migrant women’s experiences of pregnancy, childbirth and
TRANSCRIPT
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Migrant women’s experiences of pregnancy,
childbirth and maternity care in European
countries: A systematic review
Frankie FairID1, Liselotte Raben2, Helen WatsonID
1, Victoria Vivilaki3, Maria van den
Muijsenbergh2,4, Hora SoltaniID1*, the ORAMMA team¶
1 Department of Nursing and Midwifery, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, England, United Kingdom,
2 Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands,
3 Department of Midwifery, Faculty of Health and Caring Sciences, University of West Attica, Athens,
Greece, 4 Pharos, Centre of Expertise on Health Disparities, Utrecht, Netherlands
¶ Membership of the ORAMMA team is provided in the Acknowledgments.
Abstract
Background
Across Europe there are increasing numbers of migrant women who are of childbearing
age. Migrant women are at risk of poorer pregnancy outcomes. Models of maternity care
need to be designed to meet the needs of all women in society to ensure equitable access to
services and to address health inequalities.
Objective
To provide up-to-date systematic evidence on migrant women’s experiences of pregnancy,
childbirth and maternity care in their destination European country.
Search strategy
CINAHL, MEDLINE, PubMed, PsycINFO and Scopus were searched for peer-reviewed arti-
cles published between 2007 and 2017.
Selection criteria
Qualitative and mixed-methods studies with a relevant qualitative component were consid-
ered for inclusion if they explored any aspect of migrant women’s experiences of maternity
care in Europe.
Data collection and analysis
Qualitative data were extracted and analysed using thematic synthesis.
Results
The search identified 7472 articles, of which 51 were eligible and included. Studies were
conducted in 14 European countries and focused on women described as migrants,
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228378 February 11, 2020 1 / 26
a1111111111
a1111111111
a1111111111
a1111111111
a1111111111
OPEN ACCESS
Citation: Fair F, Raben L, Watson H, Vivilaki V, van
den Muijsenbergh M, Soltani H, et al. (2020)
Migrant women’s experiences of pregnancy,
childbirth and maternity care in European
countries: A systematic review. PLoS ONE 15(2):
e0228378. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.
pone.0228378
Editor: Nihaya Daoud, Ben-Gurion University of the
Negev Faculty of Health Sciences, ISRAEL
Received: May 17, 2019
Accepted: January 14, 2020
Published: February 11, 2020
Copyright: © 2020 Fair et al. This is an open access
article distributed under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution License, which permits
unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in
any medium, provided the original author and
source are credited.
Data Availability Statement: All relevant data are
within the paper and its Supporting Information
files.
Funding: MM,HS & VV - grant received from the
Consumers, Health, Agriculture and Food Executive
Agency (CHAFEA) of the European Commission
Grant Number 738148. http://ec.europa.eu/chafea/
index_en.htm The funders had no role in study
design, data collection and analysis, decision to
publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
refugees or asylum seekers. Four overarching themes emerged: ‘Finding the way—the
experience of navigating the system in a new place’, ‘We don’t understand each other’, ‘The
way you treat me matters’, and ‘My needs go beyond being pregnant’.
Conclusions
Migrant women need culturally-competent healthcare providers who provide equitable, high
quality and trauma-informed maternity care, undergirded by interdisciplinary and cross-
agency team-working and continuity of care. New models of maternity care are needed
which go beyond clinical care and address migrant women’s unique socioeconomic and
psychosocial needs.
Introduction
International migration continues to grow rapidly [1]. Between 2000 and 2017, the migrant
population increased by 85 million, from 173 to 258 million [1]. In 2017, more than 90 million
international migrants were residing in the World Health Organization (WHO) European
region and more than half of these migrants were women, many of childbearing age [2]. There
are no universally accepted definitions for a migrant at an international level [2] and this het-
erogeneous group includes individuals who vary by length of stay in a country, documentation
and residency status, movement being voluntary or forced, and reasons for migration [2,3].
Health needs and outcomes in this heterogeneous group is a complex topic, as these are influ-
enced by the interaction of the process of migration and exposure to risks and access to the
determinants of health in the country of origin, during transit and in the destination country
[2].
On average the fertility rate in the migration population is higher than the native popula-
tion [4]. Among women living in the United Kingdom, birth data from 2015 show a total fer-
tility rate (the average number of children a woman has in her lifetime) of 2.06 for non-UK
born women versus 1.75 for UK born women [5]. Pregnancy is a period of increased vulnera-
bility for migrant women [6,7]. There is a consistent trend for poorer pregnancy outcomes
amongst migrant women [2] who are at greater risk of maternal and neonatal morbidity and
mortality when compared to native born women [2,8–17]. This is a result of the complex inter-
play of multiple factors including substandard healthcare in the country of origin [2] and
issues around accessing care and the quality of care in the new country [2,14,18]. Moreover,
migration itself can have significant negative consequences for people’s physical and mental
health and their wellbeing due to migration-related social problems, like poor socio-economic
status, discrimination and social exclusion, multiple losses, and the chronic stress caused by
these [19–21]. It is often observed that migrants leaving their country of origin are healthier
than comparable native populations. This phenomenon has been called the “healthy migrant
effect” and is usually explained through the positive self-selection of immigrants and the posi-
tive selection, screening and discrimination applied by host countries [22]. But, although often
healthy when arriving in the country, the health of migrants deteriorates over time, and in gen-
eral, they rate themselves to have poorer health compared to the native population of their
host countries [20].
Across the WHO European region there is consensus and commitment to ensure the avail-
ability, accessibility, affordability and quality of essential health services for migrants in transit
and host environments [23]. Hence European countries have a common responsibility to
Migrant women’s experiences of maternity care
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228378 February 11, 2020 2 / 26
Competing interests: The authors have declared
that no competing interests exist.
tackle inequalities and provide high quality healthcare that meets the needs of childbearing
migrant women. However across European Union (EU) member states, the services provided
for migrants and how they are administered, financed and delivered differs between countries;
with some providing care free of charge, some requiring health insurance and some available
to those making national insurance contributions through a place of work [24].
A previous qualitative evidence synthesis [25] has explored both migrant women’s care
experiences and their perceived care needs for data published prior to June 2010. However, an
updated review was deemed important with the acknowledgement that changing global, politi-
cal and economic climates have led to increased migration into Europe [2,26]. This includes
recent political unrest and conflict in many Middle Eastern and Sub-Saharan countries [26],
the updated rights of free movement of citizens and their families within the European Eco-
nomic Area laid down in a Directive in 2004 [27] and an increased recognition of the need to
integrate the health needs of migrants and refugees into national health strategies [2]. This
review therefore aimed to provide up-to-date systematic evidence on migrant women’s experi-
ences of pregnancy, childbirth and maternity care in their destination country within Europe.
Methods
A systematic search of five databases was undertaken to identify articles pertaining to migrant
women’s experiences of pregnancy and maternity care in their destination country. The fol-
lowing databases were searched; CINAHL, MEDLINE, PUBMED, PSYCHINFO and SCO-
PUS. Databases were searched from 2007 until the final search on 22/05/2017. The point of
commencement was taken as 2007 due to the changing political landscape within the EU at
that point, with the health of migrants being a focus of the EU president in 2007 [28]. The
search strategy comprised of three facets, with terms relating to (i) migrant (ii) maternity and
(iii) experience. The Boolean operators AND and OR were used alongside truncation opera-
tors and phrase-searching, and the search syntax was adapted for each database. The full search
strategy, as applied in MEDLINE (EBSCO interface) is provided in S1 File. In addition to the
electronic database search, the reference lists of eligible studies were examined to identify any
other relevant studies and citation tracking was undertaken.
Study selection and data extraction
Screening of the titles and abstracts against the inclusion and exclusion criteria in Table 1 was
carried out by two researchers independently. This was followed by double-screening the full-
text of potentially relevant sources. Any disagreements concerning eligibility were resolved
through discussion between team members. Study characteristics and all qualitative data that
related to women’s experiences of any aspect of maternity care within the host country were
extracted using a standardised form.
Critical appraisal
Included articles were quality appraised using the qualitative National Institute for Health and
Care Excellence (NICE) critique tool [29] (see S2 File) and 10% were appraised by a second
reviewer to ensure consistency. A low-quality score (-) was assigned if either most criteria
were not met, or it was judged that there were significant flaws in the study design. The article
was classified as moderate quality (+) if most criteria were met and it was identified that there
may be some flaws in the study resulting in a lack of rigor. A high-quality score (++) required
that the majority of the appraisal criteria were met and the study was judged to be trustworthy
and reliable and there was significant evidence of author reflexivity.
Migrant women’s experiences of maternity care
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228378 February 11, 2020 3 / 26
Evidence synthesis
A thematic synthesis was undertaken involving 3 separate steps; i) line by line coding adding
new codes to the ’bank’ of codes as required, ii) organising codes into descriptive themes
according to their similarities or differences and using new codes to capture the group of origi-
nal codes, iii) generating analytical themes [30]. Coding was undertaken using NVivo and
Atlas.ti packages. A total of 28% of the articles were double-coded, and development of the
final analytic themes involved discussion with the whole research team to achieve consensus.
Confidence in the findings
The confidence in the findings of this review was assessed independently by two reviewers
using the Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research (CERQual)
approach [31,32]. This assesses confidence in the evidence base in four components: (i) meth-
odological limitations which evaluates any methodological concerns in the primary studies
contributing to the review finding, (ii) relevance to the review question evaluates the applica-
bility of primary study data to the context specified in the review question, (iii) coherence
which evaluates the fit between the primary study’s data and the review finding it contributes
to and (iv) adequacy of the data which evaluates the richness and quantity of primary study
data for each review finding [33]. An overall judgement for confidence in each review finding
of ’high’, ’moderate’ or ’low’ was determined based on evaluation of the four components.
Results
A flow diagram of the study selection process can be seen in Fig 1. A total of 7472 citations
were initially identified out of which 51 articles (47 studies) were included.
Description of included studies
The characteristics of the included studies can be seen in Table 2 and the reasons for exclusion
at abstract and full text can be found in S3 File. Of the 47 included studies, 43 exclusively used
qualitative methodology and four adopted a mixed methods approach and reported relevant
qualitative data [34–37]. Individual interviews were exclusively undertaken in 27 of the studies
[8,38–63] and focus groups in five studies [64–68]. Multiple methods of data collection were
Table 1. Inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Inclusion Criteria Exclusion criteria
• Qualitative or mixed-methods studies with a qualitative
component
• Peer reviewed articles
• Exploring any aspect of migrant women’s experiences of
maternity care in the host country
• Study undertaken in Europe
• Published within the last 10 years (from 2007 onwards)
• Studies focussed on women described as migrants,
refugees or asylum seekers, including undocumented
migrants
• Where both first and second-generation migrants were
included within a study, the study was included but where
possible only the views of the first-generation migrant
women were included
• Where studies included both the experiences of migrant
women and health care professionals, only the views of the
migrant women were included
• No language restrictions were put in place
• Internal migrants (eg rural to urban)
• Migration status unclear (eg. studies of ethnic
minorities women with no reference to migration
status)
• Non peer-reviewed articles eg commentaries,
editorials, reports, books, protocols and theses/
dissertations
• Systematic reviews and reviews—however their
references were systematically searched
• Studies focussed solely on women’s experiences of
interventions
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228378.t001
Migrant women’s experiences of maternity care
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228378 February 11, 2020 4 / 26
Ta
ble
2.
Ch
ara
cter
isti
cso
fin
clu
ded
stu
die
s.
Qu
ali
tati
ve
stu
die
s
�st
ud
ies
mar
ked
wit
han
aste
rix
are
tak
enas
the
pri
mar
yre
po
rtfo
rth
atst
ud
y
Fir
sta
uth
or
(yea
r)
Stu
dy
des
ign
Set
tin
g
(co
un
try
rese
arc
h
un
der
tak
en
in)
Pa
rtic
ipa
nts
Aim
Da
taco
llec
tio
nD
ata
an
aly
sis
Ou
tco
mes
Co
mm
ents
Qu
ali
ty
sco
resa
mp
lesi
zeco
un
try
of
ori
gin
ag
ep
ari
ty
Alm
eid
a&
Cal
das
(20
13
)
[8]
Qu
alit
ativ
eP
ort
ug
al1
4B
razi
l(n
=7
)an
d
Po
rtu
gal
(n=
7)
No
tre
po
rted
No
tre
po
rted
To
inv
esti
gat
en
ativ
e
Po
rtu
gu
ese
and
imm
igra
nt
wo
men
’sp
erce
pti
on
so
f
mat
ern
ity
care
.
Sem
i-st
ruct
ure
d
inte
rvie
ws
Qu
alit
ativ
eco
nte
nt
anal
ysi
s.
Bra
zili
anw
om
enw
ere
dis
sati
sfie
dw
ith
the
qu
alit
yo
fin
form
atio
np
rovid
edb
y
the
hea
lth
pro
fess
ion
als,
the
com
mu
nic
atio
ns
skil
lso
fth
ese
pro
fess
ion
als,
and
rep
ort
edre
du
ced
acce
ssto
med
ical
spec
ialt
ies,
esp
ecia
lly
in
pri
mar
yca
re
On
lyre
sult
sfr
om
mig
ran
tw
om
en
wer
eu
sed
-
�A
lmei
da,
Cal
das
etal
(20
14
)
Alm
eid
a,
Cas
ano
va
etal
(20
14
)[3
8,8
0]
Qu
alit
ativ
eP
ort
ug
al3
1A
fric
anco
un
trie
s(1
1),
Eas
tern
Eu
rop
ean
cou
ntr
ies;
(7),
Bra
zil
(7)
and
6P
ort
ug
al
20
–4
5yea
rsN
ot
rep
ort
edT
oin
ves
tig
ate
nat
ive
and
imm
igra
nt
wo
men
’s
per
cep
tio
ns
abo
ut
qu
alit
yan
d
app
rop
riat
enes
so
fm
ater
nit
y
care
Sem
i-st
ruct
ure
d
inte
rvie
ws
Qu
alit
ativ
eco
nte
nt
Mis
info
rmat
ion
abo
ut
leg
alri
gh
tsan
d
inad
equ
ate
clar
ific
atio
nd
uri
ng
med
ical
app
oin
tmen
tsfr
equ
entl
yin
tera
cted
wit
h
soci
ald
eter
min
ants
,su
chas
low
soci
al-
eco
no
mic
stat
us,
un
emp
loym
ent,
and
po
or
livin
gco
nd
itio
ns,
tore
sult
inlo
wer
per
ceiv
edq
ual
ity
of
hea
lth
care
.
On
lyre
sult
sfr
om
mig
ran
tsw
ere
extr
acte
d
+
Bab
atu
nd
e&
Mo
ren
o-
Leg
uiz
amo
n
(20
12
)[6
4]
Qu
alit
ativ
eU
K1
7N
iger
ia(1
1),
Gh
ana
(2),
Ken
ya
(1),
So
mal
ia
(1),
Sie
rra
Leo
ne
(2)
16
–4
5yea
rsN
ot
rep
ort
edT
oes
tab
lish
cult
ura
lel
emen
ts
rela
ted
top
ost
nat
al
dep
ress
ion
thro
ug
hw
om
en’s
nar
rati
ves
.
Fo
cus
gro
up
sT
hem
atic
anal
ysi
sW
om
enw
ho
exp
erie
nce
dp
ost
nat
al
dep
ress
ion
did
no
tp
erce
ive
the
sig
ns
as
rela
ted
toil
lnes
sb
ut
asso
met
hin
gel
sein
thei
rd
aily
lives
.D
epre
ssio
nw
asn
ot
iden
tifi
edb
yh
ealt
hvis
ito
rs,
des
pit
e
pro
lon
ged
con
tact
wit
hth
ew
om
en.
