st.gallen april final version
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
1/102
A Post-Hofstedeian Notion ofCulture
Professor Dr. Brendan McSweeneyChair in Management, Royal Holloway, University ofLondon/Visiting Professor in Business Administration, School
of Business, Stockholm University
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
2/102
Why bother?
Why is the cultural research of Geert Hofstede,and similar work, a desirable/useful object ofreview?
Diversity/inter-culturality presents hugeintellectual and practical challenges.
Within the business school communities andmanagement consultancy arenas Hofstedes, andsimilar work, has an immense following.
As of this morning, Hofstedes work has beencited almost 61,000 times.
Is his work a road-bridge or a road-block?
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
3/102
Hofstedes Claims
To have empirically identified found the national cultures (or differencesbetween such cultures) of numerous countries.
The cultures or differences between them are described on the basis of the six
[bi-polar] dimensions of national culture viz.Power-distance attitudes about power distribution
Uncertainty Avoidance high-low uncertainty tolerance
Individualism vs Collectivism
Masculinity vs Femininity
Confucian Dynamism long vs short-term time orientation
More recently (2010) Indulgence vs. Restraint
And that these dimensions strongly influence national thinking, feeling,and acting, as well as organizations, institutions, etc. in predictable ways
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
4/102
The data obtained from within a single MNC does have the power to
uncover the secrets of entire national cultures (Hofstede,1980).
[N]ational values are given facts, as hard as countrys geographic position orits weather (Hofstede and Hofstede, 2005)
In ... masculine cultures ... there is a feeling that conflicts should be resolved bya good fight... The industrial relations scene in these countries is marked by
such fights ... In feminine cultures ... there is a preference for resolving conflictsbycompromise and negotiations (Hofstede, 2010; Hofstede & Hofstede, 2005:143)(Hofstede, Hofstede & Minkov, 2010), and elsewhere.
Freud was an Austrian; and there are good reasons in the culture profile of
Austria in the IBM data why his theory would be conceived in Austria rather thanelsewhere (Hofstede, 2001; 1980).
The five main dimensions along which the dominant value systems in morethan 50 countries can be ordered and that [they] affecthuman thinking, feeling,
and acting, as well as organizations and institutions, in predictable ways(Hofstede, 2001: xix
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
5/102
This particular notion of culture and itssupposed consequences is not unique toHofstede
The claim that populations (civilizations,regions, countries, organizations, ethnic (andother sub-national groups) aredistinguishable on the basis of distinct,shared, enduring, causal, and identifiablecultures (defined as subjective values) has
considerable following both as an explanationand a guide to action.
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
6/102
According to David Hickson and Derek Pugh nationalculture lie[s] beneath [a societys] characteristic arts,clothes, food, ways of greeting and meeting, ways of
working together, ways of communicating, and so on(1995: 17).
Nancy Adler, states that a national cultural orientation
describes the attitude of most people most of the time
(2002: 19).
David Landes, states that: culture makes almost all the
difference (2000: 2)
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
7/102
Many varieties of culture as enduring,identifiable, subjective valueconfigurations
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
8/102
A long-standing view
In 1797 the French counter-revolutionary Joseph de
Maistre declared I have seen Frenchmen, Italians,Russians. But for man, I declare I have never in my life
met him.
W. B. Yeats claim that there was a national "Collective
Unconscious or Anima Mundiof the race" (1922)
W. W. M. Eiselen the intellectual architect of apartheid
- stated in 1929 that culture not race was the true basisof difference, the sign of destiny
A. J. P. Taylor pronounced that: The problem with Hitler
was that he was German (in Davies, 1999)
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
9/102
Understanding and managingdiversity
As academics or/and advisors/consultantswe seek to, or are expected to, identify,teach, and otherwise communicate methods
of management that create enduring successfor uninational and multinationalorganizations whether for- or not-for-profit.
But there is a gap between the speculativegeneralisations/practical expected of usabout complex worlds and what meets thestandards of rigorous scholarship (March &
Sutton, 1997) .
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
10/102
Conditions
i. the world is not flat; ii. performanceadvantages are unstable; iii. the causes ofsuccess are complex; iv. atomistic
explanations of action are notcomprehensive; and v. causes are not alwaysreducible to the exterior/materialistic.
Because of these (and other) conditions,understanding and/or managing transnational
business activities is immensely challenging.
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
11/102
Cultural values theories therefore addressmajor intellectual and practical challenges,but how realistic and/or useful are thesetheories?
