pavement (turapan) - universiti sains malaysia 366/pavementslides.pdf · reg 366 hbp usm 2007...
TRANSCRIPT
REG 366 HBP USM 2007
PAVEMENT(TURAPAN)
MATERIALS, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION
FOUNDATION THICKNESS
REG 366 HBP USM 2007
MATERIALS
• SOILS• AGGREGATES• CEMENTS• CONCRETE• ASPHALT • LIGHTWEIGHT MATERIALS
REG 366 HBP USM 2007
Engineering Definition• Soil is considered to be
any loose sedimentary deposit, such as gravel, sand, silt, clay or a mixture of these materials. They are readily separated into relatively small pieces in which it may contain air, water or organic material (from vegetation).
• Rock is the naturally occurring material composed of mineral particles so firmly bonded together that great effort is required to separate the particle.
REG 366 HBP USM 2007
Main Soil Group
Granular Soils/Coarse-grained soils(Frictional)
Sand and Gravel
Fine-grained soils(Cohesive)
Silt and Clay
Organic soils Peat, organic clays, organic silt.
REG 366 HBP USM 2007
GRANULAR SOILS
• Excellent foundation materials for supporting structures and roads
• The best embankment materials• The best backfill material for retaining
walls• Might settle under vibratory load or blasts• Dewatering can be difficult due to high
permeability
REG 366 HBP USM 2007
Cohesive soils• Very often posses low shear strength• Plastic and compressible• Loses part of shear strength upon wet• Loses part of shear strength upon disturbance• Shrink upon drying and expand upon wetting• Poor material for backfill• Practically impervious• Clay slopes are prone to landslides• Difficult to compact (silt)
REG 366 HBP USM 2007
Organic Soils
• Any soil containing a sufficient amount of organic matter to influence its engineering properties is called an organic soil.
REG 366 HBP USM 2007
Organic matter
• Decayed vegetative and/or animal matter in various state of decomposition
OBJECTIONABLE BECAUSE……
1. REDUCES LOAD CARRYING CAPACITY
2. INCREASE COMPRESSIBILITY
3. FREQUENTLY CONTAIN TOXIC GASES THAT ARE RELEASED DURING EXCAVATION PROCESS.
REG 366 HBP USM 2007
Soil Analytical Representation• Soil is made up of various
sized particle packed together. Spaces between particles are known as voids.
• The voids usually contain a mixture of water and another part air or other gas. Or it can be completely water or air.
Air
Water
Solid
Void
REG 366 HBP USM 2007
Collapsible soils
• Soil deposit that experience significant decrease in volume when exposed to water.
REG 366 HBP USM 2007
Liquefaction• Liquefaction can occur
when saturated cohesionless sand deposit exist in relatively loose condition.
• When subjected to vibration or shock wave, the soil grain will quickly move into denser arrangement
• However water prevented the particle to particle contact causing shear strength lost.
REG 366 HBP USM 2007
Expansive clay• Clays containing
montmorillonite expand in volume when in contact with water.
• The expansive force created by clay undergoing an increase in water content is capable of lifting heavy structure and imposing excessive lateral pressure.
• Swell forces can go beyond 500kPa
REG 366 HBP USM 2007
Laterites• Residual soil formed from
weathering of igneous rock under conditions of high temperature and high rainfall.
• Usually reddish in color but not always.
• Agriculturally – not suitable because of low nutrients.
• Acceptable construction material for road bases and embankment or foundation.
REG 366 HBP USM 2007
Lightweight Geo-material
REG 366 HBP USM 2007
Road Applications
• Reduce loading consequently settlement and avoiding potential sliding and soil treatment requirements
• Minimizing earthwork operations on hill slopes and reducing load on ground and retaining systems.
TireShred Based Geocomposite
Soil Cover
Soft Soil Area
TireShred Based Geocomposite
Hilly Slopes
REG 366 HBP USM 2007
RW and Bridge Abutment• As compressible layers to
induce active conditions for retaining wall, at the same time reduce lateral and vertical pressure.