++
Bar
on
a-V
ilar
etal
(20
13
)[6
5]
Qu
alit
ativ
e
des
crip
tiv
ean
d
exp
lora
tory
stu
dy
Sp
ain
26
imm
igra
nt
wo
men
and
24
mid
wif
es
Bo
liv
iaan
dE
cuad
or
20
–3
5y
ears
1->
2ch
ild
ren
To
exp
lore
the
per
cep
tio
ns,
atti
tud
esan
dex
per
ien
ces
of
Ecu
ado
rian
and
Bo
livia
n
wo
men
wit
hre
gar
dto
mo
ther
ho
od
,p
reg
nan
cyan
d
thei
rex
per
ien
ces
of
the
hea
lth
-car
esy
stem
.
Fo
cus
gro
up
sC
on
ten
tan
aly
sis
Wo
men
rep
ort
edth
atit
was
no
t
nec
essa
ryto
go
asso
on
and
asfr
equ
entl
y
for
hea
lth
exam
inat
ion
sd
uri
ng
pre
gn
ancy
asth
em
idw
ives
sug
ges
ted
.
Th
em
ain
bar
rier
sid
enti
fied
toh
ealt
h-
care
serv
ices
wer
eli
nk
edto
inse
cure
or
ille
gal
emp
loym
ent
stat
us,
infl
exib
le
app
oin
tmen
tti
met
able
sfo
rp
ren
atal
chec
ku
ps
and
som
etim
esto
ign
ora
nce
abo
ut
ho
wp
ub
lic
serv
ices
wo
rked
On
lyre
sult
sfr
om
mig
ran
tw
om
en
wer
eu
sed
+
Bin
der
,
Joh
nsd
ott
er
etal
(20
12
)[3
9]
Qu
alit
ativ
e.
Her
men
euti
c
UK
54
imm
igra
nt
wo
men
and
62
NH
Sm
ater
nal
care
pro
vid
ers
Su
b-S
ahar
anre
gio
ns
inA
fric
a(S
om
alia
,
Gh
ana,
Nig
eria
,
Sen
egal
,E
ritr
ea).
18
–4
8y
ears
1–
10
chil
dre
nT
oex
plo
reth
ein
flu
ence
of
pre
-mig
rati
on
soci
o-c
ult
ura
l
fact
ors
on
po
st-m
igra
tio
n
mat
ern
alca
re-s
eek
ing
,an
d
bar
rier
sb
etw
een
imm
igra
nt
wo
men
and
mat
ern
alca
re
pro
vid
ers
du
rin
gth
eca
re
enco
un
ter.
Sem
i-st
ruct
ure
d
inte
rvie
ws
Co
nst
ant
com
par
iso
n
and
tria
ng
ula
tio
nw
ith
fram
ewo
rk
Bro
ken
tru
stb
etw
een
wo
men
and
mat
ern
alca
rep
rov
ider
sm
ayre
sult
in
del
ays
atth
efa
cili
tyle
vel
,ex
pre
ssed
as
wo
men
’sch
oic
efo
rla
te-b
oo
kin
g,
no
n-
adh
eren
ce,
or
inap
pro
pri
ate
dec
isio
n-
mak
ing
,an
das
pro
vid
erfr
ust
rati
on
resu
ltin
gfr
om
the
inab
ilit
yto
imp
art
op
tim
altr
eatm
ent.
+
Bin
der
,B
orn
e
etal
(20
12
)[6
9]
Qu
alit
ativ
eU
K5
0im
mig
ran
t
wo
men
,1
0w
hit
e
Bri
tish
wo
men
and
62
ob
stet
ric
care
pro
vid
ers
So
mal
ia(3
9)
and
Gh
ana
(11
)an
dU
K
(10
)
18
–4
8yea
rs1
–1
0ch
ild
ren
To
exp
lore
imm
igra
nt
wo
men
’sex
per
ien
ces
of
com
mu
nic
atio
nan
d
con
cep
tio
ns
of
mat
ern
ity
care
.
Ind
epth
-
ind
ivid
ual
inte
rvie
ws
and
focu
sg
rou
ps
Qu
alit
ativ
ete
chn
iqu
es
usi
ng
afr
amew
ork
of
nat
ura
list
icen
qu
iry
.
Wo
men
enco
un
tere
dd
iffi
cult
ies
in
hea
lth
com
mu
nic
atio
n.
Pro
fess
ion
alis
m
and
com
pet
ence
wer
em
ore
imp
ort
ant
than
mee
tin
gp
rov
ider
sfr
om
on
e’s
ow
n
eth
nic
gro
up
.In
terp
rete
ru
sew
asli
mit
ed
by
issu
eso
fq
ual
ity,
tru
st,
and
acce
ssib
ilit
yan
dh
asp
ote
nti
alfo
r
imp
rovem
ent
On
lyre
sult
sfr
om
mig
ran
tw
om
en
wer
eu
sed
-
Bo
llin
iet
al
(20
07
)[6
6]
Qu
alit
ativ
eS
wit
zerl
and
31
imm
igra
nt
wo
men
and
9
nat
ive
Sw
iss
wo
men
Tu
rkey
(14
),P
ort
ug
al
(17
)
Bet
wee
n<
30
and>
50
(no
tsp
ecif
ied
)
Bet
wee
n1
and
>2
chil
dre
n
To
exp
lore
the
issu
eso
f
pre
gn
ancy
and
del
iver
yin
mig
ran
tw
om
enin
thei
r
inte
ract
ion
wit
hth
eS
wis
s
hea
lth
care
syst
em
Fo
cus
gro
up
sC
od
ing
and
the
con
stru
ctio
no
f
them
es
Mig
ran
tw
om
enfa
cest
ress
ful
situ
atio
ns,
wh
ich
may
dif
fer
acco
rdin
gto
nat
ion
alit
y
and
len
gth
of
stay
inth
eco
un
try
.M
ain
fact
ors
neg
ativ
ely
affe
ctin
gp
reg
nan
cy
wer
est
ress
du
eto
pre
cari
ou
sli
vin
g
con
dit
ion
s,h
eavy
wo
rkd
uri
ng
pre
gn
ancy
,in
adeq
uat
eco
mm
un
icat
ion
wit
hh
ealt
hca
rep
rov
ider
s,an
dfe
elin
gs
of
raci
sman
dd
iscr
imin
atio
nin
soci
ety
On
lyre
sult
sfr
om
mig
ran
tw
om
en
wer
eu
sed
-
Bri
sco
e&
Lav
end
er
(20
09
)[7
0]
Qu
alit
ativ
e.
Lo
ng
itu
din
al
exp
lora
tory
mu
ltip
le
case
stu
dy
UK
4A
fgh
anis
tan
,C
on
go
,
Rw
and
a,S
om
alia
.
19
–3
6y
ears
1–
3T
oex
plo
rean
dsy
nth
esiz
e
fem
ale
asy
lum
seek
ers’
and
refu
gee
s’ex
per
ien
ceo
f
mat
ern
ity
care
In-d
epth
inte
rvie
ws.
Ph
oto
gra
ph
sta
ken
by
the
wo
men
.
Fie
ldn
ote
san
d
ob
serv
atio
n.
Co
nst
ruct
ion
of
them
es
Th
ew
om
enp
erce
ived
‘sel
f’as
are
spo
nse
toso
cial
inte
ract
ion
.A
tti
mes
,‘t
aken
for
gra
nte
d’co
mm
un
icat
ion
inp
ract
ice
crea
ted
ab
arri
erto
un
der
stan
din
gfo
rth
e
wo
men
.S
oci
alp
oli
cyre
late
dto
seek
ing
asy
lum
,d
isp
ersa
l,h
ou
sin
gan
dh
ealt
h
affe
cted
the
lives
and
mat
ern
ity
exp
erie
nce
so
fw
om
en
+
(Con
tinued)
Migrant women’s experiences of maternity care
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228378 February 11, 2020 5 / 26
Ta
ble
2.
(Co
nti
nu
ed)
By
rsk
og
etal
(20
16
)[4
0]
An
exp
lora
tive,
qu
alit
ativ
eap
pro
ach
Sw
eden
17
So
mal
ia1
8–
45
yea
rsB
etw
een
0an
d
>7
chil
dre
n
To
exp
lore
ho
wS
om
ali-
bo
rn
wo
men
un
der
stan
dan
dre
late
tov
iole
nce
and
wel
lbei
ng
du
rin
gth
eir
mig
rati
on
tran
siti
on
and
thei
rv
iew
so
n
bei
ng
qu
esti
on
edab
ou
t
vio
len
cein
Sw
edis
han
ten
atal
care
Ind
ivid
ual
sem
i-
stru
ctu
red
inte
rvie
ws
Th
emat
ican
alysi
s.A
bal
anci
ng
act
bet
wee
nk
eep
ing
pri
vat
e
life
pri
vat
ean
dth
en
eww
elfa
resy
stem
was
iden
tifi
ed,
wh
ere
the
mid
wif
e’s
qu
esti
on
sab
ou
tvio
len
cew
ere
met
wit
h
hes
itan
ce.
Th
em
idw
ife
was
,h
ow
ever
,
con
sid
ered
are
sou
rce
for
acce
ssto
sup
po
rtse
rvic
esin
the
new
soci
ety
.A
focu
so
np
rag
mat
icst
rate
gie
sto
mo
ve
on
inli
fe,
rath
erth
and
wel
lin
go
np
ote
nti
al
exp
erie
nce
so
fvio
len
cean
dre
late
d
trau
mas
,w
asp
rom
inen
t.S
oci
al
net
wo
rks,
spir
itu
alfa
ith
and
mo
ther
ho
od
wer
ecr
uci
alfo
rre
gai
nin
gco
her
ence
in
the
afte
rmat
ho
fw
ar.
Dia
log
ue
and
mu
tual
adju
stm
ents
wer
eid
enti
fied
as
stra
teg
ies
use
dto
over
com
ep
ow
er
ten
sio
ns
inin
tim
ate
rela
tio
nsh
ips
un
der
go
ing
tran
siti
on
++
Ch
ou
dh
ry&
Wal
lace
(20
12
)
[41
]
Des
crip
tive
qu
alit
ativ
est
ud
y
UK
20
So
uth
Asi
a.1
1b
orn
in
UK
,9
ou
tsid
eU
K.
No
tre
po
rted
9p
ara
1,9
par
a
2,
2ex
pec
tin
g
firs
tb
aby
To
exp
lore
the
infl
uen
ceo
f
accu
ltu
rati
on
on
bre
astf
eed
ing
pra
ctic
eso
fS
ou
thA
sian
wo
men
.
Sem
i-st
ruct
ure
d
inte
rvie
ws
Th
emat
ican
alysi
s5
them
es-‘M
aaKaa
Dood’(The
mother’s
milk
);T
he
mo
stco
nv
enie
nt
met
ho
dfo
r
me;
Fo
rmu
lafe
edin
gas
aw
ayo
ffu
lfil
lin
g
the
bab
y’s
dem
and
s;B
reas
tis
n’t
alw
ays
bes
t–
wo
men
’sex
per
ien
ceo
f
info
rmat
ion
and
role
con
flic
t;L
earn
ing
by
ob
serv
atio
n–
the
form
ula
feed
ing
cult
ure
On
lyre
sult
sfr
om
mig
ran
tw
om
en
wer
eu
sed
+
Co
uti
nh
oet
al
(20
14
)[4
2]
Qu
alit
ativ
e,
exp
lora
tory
,
des
crip
tiv
est
ud
y
Po
rtu
gal
82
(60
imm
igra
nt
wo
men
and
22
nat
ive
Po
rtu
gu
ese
wo
men
)
Bra
zil,
Uk
rain
e,C
hin
a,
Mo
ldo
va,
Ru
ssia
,
Fra
nce
,S
pan
,In
dia
,
Po
rtu
gal
and
oth
ers
No
tre
po
rted
No
tre
po
rted
To
iden
tify
the
un
met
exp
ecta
tio
ns
of
the
hea
lth
syst
emb
yP
ort
ug
ues
e
and
imm
igra
nt
wo
men
,
du
rin
gp
reg
nan
cy,
chil
db
irth
and
po
stp
artu
m.
Sem
i-st
ruct
ure
d
inte
rvie
ws.
Gu
idel
ines
wer
e
use
d.
Rec
ord
ed.
Co
nte
nt
anal
ysi
sM
ajo
rem
erg
ing
cate
go
ries
of
un
met
exp
ecta
tio
ns
refe
rred
toth
eac
cess
ibil
ity,
hu
man
reso
urc
es,
ince
nti
ves
tom
ater
nit
y
care
,p
hysi
cal
and
envir
on
men
tal
con
dit
ion
s,an
do
rgan
izat
ion
of
the
hea
lth
syst
em.
On
lyre
sult
sfr
om
mig
ran
tw
om
en
wer
eu
sed
-
Deg
ni
etal
(20
14
)[6
7]
Qu
alit
ativ
eF
inla
nd
70
So
mal
iw
om
enfr
om
Ken
ya
(18
),
Mo
gad
ish
u(3
2)
and
Har
gey
sa(2
0)
18
–5
0y
ears
2–
10
chil
dre
nT
oex
plo
reim
mig
ran
tS
om
ali
wo
men
’sex
per
ien
ces
of
rep
rod
uct
ive
and
mat
ern
ity
hea
lth
care
serv
ices
and
thei
r
per
cep
tio
ns
abo
ut
the
serv
ice
pro
vid
ers
Fo
cus
gro
up
s.T
hem
esco
nst
ruct
edP
arti
cip
ants
wer
esa
tisf
ied
wit
hth
eca
re
they
rece
ived
inF
inla
nd
.D
esp
ite
thei
r
sati
sfac
tio
n,
the
hea
lth
care
pro
vid
ers’
soci
alat
titu
des
tow
ard
sth
emw
ere
per
ceiv
edas
un
frie
nd
ly,an
d
com
mu
nic
atio
nas
po
or
++
Dem
pse
y&
Pee
ren
(20
16
)
[43
]
Qu
alit
ativ
e—
gro
un
ded
theo
ry
Irel
and
12
Eas
tern
Eu
rop
e2
0–
40
yea
rsV
arie
d,
nu
mb
ers
no
t
rep
ort
ed.
To
exp
lore
mig
ran
tE
aste
rn
Eu
rop
ean
wo
men
’s
exp
erie
nce
of
pre
gn
ancy
in
Irel
and
Sem
i-st
ruct
ure
d
inte
rvie
ws
Co
nst
ruct
ion
of
them
es
Mig
ran
tw
om
enw
ho
exp
erie
nce
pre
gn
ancy
inth
eir
ho
stco
un
try
face
mu
ltip
le,
mu
lti-
face
ted
chal
len
ges
.
Mig
ran
tE
aste
rnE
uro
pea
nw
om
enm
ay
hav
ep
arti
cula
rst
rug
gle
sw
ith
tran
siti
on
ing
toa
less
med
ical
ised
mat
ern
ity
hea
lth
care
syst
em.
+
Ess
enet
al
(20
11
)[7
1]
Qu
alit
ativ
eU
K1
01
(39
So
mal
i
wo
men
and
62
ob
stet
ric
care
pro
vid
ers)
So
mal
ia1
8–
48
yea
rs(S
om
ali
wo
men
)
1–
10
chil
dre
nT
oex
plo
reth
eat
titu
des
of
So
mal
iw
om
enan
dth
eir
wes
tern
ob
stet
ric
care
pro
vid
ers
tow
ard
sC
aesa
rean
sect
ion
In-d
epth
sem
i-
stru
ctu
red
inte
rvie
ws
and
focu
sg
rou
ps
Fra
mew
ork
of
nat
ura
list
icin
qu
iry
usi
ng
the
emic
/eti
c
mo
del
.
