aip library matters · impact factor (if) and the h-index, to inform decisions on tenure,...

4
Carol Feltes has held the prestigious position of University Librarian at The Rockefeller University in New York City since 2005. Carol has been a science librarian for over 30 years in a variety of not-for-profit and for-profit research environments including Aurora University, Battelle Columbus Laboratories, and three Fortune 500 companies (Monsanto, Kellogg, and Merck). AIP Library Matters News for Librarians Fall 2013 continued on page 2 Library Matters: How is the field of bibliometrics evolving? Carol Feltes: At this time there is a flurry of new ideas and activities causing both excitement and confusion. Bibliometric tools, originally created as indicators and selection aids for librarians, were adopted by researchers and administrators looking for performance measures. Now they realize that these early metrics are not meant for, and do not meet, their needs. So everyone — librarians, administrators, and researchers — are exploring the capabilities of technical innovations in search of more rigorous, comprehensive, and predictive measures. LM: What are the most significant trends in bibliometrics and what is driving their development? CF: Bibliometrics began with citation analysis at the time of the very first computer-based citation database, Science Citation Abstracts, long before the worldwide web and mobile computing devices. The amount of data now available, and our ability to parse analyze and describe it, have revolutionized the possibilities for identifying and understanding trends and relationships. The problem is that we do not yet fully understand the use, the impact, and the Can We Measure the Impact of a Single Scientific Article? Librarian Carol Feltes Talks About Altmetrics meaning of what we see and analyze. It’s the wild, wild west of bibliometrics. Administrators are still very much focused on using established metrics, like journal impact factor (IF) and the h-index, to inform decisions on tenure, promotion, and allocation of resources. But the scientists who are impacted by these uses have realized that these metrics do not result in a fully informed decision. The newest generation of scientists, in particular, are interested in capturing and leveraging data from a wider variety of newer sources, like social media, twitters, and blogs. They communicate among themselves in ways that more senior scientists do not, and believe that high levels of active discussion of research in these unpublished and more immediate sources of information, are highly valid indicators of the importance of the science. LM: Can you tell us about the “altmetrics” movement? CF: Altmetrics are metrics at the article level, and beyond, as opposed to the journal title level, like the IF. It is now possible to actually use — and cite — a portion of a paper — one dataset, figure, or section (like the discussion or conclusions). It is seen as the “disaggregation” of an article and its parts from the journal that published it. A couple of things are really different about it. First, it can be much more immediate. Postings can happen within seconds or minutes of an article’s content being released publicly. Second, it tracks impact not just in the scholarly arena. It also is a measure of how much impact something has in the lay public. How ‘socialized’ is the content of this article? More and more scientists are moving their everyday work to the web and into the “cloud.” It is discoverable to interested individuals across any and all disciplines and may have truly unexpected influence. No one has previously considered what, if any, influence new scientific knowledge has beyond the realms of science. LM: What are the strengths and weaknesses of altmetrics? CF: The greatest strength is how cutting edge, how immediate, altmetrics can be. Also the source for altmetrics data is extremely inclusive. Many sources are mined and counted that are not captured by aggregator databases. However, there are also several concerns. There is no guarantee that everything that is truly remarkable and worthy of broad notice AIP Library Matters spoke with Carol about one of her favorite topics, bibliometrics, and the recent alternative to traditional metrics, altmetrics.

Upload: others

Post on 25-Mar-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

carol Feltes has held the prestigious position of University Librarian at The Rockefeller University in New York City since 2005. Carol has been a science librarian for over 30 years in a variety of not-for-profit and for-profit research environments including Aurora University, Battelle Columbus Laboratories, and three Fortune 500 companies (Monsanto, Kellogg, and Merck).

