retreat presentation draft 012710mgl

8/14/2019 Retreat Presentation Draft 012710mgl

1/78

1

Planning Council Retreat

January 29th, 2010

Rita Bass Trauma and EMS Education Institute


2/78

2010 DHRPC Retreat 2

Retreat Schedule

Welcome and Introductions Overview of the Day Legislative Review Present and Future of the Denver Transitional Grant

Area (TGA)

Present and Future of Denver HIV Resource PlanningCouncil

Lunch Introduction to Breakout Groups Breakout Groups Reports Back from Breakout Groups


3/78

3

Changes in Ryan White

Legislation

Robin Valdez

Department of EnvironmentalHealth


4/78

4

Anthony StamperDenver Office of HIV Resources

Present and Future ofDenver TGA


5/78


City & County of Denver


6/78


Denver EMA Chief Elected OfficialMayor John W. Hickenlooper Legislative Role

Official recipient of RyanWhite Part A funds

Has ultimate responsibilityfor management &

oversight of the grant Establishes IGAs Responsible for

establishing theadministrativemechanism for

allocating funds Responsible for

appointing the HIVResources PlanningCouncil


7/78


Department of Environmental Health


8/78


Ryan White HIV/AIDS TreatmentModernization Act of 2006


9/78


Denver TGAPart A Funded Services

AIDS PharmaceuticalAssistance (local)

Case Management (non-Medical)

Emergency Financial

Assistance Food Bank/Home Delivered

Meals

Home & Community BasedHealth Services

Home Health Housing Services

Medical Case Management

Medical Transportation Services

Mental Health Services

Oral Health Care

Outpatient/Ambulatory MedicalCare (health services)

Substance Abuse ServicesOutpatient


10/78


Denver TGA MAI Funded Services

Case Management (non-Medical) Mental Health Services Substance Abuse Services Outpatient


11/78


DOHR Responsibilities

Pre-Grant Preparation (informational background for Priorities)

Other Sources of Funding

Service Utilization

Financial Data (past three years)

Federal Grant Application

Part A Application submitted yearly

MAI Application submitted every 3-years withyearly update


12/78


DOHR Responsibilities:Disbursement of Funds

Request for Proposals - 3-year cycle Revise RFP & Tables to include special considerations Release of RFPs

Conduct a Bidders Conference

Grant Application Review Committee (GARC) - 3-year cycle Recruit & Train GARC volunteers

Conduct and facilitate review

Funding recommendations forwarded to Mayor

Letters of Award

Contract Procurement (GSAs) yearly (March February) Negotiate terms of contracts

Revise budgets, implementation and outreach plans

Other City Contracts Propose an ordinance

City Attorneys Office

First reading at City Council

Second and third readings

Signatures


13/78


Fiscal Agent

City & County ofDenver

DOHRado Nonprofit Development Center (CNDC)

CNDC is a non-profit organization, which functions as a third-party

fiscal agent to expedite provider reimbursements for DOHR.Currently, it takes about seven days to reimburse a provider comparedto the usual six to eight weeks through the City process.


14/78


Reimbursement of Service Providers

Invoice toAnthony Stamper

Return to

Provider

Approv

e

Send approvalform to the

CNDC

Provider ispaid

Check

AccuracyData Req.

Report Req.