• Control differential settlement, eliminate sudden bump and maintenance, reduce lateral and vertical vressure, thus reduce foundation requirements
Retaining Wall
Granular Backfill or Geocomposite
TireShred Based Geocomposite
Bridge Abutment
TireShred Based Geocomposite
REG 366 HBP USM 2007
Full Wall Pressure Reduction 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.50 7.00 7.50 8.00 8.50 9.00 9.50 10.00 10.50
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
Effective normal stressesExtreme effective normal stress -25.10 kN/m2
5.00 5.50 6.00 6.50 7.00 7.50 8.00 8.50 9.00 9.50 10.00 10.50 11.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
Effective normal stressesExtreme effective normal stress -11.07 kN/m2
11 kPaMax
25 kPaMax
REG 366 HBP USM 2007
ROAD FOUNDATIONThe Purpose of the foundation is to transfer the loading from the road to the soil or sub-grade.
The foundation for the purpose of ROAD CONSTRUCTION is defined as the sub-base and any associated strengthening materials
used.
REG 366 HBP USM 2007
Road Foundation
• If the road is new then the first step is the assessment of the sub-grade on which the road is to be built. If this is not carried out correctly then the information on which the designs are based may be incorrect.
• If the road is a not a new road then the first step is the assessment of the existing foundations.
REG 366 HBP USM 2007
Sub-grade Strength• The strength of the sub-grade (soil below the
pavement) is assessed using a test known as the California Bearing Ratio test. This was developed in California in the 1930's and makes no attempt to determine any of the standard soil properties such as density. It is merely a value and it is integral to the process of road design. Nearly all design charts for the road foundations are based on the CBR value for the sub-grade.
REG 366 HBP USM 2007
CBR VALUES
• To determine the CBR for a soil the designer has two options, they can either use the California Bearing Ratio (CBR) test if equipment is available or they can use the table below to estimate the CBR.
REG 366 HBP USM 2007
Type of soil
Plasticity index (%)
CBR (%) Depth of formation below water
table More than 600mm 600mm or less
Heavy clay 70 2 1*
60 2 1.5* 50 2.5 2 40 3 2
Silty clay 30 5 3 Sandy clay 20 6 4
10 7 5 Silt - 2 1* Sand (poorly graded) non-plastic 20 10 Sand (well graded) non-plastic 40 15 Well graded sandy gravel non-plastic 60 20
Table 1 Estimation of CBR values
REG 366 HBP USM 2007
CBR Test• The test involves the equipment shown below. The
plunger is then seated into the soil using a force of 50N for an expected CBR below 30% or 250N for greater than 30%. The plunger is then penetrated into the soil at a constant rate of 1mm/min and the forces recorded at penetration intervals of 0.25mm. The total penetration should not exceed 7.5mm. These results are then compared to a standard curve for a value of 100% CBR. The forces on the standard curve are 13.2kN at 2.5mm penetration and 20.0kN at 5.0mm penetration. The CBR is then a simple ratio of the corresponding values and where a difference between the value at 2.5mm and 5mm occurs, the higher value is taken. Annular weights are sometimes used to represent a surcharge.
REG 366 HBP USM 2007
Test Setup
REG 366 HBP USM 2007
Compaction
Densification of soil by removal of air using mechanical energy
REG 366 HBP USM 2007
Compaction vs. ConsolidationCONSOLIDATION:
REDUCTION OF SOIL VOLUME UNDER STRESS/LOADING. STRESS OR LOADING CAUSES
1) DEFORMATION OF SOIL PARTICLE
2) RELOCATION OF SOIL PARTICLE
3) EXPULSION OF WATER OR AIR ( IN MOST PRACTICAL CASES, ITS WATER)
REG 366 HBP USM 2007
Effect of moisture content• Water added act as
softening agent• Soil slip onto each
other and into a more dense packed position
• Beyond certain m%, dry unit weight is reduced because the moist/water takes up spaces of soil !!!
REG 366 HBP USM 2007
Optimum Moisture Content
Water
Moisture content, m
Unit Weight
γ=γd
REG 366 HBP USM 2007
Proctor compaction test
MOULD
Extension
HAMMER
25 BLOWS
REG 366 HBP USM 2007
Standard & Modified Proctor
Original Ilustration by Prof. Bengt B. Broms inFoundation Engineering
REG 366 HBP USM 2007
Test Concept
• Soil is mixed with varying amount of water then compacted.