So
mal
iw
om
enex
pre
ssed
fear
and
anx
iety
thro
ug
ho
ut
the
pre
gn
ancy
and
iden
tifi
edst
rate
gie
sto
avo
idca
esar
ean
sect
ion
Avo
idin
go
rre
fusi
ng
caes
area
n
was
bas
edo
na
rati
on
alch
oic
eto
avo
id
dea
than
dco
pin
gw
ith
adv
erse
ou
tco
me
reli
edo
nfa
tali
stic
atti
tud
es
On
lyre
sult
sfr
om
mig
ran
tw
om
en
wer
eu
sed
++
Fel
dm
an(2
01
4)
[44
]
Qu
alit
ativ
eU
K2
0w
om
en1
4d
iffe
ren
tco
un
trie
sN
ot
rep
ort
edN
ot
rep
ort
edT
oin
ves
tig
ate
the
exp
erie
nce
s
of
wo
men
wh
oh
adb
een
dis
per
sed
du
rin
gp
reg
nan
cy
and
of
mid
wiv
esin
vo
lved
in
cari
ng
for
thes
ew
om
en
Ind
ivid
ual
inte
rvie
ws,
face
-to
-
face
or
tele
ph
on
e
No
tsp
ecif
ied
Dis
per
sal
inte
rru
pte
dw
om
en’s
acce
ssto
mat
ern
ity
care
.W
om
enex
per
ien
ced
pra
ctic
alb
arri
ers
toac
cess
ing
care
and
com
mu
nic
atio
np
rob
lem
s.W
om
en
exp
erie
nce
dth
ep
ost
nat
alp
erio
das
emo
tio
nal
and
stre
ssfu
lan
dh
ad
con
cern
sab
ou
tth
eir
livin
gco
nd
itio
ns.
-
Gar
dn
eret
al
(20
14
)[4
5]
Qu
alit
ativ
eU
K6
Nig
eria
and
Gh
ana
22
–2
61
–3
To
exp
lore
the
liv
ed
exp
erie
nce
of
po
stn
atal
dep
ress
ion
inW
est
Afr
ican
mo
ther
sli
vin
gin
the
UK
.
Sem
i-st
ruct
ure
d
inte
rvie
ws
Inte
rpre
tive
Ph
eno
men
olo
gic
al
An
alysi
s
Wes
tA
fric
anm
oth
ers
liv
ing
inth
eU
K
exp
erie
nce
dis
ola
tio
nan
da
lack
of
pra
ctic
al,
emo
tio
nal
and
pro
fess
ion
al
sup
po
rtin
the
po
stn
atal
per
iod
.
+
(Con
tinued)
Migrant women’s experiences of maternity care
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228378 February 11, 2020 6 / 26
Ta
ble
2.
(Co
nti
nu
ed)
Gar
nw
eid
ner
etal
(20
13
)[4
6]
Qu
alit
ativ
eN
orw
ay1
7
(5et
hn
ic
No
rweg
ian
and
12
imm
igra
nts
)
Alg
eria
,A
lban
ia,
Pak
ista
n,
Th
aila
nd
,
Tu
rkey
,R
uss
ia,
Sri
Lan
ka,
So
mal
ia.
On
aver
age
28
yea
rs
old
No
tre
po
rted
To
exp
lore
exp
erie
nce
sw
ith
nu
trit
ion
-rel
ated
info
rmat
ion
du
rin
gro
uti
ne
ante
nat
alca
re
amo
ng
wo
men
of
dif
fere
nt
eth
nic
alb
ack
gro
un
ds
Ind
ivid
ual
inte
rvie
ws
Inte
rpre
tati
ve
ph
eno
men
olo
gic
al
anal
ysi
s
Par
tici
pan
tsre
po
rted
that
they
wer
e
pro
vid
edw
ith
litt
len
utr
itio
n-r
elat
ed
info
rmat
ion
.T
he
info
rmat
ion
was
per
ceiv
edas
pre
sen
ted
inver
yg
ener
al
term
san
dfo
cuse
do
nfo
od
safe
ty.
Wei
gh
t
man
agem
ent
and
the
lon
g-t
erm
pre
ven
tio
no
fd
iet-
rela
ted
chro
nic
dis
ease
sh
adh
ard
lyb
een
dis
cuss
ed.
Wo
men
wer
eco
nfu
sed
abo
ut
info
rmat
ion
giv
enb
yth
em
idw
ife
wh
ich
was
inco
ng
ruen
tw
ith
thei
ro
rig
inal
foo
d
cult
ure
.T
he
par
tici
pan
tsw
ere
acti
vel
y
seek
ing
for
nu
trit
ion
-rel
ated
info
rmat
ion
On
lyre
sult
sfr
om
mig
ran
tw
om
en
wer
eu
sed
+
Gar
nw
eid
ner
etal
(20
17
)[4
7]
An
exp
lora
tiv
e
qu
alit
ativ
eap
pro
ach
No
rway
8 (5im
mig
ran
ts
and
3et
hn
ic
No
rweg
ian
Iraq
,T
urk
ey,
Pak
ista
n,
Po
lan
d,
Sp
ain
and
No
rway
No
tre
po
rted
1–
3ch
ild
ren
To
inves
tig
ate
pre
gn
ant
wo
men
’sex
per
ien
ces
of
do
mes
tic
vio
len
cean
dh
ow
this
isad
dre
ssed
inan
ten
atal
care
Ind
ivid
ual
sem
i-
stru
ctu
red
inte
rvie
ws
Th
emat
ican
alysi
s
acco
rdin
gto
Even
tho
ug
hn
on
eo
fth
ep
arti
cip
ants
wer
eas
ked
abo
ut
do
mes
tic
vio
len
cein
ante
nat
alca
re,th
eyo
ffer
edd
iffe
ren
t
sug
ges
tio
ns
on
ho
wan
dw
hen
mid
wiv
es
sho
uld
talk
abo
ut
it.
On
lyre
sult
sfr
om
mig
ran
tw
om
en
wer
eu
sed
-
Gau
dio
n&
All
ote
y(2
00
9)
[72
]
Qu
alit
ativ
eU
K4
3A
fgh
anis
tan
,C
hin
a,
Eri
trea
,E
thio
pia
,Ir
aq,
Iran
,S
riL
ank
a,
So
mal
ia,
Cen
tral
and
Wes
tA
fric
a,U
gan
da,
Zim
bab
we
and
Ru
ssia
Man
yw
ere
teen
ager
s
wh
oen
tere
dU
Kas
un
acco
mp
anie
d
asy
lum
seek
ing
chil
dre
n(o
ther
wis
e
NR
)
No
tre
po
rted
To
des
crib
ere
fug
eean
d
asy
lum
seek
ing
wo
men
’s
exp
erie
nce
so
fp
reg
nan
cy,
chil
db
irth
and
mat
ern
ity
serv
ices
Inte
rvie
ws
and
focu
sg
rou
ps
Th
emat
ican
aly
sis.
Wo
men
rep
ort
edo
ver
stre
tch
edse
rvic
es,
lan
gu
age
and
com
mu
nic
atio
np
rob
lem
s,
issu
esar
ou
nd
acce
ssan
den
gag
emen
t,
and
the
imp
ort
ance
of
cult
ura
lis
sues
.
Tee
nag
ers
wer
e
also
incl
ud
ed
-
Git
sels
-van
der
Wal
etal
(20
15
)
[48
]
Qu
alit
ativ
eN
eth
erla
nd
s1
2M
oro
cco
20
–3
6y
ears
0–
3ch
ild
ren
To
exp
lore
the
pre
fere
nce
so
f
pre
gn
ant
Mo
rocc
anw
om
en
reg
ard
ing
con
ten
to
fan
d
app
roac
hto
ante
nat
al
cou
nse
llin
gfo
ran
om
aly
scre
enin
g.
Inte
rvie
ws
Th
emat
ican
alysi
s.W
om
enu
nd
erli
ned
the
imp
ort
ance
of
accu
rate
and
det
aile
din
form
atio
nab
ou
t
the
test
sp
roce
du
res
and
the
ano
mal
ies
that
cou
ldb
ed
etec
ted
and
pre
ferr
ed
cou
nse
llo
rsto
init
iate
dis
cuss
ion
sab
ou
t
mo
ral
top
ics
and
its
rela
tio
nsh
ipw
ith
the
wo
men
’sre
lig
iou
sb
elie
fsan
dval
ues
to
faci
lita
tean
info
rmed
cho
ice
abo
ut
wh
eth
ero
rn
ot
top
arti
cip
ate
inth
e
scre
enin
gte
sts.
Wo
men
pre
ferr
eda
cou
nse
llo
rw
ho
resp
ects
and
trea
tsth
em
asan
ind
ivid
ual
wh
oh
asan
Isla
mic
bac
kg
rou
nd
.
+
Gla
vin
&
Sæ
tere
n(2
01
6)
[49
]
Qu
alit
ativ
eN
orw
ay1
0S
om
ali
25
–3
41
–4
chil
dre
nT
oex
plo
reS
om
ali
new
mo
ther
s’ex
per
ien
ces
of
the
No
rweg
ian
mat
ern
ity
hea
lth
care
syst
em.
Sem
i-st
ruct
ure
d
inte
rvie
ws
Co
nte
nt
anal
ysi
sF
ind
ing
sh
igh
lig
hte
din
adeq
uat
e
inte
gra
tio
nin
toN
orw
egia
nso
ciet
y,
the
nee
dfo
ran
dfe
aro
fa
caes
area
nd
eliv
ery,
issu
eso
ffa
mil
ysu
pp
ort
aro
un
dth
e
po
stp
artu
mp
erio
dan
dsu
pp
ort
fro
m
hea
lth
serv
ices
No
rway
pu
bli
c
hea
lth
serv
ices
cov
eral
lw
om
en
and
chil
dre
n
-
Han
ley
(20
07
)
[68
]
Qu
alit
ativ
eU
K1
0B
ang
lad
esh
i1
6–
24
1–
4T
oex
plo
reB
ang
lad
esh
i
mo
ther
s’in
terp
reta
tio
ns
of
po
stn
atal
dep
ress
ion
and
its
effe
cto
nth
ew
ellb
ein
go
nth
e
mo
ther
,fa
mil
yan
d
com
mu
nit
y.
Fo
cus
gro
up
sT
hem
atic
anal
ysi
sW
hen
mo
ther
sex
per
ien
ced
emo
tio
nal
issu
esth
eyso
ug
ht
the
sup
po
rto
fth
eir
fam
ily,
frie
nd
san
dre
lig
iou
sle
ader
s,an
d,
alth
ou
gh
fam
ilia
rw
ith
som
ep
rim
ary
care
serv
ices
,th
eyw
ere
no
tal
way
sth
eir
firs
tp
oin
to
fco
nta
ct
-
Hje
lmet
al
(20
07
)[5
0]
Qu
alit
ativ
eS
wed
en2
7M
idd
leE
ast
(14
)
Sw
eden
(13
)
Mea
nag
e=
35
2n
ull
ipar
ou
s
12
par
ou
s
To
exp
lore
pat
ien
ts’
eval
uat
ion
of
asp
ecia
lise
d
ges
tati
on
ald
iab
etes
clin
ic
Sem
i-st
ruct
ure
d
ind
ivid
ual
inte
rvie
ws
Co
nte
nt
anal
ysi
sT
he
hea
lth
care
mo
del
was
per
ceiv
edas
fun
ctio
nin
gw
ell.
Wo
men
fro
mth
e
Mid
dle
Eas
tfe
ltca
red
for,
had
bee
ng
iven
the
nec
essa
ryin
form
atio
nan
dcl
aim
edto
foll
ow
advic
e.A
deq
uat
ein
form
atio
n
red
uce
dre
spo
nd
ents
’an
xie
tyan
d
incr
ease
dth
eir
con
tro
lo
ver
the
situ
atio
n
On
lyre
sult
sfr
om
mig
ran
tw
om
en
wer
eu
sed
-
Hu
fto
n&
Rav
en(2
01
6)
[73
]
Qu
alit
ativ
eU
K3
5
(30
imm
igra
nt
mo
ther
san
d5
mat
ern
alH
CP
s)
Fro
m1
9co
un
trie
sN
ot
rep
ort
ed0
–8
chil
dre
nT
oex
plo
rein
fan
tfe
edin
g
pra
ctic
eso
fim
mig
ran
t
mo
ther
s.
Sem
i-st
ruct
ure
d
inte
rvie
ws
and
focu
sg
rou
ps
Fra
mew
ork
app
roac
hO
ver
all
mo
ther
sw
ere
dis
sati
sfie
dw
ith
thei
rin
fan
tfe
edin
go
utc
om
es.
Mo
ther
s
wh
ow
ere
po
siti
ve
toh
um
an
imm
un
od
efic
ien
cyv
iru
sfo
llo
wed
the
UK
gu
idel
ines
bu
tst
rug
gle
dw
ith
gu
ilt
of
no
t
bei
ng
able
tob
reas
tfee
d.
All
mo
ther
s
un
able
toex
clu
sivel
yb
reas
tfee
d
exp
erie
nce
da
sen
seo
flo
ss.
Lac
ko
fw
ider
sup
po
rtse
rvic
esco
up
led
wit
hco
mp
lex
life
style
sap
pea
red
tocr
eate
chal
len
ges
in
pro
vid
ing
infa
nt
feed
ing
sup
po
rt
On
lyre
sult
sfr
om
mig
ran
tw
om
en
wer
eu
sed
+
Ilia
di
(20
08
)
[51
]
Qu
alit
ativ
eG
reec
e2
6Ir
aq,
Iran
,S
ud
an,
Leb
ano
n,
Sy
ria,
Afg
han
ista
n,
Arm
enia
,
Tu
rkey
,A
lban
ia,
Ser
bia
,Z
aire
No
tre
po
rted
Pri
mig
rav
id
(11
),
Mu
ltp
aro
us
(15
)
To
exam
ine
wh
eth
erre
fug
ee
wo
men
,re
ceiv
ean
ten
atal
care
and
toex
plo
rep
oss
ible
fact
ors
that
may
infl
uen
ceth
eir
atti
tud
eto
war
ds
mat
ern
ity
care
Sem
i-st
ruct
ure
d
inte
rvie
ws
Lat
ent
con
ten
t
anal
ysi
s
An
aly
sis
sho
wed
that
refu
gee
wo
men
ente
ran
ten
atal
care
inth
efi
rst
trim
este
r
of
thei
rp
reg
nan
cies
,b
ut
they
may
mis
s
fro
mo
ne
tom
any
app
oin
tmen
tsd
ue
to
the
lan
gu
age
and
fin
anci
alb
arri
er,
the
un
fam
ilia
rity
wit
hth
en
atio
nal
hea
lth
syst
em,
and
the
wo
men
’svie
wo
f
pre
gn
ancy
asa
nat
ura
lev
ent
-
(Con
tinued)
Migrant women’s experiences of maternity care
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228378 February 11, 2020 7 / 26
Ta
ble
2.
(Co
nti
nu
ed)
Jon
ker
set
al
(20
11
)[5
2]
Qu
alit
ativ
e—
gro
un
ded
theo
ry
Net
her
lan
ds
40
imm
igra
nt
wo
men
(an
d1
0
Du
tch
wo
men
)
wit
hse
ver
e
mat
ern
al
mo
rbid
ity
Mo
rocc
oT
urk
ey,
Su
rin
ame’
Du
tch
Car
ibb
ean
Eas
tern
Eu
rop
eM
idd
leE
ast,
Asi
anan
dsu
b-
Sah
aran
Afr
ica
No
tre
po
rted
No
tre
po
rted
To
inv
esti
gat
eet
hn
icit
y-
rela
ted
fact
ors
con
trib
uti
ng
to
sub
-mat
ern
ity
care
and
the
effe
cts
on
sever
em
ater
nal
mo
rbid
ity
amo
ng
imm
igra
nt
wo
men
Net
her
lan
ds
In-d
epth
inte
rvie
ws
Th
emat
ican
alysi
sW
om
enu
naw
are
of
po
ten
tial
pre
gn
ancy
com
pli
cati
on
san
dfe
ltth
atH
CP
pai
d
insu
ffic
ien
tat
ten
tio
nto
pre
gn
ancy
com
pli
cati
on
s.
