q3 2012 marketbeat presentation eng main

55
OCTOBER 2012 MARKETBEAT REAL ESTATE MARKET UPDATE Q3 2012

Upload: philip-arden

Post on 30-May-2015

748 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

A presentation on the Russian economy and real estate market.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Q3 2012 Marketbeat Presentation Eng Main

OCTOBER 2012

MARKETBEAT

REAL ESTATE MARKET UPDATE

Q3 2012

Page 2: Q3 2012 Marketbeat Presentation Eng Main

CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD 1

MARKETBEATQ3 2012

INFORMATION RESOURCES

CWRUSSIA.RU

Market information, contacts news

MARKETBEAT.RU Latest Marketbeat report, reports archive, interactive maps

iCushman

Mobile application for Commercial real estate professionals, available at iTunes

SOCIAL NETWORKSWEB

Page 3: Q3 2012 Marketbeat Presentation Eng Main

CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD 2

MARKETBEATQ3 2012

INTERACTIVE MAPS Click to open in browser

You need Flash player installed and internet connection for interactive map to run

Для работы интерактивной карты необходимFlash Player и соединение с интернет

OFFICES SHOPPING CENTERS

WAREHOUSES

Page 4: Q3 2012 Marketbeat Presentation Eng Main

CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD 3

MARKETBEATQ3 2012

AGENDA

MACROECONOMY

RETAIL

OFFICE

WAREHOUSE

LAND

CAPITAL MARKETS

Page 5: Q3 2012 Marketbeat Presentation Eng Main

CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD 4

MARKETBEATQ3 2012

MACROECONOMY

Page 6: Q3 2012 Marketbeat Presentation Eng Main

CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD 5

MARKETBEATQ3 2012

MACROECONOMIC INDICATORS Russia’s economy is competitive

2011 Q3 2012 2012F 2012F

REAL ECONOMY

GDP 4.3% 4.0% 3.4% 3%

INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION 4.7% 3.1% 3.1% 5%

CONSUMER SECTOR

RETAIL TRADE TURNOVER 7.0% 6.6% 6.3% 4%

REAL WAGES 4.2% 10% 6.3% 8.8%

REAL DISPOSABLE INCOME 0.8% 3.6% 5.0%

CPI 6.1% 5.2% 5 - 6% 6%

RUR/USD ANNUAL AVERAGE 29.39 30.99 27.9 30.7

– Ministry for Economic development has left its forecast for 2012 unchanged despite of recent deceleration

INTERNATIONAL COMPARISONS

LOCAL INDICATORS

– IMF has decreased the GDP forecast to 3.4%, but Russia still looks competitive

-2% 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10%

China

India

Russia

US

Brazil

Germany

France

UK

Page 7: Q3 2012 Marketbeat Presentation Eng Main

CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD 6

MARKETBEATQ3 2012

OIL PRICE AND BUDGET PERFORMANCE

• The budget is performing with small 1.4% GDP surplus

• One year ago the surplus was 2.3% GDP

• Average URALS price in Q1-Q3 2012 was $111 / bbl

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

-100

0

100

200

300

400

500

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 YTD

US

$ /

bb

l

bn

US

$

Budget revenue (left) Budget expenditure (left)

Deficit / Surplus (left) Urals actual average (right)

Page 8: Q3 2012 Marketbeat Presentation Eng Main

CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD 7

MARKETBEATQ3 2012

CAPITAL OUTFLOW

-150

-100

-50

0

50

100

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 YTD

USD

bn

Total outflow Banks Other sectors

• The capital outflow is comparable to 2011, but the pattern has changed.

• The outflow is mainly generated by non-banking sector increasing and is comparable to the one in 2008, whereas the banking sector provided small inflow.

Page 9: Q3 2012 Marketbeat Presentation Eng Main

CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD 8

MARKETBEATQ3 2012

CONSUMERS

• Consumer confidence is decreasing on the negative short-term expectations

• According to CBR statistics, consumers withdraw money from banks, loans growth is decelerating. The role of saving pattern isincreasing, with less trust to banks as to saving instruments.

