document resume ed 129 837 · 2014-01-27 · canadore college continuing education division...
TRANSCRIPT
DOCUMENT RESUME
ED 129 837 TN 005 447_
TITLE Canadore Comprehensive Achievement Monitoring (CAM)Mathematics: An Introduction & Overview.
INSTITUTION Canadore Coll., North Bay (Ontario).NOTE 124p.; Prepared by Continuing Education Division;
Best copy available
EDRS PRICE MF-40.83 HC-S6.01 Plus Postage.DESCRIPTORS Achievement Tests; Cognitive Objectives; Curriculum
Development; Curriculum Evaluation; *EducationalObjectives; Electronic Data Processing; ElementarySchool Mathematics; *Elementary Secondary Education;Individualized Curriculum; *Individualized Programs;*Mathematics; Multiple Choice Tests; Post Testing;Pretests; Screening Tests; Secondary SchoolMathematics; Student Placement; Student Testing;*Test Construction
IDENTIFIERS CAR; *Comprehensive Achievement Monitoring; LearningIndividualized for Canadians
ABSTRACTThree tests were developed in the Canadore
Comprehensive Achievement Monitoring (CAM) project in the area ofmathematics..The Canadore CAM Monitoring Tests were used to obtain anestimate of knowledge of objectives on a preinstruction,postinstruction and retention basis. The Math Survey Tests were usedto place a student at the appropriate point within the mathcurriculum. The Math Block Mastery Tests were developed to allow for
a pretest, posttest and interim test within each study block. Inorder to construct these tests, content topics vere identified, thenfurther defined by curriculum level. Since in an individualizedprogram, it is necessary for some sort of objectives to be written sothat students can ascertain the immediate goal of their study,Generic Objectives were developed for each content topic at eachcurriculum level. Each Generic Objective indicates the stimulus, howthe informati^n is received by the student, the general operation andthe component operated on, and the output expected from the student.Five test items were written for each of the Generic Objectives. Foreach kind of test, items were randomly selected to cover theappropriate Generic Objectives. (BA)
***********************************************************************Documents acquired by ERIC include many informal unpublished
* materials not available from other sources. ERIC makes every effort ?le
* to obtain the best copy available. Nevertheless, items of marginal *
* reproducibility are often encountered and this affects the quality *
* of the microfiche and hardcopy reproductions ERIC makes available *
* via the ERIC Document Reproduction Service (EDRS). EDIS is not* responsible for the quality of the original document..Reproductions ** supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original. *
***********************************************************************
U.S. DEPARTMENTOF HEALTH.EDUCATION &WELFARE
.
NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF
EDUCATION
THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRO.DUCED EXACTLY AS RECEIVED FROM
THE PERSON OR ORGANIZATION ORIGIN.ATING IT POINTS OF VIEW OR OPINIONS
STATED DO NOT NECESSARILY REPRE-
SENT OFFICIAL NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF
EDUCATION POSITION OR POLICY
z
CANADORE COMPREHENSIVE ACHIEVEMENTMONITORING (CAM) MATHMATICS:AN INTRODUCTION & OVERVIEW
Learner at the Centre:A Project in the.Management ofInstruction
Pro ect Director
Paul J. DudgeonDean, Continuing EducationCanadore CollegeContinuing Education DivisionNorth.Bay, Ontario, Canada
Pro ect Staff
John Brock, ChairmanContinuing Education
Andres'aminez, EducationalDevelopment Officer
W. L. Roger Crane, EducationalDevelopment Officer
Gordon Richardson, EducationalDevelopment Officer
2
- I -
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Curriculum AREA .2
Content Topics 3
Curriculum Levels 3
Topics By Curriculum-Levels-Matrix 5
Subdivision of Topics Into Strata 6
Utilizing Published ObjectivesGeneric Objectives 8Constructing the Generic Objective 10
Sequencing Objectives Between Curriculum Levels 12
Sequencing Objectives Within Curriculum Levels 14
Selecting Test Item Format 16
Constructing Test Items 18
Selecting Test Types 21
Constructing all CAM Tests 23
Canadore CAM Monitoring Tests 23
Canadore CAM: Math Survey Tests 26
Canadore CAM: Math Block Mastery Tests 26
CAM Computer Program 28
Preparing Computer Input 29
Canadore CAM Reports 29
Administrating Canadore CAM: Math Monitoring Tests . 30
Student Management Folders 30
Implementation of Canadore CAM: Math Block Mastery Section 32
APPENDICES
Content Topics by Curriculum-Levels-MatrixContent Outline of Canadore CAM: Math
D-1D-2
EXplana ion of Generic Objectives D-3
Generi 0,ctive Card D-4
Sele ed S es of Generic Objectives D-5
Number of Generic Objectives in Content Tppics By
Curriculum Leyels Matrix D-6 .
Abbreviations Administrative Outline of Generic Objectives D-T
Test Item Card D-8
Spacing Guide for Typing Items on Cards D-9
Selected Samples of Test Items D-10
Sample Canadore CAM Reports D-11
Student Management Folders and Examples D-12
CURRICULUM AREA
For the purposes of the project it was decided that attention
would be placed on mathematics as the subject area for this
initial portion of the Canadore CAM System. Only a single
curriculum area was chosen so as to concentrate developmental
tasks in one direction.
It is obvious that mathematics is a vital and basic skill
area for many occupational trades. Because of the strong
hierarchical and sequential nature of the discipline, the
obtaining of accurate data on student learning outcomes and
retention is vital both for the student and the program. The
CAM Model as explained in the ensuing pages, is ideally
suited to the task. There were four possible curriculum areas
that could have been chosen: communications, science, math-
ematics and reading. The science and communication areas
were allocated to another part of the project - cognitive
style mapping. It would have been unwise to further confound
that investigation by incorporating a new curricular organ-
ization and management system.
Further, a CAM System in reading for students in a group-
paced setting has been developed in New York State. It was
thought to be more beneficial to embark on a different
curricular discipline than just to revise a CAM Model for
reading so as to fit into an individualized setting.
CONTENT TOPICS
After deciding on the curricular area, the general topics
to be utilized were determined. The LINC Mathematics
Program, in use at the time, in the BTSD Program at Canadore
was consulted as were other materials (such as text books
and course outlines) that are usually employed by the
mathematics instructors.
After these series of analyses were accomplished,'it was
decided to form 19 topic areas. They were to.be tentative
and subject to change as conditions altered. The content
topics enumerated were:
Whole Numbers Trigonometry
Fractions Algebra
Decimals Indices
Percent Graphs and Statistics
Measurement Slide Rule
Sets Logs
Geometry Series and Progressions
Integers Permulations and Combinations
Ratio and Proportion Consumer Mdthematics
Metric System
These topics included every unit that is usually taught to
the students from the lowest grade to the highest (i.e.
grades one through twelve). The topic outline was designed
to be complete for the entire BTSD mathematics curriculum.
CURRICULUM LEVELS
In the BTSD Program, students enter with varying achievement
levels in mathematics and indeed, in all content areas. A
5
4
student might enter with, in effect, no knowledge and/or
training in arithmetic (at the Kindergarten or,G,Kade "0"
level) or with most mathematics skills learned except for
a selected few (i.e. use of a slide rule). As a result, it
was decided to include.all grade levels from K to 12 for
the final version of the Canadore CAM-Math System.
However, it was preferred that these grade levels (13 in all)
be grouped together to make a more manageable number of
curriculum levels. Of course, these grades could be grouped
in any number of different combinations to make as many or
as few levels as desired.
After discussions, it was determined that the lower grades
of the traditional school system*(i.e. K-8) could be more
conveniently grouped than the traditional high school levels
since much of the material is usually reinforced from grade
to grade at these earliest levels. Also, the topics are
more consistent from grade to grade in K-8 than 9-12 where
many new topics are actually initiated and then concentratedly
reinforced.
Curriculum levels for the Canadore CAM System-Mathematics
are as follows:
Curriculum Levels Grade Levels
K-3
II 4-6
7-8
Iv 9
V 10
VI 11
VII 12
TOPICS BY CURRICULUM-LEVELS4TATRIX
The'two aspects-content topics and curriculum levels-were
combined into a matrix of 7 columns by 19 rows that consisted
of 133 cells. As a result, there were 133 decisions to be
made as each cell represented a given content topic in a
specific curriculum level. In effect, for each cell, a
decision had to be made as to whether at least a portion of
the specific content topic ought to be taught in the given
curriculum level.
A two-level format was developed to be used to indicate
teaching within a cell. A solid line ( ) in a cell was
used to indicate that this topic was taught with emphasis at
this level. A broken line ( ) was used to indicate that
some attention was given the topic but only briefly or in an
introductory or peripheral manner. It was further determined
that the teaching with emphasis for a topic would occur in
contiguous cells (horizontally) if it occurred at more than
one curriculum level. Information from various inputs was
used in order to classify each cell. The experience of the
mathematics instructional staff in combination with current
mathematics material (i.e. LINC) were relied on most specif-
ically in this classifatory procedure.
The resulting completed matrix is given in Appendix D-1. In
this matrix, for example, it can be seen that the,topic of
"whole numbers" is taught primarily in curriculum,leveI I and
II with peripheral attention given in the third and fourth
levels. Decimals, on the other hand, is taught peripherally
in levels I and II, with concentration in level III and rein-
forcement in levels IV.and V.
6
This matrix has become the curriculum basis for the Canadore
CAM-Math System. The subsequent organizational structure
will always be able to trace its roots back to this matrix.
SUBDIVISION OF TOPICS INTO STRATA
Once the basic 19 general topic areas had been determined,
it was necessary to subdivide them into smaller units. A
three-tier approach in this breakdown of the content topics
was developed. That is, there would be a general topic sub-
divided into subtopics and, if necessary, furtfier broken
down into subsubtopics. It was also realized that in some
circumstances two levels would be sufficient and this was to
be acceptable.
Inputs were obtained from numerous sources in order to achieve
this subdivision. Again, content outlines, current.texts,
Humber's RANDA Program and our existing mathematics programs
were all employed. This data was further refined by utilizing
the experience of the instructional faculty-at Canadore. .
Originally, a rough division into subtopics was achieved. A
subtopic was to be included if it was found in a content out-
line and if in the instructional staff's opinion it ought to
be taught to students in this program once they had attained
the appropriate prior learning experiences.
Once this original subdivision had been accomplished, an
additional sub-level was obtained by subdividing the second-
tier topics. Again, the same sort of analysis was used as for
the original breakdown. However, this time, much more atten-
tion was placed on whether specific content areas should be
- 7
taught to students in a BTSD Program. The aSsumption here
was that only the content areas that ought to be taught
should be included in the outline, at least in the pre-
liminary version.
This "Revised Draft" of the content outline is listed in
Appendix D-2. It is not designed to be a final format. The
whole concept in our system's design is that formative evalu-
ation will be utilized to the utmost. It is hoped that
continuous feedback of all types will allow constant upgrading
of the topic outline as well as all other portions of the
Canadore CAM-Math System.
UTILIZING PUBLISHED OBJECTIVES
Math objectives have been written for numerous courses, books
and instructional systems. There are a wide variety available
from numerous sources. In fact, some published objectives
are very comprehensive and, in a general way, applicable in
any BTSD Program.
It was decided to obtain a reference file of mathematics
objectivts from selected sources. This file was firstly to
be used as an idea generator in as far as writing objectives
was concerned. However, even more important was its use as
a check to ensure that important, perhaps intermediary,
objectives were not excluded.
Objectives from four sources were deemed relevant enough to
be included in this reference file. Most directly applicable
were those that were at that time in use at Canadore-those of
the LINC (Learning Individualized for Canadians) Program.
9
-
This was thought to be a good base on which to build the
reference file. In addition, the forebearer of LINC, the
NewStart objectives, were thought to be a useful supple-
ment. Although they overlapped considerably, together they
represented most content subtopics.
. An additional group of mathematics objectives were obtained
from Project SPPED-System for Pupil and Program Evaluation
and Development. This group of objectives, covering grades
K through 9, was organized by level and topic and grouped
into a "bank" (or collection) of objectives. In addition
the packages prepared by Humber's RANDA Division were useful.
Every stated objective of these three programs was cut-out
from the original document and pasted onto a 5 by 8 inch
index file card. Then each card was sorted, based on the
previously obtained strata of objectives. The resUlt was
over one thousand objectives sorted by topics and sub-
topics.
Of course there were very many cases in which virtually
identical objectives were obtained in the same subtopic area.
In addition, nearly all of the objectives were far too specific
to suit the purpose of the Canadore CAM-Math System. Never-
theless, these did help greatly in forming the genesis of our
objectives.
GENERIC OBJECTIVES
The basic element in the CAM System is the "generic objec-
tive" (GO). It was found that many of the objectives
developed by others were far too specific, or even too
10
Nthole and decimal number(
- 9
general for this curriculum development. Partially in order
to lessen the instructor's load in the preparation of these
objectives, it was thought that objectives could be written
that neglected specific content in favor of an overall
objective. This could be made more specific later when the
GO and specific content were mapped together to produce
content objectives.
A defined form of the generic objective was developed. A
specific format was utilized in order to ease the problems of
writing the objectives and, more importantly, applying them
in practice.
Our generic form of objectives can be broken into an input
and an output string. An example of a possible mathematics
generic objective is:
Given a1
the student
Input String
3writes
2
5 /
thelw olejnumbetj
Output String
The input string indentifies the general type of stimulus or
stimuli (1) and the general mode of input (2) in the math
objectives. The usual mode of stimulus is visual - the student
reads what he is given. So common is this that it was decided
to state that the mode of input (2) will only be listed where
_it is not written or visual. Every other mode was to be an
exception and therefore to be specifically, stated, as in the
above example.
10 -
The output string consists of the general operation or
behavioral indicator or verb (3), the thing operated on or
component (4) and any necessary modifiers (5). The behavioral
indicator (3) is the action verb that indicates what the
student is to do - write, solve, calculate and so on. A
modifier (5)is only utilized when it is considered necessary
to further describe the component.
From the explanation and example given, IL is clear that
this particular form of objective initially disregards
specific content (for further explanation, see Appendix D-3).