On
lyre
sult
sfr
om
mig
ran
tw
om
en
wer
eu
sed
.It
was
no
tp
oss
ible
inth
is
stu
dy
tose
par
ate
1st
/2n
dg
ener
atio
n
mig
ran
ts
-
Lep
har
d&
Hai
th-C
oo
per
(20
16
)[5
3]
Qu
alit
ativ
e
inte
rpre
tive,
inli
ne
wit
hh
erm
eneu
tic
ph
eno
men
olo
gy
UK
6S
ub
-Sah
ara
Afr
ica
(4),
Eas
tern
Eu
rop
e(2
)
Ov
er1
8o
ther
wis
en
ot
reco
rded
5p
rim
igra
vid
,
1h
ad1
pre
vio
us
chil
d
To
un
der
stan
dth
e
exp
erie
nce
so
fw
om
ense
ekin
g
asylu
mw
hil
eac
cess
ing
loca
l
mat
ern
ity
serv
ices
Sem
i-st
ruct
ure
inte
rvie
ws.
Th
emat
ican
aly
sis
Wo
men
exp
erie
nce
dp
re-b
oo
kin
g
chal
len
ges
,in
app
rop
riat
e
acco
mm
od
atio
n,
dis
per
sal,
bei
ng
alo
ne
and
no
tb
ein
gli
sten
edto
+
Leu
ng
(20
17
)
[54
]
Qu
alit
ativ
eU
K1
0C
hin
aA
ver
age
age
36
8p
rim
igra
vid
,
2m
uli
tip
aro
us
To
exp
lore
ho
wcu
ltu
ral
bel
iefs
infl
uen
cep
ost
par
tum
die
tary
cho
ices
and
infa
nt
feed
ing
pra
ctic
es.
Sem
i-st
ruct
ure
d
inte
rvie
ws
No
tre
po
rted
Wo
men
felt
mid
wiv
esw
ere
un
awar
eo
f
thei
rcu
ltu
ral
pra
ctic
esw
hen
off
erin
g
po
stn
atal
die
tary
advic
e
-
Lu
nd
ber
g&
Ger
ezg
iher
(20
08
)[5
5]
Qu
alit
ativ
e—
eth
no
gra
ph
y.
Sw
eden
15
Eri
trea
31
–4
5y
ears
3to
5ch
ild
ren
To
exp
lore
Eri
trea
n
imm
igra
nt
wo
men
’s
exp
erie
nce
so
ffe
mal
eg
enit
al
mu
tila
tio
nd
uri
ng
pre
gn
ancy
,
bir
than
dp
ost
par
tum
.
Sem
i-st
ruct
ure
d
inte
rvie
ws
Th
emat
ican
alysi
sW
om
enre
po
rted
fear
and
anx
iety
,
extr
eme
pai
nan
dlo
ng
-ter
m
com
pli
cati
on
san
dh
ealt
h-c
are
pro
fess
ion
als’
kn
ow
led
ge
of
circ
um
cisi
on
+
Ny
etal
(20
07
)
[74
]
Qu
alit
ativ
eS
wed
en1
3T
urk
ey,
Sy
ria,
Iraq
and
Leb
ano
n
23
–4
11
–6
chil
dre
nT
od
escr
ibe
Mid
dle
Eas
tern
mo
ther
s’ex
per
ien
ces
of
the
mat
ern
alh
ealt
hca
rese
rvic
es
inS
wed
enan
dth
e
invo
lvem
ent
of
thei
rm
ale
par
tner
.
Fo
cus
gro
up
dis
cuss
ion
san
d
ind
ivid
ual
inte
rvie
ws.
Co
nte
nt
anal
ysi
sW
om
end
evel
op
edtr
ust
inth
em
idw
ife
bas
edo
nth
ek
no
wle
dg
ean
dth
eem
pat
hy
the
mid
wif
eim
par
ted
,an
dd
idn
ot
feel
that
the
mid
wif
e’s
un
der
stan
din
go
fth
eir
nat
ive
lan
gu
age
or
cult
ure
was
vit
alto
dev
elo
pa
go
od
rela
tio
nsh
ip
++
Pet
rusc
hk
eet
al
(20
16
)[5
6]
Qu
alit
ativ
e
exp
lora
tory
Ger
man
y1
9T
urk
ish
ori
gin
(11
Ger
man
ori
gin
)
Tu
rkey
21
–4
1y
ears
42
%
nu
llip
aro
us
To
iden
tify
po
ssib
le
dif
fere
nce
sin
the
Tu
rkis
han
d
Ger
man
wo
men
’sat
titu
des
tow
ard
sep
idu
ral
anal
ges
ia.
Sem
i-st
ruct
ure
d
inte
rvie
ws
Co
nte
nt
anal
ysi
sT
urk
ish
wo
men
ascr
ibe
mea
nin
gto
lab
ou
rp
ain
and
reje
ctep
idu
ral
for
fear
of
lon
g-t
erm
com
pli
cati
on
san
db
ecau
se
they
do
n’t
vie
wep
idu
ral
del
iver
yas
nat
ura
l
+
Ran
jiet
al
(20
12
)[5
7]
Ex
plo
rato
ry,
qu
alit
ativ
e
Sw
eden
9Ir
an(5
),A
fgh
anis
tan
(4)
21
–3
9y
ears
2n
ull
ipar
ou
s,7
had
on
ech
ild
.
To
des
crib
eim
mig
ran
t
par
ents
’ex
per
ien
ces
of
ult
raso
un
dex
amin
atio
nin
the
seco
nd
trim
este
ro
fp
reg
nan
cy
Ind
epth
inte
rvie
ws
Co
nte
nt
anal
ysi
sP
aren
tsw
ere
imp
ress
edb
yth
eq
ual
ity
of
thei
rco
mm
un
icat
ion
wit
hth
eca
re-
giv
ers,
fou
nd
the
pro
cess
tob
ew
ell
org
anis
edan
dd
idn
ot
exp
erie
nce
dis
crim
inat
ion
on
the
bas
iso
fb
ein
gan
imm
igra
nt
+
Ro
ber
tso
n
(20
15
)[7
5]
Inte
rsec
tio
nal
app
roac
h
Sw
eden
25
17
cou
ntr
ies
21
–5
0+
No
tre
po
rted
To
anal
yse
wo
men
’s
refl
ecti
on
so
nh
ow
thei
r
mig
rati
on
and
rese
ttle
men
t
infl
uen
ced
thei
rh
ealt
han
d
hea
lth
care
nee
ds
du
rin
g
chil
db
eari
ng
.
Fo
cus
gro
up
san
d
sem
i-st
ruct
ure
d
ind
ivid
ual
inte
rvie
ws
Co
nte
nt
anal
ysi
sT
he
har
dsh
ips
of
mig
rati
on
,re
sett
lem
ent,
and
con
stra
ints
inth
ed
aily
life
mad
e
wo
men
feel
ten
sean
dd
isem
bo
die
d.
Bei
ng
trea
ted
asa
stra
ng
eran
dre
ject
ed
inh
ealt
hca
reen
cou
nte
rsw
asd
eval
uin
g
and
dis
crim
inat
ing
.W
om
enfe
ltst
ron
ger
and
had
few
erco
mp
lica
tio
ns
du
rin
g
pre
gn
ancy
and
lab
ou
rw
hen
they
had
a
con
fid
ent,
cari
ng
rela
tio
nsh
ipw
ith
care
giv
ers/
mid
wiv
es.
Inte
rvie
ws
wer
ea
lon
gti
me
po
st
del
iver
yfo
rso
me
par
tici
pan
ts
+
Sau
veg
rain
etal
(20
17
)[7
6]
Qu
alit
ativ
eF
ran
ce3
3S
ub
Sah
aran
Afr
ica
(16
)
Fra
nce
(17
)
21
–4
4P
1=
12
P2
=1
3
P3
=3
P4
=3
P6
=2
To
anal
yse
wh
eth
erth
e
pre
nat
alca
retr
ajec
tori
es
amo
ng
wo
men
wit
h
hy
per
ten
siv
ed
iso
rder
sd
uri
ng
pre
gn
ancy
dif
fere
db
etw
een
imm
igra
nt
and
nat
ive
wo
men
Sem
i-st
ruct
ure
d
inte
rvie
ws
Iden
tifi
cati
on
of
them
es
So
me
evid
ence
of
dif
fere
nti
alca
re.
On
lyre
sult
sfr
om
mig
ran
tw
om
en
wer
eu
sed
+
Str
auss
etal
(20
09
)[5
8]
Eth
no
gra
ph
yU
K8
So
mal
ia2
3–
57
No
tsp
ecif
ied
To
exam
ine
cult
ura
lan
d
soci
alas
pec
tso
fch
ild
bir
th
and
ho
wth
eyin
ters
ect
wit
h
the
nee
ds
and
exp
erie
nce
so
f
So
mal
iw
om
enin
the
UK
.
In-d
epth
nar
rati
ve
inte
rvie
ws
Th
emat
ican
aly
sis
Co
nce
rns
rais
edar
ou
nd
:th
e
mis
man
agem
ent
of
care
for
wo
men
wh
o
hav
eb
een
circ
um
cise
d,
asp
ects
of
com
mu
nic
atio
n,
con
tin
uit
yo
fca
rean
d
atti
tud
eso
fh
ealt
hp
rofe
ssio
nal
s
-
Sza
fran
ska
&
Gal
lag
her
(20
13
)[5
9]
Des
crip
tiv
e
qu
alit
ativ
eap
pro
ach
Irel
and
6P
ola
nd
,N
ot
rep
ort
edN
ot
rep
ort
edT
oex
plo
reth
efa
cto
rsth
at
infl
uen
ceP
oli
shw
om
en’s
dec
isio
ns
toin
itia
tean
d
con
tin
ue
bre
astf
eed
ing
in
Irel
and
Un
stru
ctu
red
face
-
tofa
cein
terv
iew
s.
Iden
tifi
cati
on
of
them
es
Pro
fess
ion
alan
dfa
mil
ysu
pp
ort
are
key
tosu
cces
sfu
lB
F
-
To
bin
etal
(20
14
)[6
0]
Qu
alit
ativ
e
Dra
mat
isit
icp
enta
d
Irel
and
22
9d
iffe
ren
tco
un
trie
s1
8–
40
9p
rim
ipar
ou
s,
13
mu
ltip
aro
us
To
gai
nin
sig
ht
into
wo
men
’s
exp
erie
nce
so
fch
ild
bir
thin
Irel
and
wh
ile
seek
ing
asy
lum
Ind
epth
un
stru
ctu
red
inte
rvie
ws
Nar
rati
ve
anal
ysi
sW
om
enex
per
ien
ced
ala
cko
f
con
nec
tio
n,
com
mu
nic
atio
nan
d
cult
ura
lly
com
pet
ent
care
++
To
pa
etal
(20
17
)[6
1]
Qu
alit
ativ
e—cr
itic
al
fem
inis
tex
plo
rato
ry
des
ign
wit
h
her
men
euti
c
app
roac
h.
Po
rtu
gal
10
Uk
rain
e2
8–
49
6x
par
a1
,4
x
par
a2
To
inv
esti
gat
em
igra
nt
wo
men
’sp
erce
pti
on
so
fth
e
qu
alit
yan
dap
pro
pri
aten
ess
of
mat
ern
ity
care
rece
ived
in
pu
bli
ch
ealt
hse
rvic
es
Sem
i-st
ruct
ure
d
inte
rvie
ws
Th
emat
ican
alysi
s.W
om
enfe
elm
isin
form
edab
ou
tth
eir
leg
alri
gh
tsan
dfr
eeac
cess
tom
ater
nal
hea
lth
serv
ices
.T
hey
wer
ed
issa
tisf
ied
wit
hth
eq
ual
ity
of
info
rmat
ion
pro
vid
ed
by
HC
Pan
dth
eir
com
mu
nic
atio
nsk
ills
.
Th
eyfe
ltth
atth
eir
acce
ssto
med
ical
spec
ialt
ies
was
lim
ited
.
+
(Con
tinued)
Migrant women’s experiences of maternity care
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228378 February 11, 2020 8 / 26
Ta
ble
2.
(Co
nti
nu
ed)
Tre
ism
anet
al
(20
14
)[6
2]
Qu
alit
ativ
eU
K1
2A
fric
a2
3–
41
yea
rsN
ot
rep
ort
edT
oin
ves
tig
ate
ho
wU
K-b
ased
Afr
ican
wo
men
per
ceiv
e,
mak
ese
nse
of,
and
man
age
a
dia
gn
osi
so
fH
IVd
uri
ng
pre
gn
ancy
,an
daf
ter
del
iver
y
Sem
i-st
ruct
ure
d
inte
rvie
w
Inte
rpre
tive
ph
eno
men
olo
gic
al
anal
ysi
s(I
PA
).
Rec
eiv
ing
anH
IVd
iag
no
sis
chal
len
ged
the
no
rmal
cyan
djo
yo
fb
eco
min
ga
mo
ther
.W
om
enex
per
ien
ced
stig
ma
and
bre
ach
eso
fco
nfi
den
tial
ity
fro
mH
CP
.
Wo
men
fou
nd
thei
rin
abil
ity
to
bre
astf
eed
mo
std
istr
essi
ng
asth
isw
as
cen
tral
toth
eir
cult
ura
lid
enti
tyas
mo
ther
s.
+
Vik
enet
al
(20
15
)[6
3]
Qu
alit
ativ
e
exp
lora
tory
,
des
crip
tiv
ed
esig
n
wit
hh
erm
eneu
tic
app
roac
h
No
rway
17
So
uth
Am
eric
a,
Eu
rop
e,M
idd
leE
ast,
Afr
ica,
Asi
a
20
–3
81
–8
chil
dre
nT
oex
plo
reth
em
ater
nal
hea
lth
cop
ing
stra
teg
ies
of
mig
ran
tw
om
enin
No
rway
Sem
i-st
ruct
ure
d
inte
rvie
ws
Qu
alit
ativ
eco
nte
nt
anal
ysi
s.
Th
ere
wer
eb
oth
go
od
and
bad
exp
erie
nce
so
fca
refr
om
HC
Ps
du
rin
g
pre
gn
ancy
and
chil
db
irth
.C
ult
ure
infl
uen
ced
the
wo
men
’svie
ws
of
hea
lth
and
dis
ease
.
+
Wan
dal
etal
(20
16
)[7
7]
Qu
alit
ativ
eN
orw
ay3
8(1
6S
om
alia
21
–4
0y
ears
Maj
ori
ty
mu
ltip
aro
us
To
exp
lore
infa
nt
feed
ing
pra
ctic
esam
on
gS
om
ali-
bo
rn
mo
ther
sin
No
rway
,an
dth
e
way
sin
wh
ich
they
nav
igat
e
amo
ng
dif
fere
nt
info
rmat
ion
sou
rces
Sem
i-st
ruct
ure
d
inte
rvie
ws
and
focu
sg
rou
ps.
Dev
elo
pm
ent
of
cate
go
ries
Th
em
oth
ers
exp
erie
nce
dch
alle
ng
eso
f
dea
lin
gw
ith
con
flic
tin
g
reco
mm
end
atio
ns
and
exp
ecta
tio
ns
reg
ard
ing
infa
nt
feed
ing
.T
hey
nav
igat
ed
amo
ng
dif
fere
nt
sou
rces
of
info
rmat
ion
,
tak
ing
into
con
sid
erat
ion
trad
itio
nal
val
ues
,ex
per
ien
ces
and
hab
its
fro
m
livin
gin
No
rway
,an
dre
sear
ch-b
ased
kn
ow
led
ge.
