nuclear energy and the decarbonisation of electricity · •nuclear energy can play a large role in...
TRANSCRIPT
© 2019 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Reliable Long Term Electricity Supply and the Role of Nuclear EnergyBudapest, Hungary - 25 January 2019
Nuclear Energy and the Decarbonisation of Electricity:Challenges and Opportunities
William D. Magwood, IVDirector-General
Nuclear Energy Agency
4th IEEJ/APERC International Energy Symposium17 May 2019
IEEJ:May 2019 © IEEJ2019
© 2019 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development© 2018 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 2
The NEA: 33 Countries Seeking Excellence in Nuclear Safety, Technology, and Policy
• 33 member countries +strategic partners (e.g., China,India, etc.)
• 8 standing technicalcommittees and over 80working parties and expertgroups
• Major International Initiatives—GIF, MDEP, IFNEC
• NEA Data Bank
• 23 international joint projects2
IEEJ:May 2019 © IEEJ2019
© 2019 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
COP 21 and Energy Production
UN-sponsored meetingconcluded with 195 countriesagreeing to developapproaches to limit globalwarming to below 2°C.
Energy represents 60% ofglobal CO2 emissions - ¾ ofglobal electric powerproduction today is based onfossil fuels.
Many countries – includingChina and India indicate thatnuclear will play a large role.
9
3
IEEJ:May 2019 © IEEJ2019
© 2019 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
• Paris Agreement is intended to hold “increase inglobal average temperature to well below 2°C”.
• Current emission intensity is 570 gCO2/kWh - targetis 50 gCO2/kWh
• Electricity contributes 40% of global CO2 emissionsand will play key role. Annual emissions fromelectricity will need to decline 73% (global) and 85%(OECD countries).
Paris Agreement Implies a 50 gCO2/kWh Target
Source: OECD Environmental Outlook
GHG Emissions will need to decline despite GDP growth ...
___ Baseline----- Paris Agreement goals
9
4
IEEJ:May 2019 © IEEJ2019
© 2019 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development© 2018 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
All Costs Should be Reflected in Future Energy Decisions
• Market prices and production costs account for an important share of the overall impacts of electricity.
• However, the market value of electricity is not the whole story:– “Grid-level” Costs– Atmospheric pollution, climate
change risks and land-use– Impacts on security of supply and
societal costs• The price of electricity in today’s
markets does not accurately reflect the FULL COSTS of electricity, which include the impacts on society and the environment.
Plant-level production
costs
Grid-level costs
Full costs including all
external costs
http://www.oecd-nea.org/ndd/pubs/2018/7298-full-costs-2018.pdf
5
IEEJ:May 2019 © IEEJ2019
© 2019 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
• Total system costs are the sum of plant-level generation costs and grid-level system costs • System costs are mainly due to characteristics intrinsic to variable generation
System costs depend on:– Local & regional factors
and the existing mix – VRE penetration and
load profiles– Flexibility resources
(hydro, storage, interconnections)
Additional impacts on load factors of dispatchable generators and prices.
Profile costs(Changing mix)
Balancing costs(Short-term variations)
Transmission and distribution costs
Assessing the System Costs of Electricity
Sour
ce: L
. Hirt
h
VREs are not always available
VREs are difficult to predict
Good VRE sites are distant from load centers
12
6
IEEJ:May 2019 © IEEJ2019
© 2019 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
10% Variable Renewables 75% Variable Renewables
• High VRE penetration result in challenges for system management.• Residual demand (BLUE line) – the available market for dispatchable generation becomes
volatile and unpredictable.
High VRE Shares Result in Large Inefficiencies
Annual Excess production = 37%
Hours
Hours
13
7
IEEJ:May 2019 © IEEJ2019
© 2019 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
As VRE Share Increases System Costs Grow Quickly
• System costs are large and increase with VRE generation share - Profile costs are the dominant component.
Total Costs Breakdown of System Costs
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Reference No Intc No Intc, no hydro
10% VRE 30% VRE 50% VRE 75% VRE
Syst
em c
osts
(USD
/MW
h VR
E)
Profile Costs Connection Costs Balancing Costs T&D Costs
15
8
IEEJ:May 2019 © IEEJ2019
© 2019 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Decarbonising the electricity sector in a cost-effective manner while maintaining security of supply requires:
–Recognising and allocating system costs to the technologies that cause them
–Encouraging new investment in all low-carbon technologies by providing stability for investors
–Enabling adequate capacity, transmission and distribution, and flexibility
–Implementation of carbon pricing – the most efficient approach for decarbonising electricity
Policy Recommendations for Cost-efficient Decarbonisation
17
9
IEEJ:May 2019 © IEEJ2019
© 2019 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Key Observations Renewables will be deployed in
significant quantities and arealtering electricity markets.
Natural gas prices are at historiclows in many markets and areexpected to remain low for manyyears – if not decades.
According to Eurostat, CO2emissions in the EU increased 1.8percent in 2017 despite a 25percent increase in wind powerand 6 percent growth in solar.
17
10
IEEJ:May 2019 © IEEJ2019
© 2019 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Key Observations (2) While electricity production
receives most focus, around 20% ofall , CO2 emissions originate fromindustrial processes requiring heat.
Nuclear energy can play a largerole in the future of both electricityand industrial heat – if it can adaptto future markets.