CONSUMER CONFIDENCE AND INDUSTRIAL OPTIMISM

CONSUMER LOANS AND DEPOSITS GROWTH

-40%

-30%

-20%

-10%

0%

10%

20%

30%

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

Q1

Q2

Q3

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Consumer confidence index, % Industrial optimism index, %

-30%

-20%

-10%

0%

10%

20%

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

Q1

Q2

Q3

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Deposits growth, % Loans growth, %

Page 10: Q3 2012 Marketbeat Presentation Eng Main

CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD 9

MARKETBEATQ3 2012

RETAIL MARKET VOLUMERussia is No.4 Retail Market in Europe

RETAIL TURNOVER IN EUROPE* RUSSIA RETAIL TURNOVER **

France 530.3Germany 528.3

United Kingdom 455.7

Russia 433.7

Italy 329.7Spain 264.3

Turkey 181.6

Netherlands 123.1

Poland 108.7

Belgium 93.6

Switzerland 90.9

Sweden 88.5

Austria 64.9

Greece 59.6

Denmark 57.6

Norway 55.6

Portugal 55.2Finland 50.3

Czech Republic 39.7Ireland 36.6Romania 31.9

Hungary 30.1Croatia 15.7Slovakia 15.3

Others** 56.1

*Data of 2010, bn USD , GFK GeoMarketing**Source: ROSSTAT

RUSSIA RETAIL TURNOVER GROWTH IS DECELERATING BUT STILL ONE OF THE LARGEST

IN EUROPE AND IS ONE OF THE DRIVERS OF GDP GROWTH IN 2012

-10%

-5%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

Q1

Q2

Q3

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Page 11: Q3 2012 Marketbeat Presentation Eng Main

CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD 10

MARKETBEATQ3 2012

2,699

3,215

4,457

4,852

5,501

5,850

6,297

7,715

7,829

7,874

8,947

9,435

9,628

10,161

11,840

0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000

Hungary

Spain

Russia

Portugal

Germany

Italy

Great Britain

Belgium

France

Moscow

Austria

Denmark

Norway

Switzerland

Luxembourg

RETAIL SALES

RETAIL SALES PER CAPITA FOR EUROPEAN COUNTRIES

Source: ROSSTAT, RegioData Research

Russian consumers are important players

Page 12: Q3 2012 Marketbeat Presentation Eng Main

CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD 11

MARKETBEATQ3 2012

RETAIL SPENDINGRussians are the most active consumers in Europe

RETAIL SPENDING IN EUROPE* RUSSIA CONSUMER PATTERN

AVERAGE RUSSIAN CITIZEN SPENDS 78% OF HIS/HER INCOME FOR RETAIL

AVERAGE SALARY IN RUSSIA – 25 704 RUR

Source: ROSSTAT, GFK GeoMarketing

CountryShare of retail spending in total

private spending

Russia 77%Czech Republic 40%

Poland 38%

France 35%

Germany 28%

United Kingdom 31%-10%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

110%

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 YTD

Goods and services Obligatory payments SavingsCurrency purchase Money on hand growth

Page 13: Q3 2012 Marketbeat Presentation Eng Main

CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD 12

MARKETBEATQ3 2012

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

120.0%

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Czech

Bulgaria

Germany

Spain

France

Italy

Russia

UK

CONSUMERS

–Russian consumer credit market was not growing fast enough in comparison with other countries

–Average Russian citizen owes $1091 in loans

CONSUMER CREDIT/GDP RATIO

Source: EUROSTAT

Russian consumer market has strong upside

Page 14: Q3 2012 Marketbeat Presentation Eng Main

CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD 13

MARKETBEATQ3 2012

RETAIL MARKET

Page 16: Q3 2012 Marketbeat Presentation Eng Main

CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD 15

MARKETBEATQ3 2012

`NEW RETAILERS

NEW RETAILERS 2012

COMING SOON

New reasons to visit shopping center

–The most notable opening in 2012 is Debenhams store.

– In 2012 all new international brands are coming to Russia with Russian partners

–New brands are coming to Moscow initially with expansion plants for Russian regions (mostly “millionniki” cities)

–New Russian brands:

»Cosmopolitan Fine Jewellery, CookHouse, Kari, Sabotage

– Closed

»Peacocks, Saturn (Metro Group)

Page 17: Q3 2012 Marketbeat Presentation Eng Main

CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD 16

MARKETBEATQ3 2012

HYPERMARKETSHistoric expansion of hypermarkets and impressive development plans

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

1992 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Auchan O’KEY Lenta REAL

Tota

l uni

ts t

radi

ng

Page 18: Q3 2012 Marketbeat Presentation Eng Main

CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD 17

MARKETBEATQ3 2012

NON-FOOD RETAILERSHistoric expansion of non-food big boxes and impressive development plans

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

1992 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Leroy Merlin OBI Castorama Media Markt

