mpemch15(cim) 2

Upload: kherszal

Post on 14-Apr-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/30/2019 Mpemch15(CIM) 2

    1/26

    Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 4th ed.Kalpakjian Schmid

    Prentice Hall, 2003

    CHAPTER 15

    Computer-Integrated

    Manufacturing

    Systems

  • 7/30/2019 Mpemch15(CIM) 2

    2/26

    Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 4th ed.Kalpakjian Schmid

    Prentice Hall, 2003

    Computer-

    IntegratedManufacturing

    System

    FIGURE 15.1 Aschematic illustration of acomputer-integrated

    manufacturing system.Source: U. Rembold etal., Computer-Integrated

    Manufacturing andEngineering, Addison-

    Wesley, 1993.

  • 7/30/2019 Mpemch15(CIM) 2

    3/26

    Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 4th ed.Kalpakjian Schmid

    Prentice Hall, 2003

    Modeling for CAD

    FIGURE 15.2 Various types of modeling for CAD.

  • 7/30/2019 Mpemch15(CIM) 2

    4/26

    Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 4th ed.Kalpakjian Schmid

    Prentice Hall, 2003

    Types of Splines

    FIGURE 15.3 Types of splines. (a) A Bezier curve passes through the first and last controlpoint and generates a curve from the other points. Changing a control point modifies theentire curve. (b) A B-spline is constructed piecewise, so that changing a vertex affects thecurve only in the vicinity of the changed control point. (c) Third-order piecewise Beziercurve constructed through two adjacent control points, with two other control pointsdefining the curve slope at the end points. A third-order piecewise Bezier curve iscontinuous, but its slope may be discontinuous.

  • 7/30/2019 Mpemch15(CIM) 2

    5/26

    Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 4th ed.Kalpakjian Schmid

    Prentice Hall, 2003

    Boundary Representation of Solids

    FIGURE 15.4 (a) Boundary representation of solids, showing the enclosing surfaces and

    the generated solid model. (b) A solid model represented as compositions of solidprimitives. (c) Three representations of the same part be CAD. Source: P. Ranky.

  • 7/30/2019 Mpemch15(CIM) 2

    6/26

    Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 4th ed.Kalpakjian Schmid

    Prentice Hall, 2003

    Parametric Design

    FIGURE 15.5 An example of parametric design. Dimensions of part features can be easily

    modified to quickly obtain an updated solid model.

  • 7/30/2019 Mpemch15(CIM) 2

    7/26

    Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 4th ed.Kalpakjian Schmid

    Prentice Hall, 2003

    Octree Representation of a Solid Object

    FIGURE 15.6 The octree representation of a solid object. Any volume can be broken downinto octants, which are then identified as solid, void, or partially filled. Shown is two-dimensional, or quadtree, version, for representation of shapes in a plane.

  • 7/30/2019 Mpemch15(CIM) 2

    8/26

    Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 4th ed.Kalpakjian Schmid

    Prentice Hall, 2003

    Skeleton Data Structure for Solid Objects

    FIGURE 15.7 (a) Illustration of the skeleton data structure for solid objects. The skeleton isthe dashed line in the objects interior. (b) A skeleton model used for kinematic analysis of aclamp. Source: S. D. Lockhart and C. M. Johnson,Engineering Design Communication,

    Prentice Hall, 2000, p. 299.

  • 7/30/2019 Mpemch15(CIM) 2

    9/26

    Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 4th ed.Kalpakjian Schmid

    Prentice Hall, 2003

    Simple Routing Sheet

    FIGURE 15.8 An example of asimple routing sheet. These

    operation sheets may include

    additional information on

    materials, tooling, estimated

    time for each operation,processing parameters (such as

    cutting speeds and feeds), and

    other details. The routing sheet

    travels with the part from

    operation to operation. Thecurrent trend is to store all

    relevant data in computers and

    to affix to the part a bar code

    that serves as a key into the

    database of parts information.

  • 7/30/2019 Mpemch15(CIM) 2

    10/26

    Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 4th ed.Kalpakjian Schmid

    Prentice Hall, 2003

    Robotic Welding Station

    FIGURE 15.9 Simulation ofa robotic welding station. A

    collision has been detected

    that production engineers

    can rectify before building

    the assembly line, therebyreducing development time

    and cost. Source: Mechanical

    Engineering, March 2001.

  • 7/30/2019 Mpemch15(CIM) 2

    11/26

    Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 4th ed.Kalpakjian Schmid

    Prentice Hall, 2003

    Grouping of Parts

    FIGURE 15.10 Groupingparts according to theirgeometric similarities.

  • 7/30/2019 Mpemch15(CIM) 2

    12/26

    Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 4th ed.Kalpakjian Schmid

    Prentice Hall, 2003

    Machine Tools in a

    Traditional Plant

    FIGURE 15.11 Functional layout of

    machine tools in a traditional plant.

    Arrows indicate the flow of materialsand parts in various stages of

    completion. (b) Group-technology

    (cellular) layout. Legend: L= lathe; M=

    milling machine; D= drilling machine;

    G= Grinding machine; A= assembly.Source: M. P. Groover.

  • 7/30/2019 Mpemch15(CIM) 2

    13/26

    Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 4th ed.Kalpakjian Schmid

    Prentice Hall, 2003

    Decision-Tree Classification

    FIGURE 15.12 Decision-tree classification for a sheet-metal bracket. Source: G. W. Millar.

