capability and validity of grastro_amr mew-bing wan e. evans, s. iyer, e. schnetter, w.-m. suen, j....
TRANSCRIPT
Capability and Validity of GRAstro_AMR
Mew-Bing Wan
E. Evans, S. Iyer, E. Schnetter, W.-M. Suen, J. Tao, R. Wolfmeyer, H.-M. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 71
(2005)
Why GRAstro_AMR?• Needs:
a) resolution on the order of 0.1*baryonic mass of 1 neutron star with a typical EOS stable evolution
b) initial separation of 2 neutron stars in a binary inspiral on the order of 50*baryonic mass of 1 neutron star astrophysically-relevant
c) distance of computational domain boundary from system 0.5*gravitational wavelength of system artificial influence
d) size of computational domain 1*gravitational wavelength of system accurate extraction of gravitational waveform from system
e) binary inspiral evolution of neutron stars up to coalescence point within convergence regime
Capability of GRAstro_AMR• Solution of full Einstein field equations:
coupling between space-time and hydrodynamics
• Multiple-length scale resolution:
a) multiple levels of refinement
b) resolutions increasing with higher refinement levels
c) refinement criteria based on matter density and Hamiltonian constraint violation
Capability of GRAstro_AMR
• Merging of grid patches comoving with neutron stars in binary inspiral
• Equivalence to high-memory, long-term and high-resolution unigrid evolution:
inspiral run of binary neutron stars
AMR 4 levels of refinement 603 finest grid covering
each star maximum memory of 8GB
Unigrid
10253 grid minimum memory of 1.2TB
Merging of grid patches
t=0 t=61.2sm
t=122.4sm
Height field of lapse function of coalescing neutron stars
Not showing whole computational domain!
Equivalence to high-resolution unigrid run
Full computational domain of size (34R)3
R - proper radius of each star
Close-up on stars
Central density of coalescing neutron stars
t=0
t=418sm
Close-up on grid structure
Validity of GRAstro_AMR• of full EFEs:
TG 8
1623 KKKR
Hamiltonian constraint equation Momentum constraint equation
SSKKKKRN 2423
3+1 evolution equation
JKK 8
NKL Nn
3+1 split
Validity of GRAstro_AMR
We monitor the convergence of:
a) the Hamiltonian constraint violation:
ndxOKKKR 1623
n - order of convergence
dx - size of grid element
b) the momentum constraint violation
c) various physical quantities for e.g
• Our code carries out unconstrained evolution
Monitoring convergence of Hamiltonian constraint violation
• 3 kinds of convergence tests: a) comparison of Hamiltonian constraint violation (HCV)
between the same levels of refinement with different resolutions
b) comparison of HCV between different levels of refinement generated from the same base grid
c) comparison of HCV between the finest level of refinement and its unigrid equivalent
Monitoring HCV convergence• Example: single static neutron star
a) comparison of HCV between the with
Level 1 refinement Level 2 refinementx x
dx=1.2sm
dx=0.6sm
scaled
2nd-order convergencesame levels of refinement
different resolutions
Monitoring HCV convergenceb) comparison of HCV between generated from
the
Finest base gridx
different levels of refinementsame base grid 2nd-order convergence Level 1 refinement
Level 2 refinement
Monitoring HCV convergence• Example: single boosted neutron star
a) comparison of HCV between the with
Level 2 refinement
dx=2.88sm
dx=1.2sm
same levels of refinementdifferent resolutions 1st-order convergence High-Resolution
Shock Capturing (HRSC) Total-
Variation- Diminishing (TVD) scheme in evolving
the hydrodynamics! 1st-order HCV at
isolated points which propagate to
other points during evolution
Monitoring HCV convergenceb) comparison of HCV between generated from
the
Finest base grid
x
different levels of refinementsame base grid 1st-order convergence
Level 2 refinement
Level 1 refinement
Monitoring HCV convergencec) comparison of HCV between the and
its
Finest base grid
finest level of refinement
unigrid equivalent
Equivalent to base grid
Equivalent to Level 2 refinement
dx=1.2sm
Summary• We have carried out various convergence tests of
GRAstro_AMR:
a) convergence order of HCV: from 1st-order to 2nd-order
b) order of convergence proven valid for the simplest non-trivial case of the boosted neutron star and various configurations involving boosted NS’s
• Development of further computational tools and convergence of physical quantities will be shown in later talks on the usage of GRAstro_AMR in physical problems
• We invite researchers to utilize GRAstro_AMR