I ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~File: 18GD.B.

I UNITED STATES AIR FORCEEIELSON AIR FORCE BASE, ALASKA

II FINAL

WORK PLAN AND SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PLANCITS Contamination AssessmentEielson Air Force Base, Alaska

AFCEE Contract No. F41624-OO-D-8026, Delivery Order No. 0026

AUGUST 2002

J

L ~ Table of Contenits ________________________

List of Figures ............................................................................................. I V-Hii'1 List of T ables............ .. .......................... ............ ............................... ............. I... iiiiA c ro n y m s a n d A b b re v ia tio n s .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IIV -iv

1.0 Project Description ............................................................................... 1-11.1 Introduction............................................................................... A

L 2.0 ~~~~~1.2 Site Description and Location...........................................................I1-120 Project Organization and Responsibilities.......................................................I2-1

3.0 Project Scope, Schedule and Objectives........................................................I3-13.1 Scope, Schedule and Objectives ....................................................... I3-1

L 3.2 Intended Use of the Data ............................................................... I3-33.3 Analytical Laboratory Requirements....................................................I3-33.4 Deliverables.............................................................................I3-4

4.0 Field Activities ................................................................................... I4-14.1 Site Security............................................................................. 4-14.2 Utility Location/Dig Permits.............................................................. 4-14.3 Soil Gas Sampling and Analysis........................................................I4-14.4 Soil Boring and Soil Sample Collection ................................................. I4-24.5 Groundwater Monitoring Well Installation and Sample Collection ...................... I4-34.6 Sampling Location Documentation......................................................I4-34.7 Quality Control Sampling and Frequency...............................................I4-34.8 Field Procedures ....................................................................... I4-4

4.8.1 Field Screening with a Photoionization Detector...:..........................I4-44.8.2 Field Screening with a Flame Ionization Detector ........................... I4-5II ~ ~~~~~ ~~~~4.8.3 Soil Vapor Sampling ......................................................... I4-54.8.4 Soil Sampling ................................................................ I4-64.8.5 Groundwater Sampling.......................................................I4-64.8.6 Decontamination.............................................................I4-74.8.7 Sample Preservation, Containers, and Holding Times ...................... I4-7

5.0 Sample Chain-of-Custody and Documentation..................................................I5-1B ~ ~~~~~~~5.1 Field Documentation .................................................................... I5-15.2 Sample Identification Numbers and Labeling...........................................I5-25.3 Chain-of-Custody Procedures .......................................................... I5-2C ~ ~~~ ~~~5.4 Verification of Sample Receipt..........................................................I5-4

6.0 Packing and Shipment of Samples .............................................................. I6-17.0 Investigation-Derived Waste.....................................................................I7-18.0 Chemical Quality Control ............ ............................................................ 8-1

8.1 Project Description ...................................................................... I8-18.2 Project Organization and Responsibility ................................................ 8-18.3 Data Quality Objectives.................................................................I8-1

8.3.1 Field Screening Data ......................................................... 8-38.3.2 On Site Mobile Laboratory ................................................... I8-3

8.3.3 Definitive Data................................................................ 8-38.4 Analytical Methods ............................. ;........................................I8-4

bx.xbncimydocmeU'fcnkhsu do 26flec11woApn ad h&,piw*.or .-fdoe

814,V2 P/-i

t ~~~~~~~~8.5 Data Validation .......................................................................... 8-49.0 Response to Comments ........................................................................... 9-1

-~~~~ ~10. References........................................................................................ 10-1

f~ ~~~bqd~k~dtd pjlp~~

I~~~~140 Vi

List of Figures

Figurel1-1 Vicinity Map.................................................................................1-4Figure 1-2 Site Map .................................................................................... 1-5

I ~~~~Figure 1-3 Building 2270 ............................................................. I................. 1-6Figure 1-4 Building 3426............................................................................... 1-7Figure 1-5 Building 1138............................................................................... 1-8

~~~ ~~Figure 1-6 HAZMAT Area.............................................................................. 1-9Figure 1-7 Building 1161 ............................................................................. 1-10Figure 2-1 Project Organization Chart ................................................................. 2-3Figure 5-1 Example of COG Form ..................................................................... 5-3Figure 5-2 Cooler Receipt Form ....................................................................... 5-5Figure 7-1 Container Markings for Liquid and Solid Waste............................................. 7-2

List of Tables_______________________

I ~~~~Table 2-1 Project Contacts............................................................................ 2-4Table 3-1 Intended Use of Data and Appropdiate Quality Control Levels ............................. 3-3Table 3-2 Analytical Method References..............................................................3-4Table 4-1 Requirements for Sample Containers, Volume, Preservation, and Holding Times .........4-8Table 8-1 Project Personnel and Responsibility ...................................................... 8-1Table 8-2 Data Quality Objectives (Soil Vapor) ....................................................... 8-2Table 8-3 Data Quality Objectives (Soil).............................................................. 8-2Table 8-4 Data Quality Objectives (Groundwater) .................................................... 8-2

b~.A~bni mydooienlafceeliu do 2ir ..*Inad MspIv.c*Wnf do

814102 IV-iii

I ~Acronyms and Abbreviations ___________________

ADEC Alaska Department of Environmental ConservationAFB Air Force Base

I ~~AFCEE Air Force Center for Environmental ExcellenceAK Alaskabgs below ground surface

I E~~NCI BNC International, Inc.BTEX benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes

Oc ~~~~degrees Celsiusr ~~CITS Combat Information Transportation SystemL ~CES Civil Engineering Squadron

CLP Contract Laboratory Program

COG Chain-of-CustodyCRZ Contamnination Reduction ZoneDO Delivery OrderDRO diesel-range organicsDQO data quality objectivesEMSS Environmental Management Solutions ServicesEPA U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyERPIMS Environmental Resources Program Information Management SystemeV electron volt

b ~~EZ Exclusion ZoneOF degrees FahrenheitFID flame ionization detector

j ~~FSP Field Sampling PlanGC ~~~~gas chromatography

GPS global positioning systemp ~ ~GRO gasoline-range organicsID identificationIDW investigation-derived wasteI ~ ~IT IT Alaskamg/kg milligrams per kilogrammL milliliterNADS83 North American Datum of 1983PARCC precision, accuracy, representativeness, comparability, and completenessPID photoionization detector11 ~POC Point of Contactppm parts per millionppm-v parts per million by volumeII ~QA quality assuranceQAPP Quality Assurance Project PlanQC quality control

QCP Quality Control PlanRRO residual-range organics

bi:.z:bc mydocuenUilaeetw ldo 26*t.1pmjrct4Iana VIhp~W ~l~-fdCCA/1"2 IV-iv

I ~SAP Sampling and Analysis PlanSHSR Site Health and Safety RepresentativeI ~sow Statement of Work

Sz ~~~~support zoneUST underground storage tankVOC volatile organic compound

WP Work Plan

I~~~~~& ,I~ RM2I-

1.0 Project Description

1.1 Introductiont ~~In 2000, Environmental Management Solutions Services (EMSS) prepared a report summarizing

the analytical data generated during the installation of the utility vault and underground

communication conduit for the Combat Information Transportation System (CITS) at Eielson* ~~Air Force Base (AFB) located near Fairbanks, Alaska. Associated analytical data suggest that

five (previously unidentified) areas have been impacted by petroleum hydrocarbons.

The 354 b~ Civil Engineering Squadron (CES), with support from the U.S. Air Force Center forEnvironmental Excellence (AFCEE), is performing additional site characterization of the fivesites to facilitate the development of appropriate closure scenarios with the Alaska Departmentof Environmental Conservation (ADEC). This Work Plan (WP) and Sampling and Analysis PlanII ~ ~(SAP) describe the site characterization activities to be performed by IT Alaska (IT) to progressthis objective.

The work will be performed under AFCEE Contract F41624-00-D-8026 and Delivery Order

(DO) 0026. The work is described in the Statement of Work (SOW) titled "CITS Petroleumb ~~Contamination Study, Project fi FTQW20027615" from AFCEE dated June 21, 2001 (AFCEE,

2001).

1.2 Site Description and LocationEielson AFB is located within the Fairbanks North Star Borough approximately 21 milessoutheast of Fairbanks, Alaska, along the Richardson Highway. A map showing the location ofEielson AFB is presented in Figure 1-1. A map of Eielson AFB, identifying the five sites thatare the subject of this assessment, is presented in Figure 1-2.

Eielson MFB was established in 1944, and military operations have continued to the present.The mission for Eielson AFI3 is to train and equip personnel for close air support of groundtroops in an arctic environment. The base occupies approximately 19,270 acres. Approximately

h ~~3,650 acres are improved or partially improved. The remaining land encompasses forest,P ~~wetlands, lakes, and ponds. Most of the developed portions of Eielson AFB have beenB ~~constructed on fill material. The resultant topography is generally flat and has an average

elevation about 50 feet above mean sea level.

b-x;Ibnc nM dcnrne,fl~&=t &. 261pjcA..o4La and h&pl"piLo4nf do

The water table in the study areas is estimated to range from 5 to 15 feet below ground surface(bgs). The average hydraulic conductivity of the aquifer is representative of a clean sand or

gravel (ranging from 500 feet/day to 1500 feet/day), which agrees with the observed geology of

the area. These values correspond to high groundwater seepage velocities (2 to 6 feet/day) even

with the typically low gradient of 0.001 and an assumed porosity of 0.25 for sand and gravel.

Groundwater flow direction in the subject study areas is generally north-northwest.

The region has warm summers and extremely cold winters. Summer temperatures range from39 to 72 degrees Fahrenheit OF) on average, while winter temperatures range from minus 22 to

minus 26 tF. Extreme variances range from minus 60 to 90 OF. This area receives

approximately 11I inches of precipitation, which includes approximately 70 inches of snowfall

annually.L

The following site descriptions were developed from information presented in the Combat

Information Transportation System (CITS), Final Field Report (EMSS, 2000). The five subjectsites are:

f ~~~~1) Building 2207 (Dining Hall) - Two subsurface soil samples, designated SEG12A and

SEG12B3, were collected along the southeast edge of the area (see Figure 1-3). Both

samples were collected at a depth of 2 to 4 feet bgs. Diesel-range organics (DRO)and gasoline-range organics (GRO) results associated with sample SEG12A were

4030 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) and 23 mg/kg, respectively. DRO and GRO

results associated with sample SEG12B were 17,400 mg/kg and 55 mg/kg,

respectively.

2) Building 3426 -Two subsurface soil samples, designated MH2-I IA and SEG94A,were collected from the area between Building 3426 and the former campground area

(see Figure 1-4). Sample MH12-1 IA was collected at a depth of 8 feet bgs and

displayed DRO and GRO concentrations of 7680 mg/kg and 12 mglkg, respectively.Sample SEG94A was collected at a depth of 2 to 4 feet bgs and displayed DRO and

GRO concentrations of 986 mg/kg and 17 mg/kg, respectively. The EMSS report

indicates that hydrocarbon contamination appears to be confined to the immediate

vicinity of these two samples, at depths greater than 4 feet bgs.

3) Building 1138 -Nine subsurface soil samples, designated SEG314A through SEGI14,

f ~~~~~were collected along the west side of Flightline Avenue in front of Building 11 38 (seeFigure 1-5). The samples were collected at depths of 2 to 4 feet bgs. Noteworthy

F ~~~~~analytical results are limited to DRO concentrations associated with samples

b~rbndn~dccme~&fn~a d 26prjec~vo~k an hIV-o4an-2c

SEGl4A, SEG14B and SEGl4D); 332 mg/kg, 332 mg/kg and 5950 mg/kg,

respectively.

4) HAZMAT Area - Two subsurface soil samples, designated MH4-20A and MH4-20-

IA, were collected from the area to the south of the HAZMAT Area and adjacent toFlightline Avenue (see Figurel-6). Sample MH-20A was collected at the

"groundwater interface", or approximately 9 feet bgs. Analytical results for DRO andGRO were 166 mg/kg and 11I mg/kg, respectively. Sample MIH-20-lIA was collected

at a depth of 8 feet bgs. Analytical results for DRO and GRO were 22 mg/kg and 431mg/kg, respectively. The EMS S report indicated that hydrocarbon contamination in

this area appears to be limited to "the groundwater interface", or smear zone.

5) Building 1161 - Three subsurface soil samples, designated NM4-1 A through NMI4-I C, were collected at one sampling location on the east side of Flightline Avenue,across from Building 11 61 (see Figure 1-7). Samples MH14-1lA & B are fieldduplicates and were collected at a depth of 9 feet bgs. Associated DRO results were314 mg/kg and 1200 mg/kg, respectively. Associated residual-range organics (RRO)

L ~~~~~show similar variability; 449 mg/kg and 11 50 mg/kg, respectively. Note that the

surrogate recovery associated with duplicate sample MH4-1lB is 260%, well outsidethe acceptable recovery range of 60-120%. Accordingly, the comparatively high

results associated with sample MH4-IB may be considered suspect. Sample MH4-1ICwas collected from the same location at a depth of 5 feet bgs. DRO and RRO results

were 443 mg/kg and 898 mg/kg, respectively.

B~

Ii

A/OW ~~~~~~~~~~IV-1-3

r LLJ~~~~~~~~~~~-

< Zn

o 2- (AD~~~~~~~~~~~~V

Li- ~~~~~~~zo

2 <

U~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

L)~~~~~~~~~~~~U<u

F-.~~~~~

£~~~~~~~~~~~

<~~<0~~~~~

<~~~~*s

C-o: z w 7

0 C 'C~~~~

I-, 0., a~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

-fl~~~~~~0

C-)~~~~~~~~~~~~~C

a~~~~~~~~~~~F

w 4

C7~~~~~~~~~~~~~C

I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~tcw~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~I

I j q~~~~~~~oe)c E

.0 1 I, (1

1-f ~~~~~~~~~~~--0

4, 0~~

0 w~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~0

XL~~~~~~~~~~~~~L

0~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

0 C09 0 ) CLC

C, C~~~~~~~-,a

C-0

CL

LU.>

