table of contents -...
TRANSCRIPT
Table of Contents CHAPTER -1 ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 6
PROJECT BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 6
1.1 Project Background ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7
Table no.1: Basic project information .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 8
1.2 Need of Watershed Development Programme............................................................................................................................................................................ 8
Table no.2: Weight age of the project ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 9
Table No. 2.1 Criteria and weight age for selection of watershed .............................................................................................................................................. 11
Table no.3: Watershed information ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 12
Table no.4: Developmental programmers running in the project area ........................................................................................................................................ 13
Source: GP & Talati ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 13
Table no. 5: Previous Watershed programmes in the project area .............................................................................................................................................. 14
CHAPTER – 2 .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 15
PROJECT IMPLEMENTING AGENCY ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 15
2.1. Project Implementing Agency ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 16
2.2 About District Watershed Development Unit (DWDU), Patan ................................................................................................................................................ 16
Table no. 6: PIA .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 17
Table no. 7: Staff at PIA level .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 17
2.3 SWOT Analysis of the DWDU ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 18
CHAPTER – 3 .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 20
BASIC INFORMATION OF THE PROJECT AREA ....................................................................................................................................................................... 20
3.1. Geography and Geo-hydrology ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 21
Table no. 8: Land use pattern ...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 21
Table no. 9: Soil type and topography ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 23
Table no. 10: Flood and drought condition ................................................................................................................................................................................. 23
Table no. 11.1: Soil Erosion ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 24
Table no. 11.2: Soil Salinity/Alkalinity (Salinity ingress) .......................................................................................................................................................... 24
Table no. 11.3: Water logging Conditions .................................................................................................................................................................................. 25
Table no. 12: Climatic conditions ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 25
Table no. 13: Physiographic and relief ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 26
Table no. 14: Land ownership details ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 28
Table no. 15: Agriculture ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 28
Table no. 16: Irrigation ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... 29
Table no. 17: Crop details ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 30
Table no. 18: Livestock............................................................................................................................................................................................................... 32
Table no. 19: Drinking water ...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 32
3.2. Socio-Economic Profile ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 36
Table no. 21: Demographic information ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 36
Table no. 22: Literacy rate .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 37
Table no. 23: Migration details ................................................................................................................................................................................................... 38
Table no. 24: Poverty .................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 38
Table no. 25: Village infrastructure ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 39
Table no. 26 : Facilities / HH assets ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 40
Table no. 27: Per capita Income ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 41
Table no.28: Dependence on Forest/CPR ................................................................................................................................................................................... 42
Table no. 29: Livelihood pattern (Occupational distribution) .................................................................................................................................................... 42
CHAPTER – 4 .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 46
WATERSHED ACTIVITIES ............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 46
4.1. Scientific Planning ................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 47
Table no. 30: Details of Scientific Planning and Inputs in IWMP projects ................................................................................................................................ 49
4.2. Institution building ................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 50
Table no.31: Details of PRA Activities conducted in the project area ...................................................................................................................................... 51
Problem Tree ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 52
Objective Tree ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 53
Table no. 32: Watershed Committee details ............................................................................................................................................................................... 54
Table no. 33: SHG detail ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 59
Table no. 34: UG detail ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... 60
4.3. Physical activities to be undertaken under IWMP-16 Jamvada ............................................................................................................................................... 61
Table no.35: Probable Entry point activities (EPA) (All financial figures in lakh Rs.) .............................................................................................................. 62
4.3.2. Watershed Development Works: ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 64
Table no.36: Details of ridge line treatment / land based activities in watershed works* .......................................................................................................... 65
36.1 Technical Detail & Model Estimates of Work phase Watershed Work .............................................................................................................................. 68
Table No 36.1.2 Recharging Bore well ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 69
Table No 36.1.3 Technical details of Earth Bund ...................................................................................................................................................................... 71
Table No 36.1.4 Technical details of Waste weir ...................................................................................................................................................................... 72
Table No 36.1.4 Technical details of Field Outlet ..................................................................................................................................................................... 74
Table No 36.1.4 Technical details of Field Bund ...................................................................................................................................................................... 76
Table no.37: Activities related to Surface water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) ..................................................................... 77
Table no.38: Activities related to recharging ground water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lack Rs.) .................................................... 80
Table no.39: Details of activities related to livelihood, production system and micro-enterprises ............................................................................................ 82
Table 39.1. Primary Model for A Cattle feed centre .................................................................................................................................................................. 85
Table 39.2. Primary Model for Dairy Collection Centre ............................................................................................................................................................. 87
Table 39.3. Primary Model for Cumin Processing Unit .............................................................................................................................................................. 89
Table no. 40: Activities related to livelihoods by Self Help Groups (SHGs) in the project areas .............................................................................................. 91
Table no. 41: Linkages developed at village level ...................................................................................................................................................................... 92
Table no.42: Details of activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works ............................................................................................................ 93
Table no.43: Details of activities in the CPRs in the project areas.............................................................................................................................................. 94
Table no. 44: Capacity Building Institution ................................................................................................................................................................................ 95
Table no. 45: Capacity Building plan ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 96
Table no.46: Information, Education and Communication Activities ........................................................................................................................................ 98
CHAPTER 5 ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 99
BUDGET ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 99
Table no. 48: Village wise- component wise budget available under IWMP (Rs. In Lakh) ................................................................................................. 101
Table no. 49: Village wise gap in funds requirement ............................................................................................................................................................... 102
Table no.50: Details of Convergence of IWMP with other Schemes ....................................................................................................................................... 103
Table no. 51: Public-Private Partnership in the IWMP projects ............................................................................................................................................... 104
CHAPTER 6 ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 105
OUTCOME ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 105
Table no.52: Environmental Benefits ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 106
Table no. 53: Status of Drinking water ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 107
Table no. 54:Crop area and yield in the project area ................................................................................................................................................................ 108
Table no. 55: Area under horticulture / other crops .................................................................................................................................................................. 109
Table no. 56: Details of livestock in the project areas .............................................................................................................................................................. 110
Table no. 57: Employment to be supplemented in the Project area .......................................................................................................................................... 111
Table no. 58: Seasonal migration from Project area ................................................................................................................................................................. 112
Table no.59: Per capita Income ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 113
Table no. 60: Backward-Forward linkages ............................................................................................................................................................................... 115
CHAPTER -7 .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 116
QUALITY AND SUSTAINABILITY ISSUES ............................................................................................................................................................................... 116
7.1 Plans for Monitoring and Evaluation ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 117
7.2 Plans For Project management ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 117
7.3 Watershed Development Fund ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 118
7.4 User Charges ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 118
CHAPTER -8 .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 119
MAPS ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 119
CHAPTER -1
PROJECT BACKGROUND
1.1 Project Background
Jamvada (IWMP-16) project is located in Santalpur Taluka, Patan District of Gujarat state. The project is a cluster of three micro-watersheds with
5H3C1c1#, 5H3C1c2#,6A1B7b2# are being their respective code. There are 5 villages in this watershed with total geographical area 9728.7 ha out
of which total 2009.7 ha is under forest department. The total area of this project is 5610 ha . The villages are Jamvada (950 ha), Daldi (603 ha),
Gadha (1114 ha), Varnosari (653 ha) and Korda (2290 ha).
The nearest town is Varahi which nearly 10-15 km away from the project villages respectively. Varahi is a fast growing city with rapid
urbanisation and well connected with nation highways 27 & 14 due to Solar Park at Charanka Village. The Solar park is the biggest solar park in
India, therefore generating a demand of infrastructure and daily labour in the nearby villages. Charanka is nearly 15km away from the project area.
Ayar ,Rabari, Thakor, Bajaniya, Vadi, Darbar, Patel, Muslim, and SC communities are the primary inhabitants of the village. The livelihood of
these people is based on rainfed agriculture, animal husbandry and as wage labour mainly.
The Project area falls under the Desert Prone Area according to Dolr Classification. The villages of this projects were heavily damaged in a
massive earth quake on Jan 26, 2001, the epicentre of which was Bhuj(Kutch). This has resulted in post-relief activities in the area, especially the
newly constructed cement brick houses with asbestos roofing.
Table no.1: Basic project information
Sl
No.
Name of
the project
Villages
name Census code
Gram
Panchayats Taluka District
Area
of the
project
Area
proposed
to be
treated
Total
project
cost
PIA
1
IWMP-16
(Jamvada)
Jamvada 30010022190000 Jamvada Santalpur Patan
5610
950 142.50
DWDU
Patan
2 Daldi 30010022300000 Daldi Santalpur Patan 603 90.45
3 Gadha 30010022160000 Gadha Santalpur Patan 1114 167.10
4 Varnosari 30010022050000 Kilana Santalpur Patan 653 97.95
5 Korda 30010022180000 Korda Santalpur Patan 2290 343.50
Total
5610 5610 841.50 -
Source: Census
1.2 Need of Watershed Development Programme
Watershed Development Programme is prioritised on the basis of thirteen parameters namely Poverty Index, Percentage of SC/ST, Actual
wages, Percentage of small and marginal farmers, Ground water status, Moisture Index, Area under rainfed agriculture, Drinking water situation in
the area, Percentage of the degraded land, Productivity potential of the land, Continuity of another watershed that has already developed/treated,
Cluster approach for plain. Based on these thirteen parameters a composite ranking was given to Jamvada Watershed project as given in table no. 2.
The Total percentages of families under BPL Jamvada (45.6%), Daldi (97.2%), Gadha (91.47%), Varnosari (66.41%) and Korda (63.04%) which
is 69.13 percentage out of total HHs in the watershed. Hence a score of 10 is allotted. The percentage of schedule castes and schedule tribe is
negligible in the villages which is less than 20 percent(average.) of the total population; Hence a score of 3 was allotted in all the vilages. Rainfed
agriculture forms the primary occupation of the village due to the fact that ground water is saline and hence unfit for usage. More than 50 per cent
of the farmers are small and marginal by nature and the actual wages earned by the labour is less than the minimum wages, hence a composite rank
of 3, 5 and 3 are allotted respectively.
Since the rainfall received is erratic and irregular, the moisture index is low and the area is classified under DDP block. Drinking water is
problematic in the village. Majority of land is degraded due to inherent salinity and ingress of salt from Rann. The soil is very permeable and
production of the land can be significantly enriched with the availability of timely irrigation. Cluster approach was followed taking into
consideration three micro-watersheds covering a total area of 5610 Ha. for Jamvada cluster is selected. Thus a cumulative score of 15,10 & 5 are
allotted respectively.
All the parameters taken together give a cumulative score of 104 to the watershed (reference Table 2.1 below).
Area proposed to be treated
Table no.2: Weight age of the project
Project
name
Name of
the Village
Project
type Weight age
i ii iii iv v vi vii viii ix x xi xii xiii
IWMP-16
(jamvada)
Jamvada
DESERT 10 3 5 3 3 15 15 5 15 15 10 5 NA
Daldi
Gadha
Varnosari
Korda
(Source : PPR Table NO : 6)
Table No. 2.1 Criteria and weight age for selection of watershed
Sr. No. Criteria Maximum
score Ranges & scores
i Poverty index (% of poor to
population)
10 Above 80 % (10) 80 to 50 % (7.5) 50 to 20 % (5) Below 20 %
(2.5)
ii % of SC/ ST population 3 More than 40 % (10) 20 to 40 % (5) Less than 20 % (3)
iii Actual wages 5 Actual wages are significantly lower
than minimum wages (5)
Actual wages are equal to or
higher than minimum wages
(0)
iv % of small and marginal
farmers
3 More than 80 % (10) 50 to 80 % (5) Less than 50 % (3)
v Ground water status 3 Over exploited (5) Critical (3) Sub critical (2) Safe (0)
vi Moisture index/
DPAP/ DDP Block
15 -66.7 & below (15)
DDP Block
-33.3 to -66.6 (10)
DPAP Block
0 to -33.2 (0)
Non DPAP/ DDP Block
vii Area under rain-fed agriculture 15 More than 90 % (15) 80 to 90 % (10) 70 to 80% (5) Above 70 %
(Reject)
viii Drinking water 5 No source (10) Problematic village (7.5) Partially covered (5) Fully covered
(0)
ix Degraded land 15 High – above 20 % (15) Medium – 10 to 20 % (10) Low- less than 10 % of TGA
(5)
x Productivity potential of the
land
15 Lands with low production & where
productivity can be significantly
enhanced with reasonable efforts
(15)
Lands with moderate
production & where
productivity can be enhanced
with reasonable efforts (10)
Lands with high production &
where productivity can be
marginally enhanced with
reasonable efforts (5)
xi Contiguity to another
watershed that has already
been developed/ treated
10 Contiguous to previously treated
watershed & contiguity within the
micro watersheds in the project (10)
Contiguity within the micro
watersheds in the project but
non contiguous to previously
treated watershed (5)
Neither contiguous to
previously treated watershed
nor contiguity within the
micro watersheds in the
project
xii Cluster approach in the plains
(more than one contiguous
micro-watersheds in the
project)
5 Above 6 micro-watersheds in cluster
(15)
4 to 6 micro watersheds in
cluster (10)
2 to 4 micro watersheds in
cluster (5)
xiii Cluster approach in the hills
(more than one contiguous
micro-watersheds in the
project)
NA Above 5 micro-watersheds in cluster
(15)
3 to 5 micro watersheds in
cluster (10)
2 to 3 micro watersheds in
cluster (5)
Total 104 150 90 41 2.5
Project type: Hilly/desert/Other
Table no.3: Watershed information
Name of the
project Name of the Village
No. Of
watersheds to be
treated
Watershed code Watershed
regime/type/order
IWMP-16
(Jamvada)
Jamvada 2 6A1B7b2#, 6A1B7b2#
Micro Watershed
Daldi 2 6A1B7b2#, 6A1B7b2#
Gadha 2 5H3C1c1#, 5H3C1c2#
Varnosari 2 6A1B7b2#, 6A1B7b2#
Korda 1 5H3C1c1#
Source: BISAG
These villages are being very back ward, so they have been on top priority of a number of developmental projects. These programmes are
Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS), Misson Mangalam are running in cluster villages.
i. MGNREGS: Deepening of three village pond, Road repairing and afforestation activity has been taken-up under MGNREGA.
ii. Mission Mangalam:- The objective is to organize the poor into Self Help Groups / Sakhi Mandals, link them with banks, build capacities
in them and lead them towards sustainable livelihoods. 187 beneficiaries are benefited by this scheme till now.
iii. Total Sanitation Campaign (TSC): 133 individual toilets are constructed under TSC programme.
iv. Awas Yojana: 182houses have been constructed in the Jamada project under Indira Awas Yojana and Sardar Awas Yojana
v. Wasmo project : Overhead tank, underground tank and pipelines are build under the Wasmo project.
Table no.4: Developmental programmers running in the project area
Sl.
no
Name of the
programme/scheme Sponsoring agency
Objectives of the
programme/scheme
Year of
commencement
Villages
covered
Estimated number
of beneficiaries
1 MGNREGA Rural Development Dep. Employment 2011-12
Jamvada
482
2 Misson Mangalam Rural Development Dep. Livelihood 2011-12 29
3 IAY Rural Development Dep. Housing 2011-12 14
4 SAY Rural Development Dep. Housing 2011-12 22
5 TSC Rural Development Dep. Sanitation 2011-12 15
6 GSWSB GSWSB Drinking Water 2011-12 204
7 MGNREGA Rural Development Dep. Employment 2011-12
Daldi
316
8 Misson Mangalam Rural Development Dep. Livelihood 2011-12 47
9 IAY Rural Development Dep. Housing 2011-12 18
10 SAY Rural Development Dep. Housing 2011-12 0
11 TSC Rural Development Dep. Sanitation 2011-12 41
12 GSWSB GSWSB Drinking Water 2011-12 230
13 MGNREGA Rural Development Dep. Employment 2011-12
Gadha
325
14 Misson Mangalam Rural Development Dep. Livelihood 2011-12 26
15 IAY Rural Development Dep. Housing 2011-12 24
16 SAY Rural Development Dep. Housing 2011-12 13
17 TSC Rural Development Dep. Sanitation 2011-12 2
18 GSWSB GSWSB Drinking Water 2011-12 290
19 MGNREGA Rural Development Dep. Employment 2011-12
Varnosari
175
20 Misson Mangalam Rural Development Dep. Livelihood 2011-12 11
21 IAY Rural Development Dep. Housing 2011-12 5
22 SAY Rural Development Dep. Housing 2011-12 4
23 TSC Rural Development Dep. Sanitation 2011-12 0
24 GSWSB GSWSB Drinking Water 2011-12 180
25 MGNREGA Rural Development Dep. Employment 2011-12
Korda
630
26 Misson Mangalam Rural Development Dep. Livelihood 2011-12 74
27 IAY Rural Development Dep. Housing 2011-12 32
28 SAY Rural Development Dep. Housing 2011-12 50
29 TSC Rural Development Dep. Sanitation 2011-12 75
30 GSWSB GSWSB Drinking Water 2011-12 205
Source: GP & Talati
Table no. 5: Previous Watershed programmes in the project area
No
.