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
12/102
My view, in short ... As an academic, and also as someone engaged
in managing across many country borders, in myopinion, partitioning populations (civilizations,regions, countries, organizations, ethnic (andother sub-national groups) on the basis that theyare distinguishable from other populations onthe basis distinct, shared, enduring, causal, and
identifiable cultures (defined as configurations ofsubjective values) is an intellectual cul-de-sac;lacks scholarly rigour; and is not merely useless,but is misleading.
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
13/102
Good theory?
Theory as surprise: defamiliarising Hofstede et al. perhaps once usefulagainst the global one best way view but overfamiliar now. And bestachieved through descriptions of real differences
Theory as covering laws? Every good theory does not consist of coveringlaws, but the culture as values theories claim to have identified suchgeneralisations and thus should be judged against that criterion.
Theory as a predictor: temperate or imperious versions some levelimportant if it is to be useful as a guide to action case-study of predictive
failure of Hofstedes claims.
Theory as narrative: an explanation (story) that describes the process, orsequence of events, that suggests a relationship between factors/variables.Distinct from stories/cases presented as evidence of a covering law.
Examine one of Hofstedes alleged cases.
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
14/102
8 Tests of a Theory of Causality
1. Well Specified or Too Vague: Is its definition/description precise/demarcated? Oris it underspecified or a composite?
2. Internally Uniform or Heterogeneous: If causal, is it represented as a coherent(homogeneous) force or as incoherent (heterogeneous)?
3. Identified by Valid Methods or a Product of Inappropriate Processes:Assuming it exits, is it identifiable and with sufficient degrees of accuracy and/or by
justifiable means? Or are its descriptions imprecise and/or the product of unsoundprocesses ?
4. Causal at One Level or All levels: Assuming they are accurate, are thedescriptions accurate about/useful enough at one societal level only or valid for alllevels?
5. Strong, Weak, or Nil Causality: If causal (i) how strong is that influence; and (ii) isthat influence distinguishable from other causes? Or is action usually an outcome ofmultiple and complex factors?
6. Enduring or Changing: If causal, are outcomes stable or variable?
7. Uniformity or Diversity in a Domain: Is it uniform in content and consequencesacross its claimed domain (country, or whatever)? Or is there intra-domain diversity?
8. Strong or Weak Predictive Power: Do the depictions provide good predictions? Orare many false predictions observed?
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
15/102
A broadly similar debate is taking place withinthe institutional, neo-institutional, community.
For an overview see: special issue ofEconomy and Society38, 4. 2009.
See also the journal Socio-EconomicReviewand books by Colin Crouch,Wofgang Streeck.
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
16/102
Test 1:Well Specified or Too Vague?
1. From a particular academic/managementconsultancy firm, is the definition/description of
culture employed precise/demarcated enough?Or is it underspecified or a composite? and
2.
Generally, is there even a broad consensusabout what the term culture means or is therea multiplicity of meanings?
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
17/102
Which notion of culture?
There is no consensual definition of culture.
As early as the 1950s, Alfred Kroeber and ClydeKluckhohn estimated in a survey of Englishlanguage sources only - that there were already over
160 definitions of culture (and its near-synonymcivilization) in use.
And those multiple definitions are usuallyunderspecified.
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
18/102
Which/What Culture?
Widely used to indicate that societal context isinfluential.
Johns (2006), for instance, describes nationalculture as a contextual imperative.
Of course, context matters useful counter to purenotions of individuality - but that does not get usvery far. What are its/their properties, degree, andtype of influence?
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
19/102
Identity
Also confused with the notion of identity.
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
20/102
It is used in an objective sense: rituals of daily life,ceremonies, art forms, fashion, customs, means ofsocial differentiation, and so forth
And in a subjective (psychological) sense.
In the latter, views of the causal influence of cultureranges from that as a supremely independentvariable, the superordinate power in society to, atthe other extreme, a mere powerlessepiphenomenon.
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
21/102
Subjective
A variety of implicit or explicit definitions of culture are employedby management/business academics/consultants, but the dominant
one is that of: (a) mental programming subjective values. A notion of culture long out-of-favour in most other disciplines,
including anthropology.
And as (b) highly influential even the exclusive causethus inappropriately neglecting other cultural and non-culturalinfluences.
And (c) reductive - the notion of mind is unclear and complex,and not reducible merely to values (of which, in any event, there isno consensual definition).
A notion of mind needs also to consider: preferences, desires,goals, needs, norms, traits, aversions, tastes, assumptions, and
attractions and their inter-relationships.