In this system, specific content is employed only when
allocating Generic Objectives to horizontal sequences of
cells in the Content Topics by CUrriculum-Levels-Matrix.
CONSTRUCTING THE GENERIC OBJECTIVES
The basis for constructing the generic objectives was the
strata of objectives that analyzed the 19 topics into a
three tier system. As this had been constructed with consid-
erable care, the writing of the generic objectives was made
less onerous than would have been the case without this
detailed outline.
Every Generic Objective was written in the format indicated
above: "Given , the student
As each Generic Objective was written, it was independently
checked as to the validity of the content and the general .
clarity of the objective itself. It then went back to the
initiator of the generic objective for his re-assessment.
It
At that point, the generic objective (written on a printed
card) was preliminarilyiapproved and given a temporary generic
12
objective content number that consisted of eight digits and
corresponded to the six digit code developed for the strata
of objectives plus two digits for the objective number.
Then the objective was sent to be typed in the appropriate
places on a previously designed draft version of a Generic
Objective card (for further explanation, see Appendix D-4).
The objective, objective number and classification were typed
on the card. The procedure then called for ihe initiator and
an instructor to approve the objective to their satisfaction.
The objective was then sent to the Evaluator for final
analysis. It was his duty to approve the overall content
and style of the objective. More importantly, he utilized
the previously developed objectiire Reference File for compar-
ative analysis. Care was taken to prevent important objec-
tives from not being included in the Canadore CAM-Math
System.
This procedure was followed for every generic objective so
that, eventually, a paper-based data bank of generic objec-
tives was obtained. A list of some of our generic objectives
is given in Appendix D-S. However, it must be kept in mind
that this is not a static collection. Any individual Generic
Objective may be altered if necessary. In addition, entirely
new objectives or groups of objectives crl be initiated if
later feedback and analysis indicates the advisability of
this action.
Generic objectives were written for all the content topics
of relevance to the K-10 grades: Levels 1 to S. It had been
decided a priori to confine the original course domain to the
.13
- 12 -
first five levels. Correspondingly Generic Objectives
were written for only those sub-topics in levels 1-5 as
indicated in the content topics by curriculum ievels matrix.
SEQUENCING OBJECTIVES BETWEEN CURRICULUM LEVELS
When all the necessary Generic Objectives had been written
and passed final approval, it was necessary to assign each
objective to a specific level or levels. The process started
with a look at the objectives in the whole number class-
ification. Each objective was reviewed as to which level it
should be in, taking into account the matrix as illustrated
in Appendix D-1. When it was determined at which approximate
level the objective belonged, it.was time for a different
evaluation.
Each objective was reviewed as to the utility or necessity
of teaching it at two or more levels. The general approach
was to consider if the objective was important enough to be
introduced at one level and then re-taught at a higher level.
There were two classifications for re-teaching: "re-cycle"
where the objective was re-taught at a higher level of diffi-
culty and "review" where the objective was re-taught at the
same level of difficulty as the previous level.
Generally "level of difficulty" was synonymous with different
content parameters. Where one level of difficulty might
be adding one and two digit numbers, the next higher level
might deal with three or more digit numbers. In virtually
all cases where an objective was introduced in one level and
re-cycled in another level, the difference was in the specific'
content parameters on the Generic Objectives. These content
14
- 13 -
parameters further defined the item-form type of objective
we were writing.
In the case where an objective was introduced and then
reviewed at a later level, the content parameters were
identical, often not being mentioned, at least in as great
a detail as in the previous case.
Accordingly, all objectives were reviewed as to the
following:
1) Choose "introduction" level.
2) Decide if phasing to be done in two or more
levels.
3) Decide whether post-introduction levels to be
described as "re-cydle" or "review".
4) Decide level of difficulty parameter if more
than one level and objective is re-cycled.
These decisions were made and reviewed several times before
the final Levelling phases were determined. The final
approval and arrangement was determined-by the CAM Evaluator.
As a result of these analyses, some 1004 Generic Objectives
were developed, some of which were in two or more Curriculum
levels at one or more levels of difficulty. The distribution
of the Generic objectives in the content topic by curriculum
levels matrix was as is shown in Appendix D-6.
Note that the total number of objectives is at a maximum
in Levels II and III and at a minimum in Level I where
greater attention is paid to fewer numbers of objectives.
15
- 14 -
SEQUENCING OBJECTIVES WITHIN CURRICULUM LEVELS
Now that the objectives that were to be included in each
level were chosen, it was'necessary to order the objectives
within each level into an instructional sequence. That is
one had to decide what objective was to be taught first,
second, third...in each level. In what order was the
typical student to receive instruction on objectives.
It was decided to utilize a block organization for our
curriculum. Each level was to consist of Blocks of instruc-
tion. Each Block was to a priori be defined as a section
of content taking the average student about 20 hours to
learn. As our program is individualized, the determination
of 20 hours worth of instruction was difficult. However,
as long as there was the tendency to make each block roughly
equal in length of time taken to learn the material, this
was satisfactory. There were to be no more than 19 blocks
of instruction in each level. For our five levels, the
following illustrates the numerical schema.
Level Allowable Blocks
1 01-19
2 20-39
3 40-59
4 60-79
80-99
Within each block were units and within each unit were
modules or objectives. The make-up of each unit was formed
on the basis of homogenous content. There were to be no
more than 9 units in a block and no more than 9 modules in
a unit - forming a maximum of 81 allowable modules per block.
16
- 15 -
For each level, the first step uas to roughly order the
topic areas to be covered in a level according to logical
instructional sequence. After this rough ordering, specific
Generic Objectives were put into order. This order was
checked at least twice with final approval being given by
the CAM Evaluator.
After the instructional sequence was determined on the
basis of Generic Objectives, it was time to put the objectives
into the administrative schema. The objectives were first
grouped into units of instruction, the main consideration
being homogeneity of content and the stipulation that the
maximum number of objectives per unit would be 9 with the
mean to be considerably less than that-hopefully around 5
or 6 modules per objective. This requirement was needed to
keep the units reasonably short and to allow for additional
objectives in a unit if this became desirable in a later
curriculum revision.
During formulation of these units, there were some alter-
ations and revisions to the sequence of instruction
previously chosen. This came about for pedagogical and
administrative reasons. However, these changes, especially
for the latter reason, were kept to an absolute minimum.
Once the units for each block were determined and were
in the recommended sequence, the units were grouped into
blocks. Each block was to contain the above mentioned
20 hours of instruction for the average student as well
as being restricted to 9 units or less. This process was
followed for all five levels. As a result, the following
indicates the actual block numbers in each level:
17
- 16 -
Curriculum Level Blocks
1 01-07
2 20-33
3 40-55
4 60-71
5 80-88
The administrative numbering structure differed from that
of the content classification scheme, there being 4 digits
in the administration number. The meaning of the digits
is explained below:
block no. module no.
2 i 3 4
unit no.
The scheme was restricted to 4 digits because of the.CAM
computer program that was to be utilized. However,. the Block
number indicated which level it was in because of the non-
repetitive block numbering sequence.
At this point, there existed the entire administrative
structure with all objectives grouped and in the desired
instructional sequence. In abbreviated form, the outline
of the Generic Objectives by Level, block and unit is given
in Appendix D-7.
Now the attention needed to be turned to assessment.
SELECTING TEST ITEM FORMAT
The objectives were written in Generic format, for one reason
because it is an item-form type of objective. That is to say,
it explicitly states the information to be given the student
in assessing his knowledge as well as indicating the desired
- 17 -
output he should produce. Our objectives are much more
explicit in regards to parameters such as these than most
other objectives.
In addition, it was known that we would utilize the CAM
computer program to analyze performance. This program
allows for direct input of student responses to a test.
The most efficient means is to have objective type items
(True-False, Matching, Multiple Choice). The use of these
types of test items eliminates the need for direct involve-
ment by any teacher or clerical aid. Also, since we are
dealing with a mastery situation it was thought extremely
unlikely that a person could obtain 80% or so just by
guessing. Furthermore, multiple-.choice test items are
recognized for their sensitiveness as test questions.
Minor fluctuations in knowledge can be detected by these
types of tests, a change more difficult to assess and
quantify in short-answer (recall) or essay tests.
Finally, if the distractors are constructed and chosen with
care, there exists a powerful diagnostic device capable
of informing the intelligent evaluator and instructor
about the types of mistakes being made by a student and
the specific instruction he should receive. It is the
ideal beginning of a truly effective au system.
Correspondingly, it was decided to employ multiple choice
questions for virtually all objectives (there were a very
few exceptions). It was additionally determined to make
five response options available to the student. This
number was chosen for a variety of reasons: maximum
1 9
- 18 -
number of options permitted by CAM, lowest chance score
and on the-average more diagnostic possibilities.
Of the five options, the fifth was virtually always to
be of the "correct answer not given" or "none of these
is correct" sort. Having this non-numerical option in
a content area that is usually either of the right or
wrong answer variety would hopefully tend to reduce
chance scores somewhat. In anST event, it was decided to
make this fifth option the correct answer on 20% of the
population of test items. Indsed it was determined that
each objective was to have 5 test items written for.it.
These 5 test items for an objective would have the
correct answer 1,1 2, 3, 4 and S. Thus in the population
of test items for an objective, or for groups- of objectives,
the distribution of correct answers would follow a rectang-
ular distribution (all answers equally likely). On a
sample of test items, there would exist a tendency to
form a rectangular distribution, deviating from the true
distribution being due to random fluctuations due to
sampling.
CONSTRUCTING TEST ITEMS
Once the test item parameters were determined, the test
items needed to be written. The goal was to write five
test items for each of the 1,000 plus objectives - a total
of over 5,000 test items. The task was very awesome.but
possible - but with much efforts Because the objectives
were written in Generic format, the job was made very much
20-;',77'
- 19 -
easier. In general, the objective was very specific as
to the required elements of the test item.
Item writers were selected to write the test items under
the direction and control of the CAM Evaluator. Very
specific instructions were given to each test item writer.
Initially, the CAM Evaluator wrote what were termed
proto-type test items". This consisted, in fact, of one
sample test item for each objective. The test item writers .
then were to follow the format, in general just changing
the specific content numbers and such like.
The test item writers then wrote the remaining four test
items for the objectives that had proto-type items
written. The CAM Evaluator then'very carefully checked
the test items for specificity, correct answer, desirability
of distractors and so on. Those not passing scrutiny were
passed back to the item writer for revision. The CAM
Evaluator had final approval on all test items.
As the item writers becake more 6kpérienced, they wrote
proto-type test items for those objectives not having
this sample item completed. Every proto-type was thoroughly
checked and revisions made as needed. It was only after
the proto-types were written and approved that the.remaining
four test items were constructed.
Even after all the test items had been constructed, the
CAM Evaluator and others reviewed the test items to ensure
face validity and accuracy of the test items.
It had been decided to type all test items on 5" x 8" cards.
After much deliberation the final design chosen was as is
- 20 -
illustrated in Appendix D-8. The upper half is the front
of the card and the lower half is the back of the card.
The card itself was printed on yellow stock.
The test items were typed onto the card, following a very
rigid spacing guide (See Appendix D-9). It was necessary
to ensure all test items were typed following this guide
because of the method of constructing tests to be
employed.
Sample test items are shown in Appendix D-lp. Notice that
there are three formats for displaying the five options.
The decision as to the specific arrangement to use for any
one test item depended on the length of the longest response
option. The goal was always to reduce vertical length
without sacrificing clarity of the response options.
All 5,000 plus test items were typed on the test item card,
front and back, each objective having 5 items written for
it. As previously indicated, for any objective the correct
responses were 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 respectively for the five
test items.
The test items were numbered using the four digit admin-
istrative code plus 2 digits for the test item. All test
items were given numbers from 01 to 05 to correspond with
the correct response of the test item. One can notice from
the samples, that the single digit preceeding the block
number indicates the level. Although, strictly speaking,
this number is redundant and cannot be used in the CAM
computer program (for space reasons) it is useful when
looking at the test items (and Generic Objective) cards.
_
- 21 -
Each of the test.items was checked again after typing to
ascertain any typographical errors that might exist. In
that,way, virtually all of these typing errors were corrected.
As a last check at this stage, a check was made to ensure
that the correct answer indicated was, in fact, the correct
answer and that there was only one correct answer among
the five options. Finally, a review was made by the CAM
Evaluator to check on any anomalies that might exist.
At this point, it is generally the procedure to "try-out"
the test items on a sample of students to pick up any
"bugs" that might exist as well as to obtain a rough esti-
mate of the efficiency of the distractors. For some
selected test items this normal procedure was followed.
However, the ratio of number of test items to students
was so large and the students spread so thinly throughout
the levels that this normal procedure was discarded as
impractical. Nevertheless, as many checks and reviews
as possible were made (taking into account the limited
. funds available).
SELECTING TEST TYPES
During the process of selecting the test item types, a
parallel procedure was being pursued. The entire evalu-
ation scheme was in the process of being established.
After much discussion and thought, it was finally decided
to employ a system utilizing thre.e types of tests.
The first test-type to be developed was to be called
Canadore CAM: Math Monitoring Tests. These series of tests
were to.be designed to monitor pre-instruction, post-
-- 22 -
instruction and retention knowledge on a large group of
objectives. The prime purpose of these tests was to serve
as a method of obtaining extremely useful data (especially
pre-instruction and retention) for the purposes of curr-
iculum analysis and revision. However, they were also to
serve as a review of objectives previously studied on the
_part of students.
The second set of tests to be developed was the Canadore
CAM: Math Survey Tests. These series of.tests were to be
administered to an incoming student. Any student was to
take this series only once - when he entered. Essentially
they were to be designed to approximately place the student
in the curriculum. Assuming some knowledge of mathematics,
at what point in the curriculum should the student start?
At what block should he commence his instruction?
The last in the series of tests was the Canadore CAM: Math
Block Mastery Tests. These tests were to be designed to
assess mastery of the set of objectives in a block. A test
would be given upon entry to a block to ascertain what
objectives, if any, the student needed to study-those on
which he apparently lacked adequate knowledge.
