spatiotemporal analysis of flight delays poster

1
Air Carrier Delay Extreme Weather Delay Na2onal Avia2on System Delay Aircra9 Arriving Late Methods Performed on airports dataset for each of 4 delay type aAributes for all 12 months: Global Moran’s I test for spa2al autocorrela2on o Inverse distance conceptualiza2on of spa2al weights Anselin Locan Moran’s I Clustering/Outlier Analysis (C/O) Ge5s6Ord Gi* Hot Spot Analysis (HS) Spa5al and Temporal Pa>erns of Flight Delay Types in the Con5guous United States During 2012 Data Sta5s5cally significant clustering found for: Extreme weather delay in southern Great Plains during spring and summer months NAS delay in the Rocky Mountain region and Minnesota/Michigan area during winter months NAS delay in Florida and the east coast during summer months AircraP arriving late delay on the west coast of the United States during all months Other notable trends: NAS delays tend to be more common (percentageU wise) at busier airports Air carrier delays showed an inverse type of effect in rela2on to NAS delays in terms of regions that experienced clustering C/O U February C/O U August C/O U December Na2onal Avia2on System Delay Air Carrier Delay HS U February HS U August Objec5ve To understand sta2s2cally significant temporal and spa2al paAerns of four reported flight delay types in the United States in 2012 ! Do certain regions exhibit significant clustering of higher percentages of delay types during certain 2mes of the year? Lauren Anderson, M.S. Student U University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA U [email protected] Introduc5on Flight delays are a significant problem in the United States, with 20% of all flights delayed by 15 minutes or more in 2012 (22% in 2013) 1 , cos2ng billions of dollars to passengers and airlines each year 2 . Understanding the underlying paAerns in delay types related to regional and seasonal weather condi2ons throughout the country is an important step in gaining a complete understanding of the problem as a whole. Spa2al sta2s2cs allow for the detec2on of significant paAerns in aAributes through space, and are u2lized in this study in the context of airports and their percentages of flight delays by type. !Are there significant pa+erns? !Where are the significant pa+erns? Bureau of Transporta2on Sta2s2cs (BTS): delay data o For 296 airports: # of total opera2ons (listed separately for each air carrier), # opera2ons delayed, # opera2ons delayed by type Openflights.org: airports shapefile o 3UleAer airport code, la2tude, longitutde, opera2onal status Note: Figures 2U7 only show buffers around airports with > 3500 departures per month. Buffer size = (log([SUM_arr_fl])^3)*200. The buffers are displayed to help visually iden2fy large airports (not part of analysis). Delay Type % AircraP Arriving Late 41.41 Air Carrier (54.45) Security (0.22) Extreme Weather (6.86) NAS (38.47) Weather (70.03) Volume (19.13) Equipment (0.47) Closed Runway (7.15) Other (3.22) Na5onal Avia5on System (NAS) 22.54 Weather (69.81) Volume (19.23) Equipment (0.45) Closed Runway (7.26) Other (3.25) Air Carrier 31.92 Extreme Weather 4.01 (Security ) 0.13 Total 100.00 Delay Types: (Security delay not included in analysis) Data Preprocessing The Global Moran’s I test was significant at or above the 95% confidence level for all delay types and months except for Extreme Weather for September, October, and November. Extreme Weather Delay Results Aircra9 Arriving Late Delay Global Moran’s I Table 1. Reported delay types breakdown (2012) Table 2. Global Moran’s I results for Extreme Weather Delays Figure 1. Airports points dataset with buffer size corresponding to # of monthly arriving flights Note: Only selected result maps for local indicators of spa2al autocorrela2on are shown. Overarching trends from all months’ results are summarized in the bulleted list . C/O = Cluster/Outlier Analysis HS = Hot Spot Analysis References 1. BTS: 2014. Airline OnUTime Sta2s2cs and Delay Causes 2. MITRE Corpora2on Center for Advanced Avia2on System Development: 2007. Capacity needs in the Na2onal Airspace System 2007 – 2025: An analysis of airports and metropolitan area demand and opera2onal capacity in the future. 1 – 45. Conclusions Sta2s2cally significant regional trends were found to exist for flight delay type percentages over the course of one year, 2012. In par2cular, clusters of high percentages of Na2onal Avia2on System (NAS) delay were found to coincide with areas with clima2c trends known for producing unfavorable weather condi2ons for flying. ! Snowy condi2ons in winter months, thunderstorms during spring and summer months ! Result makes sense given that weather was the cause of nearly 70 percent of NAS delays in 2012 (Table 1) Less clear are the specific reasons for regional air carrier and aircra9 arriving late trends, however inverse percentages of other delay types and the effect of 2me zones and flight schedules are speculated to play a role. Spa2allyUdependent trends with regard to flight delays are important in that they are necessary to consider before drawing conclusions about delay at specific airports or months of the year. Ongoing and Future Work My ongoing research involves the study of changes in nonUweatherU caused flight delays in airline networks surrounding airline merger events. Given that this type of analysis involves specific airports and series’ of months as the 2me periods, underlying regional and seasonal trends are factors that must be taken into considera2on. To do this, similar spa2al sta2s2cal analysis will be performed, but with weather vs. nonUweather delay as the aAributes of focus. Figure 3 Figure 4 C/O – April Figure 2 Figure 5 Figure 6 Figure 7