Tota

l uni

ts t

radi

ng

Page 19: Q3 2012 Marketbeat Presentation Eng Main

CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD 18

MARKETBEATQ3 2012

SHOPPING CENTERSEurope 2011, sq.m of quality retail per ‘000 inhabitant

Source: Cushman&Wakefield Research

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700

Bosnia Herz.Serbia

GreeceUkraine

Moscow regionBulgariaTurkeyRussia

BelgiumRomaniaHungary

GermanyMalta

Czech Rep.SlovakiaPoland

ItalySpain

CroatiaSwitzerland

EU-27 AverageFrance

United KingdomPortugal

LatviaLithuaniaDenmarkMoscowAustriaFinland

NetherlandsSlovenia

IrelandEstonia

LuxembourgSwedenNorway

RETAIL FORMATS:

1.SHOPPING CENTER

2. STREET RETAIL

3. DEPARTMENT STORE

4. RETAIL OUTLET – to come soon

5. RETAIL PARK – not in Russia yet

6. RETAIL WAREHOUSE – not in Russia yet

Page 20: Q3 2012 Marketbeat Presentation Eng Main

CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD 19

MARKETBEATQ3 2012

FOOTFALL, Q1 2010=100%

SHOPPING CENTERSQuarterly monitoring

VACANCY RATE, %

* Cushman&Wakefield Research quarterly monitoring of 9 quality shopping centers (total GLA - 0.5 mn sq m).

These shopping centers have been opened more than one year ago and have the clear catchment area.

– Share of "successful shoppers" in visitors is 43.9% (Q3 2012) and at the highest level since Q4 2009

–Footfall in shopping centers is in line with seasonable trend

–Vacancy rate in established shopping malls with stabilized catchment area is extremely low

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

110%

120%

Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3

2009 2010 2011 2012

1.65% 3.05% 1.58% 0.80% 0.95% 1.00% 1.05% 0.97% 0.41% 0.65% 0.80% 0.41%

Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3

2009 2010 2011 2012

Page 21: Q3 2012 Marketbeat Presentation Eng Main

CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD 20

MARKETBEATQ3 2012

SHOPPING CENTERS – RUSSIA*

– There are 355 quality shopping malls in Russia (excluding Moscow and Moscow

agglomeration) total GLA 9 ,962, 317 sq m

– 17 new quality shopping malls were delivered in Q1-Q3 2012

QUALITY RETAIL SPACE UNDER CONSTRUCTION (IN SHOPPING CENTERS), ‘000 SQ M

PIPELINE OF QUALITY SHOPPING CENTERS, GLA 50,000+, 2012

* Without Moscow and Moscow region Source: Cushman&Wakefield Research

City Property Name Retail GLA, sq.m DeliveryVolgograd KomsoMall (Slava) 68,000 Q1

Krasnodar Krasnaya Plozhad

50,000 Q1

St. Petersburg RIO 52,500 Q2

Krasnodar Oz Mall 169,000 Q2

Ryazan Premier 50,000 Q2

Nizhnyi Novgorod Sedmoe Nebo 60,800 Q3

Ekaterinburg Prizma (E k )

70,400 Q4

Nizhnyi Novgorod RIO 68,000 Q4

Surgut Surgut City Mall 69,600 Q4

Sochi Moremall 80,000 Q4

Ekaterinburg Raduga Park 56,000 Q4

Belgorod Megagreen 53,000 Q4

Surgut Aura 65,000 Q4

912,300

1,918,464

Total GLA of shopping centers > 50,000 sq

Total GLA

1558

1143 1149 1189

866

1912

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 (forecast)

Announced developers plans CW Forecast New construction

Page 22: Q3 2012 Marketbeat Presentation Eng Main

CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD 21

MARKETBEATQ3 2012

SHOPPING CENTERS – MOSCOW AND MOSCOW REGIONConstruction of shopping centers in Moscow is down

Source: Cushman&Wakefield Research

– There are 115 quality shopping malls in Moscow, total GLA 3,449 ,610 SQM

– 6 new quality shopping malls and the first Russia outlet were delivered in Q1-Q3 2012

– Less new projects are announced and pipeline is drying out

515599

443

266

114

412

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 (forecast)