~~~~~g- Rju OF-0~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~C~

&~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~0

T~~~~~~~~~~~c

*Sample pointsBuildingFire HydrantUtilidor

I!~~~~~~~SdwlRoad Centerlines

ii j ~~~~~~Parking AreaDriveway

10 0 10 20 FeetBuilding 2207

LOCATION MAP FOR SAMPLES Chectb Dole -Nor. Ashley, P.E. 1/9/02 829947

EIELSON CITS CONTAMINENTS ASSESSMENTEIELSON AFB, ALASKA F~gaeNo,

T. Ele, PhD. 1-3IT ALASKA, INC. UTESTESARFCEBLDG 2207

A

*Sample pointsBuildingFire Hydrant

Sidewalk

Road CenterlinesParking AreaDriveway

10 0 10 20 Feetlw~~~ml F ~Building 3426

LOCATION MAP FOR SAMPLES Y C. op4N

EIELSON CITS CONTAMINENTS ASSESSMENT T sly .. iam2[q94EIELSON AFBl, ALASKA catogragw Fqn .

T, Eley, PhD, 1-4IT ALASKA, INC. UNITED STATES AIR FORCE Ffle BLDG 3426

82997-41000

A

10 0 10 20 Feet~~~~~~~~~~~ SO 4AD

BuildiBuldngn13

Road Centerlines ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~Ckcedy teN

IT ALASKA, INC.UNITEDSTTE AI1FRC38D 13it - P 6S97404J0

GR41A 0 0**4 m& I

*Sample points-M Buildingt~j Fire Hydrant

Utilidlor-Sidewalk

Road CenterlinesLParking Area

Driveway

10 0 1020 Feet!1111~~~ HAZMAT A~rea

LOCATION MAP FOR SAMPLES by a N

EIELSON CITS CONTAMINENTS ASSESSMENT T, Ashley, PFE. 1(9/02 82997

EIELSON AFB, ALASKA I~g~t~ FoxmnNOT0,7.E3e , P. 146

IT AUSKA, INC. ~UNITED STATES AIR FORCE HAZMAT Ares

*Sample pointsINBuilding

Fire HydrantUtilidorSidewalkRoad Centerlines

L Parking AreaDriveway

10 0 10 20 Feet

Building 1161CtWAWI bt On. ~ t &LOCATION MAP FOR SAMPLES TAhePE 112894

EIELSON CITS CONTAMINENTS ASSESSMENTTAslyPE1902[27EIELSON AFB, ALASKA crowd" F" No,~~~1-

EIELSON MB, AlASKAeyPhD 1-IT ALASKA, INC. UNTE TAESAR OREBLDG 1 161

U It ~ ~ ~ UITDSATSAR OC

2.0 Project Organization and Responsibilities

T his project is being performed by IT through a subcontracting agreement with BNC

International, Inc. (BNCI) of Anchorage, Alaska, under the direction of A.FCEE and the EielsonAFB 354th CES. A project organization chart is presented on Figure 2-1. The IT program

7 ~~management office for this project is located in Knoxville, Tennessee. The field activities for theproject will be managed and staffed by personnel from BNCI. The names and telephonenumbers of project contacts are presented in Table 2-1.

h ~~Sampling services will be provided by the BNCI sample technician, Ms. Molly Brodin with

oversight by the BNCI project manager, Mr. Greg DuBois, who will ensure compliance with the

IL requirements of this document and its quality assurance (QA) and quality control (QC) protocols.The Project Manager has extensive experience with the use of direct-push technology employed

for this project, soil and groundwater sampling, and soil vapor sampling and sample handlingprocedures. The Sample Technician has field experience in soil sampling and groundwater

monitoring sampling, and sample handling procedures. The sample technician will be the

sample custodian and will be responsible for sampling, recording field sampling data, and

shipping samples to an off-site laboratory. For this project, the Project Manager will serve as the

Site Health and Safety Representative (SHSR).

