detailed project report -...

DETAILED PROJECT REPORT

IWMP 2011-12

IWMP-11 {SahyadrI}

District Watershed Development Unit, Dang

Gujarat State Watershed Management Agency

D e t a i l e d P r o j e c t R e p o r t , I W M P - 1 1 ( S A H Y A D R I )

2 | P a g e D i s t r i c t W a t e r s h e d D e v e l o p m e n t U n i t , D a n g

Table of Contents

Contents CHAPTER – 1 .............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 9

1.1 Project Background .................................................................................................................................................................................................. 10

Table no.1: Basic project information ............................................................................................................................................................................. 11

1.2 Need for watershed Development Programme ......................................................................................................................................................... 13

Table no.2: Weight age of the project ............................................................................................................................................................................. 14

Table no.2.1 Criteria and Weight age for selection of Watershed ................................................................................................................................... 16

Table no.3: Watershed information ................................................................................................................................................................................ 17

1.3 Other Developmental projects/schemes running in the Sahyadri project: .................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.

Table no.4: Developmental programmes running in the project area: ................................................................................ Error! Bookmark not defined.

Table no.5: Previous Watershed programmes in the project area: .................................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.

CHAPTER – 2 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 18

2.1 Project Implementing Agency ................................................................................................................................................................................... 19

2.2 About Gujarat Forest Department as a PIA ................................................................................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined.

2.2.1 The organization and its objectives: ......................................................................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.

2.2.2 Objectives of the Forest Dept.: ................................................................................................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined.

2.3 SWOT Analysis of the PIA: ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 19

Table no. 6: PIA ............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 20

Table no. 7: Staff at PIA level ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 21

CHAPTER – 3 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 22

3.1. Geography & Geo-hydrology ................................................................................................................................................................................... 23

3.1.1. Land use pattern: ................................................................................................................................................................................................. 23

Table no. 8: Land use pattern ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 23



3.1.2 Soil and topography: ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 24

Table no. 9: Soil type and topography: ........................................................................................................................................................................... 24

Table no. 10: Flood and drought condition: .................................................................................................................................................................... 26

Table no. 11.1: Soil Erosion ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 26

Table no. 11.2: Soil Salinity/Alkalinity (Salinity ingress) .................................................................................................................................................. 27

Table no. 11.3: Water logging Conditions ....................................................................................................................................................................... 28

Table no. 12: Climatic conditions: ................................................................................................................................................................................... 28

Table no. 13: Physiography and relief ............................................................................................................................................................................ 28

3.1.3 Land and Agriculture ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 29

Table no. 14: Land ownership details ............................................................................................................................................................................. 29

Table no. 15: Agriculture ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 30

Table no. 16: Irrigation ................................................................................................................................................................................................... 30

Table no. 17: Crop details .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 31

Table no. 18: Livestock .................................................................................................................................................................................................. 33

Table no. 19: Drinking water .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 33

Table no. 20: Details of Common Property Resources ................................................................................................................................................... 34

3.2 Socio-Economic profile ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 34

3.2.1 Demographic Status: ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 34

Table no. 21: Demographic information ......................................................................................................................................................................... 35

Table no. 22: Literacy rate ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 36

3.2.2 Migration pattern: .................................................................................................................................................................................................. 36

Table no. 23: Migration details ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 36

Table no. 24: Poverty ..................................................................................................................................................................................................... 37

3.2.3 Infrastructure Facilities: ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 37

Table no. 25: Village infrastructure ................................................................................................................................................................................. 38



Table no. 26: Facilities / HH assets ................................................................................................................................................................................ 38

3.3 Livelihood pattern: .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 39

Table no. 27: Income ..................................................................................................................................................................................................... 39

3.3.1 Dependence on Common property Resource: ....................................................................................................................................................... 40

Table no.28: Dependence on Forest/CPR ...................................................................................................................................................................... 40

Table no. 29: Livelihood Pattern (Occupational distribution) ........................................................................................................................................... 41

3.4. Comparative data of the crop productivity of the area: ............................................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.

CHAPTER – 4 ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 42

4.1. Scientific Planning: .................................................................................................................................................................................................. 43

Table no. 30: Details of Scientific Planning and Inputs in IWMP projects ....................................................................................................................... 46

Table no. 31: Details of PRA Activities conducted in the project area ............................................................................................................................ 48

4.2a PTA (Problem Tree Analysis): ................................................................................................................................................................................ 51

4.2b OTA (Object Tree Analysis): ................................................................................................................................................................................... 53

Table no. 32.1: Watershed Committee details of Bondarmal Village .............................................................................................................................. 56

4.2.2 Self Help Group ..................................................................................................................................................................................................... 68

Table no. 33: SHG detail ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 68

4.2.3 User Group: .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 70

Table no. 34: UG detail .................................................................................................................................................................................................. 71

4.3. Physical activities to be undertaken under IWMP, Sahyadri Village ........................................................................................................................ 73

4.3.1 Entry Point activity (EPA) ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 73

Table no.35: Entry point activities (EPA) ........................................................................................................................................................................ 73

Table no.36: Details of ridge & drainage line treatment/ land based activities in watershed works ................................................................................. 75

4.3.2. Watershed Development Works: .......................................................................................................................................................................... 83

Table no.37: Activities related to Surface water resources in the project areas .............................................................................................................. 84

Table no.38: Activities related to recharging ground water resources in the project areas .............................................................................................. 85



Table no.39: Details of activities related to livelihood, production system and micro-enterprises .................................................................................... 86

Table no. 40: Activities related to livelihoods by Self Help Groups (SHGs) in the project areas .................................................................................... 101

Table no. 41: Linkages developed at village level ........................................................................................................................................................ 104

Table no. 42: Details of activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works ............................................................................................... 106

Table no.43: Details of activities in the CPRs in the project areas ................................................................................................................................ 116

4.4 Capacity Building: .................................................................................................................................................................................................. 118

Table no. 44: Capacity Building Institution .................................................................................................................................................................... 119

Table no. 45: Capacity Building plan: ........................................................................................................................................................................... 120

Table no.46: Information, Education and Communication Activities: ............................................................................................................................ 120

CHAPTER – 5 .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 121

Table no. 47: Budget at a glance ................................................................................................................................................................................. 122

Table no. 48: Village component wise budget available under IWMP (Rs. in Lakh) ...................................................................................................... 123

Table no. 49: Village wise gap in funds requirement .................................................................................................................................................... 124

Table no.50: Details of Convergence of IWMP with other Schemes ............................................................................................................................. 125

Table no. 51: Public-Private Partnership in the IWMP Projects .................................................................................................................................... 135

CHAPTER – 6 .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 136

6.1 Expected Outcomes ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 137

6.1.1 Environmental Benefits ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 137

Table no.52: Environmental Benefits ............................................................................................................................................................................ 137

6.1.2 Drinking water ..................................................................................................................................................................................................... 138

Table no. 53: Status of Drinking water ......................................................................................................................................................................... 138

6.1.3 Crop .................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 139

Table no. 54: Details of Kharif crop area and yield in the project areas ........................................................................................................................ 139

Table no. 55: Area under Horticulture .......................................................................................................................................................................... 144

6.1.4 Livestock ............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 145



Table no. 56: Details of livestock in the project areas ................................................................................................................................................... 145

6.1.5 Employment ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 149

Table no. 57: Employment in Project area .................................................................................................................................................................... 149

6.1.6. Migration ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 150

Table no. 58: Details of seasonal migration from Project area ...................................................................................................................................... 151

Table no.59: Per capita Income ................................................................................................................................................................................... 152

Table no. 60: Backward-Forward linkages ................................................................................................................................................................... 154

6.1.7. Logical Framework Analysis: .............................................................................................................................................................................. 155

CHAPTER – 7 .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 157

7.1 Plans for Monitoring and Evaluation ....................................................................................................................................................................... 158

7.2 Plans for Project Management: .............................................................................................................................................................................. 159

7.3 Watershed Development Fund: .............................................................................................................................................................................. 159

7.4 User Charges: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 159

CHAPTER – 8 .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 160

8.1 Maps



History of the Dangs:

Dang (also known as The Dangs) is a district in the state

of Gujarat in India. The administrative headquarter/ Taluka of the

district is located in Ahwa. The Dangs have an area of 1764 km²

and a population of 186,729 (as of 2001).The Dangs is

predominantly tribal area with sparse population and rich forest

cover. Dangs is one of the two districts in the country having

more than 80% rich forest-cover. With very small and

uneconomic holdings, the majority of the cultivators barely

manage to survive for a year on the crops harvested. The

agricultural labourers find some employment only during the agricultural season. Large numbers migrate in semi-bonded conditions

to Surat district to work as cane-cutters in the sugar co-operatives. Before Independence several wars were fought between the five

tribal kings of Dang and the British. According to the history of Dang, the biggest ever war took place at Lashkaria Amba, in which

the kings of all five erstwhile states Deher, Wasurna, Ghadvi, Linga & Pimpri got together to protect Dang from British rule. The

British were beaten and decided to discontinue war and resorted to compromise.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gujarat�

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/India�

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ahwa�

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Area�

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Population�

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lashkaria_Amba&action=edit&redlink=1�



As per historic compromise treaty was signed in 1842 according to which Britishers were allowed to use the forests & their

natural products against which they had to pay certain amount around 3,000 silver coins to five kings of the monarchy. However,

currently the kings are offered monthly political pension by the Government of India, which is the main source of their income. This

payment is continued even though all privy purses for the Princely states of India were stopped in 1970 since the agreement was

between then monarchy of Dangs & the British. Every year during the financial end, the Kings gather in Ahwa for a traditional royal

ceremony in their richly decorated buggies, bands with tribal dancers to receive the payment as per the agreement of 1842.

In ancient Indian Scriptures Dang is known as Dand Aranyaka, means Bamboo Forest. The only densely wooded & well

known Hill station, Saputara is situated in The Dang district of southern tip of Gujarat. The Dangs is 100% tribal district declared by

the Economic Times and also it was one of the most backward districts among top 20 in India mentioned in the bulletin of Planning

Commission but Dangis have started coming out of the extreme poverty by opting mixed crops in their regular agricultural practices.

An effort to bring new cash flow to tribal through sustainable use of resources has been made and implemented successfully,

through the MALIKI scheme of planting and allowing the logging and replanting teak and bamboo varieties, on a cyclical mode to

enhance conservation and make forest trees based incomes possible. Most people believe that Gujarat is a dry but; this view is

changed in a jiffy, once they visit Dangs. This southern district of Gujarat has the highest forest cover among all the districts of

Gujarat. Its high precipitation, fast flowing rivers (Purna, Khapri, Gira and Ambika) lofty moist forests, lush bamboo brakes and hilly

terrain make it a paradise for nature lovers. Being located in the Western Ghats or Sahyadri mountain range, it possesses an

exceptionally rich flora and fauna.



CHAPTER – 1

PROJECT BACKGROUND



1.1 Project Background

Sahyadri (IWMP-11) project is located in Ahwa Taluka, Dang district of Gujarat state. The project is a cluster of Eight micro-

watersheds with 5B2D5b2h, 5B2D5c2f, 5B2D5b2d 5B2D5d2e, 5B2D5d2c, 5B2D5b2a, 5B2D5b2j, 5B2D5b2g being their respective

codes. The total Geographical area of the project is 5135.6 Ha out of which 5132.62 Ha has been proposed to be treated under

Integrated Management Programme (IWMP 2010-11)

The nearest town is Nashik in Maharashtra which is about 83Km from Sahyadri. It is well as connected by Ahwa. The project

area lies in the edges of forest of Saag which is very famous for it all over India. A Dangi community includes Bhils, Konkani's;

Warlis are the major tribal inhabitants of the village. The livelihood of these people is primarily based on rainfed agriculture, animal

husbandry, wage labour, cows and buffalos for the milk production.

The Project contains seven Gram Panchayat (Jakhana, Maleganv, Sahyadri, Thorpada, Galkund, Lahancharya, Borkhal).

The PIA (Project Implementation Agency) for the IWMP 6-Sahyadri project is DWDU, Dang and the project lies under the Sahyadri

range. The Saputara Hill Station is located at 10-12 km from the proposed project.



Table no.1: Basic project information

Sr No

Village Gram Panchayat

Taluka District

Area of project

(ha)

Area proposed to be treated

(ha) Total project cost (Lakh) PIA

Name Census Code

1 Nimpada 230010176960000 Chinchli

Ahwa Dang

332.10 331.76 39.81

DWDU, Dangs

2 Karadiamba 230010176930000 Chinchli 188.50 186.40 22.37

3 Kadmal(Gadadsaja)

230010176910000 Harpada 630.70 630.70 75.68

4 Sahyadri 230010176920000 Chinchli 201.90 201.90 24.23

5 Thorpada 230010176530000 Harpada 304.60 304.60 36.55

6 Harpada 230010176510000 Harpada 470.30 470.30 56.44

7 Wadiawan 230010176500000 Harpada 1323.10 1323.10 158.77

8 Wanzttemrun 230010176550000 Taklipada (Pipalaidevi) 133.00 133.00 15.96

9 Sadadvihir 230010176480000 Harpada 214.10 213.86 25.66

10 Kamdiawan 230010176540000 Harpada 177.50 177.50 21.30

11 Ghaniamba 230010176520000 Garkhadi 102.40 102.40 12.29

12 Jhari 230010176010000 Garkhadi 1057.10 1057.10 126.85

Total 5135.6 5132.67 615.9



District: The Dangs

Figure 1 Geographical location of Sahyadri



1.2 Need for watershed Development Programme

Watershed Development programme is prioritised on the basis of 13 parameters namely poverty Index, Percentage of

SC/ST, Actual wages, percentage of small and marginal farmers, Ground water status, Moisture Index, Area under rain fed

agriculture, Drinking water situation in the area, Percentage of the degraded land, Productivity potential of the land, Continuity of

another watershed that has already developed/treated, Cluster approach for plain or for hilly terrain. Based on these thirteen

parameters a composite ranking was given to Sahyadri Watershed project as given in Table no.2.

For ex: the total number of HHs under BPL is 113 in village Sadavihir, which is 51.32% of the total households of the village.

Hence a score of 10 is allotted in criteria (i). The percentage of schedule tribes in the village is about 100 % to the total population;

hence a score of 10 was allotted. Rain fed agriculture forms the primary occupation of the village due to the fact that ground water

is saline and hence unfit for usage. Less than 50% of the farmers are small and marginal by nature and the actual wages are

significantly lower than minimum wages hence, a composite rank of 3 and 5 are allotted respectively.

Since, the rainfall received is irregular and soil remains dry after monsoon, the moisture index is low and the area is

classified under DPAP block. There is problem for drinking water in every village of the Dang District. Majority of land is degraded

due to inherent for a lack of nitrogen and ingress of stone from over the hill. The soil is permeable and production of the land can be

significantly enriched with the availability of timely irrigation. Sahyadri watershed falls in continuity with other watersheds namely

Nimpada, Sahyadri, Thorpada, Harpada, Wadiawan, Sadadvihir. Cluster approach was followed taking into consideration Eight



micro-watersheds covering a total area of 6098.7Ha. All the parameters taken together give a cumulative score to this watershed

(ref: Table 2.1 below).

Area proposed to be treated

Table no.2: Weight age of the project Project name

Project type Village Name Weight age criteria's

Total

Sahyadri project

IWMP-11 Others

i ii iii iv v vi vii viii ix x xi xii xiii

Nimpada 10 10 5 3 0 10 5 5 10 5 10 15 15 103

Karadiamba 10 10 5 3 0 10 5 5 10 5 10 15 15 103

Kadmal(Gadadsaja) 10 10 5 3 0 10 5 5 10 5 10 15 15 103

Sahyadri 10 10 5 3 0 10 5 5 10 5 10 15 15 103

Thorpada 10 10 5 3 0 10 5 5 10 5 10 15 15 103

Harpada 10 10 5 3 0 10 5 5 10 5 10 15 15 103

Wadiawan 10 10 5 3 0 10 5 5 10 5 10 15 15 103

Wanzttemrun 10 10 5 3 0 10 5 5 10 5 10 15 15 103

Sadadvihir 10 10 5 3 0 10 5 5 10 5 10 15 15 103

Kamdiawan 10 10 5 3 0 10 5 5 10 5 10 15 15 103

Ghaniamba 10 10 5 3 0 10 5 5 10 5 10 15 15 103

Jhari 10 10 5 3 0 10 5 5 10 5 10 15 15 103

Umbarpada 10 10 5 3 0 10 5 5 10 5 10 15 15 103



Table no.2.1 Criteria and Weight age for selection of Watershed

Sl No Criteria Maximu

m score

Ranges & scores

i. Poverty index (% of poor to population) 10 Above 80 % (10) 80 to 50% (7.5) 50 to 20% (5) Below 20 %

(2.5) ii. % of SC/ST Population 10 More then 40% (10) 20 to 40 % (5) Less than 20% (3)

iii. Actual wages 5 Actual wages are

significantly lower than minimum wages (5)

Actual Wages are equal to or higher than

minimum wages (0)

iv. % of small and marginal farmers 10 More than 80 % (10) 50 to 80 % (5) Less than 50% (3)

v. Ground water status 5 Over exploited(5) Critical (3) Sub critical (2) Safe (0)

vi. Moisture index /DPAP/DDP Block 15 -66.7 & below(15) DDP -33.3 to -66.6 (10)

DPAP Block 0 to -33.2 (0)

vii. Area under rain –fed agriculture 15 More then 90%(15) 80 to 90 % (10) 70 to 80% (5) Above 70%

(Reject)

viii. Drinking water 10 No source (10) problematic village(7.5) Partially Covered (5) Fully Covered (0)

ix. Degraded land 15 High –above 20% (15) Medium -10 to 20% (10)

Low-less than 10% of TGA (5)

x. Productivity potential of the land 15

Lands with low production & where

productivity enhanced with reasonable efforts

(15)

Lands with moderate production & where productivity can be

enhanced with reasonable efforts (10)

Lands with high production & where productivity can be

marginally enhanced with reasonable

efforts (5)

xi.

Contiguity to another watershed that has already been developed /treated

10

Contiguous to previously treated watershed & contiguity within the

micro watersheds in the project(10)

Contiguity within the micro watersheds in the

project but non contiguous to

previously treated watershed (5)

Neither Contiguous to previously treated

watershed nor contiguity within the micro-watersheds in

the project (0)



xii.

Cluster approach in the plains (more than one contiguous micro- watersheds in the project)

15 Above 6 micro-

watersheds in cluster (15)

4 to 6 micro watersheds in cluster

(10)

2 to 4 micro-watersheds in

cluster (5)

xiii.

Cluster approach in the hills (more than one contiguous micro- watersheds in the project)

15 Above 5 micro-

watersheds in cluster (15)

3 to 5 micro watersheds in cluster

(10)

2 to 3 micro-watersheds in

cluster (5)

Total 150 150 90 41 2.5

Project type: Other Table no.3: Watershed information

Name of the project No. of watersheds to be treated Watershed code Watershed regime/type/order

Sahyadri project IWMP-11 4 5B2D8g2h,5B2D8d2j,5B2D8g1g, 5B2D8g1h Mini Watershed



CHAPTER – 2

PROJECT IMPLEMENTING AGENCY



2.1 Project Implementing Agency The Project Implementing Agencies (PIA) is selected by an appropriate mechanism by Gujarat State Watershed

Management Agency (GSWMA), the State Level Nodal Agency (SLNA) for Integrated Watershed Management Programme

(IWMP) in Gujarat. The PIAs are responsible for implementation of watershed project. These PIAs may include relevant line

departments, autonomous organizations under State / Central Governments, Government Institutes/Research bodies, Intermediate

Panchayats, Voluntary Organization (VOs). The PIA for Sahyadri watershed project is the District Watershed Dev. Unit, Ahwa.

2.2.4 Programmes/projects of DWDU, Dang:

The total 4 IWMP projects have been sanctioned by Government of India in the year 2011-12 for Dangs district. The entry point

activities of all the 4 IWMP projects have been identified by the respective PIAs in the district. The South-Dang Forest Division

implements two projects namely; IWMP-10 Pandava & IWMP-13 Ambika while DWDU, Dangs implements 2 projects namely;

IWMP-11 Sahyadri , IWMP-12 Saler.

2.3 SWOT Analysis of the PIA: Strength:

(1) Vast experience to work in forest area for treatment of ridge and drainage line

(2) Easy interaction with PIAs

(3) Nodal officers possess brief knowledge regarding the project area.



(4) Good communication between WDTs & villagers belonging to respective range with help of foresters and beet guards.

