the siegel-tukey-test-for-equal-variability
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: The siegel-tukey-test-for-equal-variability](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022070520/58f1f6941a28ab031c8b4599/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Introduction Siegel-Tukey test named after Sidney Siegel and
John Tukey, is a non-parametric test which may be applied to the data measured at least on an ordinal scale. It tests for the differences in scale between two groups.
The test is used to determine if one of two groups of data tends to have more widely dispersed values than the other.
The test was published in 1980 by Sidney Siegel and John Wilder Tukey in the journal of the American Statistical Association in the article “A Non-parametric Sum Of Ranks Procedure For Relative Spread in Unpaired Samples “.
![Page 2: The siegel-tukey-test-for-equal-variability](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022070520/58f1f6941a28ab031c8b4599/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Assumptions Each sample has been randomly selected
from the population. The two samples are independent of one
another. The level of measurement the data
represent is at least ordinal. The two populations from which the
samples are derived have equal medians.
![Page 3: The siegel-tukey-test-for-equal-variability](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022070520/58f1f6941a28ab031c8b4599/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Procedure Null hypothesis
H0 : δ2A = δ
2B
When the sample sizes are equal , then sum of the ranks also will be equal.
ԐR1 = ԐR2 Alternate hypothesis
H1: δ2A ≠ δ
2B
![Page 4: The siegel-tukey-test-for-equal-variability](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022070520/58f1f6941a28ab031c8b4599/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Procedure (Continued)2) α=0.053) Test statistic Siegel-Tukey test4) CalculationsBy combining the groups. The ranking is done by alternate extremes (rank 1 is lowest, 2 and 3 are the two highest, 4 and 5 are the two next lowest etc)Sum the rank of first and second group, after this procedure apply Mann-Whitney U test to find out the U value.
![Page 5: The siegel-tukey-test-for-equal-variability](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022070520/58f1f6941a28ab031c8b4599/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Procedure(Continued) U1 = n1n2+n1(n1+1)/2‒ ԐR1 U2 = n1n2+n2(n2+1)‒ԐR2 U = Min( U1,U2)
5)Critical region Ucal ˂ Utab ˂ Ucal6) Conclusion Accept or reject H0
![Page 6: The siegel-tukey-test-for-equal-variability](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022070520/58f1f6941a28ab031c8b4599/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
In case when the sample size is less than 8
EXAMPLETwo plastics each produced by a different process were tested for ultimate strength. The measurement shown below represent breaking load in units of 1000 pounds per square inch. Plastic 1: 15.3, 18.7, 22.3, 17.6, 15.1, 14.8Plastic 2: 21.2, 22.4, 18.3, 19.3, 17.1, 27.7 Use Siegel-Tukey test to test the hypothesis that : δ2
1 = δ2
2
![Page 7: The siegel-tukey-test-for-equal-variability](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022070520/58f1f6941a28ab031c8b4599/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Solution1) H0 : : δ2
1 = δ22
H1: δ21 ≠ δ
22
2) α=0.05
3) Test statisticSiegel-Tukey test4) CalculationsArrange combine samples in ascending order,
![Page 8: The siegel-tukey-test-for-equal-variability](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022070520/58f1f6941a28ab031c8b4599/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Solution ( Continued ) 14.8, 15.1, 15.3, 17.1, 17.6, 18.3, 18.7, 19.3, 1 4 5 8 9 12 11
10 21.2, 22.3, 22.4, 27.7 7 6 3 2 R1 = 1+4+5+9+11+6 = 36 R2 = 8+12+10+7+3+2 = 42 U1 = n1n2+n1(n1+1)/2‒ ԐR1 = 36+6( 6+1 ) /2 – 36 =21
![Page 9: The siegel-tukey-test-for-equal-variability](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022070520/58f1f6941a28ab031c8b4599/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Solution ( Continued ) U2 = n1n2- U1 = 36 – 21 U2 = 15 U = min ( U1 , U2 ) U = min ( 21 , 15 ) U = 15
5) Critical regionIf U cal lies between 5 and 31 we accept H0, otherwise we will reject
![Page 10: The siegel-tukey-test-for-equal-variability](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022070520/58f1f6941a28ab031c8b4599/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Solution ( Continued )6) Conclusion As the calculated value of U lies in the interval 5 and 31. So, we accept the null hypothesis.