After instruction, the student would be given an equivalent
form of the mastery test for that block to determine his
mastery of the objectives. To pass out of the block, he
needed to obtain 80% correct on a block mastery test.
23
CONSTRUCTING ALL CAM TESTS
it was decided that no test would exceed 30 test items in
length, with the desirable maximum being about 25. No test
was to be so long as to increase normal student fatigue to
an undesirable level.
The tests were to be answered on separate answer sheets.
Two typ'es of answer sheets were to be available: mark sense
cards and 3M test score sheets. The final destination of
the student's answer to a test was to be the computer.
Correspondingly, the mark sense cards needed to be read and
Hollerith codes punched. The 3M sheets needed to be key-
punched.
The tests were to be constructed by selecting the test item
numbers to be used in a test. Then, the item cards were
pulled out of the paper-based data bank. The cards then
were put in the required order and placed in acetate folders.
Required headings, instructions, test item numbers, etc.
were also placed in the appropriate places in the acetate
folder. These folders then were transformed into offset
masters and lastly, the test sheets were reproduced and
sheets collated to form a test form.
As can be seen, no typing of test itemS was to be required,
a saving in time and accuracy of the reproduction Of the
test items.
CANADORE CAM MONITORING TESTS
The first set of tests to be constructed were the Canadore
CAM Monitoring Tests. The purpose of these tests was to
obtain an estimate of knowledge of objective's on a pre-
25
- 24 -
instruction, post-instruction and retention basis.
It was decided to develop a series of Monitoring Tests
for each level. The student was to be given a Monitoring
Test in the level in which he was currently studying. After
much deliberation, a maximum of about 50 Generic Objectives
in each level were selected and designated "Monitoring"
Objectives. These were objectives thought to be so im-
portant, for whatever reason, that it was advisable that
close "tabs" be kept on students' performance on these
specific objectives.
The decision on "about 50" as a maximum was mainly based on
practical considerations. It was obvious that, considering
the size of our student body, we could not monitor all
objectives. Thus a subset hadjto be chosen from each level.
As each test form had an a priori maximum of 25 teii items,
50 objectives meant that there would be two completely
different sets of objectives in each level. In order to
obtain reliable data rather quickly, this was thought to be
a practical upper limit to the number of sets of monitoring
objectives in a level.
After a rather exhaustive review, the following indicates
the number of generic objectives chosen to be monitoring
objectives in each level:
Number ofLevel Monitoring Objectives Total Objectives
1 20 71
2 51 301
3 53 300
26
- 25 -
Number oflevel Monitoring Objectives Total Objectives
4 48 185
5 38 147
After the Monitoring Objectives had been selected, it was
necessary io obtain two sets of the objectives to form
the basis for the two sets of test forms in each level.
The sampling of the objectives (into set 1 or set 2) was
on a rather deliberate basis. The attempt was to ensure
that each block was about equally represented in each set.
Levels 1, 4 and 5 had 10, 24 and 19 objectives in each set
while Level 2 had 26 and 25 and Level 3 had 27 and 26
objectives in each set.
For both sets of objectives in each level, five test forms
were constructed: The test items for each objective were
randomly assigned to the five equivalent test forms of
the-set. When all test items had been assigned, the order
of the administration of test items on a particular test
form was randomly determined.
Correspondingly, although the selection of the Monitoring
objectives and the breakdown of these into two sets in
each level was deliberate, the assignment of test items to
test forms for all objectives and the ordering of assigned
test items in each test form was randomly determined.
After all the test forms were formulated on paper, the
actual test forms were constructed following the procedure
- 26
CANADORE CAM: MATH SURVEY TESTS
When a student enters the program it is necessary to place
him at a specific point in the Math Curriculum. To that
end, the survey tests were developed.
As a starting point, the two sets of objectives in the
Monitorinz Tests were collated and a level survey test
constructed on the basis of all Monitoring Objectives.
There were five forms of each survey test (5 test forms
per level). The test items and arrangements of test items
in the test form were randomly chosen.
In the program, an entering student would take the survey
test considered appropriate for a student with his background.
If he reached 80% criteria on the survey test, he then would
take a survey test in the next higher level. He would take
survey tests until his performance fell below 80%. At
that point, he would take a Block Mastery Test in the first
block of that level to see if he needed any instruction in
that particular block (see below).
Correspondingly, the survey tests were to be used as rough
screening device to ascertain at which level a student should
commence instruction.
CANADORE CAM: MATH BLOCK MASTERY TESTS
In our individualized approach, students are in a mastery
learning situation. Correspondingly, Block Mastery tests
needed to be constructed for each block of instruction.
27 -
posttest and interim test while studying in the block.
At a later time, when more test items were written, add-
itional Block Mastery Tests would be constructed for
ach block.
The specific number of test items chosen per pbjective
depended on the number of objectives in the block, taking
into account the desired maximum of 25 test items per test
form. In all but the largest blocks, at least one test
item was randomly selected for each objective. In these
extral-lung blocks (in terms of objectives) not all objectives
were tested in at least two of the three test forms in the
block.
The specific test items selected-for a particular test form
welt. randomly chosen. In addition, the arrangement of test
items on any one test form was also random. Thus on any
set of test forms in a block, the test items were randomly
selected and no test foria had the same pattern or'order of
the objectives. No test item was selected for two forms
unless, because ofethe test selection rules for that block,
it was necessary (for example, if two test items needed to
be selected for each objective in a block, one test item
was repeated, but never on the same test form).
In this way., every block had three (seemingly) equivalent
block mastery tests - making a total of 174 of these tests,
three for each of the existing 58 blocks.
- LtS
CAM COMPUTER PROGRAM
The Comprehensive Achievement Monitoring system computer
program (CAM3) was selected to be the vehicle to record
and analyze the student achievement data. This program
was selcted after much deliberation and enasynthesis.
As the computer at Canadore (Honeywell Series 200, Model
115) has too small a core capacity to accept the CAM3
program, it was decided to load it on a computer at
another community college. After extensive negotiations
were completed, Humber College was chosen to have the
CAM program installed - at no charge to Humber. This
program would have the data inputted and stored and would
output the reports that were required at that time from
the more than 50 reports that are available. This program
would be the source of all the special reports of great
use to the students, staff and administration.
However, as Humber's computer was 200 miles-away, as some
tests (Block Mastery) needed to be scared and reports sent
back overnight and as no computer terminal facilities were
available, it was thought advisable to have a means of
scoring the students' tests with at most, overnight turn
around. As a result and after discussion and analysis of
alternatives, it was thought best to design a computer
program that could be used at Canadore to score the tests.
Correspondingly, a computer program was designed and was to be
installed on the Honeywell machine at Car lore. This
nrnarnm was designed only to score the tests and outvut
- 29 -.
information to enter into the analysis algorithms of CAM.
At a later date, it is hoped to have direct terminal
access to the full CAM program thereby eliminating the
dual inputting required as of now. This will allow for
much greater efficiency.
PREPARING COMPUTER INPUT
To prepare data to enter the CAM3 program there exists a
series of manuals, including:
CAM3 User's Manual
CAM3 CANAL User's Manual
CAM3 SREP User's Manual
CAM3 PRCOD User's Manual
These manuals along with practice exercises give the basic
information needed to prepare data far input. In addition,
it is helpful to have someone experienced in this area, to
be of assistance in this process.
CANADORE CAM REPORTS
The information given in Appendix D-11 gives a short
summary of the types of reports available to a CAM3 user.
A careful analysis of this gives the-neonate some valuable
tips on what type of analysis can be performed.
The regular reports available on each run are the Individual
Student Report, Test Form Analysis Report, Teacher Roster
(7.,,^11,1 Pnnnrt Thp nthpr rPnnrts are
- 30 -
ADMINISTERING CANADORE CAM: MATH MONITORING TESTS
Each student is to be given a test form, randomly chosen
from the population of 10 available from the level in
which he is taking instruction. He will never be given
a test form which he has taken previously as it is
almost impossible for him to remain in the same level
for more than 10 test administrations.
The tests are initially to be administered on a monthly
basis approximately'the third Tuesday in each month.
After complete implementation of Canadore CAM: Math in
all its aspects, more'frequent administrations, probably
bi-monthly, could be undertaken. All students are to be
scheduled to take the test the same day. Those absent
or who do not attend on the first day are to be requested
to take the test the next day. Those who still do*not
attend will be asked to do so on a third day through
their faculty advisor.
In this way, almost 100% of students will take the test
in a given test administration.
STUDENT MANAGEMENT FOLDERS
If a student is required to study in a block, he needs
to know three pieces of information:*
1) the objectives in the block, along with their
administrative numbers.
91 1.1,A nhiprtiVeS he needs to study in the block.
- 31 -
For any block, a list of generic objectives exists.
However, these objectives were needlessly complex for
students to have the gist of what the objective was about.
Correspondlingly, every objective was simplified and
usually shortened. This laborous process involved an
original revision, a review, secondary revision, review
and so on, until the alteration was acceptable. Next,
a form was designed on which to type the objective.
Each revised student objective in a block was typed onto
the "mathematic Task Index Sheet". The format and
sample sheets are as shown in Appendix D-12. The triad
of squares at the right - by each unit - reserves a
place for the student to place the month, day and year
he completed instruction on the unit. When a student is
told which objective number he needs to study as deter-
mined on the basis of the pre-test in the block, he can
tell with what the objective deals.
In companion with the task index were designed a series
of Resources sheets - one each for Print Material, Films
and Video-cassettes, Audio Tapes and Filmstrips.
For each unit of each block, a committee scoured the
available resources to indicate in what book, tape, film-
strip etc. a student could find instruction on a given unit.
This process consumed many weeks as a thorough search was
made so as to generate as many resource references as
sw-tccii-Oo frir pnrh unit. As a result there finally existed
- 32 -
With these the student would have a valuable tool with which
to guide his studies in a block. The format and sample
sheets are shown in Appendix D-12.
IMPLEMENTATION OF CANADORE CAM: MATH BLOCK MASTERY SYSTEM
In the near future, the Canadore CAM: Math Block Mastery
System will be initiated. At that time, students will
cease studying under the old "LINC" System and be engaged
in the new Canadore System. The changeover will be a
gradual one. Students will be given a thorough initiation
into the nuts and bolts of the Canadore Math. As many
questions as possible will be answered before the student
commences the course.
The initiation will commence with level 2 and expand
upward as the situation suggests. Level 1. will be
introduced at the discretion of the instructor. All levels
ought to be operational within six weeks of the initiation
of the Block Mastery System.
APPENDIX "D-1"
CONTENT TOPICS BY CURRICULUM LEVELS MATRIX
V VI VII
Whole Numbers
1 - 3 4 - 6 7 - 8 9 10 11 12
- - - -
Fractions
Decimals --Percent
Measurement,
-Sets ____ .. - ----- -
Geometry
Integers
Ratio Prop -
Trig
Algebra .- -
Indices
GraphsStats
Slide Rule
Logs
Series &
Prog
Perm &Comb
-
ConsumerMath _
MetricSystem
_
APPENDIX "D.-2",
CONTENT OUTLINE OF CANADORE CAM: MATH
01 WHOLE NUMBERS
01 Counting
01 number lines02 cardinal relationship03 counting by 2's, 3's, 7's, etc.04 ordering of numbers05 writing numbers06 rounding off07 place value
02 Even Numbers
01 definition02 counting 2, 4, 6, etc.
03 Odd Numbers
01 definition02 counting 1, 3, 5, etc.
04 Addition
01 symbols02 .use of number lines03 without carrying04 with carrying05 names of parts of addition question06 additive identity07 communitive property08 associative property09 distributive property
05 Subtraction
01 symbols02 use of number lines03 without borrowing04 with borrowing05 check by addition06 names of parts07 written problems
06 Multiplication
01 symbols02 as repeated addition03 multiplication tables04 horizontal multiplication05 multiplication using zero06 multiplicative identity
2
01 WHOLE NUMBERS
06 Multiplication
11 word problems12 highest common factor13 lowest common multiple
07 Division
01 symbols02 subtractive method03 tradition method04 checking division05 division without remainders06 division with remainders07 word problems
08 Order .of Operation
01 rules02 application to problems
02 FRACTIONS
01 Introduction
01 parts of a whole02 number line03 equivalent fractions04 lowest common denominator05 terminology06 ordering sets (sequencing)07 reducing
02 Addition
A *7
01 like denominator02 one denominator common to other03 denominator prime to each other04 denominators containing common factors*05 combinations - proper, improper, mixed numbers06 horizontal and vertical07 communitative property08 associative property09 problems (word)
r _ 1 ... _
3
02 FRACTIONS
03 Subtraction
05 using combinations of proper, improper, mixed numbers06 subtraction (horizontally, vertically)07 without borrowing08 with borrowing09 word problems
04 Multiplication
01 symbols02 use of word of03 proper fraction by proper fraction04 improper (mixed) by whole numbers05 proper by improper (mixed)06 improper (mixed) by improper (mixed)07 multip1icative identity08 communitative property09 associative property10 distributive property11 word problems
05 Division
01 symbols02 rule (reciprocal & inversion)03 division of whole number by proper fraction04 proper by proper fraction05 proper by wholb number06 mixed by proper07 mixed by whole number08 mixed by mixed09 word problems (1/4 of is 3)
06 Order of Operations
01 introduction to order of operations02 complex fractions03 problems
03 'DECIMALS
er
01 Introduction
01 symbols02 place value03 number line order of decimals (comparing fractions)04 reading decimals05 writing decimals
4
03 DECIMALS
01 Introduction
09 repeating decimals10 number of decimal places11 .significant digits
02 Addition
01 symbols02 rule03 vertical addition04 horizontalOS without carrying06 with carrying07 word problems08 properties
03 Subtraction
01 symbols02 rule03 names and parts04 vertical...OS horizontal06 with borrowing07 without borrowing08 fractions and decimals09 word problems
04 Multiplication,
01 symbols02 rules03 multiplication by 10's & multiples of 10's04 decimal and fractionsOS word problems
OS Division
01 symbols02 rules (place holders)03 division by multiples of 10's04 termination of divisionOS division with decimals and fractions06 word problem
04 PERCENT
01 Reading, Writing and Equivalents
01 symbols ,
02 reading numbers in percent notation
41
5
04 PERCENT
01 Reading, Writing and Equivalents
03 identify as fraction with denominator of 10004 change percents to decimals05 change decimals to percent06 change percent to common fractions07 change common fraction to percent08 equivalents - percent, decimal, fractions
02 Operations
01 calculate % of numbers - type 1 0% of b =02 word problems03 calculate percentage one number is to another
- type 2 - a is t of b04 word problems05 calculate number when percent of it is known
- type 3 0% of' = b06 word problems
05 RATIO AND PROPORTION
01 Ratio .60
01 define02 example03 symbols04 reduce to common fraction05 ratio to decimals06 word problems
02 Proportion
01 define02 example03 symbols04 direct proportion05 similar triangle06 inverse proportion07 pulleys08 gears09 word problem
06 CONSUMER MATHEMATICS
01 Pay Calculation - Income
01 per hour02 per day03 per week04 per monthOS per annum
42...16
6
06 CONSUMER MATHEMATICS
01 Pay Calculation - Income
06 piece work07 bonuses and tips08 commission09 fees
02 Taxes - Income
01 income deducted02 U.I.C.03 Canada Pension04 income tax filing form
03 Budgets
01 housing costs - buying02 housing costs - renting03 utilities04 groceries - per unit buying
05 home insurance06 auto/transportation -.insurance07 clothing.