Project
name
Year
started
Name of
villages
No.
Of
micro
water
shed
Wate
rshed
codes
Area
under
treatm
ent
Fundi
ng
source
Nodal
agency PIA
Total
cost
(Lack
s)
Expen
diture
incurre
d up to
start of
IWMP
(in
lakh)
%
financ
ial
compl
etion
%
physical
completi
on
1 DDP-8 2011-12 Jamvada 1
500 Govt. DRDA GSRDC 30 30 100% 100%
2 DDP-5 2011-12 Daldi 2
1000 Govt. DRDA
M.R.Chaudh
ary,
Mehsana
60 60 100% 100%
4 DDP-4 2011-12 Varnosari 1
500 Govt. DRDA GSRDC 30 30 100% 100%
5 IWMP-6 2011-12 Korda 1
2000 Govt. DWDU DWDU
PAtan 300 300
Progre
ss Progress
Source: GP & Talati
CHAPTER – 2
PROJECT IMPLEMENTING AGENCY
2.1. Project Implementing Agency
The Project Implementing Agencies (PIA) is selected by an appropriate mechanism by Gujarat State Watershed Management Agency
(GSWMA), the State Level Nodal Agency (SLNA) for Integrated Watershed Management Programme (IWMP) in Gujarat. The PIAs are
responsible for implementation of watershed project. These PIAs may include relevant line departments, autonomous organizations under State/
Central Governments, Government Institutes/ Research bodies, Intermediate Panchayats, Voluntary Organizations (VOs).The PIA for
Godhana watershed Project is District watershed development Unit (DWDU), Patan.
2.2 About District Watershed Development Unit (DWDU), Patan
2.2.1 The organization and its objectives
The District Watershed Development Unit (DWDU), Patan is a district level nodal agency and was established on 13 May 2008 to oversee
the smooth implementation of watershed projects in the district. The District Development Officer (DDO) is the chairman of the DWDU. The
DWDU has dedicated and experienced staff comprising one Project Director (Deputation from Gujarat Forest Department), a technical expert and a
multidisciplinary team of agriculture expert, community mobilization expert and Data Entry Operator, civil engineer, MIS coordinator, system
analyst, surveyor, and Accountant. The objectives of the DWDU, Patan are supervising, planning, implementing, documentation, promoting
watershed development projects and related developmental activities in the district as per guidelines. The DWDU, Patan also works as a PIA for
some IWMP projects.
2.2.2 Programmes/projects of DWDU, Patan
At present 21 IWMP projects have been sanctioned by Government of India for Patan district. The entry point activities of 18 IWMP
projects have been identified by the respective PIAs in the district. Patan Forest Division is PIA for 5 projects (IWMP-1, 2, 3, 4 & 7) and DWDU
itself is PIA for 17 projects (IWMP- 5, 6, 8 to 21). Apart from the 21 IWMP projects, DWDU Patan is involved in a total of 290 pre-Hariyali &
Hariyali projects (DDP & IWDP); in which 164 projects are completed and 126 projects are still running in the district. The DWDU, Patan is also
monitoring a central government sponsored scheme on “Artificial Recharge of Groundwater through Dugwells” in the district.
Table no. 6: PIA
No. Names of project Details of PIA
1 IWMP-8
(Godhana)
(i) Type of organization District Level Nodal Agency (Society)
(ii) Name of organization DWDU, Patan
(iii) Designation & Address Project Manager,DWDU, Patan
(iv) Telephone 02766 291800
(v) Fax 02766 232219
(vi) E-mail [email protected]
Table no. 7: Staff at PIA level
No. Name Age Sex Designation Qualification Experience Job assigned Monthly
remuneration
1 M K Patel 57 M Project Director BSC (Agri) 30 Years Project
Management 64145
2 Abhinandan Das 28 M T.E MBA in rural mang. 4 years Techanical Ex. 31250
3 Rahevar Pradeepsinh, 31 M MDT (Agriculture) BRS (Agri) 9 years Agriculture
Development 26250
4 Thakor Pravinsinh 38 M MDT (Agriculture) BRS (Agri) 11 years Agriculture
Development 15000
5 Patel Manisha 41 F MDT (CM) BRS (Agri) 9 years Community
Mobilization 20700
6 Modi Ravibhai 24 M Mis Co.ordinater M.sc. IT 1 year M.sc. IT 18000
7 Patel Vinodbhai 45 M MDT Engineer Civil Engineer 23 years Engineer 19838
8 Chaudhari Alpesh 29 M System Annalist PGDCA 7 years PGDCA 14400
9 Bhikhabhai Patel 62 M Account F.Y.BSC 34 Years Account 11040
10 Thakor Balvantji 35 M Account M.Com 5 Years Account 11875
11 Nisha Dodiya 27 F Exctive Ass. T.Y.B.Com 6 Years Exctive Ass. 6613
12 Nai Alkesh 37 M MDT (Data Entry
Operator) Basic Computer 6 years Data Entry 9919
13 Patel Riddhi 21 F MDT (Data Entry
Operator) Basic Computer 2 years Data Entry 9375
14 Takor Amrutji 42 M WDT(Agriculture) BRS(Agri) 12 years Agriculture
Development 10000
15 Bavlecha Dharmendra 27 M WDT(Engineer) D.C.E. 2 Year Engineer 12000
16 Patel Karishmaben 24 F WDT (CM) B.R.S,MSW 1 year Community
Mobilization 10000
17 Sidhu Vivek T. 27 M WDT(ACC) B.Com /PGDCA 7 year Accountant 7000
18 Parmar Mehulkumar 24 M WDT (Data Entry
Operator)
B.C.A., MS Office,
DTP 1 year Data Entry 6250
2.3 SWOT Analysis of the DWDU
Strength:
(1) Independent District Level Nodal Agency(DWDU). With Dedicated competent and experienced personnel.
(2) Separate State Level Nodal Agency (Gujarat State Watershed Management Agency) for Planning and fund Dispersion.
(3) Use multidisciplinary teams and with more holistic approaches using modern technology like GIS & Remote Sensing(RS).
(4) Good in-house training programmes have produced credible staff.
(5) Extensive grassroots coverage at district- and village-level with project office in cluster level and village office at village level.
(6) Amalgamation of Various technological, academic and Social institutions for programme support.
(7) Participatory planning involving more grassroots contact. Bottom-up approaches ensures effective grassroots and community participation.
(8) Allocation of financial resources to the community hence planning and Implementation by community with a Project Implementation
Agency for technical and Logistical support.
(9) Programme is more flexible and is adjusted to changing needs and environmental factors for making a sustainable and measurable
outcome
Weakness:
(1) Lack of technical knowledge in new Personnel.
(2) Bureaucracy and long channels of communication.
(3) High staff turnover since there is no permanent staff.
(4) Inadequate budgets as majority of area is rainfed and highly scarce natural resources.
(5) Numerous but uncoordinated developmental interventions resulting from secluded and untenable output.
(6) Duplication and repetition of projects without measuring output and gap analysis.
(7) Community participation suffers due to conflicts, counterproductive thinking and Lack of leadership for effective community mobilisation.
Opportunities:
(1) Cooperation between the public and private sectors.
(2) Improved collaboration and efficiency through departmental convergence.
(3) Greatly improved understanding of community needs through participatory planning and implementation would show greater accountability
and impact of work.
(4) Small independent decision-making units like village Watershed committee, SHG federation will facilitate quick decision-making and
greater flexibility in programme implementation.
Threats:
(1) Inadequate budgets are declining in real terms (inflation).
(2) Majority of project is near Rann Of Kachhaa which makes the project susceptible in natural bases resulting in limited impact.
(3) The outcome of the project is heavily dependent on monsoon making it vulnerable.
(4) Unfavourable socio-economic environment threatens operations and survival of the project.
CHAPTER – 3
BASIC INFORMATION OF THE PROJECT AREA
3.1. Geography and Geo-hydrology
3.1.1 Land use pattern
The net geographical area of Sinad watershed is about 8238.2 ha. out of which only 23.3 ha is forest area. About 6790 ha of land is under
agriculture and 9728.7 ha is rain-fed; mainly a Kharif crop is taken. About 1643 ha of the total land is classified under wasteland of which 99.1
percent is cultivable and rest is uncultivable (0.98%). The watershed consists of thorny species of Prosopis juliflora which was mainly broadcasted
to stop the spread of desert.
Table no. 8: Land use pattern
S. No. Names of
villages
Geographical
Area of the
village
Forest
Area
Land under
agricultural
use
Rainfed
area
Permanent
pastures
Wasteland
Cultivable Non-
cultivable
1 Jamvada 1457.3 292 854 854 - 2.2 308
2 Daldi 1118 160.2 762 719 - 3.6 272
3 Gadha 1699.4 0 1423.4 1263.5 - 1.7 355
4 Varnosari 1159 222.6 829 606.4 - 3.5 326
5 Korda 4295 1334.9 2589 2589 - 13 358
Total 9728.7 2009.7 6457.4 6031.9 0 24 1619
(Source : Census)
Forest Area13%
Land under agricultural
use40%
Rainfed area37%
Permanent pastures
0%
Wasteland10%
Land Cover
3.1.2 Soil and topography:
Jamvada Watershed Project falls under North West Gujarat Agro Climatic Zone. The soil is mainly sandy loam and saline. The soil is
brown to very dark grayish brown in surface colour. The depth of soil is moderate to deep about 25 to 75 cm. The predominant texture of soil is
loamy sand and silt and clay. The soil fertility is very poor with low nitrogen, phosphorus and potash. The soil falls in Aridsol and Inseptisols
order. The topography of the area is flat.
Table no. 9: Soil type and topography
S. No.
Name of
the Agro-
climatic
zone
covers
project
area
Area in
ha
Names of
the villages
Major soil types
Topo-graphy a)Type b) Area in ha
1
North
Gujarat
Agro
climatic
zone
950 Jamvada Sandy laom to Sandy and Saline 950 Flat to moderate slope
2 603 Daldi Sandy laom to Sandy and Saline 603 Flat to moderate slope
3 1114 Gadha Sandy laom to Sandy and Saline 1114 Flat to moderate slope
4 653 Varnosari Sandy laom to Sandy and Saline 653 Flat to moderate slope
5 2290 Korda Sandy laom to Sandy and Saline 2290 Flat to moderate slope
5610 Total
5610
(Source : PPR )
Table no. 10: Flood and drought condition
Sl no Village Flood (Incidence) Drought (Incidence)
1 Jamvada
Nil Once in 5 Years
2 Daldi
3 Gadha
4 Varnosari
5 Korda
11. Edaphic Factors
Table no. 11.1: Soil Erosion
Cause Type of
erosion Area affected (ha)
Run off Average
soil loss
(mm/ year) (Tonnes/
ha/ year)
Water erosion -
Jamvada Daldi Gadha Varnosari Korda Total Jamvada Daldi Gadha Varnosari Total
a Sheet 767 535 963 515 1528 4308
b Rill 15 10 17 11 27 80
c Gully 9 6 11 5 19 50
d Ravenous
Sub-Total : 4438 Sub-Total :
Wind erosion 780 565 1000 575 1633 4553 - - - - - 35%
Total : 8991 Total : -
(Source : BISAG)
Table no. 11.2: Soil Salinity/Alkalinity (Salinity ingress)
Name of the
Village Survey Number
Soil
pH
Type of
Salinity
(Inherent/I
ngress)
Jamvada 242,239,237,236,232,221,205,204,203,194,22,21,20,36 8.0
Daldi 151,152,153,154,161,162,163,164,100,101,102,103,104,163,169,171,172,26,267,270,271,272,288 8.0
Gadha 8,10,13,14,230,221,229,228,220,219,325,214,146,145,144,143,140,142,139,132,134,87 8.2
Varnosari 25,33,28,29,110,109,100,101,96,99,98,77,76,73,72,71 8.0
Korda 305,824,301,245,833,50,51,57,58,832,831,845,60,61,781,782,768, 8.2
(Source : Talati Office)
Table no. 11.3: Water logging Conditions
Name of the
Village Survey Number Reasons
Jamvada Nil
Daldi Nil
Gadha Nil
Varnosari Nil
Korda Nil
Table no. 12: Climatic conditions
Name of project Average rainfall- last 5 years Average temperature
Year mm Summer Winter
IWMP-16
(Jamvada)
Max Min Max Min
2008 1020 44 24 34 17
2009 576 45 25 35 18
2010 311 46 27 34 15
2011 825 45 26 36 12
2012 280 43 27 35 11 (Source: DRDA)
The rainfall is scanty which has resulted in recurrent phenomenon of drought in every two to three years. The average rainfall of this area is
about 603 mm (from past five year data) with a highest intensity of 1020 mm. Last year 2012 is considered as a drought year because of 280mm of
rainfall. While uneven distribution is leading to runoff of soil every year to the streams, rivulets and depressed area of Rann , scantly rainfall led to
water scarcity in dry season.
Table no. 13: Physiographic and relief
Project name Village Elevation Slope range (%) Major streams
IWMP-16 (JAMVADA)
Jamvada 24 mt 1 - 3 % YES
Daldi 25 mt 1 - 3 % YES
Gadha 30 mt 1 - 3 % YES
Varnosari 32 mt 1 - 3 % YES
Korda 32 mt 1 - 3 % YES
3.1.3 Land and Agriculture
Lack of surface water source and high salinity of ground water has limited the sufficient base for irrigation as well as for drinking purpose
in dry season. The average land holding is about 2 ha mostly rain-fed in nature. Lack of irrigation source forces the majority of the farmers to
migrate to ensure their livelihood. This affects directly the demographic profile of the village. The major crops cultivated by the farmers are Jowar
(Sorghum) and Cotton, castor, wheat and cumin. Sorghum is primarily grown for fodder purpose only. Cumin is the main cash crop in this region.
It is grown in alternate year with available irrigation facility. It is also grown without irrigation in some areas but the yield varies thereafter. Some
of the farmers take up rain-fed castor crop if rainfall is good. The land conservation measures such as earthen bunds and farm bunds in the area will
help them to take up a rabi crop of mustard or cumin in the residual moisture.
Juvar60%
Bajra30%
Castor10%
Cropping pattern in Kharif seasonWheat
2%
Cumin98%
Cropping pattern in Rabi Season
Table no. 14: Land ownership details
Sl no Village
Total owned land(Ha) HHs giving land
on lease
HHs taking land
on lease Gen OBC SC ST
1 Jamvada 66.49 800.40 0 0 20 20
2 Daldi 107.21 706.11 22.55 6.18 27 27
3 Gadha 161.39 562.45 3.69 0.00 19 19
4 Varnosari 58.97 449.04 21.38 13.30 22 22
5 Korda 955 1562 70 2 26 26
Total : 1349 4080 118 21 114 114
(Source : Pani Patrak & HH Survey)
Table no. 15: Agriculture
Sl no Village Net sown area
One time Two times Three times
1 Jamvada 854 162 NA
2 Daldi 762 286 NA
3 Gadha 1423 465 NA
4 Varnosari 829 94 NA
5 Korda 1500 200 NA
Total 5368.00 1207.00
(Source : House Hold Survey)
Table no. 16: Irrigation
Sl
no Village
Source 1 : Canal Source 2 : Check dam / Pond Source 3 : Well/Bore/Holia
Availability
months
Net
area(Ha)
Gross
area
Availability
months
Net
area(Ha)
Gross
area
Availability
months
Net
area(Ha)
Gross
area
1 Jamvada - - - 4 120 - 12 106 -
2 Daldi - - - 4 248 - - - -
3 Gadha - - - 4 200 - 12 193 -
4 Varnosari - - - 4 120 - 12 105 -
5 Korda - - - 4 160 - 12 298 -
Total 0 0 848 0 702 0
(Source : House Hold Survey & Bio Physical Survey)
Table no. 17: Crop details
Sl no Village
Kharif (Monsoon)
Crop 1 Juvar(fodder) Crop 2 BAJRA Crop 3 Castor
Area
(Ha.)