![Page 11: The siegel-tukey-test-for-equal-variability](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022070520/58f1f6941a28ab031c8b4599/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
In case of tied ranks and n less than 8
EXAMPLEX1 : 10, 10, 9, 1, 0, 0X2 : 6, 6, 5, 5, 4, 4
SOLUTION:1) H0 : : δ2
1 = δ2
2
H1: δ21 ≠ δ
22
2) α=0.05
3) Test statisticSiegel-Tukey test
![Page 12: The siegel-tukey-test-for-equal-variability](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022070520/58f1f6941a28ab031c8b4599/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Solution ( Continued )4) CalculationsArrange combine samples in ascending order, Arrange data set 0, 0, 1, 4, 4, 5, 5, 6, 6, 9, 10,
10 Ranks 1 4 5 8 9 12 11 10 7 6
3 2 Tied adjusted rank 2.5, 2.5, 5, 8.5, 8.5, 11.5,
11.5, 8.5, 8.5, 6, 2.5, 2.5 R1 = 2.5+2.5+6+5+2.5+2.5 = 21
![Page 13: The siegel-tukey-test-for-equal-variability](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022070520/58f1f6941a28ab031c8b4599/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Solution ( Continued ) R2 = 8.5 +8.5+11.5+11.5+8.5+8.5 = 57 U1 = n1n2+n1(n1+1)/2‒ ԐR1 U1 = 36+6( 6+1)/2 – 21 U1 = 36+21 – 21 U1 = 36 U2 = n1n2 – U1 U2 = 36 – 36 U2 = 0
![Page 14: The siegel-tukey-test-for-equal-variability](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022070520/58f1f6941a28ab031c8b4599/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Solution ( Continued ) U = min ( U1,U2 ) U = min (36,0) U = 0
5) Critical regionIf U cal lies between 5 and 31 we will accept, otherwise we will reject6) ConclusionAs the calculated value of U does not lie in the interval 5 and 31. So, we will reject the null hypothesis.
![Page 15: The siegel-tukey-test-for-equal-variability](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022070520/58f1f6941a28ab031c8b4599/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
In case of tied ranks and n greater than 8
If the sample size is greater than 8 and there are tied ranks in the data. We will use the formula Where s denotes the no of pair of ties and t denotes no of tied ranks
![Page 16: The siegel-tukey-test-for-equal-variability](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022070520/58f1f6941a28ab031c8b4599/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Incase of n greater than 8EXAMPLE
Group 1: 3.1, 5.3, 6.4, 6.2, 3.8, 7.5, 5.8, 4.3, 5.9, 4.9 Group 2: 9, 5.6, 6.3, 8.5, 4.6, 7.1, 5.5, 7.9, 6.8, 5.7,
8.9Solution:
1) H0 : : δ21 = δ
22
H1: δ21 ≠ δ
22
2) α=0.05
3) Test statisticSiegel-Tukey test
![Page 17: The siegel-tukey-test-for-equal-variability](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022070520/58f1f6941a28ab031c8b4599/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Solution ( Continued )4) CalculationsArrange combine samples in ascending order 3.1, 3.8, 4.3, 4.6, 4.9, 5.3, 5.5, 5.6, 5.7, 5.8, 1 4 5 8 9 12 13 16 17
20 5.9, 6.2, 6.3, 6.4, 6,8, 7.1, 7.5, 7.9, 8.5, 8.9,
9.0 21 19 18 15 14 11 10 7 6 3
2R1 = 1+4+5+9+12+20+21+19+15+10 = 116
![Page 18: The siegel-tukey-test-for-equal-variability](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022070520/58f1f6941a28ab031c8b4599/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Solution ( C0ntinued )R2 = 8+13+16+17+18+14+11+7+6+3+2 = 115U1 = n1n2+n1(n1+1)/2‒ ԐR1U1 = 10(11)+10(10+1)/2 – 116U1 = 149U2 = n1n2+n2(n2+1)‒ԐR2
U2 = 10(11)+11(11+1)/2 – 115U2 = 61
![Page 19: The siegel-tukey-test-for-equal-variability](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022070520/58f1f6941a28ab031c8b4599/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Solution ( Continued ) U=min( U1,U2 ) U=min( 149,61 ) U=61
![Page 20: The siegel-tukey-test-for-equal-variability](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022070520/58f1f6941a28ab031c8b4599/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Solution ( Continued ) Z = 0.42
5) Critical regionIf Zcal ≥ Ztab we reject our null hypothesis6) ConclusionSince calculated value is less than tabulated value. So, we accept the null hypothesis.
![Page 21: The siegel-tukey-test-for-equal-variability](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022070520/58f1f6941a28ab031c8b4599/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
THANK YOU