04 Banking
01 loans, borrowing02 interest - simple, compound
03 amortizing mortgages04 credit unions05 finance companies06 wills07 bankruptcy08 judgments
07 MEASUREMENT
01 Time
01 definition and equivalencies02 symbols, abbreviations (second, minute, hour,
day,month, year, centuries)
03 convert 12 hour clock times to 24 hour clock.times
04 convert 24 hour clock times to 12 hour clock times
12 hour clock times and 24 hour clock times - days
05 add and subtract identical times and convert
06 add different times and convert
07 subtract different times and convert
08 time zones09 word problems
43
.17
7
07 MEASUREMENT
02 Distance
01 definitions as units02 symbols, abbreviations (inches, feet, yards, miles)03 conversion - feet to yards, etc.04 add and subtract identical units of distance and convert05 add different distances and convert06 subtract different distances and convert07 measure
03 Liquid
01 definitions02 symbols and abbreviations (Imperial, Metric, U.S.)03 conversions04 add and subtract identical units05 add different units06 subtract different units07 multiply different units08 divide different units09 word problems
04 Weights 4.11
01 definitions02 symbols03 conversions04 add and subtract identical units05 add-different units06 subtract different units07 multiply different units08 divide different units09 word problems
05 Thermometers
01 definition02 conversion03 operations
06 Volume
01 formulas (cubes, squares, spheres, etc.)
08 SETS
0101 Symbols0201 Operations using Sets0301 Venn Diagrams0401 Infinite and Finite0501 Word Problems
44
09 GEOMETRY
0101. 02010301
TerminologySymbolsShapes
04 Bi-section
01 lines02 angles
cis Instruments
01 lines02 angles
06 Construction
01 line02 angles .
03 figures04 perpendiculars05 parallel lines
07 Formulas
01020304
perimeter'"areacircumferencevolume
0801 Scale Drawing
09 Coordinate Geometry
01 four quadrants02 graph with ordered03 graph with a point04 graphing equations wi.h one unknown05 graphing equations witlitwo unknowns06 graphs to solve simultaneous equations
8
pair
10 INTEGERS
01 Introduction
01 definitions and symbols02 number lines03 ordering04 inequalities05 absolute value
02 Addition
01 horizontally and vertically
45
in two unknowns
9
10 INTEGERS
03 Subtract
01 horizontally and vertically
04 Multiplication
01 horizontal and vertical
OS Division
01 horizontal and vertical
0601 Order of Operations
11 ALGEBRA
01 Introduction
01 terminology02 definition of terms
02 Operations
01 addition using the number line02 horizontal and vertical addition using the
laws of addition03 subtraction using the number line04 horizontal and vertical subtraction using the laws
of subtractionOS horizontal and vertical multiplication of
monomials, binonials and trinomials06 application of BODMAS rule in use of brackets
03 Laws
01 commutative02 associative03 distributive04 multiplicative identityOS additive identity
04 Factoring
01 simplifying products into factors02 formulas for factoring
OS Algebraic Fractions
01 addition02 subtraction03 Eultiplication04 division -
OS solving equations in one unknown06 graphing algebraic equations in one unknown
.../I0
- 10 -
11 ALGEBRA
05 Algebraic Fractions
07 solving simultaneous equations in two unknowns08 graphing algebraic equations in two unknowns
06 Solution of Word Problems
12 INDICES
01 Introduction
01 terminology (index, exponent, base coefficient)02 definition of X which equals X X ... for m factors
02 Laws of Indices
X 701 law of multiplication X3.X
4=
02 law of division 12?La_ = X10
03 law of powers 2 2(e) = x
6.
04 power of a product(x
2y)
3= x
6y3
05 power of a quotient
[
6ri2x'
Y Y
06 meaning of a zero index07 meaning of a negative index08 meaning of a fractional index09 operations using indices
03 Standard Numbers (Scientific Notation)
01 definition of standard or scientific notation02 changing large numbers to standard numbers03 changing standard numbers back to whole numbers04 changing small numbers to standard numbers05 changing small standard numbers back to (regular)
whole numbers
13 GRAPHS & STATISTICS
01 Terminology
01 mean (average)02 mode03 medium
02 Probabilities
47
:
13 GRAPHS & STATISTICS
03 Types of Graphs
01 line02 bar03 circle
14 METRIC SYSTEM
03 Liquid Measure
06 addition of unlike units07 subtraction of like units08 subtraction of unlike units09 multiplication of like and unlike units10 division of like and unlike units11 problems involving liquid measure
APPENDIX "D-3"
EXPLANATION OF GENERIC. OBJECTIVES
49
In any individualized program it is necessary for
some sort-of objectives to be written so that students can
ascertain whaf is the immediate goal of their study. In the
Canadore Comprehensive Achievement Monitoring.- Mathematics
(CAM-Math) System, we have decided to utilize a number of
distinct but interrelated types of instructional objectives.
Although, perhaps, initially more difficult to comprehend
than the monotype approach, the eventual.goal is to make the
generation of the objectives a more understandable procedure.
The first type of objective that an intructor
would write is called a generic objective, sometimes
abbreviated as GO. This objectiire is a general one and
is written in a standard format. The following is a possible
GO:
Given a whole and decimal_namEel
the student the
QuIsalI_arIaZ
This GO is expressed in the standard or common
format. The input string always commences with "Given". _
and the output string always begins with "the student".
In addition to the specific words common to all objectives,
a particular GO can consist of between 3 and 5 elements
(the numbers refer to the above example):
- 2 -
(1) Indicates the particular stimulus required;
it consists of what information the student
needs in order to do the task.
(2) Indicates mode of input or how this information
is received by the student (e.g. orally,
visually, from memory). In CAM-Math it
is assumed that the mode is written and this
element is given only if the mode is other
than visual.
(3) Indicates the behavioral indicator or general
operation. It is an action Irerb that
tells what activity the student will perform
(e.g. calculate, designate, wriie).
(4) Indicates the thing operated on or ihe
component. It is what the student will
calculate, designate, write and so.on.
(5) Indicates any modifier that may be necessary
to.further describe the output expected.
A Generic Objective does not contain any specific
content but indicates a class of objectives all hairing
identical procedures but differing in specifics. Another
example of a generic objective would be:
Given two or more whole numbers to add, not
requirimg carrying, the student calculates
the sum.
- 3 -
This is generic because it contains no specific
content, the addends could be any number (two is the logical
minimum) and .each would consist of any number of digits.
This GO is placed at the lowest instructional
(grade or difficulty),Ievel appropriate and could appear
in any number of succeeding levels as indicated by the
specific content.
A specific Content Objective (CONOB) for a low
level could map the numbers 6 and 3 to the preceeding
GO to form the following content objective:
given the numbers 6 and 3 to add,
the student calculates the sum as 9.
At a somewhat higher difficulty (grade or level)
the numbers 1,463,132 and 8;325,827 could be mapped into
the original GO to form a more difficult CONOB.
A Generic Objective mapped across all or several
levels of difficulty or a set of interrelated.generic
objectives at a particular level of difficulty can be
subsumed into a criterion objective (CO). A possible CO
at a specific level might be:
Given 10 addition problems of whole numbers
(not requiring carrying) with up to 8 addends
and 6 digits, the student.calculates the sum
for 9 out of 10 problems.
52
4 -
At this stage enters the idea of achievement for-a
random sample of similar problems with an appropriate
mastery standard. It is for the purpose of reaching this
criterion with these particular problems that the.generic
objectives and the content that was mapped onto them were
developed. It is these CO's that form the bases for
grouping instruction into administrative divisions (e.g.
Blocks, Units and Instructional Modules).
The Criterion Objective that includes all
appropriate content difficulties (across levels) for a
set of generic objectives can also be termed a Terminal
Objective (TO). It is this terMinal behaviour (among
others) that is expected from an individual who aspires to
a particular stated goal. These TO's could vary if the
goal is entry to a skilled trade or alternatively, to a
university.
CONCLUSION
This paper has attempted to introduce some of the
various types of instructional objectives designed into the
CAM-Math System. However, it is important to remember
that this is merely an overview and does not represent an
attempt to be an instruction manual for designing these
objectives within a CAM System.
GENERIC OBJECTIVE
The "generic objective" (GO) is a standardizedformat for a behaviourally-oriented objectivethat is both specific and general. It is specificin that it describes the type of stimulus to begiven, states how it will be presented and limitsthe student response to a particular behaviour.It is general in that it does not cite the Specificstimulus material or content to be used.
For any objective in any course (including skill)if the objective can b.a expressed behaviourally,then it can be formulated as a generic objective.
EXHIBITS
Adequately expressed GO:
Given a whole number orally, the student writesit in numeral form.
Too Specific for a GO:
Given the number 113 orally, the student writesit in numeral form.
Too General for a GO:
Given a number orally, the student writes it innumeral form.
Given a whole number, the student.writes it innumeral form.
Given a whole number orally, the student writesit.
54
GENERIC OBJECTIVE FORMAT-'
1. particular stimulus required
2. - mode of input
Input String
.GIVEN A WHOLE AND DECIMAL NUMBER ORALLY,1 2'
THE STUDENT WRITES THE WHOLE.NUMBER
Output String
3. - behavioural indicator; action verb
4. - indicates the thing operated upon; the activity performed
S. - modifier to further describe output expected
APPENDiX 1D-4"
GENERIC OBJECTIVE CARD
56
L.L.1
1
GENERIC OBJECTIVE.CARD
GENERIC OBJECTIVE.
assification: Levelling Phase:
Introduce'RecycleReview
57
1
Approval:
InitiatorInstructorEvaluator
j 3 4 I 3 141
The following is a diagramatic explanation of the elements
of this card.
Ii 2 I
1 Topic 1 - CurriculumLevel (Grade)
2 Sub Topic21- Block
3 Sub Topic (19 Max.)
4 Objective Number 3 - Unit Sequencein Block(Max. 9 Units)
4 - InstructionalModule CriterionObjective withinUnit (Max. 9 Modules)
The bottom of the card can be interpreted thusly:
(1) Classification (2) Levelling Phase
(3) Introduce
(4) Recycle
(5) Review
(6) Approval
(7) Initiator
(8) Instructor
(9) Evaluator
(1) Classification Cell two descriptors including topic and
subtopic names.
- 3 -
(2) Levelling Phase indicates in what sequence the objective
occurs for an individual learner.
(3) Introduce - this is the first time that a learner
encounters this objective.
(4) Recycle - this is an objective that is being taught
again but at a higher level than before.
(5) Review this is an identical objective that a student'
learned before but which he is required to
relearn.
(6) Approval format:
- can be used either before and/or after
typing.
- people approvin indicated as:
(7) person who originall- writes objective
(8) person checks content
(9) CAM Evaluator who gives final check on
entire objective.
The numbers (1-7) listed vtrtically onthe left side of
the card indicate the Curriculum Level(s) in which this
objective appears. This could be only one level or could be
as many as 3 or 4 levels if this is the desired.frequency.
59
APPENDIX "D-5"
SELECTED SAMPLES OF GENERIC OBJECTIVES
60
.4
OS 06 I 00 GENERIC OBJECTIVE
Given a word problem involving the division ofdecimal numbers,, the student solve the problem.
The decimal numbers have no less than 2 digitsto the right of the decimal point.
Lassification:
Decimals - Division
-
LevellingAphase:
IntroduceRecycleReview
0Approval:
InitiatorInstructorEvaluator
EYEV[7.]
61
01 07 01 GENERIC OBJECTIVE 2 2 6
Given two or more different units of time, thestudent converts them to identical units,calculates the difference and selects itsother appropriate unit or units of time.
There are two different units of time employed.
lassification:
Measurement - Time
Levelling Phase:
62
IntroduceRecycleReview
Approval:
InitiatorInstructorEvaluator
03 05 06 I 03 GENERIC OBJECTIVE
Given a word problem involving the division ofdecimal numbers, the student identifies that theoperation of division is necessary for its.solution.
The decimal numbers have no more than2 digits to the right of the decimal point.
lassification:
Decimals Division
Levelling Phase:
63
IntroduceRecycleReview
112
Approval:
InitiatorInstructor C:1Evaluator ca,
APPENDIX "D-6"
NUMBER OF GENERIC OBJECTIVES
IN CONTENT TOPICS
BY CURRICULUM LEVELS MATRIX
6 4
NUMBER OF GO'S IN TOPIC BY LEVEL MATRIX
'TOPIC TOPIC NO.
