alberta oil sands: insufficiency of the integrated oil sands environment monitoring plan
TRANSCRIPT
Running head: ALBERTA OIL SANDS
Alberta Oil Sands: Insufficiency of the Integrated Oil Sands Environment Monitoring
Plan
Question #1: How should Canadians respond to the environmental challenges associated with oil
sand mining?Course: GEO 2153
Professor: Abednego Aryee
Student name: Yanan Wang
Student number: 250630628
1
ALBERTA OIL SANDS
Alberta Oil Sands: Insufficiency of the Integrated Oil Sands Environment Monitoring Plan
Alberta’s oil sands extraction is an important contributor to the Canadian economy. The
oil sands have led to great economic prosperity for Canada. Every benefit has an associated cost;
with the great economic prosperity resulting from the oil sands industry comes tremendous social
and environmental cost. These negative externalities are often unaccounted for and can spill over
into our ecological and social environment during any of the four stages of development or
during transportation. In the early years of the oil sands industry, the Alberta government
assumed an active role. It was primarily responsibility for the development of the oil sands and
invested millions of dollars into the industry. Government involvement has gradually decreased
over the past four decades. However, recent challenges in the 21st Century called for a more
assertive role for government monitoring and regulation. After multiple studies disproved
industry claims of having no negative environmental impacts, the Federal Government launched
a new policy—the Integrated Oil Sands Environment Monitoring Program in 2013. The
monitoring program covers water, air, and biodiversity monitoring, and takes an integrated
approach of transparency and accessibility (Environment Canada, 2011, p.xv). However, the
mere monitoring of the oil sands industry—no matter how transparent it claims to be—is, in the
end, only monitoring. The current monitoring program is a failure of the Canadian government to
take into account with all seriousness the devastating impacts of Alberta’s oil sands projects.
Rather than the mere monitoring of an industry that has been proven to be harmful to the
environment, the Canadian government must take drastic measures to regulate and restrict entry
to the oil sands industry in order to preserve the integrity of our natural and social environment.
What is Oil Sands Mining?
2
ALBERTA OIL SANDS
Oil sands are a type of heavy oil fossil fuels that consist of sand, bitumen, mineral-rich
clays, and water (Draper & Reed, 2009, p.452). The extraction of oil sands employs conventional
open-pit mining or in situ nonconventional mining. In conventional mining, where bitumen
deposits are located near the surface (no more than 75 metres below ground), overburden is
removed during the development process and the deposits are extracted using open pit mining
methods. Oil sands development in Alberta currently occupies a very large area of land. The
three main zones of occupation are the Athabasca, Cold Lake, and the Peace River regions,
accounting for at least 30% of the total landmass in Alberta (see Figure 1).
Economic Benefits
Alberta’s oil sands are an important part of the Canadian economy. Canada currently
ranks third in the top holders of proven oil reserves (see Figure 2). Firstly, the oil sands industry
makes a direct contribution to Canada’s GDP. In Canada, 52% of all crude oil is produced by
Alberta’s oil sands (Natural Resources Canada, 2012, p.25). Mining, quarrying, and oil and gas
extraction are currently the third largest industry in Canada, accounting for just over 8% of GDP
as of January 2014 (see Figure 3). Canada’s GDP in 2013 was $1.827 trillion USD. Mining,
quarrying, and oil and gas extraction contributed over $146 billion USD to our economy (The
World Bank, 2014). Since 2002, oil sands production was determined to be growing at an
average rate of 85,228 barrels per day (bpd) from its 2002 production level of 823,418 bpd to
almost 1.6 million bpd in 2010 (see Figure 4). The compounded annual growth rate has been
estimated at 8.6% and, observing the upward linear trend of production (see Figure 4), growth
does not appear to be slowing (Alberta Department of Energy, 2012).
Secondly, the oil sands industry is not only an important industry in Canada, but also
across international borders. The entire world, especially OCED countries, are very dependent
3
ALBERTA OIL SANDS
upon fossil fuels to power daily needs. In addition to the direct economic benefit accrued from
producing and exporting oil sands, Alberta’s oil sands industry also attracts foreign direct
investment (FDI) into Canada. According to Statistics Canada, the stocks of FDI in Canada’s oil
and gas industry rose by 66% to reach $84 billion. Between 2009-2011, FDI in Canada’s oil and
gas sector accounted for 32% of total investment (Statistics Canada, 2011). FDI has been proven
to lead to capital formation, job creation, higher wages, increased tax revenue, and more
advanced technologies (The Conference Board of Canada, 2012).