+
�W
ikb
erg
etal
(20
12
)
Wik
ber
get
al
(20
14
)[7
8,8
1]
Eth
no
gra
ph
yF
inla
nd
17
Au
stra
lia(
1),
Bo
snia
(3),
Bu
rma
(1),
Co
lom
bia
(1)
Est
on
ia
(3),
Hu
ng
ary
(1)
Ind
ia
(1),
Iraq
(2)
Ru
ssia
(1),
Th
aila
nd
(1),
Ug
and
a
(1),
and
Vie
tnam
(1)
19
–3
6y
ears
9x
par
a1
,4
x
par
a2
,3
xp
ara
3,
1x
par
a4
To
exp
lore
imm
igra
nt
mo
ther
s’ex
per
ien
ces
of
mat
ern
ity
care
Inte
rvie
ws,
ob
serv
atio
ns
and
fiel
dn
ote
s.
Fo
cuss
ed
eth
no
gra
ph
ican
alysi
s.
Th
ere
wer
ed
iffe
ren
ces
bet
wee
nth
e
wo
men
’sex
pec
tati
on
san
dth
eir
mat
ern
ity
care
exp
erie
nce
.C
arin
gw
as
rela
ted
toth
ech
ang
ing
cult
ure
.F
inn
ish
mat
ern
ity
care
trad
itio
ns
wer
e
som
etim
esim
po
sed
on
the
imm
igra
nt
new
mo
ther
s.F
emal
en
urs
ew
asse
enas
a
pro
fess
ion
alfr
ien
d,an
dth
eco
nfl
icts
enco
un
tere
dw
ere
reso
lved
.
+
Yea
smin
&
Reg
mi
(20
13
)
[79
]
Qu
alit
ativ
eU
K2
6B
ang
lad
esh
20
–4
4yea
rso
ldM
ost
had
mo
re
than
1b
aby
To
exam
ine
the
foo
dh
abit
s
and
bel
iefs
of
pre
gn
ant
Bri
tish
Ban
gla
des
hi
wo
men
Fo
cus
gro
up
san
d
ind
epth
sem
i-
stru
ctu
red
inte
rvie
ws
Iden
tifi
cati
on
of
them
es
Cu
ltu
rein
flu
ence
wo
men
’sp
erce
pti
on
s
of
’go
od
’an
d’b
ad’f
oo
dan
dth
eir
foo
d
hab
its
du
rin
gp
reg
nan
cy.
+
Mix
ed-m
eth
od
stu
die
s
�st
ud
ies
mar
ked
wit
han
aste
rix
are
tak
enas
the
pri
mar
yre
po
rtfo
rth
atst
ud
y
Fir
sta
uth
or
(yea
r)
Stu
dy
des
ign
Set
tin
g(c
ou
ntr
y
rese
arc
h
un
der
tak
enin
)
Pa
rtic
ipa
nts
Aim
Da
taco
llec
tio
nD
ata
an
aly
sis
Ou
tco
mes
Co
mm
ents
Qu
ali
ty
sco
resa
mp
le
size
cou
ntr
yo
fo
rig
ina
ge
pa
rity
Bak
enet
al
(20
07
)[3
4]
Mix
edm
eth
od
sIt
aly
,1
03
Nat
ives
and
imm
igra
nts
,n
o
furt
her
det
ails
spec
ifie
d
No
t
rep
ort
ed
No
tre
po
rted
To
inves
tig
ate
imm
igra
nt’
s
acce
ssto
mat
ern
ity
hea
lth
serv
ices
Qu
anti
tati
ve
rese
arch
alo
ng
sid
eF
ocu
sg
rou
ps
No
tre
po
rted
Mig
ran
tw
om
enfa
ced
sever
alo
bst
acle
sto
acce
ssin
gca
rein
clu
din
gco
mm
un
icat
ion
pro
ble
ms,
lim
ited
kn
ow
led
ge
of
the
hea
lth
syst
emin
the
new
cou
ntr
y,
log
isti
cal
bar
rier
s,
lim
ited
fam
ily
sup
po
rtan
dso
cial
ineq
ual
itie
s
On
ly
qu
alit
ativ
e
dat
aex
trac
ted
-
�P
hil
lim
ore
(20
15
),
Ph
illi
mo
re
(20
16
)an
d
New
all
etal
(20
12
)[3
5,8
2,8
3]
Mix
edm
eth
od
s
stu
dy
UK
95
28
dif
fere
nt
cou
ntr
ies
Maj
ori
ty
un
der
30
4n
ull
ipar
ou
s4
3h
ad1
chil
d,2
7h
ad2
chil
dre
n,
6h
ad3
chil
dre
nan
d2
had
4
chil
dre
n
To
exp
lore
the
reas
on
sn
ew
mig
ran
tw
om
enb
oo
kla
tefo
r
ante
nat
alca
rean
dd
on
ot
atte
nd
foll
ow
-up
app
oin
tmen
ts
82
sem
i-st
ruct
ure
d
qu
esti
on
nai
res
and
13
case
stu
die
su
sin
gin
-
dep
thin
terv
iew
s
Th
emat
ican
aly
sis
of
qu
alit
ativ
ed
ata
and
des
crip
tiv
est
atis
tics
for
qu
anti
tati
ve
dat
a
Str
uct
ura
l,le
gal
and
inst
itu
tio
nal
bar
rier
s
pre
ven
tac
cess
toca
re.T
his
incl
ud
esla
ng
uag
e
and
com
mu
nic
atio
n,
cult
ura
lh
ealt
hca
pit
alan
d
dis
crim
inat
ion
,p
ow
eran
dco
ntr
ol,
stru
ctu
ral
ineq
ual
itie
san
dso
cial
net
wo
rks
On
ly
qu
alit
ativ
e
dat
aex
trac
ted
++
Sch
oev
ers
etal
(20
10
)[3
6]
Ex
plo
rato
rym
ixed
met
ho
dst
ud
y
Th
eN
eth
erla
nd
s1
00
32
dif
fere
nt
cou
ntr
ies
Mea
nag
e
of
36
.4
No
tre
po
rted
To
exp
lore
the
rep
rod
uct
ive
hea
lth
pro
ble
ms
of
ille
gal
fem
ale
imm
igra
nts
and
ob
stac
les
they
exp
erie
nce
to
seek
ing
hel
p.
Sem
i-st
ruct
ure
d
inte
rvie
ws,
Iden
tifi
cati
on
of
them
esin
qu
alit
ativ
ed
ata,
and
use
of
des
crip
tiv
est
atis
tics
for
qu
anti
tati
ve
dat
a
Ob
stac
les
toac
cess
ing
rep
rod
uct
ive
hea
lth
faci
liti
esin
clu
de
lack
of
info
rmat
ion
abo
ut
serv
ices
,fi
nan
cial
pro
ble
ms,
sex
ual
and
ph
ysi
cal
vio
len
cean
dfe
aro
fd
epo
rtat
ion
On
ly
qu
alit
ativ
e
dat
aex
trac
ted
-
Vel
emin
sky
etal
(20
14
)[3
7]
Qu
esti
on
nai
rew
ith
op
enan
dcl
ose
d
qu
esti
on
s
Cze
chR
epu
bli
c1
93
Vie
tnam
(65
),
Mo
ng
oli
a(3
5)
and
Uk
rain
e(9
3)
20
–4
64
6.8
%1
chil
d3
7.1
%2
chil
dre
n,
To
exp
lore
imm
igra
nt
wo
men
’sex
per
ien
ces
of
pre
gn
ancy
and
per
inat
alca
re
Sem
i-st
ruct
ure
d
inte
rvie
w
No
tre
po
rted
Fai
lure
sin
care
incl
ud
edp
oo
rco
mm
un
icat
ion
esp
ecia
lly
wit
ha
lan
gu
age
bar
rier
,li
mit
ed
po
ssib
ilit
ies
for
fam
ily
tob
ein
vo
lved
ind
eliv
ery
and
un
suit
able
HC
Pb
ehav
iou
rs
On
ly
qu
alit
ativ
e
dat
aex
trac
ted
-
(gre
en)
++
arti
cle
jud
ged
tob
eo
fh
igh
qu
alit
yas
maj
ori
tyo
fN
ICE
app
rais
alto
ol
[29
]cr
iter
iam
et.S
tud
yju
dg
edto
be
reli
able
and
tru
stw
ort
hy,w
ith
evid
ence
of
auth
or
refl
exiv
ity
(yel
low
)+
arti
cle
jud
ged
tob
eo
fm
od
erat
eq
ual
ity
asm
ost
crit
eria
met
inN
ICE
app
rais
alto
ol,
Stu
dy
ho
wev
erd
eem
edto
lack
rig
or
du
eto
som
efl
aws
inst
ud
yd
esig
n
(red
)-
arti
cle
jud
ged
tob
eo
flo
wq
ual
ity
asm
ost
crit
eria
wit
hin
the
NIC
Ecr
itic
alap
pra
isal
too
ln
ot
met
htt
ps:
//doi.o
rg/1
0.1
371/jo
urn
al.p
one.
0228378.t002
Migrant women’s experiences of maternity care
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228378 February 11, 2020 9 / 26
used in fourteen studies [34–36,69–79] including eight which conducted both interviews and
focus groups with different groups of women [69,71–75,77,79]. One study used a question-
naire which included relevant qualitative data [37]. Studies were undertaken in 14 European
countries, ranged in size from four [70] to 193 [37] participants and included a total of 1330
migrant women, although one study did not specify the number of participants and could not
be included in this number [34]. The majority of studies (n = 34) were published from 2012
onwards. A total of seven studies were rated as high quality [35,40,60,64,67,71,74], 22 were of
Fig 1. Flowchart of study selection.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228378.g001
Migrant women’s experiences of maternity care
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228378 February 11, 2020 10 / 26
moderate quality [38,39,41,43,45,46,48,53,55–57,61–63,65,70,73,75–79] and 18 of low quality
[8,34,36,37,42,44,47,49–52,54,58,59,66,68,69,72].
Data synthesis
Four overarching analytic themes emerged from the literature.
Finding the way—navigating the system in a new place. Weighing it up. Before accessing
maternity care women considered the value [35,51,52,60,81,82], and necessity [65] of care.
They also weighed up the financial costs of accessing care [37,49,61], and the consequences of
accessing care, particularly when they had a lack of trust in healthcare providers (HCPs)
[39,75], previous poor experiences with HCPs [38], or were fearful that their visibility in
maternity services could result in deportation [35,36,66,82].
“I had my first daughter when I was illegal, it has been a terrible experience even though mysister helped me, I was always fearing that someone would knock at the door and would sendus back to Portugal. . . Even when I had contractions I was afraid to go to the hospital fearingto be sent back to Portugal." (Bollini et al 2007, pp.82) [66]
Finding the way in and through the system. For some migrant women who wanted to access
care, there were difficulties in finding the way into the system. The system was unfamiliar and
different to that of their country of origin and the women were often unaware of their rights
and entitlement to care [34,36,42,53,61,65,72,78,82,83]. There was a lack of information about
the services that were available and if the services were free [36,53,61,82]. Some women faced
difficulties in being accepted for registration for primary healthcare services [36,53,82], were
refused entry to healthcare facilities [75], and struggled to provide the required documentation
or insurance that were prerequisites for care [66,80]. Having friends and relatives who had
already settled in the new country and could speak the local language helped migrant women
find the way into the system, along with NGOs who provided information about entitlement
and available services [36,51]. Women being held in detention centres were isolated from
these sources of help and reported that the way into the system was blocked by detention cen-
tre staff who refused or delayed their access to care [35,53].
"The Home Office put me in detention centre so I could not attend my appointments. Therewere no maternity services there for me for the 2 months I was there. I was offered appoint-ments but they were cancelled at short notice without anyone telling me why." (Phillimore
2015, pp.576) [35]
Costs related to transportation and payment for care were identified as factors influencing
ongoing access to care [34,44,53,61,83]. Those who received free care identified that this
enabled them to access care, which was often in contrast to the situation in their country of ori-
gin [37,49,67,81]. Flexibility in the system in relation to the timing and location of appoint-
ments influenced access [61,65,70]. Inflexibility in the system, such as the rigid use of
telephone booking systems for appointments were an ongoing barrier that women faced when
trying to navigate the system in a new language [34,75,82].
“I get so nervous to communicate through the telephone, is so difficult . . . instead I go there toget an appointment but they tell me I have to phone . . .Why?” (Robertson 2015, pp.62) [75]
Migrant women’s experiences of maternity care
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228378 February 11, 2020 11 / 26
We don’t understand each other. Women highlighted that information, advice and the
opportunity to discuss their health and the health of their unborn child with a HCP was
extremely important to them [63,74,78]. However, they identified a range of issues related to
communication and understanding which are discussed in the sub-themes; Overcoming lan-
guage barriers, Unmet information needs and Different expectations of care.
Overcoming language barriers. Women faced significant language barriers in the new coun-
try and felt that their language difficulties made them problem patients [69], that impacted on
their relationship with their HCPs [37,53,66,78]. Even when women could proficiently manage
everyday situations, they still often lacked the vocabulary to cope with medical terminology
[53,58,70,75].
"I asked them, “[Can] we cancel the meeting until we get an interpreter. . . I didn’t understandyou and you didn’t understand me.” She said, “No, it’s OK, we can go on—you understandEnglish.”’ (Lephard & Haith-Cooper 2016, pp. 134) [53]
Failure to use professional interpreters was a barrier to receiving satisfactory care
[38,44,58,60,69,83], hindered accurate information sharing and led to frequent misinterpreta-
tion [52,70,81] and a lack of understanding of procedures women were asked to give consent
for [35,52,60].
“They [midwives] communicated by sign language and I was never sure I had understoodproperly.” (Briscoe & Lavender 2009, pp.20) [707]
However, the use of professional interpreters was met with caution when discussing inti-
mate or difficult matters [47,69,74,82] or when women had come from areas of persecution
leaving them suspicious of everyone [75]. When women’s partners were asked to interpret
during care encounters some women felt vulnerable [35,82,83] and embarrassed [51,74] and
felt that their partners were reluctant to reveal their own poor understanding [52,70,74].
“If I could have someone who is not my husband it could make a big difference becausethroughout my pregnancy I did not say anything about my needs or problems. My husbandwas saying everything.” (Phillimore 2015 pp.576) [35]
Unmet information needs. Women identified a lack of information around pregnancy,
childbirth or the postpartum period, and a lack of information that was available in an accessi-
ble language or format [8,35,37,46–50,52,58,64,66,70–72,75–79,81–83]. Professional advice
often conflicted with cultural and family advice [41,46,49,54,63,77–79] and this left women
feeling insecure about which actions to take [46,63,77].
"I did not give water, and I was criticized by my family and relatives. They told me: He is ahuman being, he gets thirsty and that milk does not quench thirst. . . while the health clinicsaid: no, he does not need water" (Wandal et al 2016, pp.4) [77]
Women also identified that their care and safety were adversely affected when they did not
disclose important information to HCPs, as did not want to be a nuisance or failed to under-
stand the importance of their health history or potential seriousness of their current or previ-
ous symptoms [52,76].
Migrant women’s experiences of maternity care
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228378 February 11, 2020 12 / 26
"I thought: it is a holiday, I do not want to be a problem for someone. I will try to go Mondayor Tuesday after the holidays. But I think now: why did I wait ? Why didn't I phone immedi-ately ?" (Jonkers et al 2011, pp.149) [52]
Different expectations of care. Some women reported being fearful of being treated poorly in
the new country when their expectation of maternity care was based on poor experiences in
their country of origin [60,61].
"I was so scared of them (the midwives). . . I thought they would beat me. . .if I scream or if Icry. So in labour I don't speak, so that I don't upset them." (Tobin et al 2014, pp.836) [60]
Procedures which were familiar to practitioners were not always familiar to women coming
from other care systems [8,70], and this caused women to feel fearful [60,82] and to lack trust
in the information provided by HCPs [39].
