municipal solid waste management analysis of waste ... · corresponding author municipal solid...
TRANSCRIPT
† Corresponding author
Municipal Solid Waste Management – Analysis of Waste Generation:
A Case Study of Bangkok, Thailand
Pitchayanin Sukholthaman† School of Management Technology,
Sirindhorn International Institute of Technology, Thammasat University, Pathum Thani, 12000, THAILAND
+662-501-3505, Email: [email protected]
Pisit Chanvarasuth School of Management Technology,
Sirindhorn International Institute of Technology, Thammasat University, Pathum Thani, 12000, THAILAND
+662-501-3505, Email: [email protected]
Abstract The enormous amount of waste has caused tremendous adverse impacts to the world. Waste
generation is the most important factor for successful planning of MSW management system.
Thus, the prediction of MSW is a very important role to understand MSW distribution and
characteristic in order to be used for MSW management strategic plan. In this study, Bangkok,
Thailand, is chosen as a representative of an urban city from a developing country coping with
serious MSW problems due to vast amount of waste generated, ineffective and improper
waste management problems. This study aims to examine influencing variables that affect the
quantity of Bangkok MSW generation.
Keywords: MSW generation, MSW quantity prediction, MSW management, Bangkok
1. INTRODUCTION
Gradually accumulated, the enormous amount of waste has caused tremendous adverse
impacts to the world. In general, municipal solid waste (MSW) is the natural result of human
activities. Not only poorly managed waste streams generate a vast amount of MSW, but it also
causes a remarkable environmental pollution and may jeopardize mankind's health (Batool
and Chuadhry 2009). For example, the growth of MSW in Mexico makes it urgent to have
improved MSW management practice to counteract the adverse environmental, social and
public health impacts (Buenrostro et al. 2001).
In recent year, waste situation has reached its threshold level, especially in developing
countries such as countries in Asia. According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(2003), MSW generation has increased by 2.6 times from 1960 to the present. This amount of
new waste generated is an additional to an already huge amount of waste that has been left in
many landfills. In fact, governments and communities in most countries are now struggling to
handle the increasing amount of municipal solid waste arising from growing population and
expanding consumer economy (Dhokhikah and Trihadiningrum 2012). Therefore,
determination of generated waste quantity is one of the most important factors for operating
Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Engineering, Project, and Production Management (EPPM 2013)
1173
municipal solid waste management system (MSWMS) correctly.
In this study, Bangkok, Thailand, is chosen as a representative of an urban city of a
developing country coping with serious MSW problems due to vast amount of waste
generated, ineffective and improper waste management. The aim of this paper is to examine
factors influencing on waste generation.
In the next section, we describe the overview of MSW, followed by the current MSW
management situation in Bangkok, Thailand. Section 4 explains our research methodology.
Data and information used in this paper obtained from a thorough study of Bangkok waste
generation. The results and conclusions of the studies are presented afterwards.
2. MSW MANAGEMENT
Altaf and Deshazo (1996) stated that MSW management is a public service. Effective
waste management service should be efficiently provided to all people to live in a good
environment, good hygiene, and good standard of life. The successfulness of the waste
management system highly depends on the effectiveness of MSW collection. Unfortunately,
MSW management system in many developing countries is relatively ineffective despite of a
relatively high proportion of budget spent. This leads to an incomplete historical long-term
planning which impacts the effectiveness of waste management system (Dyson and Chang
2005).
According to the study of Garrod and Willis (1998), there are 6 functional elements
grouped by activities associated with MSW management, including waste generation, waste
storage, waste collection, waste transfer and collection, waste processing, and waste disposal.