AIP library mattersNews for Librarians

F a l l 2 0 1 3

continued on page 2

Library Matters: how is the field of bibliometrics evolving? carol Feltes: At this time there is a flurry of new ideas and activities causing both excitement and confusion. Bibliometric tools, originally created as indicators and selection aids for librarians, were adopted by researchers and administrators looking for performance measures. Now they realize that these early metrics are not meant for, and do not meet, their needs. So everyone — librarians, administrators, and researchers — are exploring the capabilities of technical innovations in search of more rigorous, comprehensive, and predictive measures.

lm: What are the most significant trends in bibliometrics and what is driving their development? cF: Bibliometrics began with citation analysis at the time of the very first computer-based citation database, Science Citation Abstracts, long before the worldwide web and mobile computing devices. The amount of data now available, and our ability to parse analyze and describe it, have revolutionized the possibilities for identifying and understanding trends and relationships. The problem is that we do not yet fully understand the use, the impact, and the

can We measure the Impact of a Single Scientific Article? librarian carol Feltes talks About Altmetrics

meaning of what we see and analyze. It’s the wild, wild west of bibliometrics.

Administrators are still very much focused on using established metrics, like journal impact factor (IF) and the h-index, to inform decisions on tenure, promotion, and allocation of resources. But the scientists who are impacted by these uses have realized that these metrics do not result in a fully informed decision.

The newest generation of scientists, in particular, are interested in capturing and leveraging data from a wider variety of newer sources, like social media, twitters, and blogs. They communicate among themselves in ways that more senior scientists do not, and believe that high levels of active discussion of research in these unpublished and more immediate sources of information, are highly valid indicators of the importance of the science.

lm: can you tell us about the “altmetrics” movement?cF: Altmetrics are metrics at the article level, and beyond, as opposed to the journal title level, like the IF. It is now possible to actually use — and cite — a portion of a paper — one dataset, figure, or section (like the discussion or conclusions). It is seen

as the “disaggregation” of an article and its parts from the journal that published it. A couple of things are really different about it. First, it can be much more immediate. Postings can happen within seconds or minutes of an article’s content being released publicly. Second, it tracks impact not just in the scholarly arena. It also is a measure of how much impact something has in the lay public. How ‘socialized’ is the content of this article? More and more scientists are moving their everyday work to the web and into the “cloud.” It is discoverable to interested individuals across any and all disciplines and may have truly unexpected influence. No one has previously considered what, if any, influence new scientific knowledge has beyond the realms of science.

lm: What are the strengths and weaknesses of altmetrics?cF: The greatest strength is how cutting edge, how immediate, altmetrics can be. Also the source for altmetrics data is extremely inclusive. Many sources are mined and counted that are not captured by aggregator databases. However, there are also several concerns. There is no guarantee that everything that is truly remarkable and worthy of broad notice

AIP Library Matters spoke with Carol about one of her favorite topics, bibliometrics, and the recent alternative to traditional metrics, altmetrics.

2 AIP | L i b r a r y M a t t e r s 1 800-344-6902

exceptional value for Researchers . . . AND lIbRARIANSIn February 2013, our organization began a new chapter in our history with the creation of AIP Publishing. We continue to offer value, predictability, and flexibility through right-sized Tier Pricing, AIP Select & AIP Complete package offerings, three-year price protection agreements, and affordable options to lease or purchase our extensive, seminal back file collection, the AIP Digital Archives.

OUTSTANDINGQUALITYWith nearly 350,000 total citations in the category of Applied Physics in 2012, Applied Physics Letters and the Journal of Applied Physics ranked first and second in total citations for the category, accounting for over one quarter of the total citations in this category. In the same year, The Journal of Chemical Physics was ranked number one in total citations in Atomic, Molecular & Chemical Physics with over 188,000 citations—nearly twice as many as its next closest competitor.

BROAD REACH AND DISSEMINATIONResearchers from nearly 4,000 institutions world-wide downloaded articles from AIP Publishing journals more than 14 million times in 2012.

RIGOROUS AND FAIR PEER REvIEWIn 2012, over 20,000 individuals served as peer reviewers for AIP Publishing, providing balanced, actionable feedback to advance the research and careers of AIP Publishing authors. In that same year, over 90% of articles published benefited from significant reviewer input.

AIP DIGITAL ARCHIvESHalf of the nearly 800,000 papers AIP Publishing has published to date are part of our extensive online backfile collection, the AIP Digital Archives. Including content from volume 1/Issue 1 (dating back to 1930) to 1998, there are no gaps between where archival coverage ends and current coverage begins. In 2012, the AIP Digital Archives accounted for 20% of all AIP Publishing article downloads.