METRICSYSTEM 0 2 44 0 . 0 19
GRAPHS& STATS 0 0 34 16 0 14
INDICES 0 0 0 5 8 13
ALGEBRA 0 0 0 25 41 12
INTEGERS 0 0 0 32 27 10
GEOMETRY 1 1 .5. 39 20 9
SETS 0 0 0 21 1 8
MEAS. 0 58 49 7 2
CONSUMERMATH 8 20 42 19 20 6
RATIO &PROP. 0 5 8 8 28 5
PERCENT 0 8 21 12 0 4
DECIMALS 0 62 39 0 0 3
FRACTIONS 1 78 .34 0- 0
WHOLENUMBERS 61 67 24 1 0
TOTALS 71 301 300 185 147 1004 .
1 2 3
LEVELS
65
4
APPENDIX "D-7"
ABBREVIATES ADMINISTRATIVE OUTLINE
OF GENERIC OBJECTrVES
66
LEVEL I OUTLINE
01. WHOLE NUMBERS: INTRO.:
1 (5) cardinal; numerals; ordering; numberline; counting.
2 (1) place value
3 (4) even; counting (even nos.); odd; counting (odd nos.).
WHOLE NUMBERS: ADD:
1 (5) sum-no. line; symbol-add; symbol equals; no. equals
total; use of + and equals.
2 (5) nos. equals "addends"; definition addend; sum; sum
vs "total"; nos. sentence symbol equals.
(5) add-no carrying; add-carrying; adding from w. problems;
w. problem-adding
03 WHOLE NUMBERS : SUBTRACT:
1 (2) sub.- no. line; sym..-sub..
2 (3) sub.-no borrowing; sub.-borrowing; check sub. by add.
3 (3) part-minuend; part-subtrahend; part-difference
04 WHOLE NUMBERS: MULTIPLY:
1 (3) sym.-mult.-arith. exp.; add. prob. as mult.; mult. as
add.
2 (4) three two's are; num. x 1; num. x 0; product from' mem.
(5) multiplier in exp.; x x y is ; prod. of x and y is
3 x ? = 18; factor of terms
4 (3) exp.-mult. whole nos..; w. prob.-mult. whole nos.-exp. and.
solves.
05 WHOLE NUMBERS: DIVIDE:
1 (3) sym.-"divide"-exp.; x into y goes ? times; x divided by
y is;
2 (7) div.-repeated subt.; div.-trad. method; check division;
div.-evenly; select terms-div.; 0 divide a;
3 ( ) w. prob.-div.-exp.-obtain exp.-solves
06 FRACTIONS:
1 (1) name of geom. figure
2 (7) 4 of 7 parts; fractions-no, line; part-numerator; part-
denominator; select proper frac.; select improper fractions;
select mixed nos.P7
2
06
3 (5) fractions: sum-no. line; sum-proper-common denominator;
common denom.; LCD; one function of other denominator.
4 (3) fractions-dif.-common denom.; dif.-factor of denom.;
borrowing not necessary.
07 CONSUMER MATH.:
1 (2) change-from bill; from fees to bill.
2 (6) hourly rate-wage; daily rate-pay; weekly rate-pay;
monthly rate-pay; yearly rate-pay; piece work rate-pay.
68
v1.41.1.4
LEVEL 2 OUTLINE
20 Whole Numbers
1 (4) numerals; place value; ordering nos.; round nos.
2 (4) associative prop. of add.; commutative prop. of
add; additive identity; sum-carrying
3 (3) w. prob.; adding-expression-solve
4 (4) subt.-no. line; subt.-no. borrowing; subt.-
borrowing; check subt.
5 (3) exp.-"minuend"; exp.-"subtrahend"; exp.-"difference"
6 (3) w. prob: subt.-expression-solve
21 Whole Numbers
1 (6) add, as mult. prob.; mult. as add prob.; three two's
are?; prod. from mem.; "multiplier in exp." factor exp.
2 (5) exp. mult. by ten; product-horizontal; x times y is ?
the prod. of x and y is ? 3 x ? = 18.
3 (6) mult. by 1; mult. by 0; communitative prop.;
associative; multiplicative identity; distributive.
4 (3) w. prob.: mult.-exp.-solve
5 (4) "prime no."; exp.-prime nos.; exp. HCF; exp.-LCM
22 Whole Numbers
1 (6) symboli.exp.; quant. of x div. by y is ?
div. rep. subt; div.-trad.; terms in div.-eg. check div.
2 (7) div. evenly; x into y goes ? times; x divided by Y is
o divided by a is ? a divided by o is ? div.-remainder;
check div.
3 (3) w. prob.-div.-exp.-solve
4 (5) step.no. of oper.; order of oper.; w. prob. order of
oper.-exp. -solve
23 Fractions
1 (7) 4 of 7 parts; improper-mixed; mixed-improper;
equivalent fractions; procedure-reduction; reduced frac.
ordering
2 (7) common factors; *prime common denom.; sum-horizontal;
69
2.
sum-vertical; sum: prop. & improper; sum-prop. &
mixed.
3 (3) sum-denom. prime; sum-common factors; sum-comb.
of fractions.
4 (2) commutative; associative
5 (3) w.prob. add fractions - exp. solve
24. FRACTIONS:1 (4) subt-vertical; subt.-horizontal; subt-denom.
prime; subt-common factors-denom.
2 (5) subt-prop. & mixes; subt-prop. & improper;
subt-improper & mixes; subt-borrowing; subt-combinations.
3 subt-w.prob. - exp. - solve
25 Fractions
1 (4) symbol "x"-exp., symbol "of"-exp.; product-proper
product - prop. & improper.
2 (5) product: improper; product: whole & improper,
product: whole & mixed; product: prop, & mixed.
product: mixed.
3 (5) multiplication identify; commutative; associative,
distributive add; distributive - subtraction.
4 (3) w.prob. mult. of fractions - exp..4- solve
26 Fractions
1 (5) symbol ":" exp.; pr,vr dure ; quot. - prop. &
whole quot.- whole by pi, ,,er; quot. - proper.
2 (4) quot. - improper by whole; quot.-improper by1
proper; quot.-improper; of ? = M
3 (3) w. prob.: div. of fractions - exp. - solve.
4 (4) order of ops., w. prob. - order of ops. - solve
27 Decimals
1 (8) def'n. - decimal fract.; def'n.-decimal pt.;
decimal aloud; decimal writes; decimal nos.; decimal
70
3.
in words; decimals on No. 1 re defn.-mixed decimal
2 (4) place value-dec.nos.digits; sig. digits, level of
accuracy; place value dec. fract.
3 (6) dec.-fract., mixed dec.-mixed no. mixed no.-dec.,
fract-dec.(accuracy) def'n. "repeating dec."; frac.-
rep.dec.
4 (9) sym. "+" exp., decimal pts.-vertical, add-no.
carrying; add-carrying sum-vertical; sum-horizontal;
sum-whole & dec.; w.prob. - add dec. - exp.-solve.
5 (8) sym. "-"exp., names part-subt, subt.-no. borrowing;
subt.-borrowing; subt.-horizontal, format; subt.-horizontal;
w.prob.: subt. exp.-solve
28 Decimals
1 (8) sym. "x" exp.; mult. by 0; mult. by 10; decimal
place; w.prob.-mult. of dec.-exp.-solve commutative;
associative.
2 (8) sym. " exp.; div.-decimal pt.; no dec. pt.in
divisor; div.-places moved; quot.-div. by 10; divide-
decimal place; div.-no decimal;div.-remainder as decimal
3 (5) quot. dec. & fract.; w. prob. - div. dec.; exp.-
solve;
quot. at accuracy;
4 (8) w. prob. - add dec.; w. prob.-subt. .dec.;subt.-frac.
& dec.; w. prob.-mult.; mult.-frac. & dec.; w. prob.-
div.dec.; ans.-no. of dec. places; format for add &
subt.
29 Percent & Ratio
1 (5) sym. "%" exp.; % num'words; frac.-%; dec.- ;
%-dec.
2 (3) frac.-dec.& %; dec.-% & frac.; % dec. & frac.
3 (5) ratio defn.; ratio of 2 nos.; ratio - eg.;
ratio-reduced; ratio-equivalent
30 Consumer
1 (8) hourly rate-pay; daily rate-pay; weekly rate-pay;
71
4.
monthly-rate pay; yearly rate-pay; fees - total charges;
rate of commission-amt.; piece work rate-pay.
2 (6) change; cost: one item-many; total price-one item;
better buy, w. prob.-cost of food same & diff.
3 (6) water meter; utility-costs; utility meter;
w. prob.-procedure utility; - exp.- solve
31 Time Length Distance
1 (4) sym. - unit of time; time - relationships; 12 24
time; 24 - 12 time
2 (8) sum id. time; subt. - id. time; sum-dif. time;
sum-dif. units time subt.-dif. units of time - exp.-
solve
3 (6) length: symbol, convert units; calibre of instru-
ments; measure metric; metric units
4 (6) Distance: sum-identical; sum-different; subt.-
dif. units-converted
5 (3) w. prob: meas. of distance-. exp.-solve-
32 Liquid Measure
1 (6) Liquid measure: symbol; convert units; sum-similar
units; sum-convert,-sum-dif. units w & w/o conversion
2 (4) Liquid meas.: subt.-similar units w. & w/o conversion;
subt.-dif. units - w & w/o conversion
3 (2) Liquid meas.: mult.; div.
4 (3) Liq. meas.: w. prob.-exp.solve
33 Weight Measures:
1.(5) weight - def'n.; symbol; convert units;- - dif. units
2 (3) sum - identical units, w & w/o conversion;
3 (3) subt. identical units w & w/o conversion
4 (2) mult.; div.
5 (3) w. prob. weights - exp. - solve
6 (2) geo. shape; volume of shape
LEVEL 3 OUTLINE
40. Whole Numbers:
1(5) round off, additive identity, associative, commutative,.distri-butive.
2(2) mult-parts; factors3(3) w. prob. mult exp. solve4(4) "prime no." defn., eg. of prime nos.HCF, LCM5(3) quot. of x t by y is ?, div. leaving remainder
express remainder6(3) w. prob.: div. - exp. - solve7(4) order of ops.; w. prob. order of ops. - exp. - solve
41. Fractions:
1(4) no. line; reduction; prime denom, lowest common denom.2(7) sum - common factors; sum - denom. - prime associative; sum-
combination w. prob. - add - exp. - solve3(4) subt. - borrowing; w. prob. - subt. - exp. - solve
42. Fractions Mult.:
1(5) multiplicative identity, commutative associative; distributiveover add; distributive over subt.
2(3) w. prob. mult. - exp. solve3(4) 1/4 of ? is 3; w. prob. div. exp. - solve4(7) procedures - complex fract.; ans. - complex fract.; sequence
of ops.; w. prob. - order of ops. - exp. - solve
43. Decimals:
1(8) reads no.; words represent; id. dec. no.; write decimal; onno. line place value; ordering; ans. decimal places
2(8) equiv.; frac..-> dec.; dec.>fract.; mixed dec.-4,mixed no.;repeating dec.-9fraction seg. digits; level of accuracy
3(5) commutative; associative; w. prob. - add dec. - exp. - solve4(3) align dec. points; w. prob. - subt. - exp. - solve
44. Decimals:
1(2) mult. by 10 - places moved & mult.2(3) w. prob. - mult. - exp. solve; mult. - frac. & dec.3(6) no dec. in divisor; moving decimal places, div. by 10's;
div. level of accuracy; div. dec. & fraction4(4) w. prob. div. - operation - exp. - solve
45. Fractions & Decimals:
1(4) Frac..4>%; %->frac. denom. of 100; 96->fraction; mixed no; %->frac.
2(2) dec.-0; %.1dec.3(3) frac..i>% & dec.; dec.i>% & frac.; %.9dec. & frac.
46. Percents & Ratios:
1(2) Type I: x % of y = a: calc. & w. prob. - exp. - solve2(4) Type II: x is a % of y: Calc. & w. prob. - exp. - solve3(4) Type III: x% of a = y: calc. & w. prob. exp. - solve
4(6) def'n. - 7...itio; ratio - eg.; ratio from 2 nos. lowest terms;
2.
ratio dec.; % ratio5(2) equivalent ratio; ratio a/b to proportion
47. Consumer: Pay & Prices:
1(5) hourly rate - pay; daily rate - pay; weekly rate - pay;monthly rate pay ; yearly rate - pay
2(3) fees - total change; price work rate - pay; commission rate -amt. calc.
3(2) rental rate - year; % income for rent;4(2) defn. - types of prices; sala price;5(5) food - for 1; one to many items; better buy; w. prob. - cost
of food - exp. - solve
48. Consumer: Car, Utilities & Pthance:
1(3) m.p.g. distance; ay. speed, odometer2(4) insurance terms; premium; car premium; better buy3(7) gas meter; electricity meter; utility meter; costs of utility
w. prob. utility procedure - solve4(6) "finance company" - term; "bank" vs. "fin. co."; "credit Union';
"int. & principal"; "demand loan"; "collateral loan"5(5) interest; w. prob. - interest - loans
49. Time & Distance:
1(3) time zones; 12 24 hrs. time; 24 to 12 hrs. ime;2(3) sum - time; sum - time convert;3(3) difference - time - w. & w/o time4(2) w. prob. - time - exp. - solve5(2) calibre of instrument, measure6(3) w. prob. - distance - exp. - solve
SO. Liquids & Weights:
1(3) lig. meas.: sum of similar & dif. units2(2) lig. meas.: diff. of similar & different units3(2) lig. meas.: mult. & div.4(3) lig. meas.: word prob. - solve exp._5(2) weights: convert6(2) weights: sum & diff.7(2) weights: mult. & div.8(3) weights: w. prob. - solve - exp.
51. Thermometer & Geometry:
1.(7) thermometer - defn. points on scale; sym., sum of ident.& dif. units; diff. Of ident. & dif. units
2(5) thermometer: mult. & div.; w. prob._- solve exp.3(3) name of geom. shape; formula; perimeter4(2) formula for area; compute area5(3) volume: formula & compute
52. Graphs & Stats.:
1(3) defn. - mean; cal. mean;2(7) pictogram; - select & procedures - constr.