Weakness:- (1) Inadequate experience in livelihood activities

(2) Limited knowledge regarding employment and economic activities due to absence of major industries

(3) Poor connectivity in interior areas

(4) Irregular electric supply at the project level

(5) Lack of skilled manpower and specialized services

(6) Lack of marketing knowledge

Opportunities: (1) A number of different other development schemes of the government are running; so, there can be horizontal integration

and convergence of programmes

(2) Better financial provision under IWMP with usage of new ICT tools like GIS,GPS

(3) Sustainable community forest management through Joint Forest Management Committee can be strengthen with

diagnostic and focused intervention

(4) JFMCs are altered for Watershed Committee formation

Threats: (1) Ignorance towards the watershed project & low literacy rate in the project area

(2) Lack of contribution and cooperation from local people

(3) Irregularities in fund flow can derail the smooth functioning

Table no. 6: PIA Sl No Names of project Details of PIA

1 Sahyadri project IWMP-11

(i) Type of organization District Level Nodal Agency (ii) Name of organization District Watershed Development Unit (iii) Designation & Address Project Director



(iv) Telephone 02631-290645 (v) Fax 02631-220062 (vi) E-mail [email protected], [email protected]

Table no. 7: Staff at PIA level

Sl No Name Age Sex Designation Qualification Experience Job assigned Monthly

remuneration 1 Shri. K.N.Patel M Project Director B.Sc. 33 year Management

2 Shri. Yogesh Raundal M Nodal Officer M.Tech 2.5year Co-ordination

3 Sanjay G. Shinde 23 M Civil Engg. Diploma civil 1 year Field Work 12,000/-

4 Hitesh R. Pawar 23 M Agri. Expert BRS,MRS 3 months Field Work 8000/-

5 Kamlesh L. Vadu 29 M Community mobiliser B.A. (Socio) 2 year Field Work 8000/-

6 Vijay S. Rathod 24 M Accountant M.com 3 months Office work 7000/-

7 Raghu J. Gaikwad 22 M Messanger 12th 1 year pass Office work 3000/-

mailto:[email protected]�



CHAPTER – 3

BASIC INFORMATION OF THE PROJECT AREA



3.1. Geography & Geo-hydrology 3.1.1. Land use pattern: The net geographical area of Sahyadri project is 5135.6 ha. The total forest area in Sahyadri project is 1710.04 ha. The total forest

area is about 33% of the total net geographical area of Sahyadri project. The Land under cultivation in Sahyadri Project is

completely rain-fed and mainly Kharif crop is taken. In Sahyadri project, about 11% of the total geographical land is classified under

wasteland.

Table no. 8: Land use pattern

Sr. No. Names of village

Geographical Area of the village (Ha)

Forest Area (Ha)

Land under agricultural

use (Ha) Rain fed area (Ha)

Permanent pastures

Wasteland (Ha)

Cultivable Non-cultivable

1 Nimpada 332.10 255.630 81.10 81.10 0 17.9 15.2

2 Karadiamba 188.50 12.370 114.30 114.30 0 34.7 4.6

3 Kadmal(Gadadsaja) 630.70 354.650 413.70 413.70 0 18.3 14.9

4 Sahyadri 201.90 15.410 97.50 97.50 0 5.1 49.0

5 Thorpada 304.60 8.250 124.30 124.30 0 8.4 37.1

6 Harpada 470.30 0.000 214.80 214.80 0 8.4 37.1

7 Wadiawan 1323.10 98.960 415.75 415.75 0 12.0 15.6

8 Wanzttemrun 133.00 616.300 99.00 99.00 0 0.0 43.1

9 Sadadvihir 214.10 72.590 116.40 116.40 0 2.4 42.9

10 Kamdiawan 177.50 275.500 132.70 132.70 0 23.7 37.3

11 Ghaniamba 102.40 0.380 80.60 80.60 0 17.0 24.5



12 Jhari 1057.10 0.000 426.00 426.00 0 19.0 16.2

Total 5135.6 1710.04 2316.15 2316.15 0 197.2 344.5 *Source: Census Book 2001

3.1.2 Soil and topography: Sahyadri watershed project falls under Southern Hills of Gujarat Agro-Climatic zone. The soil is mainly black rock-outcrop,

shallow black, brown & alluvial soil in project area. There is a thin soil layer lead to heavy erosion due to high rain fall. The soil is

dark brown to dark blackish in surface colour. The depth of soil in project area is moderate about 25 to 35 cm. The predominant

texture of soil is loamy sand and silt and clay. The soil fertility is poor with low nitrogen, phosphorus and potash. The topography of

the area is hilly with undulating plains & steep slopes ranging from 25-30% slope and highest elevation of the project is 614mt.

Table no. 9: Soil type and topography: Sl No

Name of the Agro-climatic zone Area in ha Names of the village

Major soil types Topography

a)Type b) Area in ha

1

Agro-climatic sub zones -

southern Hills

331.76 Nimpada

Sandy Loam, Black cotton, Rocky

331.76

Undulating, moderate to steep

slope

2. 186.40 Karadiamba 186.40

3. 630.70 Kadmal(Gadadsaja) 630.70

4. 201.90 Sahyadri 201.90

5. 304.60 Thorpada 304.60

6. 470.30 Harpada 470.30

7. 1323.10 Wadiawan 1323.10

8. 133.00 Wanzttemrun 133.00



9. 213.86 Sadadvihir 213.86

10. 177.50 Kamdiawan 177.50

11. 102.40 Ghaniamba 102.40

12 1057.10 Jhari 1057.10

Total 5135.67 5235.67



Table no. 10: Flood and drought condition:

Sr. No Village Flood (Incidence) Drought (Incidence)

1. Nimpada

Nil 7-8 years

2. Karadiamba 3. Kadmal(Gadadsaja) 4. Sahyadri 5. Thorpada 6. Harpada 7. Wadiawan 8. Wanzttemrun 9. Sadadvihir 10. Kamdiawan 11. Ghaniamba 12 Jhari

11: Edaphic Factors Table no. 11.1: Soil Erosion

Cause Type of erosion Area affected (ha) Run off (mm/ year)

Average soil loss (Tonnes/ ha/ year)

Water erosion a Sheet -

1200

- b Rill 513.52 10% c Gully 4523.8 90% d Ravenous -

Sub-Total 5135.67 Wind erosion -

Total 5135.67 1200



Table no. 11.2: Soil Salinity/Alkalinity (Salinity ingress)

Sl No. Name of the Village Survey Number Soil pH Type of Salinity (Inherent/Ingress)

1. Nimpada 125 6.52

Normal < 1, Inherent

127 5.74

2. Karadiamba 67 6.21 46/2 6.08

3. Kadmal(Gadadsaja) 40/1 6.41 46/2 6.13

4. Sahyadri 41 6.02 135 6.51

5. Thorpada 28 5.81 69 6.00

6. Harpada 33 5.96 6 5.94

7. Wadiawan 13/1 6.17 37/1 6.04

8. Wanzttemrun 46 6.10 42 6.41

9. Sadadvihir 6 6.12 54/1 6.68

10. Kamdiawan 103 6.61 37 6.56

11. Ghaniamba 19 6.50 75 6.24

12 Jhari 41 6.02 135 6.51 37/1 6.04

PH: Alkaline < 5.5, Normal 5.5 to 8.2, Ash > 8.2 Salinity: Normal < 1, Less Hazardous 1 to 3, Hazardous > 3



Table no. 11.3: Water logging Conditions Sl No. Name of the Village Survey Number Reasons

No water logging is observed in Dangs

Table no. 12: Climatic conditions:

Name of project Average Rainfall (last 5 years) Average Temperature

Sahyadri Project IWMP-11

99.048 inch

Summer ( C̊) Winter ( C̊) Max Min Max Min 44.5 21.5 35.0 14.5

Due to hilly terrain, there is heavy rainfall resulting maximum soil erosion in this region whereas in summer it leads to the

acute shortage for drinking water. The average rainfall of this area is about 2738.40 mm (from past five year's data) with a highest

intensity of 190 cm within span of a day. (Source: http://www.gujarat-tourism.net/Gujarat_Geography.htm). The average rainfall per

year calculated for the last ten years by the SEOC (State Emergency Operation Centre) comes to 2475mm. This uneven

distribution is leading to runoff of soil every year to the streams, rivulets and depressed area of Dang.

Table no. 13: Physiography and relief

Project name Elevation (MSL) Slope range (%) Major streams Sahyadri Project IWMP-11 614 mt 25-30% -



3.1.3 Land and Agriculture

The main reason for the insufficient base of surface water source is the steep slope & undulated plains causing maximum

runoff and appreciable seepage (lateral movement of water). Therefore, wells are seen over flooded during monsoon & completely

dry in summer and major part of winter. The average land holding is about 1.22 ha in project area. Unavailability of irrigation source

in the village forces the majority of the farmers to migrate for ensuring their livelihood. This affects directly the demographic profile

of the village. The major crops cultivated during Kharif by the farmers are Nagli, Varai and Paddy. The land conservation measures

such gully plugs, stone bunds & nala bunds in this area will ensure double cropping and increase in yield.

Table no. 14: Land ownership details

Sl no Village Total owned land HHs giving

land on lease HHs taking

land on lease Gen OBC SC ST (Ha) 1. Nimpada 0 0 0 318.40 0 0 2. Karadiamba 0 0 0 310.10 0 0 3. Kadmal(Gadadsaja) 0 0 0 162.00 0 0 4. Sahyadri 0 0 0 317.10 0 0 5. Thorpada 0 0 0 163.00 0 0 6. Harpada 0 0 0 240.50 0 0 7. Wadiawan 0 0 0 127.40 0 0 8. Wanzttemrun 0 0 0 161.50 0 0 9. Sadadvihir 0 0 0 162.40 0 0

10. Kamdiawan 0 0 0 113.40 0 0 11. Ghaniamba 0 0 0 95.90 0 0 12 Jhari 0 0 0 108.50 0 0

Total 0 0 0 2360.90 0 0 * Sources: Baseline Survey, 2011



Table no. 15: Agriculture Sl no Village Net Sown Area

One time (Ha) Two times (Ha) Three times (Ha) 1. Nimpada 318.40 41.392 0 2. Karadiamba 310.10 40.313 0 3. Kadmal(Gadadsaja) 162.00 21.06 0 4. Sahyadri 317.10 41.223 0 5. Thorpada 163.00 21.19 0 6. Harpada 240.50 31.265 0 7. Wadiawan 127.40 16.562 0 8. Wanzttemrun 161.50 20.995 0 9. Sadadvihir 162.40 21.112 0 10. Kamdiawan 113.40 14.742 0 11. Ghaniamba 95.90 12.467 0 12 Jhari 108.50 14.105 0

Total 2360.90 306.917 0 * Sources: Baseline Survey, 2011

Table no. 16: Irrigation Sl no Village

Source 1 : Canal Source 2 : Check dam / Pond Source 3 : Well Availability

months Net area Gross area

Availability months

Net area (Ha)

Gross area (Ha)

Availability months Net area Gross

area 1. Nimpada - - - 8 Month 0.60 1.00 - - - 2. Karadiamba - - - 8 Month 5.00 10.00 - - - 3. Kadmal(Gadadsaja) - - - 8 Month 8.40 11.00 - - - 4. Sahyadri - - - 8 Month 0.60 1.50 - - - 5. Thorpada - - - 8 Month 0.50 1.20 - - - 6. Harpada - - - 8 Month 7.24 10.50 4 Month 6.1 8.42 7. Wadiawan - - - 8 Month 1.20 2.00 - - - 8. Wanzttemrun - - - 8 Month 0.70 1.20 - - - 9. Sadadvihir - - - 8 Month 2.25 4.40 - - -

10. Kamdiawan - - - 8 Month 1.20 2.40 - - - 11. Ghaniamba - - - 8 Month 8.90 10.40 - - - 12 Jhari 8 Month 1.20 2.00 - - -

Total - - - 8 Month 36.59 55.60 4 Month 6.1 8.42



Table no. 17: Crop details Kharif (Monsoon)

Sl No

Village

Crop 1 (Nagli) Finger Millet

Crop 2 (Varai) Small Millet Crop 3 (Paddy) Rice Crop 4 (Udad) Black

Gram Crop 5 (Kharsani)

Niger Seed

Are

a (H

a)

Prod

ucti

on (K

g)

Prod

ucti

vity

(K

g/H

a)

Are

a (H

a)

Prod

ucti

on (K

g)

Prod

ucti

vity

(K

g/H

a)

Are

a (H

a)

Prod

ucti

on (K

g)

Prod

ucti

vity

(K

g/H

a)

Are

a (H

a)

Prod

ucti

on (K

g)

Prod

ucti

vity

(K

g/H

a)

Are

a (H

a)

Prod

ucti

on (K

g)

Prod

ucti

vity

(K

g/H

a)

1. Nimpada 81.07 8192 101.05 61.9

3 69245 1118.12

87.81

15299

174.23

64.76

722.72 11.16 48.0

2 206.80 4.30

2. Karadiamba 34.31 6570 191.48 22.8 1534.

5 637.0

7 46.3

9 1372

8 295.9

2 26.3

9 642 24.33 29.18 2199 75.36

3. Kadmal(Gadadsaja)

31.43 6118 194.65 24.1

0 5976 247.97

39.56

11364

287.26

12.91

333.00 25.79 22.1

2 659.00 29.79

4. Sahyadri 16.41 3282 200.00 13.7

2 3630 264.58

17.91 5248 293.0

2 5.41 139.6 25.80 5.11 53.00 10.37

5. Thorpada 23.46 4692 200.00 17.1

4 4149 242.06

34.09 9959 292.1

4 20.9

3 1846 88.19 23.0 780.00 33.91

6. Harpada 16.95 3390 200.00 14.5 4485.

5 309.3

4 18.4

3 1073

3 582.3

6 9.41 1223 129.96 8.69 149.

16 17.16

7. Wadiawan 36.23 5872 162.07 36.6

5 6797 185.46

50.68

14614

288.36 25.9 299.5 11.56 21.7

3 1532 70.50

8. Wanzttemrun 35.58 5342 150.15 31.6

9 5398.

50 170.3

5 44.4

2 1053

3 237.1

2 28.6

3 2596 90.67 37.65 1003 26.64

9. Sadadvihir 34.02 6708 197.18 24.4

8 5165 210.99

46.94

13932

296.80

23.62 3402 144.0

3 24.7

4 4595 185.73

10. Kamdiawan 57.4

0 11463 199.70 52.47 13580 258.8

1 53.8

5 1668

0 309.7

5 52.6

1 2595 49.42 41.54 3831 90.22

11. Ghaniamba 18.5

4 2370.

7 127.87 11.45

1342.25

117.23

25.35 7935 313.0

2 13.0

7 1824 139.55

12.71 1848 145.3

9 12 Jhari 36.2

3 5872 162.07 36.65 6797 185.4

6 50.6

8 1461

4 288.3

6 9.41 1223 129.96 8.69 149.

16 17.16

Total 385.4

63999.7

172.028462

310.93

121303

316.753

465.43

130025

299.651

283.64

15622.8

67.8446

274.49

16856

59.7715



Rabi (winter)

Sl No Village

Crop 1 (Jowar) Crop 2 (Wheat) Crop 3 (Chana)

Area (Ha)

Production (Kg)

Productivity (Kg/Ha)

Area (Ha)

Production (Kg)


Area (Ha)

Production (Kg)


1. Nimpada 0 0 0 0.6 180 300 0.8 220 275.00

2. Karadiamba 0 0 0 3.41 560 164.22 12.31 560 45.49

3. Kadmal(Gadadsaja) 0 0 0 4.72 1033 218.85 6.42 1048 163.24

4. Sahyadri 0 0 0 0.90 225 250.00 0.50 150 300.00

5. Thorpada 0 0 0 1.5 110 73.33 0.90 71.62 79.58

6. Harpada 0 0 0 4.39 1122.5 255.70 4.19 2234 533.17

7. Wadiawan 0.3 90 300 1.26 149 118.25 1.35 235 174.07

8. Wanzttemrun 0 0 0 0.5 175 350.00 0.8 160 200.00

9. Sadadvihir 0 0 0 0.7 165 235.71 3.55 670 188.73

10. Kamdiawan 0 0 0 1.17 167 142.74 2.09 445 212.91

11. Ghaniamba 8.15 765 93.86 2.3 142.5 61.96 4.38 493.13 112.59

12 Jhari 0 0 0 1.5 110 73.33 0.90 71.62 79.58

Total 8.45 855 393.86 21.45 4029 192.29 37.29 6286.75 222.88 * Sources: Baseline Survey, 2011



3.1.4 Livestock details

The Sahyadri Project contains 318 cows, 161 buffaloes, 1298 bullocks & 5359 goats. Majority of Dangi community depends

on cattle rearing except agriculture, for their livelihood. Cows and buffaloes are of local/indigenous breed. Shortage of surface

water has reduced the fodder and pasture availability for animals & but the milk yield per cattle is minimum. The daily milk pourers

from Sahyadri project have the daily pouring capacity approx 177 lit/day. Milk production is not appreciable in this village hence;

promotion of HF cows can be promotional event to improve livelihood aspect of this cluster.

Table no. 18: Livestock

Sl No

Village

Buffalow Cow Total Milk (lit/yr)

Goat Sheep

Bullock

Hen No Milk (lit/yr) No Milk (lit/yr) No Milk lit/yr)

1. Nimpada 10 1800 18 2025 3825 39 780 0 100 819 2. Karadiamba 17 3060 19 2137.5 5197.5 1400 28000 0 208 2362 3. Kadmal(Gadadsaja) 15 2700 18 2025 4725 10 200 0 102 336 4. Sahyadri 17 3060 14 1575 4635 755 15100 30 171 730 5. Thorpada 13 2340 56 6300 8640 1013 20260 0 136 1988 6. Harpada 18 3240 8 900 4140 194 3880 0 98 335 7. Wadiawan 6 1080 52 5850 6930 935 18700 0 152 1915 8. Wanzttemrun 7 1260 54 6075 7335 405 8100 0 94 916 9. Sadadvihir 5 900 42 4725 5625 40 800 0 52 252 10. Kamdiawan 33 5940 16 1800 7740 530 10600 0 115 1575 11. Ghaniamba 20 3600 21 2362.5 5962.5 38 760 0 70 548 12 Jhari 13 2340 56 6300 8640 1013 20260 0 136 1988 Sahyadri Project Total 161 28980 318 35775 64755 5359 107180 30 1298 11776

* Sources: Baseline Survey, 2011 Table no. 19: Drinking water

Sl no Village Avg Ground Water Table (Mt) Source of drinking water Availability in

months Quality



1. Nimpada

40-45 Well, Hand pump 11 Potable

2. Karadiamba 3. Kadmal(Gadadsaja) 4. Sahyadri 5. Thorpada 6. Harpada 7. Wadiawan 8. Wanzttemrun 9. Sadadvihir 10. Kamdiawan 11. Ghaniamba 12 Jhari

* Sources: Baseline Survey, 2011 Table no. 20: Details of Common Property Resources

Sl No

Names of project

CPR Particulars

Total Area (ha) Area owned/ In possession of Area available for treatment (ha)

Pvt. persons

Govt. (Specify deptt.) PRI

Any other (Pl.

Specify) Pvt.

persons Govt.

(Forest deptt.)

PRI Any

other (Pl.

Specify)

1. IWMP-11 (Sahyadri)

Wasteland/degraded land Pastures Orchards Village Woodlot Forest 3177.5 3177.5 Village Ponds/ Tanks Community Buildings Weekly Markets Permanent markets Temples/ Places of worship

3.2 Socio-Economic profile 3.2.1 Demographic Status:



Sahyadri project has a total population of 4905 (As per base – line survey) out of which 2432 are male and 2427 female. The

sex ratio is 998 females to 1000 males. The average family size is 5. There are total 63HH with no land. The literacy rate is 73% (of

total male population) and female literacy rate is as low as 67% (of total female population). The total population belongs to ST

caste & mainly involved in agriculture and animal husbandry. The table no. 21 indicates the demographic situation in project area

while table no. 22 describes the literacy rate of male and female out of total male & female population existing in each village.