YES

NO


15/78


DOHR Responsibilities:Fiscal/Program Monitoring

Provider Reporting Service utilization report

Mid-year Report

Year-end Report

Special Reports/MAITables

Fiscal Monitoring Site Visits

Site Visit Evaluation

QM Monitoring Corrective Actions

Audits


16/78


RW CAREWare


17/78


Technical Assistance

Technical Assistance

Provider SupportPlanning Council


18/78


Client Totals

580

3663

619

3692

764

3898

0500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

35004000

Numberof

Clients

New06 2006 New07 2007 New08 2008

Reporting Period


19/78


Client Demographics FY 2008

African-

American

19%

Hispanic

15%

White

55%

Other

11%


20/78


Core Service Utilization FY 2008

2905

2012

972

976

354Substance Abuse

Mental Health

Dental/Oral Health

Medical Case

Management

Primary Medical

Number of Clients


21/78


Numbers Trend

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

2005 2006 2007 2008

Age 45 - 64

CDC defined AIDS

HIV Positive


22/78


Part A Service Dollars

$3,721,576

$5,988,100 $6,011,890$6,590,710

$0

$1,000,000

$2,000,000

$3,000,000

$4,000,000

$5,000,000

$6,000,000

$7,000,000

FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009


23/78


FY 2009 Allocations

Oral Health Ca

13.00%

Outpatient/Ambulatory Hea

Services

37.75%

Substance Abuse Service

outpatient7.05%

AIDS Pharmacuetic

Assistance (local)

9.18%

ase anagemen no

Medical)

2.05%

Emergency Financi

Assistance

3.09%

Food Bank/Home Deliver

Meals

2.11%

Home Healt

1.00%

Housing Servic

5.61%

Medical Case Managem

11.46%

Medical Transportati

Services

0.85%

Mental Health Servic

6.85%


24/78


Conclusion

Good plans shape good decisions. That's why good planning helps

to make elusive dreams come true. L.R. Bittel


25/78

25

Maria Lopez, Program CoordinatorRod Rushing, Co-Chair

Dr. Mark Thrun, EACJessica Forsyth, Co-Chair

Present and Future ofDenver HIV Resource Planning Council


26/78

26

Web Site

History No historical site usage statistics for old Web site. Appeared there were 19 visits to the old site in the last year

it was up.

Original high-level redesign goals

Increase usage of the Web site, making it a primarycommunications tool (internal to the Council and externalmarketing to the community).

Help partners and members of the HIV and public healthcommunity learn more about resources available for thoseimpacted by HIV.

Provide easy access to information on Council data, reports,meetings and community events.

Redesigned site launched 12/10/08


27/78

27

Web Site

2009 goals were met! Provided quick, easy and timely access to Council data,reports and meetings information.

Supplied information on available Part A and otherresources, through an intuitive user experience.

Maintained and provided easy access to relevant HIV/AIDScommunity event information.


28/78

28

Web Site

Metrics Overview (12/15/0812/15/09) 4,174 visits

Compare to 19 visits the previous year!

Average 11.40 visits/day

Visitors spend average of 3.52 minutes on our site

15,324 pages viewed (pageviews)

Where visitors are coming from (traffic sources)

56.76% direct traffic (includes bookmarks) 25.68% search engines

77.26% Google

10.53% Bing

7.36% Yahoo

Balance = other search engines

17.56% referring sites Top 5 (ranked)

e-mail links denvergov.org

cdphe.state.co.us

careacttarget.org

OnTheTen (Web site, blog, etc.)


29/78

29

Web Site

Metrics Overview (12/15/0812/15/09) contd. What pages are they viewing (content)? Top 5

28.96% home page

15.71% happenings 7.14% calendar

6.45% community happenings

2.12% happenings main

12.7% resources, participating providers & additional resources

8.4% committees

5.79% council meetings

Celebrate our success!

We saw increased usage of the Web site, making it a primarycommunications tool for the Council.

Partners and members of the HIV and public health communityaccessed information on available resources.

DHRPC and community members enjoyed easy access toinformation on Council and Committee meetings andcommunity events.


30/78

30

Web Site

Next Steps: 2010 Metrics Goals & Plan 2010 Web site metrics goals are one of the tactics that willsupport the overall DHRPC strategy in 2010 and beyond.

Increase traffic from referring sites. Assumption is that those coming from referring sites will gain most

benefit from the resources available on the site.

Proactive effort required to gain involvement/cooperation fromreferring site entities and ensure success of this objective.

Increase traffic to pages supporting HIV+ communitymembers (including those needing to get tested, or havinga loved one living with HIV), including:

Proactive effort required to help build additional awareness aboutthe Web site and drive traffic to it. Suggestions includeincreasing visibility through marketing pieces such aspostcards/handouts and social media.

Pages targeted include: living with HIV, resources, participatingproviders, additional resources


31/78

31

Web Site

Next Steps: 2010 Metrics Goals & Plan contd. Maintain visit levels to DHRPC administrative pages. Continue trend of using Web site for access to meeting dates,

change announcements, agendas, minutes and relateddocuments.

