overiew of comb cycle rev 6.0_part 2

Upload: sam

Post on 05-Apr-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/31/2019 Overiew of Comb Cycle Rev 6.0_Part 2

    1/62

    Combined Cycle Power Generation

    -An Introduction

  • 7/31/2019 Overiew of Comb Cycle Rev 6.0_Part 2

    2/62

    Combined

    Cycle

    PowerGeneration

  • 7/31/2019 Overiew of Comb Cycle Rev 6.0_Part 2

    3/62

    One Gas

    Turbine andOne SteamTurbine.

    [without anyadditionalfuelconsumption]

  • 7/31/2019 Overiew of Comb Cycle Rev 6.0_Part 2

    4/62

    Fully firedcombinedcycle

  • 7/31/2019 Overiew of Comb Cycle Rev 6.0_Part 2

    5/62

    District

    heating andprocess heatfor industry.

  • 7/31/2019 Overiew of Comb Cycle Rev 6.0_Part 2

    6/62

    Bypass Stack /

    Waste Heat Recovery Systems

  • 7/31/2019 Overiew of Comb Cycle Rev 6.0_Part 2

    7/62

    GTHRSG

    +

    ST

    3%

    MISC

    LOSSES

    100% FUEL

    INPUT

    OUTPUT

    30 %

    67%

    OUTPUT

    16 %

    3% MISC

    LOSSES

    34%

    CONDENSER

    LOSSES

    14% TO

    STACK

    Combined Cycle Heat Flow

  • 7/31/2019 Overiew of Comb Cycle Rev 6.0_Part 2

    8/62

    HRSG - Classification

    HRSG

    VERTICAL HORIZONTAL

    DRUMTYPE

    ONCETHROUGH

    UNFIRED SUPPLEMENTRY FIRED

  • 7/31/2019 Overiew of Comb Cycle Rev 6.0_Part 2

    9/62

    Heat Recovery

    Steam Generator[HRSG]

  • 7/31/2019 Overiew of Comb Cycle Rev 6.0_Part 2

    10/62

    Typical two stage Combined Cycle

  • 7/31/2019 Overiew of Comb Cycle Rev 6.0_Part 2

    11/62

    Water Steam Path

  • 7/31/2019 Overiew of Comb Cycle Rev 6.0_Part 2

    12/62

    VERTICAL HRSG

    Flue gas flow -vertical

    Water/ steam flow inhorizontal finned tubes

    Small foot print area Added circulation

    Good cycling capability

    Replacement of tubeseasily possible

    Easily access forinspections

  • 7/31/2019 Overiew of Comb Cycle Rev 6.0_Part 2

    13/62

    VERTICAL HRSG

    Flue gas flow -vertical

    Water/ steam flow inhorizontal finned tubes

    Small foot print area Added circulation

    Good cycling capability

    Replacement of tubeseasily possible

    Easily access forinspections

  • 7/31/2019 Overiew of Comb Cycle Rev 6.0_Part 2

    14/62

  • 7/31/2019 Overiew of Comb Cycle Rev 6.0_Part 2

    15/62

    Horizontal HRSG

    Flue gas flow-horizontal

    Water/ steam flow invertical finned tubes

    Large foot print area

    Natural circulation

    In cycling duty problemsin superheater/ reheatersections.