Table no. 21: Demographic information

Sr No. Village Population SC ST Total Male Female Total Male Female % Total Male Female %

1. Nimpada 481 238 243 - - - - 481 238 243

100%

2. Karadiamba 664 326 338 - - - - 664 326 338 3. Kadmal(Gadadsaja) 492 253 239 - - - - 492 253 239 4. Sahyadri 494 252 242 - - - - 494 252 242 5. Thorpada 323 153 170 - - - - 323 153 170 6. Harpada 296 146 150 - - - - 296 146 150 7. Wadiawan 426 213 213 - - - - 426 213 213 8. Wanzttemrun 369 185 184 - - - - 369 185 184 9. Sadadvihir 426 209 217 - - - - 426 209 217 10. Kamdiawan 592 291 300 - - - - 592 291 300 11. Ghaniamba 342 166 176 - - - - 342 166 176 12 Jhari 296 146 150 - - - - 296 146 150

Total 4905 2432 2472 - - - - 4905 2432 2472



Table no. 22: Literacy rate Sl No Village Total

population Literacy

Literacy % above age 14 Literacy % below age 14 Total Male Female

1 Nimpada 973 554.61 212 190 0% 90% 2 Karadiamba 1226 698.82 181 100 5% 78% 3 Kadmal(Gadadsaja) 292 166.44 220 203 14% 72% 4 Sahyadri 1194 680.58 136 134 12% 63% 5 Thorpada 453 258.21 150 165 7% 68% 6 Harpada 595 339.15 103 120 4% 92% 7 Wadiawan 329 187.53 96 105 14% 61% 8 Wanzttemrun 642 365.94 163 163 10% 83% 9 Sadadvihir 289 164.73 135 134 17% 88%

10 Kamdiawan 308 175.56 169 157 14% 91% 11 Ghaniamba 319 181.83 150 109 14% 81% 12 Jhari 289 164.73 150 165 7% 68%

Total 7479 4263 1968 1865 9% 79% 3.2.2 Migration pattern: Migration of the villagers is observed mainly from November to May when they do not have any work to do. The agricultural

labourers find some employment during the monsoon season in their own village. However, in the idle period, large numbers of

villagers migrate in semi-bonded areas such as Surat district to work as cane-cutters in the sugar co-operatives. They even migrate

to Nashik district as agricultural labours i.e. harvesting grapes and for construction works. The income they earn during the

migration period ranges from Rs. 1000 to Rs. 4000 per month.

Table no. 23: Migration details Sr Village Total Migration Migration By Months Main reason Avg Income



No population Total Male Female Up to 3 Months

3-6 Months

>6 Months

for migration during migration

1 Nimpada 973 126 82 44 25 63 38

Lack of employment opportunity in the project area and no income source from Nov to May.

Rs. 5000-6000/month

2 Karadiamba 1226 159 104 56 32 80 48 3 Kadmal(Gadadsaja) 292 38 25 13 8 19 11 4 Sahyadri 1194 155 101 54 31 78 47 5 Thorpada 453 59 38 21 12 29 18 6 Harpada 595 77 50 27 15 39 23 7 Wadiawan 329 43 28 15 9 21 13 8 Wanzttemrun 642 83 54 29 17 42 25 9 Sadadvihir 289 38 24 13 8 19 11 10 Kamdiawan 308 40 26 14 8 20 12 11 Ghaniamba 319 41 27 15 8 21 12 12 Jhari 289 38 24 13 8 19 11

Total Project 7479 972 632 340 194 486 292 Table no. 24: Poverty

Sl no Village Total Household BPL** % of BPL

HH Total Landless

HH % of land less HH 0-16 16-20 Total 1 Nimpada 142 36 55 91

60-65%

11 7.7 2 Karadiamba 238 60 93 152 33 13.9 3 Kadmal(Gadadsaja) 79 20 31 51 6 7.6 4 Sahyadri 301 75 117 193 80 26.6 5 Thorpada 96 24 37 61 5 5.2 6 Harpada 112 28 44 72 3 2.7 7 Wadiawan 57 14 22 36 6 10.5 8 Wanzttemrun 80 20 31 51 5 6.3 9 Sadadvihir 65 16 25 42 13 20.0

10 Kamdiawan 62 16 24 40 7 11.3 11 Ghaniamba 53 13 21 34 3 5.7 12 Jhari 44 11 17 28 2 4.5

Total 1413 353 551 904 203 14.4 3.2.3 Infrastructure Facilities: Sahyadri IWMP 11 watershed is well connected with Ahwa Taluka with pucca roads. The village has electricity connectivity

under Jyotigram Yojana of the State Government. Nearly 19 per cent of households in the village have their personal electric



meters. Sahyadri Project has a primary school with 10th

Table no. 25: Village infrastructure

standard. For middle and higher secondary education, the students have to

go to Ahwa village which is about 44 km away from the project area.

Sl no Village

Pucca road to the villag

e (Y/N)

Schools

Colleges (No)

Post Office

(Distance)

Banks (No)

Distance from nearest market

yard

Milk collection centre

(No)

Milk co-operative (No)

Other cooperatives/ CBIs (No)

Any other

institution

LP

UP

HS

1. Nimpada Yes 1 1 0 42 km 10 Km 10 km 10 Km 1 0 0 JFMC 2. Karadiamba Yes 1 1 0 50 km 12 km 12 km 12 km 1 0 0 JFMC

3. Kadmal(Gadadsaja) Yes 1 1 0 47 km 14 km 14 km 14 km. 0 0 0 JFMC

4. Sahyadri Yes 1 1 0 57 km 15 km 15 km 15 km 0 0 0 JFMC 5. Thorpada Yes 1 1 0 52 km 20 km 20 km 20 km 0 0 0 JFMC

6. Harpada Yes 1 1 0 42 km 10 km 10 Km 10 Km 0 0 0 JFMC

7. Wadiawan Yes 1 1 0 48 km 16 km 16 km 16 km 1 0 0 JFMC 8. Wanzttemrun Yes 1 1 0 50 km 18 km 18 km 18 km 1 0 0 JFMC 9. Sadadvihir Yes 1 1 0 48 km 16 km 16 km 16 km 1 0 0 JFMC 10. Kamdiawan Yes 1 1 0 38 km 6 km 6 km 6 Km 0 0 0 JFMC

11. Ghaniamba Yes 1 1 0 40 km 18 Km 18 km 18 Km 0 0 0 JFMC

12 Jhari Yes 1 1 0 48 km 16 km 16 km 16 km 1 0 0 JFMC Table no. 26: Facilities / HH assets

Sl no Village HHs with

electricity HHs with

safety latrines

HHs with phones HHs with vehicle HHs

with TV set

HHs with cooking

gas

HHs with Drinking

water

HHs with

fridge Land line Mobile 2

wheeler 4

wheeler 1. Nimpada 42 4 04 2 07 03 1 0 0 0



2. Karadiamba 29 6 1 4 1 2 1 0 0 0 3. Kadmal(Gadadsaja) 24 5 0 7 3 0 2 0 0 0 4. Sahyadri 17 5 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1

5. Thorpada 31 5 1 8 7 2 7 0 0 0 6. Harpada 14 4 0 6 2 1 2 0 0 0 7. Wadiawan 47 5 6 14 11 1 20 0 0 0

8. Wanzttemrun 30 6 1 14 11 0 9 0 0 1 9. Sadadvihir 37 7 7 25 13 3 16 2 0 3 10. Kamdiawan 82 23 11 11 18 1 33 2 0 2

11. Ghaniamba 25 8 0 3 3 2 3 0 0 0 12 Jhari 31 5 1 8 7 2 7 0 0 0

3.3 Livelihood pattern: The livelihood of the villagers depends on agriculture and animal husbandry & during lean seasons they migrate for daily wages to

other parts of the state. There are few people who are engaged in services. Since, the 23% of the total budget in dedicated to

livelihood purpose, the major attention need to be given (ref Table no.47). Under this project, livelihood activities such as Wadi

cultivation, Vermicompost, Animal husbandry, Nursery raising, Kitchen garden, etc primarily focused to improve their livelihood.

Table no. 27: Income

Sl no Village Agriculture Animal husbandry Casual labour Others Total

1. Nimpada 107760 143680 71840 35920 359200 2. Karadiamba 70350 93800 46900 23450 234500 3. Kadmal(Gadadsaja) 884250 441750 441750 25500 1793000



4. Sahyadri 58650 78200 39100 19550 195500 5. Thorpada 72858 97144 48572 24286 242860 6. Harpada 49950 66600 33300 16650 166500 7. Wadiawan 169890 226520 113260 56630 566300 8. Wanzttemrun 131730 175640 87820 43910 439100 9. Sadadvihir 129481 172642 86321 43160 431605

10. Kamdiawan 297750 397000 198500 99250 992500 11. Ghaniamba 80550 107400 53700 26850 268500 12 Jhari 70350 93800 46900 23450 234500

Total 2053219 2000376 1221063 415156 5689565 * Sources: Baseline Survey, 2011 3.3.1 Dependence on Common property Resource:

Other major activities of the people are seasonal mahoa collection and selling grass pendi which are available in forest area.

In fact, the availability of fodder during the monsoon is very easy, and is of good quality. This allows the villagers to cut the grass

from forest & pasture land & sell the grass @ Rs. 3/pendi to the nearby villagers and earn income. There are approximately 185

Mahoa trees in Sahyadri project, flowers are dried and sold @ Rs. 22-30/kg. The wood as a fuel is mainly self consumed for

cooking purpose.

Table no.28: Dependence on Forest/CPR

SL No Village

Benefit type-1

(Fodder)

Benefit type-2 (Mahuda

Flower/Seed)

Benefit type-3

(Fruits)

Benefit type-4 (Gums) Total income (Rs. Lakhs) % sells Income

(Lakhs) % sells Income (Lakhs)

% sells

Income (Lakhs) % sells Income

(Lakhs) 1. Nimpada 40% 1.70 50% 1.30 50% 0.23 80% 0.185 3.60 2. Karadiamba 40% 1.70 50% 1.30 50% 0.23 80% 0.185 3.60 3. Kadmal(Gadadsaja) 40% 1.70 50% 1.30 50% 0.23 80% 0.185 3.60



4. Sahyadri 40% 1.70 50% 1.30 50% 0.23 80% 0.185 3.60 5. Thorpada 40% 1.70 50% 1.30 50% 0.23 80% 0.185 3.60 6. Harpada 40% 1.70 50% 1.30 50% 0.23 80% 0.185 3.60 7. Wadiawan 40% 1.70 50% 1.30 50% 0.23 80% 0.185 3.60 8. Wanzttemrun 40% 1.70 50% 1.30 50% 0.23 80% 0.185 3.60 9. Sadadvihir 40% 1.70 50% 1.30 50% 0.23 80% 0.185 3.60

10. Kamdiawan 40% 1.70 50% 1.30 50% 0.23 80% 0.185 3.60 11. Ghaniamba 40% 1.70 50% 1.30 50% 0.23 80% 0.185 3.60 12 Jhari 40% 1.70 50% 1.30 50% 0.23 80% 0.185 3.60

* Sources: Baseline Survey, 2011 Table no. 29: Livelihood Pattern (Occupational distribution)

Sl no Village Total

workforce Agriculture Animal husbandry (AH)

Agriculture + AH

Casual labour Services Handicraft Others

1. Nimpada 465 153 63 216 26 7 0 0 2. Karadiamba 580 186 65 251 78 0 0 0 3. Kadmal(Gadadsaja) 495 156 56 211 73 0 0 0 4. Sahyadri 517 124 33 157 233 0 0 0 5. Thorpada 373 128 44 172 22 7 0 0 6. Harpada 409 138 34 172 65 0 0 0 7. Wadiawan 747 292 66 358 26 5 0 0 8. Wanzttemrun 547 207 58 265 6 11 0 0 9. Sadadvihir 440 161 49 210 7 13 0 0

10. Kamdiawan 480 170 60 230 10 10 0 0 11. Ghaniamba 330 119 36 155 18 1 1 0 12 Jhari 495 156 56 211 73 0 0 0

Total 5383 1834 564 2397 564 54 1 0



CHAPTER – 4

.

WATERSHED ACTIVITIES

Watershed Activities

Watershed management as a strategy has been adopted by Government of India especially in the rain-fed regions of semi-arid

tropics. These regions are characterized by low and undependable rain, low soil fertility, poor infrastructure development, low

literacy and high incidence of migration. Several studies have identified that there is a dire need of a systematic and scientific



approach to deal with watershed development. The common guidelines generate a fresh and flexible framework for the next

generation watershed development.

4.1. Scientific Planning: i) Cluster Approach

This envisages a broader vision of Geo-hydrological unit which involves treating a cluster of micro-watershed. The Sahyadri

Project consists of Eight micro- watersheds namely 5B2D5b2h,5B2D5c2f,5B2D5b2d 5B2D5d2e, 5B2D5d2c, 5B2D5b2a,

5B2D5b2j, 5B2D5b2g as their respective codes.

ii) Base line Survey

To access the impact of any watershed development programme a detailed baseline survey has to be conducted. This acts a

benchmark for any intervention during and post implementation of any development programme. A detailed baseline survey was

undertaken which involved household census survey, Bio-physical survey; field to field survey, forest land survey and Village

level data collection from Talati–cum Mantri. Household census survey includes a detailed questionnaire which was been filled

by visiting each and every household in the village. This gave in the details of the demographic profile of the village, the literacy

percentage, SC/ST population, number of BPL household, cattle population, and net consumption rate in the village, average

milk production of the cattle and various schemes running and their benefits. Bio-physical survey was undertaken to identify

various natural resources available in the village. It included the soil typology, wells in the area, crops cultivation, cropping

pattern, fertilizer application and various sources of irrigation in the field.

iii) Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA)



The past experience of watershed has given tremendous input to focus on creating accountability of the stakeholders towards

the programme. This has created an emphasis to include all the stakeholder communities and their local and Indigenous

Technological Knowledge (ITK) while planning for any activity. Participatory approach provides a new path for planning,

implementing, monitoring and post-withdrawal activities with a complete accountability of the stakeholders. Various PRA

techniques like resource mapping, social mapping, transect walk and season calendars were used to understand the physical

and social orientation of the village in general and watershed in specific. These tools put the villagers in ease than the

complicated questionnaires. Various tools like Matrix ranking, Venn diagram were used to identify various local vegetations,

fodders crops and even various institutions to identify their significance in the life of the farmers.

IV) Use of GIS and remote sensing for planning

Use of various high science tools has been promoted at various stages of watershed development which include GPS, satellite

maps through BISAG. The A0 size cadastral and contour maps of each village has helped us to plan the work as per the

different survey nos. the action plan of the work to be done is roughly sketched in these maps. The use of GIS and remote

sensing at different stages are described below:

a) Prioritization: Geographical Information System (GIS) has been used for prioritization process. Various layer maps were

created like Geo-morphological, Soil, BPL Population, SC/ST population, Ground water Status, Drinking water situation

Slope percent. These were all given proper weight age according to the DoLR specification. This helped in prioritization of

various watershed areas.



b) Planning: An action plan matrix was formulated by State Level Nodal Agency (SLNA) taking into account various features

like the slope percent, soil Depth, Soil Texture, Soil erosion in the area for wasteland, forest land and agricultural land.

Global positioning System (GPS) was used to identify each and every water conservation structures available in the project

area. This was used to create a map. Contour Map of vertical interval of 1 meter at a scale of 1:8000 was used for

identifying various locations for soil and water conservation structures.

c) Hydrological modeling: Hydrology modeling technique was used for locating drainage, stream length, flow direction, sink,

and flow accumulation. This model overlaid over cadastral map to calculate the catchment area of each structures like the

check dam etc. This has helped to remove the human error which generally occurs while calculating the catchment area of

a check dam.



Table no. 30: Details of Scientific Planning and Inputs in IWMP projects Sl No Scientific criteria/ inputs used Whether scientific criteria

was used

1

(A) Planning Yes Cluster approach Yes Whether technical back-stopping for the project has been arranged? If yes, mention the name of the Institute Yes

Baseline survey Yes Hydro-geological survey Yes Contour mapping Yes Participatory Net Planning (PNP) Yes Remote sensing data-especially soil/ crop/ run-off cover Yes Ridge to Valley treatment Yes Online IT connectivity between (1) Project and DRDA cell/ZP Yes (2) DRDA and SLNA Yes (3) SLNA and DoLR Yes Availability of GIS layers 1. Cadastral map Yes 2. Village boundaries Yes 3. Drainage Yes 4. Soil (Soil nutrient status) Yes 5. Land use Yes 6. Ground water status Yes 7. Watershed boundaries Yes 8. Activity Crop simulation models # Integrated coupled analyzer/ near infrared visible spectroscopy/ medium spectroscopy for high speed soil nutrient analysis

Normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI)# Weather Station Yes (B) Inputs 1. Bio-pesticides No



2. Organic manures Yes 3. Vermicompost Yes 4. Bio-fertilizer Yes 5. Water saving devices Yes 6. Mechanized tools/ implements Yes 7. Bio-fencing Yes 8. Nutrient budgeting Yes 9. Automatic water level recorders & sediment samplers No

Any other (please specify) #NDVI - Ratio of the differences of the response of vegetation in the near infrared & red regions of the electromagnetic spectrum



Table no. 31: Details of PRA Activities conducted in the project area

Sl No

Name of the PRA

Activity Date Number of

people present Lessons learnt / Understanding of the problem/situation

1 Resource Mapping 7-2-13 121

• Major resources of income- Agriculture, Forestry & AH • Drinking water sources, i.e. open wells & hand pumps are available for

8-9 months, but villages faces severe scarcity in summer • Sufficient drinking water facility not found in uchli falia out of 4 falias. • fragmented land holding • It provided alternative database, Depicts differing local perception of

local problems/needs. • It was analysed that, 3 wells in Sahyadri village and hand pump are only

the drinking water resource available for the villages. Well remain almost dried for 2-3 months (Apr-May)

2 Social Mapping 7-2-13 121

• 100% ST population (Gamit, Bhils, Konkani, Warlis) • scattered hamlets (falias) • main festivals: Holi (Dang Darbar), Diwali, Dangi & Gamit nrutya • high expenditure on social occasions • Gender ratio-992 (census 2001). Recent surveyed data shows: 1029

females per 1000 male

3 Transect walks 7-2-13 23

• Observatory walk through an area with local informants • water source for drinking water-2wells, majors crops grown-finger millet

& paddy • verified the information given during resource mapping • agriculture on undulate terrains • no sufficient trees on farm boundary • Teak plantation were 10-15 yrs old and well protected, Teak is

dominated, other trees like Haldu, Sadad & Siasam • due to bamboo flowering, old clumps were not identified • Builds rapport with local people • It supports to identify problems of local resources/needs discussed



during mapping session

4 FGD 7-2-13 98

• The formation of men & women SHGs were carried out • women were mostly interested in Vermicompost, nurseries, Animal

husbandry & Kitchen gardening • vegetables productivity was low & men were interested in HYV • Land holding-less than 2ha • Social problems of women • Focussed group discussion identifies the group activity which would be

effectively carried out.

5 Seasonal calendar 7-2-13 67

• cropping pattern: continually cultivation of finger millet, paddy & hill millet, thus decrease in productivity

• period of availability of water for agriculture: 4 months • migration period- nov to may • Helps to identify lean periods for resources and timing of supply of key

farm inputs. • Finger millet & Paddy are major crops grown in this region. People

migrates in off season (Aug-Sep)

6 7-2-13 Venn diagram 56

• Helps to identify marginalized individuals and groups within the village, different schemes running in project area.

7 7-2-13 Preference ranking 84

• The priority of the activities to be carried out is decided in terms of immediate need of the villagers.

• To create social acceptance of the programme



Problem Tree Analysis chart



4.2a PTA (Problem Tree Analysis): The geographical factors of Dangs district are very distinct. The majority of land is undulated & plateau. Even in the project

cluster, in spite of the abundant water resources available, the total cultivated area as well as irrigated area remains pathetically

low. Due to limited opportunities for irrigation, coupled with low agricultural productivity and degradation of land, a majority of the

population migrates during the winter and summer months to be engaged as agricultural labour and construction workers. It is

evidently noticed that there is migration from villages in the North Eastern part of the district due to lack of irrigation facility.

Irrigation is dependent only on ground water sources and there is a total absence of surface water irrigation due to technically

unsound structures. Due to lack of any recharging mechanism, the amount of utilizable groundwater in the project area is depleting

at a rapid rate.

Maximum soil erosion is observed due to steep slopes & high velocity runoff resulting in degradation of thin fertile soil layer.

The agriculture productivity on this degraded land is poor. The drinking water supply system in project area, which consists of hand

pumps and open wells, is precariously dependent upon ground water availability. Many drinking water sources become non

operational by the end of February (the onset of summer). Even though the number of installed hand pumps to provide drinking

water is high, and one hand pump is shared amongst about twelve families, the real picture is quite different. This is because the

number of functional hand pumps is far lesser than the installed ones; hence, in reality, about twenty eight families have to share a

single hand pump for their drinking water needs.

These factors mentioned above adversely affects agriculture & animal husbandry productivity, the quality of life of people

and hence, overall human socio-economic development.