Announced developers plans CW Forecast New construction

Property Name Retail GLA, sq.m DeliveryMoscow

Hotel Moskva 21,000 Q1

Sombrero 6,000 Q2Outlet Village Belaya Dacha

24,000 Q3

Sviblovo (former Friz) 15,000 Q3

Otrada (2 phase) 28,000 Q4

Kaleidoskop 41,000 Q4

Favorit 21,900 Q4

Moskvorechye 19,800 Q4

Parus 17,280 Q4

Perovo 5,000 Q4

Total GLA 198,980

Moscow RegionDomodedovo Torgovy Kvartal 22,500 Q1

Krasnogorsk Solnechniy Ray 8,000 Q3

Krasnogorsk June 17,500 Q3

Mytischi June 75,000 Q4

Mytischi Krasny Kit (2 phase) 35,000 Q4

Korolev SC on Kosmonavtov 22,500 Q4

Zelenograd Panfilovskiy 13,300 Q4

Lytkarino Vesna 12,500 Q4

Odintsovo Westore 7,600 Q4

Total GLA 213,900

* Outlets are included, retail part of mix-use complexes are not included

QUALITY RETIAL SPACE UNDER CONSTRUCTION (IN SHOPPING CENTERS), ‘000 SQ M

PIPELINE OF QUALITY SHOPPING CENTERS *, 2012

Page 23: Q3 2012 Marketbeat Presentation Eng Main

CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD 22

MARKETBEATQ3 2012

Q3 2012 prime retail indicator** is

3,800 USDper sq.m per annum, base rate

SHOPPING CENTERS : RENTAL RATESMoscow rental rates are stable

QUALITY SHOPPING CENTERS RETAIL GALLERY

<100 100 - 300 300 - 800 800 - 1,500

Kiosks $2,000

Cellphones $3,500

Drugstore $1,200-$1,500

Banks $1,200-$1,500

Restaurant $1,200 $600-$1000

Textiles $1,200 $800

Books $1,000 $500-$600 $400 $300

Clothing and Footwear $1,200 $800 $600 $400

White and Brown $500

Supermarket $750

Gross leasable area,sq mRetail Gallery Mini Anchors

Business type

Source: Cushman&Wakefield Research

Page 24: Q3 2012 Marketbeat Presentation Eng Main

CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD 23

MARKETBEATQ3 2012

RETAIL STREETS : RENTAL RATESMoscow rental rates are stable

STREET USD/sq. m/annum 2012 trend

1st Tverskaya Yamskaya $1,500 - $2 ,500 up

Arbat $1,500 - $2,500 up

Garden Ring $1,000 - $2,500 stable

Kutuzovsky Prospekt $1,000 - $2,500 stable

Kuznetsky Most $2,000 - $2,500 stable

Leningradsky Prospekt $1,000 - $2,000 stable

Leninsky prospect $1,000 - $2,000 stable

Prospect Mira $1,200 - $2,000 stable

Novy Arbat $1,500 - $2,500 up

Petrovka $3,000 - $4,000 up

Pyatnitskaya $1,500 - $2,000 stable

Tverskaya $3,500 - $4,500 up

Stoleshnikov per. $3,500 - $4,500 up

Source: Cushman&Wakefield Research

Page 25: Q3 2012 Marketbeat Presentation Eng Main

CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD 24

MARKETBEATQ3 2012

LEASE TERMSBehind the rent

ITEM COMMENT

Lease Terms Standard lease terms are between 3-5 years with some up to 10 -15 for anchors. Break options are not common in the market.

Rental Payment Rents are typically payable monthly in advance.Turnover / percentage rents are increasingly seen in shopping centres. Rental rates are generally calculated in USD, Euro or commercial units are used. In less quality shopping centres rental rates are calculated in RUR.

Rent Deposit The rent deposit required in quality shopping centres is typically between 1 – 3 months rent equitant.

Indexation Annual indexation is typical between 3-10% or at a level of USD / EU CPI. The practice of premium / key money payments is seldom seen in Russia. Rent reviews are rare on the market.

Service Charges Service charge is payable by tenants at either an “open book” basis or more common as a fixed cost. Utilities payments are charged on consumption. Building insurance is normally charged back to tenant via service charge.

Other costs VAT 18% Local property taxes are not paid separately, they are generally included in the service charges.

Page 26: Q3 2012 Marketbeat Presentation Eng Main

CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD 25

MARKETBEATQ3 2012

OFFICE MARKET

Page 27: Q3 2012 Marketbeat Presentation Eng Main

CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD 26

MARKETBEATQ3 2012

MOSCOW OFFICE INDICATORSNew construction, Take up and Vacancy rate

High demand

–450,000 sq m (take up)

Fair net absorption

–31.8 % from take-up

Low new construction

–176,500 sq m

Decreasing Vacancy

–11.3%

Stable Rental Rates

–Prime $1,200

–Class A $790

–Class B $450

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400

1,600

1,800

2,000

2,200

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 F2012 F2013 F2014 F2015

'000 sq m

New construction (2012: Q1-Q3) New construction Forecast (2012: Q4)

Take-up (2012: Q1-Q3) Take-up Forecast (2012: Q4)

Vacancy rate

Page 28: Q3 2012 Marketbeat Presentation Eng Main

CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD 27

MARKETBEATQ3 2012

OFFICE STOCK AND VACANCY

SUPPLYShortage in Downtown, excessive in outskirts

OFFICE STOCK AND VACANCY

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

0

3

6

9

12

15

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 F2013 F2014 F2015

mn sq m

Stock, Class B, (2012: Q1-Q3) Stock, Class A, (2012: Q1-Q3)

Vacancy rate, Class A Vacancy rate, Class B

Class A occupied

2.06Class A vacant 0.41

Class B occupied

9.46

Class B vacant 1.06

• The volume of space under construction is growing. There is 3.24 mn sq m of quality office space under construction, which is 0.64 mn sq m more than at the beginning of the year.