Upload: lauren-anderson

Post on 20-Feb-2017

86 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: SpatioTemporal Analysis of Flight Delays Poster

Air$Carrier$Delay$

Extreme$Weather$Delay$

Na2onal$Avia2on$

System$Delay$

Aircra9$Arriving$Late$

Methods(Performed$on$airports$dataset$for$each$of$4$delay$type$aAributes$for$all$12$months:$•  Global(Moran’s(I(test$for$spa2al$autocorrela2on$!

o  Inverse$distance$conceptualiza2on$of$spa2al$weights$$•  Anselin(Locan(Moran’s(I(Clustering/Outlier$Analysis$(C/O)$•  Ge5s6Ord(Gi*$Hot$Spot$Analysis$(HS)$

Spa5al(and(Temporal(Pa>erns(of(Flight(Delay(Types(in(the(Con5guous(United(States(During(2012(

Data(

Sta5s5cally(significant(clustering(found(for:(•  Extreme(weather(delay$in$southern$Great$Plains$during$spring$and$summer$months$•  NAS(delay(in$the$Rocky$Mountain$region$and$Minnesota/Michigan$area$during$winter$months$•  NAS(delay(in$Florida$and$the$east$coast$during$summer$months$$•  AircraP(arriving(late(delay(on$the$west$coast$of$the$United$States$during$all$months$

Other(notable(trends:(•  NAS(delays$tend$to$be$more$common$(percentageUwise)$at$busier$airports$•  Air(carrier(delays(showed$an$inverse$type$of$effect$in$rela2on$to$NAS(delays(in$terms$of$regions$that$experienced$clustering$$

C/O$U$February$ C/O$U$August$

C/O$U$December$

Na2onal$Avia2on$System$Delay$

Air$Carrier$Delay$

HS$U$February$ HS$U$August$

Objec5ve(To$understand$sta2s2cally$significant$temporal$and$spa2al$paAerns$of$four$

reported$flight$delay$types$in$the$United$States$in$2012$

$!$Do$certain$regions$

exhibit$significant$clustering$of$higher$percentages$of$delay$types$during$certain$

2mes$of$the$year?$

Lauren$Anderson,$M.S.$Student$U$$University$of$Georgia,$Athens,$GA,[email protected]$

Introduc5on(Flight$ delays$ are$ a$ significant$ problem$ in$ the$United$ States,$with$ 20%$of$ all$ flights$ delayed$by$ 15$ minutes$ or$ more$ in$ 2012$ $ (22%$ in$2013)1,$cos2ng$billions$of$dollars$to$passengers$and$ airlines$ each$ year2.$ Understanding$ the$underlying$ paAerns$ in$ delay$ types$ related$ to$regional$ and$ seasonal$ weather$ condi2ons$throughout$the$country$is$an$important$step$in$gaining$ a$ complete$ understanding$ of$ the$problem$as$a$whole.$$Spa2al$sta2s2cs$allow$for$the$ detec2on$ of$ significant$ paAerns$ in$aAributes$ through$ space,$ and$ are$ u2lized$ in$this$ study$ in$ the$context$of$airports$and$ their$percentages$of$flight$delays$by$type.$$$

!Are$there$significant!pa+erns?!

!Where!are!the!significant!!!!!!!pa+erns?!