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
22/102
That is not to criticise studies which focus exclusively onjust one of: values; preferences, desires, goals, needs,norms, traits, aversions, tastes, assumptions, attractions,or whatever.
Focus, parsimony, strategic reduction abstracting awayenough of the worlds complexity to develop pointedexplanations - are often necessary, BUT
... given the totalizing claims made for subjective cultureand its alleged comprehensive consequences, a narrowfocus of research which claims to explain so much is, to
say the least, questionable.
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
23/102
Software of the Mind(Hofstede, 1980, 2010., etc.)
Aside from the unobserveability of Values,they are not the equivalent of MS-DOS orMac OS X
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
24/102
Test 1 (Adequately Specified?)Conclusion
Culture is an over-used and under-specified term.
But in management it is often unjustifiably -
defined narrowly as endogenous, highly influential(even determinate) values.
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
25/102
Test 2(Coherent or Incoherent?)
Internal Uniformity: Is the culture a stableuniformity (dammed up into a neat, separate,pond) or a dynamic cocktail (perhaps
containing some patterns, but overall a looseassemblage)?
Why does this matter? If the latter, uniformoutcomes are not possible.
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
26/102
Uniform culture Uniformaction
The assumption of cultural determinism alone doesnot exclude the possibility of inconsistent, varying,actions within, or outside of, organizations.
What the culture as subjective values model alsosupposes is that for each specific arena or categoryof actors (civilization, country, ethnic group, or
whatever) culture is coherent, that is: uniform, non-contradictory.
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
27/102
Coherent (unambiguous/non-contradictory)
The notion of cultural coherence probably has its roots in
romanticism with all of the variations of the idea of the Geist(spirit) of an age or a people (Appadural, 1988: 41).
Anthropologists, Pitrim Sorokin, the early Ruth Benedict, andGregory Bateson, all argued that each culture has a singleethos.
Hofstede describes each culture a whole (2001: 17).
In sum, as Carl Ratner (2005: 61) states individuals participate in a common, coherent culture that is structurally
integrated at the societal level.
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
28/102
In contrast:
Edward Burnet Tyler characterized culture as a thing of shreds andpatches.
Bronislaw Malinowski states that human cultural reality is not a consistent or
logical scheme, but rather a seething mixture of conflicting principles.
A. L. Kroeber, described the notion of total [cultural] integration as an idealconditioninvented by a few anthropologists not well versed in history.
Richard Merelman describes culture in the US as a loosely bounded fabric,ill-organized, permeable, inconsistent.
Amitai Etzioni describes the myth of cultural coherence as: One of the mostdeep-seated fallacies in social science.
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
29/102
Endogenous change is inconceivable.
As Margaret Archer states: The net effect of thisinsistence on cultural compactness [is to preclude] anytheory of cultural development springing from internaldynamics ... internal dynamics are surrendered to external
ones (1988: 6).
Bizarrely, Hofstede claims that on the very few occasionswhen there is an externally caused change in a national
culture, the change occurs not only across that country butalso within all countries throughout the world. Nationalcultures very rarely change, he states, but when they do,they change in formation across the globe, that is to saytheir relative position or ranking in his five national cultural
indices are unaffected (2001: 36).
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
30/102
Studies
1. Many studies have found incoherence (incompleteness,illogicality, gaps, cracks, hybridity, remixing,
contradictions, ambiguity, slippages, conflicts, malleability)within cultures. (This is now the standard view in anthropology)(Kuper, 2003).
2. Even if individual cultures are supposed to be coherent itdoes not follow that there will be no contradiction, gaps,
frictions, ambiguities at cultural interfaces.
3. Cultural coherence allows no room for individuals toexploit it is a theory of cultural automatons. We are
social but not entirely socialized (Wrong, 1961).
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
31/102
Hindu civilization?
In addition to multiple varieties of Hinduism the notion thatit is a single religion is a colonial constructed myth.
There are approximately 36,000 different Hindu gods andgoddesses.
The extent and ways in which religion influences socialaction varies enormously, and there are many otherinfluences.
In India, as well as Hindus and Muslims, there are also
Sikhs, Buddhists, Anglo-Indians, Christians, Parsis, Jains,Jews, Atheists, and Agnostics. And many ways of beingeach of these.
Si i /C f i (Chi )
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
32/102
Sinic/Confucian (Chinese)Civilization
Confucianism - it is not a holistic framework or ahegemonic influence. Confucianism a term
invented by Jesuit missionaries consists of a largebody of work that is interpretable in multiple ways.