II ~~The sample technician responsibilities include the following:

* Performing the sampling in accordance with approved procedures and methods asdefined in this SAP

* Ensuring that field quality control samples are acquired as specified by the SAP

* Initiating and implementing the chain-of-custody (COG) procedures

o Completing the sampling forms and sampling logs

* Packaging and shipping samples to the analytical laboratory

The Project Manager/Chemist, Mr. Greg DuBois, also has the following responsibilities:

k *~~~~ Preparing this WP and SAP

* Providing overall supervision for the sampling activities

I

sumb ydocutttsI~eW do 260WMA.*.oa ad hUsplcr* j'nf dx V.2

I ~~~~~* Selecting the qualified off-site laboratory for the analyses

4 *~~~~~ Reviewing and validating laboratory data

C.~ ~ b.1m yd.WfW 20j6*== &p.Oa-d

I~ ~~V12I--

Figure 2-1*1 ~~~~~~~~~Project Organization Chart

I ~~~~~~~~~~~~Elelson Air Farce Base354th CES

Mr. Brent Koenen

Air Farce Center forEnvironmental Excellence

Cindy Hood

Glenn Quarles - Program Manager

Ms. Marilyn Butler - Subcontract Ma~nager

Ms. Laura Noland - Project Assistan

FBNC international, Inc.

P ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Geg D~isM1

MlyBrodin

Subcotot

larhfflcmno.n~jctlajlgi M89O do 59 deli4/anOWdaedFipa 2-1.,IV2-81410602 I - -

1'

Table 241

Project Cnat

Name Position Company Location Phone Fax

Linda Fellows Contracting Officer AFCEE Elnmendorf AFB, AK 907-552-9762 907-552-1822

I ~~~Cindy Hood Contracting Officer's AFCEE Elmendorf AFB, AK 907-552-9618 907-552-1822Representative

Brent Koenen Project Manager Eielson AFB Eielson AFB, AK 907-377-1678 907-377-3367I S~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~54thCES

Glenn Quarles Program Manager IT Knoxville, TN 865-694-7320 865-690-3626

Ms. Marilyn Butler Subcontract Manager IT Knoxville, TN 865-694-7424 865-694-7443

Laura Noland Project Assistant IT Fairbanks, AK 907-479-7720 907-479-7723f ~~~Greg DuBois Project Manager, BNCI Anchorage, AK 907-522-6103 907-522-6153Project Chemist, andsite Health andSafety Officer

Molly Brodin Sample Technician BNCI Anchorage, AK 907-522-6103 907-522-6153

L

r

b-x:Ibnci my donemnts.feeeld do 26pjeI .4Inad h&,p~oklan~fd.do

IV-2-4

3.0 Project Scope, Schedule and Objectives

This section describes the scope, schedule, objectives and approach for project sampling and

V ~~~analytical activities.

3.1 Scope, Schedule and ObjectivesThe scope of work forthe project includes the acquisition of soil vapor, soil and groundwater

samples to characterize the nature and extent of petroleum contamination at the five subject sites.Ti ~~The site characterization data will be used to facilitate the development of appropriate site

closure scenarios with the ADEC.

At each of the five sites, environmental characterization using direct push technology for soilvapor, soil and groundwater sample collection will be performed. Specifically, approximately 13locations at each site, specified by the IT Project Manager in consultation with the Eielson AMBProject Manager, will be assessed using soil gas probes to be installed by direct push technology.At each of the 13 locations, two soil gas probes will be installed; one at mid vadose zone (1/2way down in the unsaturated zone), one just above the water table (immediately above thecapillary fringe). Depths to groundwater are expected to range from 5 feet bgs to approximately

15 feet bgs.

Soil gas samples will be collected in 1 liter Tedlar® bags from each probe using a vacuum boxapparatus. The samples will immediately be submitted for GRO and benzene, toluene,

P ~~ethylbenzene and xylenes (BTEX) analysis at an on-site mobile analytical laboratory. Flameionization detector (FID) and photoionization detector (PID) readings of the extracted vaporswill also be documented.

The on-site mobile laboratory will analyze the soil vapor samples for GRO/BTEX using gaschromatography (GC) methods AKllI/EPA SW 8021B. Sample turnaround times are expectedto range from 30 minutes to 45 minutes. ADEC specified QAIQC practices and frequencies will

Ip be observed and documented.

Based on the analytical results obtained (i.e., PID, FID and GC), approximately S of the 13locations will be specified for soil sample collection using direct push split spoons (orequivalent). In addition, approximately 3 of the 13 locations will be specified for installation ofdirect push temporary groundwater monitoring wells. Direct push wells will have 2-foot stainlesssteel screens and will be advanced such that the screened interval bisects the water table surface.

b-xibc my docwentlafcei do 26ocjc~. or11 Ia. and hdslvO" lanf dc

t14M2 IV-3-1

Li

[ ~~Wells will be compliant with applicable ADEC regulations and specifications, and finished as

above grade with locking caps, and removed upon receipt of acceptable data as determined by

the Air Force. Soil vapor probes will be removed from each location upon completion of

characterization activities.

L It is anticipated that two days of fieldwork will be required for each site; one day to install the

T, ~~soil gas probes at 13 locations, the second day to collect 8 soil samples using split spoons (orequivalent) and install 3 groundwater monitoring wells.

I f ~~Soil and groundwater samples collected for off-site analysis will be analyzed for GRO/BTEX by

AKIOI/EPA SW 8021 B and DRO/RRO by AKIO02/103. Because resulting data will be used tofacilitate site closure, applicable data packages and data validation procedures will be ADEC

L ~~compliant.

Field work is currently scheduled to start the week of August 7, 2002. Field work schedule

- ~~includes mobilization, Dig Permit(s) acquisition, field work, mobile laboratory analysis, global

p ~~positioning system (GPS) data point location, demobilization and off-site laboratory analysis.

Project is funding limited. Accordingly, field work accruals will be monitored by the IT Project

Manager on a daily basis, and field work will be terminated upon applicable budget expenditure.

A complete project schedule is presented in Appendix A.

Note that field screening and on-site laboratory analytical results will be used to guide theii ~~investigation at each site. Therefore, exact sampling locations are not explicitly identified herein.

However, the sampling approach at each site will incorporate the following elements:

I) Installation of one well immediately down gradient of the impacted area todetermine depth to water table, and provide indication of groundwater quality.

2) Installation of up to 26 soil vapor probes (i.e., 2 probes @ 13 locations) to assessL ~~~~~~hydrocarbon impact to the area's vadose zone.

3) Based on the results of 2) above, collection of approximately 8 soil samples from

the investigation area.

4) Based on the results of 2) above, installation of approximately 3 groundwater

monitoring wells to provide additional groundwater characterization information.

As mentioned above, the actual sampling locations will be determined by Brent Koenen, the

Eielson AFB Project Manager, in collaboration with the BNCI Project Manager.

b~i y don emt1s.feeWfr do 26\orjeA.or&In on h&sp1wo4 Inf dwe P --

'T

t ~~3.2 Intended Use of the Data

Analytical data acquired during this project will be of sufficient quality and quantity to facilitatethe development of appropriate site closure scenarios in accordance with the data uses

summarized in Table 3-1.

L ~~Table 3-1Intended Use of Data and Appropriate Quality Control Levels

Data Use QC Package Characteristics of DataField screening of soil Not applicable Qualitative determination of ionizable compounds in soilvapor ____________ vapor using a portable PLO and FID

Soil vapor Per ADEC and EPA Quantitative determination of GRO/BTEX in soil vapor usingcharacterization requirements an on-site transportable GC; ADEC compliant data package

Soil characterization Per AFCEE CAPP, Version 3.0 Quantitative, compound specific, definitive analysis; fullCLP-type data package to support assessment of data

_____ _____ ____ _____ _ __ _____ _____ ____ _____ ____ usability

Groundwater Per AFCEE QAPP, Version 3.0 Quantitative, compound specific, definitive analysis; fullcharacterization CLP-type data package to support assessment of data

PID denotes photolonization detector. sblt

FID denotes flame ionization detector.BTEX denotes benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylenes.II ~ ~~~GRO denotes gasoline-range organics.QAPP denotes Quality Assurance Project P/an.C/P denotes Contract Laboratory Program.

3.3 Analytical Laboratoiy RequirementsAnalytical method requirements are presented in Table 3-2. On-site GC analysis of soil vapor

samples will be conducted in accordance with applicable ADEC and U.S. EnvironmentalProtection Agency (EPA) method and guidance specification (ADEC, 1999, EPA, 1996 and

EPA, 1997). Off-site analytical testing of soil and groundwater will be performed by a qualified,

ADEC-approved laboratory, capable of complying with the requirements of the AFCEE Quality

Assurance Program Plan (QAPP), Version 3.0. To ensure that soil and groundwater

characterization are not based on questionable data, analytical data will undergo a laboratoryquality review. The Project Chemist will review and validate 100 percent of the data in

accordance with the specifications presented in Section 8 of this document.

b-x~bnci my docUUf~Menafecs d 26 Wpojectlwo4Ia and Ipwrla-dcMV"2 IV-3-3

Table 3-2Analytical Method References

Analyte Method ReferenceBTEX EPA 80218B EPA, Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,

Physical/Chemical Methods, SW-846, December 1996F ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~(on-site and off-site labs), and AFCEE QAPP Version______________________ ~~~~~~~3.0, 1998 (off-site lab only)

GRO AK 101 ADEC Underground Storage Tanks Procedures£ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Manual, July 25, 1999 (on-site and off-site labs)

DRO AK 102 ADEC Underground Storage Tanks Procedures[ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Manual, July 25, 1999 (off-site lab only)RRO AK 103 ADEC Underground Storage Tanks Procedures

STEX'denotes benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylenes.MaulJly2,19(ofstlbon)

GRO denotes gasoline-range organics.DOR denotes diesel-ian ye organics.RRO denotes residual-range organics.EPA denotes US, Environmental Protection Agency.