Includes pages: calendar, planning council, our meetings, ourcommittees, data & reports.

Increase traffic from new Council members, specifically to NewMember Orientation link.

Implement functionality to verify Web site visitors identity andtrack download of new member materials.

Implement online survey tool.

Gather information on Web site visitors satisfaction and needs.

Other objectives as defined by DHRPC.

Track views of new information added to Web site, such as Part Bproviders.

Add quality content accordingly.


32/78

32

The Planning Councils Key Roles

Needs Assessment

Priorities

Standards of Care

Comprehensive Plan Values

Goals


33/78

33

Values Guided Focus

Linkage to Care

Eliminating Health Disparities

Retention in Care

Adherence/Medical Self-Management

Everyone has a chance to have a meaningful voice


34/78

34

Review of2008 Comprehensive Plan

Rod Rushing, Co-Chair

Matthew Bennett, DMS

Maria Lopez, Program Coordinator


35/78

35

HRSA Guidelines

Delivers quality core medical services

Eliminates disparities in access to services

Conducts strategic outreach to PLWH/As not in care;and

Accesses results based on clinical quality measures


36/78

36

Outline the Process

Executive Committee Kick-Off Retreat Review of 2005 2008 Comprehensive Plan Defining direction and purpose of 2009 2011

Comprehensive Plan

Five two-hour Mini-Retreats with subcommittees

Assessment of Current Functioning Future Direction

Final Executive Committee Retreat Incorporate results from Mini-Retreats

Confirming Mission, Vision, Values Finalize Goals and Objectives

Planning Council approved

C h i Pl


37/78

37

Comprehensive Plan:What We Learned

Improved Culture in the New Era Desire for data to drive decision making Great energy; current structure struggles to capture it Low capacity system Understanding that systems need to be evolved to meet

changes in disease

Desire for more collaboration with the state Ambiguity around defining Case Management Need to continue to improve communication


38/78

38

Past Functioning Future Direction

Key area of power and decision

making Strong representative leadership

Limited capacity due to structureunderneath

Currently positioned to hold toomany process and

responsibilities

Purpose: Lead the improvement

process for the TGA Analyze data and identify

areas for improvement

Create and implement QualityImprovement Plan for TGA

Create and supervise Project

Workgroups Supervise Needs

Assessment, Priorities,Comprehensive PlanWorkgroups and otherPlanning Council Functions

Executive Committee EvolutionLeadershipCommittee


39/78

39

Past Functioning Future Direction

Energy exists if there is a specifictasks that energizes people

Struggle to maintain energy and focusover time (meeting to meet)

Not enough capacity to make impactsover time

Right people are not at the table

Missing larger vision/scope todetermine priorities

Purpose: Take on specific issues in a timelimited, targeted, and structured manner

Leadership Committee assignstask, scope, timelines andleadership

Workgroups meet and work on

specific tasks reporting back toLeadership Committee monthly

Once the Workgroup completestheir task they work withLeadership Committee onimplementation

Celebration time!

Rebuilt+

Project Workgroups

POCL

Evaluation & Assessment Evolution


40/78

40

Current Functioning Future Direction

Leader has great energy and ideas tomove the Committee forward

Committee of one shows structuredoes not support the work

Current purpose does not engage orexcite members to join

Purpose: Lead the ongoing development

of the Planning Council Structure and content of the

Planning Council Meetings

Strategic membership recruitment

Orientation and ongoing trainingof members

Mentorship for new members

Annual Evaluation of Councilseffectiveness and its members

Update By-laws as needed (incollaboration with LeadershipCommittee)

Membership Evolution Membership Development


41/78

41

Current Functioning Future Direction

Great arena for networking and sharinginformation between DOHR andProviders

Has successfully updated Standards ofCare (potential model for futureworkgroups)

Many expressed concern that without atask MDASC struggles to be

worthwhile and meaningful

Currently too big and not the rightpeople at the table to tackle largerissues

Purpose: To ensure open communication

between DOHR and providers; whileincreasing system wide knowledge.