Explaining the values of the 4 billion Asians on thebasis of one persons writings is as absurd as
claiming to explain the behaviour of three quarters ofa billion Europeans from the bible.
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
33/102
We all live with, engage with,paradoxes, contradictions
Look before you leap
Too many cooks spoil thebroth
He (or she) whohesitates is lost
Many hands make lightwork
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
34/102
Test 2 (Internal Uniformity?)Conclusion
Each notion of culturally cohesive communitiesgreatly exaggerates the internal unity of cultures andtherefore, even if the causality of culture is
supposed, social uniformity and continuity cannotalso be logically supposed to be the outcome.
As the former president of the US Society ofPsychological Anthropology, Philip K. Bock,
unhesitatingly states: We must conclude that theuniformity assumption is false (1999).
T 3
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
35/102
Test 3:Empirically Identified by Valid Methods orDepicted Through Inappropriate Processes?
Assuming it exits, is it identifiable and with
sufficient degrees of accuracy and/or byjustifiable means? Or, alternatively, are itsdescriptions imprecise and/or the product of
unsound processes?
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
36/102
Identifiability/Measurability ofNational Culture as Values
Discussed at length inMcSweeney, B. HumanRelations, 55.1 (2002)
See Hofstedes replyand my response (bothin 55.11).
Many other critiques
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
37/102
Hofstedes Dimensions
My criticism is not of the use of the depictionsor dimensions they can be usefully used.
But with Hofstedes claim to have used themto measure what he depicts as an enduringand causal (even deterministic) nationalforce.
Incidentally, the dimensions are not originalto Hofstede and have long history in thesocial sciences.
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
38/102
Data Source: 117,000questionnaires
Not as many used as is implied Combined figure for two surveys
66 countries, but only 40 yielded scores
Unrepresentative In 15 countries - less than 200 respondents
First survey in Pakistan 37 employees and second 70
Only surveys in Hong Kong, Taiwan and Singapore 88, 71, and58 respectively
All from one company: IBM.
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
39/102
IBM questionnaires
Not designed to identify national culture.
Not independently administered.
Not confidential
Respondents knew of possibleconsequences for them of their answers.
Blue collar workers not surveyedmarketing and sales staff only.
Atypicality of IBM
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
40/102
Deriving Descriptions of National Culturefrom Questionnaire Data: 5 Crucial
Assumptions(each necessary each, it isagued, is fatally flawed)
1) Every micro-location is typical of the national;
2) Every respondent had already been permanentlyprogrammed with three non-interactive culturalprograms;
3) National culture creates response differences;
4) National culture can be identified through the responsedifferences;
5) National culture is nationally uniform its acontextual.
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
41/102
Assumption 2. Every respondent had already beenpermanently programmed with three non-interactive cultures
Only one and the same organizational culture in every IBM subsidiary So a cultural monopoly, no harmonious, dissenting, emergent, contradictory, organizational
cultures in IBM
One global occupational culture for each occupation No interaction between the three cultures
No other cultural (or otherinfluences) on the responses)
(OrC + OcC + NC1) (OrC + OcC + NC2) = NC1 - NC2
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
42/102
(OrC + OcC + NC1) (OrC + OcC + NC2) = NC1 - NC2
Very convenient! But ridiculous.
M th iti f
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
43/102
Many other critiques ofHofstedes methodology
There are many other critiques of Hofstedes
measurements see Gerhart & Fang, 2005,for instance.
T t 3 (Id tifi ti )
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
44/102
Test 3 (Identification)Conclusion
The methods Hofstede used violate everypremise of opinion analysis I learned at thefeet of Lazerfeld and Hyman
Immanuel Wallerstein
(personal communication)
T t 4
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
45/102
Test 4One Level or All levels?
Assuming a description is accurate at onesocietal level, is it also accurate/usefulenough at that level only or valid also at
other or all levels?
Hofstede captures the values that shape the
cognitive maps of individuals as a well associal systems and institutions(Greckhamer, 2011:87)
At h t l l( ) i lt
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
46/102
At what level(s) is culturesupposed to be causal?
Civilizations?
Multi-country regions?
Nations (or rather countries)? Within country immigrant, indigenous, and
minoritycultural groups (plural mono-culturalism)(ethnicity, gender, etc.)?
Organizations?
Individuals?
One, some, or all?
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
47/102
If a causal theory is represented as applyingonly to one high level only (civilization, country,or whatever) there would outside of the
research community be little interest as it asmore micro-levels we act, negotiate, etc.