    Replacement of tubes notpossible

    Access for inspections isdifficult

  • 7/31/2019 Overiew of Comb Cycle Rev 6.0_Part 2

    16/62

  • 7/31/2019 Overiew of Comb Cycle Rev 6.0_Part 2

    17/62

    SINGLE PRESSURE NON REHEAT

  • 7/31/2019 Overiew of Comb Cycle Rev 6.0_Part 2

    18/62

    DOUBLE PRESSURE NON REHEAT CYCLE

  • 7/31/2019 Overiew of Comb Cycle Rev 6.0_Part 2

    19/62

    DUAL PRESSURE CC PLANT

  • 7/31/2019 Overiew of Comb Cycle Rev 6.0_Part 2

    20/62

    TRIPLE PRESSURE CC PLANT

  • 7/31/2019 Overiew of Comb Cycle Rev 6.0_Part 2

    21/62

  • 7/31/2019 Overiew of Comb Cycle Rev 6.0_Part 2

    22/62

  • 7/31/2019 Overiew of Comb Cycle Rev 6.0_Part 2

    23/62

  • 7/31/2019 Overiew of Comb Cycle Rev 6.0_Part 2

    24/62

  • 7/31/2019 Overiew of Comb Cycle Rev 6.0_Part 2

    25/62

  • 7/31/2019 Overiew of Comb Cycle Rev 6.0_Part 2

    26/62

    Temperature

    Profile in aWaste HeatRecoveryBoiler

  • 7/31/2019 Overiew of Comb Cycle Rev 6.0_Part 2

    27/62

  • 7/31/2019 Overiew of Comb Cycle Rev 6.0_Part 2

    28/62

  • 7/31/2019 Overiew of Comb Cycle Rev 6.0_Part 2

    29/62

    Pressure Stages in WHRB

    Criteria :Maximum available Temperature at WHRB inlet

    Provision of Supplementary firing in WHRB

    Station owners own economic evaluation ofHeat rate,

    Efficiency,

    Power output,Extra investment,

    Added O&M Cost

  • 7/31/2019 Overiew of Comb Cycle Rev 6.0_Part 2

    30/62

    Pressure Stages in WHRB

    Output (%) Plant Eff. (%)

    Single pr., Non reheat - 4.7 - 4.7

    Two pr., Non reheat - 1.0 - 1.0

    Three pr., Non reheat Base BaseThree pr., Reheat + 0.7 + 0.7

    Limiting Factor:

    Saturation temperature at particular pressure

    Possible degree of Superheat

  • 7/31/2019 Overiew of Comb Cycle Rev 6.0_Part 2

    31/62

    Combined Cycle Parameters

    PINCH POINT:

    Difference between flue gas and water/steam

    temperature at evaporator section

    It is the minimum differential temperature

    between gas and water/steam in the Boiler

    Lower pinch point results in linear rise in cycle

    efficiency

    Lower pinch point results in exponential rise in

    boiler heat transfer area

  • 7/31/2019 Overiew of Comb Cycle Rev 6.0_Part 2

    32/62

    PINCH POINT:Every 10C decrease in Pinch Point, results inq HP steam flow increases by 4.6 %

    q Steam turbine output increases by 3.4 %

    q Heat rate improves by 20 kcal/kWHrq Efficiency improves by 0.52 %

    Optimum breakeven is 10 C, with regard to

    Heat Transfer area of Evaporator

    Pinch point at Dadri (HP Ckt) is 11.6C

    (LP ckt) is 8.0 C

    Combined Cycle Parameters

  • 7/31/2019 Overiew of Comb Cycle Rev 6.0_Part 2

    33/62

    Optimum Approach & Pinch Point

    Triple Pressure Levels Reduces Irreversibility &

  • 7/31/2019 Overiew of Comb Cycle Rev 6.0_Part 2

    34/62

    Triple Pressure Levels Reduces Irreversibility &Increasing Heat Transfer

    Triple Pressure CC Plant

  • 7/31/2019 Overiew of Comb Cycle Rev 6.0_Part 2

    35/62

    Triple Pressure CC Plant

    T i l P HRSG With SCR

  • 7/31/2019 Overiew of Comb Cycle Rev 6.0_Part 2

    36/62

    Triple Pressure HRSG With SCR

    SCR

  • 7/31/2019 Overiew of Comb Cycle Rev 6.0_Part 2

    37/62

    SCR

    Suitable temperature range 300 to 400 oC.

    Segments having honeycomb patterns containing

    catalyst is arranged within HRSG.

    Ammonia slip is a concern, requires sophisticatedcontrol system for controlling injection.

    Excessive Size and Weight.

    Costly as compared to primary methods.

    Sensitive to fuels containing more than 1000 ppm of

    sulfur.