In order to have an effective and sustainable MSW management system, it is important that all
applied and social studies are linked with a good management plan that involves all sectors
from all levels (Buenrostro and Bocco 2003). As the first element of MSW management
system, many studies have shown that waste generation is the most important factor for
successful planning of MSW management system (Zia and Devadas 2008). It depends mostly
on the accuracy of solid waste generation data set (Dyson and Chang 2005; Buenrostro and
Bocco 2003; Chen and Chang 2000; Lebersorger and Beigl 2011). Thus, the prediction of
MSW is a very important role to understand MSW distribution and its characteristic in order
to develop MSW management strategic planning (Thanh et al. 2010; Sakawi and Gerrard
2013). In general, waste generation prediction models and conventional analysis are estimated
based on demographic and socioeconomic factors in a per-capita basis (Buenrostro and Bocco
2003; Chen and Chang 2000; Eriksson et al. 2005).
3. CURRENT MSW MANAGEMENT SITUATION IN BANGKOK
Bangkok, the capital and the fastest growing city in Thailand, has continuously
witnessed an accumulating MSW management problem. The amount of generated solid waste
Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Engineering, Project, and Production Management (EPPM 2013)
1174
mainly depends on population, economic growth, and the efficiency of the reuse and recycling
system. Both the growth of economic development and the population, which increased
sharply from 48 million in 1982 to 65 million in 2006, really enlarge MSW generation in
Thailand. As of December 2012, population in Bangkok is 5,673,560, which is about 9% of
the total population in Thailand. As a result, there are more than 300,000 tons of MSW
generated monthly in Bangkok (Department of Environment Bangkok City 2011).
The quality of the environment is therefore a matter of growing concern. The Bangkok
Metropolitan Administration (BMA), who has a responsibility for the city management and
the well-being of Bangkok residents, has realized that the problem of waste is increasing. Like
other countries, BMA seeks to avoid environmental pollution by encompassing various
strategies, such as the 3Rs, efficient waste collection and disposal system campaigns, and
effective participation of government, public, and private sectors. Although the policies,
strategies, or plans have been successfully implemented in some countries, solid waste
problems in Bangkok are still in need for further attention through the involvement of related
parties and a long-term master plan. In addition, BMA also needs an integrated waste
management system that suits the characteristics of the City and works well with the
residents.
Nonetheless, since 1998, the average collection costs have been about $51 million a year
and the average disposal costs were at $23.51 million a year. However, the average revenue
from fees was $4 million, representing only 5% of the collection and disposal costs. Due to
the imbalance of income and expenses, BMA had to compensate for excessive costs by using
other sources of income to subsidize on an average of $70.32 million yearly. To make the
situation even worse, the cost has increased every year (Department of Environment Bangkok
City 2011). As a result, BMA is acting on these problems by increasing waste collection fees
and improving the efficiency of fee collection, which will be implemented at all houses in the
relevant areas.
4. METHODOLOGY
Since our objectives are to find relevant variables that influence the amount of waste
generation, all variables are grouped base on type of factors that influence waste generation
from reviewed papers. Those groups of variables are demographic related group, economic
related group, technical related group, social related group, consumer behavior related group,
and legislative and administration related group. On the basis of accuracy and consistency,
Bangkok waste generation data are predicted by a number of population, a number of
household, household size, average income per household, GDP per capita, and CPI. Based on
the availability of the data, total sample size of each data set is 96, which is the total number
of months from year 2005 to 2012.
Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Engineering, Project, and Production Management (EPPM 2013)
1175
5. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
MSW generation shows an increasing trend parallel to the development of economic
conditions, urbanization, and rapid growth of population (Lebersorger and Beigl 2011; Beigl
et al. 2008; Singh et al. 2011). MSW management is also highly influenced by other vital
factors, for example, legal, political, socioeconomic, and environmental issues. Each of these
factors is interrelated which usually makes waste management systems more complicated
(AbuQdais et al. 1997; Kum et al. 2005). Aside from these particular factors, the most
important factor that causes MSW generation is waste disposal at its source. Waste reduction
at its source is one of many solutions to solve waste management problems in order to achieve
a sustainable waste management system (Chen and Chang 2000; Zorpas and Lasaridi 2013;
Abduli and Azimi 2010; Bai and Sutanto 2002). The results are shown as follows:
Table 1: Model 1 (All Variables; N = 96)
Table 2: Model 2 (CENSUS; N = 96)
Table 3: Model 3 (ECONOMIC; N = 96)
According to different output models, model 3, using average income per household,
GDP per capita, and CPI as independent variables, showed the best result. That is, waste
generation increases proportionally with income level and have a diverse relationship with the
types of the solid waste generated. Family income had a positive relationship with daily waste
generation. A slight increase in income causes changes consumption patterns of people
(Mazzantia and Zoboli 2008; Ngoc and Schnitzer 2009; Ogwueleka 2013; Parizeau et al.