Analytical data for characterization samples will be delivered to AFCEE in both hard copy andP ~~CD-ROM (e.g., Excel) formats. However, AFCEE electronic data deliverable requirements

associated with the Environmental Resources Program Information Management System(ERPIMS) are not required.

3.4 DeliverablesPre-mobilization project deliverables include this WP and SAP, and a project Health and SafetyPlan. Results of the assessment will be documented in a project Site Assessment Report and an

r ~~Analytical Data Report.

The Site Assessment Report shall document site assessment activities and results and includeassessments of the nature and extent of petroleum contamination at the five sites in terms ofpotentially applicable cleanup levels including risk-based alternative action level precedentsestablished for similar sites at Eielson AFB. The Analytical Data Report will include all raw datapackages and the results of associated data validation activities as described in Section 8 of thisdocument. The deliverables will be provided to Eielson MFB and the AFCEE in both hard copyand CD-ROM formats approximately 45 days after receipt of data packages from the off-sitelaboratory.

y-~nin davmetslfceek do 26,twop k a nd. ksNIn-doc&1"2 ~~~~~~~~~~IV-3-4

1 ~4.0 Field Activities

£ ~~This section describes the sampling and analysis procedures that will be used to achieve the

objectives and scope of work outlined in Section 3. Specific field activities include security,utilities location, grab sampling, field screening and analysis of soil vapor, soil and groundwater

to document associated concentrations of BTEX, CR0, DRO, and RRO, as applicable.

4.1 Site Security

[ ~~Site access will be controlled at all times during the project. Currently, there is no open publicaccess to Eielson AFB. Site access is limited to contractors, military personnel and dependents.

¶1 ~~Pass and registration for project personnel will be coordinated with the Eielson Point of Contact

(POC), Mr. Brent Koenen, (907) 377-1678, approximately two weeks prior to mobilization.

P ~~Field personnel will also monitor access to the work areas and stop activities if unauthorized

persons enter the work zones. An Exclusion Zone (EZ), a Contamination Reduction Zone (CR2),and a Support Zone (SZ) will be established at all work locations as described in Section 4 of the

project Environmental Health and Safety Plan. Signs, barricades and barrier tape will be used to

clearly designate these zones. The SHSR will maintain and update a site visitors log on a daily

basis. In addition, all activities performed and all personnel on site will be recorded in fieldlogbooks maintained by the BNCI project team.

4.2 Utility Location/Dig PermitsP ~~Prior to implementation of field activities, all underground utilities will be located and clearlyI ~~marked. The utility location will be accomplished by completing a "Base Civil Engineering

Work Clearance Request" (Air Force Form 103), or Dig Permit, and coordinating withI! ~ ~applicable Eielson AFB, GCI or PTI personnel as required to obtain timely completion of same.All Dig Permit requests and activities will be coordinated through the Eielson POC, Mr. Brent

Ii ~Koenen, (907) 377-1678. A copy of the "Base Civil Engineering Work Clearance Request" formis provided in Appendix B.

~~ ~ 4.3 Soil Gas Sampling and AnalysisAn active soil gas sampling method will be used at each location which will allow for rapidsample collection. Upon installation of the soil gas probe and associated polyethylene sample

tubing a PID will be attached to the out-hole end of the tubing to purge soil gas from the probe

location. Purging will proceed until a stable concentration of organic compounds is observed on

b-xtbc my docnetUfce~iu do 26~pmymllwti.or~a and h&splWor~lan-f doj V4~&V2 IV-4-1

L ~~the P1ID. At a minimum, two volumes of air will be purged from the tubing and probe apparatusprior to obtaining a soil gas sample.

Qualitative analysis of soil gas will be performed at each probe location using portable PID and

FID instruments. A PID equipped with an 10.6 electron volt (eV) lamp will be attached to theout hole end of the of the tubing. Once the meter reading has stabilized, the concentration of

organic compounds as recorded on the PID will be documented. Similarly, an FID will be

attached to the out-hole end of the sample tubing and the stable concentration of organiccompounds will be documented. The meter readings will be considered stable when the reading

L ~~does not fluctuate more than 2 parts per million (ppm) for 5 to 10 seconds.

A soil gas sample will then be collected from the probe location by attaching a 1 liter Tedlar®&

bag to the out hole end of the tubing,.placing the bag in a vacuum container and applying avacuum to the outside of the bag causing the bag to draw in the soil gas sample. Immediately

following sample collection, the Tedlar® bag will be sealed and submitted to the on-site mobile

analytical laboratory for quantitative analysis of organic compounds.

Upon completion of soil gas sampling at each location, the soil gas probe and associated tubing

p ~~will be removed. The boring will be abandoned by the direct push subcontractor in accordancewith applicable standards.

4.4 Soil Boring and Soil Sample CollectionSoil boring locations will be determined based on the results of the on-site analysis of soil gas

P ~~samples collected from the soil gas probes. Soil borings will be installed using the same directpush device used to install the soil gas probes. Continuous soil recovery is expected during this

effort at intervals of 24 or 48 inches.

The subsurface lithology of each soil boring will be documented on a soil boring log along with

applicable PID and FID soil vapor field screening results. Soil samples will be collected for

laboratory analysis at the discretion of the BNCI Project Manager in consultation with theEielson POC, Mr. Brent Koenen. It is expected that 8 soil samples will be collected at each siteto provide definitive soil characterization data.

Soil borings will terminate at the water table. Each soil boring will be abandoned by the directpush subcontractor in accordance with applicable standards.

b-x:lbnd ny dxmr~Wfceekn do 26~pwj eA .,o4Ia an h&,p1.or*lanfd.do91"2 ~~~~~~~~~~IV-4-2

4.5 Groundwater Monitoring Well Installation and Sample Collection- ~~Temporary groundwater monitoring well locations will be determined based on the results of on-

site soil gas analysis results. The temporary wells will be installed using the same direct pushdevice used in the previous operations.

L ~~The wells will be advanced directly into the subsurface without additional annular space belowthe bottom of the well or around the well. Each well is to be constructed of 1.5 inch diameter

L stainless steel pipe with a 24 inch stainless steel screen. Each well will be advanced to a depthwhich will allow the screened interval to bisect the water table. Wells will also be finished as

above grade with the option having locking caps if necessary. A construction log detailing thetotal depth of the well and its screened interval will be completed for each well.

ii ~~Following well installation, the depth to water will be measured to establish local groundwaterelevation and calculated the volume of water in the well. The wells will be purged and sampledusing low flow purging techniques in general accordance with those methods described in theEPA document EPAI540/S-95/504, "Low-Flow (Minimal Drawdown) Ground-water SamplingProcedures", by Robedt W. Puls and Michael J. Barcelona, April 1996.

The temporary wells will be left in the ground until laboratory analytical data has been receivedand the data judged to be acceptable for use in this site assessment. When acceptable to the AirForce, the wells will be removed and the holes abandoned by the subcontractor performing direct

B ~~push services with hydrated bentonite.

4.6 Sampling Location DocumentationAll direct push soil vapor probe, soil boring and monitoring well locations will be horizontallylocated by documenting the GPS coordinates using North American Datum of 1983 (NAD) 83)

format. Additionally, the depth of each probe, boring and well will be documented in applicablesoil boring and well completion logs.

4.7 Quality Control Sampling and FrequencyF ~~Field QC samples will be collected throughout the field phase of the project. The purpose of the

QC samples is to assess the precision and accuracy of the analytical data and the performance ofthe off-site laboratory. QC samples collected in the field will consist of duplicate samples, travelblanks, and temperature blanks, as follows:

*Field duplicates are secondary samples collected at the same time and from thesame source as their corresponding primary samples. The identity of the duplicateis withheld from the laboratory until after analysis is completed. The purpose of

8/4/2 IV-4-3

rnL

L duplicate samples is to assess the overall sampling effort. Field duplicates willrepresent at least 10% of the primary samples.

*Methanol Travel Blanks are 40-millileter (mL) glass vials containing Ottawa sandor other appropriate standard soil or sediment, and 20 mL of methanol of the samelot that is used to preserve soil samples for the GROIBTEX analysis. The methanolblanks are prepared by the analytical laboratory and are shipped to the site alongwith the empty sample containers. At the site, the trip blanks are kept with thesample containers during sampling and are stored in the sample coolers until

I ~~~~~received by the analytical laboratory. The blanks are analyzed for BTEX and GROalong with the samples. The purpose of these blanks is to detect contaminantspresent in the methanol solvent or introduced during sample shipping and storage.

