operational river monitoring from sentinel-3 radar altimetry groups/moxxi/2_kittel.pdf ·...

10
Operational river monitoring from Sentinel-3 radar altimetry A review of the potential to establish a global, operational river monitoring based on Sentinel-3 water surface elevation observations Cécile M. M. Kittel, [email protected] Peter Bauer-Gottwein

Upload: builien

Post on 21-Jul-2018

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Operational river monitoring from Sentinel-3 radar altimetry

A review of the potential to establish a global, operational river monitoring based on Sentinel-3 water surface elevation observations

Cécile M. M. Kittel, [email protected]

Peter Bauer-Gottwein

DTU Environment, Technical University of Denmark 04 December 2017

Background and motivation

• In-situ observations declining

• Need for observations for operational and long-term management purposes

• Solution:

– Alternative observation technologies combined with reliable simulations

– Remote sensing observations:

• Observations of important components of the land-surface water balance

• Global coverage and gridded data

• New missions are publically accessible and offer new possibilities

2

1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 20000

2000

4000

6000

8000

Nu

mb

er

of s

tatio

ns

Sentinel-3 satellite

River discharge, GRDC, 2014

SITAEL, 2016

DTU Environment, Technical University of Denmark 04 December 2017

Measuring discharge from space?

• Discharge not directly observable

• Two evolving approaches:

– Water level from satellite altimetry

• Discharge estimated from rating curves or using hydrodynamic models

– Water surface extent from multi-mission remote sensing data

• E.g. Pekel et al., Nature (2016)

– Combining the two: volume/height and extent holds great potential for hydrological applications

• Existing networks with altimetry observations for global water bodies:

– Hydroweb (Crétaux et al. ASR (2011))

– DAHITI (Schwatke et al. HESS (2015))

New missions, e.g. Sentinel-3, will ensure continuity

3

DTU Environment, Technical University of Denmark 04 December 2017

Altimetry observations

• Altimeter sends a pulse and records the return echo

• Waveform is then ”retracked” to extract nadir height

• Water height in inland water bodies.

• Uncertainties in range of 0.5 m

• Main issue for inland water bodies: surrounding land cover and topography

• Position must be precisely known

http://altimetry.info, Credits: CNES/D. Ducros

DTU Environment, Technical University of Denmark 04 December 2017

Example: The Ogooué, Africa

• Extracted using Sentinel-1 water mask – four altimetry missions combined (Kittel et al., 2017, HESSD)

• Water surface elevation (WSE) above a reference (geoid) for the entire river

• Interpolate to annual water height amplitude

• Drifting groundtrack = longitudinal WSE profile

• Fixed groundtrack = Time series at “Virtual Station”

5

ICESat Water Elevation [m]

0-47

47-95

95-142

142-189

427-474

CryoSat-2 Water Elevation [m]

0 - 47 47 - 95 95 - 142 142 - 189 189 - 237 237 - 284 284 - 332 332 - 379 379 - 427 427 - 474

Legend

0 50 100 150 200 km

DTU Environment, Technical University of Denmark 04 December 2017

Sentinel-3

• European Space Agency (ESA) mission

– Sentinel-3A launched in 2016

– Sentinel-3B scheduled for launch in 2018

• Operates in Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) mode

• Ground track separation of 104 km (52 km with Sentinel-3B)

• Revisit time of 27 days

• For 98 of the worlds largest rivers:

– 2940-5898 virtual stations

– One VS every 44 km of river

6

Sentinel-3 virtual stations, Amazon river

Virtual stations concept

DTU Environment, Technical University of Denmark 04 December 2017

Sentinel-3

What can we expect?

• Unmonitored basin, the Ogooué

– 39 VS

– 1540 km river

– Observations every ~40 km

– Currently no monitoring

7

DTU Environment, Technical University of Denmark 04 December 2017

Discharge from water surface elevation (WSE)

Different approaches:

Method 1: Ground surveys at virtual stations to establish rating curve

– Michailovsky et al. HESS (2012)

Method 2: Regression results from large global datasets

– Bjerklie et al., J Hydrol (2003)

– Gleason and Smith, PNAS (2014)

8

Correlation between hydraulic geometry coefficients (Gleason and Smith, 2014)

Rating curves (Michailovsky et al., 2012)

DTU Environment, Technical University of Denmark 04 December 2017

Discharge from water surface elevation (WSE)

Method 3: Informing hydraulic models with WSE

– E.g. Kittel et al., HESSD (2017), Schneider et al., HESS (2017)

Method 4: UAV surveys at VS locations to establish rating curve

– Hydraulic variables observable from UAV platform

• E.g. Bandini et al., J Hydrol (2017)

9

Qy

w

DTU Environment, Technical University of Denmark 04 December 2017

Conclusion and Outlook

Great potential in operational monitoring using satellite altimetry

• Sentinel-3 will be a significant inland water monitoring asset

• Value will increase significantly if rating curves can be estimated accurately and efficiently

• We need a new, innovative technology to properly setup rating curves

• UAVs attractive for estimating rating curves at Sentinel-3 VS locations

– Bandini et al., Session 8, 17:40

10

Wang, 2016