Environmental & Social Costs
Increasing world interest in securing oil supplies, especially from the United States and
China, has increased the demand for oil sands. Although there is great economic prosperity to be
gained from oil extraction, there are also negative impacts associated with oil sands development
and production. In 2008, the Pembina Institute released its first oil sands “report card” in which it
was revealed that oil sands extraction was “the most environmentally costly source of transport
fuel in the world” (Dyer et al., 2008, p.vii). Direct and indirect negative environmental impacts
can occur during the four stages of mining, as well as during transportation.
In the first stage of mining, access roads must be built during the exploration process,
inevitably disturbing the natural habitat of the ecosystem. Access roads indirectly cause the
fragmentation of forests and ecosystems. During development and extraction, the second stage of
mining, trees and soil are removed before the extraction process can begin. Development also
affects the air quality with emissions of nitrous oxides, sulphur dioxide, and volatile organic
compounds. Nitrous oxides and sulphur dioxide react with water and increases the acidity. The
most problematic environmental impact of the oil sands and mining industry is acid mine
drainage, in which “acidic water drains from mine sites and sometimes enters streams and lakes”
4
ALBERTA OIL SANDS
(Draper & Reed, 2009, p.682). These air emissions have found to be the major contributors to
smog or ground-level ozone and have potential human health effects such as respiratory
problems. In addition, mining requires the use of freshwater and groundwater consumption.
Overuse of local water resources can affect the sustainability of water resources. During the third
stage, the processing of oil sands releases mature fine tailings into the ecosystem. Finally, during
the mine closure and reclamation process, the mining site should be restored to its state prior to
human disturbances. However, restoration rarely takes place. In the past, when environmental
regulation of the oil sands industry was lax, mines failed to reclaim land to a socially acceptable
standard. This resulted due to a lack of data accumulated about the surrounding ecosystem prior
to development or just the failure to reclaim land after mine closure.
Although there has been no research to date that quantifies the total environmental
damage the oil sands industry has done, it is estimated that “more than 280 km2 of boreal forest
and peatlands have already been eliminated to make way for oilsands development” (Leahy,
2014). Prior to 2008, the oil sands industry claimed that development and extraction had no
“significant” adverse effects on the environment. However, in 2008, David Schindler led a team
to conduct the first independent study on the oil sands impact on the environment by observing
the amount of contaminants found in snow within a 50 km radius of mining sites. Schindler’s
research results found that
The loading to the snowpack of airborne particulate was 11,400 T over 4 months
and included 391 kg of polycyclic aromatic compounds (PAC), [there were]
significant increases in PAC concentrations in the Athabasca River and its
tributaries, [and] oil sands development in the previous two years was related to
5
ALBERTA OIL SANDS
elevated dissolved APC concentrations that were likely toxic to fish embryos
(Paksey et al., 2009).
After the publication of Schindler’s revolutionary study, numerous other studies such as the
Environmental and Health Impacts of Canada’s Oil Industry report in a PNAS journal in 2009
and the Pembina Institute’s 2011 Solving the Puzzle: Environmental Responsibility in Oil Sands
Development report followed, all of which confirmed Schindler's results.
The social impacts of oil sands development are closely related to its environmental
impacts. In the Athabasca region, the “keepers of the Athabasca are [the First Nations, Metis,
Inuit, environmental groups, and watershed citizens working together for the protection of the
water, land and air, and thus for all living things today” (Walsh, 2012). Those in the Athabasca
region have been dramatically affected by environmental changes brought on by oil sands
development in the region. The Athabasca river is crucial to the survival of the people: the
community relies on traditional foods such as fishing and for drinking water. However, the
carcinogenic (cancer-causing) compounds released into the river by nearby oil sands
development sites have caused the water to be contaminated with toxic pollutants. This has
resulted in deformed fish (see Figure 5) and spiking cancer rates (Thompson & Radford, 2013).
