germany), aPKCz (C-20), aPKCi/l (H-76), Tiam1 (C-16) from Santa

Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA), and actin from Sigma-Aldrich

(Munich, Germany) were used. Antibodies specific for loricrin (PRB-

145P) and filaggrin (PRB-417P) were obtained from Covance

(Emeryville, CA), involucrin (AB-1) was from Lab Vision Products

(Fremont, CA), and CK10 (DE-K10) and CK14 (10003) were from

Progen (Heidelberg, Germany).

For nuclear staining, DAPI (40,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole)

(Boehringer Mannheim, Germany) was applied.

FAM dye-labeled real-time PCR (rtPCR) TaqMan MGB probes for

Cldn1 (Mm00516701_m1), Cldn4 (Mm00515514_s1), occludin

(Mm00500912_m1), and 18S RNA (Hs99999901_s1) were pur-

chased from Applied Biosystems (Carlsbad, CA). HA-L (molecular

weight 4400 kDa; purity level 499.9%) derived from rooster comb

was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (H5388).

Immunofluorescence microscopyCryosections (6 mm) of the frozen murine embryonic tissue were

fixed for 10minutes in acetone at 20 1C. Cultured cells were fixed

in cold methanol (at 20 1C for 5minutes) and acetone (at 20 1C

for 15 seconds). Primary antibodies were diluted in phosphate-

buffered saline (PBS) and applied to the sections for 30minutes at

RT. For some of the antibodies, a blocking step (2% normal goat

serum, 0.1% Triton X-100; 15minutes RT) preceded the antibody

incubation. The samples were subsequently washed 2 10minutes

in PBS. Thereafter, Alexa 488- or Alexa 594-labeled secondary

antibodies (Jackson ImmunoResearch, Suffolk, UK) were applied for

30minutes at RT, followed by another washing and a subsequent

incubation with DAPI (1:5,000 in PBS). Finally, the slides or

coverslips were washed again with PBS, followed by distilled water

and mounted with Fluoromount (Southern Biotechnology Associ-

ates, Birmingham, AL). Isotype-matched antibodies were used as

negative controls. An Axiophot II microscope (Zeiss, Gottingen,

Germany) and the software Openlab 2.0.9 (Improvision, Coventry,

UK) were used for the evaluation of staining. All images of staining

from a series of experiments were acquired and processed with the

same settings and representative areas were photographed.

XZ-images were generated using an Olympus confocal micro-

scope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) and analyzed with ImageJ 1.43

software program (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD).

Ultrastructural analysisDecapitated embryos were immersed in ice-cold 2% glutaraldehyde

solution in sodium cacodylate buffer. Back skin samples were collected

and cut into 1-mm2 blocks in the same fixative, followed by washing

and post-fixation in 1% osmium tetroxide. The tissue samples were

dehydrated in graded ethanol series and embedded in Epon at 60 1C.

Ultrathin sections recovered on copper grids were counterstained in

uranyl acetate and lead citrate (Haftek et al., 1998).

Outside-in skin permeability assayOutside-in skin permeability assays were performed using toluidine

blue O (Sigma-Aldrich) as described by Hardman et al. (1998).

In brief, embryos that were killed were dehydrated by incubation in

25, 50, and 75% methanol/PBS (1minute each), followed by

1minute in 100% methanol. The embryos were then rehydrated

with the same series of methanol solutions (1-minute incubations),

washed in PBS, and stained for 30minutes in 0.1% toluidine blue O/

PBS. After extensive destaining in PBS, dye penetration reveals

barrier status. The white skin reflects an intact outside-in barrier, and

the stained skin lacks a functional skin barrier.

In vivo TJ barrier function assayIn vivo TJ barrier function assays were performed by dermal injection

of a biotinylation reagent into the back of embryonic mice that were

killed (Furuse et al., 2002). A volume of 50 ml of 10mgml1 EZ-Link

Sulfo-NHS-LC-Biotin (Pierce, Rockford, IL) in PBS containing 1mM

CaCl2 was injected. After 30minutes of incubation, skin biopsies

were taken, embedded in Tissue-Tec, and frozen. Tissue sections of

6-mm thickness were fixed for 30minutes in 95% ethanol at 4 1C and

for 1minute in 100% acetone at RT. For staining, the cryosections

were soaked in blocking solution (2% normal goat serum, 0.1%

Triton X-100) for 15minutes, incubated with the primary anti-

body (occludin) for 30minutes, washed three times with PBS, and

then incubated with a mixture of secondary antibody (Jackson

ImmunoResearch) and Streptavidin Texas red (Merck Biosciences,

Darmstadt, Germany) for 30minutes.