• Most new constructions of class A are concentrated in the Central business district, with most class B in the CBD and Other Trading Areas (OTA).

Page 29: Q3 2012 Marketbeat Presentation Eng Main

CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD 28

MARKETBEATQ3 2012

VACANCY RATE AND AVAILABLE SPACE BY BUSINESS AREAS, Q3 2012

AVAILABILITYHigh vacancy but limited number of options

• The average vacancy rate is stable (and has contracted from 11.6% in Q2 down to 11.3% in Q3).

• Some submarkets are experiencing extremely low availability, for example in the Belorussky and Frunzensky submarkets the vacancy rate is less than 5%, which indicates a strong deficit of quality space in these areas.

6.0%

9.4%

12.8%

12.6%

22.4%

10.6%

`

140

343

576

Class B

133

239

39

Class A

`

Downtown

Central

OTA

Page 30: Q3 2012 Marketbeat Presentation Eng Main

CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD 29

MARKETBEATQ3 2012

TAKE-UP (’000 SQ M)

DEMAND

• Office take up levels were positive over the quarter with over 450,000 sq.m transacted.

• Occupier demand is steady as tenants look to consolidate or renegotiate leases.

• This year the Moscow office market may overcome the historic high of 2 mn sq m in office transactions.

• At the same time, Net Absorption is lower than in previous years and is about 31,1% of Gross Absorption (or take-up).

High turnover, low net absorption

80%83%

75%86% 86% 79% 84%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

0200400600800

1,0001,2001,4001,6001,8002,0002,2002,4002,600

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 F2012 F2013 F2014 F2015

'000 sq m

Forecast Class B (B+ and B-) Class B (B+ and B-)

Forecast Class A Class A

Share of lease deals

Page 31: Q3 2012 Marketbeat Presentation Eng Main

CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD 30

MARKETBEATQ3 2012

ABSORPTION VS. TAKE-UP ABSORPTION VS. NEW CONSTRUCTION

NET ABSORPTION AND TAKE UPIn balance

Net absorption—represents the change in the occupied stock within a market during the period. Calculation: Net Absorption =X-YWhere:

X = Current stock – current vacancy Y = Previous stock (same quarter, previous year) – previous vacancy (same quarter, previous year)

• Originally Take up was close to net absorption, because companies were moving to newly constructed buildings from old stock

• In 2008 Net absorption was higher than Take up because of high number of pre-lease contracts in 2007. As the result of massive preleases, fully let buildings were delivered to the market

• Low net absorption and high take up indicates maturity of Moscow market

1.51

1.75

0.74

1.27

1.97

1.481.35

1.81

0.630.74 0.76

0.46

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Q 1-3 2012

Take-up Absorption

1.49

2.17

1.39

0.88

0.65

0.45

1.35

1.81

0.630.74 0.76

0.46

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Q 1-3 2012

New construction Absorption

Page 32: Q3 2012 Marketbeat Presentation Eng Main

CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD 31

MARKETBEATQ3 2012

MOSCOW OFFICE MARKET NET ABSORPTIONInteractive chart

Flash player is required for interactive content

Page 33: Q3 2012 Marketbeat Presentation Eng Main

CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD 32

MARKETBEATQ3 2012

RENTAL RATES BY CLASSES

RENTAL RATESStability is the key

• Prime $1,200

• Class A $ 790

• Class B $ 450

* Rental rates – base asking rates for deals closed within the period per sq m per annum, triple net

$717.4

$938.4

$1,090.0

$710.0

$640.0 $760.0 $743.0 $750.0$800.0

$850.0

$521.4

$627.9

$810.0

$510.0$420.0

$490.0$437.0 $450.0

$550.0$600.0

$790.0

$450.0

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 F2012 F2013 F2014 F2015

Class A Class B (B+ and B-)Class A Q3 Class A Q3

• High activity by tenants has had little impact on rents, which remain flat for all classes and all submarkets. In the vast majority of office buildings in Moscow, asking rents are stable.

• Nevertheless, there are positive dynamics in Class A average rental rates. In Q3 class A average rents have grown from USD 750 to USD 790 due to the respectively high proportion of transactions in the Central area (46% in Q3 compared with a traditional 30%). The higher share of more expensive deals pushed average rents up.