• Unit wt =
W = weight of compacted soil in the moldVm = volume of mold
• Moisture content w% is determined in lab.
mVW
=γ
REG 366 HBP USM 2007
Plotting dry density against w%
• Dry density is calculated as:
• Plot the various γd vs. w%
100%1 wd
+=
γγ
w%
γd
REG 366 HBP USM 2007
S=100 and 80 curve• S=100% is the ZAV
curve – zero air void• ZAV plot can be
calculated using:
• Both ZAV and S80 can also be calculated using:
s
wzav
Gw 1+
=γγ
%1001×⎟⎟⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛−=
sd
w
GSw
γγ
w%
γd
ZavS80
REG 366 HBP USM 2007
Specs. For Field Compaction
• Typical requirements: 90-95% MDD
• Specs. normally in term of relative compaction Cr.
( ) %100max
×=labd
dRC
γγ
Type of works Minimum CR
Building platform or road
90%
Upper 150mm of sub-grade below roadway
95%
Dam 100%
REG 366 HBP USM 2007
Site Procedure
• Soil is normally compacted in layers of 200-300mm.
• Constant check of field density should be carried out to ensure compliance.
• Rate of construction in embankment work should be control to prevent build up of pore pressure
• Heavier roller gives better compaction.
REG 366 HBP USM 2007
Site Procedure (cont’d)• For embankment work,
the best procedure is to compact a trial area and measure the dry density.
• When relative compaction is satisfactory, the number of roller passes is used for the actual embankment.
REG 366 HBP USM 2007
How to determine field density?
• Field density tests– Sand Cone Test/Sand Replacement Method– Rubber balloon test– Nuclear density test– Water ring test– Drive cylinder test
REG 366 HBP USM 2007
Sand Replacement Method
• ASTM D1556 or BS 1377
100%1 w
WW field
dry
+=
Compacted fill
Test hole filled with std. sand
VWdry
dry =γ
REG 366 HBP USM 2007
Example 1: Proctor compaction test1 2 3 4 5
Compacted Soil + mold 3762 3921 4034 4091 4040
Mass of tray 20.11 21.24 19.81 20.30 20.99
Mass of tray + wet soil 240.85 227.03 263.45 267.01 240.29
Mass of tray + dry soil 231.32 212.65 241.14 238.81 209.33
Mass of mold = 2031 g, Volume of mold = 9.44 E-4 m3
1) Compute γd and w% for each data point and plot results
2) Calculate S80 and S100 using Gs = 2.69
3) Determine MDD and wo
REG 366 HBP USM 2007
Calculate moisture content for each data points:
%100% ×−
−=
traydry
drywet
MMMM
w
%10011.2032.23132.23185.240
1 ×−−
=w
= 4.5 %
Moisture content
REG 366 HBP USM 2007
Dry density
mVW
=γ
3/22.17045.0199.17
100%1
mkNwd =+
=+
=γγ
Remember W = mass x gravity
Gravity = 9.81 m/s2
W1 = (3.762-2.031) x 9.81
= 16.981 kg.m/s2 or N
= 0.016981 kN
γ = 0.016981 / 9.44E-4
= 17.99 kN/m3
REG 366 HBP USM 2007
Summary of data points
1 2 3 4 5
γ (kN/m3) 17.99 19.64 20.81 21.41 20.88
w 4.5% 7.5% 10.1% 12.9% 16.4%
γd (kN/m3) 17.22 18.27 18.90 18.96 17.94
REG 366 HBP USM 2007
S80 and S100
s
wzav
Gw 1+
=γγ %1001
×⎟⎟⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛−=
sd
w
GSw
γγ
Use γd = 16, 18 and 20 (i.e. within data points range)
%3.19%10069.21
1681.9%8080 =×⎥⎦
⎤⎢⎣⎡ −=w
REG 366 HBP USM 2007
S80 and S100 data points
γd S80 S100
16 19.3% 24.1%
18 13.9% 17.3%
20 9.5% 11.9%
REG 366 HBP USM 2007
Chart and Report
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Moisture content (%)
Dry
Den
sity
(kN
/m3)
curves80s100
OMC
MDD
REG 366 HBP USM 2007
Example 2: Sand Replacement test
• Determination of Dry Density of soil on site
• BS 1377• Specs.
Requirement of Compaction ratio is 90% MDD of ex.#1
• Initial mass of sand: 5.912 kg• Remaining sand after
pouring: 2.378 kg• Mass of soil from hole: 2.383
kg• Moisture content w = 7.0 %• Density of sand: 1490 kg/m3• Volume of cone: 1.114E-3 m3• Calculate γd and Compaction
ratio.