Object Tree Analysis chart



4.2b OTA (Object Tree Analysis):

After analyzing the problem and existing situation of the project area, the DPR focuses more towards its solution. We as a

team not tried to eradicate the hurdles but definitely tried to identify the core causes for above mentioned problems. The solution for

the control of soil & water erosion would be vegetative cover on the hilly and ridge area. Thus, prime action on the ridge area would

start from SMC works like staggered contour trench along with Afforestation (TKB). The ridge of the project area is covered with 1st

& 2nd order streams adjacent to forest land which is proposed to be treated by gully & nala bunding. The purpose of constructing

the suitable bunds across the nala/gully for intercepting the runoff coming from catchment area would be temporary storage of

runoff, resulting in deposition of silt over the gully bed. Suitable point of drain would be provided in controlled manner to posterior of

bund. Waste weir is proposed in farms which are at higher altitudes to drain the excess water in control manner.

Linkages are made with the activities proposed in livelihood and production micro-enterprises. For e.g., the SHG groups

which are involved in preparation of Vermicompost are linked with crop demonstrators, poly house beneficiaries, Kitchen

gardeners, Wadi cultivators & forest deptt carrying out Afforestation. Wadi cultivators would buy the seedling of mango and cashew

from nursery prepared by other SHGs; would be trained by experts from BAIF.



Small & marginal farmers would be encouraged for cultivation of vegetables & nurseries in Low cost poly house for better

quality & yield. The market available for bulk produce is in Songadh and Vyara Taluka of Tapi district. Few farmers were interested

to form a group and sell their produce in Ahwa taluka itself, marketing there produce as organic & targeting premium market in

Ahwa.

Wadi is the major activity in which most of the

farmers are involved, they would be provided with

the training to carry out good farm practices & SMC

measures, tried to shown in figure here.

Check dams beneficiaries are grouped under User groups so as to make use of

surface water for irrigation purpose through lift system or treadle pump depending

upon the distance from the harvesting structures. Farm ponds would be one of the

better solutions to harvest rain water rather than facing percolation losses. The appropriate

technologies are proposed in terms of improved but low cost agricultural implements, training & exposures so as to overcome

Fig. Treadle Pump

Fig. SMC measures along the Wadi plot



laborious hard-work, to improve efficiency & to generate alternative income source, resulting reduction in migration. It is long term

process and changes would be observed gradually, incorporating right message to villagers.

4.2.1 Institution building

Watershed Committee (WC)

It is a committee that is constituted by Gram Sabha to implement the watershed project with technical support of WDT in the village.

This committee is registered under Society Registration Act 1860. The Gram Sabha of the village selects the chairman of the

watershed committee with the secretary who will be a paid functionary. A watershed Committee was formed accordingly in

Sahyadri Project. The separate watershed committee was formed in Sahyadri village under Sahyadri Project. Capacity building

training to the watershed committee is given by WDT. The watershed committee has a pivotal role to play during and after the

project implementation period.



Table no. 32.1: Watershed Committee details of Nimpada Village

Sl no

Names of WCs

Date of Registration

as Society (dd/mm/

yyyy)

Name Designation M/F Age ST SF MF LF Landless UG SHG GP Any other

Educational qualification

Function assigned

1

WC, Nimpada

Sahyadri IWMP-

11

1. Wagh Rajeshbhai Sukarbhai

President M 35 1 1 JFMC 9th


std.

2.Santoshsing Chauhan Secretary M 45 1 BSC

3. Gangurda Manjulaben Shivrambhai

Member F 35 1 1 1 7th

4 Pawar Rashiben Kishanbhai


5.Deshmukh Hirajibhai Rangyabhai

Member M 35 1 1 1 5th

6.Deshmukh Padmaben D. Member F 30 1 1 JFMC 4th

7.Bhoye Lakhamabhai Laxmabhai

Member M 40 1 1

8. Mahala Kantilal M Member M 30 1 1 WDT ITI Surv.

9. Gavit Bhashkarbhai Gangarambhai

Member M 30 1 JFMC 5th

10. Chaudhari Tulsirambhai Pandubhai

Member M 40 1 1 JFMC 3rd

11. Kotwal Abajibhai H. Member M 40 1



Table no. 32.2: Watershed Committee details of Karadiamba Village

Sl no

Names of WCs

Date of Registration as Society (dd/mm/

yyyy)



Function assigned

1

WC, Karadiamba

Sahyadri IWMP-11

1. Devidasbhai Janabhai Bhoye President M 45 1 1 JFMC B.A


2.Santoshsing Chauhan

Member Secretary M 45 1 BSC

3. Meeraben Devidasbhai Bhoye

Member F 35 1 1 1 S.S.C

4. Chandrakalaben Ramdasbhai Rathod


5. Yashvantbhai Ravjibhai Rathod

Member M 38 1 1 1 S.S.C

6. Dineshbhai Somabhai Varde

Member M 32 1 Dairy Mem. S.S.C

7. Sevantaben Vithalbhai Bahiram

Member F 40 1 1 1 9 th

8. Kantilal M. Mahla Member M 30 1 1 WDT ITI Surv.

9. Saduram Chimanbhai Palve

Member M 30 1 1 9th

10. Bhagvan Babubhai Bhoye Member M 35 1 1 JFMC S.S.C

11. Ramdasbhai Govindbhai Rathod

Member M 42 1 1 JFMC B.A



Table no. 32.3: Watershed Committee details of Kadmal(Gadadsaja) Village

Sl no Names of WCs


yyyy)



Function assigned

1 WC,

Kadmal(Gadadsaja) Sahyadri IWMP-11

1. Pandubhai Nanabhai Lakahan





3. Kamalaben C. Chauhan Member F 30 1 1 1 9th

4. Mandaben S. Gavit Member F 32 1 1 1 S.S.C

5. Ramjibahi Chandubhai Mahle

Member M 35 1 1 1 2nd

6. Manjuben Sanjaybhai Shevare


7. Rahiben Zimanbhai Chaudhari

Member F 40 1 1 1 Dairy Mem. H.S.C


9. Anadbhai Kalubhai Shevare

Member M 45 1 1 H.S.C

10. Sureshbhai Chintamanbhai Chauhan

Member M 40 1 1 JFMC S.S.C

11. Chimanbhai Hirajibhai Thavil

Member M 35 1 1 JFMC 8th



Table no. 32.4: Watershed Committee details of Chinchdhara Village

Sl no Names of WCs


yyyy)



Function assigned

1

WC, Chinchdhara

Sahyadri IWMP-11

1.Narayanbhai B. Chaudhari President M 35 1 1 JFMC T.Y.B.A




3. Gokulaben N. Chaudhari Member F 30 1 1 1 T.Y.B.A

4. Kamdiben Somabhai Pawar


5. Padmaben Vithhalbhai Dalavi


6. Kalaben Dineshbhai Dalavi


7. Ziparbhai Pandubhai Chaudhari

Member M 40 1 1 1 T.Y.B.A


9. Govindbhai Shivarambhai Gavli

Member M 40 1 1 7th

10. Jivalbhai Lahnubhai Varde

Member M 40 1 1 1 H.S.C

11. Saytraben Rajeshbhai Kunvar

Member F 35 1 1 JFMC H.S.C



Table no. 32.5: Watershed Committee details of Thorpada Village

Sl no Names of WCs


yyyy)



Function assigned

1

WC, Thorpada Sahyadri IWMP-11

(Reg. No. U 14628) 04-2-2007

1. Bangal Chintaman Devarambhai

President M 35 1 1 JFMC S.S.C




3. Dhule Malatiben Vijaybhai


4. Bangal Kusumben Chintamanbhai


5. Bangal Kasirambhai Ramjibhai


6. Banbal Kalidasbhai K. Member M 40 1 1 1 H.S.C

7. Dhule Vijaybhai C. Member M 45 1 1 1 8th

8. Halpati Nareshbhai H. Member M 26 1 1 WDT BRS

9. Pavar Narayanbhai Devajibhai

Member M 40 1 1 S.S.C

10. Bangal Sumitraben G. Member M 25 1 1 JFMC H.S.C

11. Bhoye Shivarambhai Kashirambhai




Table no. 32.6: Watershed Committee details of Harpada Village

Sl no

Names of WCs

Date of Registration as Society



Function assigned

1

WC, Harpada Sahyadri IWMP-

11

(Reg. No. U 14636)

04-2-2007

1. Laxmanbhai R. Gaikwad





3. Punamben Rameshbhai Gaikwad


4. Ranjitaben Silyabhai Gaikwad


5. Padal Sivarambhai Vaghamare


6. Shivalya Bansipabhai Gaikwad


7. Lavangben Govindbhai Bhoye

Member F 28 1 1 JFMC S.S.C


9. Maniben Dansingbhai Vaghamare

Member F 60 1 1 -

10. Eknath Hirajibhai Pawar


11. Pravibhai Sureshbhai Pawar




Table no. 32.7: Watershed Committee details of Wadiawan Village

Sl no

Names of WCs

Date of Registratio

n as Society (dd/mm/

yyyy)

Name Designation

M/F

Age

ST

SF

MF

LF

Landless

UG

SHG

GP

Any other

Educational qualificatio

n Function assigned

1

WC, Wadiawa

n Sahyadri IWMP-11

(Reg. No. U 14536) 13-3-2006

1.Gangarambhai S. Chaudhari President M 52 1 1 JFM

C 8th

Watershed

Activities



3. Kamalaben T. Hadar Member F 35 1 1 1 7th

4. Meeraben S. Chaudhari Member F 28 1 1 1 7th

5. Dattubhai Abajibhai Chaudhari


6. Mohanbhai Khandubhai Pavar


7. Naruben Ramdasbhai Chaudhari

Member F 30 1 JFMC 5th


9. Haribhai Shivarambhai Gangorda

Member M 45 1 1 9th

10. Laxmanbhai Gangarambhai Mukane

Member M 44 1 1 JFMC T.Y.B.A

11. Babubhai Lahanubhai Pawar

Member M 46 1 JFMC 4th



Table no. 32.8: Watershed Committee details of Wanzttemrun Village

Sl no

Names of WCs

Date of Registratio

n as Society (dd/mm/

yyyy)

Name Designation

M/F

Age

ST

SF

MF

LF

Landless

UG

SHG

GP

Any other


n Function assigned

1

WC, Wanzttemru

n Sahyadri IWMP-11

(Reg. No. U 14625) 04-2-2007

1. Kishanbhai Shakaram Pawar


Watershed

Activities



3. Shakuntala Sonyabhai Gavit


4. Sumitraben Kishanbhai Pawar


5. Amaratbhai Haribhai Pawar


6. Bharatbhai Kashinathbhai Birari

Member M 30 1 1 1 H.S.C

7. Suraben Anandbhai Gavit

Member F 41 1 1 Dairy Mem. 2th


9. Haribhai Mangalyabhai Gaikwad

Member M 34 1 1 3th

10. Raghubhai Govindbhai Bangal


11.Jayrambhai Chimanbhai Gavit




Table no. 32.9: Watershed Committee details of Sadadvihir Village

Sl no

Names of WCs


yyyy)



Function assigned

1

WC, Sadadvihir Sahyadri IWMP-11

(Reg. No. U 14635) 04-2-2007

1.Chanrarbhai Badyabhai Chaudhari





3. Soniben Budyabhai Gaikwad


4. Kusumben Lahanubhai Bhagare


5. Dharmabhai Davlyabhai Chaudhari


6. Ramchand Dhanjibhai Kadale


7. Dhavalya Somabhai Kadale

Member M 40 1 1 -


9. Kamalesh Mohanbhai Bhoye

Member M 30 1 1 JFMC T.Y.B.A

10. Mayaben Navsubhai Chaudhari

Member F 55 1 1 Dairy Mem. 2th

11.Rajiram Dhanjibhai Chaudhari




Table no. 32.10: Watershed Committee details of Kamdiawan Village

Sl no

Names of WCs

Date of Registration as Society

(dd/mm/ yyyy) Name Designatio

n M/F

Age

ST

SF

MF

LF

Landless

UG

SHG

GP

Any other


n Function assigned

1

WC, Kamdiaw

an Sahyadri IWMP-11

(Reg. No. U 14631)

04-2-2007

1. Gavit Devaqrambhai Hirajibhai


Watershed

Activities



3. Bhoye Sangeetaben K.


4. Chauhan Kamaliben P. Member F 40 1 1 1 1 5th

5. Gavit Pandurang Hirajibhai


6. Bhoye Pariben Balubhai


7. Dalavi Bansipabhai B.

Member M 45 1 1 1 -

8. Halpati Nareshbhai H.

Member M 26 1 1 WDT BRS

9. Khandvi Ramabhai Janubhai

Member M 50 1 1 8th

10. Gaikwad Jayarambhai A


11.Thakare Ganapatbhai Ramubhai

Member M 30 1 1 JFMC 8 th



Table no. 32.11: Watershed Committee details of Ghaniamba Village

Sl no Names of WCs


yyyy)



Function assigned

1

WC, Ghaniamba

Sahyadri IWMP-11

(Reg. No. U 14532) 13-3-2006

1. Sakharam Somabhai Mahale





3. Kamalaben S. Mahle Member F 45 1 1 1 3th

4. Kaushalben S. Mahle Member F 30 1 1 1 4th

5. Haribhai Ratanbhai Bhoye


6. Gulabbhai Mohanbhai Bhoye


7. Saralaben Bhashakarbhai Bhoye

Member M 30 1 1 Dairy Mem. S.S.C


9. Tulasebhai Kalabhai Pradhan

Member M 40 1 1 -

10.Bhaskarbhai A. Bhoye Member M 35 1 1 JFMC 3th

11.Bharatiben Gulabbhai Bhoye

Member M 30 1 1 JFMC 2nd



Table no. 32.12: Watershed Committee details of Jhari Village

Sl no

Names of WCs


yyyy)



Function assigned

1 WC, Jhari Sahyadri IWMP-11

(Reg. No. U 14532) 13-3-2006

1. Sakharam Somabhai Mahale





3. Kamalaben S. Mahle Member F 45 1 1 1 3th

4. Kaushalben S. Mahle Member F 30 1 1 1 4th

5. Haribhai Ratanbhai Bhoye


6. Gulabbhai Mohanbhai Bhoye


7. Saralaben Bhashakarbhai Bhoye

Member M 30 1 1 Dairy Mem. S.S.C


9. Tulasebhai Kalabhai Pradhan

Member M 40 1 1 -

10.Bhaskarbhai A. Bhoye Member M 35 1 1 JFMC 3th

11.Bharatiben Gulabbhai Bhoye

Member M 30 1 1 JFMC 2nd



4.2.2 Self Help Group

Self Help Groups are motivated, small homogenous groups organized together through credit and thrift activities. Self help group

initiative especially for women help uplift their livelihood. Generally self help groups include landless and poor women. Before

formation of the SHGs, during PRA activities, Focused Group Discussions (FGDs) were held with the women, which came up with

the following observations:

a) Lack of proper credit facilities due to low intervention of formal financial credit institution.

b) Excessive exploitation of weaker section by money lenders

c) Lack of knowledge on credit facility and banking.

With a detailed discussion with some of the local NGOs working in the area like BAIF, it was planned to have some capacity

building training regarding SHG activities.

It was also proposed to have some livelihood activities which will promote women empowerment such as Wadi Project,

Vermicompost units, Nursery Raising, etc.

Table no. 33: SHG detail

Sl No Name of Village Total no. of registered SHGs No. of members No. of SC/ST in

each category No. of BPL in each category

With only Men

With only

Women With both

Total SHG Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total

1 Nimpada 2 2 0 4

(i) Landless 9 10 19 9 10 19 9 10 19 (ii) SF 7 10 17 7 10 17 7 10 17 (iii) MF 2 5 7 2 5 7 2 5 7 (iv) LF 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0



2 Karadiamba 2 2 1 4


3 Kadmal(Gadadsaja) 2 2 0 4


4 Sahyadri 2 2 0 4


5 Thorpada 2 2 1 5


6 Harpada 2 2 1 5

(i) Landless 5 12 17 5 12 17 5 12 17 (ii) SF 5 15 20 5 15 20 5 15 20 (iii) MF 7 5 12 7 5 12 7 5 12 (iv) LF 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 (ii) SF 5 12 17 5 12 17 5 12 17 (iii) MF 5 15 20 5 15 20 5 15 20 (iv) LF 7 5 12 7 5 12 7 5 12

7 Wadiawan 2 2 1 5


8 Wanzttemrun 2 2 1 5


9 Sadadvihir 2 2 1 5 (i) Landless 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0



(ii) SF 5 12 17 5 12 17 5 12 17 (iii) MF 5 15 20 5 15 20 5 15 20 (iv) LF 7 5 12 7 5 12 7 5 12

10 Kamdiawan 2 2 1 5


11 Ghaniamba 2 2 1 5


12 Jhari 2 2 1 5


Total 22 21 8 51 220 349 256 220 349 256 209 349 558

4.2.3 User Group:

User Groups are normally formed to manage an activity or asset created under the programme on a long term basis. The

user group collects user charges from their members, oversee the works and manage the benefits. It was decided that each group

would formulate certain internal rules and have a feeling of ownership with community spirit.



Table no. 34: UG detail

Sl No

Name of Village

Total no. of UG No. of members No. of SC/ST in each category

No. of BPL in each category

Men Women Both Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total

1 Nimpada 2 1 1 4


2 Karadiamba 2 0 1 3


3 Kadmal(Gadadsaja) 2 0 0 2


4 Sahyadri 2 0 1 3


5

Thorpada 2 1 1 4


6 Harpada 2 0 1 3


7 Wadiawan 2 0 1 3 (i) Landless 6 3 9 6 3 9 6 3 9



(ii) SF 15 2 17 15 2 17 15 2 17 (iii) MF 6 3 9 6 3 9 6 3 9 (iv) LF 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0

8 Wanzttemrun 2 1 1 4


9 Sadadvihir 2 0 1 3


10 Kamdiawan 2 0 1 3


11 Ghaniamba 3 2 1 6


12 Jhari 2 1 1 4


Total 23 5 10 38 302 95 397 302 95 397 291 95 386



4.3. Physical activities to be undertaken under IWMP, Sahyadri Village

4.3.1 Entry Point activity (EPA)

EPA activities are taken up under watershed projects to build a rapport with the village community at the beginning of the

project; generally, certain important works which are in urgent demand of the local community are taken up. A group discussion

was conducted with watershed Development Committee regarding the EPA activity, it was conveyed to the WC that an amount

of Rs. 24.8102Lakh was allotted for EPA activity for the different six villages, which was 4 per cent of total allocated budget. The

villagers discussed various activities which they felt is important but after a brief discussion it was conveyed to them that only

those activities can be taken, which revive the common natural resources. It was also taken into priority that there should be an

instrument of convergence which will result in sustainability of activities.

Table no.35: Entry point activities (EPA)

Sl No Names of Villages Amount

earmarked for EPA (Rs.