74
reading - comparitive - question - interpretation3(7) line graph: - select - procedures - const. - comparitive
value of pt. - interpretation4(7) bar graph: select - procedures - const. - comparative - value
of pt. - interpretation5(7) write graph: select - procedures - const. - comparitive - value
of pt. - interpretation6(3) w. prob. - graph - solve - exp.
53. Metric - Length:
1(3) length: Brit. to metric; metric to Brit. metric to metric2(4) length: sum & dif. of metric - similar & unlike3(4) mult. & div. of sim. & dif. units4(3) w.prob. - metric - solve exp.
54. Metric - Weight:
1(4) units in metric; Brit. to metric, metric to Brit., conversionfactor
2(4) sum & dif. of similar & different units3(4) mult. & div. of similar & dif. units4(3) w. prob. - metric wt. solve - exp.
55. Metric Liquid:
1(4) units of meas.; Brit. to metric, metric to Brit.; conversionfactor
2(4) sum & dif. of similar & dif. units3(4) mult. & div. of similar & dif. units -4(3) w. prob. - liquid meas. - metric - solve - exp.
'^
75
LEVEL 4 OUTLINE
60. WHOLE NO.(1) & PERCENTS:
1(1) whole nos. - series of ops.2(1) Type I - x% of y = a3(3) w. prob. Type I % solve - exp.4(1) Type II x is a % of y5(3) w. prob. Type II - exp. - solve6(1) Type III, x % of a = y7(3) w. prob. - Type III - solve exp.
61. RATIO & CONSUMERS:
1(8) Ratio: defn.; eg. forming; reduce; equivalent; to decimal;percent to ratio; ratio to proportion
2(5) Pay: hourly rate; eg. hourly, daily; weekly, monthly, yearly3(3) fees to charges; piece work rate to pay; commission rate to
total
62. CONSUMER & TEMPERATURE:
1(4) defn. - principal; costs of home; rent & buy; depreciationof car
2(6) simple & compound int.; defn. - will; defn. discount loanw. prob. loans - exp. - solve
3(2) convert: temp. scale4(3) w. prob. temp. - exp. - solve
63. SETS:
1(8) select sets; satisfy limits; -define limits10; ei.); C; 0;2(6) limits - identical sets; equivalent set; finite set; infinite
set; null set; sivbset3(5) AUB3 Atia ; Venn diag. union-Venn; Venn-disjoint4(2) w. prob. sets set notation - solve
64. GEOMETRY:
1(3) name of figure; as a figure; as a form2(3) name of instrument; defn. of terms; defn. of symbols3(2) congruent triangles; similar triangles4(3) construct line & procedure & instruments5(3) construct angle & proced. & instruments6(3) figure - construct procedures instruments7(3) parallel line construct - procedures - instruments8(4) bisect line - procedure - bisect angle - procedure9(6) perpendicular pt. on and off line: instruments; procedure;
construct
65. GEOMETRY:
1(4) perimeter: formula & compute circumference: formula & compute2(4) area: formula & compute; volume: formula & compute3(3) w. prob.: geometry procedure solve
76.1_
2.
66. INTEGERS:
1(3) pos. or neg., in words; in symbols2(4) no. line; opposite; absolute value; order3(2) inequality - operation: calc. & missing element
.67. INTEGERS:
1(4) sign of sum; sum; sum - vertically; sum - horizontally2(3) w. prob. - adding integers - exp. - solve3(3) sign of diff.; diff - vertically; diff. - horizontally4(3) w. -rob. - subt. of integers - exp. - solve
68. INTEGERS:
1(3) mult. sign: opposite & liked sign; horizontal mult.2(3) w. prob. - mult. of Integers exp. solve3(3) w. prob. - div. of integers exp. solve4(3) rules of ops.; simplified expression remove parentheses
69. ALGEBRA:
1(4) symbols: constants & variables, algebraic exp.; defn.formula; binominals
2(3) numeral coefficent; equivalent exp., into word exp.3(4) sum: vertical & horizontal; dif. vertical & horizontal4(1) calc. of one variable
70. ALGEBRA & INDICES:
1(2) product: nominal - horizontal & vertical2(2) product: binominal vertical & horizontal3(3) pt. on no. line; sum on no. line; dif. on no. line4(2) w. prob. one unknown - exp. - solve5(3) w. prob-. - alg. expression - exp. - solve6(5) indices: base; index equiv. as mult., equiv. as index
mult. - identical base
71. GRAPHS & STATS.:
1(4) mode: defn.; calc. whole & decimal nes.; 2 modes2(5) median: defn.; calc. nos. occurring & not; event total of nos.3(2) range: whole & decimals4(5) defn. probability; calc. ratio outcome certain; no. possibility
of outcome; odds
77
LEVEL 5 OUTLINE
80. RATIO & PROPORTION:
1(4) Atio: defn.; symbols, a:b to a/b2(4) ratio - eg. forming; reduced; equivalent3(2) as decimal; % to ratio4(3) w. prob. ratio - exp. - solve5(4) proportion: defn.; eg. symbols6(5) direct prop.; inverse prop.; similar triangles7(4) pulleys - formula; calc.8(3) w. prob. - proportion - exp. solve
81. CONSUMER MATH.. & SETS(1):
1(4) Fed. Tax: heading; Income, Net Income, Personal Exemption2(4) CPP, UIC3(5) Taxable Income; amt. of tax dec., total tax due; total owing4(4) defn. & eg. judgement; bankruptcy; amortizing mortgage: w. prob.5(3) total interest; prin. & int.; w. prob. - interest6(1) w. prob. - sets
82. GEOMETRY:
1(2) scale drawing - proced. & construct2(2) pythagoreanth: proced. & compute3(2) perimeter: formula & calc.4(2) area - formula & calc.5(4) volume: formula & calc.
83. GEOMETRY: r,
1(2) 4 quadrants;2(4) ordered pair or graph; location line on graph 1 unknown &
2 unknowns3(2) graph: 2 simultaneous eqns.4(3) w. prob.: geom. sol. exp. - solve
84. INTEGERS:
1(4) absolute value; order; inequality & operate2(3) sum: int,egers; horizontal & vertical3(3)w. prob. - adding integers exp. - solve
4(2) diff. - horizon. & vert.5(3) w. prob. - subt. integers - exp. solve
85. INTEGERS & ALGEBRA:
1(3) Integers mult. - sign horizontal2(3) w. prob. - mult. of Integers exp. solve3(3) w. prob. - div. of integers exp. - solve4(3) rules: order of ops.; remove paren.;5(2) Algebra: symbol formula; inequalities6(3) equiv. expression; mult. inverse7(3) commutative law; associative distributive
;
2.
86. ALGEBRA:
1(3) LCD: algebra fractions2(2) sum of alg. exp.3(2) dif. of alg. exp.4(3) prod. of alg. exp. - quot. of alg. exp.5(2) value - variable(one) value 2 variables6(2) graph line - 1 variable - graph line - 2 variables
87. ALGEBRA:
1(2) simplify exp.(mult.)rule: common factors
2(1) factoring perfect sq.3(3) factoring dif. of sq.: rule & calc.4(2) factor incomplete sq: - rule5(2) factor trinomial: rule & eg,6(3) common facioring: rule & eg.
88. ALGEBRA & INDICE:
1(2) Algebra: prod. trinomials & horizontal2(5) w. prob. - 2 unknowns solve - exp. - seq. of steps - w. prob.
alg. exp. - exp. solve3(4) Indices - base; exponent as *tuft. prob.; as index4(4) mult. 2 index nos.: procedures & calc. div. 2 index nos.:
procedures & calc.
APPENDIX "D-8"
TEST'ITEM CARD
80
1 1-1....i.....,...1 r , -I I
ANSI UNIT LESSON OBJECT. OBJECTIVE/ITEM
81
M SUPPLEM.
APPENDIX "D-9"
SPACING GUIDE
FOR TYPING ITEMS ON CARDS
82
he sum of 4 and 3 is6's141.)2)
/ SpAc3 s p S
3)
c-r-i oNs
804)
OBJECT:. I OBJECTiVE/ITEM
I/ ;s , 1
The sum of 2 and 4 is
515)
t3 c1) 2) 3) 4) 5) not given
1) 3)2) 4)
5);
1)2)3)4)5)
/7 /67
Lessom J 03JECT.
...zerviarn.u.2"gnsoaslysevainwcarowl-vw.lisloceralsext,-
APPENDIX "D-10"
SELECTED SAMPLES OF TEST ITEMS
Lawn chairs were on sale. Five chairs were $43.52, but theSmith family needed only one chair. How much would itcost them?
1) $8.70 3) $7.602) $4.38 4) $8.73
5) Not given
ANS UNIT LESSON OBJECT. OBJECTIVE/ITEM I M
LESJILLOLL.
85
SUPPLEM.
ANS UNIT
The difference in time between 3 weeks and 18 days is:
1) 72 hours2) 36 hours
LESSON
3) 42 hours4) 144 hours5) not given
OBJECT. ,, OBJECTIVE/ITEM ____ SUPPLEM.....,i
2 31 21
6 0 1Lj 1
Or."
If you paid the cleaner $9.53 for 4 pairs of pants. Whatoperation would you perform to discover the cost of cleaningfor 1 pair of pants?
1) Divide $9.53 by 42) Divide 4 by $9.533) Subtract 4 from $9.534) Multiply $9.53 x 45) Not given
jNIT LESSON OBJECT.'
212813 I 0
OBJECTIVE/ITEM SUPPLEM.
If Dc-- aid $5.95 for gas per week and his car runs on 89tper mi - How many miles can he drive per week? Identifythe op( .:ion necessary here.
pubtract 89t from $5.95Divide $5.95 by 89t
3) Divide 89t by $5.954) Multiply $5.95 x 89t5) Not given
LESSON OBJECT. IOBJECTIVE/1TEM
12 813 12 0 12
.M1 SUPPLEM.
ANSI3
Tony bought new lawn equipment. Total tost was $101.22.If he bought ten items, what operation would you use todetermine how much he spent on each item?
1) Multiply $101.22 by 102) 10 should be divided by $101.223) $101.22 should by divided by 104) Subtract 10 from $101.225) Not given
UNIT LESSON OBJEC
I 1
OBJECTIVE/ITEM MI
2 28 3 2 0
SUPPLEM.
Farmer Jones sold 595 eggs at market for $33.55. How muchis one t.gg worth to the farmer. What operation would youuse to solve this problem?
1) Divide 595 by $33.552) Multiply 595 by $33.553) Subtract 595 from $33.754) Divide $33.55 by 5955) Not ,;iven
LESSON 'OBJECTI VE/ITEM
ANS
Mr. Ames drinks 12.2 bottles of whiskey'per month. If histotal bill per month is $131.58, what operation wouldgive us the cost of 1 bottle?
1) Divide 12.2 by $131.582) Subtract $131.58 from 12.23) Add $131.58 + 12.24) Multiply $131.58 x 12.25) None of these
LJNIT LESSON IOBJECT. OBJECTIVE/ITEM M.I SUPPLEM.
5 f 1 I, 2 t28 ( 3 ,.,21 0 5 I
APPENDIX "D-11"
SAMPLE CANADORE CAM REPORTS
9 2
';'.. **4c*IY.*tt****. .4.**:::***X:J.,:".-: **
It*
***?: A r::::**1;:. .
***A.::: s' .:::,:::"*.:*** ** ** *%: * * * *: T.: *** * * ....: * * er .... * 4: * * * :: 4:** *.4, 2 4: 1. ::: * ::: * r.t ::.: :!: 7:".. 4;
t: 41 * et t: r!.. *- '.,:' * e.: .;:. 2.: et * e:
********tet* ** ****X.*****t:** * * ';' * *::: * * 4: e:*...* .e:!! e: e: :,4 *
CA103 15/03o14 17:47:38 C4113CAM3 15/03/7 17:=-7:Ab cAm3C4Y3 19/C3/7z. 17:=4:iA CA13CAv.3 15/03/7:. 17:47:38 CAm3
4
9 3
CCMPRFHENSIVE ACHliiVEMENTCANADORE MATH 4ON1TORING 1-3
STUDENT GROUP 0
MCNITCPING
ALL STUDENTS
GROUP
TEST
SWMARY PEPORT
ACWINISTPAT10N
3171303L
CGN CONTENT GROUP 1 2 3 4. 5 6 7 8
NUMBER CF STUDENTS 49. 5S
1 BLOCK 01 AVG 20 41NUM 10 12
2 BLOCK 02 AVG 85 e5.NUM 14 73
3 BLOCK 03 AVG 60NUM 10 12
It BLOCK 0f- AVG 50 5s1.
NUM 10 12
5 BLOCK 05 AVG 56 6PNUM 16 16
6 BLOCK 06 AVG 23 J3NUM 30 36
7 BLOCK 07 AVG 50 .66NUM 10 12
.. ...20 BLOCK 20 AVG 65 Lr4
NUM 55 63
.21_ PLUCK 21 AVG 46 51
NUM 60 62
22 BLOCK 22 AVG 60 63NUM 46 52
.23 BLOCK 23 AVG 61 4195
24 BLOCK AVG 43 11
MIJ 23 76
25 BLOCK 29 AVG 45 38NUm 37 36
26 'BLOCK 26 AVG 37 28NUM 32 4?
27 BLOCK 27 8VG 63NUM 46 2
29 PLOOK 28 AVG 3:) 42NUM . 7B
CANADOS E PATH MC N1 TOR 1 NG 1-3STUDENT G;VJUD 0 AL L STUDENT S
TESI ADM' "..!
IN.
STRAT 1CN
, A. .7;
031
CGN CCNTFNT GRCUP 1. 2 3 4 7 8
29 BLOCK 29 AVG 41 42NUM 46 52
30 BLC.C.K 30 AVG 28 34N 46
31 BLOCK 31 AVG 35 41NUM 37 36
32 BLOCK 32 AVG 26 23NUM 23 26
33. BLCCK 33 AVG 44 18NUM 9 16
40 BLCCK 40 AVG 40 55NUM 22 36
41. PLCCK 41 AVG 50 74MJM 26 27
42 PLCCK 42 AVG 15 2157
43 BLCCK 43 AVG 34 45NUM 38 57
BLCCK AVG 26NUM 25 27
BLCCK 45 AVG 4 6 51NUY 26 27
46 BLCCK 46 AVG 't 1NUM 34
47 PLOCK 47 AVG 22 38NUM 22 36
48 BLOCK 48 AVG 1?NUN 16 21
49 BLCCK 49 6.VG 19 2316 21
50 Urck< 50 AVG 17 23NUN 16 fl
51 i/Ct:::< AVG 40 33N M 22
9 5 .