Meet quarterly

Providers and DOHR givesupdates on key issues

Networking for providers

MDASCEvolutionMDASC


42/78

42

DOHReceive, distribute and monitor grant funds)

Planning Council(Assess Community needs in order to allocate funding)

Executive Committee

Rebuilt+

Evaluation & Assessment

Membership

POCLC

MDASC

Past Comprehensive Plan

(The vision and the plan to get there)

Input


43/78

43

Comprehensive Plan(The vision and the plan to get

there)

DOHR(Receive, distribute and monitor grant funds)

Planning Council(Assess community needs and allocate funding)

Leadership

Committee

WorkgroupsWorkgroups

Development

Futur

e

MDASC

Workgroups


44/78

44

Goal #1Implement a project management structure toaddress critical issues within TGA

Objective 1

Create a process where the Leadership Committee identifiesand prioritizes emerging issues and establishes workgroups

to develop solutions (Quality Plan)

Update

Process is happening ideas are not only generated fromLeadership but from other committees operating in

workgroup fashion.

Gap in process to assess capacity to take on allideas?


45/78


46/78

46

Goal #2Establish workgroups to take on critical TGAinitiatives

Objective 1 Create Workgroups to address current PC Processes:

Needs Assessment Priorities/Resource Allocation Process Standards of Care

Update The workgroup process is a goal for today.

Evaluate the current progress of workgroups Do they need to wrap up in order to address the above

current PC processes?


47/78

47

Goal #2Establish workgroups to take on critical TGAinitiatives

Objective 2 Plan & Prioritize future workgroups to address emerging

needs: Peer Mentoring/Leadership Redefinition of Rebuilt +

(in process) Programming for Recently Released Positives

Redefinition of POCLC Information Sharing within TGA Defining Medical/Nonmedical Case Management

Define outreach/MAI structure and focus Create Model for TGAs future

Update Not completed.


48/78

48

Goal #3Strategically improve the functioning of thePlanning Council

Objective 1 Create a Development Committee whose sole purpose is to

ensure efficient and effective operations of the Planning

Council

Update Strategic membership recruitment (Done) New Member Orientation Manual (Done) Update important documents (Done) Strategically plan recruitment and retention (community)

events for FY 2009 (Done)


49/78



Objective 1 Create a Development Committee whose sole purpose is to

ensure efficient and effective operations of the PlanningCouncil

Update Orientation and ongoing training of members (In progress)

Mentorship for new members (No)

Annual Evaluation of Councils effectiveness and itsmembers (No)

Assess Workgroup participation (No)

Update By-laws as needed (in collaboration with LeadershipCommittee) (No)


50/78

50


Objective 2 Create protocol to strategically recruit membership with a

focus on the development of future leaders

Update Mentorship program not in place.


51/78

51

Goal #4Ensure that strong communication existsbetween DOHR, Planning Council and Providers

Objective 1 Turn present MDASC format into an information sharing and

gathering forum lead by Leadership Committee and DOHR

Update Currently two workgroups Housing and Mental

Health/Substance Abuse Where are Standards of Care getting met? Information sharing does take place, however is Objective 1

valid goal for MDASC?


52/78

52

Goal #4Ensure that strong communication existsbetween DOHR, Planning Council and Providers

Objective 2 Develop a networking component to MDASC to ensure strong

communication across TGA providers

Update Workgroups have helped with agency partnerships Is this the best forum for provider networking?


53/78

53

Needs Assessment andSuggested Annual Data Plan

Ryan White Part A

Dr. Mark ThrunDenver Health


54/78

54

Process

2008 Comprehensive Needs Assessment

2009 Focused Needs Assessment

2010 Needs Assessment workgroup to start October2009

2010 Focused Needs Assessment Topics not yet

determined

2011 Comprehensive Needs Assessment to focus onUnmet Need


55/78


Suggested Annual Data Plan

Ryan White Part A


56/78

56

Data Analysis MUST be Ongoing

Identification andevaluation of

emerging issues



57/78

57

Ongoing review

of existing data



58/78

58

Existing Data Sources: CDPHE

CDPHE State-wide Coordinated Statement of Need http://www.cdphe.state.co.us/dc/HIVandSTD/cohivaidscoalition/Colorado%20SCS