!L ~~~~~Methanol travel blanks will be included with coolers containing soil samples forGROIBTEX analysis.

L * ~~~~~Temperature Blanks are 40-mL vials of tap water that are shipped in each coolercontaining field samples that require cooling. Laboratory personnel measure the

p ~~~~~~temperature of the cooler upon arrival to the laboratory using the temperatureblank. A temperature blank will be placed in every cooler shipped from the projectsite to the laboratory.

~~ ~ 4.8 Field Procedures

This section describes the field procedures that will be implemented to achieve the project

sampling objectives.

4.8.1 Field Screening with aPhotolonizatian DetectorContractor personnel will use a portable PID to screen soil vapor soil samples. The PID

r ~~measures the concentration of total volatile organic compounds in the pore space of the impacted

soils. The PID will be calibrated daily according tothe manufacturer's specifications. Theprocedure for PID operation is summarized below:

* Turn on the instrument according to the manufacturer's directions and allow thep ~~~~~~lamp to stabilize. Establish "zero" for the PID calibration using atniosphenic air.j ~~~~~~Verify the instrument is in calibration by reading a known concentration, usually in

the range of 50 to 1 00 parts per million by volume (ppm-v) of isobutylene in air. IfP ~~~~~~the instrument reading is more than 25% off the true value, then recalibrate the PID

following manufacturer's directions.

* Connect the PID to the soil vapor probe using new polyethylene tubing at eachsampling location. Run the PID until the pump has purged approximately twoprobe volumes and readings stabilize (i.e., equilibrium has been reached).

* Record the maximum sustained reading from the instrument.

b-x;bndn docUmatkfcn~iu do , ve~i.4a n h&p. ,#d.-fdnjk

IV4-4

4.8.2 Field Screening with a Flame Ionization DetectorContractor personnel will also use a portable FID to screen soil vapor samples. The FID uses a

hydrogen flame to ionize organic vapors. FIDs provide significant response to most organicvapors, however they are more sensitive to aliphatic hydrocarbons because these hydrocarbonsbum more efficiently than aromatic hydrocarbons.

The exact calibration for the FID will depend on which model will be used, however most FIDsare calibrated using a methane standard. Sample testing and documentation procedures will beperformed using the same methods described in the previous section for PID screening.

4.&3 Soil Vapor SamplingNumerous QAIQC procedures are to be performed as part of an active soil gas survey to ensurethat the samples are representative of subsurface conditions. The following describes theprocedures that will be employed during the active soil vapor survey:

* All soil gas samples will be collected using the standardized procedures presentedherein, and will be performed by the same project team members throughout thefield effort to help ensure that soil vapor results are representative of subsurfaceconditions.

* Sampling will be completed mn a relatively short peniod of time (ex. each site shouldbe sampled within the same day) because temporal variations such as temperature,humidity, barometric pressure and rain can affect contaminant concentrations.

* Decontamination procedures will be practiced to prevent contaminant gain or lossthat results from adsorption onto sampling equipment. The soil vapor probes willbe verified as clean following decontamination by collecting "blank" vapor samplesusing the FIt) and PIt).

a The insides of the sample train components (probe and tubing) will be kept as drtyas possible because water can raise or lower contamination values.

* Ambient air present in the sample train will be purged prior to sample collection. Aminimum of two probe volumes will be removed prior to sampling, equilibriumwill be attained (i.e., meter readings stabilize) prior to documenting results.

* Blank samples will be tested regularly to ensure that decontamination proceduresare adequate and to determine background volatile organic compound (VOC)levels.

* Duplicate soil gas samples will be collected each day (at a rate of I for every IOsamples) to assess the reproducibility of the data.

• Sample containers (Tedlar® bags) will be monitored for leakage.

b-z.Ibncn dooaBk~fw~dU do 26j.iA,.o4Ian adhbi s4Ii o&4iVY IV-4-5

L ~ ~ ~~~*Used polypropylene tubing will be disposed of as solid waste immediately aftereach use.

j ~4.&4 Soil SamplingThe following describes the procedure to collect soil samples recovered from the soil borings.

I ~~To collect soil, the Project Geologist will follow these steps:

* Soil samples will be collected using decontaminated split spoons using direct pushdrilling methods or hollow stemn auger drilling methods. The direct push tooling isattached to a CME 55 drill rig. Therefore, if sample recovery is not adequate usingthe 1.5" diameter direct push split spoon, the drillers will be able to switch tohollow stem auger drilling methods and use a 2.5 inch diameter split spoon.

* Don an unused clean pair of sampling gloves.

* Use a new, disposable plastic spoon or scoop, or a clean, decontaminated stainlesssteel spoon or scoop as necessary.

e Select samples from representative portions of the recovered soil in the splitspoons/sampling device. For instance, do not collect loose soil from the top of the[ ~~~~~~spilt spoon that may be loose slough material.

* Sample jars will be filled in order of volatility (i.e., BTEX and GRO first, followedby DRO and RRO).

a For analysis of BTEXIGRO, quickly collect soil into a tared 4-ounce glass jar, withas little disturbance to the soil as possible. Add pre-weighed 25-mL aliquots ofF ~ ~~~~methanol/surrogate solution. Record the volume of methanol added on the labeland in the field notebook. Seal the jar with a Teflon® septumn-lined lid.

* For analysis of DRO and RRO, fill the sample jar loosely and seal the jar.

* Label all sample containers and store samples on site at 4 degrees Celsius (0C)±20C until they are transported to the off-site laboratory for analysis.

* Do not add labels to BTEX/GRO soil containers since this will interfere with thep ~~~~~~accurate measurement of soil weight in the tared container. Either record

information on the existing label or record label information on a separate formkeyed to a number on the sample label. Include this form in the cooler when it isshipped to the laboratory.

4.&5 Groundwater SamplingGroundwater sampling will be initiated by measuring the depth-to-water relative to a permanentreference point on top of the well casing using an electric water-level meter. The water columnwill be checked for free product. The wells will be purged and sampled using low flow purgingtechniques in general accordance with those methods described in the EPA document

b-xAbnc ny dacUketlfWki do 260.wroixt.ok ad h&V1wor1tqdocIV-4-6

EPAI54OIS-951504, "Low-Flow (Minimal Drawdown) Ground-water Sampling Procedures", by

Robedt W. Puls and Michael J. Barcelona, April 1996. Observations, field data, and

measurements will be recorded on water-sampling field-data sheets. Each monitoring well will

be purged using a peristaltic pump or equivalent. Purged groundwater will be field-monitored

for temperature, pH, and conductivity. Readings will be taken every 3 to 5 minutes. When threesuccessive readings are + 0.1I degree centigrade or Fahrenheit for temperature, ± 0.1I for pH, and

+3% for conductivity, the well will be sampled.

The groundwater samples will be contained in appropriate laboratory-preserved containers

labeled with the site identification, well number, date, time, analysis required, and the sampler'sinitials. Samples will be immediately placed in a cooler with gel ice for transport to the field

office, and then shipped to the analytical laboratory. Samples will be maintained at a temperature

of 40C (plus or minus 2 degrees) prior to submission to the laboratory.

All non-disposable groundwater sampling equipment will be decontaminated between sampling

events using standard decontamination procedures.

Disposable groundwater sampling materials, such as polypropylene tubing, will be discarded and

disposed of as solid waste.

Purged groundwater and decontamination solutions will be managed according to the procedures

in Section 7.0, Investigation Derived Waste (IDW).

4.8&6 DecontaminationContractor field personnel will avoid decontaminating sampling tools on site by using pre-

cleaned or disposable sampling equipment whenever possible. After using, non-disposable

sampling tools should be bagged, sealed, and returned to the home office warehouse fordecontamination off site. All IDW requiring disposal shall be disposed of in accordance the

specifications presented in Section 7 of this document.