CUMPREHt'NS I VE ACH I EVEMENT MCN I TOR I NGCANAOOR E MATH MCN1 TGR I NG 1-3
S TUDF NT GP CUP 0 .1_ STUCE-NTS
- GPCUP SUMA;PY 4PORT
TEST AOMI NI ST= AT I ON
31713. ;
031_
CGN CCNTENT G?CIJ 1 2 3 4 5. 6 7 9
52 BLCCK 52 AVG 19 294;i 43
53 BLOCK 53 AVG 31 29NUM 16 21
54 BLCCK 54 AVG 12 19NUM 16 21
55 BLCCK 55 AVG . 18 19NUM 16 21
7181 LEVEL 1 CB J- AVG 46 59NUM 100 120
7182 LEVEL 2 C5J AVG 47NUM 584 666
7133 LEVEL 3 OBJ, AVG 21 36NUM 422 961
113 03JECT I VE 113 AYG 0 75NUM 4
121 . CBJECT I WE 121 AVG 33 75NUM 6 4
231 , CPJ ECT I VE 231 AVG 83 IO()
NU
232, - C5J ECT I VE 232 :A VG 75 75NU m 4 8
735 ORJECT I VE 235 AVG 100 87L. 8
321 ,C9JECT 1VE 291 AVG 50 100NIJM 6 4
322 :CBJECT I V c 377 AVG 75 62Ntr). 4 3
434 - 09JECT I VE 434 AVG 33 50MUM 6 4
f1.43 C?JECT I VE 443 A VG 75 1.)2
N'JN 4
522 .C5JECT I VE !72: ;.1VG 33 75
NU P
COMPREhEhSIVF ACHIEvEmENT PCNITCrING FoRm ANAIYSIS REPTITCANAGGRE MATH mnNITORING 1-331718
FGRM 921 16 STUDENTS RESPONDEC TC THE FORM DURiNG TEST ADMMSTR.QUESTION AvG RFSPONSES
'NU48EP CEJECT1VE NSWFR scnpf: N1 1 2 3 4_1 2771 3 50 0 25 25 50 02 2314 5 25 ,6 0 *7 25 63 2973 1 : 18 18 6 31 0. -4 2C63 4 18 0 0 0 .6 135 2831 1 17 25 12 6 '6 0 '6 2525 5 37 12 6 -37 0 6 ..77 2153 2. 56 6 0 56 12 12'.8 2842 3 87 C 0 6 87 09
.2013 3 25 0 .6 25_ _.1
25 12_L_10 3024 5 50 0 12 21 6 0 ..11 2742 2 75 6 0 75 -12 012-13
3212 3 18 6 0 18 18 12 .,.__. .i2353 7 62 12 6 62 18 014 2644 5 56 12 18 6 0 615.... . 2615 4 0 6 12.12 18.__0_;_ _16 3252 2 18 25 0 18 25 617 2754 3 43 12 6 0 43 6 -la 2921 1 43 75 43 18 019 2024 3 '81 5 0.60 81 620 2345 5 37 18 18 6 1621. 31.28 4 75 0 12. 0.. 6 _75
. .._22 2221 1 50 12 50 6 6 6 -23 3016 4 43 6 0 18 0 4324 2424!- 3 18 12 47 6 18 075 2136 1. 12 6 12 6 0 3726 2332 2 12 25 0 12' 13 0
FORM g21: Tn1";.1 PE.'rEA7AGr CrRqr-CT lq
97 :.;;4,"
ANDRY YVON 730CS0
TEST ADM 2 3/12174',.FRACTICN CORRECT rm ALL IT:MS TS..FRACTICN C01--ZPECT CN YES ITEMS IS
SECTN 1
1412511/71
Cc1;BETT 03157431713
Fr2v. 931
TEST ERN CCP. EC:N CCR6N OBJ PP INS CN C8J RP INS Alr**1 FORm ALL YES
'6 2014 5 YES 23 2723 + yEs 1 921 15/26. 0/ 0'
18 2043 + YES 7 27/-4. + YES 2 931 14/?5 11/21
10 2122 + YES 11 2835 + YES
2 2143 + YES. 3 2843 5 YES
14 2154 + 1 2846 5 YES
22 2226 4 YES 25 2922 1 YES
c 2935 5 YES
12 2317 + YES 17 3017 1 YliS
?0 2333 + YES 13 3035 58 9414 5 YES 24 3135 + Yi7S
:6 2513 3 YES 21 3153 6= YES
9 2535 + 15 3223 + YES
5 9633 + YES 26 0
CUM TOTAL 29/ 51 11/ 21
98
HAZZARD RAnOY
TEST ACM 2
FRACTICM CORRECT CNFRACTICN CORPECT CM
73029D SECTM 1
3/12/74ALL ITEYS IS 12/7.6YES ITEMS IS 9/20
M1M0GUE M.31714
FIRM 971
fEST FPN CCP.. FRN CO.)OBJ RP INS ' OBJ RP INS A0m FOR ALL. YES
9 2011 2- YES 14 7644 + YFS 1 931 14/7.5 0.1
11 2024 YES 1 2721 2- YES 2 921 12126 .9/20
4 2C63 5- YES 17 2754 + YES
25.2136 5- 5 2831 5- YFS
7 2153 8 2842 + YES
22 2221 3- YES 20 2545 + YES
_....-..._11 2242 2921 + YES
2 231/: + YES 3 2923 5- YES
:26 2332 YES 233016 + YES
13 2353 + YPS 10 3024 1- YpS"
211 2424 2- YES 21 3128 +
6 2525 + `11S 12 3212 4-
15 2615 5- YES 1.6 1352
CUM TOT .:1L 26/ 51 9/ 20
99
031!
.1.FAUBERT'KEVIN .730700 SECTN
.TEST ACM. 2 3/12/74FRACTION CORRECT ON ALL ITPo.S ISFRACTICN CORrECT ON YES ITEMC IS
4/263/23
BURT3N H'31713
FORM 921
TEST FrV CCR PRN CUR, CN CO,1 RP INS QNz-9B,AP..9_,IN,5 ADM FCPM ALL YES
92013 4 YES
19 2024 + YPS
4 20E3 3 YES
25-2136 5
7
22
2153
2221 4.YES
11 2242 32 2314 4 YES
26 2332 3 YES
13 2353 YES.
24 2424 1 YES
6 2525 2 YES
15 2615 1 YES
14 2644 2 YLS 1 931 5/2i
1 2721 1 YES 2 921 A/26
17 2754 5 YES
3 2331 5 YES
8,21342 + YPc
20 2845 + YES,
18. 2921 3 YES
3 2923 YES
23 3016 2 YES
10 3024 2 YFc
21 312r1 YFS
123212 2 YES
163352 5 YES.
CUA TOTAL 9/ 51
100
3/ 23
-.TRICEAU ANTONIA
TEST AOM:.FRACTICM CRP.ECTFRACTICN CORRECT
2
ONCN
740110 SECTN 1
- -3/12/74ALL'ITEmS IS 14/25YES ITEMS IS 12/21
TOPLINSOM B3k718
FfiRM 131.
TEST FPN CIP. Fkm Cri.)
CN OBJ RP INS CN CBJ RP INS 40m FoRm ALL . YES
4 2014 3- YES 23 2723 + YEc 1. 921 1C/76 0/ 0
18 2043 + YES 7 7744 + YES 2 931 14/25 12/71
40 2122 + YES 11 2835 4- YPS
2 2143 4:YES. -3. 2843 5- YES
14 2154 +- 1 2846 + YPS
17 226 + YES 25 7927 + YES
4 2245'. '9 2935 +'YFS
12 2317 2YES 17 3017 + YES
20 2333 + YES 13 3035
6 2414 5- YES 24 3135 4- YFE.
16 2513 5- YES 21 3153 9- YES
19 2535 15 3223 1- YES
5 2633 + YES 26 0
CUM TOTAL .24/ c) 12/ 21 .
101
'03157
, _
ZOMPREHENSIVE ACHIEVEMENT MCNITORING - TEACHEP SUM;!1Aky RiFpoRT .317AkADORE MATH NCITORING
,.INUPRER . NAPE
7404C0 3ELL ROBERT
.740300 DEGAGNF mARGAPFT
1-3
CUAVG 1
ALL
FCPp
AILYf.'S
FCRp
230
00
0
0
0
0
-74C470 FIELDING. PARGARET.
.-740310 FLETCHER SHIRLEY
740500 GERVAIS RICHARD
740390 GREGOIRE MARC
Nib
.740320 HARE LILLIA
740460 HENDRY ReNALo
:740330 MORROW RICHARD
740520 RAGNINI BIL1.
740490 RESTOULE ERI:NCA
140410 RICHER mICHAEL.
740340 SIM.s DE6FIE
SECTN ,J TN8 8. TORBAY03157
TEST ADNINISTPATIoN2' 3 4 5 6 7 8
230
921
0
0
ALL. 61 0 61Y:c 0 0 . 0
FORM C 921
ALL 34 0 -/-6
YPC 0 0 0FOPm O. 951
ALL 40 0 40YES 0 0 0
FCRP 0 931
ALL 27 C 22YES Q 0 0.
POPP .0 941
M L 40 C 40Y7S 0 0 0
FoRm C 941
ALL 48 0' AiYF S 0 C 0
FUN. 0931
ALL 19 CYFS 0 0FcRp 0
ALL 59 0YES 0 0
:FOP 0
ALL 61 0YES 0 0
FOPm C
ALL 40 0y7.c 0 C
Pc:Qv 0
ALL 0 0YES 0 O.
FCRM 0
190
951
590
941
610
921
-,.....*******-* 4%**It **********
**41*
********** .
************** **
.**. .......-,*** *.t 4 :4.7 i: * *74: 1...
**** .4.: *
****
****
*** ***
*0* t
**.:%.:s 0 :4*** I* * ** * :.: *** '**
tt*, ....; 11.1'.: * r: r: :I.: *e: t
eptt
*Jr.
**A.
* 4?
4::`-**
***********
*************** **
** At *
**.**
**
7.........1.
*** *
*****
* of
************* **
7::*
****
CANAL 15/03/76 18:34:53 CAN4L 15/03
CANAL 15/03/76 13:3-r:56 CANAL
CANAL 15103/7'. 14:34:53 CANA! 15/03
CANAL 15/03/7. 11:34:5a CANAL 15/03
4 I.
103,.
COMPREIre4SIVE ACHIEVEmtNT mOMITORING CURr;ICUIUM AN4LYSIS PRO:;i44R::-!
CAN/MOPE PATH MONITORING 1-3 31713 0?1574-PPFLIMINAPY ANALYSIS Or LErt. ? i3ASED rwC TI4ST AD412ISrRATIONS
Pol1:4 171 1.!ITH 26 QUI=STITIS
QUESTIONPOSITION
1
2
34r.)
ANSwER3
5
14
1
UNIT27.).i
.1c,
7 02P
LESSON27202310292020602d30
OBJECTIVE272123142.42320632131
!TEm:,1v.iliaR
2721032314052'42301706304233101
6 5 25 2520 2525 2575057 2 21. 2150 2153 2153078 3 78 2,340 2142 2:347039
103
5
2030
20103020
20133024
201303302405
11 2 22 2240 2242 22420212 3 32 3210 3212 32120313 2 23 7.350 23530714 5. 26 2640 ?6/.4 26440515 4 26 7610 2615 26150416 2 33 3350 3357 33520217 3 77 2150 2754 2/5=03ln 1 29 2920 2921 292101_19 1 20 2320 2.32e- 20240120 5 ... .28 2-0 2345 23450571 4 31 3120 312n 31230422 1 22 7270 2221 22210123 4 30 3010 3016 3016042f- 3 24 2=-20 2424 242403..
21 2130 213f, 21360126 2 23 2330 233 ? 233202
COMPREHENSIVE ACHIEVEMENT mONITOPING --- CUR!J.ICULUM t,NALYSIS PPOGRA4
CANAnOR.F. MATH MONITORING 1-3PRELIMINPy At.ALYSIS OF LtVFL 2
FoRm 931
:.
. 31711 131.5743ASF0 ON TWO TFST ACYAINISTRATIpNS
WITH 25 owisrTnNs
.GUESTIONPOSITION ANSWER UNIT LESSON 03JECTIVE
ITFMNUITIER
1 2 28 2340 7446 2e46o2:2 5 21 2140 2143 2143057 2 28 2340 2343 2843024 2 22 2240 2245 2245025 5 26 2630 2633 263305
: 6 .1 20 2310 2014 201401..
7 5 27 2740 2744 .2.744058 2 24 2410 2414 241402g 3 79 2930 2935 293503
10 4 p 1 2120 2122 21223411 1 28 .2830. 2335 28350112 3 23 2310 2317_ 231703___13 /... 30 303C 3035 30350414 4 21 2150 2154 21540415 2 32 3220 3223. 32230216 1 25 -2510 2513 251301..17 3 30 3010 30.17 30170318 1 20 2040 2043 23430!19 4 75 2530 2535 25350420 5 ,. 23 2330 2333 23330521 1 31 3150 3153 31530122 3 22 2220 2226 22260323 4 27 2720 2723 27230424 .5 31 3130 3135 313505 ....
25 3 29 29,20 2922 292203
CANADORF PATH mlNIr0tN6 31718 031574PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS OF LEVEL 2 BASED OM TWO TEST 41:MINISTRATIONS
iTFNUNIT OBJECTIVE
20 2013
20 2014
20. 2074
20 2043
20 .2063
21 2122
21 2136
21 213
21 _2153
21 2154
22 2221
22 2226
92 2242
22. 2245
23 7314
23 2317
NUMBER ANSWER
201303 3
201401 1
207403.. 3
204301 1
20630'. 4
212204 4
213601 1
214305 5
215302 2
215404 4
222101 1
222603 3
224202 2
224502 2
231405 5
LESSON =ORm
2010 971
2010 931
2020 -921
2040 931.