CDPHE Part B Comprehensive HIV Care & TreatmentPlan

http://www.cdphe.state.co.us/dc/HIVandSTD/cohivaidscoalition/Colorado%20Part

CDPHE Comprehensive HIV Prevention Plan http://www.cdphe.state.co.us/dc/HIVandSTD/cwt/cwtplan0709/0709plan.html
http://www.cdphe.state.co.us/dc/HIVandSTD/cohivaidscoalition/Colorado%20SCSN%202009.pdfhttp://www.cdphe.state.co.us/dc/HIVandSTD/cohivaidscoalition/Colorado%20Part%20B%20Comprehensive%20Plan%202009%20-%202012.pdfhttp://www.cdphe.state.co.us/dc/HIVandSTD/cwt/cwtplan0709/0709plan.htmlhttp://www.cdphe.state.co.us/dc/HIVandSTD/cwt/cwtplan0709/0709plan.htmlhttp://www.cdphe.state.co.us/dc/HIVandSTD/cohivaidscoalition/Colorado%20Part%20B%20Comprehensive%20Plan%202009%20-%202012.pdfhttp://www.cdphe.state.co.us/dc/HIVandSTD/cohivaidscoalition/Colorado%20SCSN%202009.pdf


59/78

59

Existing Data Sources: Council

Council Comprehensive Needs Assessment 2008 http://dhrpc.org/tasks/sites/default/assets/File/PDF's/DHRPC_DataReports_Needs

Council Comprehensive Needs Assessment 2008,Provider Report

http://dhrpc.org/tasks/sites/default/assets/File/PDF's/DHRPC_DataReports_Needs

Councils Comprehensive Plan http://dhrpc.org/tasks/sites/default/assets/File/PDF's/DHRPC_DataReports_Comp

Council Mapping of Service Utilization 2007 http://dhrpc.org/tasks/sites/default/assets/File/PDF's/DHRPC_DataReports_Needs

S O
http://dhrpc.org/tasks/sites/default/assets/File/PDF's/DHRPC_DataReports_NeedsAssessmentRept2008.pdfhttp://dhrpc.org/tasks/sites/default/assets/File/PDF's/DHRPC_DataReports_NeedsAssessmentSuppProvRept2008.pdfhttp://dhrpc.org/tasks/sites/default/assets/File/PDF's/DHRPC_DataReports_ComprehensivePlan2009to2011.pdfhttp://dhrpc.org/tasks/sites/default/assets/File/PDF's/DHRPC_DataReports_NeedsAssessmentPresMaps2007.pdfhttp://dhrpc.org/tasks/sites/default/assets/File/PDF's/DHRPC_DataReports_NeedsAssessmentPresMaps2007.pdfhttp://dhrpc.org/tasks/sites/default/assets/File/PDF's/DHRPC_DataReports_ComprehensivePlan2009to2011.pdfhttp://dhrpc.org/tasks/sites/default/assets/File/PDF's/DHRPC_DataReports_NeedsAssessmentSuppProvRept2008.pdfhttp://dhrpc.org/tasks/sites/default/assets/File/PDF's/DHRPC_DataReports_NeedsAssessmentRept2008.pdf


60/78

60

Existing Data Sources: Other

CDPHE In-Depth Assessment on MSM http://www.cdphe.state.co.us/dc/HIVandSTD/cwt/2006NAReport.pdf

CDPHE In-Depth Assessment on IDU andHeterosexuals at Risk for HIV

http://www.cdphe.state.co.us/dc/HIVandSTD/cwt/2007NAReport.pdf

Council Standards of Care http://dhrpc.org/tasks/sites/default/assets/File/PDF's/DHRPC_DataReports_Stand