  • 7/30/2019 Mpemch15(CIM) 2

    14/26

    Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 4th ed.Kalpakjian Schmid

    Prentice Hall, 2003

    Classification and Coding System

    FIGURE 15.13

    A classification

    and coding

    system using the

    Opitz system,consisting of five

    digits and a

    supplementary

    code of four

    digits.

  • 7/30/2019 Mpemch15(CIM) 2

    15/26

    Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 4th ed.Kalpakjian Schmid

    Prentice Hall, 2003

    Multiclass Code for a Machined Part

    FIGURE 15.14 Typical MultiClass code for a machined part. Source: Organization for

    Industrial research.

  • 7/30/2019 Mpemch15(CIM) 2

    16/26

    Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 4th ed.Kalpakjian Schmid

    Prentice Hall, 2003

    System for Rotational Components

    FIGURE 15.15 The structure

    of a KK-3 system for

    rotational components. Source:

    Japan Society for the

    Promotion of MachineIndustry.

  • 7/30/2019 Mpemch15(CIM) 2

    17/26

    Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 4th ed.Kalpakjian Schmid

    Prentice Hall, 2003

    Flexible Manufacturing Cell

    FIGURE 15.16Schematic view

    of a flexible

    manufacturing

    cell, showing two

    machine tools,and automated art

    inspection

    system, and a

    central robot

    serving thesemachines.

    Source: P. K.

    Wright.

  • 7/30/2019 Mpemch15(CIM) 2

    18/26

    Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 4th ed.Kalpakjian Schmid

    Prentice Hall, 2003

    Flexible Manufacturing System

    FIGURE 15.17 Ageneral view of aflexiblemanufacturingsystem, showingseveral machinetools and anautomated guidedvehicle. Source:Courtesy ofCincinnati

    Milacron, Inc.

  • 7/30/2019 Mpemch15(CIM) 2

    19/26

    Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 4th ed.Kalpakjian Schmid

    Prentice Hall, 2003

    Comparison of Transfer Lines and Flexible

    Manufacturing SystemsCharacteristic Transfer line FMS

    Types of parts made Generally few InfiniteLot size > 100 150Part changing time 1/2 to 8 hr 1 minTool change Manual AutomaticAdaptive control Difficult AvailableInventory High LowProduction during breakdown None PartialEfficiency 6070% 85%

    J ustification for capital expenditure Simple Difficult

    TABLE 15.1 Comparison of the characteristics of transfer lines and flexible manufacturing

    systems.

  • 7/30/2019 Mpemch15(CIM) 2

    20/26

    Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 4th ed.Kalpakjian Schmid

    Prentice Hall, 2003

    Topology for a Local Area Network

    FIGURE 15.18 Three basic types of topology for a local area network (LAN). (a) the startopology is suitable for situations that are not subject to frequent configuration changes. Allmessages pass through a central station. Telephone systems in office buildings usually have thistype of topology. (b) In the ring topology, all individual user station are connected in a continuousring. The message is forwarded from one station to the next until it reaches its assigned destination.Although the wiring is relatively simple, the failure of one station shuts down the entire network.

    (c) In the bus topology, all stations have independent access to the bus. This system is reliable andis easier than the other two to service. Because its arrangement is similar to the layout of themachines in the factory, its installation is relatively easy, and it can be rearranged when themachines are rearranged.

  • 7/30/2019 Mpemch15(CIM) 2

    21/26

    Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 4th ed.Kalpakjian Schmid

    Prentice Hall, 2003

    Reference Model for Open Communication

    FIGURE 15.19 The ISO/OSI reference model for open communication. Source: U.Rembold et al., Computer Integrated Manufacturing and Engineering, Addison-Wesley,

    1993.

  • 7/30/2019 Mpemch15(CIM) 2

    22/26

    Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 4th ed.Kalpakjian Schmid

    Prentice Hall, 2003

    Expert System Structure

    FIGURE 15.20 The basic structure ofan expert system. The knowledge base

    consists of knowledge rules (general

    information about the problem) and

    inference rules (the way conclusions are

    reached). The results may becommunicated to the user through the

    natural-language interface. Source: K.

    W. Goff, Mechanical Engineering,

    October 1985.

  • 7/30/2019 Mpemch15(CIM) 2

    23/26

    Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 4th ed.Kalpakjian Schmid

    Prentice Hall, 2003

    Vision Guided Robot

    FIGURE 15.21 Expert system as applied to an industrial robot guided by machine vision.

  • 7/30/2019 Mpemch15(CIM) 2

    24/26

    Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 4th ed.Kalpakjian Schmid

    Prentice Hall, 2003

    Solid Model of an Engine Compartment

    FIGURE 15.22 Every vehiclecomponent, from body panels

    to knobs on the instrument

    panel, has a solid model

    associated with it. Source:

    Ford Motor Company.

  • 7/30/2019 Mpemch15(CIM) 2

    25/26

    Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 4th ed.Kalpakjian Schmid

    Prentice Hall, 2003

    Instrument-Panel Concept

    FIGURE 15.23 A clay sculptor working on an instrument-panel concept. Source: Ford

    Motor Company.

  • 7/30/2019 Mpemch15(CIM) 2

    26/26

    Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 4th ed.Kalpakjian Schmid

    Prentice Hall, 2003

    Flange and Fillet

    FIGURE 15.24 First flange and fillet.