Production
(Kg.)
Productivity
(qt/ha)
Area
(Ha.)
Production
(Kg.)
Productivity
(qt/ha)
Area
(Ha.)
Production
(Kg.)
Productivity
(qt/ha)
1 Jamvada 450.0 3388500 75.3 256.2 235704 9.2 85.4 46970 5.5
2 Daldi 389.0 3306500 85.0 228.6 246888 10.8 76.2 38100 5.0
3 Gadha 734.0 4991200 68.0 426.9 290292 6.8 142.3 85380 6.0
4 Varnosari 376.0 3083200 82.0 248.7 310875 12.5 82.9 40621 4.9
5 Korda 1870.0 18400800 98.4 450.0 1278000 28.4 150.0 282000 18.8
Total : 3819.0 33170200.0 408.7 1610.4 2361759.0 67.7 536.8 493071.0 40.2
Sl no Village
Rabi (Winter)
Crop 1 Wheat Crop 2 Gram Crop 3 Cumin
Area
(Ha.)
Production
(Kg.)
Productivity
(qt/ha)
Area
(Ha.)
Production
(Kg.)
Productivity
(qt/ha)
Area
(Ha.)
Production
(Kg.)
Productivity
(qt/ha)
1 Jamvada 5.1 10353 20.3 0 0 0 158 44240 2.8
2 Daldi 8.2 16236 19.8 0 0 0 278 80620 2.9
3 Gadha 14.9 29800 20.0 0 0 0 450 112500 2.5
4 Varnosari 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 94 19740 2.1
5 Korda 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 200 44000 2.2
Total : 28 56389.0 60.1 0 0 0 1180 301100.0 12.5
Sl no Village
Zaid (Summer)
Crop
1 - -
Crop
2 - - Crop 3 - -
Area
(Ha.)
Production
(Kg.)
Productivity
(qt/ha)
Area
(Ha.)
Production
(Kg.)
Productivity
(qt/ha)
Area
(Ha.)
Production
(Kg.)
Productivity
(qt/ha)
1 Jamvada 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 Daldi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 Gadha 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 Varnosari 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5 Korda 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total : 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(Source : House Hold Survey)
3.1.4 Livestock
The village has 991 cows, 1243 buffaloes, 270 Bullocks, 1047 Goats and 855 sheep. Cows and buffaloes are of local breed. The average
milk production of cattle is nearly 4- 6 litre per day. Goat milk is used for personal purpose and not sold in market. Majority of rabari community
depends on goat and sheep rearing for their livelihood. Lack of rain and surface water has reduced the fodder and pasture availability for their
animals. This leads to heavy migration to other parts of the state with their herds of goats and sheep. There is one dairy cooperative in the each
village. The dairy cooperatives are well linked with Dudh Sager or Banas Dairies and farmers get proper prices for the produces.
Table no. 18: Livestock
Sl no Village
Buffalo Cow Total Milk
(Buffalo+Cow) Goat
Sheep Bullock Hen Others
No milk/day
(ltr) No
milk/day
(ltr) Litre / Annual No
milk/day
(ltr)
1 Jamvada 108 540 54 162 130221 112 40 210 41 0 5
2 Daldi 162 810 317 951 326666 230 70 25 30 15 4
3 Gadha 213 1065 36 108 217592 136 54 90 8 0 15
4 Varnosari 260 1300 284 852 399196 69 25 180 88 0 7
5 Korda 500 2500 300 900 630700 500 140 350 103 25 10
Total : 1243 6215 991 2973 1704374 1047 329 855 270 40 41 (Source : House Hold Survey)
Table no. 19: Drinking water
Sl no Village Ground water table (mt) Source of drinking water Availability in months Quality
1 Jamvada 20 mt, 140 mt Netharland Connection 11 Portable
2 Daladi 25 mt, 160 mt Netharland Connection 11
3 Gadha 20 mt, 140 mt Netharland Connection 11
4 Varnosari 20 mt, 140 mt Netharland Connection 11
5 Korda 20 mt, 140 mt Netharland Connection 11
(Source : Bio-Physical Survey)
Table no. 20: Details of Common Property Resources
Sl.
No.
Names of
project
Names of
Village CPR Particulars
Total Area (ha) Area available for treatment (ha)
Area owned/ In possession of
Pvt.
persons
Govt.
(specify
deptt.)
PRI
Any
other
(Pl.
Specify)
Pvt.
persons
Govt.
(specify
deptt.)
PRI
Any
other
(Pl.
Specify)
1 IWMP16 Jamvada Wasteland/ degraded land 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(Jamvada) Pastures 0 110.2 0 0 0 110.2 0 0
Orchards 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Village Woodlot 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Forest 0 292 0 0 0 292 0 0
Village Ponds/ Tanks 0 79.81 0 0 0 79.81 0 0
Community Buildings 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Weekly Markets 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Permanent markets 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Temples/ Places of worship 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Gramthan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 482.01 0 0 0 482.006 0 0
2 Daldi
Wasteland/ degraded land 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pastures 0 64.06 0 0 0 64.06 0 0
Orchards 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Village Woodlot 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Forest 0 160.2 0 0 0 160.2 0 0
Village Ponds/ Tanks 0 43.42 0 0 0 43.42 0 0
Community Buildings 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Weekly Markets 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Permanent markets 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Temples/ Places of worship 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Gramthan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 267.68 0 0 0 267.68 0 0
3 Gadha Wasteland/ degraded land 0 76 0 0 0 76 0 0
Pastures 0 224 0 0 0 224 0 0
Orchards 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Village Woodlot 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Forest 0 5.91 0 0 0 5.91 0 0
Village Ponds/ Tanks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Community Buildings 0 9 0 0 0 9 0 0
Weekly Markets 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Permanent markets 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Temples/ Places of worship 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Gramthan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 314.91 0 0 0 314.91 0 0
4 Varnosari
Wasteland/ degraded land 0 341.25 0 0 0 341.25 0 0
Pastures 0 5.13 0 0 0 5.13 0 0
Orchards 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Village Woodlot 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Forest 0 222.6 0 0 0 222.6 0 0
Village Ponds/ Tanks 0 0 8.93 0 0 0 8.93 0
Community Buildings 0 0.18 0 0 0 0.18 0 0
Weekly Markets 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Permanent markets 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Temples/ Places of worship 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Gramthan 0 0.9 0.9 0 0 0.9 0.9 0
Total 0 570.06 9.83 0 0 570.064 9.8294 0
5 Korda Wasteland/ degraded land 0 358 0 0 0 358 0 0
Pastures 0 18 0 0 0 18 0 0
Orchards 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Village Woodlot 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Forest 0 1334.9 0 0 0 1334.9 0 0
Village Ponds/ Tanks 0 6 0 0 0 6 0 0
Community Buildings 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0
Weekly Markets 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Permanent markets 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Temples/ Places of worship 0 5 0 0 0 5 0 0
Gramthan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 1723.9 0 0 0 1723.9 0 0
(Source : Bio Physical Survey & Talati Office)
3.2. Socio-Economic Profile
3.2.1 Demographic Status
Jamvada watershed project has a total of 2154 households with a population of 10589 (as per base-line survey) out of which 5578 are male
and 5011 female .The sex ratio is 898 female to 1000 male. There are 672 BPL Households considering scores between (1-16) and 727 BPL
Households considering (16-20) scores. The average family size is 4.8. The literacy rate is very low i.e. 51.33 per cent; male literacy rate is 64.45
percent (of total male population) and female literacy rate is as low as36.81 percent (of total female population). The major castes in the village are
Thakor, Jadav, Goswami Bajaniya, Brahmin, Mali,Rabari and Schedule Caste . Majority of population is involved in agriculture and animal
husbandry.
Table no. 21: Demographic information
Sl no Village Population SC ST
Male Female Total Male Female Total % Male Female Total %
1 Jamvada 763 739 1502 8 8 16 1.07% 8 9 17 1.13%
2 Daldi 544 502 1046 24 32 56 5.35% 6 5 11 1.05%
3 Gadha 923 831 1754 22 21 43 2.45% 0 0 0 0.00%
4 Varnosari 685 602 1287 44 44 88 6.84% 1 1 2 0.16%
5 Korda 2663 2337 5000 45 35 80 1.60% 5 3 8 0.16%
TOTAL 5578 5011 10589 143 140 283 2.67% 20 18 38 0.36%
(Source : House Hold Survey)
Table no. 22: Literacy rate
Sl no Village
Population Literacy Literacy %
above age 14
Literacy %
below age
14 Total Male % Female % Total %
1 Jamvada 1502 434 56.88% 255 34.51% 689 45.87% 34.22% 11.65%
2 Daldi 1046 325 59.74% 190 37.85% 515 49.24% 37.38% 11.85%
3 Gadha 1754 561 60.78% 260 31.29% 821 46.81% 38.65% 8.15%
4 Varnosari 1287 432 63.07% 317 52.66% 749 58.20% 47.55% 10.64%
5 Korda 5000 2178 81.79% 649 27.77% 2827 56.54% 42.80% 13.74%
(Source : House Hold Survey)
3.2.2 Migration Pattern
People migrate during summer season to different parts of the state like Gandhidam, mehsana , Vijapur and Suarashtra as daily wagers,
agricultural labours and construction workers. Lack of fodder availability and grazing land for smaller ruminant force these people to migrate to
other places. Yearly migration is very less. Daily wage labour work mainly construction work is done by the villagers in the nearby town ,
Radhanpur. The community with livestock mainly sheep are migrating in nature. Nearly 4-5 months the community stays outside the village for
providing quality fodder to the livestock.
Table no. 23: Migration details
Sl no Village Total
population
Migration Migration by months
Main reason for
migration
Income
during
migration /
month Total Male Female
Up to 3
months
3-6
months
More
than 6
months
1 Jamvada 1502 196 99 97 64 82 50
Livelihood &
Fodder
4000
2 Daldi 1046 177 92 85 52 71 54 4000
3 Gadha 1754 253 140 113 112 97 44 4000
4 Varnosari 1287 162 91 71 48 69 45 4000
5 Korda 5000 909 630 279 824 55 30 4000
Total : 10589 1697 1052 645 1100 374 223
(Source : House Hold Survey)
Table no. 24: Poverty
Sl no Village Total
Household
BPL % of BPL HH
Total Land
less HH
% of land less
HH 0-16 16-20 Total
1 Jamvada 285 35 95 130 45.61% 40 14.04%
2 Daldi 181 104 72 176 97.24% 67 37.02%
3 Gadha 387 232 122 354 91.47% 143 36.95%
4 Varnosari 262 114 60 174 66.41% 55 20.99%
5 Korda 1039 277 378 655 63.04% 148 14.24%
Total : 2154 762 727 1489 69.13% 453 21.03% (Source : House Hold Survey & Talati Office)
3.2.3 Infrastructure facilities:
Jamvada watershed is well connected with Santalpur Taluka with pucca roads and NH ways. The village has electricity connectivity under
Jyotigram Yojana of the State Government. Nearly all households in the village have electric connection. All the villages have primary schools.
Post office is only available in Korda. The nearest APMC is at Radhanpur which is nearly 35 km away. All the villages have milk collection centre.
No upper primary or higher secondary schools are there in the villages. All the students goes to Radhanpur ,which is the taluka town, for their
studies. The nearest market yard is also present in Radhanpur.
Table no. 25: Village infrastructure
Sl
no Village
Pucca
road
to the
village
(Y/N)
Schools Colleges
(Number)
Post
Office
(Distance)
Banks
(Number)
Distance
from
nearest
market
yard
Milk
collection
centre
(Number)
Milk
cooperative
(Number)
Other
cooperatives
/ CBIs
(Number)
Any other
institution LP UP HS
1 Jamvada Y Y N N N N N 35 Km. 2 1 1 Anganvadi
2 Daladi Y Y N N N N N 37 Km. 1 1 N Anganvadi
3 Gadha Y Y N N N y N 25 Km. 2 1 1 Anganvadi
4 Varnosari Y Y N N N N N 36 Km. 1 1 N Anganvadi
5 Korda Y Y Y Y N Y Y 31 KM 2 1 1 Anganvadi
(Source : House Hold Survey)
Table no. 26 : Facilities / HH assets
Sl no Village HHs with
electricity
HHs with
safety
latrines
HHs with phones HHs with vehicle HHs
with
TV set
HHs
with
cooking
gas
HHs
with
Drinking
water
HHs
with
fridge Land
line Mobile
2-
wheeler
4-
wheeler
1 Jamvada 270 7 0 141 27 10 39 6 264 1
2 Daldi 171 10 0 173 13 13 26 5 180 5
3 Gadha 320 19 0 303 42 27 83 10 312 5
4 Varnosari 262 4 0 258 5 7 25 7 262 0
5 Korda 942 145 5 704 189 70 92 89 789 178
Total : 1965 185 5 1579 276 127 265 117 1807 189
(Source : House Hold Survey)
3.2.4 Livelihood pattern
The villagers earn their livelihood from animal husbandry, agriculture and during lean seasons they migrate for daily wage labourers in
other towns.. Another major occupation of the people is Charcoal making, using the wood of prosopis which they collect from the community land
or forest. Nearly 34% of people depends on agriculture while 68% of people depends on Animal Husbandry and agriculture. Casual labour is the
main source of livelihood for the marginal, small and landless farmers. Bharat Gunthan (Embroidery ) handicraft is one of the primitive work of
this region is now on the verge of extinction. There is an increase in tendency of skilled labour work due to high daily wage and availability of
construction work in the nearby town. Although trenching work of cannal irrigation is going on the villages for providing cannal irrigation,
presently there is very limited source of irrigation. So many labour works in the cannal irrigation work in the adjoining villages. The per capita
income of the villages depends on the livelihood opportunities in the villages. The average per capita income ranges from Rs. 19550 to Rs 35678.
Table no. 27: Per capita Income
Sl no Village Agriculture/ Forestry/
Animal
husbandry/
Casual
labour/ Services/ Handicraft/ Others/ Total/
annual annual annual annual annual annual annual annual
1 Jamvada 12683 0 3390 1294 1102 0 3490 21960
2 Daldi 15115 0 5723 1066 787 0 4163 26854
3 Gadha 9503 0 1976 3872 1059 0 3141 19550
4 Varnosari 8055 0 4590 9044 453 0 5298 27440
5 Korda 15637 0 2402 8757 0 0 2564 29360
Total : 60993 0 18080 24033 3401 0 18657 125164
Average per
capita 12199 0 3616 4807 680 0 3731 25033
(Source : House Hold Survey)
3.2.5 Dependence on Common Property Resource
Around two decades ago, in a bid to check the advance of the encroaching desert, the government authorities arranged for a thorny desert
bush, commonly known in India as the Babul (Acacia nilotica ) and in rann as the Jangli or Ganda Baval (Prosopis juliflora) to be imported from
Israel and to be broadcasted in semi-desert parts of northern Kutch. This bush grows about ten feet and further spreads laterally like a wild fire. The
cutting of Ganda Baval was banned in this area three years ago. But now, almost every family in this area supplements its meagre income by
felling the tree and burning its wood in large pyramid-shaped piles to make charcoal, or kolsa as it is locally called. The charcoal is generally used
for fuel for daily meals. Very small or negligible number of people sells this charcoal for earning livelihood. Those who sells are reluctant to
disclose their identity as cutting Babul is banned.