Evolution of Government Involvement
In the early 1970s, the Alberta government assumed primary responsibility for
subsidizing the oil sands industry. Gradually, as the industry became more prosperous, the
provincial government moved away from direct investments in the industry. Eventually,
nationalistic sentiments in the energy sector decreased as the government recognized the need for
foreign investment for the industry to grow. In a recent Senate document on the topic of energy
management, the author states:
6
ALBERTA OIL SANDS
Unlike many other countries, foreign investment in the energy sector is welcomed.
This openness to the world is crucial given Canada’s relatively small population
base, limited capital markets and the massive capital needed to develop our vast
energy resources. We must never take this for granted (Standing Senate
Committee on Energy, 2012, p.10)
In preparation for its expansion, the Canadian government is actually preparing to loosen the
restrictions on FDI in the oil sands industry, perpetuating further growth and development of the
toxic oil sands industry.
The Integrated Oil Sands Environment Monitoring Program
Following the publication of Dr. David Schindler’s study revealing the dangerous
impacts of the oil sands industry, the Canadian government began to confirm his results and
develop a policy to mitigate the negative attention Schindler’s and subsequent studies had drawn
to the industry. Finally, on February 3, 2012, the federal government announced the launch of
“the most transparent and accountable oil sands monitoring system in the world,” as Canada’s
Environment Minister Peter Kent claimed (Hussain, 2012). The program is to be managed by the
Federal and Alberta governments, covering water, air, and biodiversity monitoring.
The new “policy” is described in Environment Canada’s An Integrated Oil Sands
Environmental Monitoring Plan report. The report describes in detail the components to be
monitored, its methodology and execution, and data management procedures (Environment
Canada, 2012). However, nowhere in this proposed “policy” is there any mention of regulation
or consequences for causing environmental damage. In addition, the Federal and Albertan
government have made no attempt to answer the calls for placing a moratorium on the oil sands
7
ALBERTA OIL SANDS
industry. Nor have any oil sands companies made voluntary commitments to reduce emissions or
monitor the release of toxic tailings into the ecosphere (Draper & Reed, 2009, p.454)
Conclusion
Development in the oil sands industry presents a challenging dilemma for the Canadian
government. The oil sands industry is one of the top contributors to the Canadian economy and
thousands of jobs depend on its continuing prosperity. However, the negative environmental and
social consequences of oil sands development are dramatic and undeniable. Not only is oil sands
mining the most environmentally costly source of fuel extraction in the world, but it has also
been proven to have direct and negative health effects on surrounding human and animal
inhabitants. Opening the oil sands industry to unrestricted foreign direct investment is the
Government’s de facto way of giving consent to the continuing expansion and growth of a toxic
industry. The integrated oil sands environment monitoring plan is not only a failure of the
government to ensure responsible and sustainable development in the oil sands industry, but also
a legitimate execution of its consent for the pollution and destruction caused by the industry. It
must be stressed once more that the oil sands industry involves proven and dramatic negative
environmental and social consequences. Rather than establishing a mere monitoring program, the
Canadian and Albertan governments must take responsible and drastic measures to restrict the
expansion of the oil sands industry to preserve the integrity of our ecological and social
environment.
8
ALBERTA OIL SANDS
Figure 1: Oil Sands Areas
Source: Oil Sands Production Profile. (2012). Alberta Department of Energy. Retrieved
November 16, 2014, from Government of Alberta website:
http://www.energy.alberta.ca/Org/pdfs/InitiativeOSPP.pdf
9
ALBERTA OIL SANDS
Figure 2: Top Holders of Proven Oil Reserves
Source: BP Statistical Review of World Energy June 2012. (2012). British Petroleum, London:
British Petroleum.
10
ALBERTA OIL SANDS
Figure 3: Canadian GDP Segments %
Source: Gross domestic product at basic prices, by industry (monthly) (2014). Statistics Canada.
Retrieved November 16, 2014, from
http://www.statcan.gc.ca/tables-tableaux/sum-som/l01/cst01/gdps04a-eng.htm
11
ALBERTA OIL SANDS
Figure 4: Annual Crude Oil Production from Oil Sands
Source: Oil Sands Production Profile. (2012). Alberta Department of Energy. Retrieved
November 16, 2014, from Government of Alberta website:
http://www.energy.alberta.ca/Org/pdfs/InitiativeOSPP.pdf
12
ALBERTA OIL SANDS
Figure 5: Deformed fish found in Athabasca watershed
Source: Oilsands poisoning fish, say scientists, fishermen. (2010). Sierra Club Canada.