COMBINATION PACKAGESInstitutions that purchase multiple titles can subscribe to one of our discounted combination packages, AIP Select

or AIP Complete. AIP Select includes a selection of core titles while AIP Complete encompasses the entire collection of AIP Publishing journals plus AIP Conference Proceedings. Both packages offer the extended AIP Digital Archives backfile option.

MULTI-YEAR PRICINGIn order to provide AIP Publishing customers with real price stability and predictability, we will continue the three-year agreement program for 2014.

OPEN ACCESS: SHARING SCIENTIFIC ADvANCEMENT In addition to AIP Advances (launched in 2011), AIP Publishing is pleased to announce the publication of APL

Materials (2013) and Structural Dynamics (2014), our newest Open Access journals. AIP Publishing also offers its “Author Select” author-pays model as an option for ALL AIP Publishing titles to help authors comply with NIH and DOE Open Access mandates.

ANY QUESTIONS?

[email protected] 1-800-344-6902 or 516-576-2270

COMPLETE 2014 AIP PUBLISHING PRICING AvAILABLE AT publishing.aip.org/librarians/licensing

WILL in fact be noted and shared. The context of the data or information is also often lost. Was the tweet discussion a positive or a negative one? Perhaps this work is being noted because it is flawed, or suspect. Such things need to be known….but in counting how many times something is cited, mentioned, or discussed is invariably a “plus” and that may be incorrect.

lm: What do web-based services like mendeley, oRcID, and Symplectic contribute?

cF: They are the current class of tools or filters that attempt to be comprehensive data gatherers as well as analytical tools for the data they amass. They are monitoring

every source they can identify on the web of data about individual scientists’ work and impact. They build profiles and count activities and mentions. They assist scientists with managing their own Cvs but do so much more than that. They help improve the accuracy of some measures — like the h-index — by disambiguating names. They facilitate new collaborations. They offer creative graphic representations of data.

lm: What is the role of the academic librarian and how can they make the most productive use of this information?

cF: The role of the librarian is to promote the understanding and appropriate use of

metrics, as well as to explore possible new ways to find and use trend information and patterns in the literature and the use of literature. Ultimately it is our job to help our patrons obtain knowledge that informs their decisions and actions.

carol recommends these sites for further information:

sparc.arl.org/sites/default/files/ sparc-alm-primer.pdf

sparc.arl.org/initiatives/article-level-metrics

phys.org/news/2013-06-scientific-impact.html

Carol Feltes talks about altmetrics — continued from page 1

+ 1 5 1 6 - 5 7 6 - 2 2 7 0 F A l l 2 0 1 3 3

Earlier this year, AIP Publishing entered into a trial agreement with KUDOS, a free service that

will help authors successfully promote their research in the midst of information overload, thereby growing the visibility and impact of their published works. AIP Publishing is a proud partner in this innovative pilot project.

With the number of published articles increasing each year, there is growing competition for visibility. Less than half of published works today ever get cited. The Kudos toolkit includes social and multimedia outlets to help increase discovery and filterability.

Kudos aims to put scattered communications about scholarly articles “back together,” helping with the discoverability and filtering of articles — making them more findable but also, critically, making it easier and quicker, once found, to assess whether they are worth downloading and reading in more depth.

On the discovery side, there is rudimentary evidence to suggest that social media activity increases the visibility and therefore the usage of articles; on the filtering side, there is rudimentary evidence to suggest that multimedia (e.g. video abstracts) further increases usage. Kudos will provide authors with statistics so they know where to focus their efforts and enable them to assign proxies — their institution, society, publisher, or funder, for example — to help them out.

AIP Publishing joins the Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC) and Taylor & Francis in supporting Kudos’ exploration of tools and services to increase discoverability and facilitate filtering of research articles.

For more information go to: growkudos.com

Launched on October 14 the new AIP Scitation offers improved discoverability, author and institution disambiguation, more personalized alerting options, and cleaner look and feel.

New AIP thesaurus makes it easier for researchers to find the information they need.

New enhanced Personalization Features like TOC, Topic and Citation Alerts help researchers stay at the cutting edge of their field.

New Article level metrics offer a graphical snapshot of abstract and full-text views, helping researchers track the impact of research.