Table no.28: Dependence on Forest/CPR
Sl no Village
Charcoal
Making Income
Benefit type
2 Income
Benefit type
2 Income Total income
% sells % sells % sells
1 Jamvada 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 Daldi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 Gadha 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 Varnosari 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5 Korda 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total : 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(Source : House Hold Survey)
Table no. 29: Livelihood pattern (Occupational distribution)
Sl
no Village
Total
workforce Agriculture
Animal husbandry
(AH)
Agriculture +
AH Casual labour Services Handicraft Others
1 Jamvada 285 78 28 48 52 4 0 75
2 Daldi 181 59 16 22 32 2 0 50
3 Gadha 387 108 45 62 75 5 0 92
4 Varnosari 262 77 25 42 48 2 0 68
5 Korda 1039 382 160 278 158 16 5 40
Total : 2154 704 274 452 365 29 5 325
(Source : House Hold Survey)
5.51
5.2
4.8
4.4
4.6
4.8
5
5.2
5.4
5.6
Gujarat India IWMP-16
(qt/
ha)
Castor Productivity(qt/ha)
3.2.6 Comparative data of the crop productivity of the area: project area vs. District vs. State vs. Country vs. World
“The term productivity in general means the total output per unit of factor input. For example land productivity means output per hectare of
land. Productivity can be calculated as dividing the total output of a particular crop by the total cultivated area under that crop.”
Data are made available by the Baseline survey , Handbook of Agriculture, ICAR publication 2006(For Gujarat and India), and Final
district plan (DAP) of Dept. of Agriculture (for Patan). The results indicate that the cluster villages have comparatively lower productivity
compared to Gujarat.. The productivity is low not only because that the land is unproductive or the farmer’s lack the skills to manage their crop but
also due lack to of source of irrigation, salty water and scarcity of rain.
The IWMP-14 villages comes under arid zone. So farmers grow crop according to the rainfall. If they get good rainfall they generally grow
high value crops like mustard, cumin, Bengal gram etc. In case of low rainfall they go for sorghum, and pearl millet. So we can say that monsoon
decides cropping patterns of the villages.
The IWMP-14 project has low productivity because of the following reasons
i) Full dependence on monsoon:
Water is essential input in agriculture. Due to the absence of proper irrigation facility,100% of the total cultivated area depends on
the uncertain monsoon. Therefore, the suceess or failure of the monsoon determines the success or failure of agriculture
production.The rainfall is unreliable due to two factors: untimely and inadequate rainfall.
ii) Low use of fertilizer per unit cropped area:
Farmers do not use sufficient fertilizer due to lack of water, scarcity of fertilizer in market and insufficient money for fertilizer.
Many a times they don’t get fertilizer at the right time.
iii) Traditional farming methods:
This also leads to low productivity. There is a lot of ignorance about the use of new farming methods and technologies such as
multiple cropping. They don’t use FYM and other input in a proper way; that is why they don’t get 100% output. So these factors
contribute to low productivity.
iv) Lack of adequate farm machinery:
Even today a large number of farmers in some villages use wooden ploughs and bullocks. They don’t have adequate machinery like
seed drill. So, old machineries take more time in tillage practices.
v) Lack of finances for farmers:
Most of the farmers are marginal or small farmers in the villages. They do not have enough money to buy good quality seeds,
machinery and other inputs.
vi) Lack of good quality seeds and fertilizers:
Good quality seed, fertilizer and pesticide are important factor in agriculture productivity. The use of good quality leads to higher
land productivity. In Jamvada Project, there are mainly two limitations in the use of fertilizer. First these fertilizers are most useful in
irrigated condition. But in Jamvada Project 100 per cent of land depend on rainfall. Second is mostly farmers use nitrogenous fertilizers
especially urea. This has resulted in disproportionate use of fertilizer depleting the quality of land.
vii) Lack of other facilities such as storage and marketing:
5-10% of agriculture product damage after harvesting due to scarcity of proper storage and proper market for sale. So they sell it to
local traders at the low prices. Farmers mainly face two problems in which first is proper means of transportation and roads and second
problem is farmers don’t have proper storage facilities.
CHAPTER – 4
WATERSHED ACTIVITIES
Watershed Activities
Watershed management as a strategy has been adopted by Government of India especially in the rain-fed regions of semi-arid tropics. These
regions are characterized by low and undependable rain, low soil fertility, poor infrastructure development, low literacy and high incidence of
migration. Several studies have identified that there is a dire need of a systematic and scientific approach to deal with watershed development. The
common guidelines generate a fresh and flexible framework for the next generation watershed development.
4.1. Scientific Planning
i) Cluster Approach
This envisages a broader vision of Geo-hydrological unit which involves treating a cluster of micro-watershed. The Jamvada Project
consists of three micro- watersheds namely 6A1B7b2#, 5H3C1c1#, 5H3C1c2# as their respective codes.
ii) Base line Survey
To access the impact of any watershed development programme a detailed baseline survey has to be conducted. This acts a
benchmark for any intervention during and post implementation of any development programme. A detailed baseline survey was
undertaken which involved household census survey, Bio-physical survey and Village level data collection from Talati –cum mantri.
Household census survey includes a detailed questionnaire which was been filled by visiting each and every household in the village. This
gave in the details of the demographic profile of the village, the literacy percentage, SC/ST population, number of BPL household, cattle
population, net consumption rate in the village, average milk production of the cattle and various schemes running and their benefits
Bio-physical survey was undertaken to identify various natural resources available in the village. It included the soil typology, wells
in the area, crop taken in the field, Cropping pattern, fertilizer used and various sources of irrigation in the field.
iii) Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA)
The past experience of watershed has given tremendous input to focus on creating accountability of the stakeholders towards the
programme. This has created an emphasis to include all the stakeholder communities and their local and indigenous Technological
Knowledge (ITK) while planning for any activity. Participatory approach provides a new path for planning, implementing, monitoring and
post- withdrawal activities with a complete accountability of the stakeholders. Various PRA techniques like resource mapping, social
mapping, and season calendars were used to understand the physical and social orientation of the village in general and watershed in
specific. These tools put the villagers in ease than the complicated questionnaires. Various tools like Matrix ranking, Venn Diagram were
used to identify various local vegetations (apt for a forestation) , Fodders crops , various institution and their significance in the life of the
farmers.
iv) Use of GIS and Remote sensing for planning
Use of various high science tools has been promoted at various stages of watershed development.
a) Prioritization
Geographical Information System(GIS) has been used for prioritization process. Various layer maps were created like Geo-
morphological, Soil, BPL Population, SC/ST population, Ground water Status, Drinking water situation Slope percent. These were all given
proper weight age according to the Do LR specification. This helped in prioritization of various watershed areas.
b) Planning
An action plan matrix was formulated by State Level Nodal Agency (SLNA) taking into account various features like the slope
percent, soil Depth, Soil Texture, Soil erosion in the area for wasteland, forest land and agricultural land. Global positioning System (GPS)
was used to identify each and every water conservation structures available in the project area. This was used to create a map. Contour Map
of vertical interval of 1 meter at a scale of 1:8000 was used for identifying various locations for soil and water conservation structures.
c) Hydrological modelling
Hydrology modelling technique was used for locating drainage, stream length, flow direction, sink, Flow accumulation. This model
overlaid over cadastral map to calculate the catchment area of each structures like the check dam etc. This has helped to remove the human
error which generally occurs while calculating the catchment area of a check dam.
Table no. 30: Details of Scientific Planning and Inputs in IWMP projects
S. No. Scientific criteria/ inputs used Whether scientific criteria
was used
(A) Planning
Cluster approach Yes
Whether technical back-stopping for the project has been arranged? If yes, mention the name of the
Institute -
Baseline survey Yes
Hydro-geological survey Yes
Contour mapping Yes
Participatory Net Planning (PNP) Yes
Remote sensing data-especially soil/ crop/ run-off cover Yes
Ridge to Valley treatment Yes
Online IT connectivity between -
(1) Project and DRDA cell/ZP Yes
(2) DRDA and SLNA Yes
(3) SLNA and DoLR Yes
Availability of GIS layers -
1. Cadastral map Yes
2. Village boundaries Yes
3. Drainage Yes
4. Soil (Soil nutrient status) Yes
5. Land use Yes
6. Ground water status Yes
7. Watershed boundaries Yes
8. Activity -
Crop simulation models# No
Integrated coupled analyzer/ near infrared visible spectroscopy/ medium spectroscopy for high speed
soil nutrient analysis No
Normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI)# No
Weather Station No
(B) Inputs
1. Bio-pesticides No
2. Organic manures No
3. Vermi compost No
4. Bio-fertilizer No
5. Water saving devices No
6. Mechanized tools/ implements No
7. Bio-fencing No
8. Nutrient budgeting No
9. Automatic water level recorders & sediment samplers No
Any other (please specify)
4.2. Institution building
i) Watershed Committee (WC)
It is a committee that is constituted by Gram Sabha to implement the watershed project with technical support of WDT in the village. This
committee is registered under society Registration Act 1860. The Gram Sabha of the village selects the chairman of the watershed committee with
the secretary who will be a paid functionary. A watershed Committee was formed accordingly in all the village .The watershed has divided into 5
villages Jamvada (950 ha), Daldi (603 ha), Gadha (1114 ha), Varnosari (653 ha) and Korda (2290 ha) so separate watershed committees was
formed in the project. Capacity building training to the watershed committee is given by WDT. The watershed committee has a pivotal role to play
during and after the project implementation period.
Table no.31: Details of PRA Activities conducted in the project area
Sr.
No
Village
Name
Name of the PRA
/Activity / FGD Date
Number
of
people
present
Lessons learnt / Understanding of the problem/situation
1 Jamvada
Gram Sabha, 24-Feb-2012 64 Provide Information
Committee Formation 24-Feb-2012 64 Different communities, Leadership of president. Interest of
villagers in the project.
PRA 22-May-2012 74 Migration ,lack of fodder, rainy farming ,less milk
production, poverty problem
2 Daldi
Gram Sabha, 15-02-12
31-05-12 74
Migration, lack of fodder, rainy farming, less education,
Cropping Pattern.
Committee Formation 31-May-2012 74 Provide Information
PRA 6-Jun-2012 51 Different communities, Leadership of president. Interest of
villagers in the project.
3 Gadha
Gram Sabha, 17-02-2012
04-06-2012 92
Migration, lack of fodder, rainy farming, less education,
Cropping Pattern.
Committee Formation 4-Jun-2012 92 Provide Information
PRA 5-Jun-2012 55 Different communities, Leadership of president. Interest of
villagers in the project.
4 Varnosari
Gram Sabha, 7-Feb-2012 60 Migration, lack of fodder, rainy farming, less education,
Cropping Pattern.
Committee Formation 7-Feb-2012 60 Provide Information
PRA 11-May-2012 85 Different communities, Leadership of president. Interest of
villagers in the project.
5 Korda
Gram Sabha, 30-Jul-2012 45 Migration, lack of fodder, rainy farming, less education,
Cropping Pattern.
Committee Formation 30-Jul-2012 65 Provide Information
PRA 3rd
Aug 76 Different communities, Leadership of president. Interest of
villagers in the project.
Problem Tree
Poverty
Unemployment
Not having effective skill
other than Frming and Animal husbandary
Law level of Illiterarcy
Not Having enough money for higher study
Migration for 8
months
One seasonal Farming
Not having fodder
favailability for animal (For 8
months)
Not having sufficient
infrastructure
Limited Market
Low Agricultural Production
Water Scarcity for agriculture
Unavailability of sufficient water
resource
Irratic and Irregular rainfall
Low fertile Soil
Poor Vegetative
Cover
saline water
ingress of sand
from Kutch
Poor Agricultural
Practice
Not Using advance tech. efficientlly and sufficient
fertilizer
abscence of effective effort for marketing
Absence of Credit availability
Not having any financial institution to land money
Low Income
Objective Tree
To improve Socio-economic status/
Migration
To improve new employment Opportunity
To linkage activity with existing
market
Handicraft, Fodder Bank.
To raise total family income with
existing activity
To improve soil fertility and water
availability
Waste weir, Seem Pond, Drainage Canal, farm pond, village
pond, Percolation tank, Afforestation.
To improve agriculture pactice
production imrovement training through KVK & Dry
farming research station, Crop demostration.
To Assure fodder availability, Improv
e animal health
Pasture land development, fodder Bank, Animal camp,.
Table no. 32: Watershed Committee details
Sl
.
N
o.
Names of
VWCs
Date
of
Regi.
as a
Socie
ty
(dd/
mm/
yyyy)
Name Designati
on
M
/
F
GE
N.
O
BC
S
C
S
T
S
F
M
F
L
F
La
nd-
less
U
G
SH
G
G
P
An
y
oth
er
Educati
onal
Qualific
ation
Functi
on/s
assign
ed#
1 Jamvada AYAR ANDABHAI
KARSHANBHAI
President M - 1 - - - - 1 - - - 1 - 5th
AYAR JIVANBHAI
BHURABHAI
Secretary M - 1 - - - 1 - - - - - - 7th
GOSWAMI
USHABEN
NIMGARBHAI
Member F - 1 - - - - - 1 - - - - 3th
NAYAK
LAXMANBHAI
DHUDABHAI
Member M - 1 - - - - 1 - - - - - 4th
RABARI RAJUBEN
SAGRAMBHAI
Member F - 1 - - - - - 1 - - - - -
THAKOR
RAMESHBHAI
DARGHABHAI
Member M - 1 - - - 1 - - - - - - TYBA
AYAR MADEVBHAI
KARSHANBHAI
Member M - 1 - - - - 1 - - - - 2th
AYAR RAMABHAI
GODADBHAI
Member M - 1 - - - - 1 - - - - - 4th
AYAR AJABHAI
PUNJABHAI
Member M - 1 - - 1 - - - - - 1 - 6th
AYAR
PARBATBHAI
AMRABHAI
Member M - 1 - - - 1 - - - - - - 9th
VAGHELA
PRAVINSINH
BADUBHA
Member M 1 - - - - - 1 - - - - - HSC
THAKOR KANJIJI
KALYANBHAI
Member M - 1 - - - - 1 - - - - - 2th
AYAR
RAYMALBHAI
RAVABHAI
Member M - 1 - - - - 1 - - - - - 7th
AYAR BABUBHAI
MANDANBHAI
Member M - 1 - - - - 1 - - - - - 5th
THAKOR AMRUTJI
JAYAJI
WDT
Member
M - 1 - - - - - - - - - - BRS
2 Daldi AYAR KHODABHAI
AJABHAI
President M - 1 - - 1 - -
MALEK MANUBHA
RAVAJI
Secretary M - 1 - - 1 - 10th
AYAR VALIBEN
BHIMABHAI
Member F - 1 - - - - -
RABARI
VIRAMBHAI
BHURABHAI
Member M - 1 - - - -
HARIJAN MANIBEN
VELABHAI
Member F - - 1 - - - -
RABARI NATHIBEN
JAMABHAI
Member F - 1 - - - - 7th
DESAI MAFABHAI
BHURABHAI
Member M - 1 - - - - -
MALEK
UMEDKHAN
BAVAJI
Member M - 1 - - 1 - 4th
AYAR
GOVINDBHAI
DAYABHAI
Member M - 1 - - - - 4th
THAKOR SARTANJI
GANESHJI
Member M - 1 - - - - -
BAJANIYA
LEELABHAI
UKABHAI
Member M - 1 - - - - 3th
PANCHAL
KANJIBHAI
JEHABHAI
Member M - 1 - - - - 5th
FAKIR GULABSHA
ISMAILSHA
Member M - 1 - - - - 5th
THAKOR AMRUTJI
JAYAJI
WDT
Member
M - 1 - - - - BRS
3 Gadha PARMAR
MENABEN
BAJUBHAI
President F - 1 - - 1 - - - 1 SCC
RABARI
PACHANBHAI
SADABHAI
Secretary M - 1 - - - - - - - - - 11th
THAKOR GAGUBEN
SAVABHAI
Member F - 1 - - - - - - -
VAGHELA
KUMBHAJI MAMUJI
Member M 1 - - - - - - - 9th
HARIJAN
NANJIBHAI
JIVABHAI
Member M - - 1 - - - - 5th
PANDYA
BHIKHIBEN
BABULAL
Member F 1 - - - - - - - -
RABARI
MANABHAI
GOKALBHAI
Member M - 1 - - - - - - -
RABARI SAVABHAI
RAMABHAI
Member M - 1 - - - - - - -
THAKOR AMRUTJI
JAYAJI
WDT
Member
M - 1 - - - - - - BRS
4 Varnosar
i
JADEJA KARSHANJI
GAMBHIRSINH
President M - 1 - - - HSC
THAKKAR
JYANTILAL PRAGJI
Secretary M - 1 - - - 5th
RABARI VALABHAI
SAGRAMBHAI
Member M - 1 - - - -
RABARI SATABHAI
VERSIBHAI
Member M - 1 - - - 2th
PARMAR SEMIBEN
SHANKARBHAI
Member F - - 1 - - -
THAKOR Member F - 1 - - - -
SHANKUBEN
RAVJIBHAI
THAKOR
SOMABHAI
CHATRAJI MUDAJI
Member M - 1 - - - 8th
LUHAR MEMABHAI
BHURABHAI
Member M - 1 - - - -
THAKOR TEJAJI
DEHAJI
Member M - 1 - - - -
THAKOR
MANABHAI
NARANBHAI
Member M - 1 - - 1 2th
THAKOR AMRUTJI
JAYAJI
WDT
Member
M - 1 - - - BRS
5 Korda Makvana Lebabhai
Dansangji
President M - 1 - - - - 1 - 4th
Makavana Pragabhai Secretary M - 1 - - 1 - - - - SSC
Joshi Premshankar
Natavarlal
Member M 1 - - - - - - - - PTC
Patel Nathubhai
Khemabhai
Member M - 1 - - - - - 1 - 2th
Harijan Somabhai
Devabhai
Member M - - 1 - - - - 1 - 7th
Kureshi Ramjanbhai
Abhaarambhai
Member M - 1 - - - - - - - PTC
Makvana Manguben
Paragbhai
Member F - 1 - - - - - 1 - -
Solanki Karshanbhai
Lavajibhai
Member M - 1 - - - - - 1 - -
Makvana Kankuben
Danabhai
Member M - 1 - - - - - 1 - -
Rabari Sagrambhai
Masharubhai
Member M - 1 - - - - - 1 - -
Parmar Manguben
Amratbhai
Member F - 1 - - - - - 1 - -
Thakor Amrutji Jayaji WDT
Member
M - 1 - - - - - - - BRS
Self Help Group
Self Help Groups are motivated, small homogenous groups organized together through credit and thrift activities. Self help group
initiative especially for women help uplift their livelihood. Generally self help groups include landless and poor women.