Lakhs)

Entry Point Activities planned

No of units

Estimated cost (Rs. in

Lakhs) Survey no

1 Nimpada 1.4298 Drainage line repairing(Gamtal) (Unit-2) 1.4298 village settlement

2 Karadiamba 0.6449 Renovation of cemetery (Unit-1) 0.6449 (Survey No 67)

3 Kadmal(Gadadsaja) 0.5064 Building of Animal water Trough (Unit-1) 0.5064 (Survey No 123)

4 Sahyadri 2.1835 Solar light in Cemetery 0.6835 (Survey No 67) Community Well Repairing 1.5 (Survey No 128)

5 Thorpada 3.904

Solar lights for cemetery (Unit-1) 0.5 (Survey No 66) New Cause way Construction 1.5 (Survey No 34/2)

Computer training for youths 1.504



Building of Animal water Trough (Gamtal) (Unit-1) 0.4 village settlement

6 Harpada 2.0994

Building of Animal water Trough (Gamtal) (Units-1) 0.4 village settlement

Drainage line repairing (Gamtal ) 0.8994 village settlement

Cause way Repairing (Survey No) 1 0.8 village settlement

7 Wadiawan 2.018 Solar light in Cemetery 2 1.018 (Survey No 11, 81)

Community Well repairing 1 1 (Survey No 72)

8 Wanzttemrun 5.6947

Community Well repairing 1 1.2 (Survey No 70) Building of Animal water Trough (Gamtal ) (Units-1) 0.4 village settlement

Pipeline construction for drinking water (Gamtal) 0.9447 village settlement

New Cause way Construction 1.65 village settlement


9 Sadadvihir 3.7048

Book for school library 0.2 village settlement

Community Well repairing (Units-2) 2 (Survey No 13/4,6/1)


Building of Animal water Trough (Gamtal ) (Units-1) 0.4 village settlement

10 Kamdiawan 1.9632 Pipeline construction for drinking water (Gamtal) 1.9632 village settlement

11 Ghaniamba 0.6615 Building of Animal water Trough (Units-1) 0.4 (Survey No 9 )

Community Well repairing 0.2615 (Survey No 9) 12 Jhari 0.72000 Water Storage Facility 0.72000 village settlement

Total cost 24.8102 24.8102



Table no.36: Details of ridge & drainage line treatment/ land based activities in watershed works

Sl No

Village name Name of structures

Type of treatment Type of land Target

(i) Ridge area (R)

(ii) Drainage line (D)

(iii) Land dev (L)

(i) Private

(ii) Communi

ty (C)

(iii) Others/Forest (F)

No. of units

(No./Cu.m./ rmt)

Estimated cost Expected month & year of

completion (mm/yyyy)

(Rs. in lakh)

M W O T

1 Thorpada

Nala Plug(Cement) D P F 208 Rmt - - - 14.560 DEC-19 Land Levelling L (123 Ha) P 123 Ha - - - 18.450 DEC-19

Waste Weir L P 272 Rmt - - - 7.344 DEC-19 Check dam D C 2 - - - 6.480 DEC-19

Check dam Reparing D C 2 - - - 3.618 DEC-19 Farm Pond L (73 Ha) P 73 Ha - - - 10.875 DEC-19

SCT R (74 Ha) F 14900

nos. - - - 1.493 DEC-19

Spring Development D C 2 - - - 1.600 DEC-19 Afforestation L (19 Ha) F 19 Ha - - - 9.500 DEC-19

2 Harpada




SCT R (31 Ha) F 6300 nos. - - - 0.636 DEC-19

Afforestation L (8 Ha) F 8 Ha - - - 4.000 DEC-19

3 Wanzttemrun






SCT R (16 Ha) F 3300 nos. - - - 0.332 DEC-19


4 Wadiawan




SCT R (29 Ha) F 5800 nos. - - - 0.580 DEC-19


5 Kadmal(Gadadsaja)




SCT R (33 Ha) F 6600 nos. - - - 0.663 DEC-19


6 Nimpada




SCT R

(107 Ha) F 21500

nos. - - - 2.156 DEC-19

Spring Development D C 2 - - - 1.600 DEC-19




7 Sadadvihir




SCT R (40 Ha) F 8000 nos. - - - 0.802 DEC-19


8 Karadiamba




SCT R (29 Ha) F 5800 nos. - - - 0.580 DEC-19


9 Kamdiawan




SCT R (20 Ha) F 4100 nos. - - - 0.415 DEC-19


10 Ghaniamba Nala Plug(Cement) D P F 24 Rmt - - - 1.680 DEC-19

Land Levelling L (14 Ha) P 14 Ha - - - 2.100 DEC-19





SCT R (11 Ha) F 2200 nos. - - - 0.221 DEC-19


11 Sahyadri


Waste Weir L P 28 Rmt - - - 0.756 DEC-19 Check dam D C 1 - - - 3.015 DEC-19 Farm Pond L (7 Ha) P 7 Ha - - - 1.088 DEC-19

SCT R (11 Ha) F 2200 nos. - - - 0.221 DEC-19


12 Jhari


Waste Weir L P 34 Rmt - - - 0.918 DEC-19 Check dam D C 1 - - - 3.438 DEC-19 Farm Pond L (11 Ha) P 11 Ha - - - 1.631 DEC-19

SCT R (12 Ha) F 2400 nos. - - - 0.249 DEC-19


Total 403.199

M-Material, W-Wage, O-other, T-Total The following rates are derived using the Schedule of Rate (SOR) for South Gujarat Region for the Year 2008-09 & National

Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme schedule of Rates 2008-09.



Table No. 36.1: Farm Pond

Description Nos. Quantity Rate

Pond: 20 mt *20 mt * 2.5 mt 1 781.25 CM 54375 Rs.

Descriptions Quantity Units

Pond Length 20.00 Meter

Pond Width 20.00 Meter

Pond Depth 2.50 Meter

Side Slope 2:1

Table No. 36.2: Check Dam


R.C.C Check Dam: Length = 30 mt 1 360 CM 5.38 Lakh

Description Value Units

Top width 1 Meter

Bottom width 4 Meter

Depth above ground level 2 Meter

Depth of Foundation 0.500 Meter



Cross section of bund 240 Sq. M.

Proposed Area 3 Ha

Upstream Slope 2:1

Down Stream Slope 1:1

Table No. 36.3: SCT

Description Nos. Unit Rate

SCT : 2 mt * 0.3 mt * 0.45mt (LBH) 200 1Ha Rs.2764

*The labour wages is taken as Rs 150.20 per day which may subject to change

Table No 36.4 Contour bunding


Contour Bunding: Length = 5 mt 1 20 CM/1Ha Rs. 12000


Top width 1 Meter




Cross section of bund 12.50 Sq. M.

Proposed Area 1 Ha

Upstream Slope 2:1




Table No. 36.5 Nala/Gully Plug


Gully Plug : Length = 5 mt 1 32 CM Rs 28000


Top width 1 Meter


Depth above ground level 1.5 Meter


Cross section of bund 24.5 Sq. M.

Proposed Area 1 Ha

Upstream Slope 2:1




Table No. 36.6 Land Levelling

Description Nos. Unit Rate

Excavation for 1.5 Mt Depth (with use of machinery) 1 Ha Rs 15000

Table No.36.7 Waste Weirs


Waste Weir: Length = 2 mt 1 2.22 CM Rs 5400


Length 2 Meter

Width 0.60 Meter



Along with the soil and water conservation, the establishment of vegetative cover is one of the major aspects of IWMP

project. In Sahyadri project, Wadi project is prominently focussed with SMC work as per the suitability of land and soil existing in

project area. The plan for Afforestation had been formulated along with help of forest department which comprises of Bamboo

and TKB plantation as described in Table no. 41 as below. The costing part is been formulated with help of TKB and bamboo

models.



4.3.2. Watershed Development Works:

Watershed development works are to be done during second phase of watershed project. A multi-tier ridge to valley sequence

approach should be approached towards implementation of watershed development projects. A net budget of 50 percent is

allotted for this work.

Ridge Area Treatment Plans:

The main purpose is to harvest the water at ridge level first as this is where the major water resources originate. It would allow

the water to percolate underground and recharge the natural aquifers. Other benefits would be the reduction in the velocity of

the water which is flowing with high velocity due to heavy rain and steep slope. The reduced Kinetic energy would allow the soil

particle to accumulate in the trenches and furrows, minimizing the soil erosion as well. The Sahyadri watershed had been

identified as one of the most eroded part of the South Dang. Thus, SMC treatment in that region would benefit the villagers for

drinking purpose and help them to increase the productivity. The gradual process would also help us to retain GWT of the same

region. In order to overcome above hurdles, following structure had been proposed after interaction between the watershed

committee, Range Forest Officer (RFO) and other field staff of forest.



Table no.37: Activities related to Surface water resources in the project areas

Sl No Village name Type of

structures

Proposed target Augmentation/ repair of existing

structures Construction of new structures Total target

No.

Area to be

irrigated (ha)

Storage capacity (lakh

lit.)

Estimated cost (Rs. in lakh)

No.

Area to be

irrigated (ha)


lit.)


Area to be

irrigated (ha)


lit.)


1 Nimpada Farm Pond - - - - 7 8 14 3.78 8 14 3.78

Check dam - - - - 5 10 25 13.8 10 25 13.8

2 Karadiamba Farm Pond - - - - 3 9 15 1.62 9 15 1.62

Check dam 4 12 8 1.34 3 10 16 7.89 22 30 9.23

3 Kadmal(Gadadsaja)

Farm Pond - - - - 10 20 50 5.4 20 50 5.4

Check dam - - - - 6 12 30 21.69 12 30 21.69

4 Sahyadri Farm Pond - - - - 8 16 45 4.32 16 45 4.32

Check dam - - - - 3 9 13 12.55 9 13 12.55

5 Thorpada Farm Pond - - - - 1 2 5 0.54 2 5 0.54

Check dam - - - - 3 6 18 12.94 6 18 27.93

6 Harpada Farm Pond - - - - 2 4 10 1.08 4 10 1.08

Check dam - - - - 3 6 15 8.42 6 15 8.42

7 Wadiawan Farm Pond - - - - 10 21 52 5.4 21 52 5.4

Check dam - - - - 2 4 12 10.4 4 12 10.4

8 Wanzttemrun Farm Pond - - - - 5 10 23 2.7 10 23 2.7



Check dam - - - - 2 4 12 6.45 4 12 6.45

9 Sadadvihir Farm Pond - - - - 6 12 32 3.24 12 32 3.24

Check dam 1 4 5 0.65 2 4 12 10.75 8 17 11.4

10 Kamdiawan Farm Pond - - - - 7 14 34 3.78 14 34 3.78

Check dam - - - - 2 4 12 10.75 4 12 10.75

11 Ghaniamba Farm Pond - - - - 5 12 23 2.7 12 23 2.7

Check dam - - - - 3 4 15 10.4 4 15 10.4

12 Jhari Farm Pond Check dam

Total 5 16 13 1.99 98 201 483 160.6 217 502 162.59

Table no.38: Activities related to recharging ground water resources in the project areas

Sl No Name of Villages Type of structures

Proposed target Augmentation/ repair of

existing recharging structures

Construction of new recharging structures Total target

No. Area to be irrigated

(ha)

Estimated cost (Rs. In

Lakh) No.

Area to be irrigated

(ha) Estimated

cost Area to be irrigated

(ha) Estimated

cost

1 Sahyadri village (i) Open wells - - - - - - - - (ii) Bore wells - - - - - - - -

Total for the village - - - - - - - - Total for the Project - - - - - - - -



Table no.39: Details of activities related to livelihood, production system and micro-enterprises

Sr. No Name of Village Name of activity Uni

t Estimate

d cost IWMP Convergence

Agency

1 Nimpada

Agriculture Low cost Green House 1 0.30 0.30 Group Garden 1 1.80 1.30 0.50 GGRC Improved implements/Machineries 1 2.48 2.48 Lift Irrigation for UGs 4 2.00 2.00 Green Manuring 2 1.50 1.50 Horticulture Development 20 4.90 4.90 Azolla Fodder Plot 1 0.60 0.60 Agro-forestry Cultivated Medicinal Plant/Safed Musli 2 1.00 1.00 Nursery (Teak, Bamboo, Mango, Cashewnut) 2 1.00 1.00 Animal Husbandry Pasture Development 1 1.00 1.00 Poultry (Medium scale) 2 2.00 2.00 Live stock development (Camps, AI, Cattle feed) 3 3.50 3.50

Agro-processing/ micro-enterprise Vermicompost 2 1.50 1.50 Oil Extraction unit 1 2.00 2.00 Total 25.58 25.08 0.50

2 Karadiamba

Agriculture Group Garden 1 1.69 1.19 0.50 GGRC Lift Irrigation for UGs 2 1.10 1.10 Horticulture Development 13 3.30 3.30 Agro-forestry



Cultivated Medicinal Plant/Safed Musli 1 0.50 0.50 Nursery (Teak, Bamboo, Mango, Cashewnut) 1 0.50 0.50 Animal Husbandry Pasture Development 1 0.50 0.50 Live stock development 1 1.00 1.00 Animal Camp 2 2.50 2.50 Agro-processing/ micro-enterprise Vermicompost 1 0.58 0.58 Total 11.67 11.17 0.50

3 Kadmal(Gadadsaja)

Agriculture Group Garden 1 1.60 1.10 0.50 GGRC Lift Irrigation for UGs 2 1.10 1.10 Horticulture Development 8 2.00 2.00 Agro-forestry Nursery (Teak, Bamboo, Mango, Cashewnut) 1 0.50 0.50 Animal Husbandry Live stock development 1 1.00 1.00 Total 6.20 5.70 0.50

4 Sahyadri

Agriculture Group Garden 1 1.54 1.04 0.50 GGRC Lift Irrigation for UGs 1 0.50 0.50 Horticulture Development 6 1.60 1.60 Agro-forestry Cultivated Medicinal Plant/Safed Musli 1 0.50 0.50 Nursery (Teak, Bamboo, Mango, Cashewnut) 1 0.50 0.50 Animal Husbandry Pasture Development 1 0.50 0.50 Poultry (Medium scale) 1 2.00 2.00 Live stock development 1 2.44 2.44 Agro-processing/ micro-enterprise Vermicompost 0.50 0.50



Total 10.08 9.58 0.50

5 Thorpada

Agriculture Group Garden 1 1.59 1.09 0.50 GGRC Bio-Gas 3 1.00 1.00 Lift Irrigation for UGs 1 0.50 0.50 Horticulture Development 17 4.20 4.20 Agro-forestry Cultivated Medicinal Plant/Safed Musli 0.50 0.50 Nursery (Teak, Bamboo, Mango, Cashewnut) 0.50 0.50 Animal Husbandry Live stock development 2.88 2.88 Agro-processing/ micro-enterprise Vermicompost 0.50 0.50 Total 11.67 11.17 0.50

6 Harpada

Agriculture Group Garden 2 2.56 2.56 Bio-Gas 3 1.00 1.00 Improved implements/Machineries 1 4.00 4.00 Lift Irrigation for UGs 7 3.50 3.50 Horticulture Development 40 10.10 10.10 Agro-forestry Cultivated Medicinal Plant/Safed Musli 1 0.50 0.50 Nursery (Teak, Bamboo, Mango, Cashewnut) 2 1.00 1.00 Animal Husbandry Pasture Development 1 1.00 1.00 Poultry (Medium scale) 2 2.00 2.00 Live stock development 1 2.50 2.50 Animal Camp 2 3.00 3.00 Rabbit Farming 1 1.50 1.50 Agro-processing/ micro-enterprise Vermicompost 2.00 2.00



Total 34.66 34.66 0.00

7 Wadiawan

Agriculture Group Garden 1 0.90 0.90 Bio-Gas 3 1.00 1.00 Lift Irrigation for UGs 2 1.00 1.00 Horticulture Development 18 4.50 4.50 Agro-forestry Nursery (Teak, Bamboo, Mango, Cashewnut) 2 1.00 1.00 Animal Husbandry Pasture Development 1 0.50 0.50 Live stock development 1 2.00 2.00 Agro-processing/ micro-enterprise Vermicompost 1 0.50 0.50 Total 11.40 11.40 0.00

8 Wanzttemrun

Agriculture Horticulture Development 8 2.06 2.06 Lift Irrigation for UGs 2 1.00 1.00 Agro-forestry Cultivated Medicinal Plant/Safed Musli 1 0.50 0.50 Nursery (Teak, Bamboo, Mango, Cashewnut) 2 1.00 1.00 Animal Husbandry Pasture Development 1 1.00 1.00 Live stock development 1 1.46 1.46 Agro-processing/ micro-enterprise Vermicompost 1 0.50 0.50 Total 7.52 7.52 0.00

9 Sadadvihir

Agriculture Lift Irrigation for UGs 2 1.00 1.00 Horticulture Development 8 1.97 1.97 Agro-forestry Cultivated Medicinal Plant/Safed Musli 1 0.50 0.50



Nursery (Teak, Bamboo, Mango, Cashewnut) 1 0.50 0.50 Animal Husbandry Live stock development 1 1.00 1.00 Agro-processing/ micro-enterprise Vermicompost 1 0.50 0.50 Total 5.47 5.47 0.00

10 Kamdiawan

Agriculture Lift Irrigation for UGs 1 0.50 0.50 Green Manuring 0.54 0.54 Horticulture Development 6 1.56 1.56 Agro-forestry Cultivated Medicinal Plant/Safed Musli 1 0.50 0.50 Nursery (Teak, Bamboo, Mango, Cashewnut) 1 0.50 0.50 Agro-processing/ micro-enterprise Vermicompost 0.50 0.50 Total 4.10 4.10 0.00

11 Ghaniamba

Agriculture Group Garden 1 1.00 0.60 0.40 GGRC Horticulture Development 5 1.30 1.30 Agro-forestry Cultivated Medicinal Plant/Safed Musli 1 0.52 0.52 Nursery (Teak, Bamboo, Mango, Cashewnut) 1 0.50 0.50 Animal Husbandry Pasture Development 1 0.50 0.50 Total 3.82 3.42 0.40

12 Jhari

Agriculture Group Garden 1 1.00 0.60 0.40 GGRC Horticulture Development 5 1.30 1.30 Agro-forestry Cultivated Medicinal Plant/Safed Musli 1 0.52 0.52 Nursery (Teak, Bamboo, Mango, Cashewnut) 1 0.50 0.50



Animal Husbandry Pasture Development 1 0.50 0.50 Total 3.82 3.42 0.40

Total Sahyadri Project 140.10 136.80 3.30

Model for a Vermicompost Unit

Sl No Particulars Quantity Rate (Rs.) Amount (Rs.) 1 Wooden ballies (3 m long) 20 50 1000 2 Wooden (4 m long) 25 60 1500 3 Shade mats for covering the roof 125 25 3125 4 Binding wire for tying wooden ballies & mats 20kg 50 1000 5 Labour charges for erection of sheds 20 100 2000 6 Shovels, spades, crowbars, iron baskets 2500 7 Weighing scale (100 kg capacity) 1 2000 2000 8 Cow dung 10ton 800 8000 9 Worms @ 3 kg per ton 30kg 80 2400

10 Formation of vermin bed with agro-waste, cow dung and worms 20beds 250 5000 11 Miscellaneous 2100

Total cost 25000



Sr. No

Materials and Quantity for Low cost Greenhouse

Materials Measure Quantity Using Place Remarks

1 Bamboo or plain Wood

Thickness- 3 to 4 inch Lenth-10 feet

22 Nos. Side Length 10 mt. Up to 3 mt. apply coal-tar and prick in land


Thickness- 3 to 4 inch Lenth-11.5 feet

4 Nos. 5 mt. wide Up to 3 mt. apply coal-tar and prick in land



4 Nos. 5 mt. wide Up to 3 mt. apply coal-tar and prick in land



4 Nos. For Greenhouse supporting

Vertical support bind by coir-rope


Thickness- 1.5 to 2 inch

Estimate 200 to 300

foot

Side length-breath for vertical support

Vertical support bind by coir-rope


Thickness- 1 to 1.5 inch Length- 23 foot

11 Nos. Slab circular Length side bind with coir rope (both direction)


Thickness- 2 to 2.5 inch 1 to 1.5 inch

65 foot 65 foot

for circular support Bamboo/wood with circular strong bind by coir rope

8 UV Stabilized Plastic

Lenth-12 mt. Wide- 7 mt.

84 mt. (16 to 17

k.g.)

For the covering slab of Greenhouse

Stitch plastic all side or bind

9 Agri net/kantan (50% shed)

Lenth-32 mt. Wide- 2 mt.

64 mt. Both side of Greenhouse Stitch or bind net/flax up to bottom.

10 Coir rope and coal-tar

- Required - -

*Source: NAU, Navsari



Low cost poly house:

Sl no Article name Cost

1 Bamboo or other plain wood 2500-3000

2 200 micron UV stabilized Plastic 2550

3 Agri-net/kantan 1150

4 Miscellaneous 500

5 Wages 1000-1500

6 Transportation 2300-1300 Total (approx. for 50m²) 10,000

i.e. for 1m² - Rs. 200/-

Revenue generation:

Sr. No.

Name of Crop

Increase in production

(%)

Increase in Income (%) Remarks

1. Green Leafy Vegetable 50 60 Use of Water Sprinkle

2. Vegetable nursery 185 150 Use of Water Sprinkle

3. Tomato 159 467 Nitrogen application (150%)

Yearly Planning of Crop:



Sr. No. Month Options

A B C D E

1. April Garlic Coriander - Coriander Coriander

2. May Land roast in (Sun light)

3. June Papaya Drumstick Garlic, Marigold Onion Green Chilli,

Tomato 4. July

5. August Drumstick Green Chilli Brinjal Papaya

Cabbage

6. September

Tomato

Cauliflower Brinjal Cabbage

7. October

Tomato

Chilli Eggplant Cauliflower

8. November Spinach Tandljo Tandljo

9. December

10. January Papaya

Marigold Brinjal

11. February Papaya Onion

12. March Fenugreek Fenugreek *Source: NAU, Navsari



Veterinary services will be provided in the cluster villages. They are highly dependent on small ruminants like cows, buffaloes and

other cattle. Vaccination camps/Animal camps will be conducted time to time against chronic diseases in the larger animals. The

location also will be provided with successful Artificial insemination (AI) services, relying on the supplies provided by the

government veterinary hospital in Ahwa. The pregnant cow care programme was a concept borrowed from the Vasudhara Dairy,

Discussion on Interventions proposed

The Livestock Development Programme:

Many new initiatives in the field of veterinary care, fodder development, training programmes will be taken up to encourage their

main livelihood activity i.e. animal husbandry. Many of these initiatives would results in yield much beyond what we had hoped to

achieve.