    P i i l f D NO th SCR

  • 7/31/2019 Overiew of Comb Cycle Rev 6.0_Part 2

    38/62

    Principle of DeNOx thru SCR

  • 7/31/2019 Overiew of Comb Cycle Rev 6.0_Part 2

    39/62

    Post Combustion Pollution Control

    SCR: NOx is converted into nitrogenand water vapour by injecting

    ammonia in presence of a catalyst.

    SCONOx: Single catalyst for removal

    of CO, NOx, VOCs, SO2 and requires

    no chemical injection.

    Energy balance in diff scenario

  • 7/31/2019 Overiew of Comb Cycle Rev 6.0_Part 2

    40/62

    Energy balance in diff scenario

    Config GTOutput

    GTLosses

    HRSGLossesStacklossesCondenser losses STLossesSToutput

    Single

    pr.

    37.6 0.5 0.2 11.4 29.9 0.3 20.1

    Doublepr.

    37.6 0.5 0.3 8.2 32.1 0.3 21.0

    Triple

    pr.

    37.6 0.5 0.3 8.2 32.0 0.3 21.1

    Triple,reheat

    37.6 0.5 0.3 8.6 31.0 0.3 21.7

    Fi d T b

  • 7/31/2019 Overiew of Comb Cycle Rev 6.0_Part 2

    41/62

    Finned Tubes

  • 7/31/2019 Overiew of Comb Cycle Rev 6.0_Part 2

    42/62

    Single Shaft CC Plant

  • 7/31/2019 Overiew of Comb Cycle Rev 6.0_Part 2

    43/62

    Single Shaft CC Plant

    Single Shaft Plant Arrangement

  • 7/31/2019 Overiew of Comb Cycle Rev 6.0_Part 2

    44/62

    Single Shaft Plant Arrangement

    Multi-shaft Arrangement

  • 7/31/2019 Overiew of Comb Cycle Rev 6.0_Part 2

    45/62

    Multi-shaft Arrangement

    Single-shaft Arrangement

  • 7/31/2019 Overiew of Comb Cycle Rev 6.0_Part 2

    46/62

    Single-shaft Arrangement

    Si l Sh f C bi d C l Pl

  • 7/31/2019 Overiew of Comb Cycle Rev 6.0_Part 2

    47/62

    Single Shaft Combined Cycle Plant

    Simplified Plant design and operation

    Lower initial investment

    Unitized design means problems faced inmulti shaft configuration employing Triple

    Pressure Reheat ST are absent.

    Si l Sh ft CC U it D t N d

  • 7/31/2019 Overiew of Comb Cycle Rev 6.0_Part 2

    48/62

    Single Shaft CC Units Dont Need

    Main steam non return valves

    Cold Reheat isolation valves

    Cold Reheat Balancing valves

    Reheater relief valves

    Hot Reheat stop/ control valvesLow pressure Non return valves

    Steam headers

    C t R d ti i Si l Sh ft U it lt f

  • 7/31/2019 Overiew of Comb Cycle Rev 6.0_Part 2

    49/62

    Cost Reduction in Single Shaft Unit results from:

    Reduction in number of Electric generators,step up transformers, and high voltagefeeders.

    Civil works Single building, Reducedbuilding height

    Reduction in number of valves and lengthof piping.

    Elimination of Bypass stack and diverterdamper.

    Limitations of Single Shaft Units

  • 7/31/2019 Overiew of Comb Cycle Rev 6.0_Part 2

    50/62

    Limitations of Single Shaft Units

    Need for higher starting power

    Less Operating Flexibility ;

    Option of phased construction and

    commissioning not available.

    Si l Sh ft U it C fi ti

  • 7/31/2019 Overiew of Comb Cycle Rev 6.0_Part 2

    51/62

    Single Shaft Unit Configuration

    GT- Generator Clutch ST

    GT ST Generator

    GT Generator Clutch ST config

  • 7/31/2019 Overiew of Comb Cycle Rev 6.0_Part 2

    52/62

    GT-GeneratorClutchST config.

    Steam turbine must be moved to remove andservice the generator Rotor.