Annual Data Requests:
http://www.cdphe.state.co.us/dc/HIVandSTD/cwt/2006NAReport.pdfhttp://www.cdphe.state.co.us/dc/HIVandSTD/cwt/2007NAReport.pdfhttp://dhrpc.org/tasks/sites/default/assets/File/PDF's/DHRPC_DataReports_StandardsOfCare_2009.pdfhttp://dhrpc.org/tasks/sites/default/assets/File/PDF's/DHRPC_DataReports_StandardsOfCare_2009.pdfhttp://www.cdphe.state.co.us/dc/HIVandSTD/cwt/2007NAReport.pdfhttp://www.cdphe.state.co.us/dc/HIVandSTD/cwt/2006NAReport.pdf


61/78

61

Annual Data Requests:Epi Profiles

Epidemiological profile of those living with and newlydiagnosed with HIV Limited to Denver metropolitanstatistical area (MSA)

Epidemiological profile of those persons living with oraffected by HIV served through Denver MSA RyanWhite providers



62/78

62

Annual Data Requests:Service Utilization

Service utilization by category

Funding by category

Service utilization by targeted populations identified byCouncil or listed in RW RFA



63/78

63

Annual Data Requests:Targeted Questions

Patient entry into RW system Patient exit from RW system Demographics of patients lost from RW system Comparison of persons in primary care and not in

primary care

Comparisons of absolute numbers and demographics forthose persons utilizing multiple categories ofservices

S ti


64/78

64

Suggestion

EAC and Council has content expertise to help guide and

coordinate data, but may not have evaluation nor datamanagement expertise

Council, DOHR, and workgroups should partner with an entity

with evaluation and data management expertise (and time) inan ongoingmanner Within DOHR/City or external consultant

Reasonable deadlines can be proposed

Significant growth period is needed for an evaluator to understand oursystems and questions well enough to propose meaningful datagathering and review plans

Consider hiring internal/external consultant now to begin workon 2011 Comprehensive Needs Assessment

C l i


65/78

65

Conclusions

Many excellent data sources currently exist that shouldinform decision-making (but one has to read them)

Annual data requests should be made of City and State(beginning now) to allow them to plan for data needs

Workgroups should guide data collection for emergingissues

If the Council chooses to continue in a data-drivendecision making process, an evaluation expert wouldbe helpful


66/78

66

2009 Priorities Review

Jessica ForsythPlanning Council Co-Chair

P i iti P


67/78

67

Priorities Process

Defining what Priorities Means TGA MAI

Timeline Council Preparation Meeting - July Priorities Retreat - August Implementation March of following Year

(MAI Recent FY change same as Part A)

2010 Service Priority Rankings


68/78

68

2010 Service Priority Rankings

1. Outpatient/Ambulatory Health

Services2. AIDS Drug Assistance Program

Treatments (ADAP)

3. AIDS Pharmaceutical Assistance(local)

4. Oral Health Care

5. Medical Case Management

6. Mental Health Services

7. Substance Abuse Services -Outpatient

8. Early Intervention Services (EIS)

9. Housing Services10.

10.Health Insurance Premium &

Cost Sharing Assistance11.Emergency Financial

Assistance

12.Case Management (non-medical)

13.Medical Transportation Services

14.Food Bank/Home DeliveredMeals

15.Home Health Care

16.Home & Community basedHealth Services

17.Substance Abuse Services -Residential

R d ti


69/78

69

Recommendations

L l F di


70/78

70

Level Funding

R i i t FY 2010 R All ti


71/78


Revision to FY 2010 Resource AllocationsOPTION II

Service Category Rank #$6,591,430

$ % % - New % New $Core Outpatient/Ambulatory Health Services 1 $2,454,649 37.24% 2.44% 34.80% $2,293,854

Core AIDS Drugs Assistance Program (ADAP) Treatments 2 $0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% $0

Core AIDS Pharmaceutical Assistance (local) 3 $616,958 9.36% 0.61% 8.75% $576,543

Core Oral Health Care 4 $845,680 12.83% 1.16% 11.67% $769,493

Core Medical Case Management 5 $744,832 11.30% 0.74% 10.56% $696,041

Core Mental Health Services 6 $445,581 6.76% 0.61% 6.15% $405,438

Core Substance Abuse Services - outpatient 7 $458,104 6.95% 0.63% 6.32% $416,834

Core Early Intervention Services (EIS) 8 $300,000 4.55% 0.00% 4.55% $300,000Support Housing Services 9 $364,506 5.53% 0.50% 5.03% $331,668