•  Bureau$of$Transporta2on$Sta2s2cs$(BTS):$delay$data$o  For$296$airports:$#$of$total$opera2ons$(listed$separately$for$each$air$

carrier),$#$opera2ons$delayed,$#$opera2ons$delayed$by$type$$

•  Openflights.org:$airports$shapefile$o  3UleAer$airport$code,$la2tude,$longitutde,$opera2onal$status$

Note:$Figures$2U7$only$show$buffers$around$$airports$with$>$3500$departures$per$month.$$Buffer$size$=$(log([SUM_arr_fl])^3)*200.$The$buffers$are$displayed$to$help$visually$iden2fy$large$airports$(not$part$of$analysis).$$$

((((((Delay(Type(( %((((AircraP(Arriving(Late( 41.41($$$Air$Carrier$$ (54.45)$$$$Security$$ (0.22)$$$$Extreme$Weather$$ (6.86)$$$$NAS$ (38.47)$

$$$Weather$ (70.03)$$$$Volume$ (19.13)$$$$Equipment$ (0.47)$$$$Closed$Runway$ (7.15)$$$$Other$ (3.22)$

$$ $$(((Na5onal(Avia5on(((((((((System((NAS)( 22.54($$$$Weather$ (69.81)$$$$$Volume$ (19.23)$$$$$Equipment$ (0.45)$$$$$Closed$Runway$ (7.26)$$$$$Other$ (3.25)$

$$ $$(((Air(Carrier(( 31.92((( (((((Extreme(Weather( 4.01((( ((((((Security()( 0.13((( (((((Total(( 100.00(

Delay(Types:((Security$delay$$not$included$in$$analysis)$

Data(Preprocessing(

The$ Global$ Moran’s$ I$ test$was$ significant$ at$ or$ above$the$ 95%$ confidence$ level$for$ all$ delay$ types$ and$months$except$for$Extreme$Weather$ for$ September,$October,$and$$November.$$$

Extreme$Weather$Delay$

Results(Aircra9$Arriving$Late$Delay$Global$Moran’s$I$$

Table$1.$Reported$delay$types$breakdown$(2012)$

Table$2.$Global$Moran’s$I$results$$for$Extreme$Weather$Delays$

Figure$1.$Airports$points$dataset$with$buffer$size$corresponding$to$#$of$monthly$arriving$flights$$

Note:$Only$selected$result$maps$for$local$indicators$of$spa2al$autocorrela2on$are$shown.$$Overarching$trends$from$all$months’$results$are$summarized$in$the$bulleted$list$.$$C/O(=$Cluster/Outlier$Analysis$HS(=$Hot$Spot$Analysis$

References$1.$BTS:$2014.$$Airline$OnUTime$Sta2s2cs$and$Delay$Causes$$2.$MITRE$Corpora2on$Center$for$Advanced$Avia2on$System$Development:$$2007.$$Capacity$needs$in$the$Na2onal$Airspace$System$2007$–$2025:$$An$analysis$of$airports$and$metropolitan$area$demand$and$opera2onal$capacity$in$the$future.$$1$–$45.$$$

Conclusions((•  Sta2s2cally$significant$regional$trends$were$found$to$exist$for$flight$

delay$type$percentages$over$the$course$of$one$year,$2012.$•  In$par2cular,$clusters$of$high$percentages$of$Na2onal$Avia2on$

System$(NAS)$delay$were$found$to$coincide$with$areas$with$clima2c$trends$known$for$producing$unfavorable$weather$condi2ons$for$flying.$

!  Snowy$condi2ons$in$winter$months,$thunderstorms$during$spring$and$summer$months$

!  $Result$makes$sense$given$that$weather$was$the$cause$of$nearly$70$percent$of$NAS$delays$in$2012$(Table$1)$

•  Less$clear$are$the$specific$reasons$for$regional$air$carrier$and$aircra9$arriving$late$trends,$however$inverse$percentages$of$other$delay$types$and$the$effect$of$2me$zones$and$flight$schedules$are$speculated$to$play$a$role.$

•  Spa2allyUdependent$trends$with$regard$to$flight$delays$are$important$in$that$they$are$necessary$to$consider$before$drawing$conclusions$about$delay$at$specific$airports$or$months$of$the$year.$

$Ongoing(and(Future(Work(

My$ ongoing$ research$ involves$ the$ study$ of$ changes$ in$ nonUweatherUcaused$ flight$ delays$ in$ airline$ networks$ surrounding$ airline$ merger$events.$ $Given$that$ this$ type$of$analysis$ involves$specific$airports$and$series’$of$months$as$the$2me$periods,$underlying$regional$and$seasonal$$$$

trends$ are$ factors$ that$ must$ be$ taken$ into$considera2on.$ $ To$ do$ this,$ similar$ spa2al$sta2s2cal$analysis$will$be$performed,$but$with$weather$ vs.$ nonUweather$ delay$ as$ the$aAributes$of$focus.$$$

Figure$3$$

Figure$4$$

C/O$–$April$$$

Figure$2$

Figure$5$$

Figure$6$$ Figure$7$$