pacs ibdr 27/28 feb 2002 optical system design1 n. geis mpe

45
Optical System Design 1 PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002 Optical System Design N. Geis MPE

Upload: dayna-gibson

Post on 01-Jan-2016

216 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002 Optical System Design1 N. Geis MPE

Optical System Design 1

PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002

Optical System Design

N. GeisMPE

Page 2: PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002 Optical System Design1 N. Geis MPE

Optical System Design 2

PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002Pacs Optical System

Overview

Anamorphic System

Grating Spectrometer

Telescope

Entrance Optics -- chopper -- calibration optics

Field splitter

Spectrometer

Image Slicer

To SlicerBolometer Optics

Dichroic

Bolometer

Red Bolometer Array

Blue Bolometer Array

Filter Filter Wheel Filter Filter Wheel

Red Photoconductor Array

Blue Photoconductor

Array

Bolometer Optics Bolometer Optics Dichroic

Page 3: PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002 Optical System Design1 N. Geis MPE

Optical System Design 3

PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002

Definition of Image Scale

SubsystemPixel Pitch on Sky

(Physical)

Field-of-View

Spectrometer9.4 arcsec

(3.6 mm)47 x 47 arcsec2

Photometer (60–130 µm)3.2 arcsec

(0.75 mm)214 x 106 arcsec2

Photometer (130-210 µm)6.4 arcsec

(0.75 mm)211 x 102 arcsec2

Page 4: PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002 Optical System Design1 N. Geis MPE

Optical System Design 4

PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002

Optical design for astronomical optical path

• Image inverter (3 flats) at the beginning to

compensate for telescope image tilt

• Chopper assembly on outer side of FPU (servicing)

• Labyrinth configuration for baffling (see straylight

analysis)

• Chopper throw (on sky) reduced to 1 full array size

to allow for larger FOV of bolometers with same

entrance field-stop/mirror sizes as previous design.

Optical Design – Top Optics

Page 5: PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002 Optical System Design1 N. Geis MPE

Optical System Design 5

PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002

Optical design for calibration sources

• Acceptable image quality of pupil • Köhler-type illumination (pupil on source aperture + a field

stop)

• Source aperture is projected onto M2/Cold Stop

• No physical match in source for “field” stop => excellent

uniformity expected

• Re-use of existing entrance optics mirrors in

reverse

• Excellent baffling situation • Sources are outside of Instrument Cold Stop• Initial calibration path & field stop outside of Instrument Cold

Stop

Optical Design – Top Optics

Page 6: PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002 Optical System Design1 N. Geis MPE

Optical System Design 6

PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002

Uniformity of Illumination by Calibrators

The two sources produce mirrored illumination distributions, as seen from the detectors

Maximum (unwanted) modulation of the calibration signal by non-uniformity is ~ 5%

Compatible with the goal of having relative signal changes of 10% when chopping.

E.g., one could set operating points such that the range of signal is 7.5–12.5% when chopping.

Page 7: PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002 Optical System Design1 N. Geis MPE

Optical System Design 7

PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002

Top OpticsAstronomical

Common Focus, Top

Optics

TO Active 5

TO Active 4

Chopper

TO Fold 4

TO Active 3

TO Active 2

Lyot Stop

TO Active 1

TO Fold 3

TO Fold 2

TO Fold 1

Telescope

PupilField

Page 8: PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002 Optical System Design1 N. Geis MPE

Optical System Design 8

PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002

Top OpticsCalibration

TO Fold 1

TO Active 1

TO Fold 3

TO Fold 2

Common Focus, Top

Optics

TO Active 5

C2 Active 3C1 Active 3

C1 Active 2

C1 Active 1 (Lens)

C2 Active 2

TO Active 4

Chopper

TO Fold 4

TO Active 3

Cal. Source 1

TO Active 2

Lyot Stop

Telescope

C2 Active 1 (Lens)

Cal. Source 2

PupilField

Calibrator 2Calibrator 1

Page 9: PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002 Optical System Design1 N. Geis MPE

Optical System Design 9

PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002

Optical component

safter Top

Optics

Photometer

Filter

B Active R2

Filter Wheel

Dichroic Beamsplitter

S Active 6

Slicer Optics

BlueBolometer

Array

Dichroic Beamsplitter

B Active R1

B Active B2

S Fold 2

S Active 2

S Active 1

B Active 1S Fold 1

Common FocusTop Optics

RedBolometer

Array

B Active B1

RedSpectrometer

Array

S Active 5

S Active 4

S Active 3

Spectrometer

S Fold 4

S Fold 3

Blue Spectrometer

Array

S Fold 5

Filter Filter Wheel

Grating

S Collimator 2

S Collimator 1

S Collimator 2

S Collimator 1

B Fold B1B Fold R1

PupilField

Page 10: PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002 Optical System Design1 N. Geis MPE

Optical System Design 10

PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002

Optical design for bolometer cameras finished

• very good image quality

• good geometry

• excellent baffling situation• fully separate end trains• extra pupil and field stops possible on the way to detectors (use for

alignment and baffling purposes)• exit pupil with filter at entrance window to cold (1.8K) detector housing