“They were putting all those funny cords around me which were so tight, so irritating, I didn'tknow what those were, I never had seen them before. It's like going to another planet and youare seeing all these things which are happening to you and you can't ask anything.” (Tobin
et al 2014, pp.836) [60]
Women’s cultural backgrounds influenced some of their preferences [39,56,60,71] and
beliefs about procedures [49,55,67,70,71,81] and the way they wanted to discuss these [56,74].
Experiences in their country of origin influenced their expectation of the need for medical sur-
veillance and interventions during pregnancy and childbirth [8,42,43,63,80,81].
"According to our religion, we Somali women, we don’t think that giving birth by caesareansection is a good thing and that a woman should give birth by vagina and not by opening herstomach to take the baby out. Somali women’s general belief is that caesarean birth is not areal way of a woman to give birth. And how many times doctors will cut her stomach if shehas to deliver many times in her life?" (Degni et al 2014, pp.357) [67]
“I found it extremely friendly but very low in real medicine? It’s all midwife based, no exams,which is very strange for me”. (Dempsey & Peeren 2016, pp.377) [43]
The way you treat me matters. Impact of poor care. The HCPs attitude was an important
factor in how migrant women perceived the quality of care. Some women found HCPs to be
unfriendly [67,74] and disrespectful [63,81], failing to respond to their concerns in a caring
matter, ignoring them [74,75] and not taking their complaints seriously [49,52,66,74,75]. This
made women doubt their own capabilities [75]. Unsatisfactory interactions with HCPs often
led to a lack of connection and poor relationships with HCPs which resulted in women feeling
isolated and fearful of being mistreated [60].
"Really they should have asked in a friendly way if we needed help. . .it was a very unpleasantexperience, I felt like an idiot, as totally incompetent.” (Robertson, 2015, pp.63) [75]
When encountering the healthcare system, migrant women expressed a sense of being seen
and treated differently [37,50,53,75,76]. Many women felt that their customs and culture were
not understood by those caring for them [35,37,45,54,55,64,67,76,78,83]. Prejudice and stereo-
typing by HCPs [8,35,37,57,58,66,75,77,78] led to assumptions based on women’s perceived
cultural backgrounds and left them feeling that their needs were overlooked [35,52,53]. In
Migrant women’s experiences of maternity care
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228378 February 11, 2020 13 / 26
contrast some HCPs were noted to overly focus on cultural and psychosocial factors when
assessing patient’s symptoms, and therefore overlook potentially serious medical conditions
[50,67].
“I think that people that work in the health care settings . . . the doctors, the nurses, the mid-wives and even cleaners need education in different cultures. They need to understand thatpatients from different cultures and race are not inferiors and not . . .monsters.” (Degni et al
2014, pp.360) [67]
Migrant women highlighted several other factors which resulted in inadequate and ineffec-
tive care including; long waiting times for appointments [61,80], the perceived busyness of
HCPs which prevented women sharing their anxieties and concerns [70,81,82], inadequate
knowledge of legislation by administrative staff [80], not being involved in decision-making
[80], and limited access to specialist care [80].
Importance of good care. Women stressed the importance of good quality care and reported
several examples from their experiences. They valued HCPs who were encouraging and reas-
suring [50,60,77], supportive [43,46,50,70,75] good listeners [50,71] and good information-
providers [50,57,74]. Moreover, they wanted to be cared for by HCPs who had a respectful atti-
tude [43,48,62,74], made them feel emotionally safe [43] and would take their concerns seri-
ously [75]. Women also appreciated HCPs who demonstrated cultural sensitivity, although
this did not necessarily require an in-depth knowledge of individual customs and traditions
[48,78].
‘You know when I talk about myself I feel good about it because I know there’s someone who’slistening and understanding which makes me feel better.’ (Briscoe & Lavender 2009, pp.20)
[70]
Good care encompassed a trusting relationship between women and HCPs, which empow-
ered women to feel confident and prepared for childbirth [63,75,78], even overcoming a lack
of social networks or support [75].
“When one feels well-treated and cared for, one never forgets it. . .especially when you feellonely and vulnerable with a lot of need of support. . .it is worth so much.” (Robertson
2015, pp.63) [75]
Continuity of care was seen as an important factor in establishing these trusting relation-
ships [51,58,63,75,78,81]. Individualised care, with friendly, unhurried HCPs encouraged
women to attend for maternity care and positively influenced their sense of well-being
[37,74,81]. Fragmented care given by different midwives negatively influenced the effective-
ness of care and the women’s confidence to attend appointments [82].
"For example, when I was struck by panic again, I went to the delivery ward, and there wasthe same midwife, and (she) immediately knew me. Yes, she remembered the name and that itwas the first pregnancy, it was nice.. .. It felt like she was a relative." (Wikberg et al
2012, pp.644) [78]
Women also identified that good care required facilities that were hygienic [37,74] and pro-
moted privacy [81] and informed choice [74,78].
Migrant women’s experiences of maternity care
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228378 February 11, 2020 14 / 26
My needs go beyond being pregnant. Many migrant women presented to their HCPs
and to the researchers in the primary studies with needs that were outside the ordinary remit
of maternity healthcare provision and beyond the issue of their pregnancy. Preoccupation
with these other needs impacted on their time and ability to focus on the pregnancy [35,36,62].
"I was so busy to survive, to find food, and shelter. I simply did not think of antenatal checksat all." (Schoevers et al 2010, pp.260) [36]
Financial difficulties and poor living conditions. Financial pressures were identified by many
migrant women which led to difficulties covering basic living costs [35,82,83], transport to
appointments [35,53,72,82,83] and costs of essential care [51]. This was exacerbated by not
being allowed to work in the host country [35,66,70,82] or difficultly securing a job
[49,63,74,75]. Although some women encountered actual or feared employment insecurity
[35,61,65,66,82] and exploitation [66], others appreciated the protection of national employ-
ment laws [81].
“worst aspect I think during pregnancy he want to dismiss me [. . .] but could not, could notbecause I had my rights, [. . .] but he fired me soon after the birth of my daughter” (Topa et al
2017 pp.115) [61]
Concerns over living conditions were also common [44,52,53,62,66,70,73,83] and included;
living in temporary [70] or shared accommodation [44,53], poor housing conditions [44,70]
and the impact of dispersal [35,44,53,70,73,82], whereby women were moved by migration
authorities to new, unknown areas within the host country. This increased women’s feelings of
stress [44] and powerlessness [70].
“They give me a [hotel] room. . . [It was] very small, it was smelling of cigarettes. The duvetwas very dirty. The bed. . . the walls. . . everything was very dirty.” (Lephard & Haith-Cooper
2016, pp.132) [53]
“They were saying they’re taking me to Birmingham. I had no one in Birmingham. I don’tknow anyone at all in Birmingham. I was like Oh God, where are they taking me?” (Briscoe &
Lavendar 2009, pp.21) [70]
The burden of traumatic experiences. Many childbearing women had experienced trauma or
persecution prior to or during migration [45,52,60–63,75], and the resulting stress often
became evident as pain and illness in their body [75]. These experiences left women with a lost
or negative sense of identity [45,58,70] and being unwilling to trust their interpretations of
their bodily symptoms [75].
‘‘People were killed; I survived, because they thought I was dead, you can see the scars on myface, where the bullets entered my face . . . They did what they wanted with us, beating us,having rape parties" (Treisman et al 2014, pp.150) [62]
Social support and relationship issues. Childbearing women who had family present in their
destination country appreciated their assistance with domestic tasks [49,68,79] and their guid-
ance [49,74,79,81], and support [56,59,71]. However, many migrant childbearing women
lacked this social support and this left them feeling lonely [45,51,53,60,63,64,73,78,83], isolated
[35,44,45,47,49,58,60,70,74,78,79], hopeless [51] and deeply distressed [37,60,70,74]. Women
were particularly aware of the lack of support from their own mothers [45,53,60,74,78,81] and
Migrant women’s experiences of maternity care
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228378 February 11, 2020 15 / 26
highlighted that being able to contact family members was important [63]. Without family
support women were worried about having no one to ask for advice [74,78,81], found raising
children more difficult [74,77,81] and felt that the changes in societal roles [61,75] and lack of
other social support [40] caused tension in the relationship with their partners [75].
“This was my first baby, I was afraid and also I don’t have family here. . . and was crying allthe time and very lonely.” (Babatunde & Moreno-Leguizamon 2012, pp.5) [64]
Women who experienced domestic violence were restricted from talking about this as it
was often not acceptable within their culture [47] and they were not always aware that violence
was forbidden in the destination country [47]. Where the woman experiencing abuse was also
dependent upon the partners’ family for communication with HCPs it left her unable to talk
openly about her circumstances or to report pregnancy problems [35]. Although the midwife
was seen as a resource to signpost to domestic violence support services by some [40], others
were unsure if a midwife could help them [40,47].
“. . .I don't believe a Somali woman would go and tell her (the midwife) if she is having prob-lems or anything like that. . .if it has gone far enough that a woman has decided to report theman, then she knows she can call the police, or that she can get help from friends instead”.(Byrskog et al 2016, pp. 12) [40]
CERQual assessment
The summary scores from the CERQual assessment of confidence in the findings can be seen
in Table 3 and full details are shown in S4 File. A total of 16 findings were assessed, with twelve
scoring high confidence and three scoring moderate confidence and one scoring low
confidence.
Discussion
Main findings
Migrant women’s struggles with communication and language barriers are recurrent themes
within this and previous reviews. Migrant women report a poor understanding of medical ter-
minology [25] and yet there is inadequate use of interpreters within the healthcare system
[25,84]. Poor communication and the provision of insufficient information impact on wom-
en’s ability to choose appropriate care options and provide informed consent [25,84–87]. An
inability to converse in the local language also means women find it difficult to establish a rela-
tionship with their care provider and this impacts upon women accessing care [25,84,88,89].
HCPs can help women to overcome language barriers by providing appropriate information,
engaging professional interpreters more frequently and ensuring they give women the oppor-
tunity to ask the questions that they have [90–99].
In line with other studies [25,85–87,89,100,101], a lack of understanding between migrants
and HCPs in terms of their traditional customs and their expectations of maternity care was
found to impact upon their access of services. The issues clearly point to a need for HCPs to
receive education and training in culturally competent care to better identify women’s expecta-
tions of care and how to understand and appropriately respond to women’s needs related to
their cultural background, to ensure effective maternity care and reduce barriers to accessing
care [22].
Women’s fear of deportation impacting upon use of services identified within this review is
in line with previous literature [88] as is lack of awareness of entitlements to maternity care
Migrant women’s experiences of maternity care
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228378 February 11, 2020 16 / 26
[86]. The United Nations, to which all European countries belong, has developed the Conven-
tion on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination Against Women [102] which states that
all maternity services, including routine antenatal treatment, must be treated as being immedi-
ately necessary; ‘No woman must ever be denied, or have delayed, maternity services due tocharging issues’ (Department of Health and Social Care (2018) p. 67) [103]. Healthcare provid-
ers need to ensure the provision of adequate support and timely advice for migrant mothers
on their entitlements to care to allay fears and improve access to care, with the ultimate aim of
reducing pregnancy complications.
While the healthy migrant phenomenon may mean that some migrants are healthier than
the native population [22]; a theme which emerged particularly strongly within this review is
that to meet the unique needs of many migrant women there is a necessity for care which goes
beyond traditional models. Other academic studies and reports have highlighted migrant
women’s unstable or inappropriate living conditions, their financial struggles [25,89,104,105]
and the enormous burden of loneliness and the lack of a family network around them
[25,85,100,104–106]. As the wider determinants of health are well recognised [107], including
intimate partner violence [108], low health literacy [109–111], limited social support [112];
Table 3. CERQual summary scores.
Analytic theme Review finding CERQual assessment of
confidence in the evidence
Finding the way—Navigating
the system in a new place
Migrant women weigh up the value of maternity
care and the costs and consequences of accessing
care.
HIGH
Some migrant women are unaware of their rights
and entitlements to maternity care.
HIGH
Migrant women face difficulties in finding the way
into the maternity care system.
HIGH
Ongoing access to maternity care is influenced by
financial factors
HIGH
Ongoing access to maternity care is influenced by
flexibility in the system
MODERATE
We don’t understand each
other
Migrant women face language barriers when
accessing maternity care
HIGH
Migrant women have unmet perinatal information
needs
MODERATE
Migrant women have different expectations of
maternity care
HIGH
The way you treat me matters Migrant women experience prejudice and
stereotyping from HCPs
HIGH
Maternity care is culturally insensitive to migrant
women’s needs
HIGH
Migrant women value continuity of care MODERATE
Migrant women value trusting relationships with
HCPs who demonstrate good professional
behaviours
HIGH
Migrant women value high quality maternity
facilities
LOW
My needs go beyond being
pregnant
Migrant women face financial difficulties and poor
living conditions
HIGH
Migrant women carry the burden of previous
traumatic experiences
HIGH
Migrant women have needs related to social
support and relationship issues
HIGH
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228378.t003
Migrant women’s experiences of maternity care
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228378 February 11, 2020 17 / 26
addressing social and mental wellbeing alongside physical wellbeing is seen as important for
the overall health of mothers and their infants [113]. Addressing the wider determinants of
health which impact on migrant women requires closer cross-agency working with effective
collaboration between healthcare, social care, the voluntary sector and communities [2]. This
current review also highlighted that many migrant women have experienced trauma prior to
and during migration, which is widely recognised to impact on mental health and wellbeing in
the destination country [114]. Maternity services should develop trauma-informed care [115]
to promote a culture of safety and avoid re-traumatisation through staff training and reviewing
policies and procedures through a trauma lens and developing pathways of support to meet
the needs of these vulnerable women [115].
Some migrant women described exemplary care, receiving treatment that was empathetic,
caring, culturally sensitive and compassionate. However other migrants reported discrimina-
tion prevalent in the HCPs that they encountered. Care is seen to be impacted where women
do not feel well treated or where they feel discriminated against [84,85], while unrushed, kind,
empathetic HCPs are appreciated [25,84,85]. Our findings suggest that continuity of care
increases migrant women’s satisfaction with maternity care. This is in line with the Cochrane
review into continuity of midwife care models which has found increased satisfaction reported
by women receiving continuity by a known midwife, as well as reduced rates of preterm birth
and perinatal death [116]. To address the social determinants of health and avoid discriminat-
ing against migrant women, it calls for person-centred, high-quality, continuity of care that
incorporates aspects of cultural competency and trauma aware care. The evidence within this
review, alongside other evidence, led to the development of the ORAMMA integrated perina-
tal care model [117]. This model has been feasibility tested and will be reported in further arti-
cles currently under development. Other known integrated healthcare models include
Community Orientated Primary Care [118,119], as well as the integrated approach developed
within the European Refugees-Human Movement and Advisory Network (EUR-Human)
project [120].
Strengths and limitations
This review provides up-to-date, systematic evidence located using a comprehensive search
undertaken by a multidisciplinary team. Assessing confidence in the evidence using the
CERQual approach is a further strength of this review. The review is strengthened by the inclu-
sion of a large number of eligible studies set in 14 different European countries which included
migrant women from a wide range of countries of origin. However, some papers did not pro-
vide a clear or consistent definition for the term ’migrant’ or provide details about how
recently the women within their study had arrived in the host country, the specific country of
origin or the reason for migration. Hence, some issues that may be more pertinent to particu-
lar migrants may not be visible within this synthesis. This review focussed exclusively on
migrant women’s experiences of maternity care within European host countries. It is recog-
nised that many experiences may overlap with migrant experiences across other world regions
for example social isolation, language and cultural barriers. However, to ensure local applica-
bility further in-depth investigation would be required on country or community specific fac-
tors influencing migrant experiences.
Conclusion
There are several implications for practice and research from this review.
Migrant women’s experiences of maternity care
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228378 February 11, 2020 18 / 26
• It is important that migrant women feel understood. Professional interpreters should be pro-
vided at each appointment/care encounter to enable HCPs to listen to women and build a
friendly, trusting relationship with women.