If, for example, I meet a number of Japanesemanagers, Im not meeting Japan, but a fewpeople from Japan.
Do Hofstede et al.s descriptions apply to thisgroup and not just to an abstract average
(Japan)?
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
48/102
Ecological Fallacy
Making direct translations of properties or relations at onelevel to another is unwarranted even it we suppose that thedepiction of first level is accurate.
Robinson (1950) originally described the attribution of viewsabout the characteristics of one level to other levels also asthe ecological fallacy (1950), Wagner (1964) called it thedisplacement of scope, and Galtung the fallacy of the
wrong level (1967)(see also Hofstede, 2001: 16, 463).
Drawing inferences about higher levels from individual leveldata is sometimes called the atomistic fallacy (Tsui et al.
2007: 466).
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
49/102
The pattern of correlation found in nationalaverages is not(contra Greckhamer, 2011and a multitude of others) replicated at the
individual level. Gerhart and Fang (2005:977) estimate, based on Hofstedes data, thatonly somewhere between 2 and 4 percent
of the variance at the level of individualsanswers is explained by national differences a tiny portion.
Hofstedes own estimate of 4.2 per cent isonl mar inall hi her 2001: 50 .
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
50/102
Furthermore, two of the four (later five)dimensions employed by Hofstede to depictnational culturespower distance andindividualism and collectivism were statistically
identified by him onlyin nationally averaged data.At the level of individuals they had near-zerointercorrelations (Bond, 2002) for thosedimensions and thus no* explanatory power atthat level.
* Oyserman et al.s (2002) meta-analysis of 52studies concludes that country explains 1.2% of
the variation in individualism-collectivism scores.
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
51/102
Relationships identified at one level ofanalysis may be stronger or weaker at adifferent level of analysis, or may even
reverse direction (Klein and Kozlowski 2000;Ostroff 1993).
Disaggregation leads to misrepresentationwhenever populations are not whollyhomogeneous.
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
52/102
But the ecological error may also occur when aproperty at one level are attributed to a homogeneousgroup at a lower level.
Schwartz (1994), citing, Zito (1975), gives theillustrative example of the discrepancy between ahung jury at two levels. As a group, a hung jury is an
indecisive jury, unable to decide the guilt or
innocence of the accused. However, attributing thatcharacteristic to the individual members of the jurywould be incorrect as the jury is hung because its
individual members are very decisive not indecisive.
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
53/102
Test 4 (Level?) Conclusion
The ecological fallacy is rampant in the writings of causalsubjective culture devotees. Perhaps more so in users than
originators, but the error can readily be found in multipleplaces in the originators writings, including Hofstedes.
Even if we suppose that the national or civilization
descriptions are accurate, it is at lower levels (individuals,groups, etc.) that we, and business organizations, engagewith.
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
54/102
Test 5Strong, Weak, or Nil Causality?
Does it have an influence on action, and if so: (i) howstrong is that influence; and (ii) is that influence
distinguishable from other causes? Or is actionusually an outcome of multiple and complexfactors?
A Management Question: when considering current orpossible activities in a specific country, how muchattention should be given to cultural descriptions of
that country a lot, a little?
Unjustified jump from
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
55/102
Unjustified jump fromdescription to causality
Attitude surveys (based on questionnaires,interviews, or however) provide zero direct
evidence of an influence of culture onbehaviour.
As existing theoretical traditions provide little
guidance for understanding how values shapebehaviour, little more intellectually humility andless bombast from subjective cultural devotees
in management would be appropriate.
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
56/102
Attributing causality to just one culture neglects the
independent role of other cultural influences
If cultures additional to, or other than, the singularculture are acknowledged, then the treatment of that
culture as the independent variable is possible only byillogically attributing causal power to one categoryof culture but effectively denying it to others.
Mere acknowledgement of other cultures withoutincorporating them in a theory of action is an emptygesture.
Excluding any independent
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
57/102
Excluding any independentrole of non-cultural influences
Even if we suppose that within a defined area/group, isan influential even monopolistic culture - why suppose
that it alone or culture in general is the only cause ofactions there?
Why should cultural causality be privileged over
administrative, coercive, institutional, or other meansof social integration/control?
Myths for inexperienced
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
58/102
Myths for inexperiencedteenagers
Tsui et al.s (2007:46) study of 93 papers in leadingjournals on cross-cultural organizational behaviourobserves that few studies considered non-culturalvariables, either theoretically as predictors or empirically
as controls and researchers have ignored the fact thatculture is not the only differentiator of nations.