2006). MSW generation correlates with the growth of GDP per capita, as the amount of MSW
Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Engineering, Project, and Production Management (EPPM 2013)
1176
generation increases when GDP per capita increases (Buenrostro et al. 2001; Tin et al. 1995;
Cherdsatirkul 2012; Shan 2010). In addition, like the results of the studies conducted by Shan
(2010) and USEPA (1997), CPI is one of the strongest predictors of waste generation.
6. CONCLUSION
The results of our analysis illustrated that average income per household, GDP per capita,
and CPI are the most important influencing factors on Bangkok MSW generation. Other
factors, which are number of population, number of household, and household size turned out
to be secondary. Preferably, empirical data should be collected to find other variables that
have higher impact to waste generation in Bangkok. Moreover, a longitudinal study is still
necessary to forecast the amount of waste over a period of time.
Bangkok represents an example of an urban City that has experienced impacts from
ineffective MSW management system. Many studies have shown that accurate data on MSW
generation is a vital factor to predict accurate waste generation that benefits other processes of
the MSW management chain. Therefore, this study provides a pioneer basis for the prediction
of the MSW quantity generated that can be used for other urban cities. Furthermore, we can
provide more comprehensive support for strategic decision making in this important area of
public concern.
REFERENCES
Abduli, M.A. and Azimi, E. (2010) Municipal Waste Reduction Potential and Related
Strategies in Tehran, Int. J. Environ. Res., 4, 901-912.
AbuQdais, H.A., Hamoda, M.F., and Newham, J. (1997) Analysis of Residential Waste at
Generation Sites, Waste Management and Research, 15, 395–406.
Altaf, M.A. and Deshazo, J.R. (1996) Household Demand for Improved Solid Waste
Management: A Case Study of Gujranwala, Pakistan, World Development, 24, 857-868.
Bai, R. and Sutanto, M. (2002) The Practice and Challenges of Solid Waste Management in
Singapore, Waste Management, 22, 557-567.
Batool, S.A. and Chuadhry, M.N. (2009) Municipal Solid Waste Management in Lahore City
District, Pakistan, Waste Management, 29, 1971-1981.
Beigl, P., Lebersorger, S. and Salhofer, S. (2008) Modelling Municipal Solid Waste
Generation: A Review, Waste Management, 28, 200-214.
Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Engineering, Project, and Production Management (EPPM 2013)
1177
Buenrostro, O. and Bocco, G. (2003) Solid Waste Management in Municipalities in Mexico:
Goals and Perspectives, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 39, 251-263.
Buenrostro, O., Bocco, G. and Cram, S. (2001) Classification of Sources of Municipal Solid
Wastes in Developing Countries, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 32, 29–41.
Chen, H.W. and Chang, N.B. (2000) Prediction Analysis of Solid Waste Generation Based on
Grey Fuzzy Dynamic Modelling, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 29, 1–18.
Cherdsatirkul, C. (2012) Generation and Disposition of Municipal Solid Waste (MSW)
Management in Thailand, Columbia University, NY.
Department of Environment Bangkok City (2011).
http://203.155.220.174/modules.php?name=activeshow_mod&file=showpage&new_top
ic=3
Dhokhikah, Y. and Trihadiningrum, Y. (2012) SolidWaste Management in Asian Developing
Countries: Challenges and Opportunities, J. Appl. Environ. Biol. Sci., 2, 329-335.