2660 921
2120 .931'
2130 .921--
2140 931
?150
'2.150 931.
7770 921
2220 931
.2240 .921'
22z1-0 931
2310 921
731703 2310 931
....
921
106
COM.R:HENSIVF ACH1EV9MENT mONIT041:40 ---'CURS1CULUM pRooRAM
CANAOORS MATH Mr.NITORING 1-3 31718 031574PREL/MINARY ANALYSIS OF LCVVL'2 34SED ON TW(1 TEST A)MIMISTRATIONS
ITFMUNIT OBJECTIVE
2332
NUMBER ANSWER LESSON FORM
233202 2 2330 921
23 2131233305 . 5 2330 931
2351235302 2 2350 921
24 2414241402 2 2410 931
P4 2424242403 3
25 2513251301 1 2510 931*
25 2525252505 5 2520 T11
25 2535253504 4 2530 931
11'
26 2615261504 4 2610 Q21
26 2633263305 5 2630 931
26 .26442oz-405 5 921*
27 2721272103 3 2720 921.
27 2722*93127230 4 2720
27 274427A405 5 2740 q31
27 2754215403 3 2750 921
28 21?31
2R3191 1 2830 921
ACH 1 E V EMIN T MOM I TOTTi TtiIJtiJM AMA
CANADORE MATH MUNI TORING 1-3 3171HPRELIMINARY AtIALYS IS gF Li7V.'L 2 8AS0 ON TWe Tpsr
ITF1
031674ADMINISTRATIONS
UNIT
28
00.1IICTIVE
2835
t.UMBFR ANSWER LI:SSON FORM
l!350: 1 2830 931
2842284d!03 3 2840 .921.
28 284324'. 3j2 2 2840 931
28 2845284515 5 7840 . 921
20 2846284692 9 7fle-0 911
29 2921292101 1 2920 921
29 292?29220 ?: 3
29 2923292301 1 2920 921
29 293529350? 1
., 2030 131
30 3016301604 L 3010 921
30 3017301793 3 7010 931
30 302/s302435 5 3020 921
30 3035303504 4 3030 931
31 312,1312804 4 3120 921
31 313531 1515 5 3133 931
31 3153315301 i
, '1150
108
CCMPREW:NSIVE ACHIEVEMENT :4CNITWING CUPPICULU" ANALYSIS PPOGPAm.
CANADORE MATH MONITORING 1.3 31710 031574PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS OF LE.WciL 2 BASF) ON TWC TFST ADMINISTRATIONS
ITFMUNIT OBJECTIVE NU"BER ANSWER LESSON FORM
32 3212321203 3 3210 921
12 3223372302 2 3220 931
33 3352335207 3350 921
-
109
;77,
COMPREHEMSIVt ACHIEVEmNT mCNITOMMO"CURQICUIUti ANALYSIS PROGP.A.04
CANADORF PATH MONITORING 1.3PRFLIMINAPY ANALYSIS.OF LFV7L
21
317182 RASED ON TWC rEST
. 031574A01INIST:cATIUNS
ITEM COR TOT AVG RESPONSES (1:)
NUMBER ANS RESP .SCOR NR 1 7 3 4
212704 4 24 Q1 0 8. 0 .0 SI
212? 24 91
243601 1 24 12 EL 12 16 0 33
2136 .24 12
214305 24 53 0 0 25. 0 16
2143.5
24 58
215202 2 24 56 8 0 54 12
2153 24 54
215404 4 24 . 33 8 4 4 4 33
2154 24 33
07.1PAr, Y tTf FOR
120 50
maw-
1 1 0
5
OTH.
29.:
58
45
-e,
-
COMPRFHENSIVE ACHIEVEMENT
CANADrRE MATH PONITORING 1-3PRELIMINARY ArALYSIS OF LEVEL
Ippit4 . 20
2013
2014
2024
20' 2
2063
ITEMNUMBFR
CORANS
20130, -a
201401 1
202403 3
-204301 1
206304 4
11,4,4ARY CATA FCR20
2 BASE0
---.CURRI47ULUM ANALYSIS PROGRAM
31713 031574ON 1/W 1ST AOMINISTRATIONS
TOT AVG RESPONSES (T.)
"'SP SCUR NR 1 7 3 4 5
4 0 16 41 .:8 2C7 4
24 41 0 41 8 25 16 8
24. 87 4 0 0 87 0 824 87
24 87 0 87. 0 4 3 024 . 87
24 12 . 0 0 4 4 .12 7924 12
120 54
111
tOMPPEHENSIVE ACHIFVEnNT.NCNITORING --- CURRICULUM 'ANALYSIS PROGRAIA..
..;.-
CANADOPE MATH MONITORING 1-3 31718 ._ 031574
PRFLIMINARY ANALYSIS OF LEV'L 2 BASED ON TWO TEST ADMINISTLZATIONS70
TRE = -999 TO -1 DAYS POST 0 TO 14 DAYS RETN = 15 TO 999 C
TOT AVGR=SP SUR
2013 PRE 5
POST 2 100RETN 17 35
NO GAIN PCST CCMPUTEDNO GAIN RETN COmPUTFD
2014
2024
2042
2061
SUMmARY CLTA FOR20
PPE 4 50POST 2 0RETN 18 44
.NO GAIN PCST COMPUTEDNO GAIN PETN CUVPOTED
PPE 5 100POST 2 100RETN 17 8,
NO GAIN POST CCMRUTEDNO GAIN RETNt CemPUT7D
PR!, 4 100POST 2 100RETN 1B 83
NO GAIN PO'zi CCMPUTEDNO GAIN R7TN CCeiPUTEn
PRF 5 20POST 2 50RETN 17 5
NO GAIN PCST CCI:PUTEDNO GAIN RETN Clf'PUTED
PRa 23 60POST 10 70RETN 87 50
GAIN Pr:ST = 101.;
GAIN PETM = .10%
112
Cf1MPPEHENSIVE ACHIEVEMENT MONITORING CUPRICULWA. ANALYSIS PPOGRA:
CANADORF PATH VONTTORING 1-3 31718 031574PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS flF LEVFL 2 BASED ON TWO TEST ADMIN1STRATTIMS
21
PRE = -999 TO -1 DAYS POST = 0 TO 14 DAYS RETN = 15 TO 999
TOT AVGPESP SCOR
2122 PRE loaPOST 2 100RETN 19 88
NO GAIN POST CrtoPUTEDNO GAIN RETN CCMPUTED
2136 PRE 2/1 12POST n
.. '0
RETN 0 0.NC GAIN PCST COMPUTFONO.GAIN P.FTN COMPUTED
21.43
2153
2154
cUMmA=.), DATA FOR21
PRE 4 75POST 2 100RETN 18 50
NO GAIN POST CCMPUTED)NO GAIN REIN CCMPUTED/
PRE 24 54POST 0 0
RETN 0 0NO GAIN POST CrmpuTpoNO GAIN 9FTN CCMPUTE0
PRE 24 3POST 0 0
RETN 0 0NO GAIN POST CCMPUTEDNO GAN REIN COYPUTEr)
.PRE 80 33POST 4 100RFTN 36 69
NO GAIN POST COMPUTEDGAIN RETN = 31%
1111",-
APPENDIX "D-12"
STUDENT MANAGEMENT FOLDERS AND EXAMPLES
Canadore College
CAM 3Mathematics Task and Resource Index
purse
1.402
ck 20 Whole Numbers
Unit 1 1. Identify a whole number in Hindu-Arabicnotation when given it orally (numbersup to 1,000 and more).
2. Name the place value of digits in a wholenumber.
3. Re-arrange a seties of whole "lumbers fromsmaller numbers up to millions, or visaversa.
'"4. Round off whole numbers less than 100,000
to designated accuracy.
Unit 2 1. Identify the proper application of theasociative property of addition.
2. Identify the proper application of the
q45
Task Completed ,?
Mo. Da. Yr.
commutative property of addition.
3. Identify the proper application of theadditive identity.
4. Calculate the sum of two or more wholenumbers (sum-71,000).
Unit 3 1 Identify the sum of an addition probleminvolving no more than four whole numbers. .A
2. Select the arithmetic expression that issufficient to solve the problem of addingno more than four whole numbers (sum,>100
3. Solve word problems involving adding .ofno more than four whole numbers- (sum-'7 100
Unit 4 1. Find the difference between two. wholenumbers on the number line.
2.Find the difference between whole numbersthat do not require borrowing in subtracti6
Atigtik 4tgiVs. .74.4A:Ar.
Canadore College
CAM 3Mathematics Task and Resource Index
2
20 Whale Numbers
Unit 4 3. Find the difference between two or morewhole numbers that require borrowing insubtraction.
4. Check the subtraction problem by adding.
Unit 5 1. Identify a minuend.
2. Identify a subtrahend.
3. Identify a difference between two numbers.
Unit 6 1. Find .the difference between no more thanfour whole numbers.
2. Select the expression necessary to find thedifference between no more than four wholenumbers given in a word problem.
3. Identify the difference between no more thanfour whole numbers.given in a word problem.
Task Co mpleted
Mb. Da. Yr.
CA411 W. NUMBER. - .
burce Index
.
PRINT MATERIAL UNIT
Arithmetic ReadinessLennes Essentials of Arithmetic s
Check and Double Check 5)1,14-17 )21,23 4)22,5)42 4)23,54,55Primary Math Program
_
Interm. Math Program tape 2 tape 7 .
Adult Basic Ed. Arithmetic 3) 30,31 3)10,11 3)11,12Basic Arithmetic I- 9 11,12,15 -Basic Mathematics 1-15 31-44 15. 81,82,84,Fractions I 31-45(ieneral Mathematics
_2_6Learning to Compute 1)2,3,6 1)6,2)4,5.1)23,2)19,,Math: A Basic Course .. 2 3 5-7 8,9 10,11 .f
Refresher Mathematics 5 6,8 26 26 27 32- 35,3 -Understanding Metric System
...NW
i,
,
4
Intro. to Modern Mathematics 31-49Arithmetic of the Whole NumberWhole Number and Numerals (Supp.)Introduction to Math 1 3-41 42-6Inter. Technical MathPractical Math
Basic Math ) 1-26 27-93Preparing for Algebra
..-
'AI
sirSurce ndex
PRINTWATERIALUN IT
6Arithmetic ReadinessLennes Essentials of Arithmetic 4 ) 15,11Check and Double Check
) 53 4)14.23Primary Math ProgramInterm. Math ProgramAdult Basic Ed. Arithmetic 3)15,81Basic Arithmetic 27 27Basic Mathematics 89,91,93-Fracttons I
.
General MathematicsLearning to Compute
, 1 )23-26,28,Math: A Basic Course
1 1Refresher Mathematics 37-40Understanding Metric SystemIntro. to Modern Mathematics
1 ) 94 -1 1 3Arithmetic of the Whole NumberWhole Number and Numerals (SuP13.)Introduction to Math 1)68-81 °.°inter. Technical MathPractical Math
--.Gage Math . _Basic Math 1 )97-140Preparing for Algebra ,
;0
' '.:i:.:Ai`i;
!e-.."'?" ;
isource Index
FILMS AND VIDEO CASSETTESUNIT
1 2 3How to Change FractionsHow to Multiply FractionsHow to Add FractionsHow to Subtract'FractionsPercentage Revised ,
The Concept of -Fractional Numberi
iAddition of Fractional Numbers.Place Value
XFractional PartsMode(s:- When to multiply or divide .
- When to add or subtractX XDivision of Fractional Numbers ,...
Multiplication of Fractional NumbersSubtraction of Fractional Numbers
i
,,
,
,
. .
i .., .,.
source index
14.
FILMS AND VIDEO CASSETTES
How to Change FractionsHow to Multiply FractionsHow to Add FractionsHow to Subtract FractionsPercentage RevisedThe Concept of Fractional Numbers
..Addition of Fractional NumbersPlace ValueFractional PartsModels: When to multiply or divide
When to add or subtractDivision of Fractional Numbers
UNIT
Multiplication of Fractional NumbersSubtraction of Fractional Numbers
MIN
120
le`
Otit
irce
Inde
x
AU
DIO
TA
PES
...;..
......
Irtig
adgq
:
.'.
.1ki
:111
14J-
4,-;
'
source index
AUDIO TAPESUNIT
Basic Mathematics Set 11
ts,
122
4,1641,V6?1.1
)urce Index
FILMSTRIPS . UNIT
Distance and Betweens .
Meaning and Reading of DecimalsAddition and Subtraction of DecimalsMultiplication of Decimals -
Division of DecimalsChanaine Fractions to Decimals -Advancing in Linear MeasurementsAdvancing in Quantity MeasurementsNames of NumbersAdding with FractionsNumber and NumericalPlace Value and SubtractionMultiplication with FractionsDivision by Fractional NumbersOperations with FractionsOur Decimal Number SystemOperations with DecimalsPercentsMetric System*Areas of Triangular RegionsWhere Fractions Come FromNaming FractionsMultiplication of FractionsEquivalent FractionsWhere Fractions Come From -
Namin FractionsMultiplication of FractionsEquivalent Fractions
..,
. .
-
;N.---
1-ource Index
Fl LMSTR IPS UNIT
Distance and Between;Meanina and Reading of DecimalsAddition and Subtraction of Decimals .
Multiplication of DecimalsDivision of DecimalsChanging Fractions to DncirnalsAdvancing in Linear MeasurementsAdvancing in Quantity MeasurementsNames of NumbersAdding with FractionsNumber and NumericalPlace Value and Subtraction -Multiplication with FractionsDivision by Fractional Numbers
.
Operztion with FractionsOur Decimal Number SystemOperations with Decimals
.
Percents ttMetric System iAreas of Triangular Regions , ..Where Fractions Come FromNaming Fractions .
Multiplication of FractionsEquivalent Fractions .
Where Fractions Come FromNamina FractionsMultiplication of FractionsEquivalent Fractions