I dont belittle such narrowly focused studies
development of technical skills etc. BUT the idea thatbehaviour at multiple levels within a country canexclusively be explained and predicted on the basis ofone narrow representation of culture is frankly ludicrous.
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
59/102
Working Days lost in industrial disputes per1000 employees (annual averages)
1961-65 1966-70 1971-75
Masculine Ireland 337.5 625.6 292.7
Masculine GB 127.0 222.6 538.6
Feminine Spain 14.1 37.1 95.6
Data Source: ILO Labour Relations Yearbook
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
60/102
Working Days lost in industrial disputes per1000 employees (annual averages)
1961-65 1966-70 1971-75
Masculine Ireland 337.5 625.6 292.7
Masculine GB 127.0 222.6 538.6
Feminine Spain 14.1 37.1 95.6Data Source: ILO Labour Relations Yearbook
Considerable intra-country variation demonstrates that the cause of
action cannot be reduced to a single force.
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
61/102
Working Days lost in industrial disputes per1000 employees (annual averages)
1961-65 1966-70 1971-75
Masculine Ireland 337.5 625.6 292.7
Masculine GB 127.0 222.6 538.6
Feminine Spain 14.1 37.1 95.6
1976-80 1981-85 1986-90
Masculine Ireland 716.1 360.6 183.7
Masculine GB 521.7 387.4 117.5
Feminine Spain 1,089.8 400.9 433.6
Source: ILO Labour Relations Yearbook
Spains Dictator: Franco died
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
62/102
Spain s Dictator: Franco diedin 1975
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
63/102
Massive decrease in Church attendance inSpain after Francos death.
Large increase in Russia after the end of theSoviet regime.
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
64/102
Soccer separate teams
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
65/102
One team for entire island
Test 5: Degree of Causality?
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
66/102
Test 5: Degree of Causality?Conclusion
Even if cultural causality is supposed it is illogical todeny the possibility of the influence of other cultures
and non-cultural forces.
We need to (a) separate out the various processes
that are lumped together under the heading of culture;(b) not suppose a priorithe causal dominance of onetype of, or any type of, culture; (c) be open torecognising the influence of non-cultural factors.
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
67/102
Test 6: Enduring or Changing?
The Claim:
[N]ational values are given facts, as hard as countrys
geographic position or its weather (Hofstede andHofstede, 2005: 13)
There is a stability to its essential nature ... regardless ofplace, time or regime (de Vries, 2001: 597).
As Renato Rosalso ironically states: If its moving, it isntcultural (1989: 208).
http://www.itusozluk.com/gorseller/waffen+ss/58684 -
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
68/102
Persistent Heritage
The claim of unchanging culture:
Relies of a prioribelief not empiricalevidence.
Is inconsistent once the partitionedpopulation was active in creating a uniqueculture but somehow that creativity has
ceased. And supposes that each culture is coherent,
pure and impermeable.
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
69/102
National Cultural Purity
But like an Apache rock and roll band, culturesare fusions, remixes, recombinants. They are
made and remade through exchange,imitation, intersection, incorporation,reshuffling, through travel, trade,subordination.
Geographical borders are not cultural borders.
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
70/102
Examples of impurity
Winslow Homers Eight Bellsan exampleofdistinctly American art?
Tempura, an example of uniqueJapanese cuisine?
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
71/102
Examples of impurity
Winslow Homers majestic Eight Bellswasdescribed by many contemporaries asdistinctly American, but cross-Atlanticinfluences can readily be discerned.
Tempura, from the Latin temporapractice copied from Portuguesemissionaries in Japan untilrecently popular only in SouthernJapan
T t 6 (E d i Ch i ?)
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
72/102
Test 6: (Enduring or Changing?)Conclusion
Acceptance of specific legacies (and theircontestable interpretations) does not require
acceptance the notion of stasis (oruniqueness).
The claim that the cultures of nations,civilizations, or whatever do no change relieson essentialist myths not empirical evidenceand requires implausible suppositions suchas the coherence, purity, and impermeability
of culture.
T t 7
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
73/102
Test 7:Cultural Uniformity or Diversity in a Domain
Is a culture uniform in content andconsequences across its claimed domain(country, or whatever)? Or is there intra-domain diversity?
A management question: Is it true thatwherever I locate the new factory in acountry, the culture will be the same?