4.8.7 Sample Preservation, Containersand Holding TimesSample containers and sample volumes for analysis of chemical contaminants will comply with

EPA and ADEC requirements. The laboratory will provide pre-cleaned containers for all

samples. Table 4-1 describes the required sample parameters, containers, and preservation for

soil and groundwater samples.

p ~~~b.x~tbnd my docuenLqf ceclen do 246.1.*Ih.o~.n d h&,p W.*knjfdo

84VI2 rV-4-7

I ~~Table 4-1Requirements for Sample Containers, Volume, Preservation, and Holding Times

Matrix Parameter Method Container and Preservative Holding TimeMinimum Volume'

Soil GRO/BTEX AK 101/ EPA 4-ounce amber wide- 250C, 25 ml 28 days8021 B mouth glass jar, Teflon® methanol

septum-lined lid

I ~~~~soil DRO/RRO AK 102/AK 4-ounce amber wide- 40C 14 days to extraction,j ~~~ ~ ~~~~~~~~103 mouth glass jar, Teflon®-4 astoaayi

lined lid40dytoalsi

Groundwater GROIBTEX AK 101/ EPA 2,40 ml VOA vials, 40C, HCI pH< 14 days8021 B Teflon® septum-lined lid 2

Groundwater DRO AK 102 2, 1 liter amber glass 40C, HCI pH-< 7 days to extraction,bottles, Teflon®-lined lid 2 40 days to analysis

Groundwater RRO AK 103 2, 1 liter amber glass 4CC, HCI pH< 7 days to extraction,

I I ~ ~~~~~bottles, Teflon®-lined lid 240 days to analysis6 O~~~~~C denotes degrees Celsius.

~~~~b~L~ d W.ud 20q1Ad~.hW.p~d

t~ ~~8"2I--

* 5.0 Sample Chain-of-Custody and Documentation

L ~~5.1 Field Documentation

A permanently bound logbook with sequentially numbered pages will be kept for proper recordL ~~keeping of sampling activities. The sampler will create a project field log, organized

chronologically, that will include, but will not be limited to, the following:

e Project name and location

a Dates and times

* Names of personnel on site including title and affiliation

1 *~~~~~ Name, signature, title, and affiliation of the sampler

o Weather information, including the estimated temperature, wind speed anddirection, humidity, precipitation, etc.

* Work perforned in the area to be sampled

Ii ~~~~* Photograph log

* Sampling performed, including specifics such as location, type of samples, types ofIt ~ ~~~~tests, log number, etc.

* Copy of information from sample labels

* Field analysis performed, including results, instrument checks, problems, etc., andcalibration record for the field instrumentation

I .~~~~ Deviations from the Field Sampling Plan (FSP)

p ~~~~~* Problems encountered and corrective actions taken, including specifics regardingsampling problems and alternate sampling methods used

* Quality control activities

* Verbal or written instructions

* Health and safety considerations

Standard practices regarding sampling logs will include, but are not limite d to, the following:

* All entries will be made in indelible ink.* Empty or unused pages will be marked with a diagonal line and initialed.* Each page and the end of each day's entries will be signed and dated.* Errors will be marked out with a single diagonal line and initialed.

b-xtbnc my docu Wmens~feed do 26r.d~w4Ina h&IplwolsnfdoeI ~ 812IV-5-l

5.2 Sample Identification Numbers and LabelingThe sample identification (ID) procedure will employ the numbering system described in this

section to ensure the following:

* The identities of QC check samples are concealed from the laboratory.

* A uniform and consistent sample numbering system is used.

z ~~Each sample that will be submitted for chemical analysis will be assigned a sequential numberregardless of the matrix, starting with the first sample collected at the site.

h ~~Samples will be identified as CITS-Site Number-Sequential Number. For example, the thirdsample collected at the Building 2207 site would be labeled CITS-2207-03.

A more extensive sample description, including sampling location and depth, will be recorded inthe sampler's logbook and on the COG form.

Correct labeling and documentation in the field logbook will be required to preventmisidentification of samples and to facilitate interpretation of analytical results. All labels willbe neatly printed with indelible ink.

11 ~~The following information will be recorded on labels:

* Project name or project numberII *~~~~ Name or initials of the collector* Date and time of collection

p ~~~~* Sample ID number

* Analysis required

~~ ~ 5.3 Chain-of-Custody ProceduresCOG documentation is required for each sample to track collection, shipment, laboratory receipt,f ~~custody, and disposal. An example of a COG form is shown in Figure 5-1. One copy willalways accompany the samples, and another copy will be retained for the project files. Eachindividual who has possession of the samples will sign the COG form. A sample is considered to

be in custody under any of the following conditions:

* It is in the actual possession or view of the person who collected the sample.* It has been locked in a secure area.* It has been placed in an area restricted to authorized personnel.

b-rlbnc my do.atra2qfceeLia do 261projwcli.,rplo and h&splwor4lan-f dc

0

'I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~I

s r

0 c

1 26

Ew < cE

LU~~~~~~~~ --

(DM~~~~------------------------------I~~ t -~~c

m -o~z F'Vwt C~

L)~~~~~~~~)C

E C 0 go~~~~~ -C z~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~o

Lli~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~i

go 0 - 0C

firms z 5~~~~~~~~~ '5 iz ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~F F F F

2 - z C

G*~~~

Each sample will be assigned a unique sample identification number, which will be entered onthe COG form. If the samples are transported to an off-site laboratory by a courier service, ther ~ ~courier name and waybill or airbill number will be noted on the COG form. The waybill orairbill will serve as an extension of the COG form. Finally, the original COG form will be placedin a resealable plastic bag, taped to the inside of the cooler lid, and sealed.

I ~~5.4 Verification of Sample ReceiptReceipt of samples will be acknowledged by the laboratory using the Cooler Receipt Formshown in Figure 5-2. This form will note problems in sample packaging, chain-of-custody, orsample preservation. The laboratory will supply a fax copy of the Cooler Receipt Form to theProject Chemist and attach the original to the COG.

r

&.b-xIni mYdometlf ct do 26,orjcwr nad h&splworAn-fdSo84V"2 IV-5-4

0 b.~~~~~~~

iv'- .0~~~~~~~~CD00C

JO NES.3>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~0 +o~w o W

>00~~~~~~~~~~~~0'

aa- I. 0 . r EL

ft .0~~ ~~ ~~~~~~~~~ m . C

2 0~~~~~~~~~O-.2T0a

?U -cj CD CO -e It -UsI _ _ _ i~~~~~~~u .U L

0 IC ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

a,~~~~~~~~~~~~~L C Ca

p. 0 C~~~C3 (V. . o0 EL

a, >.C >00 ID~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~0 -r

a~~~~~~~~~~~

L) -OM 2~~~~~~N

-

ni a

a' 0, Z>- 'O= a ID

U Ii C C0 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~iC

LU < * c

S ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I)

6.0 Packing and Shipment of Samples

Samples will be packed inside ice coolers with inert cushioning material, such as bubble packing

or vermiculite, to prevent breakage of the glass containers. Sufficient ice to keep the samples at4 ± 20C will be double bagged in resealable plastic bags and placed in the cooler. A 40-mi. vialof organic free water will be placed in the cooler to be used by the analytical laboratory as a

-. ~~temperature blank. A COC form will be completed, sealed in a resealable plastic bag, and tapedto the inside of the cooler lid. The cooler will be taped shut with strapping tape, and two chain-

L ~~of-custody seals will be taped across the cooler lid, one on the front and one on the back side ofthe cooler. The samples will then be shipped via overnight delivery to the laboratory. Sampleswill be shipped to the laboratory the same day that they are collected, if possible. Samples thatcannot be shipped the same day will be properly preserved, and custody will be maintained in alocked area. The importance of maintaining the samples at 4 ± 20C while on site and en route to

L ~~the lab will be stressed. The signatures on the COC form and the custody seals are required to be

legible.

If samples are shipped via commercial carrier, the following additional packaging procedures

L ~~will be followed.

* Determine the maximum weight allowed per package by the shipper.

L *~~~~~ Complete the shipping form for the courier and retain it as part of the permanentdocumentation.

* After acceptance by the shipper, wrap cooler completely with strapping or duct tapeat two locations. Secure the lid by taping. Do not cover any labels.

* Place the laboratory address on top of the cooler.

r 9~~~~~ Place "This Side Up" labels on all four sides and "Fragile" labels on at least two

sides.

* Affix custody seals on the front and back of the cooler.

The sampler will telephone or fax the laboratory to inform them that samples are on the way.Sample shipments that will be received on a Saturday or Sunday must be cleared with thelaboratory in advance to ensure that the samples can be received and that holding times will notbe exceeded.

I ~~~b-x-Ibni n dooa m dad~cel do 261mjxfhwo~an and hplnRIqIlan-,fdo814,V2 IV-6-1

1 ~7.0 Investigation-Derived Waste

IDW from sampling activities is expected to be limited to decontamination solutions and well

purging waters. These liquids will be accumulated in drums provided by Eielson AFB.

Laboratory analytical results of the groundwater samples will be used to determine theconcentrations of the IDW. Drums will be clearly marked using permanent ink (letters 1" to 2"

tall) in accordance with specifications provided in Figure 7-1. IDW will be disposed of by IT incoordination with the Eielson POC, Mr. Brent Koenen.

The handling, transportation and disposal of any hazardous materials generated by the on-sitelaboratory will be performed by the on-site laboratory subcontractor.

r

p~~~b~hiyd k~d o21mw11* ~ sl~~d

ii ~ 84V2r --

I ~~~~~~~~Figure 7-1Container Markings for Liquid and Solid Waste

container has been returned.whnepyctaeri

Please leave enough roomDopceu.

To be applied by contractor upon Accu.SatDt I

generation of product __________________

Hazardous Waste CIES Hazwaste. Please leaveLayman's Term 6" X 6" enough room.

--p.Cercla Drived Waste

applicable. Contractos ~oc Namel~h.# ______________applicable.

FSite Repd/resnie CI' A eiedWst"o

applicable. Contractor's POC M~~~~~~~~~osknlywifappable Laelsocn beo

used instead of hand written

words.

1. Copies of any Lab samples required by the contract must be turned into CES Hazwastewith the container.

2. Drums containing liquids will not have less then 6" of head space to allow for expansion.3. Container markings must be at least one inch and no larger than two inches in size and must

be made with a permanent marker of a contrasting color to the container.£4. Do not put markings on top of containers.5. Accumutation start date is date product is first is put into the container.6. CERCLA =Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act

L

8.0 Chemical Quality Control

This section presents the project approach for chemical quality control, and as such constitutesT the QAPP. The purpose of this QAPP is to supplement the information provided in previous

sections of this document and describe the QAIQC protocols for analytical sampling and analysisto be performed during project site characterization activities at Eielson AFB.

8.1 Project Descriptionf ~~Descriptions of the Eielson AFB site and project scope of work were provided in Sections 1 and

3, respectively. A description of the sampling and analysis activities was presented in Section 4.

8.2 Project Organization and ResponsibilityThe project organization and responsibilities were described in Section 2. The names andtelephone numbers of key participants involved with the analytical sampling and analysis arelisted in Table 8-1. The Project Chemist is the primary point of contact for laboratory issues.

A ~~Table 8-1Project Personnel and Responsibility

Organization Name Title/Role Telephone NumberBNCI Greg DuBois Project Manager/Chemist (907) 522-6103

b ~~~BNCI Molly Brodin Sample Technician (907) 522-6103CT&E Environmental Services Chuck Homestead Off-Site Laboratory Manager (907) 562-2343

CT&E Environmental Services Richard Losche On-Site Laboratory Manager (907) 562-2343

~~ ~ 8.3 Data Quality ObjectivesData quality objectives (DQO) have been developed for the soil vapor, soil and groundwater

sampling that will be conducted during the subject site characterization activities at Eielson AFB.The overall objective of the project is to produce site characterization data of sufficient quantityand quality to support the development of appropriate closure scenarios for the five sites. Tables

8-2 through 8-4 summarize the DQOs for this project.

&4IV2 N~~~~~~~~~I-8-1

Table 8-2Data Quality Objectives (Soil Vapor)

Data Data Method Required PracticalNeeds Use Standards Quantitation Limits

T ~~~Benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, Soil Vapor Characterization EPA 80218B Benzene -0.5 ug/Land xylene compounds Toluene - 2 ugIL

Ethylbenzene - 2 ug/L* _________________________ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~Xylenes - 2 ugIL

Gasoline-range organics Soil Vapor Characterization AK101 90 ugtLI. ~~~~~ug/L denotes micrograms per liter

Table 8-3Data Quality Objectives (Soil)

Data Data Method Required PracticalNeeds Use Standards Quantitation Limits

Diesel-range organics Soil Characterization AK102 20 mg/kgGasoline-range organics Soil Characterization AK101 5 mglkgResidual-range organics Soil Characterization AK103 I1 00 mg/kg