Dyson, B., Chang, N.B. (2005) Forecasting Municipal Solid Waste Generation in a
Fast-Growing Urban Region with System Dynamics Modelling, Waste Management, 25,
669–679.
Eriksson, O., Reich, M.C., Frostell, B., Bjo¨rklund, A., Assefa, G., Sundqvist, J.O., Granath,
J., Baky, A., and Thyselius, L. (2005) Municipal Solid Waste Management from a
Systems Perspective, Journal of Cleaner Production, 13, 241–252.
Garrod, G. and Willis, K. (1998) Estimating Lost Amenity Due to Landfill Waste Disposal,
Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 22, 83–95.
Kum, V., Sharp, A., and Harnpornchai, N. (2005) Improve the Solid Waste Management in
Phnom Penh City: A Strategic Approach, Waste Management, 25, 101–109.
Lebersorger, S. and Beigl, P. (2011) Municipal Solid Waste Generation in Municipalities:
Quantifying Impacts of Household Structure, Commercial Waste and Domestic Fuel,
Waste Management, 31, 1907–1915.
Mazzantia, M. and Zoboli, R. (2008) Waste Generation, Waste Disposal and Policy
Effectiveness Evidence on Decoupling from the European Union, Resources,
Conservation and Recycling, 52, 1221–1234.
Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Engineering, Project, and Production Management (EPPM 2013)
1178
Ngoc, U.N. and Schnitzer, H. (2009) Sustainable Solutions for Solid Waste Management in
Southeast Asian Countries, Waste Management, 29, 1982–1995.
Ogwueleka, T.C. (2013) Survey of Household Waste Composition and Quantities in Abuja,
Nigeria, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 77, 52– 60.
Parizeau, K., Maclaren, V., and Chanthy, L. (2006) Waste Characterization as an Element of
Waste Management Planning: Lessons Learned from a Study in Siem Reap, Cambodia.
Resources, Conservation, and Recycling, 49, 110–128.
Sakawi, Z. and Gerrard, S. (2013) The Development of Predictive Model for Waste
Generation Rates in Malaysia, Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and
Technology, 5, 1774-1780.
Shan, C.S. (2010) Projecting Municipal Solid Waste: The Case of Hong Kong SAR,
Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 54, 759–768.
Singh, R.P., Tyagi, V.V., Allen, T., Ibrahim, M.H., and Kothari, R. (2011) An Overview for
Exploring the Possibilities of Energy Generation from Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) in
Indian Scenario, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15, 4797– 4808.
Thanh, N.P., Matsui, Y. and Fujiwara, T. (2010) Household Solid Waste Generation and
Characteristic in a Mekong Delta City, Vietnam, Journal of Environmental Management,
91, 2307-2321.
Tin, A.M., Wise, D.L., Su,W.H., Reutergardh, L., and Lee, S.K. (1995) Cost-Benefit Analysis
of the Municipal Solid Waste Collection System in Yangon, Myanmar, Resources,
Conservation, and Recycling, 14, 103-131.
USEPA (1997) Appendix H: Methodology to Calculate Waste Generation Based on Previous
Years. In: Measuring Recycling: A Guide for State and Local Governments: Adjusting
Waste Generation, USEPA 03-27-2003, Washington, D.C.
USEPA (2003) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Municipal Solid Waste in the United
States: 2001 Facts and Figures, USEPA 530-R-03-11, Washington, D.C.
Zia, H. and Devadas, V. (2008) Urban Solid Waste Management in Kanpur: Opportunities
and Perspectives, Habitat International, 32, 58–73.
Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Engineering, Project, and Production Management (EPPM 2013)
1179
Zorpas, A.A. and Lasaridi, K. (2013) Measuring Waste Prevention, Waste Management, 33,
1047–1056.
Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Engineering, Project, and Production Management (EPPM 2013)
1180