Loans to landless SHG members/UG groups

The special loans for purchase of cattle will be made available to members in the location. Landless members will be given loans

before the summer season. Members have to procure good quality animals. Veterinary support services will be provided by the

veterinary hospitals and in animal husbandry camps. Breeds suitable for the area will be brought.

Creation of a Risk Fund

The livestock development programme will set up a risk fund to take care of an accidental death of the animals. Members who avail

of cattle loans will contribute some amount towards a risk fund. In the event of death of the animal during the loan repayment

period, money pooled in the risk fund can be used to help the member repay the loan outstanding.

Veterinary Services



Valsad, and Gujarat. This will be launched with the primary aim of demonstrating that the productivity of the local cows could be

increased with appropriate feeding practices. Within this programme, veterinary professionals would first identify local cows which

are pregnant and have around two more months to go before parturient. Once the animals were identified and if the owner was

willing the animals were put on an intensive feeding and care programme for a three month period, from the start of the programme

to one month after parturition. The farmer would contribute the dry fodder and green fodder, in kind. Farmers from the project

villages will be motivated to participate in the programme.

Training and Exposure visits

A large group of people, consisting mainly of women dairy farmers who will take loans for purchase of cattle, will visit the

successful dairy cooperatives under the Vasudhara dairy, Valsad. These cooperatives were chosen mainly for the reason that

many of the successful dairy farmers in these areas are small farmers belonging to various tribal communities. These dairies had

also built up their business on the hard work of women farmers who had taken loans from the SHGs run by the cooperative union to

buy cattle. The interaction will be helpful as dairy co-operative members in other district will make them to understand how those

women, with a similar background, had been able to build up a good livelihood option revolving around the dairy.

Training addressing the issue of infertility in animals will be provided to beneficiary group. Three day training cum exposure visit will

be organized for the team and some farmers to the BAIF organization. The visit will provide a firsthand view of the options open to

dry land farmers to ensure the availability of good quality fodder. The farmers who had adopted such practices demonstrated how it

could help in cutting down the cost of feed concentrates. One day training on azolla cultivation, as a means of providing high

protein feed to livestock, will be organized by KVK. Azolla is finding increasing use for sustainable production of livestock feed.



Azolla is rich in proteins, essential amino acids, vitamins and minerals. Studies describe feeding azolla to dairy cattle with reported

increases in milk production. Scientist from the KVK will demonstrate the simple method by which azolla could be grown in the

backyard of farmers. Demonstration pits are expected to set up in the demonstration plot of interested villagers.

Bio-Gas

Another major idea is to use cattle dung and kitchen soft waste and waste water to produce bio gas in a bio reactor. The

unmanaged cattle dung can be managed properly if fed into a bio reactor. The reactor produces bio gas which is about 60%

methane and 40 % carbon dioxide along with traces of other gases. This is used as cooking fuel and for lighting in some cases in

place of traditional inefficient wood and kerosene stove. Biogas is a clean and efficient fuel. Because of the biogas the need for

collecting firewood is avoided. The cooking is speeded up and time on cooking is reduced. Women have to spare time to take care

of their children and their education. A portion of their spare time is spent on sustainable income generating activities.

The involvement of ARTI for in-depth technical training in community outreach and education for stove design and performance,

market development, and indoor air pollution and socio-economic impact, had the crucial priority in these areas for sustainable

programs. Introduction of Environmentally friendly rural technologies based on modern scientific knowledge would be appropriate

solution towards conservation of natural resources in Dang district. It would definitely show a positive impact in minimising the use

of forest wood in process of cooking food and empowering the sub-standard of women in village.

Impact on natural resources: Reduction of pressure on the forest: As the families will use less wood (or no wood at all) to cook.

This can be one of the remedy to protect forest from deforestation in the district, and prevent villagers to go 1km or more from the

village to collect wood.



1. Restoration of soil fertility: The chemical fertilizers are damaging the soil fertility and the annual crop yields are decreasing.

The slurry will be used for the vermin production & studies have shown that when vermin-compost is used, the crops

increased of 13%.

2. Control of local water contamination: Water contamination due to leaching of chemicals from Inorganic fertilizers is one of

the issues faced by the country. The minimization of usage of these chemicals is thus essential and use of Bio-gas would be

the helping hand for the same.

1. Retail shop for small farmers & landless forming UG/SHG.

Micro-enterprise

Promotion of micro-enterprises and various income generation activities is an important aspect of empowerment. Although it is

extremely difficult to find remunerative self employment, there are enormous untapped opportunities in the rural sector. These

include both on-farm and off-farm opportunities. Typically families living below poverty line, SC, ST and landless in a cluster of

villages are motivated to take part in holistic development through livelihood opportunities through multidisciplinary interventions.

The following micro-enterprises & livelihood activities are proposed in Kaksala cluster:

2. Linkages between Vermicompost producers & wadi cultivators and even market outside the cluster

3. Mahoa oil extraction unit as a livelihood for the unemployed youths & landless villagers.



4. A group of landless to search market, make brand, sell & promote the products produced in cluster such as safed musli,

nagli products, bamboo crafts, etc starting from nearby market such as Saputara Hill station, Giradhoot and expanding over

to Nashik, Surat companies

5. A green manure is a type of cover crop grown primarily to add nutrients and organic matter to the soil. Typically, a green

manure crop (lupin, fenugreek) is grown for a specific period, and then ploughed under and incorporated into the soil. They

contain Nitrogen-fixing symbiotic bacteria in root nodules that fix atmospheric nitrogen in a form that plants can use. Green

manures increase the percentage of organic matter (biomass) in the soil, thereby improving water retention, aeration, and

other soil characteristics.

6. Animal camp in cluster to generate awareness of indigenous breed & adopt feed for cattle having maximum nutrition value.

7. Crop demonstration to encourage farmers to cultivate high yielding varieties with good farm practices, promote

wadi/orchards in their farm under optimal use of resources i.e. water, fertilizers & pesticides.

8. Backyard poultry for the landless & BPLs asset less. Focus would be made to promote indigenous breeds of cocks & hens.

9. Improved implements such as puddler, vaibhav sickle; weeder would able to reduce laborious work & will be distributed to

UG.

10. Kitchen garden kits to women to produce sufficient amount of vegetable at backyard of house to consume daily.

11. Cattle feed units to improve nutritive value of feed for cattle.

12. Teak & Bamboo nursery to generate livelihood for asset less and linkages with forest department to increase to vegetative

cover.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cover_crop�

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nutrient�

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organic_matter�

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soil�

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plow�

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nitrogen_fixation�

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symbiotic�

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bacteria�

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Root_nodules�

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biomass�

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water�



13. Vermicompost units to encourage organic farming & to generate livelihood for women in cluster.

14. Promotion of low cost green house to increase productivity and quality of produce.

15. Practising intercropping: The most common goal of intercropping is to produce a greater yield on a given piece of land by

making use of resources that would otherwise not be utilized by a single crop. Careful planning is required, taking into

account the soil, climate, crops, and varieties. It is particularly important not to have crops competing with each other for

physical space, nutrients, water, or sunlight. Examples of intercropping strategies are planting a deep-rooted crop with a

shallow-rooted crop, or planting a tall crop with a shorter crop that requires partial shade.

16. Dairy development through AI, cattle feeds (milk collection centre for landless) planned for convergence with Animal

husbandry deptt & IDDP.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soil�

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climate�

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variety_(botany)�

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water�

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sunlight�

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Root�



Table no. 40: Activities related to livelihoods by Self Help Groups (SHGs) in the project areas

Sl No Name of Village Major activities of the

SHGs No. of SHGs

involved Average annual income from activity per SHG approx.

(Rs)

1 Nimpada

Kitchen garden 1 18000 Backyard poultry 1 6000 cement block, ie centring 1 14000 fruit nursery 1 13000 Vermicompost 1 7000 carpentry works 1 11000 wadi & drip irrigation 1 13000 Vermicompost unit 1 6500

2 Karadiamba

kitchen garden 1 18000 Backyard poultry 1 6000 bamboo crafts 1 14000 cement block, i.e. centring 1 13000 wadi & drip irrigation 1 7000 Bamboo Nursery Raising 1 11000 Low cost green house 1 13000

3 Kadmal(Gadadsaja)

kitchen garden 1 6500 Backyard poultry 1 6500 Vermicompost 1 18000 cement block, i.e. centring 1 6000 wadi & drip irrigation 1 14000 Nursery Raising 1 13000 Low cost green house 1 7000

4 Chinchdhara

kitchen garden 1 11000 Backyard poultry 1 13000 cultivation of safed musli 1 6500 Improved implements 1 5000 Low cost green house 1 18000 fishery 1 6000 construction work 1 14000 wadi & drip irrigation 1 13000

5 Thorpada kitchen garden 1 7000



Backyard poultry 1 11000 cultivation of safed musli 1 13000 Vermicompost 1 6500 carpentry work 1 18000 wadi & drip irrigation 1 6000 Nursery Raising 1 14000 Low cost green house 1 13000

6 Harpada

kitchen garden 1 7000 Backyard poultry 1 11000 cultivation of safed musli 1 13000 Vermicompost 1 6500 construction work 1 18000 wadi & drip irrigation 1 6000 Nursery Raising 1 14000 Low cost green house 1 13000

7 Wadiawan

kitchen garden 1 7000 Backyard poultry 1 11000 Crop demonstration 1 13000 Tailoring 1 6500 carpentry work 1 18000 wadi & drip irrigation 1 6000 Nursery Raising 1 14000 Low cost green house 1 13000

8

Wanzttemrun

kitchen garden 1 7000 Backyard poultry 1 11000 Crop demonstration 1 13000 cultivation of safed musli 1 6500 Tailoring 1 18000 carpentry work 1 6000 wadi & drip irrigation 1 14000 Nursery Raising 1 13000 Low cost green house 1 7000 Vermicompost 1 11000

9 Sadadvihir kitchen garden 1 13000 Backyard poultry 1 6500



Crop demonstration 1 18000 cultivation of safed musli 1 6000 carpentry work 1 14000 wadi & drip irrigation 1 13000 Nursery Raising 1 7000 Vermicompost 1 11000 Bamboo crafts 1 13000 cement block, ie centring 1 6500

10 Kamdiawan

kitchen garden 1 18000 cultivation of tubers crops 1 6000 cultivation of safed musli 1 14000 cement block, ie centring 1 13000 wadi & drip irrigation 1 7000 Nursery Raising 1 18000 Bamboo crafts 1 6000

11 Ghaniamba

kitchen garden 1 14000 cultivation of tubers crops 1 13000 cultivation of safed musli 1 7000 wadi & drip irrigation 1 11000 Nursery Raising 1 13000 Bamboo crafts 1 6500

12 Jhari

kitchen garden 1 18000 cultivation of tubers crops 1 6000 cultivation of safed musli 1 14000 cement block, ie centring 1 13000 wadi & drip irrigation 1 7000 Nursery Raising 1 18000 Bamboo crafts 1 6000

Total 87 954500



Table no. 41: Linkages developed at village level

Sr. No.

Villages Name of activity Forward/Backward linkage Linkages with Outcomes

1 All 1. Vermicompost

SHGs involved in preparing Vermicompost would need not to require searching market outside the project area; they had been tied with forest deptt carrying out Afforestation within project or departmental projects. wadi cultivators would be motivated to buy compost from these SHGs. Beneficiaries of low cost poly house would also buy the same.

Crops demonstrators, Wadi cultivators, Low cost poly house beneficiaries, Forest deptt (Afforestation), Kitchen garners

Alternative source of income, employment for landless, Reduction in migration during lean period

2 All 2. Wadi cultivators

The demand of this activity in the project area is max. The saplings will be brought by SHGs at reasonable rates. They will be trained for maintaining/growing nursery. The beneficiaries of wadi would be trained to make use of optimum use of water through drip system and to carry out SMC works in wadi. The stall would be held at Saputara hill station for all the projects to sell the produce especially from IWMP projects.

BAIF, APMC

Increase in annual income, Reduction in migration during lean period

3 All

3. Low cost poly

house

Farmers growing vegetables & fruit seedlings in poly house would sell their produce in weekly market. The promotion of these produce would be under organic head.

Weekly market Increase in annual income



5 All 4. Teak &

Bamboo nursery

SHG involved in nursery raising, are to tied with forest deptt to buy the seedlings. TKB are to be planted along the ridge area within the project, which would bought from SHGs. Villagers willing to grow Teak & bamboo in their private survey no.

Forest deptt

Alternative source of income, employment for landless

6 All 5. Dairy development

1. Group of landless women beneficiaries would be provided subsidy under the convergence with IDDP (Integrated Dairy Development Programme) to buy dwelling high yielding breed in project area i.e. Surti buffalo. These beneficiaries would act as pourers in milk collection centers which will be created in each village.

2. Some beneficiaries having cattle, would provided with support for nutritious feed, milk cans, measuring units, etc

3. Involvement of BAIF for artificial insemination in Animal camp, veterinary support & expert guidance would be planned for beneficiaries.

Milk collection centre-Subir chilling centre, BAIF, Veterinary in Ahwa

Generate a source of income to unemployed, good returns for all beneficiaries



Table no. 42: Details of activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works

Sl No Name of village Name of

structure/ work

Type of treatment Type of land Executing agency Target

(i) Ridge area (R)

(ii) Drainage

line (D)

(iii) Land dev. (L)

Ha (i)

Private (ii)

Comm unity

(iii) Forest

(F) (i) UG (ii)SHG

Area (ha)

No. of plants/

seedlings

Estimated cost

(Rs. in lakh)

Expected month & year of

completion (mm/ yyyy)

1 Nimpada

Horticulture L (7 Ha) P UG, SHG, WC 7 280 2.98 Dec 2019

Afforestation (Bamboo)

R (RF-10 ha, PF-2) L (13Ha) P F UG, SHG,

WC 25 10000 3.43 Dec 2019

TKB R (RF-10 ha, PF-2) L(12 Ha) P F UG, SHG,

WC 24 42648 10.22 Dec 2019

2. Karadiamba

Horticulture L (41 Ha) P UG, SHG, WC 41 1640 17.46 Dec 2019


R (RF-5ha, PF-2ha) L (19Ha) P F

UG, SHG,

WC 26 10400 3.56 Dec 2019

TKB R (RF-7, PF-2ha) L (11Ha) P F UG, SHG,

WC 20 35548 8.49 Dec 2019


Horticulture L (10Ha) P UG, SHG, WC 10 400 4.26 Dec 2019


R (RF-4, PF-1) L (4Ha) P F UG, SHG,

WC 9 3600 1.23 Dec 2019

TKB R (RF-5, PF-1) L (4Ha) P F UG, SHG,

WC 10 17770 4.24 Dec 2019

4. Chinchdhara


Afforestation (Bamboo) (PF-8) L (16Ha) P F UG, SHG,

WC 24 9600 3.29 Dec 2019

TKB (PF-8) L (12Ha) P F UG, SHG, WC 20 35540 8.49 Dec 2019

5. Thorpada Horticulture L (16Ha) P UG, SHG,

WC 16 640 6.82 Dec 2019

Afforestation (Bamboo) (PF-6) L (9Ha) P UG, SHG,

WC 15 6000 2.05 Dec 2019




6. Harpada



WC 12 4800 1.64 Dec 2019


7. Wadiawan



WC 17 6800 2.33 Dec 2019


8. Wanzttemrun



WC 14 5600 1.92 Dec 2019


9. Sadadvihir


Afforestation (Bamboo) (RF-12, PF-4) L (10Ha) P UG, SHG,

WC 26 10400 3.56 Dec 2019

TKB (RF-12, PF-4) L (10Ha) P F UG, SHG, WC 26 46202 11.04 Dec 2019

10 Kamdiawan



WC 43 17200 5.90 Dec 2019


11 Ghaniamba Horticulture L (14Ha) P UG, SHG,

WC 14 560 5.96 Dec 2019

Afforestation (Bamboo) (RF-30) L (7Ha) P UG, SHG,

WC 37 14800 5.07 Dec 2019



TKB (RF-30) L (3Ha) P F UG, SHG, WC 33 58641 14.01 Dec 2019

12 Jhari



WC 43 17200 5.90 Dec 2019


Total 705 470099 228.38 Dec 2019

Wadi Project Model (As per division of work) (Project Expenditure Details for 1 acre)

Sl No Name of Work No. of Plants Project

Expenditure Beneficiaries contribution

Total Expenditure

1 Digging pits in 3x3x3 fit size in 1 acre No. of 40 plants 400 400 800

2 Purchase Mango saplings No. of 40 plants 2100 0 2100

3 Transportation of Mango saplings No. of 40 plants 1200 0 1200

4 Pits digging surrounding of Wadi for plantation of RATANJYOT no. of 700 No. of 700 plants 300 300 600

5 Preparation of RATANJYOT Plants No. of 700 plants 900 0 900

6 Pits digging surrounding of Wadi for plantation of CASHEW, SITAFAL & SARGVA No. of 100 plants 700 200 900

7 Fencing of forest plants surrounding Wadi project 300 500 800

8 Labour of filling fertilizer & medicine 600 700 1300

9 Care of plants after plantation 400 300 700



10 Facilities provide by irrigation & protection of plants during four year 4225 1575 5800

11 Exposure visit for beneficiaries 800 0 800

12 SMC works 1347 0 1347

Total of Project per acre 13272 3975 17247

Project cost per Ha 32782 9818.3 42600



Wadi Project Model (Year wise)

Sl No Name of Work No. of Plants First

Year Second

Year Third Year

Forth year

Total Expenditure

1 Digging pits in 3x3x3 fit size in 1 acre No. of 40 plants 600 100 100 0 800 2 Purchase Mango saplings No. of 40 plants 1500 300 300 0 2100 3 Transportation of Mango saplings No. of 40 plants 800 200 200 0 1200

4 Pits digging surrounding of Wadi for plantation of RATANJYOT no. of 700 No. of 700 plants 400 100 100 0 600

5 Preparation of RATANJYOT Plants No. of 700 plants 700 100 100 0 900

6 Pits digging surrounding of Wadi for plantation of CASHEW, SITAFAL & SARGVA

No. of 100 plants 700 100 100 0 900

7 Fencing of forest plants surrounding Wadi project 500 100 100 100 800

8 Labour of filling fertilizer & medicine 800 200 200 100 1300 9 Care of plants after plantation 400 150 150 0 700

10 Facilities provide by irrigation & protection of plants during four year 1500 1750 1750 800 5800

11 Exposure visit for beneficiaries 800 0 0 0 800 12 SMC works 500 300 300 247 1347

Total of Project per acre 9200 3400 3400 1247 17247 Project cost per Ha 22724 8398 8398 3080.1 42600



Revenue Model of Wadi of 1acre land

Sl no Particulars Estimated Production at

Economical stage (i.e. after 5yrs) kg/plant

No of plants kg rate/kg

Income generation (Rs.)