• Tenants’ incentives are as low as possible, discounts from asking rental rates are not often granted or are low (about 5% on average).

• We expect stable rents until the end of this year and possibly well into 2013.

Page 34: Q3 2012 Marketbeat Presentation Eng Main

CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD 33

MARKETBEATQ3 2012

Rental rates by submarket

Flash player required for interactive content

Page 35: Q3 2012 Marketbeat Presentation Eng Main

CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD 34

MARKETBEATQ3 2012

WAREHOUSE & INDUSTRIAL

Page 36: Q3 2012 Marketbeat Presentation Eng Main

CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD 35

MARKETBEATQ3 2012

MOSCOW SUPPLYNew construction of quality warehouses (A and B classes)

2012–New construction (Q1-Q3 2012)

531,000 sq. m

–Total pipeline 840,000 sq. m

2013

–Total pipeline 1.700,000 sq m

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012F 2013F

'000

sq

m

New construction Planned

Page 37: Q3 2012 Marketbeat Presentation Eng Main

CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD 36

MARKETBEATQ3 2012

RENTAL RATESRental rates and lease terms

$127

$132

$130

$140

$105$109

$135

$135

$80

$90

$100

$110

$120

$130

$140

$150

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012F

CLASS A CLASS B CLASS CCOLD

STORAGES

Net Rent Rates,$/sq m/year

130 -140 120-130** 170** 251

Operating Expenses,$/sq m/year

30-40 20-30 - -

Utility Charges, $/sq m/year

10-15 10 - -

Yearly rent indexation CPI-3% 8-10% n/d n/d

Minimum Lease Term, years

5-10 1-5 - -

Contract security, months

3-6 1-3 - -

Advance Payment, months

1-3 1-3 1 -

Contract currency USD/EUR RUB RUB RUB

Minimal lease area,sq m

3 500 - -

Page 38: Q3 2012 Marketbeat Presentation Eng Main

CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD 37

MARKETBEATQ3 2012

VACANCY RATEVacancy rate in Class A, Moscow region

–The vacancy rate remained stable since Q3 2011;

–In the short-term vacancy rate will not change.

11.2% 9.1% 8.1% 3.9% 2.8% 1.5% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1.0%

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3

2010 2011 2012

Page 39: Q3 2012 Marketbeat Presentation Eng Main

CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD 38

MARKETBEATQ3 2012

SUPPLY MAPDistribution of W&I space in Moscow region

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1,000

Dmitrovskoeshosse (A104)

Yaroslavskoeshosse (M8)

Shelkovskoeshosse (A103)

Gorkovskoeshosse (M7)

Novoryazanskoeshosse (M5)

Kashirskoeshosse (M4)

Simferopolskoeshosse (M2)

Kaluzhskoeshosse (A101)

Kievskoeshosse (MЗ)

Minskoeshosse (M1)

Novorizhskoeshosse (M9)

Leningradskoeshosse (M10)

30+ km 10-30 km 0-10 km Moscow

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

Dmitrovskoeshosse (A104)

Yaroslavskoeshosse (M8)

Shelkovskoeshosse (A103)

Gorkovskoeshosse (M7)

Novoryazanskoeshosse (M5)

Kashirskoeshosse (M4)

Simferopolskoeshosse (M2)

Kaluzhskoeshosse (A101)

Kievskoeshosse (MЗ)

Minskoeshosse (M1)

Novorizhskoeshosse (M9)

Leningradskoeshosse (M10)

30+ km 10-30 km 0-10 km Moscow

EXISTING 2012-2013 PIPELINE

Page 40: Q3 2012 Marketbeat Presentation Eng Main

CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD 39

MARKETBEATQ3 2012

DEMAND STRUCTUREMarket share and deal size

• During Q1-Q3 2012 the demand was generated by retail and industrial companies.

• The requests for the biggest rentable areas came from retail (18,000 sq m in average) and industrial(11,000 sq m)companies.

STRUCTURE OF DEMAND AVERAGE DEAL SIZE

Distributor17%

Logistic17%

Other2%

Producer24%

Retailer40%

14.83 10.29 8.35 10.66 18.630

4

8

12

16

20

Distributor Logistic Other Producer Retailer

'000

sq

m

Page 41: Q3 2012 Marketbeat Presentation Eng Main

CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD 40

MARKETBEATQ3 2012

DEMANDTake-up

• Q3 2012 was the record-breaker in Moscow region since Q1 2008.

• In the total volume of transactions completed in Q3 2012 the share of warehouse sales comprises 30%.