- ~~~Benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, Soil Characterization EPA 8021 B Benzene - 0.02 mg/kgand xylene compounds Toluene - 0.05 mg/kg

Ethylbenzene - 0.05 mg/kg

mg/kg denotes milligrams per kilogram. Xens-05mgk

Table 8-4Data Quality Objectives (Groundwater)

r ~~~~~~~Data Data Method Required PracticalNeeds Use Standards Quantitation Limits

Diesel-range organics Groundwater Characterization AK102 800 ugJL

Gasoline-range organics Groundwater Characterization AK101 100 ug/L

Residual-range organics Groundwater Characterization AK103 1 000 ugIL

Benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, Groundwater Characterization EPA 80216B Benzene -0.5 ugA.and xyene compounds Toluene - 2 ugIL

Ethylbenzene - 2 ugILI. _______ _________ ______ __ __________ _______ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ X yt enes - 2 ug/L

1) ~~~~ugIL denotes micrograms per liter.

These data quality objectives are necessary to obtain data that meets the required levels ofprecision and accuracy for the project. The ability of the data collection activity to meet these

b-x.ibnci my docamWsafceeia do 264p.jeai.*.ora and h&sN,4)an-f.doc814102 ~~~~~~~~~IV-8-2

objectives is provided through the establishment of data quality characteristics, which includeprecision, accuracy, representativeness, comparability, and completeness (PARCC).

8.3.1 Field Screening DataDuring this project, a portable PID and a portable FID will be used on site to help identifypotentially petroleum-contaminated soils that could be encountered during site assessment

activities. These field screening techniques will be used for qualitative analysis of extracted soilvapors.

Field screening results and associated quality control procedures will be documented in a boundfield notebook. The minimum QC requirements for routine screening methods include initial

calibration and routine calibration verification of the PID and FID instruments.

8.3.2 On Site Mobile LaboratoryData Quality Level 2 as described the EPA guidance document referenced in this workplan isrequired for this project. Data Quality Level 2 methods provide reliable quantitative data for thedelineation of contaminants during a site assessment. Generally, they are laboratory methods

t ~~adapted for the field in this case for use with portable GC methods. The minimum QC

requirements for Data Quality Level 2 include initial and continuing calibration verification,

field duplicates and blank samnples. The objectives associated with Level 2 specification are:

* Measure individual constituents or groups of constituents, in this case BTEX andCR0 compounds.

* Produce data that are highly reproducible and accurate when appropriate QAIQGprocedures are used.

* Accomplish contaminant delineation which will be correlated with a higher dataquality method.

8.3.3 Definitive DataB ~~During this project, definitive data will be produced by an off-site laboratory to determine the

concentrations of hydrocarbons in soil and groundwater. Definitive data is validatable.

The contracted project laboratory will use ADEC-a~proved methods from the Underground

Storage Tank Procedures Manual (ADEC 1999) and EPA-approved methods from Test Methodsfor Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods (EPA 1986) to analyze samples. Targetcompound lists, practical quantitation limit, QC acceptance criteria, and calibration procedures

C~~~t.biy.L~d .26pj~,W~. &p.V~d

I~ ~ &12I--

I ~~for these analyses are outlined in the AFCEE QAPP, Version 3.0 (AFCEE 1996) and thereferenced methods. Definitive data deliverables will include the following:

* Case narrative*Data summary including the dates received, extracted, and analyzed

L ~ ~~~~aMethod detection limits* Surrogate spike recoveriesa Method blank summary* Laboratory control sample summary* Duplicate sample results

I *~~~~~ Matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate summary* Initial and continuing calibration verification summary* Holding time summary* Chain-of-custody documentation* Condition-upon-receipt summary

The data will be reviewed for completeness and to determine if the data quality objectives havebeen met.

~~ 8.4 Analytical MethodsSoil vapor, soil and groundwater samples will be analyzed by the following methods, as

u ~~applicable.

* EPA Method 802lB for BTEX* State of Alaska Method AKlOI for GRO* State of Alaska Method AKlO2 for DRO* State of Alaska Method AKIO3 for RRO

The QA/QC requirements for EPA Method 8021 B are specified in the AFCEE QAPP[ ~~Version 3.0 (AFCEE 1996), and the QAIQC requirements for State of Alaska Methods arespecified in the ADEC Underground Storage Tank Procedures Manual (ADEC 1999).

~~ ~ 8.5 Data ValidationDefinitive laboratory data will be reviewed for PARCC to ensure compliance with the project

li ~data quality objectives. The review will include an evaluation of the following parameters:

* Chain-of-custody documentation

* Sample containers and preservationr

b-xihnci my d.,=aMenufaiu do 26 pwrjer1.Wo~ and h&spI.o#n-f do&4102 IV-8-4

* Analytical holding times

a Method blank concentrations* Surrogate recoveries

e Laboratory control sample and laboratory control sample duplicate recoveries andprecision

* Method calibration control limits

* Corrective actions

Data validation includes the reduction, identification, and calculations necessary to convert theraw instrument readings to the final reported compounds and their respective concentrations.Data generated by the contract laboratory will be checked for accuracy and completeness.

The contract laboratory analyst who generates the raw data has the primary responsibility for thecorrectness and completeness of the data. A second level of review, performed by the contractlaboratory section leader, or senior chemist, is structured to ensure that calibration data and QCsample results are reviewed and that the analytical results are checked back to the bench sheet..The Project Chemist will review the reported data for completeness and to determine if theproject data quality objectives have been met. Final data qualifiers will be determined from thedefinitive data report package and the field records.

Summaries of this information will be provided in the technical reports for the project asdescribed in Section 3.4, Deliverables.

b.xIbni my doeumenf .. fcetct do 261proeihl..otlan and h&~I'.~4Anj.,-o814/2 IV-8-5

L

L

9.0 Response to Comments

Appendix C presents the response to comments for the draft Workplan. Comments wereprovided by the US Air Force and AFCEE. Those comments have been incorporated aspresented in Appendix C.

L~~~&.W ~uqc~ud 6pjldl~.dMp"pa-d

B~ ~~SW2I--

10.0 References

L ~~AFCEE, 1998, Quality Assurance Project Plan. Version 3. 0.

t ~~AFCEE, 2001, Request for Proposal, Delivery Order 0026, CITS Contamination Assessment atL Eielson Air Force Base, Alaska, 19 July 2001.

L ~~ADEC, 1999, Underground Storage Tanks Procedures Manual, June 1999.

EM SS, 2 000, Combat Information Transportation System (CITS), Final Field Report, September1, 2000, Environmental Management Solutions Services

EPA, 1994, Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes - Physical/Chemical Methods, EPA EPA -£ ~~846, 3'd Edition, Update III, September 1994.