1 Raw cashew 6 100 600 40 24000 2 Mango 15 40 600 65 39000 3 Drumstick 12 700 8400 7 58800 Total 33 840 112 121800

OR 1 Raw cashew 6 100 600 40 24000 2 Raw Mango 13 40 520 50 26000 3 Drumstick 12 700 8400 7 58800

Total 31 840 97 108800

Total Expenditure chart Sl no Activity Particulars Expenditure

(Rs.) remarks

1 Total initial Investment up to four yrs 20000

2 Harvesting expenditure* five days 1250 * 250 per day

3 Post harvest treatment for mangoes Rs. 50/kg 30000

4 Post harvest treatment for cashew Rs. 60/kg 36000

5 Packaging cost 10kg, 5kg (Rs. 12/10kg packet) 720

6 Transportation cost Rs. 10/km 1400 approximately 140 km to & fro 7 Misc expenditure 5000 Total 94370

Net Profit earn from per acre

wadi

27430 (Cashew, Mango, Drumstick)

14430 (Cashew, Raw mango, Drumstick)



Sl no

TKB Model Spacement: Teak =5m x 5m = 1500, Spacement: Kher=10m x 10m=100 Plants, Spacement: Bamboo=7.50m x 7.50m = 177

Plants Density 1777 Seeding/Ha., Plot Size cm x 20 cm x 200 g, Labour/day: Rupees 154.20 paisa

Name of Work Stock Labour

rate Material

rate Total amount

of rate Unit Ha Nos Advance works

A Nursery

1 Polythene Bags Ha 1 332 0 102 102 2 Seeds Ha 1 332 0 252 252 3 Soil Fertilizer Ha 1 332 45 25 70 4 Making Bed (10 mt. x 1 mt.) Ha 1 1000 569 0 569 5 Packing soil in Polythene Bag Ha 1 1000 212 0 212

6 Cultivate seeds in Polythene bag & watering, weeding Ha 1 1000 1274 66 1340

7 Tools & Article & Misc. Ha 1 332 0 8042 8042 Total 2100 8487 10587 B Place preparation

1 Alignment & Sticking Ha 1 1777 970 27 997 2 Pits digging (30x30x30 Semi.) For Kher Ha 1 100 255 0 255

3 Pits digging (45x45x45 Semi.) For Bamboo Ha 1 177 991 0 991

4 Fencing Ha 1 1777 4655 0 4655 5 Cleaning & Cutback operation Ha 1 500 946 0 946

6 SMC works (Gully Plug, Contour Dick etc.) Ha 1 0 752 0 752

Total 8569 27 8596 Total (A+B) 10669 8514 19183 Say 70 % Advance works 7468.3 5959.8 13428.1



Say 30 % Advance works 3200.7 2554.2 5754.9 C Current year cultivation

1 Nursery maintenance Ha 1 1777 377 17 394 2 Stamp preparation Ha 1 1500 520 0 520 3 Transportation of Plants & cultivation Ha 1 1777 2234 0 2234 4 Filling the Fertilizer Ha 1 1777 108 51 159

5 Three Time weeding & Soil working (1 mt. Dia & 15 Semi. Deep) Ha 1 1777 8144 0 8144

6 Protect from Forest Firing & pasture Ha 1 1777 509 0 509 7 Cutback work & Misc. Ha 1 1777 0 35 35 Total 11892 103 11995 D Preservation of one year old cultivate

1 20 % Casualty Nursery maintenance Ha 1 355 374 0 374 2 Transportation of Plants & Cultivation Ha 1 355 293 0 293

3 Two Time weeding & Soil working (1 mt. Dia & 15 Semi. Deep) Ha 1 1777 5426 0 5426

4 Protect from Forest Firing & pasture Ha 1 1777 815 0 815 5 Cutback work & Misc. Ha 1 1777 0 0 0 Total 6908 0 6908 E Preservation of two year old cultivate

1 One Time weeding & Soil working (1 mt. Dia & 15 Semi. Deep) Ha 1 1777 2713 0 2713

2 Protect from Forest Firing & pasture Ha 1 1777 815 0 815 3 Miscellaneous expenditure 838 Total 3528 0 4366 Gross Total 42452



Sl no

Bamboo Model Spacement: Bamboo=5.0m x 5.0m = 400 Plants, Density 400 Seeding/Ha., Plot Size cm x 20 cm x 200g,

Labour @ day: Rupees 154.20 paisa

Name of Work Stock Labour

rate Material

rate Total

amount of rate Unit Ha Nos

Advance works A Nursery 1 Polythene Bags Ha 1 480 0 150 150 2 Soil Fertilizer Ha 1 480 78 24 102 3 Making Bed (10 mt. x 1 mt.) Ha 1 480 36 0 36 4 Watering cost of rhizome/Planting & weeding Ha 1 480 620 67 687 5 Packing soil in Polythene Bag Ha 1 480 133 0 133 6 Miscellaneous. Ha 1 480 0 1582 1582 Total 867 1823 2690 B Place preparation 1 Place cleanliness Ha 1 480 307 0 307 2 Alignment & Sticking Ha 1 480 78 0 78 3 Pits digging (45x45x45 Semi.) For Bamboo Ha 1 400 1833 0 1833 4 Zeta Fencing Ha 1 400 1146 0 1146 5 SMC works (Gully Plugging etc.) Ha 1 400 667 0 667 Total 4031 0 4031 Total (A+B) 4898 1823 6721 Say 70 % Advance works 3428.6 1276.1 4704.7 Say 30 % Advance works 1469.4 546.9 2016.3 C Current year cultivation 1 Nursery maintenance (April to June) Ha 1 400 281 40 321 2 Transportation of Plants & cultivation 1 400 673 74 747

3 Three Time weeding & Soil working (1 mt. Dia & 15 Semi. Deep) Ha 1 400 1632 0 1632

4 Protect from Forest Firing & pasture Ha 1 400 651 0 651 Total 3237 114 3351



D Preservation of one year old cultivate

1 Nursery maintenance (April to June) 80 305 22 327 1 Transportation of Plants & Cultivation Ha 1 80 109 36 145

2 Two Time weeding & Soil working (1 mt. Dia & 15 Semi. Deep) Ha 1 400 1087 0 1087

3 Protect from Forest Firing & pasture Ha 1 400 725 0 725 Total 2226 58 2284 E Preservation of two year old cultivate

1 One Time weeding & Soil working (1 mt. Dia & 15 Semi. Deep) Ha 1 400 631 0 631

2 Protect from Forest Firing & pasture Ha 1 400 725 0 725 Total 1356 0 1356 Gross Total 11717 1995 13712

Allied/other activities:

The livelihood activities kitchen gardens, crop demonstration, nurseries, bio-gas plants are proposed whereas, microenterprise

activities such as Vermicompost, retail shop & milk parlours for landless households are proposed under this project. It is essential

to target landless and even small & marginal farmers for the holistic improvement of entire village. Thus, the project is build on

major interest to benefit each landless through any one of the activities proposed as under. The 10% contribution is planned from

the group of each landless to start his own milk parlour & generate income.



Table no.43: Details of activities in the CPRs in the project areas

S. No. Name(s) of the villages CPR particulars Activity proposed

Target Target area under the

activity (ha)

Estimated Expenditure

(Lakh) Expected no. of

beneficiaries

1 Nimpada Forest land SMC work, TKB &

Afforestation 80 5.25 100 HH

Pastures land Pasture Development - - 100 HH

2 Karadiamba Forest land SMC work, TKB &



3 Kadmal(Gadadsaja) Forest land SMC work, TKB &



4 Chinchdhara Forest land SMC work, TKB &



5 Thorpada Forest land SMC work, TKB &



6 Harpada Forest land SMC work, TKB &



7 Wadiawan Forest land SMC work, TKB &





8 Wanzttemrun Forest land SMC work, TKB &



9 Sadadvihir Forest land SMC work, TKB &



10 Kamdiawan Forest land SMC work, TKB &



11 Ghaniamba Forest land SMC work, TKB &



12 Jhari Forest land SMC work, TKB &



Total 606 50.852



4.4 Capacity Building: Capacity Building is the process of assisting the group or individuals to identify and address issues and gain the insights,

knowledge and experience needed to solve problems and implement change. There is a realization in the development sector that

there is a need to appraise the success of development interventions by going beyond the conventional development targets and

measures of success (e.g. in the form of commodities, goods and services) to take into account improvements to human potential.

Capacity building of stakeholders is also increasingly viewed as an important factor in developmental projects that involve

participation of stakeholders at all levels for effective implementation of

projects.

Scope of capacity building at Sahyadri Village:

Scientific technique of Soil and Moisture conservation

Improved and Scientific agriculture practices

to generate feeling of owners before starting any enterprise

to become aware about the market needs

Fodder development and management

Dairy development and management

Rural craft

Video Shows



Table no. 44: Capacity Building Institution

Sl No

Name of Training Institute

Full Address with contact no., website & e-mail

Type of Institute

Areas of specialization

Accreditation details

Trainings

Reference Year

No. of trainings assigned

No. of trainees

to be trained

1 KVK

Navsari Agri. University, Waghai, Dist. Dangs. 02631-246239, [email protected]

Research Institute

Agriculture, Horticulture, Animal Husbandry, Cropping Techniques, Dairy, Nursery

GoI 2012-14 under process

under process

2 BISAG Gandhinagar Space Application

Remote sensing & GIS GoG 2010-15 under

process under

process

3 BAIF BAIF-DHRUVA, Lachakgdi NGO

Agriculture, Watershed Structures, Accounts

NGO 2010-15 under process

under process

4 SPIPA

Opp. Sundarvan, Satellite road, Ahemdabad-380015, 079-55419110, [email protected]

Training Institute

Community building, watershed activities, geo-informatics

GoG 2009-15 under process

under process

5 NAU Agricultural university University Agriculture, horticulture, Animal husbandry


under process

6 CSWCRTI

Central Soil and water conservation research and training Institute 218,kaulagarh Road,Dehradun-248195,Uttarkhand Phone:+91 0135 2758564 Fax: + 91 0135 2754213 Email:[email protected]

Training Institute

Agriculture Engineering, Water conservation


under process

mailto:[email protected]�

mailto:Email%[email protected]�



Table no. 45: Capacity Building plan:

Sl No State Project Stakeholders Total no. of persons No. of persons to be trained No. of training programmes Estimated cost

1.

Gujarat

PIA 11 11 8 1.05 WDTs 15 15 10 1.03

UGs 230 230 20 1.03

SHGs 230 230 20 1.03

WCs 121 121 10 1.03

GPs 20 20 3 1.03 Total 627 627 71 6.20

Table no.46: Information, Education and Communication Activities:

Activity Executing agency Estimated expenditure (Rs in Lakh)

Outcome (may quantify, wherever possible)

Street Plays DWDU, Dang 0.10

Awareness for the importance of Integrated Watershed Development Programme

Video Shows DWDU, Dang 0.10

Pamphlets & Posters DWDU, Dang 0.40

Banners & Hoardings DWDU, Dang 0.64

Total IEC cost 1.2404



CHAPTER – 5

BUDGETING



BUDGET

Table no. 47: Budget at a glance

Sl no Budget component Cost (Lakh)

1. Net Project Cost 720

Administrative costs 72.00(10%)

Monitoring 7.20(1%)

Evaluation 7.20(1%)

2. Preparatory Phase

Entry Point activity 28.80(4%)

Institution and Capacity Building 36.00(5%)

Detailed Project Report 7.20(1%)

3. Watershed Work Phase

Watershed Development Works 403.20(56%)

Livelihood activities for asset less 64.80(9%)

Production systems and micro-enterprises 72.00(10%)

4 Consolidation phase 21.60(3%)

TOTAL 615.91



Table no. 48: Village component wise budget available under IWMP (Rs. in Lakh)

Sl no Village

Activity

EPA Institution & CB DPR Watershed

development Work Livelihood

for asset less Production system

and Micro enterprises Consolidation

1 Nimpada 5.28 6.6 1.32 73.92 11.88 13.2 3.96

2 Karadiamba 2.352 2.94 0.588 32.928 5.292 5.88 1.764

3 Kadmal(Gadadsaja) 1.2 1.5 0.3 16.8 2.7 3 0.9

4 Sahyadri 2.016 2.52 0.504 28.224 4.536 5.04 1.512

5 Thorpada 2.352 2.94 0.588 32.928 5.292 5.88 1.764

6 Harpada 7.296 9.12 1.824 102.144 16.416 18.24 5.472

7 Wadiawan 2.4 3 0.6 33.6 5.4 6 1.8

8 Wanzttemrun 1.584 1.98 0.396 22.176 3.564 3.96 1.188

9 Sadadvihir 1.152 1.44 0.288 16.128 2.592 2.88 0.864

10 Kamdiawan 0.864 1.08 0.216 12.096 1.944 2.16 0.648

11 Ghaniamba 0.72 0.9 0.18 10.08 1.62 1.8 0.54

12 Jhari 0.72 0.9 0.18 10.08 1.62 1.8 0.54

Total 28.8 36.0 7.2 403.2 64.8 72.0 21.6



Table no. 49: Village wise gap in funds requirement

Sl No Village Total cost requirement (Lakh)

Total funds available under IWMP (Lakh)

Gap in funds requirement (Lakh)

1 Nimpada 99.0 99.0 0.0

2 Karadiamba 44.1 44.1 0.0

3 Kadmal(Gadadsaja) 22.5 22.5 0.0

4 Sahyadri 37.8 37.8 0.0

5 Thorpada 44.1 44.1 0.0

6 Harpada 136.8 136.8 0.0

7 Wadiawan 45 45 0.0

8 Wanzttemrun 29.7 29.7 0.0

9 Sadadvihir 21.6 21.6 0.0

10 Kamdiawan 16.2 16.2 0.0

11 Ghaniamba 13.5 13.5 0.0

12 Jhari 13.5 13.5 0.0

Total 540 540 0.0



Table no.50: Details of Convergence of IWMP with other Schemes

Sr. No Village

Phase / Type of

work Activity to be carried out

Fund made available to IWMP dut to Convergenc

e (Rs. In Lakh)

Scheme with

which Convergence took

place

Reference no

Activity/task/structure in

DPR

Levels at which

decision for

convergence was taken

1 Nimpada

Watershed activities

Nala Plug(Cement) 14.56 - -

Land Levelling 18.45 - - Waste Weir 7.344 - - Check dam 6.48 - -

Check dam Reparing 3.618 - - Farm Pond 10.875 - -

SCT 1.49256 - - Spring Development 1.6 - -

Afforestation 9.5 - - Total 73.91956

Livelihood Activities

Low cost Green House 0.3 - - Kitchen Garden 0.3 - -

Bio-Gas 1 - - Improved implements/Machineries 2.48 - -

Crop Demonstration 0.3 - - Cultivated Medicinal Plant/Safed Musli 1 - -

Pasture Development 1 - - Backyard Poultry 2 - -

Irrigation Facilities (Drip/Sprinkler/Lift) 2 - - Green Manuring 1.5 - -

Total 11.88 Microenterp Horticulture Development 0.6 - -



rise activities

Live stock development 2.5 - - Vermicompost 1.5 - -

Nursery (Teak, Bamboo, Mango, Cashewnut) 1 - -

Oil Extraction unit 2 - - Animal Camp 5 - -

Azolla Fodder Plot 0.6 - - Total 13.2

2 Harpada

Watershed activities




SCT 0.63572 - - Afforestation 4 - -

Total 32.92847


Kitchen Garden 0.192 - - Crop Demonstration 0.1 - -

Cultivated Medicinal Plant/Safed Musli 0.5 - - Pasture Development 0.5 - -

Backyard Poultry 2 - - Irrigation Facilities (Drip/Sprinkler/Lift) 1 - -

Green Manuring 1 - - Total 5.292

Microenterprise activites

Horticulture Development 0.3 - - Live stock development 1 - -

Vermicompost 0.58 - - Nursery (Teak, Bamboo, Mango, Cashewnut) 0.5 - -

Oil Extraction unit 1 - - Animal Camp 2.5 - -



Total 5.88

3 Wanzttemrun

Watershed activites




SCT 0.33168 - - Afforestation 2 - -

Total 16.79968


Kitchen Garden 0.1 - - Crop Demonstration 0.1 - -

Pasture Development 0.5 - - Irrigation Facilities (Drip/Sprinkler/Lift) 1 - -

Green Manuring 1 - - Total 2.7



Nursery (Teak, Bamboo, Mango, Cashewnut) 0.5 - -

Oil Extraction unit 1 - - Azolla Fodder Plot 0.3 - -

Total 3

4 Wadiawan Watershed activites










Crop Demonstration 0.2 - - Cultivated Medicinal Plant/Safed Musli 0.5 - -

Pasture Development 0.5 - - Backyard Poultry 2 - -

Irrigation Facilities (Drip/Sprinkler/Lift) 0.5 - - Green Manuring 0.536 - -

Total 4.536




Oil Extraction unit 1 - - Animal Camp 1.44 - -


5 Kadmal(Gadadsaja)

Watershed activites





Afforestation 4 - - Total 32.92811





Bio-Gas 1 - - Crop Demonstration 0.2 - -

Cultivated Medicinal Plant/Safed Musli 1 - - Pasture Development 0.5 - -

Irrigation Facilities (Drip/Sprinkler/Lift) 1.5 - - Green Manuring 0.592 - -

Total 5.292


Horticulture Development 0.2 - - Live stock development 1.5 - -


Animal Camp 2.88 - - Azolla Fodder Plot 0.3 - -

Total 5.88

6 Nimpada

Watershed activites








Bio-Gas 1 - - Improved implements/Machineries 4.96 - -


Pasture Development 0.5 - -



Backyard Poultry 2 - - Irrigation Facilities (Drip/Sprinkler/Lift) 3.5 - -

Green Manuring 2.056 - - Total 16.416



Vermicompost 2 - - Nursery (Teak, Bamboo, Mango, Cashewnut) 1 - -

Oil Extraction unit 1 - - Animal Camp 9 - -

Rabbit Farming 1.5 - - Azolla Fodder Plot 0.64 - -

Total 18.24

7 Sadadvihir

Watershed activites








Bio-Gas 1 - - Crop Demonstration 0.2 - -

Pasture Development 0.5 - - Backyard Poultry 2 - -

Irrigation Facilities (Drip/Sprinkler/Lift) 1 - - Green Manuring 0.5 - -



Total 5.4



Vermicompost 0.5 - - Nursery (Teak, Bamboo, Mango, Cashewnut) 1 - -

Animal Camp 3 - - Azolla Fodder Plot 0.3 - -

Total 6

8 Karadiamba

Watershed activites









Pasture Development 1 - - Irrigation Facilities (Drip/Sprinkler/Lift) 1 - -



Live stock development 1 - - Vermicompost 0.5 - -

Nursery (Teak, Bamboo, Mango, Cashewnut) 1 - -

Animal Camp 1.46 - -



Total 3.96

9 Kamdiawan

Watershed activites








Crop Demonstration 0.1 - - Cultivated Medicinal Plant/Safed Musli 0.5 - - Irrigation Facilities (Drip/Sprinkler/Lift) 1 - -





Animal Camp 0.98 - - Azolla Fodder Plot 0.3 - -

Total 2.88

10 Ghaniamba Watershed activites






SCT 0.22112 - - Afforestation 0.5 - -

Total 12.09637



Crop Demonstration 0.1 - - Cultivated Medicinal Plant/Safed Musli 0.5 - - Irrigation Facilities (Drip/Sprinkler/Lift) 0.5 - -






11 Sahyadri

Watershed activites


Land Levelling 1.8 - - Waste Weir 0.756 - - Check dam 3.015 - - Farm Pond 1.0875 - -






Pasture Development 0.5 - - Total 1.62





Nursery (Teak, Bamboo, Mango, Cashewnut) 0.5 - - Azolla Fodder Plot 0.6 - -

Total 1.8

12 Jhari

Watershed activites


Land Levelling 2.1 - - Waste Weir 0.918 - - Check dam 3.438 - - Farm Pond 1.63125 - -





Crop Demonstration 0.1 - - Cultivated Medicinal Plant/Safed Musli 0.5 - - Irrigation Facilities (Drip/Sprinkler/Lift) 0.5 - -



Horticulture Development 0.1 - - Nursery (Teak, Bamboo, Mango,

Cashewnut) 0.5 - - Oil Extraction unit 1 - - Azolla Fodder Plot 0.56 - -

Total 2.16 Grand Total Sahyadri Project 539.9992



Table no. 51: Public-Private Partnership in the IWMP Projects

Sl No

Name of Private Sector Partner Agency

Type of agreement signed Financial contribution Partnership

Interventions Expected Outcomes Comments

a)MoU b)Contract c) Any

other (pl. specify)

IWMP Private sector

- - - - - - - -



CHAPTER – 6

EXPECTED OUTCOMES



6.1 Expected Outcomes 6.1.1 Environmental Benefits

The project is well designed to generate the positive impact on environmental aspects. The SMC measure would lead into

reduction in soil loss in project area. The surface water structures such as check dam and farm pond would help to increase the

GWT. The Afforestation (TKB & Bamboo) is priory proposed to improve the vegetative cover. Since, more than 80% of area is

under forest, but the no trees had been reduced drastically. Thus in this project area, Afforestation and reforestation had been

planned to regain the vegetative cover. Trees like Mango, Cashew in Wadi and TKB in forest area had been proposed.

Table no.52: Environmental Benefits

Sr. No.

Village

Soil loss (tonnes/ha/yr)

Water storage (lakhs lit) Ground water table (mt) Tree cover

Pre-project

Expected post-project

Pre-project

Expected post-project

Open well: pre-project

Open well: post-project

Bore well: pre-project

Bore well: post-project

Area in Ha.: pre- project

Area in Ha.: post-project

Tree count: pre-project

Tree count: post-project

1 Nimpada

1-2 0.5-1

0 27

35-40 45 20-25 30 1444.3 2050.3

2 Karadiamba 0 32

3 Kadmal(Gadadsaja) 1.2 27.2

4 Sahyadri 3.5 47.5 5 Thorpada 9 45.5 6 Harpada 4.5 18.5 7 Wadiawan 1.5 12.5 8 Wanzttemrun 0 7 9 Sadadvihir 0 23.5 10 Kamdiawan 2.4 10.9 11 Ghaniamba 0 32 12 Jhari 2.4 27.2



6.1.2 Drinking water

The village has open wells/ community well and hand pumps on which they depend for their drinking water. Many an effort

to make a bore for water source at different other places in the six villages has failed. WASMO has constructed few Bhugarb takas

for the rain water harvesting and its work is still in process. It seems that drinking problem would be solved within a year. As well

as, due to result of the watershed activities and SMC works, it is expected that the quality of drinking water would improve and

there would be sustainable source of water in this cluster.