Measurement of TER and PTFFor TER experiments, keratinocytes were trypsinized and plated onto

Transwells of 0.4-mm pore size (Millipore, Bedford, MA) at a cell

density of 105 cells per well. When cells reached confluence, they

were transferred to the FAD medium containing 1.8mM Ca2þ . For

HA-L treatment, 10, 50, or 100mgml1 HA sodium salt were added

to the medium. TER was measured every day after Ca2þ switch (t¼ 0

days) up to 10 days using a Millicell-ERS epithelial Volt-Ohm meter

(Millipore). TER values were corrected by subtracting the blank value

(no cells) and are expressed in O cm2.

The PTF assay was also performed every 24 hours (0, 24, 48, 72,

96, and 120 hours) after Ca2þ switch. In all, 0.5mgml1 FITC-

dextran (4 and 40 kDa) (Sigma-Aldrich) was applied apically to the

cell layers and incubated for 2 hours at 37 1C. Subsequently, the

medium from the basal compartment was collected and fluores-

cence intensity was measured using a fluorescence reader (Tecan,

Mannedorf, Switzerland). The amount of FITC-dextran was calcu-

lated using a calibration curve.

Western blot analysisBiopsies of the murine embryonic skin were snap frozen in liquid

nitrogen and lysed in RIPA buffer (1% NP-40, 0.5% deoxycholate,

0.1% SDS, 5mM EDTA, 150mM NaCl, 50mM Tris, pH 8.0) and a

cocktail of protease inhibitors (Sigma-Aldrich). The same lysis buffer

was used for the cultured murine keratinocytes. Total protein (30mg)

was separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose. After

blocking for 1 hour with 5% dry milk powder in tris-buffered

salineþ triton, membranes were probed overnight at 4 1C with the

primary antibodies. Subsequently, membranes were washed

3 5minutes with tris-buffered salineþ triton and incubated for

30minutes with the appropriate secondary antibodies coupled with

horseradish peroxidase (Jackson ImmunoResearch). After another

washing for 2 5minutes with tris buffered salineþ triton immunor-

eactions were visualized by the ECL system (Amersham, Buck-

inghamshire, UK).

www.jidonline.org 941

N Kirschner et al.CD44 Regulates TJ

Signal intensities were densitometrically quantified using the

ImageJ 1.43 software program (National Institutes of Health).

Rac1 activity assayThe ‘‘Active Rac1 Pull-Down and Detection Kit’’ was purchased

from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Rockford, IL) and experiments

performed according to the manufacturer’s protocol. In brief

lysed skin samples in RIPA buffer were incubated with 20 ml of

glutathion S transferase-human Pak1-p21-binding domain for 1 hour

at 4 1C, followed by washing three times with a wash buffer. Proteins

bound to the agarose beads were eluted in 50 ml of 2 SDS sample

buffer and subjected to western blot analysis. Densitometric analysis

was performed using the ImageJ 1.43 software program (National

Institutes of Health).

rtPCR analysisTotal mRNA was isolated from three non-tape-stripped and three

tape-stripped skin samples from WT and CD44 KO mice using the

RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the

manufacturer’s instructions. In all, 3 mg of total RNA was used for

first-strand cDNA synthesis with the iScript cDNA synthesis kit (Bio-

Rad, Munich, Germany) as suggested by the manufacturer. A volume

of 2ml of the cDNA was used as a template in rtPCR analysis with the

FAM dye-labeled TaqMan MGB probes for Cldn1, Cldn4, occludin,

and 18S RNA in an iCycler iQ thermal cycler (Bio-Rad) under the

conditions recommended by Applied Biosystems. All rtPCR analyses

were performed in triplicates for three independent experiments.

Relative transcriptional levels within distinct experiments were

determined using the 2DDCt method (Livak and Schmittgen, 2001).

Tape strippingFlanks of WT and CD44 KO mice were stripped 6–8 times with

D-squames (CuDerm, Dallas, TX). TEWL was measured using a

TEWAmeter TC 350 (Courage and Khazaka, Cologne, Germany).