Before formation of the SHGs, during PRA activities, Focussed Group Discussions (FGDs) were held with the women, which came up with
the following observations:
a) Lack of proper credit facilities due to low intervention of formal financial credit institution.
b) Excessive exploitation of weaker section by money lenders
c) Lack of attitude for saving among poor people
d) Lack of knowledge on credit and thrift activity and banking.
With a detailed discussion with some of the local NGOs working in the area like SEWA, Cohesion Foundation ,it was planned to have some
capacity building training regarding SHG activities. It was also proposed to have some livelihood activities which will promote women
empowerment.
Table no. 33: SHG detail
S.
No
.
Name of
village
Total no. of registered SHGs No. of members No. of SC/ST in each
category
No. of BPL in each
category
With
only Men
With only
Women
With
both Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total
1 Jamvada
0 3 0 3
(i)
Landless 0 17 17 0 0 0 0 0 0
(ii) SF 0 23 23 0 0 0 0 3 3
(iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 3 0 3 0 0 40 40 0 0 0 0 3 3
2 Daldi
1 2 0 3
(i)
Landless 11 11 22 0 1 1 7 5 12
(ii) SF 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
(iii) MF 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 1 1
(iv) LF 0 8 8 0 0 0 0 2 2
Total 1 2 0 3 0 11 25 36 0 1 1 7 8 15
3 Gadha
0 0 3 3
(i)
Landless 14 11 25 0 0 0 10 10 20
(ii) SF 1 3 4 0 0 0 1 3 4
(iii) MF 4 2 6 0 0 0 4 2 6
(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 3 3 0 19 16 35 0 0 0 15 15 30
4 Varnosa
ri
1 1 0 2
(i)
Landless 11 11 22 1 11 12 7 11 18
(ii) SF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 1 1 0 2 0 11 11 22 1 11 12 7 11 18
5 Korda
0 3 0 3
(i)
Landless 0 32 32 0 1 1 0 20 20
(ii) SF 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 3 3
(iii) MF 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 3 0 3 0 0 37 37 0 1 1 0 23 23
(Source : Anganvadi Worker & SHG Grup Member )
User Group
User Groups are normally formed to manage an activity or asset created under the programme on a long term basis. The user group collect user
charges from their members, oversee the works and manage the benefits. It was decided that each group would formulate certain internal rules and
have a feeling of ownership with community spirit.
Table no. 34: UG detail
S.
No.
Name of
village
Total no. of UGs No. of members No. of SC/ST in each
category
No. of BPL in each
category
Men Women Both Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total
1 Jamvada 4 0 2 6
(i)Landless 2 2 0 0 0 2 0 2
(ii) SF 16 16 0 0 0 3 0 3
(iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0
(iv) LF 41 2 43 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total : 59 2 61 0 0 0 5 0 5
2 Daldi 4 0 2 6
(i)Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0
(ii) SF 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
(iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0
(iv) LF 34 11 45 1 0 1 4 0 4
Total : 36 11 47 1 0 1 4 0 4
3 Gadha 4 0 2 6
(i)Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0
(ii) SF 12 3 15 0 0 0 2 0 2
(iii) MF 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0
(iv) LF 38 4 42 0 0 0 6 0 6
Total : 53 7 60 0 0 0 8 0 8
4 Varnosari 4 0 2 6
(i)Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(ii) SF 3 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0
(iii) MF 8 0 8 0 0 0 1 0 1
(iv) LF 70 7 77 0 0 1 7 0 7
Total : 81 8 89 0 0 1 8 0 8
5 Korda 4 0 2 6
(i)Landless 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(ii) SF 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
(iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(iv) LF 34 2 36 0 0 0 8 8
Total : 34 2 37 0 0 0 8 0 8
4.3. Physical activities to be undertaken under IWMP-16 Jamvada
4.3.1 Entry Point activity (EPA)
EPA activities are taken up under watershed projects to build a rapport with the village community at the beginning of the project;
generally, certain important works which are in urgent demand of the local community are taken up. A group Discussion was conducted with
watershed Development Committee regarding the EPA activity, It was conveyed to the WC that an amount of Rs. 33.66 Lacks was allotted for
EPA activity, which was 4 per cent of total allocated budget. The villagers discussed various activities which they felt is important but after a brief
discussion it was conveyed to them that only those activities can be taken, which revive the common natural resources. It was also taken into
priority that there should be an instrument of convergence which will result in sustainability of activities.
Table no.35: Probable Entry point activities (EPA) (All financial figures in lakh Rs.)
S.
No.
Names of
Villages
Amount
earmarked for
EPA (in lacks)
Entry Point Activities planned (in
lacks)
Estimated
cost (in
lacks)
Expected outcome
1 Jamvada 5.70
Pond Entrance-Khariyavat 2.15 Animal & Public working use
Repairing of Khariyavat 0.50 Animal & Public working use
Cattle trough 1.12 Drinking water facility for
animal
Chabutara 1.93 Feeding place for birds
Sub Total 5.70
2 Daldi 3.618
Cattle trough 1.26 Drinking water facility for
animal
Pipe Culvert 0.91 Transportation facility
Repairing of Chabutara 0.35 Feeding place for birds
Drinking Water facility (Parab) 1.098 Drinking water facility
Sub Total 3.618
3 Gadha 6.684
Drinking water facility- pipeline 2.03 Drinking water facility
Protection Wall in Anganvadi 0.85
Repairing of Cattle Trough 0.375 Drinking water facility for
animal
Water Tank(20,000 ltr) 1.279 Drinking water facility
Pond Entrance-Khariyavat 2.15 Animal & Public working use
Sub Total 6.684
4 Varnosari 3.918
Cattle trough 1.54 Drinking water facility for
animal
Repairing of Chabutara 0.20 Feeding place for birds
Drinking Water Tank(20,000 ltr) 2.178 Drinking water facility
Sub Total 3.918
5 Korda 13.74
Protection Wall OF Charm Kund 0.423
Pipeline for Cattle Trough-1 0.093 Drinking water facility for
animal
Pipeline for Cattle Trough-2 0.735 Drinking water facility for
animal
Renovation of open sump with Pipeline 1.82 Working use for public
Earthen bund 0.60 Reduce soil erosion & surface
water conservation
Border Plantation 0.88 Reduce soil erosion
Afforstation 2.27 Reduce soil erosion
entrance-Khariyavat at Village Pond 3.99 Animal & Public working use
Drinking water facility-Stand Post With
Pipeline 0.30 Drinking water facility
Renovation of Water Tank 0.47 Drinking water facility
Water Storage Tank in Gaushala 0.574 Drinking water facility
Renovation Of Pumping House 1.585 Drinking water facility
Sub Total 13.74
Total 33.66
4.3.2. Watershed Development Works:
Watershed development works are to be done during second phase of watershed project. A multi-tier ridge to valley sequence approach
should be approached towards implementation of watershed development projects. A net budget of 56 percent is allotted for this work. As the
average slope of the watershed is nearly 1-3 percentages, proper ridge to valley approach is not applicable for this watershed. The main constrains
in this watershed is soil erosion, salinity of soil, lack of water harvesting mechanism, drainage of low lying areas and lack of vegetation.
The main treatments in this pasture and non arable land are Earthen Bund with waste weir for discharge of excess water, percolation tank
and village ponds. This generally includes water conservation or surface water storage structures. In arable and personal land the main treatment is
planned for soil erosion. The main treatments are farm bunds, injection well, field outlet and border plantation. Being highly labour intensive, will
involve more of manual labour; so, funds from Mahatma National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS) can be taken.
Following structures are been proposed in these areas
a. Field Bund with grass seeding
b. Percolation tank / villages pond
c. Earthen Bunds
d. Waste Weir
e. Border Plantation
f. Injection well
Table no.36: Details of ridge line treatment / land based activities in watershed works*
No
.
Village
name
Name of
structures
Type of treatment Type of land Target
(i)
Ridg
e
area
(R)
(ii)
Drai
nage
line
(D)
(iii)
Lan
d
dev.
(L)
(i)
Privat
e
(ii)
Communit
y
(iii)
Others
(pl.
specify
)
No.
No. of
units
(Nos./
cu.m./
rmt/Ha)
Estimated cost
(Rs. in lakh)
Expected
month & year
of completion
(mm/yyyy)
M W O T
1 JAMVA
DA
Earthen Bund - - L - C - 2 No. - - - 7.184 2013-14
Waste weir - D - - C - 4 No. - - - 9.000 2014-15
Farm Bund - - L P - - 48152 Cum - - - 11.24 2013-14
Land leveling
P
340 ha
15.72 2014-16
Seem Pond - - L - C - 6 No. - - - 14.20 2014-15
Farm Pond - - L P - - 13 No. - - - 5.850 2013-14
Farm Outlet - - L P - - 32 No. - - - 9.600 2013-14
Horticulture plant
Plantation - - L - C - 2000 No. - - - 1.00 2013-14
Village Pond - - - - C - 2 No. - - - 6.000 2014-15
Sub Total 79.79
2 DALDI
Farm Bund - - L P - - 31583 Cum - - - 17.686 2013-14
Earthen Bund - - L - C - 1 No 3.00 2013-14
Waste weir - D - - C - 1 No 2.00 2013-14
Seem Pond - - L - C - 7 No - - - 18.132 2014-15
Farm Pond - - L P - - 11 No - - - 4.950 2014-15
Farm Outlet - - L P - - 13 No - 3.90 2014-15
Horticulture plant
Plantation - - L P - - 1968 No - - - 0.984
Sub Total 50.652
No
.
Village
name
Name of
structures
Type of treatment Type of land Target
(i)
Ridg
e
area
(R)
(ii)
Drai
nage
line
(D)
(iii)
Lan
d
dev.
(L)
(i)
Privat
e
(ii)
Communit
y
(iii)
Others
(pl.
specify
)
No.
No. of
units
(Nos./
cu.m./
rmt/Ha
)
Estimated cost
(Rs. in lakh)
Expected
month & year
of completion
(mm/yyyy)
M W O T
3 GADH
A
Farm Bund - - L P - - 69280 Cum - - - 38.797
Seem Pond - - L C - 11 No - - - 32.500
Waste weir - D - - C - 2 No 4.00 2013-14
Check dam D L - C 1 No 3.00 2013-14
Drainage Line
for pond inlet - - L P - - 100 Rmt - - - 1.50 2013-14
Farm Outlet - - L P - - 9 No - - - 2.70 2015-16
Injection well
(Holiya) - - L P - - 3 No - - - 0.650 2015-16
Horticulture plant
Plantation - - L P - - 2858 Nos. - - - 1.429 2015-16
Pond Inlet - - L P C - 1 Nos. - - 2.000
Village Pond - - - - C 2 No, - - - 7.000
Sub Total 93.576
4 VARN
OSARI
Check dam
Repairing - - L - C - 1 No - - - 1.00 2014-15
Waste weir - D - - C - 4 No - - - 7.00 2014-15
Farm Bund - - L P - - 32400 Cum - - - 18.144 2013-14
Seem Pond - - L - C - 5 No - - - 8.500 2013-14
Farm Pond - - L P - - 5 No - - - 2.250 2013-14
Farm Outlet - - L P - - 2 No - - - 0.60 2014-15
Border Fencing
(Wire) - - L P - - 4300 Rmt - - - 16.77 2014-15
Horticulture plant
Plantation - - L p C - 1176 No - - - 0.588
Sub Total 54.852
No
.
Village
name
Name of
structures
Type of treatment Type of land Target
(i)
Ridg
e
area
(R)
(ii)
Drai
nage
line
(D)
(iii)
Lan
d
dev.
(L)
(i)
Privat
e
(ii)
Communit
y
(iii)
Others
(pl.
specify
)
No.
No. of
units
(Nos./
cu.m./
rmt/Ha
)
Estimated cost
(Rs. in lakh)
Expected
month & year
of completion
(mm/yyyy)
M W O T
5 KORD
A
Earthen Bund - - L - C - 5 No 17.484 2014-15
Waste weir - D - - C - 8 No 18.75 2014-15
Farm Bund - - L P - - 76774 Cum 42.993 2013-14
Seem Pond - - L - C - 7 No 22.297 2015-16
Farm Pond - - L P - - 3 No 1.350 2015-16
Farm Outlet - - L P - - 8 No 2.400 2015-16
Earthen Bund
(Border of rann) - - L P - - 7 No 25.000 2015-16
Horticulture plant
Plantation - - L - C - 4766 No 2.383 2014-15
Injection well
(Holiya) p - 1 No 0.250 2013-14
Land Leveling - - L P - - 243 Ha. 36.452 2015-16
Village Pond - - - - C 7 No, - - - 20.000 2015-16
Village Pond
Inlet - - - - C - 1 No. - - - 3.000 2015-16
Sub Total 192.36
Grant Total 471.24
36.1 Technical Detail & Model Estimates of Work phase Watershed Work
Farm Pond:
There is very little qualitative difference between a pond/tank, which usually serves the population of a village, and farm pond,
which serves an individual agricultural field. Farm ponds greatly vary in size depending upon the rainfall. These have only a few metres of length
and width and are built across the flow path of natural drainage channels. Surplus water from one pond spills over to a lower pond. In some cases a
series of farm ponds are built on one single stream. Each pond caters to the irrigation needs of one farm and also augments ground water recharge.
Table No. 36.1.1 Technical Details of Farm Pond
NO Item Description NO L B H/D Total
QTY Unit
1
Item No.1: Quarrying transporting and depositing
selected materials from borrow area for raising of
embankment work in all zone of earthen dam for
specified thickness as directed for lead up to 1 km
and all lifts etc. complete. (SOR Irri. P.No. 2 Item
No.6)
1 20 15 1.50 480 Cmt.