REG 366 HBP USM 2007
Example 2: Solution
3
33
2
2
3333
33
)(
/36.1707.01
58.181
/58.1810258.110337.2
10337.21000
181.9383.2
10258.1)10114.1()10372.2(
10372.21490
534.3383.2
534.3378.2912.5
mkNw
mkNVW
kNgMW
mVVV
mV
M
M
d
hole
soil
soilsoil
coneholeconehole
holecone
wetsoil
holeconesand
=+
=+
=
=××
==
×=⎟⎠⎞
⎜⎝⎛××=×=
×=×−×=−=
×==
=
=−=
−
−
−
−−−+
−+
+
γγ
γ
REG 366 HBP USM 2007
Example 2:cont’d
• Relative compaction What if CR < 90%?
– Ripping, mixing and re-compacting
– Add water( )
OK
Clabd
dR
%36.91%1000.1936.17
%100max
=×=
×=γγ
REG 366 HBP USM 2007
REG 366 HBP USM 2007
Relative density• In place density
compared to its laboratory max and minimum density
• Max – compacted in laboratory
• Min – loosely filled into a test container
• Then compacted and loose density including void ration can be calculated
%100%minmax
max ×⎟⎟⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛−
−=
eeee
D fieldR
⎥⎥⎦
⎤
⎢⎢⎣
⎡×⎥⎥⎦
⎤
⎢⎢⎣
⎡
−
−=
)(
(max)
(min)(max)
(min))(%fieldd
d
dd
dfielddRD
γγ
γγγγ
or
REG 366 HBP USM 2007
Typical values
Relative density (%)
Unit Weight (kN/m3)
Loose <35 <14
Medium dense 35-65 14-17
Dense 65-85 17-20
Very dense >85 >20
REG 366 HBP USM 2007
Pavement Structure
Wearing Course
Binder Course
Base Course
Sub Base Course
SUBGRADE
REG 366 HBP USM 2007
SUBGRADE
The uppermost part of soil, natural or imported, supporting the load transmitted from the overlying layers
REG 366 HBP USM 2007
Sub Base
• Serve as an aid to disperse load from the base course before transmitting to sub-grade. (some design omit this part)
Quary dust Sand
REG 366 HBP USM 2007
Base
• Specified material built up to certain thickness. This layer plays an important role in the support and dispersion of traffic loads
Crusher run
REG 366 HBP USM 2007
Binder
• Resisting shear + supporting and dispersing loads
Wearing
• Topmost layer. Direct contact with traffic load. Must resist abrasion and prevent skidding
REG 366 HBP USM 2007
Example:road pavement
REG 366 HBP USM 2007
Example: pavement details
REG 366 HBP USM 2007
Vertical alignment
REG 366 HBP USM 2007
Thickness Design
• CBR and the percentage of heavy vehicles are the main factors in thickness design of the pavement
REG 366 HBP USM 2007
Traffic EstimationAverage Daily Traffic (ADT) – both ways
Get the percentage of heavy commercial vehicles - Pc
Get annual traffic growth – r
Then:
Calculate Vo (initial annual traffic for one direction)
)100/(3655.0 co PADTV ×××=
REG 366 HBP USM 2007
Total number of commercial vehicles, Vc
( )[ ]rrVV
xo
c11 −+
=Vc = total number of commercial vehicles for x yrs
Vo = Initial yearly commercial traffic
r = rate of annual traffic growth
REG 366 HBP USM 2007
Check total traffic volume
( )xx rVV += 11
Vx = volume of daily traffic after x yrs in one direction
V1 = initial daily traffic in one direction
X = design period (yrs)
REG 366 HBP USM 2007
Maximum hourly traffic flow, c
c = I x R x Tc= maximum one way hourly capacity
I= ideal hourly capacity as in Table 3.2
R=roadway factor in Table 3.3
T=traffic reduction factor table 3.4
C = 10 x c
C = 24 hrs one way traffic capacity
REG 366 HBP USM 2007
Estimate equivalent factor,e
Percentage of heavy vehicles
0-15% 16-50% 51-100%
e Local1.2
Trunk2.0 3.0 3.7
REG 366 HBP USM 2007
Equivalent Standard Axle, ESA
ESA = Vc x e
BASED ON CBR AND ESA,
DETERMINE EQUIVALENT THICKNESS TA FROM CHART
REG 366 HBP USM 2007
Composite thicknesses
TA = a1D1 + a2D2 + …….anDn
a1, a2 = structural coefficient from table 3.5
D1, D2, Dn = thickness of each layer