Core Health Insurance Premium & Cost Sharing Assistance 10 $200,000 3.03% 0.00% 3.03% $200,000

Support Emergency Financial Assistance 11 $201,039 3.05% 0.27% 2.78% $182,927

Support Case Management (non-Medical) 12 $133,147 2.02% 0.18% 1.84% $121,152

Support Medical Transportation Services* 13 $90,303 1.37% 0.12% 1.25% $82,167

Support Food Bank/Home Delivered Meals 14 $137,102 2.08% 0.19% 1.89% $124,750

Core Home Health Care 15 $64,596 0.98% 0.09% 0.89% $58,777

Core Home and Community-based Health Services* 16 $34,935 0.53% 0.05% 0.48% $31,787

Support Substance Abuse Services - residential 17 $0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% $0

TOTAL $7,091,430 107.59% 7.59% 100.00% $6,591,430

CORE 6.32% 87.22% $5,748,766

SUPPORT 1.27% 12.78% $842,664

Recommendations/Observations


72/78

72

for 2010 Priorities

Needs Assessment process to drive future decisions,specifically include disenfranchised implement into ourprocess in a meaning and on-going manner

Formalize Process forDirectives Feedback

Priorities Process needs to be two days and have aone or two day preparation retreat Presentations to truly assess what is needed from each

topic. Assess who the best person would be topresent and support the data

Recommendations/Observations


73/78

73

Recommendations/Observationsfor 2010

Book Should correspond exactly to the presentations

Agenda Should include all items to be discussed and followed

Service Categories Should consider including a practice exercise on all HRSA

listed categories

Simulated Allocation Day one of the priorities meeting should include a simulated

allocation, in essence, a practice allocation, complete with

computer averaging What is meant by community involvement, how to

ensure its meaningful?


74/78


Jessica Forsyth

Planning Council Co-chair

Revisiting 2010 Priorities

Revision to FY 2010 Resource Allocations


75/78


Revision to FY 2010 Resource AllocationsOPTION II

Service Category Rank #$6,591,430

$ % % - New % New $Core Outpatient/Ambulatory Health Services 1 $2,454,649 37.24% 2.44% 34.80% $2,293,854

Core AIDS Drugs Assistance Program (ADAP) Treatments 2 $0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% $0

Core AIDS Pharmaceutical Assistance (local) 3 $616,958 9.36% 0.61% 8.75% $576,543

Core Oral Health Care 4 $845,680 12.83% 1.16% 11.67% $769,493

Core Medical Case Management 5 $744,832 11.30% 0.74% 10.56% $696,041

Core Mental Health Services 6 $445,581 6.76% 0.61% 6.15% $405,438

Core Substance Abuse Services - outpatient 7 $458,104 6.95% 0.63% 6.32% $416,834

Core Early Intervention Services (EIS) 8 $300,000 4.55% 0.00% 4.55% $300,000Support Housing Services 9 $364,506 5.53% 0.50% 5.03% $331,668

Core Health Insurance Premium & Cost Sharing Assistance 10 $200,000 3.03% 0.00% 3.03% $200,000

Support Emergency Financial Assistance 11 $201,039 3.05% 0.27% 2.78% $182,927

Support Case Management (non-Medical) 12 $133,147 2.02% 0.18% 1.84% $121,152

Support Medical Transportation Services* 13 $90,303 1.37% 0.12% 1.25% $82,167

Support Food Bank/Home Delivered Meals 14 $137,102 2.08% 0.19% 1.89% $124,750

Core Home Health Care 15 $64,596 0.98% 0.09% 0.89% $58,777

Core Home and Community-based Health Services* 16 $34,935 0.53% 0.05% 0.48% $31,787

Support Substance Abuse Services - residential 17 $0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% $0

TOTAL $7,091,430 107.59% 7.59% 100.00% $6,591,430

CORE 6.32% 87.22% $5,748,766

SUPPORT 1.27% 12.78% $842,664


76/78


Lunch


77/78


Break Out Groups


78/78

Closing Remarks

retreat presentation draft 012710mgl

Documents