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
74/102
Evidence
The existence of uniformities within a domain, forexample, a national requirement to drive on theright-hand side of the road or to use snow-tyres inthe winter, is not evidence of domain uniformity.
Confirmatory Bias: The evidence in support ofdomain uniformity is anecdotal it relies on invalidstep of generalizing from small numbers and the
essentialist presupposition of national uniformity. Falsified: It is contradicted by multiple studies.
Confuses Domain: It conflates nation with state.
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
75/102
Fons Trompeenars generalises from undisclosedinterviews with corporate executives
Kets de Vries generalizes from just one character ina novel!
Margaret Mead argued that the testimony of any
Samoan adolescent was representative of allSamoan adolescents.
Hofstede from one company
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
76/102
Considerable diversity (heterogeneity,divergence, variety) has been observed, (e.g.
Burrin 2005; Camelo et al. 2004; Campbell,et al., 1991; Crouch, 2005; Goold andCambell 1987; Kondo 1990; Law and Mol2002; Lenartowicz et al. 2003; MacIntyre
1967; OSullivan, 2000; Streeck and Thelen2005; Thompson and Phua 2005; Tsurumi1988; Weiss and Delbecq 1987; Yanagisako
2002).
Even Values Studies have
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
77/102
Even Values Studies haveShown Differences
For example:
Schwartz (1994)
Lenartowicz, Johnson & White (2003)
Peterson, Fanimokun, Mogaji & Smith (2006)
Peterson & Fanimoken (2008)
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
78/102
National Culture
The notion of uniform national culture crucially presupposesnationalist myths of the primordiality of nations.
Nations may comprise part of a state or extend beyond the
borders of a single state. There are very few single-nation states.
Confuses notions of nation, state, and country
As Walker Connor states: "The prime fact about the world is thatit is not largely composed of nation-states" (1978:39).
He reports a 1971 survey of 132 entities generally considered tobe states which concluded that only 12 states (9.1%) could
justifiably be described as nation-states.
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
79/102
Countries/States
The geographic position[s] of many countries arenot hard. They are not fixed and are ofcomparatively recent origin.
State boundaries may be unstable. Whole states orparts of states may be annexed. New states may beformed by seceding from other states. Somemultinational states are very stable, some are very
volatile. States may be formed by the voluntary orinvoluntary combination of multiple states. Statesmay fragment into multiple states, violently orpeacefully.
Test 7 (intra-domain diversity)
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
80/102
est ( t a do a d e s ty)Conclusion
The fallacious assumption of culturalhomogeneity within nations (Tung, 2008:42),
Test 8
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
81/102
Test 8:Strong or Weak Predictive Power?
Do the depictions provide goodpredictions? Or are many falsepredictions observed?
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
82/102
Nothwithstanding, the issues of social levels, nationalculturalist assert that their favoured representations ofnational cultures (or national cultural differences) enable
effective predictions of social action at sub-national levels.
Hofstede peppers his books and articles with descriptionsof events which he employs to validate his
measurements of national cultures and to demonstratethat they affect human thinking, feeling, and acting, aswell as organizations and institutions, in predictable ways(2001: xix).
E l
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
83/102
Example
In theUSAas well as in other masculine cultures like theUKand theRepublic of Irelandthere is a feeling that conflictsshould be resolved bya good fight... The industrial relationsscene in these countries is marked by such fights. If possible
management tries to avoid having to deal with labor unions at all,the labor union behaviour justifies this aversion ... In femininecultures like theNetherlands, Sweden, andDenmarkthere is apreference for resolving conflicts bycompromise andnegotiations(Hofstede & Hofstede, 2005: 143)(Hofstede, Hofstede & Minkov, 2010),
and elsewhere.
Only one section (labor unions) are said to influenced by that which issupposed to be national.
Management is treated as immune to national culture and therefore(unlike workers) influenced by something non-cultural.
Can readily be seen to be
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
84/102
yflawed
In Hofstede's 1980, 2002 'masculinity' index,Japan is the most masculine country and
Germany has the same score as GreatBritain, yet throughout the post-2nd WorldWar period their industrial relations has beenthe exemplar of co-operation.
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
85/102
Tested at the most favourable level, thenational, both by:
(i) Non-ranked Dichotomy and (ii) a strongerComparative Ranking.
First against Hofstedes 6 (3:3) namedcountries;
Then against equivalent and larger groups(8:8).
More recent data for the six named countries
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
86/102
More recent data for the six named countries weakest test (dichotomy) - fails
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
87/102
Comparative ranking test - fails
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
88/102
A necessary condition of valid comparison isthat the comparators are equivalents.