• HCPs should avoid stereotyping and respect and accommodate traditional or cultural prac-
tices that are relevant in the perinatal period.
• Migrant women’s needs go beyond their pregnancy and include psychosocial-emotional and
economic challenges. To address these needs cross-agency working is needed alongside cul-
turally competent and trauma-informed models of maternity care that incorporates
continuity.
• Future research should focus on providing robust evidence on clinical perinatal outcomes
for migrant mothers and explore the needs of different migrant populations to facilitate
development of tailored interventions.
Supporting information
S1 File. Search strategy.
(DOCX)
S2 File. Critique tool.
(DOCX)
S3 File. Excluded studies.
(DOCX)
S4 File. Full CERQual assessment scoring table.
(DOCX)
S1 PRISMA Checklist.
(DOC)
Acknowledgments
ORAMMA team members are:
M Papadakaki Department of Social Work, School of Health Sciences, Hellenic Mediterra-
nean University, Heraklion, Greece; M Jokinen Practice and Standards Professional Advisor,
The Royal College of Midwives, London, UK; President of European Midwives Association
(EMA) and Vice Chair European Forum for National Nurses and Midwives Associations
(EFNNMA); E Shaw Centre for the History of Science, Technology and Medicine at the Uni-
versity of Manchester, Manchester, UK; E Sioti Department of Midwifery, Faculty of Health
and Caring Sciences, University of West Attica, Athens, Greece; T. Mastrogiannakis CMT
Prooptiki, Athens, Greece; A Markatou CMT Prooptiki, Athens, Greece; D Aarendonk Euro-
pean Forum for Primary Care, Utrecht, Netherlands; and D Castro Sandoval European Forum
for Primary Care, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Co-ordinator for the ORAMMA consortium is Victoria Vivilaki, email: v_vivilaki@yahoo.
co.uk
The content of this article represents the views of the authors only and is their sole responsi-
bility, it cannot be considered to reflect the views of the European Commission and/or the
Consumers, Health, Agriculture and Food Executive Agency or any other body of the Euro-
pean Union. The European Commission and the Agency do not accept any responsibility for
use that may be made of the information it contains.
Migrant women’s experiences of maternity care
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228378 February 11, 2020 19 / 26
Author Contributions
Conceptualization: Victoria Vivilaki, Hora Soltani.
Formal analysis: Frankie Fair, Liselotte Raben, Helen Watson, Maria van den Muijsenbergh,
Hora Soltani.
Funding acquisition: Victoria Vivilaki.
Investigation: Frankie Fair, Liselotte Raben, Helen Watson, Maria van den Muijsenbergh,
Hora Soltani.
Methodology: Frankie Fair, Maria van den Muijsenbergh, Hora Soltani.
Writing – original draft: Frankie Fair, Liselotte Raben, Helen Watson.
Writing – review & editing: Frankie Fair, Liselotte Raben, Helen Watson, Maria van den
Muijsenbergh, Hora Soltani.
References1. International Organization for Migration. World Migration Report 2018. 2017. International Organiza-
tion for Migration Publications; Geneva.
2. World Health Organization. Report on the health of refugees and migrants in the WHO European
Region: No public health without refugee and migrant health. 2018. World Health Organization:
Copenhagen.
3. De Grande H, Vandenheede H, Gadeyne S, Deboosere P. Health status and mortality rates of adoles-
cents and young adults in the Brussels-Capital Region: differences according to region of origin and
migration history. Ethnicity and Health 2014; 19(2):122–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/13557858.2013.
771149 PMID: 23438237
4. Kulu H, Hannemann T, Pailhe A, Neels K, Krapf S, Gonzalez-Ferrer A, et al. Fertility by birth order
among the descendants of immigrants in selected European countries. Population and Development
Review 2017; 43(1):31–60.
5. Office for National Statistics. Total Fertility Rates (TFR) for UK and non UK born women in the UK,
2004 to 2015. 2016; Available from: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/
birthsdeathsandmarriages/conceptionandfertilityrates/adhocs/
006295totalfertilityratestfrforukandnonukbornwomenintheuk2004to2015. Accessed May 2, 2019.
6. Bunevicius R, Kusminskas L, Bunevicius A, Nadisauskiene R, Jureniene K, Pop V. Psychosocial risk
factors for depression during pregnancy. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica 2009; 88(5):599–605.
7. Schetter CD. Psychological science on pregnancy: Stress processes, biopsychosocial models, and
emerging research issue. Annual Review of Psychology 2011; 62:531–558. https://doi.org/10.1146/
annurev.psych.031809.130727 PMID: 21126184
8. Almeida LM, Caldas JP. Migration and maternal health: Experiences of Brazilian women in Portugal.
Revista Brasileira de Saude Materno Infantil 2013; 13(4):309–316.
9. Esscher A, Hogberg U, Haglund B, Essen B. Maternal mortality in Sweden 1988–2007: more deaths
than officially reported. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 2013; 92(1):40–46. https://doi.
org/10.1111/aogs.12037 PMID: 23157437
10. Hayes I, Enohumah K, McCaul C. Care of the migrant obstetric population. International Journal of
Obstetric Anesthesia 2011; 20(4):321–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijoa.2011.06.008 PMID:
21840201
11. Malin M, Gissler M. Maternal care and birth outcomes among ethnic minority women in Finland. BMC
Public Health 2009; 9:84. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-9-84 PMID: 19298682
12. Pedersen GS, Grøntved A, Mortensen LH, Andersen A-N, Rich-Edwards J. Maternal mortality among
migrants in western Europe: a meta-analysis. Maternal & Child Health Journal 2014; 18(7):1628–
1638.
13. Urquia ML, Glazier RH, Mortensen L, Nybo-Andersen AM, Small R, Davey MA, et al. Severe maternal
morbidity associated with maternal birthplace in three high-immigration settings. European Journal of
Public Health 2015; 25(4):620–625. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/cku230 PMID: 25587005
14. van den Akker T, van Roosmalen J. Maternal mortality and severe morbidity in a migration perspec-
tive. Best Practice & Research: Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology 2016; 32:26–38.
Migrant women’s experiences of maternity care
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228378 February 11, 2020 20 / 26
15. Van Hanegem N, Miltenburg AS, Zwart JJ, Bloemenkamp KW, Van Roosmalen J. Severe acute
maternal morbidity in asylum seekers: a two-year nationwide cohort study in the Netherlands. Acta
Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 2011; 90(9):1010–1016. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-
0412.2011.01140.x PMID: 21446931
16. Van Oostrum IE, Goosen S, Uitenbroek D, Koppenaal H, Stronks K. Mortality and causes of death
among asylum seekers in the Netherlands. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health 2011; 65
(4):376–383.
17. Zwart JJ, Richters JM, Ory F, de Vries JI, Bloemenkamp KW, van Roosmalen J. Severe maternal mor-
bidity during pregnancy, delivery and puerperium in the Netherlands: a nationwide population-based
study of 371,000 pregnancies. BJOG: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology. 2008;
115(7):842–850.
18. Arcaya MC, Arcaya AL, Subramanian SV. Inequalities in health: definitions, concepts, and theories.
Global Health Action 2015; 8(1):27106.
19. Hadgkiss EJ, Renzaho AM. The physical health status, service utilisation and barriers to accessing
care for asylum seekers residing in the community: a systematic review of the literature. Australia
Health Review 2014; 38(2):142–159.
20. Nielsen SS, Krasnik A. Poorer self-perceived health among migrants and ethnic minorities versus the
majority population in Europe: a systematic review. International Journal of Public Health 2010; 55
(5):357–371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-010-0145-4 PMID: 20437193
21. Rechel B, Mladovsky P, Ingleby D, Mackenbach JP, McKee M. Migration and health in an increasingly
diverse Europe. Lancet 2013; 381(9873):1235–1245. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62086-
8 PMID: 23541058
22. Matlin SA, Depoux A, Schutte S, Flahault A, Saso L. Migrants’ and refugees’ health: towards an
agenda of solutions. Public Health Reviews 2018; 39:27.
23. Regional Committee for Europe. Strategy and action plan for refugee and migrant health in the WHO
European Region. 2016. World Health Organization: Copenhagen.
24. European Commission. Migrant access to social security and healthcare: policies and practice. Euro-
pean Migration Network Study 2014. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/sites/
homeaffairs/files/what-we-do/networks/european_migration_network/reports/docs/emn-studies/
emn_synthesis_report_migrant_access_to_social_security_2014_en.pdf. Accessed December 17,
2019.
25. Balaam M, Akerjordet K, Lyberg A, Kaiser B, Schoening E, Fredriksen A, et al. A qualitative review of
migrant women’s perceptions of their needs and experiences related to pregnancy and childbirth.
Journal of Advanced Nursing 2013; 69(9):1919–1930. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12139 PMID:
23560897
26. Lionis C, Petelos E, Mechili E-, Sifaki-Pistolla D, Chatzea V-, Angelaki A, et al. Assessing refugee
healthcare needs in Europe and implementing educational interventions in primary care: a focus on
methods. BMC International Health and Human Rights 2018; 18:11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12914-
018-0150-x PMID: 29422090
27. Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council of the European Union. Directive 2004/38/EC
The right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory
of the Member States amending Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 and repealing Directives 64/221/EEC,
68/360/EEC, 72/194/EEC, 73/148/EEC, 75/34/EEC, 75/35/EEC, 90/364/EEC, 90/365/EEC and 93/
96/EEC. Available form: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:
L:2004:158:0077:0123:en:PDF Accessed December 17, 2019.
28. Peiro MJ, Benedict R. Migration health policy. The Portuguese and Spanish EU Presidencies. Euro-
health 2010; 16(1):1–4.
29. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Methods for the development of NICE public health
guidance: Process and methods. 2012; Third Edition. NICE (National Institute for Health and Care
Excellence): London.
30. Thomas J, Harden A. Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews.
BMC Medical Research Methodology 2008; 8:45. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45 PMID:
18616818
31. Lewin S, Glenton C, Munthe-Kass H, Colvin C, Gulmezoglu M, Noyes J. Using qualitative evidence in
decision making for health and social interventions: an approach to assess confidence in findings from
qualitative evidence syntheses (GRADE-CERQual). PLoS Medicine 2015; 12(10).
32. Lewin S, Booth A, Glenton C, Munthe-Kaas H, Rashidian A, Wainwright M, et al. Applying GRADE-
CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings: introduction to the series. Implementation Science
2018; 13(Suppl 1):2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0688-3 PMID: 29384079
Migrant women’s experiences of maternity care
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228378 February 11, 2020 21 / 26
33. Lewin S, Bohren M, Rashidian A, Munthe-Kaas H, Glenton C, Colvin CJ, et al. Applying GRADE-
CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings—paper 2: how to make an overall CERQual
assessment of confidence and create a summary of qualitative findings table. Implementation Science
2018; 13(Supp 1):10.
34. Baken E, Bazzocchi A, Bertozzi N, Celeste C, Chattat R, D’Augello V, et al. La salute materno-infantile
degli stranieri e l’accesso ai servizi. Analisi qualiquantitativa nel territorio cesenate. (Italian) [Maternal
and child health of migrants and access to services. Qualitative quantitative analysis in the Cesena
area]. Quaderni acp 2007; 14(2):56–60.
35. Phillimore J. Delivering maternity services in an era of superdiversity: The challenges of novelty and
newness. Ethnic and Racial Studies 2015; 38(4):568–582.
36. Schoevers MA, van den Muijsenbergh METC, Lagro-Janssen ALM. Illegal female immigrants in the
Netherlands have unmet needs in sexual and reproductive health. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstet-
rics & Gynecology 2010; 31(4):256–264.
37. Velemınsky M Jr, Průchova D, Vranova V, Samkova J, Samek J, Porche S, et al. Medical and saluto-
genic approaches and their integration in taking prenatal and postnatal care of immigrants. Neuroen-
docrinology Letters 2014; 35(Suppl 1):67–79.
38. Almeida L, Caldas JP, Ayres-de-Campos D, Dias S. Assessing maternal healthcare inequities among
migrants: a qualitative study. Cadernos de Saude Publica 2014; 30(2):333–340. https://doi.org/10.
1590/0102-311X00060513 PMID: 24627061
39. Binder P, Johnsdotter S, Essen B. Conceptualising the prevention of adverse obstetric outcomes
among immigrants using the ’three delays’ framework in a high-income context. Social Science & Med-
icine 2012; 75(11):2028–2036.
40. Byrskog U, Essen B, Olsson P, Klingberg-Allvin M. ’Moving on’ Violence, wellbeing and questions
about violence in antenatal care encounters. A qualitative study with Somali-born refugees in Sweden.
Midwifery 2016; 40:10–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2016.05.009 PMID: 27428093
41. Choudhry K, Wallace LM. ’Breast is not always best’: South Asian women’s experiences of infant feed-
ing in the UK within an acculturation framework. Maternal and Child Nutrition 2012; 8(1):72–87. https://
doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8709.2010.00253.x PMID: 22136221
42. Coutinho E, Rocha A, Pereira C, Silva A, Duarte J, Parreira V. Experiences of motherhood: Unmet
expectations of immigrant and native mothers, about the Portuguese health system. Atencion Primaria
2014; 46(Suppl 5):140–144.
43. Dempsey M, Peeren S. Keeping things under control: exploring migrant Eastern European womens’
experiences of pregnancy in Ireland. Journal of Reproductive & Infant Psychology 2016; 34(4):370–
382.
44. Feldman R. When maternity doesn’t matter: Dispersing pregnant women seeking asylum. British Jour-
nal of Midwifery 2014; 22(1):23–28.
45. Gardner PL, Bunton P, Edge D, Wittkowski A. The experience of postnatal depression in West African
mothers living in the United Kingdom: a qualitative study. Midwifery 2014; 30(6):756–763. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.midw.2013.08.001 PMID: 24016554
46. Garnweidner LM, Sverre Pettersen K, Mosdøl A. Experiences with nutrition-related information during
antenatal care of pregnant women of different ethnic backgrounds residing in the area of Oslo, Nor-
way. Midwifery 2013; 29(12):e130–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2012.12.006 PMID: 23481338
47. Garnweidner-Holme L, Lukasse M, Solheim M, Henriksen L. Talking about intimate partner violence in
multi-cultural antenatal care: a qualitative study of pregnant women’s advice for better communication
in South-East Norway. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2017; 17:123. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-
1308-6 PMID: 28420328
48. Gitsels-van dW, Martin L, Mannien J, Verhoeven P, Hutton EK, Reinders HS. Antenatal counselling
for congenital anomaly tests: Pregnant Muslim Moroccan women’s preferences. Midwifery 2015; 31
(3):e50–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2015.01.002 PMID: 25637462
49. Glavin K, Sæteren B. Cultural Diversity in Perinatal Care: Somali New Mothers’ Experiences with
Health Care in Norway. Health Science Journal 2016; 10(4):1–9.
50. Hjelm K, Bard K, Nyberg P, Apelqvist J. Management of gestational diabetes from the patient’s per-
spective—a comparison of Swedish and Middle-Eastern born women. Journal of Clinical Nursing
2007; 16(1):168–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01422.x PMID: 17181679
51. Iliadi P. Refugee women in Greece:- a qualitative study of their attitudes and experience in antenatal
care. Health Science Journal 2008; 2(3):173–180.
52. Jonkers M, Richters A, Zwart J, Ory F, van Roosmalen J. Severe maternal morbidity among immigrant
women in the Netherlands: patients’ perspectives. Reproductive Health Matters 2011; 19(37):144–
153. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-8080(11)37556-8 PMID: 21555095
Migrant women’s experiences of maternity care
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228378 February 11, 2020 22 / 26
53. Lephard E, Haith-Cooper M. Pregnant and seeking asylum: Exploring women’s experiences ’from
booking to baby’. British Journal of Midwifery 2016; 24(2):130–136.