No. Qty. Unit Item of Work Rate Per Amount
1 480.00 Cmt
Item No.1 : Quarrying transporting and depositing
selected materials from borrow area for raising of
embankment work in all zone of earthen dam for
specified thickness as directed for lead up to 1 km
and all lifts etc. complete. SOR Irri. P.No. 2 Item
No.6
47.80 Cmt 22944.00
Total 22944.00
Say Total 22944.00
SOR After two Years 15 % Extra Add 3441.60
26385.6
Say Total 26000
Table No 36.1.2 Recharging Bore well
NO DESCRIPTION No L B H Total QTY Unit
1 Item No.1 Driling the berl upto 10mm depth with 5" size (as per Local
rate by manually) 1.00 19.00 - - 19.00 Rmt
2 Item No.2 PVC Trade mark wi pipe … etc… comp. comp (5mm
thickness)&4"Dia PVC Pipe (as per local rate by manually) 1.00 20.00 - - 20.00 Rmt
3 Item No.3 Providing and Laying filter chamber With plaster.
(Attached Rate Analysis) 1.00 1.00 - - 1 No
4 Item No.4 Providing and Fixing Name Name plate Of Marble Size 0.45
* 0.30 with good writing etc. 1.00 1.00 - - 1 No
Rate Analysis Filter Chamber
NO DESCRIPTION No L B H Total
QTY Unit Rate Total
3 Item No.3 Providing and Laying filter chamber In Cement
Concrete/Brick Masonry Chamber & inner side plaster.
Excavation 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.10 4.40 CMT 75.00 330.00
B.B.C.C.1:5:10 1.00 2.00 2.00 0.10 0.40 CMT 1944.00 777.60
Brick Masanary1:6 2.00 2.00 0.23 1.20 1.104 CMT - -
2.00 1.20 0.23 1.20 0.66 CMT - -
1.59 CMT 3248.00 6346.59
Plaster 4.00 2.50 1.60 - 16.00 Smt 118.20 1891.20
Total 9345.39
Say Total 9345.00
NO QTY DESCRIPTION RATE PER AMOUNT
1 19.00 Item No.1 Driling the berl upto 10mm depth with 5" size (as
per Local rate by manually) 500.00 Rmt 9500.00
2 20.00
Item No.2 PVC Trade mark wi pipe … etc… comp. comp
(5mm thickness)&4"Dia PVC Pipe (as per local rate by
manually)
330.00 Rmt 6600.00
3 1.00 Item No.3 Providing and Laying filter chamber With
plaster. (Attached Rate Analysis) 9345.00 No 9345.00
4 1.00 Item No.4 Providing & fixing name plate of marbale size
0.45 × 0.30 with good writing etc… comp. (M.R.V.) 650.00 No 650.00
Total 26095.00
Say Total 26095.00
Extra Add 3914.25
SOR After two Years 15 %
Total 30009.25
Say Total 30000.000
Table No 36.1.3 Technical details of Earth Bund
NO Item Description NO L B H/D Total QTY Unit
1
Item No.2 : Quarrying transporting and depositing selected materials
from borrow area for raising of embankment work in all zone of
earthen dam for specified thickness as directed for lead upto 1 km
and all lifts etc. complete. SOR Irri. P.No. 2 Item No.6
1 100 1/2(2.35+9.75) 1.80 1089.00 Cmt.
2
Item No.3 Providing & Fixing Sign boards made out of Iron sheet
size 90*60 cms. Rectangle as per the design of IRC-67-1977 per
treated with one coat of red oxaid and two coats of best quality epoxy
paint: reflectorised with retro reflective sheeting as per IRC-30-
1968,2.1 m long stand post and frame fabricted from suitable size
iron angle of 50*50*5mm, &75*75*6 mm as required,painted with
best quality epoxy coatings in black and with bends. the details of
symbol of inscription / muberas for each board shall be in 1:2:4 CC
block of size 45*45*60 cms. for each leg. including excavation
curring etc. complete under the supervision of engineer in charge.
(M.R)
1 - - - 1 Nos.
No. Qty. Unit Item of Work Rate Per Amount
1 1089.00 Cmt.
Item No.2 : Quarrying transporting and depositing selected materials from borrow
area for raising of embankment work in all zone of earthen dam for specified
thickness as directed for lead upto 1 km and all lifts etc.complete. (SOR Irri. P.No.
2 Item No.6)
47.80 Cmt 52054.20
2 1.00 No.
Item No.3 Providing & Fixing Sign boards made out of Iron sheet size 90*60 cms.
Rectangle as per the design of IRC-67-1977 per treated with one coat of red oxaid
and two coats of best quality epoxy paint: reflectorised with retro reflective
sheeting as per IRC-30-1968,2.1 m long stand post and frame fabricted from
suitable size iron angle of 50*50*5mm, &75*75*6 mm as required,painted with
best quality epoxy coatings in black and with bends. the details of symbol of
inscription / muberas for each board shall be in 1:2:4 CC block of size 45*45*60
cms. for each leg. including excavation curring etc. complete under the supervision
of engineer in charge. (M.R)
4500 No 4500.00
Total 56554.20
Say Total 56554.00
SOR After two Years 15 % Extra Add 8483.10
Total 56137.10
Table No 36.1.4 Technical details of Waste weir
Item Description No. Length Width Depth Qty Unit
1
Excavation for foundation in loose and soft soil ---------------
Body wall 1 2.00 10.00 1.20 24.00
Appron 1 10.00 2.50 0.60 15.00
Side wall 2 4.00 1.00 1.20 9.60
Extn. Wall 2 2.00 1.00 1.20 4.80
Total 53.40 Cmt
2
Providing and laying cement concrete 1:4:8 ------------------
Body Wall 1 10.00 1.50 0.20 3.00
Side wall 2 4.00 1.00 0.20 1.60
Extn. Wall 2 1.50 1.00 0.20 0.60
Total 5.20 Cmt
3
Providing and laying C.C. 1:3:6 stone agg. 20mm --------------
Body wall 1 10.00 0.85 2.00 17.00
Key 1 10.00 0.30 0.30 0.90
Appron 1 10.00 2.00 0.50 10.00
Body wall 2 1.50 0.60 3.10 5.58
2 1.90 0.60 2.30 5.24
2 0.43 2.90 0.60 1.50
Extn. Wall 2 1.00 0.60 3.30 3.96
Total 44.18 Cmt
4
Providing 15 mm thich cement plaster In single coat ----------
Top 1 10.00 0.60 0.00 6.00
Side wall 2 10.00 1.50 0.00 30.00
Key 3 10.00 0.30 0.00 9.00
2 2.00 3.50 1.60 22.40
2 2.00 1.715 0.60 4.12
2 4.00 0.60 0.00 4.80
2 2.60 2.10 0.00 10.92
2 1.00 0.60 0.00 1.20
Total 88.44 Cmt
5 Filling available excavated earth (excluding rock) --------- 1 28.00 2.00 1.00 56.00 Cmt
6 Providing and fixing Marble Plate 0.45 x 0.60----------- 1
1.00 No.
Qty Item Descriptions Rate Unit Amount
53.40 1
Excavation for foundation in loose and soft soil unto 1.5mt depth incl. sorting out and
stacking of useful materials and disposing of excavated stuff unto 50mt lead (SOR R
&B.,-P/17,I no 1 A)
75.00 Cmt 4005.00
5.20 2
Providing and laying cement concrete 1:4:8 (1 cement : 4 coarse sand : 8 hand broken
stone aggregates 40 mm nomial size) and curing complete excluding cost of from work in
(A) Foundation and plinth ( S.O.R R&B P- 19 it no 5.3.3)
2701.00 Cmt 14045.20
44.18 3
Providing and laying C.C. 1:3:6 stone agg. 20mm nominal size and finishing smooth with
curing etc complete excluding the cost of formwork and reinforcement for RCC work
(SOR R &B.,-P/19,I no 5.3.14 iv)
3586.00 Cmt 158429.48
88.44 4
Providing 15 mm thich cement plaster In single coat on fair side brick/concrete wall for
interior plastering upto floor two level finished even and smooth in: (i) cement mortar
1:3 (1 cement : 3 sand) S.O.R R&B P-65 It no -2 (1)
118.20 Smt 10453.61
56.00 5
Filling available excavated earth (excluding rock) In trenched plinth, sides of foundations
etc. in layers not exceeding 20 cm in depth consolidating each deposited layer by
ramming and watering) (S.O.R R&B P/17 it 4.12)
310.00 Cmt 17360.00
1.00 6 Providing and fixing Marble Plate 0.45 x 0.60 with good writing etc complete ( M.R) 1500.00 No 1500.00
Total
205793.29
Say Total 207793.00
SOR After two Years 15 % Extra Add 30869.00
Total 236662.00
Say Total 236000.00
Table No 36.1.4 Technical details of Field Outlet
Item Description No. Length Width Depth Qty Unit
1
Excavation for foundation in loose and soft soil ---------------
Side wall 4 0.80 0.50 0.50 0.80
Side wall 2 2.50 0.50 0.50 1.25
Body Wall 1 3.00 2.00 0.20 1.20
Appron 1 3.00 1.10 0.30 0.99
Total 4.24 Cmt
2
Providing and laying cement concrete 1:3:6 ------------------
Side wall 4 0.80 0.50 1.50 2.40
Side wall 2 2.50 0.50 1.50 3.75
Body Wall 1 3.00 0.80 1.00 2.40
Appron 1 3.00 1.15 0.30 1.04
Total 9.59 Cmt
3
Providing 15 mm thich cement plaster In single coat ----------
Side wall 1 4.00 1.30 1.00 5.20
Side wall 2 3.10 0.30 0.30 1.86
Top 2 4.10 0.50 0.00 4.10
Side wall 1 2.00 3.00 0.60 3.60
wall 1 2.00 2.50 1.00 5.00
body Top 1 3.00 0.50 0.00 1.50
Total 21.26 Smt
4 Providing and fixing Marble Plate 0.45 x 0.60----------- 1
1.00 No.
Qty Item Descriptions Rate Unit Amount
4.24 1
Excavation for foundation in loose and soft soil unto 1.5mt depth incl. sorting out and
stacking of useful materials and disposing of excavated stuff unto 50mt lead (SOR R
&B.,-P/17,I no 1 A)
75.00 Cmt 318.00
9.59 2
Providing and laying C.C. 1:3:6 stone agg. 20mm nominal size and finishing smooth
with curing etc complete excluding the cost of formwork and reinforcement for RCC
work (SOR R &B.,-P/19,I no 5.3.14 iv)
3586.00 Cmt 34389.74
21.26 3
Providing 15 mm thich cement plaster In single coat on fair side brick/concrete wall
for interior plastering upto floor two level finished even and smooth in: (i) cement
mortar 1:3 (1 cement : 3 sand) S.O.R R&B P-65 It no -2 (1)
118.20 Smt 2512.93
1.00 4 Providing and fixing Marble Plate 0.45 x 0.60 with good writing etc complete (
M.R) 1500.00 No 1500.00
Total 38720.67
Say Total 38720.00
SOR After Two Years 15 % Extra Add 5808.00
Total
44528.00
Say Total 45000.00
Table No 36.1.4 Technical details of Field Bund
NO Item Description NO L B H/D Total QTY Unit
1
Item No.1: Quarrying transporting and depositing selected materials from borrow area for raising of embankment work in all zone of earthen dam for specified thickness as directed for lead up to 1 km and all lifts etc. complete. SOR Irri. P.No. 2 Item No.6
1 100 0.3+1.8
2 0.75 78.75 Cmt.
2
Item No.2 : Vegetative Work Showing Of Seed On The Constructed RIdge Farm Bund Suppling Of Stylo /Dhaman Seed @ 4gm/mt(in Single line M.R.V
1 100.00 - - 100.00 Rmt
No. Qty. Unit Item of Work Rate Per Amount
1 78.75 Cmt
Item No.1 : Quarrying transporting and depositing selected materials from borrow area for raising of embankment work in all zone of earthen dam for specified thickness as directed for lead upto 1 km and all lifts etc. complete. (SOR Irri. P.No. 2 Item No.6)
47.80 Cmt 3764.25
2 100.00 Rmt
Item No.2 : Vegetative Work Showing Of Seed On The Constructed RIdge Farm Bund Suppling Of Stylo /Dhaman Seed @ 4gm/mt(in Single line M.R.V
0.50 Rmt 50.00
Total 3814.25 Say Total 3815.00
SOR After two Years 15 % Extra Add 572.25
Say Total 4387.25
Table no.37: Activities related to Surface water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)
S.
No
.
Village
Name
Type of
structures
Proposed target
Augmentation/ repair of existing
structures Construction of new structures Total target
No
.
Area to
be
irrigate
d (ha)
Storage
capacity(cm
t)
Estimate
d cost
No
.
Area to
be
irrigate
d (ha)
Storag
e
capacit
y
Estimate
d cost
Area to
be
irrigate
d (ha)
Storag
e
capacit
y
Estimate
d cost
1 Jamvada
Seem Pond 0 0 0 0 5 55 16780 14.2 55 16780 14.2
Farm Pond 0 0 0 0 13 13 5711 5.85 13 5711 5.85
check dam
(Waste weir) 1 0 0 0 4 10 720 9 10 720 9
Farm Outlet 0 0 0 0 32 24 960 9.6 24 960 9.6
Earthen bund
(Sanked &
Bajaniya)
0 0 0 0 2 16 29855 7.18432 16 29855 7.18432
Village pond 0 0 0 0 2 22 10100 6 22 10100 6
Sub Total 1 0 0 0 58 140 64126 51.83432 140 64126 51.83432
2 Daldi
Seem Pond 0 0 0 0 7 77 19570 18.132 77 19570 18.13152
Farm Pond 0 0 0 0 11 11 330 4.95 11 330 4.95
check dam
(Waste weir) 0 0 0 0 1 2.5 180 2.00 2.5 180 2
Farm Outlet 0 0 0 0 13 9.75 390 3.9 9.75 390 3.9
Earthen bund
(Tetariya) 0 0 0 0 1 8 5020 3 8 5020 3
Sub Total 0 0 0 0 33 108.25 25490 31.98152 108.25 25490 31.98152
3 Gadha
Seem Pond 0 0 0 0 11 121 59033 32.5002 121 59033 32.5002
Farm Pond 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
check dam
(Waste weir) 0 0 0 0 3 7.5 540 7 7.5 540 7
Farm Outlet 0 0 0 0 1 0.75 30 2.7 0.75 30 2.7
Sub Total 0 0 0 0 15 129.25 59603 42.2002 129.25 59603 42.2002
4 Varnosari
Seem Pond 0 0 0 0 5 55 15780 8.5 55 15780 8.5
Farm Pond 0 0 0 0 5 5 2196 2.25 5 2196 2.25
check dam
(Waste weir) 1 0 2092 1 4 10 720 8 10 2812 9
Farm Outlet 0 0 0 0 2 1.5 60 0.6 1.5 60 0.6
Sub Total 1 0 2092 1 16 71.5 18756 19.35 71.5 20848 20.35
5 Korda
Seem Pond 0 0 0 0 7 77 48325 22.29731 77 48325 22.29731
Farm Pond 0 0 0 0 3 3 1506 1.35 3 1506 1.35
check dam
(Waste weir) 1 0 4184 2 8 20 1440 18.75 20 5624 20.75
Farm Outlet 0 0 0 0 8 6 240 2.4 6 240 2.4
Earthen
bund(Vadiya
sar &
0 0 0 0 5 40 15439 17.484 40 15439 17.484
Thakor)
Village pond 0 0 0 0 1 11 5100 3 11 5100 3
Sub Total 1 0 4184 2 31 146 66950 62.28131 146 71134 64.28131
Total 3 0 6276 3 15
3 595 234925 207.6474 595 241201 210.6474
Table no.38: Activities related to recharging ground water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lack Rs.)
S.
No
.
Village
Name
Type of
structures
Proposed target
Augmentation/ repair of existing
structures Construction of new structures Total target
No
.
Area to
be
irrigate
d (ha)
Storag
e
capacit
y
Estimate
d cost
No
.
Area to
be
irrigate
d (ha)
Storag
e
capacit
y
Estimate
d cost
Area to
be
irrigate
d (ha)
Storag
e
capacit
y
Estimate
d cost
1 JAMVADA
(i)Open wells 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(ii)Bore wells 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Injection well
(holiya) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(Pl. specify) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sub Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 DALDI
(i)Open wells 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(ii)Bore wells 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Injection well
(holiya) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(Pl. specify) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sub Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 GADHA
(i)Open wells 2 6 0 0.5 0 0 0 0 6 0 0.5
(ii)Bore wells 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Injection well
(holiya) 1 1 0 0.25 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.25
(Pl. specify) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sub Total 3 7 0 0.75 0 0 0 0 7 0 0.75
4 VARNOSA
RI
(i)Open wells 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(ii)Bore wells 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Injection well
(holiya) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(Pl. specify) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sub Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5 KORDA
(i)Open wells 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(ii)Bore wells 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Injection well
(holiya) 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0.3 0 0 0.3
(Pl. specify) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sub Total 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0.3 0 0 0.3
Total 3 7 0 0.75 1 0 0 0.3 7 0 1.05
Table no.39: Details of activities related to livelihood, production system and micro-enterprises
S.