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

Q1 2009

Q2 2009

Q3 2009

Q4 2009

Q1 2010

Q2 2010

Q3 2010

Q4 2010

Q1 2011

Q2 2011

Q3 2011

Q4 2011

Q1 2012

Q2 2012

Q3 2012

'000

SQ

M

Moscow Regions

Page 42: Q3 2012 Marketbeat Presentation Eng Main

CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD 41

MARKETBEATQ3 2012

REGIONSRegional rental rates, USD per sq.m.

CITYAvg base rental

rates, USD / annum

Avg leased area, sq m

Moscow 135-140 10,000-15,000

St. Petersburg 120-130 2,000-10,000

Ekaterinburg 110-115 5,000-10,000

Nizhnyi Novgorod 110-120 3,000-5,000

Samara 110-115 3,000-5,000

Kazan 90-100 3,000-5,000

Rostov-On-Don 115-120 3,000-5,000

Krasnodar 110-120 3,000-5,000

Novosibirsk 110-115 2,000-5,000

Ufa 90-100 3,000-5,000

$0

$20

$40

$60

$80

$100

$120

$140

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012F

St. Petersburg Ekaterinburg Rostov-On-Don

Page 43: Q3 2012 Marketbeat Presentation Eng Main

CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD 42

MARKETBEATQ3 2012

LAND MARKET

Page 44: Q3 2012 Marketbeat Presentation Eng Main

CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD 43

MARKETBEATQ3 2012

MOSCOW REGIONStable, growing market

MOSCOW REGION AVERAGE INDUSTRIAL LAND PRICE, mn USD/ha

PRICE FOR INDUSTRIAL LAND IN MOSCOW REGION by direction

PRICE, mn USD / ha

Dmitrovskoe shosse A104 0.5-1.5Yaroslavskoe shosse M8 0.5 - 1.5Gorkovskoe shosse M7 0.5 - 1.2

Novoryazanskoe shosse M5 0.5-1.2Kashirskoe shosse M4 0.6 - 1.5

Simferopolskoe shosse M2 0.8 - 1

Kaluzhskoeshosse shosse A101 1-1.5Kievskoe shosse M3 1-2

Minskoe shosse M1 1-1.5

Novorizhskoe shosse M9 2-4

Leningradskoe shosse M10 1.5-2.5

ROAD1.941.87

1.07 1.38

1.41.4

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Page 45: Q3 2012 Marketbeat Presentation Eng Main

CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD 44

MARKETBEATQ3 2012

MOSCOW REGIONLand prices

DISTANCE

FROM MKAD

PRICE, mn

USD / ha

MKAD 2.5 - 3

5 km 1 – 1.5

15 km 0.6 - 0.8

30 km 0.4 - 0.6

50 km 0.3 - 0.5

Page 46: Q3 2012 Marketbeat Presentation Eng Main

CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD 45

MARKETBEATQ3 2012

CAPITAL MARKETS

Page 47: Q3 2012 Marketbeat Presentation Eng Main

CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD 46

MARKETBEATQ3 2012

COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTSGlobal Markets

EUROPEAN MARKET

Moscow is the 3rd investment market in Europe and 14th market worldwide (2 places up compared to 2011 eoy).

Now there are 2 Russian cities in Top 15 of European investment markets. St. Petersburg became reliable investment location.