Table no. 53: Status of Drinking water

S. No. Names of the villages

Availability of drinking water Quality of drinking water Comments (no. of months in a year)

Pre-project Expected Post-project Pre-project Expected Post-project

1. Nimpada 7 11 Potable Potable 2. Karadiamba 6 10 Potable Potable 3. Kadmal(Gadadsaja) 7 11 Potable Potable 4. Sahyadri 6 10 Potable Potable 5. Thorpada 6 11 Potable Potable 6. Harpada 7 11 Potable Potable 7. Wadiawan 7 11 Potable Potable 8. Wanzttemrun 7 11 Potable Potable 9. Sadadvihir 6 10 Potable Potable

10. Kamdiawan 6 10 Potable Potable 11. Ghaniamba 6 10 Potable Potable 12 Jhari 7 10 Potable Potable

* Sources: Baseline Survey 2011



6.1.3 Crop

The major crops grown are Paddy, Finger millet, Hill millet, Niger. This is due to scanty surface water for only 8 months. So,

there is lack in water in the summer which adversely affects the crop production. All this can change with the integrated land and

water management during the watershed project. The planned SMC works and irrigation works would prevent the water scarcity

and preserve some moisture in the project area. This will help in additional area under cultivation and increasing productivity too.

The farmer can take more than seasonal crops and have an income source. Different varieties of crops can be taken and market

around.

Table no. 54: Details of Kharif crop area and yield in the project areas

Sl No Name Of Village Name Of Crops Pre-project Post-project

Area (Ha) Avg Yield (kg) per ha. Area (Ha) Avg Yield (kg) per ha.

1. Nimpada

Kharif Finger Millet 81.07 101.05 - - Small Millet 61.93 1118.12 - -

Paddy 87.81 174.24 - - Black Gram 64.76 11.16 - - Niger Seed 48.02 4.30 - -

Rabi Juwar 0 0 4.2 190 Wheat 0.60 300 5.4 240 Chana 0.80 275 6.2 230

Zaid 2. Karadiamba Kharif



Finger Millet 34.31 191.48 - - Small Millet 22.8 637.07 - -


Rabi Juwar 0 0 4 192 Wheat 3.41 164.22 5.5 226 Chana 12.31 45.49 6.5 242

Zaid




Rabi Juwar 0 0 4.21 196 Wheat 4.72 218.85 5.2 234 Chana 6.42 163.24 6.1 260

Zaid

4. Chinchdhara

Kharif Finger Millet 16.41 200 - - Small Millet 13.72 264.58 - -


Rabi Juwar 0 0 3.9 210



Wheat 0.90 250 4.8 250 Chana 0.50 300 7.9 245

Zaid

5.

Thorpada


Paddy 34.09 292.14 - - Black Gram 20.93 88.19 - - Niger Seed 23 33.91 - -


Zaid

6.

Harpada




Zaid

7.

Wadiawan


Paddy 50.68 288.36 - -



Black Gram 25.90 11.56 - - Niger Seed 21.73 70.50 - -

Rabi Juwar 0.3 300 4 189 Wheat 1.26 118.25 7 270 Chana 1.35 174.07 8 280

Zaid

8.

Wanzttemrun



Rabi Juwar 0 0 4 194 Wheat 0.5 350 8 300 Chana 0.8 200 7.5 220

Zaid

9.

Sadadvihir




Zaid



10.

Kamdiawan




Zaid

11.

Ghaniamba



Rabi Juwar 8.15 93.86 4.5 245 Wheat 2.3 61.96 5.8 280 Chana 4.38 112.59 7.4 305

Zaid

12 Jhari



Rabi



Juwar 8.15 93.86 4.5 245 Wheat 2.3 61.96 5.8 280 Chana 4.38 112.59 7.4 305

Zaid Total 1787.08 183.31 7844

Table no. 55: Area under Horticulture

S. No. Name of Village Existing area under horticulture (Ha) Area under horticulture proposed to be covered through IWMP

1. Nimpada 21 ha approx. 31 ha approx.

2. Karadiamba 38 ha approx. 41 ha approx.

3. Kadmal(Gadadsaja) 33 ha approx. 10 ha approx.

4. Sahyadri 56 ha approx. 29 ha approx.

5. Thorpada 29 ha approx. 16 ha approx.

6. Harpada 41 ha approx. 17 ha approx.

7. Wadiawan 52 ha approx. 23 ha approx.

8. Wanzttemrun 45 ha approx. 31 ha approx.

9. Sadadvihir 27 ha approx. 20 ha approx.

10. Kamdiawan 68 ha approx. 46 ha approx.



11. Ghaniamba 46 ha approx. 14 ha approx.

12 Jhari 52 ha approx. 23 ha approx.

Total 456 ha approx 278 ha approx.

* Sources: Baseline Survey 2011 and Sarpanch. 6.1.4 Livestock

The Sahyadri project consists of appreciable number of livestock population which include cows, bullocks, buffaloes, goats

and hens. The interventions like provision of indigenous breed cows and buffaloes, the development of pasture land, animal camps

and other such related activities would spur up the dairy development in the village.

Table no. 56: Details of livestock in the project areas (For fluids please mention in liters, for solids please mention in kgs. and income in Rs.)

S. No. Name of Village Type of Animal

Pre-Project Expected Post-project Remarks No. Total

Yield Total

Income (Lakh)

No. Total Yield Total

Income (Lakh)

1. Nimpada

Milch-animals Buffalo 10 1800 47520 15 2700 71280 Cow 18 2025 35842.50 30 3375 59737.5 Goat 39 780 12589.20 52 1040 16785.6

Draught Purpose animals

Bullock 100 0 0 124 0 0 Animals for other

purpose

Hen 819 819 kg 81900 925 925 kg 92500

2. Karadiamba

Milch-animals Buffalo 17 3060 80784 22 3960 104544 Cow 19 2137.5 37833.75 26 2925 51772.5 Goat 1400 28000 451920 1502 30040 484845.6

Draught Purpose



animals Bullock 208 0 0 238 0 0

Animals for other purpose

Hen 2362 2362 kg 236200 2600 2600 kg 260000


Milch-animals Buffalo 15 2700 71280 21 3780 99792 Cow 18 2025 35842.50 24 2700 47790 Goat 10 200 3228 17 340 5487.6



purpose

Hen 336 336 kg 33600 456 456 kg 45600

4. Chinchdhara

Milch-animals Buffalo 17 3060 80784 23 4140 109296 Cow 14 1575 27877.50 18 2025 35842.5 Goat 755 15100 243714 821 16420 265018.8



purpose

Hen 730 730 kg 73000 845 845 kg 84500

5. Thorpada

Milch-animals Buffalo 13 2340 61776 19 3420 90288 Cow 56 6300 111510 69 7762.5 137396.25 Goat 1013 20260 326996.4 1156 23120 373156.8



purpose

Hen 1988 1988 kg 198800 2021 2021 kg 202100 6. Harpada Milch-animals



Buffalo 18 3240 85536 27 4860 128304 Cow 8 900 15930 12 1350 23895 Goat 194 3880 62623.20 242 4840 78117.6



purpose

Hen 335 335 kg 33500 432 432 kg 43200

7. Wadiawan

Milch-animals Buffalo 6 1080 28512 9 1620 42768 Cow 52 5850 103545 68 7650 135405 Goat 935 18700 301818 1002 20040 323445.6



purpose

Hen 1915 1915 Kg 191500 2056 2056 kg 205600

8. Wanzttemrun

Milch-animals Buffalo 7 1260 33264 11 1980 52272 Cow 54 6075 107527.50 66 7425 131422.5 Goat 405 8100 130734 445 8900 143646



purpose

Hen 916 916 Kg 91600 1026 1026 kg 102600

9. Sadadvihir

Milch-animals Buffalo 5 900 23760 8 1440 38016 Cow 42 4725 83632.50 54 6075 107527.5 Goat 40 800 12912 48 960 15494.4


Bullock 52 0 0 60 0 0



Animals for other purpose

Hen 252 252 kg 25200 321 321 kg 32100

10. Kamdiawan

Milch-animals Buffalo 33 5940 156816 45 8100 213840 Cow 16 1800 31860 22 2475 43807.5 Goat 530 10600 171084 565 11300 182382



purpose

Hen 1575 1575 kg 157500 1702 1702 kg 170200

11. Ghaniamba

Milch-animals Buffalo 20 3600 95040 27 4860 128304 Cow 21 2362.5 41816.25 31 3487.5 61728.75 Goat 38 760 12266.40 46 920 14848.80



purpose

Hen 548 548 Kg 54800 652 652 kg 65200

12 Jhari

Milch-animals 1575 1575 kg 157500 1702 1702 kg 170200 Buffalo Cow 20 3600 95040 27 4860 128304 Goat 21 2362.5 41816.25 31 3487.5 61728.75

Draught Purpose animals 38 760 12266.40 46 920 14848.80

Bullock Animals for other

purpose 70 0 0 80 0 0

Hen

Total Income 4272275 Expected Income 5121858



6.1.5 Employment

Employment has always been a problem in the village. The principal occupations of the people are agriculture, animal

husbandry and casual labour work. However, in spite of high rainfall, the seepage of water permits to take only a single crop, which

keeps tem partially engaged for about 4 months. Lack of fodder makes animal husbandry difficult too. So, animal husbandry does

not keep them engaged full time. Thus the people mainly depend upon casual labour, either in the village itself or outside it.

The project plans for creation of both wage employment and self employment opportunities. Wage employment would be

created by engaging people in watershed physical works like construction of check dams, village/farm pond, plantation, etc. self

employment would be created by providing the people with cash support in the form of direct livelihood like agriculture, animal

husbandry and enterprise development.

Table no. 57: Employment in Project area

Sr N0 Village

Wage Employment Self employment No. of man days No. of beneficiaries No. of beneficiaries

SC ST Othe

r Wome

n Total SC ST Othe

r Wome

n Tota

l SC ST Othe

r Wome

n Tota

l

1. Nimpada 0 14911 0 6709.95 14911 0 481 0 216 481 0 481 0 216 481

2. Karadiamba 0 20584 0 9262.8 20584 0 664 0 299 664 0 664 0 299 664

3. Kadmal(Gadadsaja) 0 15252 0 6863.4 15252 0 492 0 221 492 0 492 0 221 492

4. Sahyadri 0 15252 0 6863.4 15252 0 492 0 221 492 0 492 0 221 492

5. Thorpada 0 10013 0 4505.85 10013 0 323 0 145 323 0 323 0 145 323



6. Harpada 0 9176 0 4129.2 9176 0 296 0 133 296 0 296 0 133 296

7. Wadiawan 0 13206 0 5942.7 13206 0 426 0 192 426 0 426 0 192 426

8. Wanzttemrun 0 11439 0 5147.55 11439 0 369 0 166 369 0 369 0 166 369

9. Sadadvihir 0 12896 0 5803.2 12896 0 416 0 187 416 0 416 0 187 416 10. Kamdiawan 0 17701 0 7965.4

5 17701 0 571 0 257 571 0 571 0 257 571

11. Ghaniamba 0 7750 0 3487.5 7750 0 250 0 113 250 0 250 0 113 250

12 Jhari 0 10013 0 4505.85 10013 0 323 0 145 323 0 323 0 145 323

Total 0 148180 0 66681 14818

0 0 4780 0 2150 4780 0 478

0 0 2150 4780

6.1.6. Migration

Large numbers of villagers migrate in semi-bonded areas such as Surat district to work as cane-cutters in the sugar co-

operatives. On account of agriculture and animal husbandry providing only part time employment for some part of the year, the

people migrate for a better half of the year for wage labour in sugar factory. Migration of the villagers is observed mainly from

November to May when they do not have any work to do. The agricultural labourers find some employment during the monsoon

season in their own village. However, in the idle period, large numbers of villagers migrate in semi-bonded areas such as Surat

district to work as cane-cutters in the sugar co-operatives. They even migrate to Nashik district as agricultural labours i.e.

harvesting grapes and for construction works. The income they earn during the migration period ranges from Rs.1000 to Rs. 4000

per month. The employment opportunities in the local area as mentioned above will ensure in lessening seasonal migration from



the area. The implementation of IWMP would result in employment generation in project area, further resulting in decreased

migration.

Table no. 58: Details of seasonal migration from Project area

Sl No Village

No of person Migrating per Month No of Days par year of migration

Pre-project (Days) Expected post project (Days) Pre-project (Days) Expected post project

(Days) 1. Nimpada 60 25 360 150

2. Karadiamba 75 50 450 300

3. Kadmal(Gadadsaja) 50 50 300 300

4. Sahyadri 60 40 360 240

5. Thorpada 50 45 300 270

6. Harpada 45 35 270 210

7. Wadiawan 60 45 360 270

8. Wanzttemrun 50 40 300 240

9. Sadadvihir 65 50 390 300

10. Kamdiawan 90 60 540 360

11. Ghaniamba 45 40 270 240

12 Jhari 46 23 234 198

Total 650 480 3900 2880 * Sources: Baseline Survey 2011



Table no.59: Per capita Income

Sl No Village Source of Income Pre-project (Lakh/year) Expected post project (Lakh/year)

1 Nimpada

Agriculture & Forestry 430.769

20-30% increase in income

Animal Husbandry 1750

Casual Labour 207.407

2 Karadiamba


Animal Husbandry 2057.14


3 Kadmal(Gadadsaja)

Agric ulture & Forestry 1559.69



4 Chinchdhara



Casual Labour 3485

5 Thorpada




6 Harpada




7 Wadiawan Agriculture & Forestry 10171.4





8 Wanzttemrun




9 Sadadvihir




10 Kamdiawan


Animal Husbandry 18666


11 Ghaniamba




12 Jhari






Table no. 60: Backward-Forward linkages Sl No Project Type of Marketing Facility Pre-project

(no.) During the project Post-project

1 Sahyadri Project IWMP 11

Backward linkages Seed supply system yes yes improved implements yes yes Pesticide supply system Credit institutions Bank of Baroda (1) Bank of Baroda (1) Water supply yes yes Extension services KVK, BAIF-DHRUVA (2) KVK (1) Nurseries yes yes Tools/machinery suppliers yes Price Support system Technical support Crop demonstration yes Irrigation facility (drip system) yes Organic manure through SHGs through SHGs Mango/ Cashew saplings nurseries by SHGs nurseries by SHGs Forward linkages Harvesting/ threshing machinery Storage (including cold storage) Road network Transport facilities Technical support

Markets / Mandis Collective Marketing System

Collective Marketing System

Agro and other Industries Milk and other collection centres 5 6 6 Fruit processing (mango pickle, jam) Trainings



6.1.7. Logical Framework Analysis: PROJECT STRUCTURE EXPECTED RESULT PERFORMANCE

VARIABLE INDICATOR MEANS OF VERIFICATION

RISK/ ASSUMPTIONS

GOAL: IMPACT:

• Reduction in water scarcity

• livelihood improvement

• women empowerment

• Ecological Restoration

• Project can be implemented and managed in a democratic and participatory way ensuring equity

• Unity and prosperity in the village management

• People's Participation and positive perception towards the programme.

• livelihood development • Protection , treatment and

regeneration of common and private lands

• Better Ecological order in the area

• Increase in the proportion of households having more security of fodder.

• Reduction in drudgery of fodder and fuel collection, especially women.

• Organization training and awareness programme for Village institutions

• Capacity building workshops and exposure visits User Group and Watershed Committee.

• Facilitating and monitoring the functioning of UGs and WCs.

• Strengthen linkages between UGs and WCs and Panchayat Institutions

• Sensitize village communities to involve children and youth in development.

• Gender sensitization of UGs and WCs to increase inclusiveness of samuh decision making

• local support • political

issues

OBJECTIVE-1: OUTCOMES:

• livelihood improvement & village level Institution building

Activity for Objective-1:

• WC formation • SHGs formation

• Unity and prosperity in the village management

• People's Participation and positive perception towards the programme.

• livelihood development • Enhanced capacities of

leaders of women's group

• Common and private lands to be brought under new plantations and agro- horti - forestry like Mahoa, Mango, Teak, and Bamboo.

• Forest lands to be

• Fodder availability from common and private lands increased.

• Accessibility to common and forest lands increased with removal of



• UGs formation in taking initiatives to solve problems at different levels.

• Improved access to credit for livelihood purposes.

• Increased household income

• Performance enhancement of SHGs in terms of participation, decision-making, leadership and fund management.

• Equality & Equity in gender relations at home (decision making, expenditure, children's education, health)

brought under new plantations and protection.

• Trainings, exposure visits and meetings to be organised for communities, village volunteers and staff

• Income generation intervention promoted.

encroachments and resolution of conflicts.

OBJECTIVE-2: OUTCOMES

• Vegetative growth in project area

Activity for Objective-2:

• SMC works (SCT, contour trenches, nala plug, gully plug, land levelling, waste weir)

• Afforestation (TKB, Bamboo)

• Horticulture (Wadi)

• Protection , treatment and regeneration of common and private lands

• Protection, treatment and regeneration of forest lands

• Plantation of bamboo and forest species

• Impart trainings, conduct meetings and organize exposure visits for communities, village volunteers and staff to effectively plan, execute and monitor activities.

• Income generation • NTFP dependence to

be stabilized • Identification and

promotion of non-timber forest produce based income generation activities

• Erosion control • GWT increase • availability of water

for total year



CHAPTER – 7

QUALITY AND SUSTAINABILITY ISSUES



7.1 Plans for Monitoring and Evaluation

A Web-based GIS System is being developed for monitoring and evaluating the project in its planning & implementation

phases. The system would be available on a public domain and can be accessed by all the stakeholders of the project. The system

shows the entire state of Gujarat and all of those areas selected over the next 18 years. Filtering allows the user to zoom on to one

particular project. Details related to soil type, Land-use classification, inhabitation etc., can be obtained village-wise. Furthermore,

survey-number wise details related to ownership, irrigation source, yield etc., can also be accessed by the users of the system. This

system is being used for pooling up the details obtained from the DPR. In other words, the DPR is made available online in the form

of a database which will help the stakeholders know areas of importance viz., already treated areas/ historical works in the area,

proposed areas for treatment etc., for the further treatment and planning. The system would also show the satellite imageries of

various years from the project inception stage to the project closing stages. This allows the user to evaluate the effectiveness of the

treatment and thereby plan corrective measures for the project area. The system would serve as and aiding tool to the planners

and evaluators for judging the efficacy of the project.

Yet another component of the Web-based GIS system is the Mobile based Monitoring & Evaluation System, which will help

the ground staff alias WDTs (Watershed Development Team) to transmit information from the ground level to the central server.

Also, any higher-up official in charge of the project can obtain information regarding the project area on their mobile phone by

means of an SMS. The system works in the following manner. The WDT equipped with a GPS instrument marks the latitude-

longitude information of various treatment areas during the DPR. The probable sites are then transferred onto the central server.



During the works phase, any progress in the treatment areas is reported to the server by means of an SMS by the WDT. Similarly,

any nodal officer or higher-up official can view the progress in a project by means of summarized reports generated over frequent

periods of time.

7.2 Plans for Project Management: The Project management of any Watershed programme is very important; it mainly depends upon the community

organization and the village level institutes. In Sahyadri, watershed committee and various user groups have been formulated for

post project operation and maintenance of assets created during project period. Major emphasis will be on equity and sustainable

benefit of the project even after implementation stage. A proper link-up will be built during project period with various institutes and

capacity building organization. They will act as a major kingpin during post implementation for scaling up the successful experience

during project.

7.3 Watershed Development Fund:

The major source of financial assistance after post implementation period is a watershed Development Fund. The

contribution from UGs and SHGs would contribute for maintenance, post monitoring of the assets which are given /constructed

during the project

7.4 User Charges:

Various user groups will be formed in village. These user groups will collect user charges according to the designated rules

formed during the formation of user group. These funds will be transferred to the WDF funds as per these formulated rules. There

secretary of watershed committee (WC) shall maintain the records of the following.



CHAPTER – 8

MAPS

detailed project report -...

Documents