54. Leung G. Cultural considerations in postnatal dietary and infant feeding practices among Chinese
mothers in London. British Journal of Midwifery 2017; 25(1):18–24.
55. Lundberg PC, Gerezgiher A. Experiences from pregnancy and childbirth related to female genital muti-
lation among Eritrean immigrant women in Sweden. Midwifery 2008; 24(2):214–225. https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.midw.2006.10.003 PMID: 17316934
56. Petruschke I, Ramsauer B, Borde T, David M. Differences in the Frequency of Use of Epidural Analge-
sia between Immigrant Women of Turkish Origin and Non-Immigrant Women in Germany—Explana-
tory Approaches and Conclusions of a Qualitative Study. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2016; 76(9):972–
977. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-109397 PMID: 27681522
57. Ranji A, Dykes A, Ny P. Routine ultrasound investigations in the second trimester of pregnancy: the
experiences of immigrant parents in Sweden. Journal of Reproductive & Infant Psychology 2012; 30
(3):312–325.
58. Straus L, McEwen A, Hussein FM. Somali women’s experience of childbirth in the UK: perspectives
from Somali health workers. Midwifery 2009; 25(2):181–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2007.02.
002 PMID: 17600598
59. Szafranska M, Gallagher L. Polish women’s experiences of breastfeeding in Ireland. Practising Mid-
wife 2016; 19(1):30–32. PMID: 26975131
60. Tobin C, Murphy-Lawless J, Tatano Beck C. Childbirth in exile: Asylum seeking women’s experience
of childbirth in Ireland. Midwifery 2014; 30(7):831–838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2013.07.012
PMID: 24071035
61. Topa JB, Nogueira CO, Neves SA. Maternal health services: an equal or framed territory? Interna-
tional Journal of Human Rights in Healthcare 2017; 10(2):110–122.
62. Treisman K, Jones FW, Shaw E. The experiences and coping strategies of United Kingdom-based
African women following an HIV diagnosis during pregnancy. The Journal Of The Association Of
Nurses In AIDS Care: JANAC 2014; 25(2):145–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jana.2013.01.008 PMID:
23523367
63. Viken B, Lyberg A, Severinsson E. Maternal health coping strategies of migrant women in Norway.
Nursing Research and Practice 2015;878040: https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/878040 PMID: 25866676
64. Babatunde T, Moreno-Leguizamon C. Daily and cultural issues of postnatal depression in African
women immigrants in South East London: tips for health professionals. Nursing Research And Prac-
tice 2012;181640: https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/181640 PMID: 23056936
65. Barona-Vilar C, Mas-Pons R, Fullana-Montoro A, Giner-Monfort J, Grau-Muñoz A, Bisbal-Sanz J. Per-
ceptions and experiences of parenthood and maternal health care among Latin American women liv-
ing in Spain: A qualitative study. Midwifery 2013; 29(4):332–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2012.
01.015 PMID: 22398026
66. Bollini P, Stotzer U, Wanner P. Pregnancy outcomes and migration in Switzerland: results from a
focus group study. International Journal of Public Health 2007; 52(2):78–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/
s00038-007-6003-3 PMID: 18704286
67. Degni F, Suominen SB, El Ansari W, Vehvilainen-Julkunen K, Essen B. Reproductive and maternity
health care services in Finland: perceptions and experiences of Somali-born immigrant women. Eth-
nicity & Health 2014; 19(3):348–366.
68. Hanley J. The emotional wellbeing of Bangladeshi mothers during the postnatal period. Community
Practitioner 2007; 80(5):34–37. PMID: 17536469
69. Binder P, Borne Y, Johnsdotter S, Essen B. Shared language is essential: communication in a multi-
ethnic obstetric care setting. Journal of Health Communication 2012; 17(10):1171–1186. https://doi.
org/10.1080/10810730.2012.665421 PMID: 22703624
70. Briscoe L, Lavender T. Exploring maternity care for asylum seekers and refugees. British Journal of
Midwifery 2009; 17(1):17–24.
71. Essen B, Binder P, Johnsdotter S. An anthropological analysis of the perspectives of Somali women in
the West and their obstetric care providers on caesarean birth. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics &
Gynecology 2011; 32(1):10–18.
72. Gaudion A, Allotey P. In the bag: meeting the needs of pregnant women and new parents in exile.
Practising Midwife 2009; 12(5):20–23. PMID: 19517965
73. Hufton E, Raven J. Exploring the infant feeding practices of immigrant women in the North West of
England: a case study of asylum seekers and refugees in Liverpool and Manchester. Maternal & Child
Nutrition 2016; 12(2):299–313.
Migrant women’s experiences of maternity care
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228378 February 11, 2020 23 / 26
74. Ny P, Plantin L, Karlsson D,Elisabeth, Dykes A. Middle Eastern mothers in Sweden, their experiences
of the maternal health service and their partner’s involvement. Reproductive Health 2007; 4:9. https://
doi.org/10.1186/1742-4755-4-9 PMID: 17958884
75. Robertson EK. "To be taken seriously": women’s reflections on how migration and resettlement experi-
ences influence their healthcare needs during childbearing in Sweden. Sexual & Reproductive Health-
Care 2015; 6(2):59–65.
76. Sauvegrain P, Azria E, Chiesa-Dubruille C, Deneux-Tharaux C. Exploring the hypothesis of differential
care for African immigrant and native women in France with hypertensive disorders during pregnancy:
a qualitative study. BJOG: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 2017; 124(12):1858–
1865.
77. Wandel M, Terragni L, Nguyen C, Lyngstad J, Amundsen M, de Paoli M. Breastfeeding among Somali
mothers living in Norway: Attitudes, practices and challenges. Women & Birth 2016; 29(6):487–493.
78. Wikberg A, Eriksson K, Bondas T. Intercultural Caring From the Perspectives of Immigrant New Moth-
ers. JOGNN: Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing 2012; 41(5):638–649.
79. Yeasmin SF, Regmi K. A Qualitative Study on the Food Habits and Related Beliefs of Pregnant British
Bangladeshis. Health Care for Women International 2013; 34(5):395–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/
07399332.2012.740111 PMID: 23550950
80. Almeida L, Casanova C, Caldas J, Ayres-de-Campos D, Dias S. Migrant Women’s Perceptions of
Healthcare During Pregnancy and Early Motherhood: Addressing the Social Determinants of Health.
Journal of Immigrant & Minority Health 2014; 16(4):719–723.
81. Wikberg A, Eriksson K, Bondas T. Immigrant New Mothers in Finnish Maternity Care: An Ethnographic
Study of Caring. International Journal of Childbirth 2014; 4(2):86–102.
82. Phillimore J. Migrant maternity in an era of superdiversity: New migrants’ access to, and experience
of, antenatal care in the West Midlands, UK. Social Science & Medicine 2016; 148:152–159.
83. Newall D, Phillimore J, Sharpe H. Migration and maternity in the age of superdiversity. Practising Mid-
wife 2012; 15(1):20–22. PMID: 22324128
84. Small R, Roth C, Raval M, Shafiei T, Korfker D, Heaman M, et al. Immigrant and non-immigrant
women’s experiences of maternity care: a systematic and comparative review of studies in five coun-
tries. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 2014; 14:152. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-14-152 PMID:
24773762
85. Wikberg A, Bondas T. A patient perspective in research on intercultural caring in maternity care: A
meta-ethnography. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health & Well-Being 2010; 5(1):1–
15.
86. Sudbury H, Robinson A. Barriers to sexual and reproductive health care for refugee and asylum-seek-
ing women. British Journal of Midwifery 2016; 24(4):275–281.
87. Santiago M, Figueiredo M. Immigrant Women’s Perspective on Prenatal and Postpartum Care: Sys-
tematic Review. Journal of Immigrant & Minority Health 2015; 17(1):276–284.
88. Ostrach B. ’ Yo No Sabıa . . .’-Immigrant Women’s Use of National Health Systems for Reproductive
and Abortion Care. Journal of Immigrant & Minority Health 2013; 15(2):262–272.
89. Boerleider AW, Wiegers TA, Mannien J, Francke AL, Deville WLJM. Factors affecting the use of pre-
natal care by non-western women in industrialized western countries: A systematic review. BMC Preg-
nancy Childbirth 2013; 13:81. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-13-81 PMID: 23537172
90. Cohen AL, Rivara F, Marcuse EK, McPhillips H, Davis R. Are language barriers associated with seri-
ous medical events in hospitalized pediatric patients? Pediatrics 2005; 116(3):575–579. https://doi.
org/10.1542/peds.2005-0521 PMID: 16140695
91. Divi C, Koss RG, Schmaltz SP, Loeb JM. Patients with limited English experience more serious errors.
International Journal for Quality in Health Care 2007; 19(2):60–67. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/
mzl069 PMID: 17277013
92. Karliner LS, Jacobs EA, Chen AH, Mutha S. Do professional interpreters improve clinical care for
patients with limited English proficiency? A systematic review of the literature. Health Services
Research 2007; 42(2):727–754. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00629.x PMID: 17362215
93. Flores G. The impact of medical interpreter services on the quality of health care: a systematic review.
Medical Care Research & Review 2005; 62(3):255–299.
94. Jacobs EA, Shepard DS, Suaya JA, Stone E-L. Overcoming language barriers in health care: costs
and benefits of interpreter services. American Journal of Public Health 2004; 94(5):866–869. https://
doi.org/10.2105/ajph.94.5.866 PMID: 15117713
95. Jacobs EA, Sadowski LS, Rathouz PJ. The impact of an enhanced interpreter service intervention on
hospital costs and patients satisfaction. Journal of General Internal Medicine 2005; 22(Supplement
2):306–311.
Migrant women’s experiences of maternity care
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228378 February 11, 2020 24 / 26
96. Meeuwesen L. Language barriers in migrant health: a blind spot. Patient Education and Counseling
2012; 86(2):135–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0738-3991(12)00012-2 PMID: 22284163
97. Ku L, Flores G. Pay now or pay later: Providing interpreters services in health care. Health Affairs
2005; 24(2):435–444. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.24.2.435 PMID: 15757928
98. Gany F, Kapelusznik L, Prakash K, Gonzalez J, Orta LY, Tseng C-. The impact of medical interpreta-
tion method on time and errors. Journal of General Internal Medicine 2007; 22(Supplement 2):319–
323.
99. Ramirez D, Engel KG, Tang TS. Language interpreter utilization in the emergency department setting:
a clinical review. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved 2008; 19(2):352–362. https://
doi.org/10.1353/hpu.0.0019 PMID: 18469408
100. Benza S, Liamputtong P. Pregnancy, childbirth and motherhood: A meta-synthesis of the lived experi-
ences of immigrant women. Midwifery 2014; 30(6):575–584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2014.03.
005 PMID: 24690130
101. Nilaweera I, Doran F, Fisher J. Prevalence, nature and determinants of postpartum mental health
problems among women who have migrated from South Asian to high-income countries: a systematic
review of the evidence. Journal of Affective Disorders 2014; 166:213–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
jad.2014.05.021 PMID: 25012434
102. General Assembly. Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women. Gen-
eral Assembly Resolution 34/180. 1979. UN General Assembly.
103. Department of Health and Social Care. Guidance on implementing the overseas visitor charging regu-
lations. 2018. Department of Health and Social Care: Leeds
104. Schmied V, Black E, Naidoo N, Dahlen HG, Liamputtong P. Migrant women’s experiences, meanings
and ways of dealing with postnatal depression: A meta-ethnographic study. PLoS One 2017; 12(3):
e0172385. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172385 PMID: 28296887
105. Wittkowski A, Patel S, Fox JR. The Experience of Postnatal Depression in Immigrant Mothers Living in
Western Countries: A Meta-Synthesis. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy 2017; 24(2):411–427.
106. Higginbottom G, Reime B, Bharj K, Chowbey P, Ertan K, Foster-Boucher C, et al. Migration and Mater-
nity: Insights of Context, Health Policy, and Research Evidence on Experiences and Outcomes From
a Three Country Preliminary Study Across Germany, Canada, and the United Kingdom. Health Care
for Women International 2013; 34(11):936–965. https://doi.org/10.1080/07399332.2013.769999
PMID: 23631670
107. Marmot M. Fair Society, Healthy Lives: The Marmot Review: Strategic Review of Health Inequalities in
England post-2010. 2010. Department of International Development: London.
108. Parker B, McFarlane J, Soeken K. Abuse during pregnancy: effects on maternal complications and
birth weight in adult and teenage women. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1994; 84(3):323–328. PMID:
8058224
109. Farley TA, Mason K, Rice J, Habel JD, Scribner R, Cohen DA. The relationship between the neigh-
bourhood environment and adverse birth outcomes. Paediatric & Perinatal Epidemiology 2006; 20
(3):188–200.
110. Stillerman KP, Mattison DR, Guidice LC, Woodruff TJ. Environmental exposures and adverse preg-
nancy outcomes: a review of the science. Reproductive Sciences 2008; 15(7):631–650. https://doi.
org/10.1177/1933719108322436 PMID: 18836129
111. Kruger DJ, Munsell MA, French-Turner T. Using a life history framework to understand the relationship
between neighborhood structural deterioration and adverse birth outcomes. Journal of Social, Evolu-
tionary, and Cultural Psychology 2011; 5(4):260–274.
112. Feldman PJ, Dunkel-Schetter C, Sandman CA, Wadhwa PD. Maternal social support predicts birth
weight and fetal growth in human pregnancy. Psychosomatic Medicine 2000; 62(5):715–725. https://
doi.org/10.1097/00006842-200009000-00016 PMID: 11020102
113. Graham W, Woodd S, Byass P, Filippi V, Gon G, Virgo S, et al. Diversity and divergence: the dynamic
burden of poor maternal health. Lancet 2016; 388(10056):2164–2175. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-
6736(16)31533-1 PMID: 27642022
114. Sangalang CC, Becerra D, Mitchell FM, Lechuga-Peña S, Lopez K, Kim I. Trauma, Post-Migration
Stress, and Mental Health: A Comparative Analysis of Refugees and Immigrants in the United States.
Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health 2018: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-018-0826-2.
115. Sperlich M, Seng JS, Yang Li Y, Taylor J, Bradbury-Jones C. Integrating Trauma-Informed Care into
Maternity Care Practice: Conceptual and Practical Issues. Journal of Midwifery and Women’s Health
2017; 62(6):661–672. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.12674 PMID: 29193613
Migrant women’s experiences of maternity care
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228378 February 11, 2020 25 / 26
116. Sandall J, Soltani H, Gates S, Shennan A, Devane D. Midwife-led continuity models versus other mod-
els of care for childbearing women. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2016(Issue 4). Art.
No.: CD004667.
117. Vivilaki V, Soltani H, van den Muijsenbergh M et al. Approach to Integrated Perinatal Healthcare for
Migrant and Refugee Women. 2017. Available from: http://oramma.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/
ORAMMA-D4.2-Approach_reviewed.pdf. Accessed November 15, 2019.
118. Mullen F, Epstein L. Community-Oriented Primary Care: New Relevance in a Changing World. Ameri-
can Journal of Public Health (AJPH) 2002; 92(11):1748–1755.
119. Mash B, Ray S, Essuman A, Burgueño E. Community-orientated primary care: a scoping review of dif-
ferent models, and their effectiveness and feasibility in sub-Saharan Africa. BMJ Global Health. 2019;
4:e001489. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001489 PMID: 31478027
120. Mechili EA, Angelaki A, Petelos E, Sifaki-Pistolla D, Chatzea VE, Dowrick C, et al. Compassionate
care provision: an immense need during the refugee crisis: lessons learned from a European capacity-
building project. Journal of Compassionate Health Care 2018; 5:2 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40639-
018-0045-7. Accessed December 17, 2019.
Migrant women’s experiences of maternity care
PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228378 February 11, 2020 26 / 26