• Bolometer arrays mounted close together on top of cryocooler

• Photometers are a self-contained compact unit at FPU

external wall

Optical Design – Photometers

Page 11: PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002 Optical System Design1 N. Geis MPE

Optical System Design 11

PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002

No Changes in optical design for spectrometer

since IIDR • ILB column

Slicer output was reconfigured such that one pixel’s worth of

space is intentionally left blank between slices at the slit focus and on the detector array

•Reduces (diffraction-) cross-talk•helps with assembly of detector filters & alignment

gap of 0.75 mm between slit mirrorsgap of 3.6 mm between detector blocks for filter holder

• Image quality diffraction limited

• Excellent baffling situation•end optics for both spectrometers separated on “ground

floor”

•exit field stop of spectrometer inside a “periscope”

•extra pupil and field stops possible in end optics (alignment,

baffles)

Optical Design – Spectrometers

Page 12: PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002 Optical System Design1 N. Geis MPE

Optical System Design 12

PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002

The Image Slicer

Page 13: PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002 Optical System Design1 N. Geis MPE

Optical System Design 13

PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002

Image Slicer and Grating (in)

Slicer Mirror

Capture Mirror

Slit Mirror

Grating

Page 14: PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002 Optical System Design1 N. Geis MPE

Optical System Design 14

PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002

Image Slicer and Grating (in+out)

Slicer Stack

Capture Mirror

Slit Mirror

Grating

Periscope Optics

Page 15: PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002 Optical System Design1 N. Geis MPE

Optical System Design 15

PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002

• Clean separation between optical paths – a

result of the incorporation of the bolometers.

• Realistic accommodation for mechanical

mounts.

• Significant savings in number of mirrors from

the photoconductor-only design

• Excellent image quality in both, photometers,

and spectrometers

Optical Design Summary

Page 16: PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002 Optical System Design1 N. Geis MPE

Optical System Design 16

PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002

PACS Envelope -filled

Page 17: PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002 Optical System Design1 N. Geis MPE

Optical System Design 17

PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002

PACS Optical Functional Groups

Page 18: PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002 Optical System Design1 N. Geis MPE

Optical System Design 18

PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002

Chopper

sGeGaDetectorRed Spectrometer

Blue Bolometer

Red Bolometer

Calibrator I and II

0.3 K Cooler

Filter Wheel I

Filter Wheel II

Grating

sGeGa DetectorBlue Spectrometer

Encoder

Grating Drive

Entrance Optics

Photometer Optics

Calibrator Optics

SlicerOptics

SpectrometerOptics

Page 19: PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002 Optical System Design1 N. Geis MPE

Optical System Design 19

PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002

Dichroic

FilterWheel

BlueBolometer

Cryocooler

RedBolometer

Chopper

Telescope Focus

Lyot Stop

Calibrator I+II

Entrance Optics &

Photometer

Page 20: PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002 Optical System Design1 N. Geis MPE

Optical System Design 20

PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002

Chopping Left

Page 21: PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002 Optical System Design1 N. Geis MPE

Optical System Design 21

PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002

Chopping Right

Page 22: PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002 Optical System Design1 N. Geis MPE

Optical System Design 22

PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002

The Spectrometer Section

Page 23: PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002 Optical System Design1 N. Geis MPE

Optical System Design 23

PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002

PACS Filter Scheme

Page 24: PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002 Optical System Design1 N. Geis MPE

Optical System Design 24

PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002Filter Rejection Requirements

(determined from template observation scenarios)

The requirements from 3 demanding astronomical scenarios...

• planet with high albedo• deep imaging (Galactic/extragalactic)• FIR excess around bright star

...lead to the required filter suppression factors.

Solid red line: total required suppression

Dashed blue line: model detector responsivity

Suppre

ssio

n f

act

or

Dotted green line: resulting required filter suppression factor

Wavelength [µm]

detector responsefilter transmissionoverall response

(bolometersonly)

Page 25: PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002 Optical System Design1 N. Geis MPE

Optical System Design 25

PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002

PACS Filters

• Filter Functions– definition of spectral bands

• photometric bands• order sorting for spectrometer grating

– in-band transmission (high)

– out-of-band suppression (thermal background, straylight, astronomical)

• Filter implementation– Filter types (low-pass, high-pass, band-pass, dichroic)– Technology: Metal mesh filters developed at QMW

• Proven technology• Robust• Excellent Performance

– Filter location in optical path chosen for• rejection of thermal radiation from satellite• instrument stray light management

Page 26: PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002 Optical System Design1 N. Geis MPE

Optical System Design 26

PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002

PACS Filtering Scheme

Page 27: PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002 Optical System Design1 N. Geis MPE

Optical System Design 27

PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002

Example: Prototype of Long Pass Edge filter

Examples of QMW filters

Examples of QMW filters

Page 28: PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002 Optical System Design1 N. Geis MPE

Optical System Design 28

PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002

Example Filter Chain: Long-Wavelength Photometer

Dichroic beam splitter 130.µm

Long-pass edge filters

52.µm

110.µm125.µm

Short-pass edge filter 210.µm

Page 29: PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002 Optical System Design1 N. Geis MPE