Currently, nuclear energy use is ona path to decline in OECD countriesand grow in non-OECD countries inAsia, Africa, the Middle East, andLatin America.
17
11
IEEJ:May 2019 © IEEJ2019
© 2019 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development© 2018 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
For Nuclear - Cost is the Controlling Issue
Source: NEA
In today’s market, the capital cost of nuclear power is a major issue.
Lack of construction experience and weak supply chains make construction costs uncertain.
As the costs of alternatives drop, these high costs become unsustainable.Overnight Construction Costs
for Plants Built in 2020
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
OCGT CCGT Coal Nuclear Wind - Onshore Solar
Inve
stm
ent C
osts
(USD
/kW
)Overnight Costs IDC
12
IEEJ:May 2019 © IEEJ2019
© 2019 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development© 2018 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Innovation is Needed to Assure the Long-Term Role of Nuclear Energy
• Improving cost effectiveness and flexibility
• Enabling high levels of safety at lower cost
• Assuring a sustainable, long-term fuel cycle while addressing policymaker concerns about nuclear proliferation
• Resolving questions about nuclear waste and environmental impacts
• In general: Nuclear energy must fit in the future, as yet uncertain, global energy framework.
13
IEEJ:May 2019 © IEEJ2019
© 2019 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Traditional Gen II/III Reactors:Success and Challenges
Global Successes
•Well-understood technology,can be built at large scale
•Despite 3/11, excellentrecord of safe operationaround the world
•Provides highly reliable,dispatchable, zero-emissionenergy
Ongoing Challenges
•“Bet-the-Company” reputation for new projects.
•Costly construction,operation and regulation
•Nuclear waste disposal
•Persistent public concernsabout safety in somecountries
18
14
IEEJ:May 2019 © IEEJ2019
© 2019 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development© 2018 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 15
18
• New Deployment Models—Low cost modules can be installed as needed
• Higher Flexibility—small reactors may load-follow and be deployed in niche markets
• Manufacturability—enables factory construction, increasing quality and reducing cost, uncertainty, and schedule risk
• Safety—SMRs typically have small potential source term and large water inventories; potential for no need for offsite emergency response
Growing Global Interest
First technologies now nearing regulatory approval
Major technology projects underway in US, France, UK, and other countries
High interest in both OECD countries and developing economies
Small Modular Reactors
NuScale Conceptual Design15
IEEJ:May 2019 © IEEJ2019
© 2019 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Generation IV:20 Years of R&D Activity But
No Demonstrations in OECD Countries
20
16
IEEJ:May 2019 © IEEJ2019
© 2019 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Nuclear Innovation Headwinds:Little Progress in the Last 25 years
COST•Nuclear technology researchbudgets have been under pressure inmost countries for the last decade.
•Nuclear technology often requiresan order-of-magnitude increase infunding to transition betweenresearch and engineering-scaledemonstration.
•The cost and risk of nucleartechnology innovation has becomeprohibitive in many countries.
REGULATORY•The job of today’s nuclearregulatory organisations is to assurepublic safety, not to promoteinnovation.
•Regulators in most countries willnot actively participate intechnology development – but willwait for the finished technology tobe presented for approval.
•Regulators are often viewed byresearchers and industry as abarrier to innovation.
INFRASTRUCTURE•Unlike many other areas ofinnovation, nuclear technology oftenrequires the availability of specialfacilities (test reactor, hot cells, testloops, etc.) and nuclear-skilledworkers.
•Tests using fissile materials requireappropriate facilities, trainedworkforce, security and licencing.
•Much of the global infrastructurewas built more than 40 years ago andis shrinking steadily.
17
IEEJ:May 2019 © IEEJ2019
© 2019 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Nuclear Innovation 2050:Pursuing Global Agreement on theNuclear R&D Needs for the Future
• What technologies will be needed in 10 years? 30 years? 50 years?
• What R&D is needed to make these technologies available?
• Is the global community doing the R&D needed to prepare for the future?
• Can we cooperate to do more?
2418
IEEJ:May 2019 © IEEJ2019
© 2019 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
SHORT TERM MEDIUM TERM LONG TERM
Ageing Management and Long Term Operation Decommissioning Technologies
Advanced Manufacturing and Construction Waste Management & Disposal
Nuclear Process Heat/Cogeneration (550/1000 C)
(Gen IV) Advanced Fuels & Materials
Hybrid Systems
Advanced Recycling
Severe Accident Knowledge and Management
ATF
R&D Infrastructures and Demos
NI2050 Targets for Innovation
19
Passive Safety
ENABLERS: Life Cycle Management/Modelling and Simulation/Robotics and I&C
19
IEEJ:May 2019 © IEEJ2019
© 2019 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Concluding Thoughts
•To meet global energy and environmental requirements, all low-carbon technologies must be applied in an optimized fashion.
•Nuclear energy can play a large role in the future, but the electricity markets must be modernized and nuclear technology must evolve to meet global needs
•In today’s environment, SMRs appear to have the best prospects for significant new nuclear deployment in OECD countries
•For the long-term future, we will need advanced fission energy technology that can be built and operated at costs comparable to other energy technologies.
26
20
IEEJ:May 2019 © IEEJ2019
© 2019 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development© 2018 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 21
Thank you for your attention
21
IEEJ:May 2019 © IEEJ2019
Contact :[email protected]