No.
Name of
village Name of activity
Type of land Executing agency Target Expected
month &
year of
completio
n
(mm/yyy
y)
(i) Private
(ii)
Communit
y
(iii)
Others
(pl.
specify)
(i) UG
Estimated cost
(Lacks)
(ii)SHG
(iii) Others (pl.
specify)
1 JAMVADA
Production system
Crop Demonstration p 1 Individual 0.450 2014-15
Micro Irrigation System p 30 Individual 9.000 2015-16
Animal Camp C 4 Others 1.200 2015-16
Animal Shed P 12 Individual 3.600 2014-15
Sub Total 14.250
2. Livelihood
Cattle Feed Unit C 1 SHG 2.000 2014-15
Agro Service Center C 1 SHG 2.000 2014-15
Agri Machinery spare parts
repairing and selling unit C 1 SHG 2.000 2015-16
Low cost drip irrigation P 4 Individual 1.200 2015-16
Reaper C 1 UG 0.925 2015-16
Oil Engine C 12 Individual 3.600 2016-17
Tailoring Work P 4 Individual 0.600 2015-16
Revolving fund (Seed Money) P 2 Individual 0.500 2013-14
Sub Total 12.825
Total 27.075
2 Daldi
Production
Crop Demonstration p 1 Individual 0.450 2015-16
Land Treatment (Gypsum) p 137 Individual 1.095 2014-15
Micro Irrigation System p 13 Individual 3.900 2015-16
Animal Camp C 2 Others 0.600 2015-16
Animal Shed p 10 Individual 3.000 2014-15
Sub Total 9.045
2. Livelihood
Cattle Feed Unit C 1 SHG 1.8905 2015-16
Low cost drip irrigation P 9 Individual 2.700 2015-16
Thresher C 1 SHG 1.750 2015-16
Reaper C 1 SHG 0.900 2016-17
Revolving fund (Seed Money) P 3 Individual 0.900 2014-15
Sub Total 8.1405
Total 17.186
3 Gadha
Production
Crop Demonstration p 1 Individual 0.450 2014-15
Land Treatment (Gypsum) P 183 Individual 1.460 2014-15
Micro Irrigation System p 26 Individual 7.800 2014-15
Animal Camp C 4 Others 1.600 2015-16
Animal Shed P 5 Individual 5.400 2015-16
Sub Total 16.710
2. Livelihood
Cattle Feed Unit C 1 SHG 2.000 2015-16
Rotavator C 1 SHG 1.239 2015-16
Agro Service Center C 1 SHG 2.000 2015-16
Oil Engine C 12 Individual 5.400 2015-16
Cumin Processing C 1 SHG 2.000 2015-16
Reaper C 1 Ug 0.900 2016-17
Low cost drip irrigation P 4 Individual 1.200 2016-17
Revolving fund (Seed Money) P 1 Individual 0.300 2014-15
Sub Total 15.039
Total 31.749
4 Varnosari
Production
Crop Demonstration p 3 Individual 1.500 2014-15
Micro Irrigation System P 10 Individual 3.000 2015-16
Land Treatment (Gypsum) P 137 Individual 1.095 2015-16
Animal Camp C 2 Others 0.600 2015-16
Animal Shed p 12 Individual 3.600 2015-16
Sub Total 9.795
Livelihood
Cattle Feed Unit C 1 SHG 2.000 2014-15
Agro Service Center C 1 SHG 2.000 2014-15
Low cost drip irrigation P 5 Individual 1.366 2016-17
Oil Engine P 5 Individual 2.250 2016-17
Reaper C 1 SHG 0.900 2015-16
Revolving fund (Seed Money) P 1 Individual 0.300 2015-16
Sub Total 8.816
Total 18.611
5 Korda
Production
Crop Demonstration 1 0.750 2014-15
Land Treatment (Gypsum) p 1200 Individual 9.600 2014-15
Micro Irrigation System p 50 Individual 15.000 2015-16
Animal Shed p 30 Individual 9.000 2015-16
Sub Total 34.350
2. Livelihood
Cattle Feed Unit P C 1 SHG 2.000 2015-16
Agro Service Center P C 1 VWC 4.000 2015-16
Agri Machinery spare parts
repairing and selling unit P C 1 SHG 2.015 2015-16
Oil Engine P C 30 Individual 13.500 2015-16
Cumin Processing P 1 SHG 2.000 2015-16
Rotavator P C 4 UG 5.000 2015-16
Reaper P C 1 UG 0.900 2016-17
Poultry Unit p 5 Individual 1.500 2016-17
Sub Total 30.915
Total 65.265
Grund Total 159.885
Cattle Feed Centre
Cattle feed centre is unit for procurement and selling of cattle feed to the village farmers. The centre will be managed by the SHGs and
regular guidance will be provided by the DWDU unit. The procurement of the feed will be done by the SHG from different cattle feed producing
units and dairy cooperatives. After procurement the feed will be sold to the registered cattle owner. Before procurement of the lot the cattle owners
have to registrar themselves to avail the service. This centre will provide cotton cake, Isabgul, mineral mixture, Sagardan, soya cake etc all inputs
for quality enhancement of milk.
Benefit:
Ensure timely supply of cattle feed
Increase the milk production and fat quantity
Will provide balance diet to the cattle
Table 39.1. Primary Model for A Cattle feed centre
The estimate is considering one month cattle feed for 100 cattle and 10 kg intake
Sl No Particulars Quantity Rate Amount
1 Cotton cake (50kg) 90 840 75600
2 Isabgul (60kg) 25 700 17500
3 Mineral Mix (60kg bag) 25 800 20000
4 Sagardana (70kg) 50 650 32500
5 Room rent 1 1000 1000
6 weighing 1 2000 2000
7 weighing stand 1 2500 2500
8 Stationary 1 500 500
9 Labour 3 3000 9000
10 Furniture 20000
11 Miscellaneous 20000
12 Total 200600
Particulars
day cattle feed
quantity
Total
quantity
one day
bag Rate Amount
Cost
per
cattle
per
monoth
Cotton Cattle 15 100 3 4500 90 840 75600 756
isabgul
15 100 1 1500 25 700 17500 175
MM
15 100 1 1500 25 800 20000 200
Sagardan
15 100 2 3000 50 650 32500 325
Profit distribution and re-investment
Sl No Iteam
Cost per
cattle per
monoth
Project
cost
(30%)
Farmers
cost
(70%) Bag
Project
cost
Farmers
cost
Total
Profit
Profit
Reinvested
Profit
retained
by farmer
Repay of
loan(IWMP)
1
Cotton Cake(50 kg
each) 1512 454 1058 90 40824 40824 5400 4050 270 1080
2
Isabgul cake(60 kg
each) 350 140 210 25 29400 3500 1250 937.5 62.5 250
3
Mineral mix(60 kg
each) 400 160 240 25 38400 4000 1250 937.5 62.5 250
4 Sagardana (70kg) 650 260 390 50 101400 13000 1750 1312.5 87.5 350
210024 61324 9650 7238 483 1930
Table 39.2. Primary Model for Dairy Collection Centre
Dairy Collection Centre
Sl NO Heads Rate
1 Fat testing machine 45000
2 Weighing machine 7500
3 Furniture 25000
4 Computer 20000
5 Electric fitting, Light and Fan 8000
6 Milk container 25000
8 Deposit (registration fee ) to Banas Dairy Palanpur 5000
7 Salary for staff (2 staff,@2000 per month) 2000
9 Capital 34500
10 Total 172000
Total Fixed cost 170000
Sl NO Particulars (Variable cost) Rate
1 Maintenance cost (Rs) - per month 5000
2 Electric bill (Rs)- Per month 1000
3 Daily milk collection (lit) - average 250
4 Rate (As per fat content @ 4.2 for 1 fat) ,considering 7 fat average , (Rs) per litre 29.4
5 Cost of procuring milk (per day) 7350
6 Total milk procurement cost (Rs)- per month 220500
7 TOTAL variable cost (Rs)- per month 228500
Sl NO Particulars (Income) Rate
1 Selling price of milk ( 8% + 0.03%;milk sp gr 1.030) 32
2 Sample milk (0.03% of total milk) 8
3 Gross revenue - per day (Rs) 8178
4 Gross revenue (Rs)- per month 245352
Revenue model
Sl NO
Particulars Year 0 1 2 3 4
1 Capital cost 170,000
2 Recurring cost with depreciation of 5% of fixed assets 2,742,000 2,879,025 2,879,025 2,879,025 2,879,025
3 Total Expenditure 2,912,000 2,879,025 2,879,025 2,879,025 2,879,025
4 PV @ 8% discounting rate 2,912,000 2,665,764 2,468,300 2,285,463 2,116,169
5 Revenue 2,944,228 3,003,113 3,063,175 3,124,438 3,186,927
6 PV @ 8% discounting rate 2,944,228 2,780,660 2,626,179 2,480,280 2,342,487
7 Net Income 32228 114896 157879 194817 226317
BC Ratio 4.22
Table 39.3. Primary Model for Cumin Processing Unit
1 Fixed cost Amount (Rs)
2 Cumin processing 200000
4 Total Fixed cost 200000
1 Variable cost
2 Electric rate per unit 9
3 Working Hour - per day (Unit per day) 18
4 Cost incur per day 162
5 Labour cost 200
6 Total variable cost per day 362
7 Months of working per year 2
8 Total variable cost yearly 21720
1 Income
2 Rent per hour 900
3 Working Hour - per day 18
4 Gross income - per day 16200
5 Gross income - per year 972000
Revenue model
Sl NO Particulars Year 0 1 2 3 4 Total 5 years
1 Capital cost 200,000
2 Recurring cost with depreciation
of 5% of fixed assets 21,720 241,720 241,720 241,720 241,720
3 Total Expenditure 221,720 241,720 241,720 241,720 241,720
4 PV @ 8% discounting rate 221,720 223,815 207,236 191,885 177,671 800,607
5 Revenue 972,000 991,440 1,011,269 1,031,494 1,052,124
6 PV @ 8% discounting rate 972,000 918,000 867,000 818,833 773,343
7 Net Income 750280 694185 659764 626948 595671 2,576,569
Table no. 40: Activities related to livelihoods by Self Help Groups (SHGs) in the project areas
S. No. Names of
Villages
Major activities of the SHGs No. of SHGs
involved
Average annual
income from activity
per SHG Name of activity
1 Jamvada
Cattle Feed Unit 1 30000
Agro Service Center 1 45000
Agri Machinery spare parts repairing and selling unit 1 20000
2 Daldi Cattle Feed Unit 1 28000
3 Gadha
Cattle Feed Unit 1 31000
Agro Service Center 1 36000
Rotavetar 1 12700
4 Varnosari
Cattle Feed Unit 1 34000
Agro Service Center 1 24000
5 Korda
Cattle Feed Unit 2 73000
Cumin Processing 1 75000
Agri Machinery spare parts repairing and selling unit 1 21000
Total 13 429700
Table no. 41: Linkages developed at village level
Sr.
No. Village Name of activity Forward/Backward linkage Linkage with Outcome
1 Jamvada
Cattle Feed Unit Farmer cooperatives Cattle feed companies Quality feed at lower
price
Agro Service Center Agro produce market, Village
for agri inputs
Village level individual
farmers, agri input companies
Quality input at lower
price
Agri Machinery spare
parts repairing and
selling unit
Agriculture Part produce market,
Village for agri inputs
Village level individual
farmers, agri Part input
companies
Quality input at lower
price
2 Daldi Cattle Feed Unit Farmer cooperatives Cattle feed companies Quality feed at lower
price
3 Gadha
Cattle Feed Unit Farmer cooperatives Cattle feed companies Quality feed at lower
price
Agro Service Center Agro produce market, Village
for agri inputs
Village level individual
farmers, agri input companies
Quality input at lower
price
Rotavator Agriculture Machinery work
Lend development inputs
Village level individual
farmers, agri Work Production up
4 Varnosari
Cattle Feed Unit Farmer cooperatives Cattle feed companies Quality feed at lower
price
Agro Service Center Agro produce market, Village
for agri inputs
Village level individual
farmers, agri input companies
Quality input at lower
price
5 Korda
Cattle Feed Unit Farmer cooperatives Cattle feed companies Quality feed at lower
price
Agri Machinery spare
parts repairing and
selling unit
Agriculture Part produce market,
Village for agri inputs
Village level individual
farmers, agri Part input
companies
Quality input at lower
price
Table no.42: Details of activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works
S.
No
.
Name of
village
Name of
structure/
work
Type of treatment Type of land Executin
g agency Target
(i)
Ridg
e
area
(R)
(ii)
Drainag
e line
(D)
(iii)
Lan
d
dev.
(L)
(i)
Privat
e
(ii)
Communit
y
(iii)
Others
(pl.
specify
)
(i) UG
Area
(ha)
No. of
plants
Estimated
cost (Rs.
in lakh)
Expecte
d month
& year
of
completi
on (mm/
yyyy)
(ii)SHG
(iii)
Others
(pl.
specify)
1
IWMP-16
JAMVAD
A
Horticulture 0 0 L P C 0 Ug 2554 12768 6.384
Regeneratio
n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Agro-
forestry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Fuel wood 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Fodder 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
A
forestation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pasture dev. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nursery
raising 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Others (pl.
specify) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Table no.43: Details of activities in the CPRs in the project areas
S. No. Name(s) of the
villages CPR particulars Activity proposed
Target
Target area
under the
activity (ha)
Estimated
expenditure
(Rs.)
Expected no.
of
beneficiaries
1 Jamvada Total Village Cover Seem Pond 41.21 12.2 64
2 Daldi Total Village Cover Seem Pond 24.1 17.931 50
3 Gadha Total Village Cover Seem Pond 151.41 31.5 64
4 Varnosari Total Village Cover Seem Pond 264.31 8.673 45
5 Korda Total Village Cover Seem Pond 21.4 18.992 113
Total 502.43 89.296 336
Table no. 44: Capacity Building Institution
Sr.
No.
Name of the
Training
Institute
Full Address with
contact no.,
website & e-mail
Type of
Institute# Area(s) of specialization
Accreditation
details
Trainings
Reference
Year
No. of
trainings
assigned
No. of
trainees
to be
trained
1 Krishi Vigyan
kendra Samoda, Patan
Research
Institute
Agriculture/Horticulture/Animal
Husbandry GoI
2012-
2014 27 459
2
Dantiwada
Agri
University
Banaskantha University Agriculture/Horticulture/Animal
Husbandry GoI
2012-
2014 8 136
3 VRTI/seva Kutch/Radhanpur NGO Capacity Building Society Reg.
Act
2012-
2014 10 170
4 BISAG Gandhinagar Space
application Remote GoG
2012-
2014 10 170
Table no. 45: Capacity Building plan
S. No. District Project Stakeholders Total no. of
persons
No. of
persons to
be trained
No. of training
programmes
Estimated cost
(in lacks)
1 JAMVADA
PIA 4 4 3 0.25
WDTs 5 5 4 1.67
UGs 70 70 7 1.5
SHGs 40 40 4 1.00
WCs 13 13 4 1.15
GPs 4 4 2 0.055
Community 100 100 10 1.50
Others (Pl. specify) 0 0 0 0
Sub total
236 236 34 7.125
2 DALDI
PIA 4 4 2 0.15
WDTs 6 6 2 0.84
UGs 60 60 6 0.99
SHGs 36 36 4 0.9
WCs 12 12 5 0.8
GPs 2 2 1 0.05
Community 82 82 6 0.7925
Others (Pl. specify) 0 0 0 0
Sub total
202 202 26 4.5225
3 GADHA
PIA 4 4 4 0.25
WDTs 6 6 5 1.25
UGs 70 70 5 1.722
SHGs 35 35 6 1.75
WCs 8 8 5 1.14
GPs 4 4 2 0.85
Community 98 98 8 1.393
Others (Pl. specify) 0 0 0 0
Sub total
225 225 35 8.355
4 VARNOSARI
PIA 5 5 3 0.75
WDTs 6 6 2 0.57
UGs 42 42 3 0.8875
SHGs 22 22 3 0.87
WCs 9 9 4 0.97
GPs 4 4 2 0.98
Community 65 65 4 0.87
Others (Pl. specify) 0 0 0 0
Sub total
153 153 21 5.8975
4 KORDA
PIA 5 5 5 0.29
WDTs 6 6 5 1.875
UGs 120 120 10 3.14
SHGs 36 36 4 2.85
WCs 15 15 9 3.27
GPs 4 4 3 1.18
Community 140 140 10 4.57
Others (Pl. specify) 0 0 0 0
Sub total
326 326 46 17.175
Total
1142 1142 162 43.075
Table no.46: Information, Education and Communication Activities
S. No. Activity Executing agency Estimated expenditure
(Rs.)