Optical System Design 29

PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002

Filter Summary

• Filter scheme with 4 or 5 filters in series in each instrument channel provides sufficient out-of-band suppression

• Measured/expected in-band transmission– > 80 % for long-pass and dichroic filters– ~ 80 % for band-pass filters

> 40 % for filter combination

– ~ 50 % expected

• Requirements will be met

Page 30: PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002 Optical System Design1 N. Geis MPE

Optical System Design 30

PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002

Geometrical Optics Performance

Page 31: PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002 Optical System Design1 N. Geis MPE

Optical System Design 31

PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002

Optical Performance - Blue Bolometer

Page 32: PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002 Optical System Design1 N. Geis MPE

Optical System Design 32

PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002

Optical Performance - Geometry Blue Bolometer

1 2

3

Page 33: PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002 Optical System Design1 N. Geis MPE

Optical System Design 33

PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002

Optical Performance - Red Bolometer

Page 34: PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002 Optical System Design1 N. Geis MPE

Optical System Design 34

PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002

Optical Performance - Geometry Red Bolometer

Page 35: PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002 Optical System Design1 N. Geis MPE

Optical System Design 35

PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002

Optical Performance - Spectrometer

Center of Array, center Corner of Array, extreme

Page 36: PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002 Optical System Design1 N. Geis MPE

Optical System Design 36

PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002

Optical Performance - Geometry Spectrometer

“ILB”

175.0µm

175.4µm

174.6 µm

90% Strehl @ 80 µm75% Strehl @ 80 µm

Page 37: PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002 Optical System Design1 N. Geis MPE

Optical System Design 37

PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002

PACS Optical Performance in a System Context

New Goal?

New Req?

Page 38: PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002 Optical System Design1 N. Geis MPE

Optical System Design 38

PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002

Diffraction

Page 39: PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002 Optical System Design1 N. Geis MPE

Optical System Design 39

PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002

Illumination of Lyot Stop

2 Strategiesdepending on outcome of system straylight analysis

1 M2 as system stop (baseline):oversize cold stop by ~ 10% area (if only cold sky visible beyond M2, and straylight analysis allows)

2 Lyot stop as system stop (optional):

undersize cold stop by ~ 10% area — throughput loss(if diffracted emission/reflection from M2 spider, M2 edge, or straylight is problematic)

GLAD 4.5diffraction analysis = 175 µm

Radius [cm]

Inte

nsi

ty (

arb

. unit

s)

• M2 is system aperture

• Image quality of M2 on Lyot stop determined by diffraction from PACS entrance field stop

• Diffraction ring ~10% of aperture area

• Cannot block “Narcissus effects” from M2 center at Lyot stop without throughput loss

Page 40: PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002 Optical System Design1 N. Geis MPE

Optical System Design 40

PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002

Diffraction Analysis - Slicer/Spectrometer

Diffraction Analysis of the Spectrometer repeated with final mirror dimensions and focal lengths, and for a larger range of wavelengths.

The results were used• as inputs to a detailed grating size specification

• for optimizing mirror sizes in the spectrometer path=> Diffraction on the image slicer leads to

considerable deviations from the geometrical footprint on the grating at all wavelengths

Page 41: PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002 Optical System Design1 N. Geis MPE

Optical System Design 41

PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002

Diffraction Gallery at 175 µmtelescope focus, re-imaged “slice” through point spread

function

capture mirror

entrance slit field mirror

grating

pixel

Detectorarray

Page 42: PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002 Optical System Design1 N. Geis MPE

Optical System Design 42

PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002

•Considerable difference from geometrical optics footprint.

•No noticeable spillover problem at short wavelength

•Non-uniform illumination profile will lead to change in effective grating resolution => calculate/measure

Grating: The worst offenderat long wavelength

Page 43: PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002 Optical System Design1 N. Geis MPE

Optical System Design 43

PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002

•Major difference from geometrical optics footprint.

•Spillover of ~ 20% energy past grating & collimators at longest wavelength

•Non-uniform illumination profile will lead to change in effective grating resolution => calculate/measure

Grating: The worst offenderat long wavelength

Page 44: PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002 Optical System Design1 N. Geis MPE

Optical System Design 44

PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002

Diffractive Walk-Off

Off-axis pixel diffraction throughput

For edge pixels, and long wavelength, asymmetric diffraction losses move the PSF peak ~ 0.3 pixel (3’’) from its expected spatial position.

Image scale on the sky for the spectrometer depends on wavelength Effect needs to be fully characterized for astrometry/mapping.

Page 45: PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002 Optical System Design1 N. Geis MPE

Optical System Design 45

PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002

System stop should be M2 - oversize PACS cold stop

accordingly

Diffraction lobes introduced by slicer mirrors can still be transferred through most of the spectrometer optics (i.e., image quality is intact)

Considerable clipping occurs on collimator mirrors and

grating at long wavelength

Losses due to “spill-over”:

up to 20% (205 µm), 15% (175 µm) other wavelengths tbd.

80% “diffraction transmission” to detector for central pixel

Diffraction induced “chromatic aberration” needs further

study

Diffraction Summary