TEWL values exceeded directly after tape stripping 50–65 gm2 per

hour, and the measurement of TEWL was repeated at 1 and 3 hours

after tape stripping. Samples of skin were also obtained for western

blot and rtPCR analyses.

StatisticsStatistical analysis was performed with unpaired Student’s t-test.

Values are shown as mean±SEM.

CONFLICT OF INTERESTThe authors state no conflict of interest.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTSWe thank Dr Michaela Schweizer (Center for Molecular Neurobiology,Hamburg) for expert cooperation in the double-label confocal laser scanningmicroscopy, Dr Ralf Fliegert (Department of Biochemistry and MolecularBiology, University Hospital Hamburg) for competent help in fluorescencemeasurement, and Semra Frimpong (Department of Dermatology, Universityof Cologne) for excellent technical assistance with mouse keratinocytes. Wealso gratefully acknowledge Dr Junichi Ikenouchi (Institute for ChemicalResearch, Kyoto University, Japan) for stimulating discussions. This work wassupported by the EU grant MIRG-CT-2004-006675 to Dr MJ Behne and DFGForschergruppe FOR 721/2 to Dr JM Brandner.

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL

Supplementary material is linked to the online version of the paper at http://www.nature.com/jid

REFERENCES

Aijaz S, Balda MS, Matter K et al. (2006) Tight junctions: moleculararchitecture and function. Int Rev Cytol 248:261–98

Bourguignon LYW, Ramez M, Gilad E et al. (2006) Hyaluronan-CD44interaction stimulates keratinocyte differentiation, lamellar body forma-tion//secretion, and permeability barrier homeostasis. J Invest Dermatol126:1356–65

Brandner JM (2009) Tight junctions and tight junction proteins in mammalianepidermis. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 72:289–94

Brandner JM, Kief S, Grund C et al. (2002) Organization and formation of thetight junction system in human epidermis and cultured keratinocytes. EurJ Cell Biol 81:253–63

Cywes C, Wessels MR (2001) Group A Streptococcus tissue invasion byCD44-mediated cell signalling. Nature 414:648–52

Feingold KR (2007) Thematic review series: skin lipids. The role of epidermallipids in cutaneous permeability barrier homeostasis. J Lipid Res48:2531–46

Furuse M, Furuse K, Sasaki H et al. (2001) Conversion of zonulae occludentesfrom tight to leaky strand type by introducing claudin-2 into Madin-Darby canine kidney I cells. J Cell Biol 153:263–72

Furuse M, Hata M, Furuse K et al. (2002) Claudin-based tight junctions arecrucial for the mammalian epidermal barrier: a lesson from claudin-1-deficient mice. J Cell Biol 156:1099–111

Hadj-Rabia S, Baala L, Vabres P et al. (2004) Claudin-1 gene mutations inneonatal sclerosing cholangitis associated with ichthyosis: a tightjunction disease. Gastroenterology 127:1386–90

Haftek M, Teillon M-H, Schmitt D (1998) Stratum corneum, corneodesmosomesand ex vivo percutaneous penetration. Microsc Res Tech 43:242–9

Hardman MJ, Sisi P, Banbury DN et al. (1998) Patterned acquisition of skinbarrier function during development. Development 125:1541–52

Helfrich I, Schmitz A, Zigrino P et al. (2006) Role of aPKC isoforms and theirbinding partners Par3 and Par6 in epidermal barrier formation. J InvestDermatol 127:782–91

Hennings H, Holbrook KA (1983) Calcium regulation of cell-cell contact anddifferentiation of epidermal cells in culture: an ultrastructural study. ExpCell Res 143:127–42

Kaya G, Tran C, Sorg O et al. (2006) Hyaluronate fragments reverse skinatrophy by a CD44-dependent mechanism. PLoS Med 3:2291–303

Kirschner N, Poetzl C, von den Driesch P et al. (2009) Alteration of tightjunction proteins is an early event in psoriasis: putative involvement ofproinflammatory cytokines. Am J Pathol 175:1095–106

Koch PJ, de Viragh PA, Scharer E et al. (2000) Lessons from loricrin-deficientmice: compensatory mechanisms maintaining skin barrier function in theabsence of a major cornified envelope protein. J Cell Biol 151:389–400

Kuramoto N, Takizawa T, Takizawa T, et al., Yamanishi K (2002)Development of ichthyosiform skin compensates for defective perme-ability barrier function in mice lacking transglutaminase 1. J Clin Invest109:243–50

Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data usingreal-time quantitative PCR and the 2-[Delta][Delta]CT method. Methods25:402–8

Madison KC (2003) Barrier function of the skin: ‘‘La Raison d’Etre’’ of theepidermis. J Invest Dermatol 121:231–41

Matter K, Aijaz S, Tsapara A et al. (2005) Mammalian tight junctions in theregulation of epithelial differentiation and proliferation. Curr Opin CellBiol 17:453–8

Menon GK, Feingold KR, Elias PM (1992) Lamellar body secretory response tobarrier disruption. J Invest Dermatol 98:279–89

Mertens AEE, Pegtel DM, Collard JG (2006) Tiam1 takes PARt in cell polarity.Trends Cell Biol 16:308–16

Mertens AEE, Rygiel TP, Olivo C et al. (2005) The Rac activator Tiam1controls tight junction biogenesis in keratinocytes through binding to andactivation of the Par polarity complex. J Cell Biol 170:1029–37

Nitta T, Hata M, Gotoh S et al. (2003) Size-selective loosening of the blood-brain barrier in claudin-5-deficient mice. J Cell Biol 161:653–60

942 Journal of Investigative Dermatology (2011), Volume 131

N Kirschner et al.CD44 Regulates TJ

Ooshio T, Fujita N, Yamada A et al. (2007) Cooperative roles of Par-3 andafadin in the formation of adherens and tight junctions. J Cell Sci 120:2352–65

Otani T, Ichii T, Aono S et al. (2006) Cdc42 GEF Tuba regulates the junctionalconfiguration of simple epithelial cells. J Cell Biol 175:135–46

Ponta H, Sherman L, Herrlich PA (2003) CD44: from adhesion molecules tosignalling regulators. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 4:33–45

Protin U, Schweighoffer T, Jochum W et al. (1999) CD44-deficient micedevelop normally with changes in subpopulations and recirculation oflymphocyte subsets. J Immunol 163:4917–23

Pummi K, Malminen M, Aho H et al. (2001) Epidermal tight junctions: ZO-1and occludin are expressed in mature, developing, and affected skin andin vitro differentiating keratinocytes. J Invest Dermatol 117:1050–8

Schneeberger EE, Lynch RD (2004) The tight junction: a multifunctionalcomplex. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 286:1213–28

Sevilla LM, Nachat R, Groot KR et al. (2007) Mice deficient in involucrin,envoplakin, and periplakin have a defective epidermal barrier. J Cell Biol179:1599–612

Shin K, Fogg VC, Margolis B (2006) Tight junctions and cell polarity. AnnuRev Cell Dev Biol 22:207–35

Sleeman J, Rudy W, Hofmann M et al. (1996) Regulated clustering of variantCD44 proteins increases their hyaluronate binding capacity. J Cell Biol135:1139–50

Troy T-C, Li Y, O’Malley L et al. (2007) The temporal and spatial expression ofClaudins in epidermal development and the accelerated program ofepidermal differentiation in K14-CaSR transgenic mice. Gene ExprPatterns 7:423–30

Tunggal JA, Helfrich I, Schmitz A et al. (2005) E-cadherin is essential forin vivo epidermal barrier function by regulating tight junctions. EMBO J24:1146–56

Turley EA, Noble PW, Bourguignon LYW (2002) Signaling properties ofhyaluronan receptors. J Biol Chem 277:4589–92

Umeda K, Ikenouchi J, Katahira-Tayama S et al. (2006) ZO-1 and ZO-2independently determine where claudins are polymerized in tight-junction strand formation. Cell 126:741–54

Underhill C (1992) CD44: the hyaluronan receptor. J Cell Sci 103:293–8

Yamamoto T, Saeki Y, Kurasawa M et al. (2008) Effect of RNA interference oftight junction-related molecules on intercellular barrier function incultured human keratinocytes. Arch Dermatol Res 300:517–24

Yang L, Mao-Qiang M, Taljebini M et al. (1995) Topical stratumcorneum lipids accelerate barrier repair after tape stripping, solventtreatment and some but not all types of detergent treatment. Br JDermatol 133:679–85

Yuki T, Haratake A, Koishikawa H et al. (2007) Tight junction proteins inkeratinocytes: localization and contribution to barrier function.Exp Dermatol 16:324–30

www.jidonline.org 943

N Kirschner et al.CD44 Regulates TJ