WORLDWIDE MARKET

Data of Real Capital Analytics based on 12 past month basis

2,077

2,449

2,495

2,686

2,871

2,925

3,733

3,785

3,945

4,691

5,650

6,796

8,625

18,694

32,500

0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000

Copenhagen

Warsaw

Hamburg

Saint Petersburg

Oslo

South Germany

Amsterdam/Randstad

Munich

Frankfurt/Rhine-Main

Rhine-Ruhr

Berlin-Brandenburg

Stockholm

Moscow

Paris

London Metro

$ mn

7,620

7,626

7,667

7,931

8,020

8,595

8,625

10,196

10,781

13,454

16,907

17,409

17,513

17,607

18,298

18,694

20,188

24,610

32,500

35,795

0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 40,000

Wuhan

Dallas

Tianjin

Shenyang

Boston

Seoul

Moscow

Chicago

Chongqing

Beijing

Singapore

DC Metro

SF Metro

Shanghai

LA Metro

Paris

Hong Kong

Tokyo

London Metro

NYC Metro

Page 48: Q3 2012 Marketbeat Presentation Eng Main

CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD 47

MARKETBEATQ3 2012

RUSSIAN INVESTMENT MARKETRussian Investments split

By sector

By origin

By geography

• We increased our forecast for 2012 investments to US$ 7.2 bn

Foreign investorsDomestic investors

2012 forecast

MoscowSt. PetersburgRegions

2012 forecast0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

8,000

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

mn

USD

Office Retail Industrial Other Forecast

491.5

1,637.3

4,559.8

5,3545,797.9

2,256

3,994

7,547.47,200

5,524.4

78%

21%

1%

80%

18%

2%

61%

39%

65%

35%

Page 49: Q3 2012 Marketbeat Presentation Eng Main

CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD 48

MARKETBEATQ3 2012

INVESTMENT MARKET IN NUMBERS2012 investments breakdown in $mn

39%

26%

12%

23% Offices

Shopping Centers

W&I

Hospitality and other

95%

5%Offices

Shopping Centers

W&I

Hospitality and other

Moscow is the core market for Office and W&I segments

Offices $1,672.30

Shopping Centers $1,109

W&I $513.60

Hospitality and other $1,014

Offices -

Shopping Centers $1,084.70

W&I -

Hospitality and other $56

MOSCOW $4,308.8

ST. PETERSBURG $1,140.7

REGIONS $74.9

$5,524 bn OF TOTAL YEAR-TO-DATE INVESTMENTS

Page 50: Q3 2012 Marketbeat Presentation Eng Main

CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD 49

MARKETBEATQ3 2012

CAPITALIZATION RATES

3%

5%

7%

9%

Q1

'08

Q2

'08

Q3

'08

Q4

'08

Q1

'09

Q2

'09

Q3

'09

Q4

'09

Q1

'10

Q2

'10

Q3

'10

Q4

'10

Q1

'11

Q2

'11

Q3

'11

Q4

'11

Q1

'12

Q2

'12

Paris Frankfurt Warsaw London

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

16%

Q1

'08

Q2

'08

Q3

'08

Q4

'08

Q1

'09

Q2

'09

Q3

'09

Q4

'09

Q1

'10

Q2

'10

Q3

'10

Q4

'10

Q1

'11

Q2

'11

Q3

'11

Q4

'11

Q1

'12

Q2

'12

Q3

'12

Office prime Shopping centers prime W&I Prime

• Moscow capitalization rates showed small correction for office and W&I market.

• Current rates in Moscow:

• Office 8.75%

• Shopping centers 9.25%

• W&I 11%

• Capitalization rates for St.Petersburg are stable, thus, the gap between two markets is narrowing.

• Capitalization rates in Europe remain stable

Page 51: Q3 2012 Marketbeat Presentation Eng Main

CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD 50

MARKETBEATQ3 2012

FORECAST

Page 52: Q3 2012 Marketbeat Presentation Eng Main

CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD 51

MARKETBEATQ3 2012

2012Stabilization

2013

Acceleration

2014Growth

2015Second stabilization

MARKET OUTLOOK2013-2015 forecast

$461 $478 $499$543

$602

$708

$927

$1 088

$731$645

$731 $743 $750$800

$850

$423 $391 $388$452 $468

$526$631

$808

$510$417

$460 $437 $450$550

$600

$0

$200

$400

$600

$800

$1 000

$1 200

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

F

2013

F

2014

F

2015

F

Class A Class B (B+and B-)

RENTAL RATES, USD/SQ.M

Page 53: Q3 2012 Marketbeat Presentation Eng Main

CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD 52

MARKETBEATQ3 2012

MARKET OUTLOOKSupply and Demand

0

500

1 000

1 500

2 000

2 500

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

F

2013

F

2014

F

2015

FClass B(B+and B-) Class A

TAKE UP AND NET ABSORPTION, 000 SQ.MNEW CONSTRUCTION, 000 SQ.M

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

F

2013

F

2014

F

2015

F

Class A Net Abs. Class B Net Abs.Class A Take Up Class B Take Up

Page 54: Q3 2012 Marketbeat Presentation Eng Main

CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD 53

MARKETBEATQ3 2012

MARKET OUTLOOK

High concentration of business in Moscow

Government spending

Relatively high economy growth rate

Increasing domestic investments in real estate

UPSIDEBusiness activity is slowing

Regulation complications

Investment climate is suffering

Exchange risk

DOWN-SIDE

1,1% 1,5% 0,9%2,4%

2,2%

4,1% 4,1%

11,8%

22,1%20,7%

18,4%

15,7%14,6%14,8%14,7%

1,9%

3,9%

2,8%4,2%

6,0%

10,9%11,5%11,4%10,7%9,5% 9,2%8,3%

0,0%

5,0%

10,0%

15,0%

20,0%

25,0%

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

F20

13F

2014

F20

15F

Class A Class B (B+and B-)

Fundamentals

VACANCY RATE

Page 55: Q3 2012 Marketbeat Presentation Eng Main

www.cushmanwakefield.com

RESEARCH [email protected]