But the comparison in Hofstedes case studyis not equivalent: feminine countries are notcompared with countries with equivalentlevels of masculinity.
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
89/102
The named feminine countries are at the extremefeminine end of the MAS Index but the named masculinecountries are not equivalent.
Sweden (most); Netherlands (3rd most); and Denmark(4th most).
Ireland (9th); Great Britain (joint 12th); USA (joint 19th)
Weakest test (dichotomy) -
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
90/102
( y)fails
Comparative ranking test
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
91/102
p galso fails
P-D Index instead of MAS
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
92/102
Index - fails
Homicide predictions based on Hofstedes
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
93/102
Homicide predictions based on Hofstede sP-D and MAS Indices - Fail
A post-Hofstedian notion of
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
94/102
culture would:
Complexity and Richness: Be definitionally clear but without being over-reductiveconflating mind with just values is anorexic.
Incoherence: Recognise the incoherence/heterogeneity of cultures
Causal Plurality: Abandon the imperious claim that a specific culture is the sourceof just about everything and really acknowledge the causal roles of other culturesand non-cultural factors.
Level of Relevance: Be aware that what is accurate/useful at one level may not beat other levels.
Space: Cease being prisoner of the state or other defined space and concedethe reality of intra-country diversity.
Change: Acknowledge change avoiding nationalistic myths of essentialism.
Predictions: Admit that predicting is very difficult if its is really is about the futureavoid the myth of culture as an answering machine.
Identification: Concede that the complexity of culture makes identificationchallenging and avoid depictions that presuppose what it claims to have found.
Resonate: Be in line with current notions of culture in major disciplines.
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
95/102
In short ...
unless we separate out the variousprocesses that are lumped together under theheading of culture, and then look beyond the
field of culture to other processes, we will notget very far in understanding any of it(Kuper, 1999: 247).
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
96/102
Thank you
1. National Identifiable
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
97/102
from the local
http://www.ibm.com/ukhttp://www.ibm.com/uk -
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
98/102
1. National Identifiable in the local
Version 1 (what is identified characterises everyindividual) presupposes that every national individual carries thesame national culture - what is to be found is presupposed
(catastrophic circularity). Contradicted even by his own data.
Version 2 (what is identified is the national average)Inprinciple there is always an average e.g. in the world, continent,country, region, cycling club, brothel, or whatever but why assume that
the average tendency in one micro-location is the national average?
Hofstedes data specifically: Employees not randomly selected andatypicality of IBM.
3. National Culture Creates Questionnaire ResponseDiff
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
99/102
Differences
Immediate Circumstances:We suggest that much of the observeddifferences in values surveys scores are not in fact, cultural in nature,but simply reflect differences in circumstances between groups ofpeople (Maseland and van Hoorn, 2010).
Classification: Nationally classifieddata is not evidence ofnational causality. Almost every classification would producedifference - but what is that status of such differences? Hair colourculture?
Strategists not Dopes: Individuals are assumed to be mererelays of national culture:
As discussed earlier strategic answering would have occurred as thequestionnaire answers were not confidential.
4. National Culture Can Be Identified By Response
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
100/102
y pDifference Analysis
Assumption 3 is a necessary but not sufficient condition of 4
The processes of producing national cultural depictions from thequestion answers is often unclear and sometimes bizarre. Robinson
(1983) describes the dimensions as hodgepodge of items few of whichrelate to the intended construct (See Dorfman & Howell, 1988; Bond, 2002,also)
Different questions have revealed different dimensions e.g. Schwartz
identified seven dimensions quite different than Hofstedes (1994).
5. Situationally unspecific i.e. its the sameh ithi ti
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
101/102
everywhere within a nation
Claims to have identified national culture (or differences) that arenationally pervasive in the family, at school, at work, in politics(1992).
The IBM surveys (with all the other limitations described already) wasonly of employees,indeed only some categories of employees;undertaken within the workplace of a single company (of one industrial
type) which was in a specific location within each country; the questionwere almost entirely work-related; they were administered within theformal-workplace.
No parallel or repeat surveys were undertaken in additional workplacesor non-workplaces.
-
7/31/2019 St.gallen April Final Version
102/102
Culture?
For a variety of complex reasons the idea of culture asa, or indeed the, key social driver has gained immensepopularity across a range of academic disciplines.
The popularity of the notion of culture as an explanation
and cure is not confined to the academy - manyinternational agencies, management consultants, and a
host of other groups and institutions have embraced it.