    Startup of gas Turbine is independent of Steamturbine

    SSS clutch allows load operation of Gas Turbinein case of outage of the ST

    Gas turbine and steam turbines have their ownthrust and journal bearings

    GTSTGenerator Configuration

  • 7/31/2019 Overiew of Comb Cycle Rev 6.0_Part 2

    53/62

    GT ST Generator Configuration

    Axial steam turbine exhaust is not

    possible Steam turbine shares the cold end

    thrust / journal bearing of Gas Turbine

    Auxiliary steam is required for cooling ofsteam turbine during startup

    Outage of ST necessarily lads to outage of the

    whole power train.

    Gas Turbine is accessible formaintenance only after cool-down ofcomplete power train.

  • 7/31/2019 Overiew of Comb Cycle Rev 6.0_Part 2

    54/62

    C bi d C l O ti

  • 7/31/2019 Overiew of Comb Cycle Rev 6.0_Part 2

    55/62

    Combined Cycle Options

    STEAM CYCLE:

    Single pressureTwo pressure

    Three pressure

    Reheat

    Non-reheat

    DEAERATION:

    Deaerating condenser

    Deaerator/evaporatorintegral with WHRB

    HRSG DESIGN:

    Natural circulationevaporator

    Forced circulationevaporator

    Unfired

    Supplementary fired

    NOx CONTROL:

    Water InjectionSteam Injection

    SCR ( NOx and/or CO)

    Dry Low NOx

    Combustion

    C bi d C l O i

  • 7/31/2019 Overiew of Comb Cycle Rev 6.0_Part 2

    56/62

    CONDENSER:

    Water cooled (once through system)

    Water cooled (evaporative cooling tower)

    Air Cooled condenser)

    FUEL:

    Natural gas

    Distillate oil

    Ash bearing oil

    Low Btu coal and oil-derived gas

    Multiple fuel system

    Combined Cycle Options

    Cost Distribution for a CC Power Plant

  • 7/31/2019 Overiew of Comb Cycle Rev 6.0_Part 2

    57/62

    (2GTs + 2HRSGs + 1ST)

    bine, Aux equipment : 26piping + auxiliary equipment: 1urbine + generator+piping+condenser:

    and supervisory equipment+transformeineering: 6 %+ supervision: 18 %

    Cost Distribution for a CC Power Plant

    Bypass Stack /

  • 7/31/2019 Overiew of Comb Cycle Rev 6.0_Part 2

    58/62

    Bypass Stack /Waste Heat Recovery Systems

    Power Enhancement Methods

  • 7/31/2019 Overiew of Comb Cycle Rev 6.0_Part 2

    59/62

    It is Site specific and dependant on:Site ambient temperature

    Level of desired output enhancement

    Anticipated Operational hours

    Water availability

    Structure of Power Purchase Agreement

    Allowable plant emission

    Owners own economic evaluation factors

    for plant output, heatrate, O&M costs.

    Power Enhancement Methods

    Coal fired Vs Combined Cycle

  • 7/31/2019 Overiew of Comb Cycle Rev 6.0_Part 2

    60/62

    Coal fired Vs. Combined Cycle

    0.6

    0.4

    0.55

    0.73

    0.46

    0.35

    0.65

    1.37

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    1.2

    1.4

    C

    ostofInstallation

    O&MCost

    O&MStaff

    FuelRequirement

    Landrequirement

    WaterRequirement

    GestationPeriod

    PlantEfficency

    Thermal

    Comb. Cycle

    Comparison of Availability Reliability

  • 7/31/2019 Overiew of Comb Cycle Rev 6.0_Part 2

    61/62

    Comparison of Availability, ReliabilityAvailability = [Total Operating Hours Planned outage-Forced outage]/ Total Operating Hours

    Reliability = [Total Operating Hours Forced outage]/ Total Operating Hours

    Typical Figures

    Plant types Availability Reliability

    Gas turbine (gas) 88-95 97-99

    Steam Turbine (coal) 82-89 94-97

    Comb cycle (gas) 86-93 95-98

    Nuclear 80-89 92-98

    Diesel generator 90-95 96-98

  • 7/31/2019 Overiew of Comb Cycle Rev 6.0_Part 2

    62/62