2014 graduate Programs in Physics, Astronomy, and Related Fields gradschoolshopper.com Published annually by AIP since 1965, Graduate Programs in Physics, Astronomy, and Related Fields features graduate programs in physics, astronomy, and physics-related fields, such as materials science and engineering, biophysics, chemical physics, geophysics, medical physics, oceanography, and acoustics. The 2014 edition includes programs in the U.S. as well as selected programs in China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, Mexico, and Canada.

contact [email protected] for more information

the NeW Scitation Platform Is live!ScItAtIoN.AIP.oRg

New librarian Resource center, featuring direct access to the new Scitation Librarian Admin site, has been launched at scitation.aip.org/for-librarians as part of our renewed focus on commitment to the librarian community. The new admin site allows for convenient account management, including accessing usage reports, viewing current holdings, managing

IP ranges, and enabling platform co-branding to increase visibility of your AIP Publishing journal subscriptions.

online tutorial: publishing.aip.org/publishing/librarians/webinars

New user guide: publishing.aip.org/sites/default/files/aippub/files/userguide-scitation.pdf

Local language versions in Chinese, Spanish and Brazilian Portuguese will follow shortly.

For more information: Mary vasica, Account Development Manager

[email protected]

516-576-2389

Contact me to schedule a WebEx “highlights” session.

AN ImPoRtANt ReSouRce FoR YouR lIbRARY

A I P P u b l i s h i n g J o i n s K u d o s a s a P i l o t P a r t n e r

4 AIP | L i b r a r y M a t t e r s Subscribe to AIP Library Matters at publishing.aip.org/librarians

N e w P u b l i c a t i o n s A l e r t s

S p o t l i g h t o n A I P P u b l i s h i n g J o u r n a l s

APL Materials 4th Issue Publishedaplmaterials.aip.org This new open access journal features timely publication of the best original research in functional materials science. With new content published online daily, the journal aims to become a major international materials science forum for physicists, chemists, biologists, and related researchers.

Just a few of the top institutions whose researchers have already published in APL Materials:

Researchers depend heavily on their institutions having access to Physics Today. Only 19% of Physics

Today readers log in with their membership ID in order to read the firewalled content.

www.physicstoday.org

See AIP PublIShINg At theSe uPcomINg eveNtS

uKSgApril 14-16, 2014

Harrogate, UK

For a complete list visit publishing.aip.org

Applied Physics Reviewsthe new, dedicated home for cutting-edge reviews in applied physicsapr.aip.orgLaunching in 2014, Applied Physics Reviews, currently a key component of the Journal

of Applied Physics, will be published independently of its parent journal. This new journal will be well positioned to offer researchers a larger selection of the high-quality, cutting-edge reviews they have come to expect from Journal of Applied Physics.

How researchers will benefit:

n greater emphasis on authoritative applied physics reviews — and broader topic coverage

n Substantial increase in the number of published reviews in response to the recent rapid growth in applied physics research (and strong history of Journal of Applied Physics)

n enhanced portfolio across all types of research reporting formats — including Letters, Full Length Articles, and Reviews

n guaranteed quality guided by expanded editorial oversight — 2 Editors and the addition of 6 new Associate Editors

Structural Dynamicsco-published by AIP Publishing and AcAsd.aip.orgStructural Dynamics is a new open access and online-only journal that is now accepting submissions and will launch in 2014. Enabled

by the emerging new instruments (e.g. XFELs, electron sources, etc.) and new experimental and theoretical methodologies, It will highlight research articles on:

n Structural dynamics of molecular systems, biological systems, solid materials, liquids and solutions, and surfaces and interfaces

n Static structural determination, static imaging techniques, and studies using highly coherent sources

n Dynamical studies of systems both in and out of equilibrium

n Spatial resolutions from 1 Å to 1 µm

n Electronic structure studies connected to molecular/lattice/protein structure

n Argonne National Laboratory, USA

n Imperial College, UK

n Nanoelectronics Research Institute, Japan

n National Taiwan University, Taiwan

n Northwestern University, USA

n Stanford University, USA

n Tokoku University, Japan

n University of Geneva, Switzerland

n University of Science and Technology of China