Outcome (may quantify,
wherever possible)
1 Wall Slogan DWDU, Patan 25000
Awareness & Motivation
for the importance of
watershed project
2 Street plays Local Drama Groups 24000
3 Video shows DWDU, Patan 24000
4 Pamphlets and posters DWDU, Patan 6000
5 Banners, Hoardings DWDU, Patan 6000
Total :
85000
CHAPTER 5
BUDGET
Table no. 47: Budget at a glance for the project
Sl no Budget component Cost requirement
1 Administrative costs 84.15
2 Monitoring 8.415
3 Evaluation 8.415
4 Entry Point activity 33.66
5 Institution and Capacity Building 42.075
6 Detailed Project Report 8.415
7 Watershed Development Works 471.24
8 Livelihood activities for asset less 75.735
9 Production systems and micro-enterprises 84.15
10 Consolidation phase 25.245
TOTAL : 841.50
Table no. 48: Village wise- component wise budget available under IWMP (Rs. In Lakh)
Sr. No. Particular JAMVADA DALDI GADHA VARNOSARI KORADA TOTAL
1 Budget Component
Administrative Costs 14.250 9.045 16.71 9.795 34.35 84.15
Monitoring 1.425 0.9045 1.671 0.9795 3.435 8.415
Evaluation 1.425 0.9045 1.671 0.9795 3.435 8.415
2 Preparatory phase, including
Entry point activities 5.7 3.618 6.684 3.918 13.74 33.66
Institution and capacity building 7.125 4.5225 8.355 4.8975 17.175 42.075
Detailed Project Report (DPR) 1.425 0.9045 1.671 0.9795 3.435 8.415
3 Watershed Works Phase
Watershed development works 79.8 50.652 93.576 54.852 192.36 471.24
Livelihood activities for the asset less persons 12.825 8.1405 15.039 8.8155 30.915 75.735
Production system and micro enterprises 14.25 9.05 16.71 9.795 34.35 84.15
4 Consolidation phase 4.275 2.7135 5.013 2.9385 10.305 25.245
Total : 142.50 90.45 167.10 97.95 343.50 841.50
Table no. 49: Village wise gap in funds requirement
Sl No Village Total cost requirement Total funds available under
IWMP Gap in funds requirement
1 JAMVADA 173 142.5 30.50
2 DALDI 108.85 90.45 18.40
3 GADHA 204.8 167.1 37.70
4 VARNOSARI 109.75 97.95 11.80
5 KORDA 400.5 343.5 57.00
Total
996.9 841.5 155.4
Table no.50: Details of Convergence of IWMP with other Schemes
No. Village Phase/ Type of
work*
Activity to be
carried out
Fund made
available to IWMP
due to convergence
(in lakh)
Scheme with
which
convergence
took place
Reference no. of
activity/ task/
structure in DPR
Level at which
decision for
convergence was
taken
1 Jamvada
Land base Pond deepening 9.00 MGNREGA
District level
Total 9.00
Production Drip Irrigation 21.00 GGRC, NHM
District level
Production Animal Camp 0.50 Agriculture
District level
Total 21.50
Sub Total 30.50
2 Daldi
Land base Pond deepening 9.00 MGNREGA
District level
Total 9.00
Production Drip Irrigation 9.10 GGRC, NHM
District level
Production Animal Camp 0.30 Agriculture
District level
Total 9.40
Sub Total 18.40
3 Gadha
Land base Pond deepening 19.00 MGNREGA
District level
Total 19.00
Production Drip Irrigation 18.20 GGRC, NHM
District level
Production Animal Camp 0.50 Agriculture
District level
Total 18.70
Sub Total 37.70
4 Varnosari
Land base Pond deepening 4.50 MGNREGA
District level
Total 4.50
Production Drip Irrigation 7.00 GGRC, NHM
District level
Production Animal Camp 0.30 Agriculture
District level
Total 7.30
Sub Total 11.80
5 Korda
Land base Pond deepening 22.00 MGNREGA
District level
Total 22.00
Production Drip Irrigation 35.00 GGRC, NHM
District level
Total 35.00
Sub Total 57.00
Grand Total 155.40
Table no. 51: Public-Private Partnership in the IWMP projects
S.
No.
Name of
Private Sector
Partner
Agency
Type of agreement signed Financial contribution
Partnership
Interventions
Expected
Outcomes Comments
a) M o U b)Contract c) Any other
(pl. specify) IWMP
Private
sector
- - - - - - - -
CHAPTER 6
OUTCOME
Table no.52: Environmental Benefits
Sr.
No. Village
Soil loss
(tonne/ha.)
Water storage
(‘000 lit) Ground water table (mt) Tree cover
Pre-
project
Expected
post-
project
Pre-
project
Expected
post-
project
Open
well:
pre-
project
Open
well:
post-
project
Bore
well:
pre-
project
Bore
well:
post-
project
Area
in Ha.:
pre-
project
Area
in Ha.:
post-
project
Tree
count:
pre-
project
Tree
count:
post-
project
1 JAMVADA 0 0 19238 64126 0 0 305 293 0 0 800 2000
2 DALDI 0 0 7647 25490 0 0 289 277 0 0 787 1968
3 GADHA 0 0 17881 59603 0 0 327 314 0 0 1143 2858
4 VARNOSARI 0 0 6254 20848 0 0 310 298 0 0 571 1439
5 KORDA 0 0 21340 71134 0 0 269 258 0 0 1911 4766
Average : 0 0 14472 48240.2 0 0 300 288 0 0 1042 2606
Table no. 53: Status of Drinking water
S.
No.
Names of
Villages
Availability of drinking water Quality of drinking water
Comments (no. of months in a year)
Pre-project Expected Post
project Pre-project
Expected Post-
project
1 JAMVADA
12 12 Potable Potable -
2 DALDI
3 GADHA
4 VARNOSARI
5 KORDA
Table no. 54:Crop area and yield in the project area
Sr.
No.
Name of
village Name of crops
Pre-project Expected Post-project
Area Production in
Kg
Average
Yield (Qtl)
per ha.
Area Production in
Kg
Average
Yield (Qtl)
per ha. (ha) (ha)
1 Jamvada
Kharif
Juvar 450.0 3388500 75.3 472.5 3735821 79.1
Bajra 256.2 235704 9.2 269.0 259864 9.7
Castor 85.4 46970 5.5 89.7 51784 5.8
Rabi
Wheat 5.1 10353 20.30 6.4 13588 21.3
Gram 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0
Cumin 158 44240 2.80 221.2 65033 2.9
2 Daldi
Kharif
Juvar 389.0 3306500 85 408.5 3645416 89.3
Bajra 228.6 246888 10.8 240.0 272194 11.3
Castor 76.2 38100 5 80.0 42005 5.3
Rabi
Wheat 8.2 16236 19.8 10.3 21310 20.8
Gram 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0
Cumin 278 80620 2.9 389.2 118511 3.0
3 Gadha
Kharif
Juvar 734.0 4991200 68.0 770.7 5502798 71.4
Bajra 426.9 290292 6.8 448.2 320047 7.1
Castor 142.3 85380 6.0 149.4 94131 6.3
Rabi
Wheat 14.90 29800 20.00 18.6 39113 21.0
Gram 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0
Cumin 450 112500 2.50 630.0 165375 2.6
4 Varnosari
Kharif
Juvar 376.0 3083200 82.0 394.8 3399228 86.1
Bajra 248.7 310875 12.5 261.1 342740 13.1
Castor 82.9 40621 4.9 87.0 44785 5.1
Rabi
Wheat 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Gram 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Cumin 94.00 28365.00 2.51 131.6 34683 2.6
5 Korda
Kharif
Juvar 1870 18400800 98 1963.5 20286882 103.3
Bajra 450 1278000 28 472.5 1408995 29.8
Castor 150 282000 19 157.5 310905 19.7
Rabi
Wheat 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0
Gram 0 0 0 0.0 0 0.0
Cumin 200 44000 2 280.0 64680 2.3
Table no. 55: Area under horticulture / other crops
S. No. Name of Village Crop Existing area under the
crop Area post project (ha)
1 JAMVADA Border Plantation - 19.5
2 DALDI Border Plantation - 10.9
3 GADHA Border Plantation - 19.4
4 VARNOSARI Border Plantation - 8.2
5 KORDA Border Plantation - 25.7
Table no. 56: Details of livestock in the project areas
(For fluids please mention in litres, for solids please mention in kgs. and income in Rs.)
S. No. Name of
Village Type of Animal
Pre-Project Expected Post-project
Remarks No.
Yield
(lit per
day)
Income
(Rs per
annum)
No. Yield Income
1 JAMVADA
Milch-animals 274 742 8013600 288 779 8414280 Taking present year
as base year
Draught Purpose animals 41 0 0 0 0
Animals for other purpose 215 0 0 0 0
2 DALDI
Milch-animals 709 1831 45775 744 1923 20763540 Taking present year
as base year
Draught Purpose animals 30 0 0 0 0
Animals for other purpose 44 0 0 0 0
3 GADHA
Milch-animals 385 1227 30675 404 1288 13914180 Taking present year
as base year
Draught Purpose animals 8 0 0 0 0
Animals for other purpose 105 0 0 0 0
4 VARNOSARI
Milch-animals 613 2177 54425 644 2286 24687180 Taking present year
as base year
Draught Purpose animals 88 0 0 0 0
Animals for other purpose 187 0 0 0 0
5 KORDA
Milch-animals 1300 3540 88500 1365 3717 40143600 Taking present year
as base year
Draught Purpose animals 103 0 0 0 0
Animals for other purpose 385 0 0 0 0
Table no. 57: Employment to be supplemented in the Project area
NO. Names of
Villages
Wage employment Self employment
No. of man days No. of beneficiaries No. of beneficiaries
SC ST Others Women Total SC ST Others Women Total SC ST Others Women Total
1 JAMVADA 0 0 18842 16889 35731 0 0 299 268 567 0 0 299 2 145
2 DALDI 2211 0 9947 10522 22680 50 0 225 238 513 50 0 0 66 263
3 GADHA 1791 0 20651 19458 41900 30 0 346 326 702 30 0 0 13 307
4 VARNOSARI 3751 0 6448 14361 24561 64 0 110 245 419 64 0 0 122 245
5 KORDA 9165 695 38266 38006 86131 211 16 881 875 1983 211 16 0 8 446
Table no. 58: Seasonal migration from Project area
No. Names of villages No. of persons migrating No. of days per year of migration
Pre-project Expected post project Pre-project Expected post project
1 JAMVADA 196 98 100 60
2 DALDI 177 89 100 60
3 GADHA 253 127 100 60
4 VARNOSARI 162 81 100 60
5 KORDA 909 455 100 60
Table no.59: Per capita Income
Sr. No. Village Source of Income Pre-project Expected post project
1 Jamvada
Agriculture 12683 16488
Forestry 0 0
Animal Husbandry 3390 4407
Casual Labour 1294 1682
Services 1102 1433
Handicraft 0 0
Others 3490 4537
Total : 21960 28548
2 Daldi
Agriculture 15115 19649
Forestry 0 0
Animal Husbandry 5723 7440
Casual Labour 1066 1386
Services 787 1023
Handicraft 0 0
Others 4163 5412
Total : 26854 34910
3 Gadha
Agriculture 9503 12353
Forestry 0 0
Animal Husbandry 1976 2569
Casual Labour 3872 5033
Services 1059 1376
Handicraft 0 0
Others 3141 4083
Total : 19550 25415
4 Varnosari
Agriculture 8055 10472
Forestry 0 0
Animal Husbandry 4590 5967
Casual Labour 9044 11757
Services 453 589
Handicraft 0 0
Others 5298 6888
Total : 27440 35672
5 Korda
Agriculture 15637 20328
Forestry 0 0
Animal Husbandry 2402 3122
Casual Labour 8757 11384
Services 0 0
Handicraft 0 0
Others 2564 3334
Total : 29360 38168
Total : 125164 162713
Table no. 60: Backward-Forward linkages
No. Project Type of Marketing Facility Pre-project
(no.)
During the
project (no.)
Post-project
(no.)
1 Iwmp -16
Backward linkages 0 0 0
Seed certification 0 0 0
Seed supply system 0 5 5
Fertilizer supply system 0 5 5
Pesticide supply system 0 5 5
Credit institutions 0 0 0
Water supply 0 0 0
Extension services 0 5 5
Nurseries 0 0 0
Tools/machinery suppliers 0 2 2
Price Support system 0 0 0
Labour 0 0 0
Any other (please specify) 0 0 0
Forward linkages 0 5 5
Harvesting/threshing machinery 0 5 5
Storage (including cold storage) 0 0 0
Road network 0 0 0
Transport facilities 0 0 0
Markets / Mandis 0 0 0
Agro and other Industries 0 5 5
Milk and other collection centers 0 0 0
Any other (please specify)
CHAPTER -7
QUALITY AND SUSTAINABILITY ISSUES
7.1 Plans for Monitoring and Evaluation
A Web-based GIS System is being developed for monitoring and evaluating the project in its planning & implementation phases. The
system would be available on a public domain and can be accessed by all the stakeholders of the project. The system shows the entire state of
Gujarat and all of those areas selected over the next 18 years. Filtering allows the user to zoom onto one particular project. Details related to soil
type, Land-use classification, inhabitation etc., can be obtained village-wise. Furthermore, survey-number wise details related to ownership,
irrigation source, yield etc., can also be accessed by the users of the system. This system is being used for pooling up the details obtained from the
DPR. In other words, the DPR is made available online in the form of a database which will help the stakeholders know areas of importance viz.,
already treated areas/historical works in the area, proposed areas for treatment etc., for further treatment and planning. The system would also show
the satellite imageries of various years from the project inception stage to the project closing stages. This allows the user to evaluate the
effectiveness of the treatment and thereby plan corrective measures for the project area. The system would serve as an aiding tool to the planners
and evaluators for judging the efficacy of the project.
Yet another component of the Web-based GIS system is the Mobile based Monitoring & evaluation System, which will help the ground
staff alias WDTs (Watershed Development Team) to transmit information from the ground level to the central server. Also, any higher-up official
in charge of the project can obtain information regarding the project area on their mobile phone by means of an SMS. The system works in the
following manner. The WDT equipped with a GPS instrument marks the latitude-longitude information of various treatment areas during the DPR.
The probable sites are then transferred onto the central server. During the works phase, any progress in the treatment areas is reported to the server
by means of an SMS by the WDT. Similarly, any nodal officer or higher-up official can view the progress in a project by means of summarized
reports generated over frequent periods of time.
7.2 Plans For Project management
The Project management of any watershed programme is very important. It mainly depends upon the community organisation and the
village level institutes. In Jamvada project, watershed committee and various user group have been formulated for post project operation and
maintenance of assets created during project period. Major emphasis will be on equity and sustainable benefit of the project even after
implementation stage. A proper link-up will be built during project period with various institutes and capacity building organisation. They will act
as a major kingpin during post implementation for scaling up the successful experience during project.
7.3 Watershed Development Fund
The major source of financial assistance after post implementation period is watershed Development Fund. The contribution of it will
comes mainly fund the following:
7.4 User Charges
Various user groups will be formed in village. These user groups will collect user charges according to the designated rules formed during
the formation of user group. These funds will be transferred to the WDF funds as per these formulated rules.
The secretary of watershed committee (WC) shall maintain the records of the following.
CHAPTER -8
MAPS