EPA, 1997, Expedited Site Assessment Tools for Underground Storage Tank Sites, EPA, March1997

EPA, 1996, Low-Flow (Minimal Drawdown) Ground-water Sampling Procedures, April, 1996

d(

p~ ~~~~ bim ~eafea ~2tmm~41~.dMp~k&-d

I, ~ 840 I -I0

II

.Ii

I

I

I

II

1!

I

I: . . ,.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.. ..

c~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

U 0~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

o * 0~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~c

S S '4 C~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

................ 0 *4~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~l lE * o. a

I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I 0~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~t

it .0 C Ve l ~~~~~~~~~~~~~Ll

. .... .L... ..

. . ...... ........ .. ..

... ~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ I b. 0~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~L.c - 0~~~~~~~~

~~~0 .~~~~~~~~L

0~~~~~~~~

-. ~~~ it ~~~... to ~~~~~ it ~

t. I 0 *.. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~0t~c

it ~~~~~~~~~ .5 ~~~~~~~~~~~ h.~~~~F !' 1~ 1 e .0

0 - _ 0~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~9a

0" %.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~0

______ to~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~A

IL .~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~I

,m, ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.ft 4~~~~)

is ;a E~~t

00 0~~~~~~~~

I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

IS ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I

I -

_________ _____ ---. _t ___

.. ~~~~~~c .ctI

j - -- - - - -

L~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~L

I. .~~~~~~~ .i~~~~~~o.~~~~.t....I.~~~~~~~~~.. .......... ..........

.. . . ... .. .... .. ..

............. ..........

a.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~I

I4

I ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ___~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~I N 1

I.~~~~~~~~a

- *1 _______~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~t

16, __________ ______~~~~~~~~~~~~~6

I7 E

*I094,

C,

co0

co

1C I

n~~~~~~~~~~LI NC~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

L2~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

II.II

I

Appendix BI ~~~Base Civil Engineering Work Clearance Request

I

t

'1

II

I

IT'BASE CIVIL ENGINEERING WORK CLEARANCE REQUEST DATE PREPARED

(See instructions on Reverse)

1 . Clearance is requested to proceed with work at

on Work Order No. _______________.contract No. __________________involving excavation or utility disturbance per

attached sketch. This area FlUhas LI has not been staked or clearly marked.

IA. PAVEMENTS VOLVED FRDETECTION & PROTECTION SYSTEM G. AIRCRAFT OR VEHICULAR TRAFFIC FLOW

B3. DRAINAGE SYSTM E.UIIY OVERHEAD UDRONDH. SECURITY

IC. RAILROAD TRACK CM VERHA UNDERGROND I. OTHER

3. DATE CLEARANCE REQUIRED 4. DATE OF CLEARANCE

5. SIGNATURE OF REQUESTING OFFICIAL 6. TELEPHONE NO. 7. ORGANIZATION

ORGANIZATION REMARKS (Use Reverse for additional comm ents)D REVIEWER'S NAME AND INITIALS

B A. ELCTRICA DISTRBUTIONBldg. 1136, Call Before Digging, 3774236

SA .SEMDSRBTO Bldg. 1125, Call Before Digging, 377-2172

C. WAE ITIUINBldg. 1125, Call Before Digging, 377-2172

IvD. POL DISTRIBUTION Bldg. 2258, Call Before Digging, 377-2140

ILE. SEWER DISTRIBUTION Bldg. 1125, Call Before Digging, 377-2172

E Bldg. 2258, Obtain Hazmnat Brief, 377-3365NF. ENVIRONMENTAL

IG. PAVEMENTS/ GROUNDS Bldg. 2258, Call before plowing snow and before

EEHFIEPOETO Bldg. 2258, Don't block roads/hydrants, obtain b

IR ZOECEOZ Bldg. 2258, Call before digging. 377-1319

NG .1 OTHER (Specify) Natural Resoure Bldg. 2160, Call before digging. 377-4210

9. POLICE ~~~~~~Bldg. 3125, Obtain POV pass. 377-1033SEURTYBldg. 2222

10. SAFETY ~~~~~~Bldg. 3112, Obtain ground safety brief. 377-4260

11. COMMUNICATIONS Bldg. 1127, Call before dingging. 377-2368

b 12. BASE OPERATIONS ~~Bldg. 1215, Obtain airfield vehicle pass. 377-36

13. CABLE TV ~~~~Bldg. 3490, Call GCI. 372-416913. CABLE TV _______Aft

14. COMMERCIAL UTILITY.COMPANY Bldg. Obtain PTI locate number. Locate Number:

GAS ~~~~~~~~~~~1-800478-3121

15. OTHER (Specify) RestrictedlFlightline Areas, Bldg: 2222, Call before entering. 377-1402

16. REQUESTED CLEARANCE HAPPROVED HDISAPPROVED17. TYPED NAME AND SIGNATURE OFAPPROVING OFFICER (Chief of Operations Flight or Chief of Engi'nern Fih)a.DATE SIGNED

AP FORM 103. 19940801 (EF-V 3)PREVIO OUS EDITIONS ARE OBSOLETE.

rII

i

It

I.

I

r~~~~~~~ApniI Rsos oC m et

i~~~s ~ ~ ~ ) to o -

w 0o -0 tot

0 co >~~~~

a) L. O

U ~~~~~~~~~~~O 0 0 0>

.o~~C - 0 0

A '~~~~ .0 ~~ i 00

- -(44UCU~~~~~~~2 .3-44

20

TI 1 -0

0 C.-. 0 b)4

4) 0~~~~00 -~~~~~ b 'f~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~0 O

to 4)~~~~~~~b

06

N C,

O aZ0 -~~~~~0tz~~~~~~~Ot

4~~~~~~~~~

UPCdP t V

t-

~~~ C e~ en 0

I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ c

*1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~C

-, Q2 Co 0)Co -~~~~~~~~

0 ~~ 0 C) 0.rroO )

~~ 0) 0~~~~~ 0)0)~~~~~~~ >0

C) -~~~~~~~~r )0 1 -"

> . 0s= )> 4 ~ ~~~~~~ .0

~~~~~~~~ - "0-

~ o o

0)~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Q

~~ 04- ~a0o 0~~~

C)~~~~~~~~~~c'.2' 0)N0

C-.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~C

E~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

0)

0 CA~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~a

U00

~~: 0 0 t 0

~~~ ~~~~ ~0

C~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Ez~~~~~~~~~~~~~

cozi dB en00~tQ )

j¶ 4-.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~r

0 0 c)~~~d

0) 0~~~~~~W0 cr0 C)

0 CU 0)- 4

0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~)C

0~~~~~~~Uv~~~ ~ qQ C 0) 20

0.Q) r: 7 4-) 0

2 -0 4- c 0o co

0 2~~~Z0 ) Ca CaEn

0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ )-

0) ~ ~ ~ ~~ C~~) 0) 4>~~ 4 ~~O~~a~t0)~~~ -- ~0) 1Ca

) 0) .~0 a )0

(U,) ~~~0)d~a~0Z 0) 0) 0)

t en~~~~~~~~~

42 r.~~~JO o L

.00 ~ ~ ~ ~ 40

0)~~~~~ 0 0)R u o

o C~~~~ 0)d-~ ~0to Ca

Ca 0 r ) :30 0 C 2co

'S 0'~~I 0 N ~ O .C1 0d 0 .

j*, 0) ~ ~~~0 C' ~~ - 0)c

4) o 4 4

0 'a a C

I -~o : ~09 r bt zto I~oo

It u ¾ ~0 ~ ~ b

0~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~o4 .00 n Ca - O ~

0 a 000Q) 0 'O 'C ~~~~~.- 0>

rA ~,-S) .. -CC) 4) -~O 4 0-A4

0 zs~4-04C r

~C0 o .Ct 4 .. Co

w C.--0 CL

cc r_0 0~~2

oCa~C

'4. ~ ~ ~ c.

0'Cb 4 ) CO 4 )

- to - -

co 4)All~t co 46. 0~0~ 0

(U s s -- ~ .~~ C6 c

to toE~~~~~~~oA :3-5 -S

0 touo E

o ~ ~ zs86.S M

to I-' +Qbb.C - V 0

M ~~~~~~2 C.) 6vg0CCV 2 c to d 0 0

0~~~~~~~~~~~ 15~~~~~~~~~c

- -~~~~~~b0S .~~~~~~~ Iw ~~=B t

bO. ~ ~ ~ ' o VE~~~~~s4)4W9'

t~~~~~~~'

( 000

~~ 0~

to toi-Ca,

00 00

Ed UIO

t~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~r

I~~~~~~~~~~~

*1~~~~~~C

e5 C.) C

bo 4)~~-LI

0~~~~~~.

;-Y 0

0 ~~~~~~0 ~~~~~

p ~ ~~o

.0 ~ ~ .

4 'Cd~~~~C

00

2.1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.

03

-o6 0

8 C

a 003 0~~~~~~"3 '

o ~~~~~~~ Co C~~~~~~~~t 04

to t -

C) C rs~~~~~~~~ 03~L

03 -

E -