Retrieved on November 17, 2014, from http://www.sierraclub.ca/en/node/2963
13
ALBERTA OIL SANDS
References
An integrated oil sands environment monitoring plan. (2012). Environment Canada. Retrieved
on November 17, 2014, from http://www.ec.gc.ca/pollution/EACB8951-1ED0-4CBB-
A6C9-84EE3467B211/Integrated%20Oil%20Sands_low_e.pdf
BP Statistical Review of World Energy June 2012. (2012). British Petroleum, London: British
Petroleum.
Canada. (2014). The World Bank. Retrieved on November 16, 2014, from
http://data.worldbank.org/country/canada
Draper, D., & Reed, M. (2009). Our Environment: A Canadian Perspective, Fourth Edition.
Dryer, S., Moorhouse, J., Laufenberg, K., & Powell, R. (2008). Under-mining the environment:
The oil sands report card. The Pembina Institute. Retrieved on November 16, 2014, from
http://www.pembina.org/pub/1571/
Foreign and domestic investment in Canada: 2009-2011. (2011). Statistics Canada. Retrieved on
November 16, 2014, from http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/61-232-x/61-232-x2011001-
eng.pdf
Fuel for thought: The economic benefits of oil sands investment for Canada’s regions. (2012).
The Conference Board of Canada. Retrieved on November 16, 2014, from
https://albertacanada.com/files/albertacanada/AIS_FuelforThought.pdf
Gross domestic product at basic prices, by industry (monthly). (2014). Statistics Canada.
Retrieved on November 16, 2014, from http://www.statcan.gc.ca/tables-tableaux/sum-
som/l01/cst01/gdps04a-eng.htm
Hussain, Y. (2012, Feb 3). Canada launches new oil sands monitoring policy. The National Post.
Retrieved on November 17, 2014, from
14
ALBERTA OIL SANDS
http://business.financialpost.com/2012/02/03/stung-by-critics-canada-launches-new-oil-
sands-monitoring-policy/
Important facts on Canada’s natural resources. (2011). Natural Resources Canada. Retrieved on
November, 16, 2014, from
http://www.nrcan.gc.ca.proxy1.lib.uwo.ca/sites/www.nrcan.gc.ca/files/files/stat/2012/
important-2012-eng.pdf
Leahy, S. (2014, Jun 26). Experts call for moratorium on new oil sands development until
climate, environmental impact assessed. DeSmog Canada. Retrieved on November 16,
2014, from http://desmog.ca/2014/06/26/experts-call-moratorium-new-oilsands-
development-until-climate-environmental-impacts-assessed
Now or never: Canada must act urgently to seize its place in the new energy world order. 41st
Parliament, 1st Session. (2012). Standing Senate Committee on Energy, the Environment
and Natural Resources. Retrieved on November 16, 2014, from
http://www.parl.gc.ca.proxy1.lib.uwo.ca/Content/SEN/Committee/411/enev/rep/
rep04jul12-e.pdf
Oil Sands Production Profile. (2012). Alberta Department of Energy. Retrieved on November 16,
2014, from Government of Alberta website:
http://www.energy.alberta.ca/Org/pdfs/InitiativeOSPP.pdf
Oilsands poisoning fish, say scientists, fishermen. (2010). Sierra Club Canada. Retrieved on
November 17, 2014, from http://www.sierraclub.ca/en/node/2963
Paskey, J., Steward, G., & Williams, A. (2013). The Alberta oil sands then and now: an
investigation of the economic, environmental and social discourses across four decades.
Mount Royal University. Retrieved on November 17, 2014, from
15
ALBERTA OIL SANDS
https://era.library.ualberta.ca/public/view/item/uuid:b1c0019f-d528-40ff-ac95-
b21d4c2aec2f/DS1/TR-38%20-%20Paskey%20Then%20and%20Now.pdf
Thompson, N., & Radford, T. (2013). Tipping point: Age of the oil sands [video]. Clearwater
Documentary in association with CBC-TV. Retrieved on November 17, 2014, from
http://www.cbc.ca/natureofthings/episodes/tipping-point
Walsh, H. (2012). Keepers of the Athabasca. Canadian Electronic Library. Retrieved on
November 17, 2014, from http://books.scholarsportal.info/viewdoc.html?id=547695
16